Proposed Programmatic Statewide Red-cockaded Woodpecker Safe Harbor Agreement, AL, 34154-34156 [E6-9169]
Download as PDF
34154
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Notices
scientific research permits to conduct
certain activities with endangered
species pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A)
of the Endangered Species Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (we) solicits review and
comment from local, State, and Federal
agencies, and the public on the
following permit requests.
Permit No. TE–122620
Applicant: Joseph B. Platt, Irvine,
California
The applicant requests a permit to
take (harass by survey) the southwestern
willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii
extimus) in conjunction with surveys in
Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, San
Diego, Riverside, and San Bernardino
Counties, California, for the purpose of
enhancing its survival.
Permit No. TE–074017
Applicant: Jackie Charbonneau,
Livermore, California
The permitee requests an amendment
to take (harass by survey, capture, and
release) the California tiger salamander
(Ambystoma californiense) in
conjunction with surveys and
demographic studies in Alameda
County, California, for the purpose of
enhancing its survival.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Permit No. TE–052744
Applicant: Shannon Hickey, Davis,
California
The permitee requests an amendment
to take (harass by survey, capture, and
release) the California tiger salamander
(Ambystoma californiense) in
conjunction with surveys and
demographic studies throughout the
range of the species in California for the
purpose of enhancing its survival.
Permit No. TE–122632
Applicant: Kimberly Ferree, Encinatas,
California
The applicant requests a permit to
take (harass by survey, and locate and
monitor nests) the coastal California
gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica
californica), take (harass by survey,
locate and monitor nests, capture, band,
and release) the southwestern willow
flycatcher (Empidonax trailii extimus),
and take (locate and monitor nests,
capture, band, and release) the least
Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) in
conjunction with ecological research
and surveys for the purpose of
enhancing their survival throughout the
range of each species in California.
Permit No. TE–123409
Applicant: Rachel Bomkamp,
Plancentia, California
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
The applicant requests a permit to
take (capture, and collect and kill) the
Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
conservatio), the longhorn fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta longiantenna), the vernal
pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus
packardi), the Riverside fairy shrimp
(Streptocephalus wootoni), and the San
Diego fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
sandiegonensis) in conjunction with
surveys throughout the range of each
species in California for the purpose of
enhancing their survival.
Permit No. TE–123412
Applicant: Zachary Parker, Fresno,
California.
The applicant requests a permit to
take (capture, and collect and kill) the
Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
conservatio), the longhorn fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta longiantenna), the vernal
pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus
packardi), the Riverside fairy shrimp
(Streptocephalus wootoni), and the San
Diego fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
sandiegonensis) in conjunction with
surveys throughout the range of each
species in southern California for the
purpose of enhancing their survival.
Permit No. TE–020548
Applicant: U.S. Geological Survey-BRD,
Western Ecological Research Center,
Vallejo, California
The permittee requests an amendment
to take (capture, handle, collect
biological samples, and radio-tag) the
California clapper rail (Rallus
longirostris obsoletus) in conjunction
with ecological research throughout the
species range in California for the
purpose of enhancing its survival.
Permit No. TE–124994
Applicant: USDA Forest Service, San
Bernardino National Forest, San
Bernardino, California.
The applicant requests a permit to
take (capture and release) the
unarmored threespine stickleback
(Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni) in
conjunction with surveys and
population monitoring in San
Bernardino, Los Angeles, Riverside, and
Orange Counties, California, for the
purpose of enhancing its survival.
Permit No. TE–126141
Applicant: Craig A. Stockwell, Fargo,
North Dakota.
The applicant requests a permit to
take (capture, mark, and release) the
Mohave tui chub (Siphateles bicolor
mohavensis) in conjunction with
ecological studies in San Bernardino,
California, for the purpose of enhancing
its survival.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
We solicit public review and
comment on each of these recovery
permit applications. Our practice is to
make comments, including names and
home addresses of respondents,
available for public review during
regular business hours. Individual
respondents may request that we
withhold their home addresses from the
record, which we will honor to the
extent allowable by law. There also may
be circumstances in which we would
withhold from the record a respondent’s
identity, as allowable by law. If you
wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment, but you should be aware that
we may be required to disclose your
name and address pursuant to the
Freedom of Information Act. However,
we will not consider anonymous
comments. We will make all
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Comments and materials received will
be available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the above address.
Dated: June 1, 2006.
