Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines, 33804-33855 [06-4919]
Download as PDF
33804
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60, 63, 85, 90, 1048, 1065,
and 1068
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0030, FRL–8176–1]
RIN 2060–AM81 and 2060–AN62
Standards of Performance for
Stationary Spark Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines and National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing new source
standards of performance for stationary
spark ignition internal combustion
engines. EPA is also proposing national
emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants for stationary reciprocating
internal combustion engines that either
are located at area sources of hazardous
air pollutant emissions or that have a
site rating of less than or equal to 500
brake horsepower and are located at
major sources of hazardous air pollutant
emissions.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 11, 2006, or 60 days
after date of public hearing if later.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act,
comments on the information collection
provisions must be received by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) on or before July 12, 2006. Public
Hearing. If anyone contacts us
requesting to speak at a public hearing
by July 3, 2006, a public hearing will be
held on July 12, 2006. If you are
interested in attending the public
hearing, contact Ms. Pamela Garrett at
(919) 541–7966 to verify that a hearing
will be held.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2005–0030, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: (202) 566–1741.
• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Please include a
total of two copies. EPA requests a
separate copy also be sent to the contact
person identified below (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). In
addition, please mail a copy of your
comments on the information collection
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
provisions to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Attn: Desk
Officer for EPA, 735 17th St., NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
• Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, U.S.
EPA, Room B102, 1301 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–
0030. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Public Hearing: If a public hearing is
held, it will be held at EPA’s campus
located at 109 T.W. Alexander Drive in
Research Triangle Park, NC or an
alternate site nearby.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. We also rely on documents in
Docket ID Nos. A–96–55 and A–2000–
01, and incorporate those dockets into
the record for this proposed rule.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC,
EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the Air
Docket is (202) 566–1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
´
Jaime Pagan, Energy Strategies Group,
Sector Policies and Programs Division
(D243–01), Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; telephone number (919)
541–5340; facsimile number (919) 541–
5450; email address
‘‘pagan.jaime@epa.gov.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Organization of This Document. The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in the preamble.
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
II. Background
III. Summary of This Proposed Rule
A. What is the source category regulated by
this proposed rule?
B. What are the pollutants regulated by this
proposed rule?
C. What are the proposed standards?
D. What are the requirements for sources
that are modified or reconstructed?
E. What are the requirements for
demonstrating compliance?
F. What are the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements?
IV. Rationale for Proposed Rule
A. Which control technologies apply to
stationary engines?
B. How did EPA determine the basis and
level of the proposed standards?
C. How did EPA determine the compliance
requirements?
D. How did EPA determine the reporting
and recordkeeping requirements?
E. Why did EPA determine to exempt area
sources from title V permit
requirements?
V. Summary of Environmental, Energy and
Economic Impacts
A. What are the air quality impacts?
B. What are the cost impacts?
C. What are the economic impacts?
D. What are the non-air health,
environmental and energy impacts?
VI. Solicitation of Comments and Public
Participation
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
NAICS 1
Category
Any manufacturer that produces or any industry using a stationary internal combustion engine as defined in this proposed rule.
1 North
2211
622110
335312
333912
333992
48621
211111
211112
92811
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Regulated Entities. Categories and
entities potentially regulated by this
action include:
Examples of regulated entities
Electric power generation, transmission, or distribution.
Medical and surgical hospitals.
Motor and generator manufacturing.
Pump and compressor manufacturing.
Welding and soldering equipment manufacturing.
Natural gas transmission.
Crude petroleum and natural gas production.
Natural gas liquids producers.
National security.
American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this action. To determine
whether your engine is regulated by this
action, you should examine the
applicability criteria of this proposed
rule. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
33805
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
diskor CD ROM as CBI and then identify
electronically within the disk or CD
ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver
information identified as CBI to only the
´
following address: Mr. Jaime Pagan,
c/o OAQPS Document Control Officer
(Room C404–02), U.S. EPA, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711, Attention
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–
0030.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
(a) Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:53 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
(b) Follow directions. EPA may ask
you to respond to specific questions or
organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
(c) Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
(d) Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
(e) If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
(f) Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
(g) Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
(h) Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
Docket. The docket number for this
proposed rule is Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2005–0030.
World Wide Web (WWW). In addition
to being available in the docket, an
electronic copy of this proposed rule
will be posted on the WWW through the
Technology Transfer Network Web site
(TTN Web). Following signature, EPA
will post a copy of this proposed rule
on the TTN’s policy and guidance page
for newly proposed or promulgated
rules at https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg.
The TTN provides information and
technology exchange in various areas of
air pollution control.
II. Background
This action proposes new source
performance standards (NSPS) that
would apply to new stationary spark
ignition (SI) internal combustion
engines (ICE). New source performance
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
standards implement section 111(b) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA), and are issued
for categories of sources which cause, or
contribute significantly to, air pollution
which may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health or welfare. The
standards apply to new stationary
sources of emissions, i.e., sources whose
construction, reconstruction, or
modification begins after a standard for
those sources is proposed. The NSPS for
stationary SI ICE would be promulgated
under 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ.
This action also proposes national
emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants (NESHAP) from existing,
new, and reconstructed stationary
reciprocating internal combustion
engines (RICE) with a site rating of less
than or equal to 500 horsepower (HP)
located at major sources, and existing,
new, and reconstructed stationary RICE
located at area sources. We are
proposing these requirements to meet
our statutory obligation to address
hazardous air pollutants (HAP)
emissions from these sources under
sections 112(d) and 112(k) of the CAA.
The final NESHAP for stationary RICE
would be promulgated under 40 CFR
part 63, subpart ZZZZ, which already
contains standards applicable to
stationary RICE with a site rating above
500 HP located at major sources.
We are proposing these two sets of
regulations under one notice of
proposed rulemaking because the source
categories being addressed are
practically identical. In other words,
stationary engines located at major and
area sources of HAP will also be affected
by NSPS regulations. Based on the
similarities, we decided that it would be
appropriate to propose the regulations at
the same time and attempt to bring some
consistency between them.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33806
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
III. Summary of this Proposed Rule
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
A. What is the source category regulated
by this proposed rule?
The proposed NSPS apply to new
stationary SI ICE. A stationary internal
combustion engine means any internal
combustion engine, except combustion
turbines, that converts heat energy into
mechanical work and is not mobile.
Stationary ICE differ from mobile ICE in
that a stationary internal combustion
engine is not a nonroad engine as
defined at 40 CFR 1068.30, and is not
used to propel a motor vehicle or a
vehicle used solely for competition.
Stationary ICE include reciprocating
ICE, rotary ICE, and other ICE, except
combustion turbines. The proposed
NESHAP applies only to stationary
RICE. To our knowledge, no rotary or
other types of stationary ICE exist at this
time.
The SI NSPS address emissions from
new, modified and reconstructed
stationary SI engines. An SI engine is
either a gasoline-fueled engine; or any
other type of engine, with a spark plug
(or other sparking device) and with
operating characteristics significantly
similar to the theoretical Otto
combustion cycle. Spark ignition
engines usually use a throttle to regulate
intake air flow to control power during
normal operation. Dual-fuel engines in
which a liquid fuel (typically diesel
fuel) is used for compression ignition
and gaseous fuel (typically natural gas)
is used as the primary fuel at an annual
average ratio of less than 2 parts diesel
fuel to 100 parts total fuel on an energy
equivalent basis are considered SI
engines for purposes of this proposed
rule.
The NESHAP address emissions from
existing, new, and reconstructed
stationary engines less than or equal to
500 HP located at major sources and all
stationary engines located at area
sources. A major source of HAP
emissions is a plant site that emits or
has the potential to emit any single HAP
at a rate of 10 tons (9.07 megagrams) or
more per year or any combination of
HAP at a rate of 25 tons (22.68
megagrams) or more per year, except
that for oil and gas production facilities,
a major source of HAP emissions is
determined for each surface site. An
area source of HAP emissions is a
source that is not a major source.
If you are an owner or operator of an
area source subject to this proposed
rule, you are exempt from the obligation
to obtain a permit under 40 CFR parts
70 or 71, provided you are not required
to obtain a permit under 40 CFR 70.3(a)
or 40 CFR 71.3(a) for a reason other than
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
your status as an area source under this
proposed rule.
1. SI NSPS
New source performance standards
for stationary SI engines are issued
under section 111(b) of the CAA. All
new, modified and reconstructed
stationary SI engines are covered
regardless of size. The NSPS apply to
stationary SI engines combusting any
fuel (natural gas, gasoline, liquefied
petroleum gas (LPG), compressed
natural gas, landfill gas, digester gas,
and any other applicable fuel). New
source performance standards require
these sources to control emissions to the
level achievable by best demonstrated
technology (BDT), considering costs and
any non-air quality health and
environmental impacts and energy
requirements.
Under section 111 of the CAA, 42
U.S.C. 7411, the Administrator is
required to publish, and periodically
update, a list of source categories that in
his or her judgment cause, or contribute
significantly to, air pollution which may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger
public health or welfare. This list
appears in 40 CFR 60.16. The list
reflects the Administrator’s
determination that emissions from the
listed source categories contribute
significantly to air pollution that may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger
public health or welfare, and it is
intended to identify major source
categories for which standards of
performance are to be promulgated.
EPA has determined that for purposes
of NSPS regulations, the stationary
internal combustion engine source
category should be split into two source
categories—SI engines and compression
ignition (CI) engines. Proposed NSPS for
stationary CI engines were published on
July 11, 2005 (70 FR 39870).
2. NESHAP
The NESHAP portion of this action is
a revision to the regulations in 40 CFR
part 63, subpart ZZZZ, currently
applicable to stationary RICE greater
than 500 HP located at major sources,
which were promulgated in 2004.
Subpart ZZZZ of 40 CFR part 63 does
not currently cover stationary engines
located at area sources of HAP
emissions, nor does it apply to
stationary engines located at major
sources with a site rating of 500 HP or
less. When the subpart ZZZZ of 40 CFR
part 63 regulations were promulgated in
2004 (69 FR 33474), EPA deferred
promulgating regulations with respect to
stationary engines 500 HP or less at
major sources until further information
on the engines could be obtained and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
analyzed. It was decided to regulate
these smaller engines at the same time
as we regulate engines located at area
sources.
This action proposes to revise 40 CFR
part 63, subpart ZZZZ, in order to
address HAP emissions from stationary
RICE less than or equal to 500 HP
located at major sources and stationary
RICE located at area sources. For
stationary engines less than or equal to
500 HP at major sources, EPA must
determine what is the appropriate
maximum achievable control
technology (MACT) for those engines
under section 112(d)(3) of the CAA.
For stationary engines located at area
sources, we have the flexibility to
promulgate standards based on
generally available control technology
(GACT) under CAA section 112(d)(5).
We are required to address HAP
emissions from stationary RICE located
at area sources under section 112(k) of
the CAA, based on criteria set forth by
EPA in the Urban Air Toxics Strategy
described in the paragraph below.
On July 19, 1999, EPA announced in
the Federal Register its plan for
addressing exposure to air toxics in
urban areas. The Urban Air Toxics
Strategy (64 FR 38706) listed several
source categories that emit one or more
of the air toxic pollutants of greatest
concern in urban areas. The stationary
engine source category was one of the
source categories listed and, as such,
EPA is required to consider it for
regulation. The strategy addressed
sections 112(c)(3) and 112(k)(3)(B)(ii) of
the CAA that instruct us to identify not
less than 30 HAP which, as the result of
emissions from area sources, present the
greatest threat to public health in the
largest number of urban areas, and to
list sufficient area source categories or
subcategories to ensure that emissions
representing 90 percent of the 30 listed
HAP are subject to regulation. The
strategy included a list of 33 HAP
judged to pose the greatest potential
threat to public health in the largest
number of urban areas (the urban HAP)
and a list of area source categories
emitting the listed HAP (area source
HAP). Once listed, these area source
categories shall be subject to standards
under section 112(d) of the CAA.
We have divided the source category
into the following subcategories:
Stationary RICE less than 50 HP, landfill
and digester gas stationary RICE, CI
stationary RICE greater than or equal to
50 HP, and SI stationary RICE greater
than or equal to 50 HP. The CI
stationary RICE greater than or equal to
50 HP subcategory was further
subcategorized into emergency and nonemergency engines, as was the
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
subcategory of SI stationary RICE greater
than or equal to 50 HP. Spark ignition
non-emergency stationary RICE greater
than or equal to 50 HP were then
subcategorized into 2 stroke lean burn
(2SLB), 4 stroke lean burn (4SLB), and
4 stroke rich burn (4SRB) stationary
RICE.
The regulatory approach being
proposed in this action differentiates
between gasoline, LPG, natural gas, and
digester and landfill gas. Gasoline and
LPG are fuels more commonly used in
nonroad engines than stationary
engines. Nonroad SI engines less than or
equal to 19 kilowatt (KW) (25 HP)
typically use gasoline. It is estimated
that about 68 percent of SI nonroad
engines above 19 KW (25 HP) use LPG.
A smaller percentage of nonroad SI
engines above 19 KW (25 HP) use
gasoline (about 23 percent) and even
less use compressed natural gas (about
9 percent). Natural gas fuel is more
common in larger, stationary
applications. Natural gas engines refer
to all gaseous-fueled engines except
those fueled by landfill and digester gas.
Natural gas is primarily composed of
methane and typically contains very
low levels of sulfur. Other fuels used
with stationary SI engines are landfill
and digester gases. These gases are byproducts of wastewater treatment and
land application of municipal reuse.
Landfill and digester gases, which are
formed through anaerobic
decomposition of organic materials, are
principally comprised of methane and
carbon dioxide, but small quantities of
other compounds such as hydrogen
sulfide, ammonia, volatile organic
compounds, and particulate matter (PM)
may also be present. These gases have
a lower methane content than natural
gas and may range from 50 to 65
percent. Although similar in
composition to natural gas, there are
some differences in the emissions from
combustion of landfill and digester
gases due to e.g., chlorinated
compounds typically not found in
natural gas. Both landfill and digester
gases contain a family of silicon-based
gases collectively called siloxanes.
Combustion of siloxanes forms
compounds that have been known to
foul fuel systems, combustion chambers,
and post-combustion catalysts.
B. What are the pollutants regulated by
this proposed rule?
New source performance standards
are developed under the authority of
section 111 of the CAA. Emissions of
criteria pollutants (those pollutants
identified under section 110 of the
CAA) are generally regulated under
section 111 of the CAA, while HAP are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
regulated under section 112 of the CAA.
Emissions from stationary engines
contribute significantly to air pollution
and cause adverse health and welfare
effects. The pollutants to be regulated by
the proposed NSPS for stationary SI
engines are nitrogen oxides (NOX),
carbon monoxide (CO), and nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHC). In
addition, a sulfur limit on gasoline is
being proposed.
Nitrogen oxides are listed as criteria
pollutants and are regulated due to their
contribution to the formation of ozone.
Nitrogen oxides are precursors to ozone
formation. Exposure to ozone has been
linked to health and welfare impacts.
Health and welfare risks include
impaired respiratory function, eye
irritation, deterioration of materials
such as rubber, and necrosis of plant
tissue. Nitrogen oxides are also a major
precursor for nitrate PM. Particulate
matter, also regulated as a criteria
pollutant, is associated with premature
mortality and a number of serious
adverse respiratory and cardiovascular
effects, especially in children, the
elderly, and people with existing heart
or lung disease. Particulate matter also
reduces visibility and damages building
materials. Nitrogen oxides are also
associated with various other health and
welfare effects. Nitrogen dioxide can
cause irritation of the lungs and can also
reduce the resistance to respiratory
infection. Nitrogen oxides are one of the
major pollutants emitted from stationary
ICE and stationary ICE are considered to
cause or contribute significantly to
nationwide releases of NOX emissions.
Carbon monoxide is a criteria
pollutant and is considered harmful to
public health and the environment.
Carbon monoxide has been linked to
increased risk for people with heart
disease, reduced visual perception,
cognitive functions and aerobic
capacity, and possible fetal effects.
Stationary engines emit CO and are
considered to contribute to several areas
failing to attain the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards for CO.
Emissions of NMHC from stationary
engines contribute to the formation of
ozone. In addition, emissions of NMHC
include air toxics such as benzene,
formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, 1,3butadiene, and acrolein. These
substances are known or suspected to be
human or animal carcinogens, or having
noncancer health effects such as
irritation or corrosion of the eyes, nose,
throat, and lungs; pulmonary and
respiratory problems; and dermatitis
and sensitization of the skin and
respiratory tract. Stationary engines
contribute to nationwide releases of
NMHC emissions.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33807
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a criteria
pollutant emitted from stationary SI
engines due to sulfur in gasoline. It
contributes to respiratory illness,
particularly in children and the elderly,
and aggravates existing heart and lung
diseases. It also contributes to acid
deposition, damaging forests, aquatic
ecosystems, crops, and building
materials. Sulfur dioxide undergoes
chemical reactions in the atmosphere to
form sulfate PM. The health effects of
PM were previously described in this
section. This proposed rule reduces SO2
and sulfate PM by requiring the use of
gasoline with lower sulfur levels, thus
improving air quality, public health,
and public welfare.
The NESHAP being proposed in this
action would regulate emissions of
HAP. Available emissions data show
that several HAP are emitted from
stationary engines, which are formed
during the combustion process or that
are contained within the fuel burned.
Many HAP have been detected from the
stationary engine exhaust, but only a
handful of HAP represent the majority
of HAP emissions from stationary
engines. These HAP are formaldehyde,
acrolein, methanol, and acetaldehyde.
We described the health effects of these
HAP and other HAP emitted from the
operation of stationary ICE in the
preamble to 40 CFR part 63, subpart
ZZZZ, published on June 15, 2004, on
page 33474 of the Federal Register.
These HAP emissions are known to
cause, or contribute significantly to air
pollution, which may reasonably be
anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare.
Under the RICE NESHAP, we are
proposing to limit emissions of HAP
through emissions standards for NMHC
and formaldehyde. We have determined
that it is appropriate to use NMHC and
formaldehyde or CO emissions as a
surrogate for HAP emissions. For the
RICE MHAP promulgated in 2004 (69
FR 33474) for engines greater than 500
HP located at major sources, EPA chose
to select a single pollutant to serve as a
surrogate for HAP emissions.
Formaldehyde is the hazardous air
pollutant present in the highest
concentration from stationary engines.
In addition, emissions data show that
formaldehyde emission levels are
related to other HAP emission levels.
For the NESHAP promulgated in 2004,
EPA also found that there is a strong
relationship between CO emissions
reductions and HAP emissions
reductions from 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI
stationary engines. Therefore, CO
emissions reductions were chosen as a
surrogate for HAP emissions reductions
for 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI stationary
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33808
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
engines operating with oxidation
catalyst systems for that rule. For the
standards being proposed in this action,
EPA believes that previously made
decisions regarding the appropriateness
of using formaldehyde and CO as
surrogates for HAP are still valid. For
this proposal, EPA conducted an
analysis using available emissions data
to look at the relationship between
formaldehyde (a surrogate for HAP) and
NMHC. Based on statistical results of
engine exhaust data, these data indicate
that there is a significant relationship
between formaldehyde and NMHC
emissions from 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI
stationary RICE. For this reason, EPA
believes it is appropriate to use NMHC
emissions as a surrogate for
formaldehyde, and consequently, also as
a surrogate for HAP emissions. Much of
the HAP being regulated are
hydrocarbons; e.g., formaldehyde, an
oxygenated hydrocarbon, is the HAP
emitted in largest quantities from
stationary engines. For more
information on EPA’s analysis of NMHC
as a surrogate for HAP, refer to the
docket for this proposal.
C. What are the proposed standards?
A description of the proposed
standards is provided in the following
sections.
1. SI NSPS
a. Stationary SI Engines ≤19 KW (25
HP). EPA is proposing emission
standards that will affect manufacturers,
owners, and operators of stationary SI
engines. Engine manufacturers must
certify their stationary SI engines with
a maximum engine power less than or
equal to 19 KW (25 HP) that are
manufactured after January 1, 2008, to
the certification emission standards for
new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part
90, as applicable. The standards
applicable to these engines are shown in
Table 1 of this preamble.
TABLE 1.—NOX, HC, NMHC, AND CO EMISSION STANDARDS IN G/KW-HR (G/HP-HR) FOR STATIONARY SI ENGINES >19
KW (25 HP)
Emission requirement in g/KW-hr (g/HP-hr)
Manufacture dateb
Engine classc
HC+NOX
I .................................................................................................................
16.1
(12.0)
50
(37)
40
(30)
12.1
(9.0)
I–A .............................................................................................................
I–B .............................................................................................................
II ................................................................................................................
aNMHC+NO standards are applicable only to natural gas
X
bModified and reconstructed engines manufactured prior
NMHC+NOXa
CO
14.8
(11.0)
........................
........................
37
(27.6)
11.3
(8.4)
610
(455)
January 1, 2008.
fueled engines at the option of the manufacturer, in lieu of HC+NOX standards.
to January 1, 2008, must meet the standards applicable to engines manufactured
after January 1, 2008.
cClass I–A: Engines with displacement <66 cubic centimeter (cc); Class I–B: Engines with displacement greater than or equal to 66 cc and less
than 100 cc; Class I: Engines with displacement greater than or equal to 100 cc and less than 225 cc; Class II: Engines with displacement greater than or equal to 225 cc.
b. Stationary SI Gasoline Engines >19
KW (25 HP) and Rich Burn LPG Engines
>19 KW (25 HP). Engine manufacturers
must certify their stationary SI engines
with a maximum engine power greater
than 19 KW (25 HP) and less than 500
HP that use gasoline or rich burn
engines greater than 19 KW (25 HP) and
less than 500 HP that use LPG that are
manufactured after January 1, 2008, to
the certification emission standards for
new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part
1048, as applicable. Engine
manufacturers must certify their
stationary SI engines with a maximum
engine power greater than or equal to
500 HP that use gasoline or rich burn
engines greater than or equal to 500 HP
that use LPG that are manufactured after
July 1, 2007, to the certification
emission standards for new nonroad SI
engines in 40 CFR part 1048. The
standards applicable to engines greater
than 19 KW (25 HP) that are gasoline or
rich burn engines that use LPG are
shown in Table 2 of this preamble.
TABLE 2.—NOX, HC, AND CO EMISSION STANDARDS IN G/KW-HR (G/HP-HR) FOR STATIONARY SI GASOLINE ENGINES
>19 KW (25 HP) AND RICH BURN LPG ENGINES >19 KW (25 HP)
Maximum engine power
Emission requirement in g/KW-hr
(g/HP-hr) a, b
Manufacture date
HC+NOX
January 1, 2008 .........................................................
HP≥500 d .....................................................................
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
252005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33809
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
c Modified and reconstructed engines between 25 and 500 HP manufactured prior to January 1, 2008, must meet the standards applicable to
engines manufactured after January 1, 2008.
d Modified and reconstructed engines greater than or equal to 500 HP manufactured prior to July 1, 2007, must meet the standards applicable
to engines manufactured after July 1, 2007.
In addition to the emission standards
shown in Table 2 of this preamble, there
are separate field testing standards
required under 40 CFR part 1048 that
are part of the certification requirements
for engine manufacturers.
c. Stationary Non-Emergency SI
Natural Gas Engines 1919KW (25 HP)
[Except Gasoline and Rich Burn LPG Engines]
Emission standards in g/HP-hr
Maximum
engine power
Engine type and fuel
Non-Emergency SI Natural Gas
and
Non-Emergency SI Lean Burn LPG ..............................
Non-Emergency SI Natural Gas
and
Non-Emergency SI Lean Burn LPG ..............................
Landfill/Digester Gas .....................................................
Manufacture date a
252005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
that are natural gas engines or lean burn
engines using LPG that are
manufactured after July 1, 2007, must
limit their exhaust emissions of NOX to
2.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of CO to 4.0 g/
HP-hr, and emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/
HP-hr. Engine manufacturers may
voluntarily certify these stationary SI
engines to these emission standards, but
the certification is not required by the
rule, as proposed. Stationary SI engines
with a maximum engine power greater
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
than or equal to 500 HP that are natural
gas engines or lean burn engines using
LPG that are manufactured after July 1,
2010, must limit their exhaust emissions
of NOX to 1.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of CO
to 2.0 g/HP-hr, and emissions of NMHC
to 0.7 g/HP-hr. Again, manufacturers
may voluntarily certify their engines to
these emission standards. A summary of
the emission standards EPA is
proposing for these engines is shown in
Table 3 of this preamble.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33810
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
f. Stationary SI Landfill/Digester Gas
Engines. Similar to other stationary SI
engines, EPA is proposing emission
standards in two stages for landfill and
digester gas fired engines. Owners and
operators who purchase stationary
landfill or digester SI engines that are
manufactured after July 1, 2007, that are
greater than or equal to 500 HP must
limit their exhaust emissions of NOX to
3.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of CO to 5.0 g/
HP-hr, and emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/
HP-hr. Stationary landfill and digester
gas SI engines greater than or equal to
500 HP that are manufactured after July
1, 2010, must limit their exhaust
emissions of NOX to 2.0 g/HP-hr,
emissions of CO to 5.0 g/HP-hr, and
emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/HP-hr.
Again, engine manufacturers may
voluntarily certify these stationary SI
engines to these emission standards, but
the certification is not required by the
rule, as proposed. Stationary SI engines
that use landfill or digester gas that are
less than 500 HP are given an extra 6
months to comply with the standards.
The first stage of limits of 3.0, 5.0, and
1.0 g/HP-hr, for NOX, CO, and NMHC,
respectively, applies to landfill and
digester gas engines manufactured after
January 1, 2008. The second stage of
limits of 2.0, 5.0, and 1.0 g/HP-hr, for
NOX, CO, and NMHC, respectively,
applies to landfill and digester gas
engines manufactured after January 1,
2011. A summary of the emission
standards EPA is proposing for these
engines is shown in Table 3 of this
preamble.
g. Stationary Emergency SI Engines.
For stationary SI engines that are
emergency engines, EPA is proposing a
single stage of emission limits. Owners
and operators who purchase stationary
emergency engines that are
manufactured after January 1, 2009,
must limit their exhaust emissions of
NOX to 2.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of CO to
4.0 g/HP-hr, and emissions of NMHC to
1.0 g/HP-hr.
h. Fuel Requirements. In addition to
emission standards, EPA is proposing
that owners and operators who use
gasoline in their stationary SI engine
must use gasoline that meets the
requirements of 40 CFR 80.195. The
requirements include a gasoline sulfur
per gallon cap of 80 parts per million
(ppm).
2. NESHAP
a. Engines ≤500 HP at Major Sources.
We are proposing that owners and
operators of new and reconstructed
stationary SI engines with a site rating
of equal to or less than 500 HP located
at a major source of HAP emissions
must generally meet the same NMHC
emission standards for new SI engines
as proposed for the NSPS in 40 CFR part
60, subpart JJJJ.
One major difference between the SI
NSPS and NESHAP requirements is that
owners and operators of new or
reconstructed 4SLB SI stationary
engines between 250 and 500 HP
located at a major source are required to
either reduce CO emissions by 93
percent or more, or limit the
concentration of formaldehyde in the
stationary engine exhaust to 14 ppm by
volume, dry basis (ppmvd) or less, at 15
percent oxygen (O2). These engines
would not be required to meet the
NMHC standard. The formaldehyde
standard is more stringent than the
NMHC stage 1 and stage 2 emission
standards of 1.0 and 0.7 g/HP-hr,
respectively.
Under the NESHAP, owners and
operators of new and reconstructed
landfill and digester gas fired engines
and new and reconstructed SI
emergency engines are subject to the
NMHC emission standards that are
being proposed under the SI NSPS. New
and reconstructed landfill and digester
gas engines must, under the NESHAP,
meet NMHC emission standards
consistent with the SI NSPS, i.e., a
NMHC standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr. Owners
and operators of stationary landfill and
digester gas engines must meet the
NMHC standard if they are
manufactured after January 1, 2008.
For new and reconstructed stationary
SI engines with a site rating of equal to
or less than 500 HP located at a major
source of HAP emissions that are
emergency engines, owners and
operators who purchase such engines
that are manufactured after January 1,
2009, must limit their exhaust emissions
of NMHC to 1.0 g/HP-hr.
Finally, owners and operators of new
and reconstructed stationary CI engines
with a site rating of equal to or less than
500 HP located at a major source of HAP
emissions that purchase 2007 model
year and later stationary CI engines
must meet the NMHC and PM emission
standards for new CI engines specified
in 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII. Those
standards are generally based on the
certification emission standards for new
nonroad CI engines. A summary of the
standards being proposed for stationary
engines less than or equal to 500 HP
located at major sources is presented in
Table 4 of this preamble.
Owners and operators of existing
stationary engines with a site rating of
equal to or less than 500 HP located at
a major source of HAP emissions have
an emissions standard of no emission
reduction and are not subject to any
specific requirements under subpart
ZZZZ or subpart A of 40 CFR part 63.
A stationary RICE is existing if it
commences construction or
reconstruction before June 12, 2006.
TABLE 4.—EMISSION STANDARDS FOR STATIONARY RICE >500 HP LOCATED AT MAJOR SOURCES OF HAP EMISSIONS
AND STATIONARY RICE LOCATED AT AREA SOURCES OF HAP EMISSIONS
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Engine type and fuel
Maximum engine
power
Manufacture date a
Existing All Fuels and All Types ............................
New/Reconstructed SI ...........................................
New/Reconstructed SI Gasoline and Rich Burn
LPG.
New/Reconstructed Non-Emergency SI Natural
Gas.
and
New/Reconstructed Non-Emergency SI Lean
Burn LPG b.
New/Reconstructed Non-Emergency SI Natural
Gas.
HP≤500 ..................................................................
All Sizes ...............
≤25 HP .................
25>HP<500 ..........
HP≥500 ................
252005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Emission standards
No Emission Reduction.
Meet 40 CFR part 60 subpart JJJJ.
Meet 40 CFR part 60 subpart JJJJ.
1.0 g/HP-hr NMHC.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
33811
TABLE 4.—EMISSION STANDARDS FOR STATIONARY RICE >500 HP LOCATED AT MAJOR SOURCES OF HAP EMISSIONS
AND STATIONARY RICE LOCATED AT AREA SOURCES OF HAP EMISSIONS—Continued
Maximum engine
power
Engine type and fuel
and
New/Reconstructed Non-Emergency SI Lean
Burn LPG.
New/Reconstructed Non-Emergency SI 4SLB at
Major Sources (except landfill and digester
gas) b.
CI All Fuels .............................................................
Landfill/Digester Gas ..............................................
Emergency SI .........................................................
Manufacture date a
..............................
July 1, 2010 .........
0.7 g/HP-hr NMHC.
2502005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
D. What are the requirements for
sources that are modified or
reconstructed?
1. SI NSPS
The proposed standards apply to
stationary SI engines subject to the SI
NSPS that are modified or reconstructed
after June 12, 2006. The guidelines for
determining whether a source is
modified or reconstructed are given in
40 CFR 60.14 and 40 CFR 60.15,
respectively.
Stationary SI ICE less than or equal to
19 KW (25 HP) manufactured prior to
January 1, 2008 that are modified or
reconstructed after June 12, 2006 are
required to meet the standards that
apply to engines manufactured after
January 1, 2008.
Stationary SI gasoline and rich burn
LPG engines between 25 HP and 500 HP
manufactured prior to January 1, 2008
that are modified or reconstructed after
June 12, 2006 are required to meet the
standards applicable to engines
manufactured after January 1, 2008.
Stationary SI gasoline and rich burn
LPG engines greater than or equal to 500
HP manufactured prior to July 1, 2007
that are modified or reconstructed after
June 12, 2006 are required to meet the
standards applicable to engines
manufactured after July 1, 2007.
Stationary SI natural gas and lean
burn LPG engines less than 500 HP
manufactured prior to January 1, 2008
that are modified or reconstructed after
June 12, 2006 are required to meet a
NOX emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr,
a CO standard of 4.0 g/HP-hr, and a
NMHC standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr.
Stationary SI natural gas and lean
burn LPG engines greater than or equal
to 500 HP manufactured prior to July 1,
2007 that are modified after June 12,
2006, are required to meet a NOX
emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr, a CO
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
standard of 4.0 g/HP-hr, and a NMHC
standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr.
Stationary SI landfill and digester gas
engines less than 500 HP manufactured
prior to January 1, 2008 that are
modified or reconstructed after June 12,
2006 are required to meet a NOX
emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr, a CO
standard of 5.0 g/HP-hr, and a NMHC
standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr. Stationary SI
landfill and digester gas engines greater
than or equal to 500 HP manufactured
prior to July 1, 2007 that are modified
after June 12, 2006 are required to meet
a NOX emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr,
a CO standard of 5.0 g/HP-hr, and a
NMHC standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr.
Stationary SI emergency engines
manufactured prior to January 1, 2009
that are modified or reconstructed after
June 12, 2006 are required to meet a
NOX emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr,
a CO standard of 4.0 g/HP-hr, and a
NMHC standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr.
2. NESHAP
Similar concepts as those discussed
above apply to engines subject to 40
CFR part 63 regulations; however, the
concept of modification is not included
in 40 CFR part 63. The proposed
standards apply to stationary engines
subject to the NESHAP that commence
reconstruction on or after June 12, 2006.
The reconstruction criteria are provided
in 40 CFR 63.2.
E. What are the requirements for
demonstrating compliance?
The following sections describe the
requirements for demonstrating
compliance under the stationary SI
NSPS and NESHAP.
1. SI NSPS
Owners and operators of stationary
engines subject to the requirements of
the SI NSPS must operate and maintain
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
33812
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
their stationary engine and after
treatment control device (if any)
according to the manufacturer’s written
instructions. Manufacturers of
stationary SI engines required to certify
their engines must demonstrate
compliance by certifying that their
stationary SI engines meet the emission
standards, as specified in 40 CFR part
60, subpart JJJJ, as applicable, using the
certification procedures in subpart B of
40 CFR part 90 and subpart C of 40 CFR
part 1048, as applicable, and must test
their engines as specified in those parts.
Manufacturers who conduct voluntary
certification must follow the same test
procedures that apply to large SI
nonroad engines under 40 CFR part
1048, but must use the D–2 cycle in
International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) 8178–4 for
stationary engines. The test cycle
requirements that manufacturers who
conduct voluntary certification should
follow are provided in Table 3 to 40
CFR 1048.505.
Manufacturers who opt to voluntary
certify their stationary SI engines to the
emission standards specified in this
subpart must certify their engines using
fuel that meets the definition of
pipeline-quality natural gas, which
according to the proposed definition
must be composed of at least 70 percent
methane by volume or have a gross
calorific value between 950 and 1,100
British thermal units per standard cubic
foot.
If the manufacturer chooses to certify
its stationary SI engines to another fuel,
the manufacturer must specify the
properties of that fuel and what
adjustments the owner or operator must
make to the engine during installation
in the field in order to meet the
emission standards. The manufacturer
must also perform certification testing
on the engine on that fuel, as it would
if it was certifying to pipeline-quality
natural gas, in order to assure
compliance with the emission
standards. Manufacturers who conduct
voluntary certification of stationary SI
ICE must also provide instructions to
the owner and operator for configuring
the stationary engine to meet the
emission standards on fuels that meet
the pipeline-quality natural gas
specifications and fuels that do not meet
the pipeline-quality natural gas
specifications. The manufacturer must
provide information to the owner and
operator of the certified stationary SI
engine regarding the particular fuels to
which the engine is certified, and
instructions regarding configuring the
engine in a manner most appropriate for
reducing pollutant emissions for
engines operating on such fuels. Owners
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
and operators may operate their
certified engine on other fuels that the
engine is not certified to, but the engine
would no longer be considered a
certified engine and the owner or
operator would be required to test the
engine to demonstrate compliance with
the emission standards.
