Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of Nonessential Experimental Population Status for 15 Freshwater Mussels, 1 Freshwater Snail, and 5 Fishes in the Lower French Broad River and in the Lower Holston River, Tennessee, 34196-34230 [06-5233]
Download as PDF
34196
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018–AU01
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Establishment of
Nonessential Experimental Population
Status for 15 Freshwater Mussels, 1
Freshwater Snail, and 5 Fishes in the
Lower French Broad River and in the
Lower Holston River, Tennessee
Fish and Wildlife, Interior.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
ACTION:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), in
cooperation with the State of Tennessee
and Conservation Fisheries, Inc., a
nonprofit organization, propose to
reintroduce 15 mussels listed as
endangered under section 4 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act): Appalachian
monkeyface (pearlymussel) (Quadrula
sparsa), birdwing pearlymussel
(Conradilla caelata = Lemiox rimosus),
cracking pearlymussel (Hemistena or
currently =Lastena lata), Cumberland
bean (pearlymussel) (Villosa trabalis),
Cumberlandian combshell (Epioblasma
brevidens), Cumberland monkeyface
(pearlymussel) (Quadrula intermedia),
dromedary pearlymussel (Dromus
dromas), fanshell (Cyprogenia stegaria),
fine-rayed pigtoe (Fusconaia cuneolus),
orangefoot pimpleback (pearlymussel)
(Plethobasus cooperianus), oyster
mussel (Epioblasma capsaeformis), ring
pink (mussel) (Obovaria retusa), rough
pigtoe (Pleurobema plenum), shiny
pigtoe (Fusconaia cor), and white
wartyback (pearlymussel) (Plethobasus
cicatricosus); 1 endangered aquatic
snail: Anthony’s riversnail (Athearnia
anthonyi); 2 endangered fishes:
duskytail darter (Etheostoma
percnurum) and pygmy madtom
(Noturus stanauli); and 3 fishes listed as
threatened under section 4 of the Act:
slender chub (Erimystax cahni), spotfin
chub (=turquoise shiner) (Erimonax
monachus), and yellowfin madtom
(Noturus flavipinnis) into their
historical habitat in the free-flowing
reach of the French Broad River below
Douglas Dam to its confluence with the
Holston River, Knox County, Tennessee,
and in the free-flowing reach of the
Holston River below Cherokee Dam to
its confluence with the French Broad
River. Based on the evaluation of
species experts, none of these 21 species
currently exist in these river reaches or
their tributaries. These species are being
reintroduced under the authority of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
section 10(j) of the Act and would be
classified as a nonessential
experimental population (NEP).
The geographic boundaries of the
proposed NEP would extend from the
base of Douglas Dam (river mile (RM)
32.3 (51.7 kilometers (km)) down the
French Broad River, Knox and Sevier
Counties, Tennessee, to its confluence
with the Holston River and then up the
Holston River, Knox, Grainger, and
Jefferson Counties, Tennessee, to the
base of Cherokee Dam (RM 52.3 (83.7
km)) and would include the lower 5 RM
(8 km) of all tributaries that enter these
river reaches.
These proposed reintroductions are
recovery actions and are part of a series
of reintroductions and other recovery
actions that the Service, Federal and
State agencies, and other partners are
conducting throughout the species’
historical ranges. This proposed rule
provides a plan for establishing the NEP
and provides for limited allowable legal
take of these 16 mollusks and 5 fishes
within the defined NEP area. We have
decided to include all 21 species in a
single rulemaking to allow us to restore
the aquatic ecosystem as quickly as
possible as we bring each of these
species on line in the propagation
facilities. We have reasons to believe all
of these species co-existed in the past,
and also want the public to understand
that all of these species will be
reintroduced into the same stretch of
river rather than being confused by 21
separate NEPs.
DATES: We will consider comments on
this proposed rule that are received by
August 14, 2006. Requests for a public
hearing must be made in writing and
received by July 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
and other information, identified by
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
1018–AU01, by any of the following
methods:
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Field
Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Tennessee Field Office, 446
Neal Street, Cookeville, Tennessee,
38501.
• Fax: 931–528–7075.
• E-mail: timothy_merritt@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Attn: French Broad/Holston
Rivers NEP’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Please see the ‘‘Public Comments
Solicited’’ section below for information
about submitting comments.
The comments and materials we
receive during the comment period will
be available for public inspection, by
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
appointment, during normal business
hours at our Tennessee Field Office at
the above address. If you wish to request
a public hearing, you may mail or hand
deliver your written request to the
Tennessee Field Office at the above
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Merritt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service at the above address (telephone
931/528–6481, facsimile 931/528–7075).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
1. Legislative: Under section 10(j) of
the Act, the Secretary of the Department
of the Interior may designate
reintroduced populations established
outside the species’ current range, but
within its historical range, as
‘‘experimental.’’ Based on the best
scientific and commercial data
available, we must determine whether
experimental populations are
‘‘essential’’ or ‘‘nonessential’’ to the
continued existence of the species.
Regulatory restrictions are considerably
reduced under a nonessential
experimental population (NEP)
designation.
Without the NEP designation, the Act
provides that species listed as
endangered or threatened are afforded
protection primarily through the
prohibitions of section 9, the
consultation requirements of section 7
and the special regulations provisions of
section 4(d). Section 9(a)(1)(B) of the
Act prohibits the take of endangered
wildlife. ‘‘Take’’ is defined by the Act as
‘‘harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, trap, capture, or collect, or
attempt to engage in any such conduct.’’
Service regulations (50 CFR 17.31)
generally extend the prohibitions of take
to threatened wildlife but these general
provisions may be altered as deemed by
the Secretary to be necessary and
advisable for the conservation of
threatened species. Section 7 of the Act
outlines the procedures for Federal
interagency cooperation to conserve
federally listed species and protect
designated critical habitat. It mandates
that all Federal agencies use their
existing authorities to further the
purposes of the Act by carrying out
programs for the conservation of listed
species. It also states that Federal
agencies must, in consultation with the
Service, ensure that any action they
authorize, fund, or carry out is not likely
to jeopardize the continued existence of
a listed species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
designated critical habitat. Section 7 of
the Act does not affect activities
undertaken on private land unless they
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
are authorized, funded, or carried out by
a Federal agency.
A population designated as
experimental is treated for the purposes
of section 9 of the Act as threatened,
regardless of the species’ designation
elsewhere in its range. Threatened
designation allows us greater discretion
in devising management programs and
special regulations for such a
population. Section 4(d) of the Act
allows us to adopt whatever regulations
are necessary to provide for the
conservation of a threatened species.
Although a special 4(d) rule can contain
the prohibitions and exceptions
necessary and appropriate to conserve
that species, regulations issued under
section 4(d) for NEPs are usually less
restrictive with regard to human
activities in the reintroduction area.
For the purposes of section 7 of the
Act, we treat an NEP as a threatened
species when the NEP is located within
a National Wildlife Refuge or National
Park, and section 7(a)(1) and the
consultation requirements of section
7(a)(2) of the Act apply. When NEPs are
located outside a National Wildlife
Refuge or National Park, we treat the
population as proposed for listing and
only the conference provisions of
section 7(a)(4) apply. Section 7(a)(4)
requires Federal agencies to confer
(rather than consult) with the Service on
actions that are likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of a species
proposed to be listed. The results of a
conference are advisory in nature and
do not restrict agencies from
authorizing, funding, or carrying out
activities.
2. Biological Information: The lower
French Broad and Holston Rivers
historically supported a diverse fish,
snail, and mussel fauna, possibly as
many as 85 mussel species and
subspecies, or about 65 percent of the
mussel diversity once known from the
entire Tennessee River system
(Parmalee and Bogan, 1998; Steve
Ahlstedt, U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS), personal communication (pers.
comm.) 2004). Of this once rich aquatic
fauna, 7 mussel species are extinct, and
21 federally listed species (i.e, the 15
mussels, 1 aquatic snail, and 5 fishes
listed above in the SUMMARY section) are
extirpated from these river reaches. The
only federally listed mussel still
occurring in the proposed NEP area is
the endangered pink mucket (Lampsilis
abrupta), which still occurs in both the
lower French Broad and lower Holston
Rivers (Steve Ahlstedt, pers. comm.
2004). The pink mucket is not one of the
15 mussel species we are proposing to
reintroduce under this NEP.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Although much of the mussel fauna
and some of the snail and fish fauna
were eliminated from these river
reaches, considerable suitable physical
habitat remains, and various Federal
(primarily the Tennessee Valley
Authority (TVA)) and State natural
resources agencies, industries, and
municipalities have worked together to
improve the water quality below the
dams. Fish populations are rebounding
(including the appropriate fish host
species for mussel glochidia) and snail
populations are expanding in both
rivers, and non-federally listed mussels
and snails released into the lower
French Broad River to test the area’s
suitability for mollusk transplants are
doing well. Based on the results of
recent studies and observations by
knowledgeable scientists (P. Rakes and
J. Shute, Conservation Fisheries, Inc.
(CFI), pers. comm. 2004; Ed Scott and
Charlie Saylor, TVA, pers. comm. 2004;
James Layzer and Steve Ahlstedt, USGS,
pers. comm. 2004), these river reaches
now provide suitable habitat for
reintroductions to occur.
Since the mid-1980s, CFI, a nonprofit
organization, with support from us, the
Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency
(TWRA), U.S. Forest Service, National
Park Service, TVA, and Tennessee
Aquarium, has successfully
translocated, propagated, and
reintroduced spotfin chubs, duskytail
darters, yellowfin madtoms, and smoky
madtoms into Abrams Creek, Great
Smoky Mountains National Park, Blount
County, Tennessee. These fish
historically occupied Abrams Creek
prior to an ichthyocide treatment in the
1950s. An NEP designation for Abrams
Creek was not needed since the entire
watershed occurs on National Park
Service land; section 7 of the Act
applies regardless of the NEP
designation, and existing human
activities and public use are consistent
with protection and take restrictions
needed for the reintroduced
populations. Natural reproduction by all
four species in Abrams Creek has been
documented, but the spotfin chub
appears to be the least successful in this
capacity (Rakes and Shute 2004a,
2004b). We have also worked with CFI
to translocate, propagate, and
reintroduce these same four fish into an
NEP established for a section of the
Tellico River, Monroe County,
Tennessee (67 FR 52420, August 12,
2002). Propagated fish of these four
species were released into the Tellico
River starting in 2003 and continuing in
2004. It is still too early to determine the
success of these releases, but it is
believed that the habitat and water
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
34197
quality is sufficient to ensure future
success similar to the Abrams Creek
reintroductions. CFI has also
successfully placed yellowfin madtoms
in an existing NEP on the North Fork
Holston River, Washington County,
Virginia. This site is separated from the
proposed NEP on the lower Holston
River by reservoirs, and the fish is not
known from any of these reservoirs or
intervening river sections. These
reservoirs and river sections act as
barriers to movement by the fish and
assure that the North Fork Holston River
population will remain geographically
isolated and easily identifiable as a
distinct population from the proposed
Lower Holston River population.
3. Listing Information, Distribution,
and Recovery Goals/Objectives: The
Appalachian monkeyface
(pearlymussel) (Quadrula sparsa) (Lea
1841) was listed as an endangered
species on June 14, 1976 (41 FR 24062).
We finalized a recovery plan for the
species in July 1984 (Service 1984a). It
historically occurred in the Tennessee
River and three of its tributaries: the
Clinch, Holston, and Powell Rivers
(Service 1984a). We are unaware of
historical records of the species in the
French Broad River, but archeological
records (Parmalee and Bogan 1998) of
this species exist from the Little Pigeon
River (a lower French Broad River
tributary). The species may still survive
in extremely low numbers in the Powell
River in Tennessee and the Clinch River
in Virginia (Parmalee and Bogan 1998).
No downlisting (reclassification from
endangered to threatened) criteria are
provided in the recovery plan. The
delisting objectives for the Appalachian
monkeyface (Service 1984a) are to: (1)
Restore the viability of the Clinch and
Powell River populations; (2) reestablish
or discover viable populations in one
additional river; (3) ensure that the
species is protected from present and
foreseeable threats to the continued
existence of any population; and (4)
determine that there are noticeable
improvements in coal-related problems
and substrate quality in the Powell
River and that no increase in coalrelated sedimentation has occurred in
the Clinch River.
The birdwing pearlymussel
(Conradilla caelata = Lemiox rimosus)
(Conrad 1834) was listed as an
endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41
FR 24062). We finalized a recovery plan
for the species in July 1984 (Service
1984b). We also established an NEP for
the birdwing pearlymussel and 15 other
federally listed mussels for a section of
the Tennessee River below the Wilson
Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale
Counties, Alabama, on June 14, 2001 (66
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
34198
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
FR 32250). Historical records exist for
the species in 11 rivers in the Tennessee
River system, and one record exists from
an unknown location in the Cumberland
River. Historically, the species occurred
in the Tennessee River near the
confluence of the French Broad and
Holston Rivers, in the Holston River just
upstream of its confluence with the
French Broad River, and in the
Nolichucky River (a French Broad River
tributary) (Parmalee and Bogan 1998).
Archeological records (Parmalee 1988)
of this species exist from the Little
Pigeon River, a lower French Broad
River tributary. It now survives in the
Clinch and Powell Rivers in Tennessee
and Virginia and in the Duck and Elk
Rivers in Tennessee (Service 1984b). No
downlisting criteria are given in the
recovery plan. The delisting objectives
for the birdwing pearlymussel (Service
1984b) are to: (1) Restore the viability of
the Clinch and Powell River
populations; (2) reestablish or discover
viable populations in two additional
rivers; (3) ensure that the species is
protected from present and foreseeable
threats to the continued existence of any
population; and (4) determine that
noticeable improvements in coal-related
problems and substrate quality have
occurred in the Powell River and that no
increase in coal-related sedimentation
has occurred in the Clinch River.
The cracking pearlymussel
(Hemistena lata) (Rafinesque 1820) was
listed as an endangered species on
September 28, 1989 (54 FR 39850). We
finalized a recovery plan for the species
in July 1991 (Service 1991a). We also
established an NEP for the cracking
pearlymussel and 15 other federally
listed mussels for a section of the
Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam
in Colbert and Lauderdale Counties,
Alabama, on June 14, 2001 (66 FR
32250). This species historically
occurred in the Ohio, Cumberland, and
Tennessee River systems (Bogan and
Parmalee 1983; Service 1991a). It is
extirpated throughout much of its range.
Historical records exist from the
Tennessee River near the confluence of
the French Broad and Holston Rivers
(Parmalee and Bogan 1998). No
historical records exist for the species in
the French Broad system, but
archaeological records (Parmalee 1988)
of this species exist from the Little
Pigeon River, a lower French Broad
River tributary. It now survives at a few
shoals in the Clinch and Powell Rivers
in Tennessee and Virginia (Bogan and
Parmalee 1983; Neves 1991). It possibly
survives in the Green River in Kentucky
and in the Tennessee River, below
Pickwick Dam, in Tennessee (Service
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
1991a). The downlisting objectives for
the cracking pearlymussel (Service
1991a) are to: (1) Reestablish/discover
five viable populations; (2) ensure that
one naturally produced year class exists
within each population; (3) determine if
recovery actions have been successful,
as determined by an increase in
population density and/or an increase
in length of river inhabited; and (4)
ensure there are no foreseeable threats
to the continued existence of any
population. The delisting objectives call
for the reestablishment/discovery of
eight viable populations and two
naturally produced year classes within
each population.
The Cumberland bean (pearlymussel)
(Villosa trabalis) (Conrad 1834) was
listed as an endangered species on June
14, 1976 (41 FR 24062). We finalized a
recovery plan for the species in August
1984 (Service 1984c). We also
established an NEP for the Cumberland
bean and 15 other federally listed
mussels for a section of the Tennessee
River below the Wilson Dam in Colbert
and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on
June 14, 2001 (66 FR 32250). This
species historically occurred in 10 river
systems in the Cumberland and
Tennessee River basins (Service 1984c).
No historical records exist in the French
Broad River system, but archaeological
records (Parmalee 1988) of this species
exist from the Little Pigeon River, a
lower French Broad River tributary. The
Cumberland bean now survives only in
the Hiwassee River in Tennessee; in
Buck Creek, the Little South Fork of the
Cumberland River, and the Rockcastle
River system in Kentucky; and in the
Big South Fork of the Cumberland River
in Tennessee and Kentucky (Service
1984c). No downlisting criteria are
given in the recovery plan. The delisting
objectives for the Cumberland bean
(Service 1984c) are to: (1) Restore the
viability of populations in Buck Creek,
the Rockcastle River, and the Little
South Fork River in Kentucky; (2)
reestablish or discover viable
populations in two additional rivers; (3)
ensure that the species is protected from
present and foreseeable threats to the
continued existence of any population;
and (4) determine that noticeable
improvements in coal-related problems
and substrate quality have occurred in
the upper Cumberland and Tennessee
drainages and that no increase in coalrelated sedimentation exists in streams
containing this species.
The Cumberlandian combshell
(Epioblasma brevidens) (Lea 1831) was
listed as an endangered species on
January 10, 1997 (62 FR 1647). Critical
habitat was designated for this species
on August 31, 2004 (69 FR 53136). We
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
finalized a recovery plan for the species
in May 2004 (Service 2004). We also
established an NEP for the
Cumberlandian combshell and 15 other
federally listed mussels for a section of
the Tennessee River below the Wilson
Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale
Counties, Alabama, on June 14, 2001 (66
FR 32250). This mussel was historically
distributed throughout much of the
Cumberlandian Region of the Tennessee
and Cumberland River drainages in
Alabama, Kentucky, Tennessee, and
Virginia (Gordon 1991). Currently,
populations survive in a few river
reaches in both river systems (Gordon
1991). It historically occurred in the
lower Holston River and a French Broad
River tributary (Nolichucky River)
(Parmalee and Bogan 1998).
Archaeological records (Parmalee 1988)
of this species exist from the Little
Pigeon River, a lower French Broad
River tributary. The downlisting
objectives for the Cumberlandian
combshell (Service 2004) call for the
reestablishment/discovery of six viable
populations and one naturally
reproducing year class within each
viable population. The delisting
objectives are to: (1) Reestablish or
discover viable populations in nine
distinct streams, including three in the
Cumberland River system, four in the
upper Tennessee River system, and two
in the lower Tennessee River system; (2)
ensure that the species is protected from
present and foreseeable threats to the
continued existence of any population;
and (3) ensure two distinct naturally
reproducing year classes exist within
each of the viable populations.
The Cumberland monkeyface
(pearlymussel) (Quadrula intermedia)
(Conrad 1836) was listed as an
endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41
FR 24062). We completed a recovery
plan for the species in July 1984
(Service 1984d). We also established an
NEP for the Cumberland monkeyface
and 15 other federally listed mussels for
a section of the Tennessee River below
the Wilson Dam in Colbert and
Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June
14, 2001 (66 FR 32250). It historically
occurred in 11 rivers in the Tennessee
River system (Service 1984d). Based on
collections from aboriginal shell
middens, Parmalee and Bogan (1998)
stated that the species once occurred at
the confluence of the French Broad and
Holston Rivers. The species now
survives at a few shoals in the Powell
River in Tennessee and Virginia and the
Elk and Duck Rivers in Tennessee
(Service 1984d). No downlisting criteria
are given in the recovery plan. The
delisting objectives for the Cumberland
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
monkeyface (Service 1984d) are to: (1)
Restore the viability of the Powell and
Elk River populations; (2) reestablish or
discover viable populations in two
additional rivers; (3) ensure that the
species is protected from present and
foreseeable threats to the continued
existence of any population; and (4)
determine that noticeable improvements
in coal-related problems and substrate
quality have occurred in the Powell
River and that no increase in coalrelated sedimentation occurs in the
Clinch River.
The dromedary pearlymussel (Dromus
dromas) (Lea 1845) was listed as an
endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41
FR 24062). We completed a recovery
plan for the species in July 1984
(Service 1984e). We also established an
NEP for the dromedary pearlymussel
and 15 other federally listed mussels for
a section of the Tennessee River below
the Wilson Dam in Colbert and
Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June
14, 2001 (66 FR 32250). It was
historically widespread in the
Cumberland and Tennessee River
systems (Bogan and Parmalee 1983).
Parmalee and Bogan (1998) reported
that the species historically occurred in
the lower Holston River in Knox and
Grainger Counties. Archaeological
records of this species exist from the
Little Pigeon River, a lower French
Broad River tributary (Parmalee 1988). It
survives at a few shoals in the Powell
and Clinch Rivers in Tennessee and
Virginia and possibly in the
Cumberland River in Tennessee (Service
1984e; Neves 1991). No downlisting
criteria are given in the recovery plan.
The delisting objectives for the
dromedary pearlymussel (Service
1984e) are to: (1) Restore the viability of
the Clinch and Powell River
populations; (2) reestablish or discover
viable populations in three additional
rivers; (3) ensure that the species is
protected from present and foreseeable
threats to the continued existence of any
population; and (4) determine that
noticeable improvements in coal-related
problems and substrate quality have
occurred in the Powell River and that no
increase in coal-related sedimentation
occurs in the Clinch River.
The fanshell (Cyprogenia stegaria)
(Rafinesque 1820) was listed as an
endangered species on June 21, 1990 (55
FR 25591). We completed a recovery
plan for the species in July 1991
(Service 1991b). It historically occurred
in the Ohio River and many of its large
tributaries in Pennsylvania, West
Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois,
Kentucky, Alabama, Virginia, and
Tennessee (Service 1991b). Ortmann
(1918) reported it from the lower
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Holston River, and Parmalee and Bogan
(1998) reported it from archaeological
sites in the lower French Broad River
and its tributary, the Little Pigeon River.