Michael Fris,
Acting Manager, California/Nevada
Operations Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–9183 Filed 6–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Proposed Programmatic Statewide
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Safe
Harbor Agreement, AL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
SUMMARY: This notice advises the public
that the Alabama Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources
(ADCNR, or Applicant) has applied to
the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
for an enhancement of survival permit
(ESP) under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). The ESP application
includes a proposed Safe Harbor
Agreement (SHA) for the endangered
Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides
borealis) (RCW) for a period of 99 years,
along with a supporting Environmental
Assessment (EA). We announce the
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
opening of a 30-day comment period
and request comments from the public
on the proposed SHA and the
supporting EA.
DATES: Written comments should be
sent to the Service’s Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES) and must be received on or
before July 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: To obtain copies of the
proposed SHA and the supporting EA
for review, write to the Service’s
Southeast Regional Office, 1875 Century
Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia
30345 (Attn: Endangered Species
Permits). Send your comments to this
address as well. For commenting
guidelines, see ‘‘Public Comments’’
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Documents will also be available for
public inspection by appointment
during normal business hours at the
Regional Office in Atlanta, or at our
Field Office located at 1208-B Main
Street, Daphne, Alabama 36526. Do not
write to this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Rick Gooch, Regional Safe Harbor
Coordinator, at the Atlanta address
above, 404–679–7124 (phone), or 404–
679–7081 (facsimile), or Mr. Dan
Everson, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, at
the Daphne address above or 251–441–
5837 (phone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Applicant has applied to the Service for
an ESP under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
The application includes a proposed
SHA for the endangered RCW for a
period of 99 years, along with a
supporting EA. We announce the
opening of a 30-day comment period
and request comments from the public
on the proposed SHA and the
supporting EA. If approved, the SHA
would allow the Applicant to issue
certificates of inclusion throughout the
state of Alabama to eligible non-Federal
landowners that complete an approved
Safe Harbor Management Agreement
(SHMA).
Background
The EA identifies and describes
several alternatives. All comments
received, including names and
addresses, will become part of the
official administrative record and may
be made available to the public, subject
to the requirements of the Privacy Act
and Freedom of Information Act. For
further information and instructions on
reviewing and commenting on this
application, see ADDRESSES and, in this
section, ‘‘Public Comments.’’
Under a SHA, participating property
owners voluntarily undertake
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
management activities on their property
to enhance, restore, or maintain habitat
benefiting species listed under the Act.
SHAs encourage private and other nonFederal property owners to implement
conservation efforts for listed species by
assuring property owners they will not
be subjected to increased property use
restrictions if their efforts attract listed
species to their property or increase the
numbers or distribution of listed species
already on their property. Application
requirements and issuance criteria for
enhancement of survival permits
through SHAs are found in 50 CFR
17.22 and 17.32.
ADCNR’s proposed Statewide SHA is
designed to encourage voluntary RCW
habitat restoration or enhancement
activities by relieving a landowner who
enters into a landowner-specific
agreement (i.e., the SHMA) from any
additional responsibility under the Act
beyond that which exists at the time he
or she enters into the program. The
SHMA will identify any existing RCWs
and any associated habitat (the baseline)
and will describe the actions that the
landowner commits to take (e.g.,
hardwood midstory removal, cavity
provisioning) or allows to be taken to
improve RCW habitat on the property,
and the time period within which those
actions are to be taken and maintained.
A participating landowner must
maintain the baseline on his/her
property (i.e., any existing RCW groups
and/or associated habitat), but may be
allowed the opportunity to incidentally
take RCWs at some point in the future
if above-baseline numbers of RCWs are
attracted to that site by the proactive
management measures undertaken by
the landowner. It is important to note
that the SHA does not envision, nor will
it authorize, incidental take of existing
RCW groups, with one exception. This
exception is incidental take related to a
baseline shift; in this circumstance, the
baseline will be maintained but redrawn
or shifted on that landowner’s property.
Among the minimization measures
proposed by the Applicant are no
incidental taking of RCWs during the
breeding season, consolidation of small,
isolated RCW populations at sites
capable of supporting a viable RCW
population, and measures to improve
current and potential habitat for the
species. Further details on the topics
described above are found in the
aforementioned documents available for
review under this notice.
The geographic scope of the
Applicant’s SHA is the State of
Alabama. Lands potentially eligible for
inclusion include all privately owned
lands, State lands, and public lands
owned by cities, counties, and
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34155
municipalities with potentially suitable
RCW habitat.