EPA is proposing to allow owners and
operators of natural gas engines to use
propane as back up fuel for emergency
purposes for no more than 100 hours
per year. If propane is used for more
than 100 hours per year in an engine
that is not certified to the emission
standards when using propane, the
owners and operators are required to
conduct a performance test to
demonstrate compliance with the
emission standards.
Owners and operators that operate
engines that have been certified by the
engine manufacturer are not required to
perform any performance testing unless
the engine is operated outside of the
fuel properties specified by the
manufacturer. If the owner or operator
uses fuels that are outside of the fuel
specifications or does not follow the
adjustments specified by the
manufacturer, the engine is no longer
considered a certified engine and the
owner or operator must test the engine
to demonstrate compliance. If the
engine is no longer considered a
certified engine, the owner or operator
must test the engine according to the
test procedures that are specified for
uncertified engines, as specified in this
proposed rule.
Owners and operators subject to the
emission standards specified in this
proposed rule who use stationary SI
engines with a maximum engine power
of less than or equal to 19 KW (25 HP)
or who use stationary SI engines with a
maximum engine power greater than 19
KW (25 HP) and use gasoline or are rich
burn engines greater than 19 KW (25
HP) using LPG must demonstrate
compliance by using an engine certified
to the emission standards specified in
40 CFR part 90 or 1048, as applicable.
Owners and operators subject to this
proposed rule who use stationary SI
engines with a maximum engine power
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that use
fuels other than gasoline and that are
not rich burn engines greater than 19
KW (25 HP) that use LPG, must
demonstrate compliance by either using
an engine certified to the emission
standards specified in Table 3 of this
preamble or by conducting an initial
performance test to demonstrate
compliance with the emission standards
specified in Table 3 of this preamble. If
the owner or operator purchases a
certified engine, performance testing
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
would not be required (unless the
engine is operated differently than
specified by the manufacturer). Owners
and operators of uncertified engines that
are greater than 500 HP must conduct
subsequent performance tests every 3
years, or 8,760 hours of operation,
whichever comes first.
2. NESHAP
Consistent with the requirements for
owners and operators subject to the SI
NSPS, owners and operators of
stationary engines subject to the
requirements of the NESHAP must also
operate and maintain their stationary
engine and exhaust aftertreatment
device (if any) according to the
manufacturer’s written instructions.
This requirement applies to stationary
SI and CI engines regulated under this
proposed rule.
Owners and operators subject to the
NESHAP who use stationary SI engines
must demonstrate compliance by
meeting the NMHC emission standards
specified in 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ
(unless they are new or reconstructed
non-emergency 4SLB SI stationary RICE
between 250 and 500 HP located at
major sources). Under 40 CFR part 60,
subpart JJJJ, as described in the previous
section, certain stationary SI engines
must be certified to the emission
standards in 40 CFR part 90 or 1048, as
applicable.
Owners and operators of uncertified
SI engines subject to the emission
standards proposed in the NESHAP
must conduct an initial performance test
to demonstrate compliance with the
emission standards. Owners and
operators of certified engines are not
required to conduct any performance
testing (unless the engine is operated
differently than procedures specified by
the manufacturer or procedures
developed by the owner or operator that
are approved by the engine
manufacturer). Owners and operators of
uncertified engines that are greater than
500 HP, subject to the emission
standards proposed in this action must
conduct subsequent performance tests
every 3 years, or 8,760 hours of
operation, whichever comes first.
Owners and operators of uncertified
engines subject to emission standards
that are less than or equal to 500 HP are
not required to perform subsequent
performance tests after the initial
performance test, unless the stationary
engine is rebuilt or undergoes major
repair or maintenance.
Owners and operators of new and
reconstructed non-emergency 4SLB
engines between 250 and 500 HP that
are located at major sources of HAP
emissions must demonstrate compliance
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
by conducting an initial performance
test. These engines must also conduct
subsequent performance test
semiannually if they are complying with
the requirement to reduce CO emissions
and not using a continuous emissions
monitoring system, and if they are
complying with the requirement to limit
the concentration of formaldehyde in
the stationary engine exhaust.
Owners and operators subject to the
NESHAP who use stationary CI engines
must demonstrate compliance by using
an engine certified to the NMHC and
PM emission standards specified in 40
CFR part 60, subpart IIII, and by
operating their engine properly, as
stated above. The only exception is for
owners and operators of stationary CI
engines with a displacement of greater
than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder
who must demonstrate compliance
through performance testing.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
F. What are the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements?
The following sections describe the
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements that are required under the
SI NSPS and the NESHAP.
1. SI NSPS
Owners and operators of all engines
(certified and uncertified) are required
to maintain records of proper
maintenance. An initial notification is
required for owners and operators of
engines greater than 500 HP that are not
certified. Also, owners and operators
who conduct performance testing are
required to report the test results within
30 days of each performance test.
Owners and operators of emergency
engines are required to keep records of
their hours of operation. Owners and
operators must install a non-resettable
hour meter on their engines to record
the necessary information. Emergency
stationary engines may be operated for
the purpose of maintenance checks and
readiness testing, provided that the tests
are recommended by the Federal, State
or local government, the manufacturer,
the vendor, or the insurance company
associated with the engine. Maintenance
checks and readiness testing of such
units is limited to 100 hours per year.
Owners and operators can petition the
Administrator for additional hours,
beyond the allowed 100 hours per year,
if such additional hours should prove to
be necessary for maintenance and
testing reasons. A petition is not
required if the hours beyond 100 hours
per year for maintenance and testing
purposes are mandated by regulation
such as State or local requirements.
There is no time limit on the use of
emergency stationary engines in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
emergency situations, however, the
owner or operator is required to record
the length of operation and the reason
the engine was in operation during that
time. Records must be maintained
documenting why the engine was
operating to ensure the 100 hours per
year limit for maintenance and testing
operation is not exceeded.
2. NESHAP
Consistent with the SI NSPS (and the
already proposed CI NSPS), owners and
operators of stationary emergency
engines (SI and CI) are required to keep
records of their hours of operation
under the NESHAP. Owners and
operators must install a non-resettable
hour meter on their engines to record
the necessary information. Emergency
stationary engines may be operated for
the purpose of maintenance checks and
readiness testing, provided that the tests
are recommended by Federal, State or
local government, the manufacturer, the
vendor, or the insurance company
associated with the engine. Maintenance
checks and readiness testing of such
units is limited to 100 hours per year.
Owners and operators can petition the
Administrator for additional hours,
beyond the allowed 100 hours per year,
if such additional hours should prove to
be necessary for maintenance and
testing reasons. A petition is not
required if the hours beyond 100 hours
per year for maintenance and testing
purposes are mandated by regulation
such as State or local requirements.
There is no time limit on the use of
emergency stationary engines in
emergency situations. Owners and
operators must also maintain records
documenting the reason the engine was
in operation.
The above proposed requirement to
limit the operation of maintenance and
testing operation to 100 hours per year
is different than the requirement that
was finalized for stationary engines
greater than 500 HP located at major
sources. Currently, stationary
emergency engines greater than 500 HP
located at major sources are required to
limit non-emergency operation to 50
hours per year. Multiple comments
received during the public comment
period for NSPS for stationary CI
engines argued that EPA should allow
100 hours per year for emergency
engines to conduct necessary
maintenance and testing. Based on those
comments, EPA believes it would be
appropriate to propose to allow 100
hours per year for maintenance and
testing operation for emergency engines.
As discussed, EPA is proposing 100
hours per year for maintenance and
testing operation under the SI NSPS and
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33813
the NESHAP being proposed in this
action for stationary engines with a site
rating of 500 HP or less located at major
sources and stationary engines located
at area sources. EPA believes it is
appropriate to propose to amend the
requirements of stationary engines
greater than 500 HP located at major
sources to allow emergency engines to
operate 100 hours per year for
maintenance and testing purposes. It is
crucial to allow sufficient hours for
maintenance and readiness testing to
ensure that the emergency engine will
respond as expected in the event of an
emergency and EPA believes that 100
hours per year is adequate. EPA also
believes it is appropriate to amend the
emergency engine hour limitation in the
NESHAP for stationary RICE greater
than 500 HP located at major sources to
ensure consistency between regulations
affecting the same or similar sources.
Further, as discussed, based on
information received since the
promulgation of the NESHAP for
stationary RICE greater than 500 HP
located at major sources, the 50 hours
per year allowance currently in that
regulation would not be sufficient to
address necessary maintenance, testing,
and readiness operation for emergency
engines, and EPA is, therefore,
proposing to increase the limitation to
100 hours per year.
Owners and operators of new and
reconstructed stationary RICE which fire
landfill or digester gas equivalent to 10
percent or more of the gross heat input
on an annual affected by subpart ZZZZ
of 40 CFR part 63, must monitor and
record the fuel usage daily with separate
fuel meters to measure the volumetric
flow rate of each fuel.
IV. Rationale for Proposed Rule
A. Which control technologies apply to
stationary engines?
EPA reviewed various control
technologies applicable to stationary
engines. For detailed information on the
control technology review that EPA
conducted, refer to information in the
docket for this proposed rule. The
following sections provide general
descriptions of currently available
controls that can be used to reduce
emissions from stationary engines.
Non-selective catalytic reduction
(NSCR) has been commercially available
for many years and has been widely
used on stationary engines. The
technology can be applied to rich burn
stationary engines and is capable of
reducing NOX emissions by 90 percent
or more. The technology also reduces
CO by about 90 percent. Emissions of
NMHC and HAP are also reduced by
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
33814
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
using the catalyst and significant
reductions have been recorded. Based
on our information, NSCR appears to be
technically feasible for rich burn
engines down to 19 KW (25 HP).
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is
applicable to lean burn stationary
engines, but has not been widely used
on stationary SI engines. This
technology is capable of achieving NOX
reductions of at least 90 percent. An
oxidation catalyst is often used in
conjunction with SCR to reduce
emissions of CO, NMHC, and HAP. The
technology has not been commonly
applied to stationary engines and if
applied, the applications have typically
been on larger lean burn engines. Costs
of SCR are generally high, including
significant equipment, installation, and
operating costs.
Oxidation catalyst is another type of
aftertreatment that can be applied to
stationary engines and is typically used
with lean burn engines. The technology
can be applied to either diesel or gas
fired lean burn engines. Emissions of
CO can be reduced by 90 percent or
more and significant NMHC and HAP
reductions are also possible. Applying
the technology to diesel fired engines
can reduce PM by about 25 to 30
percent. Oxidation catalyst control has
been widely used and has been
available for decades for use with lean
burn stationary engines.
Catalyzed diesel particulate filters
(CDPF) are applicable to CI engines
using diesel fuel and are primarily used
to reduce PM emissions. The technology
is a newer technology than other
aftertreatment control devices, but is
becoming increasingly widespread.
Applying CDPF can reduce PM
emissions by 90 percent or more, and
reductions in CO and HAP can be
significant. The technology appears to
be applicable to a wide range of diesel
engines, except there may be issues with
respect to applying the technology to
smaller engines (less than 19 KW (25
HP)), and potentially also to extremely
large engines (several thousand HP).
Catalyzed diesel particulate filters are
the basis for the Tier 4 emission
standards for PM for most nonroad CI
engines regulated by 40 CFR part 1039
and also for most new non-emergency
stationary CI engines regulated under 40
CFR part 60, subpart IIII. Recently
finalized standards for stationary CI
engines in California are also based on
the use of particulate filters in some
cases.
Stationary SI engines burning natural
gas typically have low levels of PM in
the order of 0.01 g/HP-hr, according to
engine manufacturers. This level is
comparable to Tier 4 levels that nonroad
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
and stationary CI engines will achieve
with CDPF. For these reasons, EPA is
not proposing PM emission standards
for stationary SI engines. Emissions of
sulfur oxides (SOX) are usually low from
natural gas fired engines since, in most
cases, the fuel is inherently very low in
sulfur. There are no controls currently
available to control SOX in the exhaust
from stationary engines; the only way to
limit SOX is to minimize sulfur in the
fuel.
Although aftertreatment devices can
help achieve very significant reductions
in exhaust emissions from stationary
engines, there are other strategies
available which can help reduce
emissions. For example, lean burn
technology alone produces much lower
levels of NOX than rich burn engines. In
a lean burn engine, excess air is
introduced into the engine with the fuel,
reducing the temperature of the
combustion process, which in turn
reduces the NOX significantly compared
to a rich burn engine. Also, because
excess O2 is available, combustion is
more efficient, so more power is
produced with the same amount of fuel.
Another example of an emission
reduction strategy that prevents the
formation of NOX is exhaust gas
recirculation. Exhaust gas recirculation
has been widely used in automotive
engines for many years to reduce NOX
emissions and could potentially be used
in stationary engine applications. Also,
in SI engines, modifications of the
combustion chamber and fuel metering
system can help improve mixing of the
fuel and air, thus improving NMHC
emissions. Spark-timing calibrations can
also help reduce CO and NMHC
emissions.
B. How did EPA determine the basis and
level of the proposed standards?
1. SI NSPS
Section 111 of the CAA states that a
standard of performance ‘‘means a
standard * * * which reflects the
degree of emission limitation achievable
through application of the best system
of emission reduction which (taking
into account the cost of achieving such
reduction and any non-air quality health
and environmental impact and energy
requirements) the Administrator
determines has been adequately
demonstrated.’’
The following discussion provides
additional information by identifying
specific technologies (referred to
hereafter as ‘‘BDT’’) that EPA anticipates
to be used to meet the NSPS. It must be
noted, however, that EPA’s proposal is
that the best system of emissions
reductions that has been adequately
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
demonstrated is a set of emissions
standards, including an averaging,
banking and trading program, where
applicable, that allows for the use of
other potential technologies that meet or
exceed the standards.
a. Stationary SI Engines ≤19 KW (25
HP). For stationary SI engines less than
or equal to 19 KW (25 HP), the
technologies that are the basis of the
proposed standards are expected to be
the same as the technologies that are the
basis for the nonroad SI engine Phase 2
standards in this size range. The Phase
2 nonroad engine program will lead to
increased use of automotive-style
overhead valve technology for
nonhandheld engines and is expected to
be the technology that is relied upon to
meet Phase 2 emission standards.
Stationary engines less than or equal to
19 KW (25 HP) are required to be
certified to the emission standards for
new nonroad SI engines as specified in
40 CFR part 90. These standards are
separated by the class of the engine
(Class I through Class V) and each class
is determined by the use of the engine,
i.e., handheld or nonhandheld, and
engine displacement. Phase 1 standards
took effect for most new handheld and
nonhandheld engines beginning in
model year 1997. Phase 2 standards for
nonhandheld engines are being phased
in between 2001 and 2007. Phase 2
standards for handheld engines have
been phased in starting in 2002. EPA
believes it is appropriate to require new
stationary SI engines less than or equal
to 19 KW (25 HP) to meet the Phase 2
emission standards for nonhandheld
nonroad SI engines, as nonhandheld
engines would be more similar to
stationary engines than handheld
engines, and because by definition, a
stationary engine cannot be a handheld
engine. EPA believes that it is
appropriate that the emission standards
for new stationary SI engines less than
or equal to 19 KW (25 HP) are the same
as those for nonroad SI engines in this
size range. To determine the BDT for
these size engines, EPA analyzed the
emission control strategies selected for
the nonroad SI engine rule for engines
less than or equal to 19 KW (25 HP).
EPA concluded that the level and
implementation timing of the nonroad
SI engine standards are the most
appropriate that can be justified for this
size group of engines. EPA believes a
manufacturer-based certification
program is also appropriate for this
group of engines and that there is little
difference, if any, between nonroad and
stationary SI engines in this size range.
Engine manufacturers are already
familiar with and have experience in
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
certifying their engine families
according to EPA’s certification
program. For the reasons provided, BDT
for stationary SI engines less than or
equal to 19 KW (25 HP) is determined
to be the control technologies used to
comply with Phase 2 emission
standards for nonhandheld nonroad SI
engines under 40 CFR part 90. EPA is
also proposing to allow manufacturers
to certify any engine with a maximum
engine power between 19 and 30 KW
(25 and 40 HP) with total displacement
of 1,000 cc or less to the nonhandheld
nonroad SI engine standards under 40
CFR part 90. This option is already
available for nonroad engines with these
maximum power and displacement
characteristics.
EPA expects to propose new
standards in the near future applicable
to nonroad SI engines less than or equal
to 19 KW (25 HP) that will be more
stringent than Phase 2 standards, giving
appropriate lead time for the
requirements. EPA will consider
incorporating these more stringent
standards into its stationary SI NSPS
regulations as they apply to stationary
SI engines in this HP range at the same
time it revises its nonroad standards for
SI engines.
EPA requests public comment on the
issue of evaluating the appropriateness
of future small non-road engine
emission standards as they may apply to
stationary SI engines less than or equal
to 19 KW (25 HP).
b. Stationary SI Gasoline Engines >19
KW (25 HP) and Rich Burn LPG Engines
>19 KW (25 HP). For stationary SI
engines greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that
use gasoline and rich burn engines
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that use
LPG, the technology that is the basis of
the proposed standards are the
technologies used by nonroad SI
engines greater than 19 KW (25 HP) to
comply with the emission standards in
40 CFR part 1048. The majority of
nonroad SI engines greater than 19 KW
(25 HP) use LPG, but some operate on
gasoline or natural gas. There are two
tiers for nonroad SI engines in this size
category. Tier 1 standards were
scheduled to begin in 2004; Tier 2
standards will begin in 2007. The
upcoming Tier 2 standards are based on
three-way catalyst systems with
electronic, closed-loop fuel systems. For
stationary SI engines greater than 19 KW
(25 HP) that use gasoline or are rich
burn engines greater than 19 KW (25
HP) that use LPG, EPA believes these
engines are very similar to nonroad SI
equipment, and the same engines
designed for use in nonroad
applications are used in stationary
applications. Therefore, for stationary SI
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
engines greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that
use gasoline and rich burn engines
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that use
LPG, the BDT is the technology that is
the basis for the Tier 2 emission
standards for nonroad engines above 19
KW (25 HP) regulated under 40 CFR
part 1048.
c. Stationary Non-Emergency SI
Natural Gas Engines 252005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
design, low NOX emitting units and
have sometimes been favored over rich
burn engines in areas with stringent air
pollution control requirements due to
their lower NOX level. There are no
other currently available add-on control
technologies on the market to further
reduce NOX emissions from stationary
SI lean burn engines, but low NOX
emission strategies and design are
currently being used to minimize NOX
levels. Based on information received
from engine manufacturers who
produce such engines, average NOX
levels from 4SLB engines are between
1.0 and 2.0 g/HP-hr, which are
comparable to engine-out NOX levels
from a rich burn engine with a catalyst.
Carbon monoxide levels are also low
from these engines and can be as low as
2.0 g/HP-hr. Stationary SI uncontrolled
lean burn engines are much cleaner than
uncontrolled rich burn engines. Levels
of CO in lean burn engines are much
lower than rich burn engines. Although
oxidation catalysts can be installed in
lean burn engines, EPA believes that no
further controls are needed, given the
already-low engine-out CO and NMHC
emissions from them. The CO levels
emitted from new lean burn SI engines
are comparable to controlled levels from
rich burn engines. For these reasons, the
BDT for stationary SI lean burn engines
is the low emitting level achieved by
design and on-engine controls, and
other combustion optimization
techniques employed in new stationary
SI lean burn engines. The BDT is the
level achieved by new lean burn
engines.
There are a few new stationary natural
gas fired 2SLB sold per year in the U.S.,
but the total number manufactured and
sold in the U.S. is insignificant
compared to the number of other engine
designs sold. In addition, there are only
a few manufacturers who produce such
engines. Available information shows
that 2SLB engines that are pre-chamber
combustion designs have similar
emissions to natural gas fired 4SLB
engines, and one manufacturer
indicated that nearly all of the engines
it sells for the U.S. are pre-chamber
combustion engines.
d. Stationary Non-Emergency Natural
Gas Engines ≥500 HP and Lean Burn
LPG Engines ≥500 HP. For natural gas
fired rich burn engines greater than or
equal to 500 HP, the technology that is
the basis for the proposed standards is
NSCR. The technology was discussed in
previous sections of this preamble and
for the reasons discussed in that section,
NSCR represents BDT for natural gas
fired rich burn engines 500 HP and
above.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
The technology that is the basis for
the proposed standards for lean burn
natural gas and LPG engines greater
than or equal to 500 HP is the level
achieved by design and on-engine
controls, and other combustion
optimization techniques employed in
new stationary SI lean burn engines. As
discussed previously, EPA considered
the use of SCR, but rejected the
technology as BDT based on several
factors. Emission levels from SI lean
burn engines are comparable to
controlled levels from rich burn engines
and engine-out emissions from SI lean
burn engines are at already low levels.
New stationary natural gas engines
greater than or equal to 500 HP and lean
burn LPG engines greater than or equal
to 500 HP must comply with two stages
of limits. The first stage, effective for
engines manufactured after July 1, 2007,
requires these engines to comply with a
NOX limit of 2.0 g/HP-hr, a CO limit of
4.0 g/HP-hr, and a NMHC limit of 1.0 g/
HP-hr. A second stage of limits, effective
for engines manufactured after July 1,
2010, requires these engines to comply
with a NOX limit of 1.0 g/HP-hr, a CO
limit of 2.0 g/HP-hr, and a NMHC limit
of 0.7 g/HP-hr. EPA is proposing that
stage 1 limits apply to engines
manufactured after July 1, 2007, to
provide enough lead time to make the
necessary preparations and adjustment
in order to meet the proposed limits. An
extra 3 years is being proposed to reach
compliance with stage 2 limits to
account for further redesign,
manufacturing and implementation
issues that manufacturers and owner
and operators must handle in order to
meet these limits. EPA believes it is
appropriate to distinguish between less
than 500 HP engines and greater than or
equal to 500 HP engines with respect to
effective dates of stage 1 and stage 2
limits. In order to spread out resources
and costs, EPA believes it is appropriate
to provide additional time for engines
less than 500 HP to meet the standards.
e. Stationary SI Landfill/Digester Gas
Engines. For stationary landfill and
digester gas fired engines, EPA
evaluated currently available control
technologies. Chemicals in landfill and
digester gas fuels called siloxanes
poison the catalyst in add-on control
technologies such as SCR, NSCR, and
oxidation catalysts, rendering them
ineffective in very short periods of time.
(See discussion below.) Emission
standards requiring aftertreatment
controls from such engines have
typically not been required due to
poisoning of the catalyst leading to poor
reduction efficiencies and eventually
destroying the add-on control device.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
For this reason, EPA did not consider
add-on control for landfill and digester
gas applications.
The technology that is the basis for
the proposed standards for landfill and
digester gas engines is the level
achieved by new lean burn engines.
EPA has been told that lean burn
engines are the preferred choice for
landfill and digester gas applications
because these engines have the lowest
NOX emissions without add-on control.
Information EPA gathered during the
proposal also shows that the majority of
landfill applications use lean burn
engines. There may be some rich burn
engines being used in wastewater
applications, and EPA is requesting
comment on how common rich burn
engine designs are in landfill and
digester gas applications.
Test results EPA has obtained from
various sanitation districts and
regulatory control agencies indicate that
landfill and digester gas engines are
capable of meeting similar emission
levels to those engines that are using
natural gas fuels. However, there is a lot
of variability in landfill and digester gas,
and the methane content can change
considerably from day to day. For these
reasons, EPA is proposing emission
standards that are similar to, but
somewhat less stringent than, the
standards for engines combusting
natural gas. Lean burn engines are lower
NOX emitting units. EPA wishes to
promote cleaner technology through
proposing emission standards based on
low NOX design.
For stationary landfill and digester gas
fired engines, EPA is proposing separate
effective dates based on the size of the
engine. In order to prepare the market
for regulations applicable to these
engines, EPA is proposing stage 1 limits
for landfill and digester gas engines less
than 500 HP that are manufactured after
January 1, 2008. Stage 2 limits are
required for landfill and digester gas
engines less than 500 HP manufactured
after January 1, 2011. Again, EPA
believes it must provide adequate time
between stages 1 and 2 in order for the
market to make the necessary
adjustments to meet stage 2 standards.
EPA is proposing that landfill and
digester gas engines greater than or
equal to 500 HP meet stage 1 limits if
they are manufactured after July 1, 2007,
and stage 2 limits after July 1, 2010.
All landfill and digester gas engines
are required to meet a NOX limit of 3.0
g/HP-hr for stage 1 and a NOX limit of
2.0 g/HP-hr for stage 2. The stage 2 CO
and NMHC limits for these engines are
not more stringent than stage 1, but
remain the same for both stages at 5.0
and 1.0 g/HP-hr for CO and NMHC,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
respectively. EPA believes that trying to
control the CO in these engines beyond
5.0 g/HP-hr may cause instability and
could affect the ability of the engine to
reduce NOX levels; therefore, the same
CO limit is being proposed for both
stages. Emissions of NMHC are similar
to natural gas fueled engines, but in
order to provide landfill and digester
gas engines with some flexibility to
account for variability in the fuel, which
can be beyond the control of the
operator, EPA is proposing a NMHC
limit that remains the same between
stage 1 and stage 2 and is not proposing
a more stringent limit for NMHC for the
second stage.
f. Stationary Emergency SI Engines.
As with landfill and digester gas fired
applications, add-on controls have
typically not been required on
stationary emergency engines.
Stationary engines used for emergency
purposes are operated infrequently, and
aftertreatment has often been avoided
because of factors such as high costs per
ton of pollutant removed due to short
periods of operation. EPA’s recently
proposed regulations for stationary CI
engines that required only in-engine
controls for emergency engines, and did
not require stringent standards based on
add-on controls for stationary CI engines
used for emergency purposes. Similarly,
the RICE NESHAP promulgated in 2004
(69 FR 33474) did not require
emergency engines to meet emission
control requirements.
Engine manufacturers expressed
during the proposal process that
emergency SI engines should be exempt
from emission standards, citing similar
reasons to those provided above.
However, we do not agree that
emergency engines should be exempt
from the standards.
Therefore, we have established that
the technology that is the basis for the
standards for stationary emergency
engines is the level achieved by new
lean burn engines. Lean burn engines
are available in the power ranges that
include emergency engines. EPA
expects that the emission standards for
emergency engines will be met with
lean burn engines. Lean burn engines
are available and represent the cleanest
technology available without the use of
exhaust aftertreatment.
EPA is providing stationary
emergency engines significant lead-time
to prepare to meet the proposed
standards for emergency engines. This is
particularly appropriate because
emergency engines have generally not
previously been subject to emission
standards and therefore have not
necessarily been optimized for
emissions performance.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33817
EPA is proposing a single stage of
emission standards for emergency
engines beginning in January 1, 2009.
Stationary SI emergency engines
manufactured after this date must meet
a NOX limit of 2.0 g/HP-hr, a CO limit
of 4.0 g/HP-hr, and a NMHC limit of 1.0
g/HP-hr. As previously discussed in this
preamble, stationary SI lean burn
engines emit low levels of NOX, in the
range of 1.0 to 2.0 g/HP-hr, which
means the limit being proposed for NOX
is achievable. Similar conclusions can
be made regarding CO and NMHC as
well.
g. Modified and Reconstructed
Stationary SI Engines. EPA is proposing
that owners and operators of stationary
SI natural gas and lean burn LPG
engines that are modified or
reconstructed and become subject to
this proposed rule limit their exhaust
emissions of NOX to 3.0 g/HP-hr,
emissions of CO to 4.0 g/HP-hr, and
emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/HP-hr.
These emission standards are consistent
with the proposed Stage 1 emission
standards for new natural gas and lean
burn LPG engines, except that a less
stringent NOX emission standard is
being proposed for these engines.
There are technical difficulties in
reaching a NOX level of 2.0 g/HP-hr for
modified and reconstructed engines that
were not originally built to meet a 2.0
g/HP-hr standard, and such a level, even
where technically feasible, would in
many cases require extensive work. In
addition, lowering emissions of NOX
down to 2.0 g/HP-hr, even where
possible, would often be very costly.
EPA discussed this issue in one of the
final rules associated with the NOX
State Implementation Plan call (69 FR
21604, 21617–21621). Therefore, EPA
believes it is more appropriate to
propose to require that modified and
reconstructed engines manufactured
prior to the dates when the 2.0 g/HP-hr
standard takes effect must meet a NOX
emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr. This
level can be achieved with retrofit
technology without extensive hardware
replacements and can be achieved
without unreasonable costs.
2. NESHAP
Section 112 of the CAA requires that
we establish NESHAP for the control of
HAP from new and existing sources in
regulated source categories. The CAA
requires the NESHAP for major sources
to reflect the maximum degree of
reduction in emissions of HAP that is
achievable. This level of control is
commonly referred to as the MACT.
The MACT floor is the minimum
control level allowed for NESHAP and
is defined under section 112(d)(3) of the
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
33818
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
CAA. In essence, the MACT floor
ensures that the standards are set at a
level that assures that all major sources
achieve the level of control at least as
stringent as that already achieved by the
better controlled and lower emitting
sources in each source category or
subcategory.
For new sources, the MACT floor
cannot be less stringent than the
emission control that is achieved in
practice by the best controlled similar
source. The MACT standards for
existing sources can be less stringent
than standards for new sources, but they
cannot be less stringent than the average
emission limitation achieved by the best
performing 12 percent of existing
sources in the category or subcategory
(or the best performing 5 sources for
categories or subcategories with fewer
than 30 sources).
In developing MACT, we also
consider control options that are more
stringent than the floor. We may
establish standards more stringent than
the floor based on the consideration of
cost of achieving the emissions
reductions, any non-air quality health
and environmental impacts, and energy
requirements.
Section 112 of the CAA allows EPA to
establish subcategories among a group
of sources, based on criteria that
differentiate such sources. The
subcategories that have been developed
for stationary RICE were previously
listed and are necessary in order to
capture the distinct differences, which
could affect the emissions of HAP from
these engines. The complete rationale
explaining the development of these
subcategories is provided in the
memorandum titled Subcategorization
of Stationary Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines 500 HP available
from the docket.
a. Engines ≤500 HP at Major Sources.
For the MACT floor determination, EPA
s Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards RICE Population Database
(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Population
Database’’) was consulted. The
Population Database, which was
developed for the stationary RICE
NESHAP for engines greater than 500
HP at major sources, represents the best
information available to EPA.
Information in the Population
Database was obtained from several
sources and is further described in the
notice of proposed rulemaking for the
RICE NESHAP (67 FR 77830). EPA
queried the Population Database to
determine how many stationary RICE
less than or equal to 500 HP have
catalyst type controls. According to the
Population Database, neither engines
less than 50 HP, landfill/digester gas
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
fired engines, CI emergency engines, CI
non-emergency engines, SI emergency
engines, nor non-emergency 2SLB
engines are equipped with catalyst type
controls. The Population Database
indicates that 32 (3.7 percent) out of 861
non-emergency use 4SLB engines are
equipped with catalyst type controls.
Out of a total of 3,533 non-emergency
4SRB engines 50 to 500 HP, 197 are
using catalyst type controls (5.6
percent). The percentage for 4SRB
engines may or may not be
representative of current conditions,
and EPA requests comments on this
issue. For further information on EPA’s
analysis on the Population Database,
refer to the docket for this proposed
rule.
MACT Floor for Existing Sources
The MACT floor for existing
stationary RICE must be no less
stringent than the average emission
limitation achieved by the best
performing 12 percent of existing
sources. According to information in the
Population Database, there are no
existing engines less than 50 HP,
landfill/digester gas fired engines, CI
emergency engines, CI non-emergency
engines, SI emergency engines, or nonemergency 2SLB engines that use
catalyst type controls. Therefore, the
MACT floor for these subcategories is no
further emissions reductions.
For existing non-emergency 4SLB
engines between 50 and 500 HP, there
are insufficient numbers of engines
using add-on controls that may reduce
HAP to support basing the MACT floor
on the use of add-on controls. The
percentage (3.7) is below the criteria for
a MACT floor that would require
emissions reductions for existing
stationary 4SLB engines. Therefore, the
MACT floor for existing non-emergency
use stationary 4SLB engines 50 to 500
HP is no further emissions reductions.
The percentage for existing nonemergency 4SRB engines is also below
the criteria for a MACT floor that would
require emissions reductions for
existing 4SRB engines. Therefore, the
MACT floor for existing non-emergency
use stationary 4SRB engines 50 to 500
HP is no further emissions reductions.
MACT for Existing Sources
As stated, for existing sources, the
MACT floor for each of the
subcategories is no emission reduction,
and the MACT standard must be no less
stringent than the MACT floor.
EPA considered one regulatory option
more stringent than the MACT floor for
existing 2SLB and existing 4SLB
engines, i.e., requiring a specific HAP
reduction through the use of an
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
oxidation catalyst. Oxidation catalysts
provide significant reductions of HAP
emissions, as well as considerable
reductions of CO. Catalyst cost
information was obtained from vendors
of catalytic control equipment and
annual costs were derived from the data.
Estimates of cost per ton of applying
oxidation catalyst to various size
engines were developed. The cost of
oxidation catalysts was determined to
outweigh the potential HAP emission
reduction benefits for these
subcategories. Therefore, the beyondthe-floor option was determined as
inappropriate for these subcategories.
Non-air quality health, environmental
impacts and energy effects were also not
significant factors. EPA is not aware of
any other options which could serve as
the basis for MACT to reduce HAP
emissions from existing 2SLB and
existing 4SLB engines. Therefore,
MACT is equal to the MACT floor for
these engines. For specific details on
this analysis, refer to memorandum
entitled ‘‘Regulatory Alternatives and
MACT for Stationary Reciprocating
Internal Combustion Engines ≤500 HP at
Major Sources,’’ available from the
docket for this proposed rule.
EPA considered one regulatory option
more stringent than the MACT floor for
existing 4SRB engines, i.e., requiring a
specific HAP reduction through the use
of NSCR.
An NSCR, or three-way catalyst, is a
catalytic post-combustion control device
that oxidizes HAP emissions, and also
reduces criteria pollutants such as NOX
and CO. To operate effectively, NSCR
requires stoichiometric conditions to
enhance both oxidation and reduction
reactions in the exhaust stream.
Removal efficiencies for NSCR were
previously discussed in this preamble.
Again, cost information was obtained
from catalyst vendors and annual NSCR
costs were estimated based on these
data. The costs per ton of pollutant
removed by applying NSCR to various
size 4SRB engines were calculated, and
are documented in information
included in the docket. Based on the
costs per ton of HAP removed from
existing 4SRB engines, it was
determined that requiring NSCR on
existing engines would not be
appropriate and, therefore, the MACT
for existing 4SRB engines is the MACT
floor, i.e., no emission reduction. No
other technology was identified as
appropriate for reducing HAP from
4SRB engines.