Presently, the fanshell is believed to be
reproducing in three rivers: The Green
and Licking Rivers in Kentucky and the
Clinch River in Tennessee and Virginia.
Additionally, based on the collection of
a few old specimens in the 1980s, small,
apparently nonreproducing, populations
may still persist in the Muskingum and
Walhonding Rivers in Ohio, the
Kanawha River in West Virginia, the
Wabash River system in Illinois and
Indiana, the Barren River and Tygarts
Creek in Kentucky, and the Tennessee
and Cumberland Rivers in Tennessee
(Service 1991b). The downlisting
objectives for the fanshell (Service
1991b) are to: (1) Protect existing
populations, reestablish historical
populations, and/or discover new
populations so that at least nine distinct
viable populations exist; (2) ensure that
one naturally reproduced year class
exists within each of the nine
populations; and (3) ensure that studies
of the species’ biological and ecological
requirements are complete and that any
required recovery measures are
beginning to succeed. The delisting
objectives are to: (1) Protect existing
populations, reestablish historical
populations, and/or discover new
populations so that at least 12 distinct
viable populations exist; (2) ensure that
two distinct naturally reproduced year
classes exist within each viable
population; (3) ensure that studies of the
species’ biological and ecological
requirements are complete and that any
required recovery measures are
successful; (4) ensure that no
foreseeable threats exist that would
likely impact the species’ survival over
a significant portion of its range; and (5)
ensure that noticeable improvements in
water and substratum quality have
occurred where habitat has been
degraded.
The fine-rayed pigtoe (Fusconaia
cuneolus) (Lea 1840) was listed as an
endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41
FR 24062). We finalized a recovery plan
for the species in September 1984
(Service 1984f). We also established an
NEP for the fine-rayed pigtoe and 15
other federally listed mussels for a
section of the Tennessee River below
the Wilson Dam in Colbert and
Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June
14, 2001 (66 FR 32250). It historically
occurred in 15 Tennessee River
tributaries (including the lower Holston
River) and is currently known from 7
rivers (including the Nolichucky River,
a French Broad River tributary, above
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
34199
the backwaters of Douglas Reservoir)
(Service 1984f; Parmalee and Bogan
1998). No downlisting criteria are given
in the recovery plan. The delisting
objectives for the fine-rayed pigtoe
(Service 1984f) are to: (1) Restore viable
populations to the Clinch, Powell, and
North Fork Holston Rivers, to the Little
River and Copper Creek (Clinch River
tributaries), and to the Elk River
(Tennessee), Sequatchie River
(Tennessee), and the Paint Rock River
(Alabama); (2) reestablish or discover
one viable population in an additional
river; (3) ensure that the species is
protected from present and foreseeable
threats to the continued existence of any
population, and (4) determine that
noticeable improvements in coal-related
problems and substrate quality have
occurred in the Powell River and that no
increase in coal or other energy-related
impacts occurs in the Clinch River.
The orangefoot pimpleback
(pearlymussel) (Plethobasus
cooperianus) (Lea 1834) was listed as an
endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41
FR 24062). We completed a recovery
plan for the species in August 1984
(Service 1984g). It historically occurred
in the Ohio, Cumberland, and
Tennessee River systems, including the
lower French Broad and Holston Rivers
(Parmalee and Bogan 1998). The species
persists in the lower Ohio, Tennessee,
and Cumberland Rivers (Service 1984g).
In 2005, three adults were taken from
the Ohio River and moved to the
Kentucky Department of Fish and
Wildlife Resources’ propagation facility
in Frankfort, Kentucky (Leroy Koch,
USFWS, pers. comm. 2005). No
downlisting criteria are given in this
recovery plan. The delisting objectives
for the orangefoot pimpleback (Service
1984g) are to ensure that: (1) One viable
population exists in the Tennessee,
Cumberland, and Ohio Rivers and these
populations are dispersed throughout
each river so that it would be unlikely
for any one event to cause the total loss
of any population; (2) viable
populations are reestablished or
discovered in two additional rivers; (3)
three year classes, including one year
class 10 years old or older, have
naturally produced in each population;
(4) no foreseeable threats exist that
would interfere with the survival of any
population; and (5) noticeable
improvements in water and substratum
quality have occurred where habitat has
been degraded.
The oyster mussel (Epioblasma
capsaeformis) (Lea 1834) was listed as
an endangered species on January 10,
1997 (62 FR 1647). Critical habitat was
designated for this species on August
31, 2004 (69 FR 53136). We finalized a
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
34200
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
recovery plan for the species in May
2004 (Service 2004). We also established
an NEP for the oyster mussel and 15
other federally listed mussels for a
section of the Tennessee River below
the Wilson Dam in Colbert and
Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June
14, 2001 (66 FR 32250). This mussel
historically occurred throughout much
of the Cumberlandian Region of the
Tennessee and Cumberland River
drainages (Gordon 1991). Small
populations now survive in a few river
reaches in both river systems (Gordon
1991). It was historically taken in the
lower French Broad River near its
confluence with the Holston, and a
population still survives in the
Nolichucky River, a French Broad River
tributary, above Douglas Reservoir
(Parmalee and Bogan 1998).
Archaeological records (Parmalee 1988)
of this species exist from the Little
Pigeon River, a lower French Broad
River tributary. The downlisting
objectives for the oyster mussel (Service
2004) call for the reestablishment/
discovery of six viable populations and
one naturally reproducing year class
within each viable population. The
delisting objectives are to: (1)
Reestablish or discover viable
populations in nine distinct streams in
the Cumberland River system, upper
Tennessee River system, and/or lower
Tennessee River system; (2) ensure that
the species is protected from present
and foreseeable threats to the continued
existence of any population; and (3)
ensure that two distinct naturally
reproducing year classes exist within
each of the viable populations.
The ring pink (mussel) (Obovaria
retusa) (Lamark 1819) was listed as an
endangered species on September 29,
1989 (54 FR 40109). We completed a
recovery plan for the species in March
1991 (Service 1991c). It historically
occurred in the Ohio River and many of
its large tributaries in Pennsylvania,
West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois,
Kentucky, Alabama, and Tennessee
(Service 1991c). Ortmann (1918) and
Parmalee and Bogan (1998) reported it
from the lower Holston River, and it has
been taken from an archeological site on
the lower French Broad River (Steve
Ahlstedt, USGS, pers. comm. 1998). It
likely still survives in very low numbers
in the Green River in Kentucky, the
Tennessee River in Tennessee and
Kentucky, and the Cumberland River in
Tennessee (Service 1991c; Parmalee and
Bogan 1998). In 2004 and 2005, three
juveniles and one adult male were
found in the Green River (Leroy Koch,
USFWS, pers. comm. 2005). The adult
male was taken to the Kentucky
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Resources’ (KDFWR) propagation
facility in Frankfort, Kentucky. KDFWR
plans to progagate this species to
augment existing populations and
develop new ones, such as the lower
French Broad and lower Holston Rivers.
The downlisting objectives for the ring
pink (Service 1991c) are to: (1) Protect
existing populations, reestablish
historical populations, and/or discover
new populations so that at least six
distinct populations exist; and (2)
ensure that studies of the species’
biological and ecological requirements
are complete and that any required
recovery measures developed and
implemented from these studies are
beginning to succeed. The delisting
objectives are to: (1) Protect existing
populations, reestablish historical
populations, and/or discover new
populations so that at least nine distinct
populations exist; (2) ensure that studies
of the species’ biological and ecological
requirements are complete and that any
required recovery measures developed
and implemented from these studies are
successful; (3) ensure that no
foreseeable threats exist which would
likely impact the species’ survival over
a significant portion of its range; and (4)
ensure that noticeable improvements in
water and substratum quality have
occurred where habitat has been
degraded.
The rough pigtoe (Pleurobema
plenum) (Lea 1840) was listed as an
endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41
FR 24062). We completed a recovery
plan for the species in August 1984
(Service 1984h). This widespread
species was historically known from 22
rivers in the Mississippi and Ohio River
systems (Service 1984h), including the
lower French Broad and Holston Rivers
(Parmalee and Bogan 1998).
Archaeological records (Parmalee 1988)
of this species exist from the Little
Pigeon River (a lower French Broad
River tributary). It is currently known
from the Green, Barren, Cumberland,
Tennessee, and Clinch Rivers (Parmalee
and Bogan 1998; Service 1984h). No
downlisting criteria are given in this
recovery plan. The delisting objectives
for the rough pigtoe (Service 1984h) are
to: (1) Protect existing populations,
reestablish historical populations, and/
or discover new populations so that at
least six distinct populations exist; (2)
ensure that these populations are
dispersed throughout each river so it
would be unlikely for any one event to
cause the total loss of any population;
(3) ensure that three year classes,
including one year class 10 years old or
older, have naturally produced in each
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
population; (4) ensure that no
foreseeable threats exist which would
interfere with the survival of any
population; and (5) ensure that
noticeable improvements in water and
substratum quality have occurred where
habitat has been degraded.
The shiny pigtoe (Fusconaia cor)
(Conrad 1834) was listed as an
endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41
FR 24062). We completed a recovery
plan for the species in July 1984
(Service 1984i). We also established an
NEP for the shiny pigtoe and 15 other
federally listed mussels for a section of
the Tennessee River below the Wilson
Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale
Counties, Alabama, on June 14, 2001 (66
FR 32250). It historically occurred in the
Tennessee River and 10 of its
tributaries. It is currently known from
five river systems: the Clinch, Powell,
North Fork Holston, Elk, and Paint Rock
(Service 1984i). It was historically
reported from the Tennessee River
around the mouth of the Holston and
French Broad Rivers, and it still occurs
in the North Fork Holston River (a
Holston River tributary) above Cherokee
Reservoir (Service 1984i; Parmalee and
Bogan 1998). No downlisting criteria are
given in the recovery plan. The delisting
objectives for the shiny pigtoe (Service
1984i) are to: (1) Restore viable
populations to the Clinch, Elk, Powell,
North Fork Holston, and Paint Rock
Rivers and to Copper Creek; (2)
reestablish or discover one viable
population in one additional river or
two river corridors; (3) ensure that the
species is protected from present and
foreseeable threats to the continued
existence of any population; and (4)
determine that noticeable improvements
in coal-related problems and substrate
quality have occurred in the Powell
River and that no increase in coal or
other energy-related impacts occurs in
the Clinch River.
The white wartyback (pearlymussel)
(Plethobasus cicatricosus) (Say 1829)
was listed as an endangered species on
June 14, 1976 (41 FR 24062). We
completed a recovery plan for the
species in September 1984 (Service
1984j). It occurred in the Ohio,
Cumberland, and Tennessee River
systems, including the lower Holston
River (Parmalee and Bogan 1998). It still
persists in the middle reaches of the
Tennessee River (Service 1984j). No
downlisting criteria are given in this
recovery plan. The delisting objectives
for the white wartyback (Service 1984j)
are to ensure that: (1) A viable
population exists in the Tennessee
River; (2) viable populations are
discovered or reestablished in two
additional rivers; (3) these populations
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
are dispersed so it is unlikely for any
one event to cause the total loss of the
species from that river system; (4) three
year classes, including one year class 10
years old or older, have been produced
in each reestablished population; and
(5) no foreseeable threats exist that
would interfere with the survival of any
population.
Anthony’s riversnail (Athearnia
anthonyi) (Budd in Redfield 1854) was
listed as an endangered species on April
15, 1994 (59 FR 17994). We completed
a recovery plan for the species in
August 1997 (Service 1997). We also
established an NEP for Anthony’s
riversnail and 16 other federally listed
mussels for a section of the Tennessee
River below the Wilson Dam in Colbert
and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on
June 14, 2001 (66 FR 32250). This snail
was historically found in the Tennessee
River and the lower reaches of some of
its tributaries from Muscle Shoals,
Colbert and Lauderdale Counties,
Alabama, upstream into the lower
French Broad River (Bogan and
Parmalee 1983; Service 1997).
Currently, two populations are known:
one in Limestone Creek in Limestone
County, Alabama, and one in the
Tennessee River and the lower portion
of the Sequatchie River (a tributary to
this reach of the Tennessee River) in
Tennessee and Alabama (Service 1997).
The downlisting objectives for
Anthony’s riversnail (Service 1997) are
to ensure that: (1) Four viable
populations exist; (2) two naturally
produced year classes exist in all four
populations; (3) biological studies on
the species are completed and recovery
measures are beginning to succeed; (4)
noticeable improvements in water and
substratum quality have occurred where
habitat is degraded; (5) each population
is protected from present and
foreseeable threats; and (6) all four
populations remain stable or increase
over a 10-year period. The delisting
objectives call for the establishment of
six viable populations in addition to
criteria (2) through (5) above.
Additionally, all six populations should
remain stable or increase over a 15-year
period.
The duskytail darter (Etheostoma
percnurum) (Jenkins 1994) was listed as
an endangered species on April 27, 1993
(58 FR 25758). We completed a recovery
plan for the species in March 1994
(Service 1994a). We also established an
NEP for the duskytail darter and three
other federally listed fishes for a section
of the Tellico River in Monroe County,
Tennessee, on August 12, 2002 (67 FR
52420). Although likely once more
widespread in the upper Tennessee and
middle Cumberland River systems,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
duskytail darters were historically
known from six populations: Little
River and Abrams Creek, Blount
County, Tennessee; Citico Creek,
Monroe County, Tennessee; Big South
Fork Cumberland River, Scott County,
Tennessee and McCreary County,
Kentucky; Copper Creek and the Clinch
River (this is one population), Scott
County, Virginia; and the South Fork
Holston River, Sullivan County, Virginia
(Service 1994a). The South Fork Holston
River population is apparently
extirpated. The Little River, Copper
Creek/Clinch River, and Big South Fork
Cumberland River populations are
extant but small and their viability is
uncertain. The Citgo Creek population is
healthy and viable. CFI has
reintroduced the species into Abrams
Creek in Tennessee, and there are
indications that it is becoming
reestablished (Rakes and Shute 2004a).
No historical records exist for the fish in
the lower French Broad or lower
Holston Rivers. However, we and others
believe it is likely that the species once
inhabited these waters (Rakes and Shute
1999). Our conclusion is based on the
following facts: (1) The species was
once likely much more widespread in
the Tennessee River system; (2) the
French Broad and Holston Rivers are
tributaries to the Tennessee River
between existing and historical
populations; (3) both river reaches
appear to contain suitable habitat for the
species; and (4) there were no physical
barriers that would have prevented the
species from inhabiting these waters.
The downlisting objectives for the
duskytail darter (Service 1994a) are to:
(1) Protect and enhance existing
populations and reestablish a
population so at least three distinct
viable duskytail darter populations
exist; (2) ensure that studies of the
species’ biological and ecological
requirements are complete and that any
required recovery measures developed
and implemented from these studies are
beginning to succeed; and (3) ensure
that no foreseeable threats exist that
would likely threaten the continued
existence of the three aforementioned
viable populations. The delisting
objectives are to: (1) Protect and
enhance existing populations and
reestablish populations so at least five
distinct viable duskytail darter
populations exist; (2) ensure that studies
of the species’ biological and ecological
requirements are complete and that any
required recovery measures developed
and implemented from these studies are
successful; and (3) ensure that no
foreseeable threats exist that would
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
34201
likely impact the survival of the five
aforementioned viable populations.
The pygmy madtom (Noturus
stanauli) (Etnier and Jenkins 1980) was
listed as an endangered species on April
27, 1993 (58 FR 25758). We completed
a recovery plan for the species in
September 1994 (Service 1994b). The
pygmy madtom, which was likely more
widespread in the Tennessee River
system, has been found, and still exists,
in only two short reaches of the Duck
and Clinch Rivers in Tennessee. These
river reaches are about 600 river miles
apart. No historical records exist for the
fish in the lower French Broad or lower
Holston Rivers. However, we and others
believe it is likely that it once inhabited
these waters (Rakes and Shute 1999).
Our conclusion is based on the same
facts outlined above for the duskytail
darter. The downlisting objectives for
the pygmy madtom (Service 1994b) are
to: (1) Protect and enhance existing
populations so that at least two distinct
viable populations exist; (2) ensure that
studies of the species’ biological and
ecological requirements are complete
and that any required recovery measures
developed and implemented from these
studies are beginning to succeed; and (3)
ensure that no foreseeable threats exist
that would likely impact the survival of
the two aforementioned viable
populations. No delisting criteria are
given in this recovery plan.
The slender chub (Erimystax cahni)
(Hubbs and Crowe 1956) was listed as
a threatened species on September 9,
1977, with critical habitat and a special
rule (42 FR 45526). The critical habitat
map was corrected on September 22,
1977 (42 FR 47840). We completed a
recovery plan for the species in July
1983 (Service 1983a). It was historically
known from the Clinch, Powell, and
Holston Rivers (Service 1983a). The
Holston River site is now under the
Cherokee Reservoir. The species has not
been found recently in the Powell River,
and its continued existence in the
Clinch River is represented by only one
specimen taken in recent years (P.
Rakes, pers. comm. 2002). However,
collections made over the years have
generally shown that specimens can
often be taken only sporadically and in
very small numbers. There has not been
a concerted effort to survey for the
slender chub in recent years. We believe
that once a slender chub survey is
funded, enough fish will exist to start a
propagation program. Although the
species has never been collected from
the lower French Broad system, we and
others believe the species once likely
inhabited these waters (Rakes and Shute
1999). Our conclusion is based on the
same facts outlined above for the
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
34202
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
duskytail darter. The delisting
objectives for the slender chub (Service
1983a) are to: (1) Protect and enhance
existing populations and/or reestablish
populations so that viable populations
exist in the Clinch and Powell Rivers;
(2) ensure, through reintroductions and/
or the discovery of new populations,
that one other viable population exists;
(3) ensure that noticeable improvements
in coal-related problems and substrate
quality have occurred in the Powell
River and that there is no increase in
coal-related sedimentation in the Clinch
River; and (4) protect the species from
threats that may adversely affect the
survival of the populations.
The spotfin chub (Erimonax
monachus) (Cope 1868) was listed as a
threatened species on September 9,
1977, with critical habitat and a special
rule (42 FR 45526). The critical habitat
map was corrected on September 22,
1977 (42 FR 47840). We completed a
recovery plan for the species in
November 1983 (Service 1983b). Two
NEPs have been established for the
spotfin chub. The first was established
for the spotfin chub and three other
federally listed fishes for a section of the
Tellico River in Monroe County,
Tennessee, on August 12, 2002 (67 FR
52420). The second was established for
the spotfin chub and the boulder darter
(Etheostoma wapiti) for a section of
Shoal Creek (a tributary to the
Tennessee River), Lauderdale County,
Alabama, and Lawrence County,
Tennessee on April 8, 2005 (70 FR
17916). This once widespread species
was historically known from 24 streams
in the upper and middle Tennessee
River system. Currently, it is extant in
only four rivers/river systems (Service
1983b; P. Shute, TVA, pers. comm.
2004). CFI has reintroduced the species
into Abrams Creek in Tennessee, and
there are indications that it has become
reestablished (Pat Rakes, CFI, pers.
comm. 2004). Historical records exist for
the species in the upper French Broad
and upper Holston River systems, and
the species still exists in the Holston
River system above the Cherokee
Reservoir (Service 1983b). We and our
partners believe the species once likely
inhabited the waters of the lower French
Broad and lower Holston Rivers. Our
conclusion is based on the same facts
outlined above for the duskytail darter.
The delisting objectives for the spotfin
chub (Service 1983b) are to: (1) Protect
and enhance existing populations and/
or reestablish populations so that viable
populations exist in the Buffalo River
system, upper Little Tennessee River,
Emory River system, and lower North
Fork Holston River; (2) ensure, through
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
reintroduction and/or the discovery of
two new populations, that viable
populations exist in two other rivers;
and (3) ensure that no present or
foreseeable threats exist that would
likely impact the survival of any
populations.
The yellowfin madtom (Noturus
flavipinnis) (Taylor 1969) was listed as
a threatened species on September 9,
1977, with critical habitat and a special
rule (42 FR 45526). The critical habitat
map was corrected on September 22,
1977 (42 FR 47840). We completed a
recovery plan for the species in June
1983 (Service 1983c). Two NEPs have
been established for the yellowfin
madtom. The first NEP was established
for a section of the North Fork Holston
River in Washington County, Virginia,
on August 4, 1988 (53 FR 29335). The
second NEP was established for the
yellowfin madtom and three other
federally listed fishes for a section of the
Tellico River in Monroe County,
Tennessee, on August 12, 2002 (67 FR
52420). It was historically known from
only seven streams (Service 1983c).
Three small extant populations still
exist, one each in Citco Creek, Copper
Creek and the Powell River. The species
was reintroduced into Abrams Creek,
and the population is becoming
reestablished (Pat Rakes, CFI, pers.
comm. 2004). Reintroductions into the
NEP section of the Tellico River are
ongoing, and early results are
promising. Although there are no
historical records from the lower
Holston River or French Broad River
system, we and others believe that the
species once likely inhabited these river
reaches (Rakes and Shute 1999). Our
conclusion is based on the same facts
outlined above for the duskytail darter.
