Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Millington and Vicinity, Tennessee, 34078 [06-5317]
Download as PDF
34078
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) for Millington and Vicinity,
Tennessee
AGENCY: Army Corps of Engineers,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
SUMMARY: The Millington, Tennessee
and Vicinity Feasibility Study will be
conducted to analyze problems being
experienced in the Big Creek drainage
basin and evaluate alternatives to
provide plans for ecosystem restoration,
flood damage reduction, and recreation.
National Ecosystem Restoration (NER)
benefits will be evaluated with respect
to the net change in habitat quantity
and/or quality and expressed
quantitatively in physical units and
indices, but not monetary units. If
justified, the feasibility study and EIS
will recommend a plan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR COMMENT
CONTACT: Mr. Danny Ward, telephone
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
(901) 544–0709, CEMVM–PM–E, 167 N.
Main, Room B–202, Memphis, TN
38103, email—
daniel.d.ward@mvm02.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States House of Representatives
Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure adopted a resolution on
March 7, 1996, authorizing that* * *
‘‘The Secretary of the Army review the
report of the Chief of Engineers on the Wolf
River and Tributaries, Tennessee and
Mississippi, published as House Document
Numbered 76, Eighty-fifth Congress, and
other pertinent reports, to determine whether
any modifications of the recommendations
contained therein are advisable at this time,
with particular reference to the need for
improvements for flood control,
environmental restoration, water quality, and
related purposes associated with storm water
runoff and management in the metropolitan
Memphis, Tennessee area and tributary
basins including Shelby, Tipton, and Fayette
Counties, Tennessee, and DeSoto and
Marshall Counties, Mississippi. This area
includes the Hatchie River, Loosahatchie
River, Wolf River, Nonconnah Creek, Horn
Lake Creek, and Coldwater River Basins. The
review shall evaluate the effectiveness of
existing Federal and non-Federal
improvements, and determine the need for
additional improvements to prevent flooding
from storm water, to restore environmental
resources, and to improve the quality of
water entering the Mississippi River and its
tributaries.’’
Big Creek, a tributary of the
Loosahatchie River, is located north of
the City of Memphis in Shelby and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Tipton Counties, Tennessee.
Metropolitan areas within the watershed
include the cities of Millington,
Munford, and Atoka. The entire reach of
Big Creek within Shelby County has
been channelized and is referred to as
the Big Creek Drainage Canal. Habitat in
Big Creek is limited due to channel
alteration, incision of the channel
bottom, bank erosion, high urbanization
rates, and an altered hydraulic regime.
Most of the historical habitat in the
watershed has been cleared for
agricultural or development purposes.
Additionally, water quality is a major
problem in the study area. Big Creek,
from its mouth to Crooked Creek, is
listed on the Clean Water Act 303(d) list
of impaired waterways by the Tennessee
Department of Environment and
Conservation (TDEC). TDEC determined
that this waterway is a high priority for
development of the Total Maximum
Daily Load (TMDL). The identified
water pollutants are organic
enrichment/DO, siltation, nutrients, and
pathogens. The sources of these water
quality problems were identified as
landfills, channelization, and
agricultural and urban runoff.
Heavy rainfalls, totaling over 10
inches in November 2001, caused
temporary road closures in the Big
Creek drainage basin and a 21-foot rise
and fall of the creek’s water surface
elevation within 48 hours. Estimates
indicate that the rainfall event
approximated a 50-year storm. This
flash flood type scenario is not
uncommon to the drainage basin, yet its
impact eventually affects the overall
stability of the drainage system and
adjoining infrastructure.
Reasonable Alternatives
There is a limited amount of flood
damages that occur in the basin based
upon recent economic and hydraulic
data. Therefore, the feasibility study
will focus on ecosystem restoration
alternatives. Likely restoration features
include but are not limited to
constructing main channel stabilization
weirs in Big Creek that will prevent
further channel bed incision and lateral
bank erosion and restore the bottom
grade of the creek that will provide
aquatic habitat, constructing
stabilization weirs on tributaries,
constructing bioengineered channel
improvements that will likely involve
lateral stone toe protection with live
plantings, restoring historical meanders
of Big Creek, and restoring riparian
buffer strips and wildlife corridors.
Additional items to be analyzed include
the development of recreational features
on project lands. Incidental flood
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
damage reduction benefits will also be
quantified.
The Corps Scoping Process
A NEPA Scoping Notice was
disseminated on 26 January 2004 and a
public scoping meeting was held on 12
February 2004. Significant issues raised
from the Corps’ scoping process that
will be analyzed in the EIS are lack of
aquatic habitat, loss of riparian zones,
excessive erosion, poor water quality,
increased development, wetland losses,
greenways, flash flooding, cultural
resources, and a lack of recreational
opportunities. Comments are being used
in the development of project features.
However, additional comments
concerning the feasibility study will be
accepted.
Comments to this Notice of Intent are
requested by 9 July 2007 at the above
address. It is anticipated that the DEIS
will be available for public review in
January 2007.
Vincent D. Navarre,
Major, Corps of Engineers, Deputy District
Commander.
[FR Doc. 06–5317 Filed 6–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–KS–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent to Prepare a Supplement to the
Final Environmental Statement for the
Area VI (Elm Fork of the North Fork of
the Red River) Portion of the Red River
Chloride Control Project, Texas and
Oklahoma
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
SUMMARY: The purpose of the
Supplement to the Final Environmental
Statement (SFES) is to address
alternatives and modifications to the
authorized plan for chloride control at
Area VI on the Elm Fork of the North
Fork of the Red River, OK.
