Determination Under the Textile and Apparel Commercial Availability Provision of the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR Agreement), 34069-34070 [06-5353]
Download as PDF
34069
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Notices
approximately 30 minutes (0.5 hours)
for an invention promoter or promotion
firm to prepare and submit a response
to a complaint.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 38 hours per year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $5,830 per year. The
USPTO expects that complaints will be
prepared by paraprofessionals or
independent inventors. Using the
average of the paraprofessional rate of
$90 per hour and the estimated rate of
$30 per hour for independent inventors,
the USPTO estimates that the average
rate for preparing the complaints will be
approximately $60 per hour. The
USPTO expects that the responses to the
complaints will be prepared by
attorneys or invention promoters. Using
the average of the professional rate of
$304 per hour for associate attorneys in
private firms and the estimated rate of
$100 per hour for invention promoters,
the USPTO estimates that the average
rate for preparing the responses to the
complaints will be $202 per hour.
Therefore, the respondent cost burden
for this collection will be $5,830 per
year.
Estimated time
for response
(minutes)
Estimated annual
responses
Estimated
annual burden
hours
Complaint Regarding Invention Promoter ...................................................................................
Responses to the Complaints .....................................................................................................
15
30
50
50
13
25
Total ......................................................................................................................................
........................
100
38
Item
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $740. There
are no capital start-up or maintenance
costs or filing fees associated with this
information collection. However, the
public may incur postage costs when
submitting a complaint or a response to
a complaint by mail to the USPTO. The
USPTO estimates that the first-class
postage cost for a mailed complaint will
be 39 cents. Promotion firms may
choose to send responses to complaints
using overnight mail service at an
estimated cost of $14.40 per response.
Therefore, the total annual (non-hour)
respondent cost burden for this
collection in the form of postage costs
is estimated to be $740 per year.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, e.g., the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 6, 2006.
Susan K. Brown,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Architecture,
Engineering and Technical Services, Data
Architecture and Services Division.
[FR Doc. E6–9173 Filed 6–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
COMMITTEE FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE
AGREEMENTS
Determination Under the Textile and
Apparel Commercial Availability
Provision of the Dominican RepublicCentral America-United States Free
Trade Agreement (CAFTA–DR
Agreement)
June 8, 2006.
AGENCY: The Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements.
ACTION: Determination to add a product
in unrestricted quantities to Annex 3.25
of the CAFTA–DR Agreement.
DATES: Effective Date: June 13, 2006.
SUMMARY: The Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements
(CITA) has determined that certain
100% cotton flannel fabrics, as specified
below, are not available in commercial
quantities in a timely manner in the
CAFTA–DR region. The product will be
added to the list in Annex 3.25 of the
CAFTA–DR in unrestricted quantities.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Stetson, Office of Textiles and
Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce,
(202) 482–2582.
For Further Information On-Line:
https://web.ita.doc.gov/tacgi/
CaftaReqTrack.nsf. Reference number:
6.2006.05.02.Fabric.ST&RforBWA.
Authority:
Section 203(o)(4) of the Dominican
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Republic-Central America-United States
Free Trade Agreement Implementation
Act (CAFTA–DR Act); the Statement of
Administrative Action (SAA),
accompanying the CAFTA–DR Act;
Presidential Proclamations 7987
(February 28, 2006) and 7996 (March 31,
2006).
The CAFTA–DR Agreement provides
a list in Annex 3.25 for fabrics, yarns,
and fibers that the Parties to the
CAFTA–DR Agreement have
determined are not available in
commercial quantities in a timely
manner in the territory of any Party.
Articles that otherwise meet the rule of
origin to qualify for preferential
treatment are not disqualified because
they contain one of the products on the
Annex 3.25 list.
The CAFTA–DR Agreement provides
that the list in Annex 3.25 may be
modified pursuant to Article 3.25(4)–(6).
The CAFTA–DR Act states that the
President will make a determination on
whether additional fabrics, yarns, and
fibers are available in commercial
quantities in a timely manner in the
territory of any Party. The CAFTA–DR
Act requires the President to establish
procedures governing the submission of
a request and providing opportunity for
interested entities to submit comments
and supporting evidence before making
a determination. In Presidential
Proclamations 7987 and 7996, the
President delegated to CITA the
authority under section 203(o)(4) of the
CAFTA–DR Act for modifying the
Annex 3.25 list. On February 23, 2006,
CITA published interim procedures it
would follow in considering requests to
modify the Annex 3.25 list. (71 FR 9315)
On May 2, 2006, the Chairman of
CITA received a request from Sandler,
Travis, & Rosenberg, P.A. on behalf of
B*W*A for certain 100% cotton napped
flannel fabrics, of the specifications
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
34070
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Notices
detailed below. On May 4, 2006, CITA
notified interested parties of, and posted
on its Web site, the accepted petition
and requested that interested entities
provide, by May 16, 2006, a response
advising of its objection to the request
or its ability to supply the subject
product, and rebuttals to responses by
May 22, 2006.