The delisting objectives for the
yellowfin madtom (Service 1983c) are
to: (1) Protect and enhance existing
populations and/or reestablish
populations so that viable populations
exist in Copper Creek, Citico Creek, and
the Powell River; (2) reestablish or
discover viable populations in two
additional rivers; (3) ensure that
noticeable improvements in coal-related
problems and substrate quality have
occurred in the Powell River; and (4)
ensure that each population is protected
from present and foreseeable threats.
The recovery objectives in the
recovery plans for all of the 21 species
generally agree that, to reach recovery:
(1) Existing populations should be
restored to viable levels; (2) the species
should be protected from threats to their
continued existence; and (3) viable
populations should be reestablished in
historical habitat. The number of secure,
viable populations needed to achieve
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
recovery (existing and restored) varies
from species to species, depending on
the extent of the species’ probable
former range (i.e., historically
widespread species require a greater
number of populations for recovery than
species with historically more restricted
distributions). However, the
reestablishment of historical
populations is a critical component in
the recovery of all these species.
4. Reintroduction Site: At the request
of the TVA and the TWRA, biologists
from the Service, TVA, USGS, TWRA,
and Alabama Game and Fish Division
evaluated Tennessee River basin rivers
for mollusk recovery potential. The
biologists rated the French Broad River
downstream of Douglas Dam as having
a high potential for mollusk recovery
and the Holston River below Cherokee
Dam as having a medium potential
primarily due to water quality and flow
improvements to the tailwaters. In
letters dated May 28, 1998, and June 29,
1998, the TWRA’s Executive Director
recommended that we consider
reintroducing endangered mussels into
the French Broad River below Douglas
Dam and the Holston River below
Cherokee Dam under NEP status. In an
October 30, 1998, letter, the TWRA
provided us with a list of mussel species
(compiled by Tennessee mussel experts)
that historically or probably occurred in
these river reaches. In a December 9,
1998, letter to us, the TVA (the
managers of the dams above the
proposed NEP for hydroelectric power,
flood control, and recreation) expressed
support for mussel recovery efforts in
the Tennessee River valley streams and
tailwaters.
Based on successes in Abrams Creek
and the North Fork Holston River
(Washington County, Virginia) and CFI’s
intimate knowledge of nongame fishes
and their habitat needs, we contracted
with them to survey the lower French
Broad River and determine if we could
expand our listed fish recovery efforts
into this major Tennessee River
tributary. CFI determined that the lower
French Broad River contains potential
suitable habitat for the reintroduction of
the duskytail darter, pygmy madtom,
spotfin chub, and yellowfin madtom
(Rakes and Shute 1999). Additionally,
Rakes and Shute (CFI, pers. comm.
2004) stated that the lower Holston
River below Cherokee Dam could
potentially support a reintroduced
population of these fishes and that both
river reaches contain potential habitat
for slender chub reintroductions.
In a May 17, 1999, letter to us, the
TWRA’s Executive Director stated that
he concurred with the conclusions in
the report prepared by Rakes and Shute
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(1999). He recommended that we
consider designating NEP status in the
lower French Broad and Holston Rivers
for the eventual reintroduction of these
five fish species.
We previously established NEPs for
the birdwing pearlymussel, cracking
pearlymussel, Cumberland bean,
Cumberlandian combshell, Cumberland
monkeyface, fine-rayed pigtoe, oyster
mussel, shiny pigtoe, and Anthony’s
riversnail in the free-flowing reach of
the Tennessee River below the Wilson
Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale
Counties, Alabama (66 FR 32250). In
October 2003, 80 each of birdwing
pearlymussels, oyster mussels, and
dromedary mussels (dromedary mussels
are not part of the proposed Lower
French Broad/Lower Holston NEP) were
placed in the NEP area below Wilson
Dam. The status of these reintroduced
mussels was checked during the
summer of 2004. While it is too early to
determine whether or not the
reintroduced individuals will become
an established population, a significant
number of them have survived thus far,
indicating that the reintroduction has a
good chance of being successful. A total
of 2,370 Anthony’s riversnails have also
been placed in the NEP area and will be
monitored this spring. Establishment of
viable populations of these species in
both the Tennessee River below the
Wilson Dam under the existing
regulation and in the lower French
Broad and lower Holston Rivers, if this
proposed regulation is finalized, is an
objective in the recovery of these
species. However, it will take several
years of monitoring to fully evaluate if
populations of these species (and the
other species) have become established
and remain viable in these historic river
reaches.
Based on the presence of suitable
physical habitat, the positive response
of endemic aquatic species to habitat
improvements, improved quality of the
water being released from the dams, the
recommendations of the TWRA’s
Executive Director, and the evaluation
of biologists familiar with the lower
French Broad and Holston Rivers, we
believe the French Broad River
(downstream of Douglas Dam) and the
Holston River (downstream of Cherokee
Dam) are suitable for the reintroduction
of these 21 species with NEP status.
We propose to reintroduce these 21
species into historical habitat of the
free-flowing reach of the French Broad
River from RM 22.3 (35.7 km)
(approximately 10 RM (16 km) below
Douglas Dam), Knox and Sevier
Counties, Tennessee, to the backwaters
of Fort Loudoun Reservoir, upstream of,
but near the confluence with the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Holston River, Knox County, Tennessee,
and in the free-flowing reach of the
Holston River, Knox, Grainger, and
Jefferson Counties, Tennessee, from
above the backwaters of Fort Loudoun
Reservoir just upstream of its
confluence with the French Broad River,
upstream to RM 42.3 (67.7 km)
(approximately 10 RM (16 km) below
Cherokee Dam). These river reaches
contain the most suitable habitat for the
reintroductions. None of these 21
species are known to currently exist in
these river reaches, in tributaries to
these reaches, or have free access to
these reaches.
5. Reintroduction Procedures: The
dates for these proposed
reintroductions, the actual number of
individuals to be released, and the
specific release sites cannot be
determined at this time.
Mussel propagation and juvenile
rearing technology are currently being
refined, and juvenile mussels of some
species could be available for
reintroduction soon after a NEP rule is
finalized. Individual endangered
mussels that would be used for these
proposed reintroductions will be
primarily artificially propagated
juveniles. However, it is possible that
wild adult stock of some mussels could
also be released into the area. The
parent stock for mussel propagation will
come from existing wild populations in
the Tennessee, Cumberland, and Ohio
Rivers, and in most cases, adults will be
returned to the capture site. Under some
circumstances, adult endangered
mussels could be permanently relocated
(i.e., kept in captivity for their entire
life) to propagation facilities or moved
directly into the NEP area after being
used for propagation purposes. A permit
under section 10 of the ESA would be
needed for handling and maintaining
threatened and endangered species in
captivity.
Anthony’s riversnails will be
collected for the proposed
reintroductions from a large naturally
reproducing population located in the
Tennessee River, Jackson County,
Alabama, and Marion County,
Tennessee, and relocated directly into
the NEP.
Individual fishes that would be used
for these proposed reintroductions will
be primarily artificially propagated
juveniles. However, it is possible that
wild adult stock of some fishes could
also be released into the NEP area.
Propagation and juvenile rearing
technology is available for the spotfin
chub, slender chub, and duskytail
darter. Limited numbers of yellowfin
madtom juveniles can be reared using
eggs and larvae taken from the wild, and
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
34203
some pygmy madtoms can be
propagated. However, madtom
propagation technology, which is
needed to produce large numbers of
juvenile madtoms, needs further
development. The parental stock for fish
propagation and reintroductions will
come from wild populations. Duskytail
darters will likely come from Little
River in Tennessee. Yellowfin madtoms
will likely come from the Powell River
in Tennessee. Spotfin chubs will likely
come from upstream in the Holston
River system above Cherokee Dam in
Tennessee. Pygmy madtoms will come
from the Clinch River in Tennessee.
Slender chubs will come from the upper
Tennessee River basin in Tennessee and
Virginia. In some cases, the parents will
be returned to the wild population from
which they were taken. However, in
most cases, adult fishes will be
permanently relocated to propagation
facilities.
To help ensure the genetic integrity of
the reintroduced species and to match
as closely as possible the genetic
composition of the historical
populations, we will observe the
following guidelines: (1) To reduce
homozygosity, at least 10 gravid female
mussels, 10 fishes, and 10 snails,
whenever possible, will be used as
parental stock over the life of the
reintroduction project (if this number
cannot be obtained for very rare species,
we will use whatever number is
available); and (2) to match as closely as
possible the genetic composition of the
species that once existed in the lower
French Broad and Holston Rivers, the
adults and brood stock for the proposed
reintroductions will be collected using
the following criteria (in order of
decreasing importance): (a) Donor
animals will be collected from
populations in adjacent stream/tributary
systems in the same physiographic
province, (b) donor animals will be
collected from populations in adjacent
stream/tributary systems in an adjacent
physiographic province, and (c) donor
animals will be collected from the only
population with a sufficient number of
adults to produce progeny.
The permanent removal of adults
(mollusks and fishes) from the wild for
their use in proposed reintroduction
efforts is allowable when the following
conditions exist: (1) Sufficient numbers
of adults are available within a donor
population to sustain the loss without
jeopardizing the species; (2) the species
must be removed from an area because
of an imminent threat that is likely to
eliminate the population or specific
individuals present in an area; or (3) the
population is not reproducing (see 50
CFR 17.22). For these 21 species, it is
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
34204
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
most likely that adults will be
permanently removed because of the
first condition. However, fewer adults
will be needed for propagation than for
actually moving individuals from a
donor population to the NEP. An
enhancement of propagation or survival
permit under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the
Act must be issued before any take
occurs. We will coordinate these
proposed actions with the Service’s
appropriate lead regions and State
natural resources agencies.
6. Status of Reintroduced
Populations: Previous translocations,
propagations, and reintroductions of
many of these species have not affected
their wild populations. The use of
artificially propagated juveniles will
further reduce the potential effects on
wild populations since fewer adults
would be needed from the donor
population. If any of the reintroduced
populations become established and are
subsequently lost, the likelihood of the
species’ survival in the wild would not
be appreciably reduced because either
the reintroduced individuals will be
from propagated stock or the donor
population will be of sufficient size to
handle movement of adults. Therefore,
we have determined that the
reintroduced populations of these 21
species in the lower French Broad and
Holston Rivers are not essential to the
continued existence of these species.
We will ensure, through our section 10
permit authority and the section 7
consultation process, that the use of
animals from any donor population for
these proposed reintroductions is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the species.
7. Location of Reintroduced
Population: The NEP area, which
encompasses all the sites for the
proposed reintroductions, will extend
from the base of Douglas Dam down the
French Broad River, Knox and Sevier
Counties, Tennessee, to its confluence
with the Holston River; then up the
Holston River, Knox, Grainger, and
Jefferson Counties, Tennessee, to the
base of Cherokee Dam; and the lower 5
RM (8 km) of all tributaries that enter
these river reaches.
Section 10(j) of the Act requires that
an experimental population be
geographically separate from other wild
populations of the same species. The
proposed NEP area is totally isolated
from existing populations of these
species by large reservoirs, and none of
these species are known to occur in, or
are likely to move through, large
reservoir habitat. Therefore, these
reservoirs will act as barriers to the
expansion of these species into other
sections of the Tennessee River basin
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
and will ensure that the proposed NEPs
remain geographically isolated and
easily distinguishable from existing
wild populations. Based on the habitat
requirements of these mollusks and
fishes, we do not expect them to become
established outside the proposed NEP
area. However, if any of the
reintroduced species move outside the
designated NEP area, then the animals
would be considered to have come from
the NEP area. In that case, we may
propose to amend this rule to enlarge
the boundaries of the NEP area to
include the entire range of the expanded
population(s).
The designated NEP area for the
duskytail darter, spotfin chub, and
yellowfin madtom in the Tellico River
(67 FR 52420) does not overlap or
interfere with this proposed NEP area
for the lower French Broad and lower
Holston Rivers in Tennessee because
they are geographically separated river
reaches. The designated NEP for the
spotfin chub in Shoal Creek, Tennessee,
(67 FR 17916) does not overlap or
interfere with this proposed NEP area
for the lower French Broad and lower
Holston rivers in Tennessee because
they are geographically separated river
reaches. The designated NEP for the
spotfin chub in Shoal Creek, Tennessee,
(67 FR 17916) does not overlap or
interfere with this proposed NEP area
for the lower French Broad and lower
Holston rivers in Tennessee because
they are geographically separated river
reaches.
Similarly, the NEP for the yellowfin
madtom in the North Fork Holston River
(53 FR 29335) is separated by reservoirs
and long stretches of river that do not
contain yellowfin madtoms or their
habitat and acts as effective barriers
between madtom populations in the
North Fork Holston River and the
proposed NEP in the lower Holston
River.
The designated NEP area for the
birdwing pearlymussel, cracking
pearlymussel, Cumberland bean,
Cumberlandian combshell, Cumberland
monkeyface, dromedary pearlymussel,
fine-rayed pigtoe, oyster mussel, shiny
pigtoe, tubercled blossom, and
Anthony’s riversnail in the Tennessee
River below the Wilson Dam (66 FR
32250) in Alabama does not overlap or
interfere with this proposed NEP area
for the lower French Broad and lower
Holston Rivers in Tennessee because
they are geographically separated river
reaches with several reservoirs between
them.
Critical habitat has been designed for
Cumberlandian combshell (69 FR
53136), oyster mussel (69 FR 53136),
slender chub (42 FR 45526), spotfin
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
chub (42 FR 45526), and yellowfin
madtom (42 FR 45526); however, none
of these designations include the
proposed NEP area. Critical habitat has
not been designated for the 16 other
species identified in this rule. Section
10(j)(2)(C)(ii) of the Act states that
critical habitat shall not be designated
for any experimental population that is
determined to be nonessential.
Accordingly, we cannot designate
critical habitat in areas where we have
already established, by regulation, a
nonessential experimental population.
8. Management: The aquatic resources
in the proposed reintroduction area are
managed by the TWRA and the TVA.
Multiple-use management of these
waters will not change as a result of the
NEP designation. The NEP designation
will not require the TWRA or the TVA
to specifically manage for reintroduced
species in the NEP area. Private
landowners within the NEP area will
still be allowed to continue all legal
agricultural and recreational activities.
Because of the substantial regulatory
relief provided by NEP designations, we
do not believe these proposed
reintroductions will conflict with
existing human activities or hinder
public use of the NEP area.
The Service, State, TVA, and CFI staff
will all be involved in the management
of the reintroductions. They will closely
coordinate on reintroductions,
monitoring, coordination with
landowners and land managers, and
public awareness, among other tasks
necessary to ensure successful
reintroductions of these species.
(a) Mortality: The regulations
implementing the Act define
‘‘incidental take’’ as take that is
incidental to, and not the purpose of,
the carrying out of an otherwise lawful
activity (50 CFR 17.3) such as recreation
(e.g., fishing, boating, wading, trapping,
or swimming), forestry, agriculture, and
other activities that are in accordance
with Federal, Tribal, State, and local
laws and regulations. A person may take
a listed species within the experimental
population area provided that the take
is unintentional and is not due to
negligent conduct. However, when we
have evidence of knowing (i.e.,
intentional) take of the listed species
within the NEP, we will refer matters to
the authorities for appropriate action.
We expect levels of incidental take to be
low since the reintroduction is
compatible with existing human use
activities and practices for the area.
(b) Special handling: Service
employees and authorized agents acting
on their behalf may handle these 21
species for scientific purposes; to
relocate them to avoid conflict with
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
human activities; for recovery purposes;
to relocate them to other reintroduction
sites; to aid sick or injured individuals;
and to salvage dead individuals.
(c) Coordination with landowners and
land managers: The Service and
cooperators identified issues and
concerns associated with the proposed
reintroduction of these 21 species before
preparing this proposed rule. The
proposed reintroduction also has been
discussed with potentially affected State
agencies, businesses, and landowners
within the proposed release area.
Affected State agencies, businesses,
landowners, and land managers,
including the TWRA and TVA, have
indicated support for the reintroduction
if the species released in the proposed
experimental population area are
established as an NEP and if aquatic
resource activities in the proposed
experimental population area are not
constrained.
(d) Potential for conflict with human
activities: We do not believe these
proposed reintroductions will conflict
with existing or proposed human
activities or hinder public use of the
NEP area within the French Broad and
Holston Rivers. Experimental
population special rules contain all the
prohibitions and exceptions regarding
the taking of individual animals. These
special rules are compatible with
routine human activities in the
reintroduction area.
(e) Monitoring: After the initial
stocking of these species, we will
monitor annually their presence or
absence and document any spawning
behavior or young-of-the-year that might
be present. This monitoring will be
conducted primarily by snorkeling or
seining and will be accomplished by
contracting with the appropriate species
experts. Annual reports will be
produced detailing the stocking rates
and monitoring activities that took place
during the previous year. We will also
fully evaluate these reintroduction
efforts after 5 and 10 years to determine
whether to continue or terminate the
reintroduction efforts.
(f) Public awareness and cooperation:
On January 12, 1999, we mailed letters
to 47 potentially affected Congressional
offices, Federal and State agencies, local
governments, and interested parties to
notify them that we were considering
proposing NEP status in the lower
French Broad and Holston Rivers for the
16 mollusks (at the time of this letter,
we had not yet decided to propose the
fish reintroductions). We received one
written response. The Tennessee
Department of Environment and
Conservation supported the
reintroduction of the mollusks under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
NEP status. It stated that NEP status
represents an appropriate step toward
promoting the species’ recovery while
protecting the rights and privileges of
Tennessee’s citizens.
We did not circulate a similar notice
regarding the potential of proposing
NEP status for the five fishes. The report
on the area’s suitability for fish
reintroductions (Rakes and Shute 1999)
was not available when the mollusk
notice was circulated. However, since
we received only one comment on the
mollusk notice, the TWRA and the TVA
both support the mollusk and fish
reintroductions under NEP status, and
the inclusion of these fishes in the
proposal would not result in any
additional impact to public or
government agency use of the river, we
did not believe it was necessary to
circulate a separate notice regarding
these fishes. In any case, through this
proposal, the public can comment on
the proposed NEP designation for these
fishes.
Through this notice, we are informing
the general public of the importance of
this reintroduction project in the overall
recovery of these 21 species. The
designation of the NEP for these reaches
of the French Broad and Holston Rivers
would provide greater flexibility in the
management of these reintroduced
species. The NEP designation is
necessary to secure needed cooperation
of the States, Tribes, landowners,
agencies, and other interests in the
affected area.
Finding
Based on the above information, and
using the best scientific and commercial
data available (in accordance with 50
CFR 17.81), the Service finds that
releasing the Appalachian monkeyface,
birdwing pearlymussel, cracking
pearlymussel, Cumberland bean,
Cumberlandian combshell, Cumberland
monkeyface, dromedary pearlymussel,
fanshell, fine-rayed pigtoe, orangefoot
pimpleback, oyster mussel, ring pink,
rough pigtoe, shiny pigtoe, white
wartyback, Anthony’s riversnail,
duskytail darter, pygmy madtom,
slender chub, spotfin chub, and
yellowfin madtom into the lower French
Broad and lower Holston Rivers
Experimental Population Area under a
Nonessential Experimental Population
designation will further the
conservation of these species.
Other Changes to the Regulations
In addition, we are making a minor
technical correction to the existing
regulation regarding the birdwing
pearlymussel. The birdwing pearly
mussel was listed on June 14, 1976 (41
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
34205
FR 24062), under the scientific name of
Conradilla caelata. The current list of
endangered and threatened species at 50
CFR 17.11(h) uses the scientific name of
Conradilla caelata for the birdwing
pearlymussel. In the latest edition of the
Common and Scientific Names of
Aquatic Invertebrates from the United
States and Canada published by the
American Fisheries Society, the
scientific name has been changed to
Lemiox rimosus (Turgeon et al. 1998).
This name change has occurred in a
peer-reviewed publication and has
acceptance in the scientific community.
Therefore, we are correcting the text for
the current list of endangered and
species at 50 CFR 17.11(h) and the
existing experimental population in the
free-flowing reach of the Tennessee
River below Wilson Dam in Alabama at
50 CFR 17.85 by changing the scientific
name for the birdwing pearlymussel
from Conradilla caelata to Lemiox
rimosus (see Regulation Promulgation
section below).
We are also making editorial changes
to 50 CFR 17.84(m) and 17.84(o). These
paragraphs currently provide NEP
information for multiple species;
§ 17.84(m) sets forth the Tellico River
NEP area for spotfin chub, duskytail
darter, and smoky madtom, while
§ 17.84(o) sets forth the Shoal Creek
NEP area for spotfin chub and boulder
darter. In this proposal, we reformat this
information into species-specific
paragraphs, so that each fish species has
its own NEP paragraph. These changes
are nonsubstantive; no existing NEP
areas would change as a result of the
reformatting. The changes are simply for
clarity and consistency, and to make
information easier for the public to find.
Finally, we are also making editorial
changes to replace the introductory text
at 50 CFR 17.85(a) with a table for
clarity. Again, this is a nonsubstantive
change; no existing NEP areas would
change as a result of the reformatting.
Public Comments Solicited
We intend that any final action
resulting from this proposal will be as
accurate and as effective as possible.
Therefore, we solicit comments or
suggestions from the public, other
concerned governmental agencies, the
scientific community, industry, or any
other interested parties concerning this
proposed rule. If you wish to comment
on this proposed rule, you may submit
your comments and materials
concerning this proposal by any one of
several methods (see ADDRESSES). All
submissions received must include the
agency name and RIN for this
rulemaking. Please include your name
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
34206
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
and return address in the body of your
message.