Cost per ton estimates are presented
in the memorandum entitled ‘‘Cost per
Ton of HAP Reduced for Stationary
RICE,’’ included in the docket. EPA’s
analysis of regulatory alternatives
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
beyond-the-floor is presented in the
memorandum entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Alternatives and MACT for Stationary
Reciprocating Internal Combustion
Engines 500 Horsepower at Major
Sources.’’
EPA considered one regulatory option
more stringent than the MACT floor for
existing CI engines, which is the use of
CDPF. A description of the technology
and potential emission reductions were
previously discussed in this preamble.
Using available information, the cost for
applying CDPF to existing CI engines
was estimated. Based on the estimated
cost per ton of HAP removed, EPA
determined that requiring the use of
CDPF would be too high for existing CI
engines. Therefore, the MACT for
existing CI engines is the MACT floor,
i.e., no emission reduction.
The MACT floor for existing digester
and landfill gas stationary engines is no
emission reduction. The use of
oxidation catalysts to reduce HAP
emissions from this subcategory of RICE
was found to be technically infeasible.
This is due to the fact that digester gases
and landfill gases contain a family of
silicon-based compounds called
siloxanes. Combustion of siloxanes can
foul post-combustion catalysts,
rendering them inoperable within a
short period of time. Because of these
technical issues associated with
applying oxidation catalyst control,
there are no viable beyond-the-floor
regulatory options for these stationary
RICE. Therefore, no emission reduction
is MACT for existing digester and
landfill gas stationary RICE.
Emission control technologies which
reduce HAP emissions from stationary
RICE have not been applied to
stationary RICE which operate
exclusively as emergency units. Thus,
the MACT floor is no emission
reduction. In considering the
application of HAP emission control
technologies to stationary RICE which
operate exclusively as emergency units,
there are a number of concerns
regarding the technical feasibility,
primarily in the areas of the long term
durability and effectiveness of emission
control. Whether such concerns are
warranted or not, however, emission
control is not considered cost effective
because of the very small reductions in
HAP emissions which might be
achieved through the use of such
technologies. In addition, non-air
quality health, environmental impacts
and energy effects were not significant
factors. As a result, MACT for existing
stationary RICE which operate
exclusively as emergency engines is no
emission reduction.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
MACT Floor for New Sources
The MACT floor for new stationary
RICE must be no less stringent than the
emission control achieved in practice by
the best controlled similar source. Since
the Population Database indicates that
there are no existing engines less than
50 HP, landfill/digester gas fired
engines, CI emergency engines, CI nonemergency engines, SI emergency
engines, or non-emergency 2SLB
engines that are using catalyst type
controls, the MACT floor for these new
stationary RICE is no further emissions
reductions.
As discussed, EPA established a
subcategory for non-emergency 4SLB
engines between 50 and 500 HP.
However, based on information received
by EPA, there are few, if any, stationary
4SLB engines less than 250 HP.
Information regarding the smallest 4SLB
engines produced is available from the
docket. The additional cost and
complexity of components associated
with lean burn engine design is not cost
effective for smaller engines (less than
400 HP), according to industry.
Stationary 4SLB engines greater than
or equal to 250 HP tend to be similar to
larger engines, i.e., those that are greater
than 500 HP, and on a mass basis,
engines greater than or equal to 250 HP
emit more than smaller engines. In
addition, engines of such size have
traditionally been treated by States as
larger engines, rather than smaller
engines, and stationary 4SLB SI engines
below 250 HP have generally been
regulated as smaller engines. In some
cases, engines greater than 250 HP may
be required to meet more stringent
emission standards than smaller
engines. In addition, the type of addcontrols that can be applied to 4SLB
engines greater than or equal to 250 HP
are the same as those that can be
applied to larger engines, i.e., those
greater than 500 HP, and those engines
are capable of achieving very similar
emission reductions as larger engines.
Further, larger engines are typically
employed in different applications than
smaller engines are and may be more
likely to be used in electric power
generation and gas transmission and
processing. In addition, smaller engines
may tend to be used more by small
businesses or for agricultural purposes
and may resemble nonroad engines
more than those greater than or equal to
250 HP, which are more similar to
traditional stationary engines. For these
reasons, EPA believes that nonemergency 4SLB engines greater than or
equal to 250 HP more closely resemble
larger engines and should be treated in
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33819
a similar manner as the engines greater
than 500 HP were treated.
The Population Database indicates
that there are non-emergency 4SLB
engines in the size range of 250 to 500
HP employing catalyst type controls,
and according to the Population
Database, the smallest 4SLB engine
equipped with catalyst control is 270
HP. However, EPA received additional
information indicating that there is a
260 HP engine operating with oxidation
catalyst control and is, therefore, the
smallest existing 4SLB engine of which
EPA is aware that is equipped with addon control.
EPA believes it is unreasonable to
require new 4SLB engines smaller than
250 HP to meet emission standards
based on add-on control. The cost per
ton for new 4SLB engines between 250
and 500 HP located at major sources is
reasonable. Looking at the cost
effectiveness for engines smaller than
250 HP, the cost per ton of HAP
removed rapidly increases with
decreasing size. EPA believes an
appropriate cutoff for requiring
emission standards based on add-on
controls is 250 HP. This conclusion is
consistent with other findings,
including an analysis of the Population
Database of the smallest engine with
catalyst control and information from
other sources. This conclusion is also
consistent with the MACT floor
decision for new 4SLB engines greater
than 500 HP located at major sources.
For these reasons, the MACT floor for
new 4SLB engines between 250 and 500
HP located at major sources is the level
of control achieved by application of
oxidation catalyst controls. The MACT
floor for new 4SLB engines between 50
and 250 HP is no further HAP emission
reduction.
We request comment on our proposed
approach for MACT requirements for
new 4SLB engines (250–500 HP). EPA’s
Population Database indicates that
oxidation catalysts are used in some of
these engines, and this technology forms
the basis of the proposed standards. It
is likely that these oxidation catalysts
are used to meet State requirements
developed as part of EPA programs such
as New Source Review (NSR) and
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD), which focus on the control of
criteria pollutants, rather than HAP.
However, oxidation catalysts installed
to control CO and NMHC can also
reduce HAP emissions. We request
comment on EPA’s determination that
oxidation catalysts should be the basis
of the MACT floor for new 4SLB engines
in the size range of 250 to 500 HP.
The Population Database indicates
that there are non-emergency 4SRB
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33820
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
engines 50 to 500 HP operating with
catalyst type controls, and, therefore,
the MACT floor for new non-emergency
4SRB engines between 50 and 500 HP
is the level achieved by the use of
NSCR.
MACT for New Sources
For 2SLB, there are no engines in the
Population Database that are using
catalyst type controls. Therefore, the
MACT floor for new stationary 2SLB is
no further emissions reductions. In
addition, the cost effectiveness of
adding an oxidation catalyst to a new
2SLB engine was not determined to be
economically feasible, and MACT for
new 2SLB engines is, therefore, no
emission reduction. This determination
is different than MACT for engines
greater than 500 HP located at major
sources because for those engines, the
Population Database indicates that there
are existing 2SLB engines greater than
500 HP operating with catalytic
controls. As stated, no existing 2SLB
engines less than or equal to 500 HP are
using catalytic controls, according to the
Population Database. However, we are
proposing to require these engines to
meet NMHC emission standards that are
based on the use of on-engine controls
in order to reduce levels of HAP.
For engines less than 50 HP, EPA
evaluated beyond-the-floor options for
engines less than or equal to 19 KW (25
HP) and engines above 19 KW (25 HP)
separately. Stationary SI engines less
than or equal to 19 KW (25 HP) are
required under the proposed SI NSPS to
meet the certification standards for new
nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 90
for nonhandheld engines. The
technologies that are the basis for those
standards rely on engine-based controls.
Under the SI NSPS, those controls were
determined to be BDT for new
stationary SI engines less than or equal
to 19 KW (25 HP). The beyond-the-floor
analysis for stationary SI engines less
than or equal to 19 KW (25 HP)
considered the use of those
technologies, and EPA believes it is
appropriate to set MACT for these
engines at the level of control required
by the SI NSPS.
The emission standards for
nonhandheld engines include limits for
HC + NOX (or NMHC + NOX standards
for natural gas fueled engines, at the
option of the manufacturer) and CO.
EPA has determined that NMHC can be
used as a surrogate for HAP and,
therefore, believes it is appropriate to
require a standard based on NMHC as
opposed to a HAP standard. For more
information on EPA’s decision to use
NMHC as a surrogate for HAP, refer to
the memorandum entitled ‘‘Non-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
methane Hydrocarbons as a Surrogate
for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Stationary Internal Combustion
Engines,’’ available from the docket.
For new stationary SI engines
between 19 and 37 KW (25 and 50 HP),
EPA evaluated beyond-the-floor options
based on the requirements for new
stationary SI engines under the SI NSPS.
Under the SI NSPS, engines greater than
19 KW (25 HP) that use gasoline or that
are rich burn engines greater than 19
KW (25 HP) that use LPG, are required
to be certified to the emission standards
in 40 CFR part 1048. The technologies
that are the basis for those standards are
three-way catalyst systems (NSCR) with
electronic, closed-loop fuel systems.
These technologies were determined to
be BDT for new stationary SI engines
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that use
gasoline and rich burn engines greater
than 19 KW (25 HP) that use LPG under
the SI NSPS. These are the same engines
that would be covered by the NESHAP,
and, therefore, EPA believes it is
appropriate to go beyond-the-floor for
these engines and require that owners
and operators of these engines meet the
standards proposed in the SI NSPS.
The nonroad standards for SI engines
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) include HC
+ NOX standards and standards for CO.
The engine has to meet the numerical
emission standard based on NMHC
emissions if the engine is fueled by
natural gas. As discussed, EPA has
determined that NMHC is an
appropriate surrogate for HAP, and EPA
believes it is appropriate to require the
nonroad SI engine standards in 40 CFR
part 1048 for these engines. In addition,
these engines are the same engines that
are covered by the SI NSPS and would
be subject to certification requirements
of 40 CFR part 1048 even in the absence
of the NESHAP.
Finally, EPA would like to ensure
consistency and avoid conflicting
requirements between regulations
affecting the same or similar source
categories. Therefore, EPA believes it is
appropriate to set MACT for these
engines at the level of control required
by the SI NSPS.
For stationary SI engines between 19
and 37 KW (25 and 50 HP) that use
natural gas or are lean burn LPG
engines, EPA described that requiring
engine certification would be
inappropriate for various reasons. For
the SI NSPS, EPA determined that it
was more appropriate to rely on a
voluntary engine certification program
combined with requirements for owners
and operators. EPA considers this
approach as a reasonable beyond-thefloor option for new stationary SI
engines between 19 and 37 KW (25 and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50 HP) located at major sources. Again,
the same engines would be covered
under the SI NSPS, and would, under
that rule, be required to meet NOX, CO,
and NMHC emission standards.
Therefore, EPA considers the NMHC
emission standards from the SI NSPS as
the most appropriate beyond-the-floor
option.
It was previously discussed that it is
appropriate to use NMHC as a surrogate
for HAP. The SI NSPS propose different
NMHC emission standards and timing
based on the type and size of the engine.
The SI NSPS propose a NMHC limit of
0.7 or 1.0 g/HP-hr, which EPA believes
is reasonable to require for engines
under the NESHAP as well. For
stationary SI engines between 19 and 37
KW (25 and 50 HP) that use natural gas
or are lean burn engines using LPG,
MACT is determined to be the level
required for these engines under the SI
NSPS, i.e., an emission standard of 0.7
or 1.0 g/HP-hr for NMHC. The NMHC
limit of 1.0 g/HP-hr is required for
natural gas fired engines less than 500
HP and lean burn engines less than 500
HP using LPG that are manufactured
after January 1, 2008. The limit of 0.7 g/
HP-hr for NMHC is required for natural
gas fired engines less than 500 HP and
lean burn engines less than 500 HP that
use LPG that are manufactured after
January 1, 2011. EPA believes that the
implementation dates are the most
stringent that can be justified that
provide engine manufacturers with
sufficient time to prepare their products
for compliance.
According to the Population Database,
there are existing 4SLB stationary
engines currently operating with
oxidation catalyst systems. No
technology achieving greater emission
reductions was found. We previously
discussed the decision to set the MACT
floor for new 4SLB engines between 250
and 500 HP located at major sources
based on the use of oxidation catalyst.
For new 4SLB engines between 50 and
250 HP, the MACT floor is no emission
reduction. We also discussed in an
earlier section that we believe nonemergency 4SLB engines between 250
and 500 HP are more similar to large
engines, i.e., those greater than 500 HP.
The formaldehyde level required by the
existing 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ,
for new 4SLB engines greater than 500
HP located at major sources is based on
using oxidation catalyst. A
formaldehyde concentration level of 14
ppmvd at 15 percent O2 was
promulgated for those engines. As an
alternative, a 93 percent reduction of CO
was provided.
EPA believes these levels are
reasonable for new 4SLB engines
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
between 250 and 500 HP located at
major sources as well. EPA expects the
capabilities of the oxidation catalyst to
be the same for engines between 250
and 500 HP as they are for engines
greater than 500 HP. For these reasons,
MACT is the level of control achieved
by using oxidation catalyst, i.e., either a
93 percent reduction of CO or a
formaldehyde outlet concentration limit
of 14 ppmvd at 15 percent O2.
For new 4SLB engines between 50
and 250 HP located at major sources, the
proposed MACT standard is equal to the
NMHC standard required under the
proposed SI NSPS.
The MACT standard for new 4SRB
stationary RICE must be at least as
stringent as the MACT floor for existing
4SRB stationary RICE. Regulatory
options more stringent than the MACT
floor include requiring the use of NSCR;
no other technology achieving greater
emissions reductions was found.
As discussed, EPA generally believes
it is appropriate to base the MACT
standards for new stationary SI engines
on the standards being proposed in the
stationary SI NSPS (except for new and
reconstructed 4SLB engines between
250 and 500 HP located at major
sources). This conclusion affects new
stationary rich burn engines. EPA
discussed selecting NSCR as BDT for
most new stationary rich burn engines
earlier in this preamble. We discussed
the appropriateness of following the SI
NSPS for new SI engines less than or
equal to 19 KW (25 HP) and new SI
engines greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that
use gasoline or that are rich burn
engines greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that
use LPG. For the reasons previously
discussed, MACT for new 4SRB engines
between 25 and 500 HP located at major
sources are the NMHC standards that
are required in the SI NSPS. EPA also
discussed the appropriateness of
requiring exhaust-based emission
standards of 1.0 and 0.7 g/HP–hr of
NMHC and has explained the reason for
setting a NMHC standard and not a HAP
standard. For rich burn engines greater
than 19 KW (25 HP) that do not use
LPG, it was determined that a
mandatory certification program would
not be appropriate due to fuel quality
and other issues.
Therefore, an emission standard is
being proposed, and is determined to be
MACT for these engines. Owners and
operators can either purchase an engine
that is certified to this standard, or
alternatively, conduct emissions testing
to demonstrate compliance with the
NMHC emission limit, if their engine is
not certified by a manufacturer. The
MACT for new 4SRB engines is the level
of control required by the SI NSPS, i.e.,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
a NMHC standard of 1.0 or 0.7 g/HP–hr,
as applicable.
For CI non-emergency engines, there
are no engines in the Population
Database that are using catalyst type
controls. Therefore, the MACT floor for
new stationary non-emergency CI RICE
is no further emissions reductions.
Catalyzed diesel particulate filters
have been proven effective in reducing
emissions of HAP and are the basis for
the majority of Tier 4 emission
standards for new nonroad and
stationary diesel engines that will go
into effect at the beginning of the next
decade. The technology was also relied
upon for the standards issued for
stationary CI engines in California. No
other technology was found to be more
effective in reducing HAP from CI
engines than CDPF, and, therefore, the
MACT for new stationary CI nonemergency engines is the level of
control achieved through application of
CDPF, with an appropriate period of
lead time equal to that provided for
nonroad CI engines.
New stationary CI engines less than or
equal to 500 HP located at major sources
will be affected by the upcoming NSPS
for stationary CI engines (40 CFR part
60, subpart IIII). The CI NSPS rely in
large part on certification of engines by
the engine manufacturers following
well-established procedures developed
under the nonroad CI engine program.
The CI NSPS require minimal effort
from engine owners and operators, and
places the burden and responsibility
mainly on the engine manufacturer
during the useful life of the engine.
Cost effectiveness analysis conducted
for the CI NSPS show that the costs of
applying CDPF to new stationary CI
engines are reasonable. Under the CI
NSPS, most owners and operators will
demonstrate compliance with 40 CFR
part 60, subpart IIII by purchasing a
certified engine. The only ongoing
compliance requirement for owners and
operators is to operate and maintain the
engine (and control device) according to
the manufacturer’s written
specifications. It is assumed that the
engine will remain in compliance with
the emission standards for the useful
life of the engine, if the engine is
operated and maintained properly.
For new stationary CI engines less
than or equal to 500 HP located at major
sources affected by 40 CFR part 63,
subpart ZZZZ, proposed in this action,
EPA believes it would be appropriate to
require owners and operators to comply
with the NMHC and PM requirements in
40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII. Although
MACT for these sources is the level of
control achieved by CDPF, with
appropriate lead time for application of
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33821
this technology for these engines,
owners and operators will not be the
party installing CDPF on their engines;
the engine manufacturers will be
responsible for this.
The requirements of the CI NSPS
include emission standards that will be
phased in depending on the model year.
Requirements include emission
standards for NOX, CO, PM, HC, and
NMHC with increasing stringency. The
standards regulating emissions of
NMHC and PM are particularly relevant
for regulating HAP emissions. The final
level of emission standards (Tier 4),
rely, in most cases, at least for larger
size engines, on the implementation of
NOX adsorber and, importantly for this
discussion, CDPF. With the addition of
CDPF controls in Tier 4 certified
engines, emissions of HAP will be
significantly reduced and the goal of
section 112(d)(5) of the CAA will be
realized by following the CI NSPS.
EPA believes it is appropriate to
require that stationary CI engines meet
PM and NMHC standards that apply to
stationary CI engines under the CI NSPS
because, while most HAP emissions
from diesel engines are gaseous
hydrocarbons, there are HAP that
become adsorbed on the diesel particles;
therefore, meeting the emission
standards under the CI NSPS for HC/
NMHC and PM helps ensure maximum
control of HAP. For the reasons
provided, EPA believes MACT for new
stationary CI engines is appropriate, and
is the level of control required by the CI
NSPS achieved through application of
CDPF.
There are no landfill or digester gas
fired stationary RICE in the Population
Database using catalyst type controls,
and therefore the MACT floor for new
stationary landfill and digester gas
engines is no further emissions
reductions. The applicability of HAP
emission control technology, such as the
use of an oxidation catalyst system for
example, was considered for this
subcategory of stationary RICE for
beyond-the-floor controls. However,
digester gases and landfill gases, as
discussed, may contain compounds that
foul catalyst elements reducing the
catalyst efficiency very quickly.
Pretreatment systems to remove
siloxanes from the gases prior to
combustion were considered; however,
there are no pretreatment systems found
to be in use and the long-term
effectiveness is unknown. Therefore,
there is no add-on emission control
technology that could be applied to the
subcategory of stationary RICE to reduce
HAP emissions. However, we are
requiring these engines to meet a
standard equal to the use of on-engine
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
33822
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
controls to reduce HAP emissions, i.e.,
through a NMHC emission standard.
For new emergency engines,
aftertreatment-based beyond-the-floor
options are not considered cost effective
due to the very small reductions in HAP
emissions that might be achieved
through the use of catalyst-based
technologies on new emergency
stationary engines. In addition, there are
concerns regarding the technical
feasibility, long term durability, and
effectiveness of emission control. Nonair quality health, environmental
impacts and energy effects were not
significant factors. Consequently, there
is no HAP emission reduction that
could be identified as MACT for new
emergency use SI stationary RICE.
Therefore, MACT is equal to the amount
of engine-based control deemed BDT
under the NSPS for this subcategory of
SI engines. New and reconstructed SI
emergency engines are required to meet
the NMHC standard that is being
proposed under the SI NSPS, i.e., 1.0 g/
HP–hr, starting with engines
manufactured after January 1, 2009.
Add-on controls have been
determined to be inappropriate for
application to emergency engines;
however, EPA believes that requiring
on-engine controls to new emergency CI
engines would be appropriate. The
recently proposed NSPS for stationary
CI engines set standards of performance
for emergency engines based on enginebased, as opposed to aftertreatmentbased, technologies. These standards
equate to the Tier 2 and Tier 3 emission
standards for nonroad CI engines and
are based on technologies such as
combustion optimization and advanced
fuel injection controls. EPA believed
that these technologies were appropriate
for emergency engines covered by the CI
NSPS. EPA also believes that it is
appropriate to require new stationary CI
emergency engines less than or equal to
500 HP located at major sources to meet
similar standards as emergency engines
are required to under the CI NSPS. EPA
does not see any reason why new
emergency CI engines should be treated
differently under the NESHAP. For the
reasons provided, MACT for new
stationary CI emergency engines less
than or equal to 500 HP located at major
sources is the level of control achieved
by on-engine controls and will be
required to meet the standards for
emergency engines under the CI NSPS.
b. Engines at Area Sources. Under
section 112(k) of the CAA, EPA
developed a national strategy to address
air toxic pollution from area sources.
The strategy is part of EPA’s overall
national effort to reduce toxics, but
focuses on the particular needs of urban
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
areas. Section 112(k) of the CAA
requires EPA to list area source
categories and to ensure 90 percent of
the emissions from area sources are
subject to standards pursuant to section
112(d) of the CAA. Under section
112(k), the CAA specifically mandated
that EPA develop a strategy to address
public health risks posed by air toxics
from area sources in urban areas.
Section 112(k) of the CAA also
mandates that the strategy achieve a 75
percent reduction in cancer incidence
attributable to HAP emitted by
stationary sources. As mentioned,
stationary RICE are listed as a source
category under the Urban Air Toxics
Strategy developed under the authority
of sections 112(k) and 112(c)(3) of the
CAA. These area sources are subject to
standards under section 112(d) of the
CAA.
Section 112(d)(5) of the CAA
indicates that EPA may elect to
promulgate standards or requirements to
area sources ‘‘which provide for the use
of generally available control
technologies or management practices
by such sources to reduce emissions of
hazardous air pollutants.’’ For
determining emission limitations, GACT
standards can be more flexible
requirements than MACT standards. For
example, GACT standards do not have
a requirement to set a control baseline
or ‘‘floor’’ that is equal to the average
emission levels achieved by the best
performing 12 percent of a type of
facility, for existing sources, or the
emission control achieved in practice by
the best controlled similar source, for
new sources. Therefore, EPA is
permitted to consider costs and other
factors during each phase of the GACT
analysis. Control technology options
available to be applied to stationary
engines located at area sources are the
same as those discussed for engines
located at major sources.
The standards being proposed in this
action are applicable to stationary RICE
located at area sources of HAP
emissions. EPA has chosen to propose
national standards, which not only
focus on urban areas, but address
emissions from area sources in all areas
(urban and rural).
For stationary RICE, it would not be
practical or appropriate to limit the
applicability to urban areas and EPA has
determined that national standards are
appropriate. Stationary RICE are located
in both urban and rural areas. In fact,
there are some rural areas with high
concentrations of stationary RICE.
Stationary RICE are employed in various
industries used for both the private and
public sector for a wide range of
applications such as generator sets,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
irrigation sets, air and gas compressors,
pumps, welders, and hydro power units.
Stationary RICE may be used by private
entities for agricultural purposes and be
located in a rural area, or it may be used
as a standby generator for an office
building located in an urban area. Other
stationary RICE may operate at large
sources for electric power generation,
transmission, or distribution purposes.
EPA determined that stationary RICE
are located all over the U.S., and EPA
cannot say that these sources are more
prevalent in certain areas of the country.
Therefore, for the source category of
stationary RICE, EPA is proposing
national requirements without a
distinction between urban and nonurban areas.
For existing engines, GACT for
engines located at area sources is equal
to MACT for engines less than or equal
to 500 HP located at major sources. For
new sources, we are proposing the same
requirements for GACT for engines
located at area sources as we are for
MACT for engines less than or equal to
500 HP located at major sources, except
for new and reconstructed nonemergency 4SLB engines between 250
and 500 HP located at area sources. As
discussed, new and reconstructed nonemergency 4SLB engines between 250
and 500 HP located at major sources are
required to meet the standards that were
finalized for new 4SLB engines greater
than 500 HP located at major sources
(69 FR 33474). New 4SLB engines at
area sources will be required to meet the
NMHC emission standards being
proposed for SI engines under the
NSPS.
C. How did EPA determine the
compliance requirements?
The following sections describe how
EPA determined the compliance
requirements for engines subject to the
SI NSPS and NESHAP.
1. SI NSPS
Unlike the NSPS for stationary CI
engines, the compliance requirements
for the SI NSPS contemplate that many
new SI engines might not be certified by
the manufacturer. EPA only requires a
subset of stationary engines to be
certified, and otherwise provides only
for optional certification by engine
manufacturers. The engines that are not
required to be certified are those SI
engines that are greater than 19 KW (25
HP) that are not gasoline engines and
that are not rich burn engines that use
LPG. EPA does not believe it is feasible
to require these engines to be certified
due to fuel quality issues and other
factors. Not only do gaseous fuel quality
and properties vary significantly across
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
the country, gaseous-fueled stationary
engines also have to be set up at each
individual site to account for sitespecific conditions. Due to varying
gaseous fuel and conditions based on
the physical location of the engine,
manufacturers would not necessarily be
able to define a set of operating
conditions during the engine
certification process that would
guarantee a certain level of emissions
from the engine. Instead, the engine
would have to be adjusted in the field
in order to meet the applicable
standards. Lean burn engines that are
using LPG are included in the voluntary
certification program instead of the
mandatory certification program
because these engines are similar to
gaseous-fueled stationary engines.
However, EPA does not preclude the
possibility that some manufacturers may
be able to certify some or all of their
stationary gaseous-fueled, or lean burn
LPG fueled, engines. EPA believes that
a certification program that is somewhat
different from the nonroad CI engine
certification program, which allows for
a wider range of fuel quality and for
adjustment of the engine in the field
according to the manufacturer’s
instructions, is feasible. EPA has written
this proposed rule to allow engine
manufacturers to voluntarily certify
their stationary SI engines greater than
19 KW (25 HP) that use fuels such as
natural gas.
Should the engine manufacturer
determine that it is feasible to certify
their engine families, such certification
would substantially reduce the burden
for owners and operators purchasing
those engines. These engine owners and
operators would not be required to
conduct performance testing should
they purchase a certified engine.
There are minimum specific
compliance requirements for owners
and operators subject to the SI NSPS
that purchase certified engines. For
certified engines, the testing performed
by engine manufacturers during the
certification process serves to
demonstrate compliance with the
emission limitations on an initial and
ongoing basis until the end of the
engine’s useful life. The certification
program reduces the burden on
individual engine owners and operators
and eliminates the requirement to do
performance testing. In addition to
engine certification, owners and
operators of all engines subject to the
proposed standards are required to
operate and maintain their engine and
control device (if any) according to the
manufacturer’s written instructions.
This requirement is consistent with the
CI NSPS and is a reasonable and non-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
burdensome requirement. EPA believes
certification is the best option for
ensuring initial and continuous
compliance.
If the manufacturer puts restrictions
on the type of fuel to be used in an
engine, or if the manufacturer requires
specific configuration instructions to the
owner or operator for installing the
engine to ensure conformance to the
standards as certified, then the owner or
operator must follow those instructions
and limitations in order to avoid the
requirement to do its own testing or
otherwise be in noncompliance with the
regulations.
For owners and operators of
uncertified engines, EPA believes that
performance testing is necessary to
ensure compliance with the emission
limitations. EPA believes it is
appropriate to require an initial
performance test for uncertified engines.
Since these engines have not gone
through the certification process where
the engine has been rigorously tested to
meet the required emission standards,
on-site testing is the best way to ensure
that the emission limitations have been
met. Also, EPA is requiring that
uncertified engines greater than 500 HP
be tested on a regular basis every 3
years, or 8,760 hours of operation,
whichever comes first. EPA believes
such a requirement is appropriate for
these size engines, but does not believe
that further testing is necessary for
smaller engines, i.e., those less than or
equal to 500 HP, unless these engines
undergo major repair or maintenance or
are rebuilt.
EPA believes that certification is
appropriate for stationary engines that
are similar to nonroad engines or that
are used for both nonroad and stationary
applications. Therefore, EPA is
requiring manufacturers of all new
stationary engines 19 KW (25 HP) and
below and all new gasoline engines and
rich burn LPG engines to certify these
engines using the provisions in 40 CFR
parts 90 and 1048, as appropriate.
In general, nonroad certification
provisions specify that engine
manufacturers must establish
appropriate engine families and certify
each engine family to the applicable
emission standards using the fuel
specifications required in those parts
(40 CFR parts 90 and 1048).
Manufacturers that voluntarily certify
new stationary engines to the standards
in this proposed rule are subject to
similar requirements, with certain
differences. Nonroad standards include
evaporative and field testing emission
standards, but those standards would
not apply to manufacturers who
participate in voluntary certification of
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33823
stationary SI engines. The concept of
useful life is also part of the nonroad
engine certification program and is
being proposed for voluntary
certification, but different useful life
values apply. Fuels used in engines
potentially participating in the
voluntary certification program,
specifically natural gas and LPG, may
have different compositions depending
on the area the fuel is used.
Manufacturers who choose to certify
engines under EPA’s proposed
voluntary certification program must
certify their natural gas engines using
pipeline-quality natural gas meeting
EPA’s specifications defined in this
proposed rule. The same is true for
manufacturers certifying lean burn LPG
engines under the proposed certification
program and manufacturers must certify
their engines for operation using fuel
that meets the specifications in 40 CFR
1068.720.
Alternatively, manufacturers can
certify their engines on fuels other than,
or in addition to, pipeline-quality
natural gas. If so, the manufacturer must
specify the properties and composition
of the other fuel and must perform
certification testing on the fuel it is
certifying the engine on. If an
aftertreatment device is needed,
manufacturers who certify engines
under the voluntary certification
program would be required to certify
their engines with the appropriate
aftertreatment equipment.
Manufacturers must provide
information to the owner or operator as
to the necessary adjustments to be made
in the field upon installation in order to
ensure that the engine meets the
emission standards demonstrated
during factory certification. This
provision would allow the owner or
operator to run the engine on fuels that
are within the range of properties
specified by the manufacturer in the
certification. The engine certification is
valid, provided that the owner or
operator uses the fuels specified by the
engine manufacturer.
EPA is proposing to include
restrictions on the import of stationary
SI ICE ≤19 KW (25 HP), stationary rich
burn LPG SI engines and stationary
gasoline SI ICE to prevent the
importation of engines that do not meet
the applicable requirements of this
proposed rule. This proposed rule
includes a provision that prohibits
importers from bringing into the U.S.
stationary SI ICE ≤19 KW (25 HP),
stationary rich burn LPG SI engines and
gasoline SI ICE that do not meet the
emission standards specified in this
proposed rule after certain dates. The
proposed dates for limiting the
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33824
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
importation of engines into the U.S.
provides sufficient time to account for
the time that may be required to bring
an engine into the U.S., and EPA
believes it is appropriate to propose
importation dates that provides for such
flexibility. We are limiting this
restriction only to stationary SI ICE ≤19
KW (25 HP) and to stationary gasoline
and rich burn LPG SI ICE because these
are the only types of SI ICE that would
have an emissions certification
requirement. All other SI ICE would not
be required to certify their emissions—
unless the manufacturer chooses the
option to certify—thus, the compliance
burden would fall on the owner/
operator of the engine.
2. NESHAP
Overall, the NESHAP compliance
requirements are very similar to the
compliance requirements discussed
above for the SI NSPS. Again, EPA is
proposing requirements that often rely
on, or allow for, engine certification by
manufacturers. The testing that
manufacturers conduct during the
certification process for such engines
will ensure that the engine is in
compliance throughout its useful life.
EPA believes relying on engine
certification is appropriate and no
additional testing is being proposed for
certified engines.
For those engines that will not be
certified by engine manufacturers, EPA
is proposing that owners and operators
conduct initial performance testing to
demonstrate compliance with the
emission standards. Since there is no
official certification testing by engine
manufacturers on these engines,
performance testing when the engine is
installed in the field is appropriate. This
is the best way to ensure that the engine
meets the emission standards.
In addition to requiring initial
performance testing for those engines
subject to the NESHAP that are not
certified, uncertified engines greater
than 500 HP must conduct additional
performance testing every 3 years or
8,760 hours of operation, whichever
comes first. Unless engines subject to
the NESHAP less than or equal to 500
HP undergo major repair or
maintenance or are rebuilt, no further
testing is required for these engines.
EPA believes that subsequent
performance testing is appropriate for
engines greater than 500 HP due to their
size. Many States mandate more
stringent compliance requirements for
large engines and the RICE NESHAP for
engines greater than 500 HP located at
major sources also required further
performance testing following the initial
compliance demonstration. Finally, EPA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
expects engines that are greater than 500
HP are less likely to be certified since
they are not mass-produced, and it
would be less cost effective for
manufacturers to certify them.
All engines subject to the NESHAP
are required to operate and maintain
their stationary engine and control
device (if any) according to the
manufacturer’s written instructions.
D. How did EPA determine the reporting
and recordkeeping requirements?
The following sections describe how
EPA determined the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for engines
subject to the SI NSPS and NESHAP.
1. SI NSPS
For engines subject to the SI NSPS,
EPA is proposing that owners and
operators maintain records of proper
maintenance. If the engine is certified,
the owner or operator must keep
documentation from the manufacturer
that the engine is certified to meet the
emission standards. EPA does not
expect this to be a burdensome
requirement and thinks that, in many
cases, owners and operators may be
documenting this information already.
An initial notification is required for
uncertified engines greater than 500 HP.
Also, owners and operators who
conduct performance testing are
required to report the test results each
time a performance test is conducted.
Owners and operators of emergency
engines are required to keep records of
their hours of operation (emergency and
non-emergency). Owners and operators
must install a non-resettable hour meter
on their engines to record the necessary
information. The owner and operators
are required to record the time of
operation and the reason the engine was
in operation during that time. EPA
believes these requirements are
appropriate for emergency engines. The
requirement to maintain records
documenting why the engine was
operating will ensure that regulatory
agencies have the necessary information
to determine if the engine was in
compliance with the maintenance and
testing hour limitation of 100 hours per
year.
2. NESHAP
Similar to the SI NSPS, engines
subject to the NESHAP are also required
to maintain records of proper
maintenance. Again, EPA does not
expect this to be a burdensome
requirement and thinks that, in many
cases, owners and operators may be
documenting this information already. If
the engine is certified, the owner or
operator must keep documentation from
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the manufacturer that the engine is
certified to meet the emission standards.
Further, an initial notification is
required for stationary SI engines greater
than 500 HP that are not certified. Also,
owners and operators of engines that are
not certified must conduct performance
testing to demonstrate compliance with
the emission standards and are required
to report the test results each time a
performance test is conducted.
Consistent with the SI NSPS, owners
and operators of emergency engines
subject to the NESHAP are also required
to keep records of their hours of
operation. Under the NESHAP, this
requirement applies not only to SI
emergency engines, but to CI emergency
engines as well. Owners and operators
must install a non-resettable hour meter
on their engines to record the necessary
information. EPA believes these
requirements are appropriate for
emergency engines and are consistent
with what was proposed for new CI
engines under the NSPS.