No interested entity filed a response
advising of its objection to the request
or its ability to supply the subject
product.
In accordance with Section 203(o)(4)
of the CAFTA–DR Act, and its
procedures, as no interested entity
submitted a response objecting to the
request or expressing an ability to
supply the subject product, CITA has
determined to add the specified fabrics
to the list in Annex 3.25 of the CAFTA–
DR Agreement.
The subject fabrics are added to the
list in Annex 3.25 of the CAFTA–DR
Agreement in unrestricted quantities.
Specifications
HTS Subheading: 5208.43.00.
Fiber Content: 100% Cotton.
Average Yarn Number: 84 to 86
metric warp and filling (49 to 51
English).
Thread Count: 39 to 66 warp ends per
centimeter × 27 to 39 filling picks per
centimeter (99 to 168 warp ends per
inch × 68 to 99 filling picks per inch).
Weave Type: 3 or 4 thread twill.
Weight: 98 to 150 grams per square
meter (2.9 to 4.4 ounces per sq. yard).
Finish: Of yarns of different colors,
yarns are dyed with fiber reactive dyes,
plaids checks and stripes, napped on
both sides, pre-shrunk.
James C. Leonard III,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation
of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 06–5353 Filed 6–8–06; 2:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Boards of Trade Located Outside of
the United States and the Requirement
To Become a Designated Contract
Market or Derivatives Transaction
Execution Facility
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Request for comment.
SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (Commission) is
publishing this request for comment in
advance of a public hearing scheduled
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
for June 27, 2006.1 The purpose of the
hearing is to solicit the views of the
public on how to identify and address
certain issues with respect to boards of
trade established in foreign countries
and located outside the U.S. (foreign
board of trade or FBOT). Specifically,
the Commission wishes to address the
point at which an FBOT that makes its
products available for trading in the
U.S. by permitting direct access to its
electronic trading system from the U.S.
(direct access) is no longer ‘‘located
outside the U.S.’’ for purposes of section
4(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act
(Act). If it is determined that the FBOT
is not ‘‘located outside the U.S.,’’ it
becomes subject to section 4(a) and may
be required to become a designated
contract market (DCM) or derivatives
transaction execution facility (DTEF).
Currently, FBOTs that wish to permit
direct access do so pursuant to
Commission staff no-action letters
(terminal placement no-action letter) in
which Commission staff represents that
it will not recommend that the
Commission institute enforcement
action against the FBOT or its members
if the FBOT, subject to certain
conditions, permits direct access
without becoming a DCM or DTEF.
Terminal placement no-action letters
state that Commission staff will examine
trade volume information submitted by
the FBOT, including volume generated
through U.S. terminals, and any change
in the nature or extent of the FBOT’s
activities in the U.S., to ascertain
whether such trade volume or FBOT
activities might warrant reconsideration
of the no-action relief because the FBOT
may no longer be ‘‘located outside the
U.S.’’ for the purposes of section 4(a) of
the Act.
Terminal placement no-action letters
do not, however, identify the specific
circumstances when no-action relief is
no longer appropriate. In order to
promote regulatory clarity in this area,
the Commission is considering whether
to set forth objective criteria for
determining when an FBOT is no longer
‘‘located outside the U.S.’’ for purposes
of Section 4(a) of the Act. In order to
foster useful discussion and provide
transparency with respect to the
Commission’s determinations in this
area, the Commission is issuing this
request for comment to solicit public
views regarding issues raised herein.
The Commission also believes that this
request for comment should help
generate and guide discussion on this
1 See Sunshine Act Meeting Notice, 71 FR 30665
(May 30, 2006); corrected at 71 FR 32059 (June 2,
2006).
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
same topic at its June 27, 2006, public
hearing.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to
the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC
20581, attention: Office of the
Secretariat. Comments may be sent by
facsimile transmission to 202–418–5521
or, by e-mail to secretary@cftc.gov.
Reference should be made to ‘‘What
Constitutes a Board of Trade Located
Outside of the United States.’’
Comments may also be submitted to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David P. Van Wagner, Chief Counsel,
(202) 418–5481, e-mail
dvanwagner@cftc.gov; or Duane C.
Andresen, Special Counsel, (202) 418–
5492, e-mail dandresen@cftc.gov;
Division of Market Oversight,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Center,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC
20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Generally, under section 4(a) of the
Act,2 a futures contract may be executed
lawfully in the U.S. only if it is traded
on or subject to the rules of a board of
trade that has been designated as a DCM
or registered as a DTEF (for ease of
reference, hereinafter referred to as
DCM/DTEF registration) pursuant to
section 5 or 5a of the Act,3 respectively,
unless the contract is either (i) traded on
or subject to the rules of a board of
trade, exchange or market located
outside the U.S. or (ii) exempted from
the Act pursuant to section 4(c).4
27
U.S.C. 6(a) (2002).