Comments submitted electronically
should be in the body of the e-mail
message itself or attached as a text file
(ASCII), and should not use special
characters or encryption. Please also
include ‘‘Attn: French Broad/Holston
Rivers NEP,’’ your full name, and your
return address in your e-mail message.
In the event that our Internet connection
is not functional, please contact the
Service by the alternative methods
mentioned in the ADDRESSES section.
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Respondents may request that we
withhold their home address, which we
will honor to the extent allowable by
law. There also may be circumstances in
which we would withhold a
respondent’s identity, as allowable by
law. If you wish for us to withhold your
name and/or address, you must state
this request prominently at the
beginning of your comment. However,
we will not consider anonymous
comments. To the extent consistent with
applicable law, we will make all
submissions from organizations or
businesses available for public
inspection in their entirety. Comments
and materials received will be available
for public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours at the
Tennessee Field Office (see ADDRESSES).
Copies of this proposed rule are
available on the Internet at https://
cookeville.fws.gov.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Peer Review
In conformance with our policy on
peer review, published on July 1, 1994
(59 FR 34270), we will seek the expert
opinions of at least three appropriate
and independent specialists regarding
this proposed rule. The purpose of such
review is to ensure that our NEP
designation is based on scientifically
sound data, assumptions, and analyses.
We will send copies of this proposed
rule to these peer reviewers
immediately following publication in
the Federal Register. We will invite
these peer reviewers to comment,
during the public comment period, on
the specific assumptions and
conclusions regarding the proposed
NEP.
We will consider all comments and
information received during the
comment period on this proposed rule
during preparation of a final
rulemaking. Accordingly, the final
decision may differ from this proposal.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Public Hearings
You may request a public hearing on
this proposal. Requests must be made in
writing at least 15 days prior to the close
of the public comment period and sent
to the Field Supervisor for the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service in Tennessee (see
ADDRESSES and DATES sections).
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866)
In accordance with the criteria in
Executive Order 12866, this proposed
rule to designate NEP status for and
reintroduce 15 endangered mussels, 1
endangered aquatic snail, 2 endangered
fishes, and 3 threatened fishes in the
free-flowing reach of the French Broad
River below Douglas Dam to its
confluence with the Holston River,
Knox County, Tennessee, and in the
free-flowing reach of the Holston River
below Cherokee Dam to its confluence
with the French Broad River is not a
significant regulatory action subject to
Office of Management and Budget
review. This rule will not have an
annual economic effect of $100 million
or more on the economy and will not
have an adverse effect on any economic
sector, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, or other units of
government. The area affected by this
rule consists of a very limited and
discrete geographic segment of the
lower French Broad River (about 32 RM
(51 km)) and the lower Holston River
(about 52 RM (83 km)) in eastern
Tennessee. Therefore, a cost-benefit and
economic analysis will not be required.
We do not expect this rule to have
significant impacts to existing human
activities (e.g., hydroelectric power
generation, flood control, agricultural
activities, fishing, boating, wading,
swimming, trapping) in the watershed.
These rivers already have populations of
the federally listed threatened snail
darter (Percina tanasi) and endangered
pink mucket mussel (Lampsilis
abrupta), both of which require Federal
agencies to consult with us under
section 7 of the Act if their activities
may are adversely affect these species.
The reintroduction of these federally
listed species, which will be
accomplished under NEP status with its
associated regulatory relief, is not
expected to impact Federal agency
actions. Because of the substantial
regulatory relief, we do not believe the
proposed reintroduction of these species
will conflict with existing or proposed
human activities or hinder public use of
the French Broad or Holston Rivers.
This rule will not create
inconsistencies with other agencies’
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
actions or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another
agency. Federal agencies most interested
in this rulemaking are primarily the
Environmental Protection Agency and
TVA.
This rule will not materially affect
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs, or the rights and obligations
of their recipients. Because there are no
expected impacts or restrictions to
existing human uses of the French
Broad and Holston Rivers as a result of
this rule, no entitlements, grants, user
fees, loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of their recipients are
expected to occur.
This rule does not raise novel legal or
policy issues. Since 1984, we have
promulgated section 10(j) rules for many
other listed species in various localities.
Such rules are designed to reduce the
regulatory burden that would otherwise
exist when reintroducing listed species
to the wild.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this document will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Although most of the
identified entities are small businesses
engaged in activities along the affected
reaches of these rivers, this rulemaking
is not expected to have any significant
impact on private activities in the
affected area. The designation of a NEP
in this rule will significantly reduce the
regulatory requirements regarding the
reintroduction of these species, will not
create inconsistencies with other
agencies’ actions, and will not conflict
with existing or proposed human
activity, or Federal, State, or public use
of the land or aquatic resources.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This proposed rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. This rule will not have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. It will not cause a
major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographical regions. This
rule does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises. The intent of this
special rule is to facilitate and continue
the existing commercial activity while
providing for the conservation of
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
species through reintroduction into
suitable habitat.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The proposed NEP designation will
not place any additional requirements
on any city, county, or other local
municipality. The TWRA, which
manages the fishes and mollusks in the
French Broad and Holston Rivers,
requested that we consider these
proposed reintroductions under a NEP
designation. However, they will not be
required to specifically manage for any
reintroduced species. Accordingly, this
proposed rule will not ‘‘significantly or
uniquely’’ affect small governments. A
Small Government Agency Plan is not
required since this rulemaking does not
require any action to be taken by local
or State government or private entities.
We have determined and certify
pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that
this rulemaking will not impose a cost
of $100 million or more in any given
year on local or State governments or
private entities (i.e., it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act).
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications. When
reintroduced populations of federally
listed species are designated as NEPs,
the Act’s regulatory requirements
regarding the reintroduced listed
species within the NEP are significantly
reduced. Section 10(j) of the Act can
provide regulatory relief with regard to
the taking of reintroduced species
within an NEP area. For example, this
rule allows for the taking of these
reintroduced mollusks and fishes when
such take is incidental to an otherwise
legal activity, such as recreation (e.g.,
fishing, boating, wading, trapping,
swimming), forestry, agriculture, and
other activities that are in accordance
with Federal, State, and local laws and
regulations. Because of the substantial
regulatory relief provided by NEP
designations, we do not believe the
reintroduction of these species will
conflict with existing or proposed
human activities or hinder public use of
the French Broad and Holston River
systems.
A takings implication assessment is
not required because this rule (1) will
not effectively compel a property owner
to suffer a physical invasion of property
and (2) will not deny all economically
beneficial or productive use of the land
or aquatic resources. This rule will
substantially advance a legitimate
government interest (conservation and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
34207
recovery of listed freshwater mussel,
snail, and fish species) and will not
present a barrier to all reasonable and
expected beneficial use of private
property.
number. This proposed rule does not
include any new collections of
information that require approval by
OMB under the Paperwork Reduction
Act.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, this rule does not have
significant federalism effects to warrant
the preparation of a federalism
assessment. This rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
in their relationship between the
Federal Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have
coordinated extensively with the State
of Tennessee on the proposed
reintroduction of these species into the
French Broad and Holston River
systems. The State wildlife agency in
Tennessee (TWRA) requested that we
undertake this rulemaking in order to
assist the State in the restoration and
recovery of its native aquatic fauna.
Achieving the recovery goals for these
species will contribute to their eventual
delisting and their return to State
management. No intrusion on State
policy or administration is expected;
roles and responsibilities of Federal or
State governments will not change; and
fiscal capacity will not be substantially
directly affected. This special rule
operates to maintain the existing
relationship between the States and the
Federal Government and is being
undertaken at the request of a State
agency (TWRA). We have cooperated
with the TWRA in the preparation of
this proposed rule. Therefore, this rule
does not have significant Federalism
effects or implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment
pursuant to the provisions of Executive
Order 13132.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
We have determined that the issuance
of this proposed rule is categorically
excluded from National Environmental
Policy Act requirements (516 DM 6,
Appendix 1.4 B(6)).
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that this proposed rule does
not unduly burden the judicial system
and that it meets the requirements of
sections (3)(a) and (3)(b)(2) of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
require that Federal agencies obtain
approval from OMB before collecting
information from the public. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 229511),
Executive Order 13175, and the
Department of the Interior Manual
Chapter 512 DM 2, we have evaluated
possible effects on federally recognized
Indian tribes and have determined that
there are no effects.
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (E.O.
13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. Executive Order
13211 requires agencies to prepare
Statements of Energy Effects when
undertaking certain actions. This rule is
not expected to significantly affect
energy supplies, distribution, and use.
Therefore, this action is not a significant
energy action and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
Clarity of This Regulation (E.O. 12866)
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write regulations that are easy
to understand. We invite your
comments on how to make this rule
easier to understand, including answers
to questions such as the following: (1)
Are the requirements in the rule clearly
stated? (2) Does the rule contain
technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the
format of the rule (grouping and order
of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its
clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to
understand if it were divided into more
(but shorter) sections? (5) Is the
description of the rule in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
the preamble helpful in understanding
the rule? (6) What else could we do to
make the rule easier to understand?
Send your comments concerning how
we could make this rule easier to
understand to: Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Department of the Interior,
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
34208
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Room 7229, 1849 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20240. You may also email your comments to:
Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available, upon request, from
the Cookeville, TN Field Office (see
ADDRESSES section).
Author
The principal author of this proposed
rule is Timothy Merritt, Cookeville
Field Office (see ADDRESSES section).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, we propose to amend
part 17, subchapter B of chapter I, title
50 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
set forth below:
PART 17—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 16 U.S.C.
1531–1544; 16 U.S.C. 4201–4245; Pub. L. 99–
625, 100 Stat. 3500; unless otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 17.11(h), the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife, as
follows:
a. Under the heading ‘‘FISHES,’’ by
revising the entries for ‘‘Chub, slender’’;
‘‘Chub, spotfin’’; ‘‘Darter, duskytail’’;
‘‘Madtom, pygmy’’; ‘‘Madtom, smoky’’;
and ‘‘Madtom, yellowfin’’ to read as set
forth below;
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
*
FISHES
Scientific name
*
*
*
*
Erimystax cahni ......
*
U.S.A. (TN, VA) ......
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
*
Chub, spotfin
Erimonax monachus
(=turquoise shiner).
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
*
Chub, slender ..........
*
U.S.A. (AL, GA, NC,
TN, VA).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
b. Under the heading ‘‘CLAMS,’’ by
revising the entries for ‘‘Bean,
Cumberland (pearlymussel)’’;
‘‘Combshell, Cumberlandian’’;
‘‘Fanshell’’; ‘‘Monkeyface, Appalachian
(pearlymussel)’’; ‘‘Monkeyface,
Cumberland (pearlymussel)’’; ‘‘Mussel,
oyster’’; ‘‘Pearlymussel, birdwing’’;
‘‘Pearlymussel, cracking’’;
‘‘Pearlymussel, dromedary’’; ‘‘Pigtoe,
fine-rayed’’; ‘‘Pigtoe, rough’’; ‘‘Pigtoe,
shiny’’; ‘‘Pimpleback, orangefoot
(pearlymussel)’’; ‘‘Pink, ring (mussel)’’;
and ‘‘Wartyback, white (pearlymussel)’’
to read as set forth below; and
c. Under the heading ‘‘SNAILS,’’ by
revising the entry for ‘‘Riversnail,
Anthony’s’’ to read as set forth below.
§ 17.11 Endangered and threatened
wildlife.
*
*
*
(h) * * *
Status
*
When listed
*
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
*
*
*
Entire, except where
listed as an experimental population.
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
*
T
*
28
17.95(e)
17.44(c)
....................
NA
17.84(r)
*
Entire, except where
listed as an experimental population.
*
T
*
28
17.95(e)
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
XN
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
*
*
*
17.44(c)
34209
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
Etheostoma
percnurum.
*
U.S.A. (TN, VA) ......
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
Darter, duskytail .......
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Do .....................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Status
When listed
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
U.S.A. (TN—The
Tellico River from
the backwaters of
theTellico Reservoir (about
Tellico River mile
19 (30.4 km)) upstream to Tellico
River mile 33
(52.8 km) in Monroe County.).
U.S.A. (AL, TN—
Shoal Creek, from
Shoal Creek mile
41.7 (66.7 km) at
the mouth of Long
Branch, Lawrence
County, TN,
downstream to
the backwaters of
Wilson Reservoir
(Shoal Creekmile
14 (22 km)) at
Goose Shoals,
Lauderdale County, AL, including
the lower 5 miles
(8 km) of all tributaries that enter
this reach.).
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
732
NA
17.84(m)
XN
747
NA
17.84(m)
XN
....................
NA
17.84(m)
*
Entire, except where
listed as an experimental population.
U.S.A. (TN—The
Tellico River from
the backwaters of
the Tellico Reservoir (about
Tellico River mile
19 (30.4 km)) upstream to Tellico
River mile 33
(52.8 km) in Monroe County.).
*
E
*
502
NA
NA
XN
732
NA
17.84(p)
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
*
34210
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
Status
......do ......................
......do ......................
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
*
Madtom, pygmy .......
*
Noturus stanauli .....
*
U.S.A. (TN) .............
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
Entire, except where
listed as an experimental population.
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
*
E
Do .....................
*
Madtom, smoky .......
*
Noturus baileyi ........
*
U.S.A. (TN) .............
Do .....................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
Entire, except where
listed as an experimental population.
U.S.A. (TN—
TheTellico River
from the backwaters of the
Tellico Reservoir
(about Tellico
River mile 19
(30.4 km)) upstream to Tellico
River mile 33
(52.8 km) in Monroe County.).
When listed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
....................
NA
*
502
NA
NA
....................
NA
17.84(s)
*
E
*
163
17.95(e)
NA
XN
732
NA
17.84(q)
XN
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
17.84(p)
*
*
34211
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
Madtom, yellowfin ....
Noturus flavipinnis ..
U.S.A. (TN, VA) ......
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
CLAMS
*
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
*
Bean, Cumberland
(pearlymussel).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
Villosa trabalis ........
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Entire, except where
listed as an experimental population.
U.S.A. (TN, VA—N.
Fork Holston
River Watershed,
VA, TN; S. Fork
Holston River, upstream to Ft. Patrick Henry Dam,
TN; Holston River,
downstream to
John Sevier Detention Lake Dam,
TN; and all tributaries thereto.).
U.S.A. (TN—The
Tellico River from
the backwaters of
the Tellico Reservoir (about
Tellico River mile
19 (30.4 km)) upstream to Tellico
River mile 33
(52.8 km) in Monroe County.).
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
Jkt 208001
*
*
U.S.A. (AL, KY, TN,
VA).
PO 00000
Frm 00017
When listed
T
Sfmt 4702
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
28
17.95(e)
17.44(c)
XN
317
NA
17.84(e)
XN
732
NA
17.84(e)
XN
....................
NA
17.84(e)
*
*
NA ...........................
Fmt 4701
Status
*
*
E
*
15
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
*
*
NA
NA
34212
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
......do ......................
......do ......................
Do ............................
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
Combshell,
Cumberlandian.
Do .....................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Do .....................
*
Epioblasma
brevidens.
......do ......................
*
U.S.A. (AL, KY, MS,
TN, VA).
......do ......................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Status
When listed
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)
(19 km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
709
NA
17.85(a)
XN
....................
NA
17.85(b)
*
NA ...........................
*
E
*
602
17.95(f)
NA
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)
(19 km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
XN
709
NA
17.85(a)
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
*
34213
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
Status
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
*
Fanshell ...................
*
Cyprogenia
stegaria(=irrorata).
*
NA ...........................
*
E
Do .....................
......do ......................
*
U.S.A. (AL, IL, IN,
KY, OH, PA, TN,
VA, WV).
......do ......................
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
*
Quadrula sparsa .....
*
U.S.A. (TN, VA) ......
*
NA ...........................
*
E
*
Monkeyface, Appalachian
(pearlymussel).
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
When listed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
....................
NA
*
391
NA
NA
....................
NA
17.85(b)
*
15
NA
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
17.85(b)
*
*
NA
34214
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
......do ......................
......do ......................
Monkeyface, Cumberland
(pearlymussel).
Do .....................
Quadrula intermedia
U.S.A. (AL, TN, VA)
......do ......................
......do ......................
Do .....................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
Epioblasma
capsaeformis.
*
U.S.A. (AL, GA, KY,
MS, NC, TN, VA).
*
Mussel, oyster .........
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Status
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
NA ...........................
XN
When listed
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
....................
NA
17.85(b)
E
15
NA
NA
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)(19
km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
709
NA
17.85(a)
XN
....................
NA
17.85(b)
*
NA ...........................
*
E
*
602
17.95(f)
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
*
NA
34215
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
......do ......................
......do ......................
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
Pearlymussel,
birdwing.
Do .....................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Do .....................
*
Lemiox rimosus ......
......do ......................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Status
When listed
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)(19
km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
709
NA
17.85(a)
XN
....................
NA
17.85(b)
*
U.S.A. (AL, TN, VA)
*
NA ...........................
*
E
*
15
NA
NA
......do ......................
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)(19
km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
XN
709
NA
17.85(a)
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
*
34216
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
......do ......................
......do ......................
Pearlymussel, cracking.
Do ............................
Hemistena lata .......
......do ......................
U.S.A. (AL, IL, IN,
KY, OH, TN, VA).
......do ......................
Do ............................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Do .....................
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
Pearlymussel, dromedary.
*
Dromus dromas ......
*
U.S.A. (AL, KY, TN,
VA).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:55 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Status
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
NA ...........................
XN
When listed
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
....................
NA
17.85(b)
E
366
NA
NA
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)
(19 km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
709
NA
17.85(a)
XN
....................
NA
17.85(b)
*
NA ...........................
*
E
*
15
NA
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
*
NA
34217
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Scientific name
Do ............................
......do ......................
......do ......................
Do ............................
......do ......................
......do ......................
*
Pigtoe, fine-rayed ....
Do ............................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Common name
*
Fusconaia cuneolus
......do ......................
*
U.S.A. (AL, TN, VA)
......do ......................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Status
When listed
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)
(19 km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
709
NA
17.85(a)
XN
....................
NA
17.85(b)
*
NA ...........................
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)
(19 km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
*
E
XN
*
15
709
NA
NA
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
*
NA
17.85(a)
34218
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Status
Scientific name
Do ............................
......do ......................
......do ......................
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
*
Pigtoe, rough ...........
*
Pleurobema plenum
Pigtoe, shiny ............
Do ............................
Fusconaia cor .........
......do ......................
U.S.A. (AL, TN, VA)
......do ......................
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
NA ...........................
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)(19
km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
When listed
*
E
......do ......................
*
U.S.A. (AL, IN, KY,
PA, TN, VA).
......do ......................
*
NA ...........................
Do ............................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Common name
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
....................
NA
*
15
NA
NA
XN
....................
NA
17.85(b)
E
XN
15
709
NA
NA
NA
17.85(a)
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
17.85(b)
*
34219
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Status
Scientific name
Do ............................
......do ......................
......do ......................
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
*
Pimpleback,
orangefoot
(pearlymussel).
Do ............................
*
Plethobasus
cooperianus.
*
U.S.A. (AL, IA, IL,
IN, KY, OH, PA,
TN).
......do ......................
*
NA ...........................
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
*
Obovaria retusa ......
*
U.S.A. (AL, IL, IN,
KY, OH, PA, TN,
WV).
*
NA ...........................
When listed
*
E
*
Pink, ring (mussel) ...
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Common name
*
E
VerDate Aug<31>2005
......do ......................
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
....................
NA
*
15
NA
NA
....................
NA
17.85(b)
*
369
NA
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
17.85(b)
*
*
NA
34220
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Status
Common name
Scientific name
Do ............................
......do ......................
......do ......................
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
*
Wartyback, white
(pearlymussel).
Do ............................
*
Plethobasus
cicatricosus.
......do ......................
*
U.S.A. (AL, IL, IN,
KY, TN).
......do ......................
*
NA ...........................
*
E
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
XN
*
SNAILS
*
*
Riversnail, Anthony’s
Do ............................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
When listed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
Athearnia anthonyi
......do ......................
15:34 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
*
*
U.S.A. (AL, GA, TN)
......do ......................
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Special
rules
....................
NA
*
15
NA
NA
....................
NA
17.85(b)
*
*
NA ...........................
U.S.A. (AL—The
free-flowing reach
of the Tennessee
River from the
base of Wilson
Dam downstream
to the backwaters
of Pickwick Reservoir (about 12
river mile (RM)
(19 km)), and the
lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to this
reach in Colbert
and Lauderdale
Counties.).
Critical
habitat
*
538
709
*
*
*
E
XN
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
17.85 (b)
*
*
NA
NA
NA
17.85(a)
34221
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Species
Vertebrate population where endangered or threatened
Historic range
Common name
Scientific name
Do ............................
......do ......................
*
*
Special rules—vertebrates.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Yellowfin madtom (Noturus
flavipinnis). (1) Where is the yellowfin
madtom designated as a nonessential
experimental population (NEP)? We
have designated three populations of
this species as NEPs: The North Fork
Holston River Watershed NEP, the
Tellico River NEP, and the French
Broad River and Holston River NEP.
(i) The North Fork Holston River
Watershed NEP area is within the
species’ historic range and is defined as
follows: The North Fork Holston River
watershed, Washington, Smyth, and
Scott Counties, Virginia; South Fork
Holston River watershed upstream to Ft.