We have evaluated several
alternatives to the proposed action, and
these are described at length in the
accompanying EA. The alternative of
our paying landowners for desired
management practices is not being
pursued because we are presently
unable to fund such a program. An
alternative by which interested private
or non-Federal property owners would
prepare an individual permit
application/Agreement with us also was
evaluated. Under that alternative, we
would process each permit application/
Agreement individually. This would
increase the effort, cost, and amount of
time it would take to provide safe
harbor assurances to participating
landowners and also cause such benefits
to be applied on a piecemeal, individual
basis. We have determined the
previously identified alternatives,
which would result in delays and lack
of a coordinated effort, would likely
result in a continued decline of the
RCWs on private lands due to habitat
fragmentation, lack of beneficial habitat
management, and the effects of
demographic isolation.
A no-action alternative was also
explored, but this alternative is not
likely to increase the number of RCW
groups or RCW habitat, nor would it
alleviate landowner conflicts. Instead,
the action proposed here, although it
authorizes future incidental take, is
expected to attract sufficient interest
among Alabama landowners to generate
substantial net conservation benefits to
the RCW on a landscape level. The
proposed SHA was developed in an
adaptive management framework to
allow changes in the program based on
new scientific information, including
but not limited to biological needs and
management actions proven to benefit
the species or its habitat.
Public Comments
Written data or comments should be
submitted to the Regional Office at the
address listed under ADDRESSES and
must be submitted in writing to be
adequately considered in the Service’s
decision-making process. Please
reference the ‘‘Proposed Programmatic
Alabama Statewide Red-cockaded
Woodpecker Safe Harbor Agreement’’ in
your comments, or in requests for the
documents discussed in this notice.
Decision
We will not make our final
determination until after the end of the
30-day comment period, and we will
fully consider all comments received
during the comment period. If the final
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
34156
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Notices
analysis shows the SHA to be consistent
with the Service’s policies and
applicable regulations, the Service will
sign the SHA and issue the ESP.
Authority
We are providing this notice under
section 10(c) of the Endangered Species
Act and implementing regulations for
the National Environmental Policy Act
(40 CFR part 1506).
Dated: May 25, 2006.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. E6–9169 Filed 6–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of Application for Formal
Modification of Issued Incidental Take
Permit (ITP); Availability of an
Environmental Assessment (EA);
Baldwin County, AL
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of an EA and Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP)/Application
for amendment to an issued incidental
take permit. D & E Investments
(permittee) requests an amendment to
its ITP Number PRT–787172, which was
issued in 1994 under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act),
for the take of the Alabama beach mouse
(Peromyscus polionotus ammobates)
(ABM). The proposed take would be
incidental to otherwise lawful activities,
including the construction, occupancy,
use, operation, and maintenance of a
residential condominium at Kiva Dunes
on the Fort Morgan Peninsula, in
Baldwin County, Alabama.
DATES: We must receive your written
comments on the ITP amendment
application, modified HCP, and EA on
or before July 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain hard or
electronic copies of the application,
HCP, and EA by sending a letter to the
Service’s Southeast Regional Office,
1875 Century Boulevard, Suite 200,
Atlanta, Georgia 30345 (Attn: HCP
Coordinator), or to the Service’s
Ecological Services Field Office, 1208–
B Main Street, Daphne, Alabama 36526,
or by sending an e-mail to
Aaron_Valenta@fws.gov. Submit your
written data or comments concerning
the proposed amendment and/or the
documents by mail to the Regional
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Office, by e-mail to
Aaron_Valenta@fws.gov, or by handdelivery to either Service office. For
more about how to request documents
or submit comments, see ‘‘Public
Comments Solicited’’ under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Aaron Valenta, Regional Permit
Coordinator (see ADDRESSES), telephone:
(404) 679–4144; or Acting Field
Supervisor, Daphne Field Office (see
ADDRESSES), telephone: (251) 441–6181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
announce the availability of an EA and
HCP/Application for amendment to an
issued incidental take permit. The
permittee requests an amendment to ITP
Number PRT–787172, which was issued
on April 29, 1994, under section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), for the take of the
ABM. The proposed take would be
incidental to otherwise lawful activities,
including the construction, occupancy,
use, operation, and maintenance of a
residential condominium at Kiva Dunes
on the Fort Morgan Peninsula, in
Baldwin County, Alabama.