Owners and operators of new and
reconstructed stationary RICE which fire
landfill or digester gas equivalent to 10
percent or more of the gross heat input
on an annual basis affected by 40 CFR
part 63, subpart ZZZZ, must monitor
and record the fuel usage daily with
separate fuel meters to measure the
volumetric flow rate of each fuel. This
requirement is appropriate and
consistent with fuel monitoring
requirements for engines greater than
500 HP located at major sources.
E. Why Did EPA Determine to Exempt
Area Sources From Title V Permit
Requirements?
Section 502(a) of the CAA specifies
the sources that are required to obtain
operating permits under title V. These
sources include (1) any affected source
subject to the acid deposition provisions
of title IV of the CAA, (2) any major
source, (3) any source required to have
a permit under parts C or D of title I of
the CAA, (4) ‘‘any other source
(including an area source) subject to
standards under section 111 (NSPS) or
112 (NESHAP),’’ and (5) any other
stationary source in a category
designated by regulations promulgated
by the Administrator.
Section 502(a) of the CAA also
provides that the Administrator may
‘‘promulgate regulations to exempt one
or more source categories (in whole or
in part) from the requirements of this
subsection if the Administrator finds
that compliance with such requirements
is impracticable, infeasible, or
unnecessarily burdensome on such
categories, except that the Administrator
may not exempt any major source from
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
such requirements.’’ EPA has exempted
many area sources subject to CAA
section 111 or 112 standards from title
V requirements in prior rulemakings, in
particular see a recent final rule, 70 FR
75320, December 19, 2005, that provides
additional background information and
rationale for such exemptions for a large
number of area sources subject to CAA
section 112 standards.
In the case of affected stationary
engines located at area sources, EPA
believes compliance with permit
requirements under title V would be
impracticable, infeasible and
unnecessarily burdensome for the
reasons explained below.
First, title V permits would be
unnecessarily burdensome for area
sources subject to this proposed rule
because title V would not result in
significant improvements to compliance
with the CAA section 111 and 112
standards for the area sources. (The term
‘‘title V permits’’ used here refers to
permits issued under 40 CFR parts 70 or
71 by either a State or local agency or
EPA.) For a great number of these area
sources, these engines are the only
emission source and the owner/operator
(often a hospital or a school) will not be
at all familiar with the requirements for
permits.
To demonstrate compliance with
these CAA section 111 and 112
standards, the NSPS require the owner
or operator of the area source to either
purchase a certified stationary SI engine
or to conduct performance testing.
Certification that the engine meets the
emission reduction requirements of this
proposed rule is done by the
manufacturer of the engine, rather than
the area source that owns or operates
the engine. This strategy places a
significant amount of responsibility for
compliance with the standard on the
manufacturer, compared to many other
emission standards that place the
compliance responsibility on the owner
or operator.
The strategy of this proposed rule of
requiring the manufacture of cleaner
burning emission sources for many of
the affected engines (manufacturerbased controls) has been employed in
other CAA section 111 standards, for
example, the NSPS for new residential
woodstoves (subpart AAA of 40 CFR
part 60). We exempted area sources
subject to the woodstove NSPS in the
final rule for part 70 (57 FR 32250, July
21, 1992) for reasons similar to these we
describe today for stationary SI engines.
(See 40 CFR 70.3(b)(4) and 40 CFR
71.3(b)(4).)
For those engines that are not certified
and located at area sources, EPA
believes it would be unnecessarily
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
burdensome to require title V permits.
Many of these engines are small
consumer items that are owned by
sources that are not otherwise regulated.
Also, title V would not result in
significant improvements to compliance
with the standard for these area sources
because the CAA section 111 and 112
standards themselves contains adequate
compliance requirements for these area
sources, consistent with the CAA,
without relying on title V. For example,
owners and operators of engines that are
not certified have to conduct
performance testing to demonstrate
compliance with the proposed emission
standards. Notification, recordkeeping,
and reporting requirements are also
proposed for these sources that own and
operator engines that are not certified
and combined with performance testing
requirements provide adequate
assurance that area sources are in
compliance with CAA section 111 and
112 standards.
Second, title V would impose certain
burdens and costs on area sources
subject to this proposed rule that EPA
does not believe are justified when
compared to the potential for title V
permits to improve compliance with the
CAA section 111 and 112 standards for
such sources. This is so because EPA
believes the costs and burdens of title V
permits for the typical area sources
subject to this proposed rule would be
significant. This assessment is not based
on any particular empirical data or
study but on a review of the types of
stand-alone area sources that would be
subject to this proposed rule. (See
current ICR for 40 CFR part 70, EPA ICR
# 1587.06 and OMB control number
2060–0243 for EPA’s best estimate of the
burdens and costs of title V for sources
subject to 40 CFR part 70 on a national,
aggregate basis.) Also, as explained
above, EPA’s judgment is that requiring
operating permits for these area sources
would not result in significant
improvements to compliance over that
already required by this proposed rule.
Thus, the burdens and cost of title V for
these area sources would be significant,
and in any case, they will be
unnecessary and not justified, when
compared to the low potential for title
V permits to improve compliance for
them, consistent with the
‘‘unnecessarily burdensome’’ criterion
of section 502(a) of the CAA.
Thus, we have decided to propose to
exempt area sources subject to this
proposed rule from title V operating
permit requirements under 40 CFR part
70 and 40 CFR part 71, and we have
incorporated language in this proposed
rule to specify this. Under this approach
title V exemptions are allowed for an
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33825
area source, provided the area source is
not required to obtain a permit under 40
CFR 70.3(a) or 40 CFR 71.3(a) for
another reason, such as when the source
becomes a major source.
Also note that this exemption only
affects whether an area source is
required to obtain an operating permit,
it has no bearing on any other
requirements of this proposed rule.
V. Summary of Environmental, Energy
and Economic Impacts
A. What are the air quality impacts?
This proposed rule is estimated to
reduce NOX emissions from stationary
SI ICE by an estimated 66,000 tons per
year (tpy), CO emissions by about
38,000 tpy, NMHC emissions by about
2,000 tpy, and HAP emissions by
approximately 800 tpy in the year 2015.
This proposed rule is estimated to
reduce NOX emissions by 73,000 tpy,
CO emissions by 41,000 tpy, NMHC
emissions by 2,000 tpy, and HAP
emissions by 900 tpy in the year 2020.
This proposed rule is estimated to
reduce NOX emissions by 88,000 tpy,
CO emissions by 48,000 tpy, NMHC
emissions by 3,000 tpy, and HAP
emissions by 1,000 tpy in the year 2030.
EPA estimates that a total of about
150,000 stationary SI engines will be
affected by this proposed rule by the
year 2015. A total of 433,000 stationary
SI engines will be affected by the year
2030. An estimated 623,000 stationary
CI engines will be affected by this
proposed rule by the year 2015.
However, stationary CI engines affected
by this proposed rule would also be
subject to the CI NSPS. Further
information regarding the estimated
reductions of this proposed rule can be
found in the memorandum entitled
‘‘Cost Impacts and Emission Reductions
Associated with Proposed NSPS for
Stationary SI ICE and NESHAP for
Stationary RICE,’’ which is available in
the docket.
B. What are the cost impacts?
The total national capital cost for this
proposed rule is estimated to be
approximately $37 million in the year
2015, with a total national annual cost
of $17 million in the year 2015. In the
year 2020, the total national capital and
annual costs for this proposed rule are
estimated to be $40 million and $18
million, respectively. In the year 2030,
the total national capital and annual
costs for this proposed rule are
estimated to be $47 million and $20
million, respectively.
C. What are the economic impacts?
The economic impacts of this
proposed rule are estimated in terms of
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33826
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
changes in price and output for affected
producers defined by industry and
affected consumers. These price and
output changes are estimated for four
industries that may be affected by this
proposed rule: NAICS 333912 (Pump
and Compressor Manufacturing), NAICS
333911 (Pump and Pumping Equipment
Manufacturing), NAICS 335312 (Motor
and Generator Manufacturing), and
NAICS 33399P (All other Miscellaneous
General Purpose, Machinery). Prices are
expected to increase by no more than
0.08 percent for output from any of the
industries affected by this proposed
rule. Affected output is expected to
decrease by no more than 0.003 percent
from any of these industries. The
decrease in total surplus (consumer +
producer surplus) is about $11 million,
or less than 0.1 percent.
As part of the assessment of the
economic impacts of this proposal, EPA
has estimated the health benefits of
reducing NOX emissions as a result of
this proposed rule. For the reduction of
66,000 tons of NOX, we estimate that the
human health benefits in the year 2015
will be in the range of $72 million to
$765 million, or about 4 to 40 times the
annual cost in that year. To get this
estimate, we assumed that each ton of
NOX reduced was worth in the range of
$1,100 to $11,600 in human health
benefits. In developing this estimate,
EPA is using the approach and
methodology laid out in the document
titled ‘‘Validating Regulatory Analysis:
2005 Report to Congress by OMB.’’
EPA plans to do a more extensive
calculation of the benefits of this
rulemaking during the development of
the final rule. Executive Order 12866
and OMB Circular A–4 require the
estimation of the costs, benefits and
economic impacts for any significant
regulatory action with an annual impact
on the economy of greater than $100
million. For the final rulemaking, EPA
will perform a more extensive
assessment of the human health benefits
and provide a more complete
characterization of the uncertainty in its
estimate as outlined in the OMB
Circular A–4 guidance.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
D. What are the non-air health,
environmental and energy impacts?
EPA does not anticipate any
significant non-air health,
environmental or energy impacts as a
result of this proposed rule.
VI. Solicitation of Public Comments and
Public Participation
EPA seeks full public participation in
arriving at its final decisions, and
strongly encourages comments on all
aspects of this proposed rule from all
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
interested parties. Whenever applicable,
full supporting data and detailed
analysis should be submitted to allow
EPA to make maximum use of the
comments. The Agency invites all
parties to coordinate their data
collection activities with EPA to
facilitate mutually beneficial and costeffective data submissions.
Specifically, we request comments on
the issue of measuring NMHC
emissions. Hydrocarbons are a byproduct of the combustion of fuel from
stationary engines. Because methane is
orders of magnitude less reactive in the
atmosphere than other hydrocarbons, it
is often excluded from emission
estimates. Therefore, NMHC emission
standards are sometimes used to
regulate emissions of hydrocarbons from
fuel combustion sources. The emissions
of NMHC are the measured hydrocarbon
components detected using a Flame
Ionization Detector (FID), subtracting
out the methane concentration. Most
hydrocarbons can be measured with an
FID, with the exception of oxygenated
compounds. Many of these oxygenated
compounds, which include
formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, methanol,
and acrolein, have been identified as
HAP emitted in high quantities from
stationary engines. Formaldehyde was
found to be the most significant HAP,
comprising more than 70 percent of all
HAP emissions from stationary natural
gas fired engines. EPA recognizes that
test methods which measure NMHC
commonly do not measure
formaldehyde. However, EPA has found
that there is a linear correlation with
NMHC emissions and formaldehyde
emissions, and is proposing that NMHC
be used as a surrogate for formaldehyde
emissions from stationary SI ICE. EPA
recognizes that measuring NMHC
directly does not measure HAP such as
formaldehyde, and requests comments
on this issue.
We also request comment on our
proposed approach for emergency SI
engines. The proposed standards for
emergency SI engines require the same
levels of emissions as the proposed
Phase 1 standards for non-emergency SI
natural gas engines, except that
additional lead time is provided. EPA
recognizes that emergency SI engines
must satisfy unique demands and
performance requirements. We request
comment on the costs, emission
reductions and technical feasibility of
the standards for rich-burn and leanburn SI emergency engines and any
potential difficulties associated with the
proposed standards for emergency SI
engines. In addition, we are also
requesting comment on our proposal to
allow the use of propane for up to 100
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
hours per year for emergency backup
purposes even if the engine is not
designed to operate on propane.
Industry requested that such an
allowance would be appropriate to
include in the rule.
In addition, we are requesting
comment on the proposed emission
standards for landfill and digester gas
fired engines that are rich burn engines.
While we recognize that there are issues
related to the application of add-on
controls to engines firing landfill and
digester gas, we believe that the
emission standards proposed can be met
by lean burn engine designs.
Information we have received during
the proposal indicates that the majority
of landfill gas applications are using
lean burn engines, therefore, we do not
expect any problems complying with
the proposed standards as the standards
can be met through on-engine controls.
However, there may be a few stationary
engines that are rich burn engines that
may have problems complying with the
proposed emission standards if they are
burning landfill or digester gas. We
request comments on how common rich
burn engines are in such applications.
We are also requesting comments on the
costs, emission reductions and technical
feasibility of the proposed second phase
of standards for SI landfill/digester gas
engines under the NSPS that would
tighten the NOX limit from 3 to 2 g/bhphr.
Finally, we are requesting comment
on our proposed approach for
addressing engines using LPG. In the
proposal we are treating rich burn
engines that use LPG and lean burn
engines that use LPG differently. We are
proposing to regulate rich burn engines
that use LPG with gasoline engines, and
lean burn engines that use LPG with
natural gas engines. We are requesting
comment on this proposed regulatory
regime for stationary SI engines that use
LPG.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), we must
determine whether a regulatory action is
‘‘significant’’ and, therefore, subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and the requirements of
the Executive Order. The Executive
Order defines ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as one that is likely to result in
a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
Pursuant to the terms of Executive
Order 12866, OMB has notified EPA
that it considers this a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ within the meaning
of the Executive Order. EPA has
submitted this action to OMB for
review. Changes made in response to
OMB suggestions or recommendations
will be documented in the public
record.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements in this proposed rule have
been submitted for approval to OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The Information
Collection Request (ICR) document
prepared by EPA has been assigned EPA
ICR number 2227.01.
The information requirements are
based on notification, recordkeeping,
and reporting requirements in the NSPS
General Provisions (40 CFR part 60,
subpart A), which are mandatory for all
operators subject to national emission
standards. These recordkeeping and
reporting requirements are specifically
authorized by section 114 of the CAA
(42 U.S.C. 7414). All information
submitted to EPA pursuant to the
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for which a claim of
confidentiality is made is safeguarded
according to Agency policies set forth in
40 CFR part 2, subpart B.
This proposed rule will not require
any notifications or reports beyond
those required by the General
Provisions. The recordkeeping
requirements require only the specific
information needed to determine
compliance.
The annual monitoring, reporting, and
recordkeeping burden for this collection
(averaged over the first 3 years after the
effective date of the final rule) is
estimated to be 132,381 labor hours per
year at a total annual cost of
$18,475,453. This estimate includes a
one-time notification for engines greater
than 500 HP that are not certified,
engine certification, engine performance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
testing, and recordkeeping. There are no
capital/start-up costs associated with
the monitoring requirements over the 3year period of the ICR. The operation
and maintenance costs for the
monitoring requirements over the 3-year
period of the ICR are estimated to be
$8,964,391 per year.
Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose
or provide information to or for a
Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop,
acquire, install, and utilize technology
and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
To comment on the Agency’s need for
this information, the accuracy of the
provided burden estimates, and any
suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of
automated collection techniques, EPA
has established a public docket for this
rule, which includes this ICR, under
Docket ID number EPA–HQ–OAR–
2005–0030. Submit any comments
related to the ICR for this proposed rule
to EPA and OMB. See ADDRESSES
section at the beginning of this notice
for where to submit comments to EPA.
Send comments to OMB at the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.
Since OMB is required to make a
decision concerning the ICR between 30
and 60 days after June 12, 2006, a
comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
by July 12, 2006. The final rule will
respond to any OMB or public
comments on the information collection
requirements contained in this proposal.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33827
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
For the purposes of assessing the
impacts of this proposed rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A
small business based on the following
Small Business Administration (SBA)
size standards, which are based on
employee size: NAICS 333911—Pump
and Pumping Equipment
Manufacturing—500 employees or less;
NAICS 333912—Pump and Compressor
Manufacturing—500 employees or less;
NAICS 33399P—All other
Miscellaneous General Purpose,
Machinery—500 employees or less; and
NAICS 335312—Motor and Generator
Manufacturing—1,000 employees or
less; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field. For more
information, refer to https://
www.sba.gov/size/sizetable2002.html.
The small entity impacts of this
proposed rule are estimated in terms of
comparing the compliance costs to
revenues at affected firms. For more
detail, see the current Economic Impact
and Small Business Analysis in the
public docket.
After considering the economic
impacts of this proposed rule on small
entities, I certify that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule is expected
to affect 21 ultimate parent businesses.
Five of the parent businesses are small
according to the SBA small business
size standard. One of these 5 firms
would have an annualized cost of more
than 1 percent of sales associated with
meeting the requirements; the estimated
cost is between 3 and 4 percent for this
small firm. Also, no other adverse
impacts are expected to these affected
small businesses.
For more information on the small
entity impacts associated with this
proposed rule, please refer to the
Economic Impact and Small Business
Analyses in the public docket.
Although this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, we nonetheless tried to reduce
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33828
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. When developing the
revised standards, we took special steps
to ensure that the burdens imposed on
small entities were minimal. We
conducted several meetings with
industry trade associations to discuss
regulatory options and the
corresponding burden on industry, such
as recordkeeping and reporting.
Following publication of this
proposed rule, copies of the Federal
Register action and, in some cases,
background documents, will be publicly
available to all industries, organizations,
and trade associations that have had
input during the regulation
development, as well as State and local
agencies. We continue to be interested
in the potential impacts of this proposed
rule on small entities and welcome
comments on issues related to such
impacts.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
EPA generally must prepare a written
statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules
with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any 1 year. Before
promulgating an EPA rule for which a
written statement is needed, section 205
of the UMRA generally requires EPA to
identify and consider a reasonable
number of regulatory alternatives and
adopt the least-costly, most costeffective, or least-burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule. The provisions of section
205 do not apply when they are
inconsistent with applicable law.
Moreover, section 205 allows EPA to
adopt an alternative other than the leastcostly, most cost-effective, or leastburdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final
rule an explanation why that alternative
was not adopted. Before EPA establishes
any regulatory requirements that may
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal
governments, it must have developed
under section 203 of the UMRA a small
government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially
affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments
to have meaningful and timely input in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal
intergovernmental mandates, and
informing, educating, and advising
small governments on compliance with
the regulatory requirements.
EPA has determined that this
proposed rule does not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures of $100 million or more
for State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or the private sector in
any 1 year. Thus, this proposed rule is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. In
addition, EPA has determined that this
proposed rule contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments
because it contains no requirements that
apply to such governments or impose
obligations upon them. Therefore, this
proposed rule is not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of the
UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) requires us to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ are defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
This proposed rule does not have
federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. This proposed
rule primarily affects private industry,
and does not impose significant
economic costs on State or local
governments. Thus, Executive Order
13132 does not apply to this proposed
rule. In the spirit of Executive Order
13132, and consistent with EPA policy
to promote communications between
EPA and State and local governments,
EPA specifically solicits comment on
this proposed rule from State and local
officials.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This proposed rule does
not have tribal implications. It will not
have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045, entitled
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
applies to any rule that: (1) Is
determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
we have reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
we must evaluate the environmental
health or safety effects of the planned
rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably
feasible alternatives.
We interpret Executive Order 13045
as applying only to those regulatory
actions that are based on health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Executive
Order has the potential to influence the
regulation. This proposed rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it is based on technology
performance and not on health or safety
risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) provides that agencies
shall prepare and submit to the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, a
Statement of Energy Effects for certain
actions identified as ‘‘significant energy
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
actions.’’ Section 4(b) of Executive
Order 13211 defines ‘‘significant energy
actions’’ as ‘‘any action by an agency
(normally published in the Federal
Register) that promulgates or is
expected to lead to the promulgation of
a final rule or regulation, including
notices of inquiry, advance notices of
proposed rulemaking, and notices of
proposed rulemaking: (1) (i) That is a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 or any successor
order, and (ii) is likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy; or (2) that
is designated by the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs as a significant energy action.’’
This proposed rule is a significant
energy action as designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs. We
have, therefore, prepared a Statement of
Energy Effects for this action as follows.
The increase in petroleum product
output, which includes increases in fuel
production, is estimated at less than
0.00001 percent, or about 10 barrels per
day based on 2006 U.S. fuel production
nationwide. The reduction in coal
production is zero since no coal-fired
units will be affected by the
requirements of this proposed rule. The
reduction in electricity output is
estimated at 0.00002 percent, or about
88,000 kilowatt-hours per year based on
2006 U.S. electricity production
nationwide. Production of natural gas is
expected to decrease by 286,000 cubic
feet (ft 3) per day, a decrease of 0.00002
percent from 2006 U.S. production
levels. The maximum of all energy price
increases, which include increases in
natural gas prices as well as those for
petroleum products, and electricity, is
estimated to be 0.0001 percent
nationwide. Energy distribution costs
may increase by roughly no more than
the same amount as electricity rates. We
expect that there will be no discernable
impact on the import of foreign energy
supplies, and no other adverse
outcomes are expected to occur with
regards to energy supplies. The increase
in cost of energy production should be
minimal given the very small increases
in energy prices and outputs shown
above. All of the estimates presented
above account for some pass-through of
costs to consumers as well as the direct
cost impact to producers. For more
information on these estimated energy
effects, please refer to the economic
impact analysis for the proposed rule.
This analysis is available in the public
docket.
Therefore, we conclude that the
proposed rule when implemented will
not have a significant adverse effect on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104–
113, section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in their regulatory and
procurement activities unless to do so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures,
business practices) developed or
adopted by one or more voluntary
consensus bodies. The NTTAA directs
EPA to provide Congress, through
annual reports to the OMB, with
explanations when an agency does not
use available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards.
This proposed rule involves technical
standards. EPA cites the standard test
procedures in 40 CFR part 1048, subpart
F, §§ 1048.501–515. Other test methods
cited in this proposed rule are EPA
Methods 1, 1A, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 10, 18, 25,
and 25A of 40 CFR part 60, EPA
Methods 320 or 323 of 40 CFR part 63,
appendix A, EPA Performance
Specifications (PS) 3 and 4A; and ASTM
D6522–00 (2005) (for Method 3A and
10) and D6348–03 (for Method 320 or
323). Consistent with the NTTAA, EPA
conducted searches to identify
voluntary consensus standards in
addition to these methods. No
applicable voluntary consensus
standards were identified for EPA
Method 1A, PS 3 and 4A, and the
nonroad test procedures in 40 CFR part
1048, subpart F, sections 1048.501–515.
The search and review results have been
documented and are placed in the
docket (Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–
2005–0030) for this proposed rule.
One potentially applicable voluntary
consensus standard that was identified
is not acceptable as an alternative as
written, but may be acceptable if minor
adjustments are made to the procedures.
EPA invites comments on the use of this
ISO standard for this proposed rule. The
voluntary consensus standard ISO
8178–1:1996, ‘‘Reciprocating ICE—
Exhaust Emission Measurement—Part 1:
Test-bed Measurement of Gaseous and
Particulate Exhaust Emissions,’’ is not
acceptable as an alternative to the test
procedures in § 60.4240 of this proposed
rule (specifically 40 CFR 86.1310) for
the following reasons. Although ISO
8178–1:1996 has many of the features of
EPA test procedures, the ISO standard
allows the gaseous measurements to be
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33829
made in an undiluted sample whereas
EPA procedures in 40 CFR 86.1310
require at least one dilution of the
sample. The ISO method does allow the
gaseous measurements to be made
during the double diluted sampling
procedures for particulate matter, but it
is not required by the ISO method. Also,
in the measurement of hydrocarbons,
the ISO method only specifies that the
sample lines are to be maintained above
70 °C and advises that the flow capacity
of the sample lines is used to prevent
condensation. In EPA procedures in 40
CFR 86.1310, the sample lines must be
maintained at 191 °C during the
hydrocarbon tests to prevent
condensation.
Two voluntary consensus standards
were identified as appropriate to this
proposed rule. The voluntary consensus
standard ASTM D6420–99 (2004),
‘‘Standard Test Method for
Determination of Gaseous Organic
Compounds by Direct Interface Gas
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
(GC/MS),’’ is appropriate in the cases
described below for inclusion in this
proposed rule in addition to EPA
Method 18 codified at 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A, for measurement of total
nonmethane organic. Therefore, the
standard ASTM D6420–99 is cited in
this proposed rule.
Similar to EPA’s performance-based
Method 18, ASTM D6420–99 is also a
performance-based method for
measurement of total gaseous organic
compounds. However, ASTM D6420–99
was written to support the specific use
of highly portable and automated GC/
MS. While offering advantages over the
traditional Method 18, the ASTM
method does allow some less stringent
criteria for accepting GC/MS results
than required by Method 18. Therefore,
ASTM D6420–99 is a suitable
alternative to Method 18 only where:
(1) The target compound(s) are those
listed in section 1.1 of ASTM D6420–99,
and
(2) The target concentration is
between 150 ppbv and 100 ppmv.
For target compound(s) not listed in
section 1.1 of ASTM D6420–99, but
potentially detected by mass
spectrometry, the regulation specifies
that the additional system continuing
calibration check after each run, as
detailed in section 10.5.3 of the ASTM
method, must be followed, met,
documented, and submitted with the
data report even if there is no moisture
condenser used or the compound is not
considered water soluble. For target
compound(s) not listed in section 1.1 of
ASTM D6420–99, and not amenable to
detection by mass spectrometry, ASTM
D6420–99 does not apply.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33830
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
As a result, EPA will cite ASTM
D6420–99 in this proposed rule. EPA
will also cite Method 18 as a GC option
in addition to ASTM D6420–99. This
will allow the continued use of GC
configurations other than GC/MS.
The voluntary consensus standard
ASME PTC 19–10–1981—Part 10, ‘‘Flue
and Exhaust Gas Analyses,’’ is cited in
this proposed rule for its manual
method for measuring the O2 content of
exhaust gas. This part of ASME PTC 19–
10–1981—Part 10 is an acceptable
alternative to Method 3B.
The search for emissions
measurement procedures identified ten
other voluntary consensus standards.
EPA determined that nine of these ten
standards identified for measuring
emissions of the HAP or surrogates
subject to emission standards in this
proposed rule were impractical
alternatives to EPA test methods for the
purposes of this proposed rule.
Therefore, EPA does not intend to adopt
these standards for this purpose. (See
the rulemaking docket for the reasons
for this determination for these nine
standards.)
One of the ten voluntary consensus
standards identified in this search were
not available at the time the review was
conducted for the purposes of this rule
because it is under development by a
voluntary consensus body: ASME/BSR
MFC 13M, ‘‘Flow Measurement by
Velocity Traverse,’’ possibly for EPA
Method 1.
Sections 60.4240 and 63.6620 of this
proposed rule lists the testing methods
included in the regulation. Under
§§ 60.8, 60.13, 63.7(f) and 63.8(f) of
subpart A to the General Provisions, a
source may apply to EPA for permission
to use alternative test methods or
alternative monitoring requirements in
place of any required testing methods,
performance specifications, or
procedures.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 60
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
40 CFR Part 63
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
40 CFR Part 85
Imports, Labeling, Motor vehicle
pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Research, Warranties.
40 CFR Part 90
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control.
40 CFR Part 1048
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control.
40 CFR Part 1065
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Research.
40 CFR Part 1068
Administrative practice and
procedure, Imports, Motor vehicle
pollution, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Warranties.
Dated: May 23, 2006.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations is proposed to be
amended to read as follows:
PART 60—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 60
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
2. Part 60 is amended by adding
subpart JJJJ to read as follows:
Subpart JJJJ—Standards of Performance
for Stationary Spark Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines
What This Subpart Covers
Sec.
60.4230 Am I subject to this subpart?
Emission Standards for Manufacturers
60.4231 What emission standards must I
meet if I am a manufacturer of stationary
SI internal combustion engines?
60.4232 How long must my engines meet
the emission standards if I am a
manufacturer of stationary SI internal
combustion engines?
Emission Standards for Owners and
Operators
60.4233 What emission standards must I
meet if I am an owner or operator of a
stationary SI internal combustion
engine?
60.4234 How long must I meet the emission
standards if I am an owner or operator
of a stationary SI internal combustion
engine?
Other Requirements for Owners and
Operators
60.4235 What fuel requirements must I
meet if I am an owner or operator of a
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
stationary SI gasoline fired internal
combustion engine subject to this
subpart?
60.4236 What is the deadline for importing
or installing stationary SI ICE produced
in the previous model year?
60.4237 What are the monitoring
requirements if I am an owner or
operator of an emergency stationary SI
internal combustion engine?
Compliance Requirements for
Manufacturers
60.4238 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a manufacturer of
stationary SI internal combustion
engines ≤19 KW (25 HP)?
60.4239 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a manufacturer of
stationary SI internal combustion
engines >19 KW (25 HP) that use
gasoline?
60.4240 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a manufacturer of
stationary SI internal combustion
engines >19 KW (25 HP) that are rich
burn engines that use LPG?
60.4241 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a manufacturer of
stationary SI internal combustion
engines participating in the voluntary
certification program?
60.4242 What other requirements must I
meet if I am a manufacturer of stationary
SI internal combustion engines?
Compliance Requirements for Owners and
Operators
60.4243 What are my compliance
requirements if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary SI internal
combustion engine?
Testing Requirements for Owners and
Operators
60.4244 What test methods and other
procedures must I use if I am an owner
or operator of a stationary SI internal
combustion engine?
Notification, Reports, and Records for
Owners and Operators
60.4245 What are my notification,
reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary SI internal
combustion engine?
Definitions
60.4246 What definitions apply to this
subpart?
Tables to Subpart JJJJ of Part 60
Table 1 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 60—NOX,
NMHC, and CO Emission Standards in g/
HP-hr for Stationary SI Engines >25 HP
(except Gasoline and Rich Burn LPG
Engines)
Table 2 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 60—
Requirements for Performance Tests
What This Subpart Covers
§ 60.4230
Am I subject to this subpart?
(a) The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to manufacturers, owners,
and operators of stationary spark
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
ignition (SI) internal combustion
engines (ICE) as specified in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (5) of this section. For the
purposes of this subpart, the date that
construction commences is the date the
engine is ordered by the owner or
operator.
(1) Manufacturers of stationary SI ICE
with a maximum engine power less than
or equal to 19 kilowatt (KW) (25
horsepower (HP)) that are manufactured
on or after January 1, 2008.
(2) Manufacturers of stationary SI ICE
with a maximum engine power greater
than 19 KW (25 HP) that are gasoline
fueled or that are rich burn engines
fueled by liquefied petroleum gas (LPG),
where the date of manufacture is:
(i) On or after July 1, 2007, for engines
with a maximum engine power greater
than or equal to 500 HP,
(ii) On or after January 1, 2008, for
engines with a maximum engine power
less than 500 HP.
(3) Manufacturers of stationary SI ICE
with a maximum engine power greater
than 19 KW (25 HP) that are not
gasoline fueled and are not rich burn
engines fueled by LPG, where the
manufacturer participates in the
voluntary manufacturer certification
program described in this subpart and
where the date of manufacture is:
(i) On or after July 1, 2007, for engines
with a maximum engine power greater
than or equal to 500 HP,
(ii) On or after January 1, 2008, for
engines with a maximum engine power
less than 500 HP,
(iii) On or after January 1, 2009, for
emergency engines.
(4) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE that commence construction after
June 12, 2006 where the stationary SI
ICE are manufactured:
(i) On or after July 1, 2007, for engines
with a maximum engine power greater
than or equal to 500 HP,
(ii) On or after January 1, 2008, for
engines with a maximum engine power
less than 500 HP,
(iii) On or after January 1, 2009, for
emergency engines with a maximum
engine power greater than 19 KW (25
HP) that are not gasoline fueled and are
not rich burn engines fueled by LPG.
(5) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE that commence modification or
reconstruction after June 12, 2006.
(b) The provisions of this subpart are
not applicable to stationary SI ICE being
tested at an engine test cell/stand.
(c) If you are an owner or operator of
an area source subject to this subpart,
you are exempt from the obligation to
obtain a permit under 40 CFR part 70 or
40 CFR part 71, provided you are not
required to obtain a permit under 40
CFR 70.3(a) or 40 CFR 71.3(a) for a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
reason other than your status as an area
source under this subpart.
Notwithstanding the previous sentence,
you must continue to comply with the
provisions of this subpart as applicable.
(d) For the purposes of this subpart,
stationary SI ICE using alcohol-based
fuels are considered gasoline engines.
(e) Stationary SI ICE used for national
security are eligible for exemption from
the requirements of this subpart as
described in 40 CFR 1068.225, except
that owners and operators, as well as
manufacturers, may be eligible to
request this exemption.
Emission Standards for Manufacturers
§ 60.4231 What emission standards must I
meet if I am a manufacturer of stationary SI
internal combustion engines?
(a) Stationary SI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
stationary SI ICE with a maximum
engine power less than or equal to 19
KW (25 HP) manufactured on or after
January 1, 2008 to the certification
emission standards and other
requirements for new nonroad SI
engines in 40 CFR part 90.
(b) Stationary SI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
stationary SI ICE with a maximum
engine power greater than 19 KW (25
HP) that use gasoline and that are
manufactured on or after the applicable
date in § 60.4230(a)(2) to the
certification emission standards and
other requirements for new nonroad SI
engines in 40 CFR part 1048. Stationary
SI internal combustion engine
manufacturers may certify their
stationary SI ICE with a maximum
engine power less than or equal to 30
KW (40 HP) with a total displacement
less than or equal to 1,000 cubic
centimeters (cc) to the certification
emission standards and other
requirements for new nonroad SI
engines in 40 CFR part 90.
(c) Stationary SI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
stationary SI ICE with a maximum
engine power greater than 19 KW (25
HP) that are rich burn engines that use
LPG and that are manufactured on or
after the applicable date in
§ 60.4230(a)(2) to the certification
emission standards and other
requirements for new nonroad SI
engines in 40 CFR part 1048. Stationary
SI internal combustion engine
manufacturers may certify their
stationary SI ICE with a maximum
engine power less than or equal to 30
KW (40 HP) with a total displacement
less than or equal to 1,000 cc to the
certification emission standards and
other requirements for new nonroad SI
engines in 40 CFR part 90.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33831
(d) Stationary SI internal combustion
engine manufacturers of engines with a
maximum engine power greater than 19
KW (25 HP) that do not use gasoline and
are not rich burn engines that use LPG
who choose to certify engines under the
voluntary manufacturer certification
program described in this subpart must
certify those engines to the emission
standards in Table 1 to this subpart.
§ 60.4232 How long must my engines meet
the emission standards if I am a
manufacturer of stationary SI internal
combustion engines?
Engines manufactured by stationary
SI internal combustion engine
manufacturers must meet the emission
standards as required in § 60.4231
during the useful life of the engines.
Emission Standards for Owners and
Operators
§ 60.4233 What emission standards must I
meet if I am an owner or operator of a
stationary SI internal combustion engine?
(a) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE with a maximum engine power
less than or equal to 19 KW (25 HP)
manufactured on or after January 1,
2008 must comply with the emission
standards in § 60.4231(a) for their
stationary SI ICE.
(b) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE with a maximum engine power
greater than 19 KW (25 HP)
manufactured on or after the applicable
date in § 60.4230(a)(2) that use gasoline
must comply with the emission
standards in § 60.4231(b) for their
stationary SI ICE.