Patrick Henry Dam, Sullivan County,
Tennessee; and the Holston River from
the confluence of the North and South
Forks downstream to the John Sevier
Detention Lake Dam, Hawkins County,
Tennessee. This site is totally isolated
from existing populations of this species
by large Tennessee River tributaries and
reservoirs. As the species is not known
to inhabit reservoirs and because
individuals of the species are not likely
to move 100 river miles through these
large reservoirs, the possibility that this
population could come in contact with
extant wild populations is unlikely.
(ii) The Tellico River NEP area is
within the species’ historic range and is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
U.S.A. (TN—French
Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, from the
base of Douglas
Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7
km)) downstream
to the confluence
with the Holston
River; then up the
Holston River,
Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson
Counties, to the
base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8
km) of all tributaries to these
reaches.).
*
3. Amend § 17.84 as follows:
a. Revise paragraphs (e), (m), and (o)
to read as set forth below; and
b. Add new paragraphs (p), (q), (r),
and (s) to read as set forth below.
§ 17.84
......do ......................
Jkt 208001
*
Status
XN
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
....................
*
defined as follows: The Tellico River,
between the backwaters of the Tellico
Reservoir (approximately Tellico River
mile 19 (30.4 kilometers) and Tellico
River mile 33 (52.8 kilometers), near the
Tellico Ranger Station, Monroe County,
Tennessee. This species is not currently
known to exist in the Tellico River or
its tributaries. Based on its habitat
requirements, we do not expect this
species to become established outside
this NEP area. However, if individuals
of this population move upstream or
downstream or into tributaries outside
the designated NEP area, we would
presume that they came from the
reintroduced population. We would
then amend this regulation to enlarge
the boundaries of the NEP area to
include the entire range of the expanded
population.
(iii) The French Broad River and
Holston River NEP area is within the
species’ historic range and is defined as
follows: The French Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, Tennessee, from
the base of Douglas Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7 km)) downstream to the
confluence with the Holston River; then
up the Holston River, Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson Counties, Tennessee, to
the base of Cherokee Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and the lower 5 RM (8 km)
of all tributaries that enter these river
reaches. This species is not known to
exist in any of the tributaries to the freeflowing reaches of the French Broad
River below Douglas Dam, Knox and
Sevier Counties, Tennessee, or of the
Holston River below the Cherokee Dam,
Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson Counties,
PO 00000
When listed
Sfmt 4702
*
Critical
habitat
Special
rules
NA
17.85(b)
*
Tennessee. Based on its habitat
requirements, we do not expect this
species to become established outside
this NEP area. However, if individuals
of this population move upstream or
downstream or into tributaries outside
the designated NEP area, we would
presume that they came from the
reintroduced population. We would
then amend this regulation to enlarge
the boundaries of the NEP area to
include the entire range of the expanded
population.
(iv) We do not intend to change the
NEP designations to ‘‘essential
experimental,’’ ‘‘threatened,’’ or
‘‘endangered’’ within the NEP areas.
Additionally, we will not designate
critical habitat for these NEPs, as
provided by 16 U.S.C. 1539(j)(2)(C)(ii).
(2) What activities are not allowed in
the NEP areas? (i) Except as expressly
allowed in paragraph (e)(3) of this
section, all the prohibitions of § 17.31
(a) and (b) apply to the yellowfin
madtom.
(ii) Any manner of take not described
under paragraph (e)(3) of this section is
prohibited in the NEP area. We may
refer unauthorized take of this species to
the appropriate authorities for
prosecution.
(iii) You may not possess, sell,
deliver, carry, transport, ship, import, or
export by any means whatsoever any of
the identified fishes, or parts thereof,
that are taken or possessed in violation
of paragraph (e)(2) of this section or in
violation of the applicable State fish and
wildlife laws or regulations or the Act.
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
34222
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(iv) You may not attempt to commit,
solicit another to commit, or cause to be
committed any offense defined in
paragraph (e)(2) of this section.
(3) What take is allowed in the NEP
area? Take of this species that is
accidental and incidental to an
otherwise legal activity, such as
recreation (e.g., fishing, boating, wading,
trapping, or swimming), forestry,
agriculture, and other activities that are
in accordance with Federal, State, and
local laws and regulations, is allowed.
(4) How will the effectiveness of these
reintroductions be monitored? After the
initial stocking of fish, we will monitor
annually their presence or absence and
document any spawning behavior or
young-of-the-year fish that might be
present. This monitoring will be
conducted primarily by snorkeling or
seining and will be accomplished by
contracting with the appropriate species
experts. We will produce annual reports
detailing the stocking rates and
monitoring activities that took place
during the previous year. We will also
fully evaluate these reintroduction
efforts after 5 and 10 years to determine
whether to continue or terminate the
reintroduction efforts.
(5) Note: Map of the NEP area for the
yellowfin madtom in the Tellico River,
Tennessee, appears immediately
following paragraph (m)(5) of this
section.
(6) Note: Map of the NEP area for the
yellowfin madtom in the French Broad
River and Holston River, Tennessee,
appears immediately following
paragraph (m)(7) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Spotfin chub (=turquoise shiner)
(Erimonax monachus).
(1) Where is the spotfin chub
designated as a nonessential
experimental population (NEP)? We
have designated three populations of
this species as NEPs: The Tellico River
NEP, the Shoal Creek NEP, and the
French Broad River and Holston River
NEP.
(i) The Tellico River NEP area is
within the species’ probable historic
range and is defined as follows: The
Tellico River, between the backwaters of
the Tellico Reservoir (approximately
Tellico River mile 19 (30.4 kilometers
(km)) and Tellico River mile 33 (52.8
km), near the Tellico Ranger Station,
Monroe County, Tennessee. This
species is not currently known to exist
in the Tellico River or its tributaries.
Based on its habitat requirements, we do
not expect this species to become
established outside this NEP area.
However, if individuals of this
population move upstream or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
downstream or into tributaries outside
the designated NEP area, we would
presume that they came from the
reintroduced population. We would
then amend this regulation to enlarge
the boundaries of the NEP area to
include the entire range of the expanded
population.
(ii) The Shoal Creek NEP area is
within the species’ historic range and is
defined as follows: Shoal Creek (from
Shoal Creek mile 41.7 (66.7 km)) at the
mouth of Long Branch, Lawrence
County, TN, downstream to the
backwaters of Wilson Reservoir (Shoal
Creek mile 14 (22 km)) at Goose Shoals,
Lauderdale County, AL, including the
lower 5 miles (8 km) of all tributaries
that enter this reach. This species is not
currently known to exist in the Shoal
Creek or its tributaries. Based on its
habitat requirements, we do not expect
this species to become established
outside this NEP area. However, if
individuals of this population move
upstream or downstream or into
tributaries outside the designated NEP
area, we would presume that they came
from the reintroduced population. We
would then amend this regulation to
enlarge the boundaries of the NEP area
to include the entire range of the
expanded population.
(iii) The French Broad River and
Holston River NEP area is within the
species’ historic range and is defined as
follows: the French Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, Tennessee, from
the base of Douglas Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7 km)) downstream to the
confluence with the Holston River; then
up the Holston River, Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson Counties, Tennessee, to
the base of Cherokee Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and the lower 5 RM (8 km)
of all tributaries that enter these river
reaches. This species is not known to
exist in any of the tributaries to the freeflowing reaches of the French Broad
River below Douglas Dam, Knox and
Sevier Counties, Tennessee, or of the
Holston River below the Cherokee Dam,
Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson Counties,
Tennessee. Based on its habitat
requirements, we do not expect this
species to become established outside
this NEP area. However, if individuals
of this population move upstream or
downstream or into tributaries outside
the designated NEP area, we would
presume that they came from the
reintroduced population. We would
then amend this regulation to enlarge
the boundaries of the NEP area to
include the entire range of the expanded
population.
(iv) We do not intend to change the
NEP designations to ‘‘essential
experimental,’’ ‘‘threatened,’’ or
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
‘‘endangered’’ within the NEP area.
Additionally, we will not designate
critical habitat for these NEPs, as
provided by 16 U.S.C. 1539(j)(2)(C)(ii).
(2) What activities are not allowed in
the NEP area? (i) Except as expressly
allowed in paragraph (m)(3) of this
section, all the provisions of § 17.31(a)
and (b) apply to the spotfin chub.
(ii) Any manner of take not described
under paragraph (m)(3) of this section is
prohibited in the NEP area. We may
refer unauthorized take of this species to
the appropriate authorities for
prosecution.
(iii) You may not possess, sell,
deliver, carry, transport, ship, import, or
export by any means whatsoever any of
the identified fishes, or parts thereof,
that are taken or possessed in violation
of paragraph (m)(2) of this section or in
violation of the applicable State fish and
wildlife laws or regulations or the Act.
(iv) You may not attempt to commit,
solicit another to commit, or cause to be
committed any offense defined in
paragraph (m)(2) of this section.
(3) What take is allowed in the NEP
area? Take of this species that is
accidental and incidental to an
otherwise legal activity, such as
recreation (e.g., fishing, boating, wading,
trapping, or swimming), forestry,
agriculture, and other activities that are
in accordance with Federal, State, and
local laws and regulations, is allowed.
(4) How will the effectiveness of these
reintroductions be monitored? (i) In the
Tellico River NEP area, we will prepare
periodic progress reports and fully
evaluate these reintroduction efforts
after 5 and 10 years to determine
whether to continue or terminate the
reintroduction efforts.
(ii) In the Shoal Creek NEP area and
the French Broad River and Holston
River NEP area, after the initial stocking
of fish, we will monitor annually their
presence or absence and document any
spawning behavior or young-of-the-year
fish that might be present. This
monitoring will be conducted primarily
by snorkeling or seining and will be
accomplished by contracting with the
appropriate species experts. We will
produce annual reports detailing the
stocking rates and monitoring activities
that took place during the previous year.
We will also fully evaluate these
reintroduction efforts after 5 and 10
years to determine whether to continue
or terminate the reintroduction efforts.
(5) Note: Map of the Tellico River NEP
area for spotfin chub, dusky darter,
smoky madtom, and yellowfin madtom
in Tennessee follows:
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
34223
EP13JN06.017
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
34224
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
EP13JN06.018
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
(6) Note: Map of the Shoal Creek NEP
area for spotfin chub and boulder darter
in Tennessee and Alabama follows:
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
darter, pygmy madtom, and yellowtail
madtom in Tennessee follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
EP13JN06.019
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
(7) Note: Map of the French Broad
River and Holston River NEP area for
spotfin chub, slender chub, duskytail
34225
34226
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Boulder darter (Etheostoma
wapiti).
(1) Where is the boulder darter
designated as a nonessential
experimental population (NEP)? (i) The
NEP area for the boulder darter is within
the species’ historic range and is
defined as follows: Shoal Creek (from
Shoal Creek mile 41.7 (66.7 km)) at the
mouth of Long Branch, Lawrence
County, TN, downstream to the
backwaters of Wilson Reservoir (Shoal
Creek mile 14 (22 km)) at Goose Shoals,
Lauderdale County, AL, including the
lower 5 miles (8 km) of all tributaries
that enter this reach.
(ii) The boulder darter is not currently
known to exist in Shoal Creek or its
tributaries. Based on the habitat
requirements of this fish, we do not
expect it to become established outside
the NEP area. However, if any
individuals of the species move
upstream or downstream or into
tributaries outside the designated NEP
area, we would presume that they came
from the reintroduced population. We
would then amend paragraph (o)(1)(i) of
this section to enlarge the boundaries of
the NEP area to include the entire range
of the expanded population.
(iii) We do not intend to change the
NEP designations to ‘‘essential
experimental,’’ ‘‘threatened,’’ or
‘‘endangered’’ within the NEP area.
Additionally, we will not designate
critical habitat for these NEPs, as
provided by 16 U.S.C. 1539(j)(2)(C)(ii).
(2) What activities are not allowed in
the NEP area? (i) Except as expressly
allowed in paragraph (o)(3) of this
section, all the provisions of § 17.31(a)
and (b) apply to the boulder darter.
(ii) Any manner of take not described
under paragraph (o)(3) of this section is
prohibited in the NEP area. We may
refer unauthorized take of these species
to the appropriate authorities for
prosecution.
(iii) You may not possess, sell,
deliver, carry, transport, ship, import, or
export by any means whatsoever any of
the identified fishes, or parts thereof,
that are taken or possessed in violation
of paragraph (o)(2) of this section or in
violation of the applicable State fish and
wildlife laws or regulations or the Act.
(iv) You may not attempt to commit,
solicit another to commit, or cause to be
committed any offense defined in
paragraph (o)(2) of this section.
(3) What take is allowed in the NEP
area? Take of this species that is
accidental and incidental to an
otherwise legal activity, such as
recreation (e.g., fishing, boating, wading,
trapping, or swimming), forestry,
agriculture, and other activities that are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
in accordance with Federal, State, and
local laws and regulations, is allowed.
(4) How will the effectiveness of these
reintroductions be monitored? After the
initial stocking of fish, we will monitor
annually their presence or absence and
document any spawning behavior or
young-of-the-year fish that might be
present. This monitoring will be
conducted primarily by snorkeling or
seining and will be accomplished by
contracting with the appropriate species
experts. We will produce annual reports
detailing the stocking rates and
monitoring activities that took place
during the previous year. We will also
fully evaluate these reintroduction
efforts after 5 and 10 years to determine
whether to continue or terminate the
reintroduction efforts.
(5) Note: Map of the NEP area for the
boulder darter in the Shoal Creek,
Tennessee and Alabama, appears
immediately following paragraph (m)(6)
of this section.
(p) Duskytail darter (Etheostoma
percnurum).
(1) Where is the duskytail darter
designated as a nonessential
experimental population (NEP)? We
have designated two populations of this
species as NEPs: The Tellico River NEP
and the French Broad River and Holston
River NEP.
(i) The Tellico River NEP area is
within the species’ historic range and is
defined as follows: The Tellico River,
between the backwaters of the Tellico
Reservoir (approximately Tellico River
mile 19 (30.4 kilometers) and Tellico
River mile 33 (52.8 kilometers), near the
Tellico Ranger Station, Monroe County,
Tennessee. This species is not currently
known to exist in the Tellico River or
its tributaries. Based on its habitat
requirements, we do not expect this
species to become established outside
this NEP area. However, if individuals
of this population move upstream or
downstream or into tributaries outside
the designated NEP area, we would
presume that they came from the
reintroduced population. We would
then amend this regulation to enlarge
the boundaries of the NEP area to
include the entire range of the expanded
population.
(ii) The French Broad River and
Holston River NEP area is within the
species’ historic range and is defined as
follows: the French Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, Tennessee, from
the base of Douglas Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7 km)) downstream to the
confluence with the Holston River; then
up the Holston River, Knox, Grainger,
and Jefferson Counties, Tennessee, to
the base of Cherokee Dam (RM 52.3
(83.7 km)); and the lower 5 RM (8 km)
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
of all tributaries that enter these river
reaches. This species is not known to
exist in any of the tributaries to the freeflowing reaches of the French Broad
River below Douglas Dam, Knox and
Sevier Counties, Tennessee, or of the
Holston River below the Cherokee Dam,
Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson Counties,
Tennessee. Based on its habitat
requirements, we do not expect this
species to become established outside
this NEP area. However, if individuals
of this population move upstream or
downstream or into tributaries outside
the designated NEP area, we would
presume that they came from the
reintroduced population. We would
then amend this regulation to enlarge
the boundaries of the NEP area to
include the entire range of the expanded
population.
(iii) We do not intend to change the
NEP designations to ‘‘essential
experimental,’’ ‘‘threatened,’’ or
‘‘endangered’’ within the NEP area.
Additionally, we will not designate
critical habitat for these NEPs, as
provided by 16 U.S.C. 1539(j)(2)(C)(ii).
(2) What activities are not allowed in
the NEP area? (i) Except as expressly
allowed in paragraph (q)(3) of this
section, all the prohibitions of § 17.31(a)
and (b) apply to the duskytail darter.
(ii) Any manner of take not described
under paragraph (q)(3) of this section is
prohibited in the NEP area. We may
refer unauthorized take of this species to
the appropriate authorities for
prosecution.
(iii) You may not possess, sell,
deliver, carry, transport, ship, import, or
export by any means whatsoever any of
the identified fishes, or parts thereof,
that are taken or possessed in violation
of paragraph (q)(2) of this section or in
violation of the applicable State fish and
wildlife laws or regulations or the Act.
(iv) You may not attempt to commit,
solicit another to commit, or cause to be
committed any offense defined in
paragraph (q)(2) of this section.
(3) What take is allowed in the NEP
area? Take of this species that is
accidental and incidental to an
otherwise legal activity, such as
recreation (e.g., fishing, boating, wading,
trapping, or swimming), forestry,
agriculture, and other activities that are
in accordance with Federal, State, and
local laws and regulations, is allowed.
(4) How will the effectiveness of these
reintroductions be monitored? After the
initial stocking of fish, we will monitor
annually their presence or absence and
document any spawning behavior or
young-of-the-year fish that might be
present. This monitoring will be
conducted primarily by snorkeling or
seining and will be accomplished by
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
contracting with the appropriate species
experts. We will produce annual reports
detailing the stocking rates and
monitoring activities that took place
during the previous year. We will also
fully evaluate these reintroduction
efforts after 5 and 10 years to determine
whether to continue or terminate the
reintroduction efforts.
(5) Note: Map of the NEP area for the
duskytail darter in the Tellico River,
Tennessee, appears immediately
following paragraph (m)(5) of this
section.
(6) Note: Map of the NEP area for the
duskytail darter in the French Broad
River and Holston River, Tennessee,
appears immediately following
paragraph (m)(7) of this section.
(q) Smoky madtom (Noturus baileyi).
(1) Where is the smoky madtom
designated as a nonessential
experimental population (NEP)? (i) The
NEP area for the smoky madtom is
within the species’ probable historic
range and is defined as follows: The
Tellico River, between the backwaters of
the Tellico Reservoir (approximately
Tellico River mile 19 (30.4 kilometers)
and Tellico River mile 33 (52.8
kilometers), near the Tellico Ranger
Station, Monroe County, Tennessee.
(ii) The smoky madtom is not
currently known to exist in the Tellico
River or its tributaries. Based on the
habitat requirements of this fish, we do
not expect it to become established
outside the NEP area. However, if any
individuals of the species move
upstream or downstream or into
tributaries outside the designated NEP
area, we would presume that they came
from the reintroduced population. We
would then amend paragraph (r)(1)(i) of
this section to enlarge the boundaries of
the NEP area to include the entire range
of the expanded population.
(iii) We do not intend to change the
NEP designations to ‘‘essential
experimental,’’ ‘‘threatened,’’ or
‘‘endangered’’ within the NEP area.
Additionally, we will not designate
critical habitat for this NEP, as provided
by 16 U.S.C. 1539(j)(2)(C)(ii).
(2) What activities are not allowed in
the NEP area? (i) Except as expressly
allowed in paragraph (r)(3) of this
section, all the prohibitions of § 17.31
(a) and (b) apply to the smoky madtom.
(ii) Any manner of take not described
under paragraph (r)(3) of this section is
prohibited in the NEP area. We may
refer unauthorized take of this species to
the appropriate authorities for
prosecution.
(iii) You may not possess, sell,
deliver, carry, transport, ship, import, or
export by any means whatsoever any of
the identified fishes, or parts thereof,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
that are taken or possessed in violation
of paragraph (r)(2) of this section or in
violation of the applicable State fish and
wildlife laws or regulations or the Act.
(iv) You may not attempt to commit,
solicit another to commit, or cause to be
committed any offense defined in
paragraph (r)(2) of this section.
(3) What take is allowed in the NEP
area? Take of this species that is
accidental and incidental to an
otherwise legal activity, such as
recreation (e.g., fishing, boating, wading,
trapping, or swimming), forestry,
agriculture, and other activities that are
in accordance with Federal, State, and
local laws and regulations, is allowed.
(4) How will the effectiveness of these
reintroductions be monitored? After the
initial stocking of fish, we will monitor
annually their presence or absence and
document any spawning behavior or
young-of-the-year fish that might be
present. This monitoring will be
conducted primarily by snorkeling or
seining and will be accomplished by
contracting with the appropriate species
experts. We will produce annual reports
detailing the stocking rates and
monitoring activities that took place
during the previous year. We will also
fully evaluate these reintroduction
efforts after 5 and 10 years to determine
whether to continue or terminate the
reintroduction efforts.
(5) Note: Map of the NEP area for the
smoky madtom in the Tellico River,
Tennessee, appears immediately
following paragraph (m)(5) of this
section.
(r) Slender chub (Erimystax cahni).
(1) Where is the slender chub
designated as a nonessential
experimental population (NEP)? (i) The
NEP area for the slender chub is within
the species’ historic range and is
defined as follows: The French Broad
River, Knox and Sevier Counties,
Tennessee, from the base of Douglas
Dam (river mile (RM) 32.3 (51.7 km))
downstream to the confluence with the
Holston River; then up the Holston
River, Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson
Counties, Tennessee, to the base of
Cherokee Dam (RM 52.3 (83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8 km) of all tributaries
that enter these river reaches.
(ii) The slender chub is not known to
exist in any of the tributaries to the freeflowing reaches of the French Broad
River below Douglas Dam, Knox and
Sevier Counties, Tennessee, or of the
Holston River below the Cherokee Dam,
Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson Counties,
Tennessee. Based on its habitat
requirements, we do not expect this
species to become established outside
this NEP area. However, if individuals
of this population move upstream or
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
34227
downstream or into tributaries outside
the designated NEP area, we would
presume that they came from the
reintroduced population. We would
then amend this regulation to enlarge
the boundaries of the NEP area to
include the entire range of the expanded
population.
