Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; UROXATRAL, 34137-34138 [E6-9201]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Notices
(NDA 21–322) was initially submitted
on May 1, 2001.
3. The date the application was
approved: October 8, 2004. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
21–322 was approved on October 8,
2004.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,780 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by August 14, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
December 11, 2006. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–9139 Filed 6–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
[Docket No. 2004E–0393]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; UROXATRAL
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
UROXATRAL and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–007), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug
product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human drug product and continues
until FDA grants permission to market
the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period
may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted, as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product UROXATRAL
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34137
(alfuzosin hydrochloride).
UROXATRAL is indicated for the
treatment of the signs and symptoms of
benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for
UROXATRAL (U.S. Patent No.
4,661,491) from Sanofi-Synthelabo, and
the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
October 19, 2004, FDA advised the
Patent and Trademark Office that this
human drug product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of UROXATRAL represented
the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product. Shortly
thereafter, the Patent and Trademark
Office requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
UROXATRAL is 2,477 days. Of this
time, 1,560 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review
period, while 917 days occurred during
the approval phase. These periods of
time were derived from the following
dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: September 1,
1996. The applicant claims August 31,
1996, as the date the investigational new
drug application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the
IND effective date was September 1,
1996, which was 30 days after FDA
receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: December 8, 2000.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the new drug application (NDA) for
UROXATRAL (NDA 21–287) was
initially submitted on December 8,
2000.
3. The date the application was
approved: June 12, 2003. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
21–287 was approved on June 12, 2003.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,481 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
34138
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Notices
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by August 14, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
December 11, 2006. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–9201 Filed 6–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2004E–0308]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; RESTYLANE
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
RESTYLANE and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
medical device.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–007), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For medical devices,
the testing phase begins with a clinical
investigation of the device and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the device and continues until
permission to market the device is
granted. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a medical device will include
all of the testing phase and approval
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(3)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the medical device RESTYLANE.
RESTYLANE is indicated for mid-todeep dermal implantation for the
correction of moderate to severe facial
wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial
folds. Subsequent to this approval, the
Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for
RESTYLANE (U.S. Patent No.
5,827,937) from Q-Med AB, and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
FDA’s assistance in determining this
patent’s eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated February
24, 2006, FDA advised the Patent and
Trademark Office that this medical
device had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
RESTYLANE represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the Patent
and Trademark Office requested that
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FDA determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
RESTYLANE is 1,491 days. Of this time,
949 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 542 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
360j(g)) involving this device became
effective: November 14, 1999. The
applicant claims that the investigational
device exemption (IDE) required under
section 520(g) of the act for human tests
to begin became effective on August 4,
2000. However, FDA records indicate
that the IDE was determined
substantially complete for clinical
studies to have begun on November 14,
1999, which represents the IDE effective
date.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
device under section 515 of the act (21
U.S.C. 360e): June 19, 2002. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that the
premarket approval application (PMA)
for RESTYLANE (PMA P020023) was
initially submitted June 19, 2002.
3. The date the application was
approved: December 12, 2003. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that PMA
P020023 was approved on December 12,
2003.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 879 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by August 14, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
December 11, 2006. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34137-34138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9201]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2004E-0393]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; UROXATRAL
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for UROXATRAL and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD-007), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to market the human drug product
and continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted, as well as any time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory
review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing
phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product
UROXATRAL (alfuzosin hydrochloride). UROXATRAL is indicated for the
treatment of the signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for UROXATRAL (U.S. Patent No.
4,661,491) from Sanofi-Synthelabo, and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated October 19, 2004, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product
had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of
UROXATRAL represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office
requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
UROXATRAL is 2,477 days. Of this time, 1,560 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 917 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
September 1, 1996. The applicant claims August 31, 1996, as the date
the investigational new drug application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was September
1, 1996, which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: December 8,
2000. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug
application (NDA) for UROXATRAL (NDA 21-287) was initially submitted on
December 8, 2000.
3. The date the application was approved: June 12, 2003. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 21-287 was approved on June 12,
2003.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,481 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets
[[Page 34138]]
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by August 14, 2006. Furthermore, any interested person
may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant
for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review
period by December 11, 2006. To meet its burden, the petition must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept.
857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should
be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6-9201 Filed 6-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S