(c) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE with a maximum engine power
greater than 19 KW (25 HP)
manufactured on or after the applicable
date in § 60.4230(a)(2) that are rich burn
engines that use LPG must comply with
the emission standards in § 60.4231(c)
for their stationary SI ICE.
(d) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE with a maximum engine power
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that do not
use gasoline and are not rich burn
engines that use LPG must comply with
the emission standards in Table 1 to this
subpart for their stationary SI ICE. These
emission standards include emission
standards for stationary SI landfill/
digester gas ICE and stationary SI
emergency ICE.
(e) Owners and operators of any
modified or reconstructed stationary SI
ICE subject to this subpart must meet
the requirements as specified in
paragraphs (e)(1) through (5) of this
section.
(1) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE with a maximum engine power
less than or equal to 19 KW (25 HP), that
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33832
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
are modified or reconstructed after June
12, 2006, must comply with the same
emission standards as those specified in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE with a maximum engine power
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that use
gasoline engines, that are modified or
reconstructed after June 12, 2006, must
comply with the same emission
standards as those specified in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(3) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE with a maximum engine power
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that are rich
burn engines that use LPG, that are
modified or reconstructed after June 12,
2006, must comply with the same
emission standards as those specified in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(4) Owners and operators of stationary
SI natural gas and lean burn LPG
engines with a maximum engine power
greater than 19 KW (25 HP), that are
modified or reconstructed after June 12,
2006, must comply with the same
emission standards as those specified in
paragraph (d) of this section, except that
such owners and operators must meet a
nitrogen oxides (NOX) emission
standard of 3.0 grams per HP-hour (g/
HP-hr), a carbon monoxide (CO)
emission standard of 4.0 g/HP-hr, and a
non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC)
emission standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr, where
the date of manufacture of the engine is:
(i) Prior to July 1, 2007, for nonemergency engines with a maximum
engine power greater than or equal to
500 HP;
(ii) Prior to January 1, 2008, for nonemergency engines with a maximum
engine power less than 500 HP;
(iii) Prior to January 1, 2009, for
emergency engines.
(5) Owners and operators of stationary
SI landfill/digester gas ICE engines with
a maximum engine power greater than
19 KW (25 HP), that are modified or
reconstructed after June 12, 2006, must
comply with the same emission
standards as those specified in
paragraph (d) of this section for
stationary landfill/digester gas engines.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 60.4234 How long must I meet the
emission standards if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary SI internal
combustion engine?
Owners and operators of stationary SI
ICE must operate and maintain
stationary SI ICE that achieve the
emission standards as required in
§ 60.4233 according to the
manufacturer’s written instructions or
procedures developed by the owner or
operator that are approved by the engine
manufacturer, over the entire life of the
engine.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Other Requirements for Owners and
Operators
Compliance Requirements for
Manufacturers
§ 60.4235 What fuel requirements must I
meet if I am an owner or operator of a
stationary SI gasoline fired internal
combustion engine subject to this subpart?
§ 60.4238 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a manufacturer of
stationary SI internal combustion engines
≤19 KW (25 HP)?
Owners and operators of stationary SI
ICE subject to this subpart that use
gasoline must use gasoline that meets
the per gallon sulfur limit in 40 CFR
80.195.
Stationary SI internal combustion
engine manufacturers who are subject to
the emission standards specified in
§ 60.4231(a) must certify their stationary
SI ICE using the certification procedures
required in 40 CFR part 90, subpart B,
and must test their engines as specified
in that part.
§ 60.4236 What is the deadline for
importing or installing stationary SI ICE
produced in the previous model year?
(a) After January 1, 2010, owners and
operators may not install stationary SI
ICE with a maximum engine power of
less than 500 HP that do not meet the
applicable requirements in § 60.4233.
(b) After July 1, 2009, owners and
operators may not install stationary SI
ICE with a maximum engine power of
greater than or equal to 500 HP that do
not meet the applicable requirements in
§ 60.4233.
(c) For emergency stationary SI ICE
with a maximum engine power of
greater than 19 kW (25 HP) that are not
gasoline fueled engines and that are not
rich burn engines fueled by LPG,
owners and operators may not install
engines that do not meet the applicable
requirements in § 60.4233 after January
1, 2011.
(d) In addition to the requirements
specified in §§ 60.4231 and 60.4233, it
is prohibited to import stationary SI ICE
≤19 KW (25 HP), stationary rich burn
LPG SI ICE, and stationary gasoline SI
ICE that do not meet the applicable
requirements specified in paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section, after the date
specified in paragraph (a) and (b) of this
section.
(e) The requirements of this section
do not apply to owners and operators of
stationary SI ICE that have been
modified or reconstructed, and they do
not apply to engines that were removed
from one existing location and
reinstalled at a new location.
§ 60.4237 What are the monitoring
requirements if I am an owner or operator
of an emergency stationary SI internal
combustion engine?
If you are an owner or operator of an
emergency stationary SI internal
combustion engine, you must install a
non-resettable hour meter prior to
startup of the engine.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 60.4239 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a manufacturer of
stationary SI internal combustion engines
>19 KW (25 HP) that use gasoline?
Stationary SI internal combustion
engine manufacturers who are subject to
the emission standards specified in
§ 60.4231(b) must certify their stationary
SI ICE using the certification procedures
required in 40 CFR part 1048, subpart C,
and must test their engines as specified
in that part. Stationary SI internal
combustion engine manufacturers who
certify their stationary SI ICE with a
maximum engine power less than or
equal to 30 KW (40 HP) with a total
displacement less than or equal to 1,000
cc to the certification emission
standards and other requirements for
new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part
90 must certify their stationary SI ICE
using the certification procedures
required in 40 CFR part 90, subpart B,
and must test their engines as specified
in that part.
§ 60.4240 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a manufacturer of
stationary SI internal combustion engines
>19 KW (25 HP) that are rich burn engines
that use LPG?
Stationary SI internal combustion
engine manufacturers who are subject to
the emission standards specified in
§ 60.4231(c) must certify their stationary
SI ICE using the certification procedures
required in 40 CFR part 1048, subpart C,
and must test their engines as specified
in that part. Stationary SI internal
combustion engine manufacturers who
certify their stationary SI ICE with a
maximum engine power less than or
equal to 30 KW (40 HP) with a total
displacement less than or equal to 1,000
cc to the certification emission
standards and other requirements for
new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part
90 must certify their stationary SI ICE
using the certification procedures
required in 40 CFR part 90, subpart B,
and must test their engines as specified
in that part.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 60.4241 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a manufacturer of
stationary SI internal combustion engines
participating in the voluntary certification
program?
(a) Manufacturers of stationary SI
internal combustion engines with a
maximum engine power greater than 19
KW (25 HP) that do not use gasoline and
are not rich burn engines that use LPG
can choose to certify their engines to the
emission standards in § 60.4231(d)
under the voluntary certification
program described in this subpart.
Manufacturers who certify their engines
under the voluntary certification
program must meet the requirements as
specified in paragraphs (b) through (g)
of this section.
(b) Manufacturers must certify their
stationary SI ICE using the certification
procedures required in 40 CFR part
1048, subpart C, and must follow the
same test procedures that apply to large
SI nonroad engines under 40 CFR part
1048, but must use the D–2 cycle of
International Organization of
Standardization 8178–4 specified in
Table 3 to 40 CFR 1048.505.
(c) Certification of stationary SI ICE to
the emission standards specified in
§ 60.4231(d) is voluntary. However,
once the manufacturer produces
stationary SI ICE certified to the
emission standards specified in
§ 60.4231(d) for a given model year, the
requirements on the manufacturer for
such stationary SI ICE are not voluntary.
(d) Manufacturers of natural gas fired
stationary SI ICE who conduct voluntary
certification of stationary SI ICE to the
emission standards specified in
§ 60.4231(d) must certify their engines
for operation using fuel that meets the
definition of pipeline-quality natural
gas. The fuel used for certifying
stationary SI natural gas engines must
meet the definition of pipeline-quality
natural gas as described in § 60.4246. In
addition, the manufacturer must
provide information to the owner and
operator of the certified stationary SI
engine including the specifications of
the pipeline-quality natural gas to
which the engine is certified and what
adjustments the owner or operator must
make to the engine when installed in
the field to ensure compliance with the
emission standards.
(e) Manufacturers of stationary SI ICE
that are lean burn engines fueled by LPG
who conduct voluntary certification of
stationary SI ICE to the emission
standards specified in § 60.4231(d) must
certify their engines for operation using
fuel that meets the specifications in 40
CFR 1065.720.
(f) Manufacturers may certify their
engines for operation using gaseous
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
fuels in addition to pipeline-quality
natural gas; however, the manufacturer
must specify the properties of that fuel
and provide testing information
showing that the engine will meet the
emission standards specified in
§ 60.4231(d) when operating on that
fuel. The manufacturer must also
provide instructions for configuring the
stationary engine to meet the emission
standards on fuels that do not meet the
pipeline-quality natural gas definition.
The manufacturer must also provide
information to the owner and operator
of the certified stationary SI engine
regarding the configuration that is most
conducive to reduced emissions where
the engine will be operated on
particular fuels to which the engine is
not certified.
(g) A stationary SI engine
manufacturer may certify an engine
family solely to the standards applicable
to landfill/digester gas engines as
specified in § 60.4231(d), but must
certify their engines for operation using
landfill/digester gas and must add a
permanent label stating that the engine
is for use only in landfill/digester gas
applications. The label must be added
according to the labeling requirements
specified in 40 CFR 1048.135(b).
§ 60.4242 What other requirements must I
meet if I am a manufacturer of stationary SI
internal combustion engines?
(a) Stationary SI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must meet the
provisions of 40 CFR part 90 or 40 CFR
part 1048, as applicable, as well as 40
CFR part 1068 for engines that are
certified to the emission standards in 40
CFR part 1048, except that engines
certified pursuant to the voluntary
certification procedures in § 60.4241 are
permitted to provide instructions to
owners and operators allowing for
deviations from certified configurations,
if such deviations are consistent with
the provisions of paragraphs
§ 60.4241(c) through (f). Labels on
engines certified to 40 CFR part 1048
must refer to stationary engines, rather
than or in addition to nonroad engines,
as appropriate.
(b) An engine manufacturer certifying
an engine family or families to
standards under this subpart that are
identical to standards applicable under
40 CFR part 90 or 40 CFR part 1048 for
that model year may certify any such
family that contains both nonroad and
stationary engines as a single engine
family and/or may include any such
family containing stationary engines in
the averaging, banking and trading
provisions applicable for such engines
under those parts.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33833
(c) Manufacturers of engine families
certified to 40 CFR part 1048 may meet
the labeling requirements referred to in
paragraph (a) of this section for
stationary SI ICE by either adding a
separate label containing the
information required in paragraph (a) of
this section or by adding the words
‘‘and stationary’’ after the word
‘‘nonroad’’ to the label.
(d) For all engines manufactured on or
after January 1, 2011, a stationary SI
engine manufacturer that certifies an
engine family solely to the standards
applicable to emergency engines must
add a permanent label stating that the
engines in that family are for emergency
use only. The label must be added
according to the labeling requirements
specified in 40 CFR 1048.135(b).
Compliance Requirements for Owners
and Operators
§ 60.4243 What are my compliance
requirements if I am an owner or operator
of a stationary SI internal combustion
engine?
(a) If you are an owner or operator,
you must operate and maintain the
stationary SI internal combustion engine
and control device according to the
manufacturer’s written instructions or
procedures developed by the owner or
operator that are approved by the engine
manufacturer. In addition, owners and
operators of certified engines may only
change those settings that are allowed
by the manufacturer to ensure
compliance with the applicable
emission standards. If you own or
operate a stationary SI internal
combustion engine that is certified to 40
CFR part 90 or 1048, you must also meet
the requirements of 40 CFR parts 90,
1048, and/or part 1068, as they apply to
you.
(b) If you are an owner or operator of
a stationary SI internal combustion
engine that is manufactured after July 1,
2007, for engines with maximum engine
power at or above 500 HP, or January 1,
2008, for engines with maximum engine
power below 500 HP, and must comply
with the emission standards specified in
§ 60.4233(a) through (c), you must
comply by purchasing an engine
certified to the emission standards in
§ 60.4231(a) through (c), as applicable,
for the same engine class and maximum
engine power. The engine must be
installed and configured according to
the manufacturer’s specifications.
(c) If you are an owner or operator of
a stationary SI internal combustion
engine and must comply with the
emission standards specified in
§ 60.4233(d), you must demonstrate
compliance according to one of the
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(d) If you are an owner or operator of
a stationary SI internal combustion
engine that must comply with the
emission standards specified in
§ 60.4233(e), you must demonstrate
compliance according paragraph (c)(2)
of this section.
(e) Emergency stationary ICE may be
operated for the purpose of maintenance
checks and readiness testing, provided
that the tests are recommended by
Federal, State or local government, the
manufacturer, the vendor, or the
insurance company associated with the
engine. Maintenance checks and
readiness testing of such units is limited
to 100 hours per year. There is no time
limit on the use of emergency stationary
ICE in emergency situations. The owner
or operator may petition the
Administrator for approval of additional
hours to be used for maintenance checks
and readiness testing, but a petition is
not required if the owner or operator
maintains records indicating that
Federal, State, or local standards require
maintenance and testing of emergency
ICE beyond 100 hours per year. For
owners and operators of emergency
engines, any operation other than
emergency operation and maintenance
and testing as permitted in this section,
is prohibited.
(f) Owners and operators of stationary
SI natural gas fired engines may operate
their engines using propane for a
maximum of 100 hours per year as an
alternative fuel solely during emergency
operations, but must keep records of
ER =
Where:
ER = Emission rate of NOX in g/HP-hr.
Cd = Measured NOX concentration in parts
per million (ppm).
1.912 × 10¥3 = Conversion constant for ppm
NOX to grams per standard cubic meter
at 25 degrees Celsius.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Cd × 1.832 × 10−3 × Q × T
HP − hr
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
§ 60.4244 What test methods and other
procedures must I use if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary SI internal
combustion engine?
Owners and operators of stationary SI
ICE who conduct performance tests
must follow the procedures in
paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section.
(a) Each performance test must be
conducted according to the
requirements in § 60.8 and under the
specific conditions that are specified by
Table 2 to this subpart.
(b) You may not conduct performance
tests during periods of startup,
shutdown, or malfunction, as specified
in § 60.8(c).
(c) You must conduct three separate
test runs for each performance test
required in this section, as specified in
§ 60.8(f). Each test run must last at least
1 hour.
(d) To determine compliance with the
NOX mass per unit output emission
limitation, convert the concentration of
NOX in the engine exhaust using
Equation 1 of this section:
(e) To determine compliance with the
CO mass per unit output emission
limitation, convert the concentration of
CO in the engine exhaust using
Equation 2 of this section:
(Eq. 2)
Q = Stack gas volumetric flow rate, in
standard cubic meters per hour.
T = Time of test run, in hours.
HP-hr = Brake work of the engine, in HP-hr.
ER =
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Cd × 1.164 × 10−3 × Q × T
HP − hr
Testing Requirements for Owners and
Operators
(Eq. 1)
Q = Stack gas volumetric flow rate, in
standard cubic meter per hour.
T = Time of test run, in hours.
HP-hr = Brake work of the engine,
horsepower-hour (HP-hr).
ER =
Where:
ER = Emission rate of CO in g/HP-hr.
Cd = Measured CO concentration in ppm.
1.164 × 10¥3 = Conversion constant for ppm
CO to grams per standard cubic meter at
25 degrees Celsius.
Cd × 1.912 × 10−3 × Q × T
HP − hr
such use. If propane is used for more
than 100 hours per year in an engine
that is not certified to the emission
standards when using propane, the
owners and operators are required to
conduct a performance test to
demonstrate compliance with the
emission standards of § 60.4233.
(f) To determine compliance with the
NMHC mass per unit output emission
limitation, convert the concentration of
NMHC in the engine exhaust using
Equation 3 of this section:
(Eq. 3)
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
EP12JN06.006 EP12JN06.007
methods specified in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (2) of this section.
(1) Purchasing an engine certified
according to procedures specified in
this subpart, for the same model year.
The engine must be installed and
configured according to the
manufacturer’s specifications to ensure
compliance with the applicable
standards. Owners and operators of
engines that have been certified by the
engine manufacturer are not required to
conduct any performance testing unless
the engine is operated outside of the
fuel properties specified by the
manufacturer. If the owner or operator
uses fuels outside of the fuel
specifications (other than propane used
solely for emergency purposes for up to
100 hours per year) or does not follow
the adjustments specified by the
manufacturer, the engine is no longer
considered a certified engine and the
owner or operator must test the engine
to demonstrate compliance, according to
the procedures specified in § 60.4244.
(2) Conducting an initial performance
test to demonstrate compliance with the
emission standards specified in Table 1
to this subpart and according to the
requirements specified in § 60.4244, as
applicable. If you are an owner or
operator of a stationary SI internal
combustion engine that is greater than
500 HP, you must also conduct
subsequent performance tests every 3
years or 8,760 hours of operation,
whichever comes first.
EP12JN06.005
33834
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Where:
ER = Emission rate of NMHC in g/HP-hr.
Cd = NMHC concentration measured as
propane in ppm.
1.832 × 10¥3 = Conversion constant for ppm
NMHC measured as propane, to grams
per standard cubic meter at 25 degrees
Celsius.
Q = Stack gas volumetric flow rate, in
standard cubic meters per hour.
T = Time of test run, in hours.
HP-hr = Brake work of the engine, in HP-hr.
Notification, Reports, and Records for
Owners and Operators
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 60.4245 What are my notification,
reporting, and recordkeeping requirements
if I am an owner or operator of a stationary
SI internal combustion engine?
Owners or operators of stationary SI
ICE must meet the following
notification, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
(a) Owners and operators of all
stationary SI ICE must keep records of
the information in paragraphs (a)(1)
through (4) of this section.
(1) All notifications submitted to
comply with this subpart and all
documentation supporting any
notification.
(2) Maintenance conducted on the
engine.
(3) If the stationary SI internal
combustion engine is a certified engine,
documentation from the manufacturer
that the engine is certified to meet the
emission standards and information as
required in 40 CFR parts 90 and 1048.
(4) If the stationary SI internal
combustion engine is not a certified
engine, documentation that the engine
meets the emission standards.
(b) The owner or operator of
stationary SI emergency ICE must keep
records of the hours of operation of the
engine that is recorded through the nonresettable hour meter. The owner or
operator must document how many
hours are spent for emergency
operation, including what classified the
operation as emergency and how many
hours are spent for non-emergency
operation.
(c) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE greater than or equal to 500 HP
that have not been certified by an engine
manufacturer to meet the emission
standards in § 60.4231 must submit an
initial notification as required in
§ 60.7(a)(1). The notification must
include the information in paragraphs
(c)(1) through (5) of this section.
(1) Name and address of the owner or
operator;
(2) The address of the affected source;
(3) Engine information including
make, model, engine family, serial
number, model year, maximum engine
power, and engine displacement;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
(4) Emission control equipment; and
(5) Fuel used.
(d) Owners and operators of stationary
SI ICE that have not been certified by an
engine manufacturer to meet the
emission standards in § 60.4231 must
submit a copy of each performance test
as conducted in § 60.4244 within 30
days after the test has been completed.
33835
stationary ICE used to pump water in
the case of fire or flood, etc. Stationary
SI ICE used for peak shaving are not
considered emergency stationary ICE.
Engine manufacturer means the
manufacturer of the engine. See the
definition of ‘‘manufacturer’’ in this
section.
Four-stroke engine means any type of
engine which completes the power
Definitions
cycle in two crankshaft revolutions,
with intake and compression strokes in
§ 60.4246 What definitions apply to this
the first revolution and power and
subpart?
exhaust strokes in the second
As used in this subpart, all terms not
revolution.
defined herein shall have the meaning
Gasoline means any fuel sold in any
given them in the CAA and in subpart
State for use in motor vehicles and
A of this part.
motor vehicle engines, or nonroad or
Certified stationary internal
combustion engine means an engine that stationary engines, and commonly or
commercially known or sold as
belongs to an engine family that has a
gasoline.
certificate of conformity that complies
Landfill gas means a gaseous
with the emission standards and
byproduct of the land application of
requirements in this part, or of 40 CFR
municipal refuse typically formed
part 90 or 40 CFR part 1048, as
through the anaerobic decomposition of
appropriate.
waste materials and composed
Combustion turbine means all
principally of methane and CO2.
equipment, including but not limited to
Lean burn engine means any twothe turbine, the fuel, air, lubrication and stroke or four-stroke spark ignited
exhaust gas systems, control systems
engine that does not meet the definition
(except emissions control equipment),
of a rich burn engine.
and any ancillary components and subLiquefied petroleum gas means any
components comprising any simple
liquefied hydrocarbon gas obtained as a
cycle combustion turbine, any
by-product in petroleum refining of
regenerative/recuperative cycle
natural gas production.
combustion turbine, the combustion
Manufacturer has the meaning given
turbine portion of any cogeneration
in section 216(1) of the Clean Air Act.
cycle combustion system, or the
In general, this term includes any
combustion turbine portion of any
person who manufactures a stationary
combined cycle steam/electric
engine for sale in the United States or
generating system.
otherwise introduces a new stationary
Compression ignition means relating
engine into commerce in the United
to a type of stationary internal
States. This includes importers who
combustion engine that is not a spark
import stationary engines for resale.
ignition engine.
Maximum engine power means
Diesel fuel means any liquid obtained maximum engine power as defined in
from the distillation of petroleum with
40 CFR 1048.801.
a boiling point of approximately 150 to
Model year means either: The
360 degrees Celsius. One commonly
calendar year in which the engine was
used form is number 2 distillate oil.
originally produced, or the annual new
Digester gas means any gaseous bymodel production period of the engine
product of wastewater treatment
manufacturer if it is different than the
typically formed through the anaerobic
calendar year. This must include
decomposition of organic waste
January 1 of the calendar year for which
materials and composed principally of
the model year is named. It may not
methane and CO2.
begin before January 2 of the previous
Emergency stationary internal
calendar year, and it must end by
combustion engine means any stationary December 31 of the named calendar
internal combustion engine whose
year. For an engine that is converted to
operation is limited to emergency
a stationary engine after being placed
situations and required testing and
into service as a nonroad or other nonmaintenance. Examples include
stationary engine, model year means the
stationary ICE used to produce power
calendar year or new model production
for critical networks or equipment
period in which the engine was
(including power supplied to portions
originally produced.
Natural gas means a naturally
of a facility) when electric power from
occurring mixture of hydrocarbon and
the local utility (or the normal power
non-hydrocarbon gases found in
source, if the facility runs on its own
geologic formations beneath the Earth’s
power production) is interrupted, or
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33836
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
surface, of which the principal
constituent is methane. Natural gas may
be field or pipeline quality.
Non-methane hydrocarbons means
the difference between the emitted mass
of total hydrocarbons and the emitted
mass of methane.
Other internal combustion engine
means any internal combustion engine,
except combustion turbines, which is
not a reciprocating internal combustion
engine or rotary internal combustion
engine.
Pipeline-quality natural gas means a
naturally occurring fluid mixture of
hydrocarbons (e.g., methane, ethane, or
propane) produced in geological
formations beneath the Earth’s surface
that maintains a gaseous state at
standard atmospheric temperature and
pressure under ordinary conditions, and
which is provided by a supplier through
a pipeline. Pipeline-quality natural gas
must either be composed of at least 70
percent methane by volume or have a
gross calorific value between 950 and
1,100 British thermal units per standard
cubic foot.
Reciprocating internal combustion
engine means any internal combustion
engine which uses reciprocating motion
to convert heat energy into mechanical
work.
Rich burn engine means any fourstroke spark ignited engine where the
manufacturer’s recommended operating
air/fuel ratio divided by the
stoichiometric air/fuel ratio at full load
conditions is less than or equal to 1.1.
Engines originally manufactured as rich
burn engines, but modified prior to June
12, 2006 with passive emission control
technology for NOX (such as precombustion chambers) will be
considered lean burn engines. Also,
existing engines where there are no
manufacturer’s recommendations
regarding air/fuel ratio will be
considered a rich burn engine if the
excess oxygen content of the exhaust at
full load conditions is less than or equal
to 2 percent.
Rotary internal combustion engine
means any internal combustion engine
which uses rotary motion to convert
heat energy into mechanical work.
Spark ignition means relating to
either: A gasoline-fueled engine; or any
other type of engine with a spark plug
(or other sparking device) and with
operating characteristics significantly
similar to the theoretical Otto
combustion cycle. Spark ignition
engines usually use a throttle to regulate
intake air flow to control power during
normal operation. Dual-fuel engines in
which a liquid fuel (typically diesel
fuel) is used for compression ignition
and gaseous fuel (typically natural gas)
is used as the primary fuel at an annual
average ratio of less than 2 parts diesel
fuel to 100 parts total fuel on an energy
equivalent basis are spark ignition
engines.
Stationary internal combustion engine
means any internal combustion engine,
except combustion turbines, that
converts heat energy into mechanical
work and is not mobile. Stationary ICE
differ from mobile ICE in that a
stationary internal combustion engine is
not a nonroad engine as defined at 40
CFR 1068.30, and is not used to propel
a motor vehicle or a vehicle used solely
for competition. Stationary ICE include
reciprocating ICE, rotary ICE, and other
ICE, except combustion turbines.
Stationary internal combustion engine
test cell/stand means an engine test cell/
stand, as defined in subpart PPPPP of
this part, that test stationary ICE.
Stoichiometric means the theoretical
air-to-fuel ratio required for complete
combustion.
Subpart means 40 CFOFR part 60,
subpart JJJJ.
Total hydrocarbons means the
combined mass of organic compounds
measured by the specified procedure for
measuring total hydrocarbon, expressed
as a hydrocarbon with a hydrogen-tocarbon mass ratio of 1.85:1.
Two-stroke engine means a type of
engine which completes the power
cycle in single crankshaft revolution by
combining the intake and compression
operations into one stroke and the
power and exhaust operations into a
second stroke. This system requires
auxiliary scavenging and inherently
runs lean of stoichiometric.
Useful life means the period during
which the engine is designed to
properly function in terms of reliability
and fuel consumption, without being
remanufactured, specified as a number
of hours of operation or calendar years,
whichever comes first. The values for
useful life for stationary SI ICE with a
maximum engine power less than or
equal to 19 KW (25 HP) are given in 40
CFR 90.105. The values for useful life
for stationary SI ICE with a maximum
engine power greater than 19 KW (25
HP) certified to 40 CFR part 1048 are
given in 40 CFR 1048.101(g). The useful
life for stationary SI ICE with a
maximum engine power greater than 19
KW (25 HP) certified under the
voluntary manufacturer certification
program of this subpart is 8,000 hours
or 10 years, whichever comes first.
Voluntary certification program
means an optional engine certification
program that manufacturers of
stationary SI internal combustion
engines with a maximum engine power
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that do not
use gasoline and are not rich burn
engines that use LPG can choose to
participate in to certify their engines to
the emission standards in § 60.4231(d).
Tables to Subpart JJJJ of Part 60
TABLE 1 TO SUBPART JJJJ OF PART 60.—NOX, NMHC, AND CO EMISSION STANDARDS IN G/HP-HR FOR STATIONARY SI
ENGINES >25 HP
[Except gasoline and rich burn LPG engines]
Maximum
engine
power
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
Engine type and fuel
Non-Emergency SI Natural Gas ...............
and
Non-Emergency SI Lean Burn LPG .........
Non-Emergency SI Natural Gas ...............
and
Non-Emergency SI Lean Burn LPG .........
Landfill/Digester Gas .................................
Manufacture date a
252005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Emission standards in g/HP-hr
NOX
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
CO
NMHC
33837
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1 TO SUBPART JJJJ OF PART 60.—NOX, NMHC, AND CO EMISSION STANDARDS IN G/HP-HR FOR STATIONARY SI
ENGINES >25 HP—Continued
[Except gasoline and rich burn LPG engines]
Emission standards in g/HP-hr
Maximum
engine
power
Engine type and fuel
Emergency ................................................
Manufacture date a
All Sizes ................
January 1, 2009 ........................................
NOX
CO
2.0
NMHC
4.0
1.0
a Stationary SI natural gas and lean burn LPG engines between 25 and 50 HP may comply with the requirements of 40 CFR part 1048, instead
of this table. Stationary SI internal combustion engine manufacturers may certify their stationary SI ICE with a maximum engine power less than
or equal to 30 KW (40 HP) with a total displacement less than or equal to 1,000 cc to the certification emission standards and other requirements for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 90.
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART JJJJ OF PART 60.—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS
As stated in § 60.4244, you must comply with the following requirements for performance tests:
For each
Complying with the requirement
You must
Using
According to the following
requirements
Stationary SI internal combustion engine demonstrating compliance
according to
§ 60.4243(c)(2).
a. limit the concentration of
NOX in the stationary SI
internal combustion engine exhaust.
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number
of traverse points;
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, Appendix
A or ASTM method
D6522–00 (2005).
ii. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and
iii. Measure NOX at the exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine.
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number
of traverse points;
(2) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A.
ii. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and
iii. Measure CO at the exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine.
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number
of traverse points;
(2) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A.
ii. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and
iii. Measure NMHC at the
exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine.
(2) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A.
(a) If using a control device, the sampling site
must be located at the
outlet of the control device.
(b) Measurements to determine moisture must
be made at the same
time as the measurement for NOX concentration.
(c) Results of this test consist of the average of
the three 1-hour or
longer runs.
(a) If using a control device, the sampling site
must be located at the
outlet of the control device.
(b) Measurements to determine moisture must
be made at the same
time as the measurement for CO concentration.
(c) Results of this test consist of the average of
the three 1-hour or
longer runs.
(a) If using a control device, the sampling site
must be located at the
outlet of the control device.
(b) Measurements to determine moisture must
be made at the same
time as the measurement for NMHC concentration.
(c) Results of this test consist of the average of
the three 1-hour or
longer runs.
b. limit the concentration of
CO in the stationary SI
internal combustion engine exhaust.
c. limit the concentration of
NMHC in the stationary
SI internal combustion
engine exhaust.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
...........................................
PART 63—[AMENDED]
(3) Method 7E of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A, or
Method D6522–00
(2005).
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, Appendix
A.
(3) Method 10 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A, or
ASTM Method D6522–
00 (2005).
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, Appendix
A.
(3) Method 25 or Methods
25A and 18 of part 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A.
§ 63.14
Subpart A—[Amended]
Incorporation by reference.
*
3. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
4. Section 63.14 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(27) to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(27) ASTM D6522–00 (2005),
Standard Test Method for Determination
of Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide,
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33838
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
and Oxygen Concentrations in
Emissions from Natural Gas Fired
Reciprocating Engines, Combustion
Turbines, Boilers, and Process Heaters
Using Portable Analyzers, IBR approved
for § 63.9307(c)(2) and Table 5 to
subpart ZZZZ of part 63.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Section 63.6580 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 63.6580
ZZZZ?
What is the purpose of subpart
Subpart ZZZZ establishes national
emission limitations and operating
limitations for hazardous air pollutants
(HAP) emitted from stationary
reciprocating internal combustion
engines (RICE) located at major and area
sources of HAP emissions. This subpart
also establishes requirements to
demonstrate initial and continuous
compliance with the emission
limitations and operating limitations.
6. Section 63.6585 is amended by
revising the introductory text and
adding paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as
follows:
§ 63.6585
Am I subject to this subpart?
You are subject to this subpart if you
own or operate a stationary RICE at a
major or area source of HAP emissions,
except if the stationary RICE is being
tested at a stationary RICE test cell/
stand.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) An area source of HAP emissions
is a source that is not a major source.
(d) If you are an owner or operator of
an area source subject to this subpart,
you are exempt from the obligation to
obtain a permit under 40 CFR parts 70
or 71, provided you are not required to
obtain a permit under 40 CFR 70.3(a) or
40 CFR 71.3(a) for a reason other than
your status as an area source under this
subpart. Notwithstanding the previous
sentence, you must continue to comply
with the provisions of this subpart as
applicable.
7. Section 63.6590 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a), (b)(1)
introductory text, (b)(2), and (b)(3), to
read as follows:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 63.6590 What parts of my plant does this
subpart cover?
This subpart applies to each affected
source.
(a) Affected source. An affected
source is any existing, new, or
reconstructed stationary RICE located at
a major or area source of HAP
emissions, excluding stationary RICE
being tested at a stationary RICE test
cell/stand.
(1) Existing stationary RICE. (i) For
stationary RICE with a site rating of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
more than 500 brake horsepower (HP)
located at a major source of HAP
emissions, a stationary RICE is existing
if you commenced construction or
reconstruction of the stationary RICE
before December 19, 2002.
(ii) For stationary RICE with a site
rating of less than or equal to 500 brake
HP located at a major source of HAP
emissions, a stationary RICE is existing
if you commenced construction or
reconstruction of the stationary RICE
before June 12, 2006.
(iii) For stationary RICE located at an
area source of HAP emissions, a
stationary RICE is existing if you
commenced construction or
reconstruction of the stationary RICE
before June 12, 2006.
(iv) A change in ownership of an
existing stationary RICE does not make
that stationary RICE a new or
reconstructed stationary RICE.
(2) New stationary RICE. (i) A
stationary RICE with a site rating of
more than 500 brake HP located at a
major source of HAP emissions is new
if you commenced construction of the
stationary RICE on or after December 19,
2002.
(ii) A stationary RICE with a site
rating of equal to or less than 500 brake
HP located at a major source of HAP
emissions is new if you commenced
construction of the stationary RICE on
or after June 12, 2006.
(iii) A stationary RICE located at an
area source of HAP emissions is new if
you commenced construction of the
stationary RICE on or after June 12,
2006.
(3) Reconstructed stationary RICE. (i)
A stationary RICE with a site rating of
more than 500 brake HP located at a
major source of HAP emissions is
reconstructed if you meet the definition
of reconstruction in § 63.2 and
reconstruction is commenced on or after
December 19, 2002.
(ii) A stationary RICE with a site
rating of equal to or less than 500 brake
HP located at a major source of HAP
emissions is reconstructed if you meet
the definition of reconstruction in § 63.2
and reconstruction is commenced on or
after June 12, 2006.
(iii) A stationary RICE located at an
area source of HAP emissions is
reconstructed if you meet the definition
of reconstruction in § 63.2 and
reconstruction is commenced on or after
June 12, 2006.
(b) * * *
(1) An affected source which meets
either of the criteria in paragraph
(b)(1)(i) through (ii) of this section does
not have to meet the requirements of
this subpart and of subpart A of this part
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
except for the initial notification
requirements of § 63.6645(h).
*
*
*
*
*
(2) A new or reconstructed stationary
RICE which combusts landfill or
digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or
more of the gross heat input on an
annual basis must meet the initial
notification requirements of
§ 63.6645(h) and the requirements of
§§ 63.6625(c), 63.6650(g), and
63.6655(c). These stationary RICE do not
have to meet the emission limitations
and operating limitations of this
subpart.