(iii) We do not intend to change the
NEP designations to ‘‘essential
experimental,’’ ‘‘threatened,’’ or
‘‘endangered’’ within the NEP area.
Additionally, we will not designate
critical habitat for this NEP, as provided
by 16 U.S.C. 1539(j)(2)(C)(ii).
(2) What activities are not allowed in
the NEP area? (i) Except as expressly
allowed in paragraph (s)(3) of this
section, all the prohibitions of § 17.31
(a) and (b) apply to the slender chub.
(ii) Any manner of take not described
under paragraph (s)(3) of this section is
prohibited in the NEP area. We may
refer unauthorized take of this species to
the appropriate authorities for
prosecution.
(iii) You may not possess, sell,
deliver, carry, transport, ship, import, or
export by any means whatsoever any of
the identified fishes, or parts thereof,
that are taken or possessed in violation
of paragraph (s)(2) of this section or in
violation of the applicable State fish and
wildlife laws or regulations or the Act.
(iv) You may not attempt to commit,
solicit another to commit, or cause to be
committed any offense defined in
paragraph (s)(2) of this section.
(3) What take is allowed in the NEP
area? Take of this species that is
accidental and incidental to an
otherwise legal activity, such as
recreation (e.g., fishing, boating, wading,
trapping, or swimming), forestry,
agriculture, and other activities that are
in accordance with Federal, State, and
local laws and regulations, is allowed.
(4) How will the effectiveness of these
reintroductions be monitored? After the
initial stocking of fish, we will monitor
annually their presence or absence and
document any spawning behavior or
young-of-the-year fish that might be
present. This monitoring will be
conducted primarily by snorkeling or
seining and will be accomplished by
contracting with the appropriate species
experts. We will produce annual reports
detailing the stocking rates and
monitoring activities that took place
during the previous year. We will also
fully evaluate these reintroduction
efforts after 5 and 10 years to determine
whether to continue or terminate the
reintroduction efforts.
(5) Note: Map of the NEP area for the
slender chub in the French Broad River
and Holston River, Tennessee, appears
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
34228
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
immediately following paragraph (m)(7)
of this section.
(s) Pygmy madtom (Noturus stanauli).
(1) Where is the pygmy madtom
designated as a nonessential
experimental population (NEP)? (i) The
NEP area for the pygmy madtom is
within the species’ historic range and is
defined as follows: The French Broad
River, Knox and Sevier Counties,
Tennessee, from the base of Douglas
Dam (river mile (RM) 32.3 (51.7 km))
downstream to the confluence with the
Holston River; then up the Holston
River, Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson
Counties, Tennessee, to the base of
Cherokee Dam (RM 52.3 (83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8 km) of all tributaries
that enter these river reaches.
(ii) The pygmy madtom is not known
to exist in any of the tributaries to the
free-flowing reaches of the French Broad
River below Douglas Dam, Knox and
Sevier Counties, Tennessee, or of the
Holston River below the Cherokee Dam,
Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson Counties,
Tennessee. Based on its habitat
requirements, we do not expect this
species to become established outside
this NEP area. However, if individuals
of this population move upstream or
downstream or into tributaries outside
the designated NEP area, we would
presume that they came from the
reintroduced population. We would
then amend this regulation to enlarge
the boundaries of the NEP area to
include the entire range of the expanded
population.
(iii) We do not intend to change the
NEP designations to ‘‘essential
experimental,’’ ‘‘threatened,’’ or
‘‘endangered’’ within the NEP area.
Additionally, we will not designate
critical habitat for this NEP, as provided
by 16 U.S.C. 1539(j)(2)(C)(ii).
(2) What activities are not allowed in
the NEP area? (i) Except as expressly
allowed in paragraph (t)(3) of this
section, all the prohibitions of § 17.31
(a) and (b) apply to the pygmy madtom.
(ii) Any manner of take not described
under paragraph (t)(3) of this section is
prohibited in the NEP area. We may
refer unauthorized take of this species to
the appropriate authorities for
prosecution.
(iii) You may not possess, sell,
deliver, carry, transport, ship, import, or
export by any means whatsoever any of
the identified fishes, or parts thereof,
that are taken or possessed in violation
of paragraph (t)(2) of this section or in
violation of the applicable State fish and
wildlife laws or regulations or the Act.
(iv) You may not attempt to commit,
solicit another to commit, or cause to be
committed any offense defined in
paragraph (t)(2) of this section.
(3) What take is allowed in the NEP
area? Take of this species that is
accidental and incidental to an
otherwise legal activity, such as
recreation (e.g., fishing, boating, wading,
trapping, or swimming), forestry,
agriculture, and other activities that are
in accordance with Federal, State, and
local laws and regulations, is allowed.
(4) How will the effectiveness of these
reintroductions be monitored? After the
initial stocking of fish, we will monitor
annually their presence or absence and
document any spawning behavior or
young-of-the-year fish that might be
present. This monitoring will be
conducted primarily by snorkeling or
seining and will be accomplished by
contracting with the appropriate species
experts. We will produce annual reports
detailing the stocking rates and
monitoring activities that took place
during the previous year. We will also
fully evaluate these reintroduction
efforts after 5 and 10 years to determine
whether to continue or terminate the
reintroduction efforts.
(5) Note: Map of the NEP area for the
pygmy madtom in the French Broad
River and Holston River, Tennessee,
appears immediately following
paragraph (m)(7) of this section.
4. Amend § 17.85 by revising
paragraph (a) introductory text and the
heading of paragraph (a)(1), and adding
a new paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 17.85
Special rules—invertebrates.
(a) Seventeen mollusks in the
Tennessee River. The species in the
following table comprise nonessential
experimental populations (NEPs):
Common name
Scientific name
Alabama lampmussel .........................................................................................................................................
birdwing pearlymussel ........................................................................................................................................
Catspaw (purple cat’s paw pearlymussel) .........................................................................................................
clubshell .............................................................................................................................................................
cracking pearlymussel ........................................................................................................................................
Cumberland bean (pearlymussel) ......................................................................................................................
Cumberlandian combshell ..................................................................................................................................
Cumberland monkeyface (pearlymussel) ..........................................................................................................
dromedary pearlymussel ....................................................................................................................................
fine-rayed pigtoe ................................................................................................................................................
oyster mussel .....................................................................................................................................................
shiny pigtoe ........................................................................................................................................................
tubercled blossom (pearlymussel) .....................................................................................................................
turgid blossom (pearlymussel) ...........................................................................................................................
Winged mapleleaf (mussel) ...............................................................................................................................
yellow blossom (pearlymussel) ..........................................................................................................................
Anthony’s riversnail ............................................................................................................................................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
(1) Where are these mollusks
designated as NEPs? * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Sixteen mollusks in the French
Broad and Holston Rivers. The species
in the following table comprise
Lampsilis virescens.
Lemiox rimosus.
Epioblasma obliquata obliquata.
Pleurobema clava.
Hemistena lata.
Villosa trabalis.
Epioblasma brevidens.
Quadrula intermedia.
Dromus dromas.
Fusconaia cuneolus.
Epioblasma capsaeformis.
Fusconaia cor.
Epioblasma torulosa torulosa.
Epioblasma turgidula.
Quadrula fragosa.
Epioblasma florentina florentina.
Athearnia anthonyi.
nonessential experimental populations
(NEPs):
Common name
Scientific name
Appalachian monkeyface (pearlymussel) ..........................................................................................................
birdwing pearlymussel ........................................................................................................................................
cracking pearlymussel ........................................................................................................................................
Cumberland bean (pearlymussel) ......................................................................................................................
Cumberlandian combshell ..................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
Quadrula sparsa.
Lemiox rimosus.
Hemistena lata.
Villosa trabalis.
Epioblasma brevidens.
13JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Common name
Scientific name
Cumberland monkeyface (pearlymussel) ..........................................................................................................
dromedary pearlymussel ....................................................................................................................................
fanshell ...............................................................................................................................................................
fine-rayed pigtoe ................................................................................................................................................
orangefoot pimpleback (pearlymussel) ..............................................................................................................
oyster mussel .....................................................................................................................................................
ring pink (mussel) ...............................................................................................................................................
rough pigtoe .......................................................................................................................................................
shiny pigtoe ........................................................................................................................................................
white wartyback (pearlymussel) .........................................................................................................................
Anthony’s riversnail ............................................................................................................................................
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
(1) Where are these mollusks
designated as NEPs? (i) The NEP area
for these mollusks is within the species’
historical range and is defined as
follows: The French Broad River, Knox
and Sevier Counties, Tennessee, from
the base of Douglas Dam (river mile
(RM) 32.3 (51.7 kilometers (km))
downstream to the confluence with the
Holston River; then up the Holston
River, Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson
Counties, Tennessee, to the base of
Cherokee Dam (RM 52.3 (83.7 km)); and
the lower 5 RM (8 km) of all tributaries
that enter these river reaches. None of
the species identified in paragraph (b)
are known to exist in any of the
tributaries to the free-flowing reaches of
the French Broad River below Douglas
Dam, Knox and Sevier Counties,
Tennessee, or of the Holston River
below the Cherokee Dam, Knox,
Grainger, and Jefferson Counties,
Tennessee. Based on their habitat
requirements, we do not expect these
species to become established outside
this NEP area. However, if any
individuals are found upstream or
downstream or into tributaries outside
the designated NEP area, we would
presume that they came from the
reintroduced populations. We would
then amend paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this
section to enlarge the boundaries of the
NEP area to include the entire range of
the expanded population.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
(ii) Another NEP area for 10 of these
mollusks (Cumberland bean,
Cumberlandian combshell, Cumberland
monkeyface, oyster mussel, birdwing
pearlymussel, cracking pearlymussel,
dromedary pearlymussel, fine-rayed
pigtoe, shiny pigtoe, and Anthony’s
riversnail) is provided in paragraph (a)
of this section.
(iii) We do not intend to change the
NEP designations to ‘‘essential
experimental,’’ ‘‘threatened,’’ or
‘‘endangered’’ within the NEP area.
Additionally, we will not designate
critical habitat for these NEPs, as
provided by 16 U.S.C. 1539(j)(2)(C)(ii).
(2) What activities are not allowed in
the NEP area? (i) Except as expressly
allowed in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, all the prohibitions of § 17.31(a)
and (b) apply to the mollusks identified
in paragraph (b) of this section.
(ii) Any manner of take not described
under paragraph (b)(3) of this section
will not be allowed in the NEP area. We
may refer the unauthorized take of these
species to the appropriate authorities for
prosecution.
(iii) You may not possess, sell,
deliver, carry, transport, ship, import, or
export by any means whatsoever any of
the identified mollusks, or parts thereof,
that are taken or possessed in violation
of paragraph (b)(2) of this section or in
violation of the applicable State fish and
wildlife laws or regulations or the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
34229
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Quadrula intermedia.
Dromus dromas.
Cyprogenia stegaria.
Fusconaia cuneolus.
Plethobasus cooperianus.
Epioblasma capsaeformis.
Obovaria retusa.
Pleurobema plenum.
Fusconaia cor.
Plethobasus cicatricosus.
Athearnia anthonyi.
(iv) You may not attempt to commit,
solicit another to commit, or cause to be
committed any offense defined in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(3) What take is allowed in the NEP
area? Take of these species that is
accidental and incidental to an
otherwise legal activity, such as
recreation (e.g., fishing, boating, wading,
trapping, or swimming), forestry,
agriculture, and other activities that are
in accordance with Federal, State, and
local laws and regulations, is allowed.
(4) How will effectiverness of these
reintroductions be monitored? After the
initial stocking of these species, we will
monitor annually their presence or
absence and document any spawning
behavior or young-of-the-year
individuals that might be present. This
monitoring will be conducted primarily
by snorkeling and will be accomplished
by contracting with the appropriate
species experts. We will produce annual
reports detailing the stocking rates and
monitoring activities that took place
during the previous year. We will also
fully evaluate these reintroduction
efforts after 5 and 10 years to determine
whether to continue or terminate the
reintroduction efforts.
(5) Note: Map of the NEP area in
Tennessee for the 16 mollusks listed in
paragraph (b) of this section follows:
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Dated: May 19, 2006.
Matt Hogan,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 06–5233 Filed 6–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–C
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jun 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JNP2.SGM
13JNP2
EP13JN06.020
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
34230
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 13, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34196-34230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5233]
[[Page 34195]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of the Interior
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish and Wildlife Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of
Nonessential Experimental Population Status for 15 Freshwater Mussels,
1 Freshwater Snail, and 5 Fishes in the Lower French Broad River and in
the Lower Holston River, Tennessee; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 13, 2006 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 34196]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018-AU01
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of
Nonessential Experimental Population Status for 15 Freshwater Mussels,
1 Freshwater Snail, and 5 Fishes in the Lower French Broad River and in
the Lower Holston River, Tennessee
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), in
cooperation with the State of Tennessee and Conservation Fisheries,
Inc., a nonprofit organization, propose to reintroduce 15 mussels
listed as endangered under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (Act): Appalachian monkeyface (pearlymussel) (Quadrula
sparsa), birdwing pearlymussel (Conradilla caelata = Lemiox rimosus),
cracking pearlymussel (Hemistena or currently =Lastena lata),
Cumberland bean (pearlymussel) (Villosa trabalis), Cumberlandian
combshell (Epioblasma brevidens), Cumberland monkeyface (pearlymussel)
(Quadrula intermedia), dromedary pearlymussel (Dromus dromas), fanshell
(Cyprogenia stegaria), fine-rayed pigtoe (Fusconaia cuneolus),
orangefoot pimpleback (pearlymussel) (Plethobasus cooperianus), oyster
mussel (Epioblasma capsaeformis), ring pink (mussel) (Obovaria retusa),
rough pigtoe (Pleurobema plenum), shiny pigtoe (Fusconaia cor), and
white wartyback (pearlymussel) (Plethobasus cicatricosus); 1 endangered
aquatic snail: Anthony's riversnail (Athearnia anthonyi); 2 endangered
fishes: duskytail darter (Etheostoma percnurum) and pygmy madtom
(Noturus stanauli); and 3 fishes listed as threatened under section 4
of the Act: slender chub (Erimystax cahni), spotfin chub (=turquoise
shiner) (Erimonax monachus), and yellowfin madtom (Noturus flavipinnis)
into their historical habitat in the free-flowing reach of the French
Broad River below Douglas Dam to its confluence with the Holston River,
Knox County, Tennessee, and in the free-flowing reach of the Holston
River below Cherokee Dam to its confluence with the French Broad River.
Based on the evaluation of species experts, none of these 21 species
currently exist in these river reaches or their tributaries. These
species are being reintroduced under the authority of section 10(j) of
the Act and would be classified as a nonessential experimental
population (NEP).
The geographic boundaries of the proposed NEP would extend from the
base of Douglas Dam (river mile (RM) 32.3 (51.7 kilometers (km)) down
the French Broad River, Knox and Sevier Counties, Tennessee, to its
confluence with the Holston River and then up the Holston River, Knox,
Grainger, and Jefferson Counties, Tennessee, to the base of Cherokee
Dam (RM 52.3 (83.7 km)) and would include the lower 5 RM (8 km) of all
tributaries that enter these river reaches.
These proposed reintroductions are recovery actions and are part of
a series of reintroductions and other recovery actions that the
Service, Federal and State agencies, and other partners are conducting
throughout the species' historical ranges. This proposed rule provides
a plan for establishing the NEP and provides for limited allowable
legal take of these 16 mollusks and 5 fishes within the defined NEP
area. We have decided to include all 21 species in a single rulemaking
to allow us to restore the aquatic ecosystem as quickly as possible as
we bring each of these species on line in the propagation facilities.
We have reasons to believe all of these species co-existed in the past,
and also want the public to understand that all of these species will
be reintroduced into the same stretch of river rather than being
confused by 21 separate NEPs.
DATES: We will consider comments on this proposed rule that are
received by August 14, 2006. Requests for a public hearing must be made
in writing and received by July 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments and other information, identified by
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 1018-AU01, by any of the following
methods:
Mail or Hand Delivery: Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Tennessee Field Office, 446 Neal Street, Cookeville,
Tennessee, 38501.
Fax: 931-528-7075.
E-mail: timothy_merritt@fws.gov. Include ``Attn: French
Broad/Holston Rivers NEP'' in the subject line of the message.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Please see the ``Public Comments Solicited'' section below for
information about submitting comments.
The comments and materials we receive during the comment period
will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal
business hours at our Tennessee Field Office at the above address. If
you wish to request a public hearing, you may mail or hand deliver your
written request to the Tennessee Field Office at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Merritt, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service at the above address (telephone 931/528-6481,
facsimile 931/528-7075).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
1. Legislative: Under section 10(j) of the Act, the Secretary of
the Department of the Interior may designate reintroduced populations
established outside the species' current range, but within its
historical range, as ``experimental.'' Based on the best scientific and
commercial data available, we must determine whether experimental
populations are ``essential'' or ``nonessential'' to the continued
existence of the species. Regulatory restrictions are considerably
reduced under a nonessential experimental population (NEP) designation.
Without the NEP designation, the Act provides that species listed
as endangered or threatened are afforded protection primarily through
the prohibitions of section 9, the consultation requirements of section
7 and the special regulations provisions of section 4(d). Section
9(a)(1)(B) of the Act prohibits the take of endangered wildlife.
``Take'' is defined by the Act as ``harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to engage in any such
conduct.'' Service regulations (50 CFR 17.31) generally extend the
prohibitions of take to threatened wildlife but these general
provisions may be altered as deemed by the Secretary to be necessary
and advisable for the conservation of threatened species. Section 7 of
the Act outlines the procedures for Federal interagency cooperation to
conserve federally listed species and protect designated critical
habitat. It mandates that all Federal agencies use their existing
authorities to further the purposes of the Act by carrying out programs
for the conservation of listed species. It also states that Federal
agencies must, in consultation with the Service, ensure that any action
they authorize, fund, or carry out is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of a listed species or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of designated critical habitat. Section 7 of the
Act does not affect activities undertaken on private land unless they
[[Page 34197]]
are authorized, funded, or carried out by a Federal agency.
A population designated as experimental is treated for the purposes
of section 9 of the Act as threatened, regardless of the species'
designation elsewhere in its range. Threatened designation allows us
greater discretion in devising management programs and special
regulations for such a population. Section 4(d) of the Act allows us to
adopt whatever regulations are necessary to provide for the
conservation of a threatened species. Although a special 4(d) rule can
contain the prohibitions and exceptions necessary and appropriate to
conserve that species, regulations issued under section 4(d) for NEPs
are usually less restrictive with regard to human activities in the
reintroduction area.
For the purposes of section 7 of the Act, we treat an NEP as a
threatened species when the NEP is located within a National Wildlife
Refuge or National Park, and section 7(a)(1) and the consultation
requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act apply. When NEPs are located
outside a National Wildlife Refuge or National Park, we treat the
population as proposed for listing and only the conference provisions
of section 7(a)(4) apply. Section 7(a)(4) requires Federal agencies to
confer (rather than consult) with the Service on actions that are
likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a species proposed to
be listed. The results of a conference are advisory in nature and do
not restrict agencies from authorizing, funding, or carrying out
activities.
2. Biological Information: The lower French Broad and Holston
Rivers historically supported a diverse fish, snail, and mussel fauna,
possibly as many as 85 mussel species and subspecies, or about 65
percent of the mussel diversity once known from the entire Tennessee
River system (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998; Steve Ahlstedt, U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS), personal communication (pers. comm.) 2004). Of this once
rich aquatic fauna, 7 mussel species are extinct, and 21 federally
listed species (i.e, the 15 mussels, 1 aquatic snail, and 5 fishes
listed above in the SUMMARY section) are extirpated from these river
reaches. The only federally listed mussel still occurring in the
proposed NEP area is the endangered pink mucket (Lampsilis abrupta),
which still occurs in both the lower French Broad and lower Holston
Rivers (Steve Ahlstedt, pers. comm. 2004). The pink mucket is not one
of the 15 mussel species we are proposing to reintroduce under this
NEP.
Although much of the mussel fauna and some of the snail and fish
fauna were eliminated from these river reaches, considerable suitable
physical habitat remains, and various Federal (primarily the Tennessee
Valley Authority (TVA)) and State natural resources agencies,
industries, and municipalities have worked together to improve the
water quality below the dams. Fish populations are rebounding
(including the appropriate fish host species for mussel glochidia) and
snail populations are expanding in both rivers, and non-federally
listed mussels and snails released into the lower French Broad River to
test the area's suitability for mollusk transplants are doing well.
Based on the results of recent studies and observations by
knowledgeable scientists (P. Rakes and J. Shute, Conservation
Fisheries, Inc. (CFI), pers. comm. 2004; Ed Scott and Charlie Saylor,
TVA, pers. comm. 2004; James Layzer and Steve Ahlstedt, USGS, pers.
comm. 2004), these river reaches now provide suitable habitat for
reintroductions to occur.
Since the mid-1980s, CFI, a nonprofit organization, with support
from us, the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA), U.S. Forest
Service, National Park Service, TVA, and Tennessee Aquarium, has
successfully translocated, propagated, and reintroduced spotfin chubs,
duskytail darters, yellowfin madtoms, and smoky madtoms into Abrams
Creek, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Blount County, Tennessee.