The amendment would allow the
permittee to build a 12-story
condominium with eight units per floor
on four beachfront lots, instead of the
four single-family residences, yet
unbuilt, that we originally approved the
permittee to build. The proposed action
would involve approval of the modified
HCP developed by the permittee, as
required by section 10(a)(2)(B) of the
Act, to minimize and mitigate for
incidental take of the ABM, the
threatened green sea turtle (Chelonia
mydas), the threatened loggerhead sea
turtle (Caretta caretta), and the
endangered Kemp’s ridley sea turtle
(Lepidochelys kempi). A detailed
description of the mitigation and
minimization measures to address the
effects of the project to the ABM and sea
turtles is provided in the permittee’s
HCP and also in our EA.
Public Comments Solicited
We specifically request information,
views, and opinions from the public via
this notice, including the identification
of any other aspects of the human
environment not already identified in
the EA. Further, we specifically solicit
information regarding the adequacy of
the HCP as measured against our ITP
issuance criteria found in 50 CFR parts
13 and 17.
If you wish to comment, you may
submit comments by any one of several
methods (see ADDRESSES). If you contact
us via e-mail, please include your name
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and return mailing address in your email message. If you do not receive a
confirmation from us that we have
received your e-mail message, contact
us directly by telephone (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their home addresses from
the administrative record. We will
honor such requests to the extent
allowable by law. There may also be
other circumstances in which we would
withhold from the administrative record
a respondent’s identity, as allowable by
law. If you wish us to withhold your
name and address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. We will not, however,
consider anonymous comments. We
will make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Background
The ABM is one of eight subspecies
of the old field mouse restricted to
coastal dunes. We estimate that ABM
historically occupied approximately 45
kilometers (28 miles) of shoreline.
Monitoring (trapping and field
observations) of the ABM population on
other private lands that hold, or are
under review for, an ITP during the last
five years indicates that the Fort Morgan
Peninsula remains occupied (more or
less continuously) by ABM along its
primary and secondary dunes, as well as
the escarpment and suitable interior
habitat.
The permittee owns approximately
252 acres of land south of Alabama
Highway 180 on the Fort Morgan
Peninsula. The site is approximately
12.5 miles west of the intersection of
Highway 180 with Alabama Highway 59
in Gulf Shores, Baldwin County,
Alabama. On May 3, 1994, the Service
issued ITP number PRT–787172,
authorizing the take of ABM incidental
to construction and occupancy of the
Kiva Dunes development. The single
project includes a golf course, and both
multi-family and single-family
residential areas located north of
currently designated critical habitat.
The ITP did not establish a maximum
number of units to be developed as part
of the project. The site development
plan incorporated in the original HCP
anticipated the construction and
occupancy of 531 residential units
within the 91 acres designated for
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34154-34156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9169]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Proposed Programmatic Statewide Red-cockaded Woodpecker Safe
Harbor Agreement, AL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the Alabama Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources (ADCNR, or Applicant) has applied to
the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for an enhancement of survival
permit (ESP) under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (Act). The ESP application includes a proposed Safe
Harbor Agreement (SHA) for the endangered Red-cockaded Woodpecker
(Picoides borealis) (RCW) for a period of 99 years, along with a
supporting Environmental Assessment (EA). We announce the
[[Page 34155]]
opening of a 30-day comment period and request comments from the public
on the proposed SHA and the supporting EA.
DATES: Written comments should be sent to the Service's Regional Office
(see ADDRESSES) and must be received on or before July 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: To obtain copies of the proposed SHA and the supporting EA
for review, write to the Service's Southeast Regional Office, 1875
Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345 (Attn: Endangered
Species Permits). Send your comments to this address as well. For
commenting guidelines, see ``Public Comments'' under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Documents will also be available for public inspection by
appointment during normal business hours at the Regional Office in
Atlanta, or at our Field Office located at 1208-B Main Street, Daphne,
Alabama 36526. Do not write to this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rick Gooch, Regional Safe Harbor
Coordinator, at the Atlanta address above, 404-679-7124 (phone), or
404-679-7081 (facsimile), or Mr. Dan Everson, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, at the Daphne address above or 251-441-5837 (phone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Applicant has applied to the Service for
an ESP under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973,
as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The application includes a
proposed SHA for the endangered RCW for a period of 99 years, along
with a supporting EA. We announce the opening of a 30-day comment
period and request comments from the public on the proposed SHA and the
supporting EA. If approved, the SHA would allow the Applicant to issue
certificates of inclusion throughout the state of Alabama to eligible
non-Federal landowners that complete an approved Safe Harbor Management
Agreement (SHMA).