(3) A stationary RICE which is an
existing spark ignition 2 stroke lean
burn (2SLB) stationary RICE, an existing
spark ignition 4 stroke lean burn (4SLB)
stationary RICE, an existing 4 stroke rich
burn (4SRB) stationary RICE with a site
rating of less than or equal to 500 brake
HP located at a major source of HAP
emissions, an existing 4SRB stationary
RICE located at an area source of HAP
emissions, an existing compression
ignition (CI) stationary RICE, an existing
emergency stationary RICE, an existing
limited use stationary RICE, or an
existing stationary RICE that combusts
landfill gas or digester gas equivalent to
10 percent or more of the gross heat
input on an annual basis, does not have
to meet the requirements of this subpart
and of subpart A of this part. No initial
notification is necessary.
8. Section 63.6595 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(2) to read
as follows:
§ 63.6595 When do I have to comply with
this subpart?
(a) Affected Sources. (1) If you have
an existing stationary RICE with a site
rating of more than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions, you must comply with the
applicable emission limitations and
operating limitations no later than June
15, 2007.
(2) If you start up your new or
reconstructed stationary RICE with a
site rating of more than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions before August 16, 2004, you
must comply with the applicable
emission limitations and operating
limitations in this subpart no later than
August 16, 2004.
(3) If you start up your new or
reconstructed stationary RICE with a
site rating of more than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions after August 16, 2004, you
must comply with the applicable
emission limitations and operating
limitations in this subpart upon startup
of your affected source.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(4) If you start up your new or
reconstructed stationary RICE with a
site rating of less than or equal to 500
brake HP located at a major source of
HAP emissions before [DATE OF
PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN
THE Federal Register], you must
comply with the applicable emission
limitations and operating limitations in
this subpart no later than [DATE OF
PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN
THE Federal Register].
(5) If you start up your new or
reconstructed stationary RICE with a
site rating of less than or equal to 500
brake HP located at a major source of
HAP emissions after [DATE OF
PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN
THE Federal Register], you must
comply with the applicable emission
limitations and operating limitations in
this subpart upon startup of your
affected source.
(6) If you start up your new or
reconstructed stationary RICE located at
an area source of HAP emissions before
[DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL
RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER],
you must comply with the applicable
emission limitations and operating
limitations in this subpart no later than
[DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL
RULE IN THE Federal Register].
(7) If you start up your new or
reconstructed stationary RICE located at
an area source of HAP emissions after
[DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL
RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER],
you must comply with the applicable
emission limitations and operating
limitations in this subpart upon startup
of your affected source.
(b) * * *
(2) Any stationary RICE for which
construction or reconstruction is
commenced before your area source
becomes a major source of HAP must be
in compliance with the provisions of
this subpart that are applicable to RICE
located at major sources within 3 years
after your area source becomes a major
source of HAP.
*
*
*
*
*
9. Section 63.6600 is revised to read
as follows:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 63.6600 What emission limitations and
operating limitations must I meet if I own or
operate a stationary RICE with a site rating
of more than 500 brake HP located at a
major source of HAP emissions?
(a) If you own or operate an existing,
new, or reconstructed spark ignition
4SRB stationary RICE with a site rating
of more than 500 brake HP located at a
major source of HAP emissions, you
must comply with the emission
limitations in Table 1a to this subpart
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
and the operating limitations in Table
1b to this subpart which apply to you.
(b) If you own or operate a new or
reconstructed 2SLB or 4SLB stationary
RICE with a site rating of more than 500
brake HP located at major source of HAP
emissions or a new or reconstructed CI
stationary RICE with a site rating of
more than 500 brake HP located at a
major source of HAP emissions, you
must comply with the emission
limitations in Table 2a to this subpart
and the operating limitations in Table
2b to this subpart which apply to you.
(c) If you own or operate any of the
following RICE with a site rating of
more than 500 brake HP located at a
major source of HAP emissions, you do
not need to comply with the emission
limitations in Tables 1a and 2a to this
subpart or operating limitations in
Tables 1b and 2b to this subpart: an
existing 2SLB stationary RICE, an
existing 4SLB stationary RICE, or an
existing CI stationary RICE; a stationary
RICE that combusts landfill gas or
digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or
more of the gross heat input on an
annual basis; an emergency stationary
RICE; or a limited use stationary RICE.
10. Section 63.6601 is added to read
as follows:
§ 63.6601 What emission limitations must I
meet if I own or operate a stationary RICE
with a site rating of equal to or less than
500 brake HP located at a major source of
HAP emissions or a stationary RICE located
at an area source of HAP emissions?
(a) If you own or operate a new or
reconstructed stationary RICE with a
site rating of equal to or less than 500
brake HP located at a major source of
HAP emissions or a new or
reconstructed stationary RICE located at
an area source of HAP emissions, you
must comply with the emission
limitations in Table 3 to this subpart
which apply to you.
(b) If you own or operate an existing
stationary RICE with a site rating of
equal to or less than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions or an existing stationary RICE
located at an area source, you do not
need to comply with the emission
limitations in Table 3 to this subpart.
11. Section 63.6610 is amended by
revising the section heading, adding
introductory text, and revising
paragraphs (a) through (c) to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33839
§ 63.6610 By what date must I conduct the
initial performance tests or other initial
compliance demonstrations if I own or
operate a stationary RICE with a site rating
of more than 500 brake HP located at a
major source of HAP emissions?
If you own or operate a stationary
RICE with a site rating of more than 500
brake HP located at a major source of
HAP emissions you are subject to the
requirements of this section.
(a) You must conduct the initial
performance test or other initial
compliance demonstrations in Table 5
to this subpart that apply to you within
180 days after the compliance date that
is specified for your stationary RICE in
§ 63.6595 and according to the
provisions in § 63.7(a)(2).
(b) If you commenced construction or
reconstruction between December 19,
2002 and June 15, 2004 and own or
operate stationary RICE with a site
rating of more than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions, you must demonstrate initial
compliance with either the proposed
emission limitations or the promulgated
emission limitations no later than
February 10, 2005 or no later than 180
days after startup of the source,
whichever is later, according to
§ 63.7(a)(2)(ix).
(c) If you commenced construction or
reconstruction between December 19,
2002 and June 15, 2004 and own or
operate stationary RICE with a site
rating of more than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions, and you chose to comply
with the proposed emission limitations
when demonstrating initial compliance,
you must conduct a second performance
test to demonstrate compliance with the
promulgated emission limitations by
December 13, 2007 or after startup of the
source, whichever is later, according to
§ 63.7(a)(2)(ix).
*
*
*
*
*
12. Section 63.6611 is added to read
as follows:
§ 63.6611 By what date must I conduct the
initial performance tests or other initial
compliance demonstrations if I own or
operate a stationary RICE with a site rating
of less than or equal to 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP emissions
or a stationary RICE located at an area
source of HAP emissions?
(a) If you own or operate a new or
reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE
with a site rating of greater than or equal
to 250 and less than or equal to 500
brake HP located at a major source of
HAP emissions, you must conduct an
initial performance test within 240 days
after the compliance date that is
specified for your stationary RICE in
§ 63.6595 and according to the
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
provisions specified in Table 5 to this
subpart, as appropriate.
(b) If you own or operate a new or
reconstructed uncertified stationary
RICE with a site rating of less than or
equal to 500 brake HP located at a major
source of HAP emissions or a new or
reconstructed uncertified stationary
RICE located at an area source of HAP
emissions you must conduct an initial
performance test within 240 days after
the compliance date that is specified for
your stationary RICE in § 63.6595 and
according to the provisions specified in
Table 5 to this subpart, as appropriate.
(c) If you own or operate a new or
reconstructed certified stationary RICE
with a site rating of less than or equal
to 500 brake HP located at a major
source of HAP emissions or a certified
stationary RICE located at an area source
of HAP emissions you are not required
to conduct an initial performance test.
13. Section 63.6615 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 63.6615 When must I conduct
subsequent performance tests?
If you must comply with the emission
limitations and operating limitations,
you must conduct subsequent
performance tests as specified in Table
4 to this subpart.
14. Section 63.6620 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (b) and
adding paragraph (j) to read as follows:
ER =
Where:
ER = Emission rate of NMHC in g/HP-hr.
Cd = NMHC concentration measured as
propane in ppm.
1.832 × 10¥3 = Conversion constant for ppm
NMHC measured as propane, to grams
per standard cubic meter at 25 degrees
Celsius.
Q = Stack gas volumetric flow rate, in
standard cubic meters per hour.
T = Time of test run, in hours.
HP-hr = Brake work of the engine, in HP-hr.
15. Section 63.6625 is amended by
revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a), revising paragraph (b),
and adding paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) to
read as follows:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 63.6625 What are my monitoring,
installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
(a) If you elect to install a continuous
emissions monitoring system (CEMS) as
specified in Table 6 of this subpart, you
must install, operate, and maintain a
CEMS to monitor CO and either oxygen
or CO2 at both the inlet and the outlet
of the control device according to the
requirements in paragraphs (a)(1)
through (4) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) If you are required to install a
continuous parameter monitoring
system (CPMS) as specified in Table 6
to this subpart, you must install,
operate, and maintain each CPMS
according to the requirements in § 63.8.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If you are operating a new or
reconstructed emergency stationary
RICE with a site rating of equal to or less
than 500 brake HP located at a major
source of HAP emissions or a new or
reconstructed stationary RICE located at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Cd × 1.832 × 10−3 × Q × T
HP − hr
§ 63.6630 How do I demonstrate initial
compliance with the emission limitations
and operating limitations?
(a) You must demonstrate initial
compliance with each emission and
operating limitation that applies to you
according to Table 6 to this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(a) You must conduct each
performance test in Tables 4 and 5 to
this subpart that applies to you.
(b) Each performance test must be
conducted according to the
requirements in § 63.7(e)(1) and under
the specific conditions that this subpart
specifies in Table 5. The test must be
conducted at any load condition within
plus or minus 10 percent of 100 percent
load.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) To determine compliance with the
non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC)
mass per unit output emission
limitation, you must use Equation 5 of
this section:
(Eq. 5)
an area source of HAP emissions, you
must install a non-resettable hour meter
prior to the startup of the engine.
(e) If you are operating a new or
reconstructed stationary RICE with a
site rating of equal to or less than 500
brake HP located at a major source of
HAP emissions or a new or
reconstructed stationary RICE located at
an area source of HAP emissions, you
must operate and maintain the
stationary RICE and control device
according to the manufacturer’s written
instructions or procedures developed by
the owner or operator that are approved
by the engine manufacturer.
(f) If you are operating a new or
reconstructed certified stationary RICE
with a site rating of equal to or less than
500 brake HP located at a major source
of HAP emissions (except new or
reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE
with a site rating of equal to or greater
than 250 brake HP and less than or
equal to 500 brake HP located at a major
source of HAP emissions) or a new or
reconstructed certified stationary RICE
located at an area source, you may only
change those settings that are allowed
by the manufacturer.
16. Section 63.6630 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
PO 00000
§ 63.6620 What performance tests and
other procedures must I use?
17. Section 63.6640 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (e) and
adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
§ 63.6640 How do I demonstrate
continuous compliance with the emission
limitations and operating limitations?
(a) You must demonstrate continuous
compliance with each emission
limitation and operating limitation in
Tables 1a and 1b, Tables 2a and 2b, and
Table 3 to this subpart that apply to you
according to methods specified in Table
7 to this subpart.
(b) You must report each instance in
which you did not meet each emission
limitation or operating limitation in
Tables 1a and 1b, Tables 2a and 2b, and
Table 3 to this subpart that apply to you.
These instances are deviations from the
emission and operating limitations in
this subpart. These deviations must be
reported according to the requirements
in § 63.6650. If you change your
catalyst, you must reestablish the values
of the operating parameters measured
during the initial performance test.
When you reestablish the values of your
operating parameters, you must also
conduct a performance test to
demonstrate that you are meeting the
required emission limitation applicable
to your stationary RICE.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) You must also report each instance
in which you did not meet the
requirements in Table 9 to this subpart
that apply to you. If you own or operate
an existing 2SLB stationary RICE, an
existing 4SLB stationary RICE, an
existing 4SRB stationary RICE with a
site rating equal to or less than 500
brake HP located at a major source of
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
EP12JN06.008
33840
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
HAP emissions, an existing 4SRB
stationary RICE located at an area source
of HAP emissions, an existing CI
stationary RICE, an existing emergency
stationary RICE, an existing limited use
emergency stationary RICE, or an
existing stationary RICE which fires
landfill gas or digester gas equivalent to
10 percent or more of the gross heat
input on an annual basis, you do not
need to comply with the requirements
in Table 9 to this subpart. If you own
or operate a new or reconstructed
stationary RICE that combusts landfill
gas or digester gas equivalent to 10
percent or more of the gross heat input
on an annual basis, a new or
reconstructed emergency stationary
RICE, or a new or reconstructed limited
use stationary RICE, you do not need to
comply with the requirements in Table
9 to this subpart, except for the initial
notification requirements.
(f) If you own or operate a stationary
emergency RICE with a site rating of
equal to or less than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions or a stationary emergency
RICE located at an area source of HAP
emissions, you may operate your
emergency stationary RICE for the
purpose of maintenance checks and
readiness testing. Maintenance checks
and readiness testing of such units is
limited to 100 hours per year. There is
no time limit on the use of stationary
emergency RICE in emergency
situations. The owner or operator may
petition the Administrator for approval
of additional hours to be used for
maintenance checks and readiness
testing, but a petition is not required if
the owner or operator maintains records
that Federal, State, or local standards
require maintenance and testing or
emergency engines beyond 100 hours
per year. For owners and operators or
emergency engines, any operation other
than emergency operation and
maintenance and testing as permitted in
this section, is prohibited.
18. Section 63.6645 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (c);
b. Redesignating paragraphs (d)
through (f) as paragraphs (h) through (j);
c. Adding paragraphs (d) through (g);
and
d. Revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (h) and (j) to read as follows:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 63.6645 What notifications must I submit
and when?
(a) If you own or operate a stationary
RICE with a site rating of more than 500
brake HP located at a major source of
HAP emissions or a new or
reconstructed 4SLB stationary RICE
with a site rating of greater than or equal
to 250 HP located at a major source of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
HAP emissions, you must submit all of
the notifications in §§ 63.7(b) and (c),
63.8(e), (f)(4) and (f)(6), 63.9(b) through
(e), and (g) and (h) that apply to you by
the dates specified.
(b) As specified in § 63.9(b)(2), if you
start up your stationary RICE with a site
rating of more than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions before the effective date of
this subpart, you must submit an Initial
Notification not later than December 13,
2004.
(c) If you start up your new or
reconstructed stationary RICE with a
site rating of more than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions on or after August 16, 2004,
you must submit an Initial Notification
not later than 120 days after you become
subject to this subpart.
(d) As specified in § 63.9(b)(2), if you
start up your stationary RICE with a site
rating of equal to or less than 500 brake
HP located at a major source of HAP
emissions before the effective date of
this subpart and you are required to
submit an initial notification, you must
submit an Initial Notification not later
than [180 DAYS AFTER DATE THE
FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE
Federal Register].
(e) If you start up your new or
reconstructed stationary RICE with a
site rating of equal to or less than 500
brake HP located at a major source of
HAP emissions on or after [60 DAYS
AFTER DATE THE FINAL RULE IS
PUBLISHED IN THE Federal Register]
and you are required to submit an initial
notification, you must submit an Initial
Notification not later than 120 days after
you become subject to this subpart.
(f) As specified in § 63.9(b)(2), if you
start up your stationary RICE located at
an area source of HAP emissions before
the effective date of this subpart and
you are required to submit an initial
notification, you must submit an Initial
Notification not later than [180 DAYS
AFTER DATE THE FINAL RULE IS
PUBLISHED IN THE Federal Register].
(g) If you start up your new or
reconstructed stationary RICE located at
an area source of HAP emissions on or
after [60 DAYS AFTER DATE THE
FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE
Federal Register] and you are required
to submit an initial notification, you
must submit an Initial Notification not
later than 120 days after you become
subject to this subpart.
(h) If you are required to submit an
Initial Notification but are otherwise not
affected by the requirements of this
subpart, in accordance with§ 63.6590(b),
your notification should include the
information in § 63.9(b)(2)(i) through
(v), and a statement that your stationary
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
33841
RICE has no additional requirements
and explain the basis of the exclusion
(for example, that it operates exclusively
as an emergency stationary RICE if it has
a site rating of more than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions).
*
*
*
*
*
(j) If you are required to conduct a
performance test or other initial
compliance demonstration as specified
in Tables 5 and 6 to this subpart, you
must submit a Notification of
Compliance Status according to
§ 63.9(h)(2)(ii).
(1) For each initial compliance
demonstration required in Table 6 to
this subpart that does not include a
performance test, you must submit the
Notification of Compliance Status before
the close of business on the 30th day
following the completion of the initial
compliance demonstration.
(2) For each initial compliance
demonstration required in Table 6 to
this subpart that includes a performance
test conducted according to the
requirements in Table 5 to this subpart,
you must submit the Notification of
Compliance Status, including the
performance test results, before the
close of business on the 60th day
following the completion of the
performance test according to
§ 63.10(d)(2).
19. Section 63.6650 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (a);
b. Revising paragraph (b) introductory
text;
c. Revising paragraph (f); and
d. Revising paragraph (g) introductory
text to read as follows:
§ 63.6650
when?
What reports must I submit and
(a) You must submit each report in
Table 8 to this subpart that applies to
you.
(b) Unless the Administrator has
approved a different schedule for
submission of reports under § 63.10(a),
you must submit each report by the date
in Table 8 to this subpart and according
to the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (5) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Each affected source that has
obtained a title V operating permit
pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 or 71 must
report all deviations as defined in this
subpart in the semiannual monitoring
report required by 40 CFR 70.6
(a)(3)(iii)(A) or 40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A).
If an affected source submits a
Compliance report pursuant to Table 8
to this subpart along with, or as part of,
the semiannual monitoring report
required by 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or
40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A), and the
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33842
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Compliance report includes all required
information concerning deviations from
any emission or operating limitation in
this subpart, submission of the
Compliance report shall be deemed to
satisfy any obligation to report the same
deviations in the semiannual
monitoring report. However, submission
of a Compliance report shall not
otherwise affect any obligation the
affected source may have to report
deviations from permit requirements to
the permit authority.
(g) If you are operating as a new or
reconstructed stationary RICE which
fires landfill gas or digester gas
equivalent to 10 percent or more of the
gross heat input on an annual basis, you
must submit an annual report according
to Table 8 to this subpart by the date
specified unless the Administrator has
approved a different schedule,
according to the information described
in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) of
this section. You must report the data
specified in (g)(1) through (g)(3) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
20. Section 63.6655 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) and adding
paragraphs (e) and (f) to read as follows:
§ 63.6655
What records must I keep?
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(d) You must keep the records
required in Table 7 to this subpart to
show continuous compliance with each
emission or operating limitation that
applies to you.
(e) If you own or operate a stationary
emergency RICE with a site rating of
equal to or less than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions or a stationary emergency
RICE located at an area source of HAP
emissions you must keep records of the
operation of the engine that is recorded
through the non-resettable hour meter.
You must keep records of the operation
in emergency and non-emergency that
are recorded through the non-resettable
hour meter. You must record the time of
operation of the engine and the reason
the engine was in operation during that
time.
(f) If you own or operate a stationary
emergency RICE with a site rating of
equal to or less than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions or a stationary emergency
RICE located at an area source of HAP
emissions, you must keep records
documenting proper engine
maintenance.
21. Section 63.6665 is revised to read
as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
§ 63.6665 What parts of the General
Provisions apply to me?
Table 9 to this subpart shows which
parts of the General Provisions in
§§ 63.1 through 63.15 apply to you. If
you own or operate an existing 2SLB
RICE, an existing 4SLB stationary RICE,
an existing 4SRB RICE with a site rating
of equal to or less than 500 brake HP
located at a major source of HAP
emissions, an existing 4SRB RICE
located at an area source of HAP
emissions, an existing CI stationary
RICE, an existing stationary RICE that
combusts landfill gas or digester gas
equivalent to 10 percent or more of the
gross heat input on an annual basis, an
existing emergency stationary RICE, or
an existing limited use stationary RICE,
you do not need to comply with any of
the requirements of the General
Provisions. If you own or operate a new
stationary RICE that combusts landfill
gas or digester gas equivalent to 10
percent or more of the gross heat input
on an annual basis, a new emergency
stationary RICE, or a new limited use
stationary RICE, you do not need to
comply with the requirements in the
General Provisions except for the initial
notification requirements.
22. Section 63.6675 is amended by:
a. Adding definitions of ‘‘Certified
stationary RICE,’’ ‘‘Compression
Ignition,’’ ‘‘Gasoline,’’ ‘‘Maximum
engine power,’’ ‘‘Model year,’’ ‘‘Nonmethane hydrocarbons,’’ ‘‘Spark
ignition,’’ ‘‘Total hydrocarbons,’’ and
‘‘Useful life’’ in alphabetical order;
b. Removing the definitions for
‘‘Compression ignition engine’’ and
‘‘Spark ignition engine;’’ and
c. Revising the definitions of
‘‘Emergency stationary RICE’’ and
‘‘Natural gas;’’ to read as follows:
§ 63.6675
subpart?
What definitions apply to this
*
*
*
*
*
Certified stationary RICE means an
engine that belongs to an engine family
that has a certificate of conformity that
complies with the emission standards
and requirements in this part, or of 40
CFR part 90 or 40 CFR part 1048, as
appropriate.
Compression ignition means relating
to a type of stationary internal
combustion engine that is not a spark
ignition engine.
*
*
*
*
*
Emergency stationary RICE means any
stationary RICE whose operation is
limited to emergency situations and
required testing and maintenance.
Examples include stationary RICE used
to produce power for critical networks
or equipment (including power
supplied to portions of a facility) when
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
electric power from the local utility (or
the normal power source, if the facility
runs on its own power production) is
interrupted, or stationary RICE used to
pump water in the case of fire or flood,
etc. Stationary RICE used for peak
shaving are not considered emergency
stationary RICE.
*
*
*
*
*
Gasoline means any fuel sold in any
State for use in motor vehicles and
motor vehicle engines, or nonroad or
stationary engines, and commonly or
commercially known or sold as
gasoline.
*
*
*
*
*
Maximum engine power means
maximum engine power as defined in
40 CFR 1039.801.
Model Year means either: the
calendar year in which the engine was
originally produced, or the annual new
model production period of the engine
manufacturer if it is different than the
calendar year. This must include
January 1 of the calendar year for which
the model year is named. It may not
begin before January 2 of the previous
calendar year, and it must end by
December 31 of the named calendar
year. For an engine that is converted to
a stationary engine after being placed
into service as a nonroad or other nonstationary engine, model year means the
calendar year or new model production
period in which the engine was
originally produced.
Natural gas means a naturally
occurring mixture of hydrocarbon and
non-hydrocarbon gases found in
geologic formations beneath the Earth’s
surface, of which the principal
constituent is methane. Natural gas may
be field or pipeline quality.
Non-methane hydrocarbons means
the difference between the emitted mass
of total hydrocarbons and the emitted
mass of methane.
*
*
*
*
*
Spark ignition means relating to
either: a gasoline-fueled engine; or any
other type of engine a spark plug (or
other sparking device) and with
operating characteristics significantly
similar to the theoretical Otto
combustion cycle. Spark ignition
engines usually use a throttle to regulate
intake air flow to control power during
normal operation. Dual-fuel engines in
which a liquid fuel (typically diesel
fuel) is used for CI and gaseous fuel
(typically natural gas) is used as the
primary fuel at an annual average ratio
of less than 2 parts diesel fuel to 100
parts total fuel on an energy equivalent
basis are spark ignition engines.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Total hydrocarbons means the
combined mass of organic compounds
measured by the specified procedure for
measuring total hydrocarbon, expressed
as a hydrocarbon with a hydrogen-tocarbon mass ratio of 1.85:1.
*
*
*
*
*
Useful life means the period during
which the engine is designed to
properly function in terms of reliability
and fuel consumption, without being
remanufactured, specified as a number
of hours of operation or calendar years,
whichever comes first. The values for
useful life for stationary CI ICE with a
displacement of less than 10 liters per
cylinder are given in 40 CFR
1039.101(g). The values for useful life
for stationary CI ICE with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
10 liters per cylinder and less than 30
liters per cylinder are given in 40 CFR
94.9(a). The values for useful life for
stationary SI ICE with a maximum
engine power less than or equal to 25
HP are given in 40 CFR 90.105. The
33843
values for useful life for stationary SI
ICE with a maximum engine power
greater than 25 HP certified to 40 CFR
part 1048 are given in 40 CFR
1048.101(g). The useful life for
stationary SI ICE with a maximum
engine power greater than 25 HP
certified under the voluntary
manufacturer certification program 40
CFR part 60 subpart JJJJ is 8,000 hours
or 10 years, whichever comes first.
23. Table 1a to Subpart ZZZZ of Part
63 is revised to read as follows:
TABLE 1A TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR EXISTING, NEW, AND RECONSTRUCTED SPARK
IGNITION, 4SRB STATIONARY RICE >500 HP LOCATED AT A MAJOR SOURCE OF HAP EMISSIONS
[As stated in § 63.6600, you must comply with the following emission limitations for existing, new and reconstructed 4SRB stationary RICE >500
HP located at a major source of HAP emissions at 100 percent load plus or minus 10 percent:]
For each . . .
You must meet the following emission limitations . . .
1. 4SRB stationary RICE ..........................................................................
a. reduce formaldehyde emissions by 76 percent or more. If you commenced constructed or reconstruction between December 19, 2002,
and June 15, 2004, you may reduce formaldehyde emissions by 75
percent or more until June 15, 2007;
or
b. limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust 350 ppbvd or less at 15 percent O2.
24. Table 1b to Subpart ZZZZ of Part
63 is revised to read as follows:
TABLE 1B TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—OPERATING LIMITATIONS FOR EXISTING, NEW, AND RECONSTRUCTED SPARK
IGNITION, 4SRB STATIONARY RICE >500 HP LOCATED AT A MAJOR SOURCE OF HAP EMISSIONS
[As stated in §§ 63.6600, 63.6630 and 63.6640, you must comply with the following operating emission limitations for existing, new and
reconstructed 4SRB stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions:]
For each . . .
You must meet the following operating limitation . . .
1. 4SRB stationary RICE complying with the requirement to reduce
formaldehyde emissions by 76 percent or more (or by 75 percent or
more, if applicable) and using NSCR;
a. maintain your catalyst so that the pressure drop across the catalyst
does not change by more than 2 inches of water at 100 percent load
plus or minus 10 percent from the pressure drop across the catalyst
measured during the initial performance test; and
or
4SRB stationary RICE complying with the requirement to limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to 350
ppbvd or less at 15 percent O2 and using NSCR.
2. 4SRB stationary RICE complying with the requirement to reduce
formaldehyde emissions by 76 percent or more (or by 75 percent or
more, if applicable) and not using NSCR;
or
4SRB stationary RICE complying with the requirement to limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to 350
ppbvd or less at 15 percent O2 and not using NSCR.
b. maintain the temperature of your stationary RICE exhaust so that
the catalyst inlet temperature is greater than or equal to 750 °F and
less than or equal to 1250 °F.
comply with any operating limitations approved by the Administrator.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
25. Table 2a to Subpart ZZZZ of Part
63 is revised to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33844
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2A TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR NEW AND RECONSTRUCTED LEAN BURN AND
COMPRESSION IGNITION STATIONARY RICE >500 HP LOCATED AT A MAJOR SOURCE OF HAP EMISSIONS
[As stated in § 63.6600, you must comply with the following emission limitations for new and reconstructed lean burn and new and reconstructed
compression ignition stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions at 100 percent load plus or minus 10 percent:]
For each . . .
You must meet the following emission limitation . . .
1. 2SLB stationary RICE ..........................................................................
a. reduce CO emissions by 58 percent or more;
or
b. limit concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to
12 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O2. If you commenced construction
or reconstruction between December 19, 2002, and June 15, 2004,
you may limit concentration of formaldehyde to 17 ppmvd or less at
15 percent O2 until June 15, 2007.
a. reduce CO emissions by 93 percent or more;
or
b. limit concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to
14 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O2.
a. reduce CO emissions by 70 percent or more;
or
b. limit concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust to
580 ppbvd or less at 15 percent O2.
2. 4SLB stationary RICE ..........................................................................
3. CI stationary RICE ...............................................................................
26. Table 2b to Subpart ZZZZ of Part
63 is revised to read as follows:
TABLE 2B TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—OPERATING LIMITATIONS FOR NEW AND RECONSTRUCTED LEAN BURN AND
COMPRESSION IGNITION STATIONARY RICE >500 HP LOCATED AT A MAJOR SOURCE OF HAP EMISSIONS
[As stated in §§ 63.6600, 63.6630, and 63.6640, you must comply with the following operating limitations for new and reconstructed lean burn
and new and reconstructed compression ignition stationary RICE >500 HP located at a major source of HAP emissions:
For each . . .
You must meet the following operating limitation . . .
1. 2SLB and 4SLB stationary RICE and CI stationary RICE complying
with the requirement to reduce CO emissions and using an oxidation
catalyst; or 2SLB and 4SLB stationary RICE and CI stationary RICE
complying with the requirement to limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust and using an oxidation catalyst.
a. maintain your catalyst so that the pressure drop across the catalyst
does not change by more than 2 inches of water at 100 percent load
plus or minus 10 percent from the pressure drop across the catalyst
that was measured during the initial performance test; and
b. maintain the temperature of your stationary RICE exhaust so that
the catalyst inlet temperature is greater than or equal to 450 °F and
less than or equal to 1350 °F.
comply with any operating limitations approved by the Administrator.
2. 2SLB and 4SLB stationary RICE and CI stationary RICE complying
with the requirement to reduce CO emissions and not using an oxidation catalyst; or 2SLB and 4SLB stationary RICE and CI stationary
RICE complying with the requirement to limit the concentration of
formaldehyde in the stationary RICE exhaust and not using an oxidation catalyst.
27. Tables 3 through 8 to Subpart
ZZZZ of Part 63 are amended by:
a. Redesignating Tables 3 through 8 as
Tables 4 through 9;
b. Adding Table 3; and
c. Revising the newly redesignated
Tables 4 through 9 to read as follows:
TABLE 3 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR NEW AND RECONSTRUCTED STATIONARY RICE
>500 HP LOCATED AT A MAJOR SOURCE OF HAP EMISSIONS OR NEW OR RECONSTRUCTED STATIONARY RICE LOCATED AT AN AREA SOURCE OF HAP EMISSIONS
With a Maximum Engine
Power. . .
And with a Manufacture Date
of a. . .
1. New or reconstructed SI stationary RICE .............
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
For each. . .
≤25 HP .........
January 1, 2008 ....
2. New or reconstructed SI stationary RICE using
gasoline or rich burn engines using LPG.
252005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
33845
TABLE 3 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR NEW AND RECONSTRUCTED STATIONARY RICE
>500 HP LOCATED AT A MAJOR SOURCE OF HAP EMISSIONS OR NEW OR RECONSTRUCTED STATIONARY RICE LOCATED AT AN AREA SOURCE OF HAP EMISSIONS—Continued
With a Maximum Engine
Power. . .
and
And with a Manufacture Date
of a. . .
25500 HP located at an area source of HAP emissions.
Reduce formaldehyde emissions .....................
Conduct subsequent performance tests semiannually.a
Conduct subsequent performance tests semiannually.a
Conduct subsequent performance tests semiannually.a
Conduct subsequent performance tests every
3 years or 8,760 hours of operation, whichever comes first.b
Limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the
stationary RICE exhaust.
Limit the concentration of NMHC in the stationary RICE exhaust.
a After you have demonstrated compliance for two consecutive tests, you may reduce the frequency of subsequent performance tests to annually. If the results of any subsequent annual performance test indicate the stationary RICE is not in compliance with the CO or formaldehyde
emission limitation, or you deviate from any of your operating limitations, you must resume semiannual performance tests.
b New and reconstructed uncertified stationary RICE with a brake HP ≤500 are not required to conduct subsequent performance testing unless
the stationary RICE is rebuilt or undergoes major repair or maintenance. Certified engines are not required to conduct any performance testing.
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS
[As stated in §§ 63.6610, 63.6611, 63.6620, and 63.6640, you must comply with the following requirements for performance tests for stationary
RICE:]
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
For each . . .
Complying with the
requirement . . .
You must . . .
Using . . .
According to the following to requirements . . .
1. 2SLB, 4SLB, and
CI stationary
RICE.
a. reduce CO
emissions.
i. measure the O2
at the inlet and
outlet of the control device; and
(1) portable CO and O2 analyzer ........
(a) using ASTM D6522–00 (2005) a
(incorporated by reference see
§ 63.14). Measurements to determine O2 must be made at the same
time as the measurements for CO
concentration.
ii. measure the CO
at the inlet and
the outlet of the
control device.
(1) portable CO
and O2 analyzer.
(a) using ASTM D6522–00 (2005) a
(incorporation by reference, see
§ 63.14). The CO concentration
must be at 15 percent O2, dry basis.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33846
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
[As stated in §§ 63.6610, 63.6611, 63.6620, and 63.6640, you must comply with the following requirements for performance tests for stationary
RICE:]
For each . . .
Complying with the
requirement . . .
You must . . .
Using . . .
According to the following to requirements . . .
2. 4SRB stationary
RICE.
a. reduce formaldehyde emissions.
i. select the sampling port location and the
number of traverse points;
and.
ii. measure O2 at
the inlet of the
control device;
and
iii. measure moisture content at
the inlet and outlet of the control
device; and
iv. measure formaldehyde at the
inlet and the outlet of the control
device.
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR part
60, appendix A § 63.7(d)(1)(i).
(a) sampling sites must be located at
the inlet and outlet of the control
device.
(1) Method 3 or 3A or 3B of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A, or ASTM
Method D6522–00(2005).
(a) measurements to determine O2
concentration must be made at the
same time as the measurements for
formaldehyde concentration.
(a) measurements to determine moisture content must be made at the
same time and location as the
measurements for formaldehyde
concentration.
(a) formaldehyde concentration must
at 15 percent O2, dry basis. Results
of this test consist of the average of
the three 1-hour or longer runs.
..........................
..........................
..........................
3. stationary RICE
a. limit the concentration of
formaldehyde in
the stationary
RICE exhaust.
..........................
..........................
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
..........................
4. New or reconstructed
uncertified stationary RICE, except stationary
RICE with a
brake HP >500
located at a
major source of
HAP emissions
and new and reconstructed 4SLB
stationary RICE
250≤HP≤500 located at a major
source of HAP
emissions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
limit the concentration of NMHC in
the stationary
RICE exhaust.
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
i. select the sampling port location and the
number of traverse points;
and
ii. determine the
O2 concentration
of the stationary
RICE exhaust at
the sampling
port location;
and
iii. measure moisture content of
the stationary
RICE exhaust at
the sampling
port location;
and
iv. measure formaldehyde at the
exhaust of the
stationary RICE.
i. select the sampling port location and the
number of traverse points;
PO 00000
Frm 00044
(1) Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or Test Method 320 of 40
CFR part 63, appendix A or ASTM
D 6348–03.
(1) Method 320 or 323 of 40 CFR part
63, appendix A; or ASTM D6348–
03, b provided in ASTM D6348–03
Annex A5 (Analyte Spiking Technique), the percent R must be
greater than or equal to 70 and less
than or equal to 130.