These fish historically occupied Abrams Creek prior to an ichthyocide
treatment in the 1950s. An NEP designation for Abrams Creek was not
needed since the entire watershed occurs on National Park Service land;
section 7 of the Act applies regardless of the NEP designation, and
existing human activities and public use are consistent with protection
and take restrictions needed for the reintroduced populations. Natural
reproduction by all four species in Abrams Creek has been documented,
but the spotfin chub appears to be the least successful in this
capacity (Rakes and Shute 2004a, 2004b). We have also worked with CFI
to translocate, propagate, and reintroduce these same four fish into an
NEP established for a section of the Tellico River, Monroe County,
Tennessee (67 FR 52420, August 12, 2002). Propagated fish of these four
species were released into the Tellico River starting in 2003 and
continuing in 2004. It is still too early to determine the success of
these releases, but it is believed that the habitat and water quality
is sufficient to ensure future success similar to the Abrams Creek
reintroductions. CFI has also successfully placed yellowfin madtoms in
an existing NEP on the North Fork Holston River, Washington County,
Virginia. This site is separated from the proposed NEP on the lower
Holston River by reservoirs, and the fish is not known from any of
these reservoirs or intervening river sections. These reservoirs and
river sections act as barriers to movement by the fish and assure that
the North Fork Holston River population will remain geographically
isolated and easily identifiable as a distinct population from the
proposed Lower Holston River population.
3. Listing Information, Distribution, and Recovery Goals/
Objectives: The Appalachian monkeyface (pearlymussel) (Quadrula sparsa)
(Lea 1841) was listed as an endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41 FR
24062). We finalized a recovery plan for the species in July 1984
(Service 1984a). It historically occurred in the Tennessee River and
three of its tributaries: the Clinch, Holston, and Powell Rivers
(Service 1984a). We are unaware of historical records of the species in
the French Broad River, but archeological records (Parmalee and Bogan
1998) of this species exist from the Little Pigeon River (a lower
French Broad River tributary). The species may still survive in
extremely low numbers in the Powell River in Tennessee and the Clinch
River in Virginia (Parmalee and Bogan 1998). No downlisting
(reclassification from endangered to threatened) criteria are provided
in the recovery plan. The delisting objectives for the Appalachian
monkeyface (Service 1984a) are to: (1) Restore the viability of the
Clinch and Powell River populations; (2) reestablish or discover viable
populations in one additional river; (3) ensure that the species is
protected from present and foreseeable threats to the continued
existence of any population; and (4) determine that there are
noticeable improvements in coal-related problems and substrate quality
in the Powell River and that no increase in coal-related sedimentation
has occurred in the Clinch River.
The birdwing pearlymussel (Conradilla caelata = Lemiox rimosus)
(Conrad 1834) was listed as an endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41
FR 24062). We finalized a recovery plan for the species in July 1984
(Service 1984b). We also established an NEP for the birdwing
pearlymussel and 15 other federally listed mussels for a section of the
Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale
Counties, Alabama, on June 14, 2001 (66
[[Page 34198]]
FR 32250). Historical records exist for the species in 11 rivers in the
Tennessee River system, and one record exists from an unknown location
in the Cumberland River. Historically, the species occurred in the
Tennessee River near the confluence of the French Broad and Holston
Rivers, in the Holston River just upstream of its confluence with the
French Broad River, and in the Nolichucky River (a French Broad River
tributary) (Parmalee and Bogan 1998). Archeological records (Parmalee
1988) of this species exist from the Little Pigeon River, a lower
French Broad River tributary. It now survives in the Clinch and Powell
Rivers in Tennessee and Virginia and in the Duck and Elk Rivers in
Tennessee (Service 1984b). No downlisting criteria are given in the
recovery plan. The delisting objectives for the birdwing pearlymussel
(Service 1984b) are to: (1) Restore the viability of the Clinch and
Powell River populations; (2) reestablish or discover viable
populations in two additional rivers; (3) ensure that the species is
protected from present and foreseeable threats to the continued
existence of any population; and (4) determine that noticeable
improvements in coal-related problems and substrate quality have
occurred in the Powell River and that no increase in coal-related
sedimentation has occurred in the Clinch River.
The cracking pearlymussel (Hemistena lata) (Rafinesque 1820) was
listed as an endangered species on September 28, 1989 (54 FR 39850). We
finalized a recovery plan for the species in July 1991 (Service 1991a).
We also established an NEP for the cracking pearlymussel and 15 other
federally listed mussels for a section of the Tennessee River below the
Wilson Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June 14,
2001 (66 FR 32250). This species historically occurred in the Ohio,
Cumberland, and Tennessee River systems (Bogan and Parmalee 1983;
Service 1991a). It is extirpated throughout much of its range.
Historical records exist from the Tennessee River near the confluence
of the French Broad and Holston Rivers (Parmalee and Bogan 1998). No
historical records exist for the species in the French Broad system,
but archaeological records (Parmalee 1988) of this species exist from
the Little Pigeon River, a lower French Broad River tributary. It now
survives at a few shoals in the Clinch and Powell Rivers in Tennessee
and Virginia (Bogan and Parmalee 1983; Neves 1991). It possibly
survives in the Green River in Kentucky and in the Tennessee River,
below Pickwick Dam, in Tennessee (Service 1991a). The downlisting
objectives for the cracking pearlymussel (Service 1991a) are to: (1)
Reestablish/discover five viable populations; (2) ensure that one
naturally produced year class exists within each population; (3)
determine if recovery actions have been successful, as determined by an
increase in population density and/or an increase in length of river
inhabited; and (4) ensure there are no foreseeable threats to the
continued existence of any population. The delisting objectives call
for the reestablishment/discovery of eight viable populations and two
naturally produced year classes within each population.
The Cumberland bean (pearlymussel) (Villosa trabalis) (Conrad 1834)
was listed as an endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41 FR 24062). We
finalized a recovery plan for the species in August 1984 (Service
1984c). We also established an NEP for the Cumberland bean and 15 other
federally listed mussels for a section of the Tennessee River below the
Wilson Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June 14,
2001 (66 FR 32250). This species historically occurred in 10 river
systems in the Cumberland and Tennessee River basins (Service 1984c).
No historical records exist in the French Broad River system, but
archaeological records (Parmalee 1988) of this species exist from the
Little Pigeon River, a lower French Broad River tributary. The
Cumberland bean now survives only in the Hiwassee River in Tennessee;
in Buck Creek, the Little South Fork of the Cumberland River, and the
Rockcastle River system in Kentucky; and in the Big South Fork of the
Cumberland River in Tennessee and Kentucky (Service 1984c). No
downlisting criteria are given in the recovery plan. The delisting
objectives for the Cumberland bean (Service 1984c) are to: (1) Restore
the viability of populations in Buck Creek, the Rockcastle River, and
the Little South Fork River in Kentucky; (2) reestablish or discover
viable populations in two additional rivers; (3) ensure that the
species is protected from present and foreseeable threats to the
continued existence of any population; and (4) determine that
noticeable improvements in coal-related problems and substrate quality
have occurred in the upper Cumberland and Tennessee drainages and that
no increase in coal-related sedimentation exists in streams containing
this species.
The Cumberlandian combshell (Epioblasma brevidens) (Lea 1831) was
listed as an endangered species on January 10, 1997 (62 FR 1647).
Critical habitat was designated for this species on August 31, 2004 (69
FR 53136). We finalized a recovery plan for the species in May 2004
(Service 2004). We also established an NEP for the Cumberlandian
combshell and 15 other federally listed mussels for a section of the
Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale
Counties, Alabama, on June 14, 2001 (66 FR 32250). This mussel was
historically distributed throughout much of the Cumberlandian Region of
the Tennessee and Cumberland River drainages in Alabama, Kentucky,
Tennessee, and Virginia (Gordon 1991). Currently, populations survive
in a few river reaches in both river systems (Gordon 1991). It
historically occurred in the lower Holston River and a French Broad
River tributary (Nolichucky River) (Parmalee and Bogan 1998).
Archaeological records (Parmalee 1988) of this species exist from the
Little Pigeon River, a lower French Broad River tributary. The
downlisting objectives for the Cumberlandian combshell (Service 2004)
call for the reestablishment/discovery of six viable populations and
one naturally reproducing year class within each viable population. The
delisting objectives are to: (1) Reestablish or discover viable
populations in nine distinct streams, including three in the Cumberland
River system, four in the upper Tennessee River system, and two in the
lower Tennessee River system; (2) ensure that the species is protected
from present and foreseeable threats to the continued existence of any
population; and (3) ensure two distinct naturally reproducing year
classes exist within each of the viable populations.
The Cumberland monkeyface (pearlymussel) (Quadrula intermedia)
(Conrad 1836) was listed as an endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41
FR 24062). We completed a recovery plan for the species in July 1984
(Service 1984d). We also established an NEP for the Cumberland
monkeyface and 15 other federally listed mussels for a section of the
Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale
Counties, Alabama, on June 14, 2001 (66 FR 32250). It historically
occurred in 11 rivers in the Tennessee River system (Service 1984d).
Based on collections from aboriginal shell middens, Parmalee and Bogan
(1998) stated that the species once occurred at the confluence of the
French Broad and Holston Rivers. The species now survives at a few
shoals in the Powell River in Tennessee and Virginia and the Elk and
Duck Rivers in Tennessee (Service 1984d). No downlisting criteria are
given in the recovery plan. The delisting objectives for the Cumberland
[[Page 34199]]
monkeyface (Service 1984d) are to: (1) Restore the viability of the
Powell and Elk River populations; (2) reestablish or discover viable
populations in two additional rivers; (3) ensure that the species is
protected from present and foreseeable threats to the continued
existence of any population; and (4) determine that noticeable
improvements in coal-related problems and substrate quality have
occurred in the Powell River and that no increase in coal-related
sedimentation occurs in the Clinch River.
The dromedary pearlymussel (Dromus dromas) (Lea 1845) was listed as
an endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41 FR 24062). We completed a
recovery plan for the species in July 1984 (Service 1984e). We also
established an NEP for the dromedary pearlymussel and 15 other
federally listed mussels for a section of the Tennessee River below the
Wilson Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June 14,
2001 (66 FR 32250). It was historically widespread in the Cumberland
and Tennessee River systems (Bogan and Parmalee 1983). Parmalee and
Bogan (1998) reported that the species historically occurred in the
lower Holston River in Knox and Grainger Counties. Archaeological
records of this species exist from the Little Pigeon River, a lower
French Broad River tributary (Parmalee 1988). It survives at a few
shoals in the Powell and Clinch Rivers in Tennessee and Virginia and
possibly in the Cumberland River in Tennessee (Service 1984e; Neves
1991). No downlisting criteria are given in the recovery plan. The
delisting objectives for the dromedary pearlymussel (Service 1984e) are
to: (1) Restore the viability of the Clinch and Powell River
populations; (2) reestablish or discover viable populations in three
additional rivers; (3) ensure that the species is protected from
present and foreseeable threats to the continued existence of any
population; and (4) determine that noticeable improvements in coal-
related problems and substrate quality have occurred in the Powell
River and that no increase in coal-related sedimentation occurs in the
Clinch River.
The fanshell (Cyprogenia stegaria) (Rafinesque 1820) was listed as
an endangered species on June 21, 1990 (55 FR 25591). We completed a
recovery plan for the species in July 1991 (Service 1991b). It
historically occurred in the Ohio River and many of its large
tributaries in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois,
Kentucky, Alabama, Virginia, and Tennessee (Service 1991b). Ortmann
(1918) reported it from the lower Holston River, and Parmalee and Bogan
(1998) reported it from archaeological sites in the lower French Broad
River and its tributary, the Little Pigeon River. Presently, the
fanshell is believed to be reproducing in three rivers: The Green and
Licking Rivers in Kentucky and the Clinch River in Tennessee and
Virginia. Additionally, based on the collection of a few old specimens
in the 1980s, small, apparently nonreproducing, populations may still
persist in the Muskingum and Walhonding Rivers in Ohio, the Kanawha
River in West Virginia, the Wabash River system in Illinois and
Indiana, the Barren River and Tygarts Creek in Kentucky, and the
Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers in Tennessee (Service 1991b). The
downlisting objectives for the fanshell (Service 1991b) are to: (1)
Protect existing populations, reestablish historical populations, and/
or discover new populations so that at least nine distinct viable
populations exist; (2) ensure that one naturally reproduced year class
exists within each of the nine populations; and (3) ensure that studies
of the species' biological and ecological requirements are complete and
that any required recovery measures are beginning to succeed. The
delisting objectives are to: (1) Protect existing populations,
reestablish historical populations, and/or discover new populations so
that at least 12 distinct viable populations exist; (2) ensure that two
distinct naturally reproduced year classes exist within each viable
population; (3) ensure that studies of the species' biological and
ecological requirements are complete and that any required recovery
measures are successful; (4) ensure that no foreseeable threats exist
that would likely impact the species' survival over a significant
portion of its range; and (5) ensure that noticeable improvements in
water and substratum quality have occurred where habitat has been
degraded.
The fine-rayed pigtoe (Fusconaia cuneolus) (Lea 1840) was listed as
an endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41 FR 24062). We finalized a
recovery plan for the species in September 1984 (Service 1984f). We
also established an NEP for the fine-rayed pigtoe and 15 other
federally listed mussels for a section of the Tennessee River below the
Wilson Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June 14,
2001 (66 FR 32250). It historically occurred in 15 Tennessee River
tributaries (including the lower Holston River) and is currently known
from 7 rivers (including the Nolichucky River, a French Broad River
tributary, above the backwaters of Douglas Reservoir) (Service 1984f;
Parmalee and Bogan 1998). No downlisting criteria are given in the
recovery plan. The delisting objectives for the fine-rayed pigtoe
(Service 1984f) are to: (1) Restore viable populations to the Clinch,
Powell, and North Fork Holston Rivers, to the Little River and Copper
Creek (Clinch River tributaries), and to the Elk River (Tennessee),
Sequatchie River (Tennessee), and the Paint Rock River (Alabama); (2)
reestablish or discover one viable population in an additional river;
(3) ensure that the species is protected from present and foreseeable
threats to the continued existence of any population, and (4) determine
that noticeable improvements in coal-related problems and substrate
quality have occurred in the Powell River and that no increase in coal
or other energy-related impacts occurs in the Clinch River.
The orangefoot pimpleback (pearlymussel) (Plethobasus cooperianus)
(Lea 1834) was listed as an endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41 FR
24062). We completed a recovery plan for the species in August 1984
(Service 1984g). It historically occurred in the Ohio, Cumberland, and
Tennessee River systems, including the lower French Broad and Holston
Rivers (Parmalee and Bogan 1998). The species persists in the lower
Ohio, Tennessee, and Cumberland Rivers (Service 1984g). In 2005, three
adults were taken from the Ohio River and moved to the Kentucky
Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources' propagation facility in
Frankfort, Kentucky (Leroy Koch, USFWS, pers. comm. 2005). No
downlisting criteria are given in this recovery plan. The delisting
objectives for the orangefoot pimpleback (Service 1984g) are to ensure
that: (1) One viable population exists in the Tennessee, Cumberland,
and Ohio Rivers and these populations are dispersed throughout each
river so that it would be unlikely for any one event to cause the total
loss of any population; (2) viable populations are reestablished or
discovered in two additional rivers; (3) three year classes, including
one year class 10 years old or older, have naturally produced in each
population; (4) no foreseeable threats exist that would interfere with
the survival of any population; and (5) noticeable improvements in
water and substratum quality have occurred where habitat has been
degraded.
The oyster mussel (Epioblasma capsaeformis) (Lea 1834) was listed
as an endangered species on January 10, 1997 (62 FR 1647). Critical
habitat was designated for this species on August 31, 2004 (69 FR
53136). We finalized a
[[Page 34200]]
recovery plan for the species in May 2004 (Service 2004). We also
established an NEP for the oyster mussel and 15 other federally listed
mussels for a section of the Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam in
Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June 14, 2001 (66 FR
32250). This mussel historically occurred throughout much of the
Cumberlandian Region of the Tennessee and Cumberland River drainages
(Gordon 1991). Small populations now survive in a few river reaches in
both river systems (Gordon 1991). It was historically taken in the
lower French Broad River near its confluence with the Holston, and a
population still survives in the Nolichucky River, a French Broad River
tributary, above Douglas Reservoir (Parmalee and Bogan 1998).
Archaeological records (Parmalee 1988) of this species exist from the
Little Pigeon River, a lower French Broad River tributary. The
downlisting objectives for the oyster mussel (Service 2004) call for
the reestablishment/discovery of six viable populations and one
naturally reproducing year class within each viable population. The
delisting objectives are to: (1) Reestablish or discover viable
populations in nine distinct streams in the Cumberland River system,
upper Tennessee River system, and/or lower Tennessee River system; (2)
ensure that the species is protected from present and foreseeable
threats to the continued existence of any population; and (3) ensure
that two distinct naturally reproducing year classes exist within each
of the viable populations.
The ring pink (mussel) (Obovaria retusa) (Lamark 1819) was listed
as an endangered species on September 29, 1989 (54 FR 40109). We
completed a recovery plan for the species in March 1991 (Service
1991c). It historically occurred in the Ohio River and many of its
large tributaries in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana,
Illinois, Kentucky, Alabama, and Tennessee (Service 1991c). Ortmann
(1918) and Parmalee and Bogan (1998) reported it from the lower Holston
River, and it has been taken from an archeological site on the lower
French Broad River (Steve Ahlstedt, USGS, pers. comm. 1998). It likely
still survives in very low numbers in the Green River in Kentucky, the
Tennessee River in Tennessee and Kentucky, and the Cumberland River in
Tennessee (Service 1991c; Parmalee and Bogan 1998). In 2004 and 2005,
three juveniles and one adult male were found in the Green River (Leroy
Koch, USFWS, pers. comm. 2005). The adult male was taken to the
Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources' (KDFWR) propagation
facility in Frankfort, Kentucky. KDFWR plans to progagate this species
to augment existing populations and develop new ones, such as the lower
French Broad and lower Holston Rivers. The downlisting objectives for
the ring pink (Service 1991c) are to: (1) Protect existing populations,
reestablish historical populations, and/or discover new populations so
that at least six distinct populations exist; and (2) ensure that
studies of the species' biological and ecological requirements are
complete and that any required recovery measures developed and
implemented from these studies are beginning to succeed. The delisting
objectives are to: (1) Protect existing populations, reestablish
historical populations, and/or discover new populations so that at
least nine distinct populations exist; (2) ensure that studies of the
species' biological and ecological requirements are complete and that
any required recovery measures developed and implemented from these
studies are successful; (3) ensure that no foreseeable threats exist
which would likely impact the species' survival over a significant
portion of its range; and (4) ensure that noticeable improvements in
water and substratum quality have occurred where habitat has been
degraded.
The rough pigtoe (Pleurobema plenum) (Lea 1840) was listed as an
endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41 FR 24062). We completed a
recovery plan for the species in August 1984 (Service 1984h). This
widespread species was historically known from 22 rivers in the
Mississippi and Ohio River systems (Service 1984h), including the lower
French Broad and Holston Rivers (Parmalee and Bogan 1998).
Archaeological records (Parmalee 1988) of this species exist from the
Little Pigeon River (a lower French Broad River tributary). It is
currently known from the Green, Barren, Cumberland, Tennessee, and
Clinch Rivers (Parmalee and Bogan 1998; Service 1984h). No downlisting
criteria are given in this recovery plan. The delisting objectives for
the rough pigtoe (Service 1984h) are to: (1) Protect existing
populations, reestablish historical populations, and/or discover new
populations so that at least six distinct populations exist; (2) ensure
that these populations are dispersed throughout each river so it would
be unlikely for any one event to cause the total loss of any
population; (3) ensure that three year classes, including one year
class 10 years old or older, have naturally produced in each
population; (4) ensure that no foreseeable threats exist which would
interfere with the survival of any population; and (5) ensure that
noticeable improvements in water and substratum quality have occurred
where habitat has been degraded.
The shiny pigtoe (Fusconaia cor) (Conrad 1834) was listed as an
endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41 FR 24062). We completed a
recovery plan for the species in July 1984 (Service 1984i). We also
established an NEP for the shiny pigtoe and 15 other federally listed
mussels for a section of the Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam in
Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June 14, 2001 (66 FR
32250). It historically occurred in the Tennessee River and 10 of its
tributaries. It is currently known from five river systems: the Clinch,
Powell, North Fork Holston, Elk, and Paint Rock (Service 1984i). It was
historically reported from the Tennessee River around the mouth of the
Holston and French Broad Rivers, and it still occurs in the North Fork
Holston River (a Holston River tributary) above Cherokee Reservoir
(Service 1984i; Parmalee and Bogan 1998). No downlisting criteria are
given in the recovery plan. The delisting objectives for the shiny
pigtoe (Service 1984i) are to: (1) Restore viable populations to the
Clinch, Elk, Powell, North Fork Holston, and Paint Rock Rivers and to
Copper Creek; (2) reestablish or discover one viable population in one
additional river or two river corridors; (3) ensure that the species is
protected from present and foreseeable threats to the continued
existence of any population; and (4) determine that noticeable
improvements in coal-related problems and substrate quality have
occurred in the Powell River and that no increase in coal or other
energy-related impacts occurs in the Clinch River.