ADDRESSES: Questions or comments
concerning the proposed action should
be addressed to Mr. Stephen L. Nolen,
Chief, Environmental Analysis and
Compliance Branch, Tulsa District, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, CESWT–PE–
E, 1645 S. 101st E. Ave, Tulsa, OK
74128–4629.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Stephen L. Nolen, (918) 669–7660, fax:
(918) 669–7546, e-mail:
Stephen.L.Nolen@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Area
VI portion was authorized as part of a
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 34078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5317]
[[Page 34078]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
for Millington and Vicinity, Tennessee
AGENCY: Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Millington, Tennessee and Vicinity Feasibility Study will
be conducted to analyze problems being experienced in the Big Creek
drainage basin and evaluate alternatives to provide plans for ecosystem
restoration, flood damage reduction, and recreation. National Ecosystem
Restoration (NER) benefits will be evaluated with respect to the net
change in habitat quantity and/or quality and expressed quantitatively
in physical units and indices, but not monetary units. If justified,
the feasibility study and EIS will recommend a plan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR COMMENT CONTACT: Mr. Danny Ward, telephone
(901) 544-0709, CEMVM-PM-E, 167 N. Main, Room B-202, Memphis, TN 38103,
email_daniel.d.ward@mvm02.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States House of Representatives
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure adopted a resolution on
March 7, 1996, authorizing that* * *
``The Secretary of the Army review the report of the Chief of
Engineers on the Wolf River and Tributaries, Tennessee and
Mississippi, published as House Document Numbered 76, Eighty-fifth
Congress, and other pertinent reports, to determine whether any
modifications of the recommendations contained therein are advisable
at this time, with particular reference to the need for improvements
for flood control, environmental restoration, water quality, and
related purposes associated with storm water runoff and management
in the metropolitan Memphis, Tennessee area and tributary basins
including Shelby, Tipton, and Fayette Counties, Tennessee, and
DeSoto and Marshall Counties, Mississippi. This area includes the
Hatchie River, Loosahatchie River, Wolf River, Nonconnah Creek, Horn
Lake Creek, and Coldwater River Basins. The review shall evaluate
the effectiveness of existing Federal and non-Federal improvements,
and determine the need for additional improvements to prevent
flooding from storm water, to restore environmental resources, and
to improve the quality of water entering the Mississippi River and
its tributaries.''
Big Creek, a tributary of the Loosahatchie River, is located north
of the City of Memphis in Shelby and Tipton Counties, Tennessee.
Metropolitan areas within the watershed include the cities of
Millington, Munford, and Atoka. The entire reach of Big Creek within
Shelby County has been channelized and is referred to as the Big Creek
Drainage Canal. Habitat in Big Creek is limited due to channel
alteration, incision of the channel bottom, bank erosion, high
urbanization rates, and an altered hydraulic regime. Most of the
historical habitat in the watershed has been cleared for agricultural
or development purposes. Additionally, water quality is a major problem
in the study area. Big Creek, from its mouth to Crooked Creek, is
listed on the Clean Water Act 303(d) list of impaired waterways by the
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC). TDEC
determined that this waterway is a high priority for development of the
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). The identified water pollutants are
organic enrichment/DO, siltation, nutrients, and pathogens. The sources
of these water quality problems were identified as landfills,
channelization, and agricultural and urban runoff.
Heavy rainfalls, totaling over 10 inches in November 2001, caused
temporary road closures in the Big Creek drainage basin and a 21-foot
rise and fall of the creek's water surface elevation within 48 hours.
Estimates indicate that the rainfall event approximated a 50-year
storm. This flash flood type scenario is not uncommon to the drainage
basin, yet its impact eventually affects the overall stability of the
drainage system and adjoining infrastructure.
Reasonable Alternatives
There is a limited amount of flood damages that occur in the basin
based upon recent economic and hydraulic data. Therefore, the
feasibility study will focus on ecosystem restoration alternatives.
Likely restoration features include but are not limited to constructing
main channel stabilization weirs in Big Creek that will prevent further
channel bed incision and lateral bank erosion and restore the bottom
grade of the creek that will provide aquatic habitat, constructing
stabilization weirs on tributaries, constructing bioengineered channel
improvements that will likely involve lateral stone toe protection with
live plantings, restoring historical meanders of Big Creek, and
restoring riparian buffer strips and wildlife corridors. Additional
items to be analyzed include the development of recreational features
on project lands. Incidental flood damage reduction benefits will also
be quantified.
The Corps Scoping Process
A NEPA Scoping Notice was disseminated on 26 January 2004 and a
public scoping meeting was held on 12 February 2004. Significant issues
raised from the Corps' scoping process that will be analyzed in the EIS
are lack of aquatic habitat, loss of riparian zones, excessive erosion,
poor water quality, increased development, wetland losses, greenways,
flash flooding, cultural resources, and a lack of recreational
opportunities. Comments are being used in the development of project
features. However, additional comments concerning the feasibility study
will be accepted.
Comments to this Notice of Intent are requested by 9 July 2007 at
the above address. It is anticipated that the DEIS will be available
for public review in January 2007.
Vincent D. Navarre,
Major, Corps of Engineers, Deputy District Commander.
[FR Doc. 06-5317 Filed 6-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-KS-P