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR part
60, appendix A § 63.7(d)(1)(i).
(a) if using a control device, the sampling site must be located at the
outlet of the control device.
(1) Method 3 or 3A or 3B of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A, or ASTM
Method D6522–00 (2005).
(a) measurements to determine O2
concentration must be made at the
same time and location as measurements for formaldehyde concentration.
(1) Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, or Test Method 320 of 40
CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM
D 6348–03.
(a) measurements to determine moisture content must be made at the
same time and location as the
measurements for formaldehyde
concentration.
(1) Method 320 or 323 of 40 CFR part
63, appendix A; or ASTM D6348–
03 b provided in ASTM D6348–03
Annex A5 (Analyte Spiking Technique), the percent R must be
greater than or equal to 70 and less
than or equal to 130.
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR part
60, appendix A.
(a) Formaldehyde concentration must
be at 15 percent O2, dry basis. Results of this test consist of the average of the three 1-hour or longer
runs.
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
(a) if using a control device, the sampling site must be located the outlet
of the control device.
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
33847
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
[As stated in §§ 63.6610, 63.6611, 63.6620, and 63.6640, you must comply with the following requirements for performance tests for stationary
RICE:]
For each . . .
Complying with the
requirement . . .
..........................
..........................
You must . . .
Using . . .
According to the following to requirements . . .
ii. If, necessary,
measure moisture content of
the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at the
sampling port location; and
iii. measure NMHC
at the exhaust of
the stationary internal combustion engine.
(2) Method 4 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
(b) measurements to determine moisture must be made at the same
time as the measurement for NMHC
concentration.
(3) Method 25 or Methods 25A and 18
of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
(c) Results of this test consist of the
average of the three 1-hour or
longer runs.
a You may also use Methods 3A and 10 as options to ASTM–D6522–00 (2005). You may obtain a copy of ASTM–D6522–00 (2005) from at
least one of the following addresses: American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428—2959,
or University Microfilms International, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
b You may obtain a copy of ASTM–D6348–03 from at least one of the following addresses: American Society for Testing and Materials, 100
Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959, or University Microfilms International, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
TABLE 6 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND OPERATING
LIMITATIONS
[As stated in §§ 63.6625 and 63.6630 you must initially comply with the emission and operating limitations as required by the following:]
Complying with the requirement to. . .
You have demonstrated initial compliance if. .
.
1. 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI stationary RICE ............
a. reduce CO emissions and using oxidation
catalyst, and using a CPMS.
2. 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI stationary RICE ............
a. reduce CO emissions and not using oxidation catalyst.
3. 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI stationary Rice ..............
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
For each. . .
a. reduce CO emissions, and using a CEMS
i. the average reduction of emissions of CO
determined from the initial performance test
achieves the required CO percent reduction; and
ii. you have installed a CPMS to continuously
monitor catalyst inlet temperature according
to the requirements in § 63.6625(b); and
iii. you have recorded the catalyst pressure
drop and catalyst inlet temperature during
the initial performance test.
i. the average reduction of emissions of CO
determined from the initial performance test
achieves the required CO percent reduction; and
ii. you have installed a CPMS to continuously
monitor operating parameters approved by
the Administrator (if any) according to the
requirements in § 63.6625(b); and
iii. you have recorded the approved operating
parameters (if any) during the initial performance test.
i. you have installed a CEMS to continuously
monitor CO and either O2 or CO2 at both
the inlet and outlet of the oxidation catalyst
according
to
the
requirements
in
§ 63.6625(a); and
ii. you have conducted a performance evaluation of your CEMS using PS 3 and 4A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix B; and
iii. the average reduction of CO calculated
using § 63.6620 equals or exceeds the required percent reduction. The initial test
comprises the first 4-hour period after successful validation of the CEMS. Compliance
is based on the average percent reduction
achieved during the 4-hour period.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33848
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 6 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND OPERATING
LIMITATIONS—Continued
[As stated in §§ 63.6625 and 63.6630 you must initially comply with the emission and operating limitations as required by the following:]
For each. . .
Complying with the requirement to. . .
You have demonstrated initial compliance if. .
.
4. 4SRB stationary RICE ....................................
a. reduce formaldehyde emissions and using
NSCR.
5. 4SRB stationary RICE ....................................
a. reduce formaldehyde emissions and not
using NSCR.
6. Stationary RICE .............................................
a. limit the concentration of formaldehyde in
the stationary RICE exhaust and using oxidation catalyst or NSCR.
7. Stationary RICE .............................................
a. limit the concentration of formaldehyde in
the stationary RICE exhaust and not using
oxidation catalyst or NSCR.
8. New and reconstructed SI stationary RICE
with a maximum engine power ≤25 HP.
meet emission standards in § 63.6605 ............
9. New and reconstructed SI stationary RICE
with a maximum engine power >25 HP that
use gasoline or that are rich burn and use
LPG.
10. New and reconstructed SI stationary RICE
with a maximum engine power >25 HP that
use fuels other than gasoline and are not rich
burn engines that use LPG.
meet emission standards in § 63.6605 ............
i. the average reduction of emissions of formaldehyde determined from the initial performance test is equal to or greater than
the required formaldehyde percent reduction; and
ii. you have installed a CPMS to continuously
monitor catalyst inlet temperature according
to the requirements in § 63.6625(b); and
iii. you have recorded the catalyst pressure
drop and catalyst inlet temperature during
the initial performance test.
i. the average reduction of emissions of formaldehyde determined from the initial performance test is equal to or greater than
the required formaldehyde percent reduction; and
ii. you have installed a CPMS to continuously
monitor operating parameters approved by
the Administrator (if any) according to the
requirements in § 63.6625(b); and
iii. you have recorded the approved operating
parameters (if any) during the initial performance test.
i. the average formaldehyde concentration
corrected to 15 percent O2, dry basis, from
the three test runs is less than or equal to
the formaldehyde emission limitation; and
ii. you have installed a CPMS to continuously
monitor catalyst inlet temperature according
to the requirements in § 63.6625(b); and
iii. you have recorded the catalyst pressure
drop and catalyst inlet temperature during
the initial performance test.
i. the average formaldehyde concentration,
corrected to 15 percent O2, dry basis, from
the three test runs is less than or equal to
the formaldehyde emission limitation; and
ii. you have installed a CPMS to continuously
monitor operating parameters approved by
the Administrator (if any) according to the
requirements in § 63.6625(b); and
iii. you have recorded the approved operating
parameters (if any) during the initial performance test.
you have purchased an engine certified to the
emission standards specified in 40 CFR
part 60, subpart JJJJ § 60.4233(a).
you have purchased an engine certified to the
emission standards specified in 40 CFR
part 60, subpart JJJJ, §§ 60.4233(b) or (c),
as applicable.
i. you have purchased an engine certified to
the emission standards specified in 40 CFR
part 60, subpart JJJJ; or
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
11. New and reconstructed CI stationary RICE
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
meet emission standards in § 63.6605 ............
meet emission standards in § 63.6605 ............
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
ii. the average NMHC concentration, from the
three test runs is less than or equal to 0.7g/
HP–hr.
you have purchased an engine certified to the
emission standards specified in 40 CFR
part 60, subpart IIII, §§ 60.4204 and
60.4205, as applicable.
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
33849
TABLE 7 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND OPERATING
LIMITATIONS
[As stated in § 63.6640, you must continuously comply with the emissions and operating limitations as required by the following:]
Complying with the requirement to . . .
You must demonstrate continuous compliance
by . . .
1. 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI stationary RICE ............
a. reduce CO emissions and using an oxidation catalyst, and using a CPM.
2. 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI stationary RICE ............
a. reduce CO emissions and not using an oxidation catalyst, and using a CPMS.
3. 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI stationary RICE ............
a. reduce CO emissions and using a CEMS ..
4. 4SRB stationary RICE ....................................
a. reduce formaldehyde emissions and using
NSCR.
5. 4SRB stationary RICE ....................................
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
For each . . .
a. reduce formaldehyde emissionis and not
using NSCR.
6. 4SRB stationary RICE with a brake HP
≥5,000.
reduce formaldehyde emissions ......................
i. conducting semiannual performance tests
for CO to demonstrate that the required CO
percent reduction is achieved a; and
ii. collecting the catalyst inlet temperature
data according to § 63.6625(b); and
iii. reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and
iv. maintaining the 4-hour rolling averages
within the operating limitations for the catalyst inlet temperature; and
v. measuring the pressure drop across the
catalyst once per month and demonstrating
that the pressure drop across the catalyst is
within the operating limitation established
during the performance test.
i. conducting semiannual performance tests
for CO to demonstrate that the required CO
percent reduction is achieved a; and
ii. collecting the approved operating parameter (if any) data according to § 63.6625(b);
and
iii. reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and
iv. maintaining the 4-hour rolling averages
within the operating limitations for the operating parameters established during the
performance test.
i. collecting the monitoring data according
§ 63.6625(a), reducing the measurements
to 1-hour averages, calculating the percent
reduction of CO emissions according to
§ 63.6620; and
ii. demonstrating that the catalyst achieves
the required percent reduction of CO emissions over the 4-hour averaging period; and
iii. conducting an annual RATA of your CEMS
using PS 3 and 4A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, as well as daily and periodic data
quality checks in accordance with 40 CFR
part 60, appendix F, procedure 1.
i. collecting the catalyst inlet temperature data
according to § 63.6625(b); and
ii. reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and
iii. maintaining the 4-hour rolling averages
within the operating limitations for the catalyst inlet temperature; and
iv. measuring the pressure drop across the
catalyst once per month and demonstrating
that the pressure drop across the catalyst is
within the operating limitation established
during the performance test.
i. collecting the approved operating parameter
(if any) data according to § 63.6625(b); and
ii. reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and
iii. maintaining the 4-hour rolling averages
within the operating limitations for the operating parameters established during the
performance test.
conducting semiannual performance tests for
formaldehyde to demonstrate that the required formaldehyde percent reduction is
achieved a.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33850
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 7 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—CONTINUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND OPERATING
LIMITATIONS—Continued
[As stated in § 63.6640, you must continuously comply with the emissions and operating limitations as required by the following:]
For each . . .
Complying with the requirement to . . .
You must demonstrate continuous compliance
by . . .
7. stationary RICE ..............................................
limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the
stationary RICE exhaust and using oxidation catalyst or NSCR.
8. stationary RICE ..............................................
limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the
stationary RICE exhaust and not using oxidation catalyst or NSCR.
9. New and reconstructed uncertified stationary
RICE with a brake HP >500 located at an
area source of HAP emissions.
limit the concentration of NMHC in the stationary RICE exhaust.
10. New and reconstructed certified stationary
RICE, except stationary RICE with a brake
HP >500 located at a major source of HAP
emissions.
meet the emission standards specified in 40
CFR part 60 subpart JJJJ § 60.4233, as applicable.
i. conducting semiannual performance tests
for formaldehyde to demonstrate that your
emissions remain at or below the formaldehyde concentration the stationary limit a;
and
ii. collecting the catalyst inlet temperature
data according to § 63.6625(b); and
iii. reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and
iv. maintaining the 4-hour rolling averages
within the operating limitations for the catalyst inlet temperature; and
v. measuring the pressure drop across the
catalyst once per month and demonstrating
that the pressure drop across the catalyst is
within the operating limitation established
during the performance test.
i. conducting semiannual performance tests
for formaldehyde to demonstrate that your
emissions remain at or below the formaldehyde concentration limit a; and
ii. collecting the approved operating parameter (if any) data according to § 63.6625(b);
and
ii. reducing these data to 4-hour rolling averages; and
iii. maintaining the 4-hour rolling averages
within the operating limitations for the operating parameters established during the
performance test.
i. conducting performance tests every 3 years
or 8,760 hours of operation, whichever
comes first for NMHC to demonstrate that
the required NMHC limit is achieved; and
ii. operating and maintaining your stationary
RICE and control device according to the
manufacturer’s written instructions.
operating and maintaining your stationary
RICE and control device according to the
manufacturer’s written instructions.
a After you have demonstrated compliance for two consecutive tests, you may reduce the frequency of subsequent performance tests to annually. If the results of any subsequent annual performance test indicate the stationary RICE is not in compliance with the CO or formaldehyde
emission limitation, or you deviate from any of your operating limitations, you must resume semiannual performance tests.
TABLE 8 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—REQUIREMENTS FOR REPORTS.
[As stated in § 63.6650, you must comply with the following requirements for reports:]
You must submit a(n)
The report must contain . . .
You must submit the report . . .
1. Stationary RICE with a brake
HP >500 located at a major
source of HAP emissions.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
For each . . .
a. compliance report .....................
i. if there are no deviations from
any emission limitations or operating limitations that apply to
you, a statement that there
were no deviations from the
emission limitations or operating limitations during the reporting period. If there were no
periods during which the CMS,
including CEMS and CPMS,
was out-of-control, as specified
in § 63.8(c)(7), a statement that
there were not periods during
which the CMS was out-of-control during the reporting period;
or.
(a) semiannually according to the
requirements in § 63.6650(b).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33851
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 8 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—REQUIREMENTS FOR REPORTS.—Continued
[As stated in § 63.6650, you must comply with the following requirements for reports:]
For each . . .
You must submit a(n)
and
New or reconstructed 4SLB stationary
RICE
with
a
250≤HP≤500 located at a major
source of HAP emissions.
2. Stationary RICE with a brake
HP >500 located at a major
source of HAP emissions.
The report must contain . . .
..................................................
b. an immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction report if
actions addressing the startup,
shutdown, or malfunction were
inconsistent with your startup,
shutdown, or malfunction plan
during the reporting period.
and
New or reconstructed 4SLB stationary
RICE
with
a
250≤HP≤500 located at a major
source of HAP emissions.
3. New or reconstructed stationary
RICE which fires landfill or digester gas equivalent to 10 percent or more of the gross heat
input on an annual basis.
You must submit the report . . .
ii. if you had a deviation from any
emission limitation or operating
limitation during the reporting
period, the information in
§ 63.6660(d). If there were periods during which the CMS, including CEMS and CPMS, was
out-of-control, as specified in
§ 63.8(c)(7), the information in
§ 63.6650(e); or
iii. if you had a startup, shutdown
or malfunction during the reporting period, the information
in § 63.10(d)(5)(i).
i. actions taken for the event; and
(a) semiannually according to the
requirements in § 63.6650(b).
ii.
c. Report .......................................
the
information
§ 63.10(d)(5)(ii).
in
i. the fuel flow rate of each fuel
and the heating values that
were used in your calculations,
and you must demonstrate that
the percentage of heat input
provided by landfill gas or digester gas, is equivalent to 10
percent or more of the gross
heat input on an annual basis;
and.
ii. the operating limits provided in
your federally enforceable permit, and any deviations from
these limits; and
iii. any problems or errors suspected with the meters.
(a) semiannually according to the
requirements in § 63.6650(b).
(a) by fax or telephone within 2
working days after starting actions inconsistent with the plan.
(a) by letter within 7 working days
after the end of the event unless you have made alternative
arrangements with the permitting
authorities.
(§ 63.10(d)(5)(ii)) plan.
(a) annually, according to the requirements in § 63.6650.
(a) see item 3(c)(i)(a).
(a) see item 3(c)(i)(a).
TABLE 9 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART ZZZZ
[As stated in § 63.6665, you must comply with the following applicable general provisions.]
General provisions citation
Subject of citation
§ 63.1 .............................................
General applicability of the General Provisions.
Definitions .....................................
Yes.
Units and abbreviations ................
Prohibited activities and circumvention.
Construction and reconstruction ...
Applicability ...................................
Compliance dates for new and reconstructed sources.
Notification ....................................
[Reserved].
Compliance dates for new and reconstructed area sources that
become major sources.
Yes.
Yes.
§ 63.2 .............................................
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 63.3 .............................................
§ 63.4 .............................................
§ 63.5 .............................................
§ 63.6(a) .........................................
§ 63.6(b)(1)–(4) ..............................
§ 63.6(b)(5) .....................................
§ 63.6(b)(6) .....................................
§ 63.6(b)(7) .....................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Applies to subpart
Fmt 4701
Explanation
Yes ................................................
Additional terms
§ 63.6675.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
defined
in
33852
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 9 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART ZZZZ—Continued
[As stated in § 63.6665, you must comply with the following applicable general provisions.]
General provisions citation
Subject of citation
§ 63.6(c)(1)–(2) ..............................
Compliance dates for existing
sources.
[Reserved].
Compliance dates for existing
area sources that become
major sources.
[Reserved].
Operation and maintenance .........
[Reserved].
Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan.
Applicability of standards except
during startup shutdown malfunction (SSM).
Methods for determining compliance.
Finding of compliance ..................
Use of alternate standard .............
Opacity and visible emission
standards.
Yes.
Compliance extension procedures
and criteria.
Presidential compliance exemption.
Performance test dates ................
Yes.
CAA section 114 authority ............
Notification of performance test ...
Notification of rescheduling ..........
Quality assurance/test plan ..........
Testing facilities ............................
Conditions for conducting performance tests.
Conduct of performance tests and
reduction of data.
Test run duration ..........................
Administrator may require other
testing under section 114 of the
CAA.
Alternative test method provisions
Performance test data analysis,
recordkeeping, and reporting.
Waiver of tests ..............................
Applicability of monitoring requirements.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Performance specifications ..........
[Reserved].
Monitoring for control devices ......
Monitoring .....................................
Multiple effluents and multiple
monitoring systems.
Monitoring system operation and
maintenance.
Routine and predictable SSM ......
SSM not in Startup Shutdown
Malfunction.
Compliance with operation and
maintenance requirements.
Monitoring system installation ......
Continuous monitoring system
(CMS) requirements.
Yes.
§ 63.6(c)(3)–(4) ..............................
§ 63.6(c)(5) .....................................
§ 63.6(d) .........................................
§ 63.6(e)(1) .....................................
§ 63.6(e)(2) .....................................
§ 63.6(e)(3) .....................................
§ 63.6(f)(1) ......................................
§ 63.6(f)(2) ......................................
§ 63.6(f)(3) ......................................
§ 63.6(g)(1)–(3) ..............................
§ 63.6(h) .........................................
§ 63.6(i) ..........................................
§ 63.6(j) ..........................................
§ 63.7(a)(1)–(2) ..............................
§ 63.7(a)(3) .....................................
§ 63.7(b)(1) .....................................
§ 63.7(b)(2) .....................................
§ 63.7(c) .........................................
§ 63.7(d) .........................................
§ 63.7(e)(1) .....................................
§ 63.7(e)(2) .....................................
§ 63.7(e)(3) .....................................
§ 63.7(e)(4) .....................................
§ 63.7(f) ..........................................
§ 63.7(g) .........................................
§ 63.7(h) .........................................
§ 63.8(a)(1) .....................................
§ 63.8(a)(2) .....................................
§ 63.8(a)(3) .....................................
§ 63.8(a)(4) .....................................
§ 63.8(b)(1) .....................................
§ 63.8(b)(2)–(3) ..............................
§ 63.8(c)(1) .....................................
§ 63.8(c)(1)(i) ..................................
§ 63.8(c)(1)(ii) .................................
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 63.8(c)(1)(iii) ................................
§ 63.8(c)(2)–(3) ..............................
§ 63.8(c)(4) .....................................
Applies to subpart
Explanation
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No .................................................
Subpart ZZZZ does not contain
opacity or visible emission
standards.
Yes.
Yes ................................................
Yes ................................................
Subpart ZZZZ contains performance test dates at §§ 63.6610
and 63.6611.
Subpart ZZZZ specifies test methods at § 63.6620.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes ................................................
Subpart ZZZZ contains specific
for monitoring at requirements
§ 63.6625.
No.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes ................................................
Plan
Yes.
Yes.
Yes ................................................
§ 63.8(c)(5) .....................................
COMS minimum procedures ........
No .................................................
§ 63.8(c)(6)–(8) ..............................
CMS requirements ........................
Yes ................................................
§ 63.8(d) .........................................
CMS quality control ......................
Except that subpart ZZZZ does
not require Continuous Opacity
Monitoring System (COMS).
Subpart ZZZZ does not require
COMS.
Except that subpart ZZZZ does
not require COMS.
Yes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33853
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 9 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63.—APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART ZZZZ—Continued
[As stated in § 63.6665, you must comply with the following applicable general provisions.]
General provisions citation
Subject of citation
Applies to subpart
Explanation
§ 63.8(e) .........................................
CMS performance evaluation .......
Yes ................................................
Except for 63.8(e)(5)(ii), which applies to COMS.
§ 63.8(f)(1)–(5) ...............................
§ 63.8(f)(6) ......................................
Alternative monitoring method ......
Alternative to relative accuracy
test.
Data reduction ..............................
Yes.
Yes.
Applicability and State delegation
of notification requirements.
Initial notifications .........................
Yes.
Request for compliance extension
Notification of special compliance
requirements for new sources.
Notification of performance test ...
Notification of visible emission
(VE)/opacity test.
Notification of performance evaluation.
Notification of use of COMS data
Yes.
Yes.
Notification that criterion for alternative to RATA is exceeded.
Notification of ................................
Yes ................................................
Adjustment of submittal deadlines
Change in previous information ...
Administrative
provisions
for
record keeping/reporting.
Record retention ...........................
Records related to ........................
Records ........................................
Record when under waiver ..........
Records when using alternative to
RATA.
Records of supporting documentation.
Records of applicability determination.
Additional records for sources
using CEMS.
General reporting requirements ...
Report of performance test results
Reporting opacity or VE observations.
Progress reports ...........................
Startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports.
Additional CMS reports ................
COMS-related report ....................
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Excess emission and parameter
exceedances reports.
Reporting COMS data ..................
Yes ................................................
Waiver for recordkeeping/reporting.
Flares ............................................
State authority and delegations ....
Addresses .....................................
Incorporation by reference ...........
Availability of information ..............
Yes.
§ 63.8(g) .........................................
§ 63.9(a) .........................................
§ 63.9(b)(1)–(5) ..............................
§ 63.9(c) .........................................
§ 63.9(d) .........................................
§ 63.9(e) .........................................
§ 63.9(f) ..........................................
§ 63.9(g)(1) .....................................
§ 63.9(g)(2) .....................................
§ 63.9(g)(3) .....................................
§ 63.9(h)(1)–(6) ..............................
§ 63.9(i) ..........................................
§ 63.9(j) ..........................................
§ 63.10(a) .......................................
§ 63.10(b)(1) ...................................
§ 63.10(b)(2)(i)–(v) SSM ................
§ 63.10(b)(2)(vi)–(xi) .......................
§ 63.10(b)(2)(xii) .............................
§ 63.10(b)(2)(xiii) ............................
§ 63.10(b)(2)(xiv) ............................
§ 63.10(b)(3) ...................................
§ 63.10(c) .......................................
§ 63.10(d)(1) ...................................
§ 63.10(d)(2) ...................................
§ 63.10(d)(3) ...................................
§ 63.10(d)(4) ...................................
§ 63.10(d)(5) ...................................
§ 63.10(e)(1) and (2)(i) ...................
§ 63.10(e)(2)(ii) ...............................
§ 63.10(e)(3) ...................................
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 63.10(e)(4) ...................................
§ 63.10(f) ........................................
§ 63.11
§ 63.12
§ 63.13
§ 63.14
§ 63.15
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
...........................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Yes ................................................
Yes ................................................
Yes.
No .................................................
Except that provisions for COMS
are not applicable. Averaging
periods for demonstrating compliance
are
specified
at
’’63.6635 and 63.6640.
Except that § 63.9(b)(3) is reserved.
Subpart ZZZZ does not contain
opacity or VE standards.
Yes.
No .................................................
Yes ................................................
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes ................................................
Subpart ZZZZ does not contain
opacity or VE standards.
If alternative is in use.
Except that notifications for compliance status sources using a
CEMS are due 30 days after
completion
of
performance
evaluations.§ 63.9(h)(4) is reserved.
For CO standard if using RATA
alternative.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes ................................................
Yes.
Yes.
No .................................................
Except that § 63.10(c)(2)–(4) and
(9) are reserved.
Subpart ZZZZ does not contain
opacity or VE standards.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No .................................................
No .................................................
Subpart ZZZZ does not require
COMS.
Except that § 63.10(e)(3)(i)(C) is
reserved.
Subpart ZZZZ does not require
COMS.
No.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
33854
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
PART 85—[AMENDED]
28. The authority citation for part 85
continues to read as follows:
§ 90.114 Requirement of certification—
engine information label.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
29. Section 85.2401 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(13) to read as
follows:
§ 85.2401
apply?
*
To whom do these requirements
(a) * * *
(13) Stationary internal combustion
engines (See 40 CFR part 60, subparts
IIII and JJJJ).
*
*
*
*
*
30. Section 85.2403 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(11) to read as
follows:
§ 85.2403
subpart?
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(7) The statement ‘‘THIS ENGINE
CONFORMS TO U.S. EPA
REGULATIONS FOR [MODEL YEAR]
ENGINES.’’;
*
*
*
*
*
36. Section 90.201 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 90.201
What definitions apply to this
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(11) 40 CFR part 60, subparts IIII and
JJJJ.
*
*
*
*
*
31. Section 85.2405 is amended by
adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:
§ 85.2405
35. Section 90.114 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(7) to read as
follows:
How much are the fees?
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Fees for stationary SI internal
combustion engine certificate requests
shall be calculated in the same manner
as for NR SI certificate. Fees for
certificate requests where the certificate
would apply to stationary and mobile
engines shall be calculated in the same
manner as fees for the certificate
requests for the applicable mobile
source engines.
PART 1048—[AMENDED]
37. The authority citation for part
1048 continues to read as follows:
PART 90—[AMENDED]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
32. The authority citation for part 90
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) This part applies as specified in 40
CFR part 60 subpart JJJJ, to sparkignition engines subject to the standards
of 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ.
34. Section 90.107 is amended by
adding paragraph (d)(12) to read as
follows:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 90.107
Application for certificate.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(12) A statement indicating whether
the engine family contains only nonroad
engines, only stationary engines, or
both.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
38. Section 1048.1 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 1048.1
33. Section 90.1 is amended by
adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:
§ 90.1
Applicability.
The requirements of this subpart C are
applicable to all Phase 2 spark-ignition
engines subject to the provisions of
subpart A of this part except as
provided in § 90.103(a). These
provisions are not applicable to any
Phase 1 engines. Participation in the
averaging, banking and trading program
is voluntary, but if a manufacturer elects
to participate, it must do so in
compliance with the regulations set
forth in this subpart. The provisions of
this subpart are applicable for HC+NOX
(NMHC+NOX) emissions but not for CO
emissions. To the extent specified in 40
CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ, stationary
engines certified under this part and
subject to the standards of 40 CFR part
60, subpart JJJJ, may participate in the
averaging, banking, and trading program
described in this subpart.
Does this part apply to me?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The definition of nonroad engine
in 40 CFR 1068.30 excludes certain
engines used in stationary applications.
These engines may be required by 40
CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ, to comply with
some of the provisions of this part 1048;
otherwise, these engines are only
required to comply with the
requirements in § 1048.20. In addition,
the prohibitions in 40 CFR 1068.101
restrict the use of stationary engines for
nonstationary purposes unless they are
certified under this part 1048 to the
same standards that would apply to
nonroad engines for the same model
year.
*
*
*
*
*
39. Section 1048.20 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) introductory text
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
and adding paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
§ 1048.20 What requirements from this
part apply to excluded stationary engines?
(a) You must add a permanent label
or tag to each new engine you produce
or import that is excluded under
§ 1048.1(c) as a stationary engine and is
not required by 40 CFR part 60, subpart
JJJJ, to meet the standards and other
requirements of this part 1048 that are
equivalent to the requirements
applicable to nonroad SI engines for the
same model year. To meet labeling
requirements, you must do the
following things:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Stationary engines required by 40
CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ, to meet the
requirements of this part 1048, or 40
CFR part 90, must meet the labeling
requirements of 40 CFR 60.4242.
40. Section 1048.101 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
§ 1048.101 What exhaust emission
standards must my engines meet?
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) For constant-speed engines, the
emission standards do not apply for
transient testing if you do both of the
following things:
(i) Demonstrate that the specified
transient duty-cycle is not
representative of how your engines will
operate in use.
(ii) Demonstrate that the engine’s
emission controls will function properly
to control emissions during transient
operation in use. In most cases, you may
do this by showing that you use the
same controls as a similar variablespeed engine that is certified as
complying with the emission standards
during transient testing.
*
*
*
*
*
41. Section 1048.205 is amended by
revising paragraph (w) to read as
follows:
§ 1048.205 What must I include in my
application?
*
*
*
*
*
(w) State whether your certification is
intended to include engines used in
stationary applications. Also State
whether your certification is limited for
certain engines. If this is the case,
describe how you will prevent use of
these engines in applications for which
they are not certified. This applies for
engines such as the following:
(1) Constant-speed engines.
(2) Variable-speed engines.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
part 1048, as indicated under 40 CFR
part 60, subpart JJJJ, the standard-setting
part for these engines.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 1065—[AMENDED]
42. The authority citation for part
1065 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
PART 1068—[AMENDED]
43. Section 1065.1 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(6) to read as
follows:
§ 1065.1
44. The authority citation for part
1068 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
Applicability.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS2
(a) * * *
(6) Stationary spark-ignition engines
certified using the provisions of 40 CFR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:50 Jun 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
45. Section 1068.1 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(5) to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 1068.1
33855
Does this part apply to me?
(a) * * *
(5) Stationary spark-ignition engines
certified to the provisions of 40 CFR
part 1048, as indicated under 40 CFR
part 60, subpart JJJJ.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–4919 Filed 6–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\12JNP2.SGM
12JNP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 112 (Monday, June 12, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33804-33855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4919]
[[Page 33803]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Environmental Protection Agency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR Parts 60, 63, et al.
Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 112 / Monday June 12, 2006 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 33804]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60, 63, 85, 90, 1048, 1065, and 1068
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0030, FRL-8176-1]
RIN 2060-AM81 and 2060-AN62
Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing new source standards of performance for
stationary spark ignition internal combustion engines. EPA is also
proposing national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for
stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines that either are
located at area sources of hazardous air pollutant emissions or that
have a site rating of less than or equal to 500 brake horsepower and
are located at major sources of hazardous air pollutant emissions.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 11, 2006, or 60
days after date of public hearing if later. Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, comments on the information collection provisions must
be received by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on or before
July 12, 2006. Public Hearing. If anyone contacts us requesting to
speak at a public hearing by July 3, 2006, a public hearing will be
held on July 12, 2006. If you are interested in attending the public
hearing, contact Ms. Pamela Garrett at (919) 541-7966 to verify that a
hearing will be held.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2005-0030, by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
Fax: (202) 566-1741.
Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total of two copies.
EPA requests a separate copy also be sent to the contact person
identified below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). In addition,
please mail a copy of your comments on the information collection
provisions to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for EPA, 735 17th St.,
NW., Washington, DC 20503.
Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation Docket and Information
Center, U.S. EPA, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2005-0030. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available on-line
at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Public Hearing: If a public hearing is held, it will be held at
EPA's campus located at 109 T.W. Alexander Drive in Research Triangle
Park, NC or an alternate site nearby.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. We also rely on documents in Docket ID Nos.
A-96-55 and A-2000-01, and incorporate those dockets into the record
for this proposed rule. Although listed in the index, some information
is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket,
EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the
Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jaime Pag[aacute]n, Energy
Strategies Group, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243-01),
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone number (919) 541-5340; facsimile number (919) 541-
5450; email address ``pagan.jaime@epa.gov.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Organization of This Document. The following
outline is provided to aid in locating information in the preamble.
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
II. Background
III. Summary of This Proposed Rule
A. What is the source category regulated by this proposed rule?
B. What are the pollutants regulated by this proposed rule?
C. What are the proposed standards?
D. What are the requirements for sources that are modified or
reconstructed?
E. What are the requirements for demonstrating compliance?
F. What are the reporting and recordkeeping requirements?
IV. Rationale for Proposed Rule
A. Which control technologies apply to stationary engines?
B. How did EPA determine the basis and level of the proposed
standards?
C. How did EPA determine the compliance requirements?
D. How did EPA determine the reporting and recordkeeping
requirements?
E. Why did EPA determine to exempt area sources from title V
permit requirements?
V. Summary of Environmental, Energy and Economic Impacts
A. What are the air quality impacts?
B. What are the cost impacts?
C. What are the economic impacts?
D. What are the non-air health, environmental and energy
impacts?
VI. Solicitation of Comments and Public Participation
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
[[Page 33805]]
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Regulated Entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated
by this action include:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category NAICS \1\ Examples of regulated entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any manufacturer that produces or any 2211 Electric power generation, transmission, or
industry using a stationary internal 622110 distribution.
combustion engine as defined in this 335312 Medical and surgical hospitals.
proposed rule. 333912 Motor and generator manufacturing.
333992 Pump and compressor manufacturing.
48621 Welding and soldering equipment manufacturing.
211111 Natural gas transmission.
211112 Crude petroleum and natural gas production.
92811 Natural gas liquids producers.
National security.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
action. To determine whether your engine is regulated by this action,
you should examine the applicability criteria of this proposed rule. If
you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the diskor CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver information
identified as CBI to only the following address: Mr. Jaime
Pag[aacute]n, c/o OAQPS Document Control Officer (Room C404-02), U.S.
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2005-0030.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
(a) Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
(b) Follow directions. EPA may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
(c) Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
(d) Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
(e) If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
(f) Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
(g) Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
(h) Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
Docket. The docket number for this proposed rule is Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0030.
World Wide Web (WWW). In addition to being available in the docket,
an electronic copy of this proposed rule will be posted on the WWW
through the Technology Transfer Network Web site (TTN Web). Following
signature, EPA will post a copy of this proposed rule on the TTN's
policy and guidance page for newly proposed or promulgated rules at
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN provides information and
technology exchange in various areas of air pollution control.
II. Background
This action proposes new source performance standards (NSPS) that
would apply to new stationary spark ignition (SI) internal combustion
engines (ICE). New source performance standards implement section
111(b) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), and are issued for categories of
sources which cause, or contribute significantly to, air pollution
which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare. The standards apply to new stationary sources of emissions,
i.e., sources whose construction, reconstruction, or modification
begins after a standard for those sources is proposed. The NSPS for
stationary SI ICE would be promulgated under 40 CFR part 60, subpart
JJJJ.
This action also proposes national emission standards for hazardous
air pollutants (NESHAP) from existing, new, and reconstructed
stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE) with a site
rating of less than or equal to 500 horsepower (HP) located at major
sources, and existing, new, and reconstructed stationary RICE located
at area sources. We are proposing these requirements to meet our
statutory obligation to address hazardous air pollutants (HAP)
emissions from these sources under sections 112(d) and 112(k) of the
CAA. The final NESHAP for stationary RICE would be promulgated under 40
CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ, which already contains standards applicable
to stationary RICE with a site rating above 500 HP located at major
sources.
We are proposing these two sets of regulations under one notice of
proposed rulemaking because the source categories being addressed are
practically identical. In other words, stationary engines located at
major and area sources of HAP will also be affected by NSPS
regulations. Based on the similarities, we decided that it would be
appropriate to propose the regulations at the same time and attempt to
bring some consistency between them.