The white wartyback (pearlymussel) (Plethobasus cicatricosus) (Say
1829) was listed as an endangered species on June 14, 1976 (41 FR
24062). We completed a recovery plan for the species in September 1984
(Service 1984j). It occurred in the Ohio, Cumberland, and Tennessee
River systems, including the lower Holston River (Parmalee and Bogan
1998). It still persists in the middle reaches of the Tennessee River
(Service 1984j). No downlisting criteria are given in this recovery
plan. The delisting objectives for the white wartyback (Service 1984j)
are to ensure that: (1) A viable population exists in the Tennessee
River; (2) viable populations are discovered or reestablished in two
additional rivers; (3) these populations
[[Page 34201]]
are dispersed so it is unlikely for any one event to cause the total
loss of the species from that river system; (4) three year classes,
including one year class 10 years old or older, have been produced in
each reestablished population; and (5) no foreseeable threats exist
that would interfere with the survival of any population.
Anthony's riversnail (Athearnia anthonyi) (Budd in Redfield 1854)
was listed as an endangered species on April 15, 1994 (59 FR 17994). We
completed a recovery plan for the species in August 1997 (Service
1997). We also established an NEP for Anthony's riversnail and 16 other
federally listed mussels for a section of the Tennessee River below the
Wilson Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, on June 14,
2001 (66 FR 32250). This snail was historically found in the Tennessee
River and the lower reaches of some of its tributaries from Muscle
Shoals, Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama, upstream into the
lower French Broad River (Bogan and Parmalee 1983; Service 1997).
Currently, two populations are known: one in Limestone Creek in
Limestone County, Alabama, and one in the Tennessee River and the lower
portion of the Sequatchie River (a tributary to this reach of the
Tennessee River) in Tennessee and Alabama (Service 1997). The
downlisting objectives for Anthony's riversnail (Service 1997) are to
ensure that: (1) Four viable populations exist; (2) two naturally
produced year classes exist in all four populations; (3) biological
studies on the species are completed and recovery measures are
beginning to succeed; (4) noticeable improvements in water and
substratum quality have occurred where habitat is degraded; (5) each
population is protected from present and foreseeable threats; and (6)
all four populations remain stable or increase over a 10-year period.
The delisting objectives call for the establishment of six viable
populations in addition to criteria (2) through (5) above.
Additionally, all six populations should remain stable or increase over
a 15-year period.
The duskytail darter (Etheostoma percnurum) (Jenkins 1994) was
listed as an endangered species on April 27, 1993 (58 FR 25758). We
completed a recovery plan for the species in March 1994 (Service
1994a). We also established an NEP for the duskytail darter and three
other federally listed fishes for a section of the Tellico River in
Monroe County, Tennessee, on August 12, 2002 (67 FR 52420). Although
likely once more widespread in the upper Tennessee and middle
Cumberland River systems, duskytail darters were historically known
from six populations: Little River and Abrams Creek, Blount County,
Tennessee; Citico Creek, Monroe County, Tennessee; Big South Fork
Cumberland River, Scott County, Tennessee and McCreary County,
Kentucky; Copper Creek and the Clinch River (this is one population),
Scott County, Virginia; and the South Fork Holston River, Sullivan
County, Virginia (Service 1994a). The South Fork Holston River
population is apparently extirpated. The Little River, Copper Creek/
Clinch River, and Big South Fork Cumberland River populations are
extant but small and their viability is uncertain. The Citgo Creek
population is healthy and viable. CFI has reintroduced the species into
Abrams Creek in Tennessee, and there are indications that it is
becoming reestablished (Rakes and Shute 2004a). No historical records
exist for the fish in the lower French Broad or lower Holston Rivers.
However, we and others believe it is likely that the species once
inhabited these waters (Rakes and Shute 1999). Our conclusion is based
on the following facts: (1) The species was once likely much more
widespread in the Tennessee River system; (2) the French Broad and
Holston Rivers are tributaries to the Tennessee River between existing
and historical populations; (3) both river reaches appear to contain
suitable habitat for the species; and (4) there were no physical
barriers that would have prevented the species from inhabiting these
waters. The downlisting objectives for the duskytail darter (Service
1994a) are to: (1) Protect and enhance existing populations and
reestablish a population so at least three distinct viable duskytail
darter populations exist; (2) ensure that studies of the species'
biological and ecological requirements are complete and that any
required recovery measures developed and implemented from these studies
are beginning to succeed; and (3) ensure that no foreseeable threats
exist that would likely threaten the continued existence of the three
aforementioned viable populations. The delisting objectives are to: (1)
Protect and enhance existing populations and reestablish populations so
at least five distinct viable duskytail darter populations exist; (2)
ensure that studies of the species' biological and ecological
requirements are complete and that any required recovery measures
developed and implemented from these studies are successful; and (3)
ensure that no foreseeable threats exist that would likely impact the
survival of the five aforementioned viable populations.
The pygmy madtom (Noturus stanauli) (Etnier and Jenkins 1980) was
listed as an endangered species on April 27, 1993 (58 FR 25758). We
completed a recovery plan for the species in September 1994 (Service
1994b). The pygmy madtom, which was likely more widespread in the
Tennessee River system, has been found, and still exists, in only two
short reaches of the Duck and Clinch Rivers in Tennessee. These river
reaches are about 600 river miles apart. No historical records exist
for the fish in the lower French Broad or lower Holston Rivers.
However, we and others believe it is likely that it once inhabited
these waters (Rakes and Shute 1999). Our conclusion is based on the
same facts outlined above for the duskytail darter. The downlisting
objectives for the pygmy madtom (Service 1994b) are to: (1) Protect and
enhance existing populations so that at least two distinct viable
populations exist; (2) ensure that studies of the species' biological
and ecological requirements are complete and that any required recovery
measures developed and implemented from these studies are beginning to
succeed; and (3) ensure that no foreseeable threats exist that would
likely impact the survival of the two aforementioned viable
populations. No delisting criteria are given in this recovery plan.
The slender chub (Erimystax cahni) (Hubbs and Crowe 1956) was
listed as a threatened species on September 9, 1977, with critical
habitat and a special rule (42 FR 45526). The critical habitat map was
corrected on September 22, 1977 (42 FR 47840). We completed a recovery
plan for the species in July 1983 (Service 1983a). It was historically
known from the Clinch, Powell, and Holston Rivers (Service 1983a). The
Holston River site is now under the Cherokee Reservoir. The species has
not been found recently in the Powell River, and its continued
existence in the Clinch River is represented by only one specimen taken
in recent years (P. Rakes, pers. comm. 2002). However, collections made
over the years have generally shown that specimens can often be taken
only sporadically and in very small numbers. There has not been a
concerted effort to survey for the slender chub in recent years. We
believe that once a slender chub survey is funded, enough fish will
exist to start a propagation program. Although the species has never
been collected from the lower French Broad system, we and others
believe the species once likely inhabited these waters (Rakes and Shute
1999). Our conclusion is based on the same facts outlined above for the
[[Page 34202]]
duskytail darter. The delisting objectives for the slender chub
(Service 1983a) are to: (1) Protect and enhance existing populations
and/or reestablish populations so that viable populations exist in the
Clinch and Powell Rivers; (2) ensure, through reintroductions and/or
the discovery of new populations, that one other viable population
exists; (3) ensure that noticeable improvements in coal-related
problems and substrate quality have occurred in the Powell River and
that there is no increase in coal-related sedimentation in the Clinch
River; and (4) protect the species from threats that may adversely
affect the survival of the populations.
The spotfin chub (Erimonax monachus) (Cope 1868) was listed as a
threatened species on September 9, 1977, with critical habitat and a
special rule (42 FR 45526). The critical habitat map was corrected on
September 22, 1977 (42 FR 47840). We completed a recovery plan for the
species in November 1983 (Service 1983b). Two NEPs have been
established for the spotfin chub. The first was established for the
spotfin chub and three other federally listed fishes for a section of
the Tellico River in Monroe County, Tennessee, on August 12, 2002 (67
FR 52420). The second was established for the spotfin chub and the
boulder darter (Etheostoma wapiti) for a section of Shoal Creek (a
tributary to the Tennessee River), Lauderdale County, Alabama, and
Lawrence County, Tennessee on April 8, 2005 (70 FR 17916). This once
widespread species was historically known from 24 streams in the upper
and middle Tennessee River system. Currently, it is extant in only four
rivers/river systems (Service 1983b; P. Shute, TVA, pers. comm. 2004).
CFI has reintroduced the species into Abrams Creek in Tennessee, and
there are indications that it has become reestablished (Pat Rakes, CFI,
pers. comm. 2004). Historical records exist for the species in the
upper French Broad and upper Holston River systems, and the species
still exists in the Holston River system above the Cherokee Reservoir
(Service 1983b). We and our partners believe the species once likely
inhabited the waters of the lower French Broad and lower Holston
Rivers. Our conclusion is based on the same facts outlined above for
the duskytail darter. The delisting objectives for the spotfin chub
(Service 1983b) are to: (1) Protect and enhance existing populations
and/or reestablish populations so that viable populations exist in the
Buffalo River system, upper Little Tennessee River, Emory River system,
and lower North Fork Holston River; (2) ensure, through reintroduction
and/or the discovery of two new populations, that viable populations
exist in two other rivers; and (3) ensure that no present or
foreseeable threats exist that would likely impact the survival of any
populations.
The yellowfin madtom (Noturus flavipinnis) (Taylor 1969) was listed
as a threatened species on September 9, 1977, with critical habitat and
a special rule (42 FR 45526). The critical habitat map was corrected on
September 22, 1977 (42 FR 47840). We completed a recovery plan for the
species in June 1983 (Service 1983c). Two NEPs have been established
for the yellowfin madtom. The first NEP was established for a section
of the North Fork Holston River in Washington County, Virginia, on
August 4, 1988 (53 FR 29335). The second NEP was established for the
yellowfin madtom and three other federally listed fishes for a section
of the Tellico River in Monroe County, Tennessee, on August 12, 2002
(67 FR 52420). It was historically known from only seven streams
(Service 1983c). Three small extant populations still exist, one each
in Citco Creek, Copper Creek and the Powell River. The species was
reintroduced into Abrams Creek, and the population is becoming
reestablished (Pat Rakes, CFI, pers. comm. 2004). Reintroductions into
the NEP section of the Tellico River are ongoing, and early results are
promising. Although there are no historical records from the lower
Holston River or French Broad River system, we and others believe that
the species once likely inhabited these river reaches (Rakes and Shute
1999). Our conclusion is based on the same facts outlined above for the
duskytail darter. The delisting objectives for the yellowfin madtom
(Service 1983c) are to: (1) Protect and enhance existing populations
and/or reestablish populations so that viable populations exist in
Copper Creek, Citico Creek, and the Powell River; (2) reestablish or
discover viable populations in two additional rivers; (3) ensure that
noticeable improvements in coal-related problems and substrate quality
have occurred in the Powell River; and (4) ensure that each population
is protected from present and foreseeable threats.
The recovery objectives in the recovery plans for all of the 21
species generally agree that, to reach recovery: (1) Existing
populations should be restored to viable levels; (2) the species should
be protected from threats to their continued existence; and (3) viable
populations should be reestablished in historical habitat. The number
of secure, viable populations needed to achieve recovery (existing and
restored) varies from species to species, depending on the extent of
the species' probable former range (i.e., historically widespread
species require a greater number of populations for recovery than
species with historically more restricted distributions). However, the
reestablishment of historical populations is a critical component in
the recovery of all these species.
4. Reintroduction Site: At the request of the TVA and the TWRA,
biologists from the Service, TVA, USGS, TWRA, and Alabama Game and Fish
Division evaluated Tennessee River basin rivers for mollusk recovery
potential. The biologists rated the French Broad River downstream of
Douglas Dam as having a high potential for mollusk recovery and the
Holston River below Cherokee Dam as having a medium potential primarily
due to water quality and flow improvements to the tailwaters. In
letters dated May 28, 1998, and June 29, 1998, the TWRA's Executive
Director recommended that we consider reintroducing endangered mussels
into the French Broad River below Douglas Dam and the Holston River
below Cherokee Dam under NEP status. In an October 30, 1998, letter,
the TWRA provided us with a list of mussel species (compiled by
Tennessee mussel experts) that historically or probably occurred in
these river reaches. In a December 9, 1998, letter to us, the TVA (the
managers of the dams above the proposed NEP for hydroelectric power,
flood control, and recreation) expressed support for mussel recovery
efforts in the Tennessee River valley streams and tailwaters.
Based on successes in Abrams Creek and the North Fork Holston River
(Washington County, Virginia) and CFI's intimate knowledge of nongame
fishes and their habitat needs, we contracted with them to survey the
lower French Broad River and determine if we could expand our listed
fish recovery efforts into this major Tennessee River tributary. CFI
determined that the lower French Broad River contains potential
suitable habitat for the reintroduction of the duskytail darter, pygmy
madtom, spotfin chub, and yellowfin madtom (Rakes and Shute 1999).
Additionally, Rakes and Shute (CFI, pers. comm. 2004) stated that the
lower Holston River below Cherokee Dam could potentially support a
reintroduced population of these fishes and that both river reaches
contain potential habitat for slender chub reintroductions.
In a May 17, 1999, letter to us, the TWRA's Executive Director
stated that he concurred with the conclusions in the report prepared by
Rakes and Shute
[[Page 34203]]
(1999). He recommended that we consider designating NEP status in the
lower French Broad and Holston Rivers for the eventual reintroduction
of these five fish species.
We previously established NEPs for the birdwing pearlymussel,
cracking pearlymussel, Cumberland bean, Cumberlandian combshell,
Cumberland monkeyface, fine-rayed pigtoe, oyster mussel, shiny pigtoe,
and Anthony's riversnail in the free-flowing reach of the Tennessee
River below the Wilson Dam in Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama
(66 FR 32250). In October 2003, 80 each of birdwing pearlymussels,
oyster mussels, and dromedary mussels (dromedary mussels are not part
of the proposed Lower French Broad/Lower Holston NEP) were placed in
the NEP area below Wilson Dam. The status of these reintroduced mussels
was checked during the summer of 2004. While it is too early to
determine whether or not the reintroduced individuals will become an
established population, a significant number of them have survived thus
far, indicating that the reintroduction has a good chance of being
successful. A total of 2,370 Anthony's riversnails have also been
placed in the NEP area and will be monitored this spring. Establishment
of viable populations of these species in both the Tennessee River
below the Wilson Dam under the existing regulation and in the lower
French Broad and lower Holston Rivers, if this proposed regulation is
finalized, is an objective in the recovery of these species. However,
it will take several years of monitoring to fully evaluate if
populations of these species (and the other species) have become
established and remain viable in these historic river reaches.
Based on the presence of suitable physical habitat, the positive
response of endemic aquatic species to habitat improvements, improved
quality of the water being released from the dams, the recommendations
of the TWRA's Executive Director, and the evaluation of biologists
familiar with the lower French Broad and Holston Rivers, we believe the
French Broad River (downstream of Douglas Dam) and the Holston River
(downstream of Cherokee Dam) are suitable for the reintroduction of
these 21 species with NEP status.
We propose to reintroduce these 21 species into historical habitat
of the free-flowing reach of the French Broad River from RM 22.3 (35.7
km) (approximately 10 RM (16 km) below Douglas Dam), Knox and Sevier
Counties, Tennessee, to the backwaters of Fort Loudoun Reservoir,
upstream of, but near the confluence with the Holston River, Knox
County, Tennessee, and in the free-flowing reach of the Holston River,
Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson Counties, Tennessee, from above the
backwaters of Fort Loudoun Reservoir just upstream of its confluence
with the French Broad River, upstream to RM 42.3 (67.7 km)
(approximately 10 RM (16 km) below Cherokee Dam). These river reaches
contain the most suitable habitat for the reintroductions. None of
these 21 species are known to currently exist in these river reaches,
in tributaries to these reaches, or have free access to these reaches.
5. Reintroduction Procedures: The dates for these proposed
reintroductions, the actual number of individuals to be released, and
the specific release sites cannot be determined at this time.
Mussel propagation and juvenile rearing technology are currently
being refined, and juvenile mussels of some species could be available
for reintroduction soon after a NEP rule is finalized. Individual
endangered mussels that would be used for these proposed
reintroductions will be primarily artificially propagated juveniles.
However, it is possible that wild adult stock of some mussels could
also be released into the area. The parent stock for mussel propagation
will come from existing wild populations in the Tennessee, Cumberland,
and Ohio Rivers, and in most cases, adults will be returned to the
capture site. Under some circumstances, adult endangered mussels could
be permanently relocated (i.e., kept in captivity for their entire
life) to propagation facilities or moved directly into the NEP area
after being used for propagation purposes. A permit under section 10 of
the ESA would be needed for handling and maintaining threatened and
endangered species in captivity.
Anthony's riversnails will be collected for the proposed
reintroductions from a large naturally reproducing population located
in the Tennessee River, Jackson County, Alabama, and Marion County,
Tennessee, and relocated directly into the NEP.
Individual fishes that would be used for these proposed
reintroductions will be primarily artificially propagated juveniles.
However, it is possible that wild adult stock of some fishes could also
be released into the NEP area. Propagation and juvenile rearing
technology is available for the spotfin chub, slender chub, and
duskytail darter. Limited numbers of yellowfin madtom juveniles can be
reared using eggs and larvae taken from the wild, and some pygmy
madtoms can be propagated. However, madtom propagation technology,
which is needed to produce large numbers of juvenile madtoms, needs
further development. The parental stock for fish propagation and
reintroductions will come from wild populations. Duskytail darters will
likely come from Little River in Tennessee. Yellowfin madtoms will
likely come from the Powell River in Tennessee. Spotfin chubs will
likely come from upstream in the Holston River system above Cherokee
Dam in Tennessee. Pygmy madtoms will come from the Clinch River in
Tennessee. Slender chubs will come from the upper Tennessee River basin
in Tennessee and Virginia. In some cases, the parents will be returned
to the wild population from which they were taken. However, in most
cases, adult fishes will be permanently relocated to propagation
facilities.
To help ensure the genetic integrity of the reintroduced species
and to match as closely as possible the genetic composition of the
historical populations, we will observe the following guidelines: (1)
To reduce homozygosity, at least 10 gravid female mussels, 10 fishes,
and 10 snails, whenever possible, will be used as parental stock over
the life of the reintroduction project (if this number cannot be
obtained for very rare species, we will use whatever number is
available); and (2) to match as closely as possible the genetic
composition of the species that once existed in the lower French Broad
and Holston Rivers, the adults and brood stock for the proposed
reintroductions will be collected using the following criteria (in
order of decreasing importance): (a) Donor animals will be collected
from populations in adjacent stream/tributary systems in the same
physiographic province, (b) donor animals will be collected from
populations in adjacent stream/tributary systems in an adjacent
physiographic province, and (c) donor animals will be collected from
the only population with a sufficient number of adults to produce
progeny.
The permanent removal of adults (mollusks and fishes) from the wild
for their use in proposed reintroduction efforts is allowable when the
following conditions exist: (1) Sufficient numbers of adults are
available within a donor population to sustain the loss without
jeopardizing the species; (2) the species must be removed from an area
because of an imminent threat that is likely to eliminate the
population or specific individuals present in an area; or (3) the
population is not reproducing (see 50 CFR 17.22). For these 21 species,
it is
[[Page 34204]]
most likely that adults will be permanently removed because of the
first condition. However, fewer adults will be needed for propagation
than for actually moving individuals from a donor population to the
NEP. An enhancement of propagation or survival permit under section
10(a)(1)(A) of the Act must be issued before any take occurs. We will
coordinate these proposed actions with the Service's appropriate lead
regions and State natural resources agencies.
6. Status of Reintroduced Populations: Previous translocations,
propagations, and reintroductions of many of these species have not
affected their wild populations. The use of artificially propagated
juveniles will further reduce the potential effects on wild populations
since fewer adults would be needed from the donor population. If any of
the reintroduced populations become established and are subsequently
lost, the likelihood of the species' survival in the wild would not be
appreciably reduced because either the reintroduced individuals will be
from propagated stock or the donor population will be of sufficient
size to handle movement of adults. Therefore, we have determined that
the reintroduced populations of these 21 species in the lower French
Broad and Holston Rivers are not essential to the continued existence
of these species. We will ensure, through our section 10 permit
authority and the section 7 consultation process, that the use of
animals from any donor population for these proposed reintroductions is
not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species.
7. Location of Reintroduced Population: The NEP area, which
encompasses all the sites for the proposed reintroductions, will extend
from the base of Douglas Dam down the French Broad River, Knox and
Sevier Counties, Tennessee, to its confluence with the Holston River;
then up the Holston River, Knox, Grainger, and Jefferson Counties,
Tennessee, to the base of Cherokee Dam; and the lower 5 RM (8 km) of
all tributaries that enter these river reaches.
Section 10(j) of the Act requires that an experimental population
be geographically separate from other wild populations of the same
species. The proposed NEP area is totally isolated from existing
populations of these species by large reservoirs, and none of these
species are known to occur in, or are likely to move through, large
reservoir habitat. Therefore, these reservoirs will act as barriers to
the expansion of these species into other sections of the Tennessee
River basin and will ensure that the proposed NEPs remain
geographically isolated and easily distinguishable from existing wild
populations. Based on the habitat requirements of these mollusks and
fishes, we do not expect them to become established outside the
proposed NEP area. However, if any of the reintroduced species move
outside the designated NEP area, then the animals would be considered
to have come from the NEP area. In that case, we may propose to amend
this rule to enlarge the boundaries of the NEP area to include the
entire range of the expanded population(s).
The designated NEP area for the duskytail darter, spotfin chub