Background
The EA identifies and describes several alternatives. All comments
received, including names and addresses, will become part of the
official administrative record and may be made available to the public,
subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of
Information Act. For further information and instructions on reviewing
and commenting on this application, see ADDRESSES and, in this section,
``Public Comments.''
Under a SHA, participating property owners voluntarily undertake
management activities on their property to enhance, restore, or
maintain habitat benefiting species listed under the Act. SHAs
encourage private and other non-Federal property owners to implement
conservation efforts for listed species by assuring property owners
they will not be subjected to increased property use restrictions if
their efforts attract listed species to their property or increase the
numbers or distribution of listed species already on their property.
Application requirements and issuance criteria for enhancement of
survival permits through SHAs are found in 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32.
ADCNR's proposed Statewide SHA is designed to encourage voluntary
RCW habitat restoration or enhancement activities by relieving a
landowner who enters into a landowner-specific agreement (i.e., the
SHMA) from any additional responsibility under the Act beyond that
which exists at the time he or she enters into the program. The SHMA
will identify any existing RCWs and any associated habitat (the
baseline) and will describe the actions that the landowner commits to
take (e.g., hardwood midstory removal, cavity provisioning) or allows
to be taken to improve RCW habitat on the property, and the time period
within which those actions are to be taken and maintained. A
participating landowner must maintain the baseline on his/her property
(i.e., any existing RCW groups and/or associated habitat), but may be
allowed the opportunity to incidentally take RCWs at some point in the
future if above-baseline numbers of RCWs are attracted to that site by
the proactive management measures undertaken by the landowner. It is
important to note that the SHA does not envision, nor will it
authorize, incidental take of existing RCW groups, with one exception.
This exception is incidental take related to a baseline shift; in this
circumstance, the baseline will be maintained but redrawn or shifted on
that landowner's property. Among the minimization measures proposed by
the Applicant are no incidental taking of RCWs during the breeding
season, consolidation of small, isolated RCW populations at sites
capable of supporting a viable RCW population, and measures to improve
current and potential habitat for the species. Further details on the
topics described above are found in the aforementioned documents
available for review under this notice.
The geographic scope of the Applicant's SHA is the State of
Alabama. Lands potentially eligible for inclusion include all privately
owned lands, State lands, and public lands owned by cities, counties,
and municipalities with potentially suitable RCW habitat.
We have evaluated several alternatives to the proposed action, and
these are described at length in the accompanying EA. The alternative
of our paying landowners for desired management practices is not being
pursued because we are presently unable to fund such a program. An
alternative by which interested private or non-Federal property owners
would prepare an individual permit application/Agreement with us also
was evaluated. Under that alternative, we would process each permit
application/Agreement individually. This would increase the effort,
cost, and amount of time it would take to provide safe harbor
assurances to participating landowners and also cause such benefits to
be applied on a piecemeal, individual basis. We have determined the
previously identified alternatives, which would result in delays and
lack of a coordinated effort, would likely result in a continued
decline of the RCWs on private lands due to habitat fragmentation, lack
of beneficial habitat management, and the effects of demographic
isolation.
A no-action alternative was also explored, but this alternative is
not likely to increase the number of RCW groups or RCW habitat, nor
would it alleviate landowner conflicts. Instead, the action proposed
here, although it authorizes future incidental take, is expected to
attract sufficient interest among Alabama landowners to generate
substantial net conservation benefits to the RCW on a landscape level.
The proposed SHA was developed in an adaptive management framework to
allow changes in the program based on new scientific information,
including but not limited to biological needs and management actions
proven to benefit the species or its habitat.
Public Comments
Written data or comments should be submitted to the Regional Office
at the address listed under ADDRESSES and must be submitted in writing
to be adequately considered in the Service's decision-making process.
Please reference the ``Proposed Programmatic Alabama Statewide Red-
cockaded Woodpecker Safe Harbor Agreement'' in your comments, or in
requests for the documents discussed in this notice.
Decision
We will not make our final determination until after the end of the
30-day comment period, and we will fully consider all comments received
during the comment period. If the final
[[Page 34156]]
analysis shows the SHA to be consistent with the Service's policies and
applicable regulations, the Service will sign the SHA and issue the
ESP.
Authority
We are providing this notice under section 10(c) of the Endangered
Species Act and implementing regulations for the National Environmental
Policy Act (40 CFR part 1506).
Dated: May 25, 2006.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. E6-9169 Filed 6-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P