U.S.C. 7 and 7a (2002).
4 Section 4(a) of the Act states in relevant part: [I]t
shall be unlawful for any person to offer to enter
into, to enter into, to execute, to confirm the
execution of, or to conduct any office or business
anywhere in the United States, its territories or
possessions, for the purpose of soliciting or
accepting any order for, or otherwise dealing in, any
transaction in, or in connection with, a contract for
the purchase or sale of a commodity for future
delivery (other than a contract which is made on
or subject to the rules of a board of trade, exchange,
or market located outside the United States, its
territories or possessions) unless—
(1) Such transaction is conducted on or subject
to the rules of a board of trade which has been
designated or registered by the Commission as a
contract market or derivatives transaction execution
facility for such commodity;
(2) Such contract is executed or consummated by
or through a contract market; and
(3) Such contract is evidenced by a record in
writing.* * *
Section 4(c) of the Act provides the Commission
with authority ‘‘by rule, regulation, or order’’ to
37
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34069-34070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5353]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS
Determination Under the Textile and Apparel Commercial
Availability Provision of the Dominican Republic-Central America-United
States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR Agreement)
June 8, 2006.
AGENCY: The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
ACTION: Determination to add a product in unrestricted quantities to
Annex 3.25 of the CAFTA-DR Agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 13, 2006.
SUMMARY: The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements
(CITA) has determined that certain 100% cotton flannel fabrics, as
specified below, are not available in commercial quantities in a timely
manner in the CAFTA-DR region. The product will be added to the list in
Annex 3.25 of the CAFTA-DR in unrestricted quantities.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Stetson, Office of Textiles
and Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-2582.
For Further Information On-Line: https://web.ita.doc.gov/tacgi/
CaftaReqTrack.nsf. Reference number: 6.2006.05.02.Fabric.ST&RforBWA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: Section 203(o)(4) of the
Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act (CAFTA-DR Act); the Statement of Administrative
Action (SAA), accompanying the CAFTA-DR Act; Presidential Proclamations
7987 (February 28, 2006) and 7996 (March 31, 2006).
The CAFTA-DR Agreement provides a list in Annex 3.25 for fabrics,
yarns, and fibers that the Parties to the CAFTA-DR Agreement have
determined are not available in commercial quantities in a timely
manner in the territory of any Party. Articles that otherwise meet the
rule of origin to qualify for preferential treatment are not
disqualified because they contain one of the products on the Annex 3.25
list.
The CAFTA-DR Agreement provides that the list in Annex 3.25 may be
modified pursuant to Article 3.25(4)-(6). The CAFTA-DR Act states that
the President will make a determination on whether additional fabrics,
yarns, and fibers are available in commercial quantities in a timely
manner in the territory of any Party. The CAFTA-DR Act requires the
President to establish procedures governing the submission of a request
and providing opportunity for interested entities to submit comments
and supporting evidence before making a determination. In Presidential
Proclamations 7987 and 7996, the President delegated to CITA the
authority under section 203(o)(4) of the CAFTA-DR Act for modifying the
Annex 3.25 list. On February 23, 2006, CITA published interim
procedures it would follow in considering requests to modify the Annex
3.25 list. (71 FR 9315)
On May 2, 2006, the Chairman of CITA received a request from
Sandler, Travis, & Rosenberg, P.A. on behalf of B*W*A for certain 100%
cotton napped flannel fabrics, of the specifications
[[Page 34070]]
detailed below. On May 4, 2006, CITA notified interested parties of,
and posted on its Web site, the accepted petition and requested that
interested entities provide, by May 16, 2006, a response advising of
its objection to the request or its ability to supply the subject
product, and rebuttals to responses by May 22, 2006.
No interested entity filed a response advising of its objection to
the request or its ability to supply the subject product.
In accordance with Section 203(o)(4) of the CAFTA-DR Act, and its
procedures, as no interested entity submitted a response objecting to
the request or expressing an ability to supply the subject product,
CITA has determined to add the specified fabrics to the list in Annex
3.25 of the CAFTA-DR Agreement.
The subject fabrics are added to the list in Annex 3.25 of the
CAFTA-DR Agreement in unrestricted quantities.
Specifications
HTS Subheading: 5208.43.00.
Fiber Content: 100% Cotton.
Average Yarn Number: 84 to 86 metric warp and filling (49 to 51
English).
Thread Count: 39 to 66 warp ends per centimeter x 27 to 39 filling
picks per centimeter (99 to 168 warp ends per inch x 68 to 99 filling
picks per inch).
Weave Type: 3 or 4 thread twill.
Weight: 98 to 150 grams per square meter (2.9 to 4.4 ounces per sq.
yard).
Finish: Of yarns of different colors, yarns are dyed with fiber
reactive dyes, plaids checks and stripes, napped on both sides, pre-
shrunk.
James C. Leonard III,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 06-5353 Filed 6-8-06; 2:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P