[[Page 33806]]
III. Summary of this Proposed Rule
A. What is the source category regulated by this proposed rule?
The proposed NSPS apply to new stationary SI ICE. A stationary
internal combustion engine means any internal combustion engine, except
combustion turbines, that converts heat energy into mechanical work and
is not mobile. Stationary ICE differ from mobile ICE in that a
stationary internal combustion engine is not a nonroad engine as
defined at 40 CFR 1068.30, and is not used to propel a motor vehicle or
a vehicle used solely for competition. Stationary ICE include
reciprocating ICE, rotary ICE, and other ICE, except combustion
turbines. The proposed NESHAP applies only to stationary RICE. To our
knowledge, no rotary or other types of stationary ICE exist at this
time.
The SI NSPS address emissions from new, modified and reconstructed
stationary SI engines. An SI engine is either a gasoline-fueled engine;
or any other type of engine, with a spark plug (or other sparking
device) and with operating characteristics significantly similar to the
theoretical Otto combustion cycle. Spark ignition engines usually use a
throttle to regulate intake air flow to control power during normal
operation. Dual-fuel engines in which a liquid fuel (typically diesel
fuel) is used for compression ignition and gaseous fuel (typically
natural gas) is used as the primary fuel at an annual average ratio of
less than 2 parts diesel fuel to 100 parts total fuel on an energy
equivalent basis are considered SI engines for purposes of this
proposed rule.
The NESHAP address emissions from existing, new, and reconstructed
stationary engines less than or equal to 500 HP located at major
sources and all stationary engines located at area sources. A major
source of HAP emissions is a plant site that emits or has the potential
to emit any single HAP at a rate of 10 tons (9.07 megagrams) or more
per year or any combination of HAP at a rate of 25 tons (22.68
megagrams) or more per year, except that for oil and gas production
facilities, a major source of HAP emissions is determined for each
surface site. An area source of HAP emissions is a source that is not a
major source.
If you are an owner or operator of an area source subject to this
proposed rule, you are exempt from the obligation to obtain a permit
under 40 CFR parts 70 or 71, provided you are not required to obtain a
permit under 40 CFR 70.3(a) or 40 CFR 71.3(a) for a reason other than
your status as an area source under this proposed rule.
1. SI NSPS
New source performance standards for stationary SI engines are
issued under section 111(b) of the CAA. All new, modified and
reconstructed stationary SI engines are covered regardless of size. The
NSPS apply to stationary SI engines combusting any fuel (natural gas,
gasoline, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), compressed natural gas,
landfill gas, digester gas, and any other applicable fuel). New source
performance standards require these sources to control emissions to the
level achievable by best demonstrated technology (BDT), considering
costs and any non-air quality health and environmental impacts and
energy requirements.
Under section 111 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7411, the Administrator is
required to publish, and periodically update, a list of source
categories that in his or her judgment cause, or contribute
significantly to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health or welfare. This list appears in 40 CFR 60.16.
The list reflects the Administrator's determination that emissions from
the listed source categories contribute significantly to air pollution
that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare, and it is intended to identify major source categories for
which standards of performance are to be promulgated.
EPA has determined that for purposes of NSPS regulations, the
stationary internal combustion engine source category should be split
into two source categories--SI engines and compression ignition (CI)
engines. Proposed NSPS for stationary CI engines were published on July
11, 2005 (70 FR 39870).
2. NESHAP
The NESHAP portion of this action is a revision to the regulations
in 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ, currently applicable to stationary
RICE greater than 500 HP located at major sources, which were
promulgated in 2004. Subpart ZZZZ of 40 CFR part 63 does not currently
cover stationary engines located at area sources of HAP emissions, nor
does it apply to stationary engines located at major sources with a
site rating of 500 HP or less. When the subpart ZZZZ of 40 CFR part 63
regulations were promulgated in 2004 (69 FR 33474), EPA deferred
promulgating regulations with respect to stationary engines 500 HP or
less at major sources until further information on the engines could be
obtained and analyzed. It was decided to regulate these smaller engines
at the same time as we regulate engines located at area sources.
This action proposes to revise 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ, in
order to address HAP emissions from stationary RICE less than or equal
to 500 HP located at major sources and stationary RICE located at area
sources. For stationary engines less than or equal to 500 HP at major
sources, EPA must determine what is the appropriate maximum achievable
control technology (MACT) for those engines under section 112(d)(3) of
the CAA.
For stationary engines located at area sources, we have the
flexibility to promulgate standards based on generally available
control technology (GACT) under CAA section 112(d)(5). We are required
to address HAP emissions from stationary RICE located at area sources
under section 112(k) of the CAA, based on criteria set forth by EPA in
the Urban Air Toxics Strategy described in the paragraph below.
On July 19, 1999, EPA announced in the Federal Register its plan
for addressing exposure to air toxics in urban areas. The Urban Air
Toxics Strategy (64 FR 38706) listed several source categories that
emit one or more of the air toxic pollutants of greatest concern in
urban areas. The stationary engine source category was one of the
source categories listed and, as such, EPA is required to consider it
for regulation. The strategy addressed sections 112(c)(3) and
112(k)(3)(B)(ii) of the CAA that instruct us to identify not less than
30 HAP which, as the result of emissions from area sources, present the
greatest threat to public health in the largest number of urban areas,
and to list sufficient area source categories or subcategories to
ensure that emissions representing 90 percent of the 30 listed HAP are
subject to regulation. The strategy included a list of 33 HAP judged to
pose the greatest potential threat to public health in the largest
number of urban areas (the urban HAP) and a list of area source
categories emitting the listed HAP (area source HAP). Once listed,
these area source categories shall be subject to standards under
section 112(d) of the CAA.
We have divided the source category into the following
subcategories: Stationary RICE less than 50 HP, landfill and digester
gas stationary RICE, CI stationary RICE greater than or equal to 50 HP,
and SI stationary RICE greater than or equal to 50 HP. The CI
stationary RICE greater than or equal to 50 HP subcategory was further
subcategorized into emergency and non-emergency engines, as was the
[[Page 33807]]
subcategory of SI stationary RICE greater than or equal to 50 HP. Spark
ignition non-emergency stationary RICE greater than or equal to 50 HP
were then subcategorized into 2 stroke lean burn (2SLB), 4 stroke lean
burn (4SLB), and 4 stroke rich burn (4SRB) stationary RICE.
The regulatory approach being proposed in this action
differentiates between gasoline, LPG, natural gas, and digester and
landfill gas. Gasoline and LPG are fuels more commonly used in nonroad
engines than stationary engines. Nonroad SI engines less than or equal
to 19 kilowatt (KW) (25 HP) typically use gasoline. It is estimated
that about 68 percent of SI nonroad engines above 19 KW (25 HP) use
LPG. A smaller percentage of nonroad SI engines above 19 KW (25 HP) use
gasoline (about 23 percent) and even less use compressed natural gas
(about 9 percent). Natural gas fuel is more common in larger,
stationary applications. Natural gas engines refer to all gaseous-
fueled engines except those fueled by landfill and digester gas.
Natural gas is primarily composed of methane and typically contains
very low levels of sulfur. Other fuels used with stationary SI engines
are landfill and digester gases. These gases are by-products of
wastewater treatment and land application of municipal reuse. Landfill
and digester gases, which are formed through anaerobic decomposition of
organic materials, are principally comprised of methane and carbon
dioxide, but small quantities of other compounds such as hydrogen
sulfide, ammonia, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter
(PM) may also be present. These gases have a lower methane content than
natural gas and may range from 50 to 65 percent. Although similar in
composition to natural gas, there are some differences in the emissions
from combustion of landfill and digester gases due to e.g., chlorinated
compounds typically not found in natural gas. Both landfill and
digester gases contain a family of silicon-based gases collectively
called siloxanes. Combustion of siloxanes forms compounds that have
been known to foul fuel systems, combustion chambers, and post-
combustion catalysts.
B. What are the pollutants regulated by this proposed rule?
New source performance standards are developed under the authority
of section 111 of the CAA. Emissions of criteria pollutants (those
pollutants identified under section 110 of the CAA) are generally
regulated under section 111 of the CAA, while HAP are regulated under
section 112 of the CAA. Emissions from stationary engines contribute
significantly to air pollution and cause adverse health and welfare
effects. The pollutants to be regulated by the proposed NSPS for
stationary SI engines are nitrogen oxides (NOX), carbon
monoxide (CO), and non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC). In addition, a
sulfur limit on gasoline is being proposed.
Nitrogen oxides are listed as criteria pollutants and are regulated
due to their contribution to the formation of ozone. Nitrogen oxides
are precursors to ozone formation. Exposure to ozone has been linked to
health and welfare impacts. Health and welfare risks include impaired
respiratory function, eye irritation, deterioration of materials such
as rubber, and necrosis of plant tissue. Nitrogen oxides are also a
major precursor for nitrate PM. Particulate matter, also regulated as a
criteria pollutant, is associated with premature mortality and a number
of serious adverse respiratory and cardiovascular effects, especially
in children, the elderly, and people with existing heart or lung
disease. Particulate matter also reduces visibility and damages
building materials. Nitrogen oxides are also associated with various
other health and welfare effects. Nitrogen dioxide can cause irritation
of the lungs and can also reduce the resistance to respiratory
infection. Nitrogen oxides are one of the major pollutants emitted from
stationary ICE and stationary ICE are considered to cause or contribute
significantly to nationwide releases of NOX emissions.
Carbon monoxide is a criteria pollutant and is considered harmful
to public health and the environment. Carbon monoxide has been linked
to increased risk for people with heart disease, reduced visual
perception, cognitive functions and aerobic capacity, and possible
fetal effects. Stationary engines emit CO and are considered to
contribute to several areas failing to attain the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards for CO.
Emissions of NMHC from stationary engines contribute to the
formation of ozone. In addition, emissions of NMHC include air toxics
such as benzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene, and
acrolein. These substances are known or suspected to be human or animal
carcinogens, or having noncancer health effects such as irritation or
corrosion of the eyes, nose, throat, and lungs; pulmonary and
respiratory problems; and dermatitis and sensitization of the skin and
respiratory tract. Stationary engines contribute to nationwide releases
of NMHC emissions.
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a criteria pollutant emitted
from stationary SI engines due to sulfur in gasoline. It contributes to
respiratory illness, particularly in children and the elderly, and
aggravates existing heart and lung diseases. It also contributes to
acid deposition, damaging forests, aquatic ecosystems, crops, and
building materials. Sulfur dioxide undergoes chemical reactions in the
atmosphere to form sulfate PM. The health effects of PM were previously
described in this section. This proposed rule reduces SO2
and sulfate PM by requiring the use of gasoline with lower sulfur
levels, thus improving air quality, public health, and public welfare.
The NESHAP being proposed in this action would regulate emissions
of HAP. Available emissions data show that several HAP are emitted from
stationary engines, which are formed during the combustion process or
that are contained within the fuel burned. Many HAP have been detected
from the stationary engine exhaust, but only a handful of HAP represent
the majority of HAP emissions from stationary engines. These HAP are
formaldehyde, acrolein, methanol, and acetaldehyde. We described the
health effects of these HAP and other HAP emitted from the operation of
stationary ICE in the preamble to 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ,
published on June 15, 2004, on page 33474 of the Federal Register.
These HAP emissions are known to cause, or contribute significantly to
air pollution, which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public
health or welfare.
Under the RICE NESHAP, we are proposing to limit emissions of HAP
through emissions standards for NMHC and formaldehyde. We have
determined that it is appropriate to use NMHC and formaldehyde or CO
emissions as a surrogate for HAP emissions. For the RICE MHAP
promulgated in 2004 (69 FR 33474) for engines greater than 500 HP
located at major sources, EPA chose to select a single pollutant to
serve as a surrogate for HAP emissions. Formaldehyde is the hazardous
air pollutant present in the highest concentration from stationary
engines. In addition, emissions data show that formaldehyde emission
levels are related to other HAP emission levels. For the NESHAP
promulgated in 2004, EPA also found that there is a strong relationship
between CO emissions reductions and HAP emissions reductions from 2SLB,
4SLB, and CI stationary engines. Therefore, CO emissions reductions
were chosen as a surrogate for HAP emissions reductions for 2SLB, 4SLB,
and CI stationary
[[Page 33808]]
engines operating with oxidation catalyst systems for that rule. For
the standards being proposed in this action, EPA believes that
previously made decisions regarding the appropriateness of using
formaldehyde and CO as surrogates for HAP are still valid. For this
proposal, EPA conducted an analysis using available emissions data to
look at the relationship between formaldehyde (a surrogate for HAP) and
NMHC. Based on statistical results of engine exhaust data, these data
indicate that there is a significant relationship between formaldehyde
and NMHC emissions from 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI stationary RICE. For this
reason, EPA believes it is appropriate to use NMHC emissions as a
surrogate for formaldehyde, and consequently, also as a surrogate for
HAP emissions. Much of the HAP being regulated are hydrocarbons; e.g.,
formaldehyde, an oxygenated hydrocarbon, is the HAP emitted in largest
quantities from stationary engines. For more information on EPA's
analysis of NMHC as a surrogate for HAP, refer to the docket for this
proposal.
C. What are the proposed standards?
A description of the proposed standards is provided in the
following sections.
1. SI NSPS
a. Stationary SI Engines <=19 KW (25 HP). EPA is proposing emission
standards that will affect manufacturers, owners, and operators of
stationary SI engines. Engine manufacturers must certify their
stationary SI engines with a maximum engine power less than or equal to
19 KW (25 HP) that are manufactured after January 1, 2008, to the
certification emission standards for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR
part 90, as applicable. The standards applicable to these engines are
shown in Table 1 of this preamble.
Table 1.--NOX, HC, NMHC, and CO Emission Standards in g/KW-hr (g/HP-hr) for Stationary SI Engines <=19 KW (25
HP)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emission requirement in g/KW-hr (g/HP-hr)
Engine classc ------------------------------------------------ Manufacture date\b\
HC+NOX NMHC+NOXa CO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I................................. 16.1 14.8
(12.0) (11.0)
I-A............................... 50 .............. 610 January 1, 2008.
(37) .............. (455)
I-B............................... 40 37
(30) (27.6)
II................................ 12.1 11.3
(9.0) (8.4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
aNMHC+NOX standards are applicable only to natural gas fueled engines at the option of the manufacturer, in lieu
of HC+NOX standards.
bModified and reconstructed engines manufactured prior to January 1, 2008, must meet the standards applicable to
engines manufactured after January 1, 2008.
cClass I-A: Engines with displacement <66 cubic centimeter (cc); Class I-B: Engines with displacement greater
than or equal to 66 cc and less than 100 cc; Class I: Engines with displacement greater than or equal to 100
cc and less than 225 cc; Class II: Engines with displacement greater than or equal to 225 cc.
b. Stationary SI Gasoline Engines >19 KW (25 HP) and Rich Burn LPG
Engines >19 KW (25 HP). Engine manufacturers must certify their
stationary SI engines with a maximum engine power greater than 19 KW
(25 HP) and less than 500 HP that use gasoline or rich burn engines
greater than 19 KW (25 HP) and less than 500 HP that use LPG that are
manufactured after January 1, 2008, to the certification emission
standards for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR part 1048, as
applicable. Engine manufacturers must certify their stationary SI
engines with a maximum engine power greater than or equal to 500 HP
that use gasoline or rich burn engines greater than or equal to 500 HP
that use LPG that are manufactured after July 1, 2007, to the
certification emission standards for new nonroad SI engines in 40 CFR
part 1048. The standards applicable to engines greater than 19 KW (25
HP) that are gasoline or rich burn engines that use LPG are shown in
Table 2 of this preamble.
Table 2.--NOX, HC, and CO Emission Standards in g/KW-hr (g/HP-hr) for Stationary SI Gasoline Engines >19 KW (25
HP) and Rich Burn LPG Engines >19 KW (25 HP)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emission requirement in g/KW-hr
(g/HP-hr) a, b
Maximum engine power Manufacture date ---------------------------------
HC+NOX CO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25=500 d.................................... July 1, 2007................... 2.7 4.4
(2.0) (3.3)
July 1, 2007................... 2.7 130.0
(severe duty).................. (2.0) (97.0)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a You may optionally certify your engines according to the following formula instead of the standards in Table 2
of this preamble: (HC+NOX)xCO0.784<=8.57. The HC+NOX and CO emission levels you select to satisfy this
formula, rounded to the nearest 0.1 g/kW-hr, become the emission standards that apply for those engines. You
may not select an HC+NOX emission standard higher than 2.7 g/kW-hr or a CO emission standard higher than 20.6
g/kW-hr.
b Provisions in 40 CFR part 1048 allow engines with a maximum engine power at or below 30 KW (40 HP) with a
total displacement at or below 1,000 cubic centimeters (cc) to comply with the requirements of 40 CFR part 90.
[[Page 33809]]
c Modified and reconstructed engines between 25 and 500 HP manufactured prior to January 1, 2008, must meet the
standards applicable to engines manufactured after January 1, 2008.
d Modified and reconstructed engines greater than or equal to 500 HP manufactured prior to July 1, 2007, must
meet the standards applicable to engines manufactured after July 1, 2007.
In addition to the emission standards shown in Table 2 of this
preamble, there are separate field testing standards required under 40
CFR part 1048 that are part of the certification requirements for
engine manufacturers.
c. Stationary Non-Emergency SI Natural Gas Engines 19X to 2.0 grams
per HP-hour (g/HP-hr), emissions of CO to 4.0 g/HP-hr, and emissions of
NMHC to 1.0 g/HP-hr. More stringent emission standards take effect 3
years later, i.e., for stationary natural gas engines 19 to 37 KW (25
to 50 HP) and lean burn engines using LPG between 19 and 37 KW (25 and
50 HP) manufactured after January 1, 2011. These engines must comply
with a NOX standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr, a CO standard of 2.0 g/
HP-hr, and a NMHC standard of 0.7 g/HP-hr. Engine manufacturers have
the option to certify their stationary SI engines to these emission
standards. However, the certification is only voluntary, and it is up
to the manufacturer to decide if it believes certification is feasible
and beneficial. Also, engine manufacturers have the option to certify
stationary SI engines between 19 and 37 KW (25 and 50 HP) that are
natural gas engines or lean burn engines using LPG to the emission
standards in 40 CFR part 1048, as shown in Table 2 of this preamble.
Additionally, engine manufacturers may certify engines between 19 and
30 KW (25 and 40 HP) with a displacement of 1,000 cc or less to the
provisions of 40 CFR part 90 (shown in Table 1 of this preamble), which
is consistent with similar provisions applicable to nonroad engines in
this displacement and size category. A summary of the proposed
standards for stationary non-emergency SI natural gas engines between
19 and 37 KW (25 and 50 HP) and stationary non-emergency lean burn LPG
engines between 19 and 37 KW (25 and 50 HP) is provided in Table 3 of
this preamble.
d. Stationary Non-Emergency SI Natural Gas Engines 50<=HP<500 and
Lean Burn LPG Engines 50<=HP<500. EPA is proposing emission standards
in two stages for these engines. Owners and operators who purchase
stationary SI engines with a maximum engine power between 50 and 500 HP
that are natural gas engines or lean burn engines using LPG that are
manufactured after January 1, 2008, must limit their exhaust emissions
of NOX to 2.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of CO to 4.0 g/HP-hr, and
emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/HP-hr. Again, engine manufacturers may
voluntarily certify these stationary SI engines to these emission
standards, but the certification is not required by this proposed rule.
Stationary SI engines with a maximum engine power between 50 and 500 HP
that are natural gas engines or lean burn engines using LPG that are
manufactured after January 1, 2011, must limit their exhaust emissions
of NOX to 1.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of CO to 2.0 g/HP-hr, and
emissions of NMHC to 0.7 g/HP-hr. A summary of the emission standards
EPA is proposing for these engines is shown in Table 3 of this
preamble.
Table 3.--NOX, NMHC, and CO Emission Standards in g/HP-hr for Stationary SI Engines >19KW (25 HP)
[Except Gasoline and Rich Burn LPG Engines]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emission standards in g/HP-hr
Engine type and fuel Maximum engine power Manufacture date a -----------------------------------------------
NOX CO NMHC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Emergency SI Natural Gas 25=500..................... January 1, 2008.................. 3.0 5.0 1.0
January 1, 2011.................. 2.0 5.0 1.0
HP>=500..................... July 1, 2007..................... 3.0 5.0 1.0
July 1, 2010..................... 2.0 5.0 1.0
Emergency.............................. All Sizes................... January 1, 2009.................. 2.0 4.0 1.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Stationary SI natural gas and lean burn LPG engines between 19 and 37 KW (25 and 50 HP) may comply with the requirements of Table 2 of this
preamble, instead of this table, as applicable.
e. Stationary Non-Emergency SI Natural Gas Engines >=500 HP and
Non-Emergency Lean Burn LPG Engines >=500 HP. EPA is proposing emission
standards in two stages for stationary non-emergency SI natural gas
engines greater than or equal to 500 HP and non-emergency lean burn LPG
engines greater than or equal to 500 HP. Owners and operators who
purchase stationary SI engines with a maximum engine power greater than
or equal to 500 HP that are natural gas engines or lean burn engines
using LPG that are manufactured after July 1, 2007, must limit their
exhaust emissions of NOX to 2.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of CO to
4.0 g/HP-hr, and emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/HP-hr. Engine manufacturers
may voluntarily certify these stationary SI engines to these emission
standards, but the certification is not required by the rule, as
proposed. Stationary SI engines with a maximum engine power greater
than or equal to 500 HP that are natural gas engines or lean burn
engines using LPG that are manufactured after July 1, 2010, must limit
their exhaust emissions of NOX to 1.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of
CO to 2.0 g/HP-hr, and emissions of NMHC to 0.7 g/HP-hr. Again,
manufacturers may voluntarily certify their engines to these emission
standards. A summary of the emission standards EPA is proposing for
these engines is shown in Table 3 of this preamble.
[[Page 33810]]
f. Stationary SI Landfill/Digester Gas Engines. Similar to other
stationary SI engines, EPA is proposing emission standards in two
stages for landfill and digester gas fired engines. Owners and
operators who purchase stationary landfill or digester SI engines that
are manufactured after July 1, 2007, that are greater than or equal to
500 HP must limit their exhaust emissions of NOX to 3.0 g/
HP-hr, emissions of CO to 5.0 g/HP-hr, and emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/
HP-hr. Stationary landfill and digester gas SI engines greater than or
equal to 500 HP that are manufactured after July 1, 2010, must limit
their exhaust emissions of NOX to 2.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of
CO to 5.0 g/HP-hr, and emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/HP-hr. Again, engine
manufacturers may voluntarily certify these stationary SI engines to
these emission standards, but the certification is not required by the
rule, as proposed. Stationary SI engines that use landfill or digester
gas that are less than 500 HP are given an extra 6 months to comply
with the standards. The first stage of limits of 3.0, 5.0, and 1.0 g/
HP-hr, for NOX, CO, and NMHC, respectively, applies to
landfill and digester gas engines manufactured after January 1, 2008.
The second stage of limits of 2.0, 5.0, and 1.0 g/HP-hr, for
NOX, CO, and NMHC, respectively, applies to landfill and
digester gas engines manufactured after January 1, 2011. A summary of
the emission standards EPA is proposing for these engines is shown in
Table 3 of this preamble.
g. Stationary Emergency SI Engines. For stationary SI engines that
are emergency engines, EPA is proposing a single stage of emission
limits. Owners and operators who purchase stationary emergency engines
that are manufactured after January 1, 2009, must limit their exhaust
emissions of NOX to 2.0 g/HP-hr, emissions of CO to 4.0 g/
HP-hr, and emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/HP-hr.
h. Fuel Requirements. In addition to emission standards, EPA is
proposing that owners and operators who use gasoline in their
stationary SI engine must use gasoline that meets the requirements of
40 CFR 80.195. The requirements include a gasoline sulfur per gallon
cap of 80 parts per million (ppm).
2. NESHAP
a. Engines <=500 HP at Major Sources. We are proposing that owners
and operators of new and reconstructed stationary SI engines with a
site rating of equal to or less than 500 HP located at a major source
of HAP emissions must generally meet the same NMHC emission standards
for new SI engines as proposed for the NSPS in 40 CFR part 60, subpart
JJJJ.
One major difference between the SI NSPS and NESHAP requirements is
that owners and operators of new or reconstructed 4SLB SI stationary
engines between 250 and 500 HP located at a major source are required
to either reduce CO emissions by 93 percent or more, or limit the
concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary engine exhaust to 14
ppm by volume, dry basis (ppmvd) or less, at 15 percent oxygen
(O2). These engines would not be required to meet the NMHC
standard. The formaldehyde standard is more stringent than the NMHC
stage 1 and stage 2 emission standards of 1.0 and 0.7 g/HP-hr,
respectively.
Under the NESHAP, owners and operators of new and reconstructed
landfill and digester gas fired engines and new and reconstructed SI
emergency engines are subject to the NMHC emission standards that are
being proposed under the SI NSPS. New and reconstructed landfill and
digester gas engines must, under the NESHAP, meet NMHC emission
standards consistent with the SI NSPS, i.e., a NMHC standard of 1.0 g/
HP-hr. Owners and operators of stationary landfill and digester gas
engines must meet the NMHC standard if they are manufactured after
January 1, 2008.
For new and reconstructed stationary SI engines with a site rating
of equal to or less than 500 HP located at a major source of HAP
emissions that are emergency engines, owners and operators who purchase
such engines that are manufactured after January 1, 2009, must limit
their exhaust emissions of NMHC to 1.0 g/HP-hr.
Finally, owners and operators of new and reconstructed stationary
CI engines with a site rating of equal to or less than 500 HP located
at a major source of HAP emissions that purchase 2007 model year and
later stationary CI engines must meet the NMHC and PM emission
standards for new CI engines specified in 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII.
Those standards are generally based on the certification emission
standards for new nonroad CI engines. A summary of the standards being
proposed for stationary engines less than or equal to 500 HP located at
major sources is presented in Table 4 of this preamble.
Owners and operators of existing stationary engines with a site
rating of equal to or less than 500 HP located at a major source of HAP
emissions have an emissions standard of no emission reduction and are
not subject to any specific requirements under subpart ZZZZ or subpart
A of 40 CFR part 63. A stationary RICE is existing if it commences
construction or reconstruction before June 12, 2006.
Table 4.--Emission Standards for Stationary RICE <=500 HP Located at Major Sources of HAP Emissions and
Stationary RICE Located at Area Sources of HAP Emissions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine type and fuel Maximum engine power Manufacture date a Emission standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Existing All Fuels and All Types. All Sizes.................. No Emission Reduction.
New/Reconstructed SI............. <=25 HP.................... January 1, 2008............ Meet 40 CFR part 60
subpart JJJJ.
New/Reconstructed SI Gasoline and 25>HP<500.................. January 1, 2008............ Meet 40 CFR part 60
Rich Burn LPG. HP>=500.................... July 1, 2007............... subpart JJJJ.
New/Reconstructed Non-Emergency 25=500.................... July 1, 2007............... 1.0 g/HP-hr NMHC
SI Natural Gas.
HP<=500.......................... July 1, 2007............... 1.0 g/HP-hr NMHC...........
[[Page 33811]]
and
New/Reconstructed Non-Emergency ........................... July 1, 2010............... 0.7 g/HP-hr NMHC.
SI Lean Burn LPG.
New/Reconstructed Non-Emergency 250=500.................... July 1, 2007............... 1.0 g/HP-hr NMHC.
Emergency SI..................... All Sizes.................. January 1, 2009............ 1.0 g/HP-hr NMHC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Stationary SI natural gas and lean burn LPG engines between 19 and 37 KW (25 and 50 HP) may comply with the
requirements of Table 2 of this preamble, instead of this table, as applicable.
b New and reconstructed non-emergency 4SLB engines at major sources with a site rating between 250 and 500 HP
are not required to meet the 1.0 and 0.7 g/HP-hr NMHC emission standards.
b. Engines at Area Sources. We are proposing that owners and
operators of new and reconstructed stationary engines located at area
sources of HAP emissions generally meet the same requirements that
apply to new and reconstructed stationary engines with a site rating of
equal to or less than 500 HP located at a major source of HAP
emissions. New and reconstructed stationary engines located at area
sources with a site rating greater than 500 HP are required to meet the
same NMHC standard as proposed in the SI NSPS for the engine's HP
classification, or the same NMHC and PM standards as proposed in the CI
NSPS for the engine's HP classification.
There is only one difference between the requirements for new and
reconstructed stationary engines located at area sources and new and
reconstructed stationary engines with a site rating of equal to or less
than 500 HP located at major sources. Owners and operators of new or
reconstructed 4SLB SI stationary engines between 250 and 500 HP located
at area sources are not required to reduce CO emissions by 93 percent
or more, or limit the concentration of formaldehyde in the stationary
engine exhaust to 14 ppmvd or less at 15 percent O2. New and
reconstructed stationary SI engines located at area sources must,
however, meet the NMHC emission standards shown in Table 4 of this
preamble.
Owners and operators of existing stationary engines located at an
area source of HAP emissions have an emission standard of no emission
reduction and are not subject to any specific requirements under
subpart ZZZZ or of subpart A of 40 CFR part 63.
D. What are the requirements for sources that are modified or
reconstructed?
1. SI NSPS
The proposed standards apply to stationary SI engines subject to
the SI NSPS that are modified or reconstructed after June 12, 2006. The
guidelines for determining whether a source is modified or
reconstructed are given in 40 CFR 60.14 and 40 CFR 60.15, respectively.
Stationary SI ICE less than or equal to 19 KW (25 HP) manufactured
prior to January 1, 2008 that are modified or reconstructed after June
12, 2006 are required to meet the standards that apply to engines
manufactured after January 1, 2008.
Stationary SI gasoline and rich burn LPG engines between 25 HP and
500 HP manufactured prior to January 1, 2008 that are modified or
reconstructed after June 12, 2006 are required to meet the standards
applicable to engines manufactured after January 1, 2008.
Stationary SI gasoline and rich burn LPG engines greater than or
equal to 500 HP manufactured prior to July 1, 2007 that are modified or
reconstructed after June 12, 2006 are required to meet the standards
applicable to engines manufactured after July 1, 2007.
Stationary SI natural gas and lean burn LPG engines less than 500
HP manufactured prior to January 1, 2008 that are modified or
reconstructed after June 12, 2006 are required to meet a NOX
emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr, a CO standard of 4.0 g/HP-hr, and a
NMHC standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr.
Stationary SI natural gas and lean burn LPG engines greater than or
equal to 500 HP manufactured prior to July 1, 2007 that are modified
after June 12, 2006, are required to meet a NOX emission
standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr, a CO standard of 4.0 g/HP-hr, and a NMHC
standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr.
Stationary SI landfill and digester gas engines less than 500 HP
manufactured prior to January 1, 2008 that are modified or
reconstructed after June 12, 2006 are required to meet a NOX
emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr, a CO standard of 5.0 g/HP-hr, and a
NMHC standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr. Stationary SI landfill and digester gas
engines greater than or equal to 500 HP manufactured prior to July 1,
2007 that are modified after June 12, 2006 are required to meet a
NOX emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr, a CO standard of 5.0
g/HP-hr, and a NMHC standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr.
Stationary SI emergency engines manufactured prior to January 1,
2009 that are modified or reconstructed after June 12, 2006 are
required to meet a NOX emission standard of 3.0 g/HP-hr, a
CO standard of 4.0 g/HP-hr, and a NMHC standard of 1.0 g/HP-hr.
2. NESHAP
Similar concepts as those discussed above apply to engines subject
to 40 CFR part 63 regulations; however, the concept of modification is
not included in 40 CFR part 63. The proposed standards apply to
stationary engines subject to the NESHAP that commence reconstruction
on or after June 12, 2006. The reconstruction criteria are provided in
40 CFR 63.2.
E. What are the requirements for demonstrating compliance?
The following sections describe the requirements for demonstrating
compliance under the stationary SI NSPS and NESHAP.
1. SI NSPS
Owners and operators of stationary engines subject to the
requirements of the SI NSPS must operate and maintain
[[Page 33812]]
their stationary engine and after treatment control device (if any)
according to the manufacturer's written instructions. Manufacturers of
stationary SI engines required to certify their engines must
demonstrate compliance by certifying that their stationary SI engines
meet the emission standards, as specified in 40 CFR part 60, subpart
JJJJ, as applicable, using the certification procedures in subpart B of
40 CFR part 90 and subpart C of 40 CFR part 1048, as applicable, and
must test their engines as specified in those parts. Manufacturers who
conduct voluntary certification must follow the same test procedures
that apply to large SI nonroad engines under 40 CFR part 1048, but must
use the D-2 cycle in International Organization for Standardization
(ISO) 8178-4 for stationary engines. The test cycle requirements that
manufacturers who conduct voluntary certification should follow are
provided in Table 3 to 40 CFR 1048.505.
Manufacturers who opt to voluntary certify their stationary SI
engines to the emission standards specified in this subpart must
certify their engines using fuel that meets the definition of pipeline-
quality natural gas, which according to the proposed definition must be
composed of at least 70 percent methane by volume or have a gross
calorific value between 950 and 1,100 British thermal units per
standard cubic foot.
If the manufacturer chooses to certify its stationary SI engines to
another fuel, the manufacturer must specify the properties of that fuel
and what adjustments the owner or operator must make to the engine
during installation in the field in order to meet the emission
standards. The manufacturer must also perform certification testing on
the engine on that fuel, as it would if it was certifying to pipeline-
quality natural gas, in order to assure compliance with the emission
standards. Manufacturers who conduct voluntary certification of
stationary SI ICE must also provide instructions to the owner and
operator for configuring the stationary engine to meet the emission
standards on fuels that meet the pipeline-quality natural gas
specifications and fuels that do not meet the pipeline-quality natural
gas specifications. The manufacturer must provide information to the
owner and operator of the certified stationary SI engine regarding the
particular fuels to which the engine is certified, and instructions
regarding configuring the engine in a manner most appropriate for
reducing pollutant emissions for engines operating on such fuels.
Owners and operators may operate their certified engine on other fuels
that the engine is not certified to, but the engine would no longer be
considered a certified engine and the owner or operator would be
required to test the engine to demonstrate compliance with the emission
standards.
EPA is proposing to allow owners and operators of natural gas
engines to use propane as back up fuel for emergency purposes for no
more than 100 hours per year. If propane is used for more than 100
hours per year in an engine that is not certified to the emission
standards when using propane, the owners and operators are required to
conduct a performance test to demonstrate compliance with the emission
standards.
Owners and operators that operate engines that have been certified
by the engine manufacturer are not required to perform any performance
testing unless the engine is operated outside of the fuel properties
specified by the manufacturer. If the owner or operator uses fuels that
are outside of the fuel specifications or does not follow the
adjustments specified by the manufacturer, the engine is no longer
considered a certified engine and the owner or operator must test the
engine to demonstrate compliance. If the engine is no longer considered
a certified engine, the owner or operator must test the engine
according to the test procedures that are specified for uncertified
engines, as specified in this proposed rule.
Owners and operators subject to the emission standards specified in
this proposed rule who use stationary SI engines with a maximum engine
power of less than or equal to 19 KW (25 HP) or who use stationary SI
engines with a maximum engine power greater than 19 KW (25 HP) and use
gasoline or are rich burn engines greater than 19 KW (25 HP) using LPG
must demonstrate compliance by using an engine certified to the
emission standards specified in 40 CFR part 90 or 1048, as applicable.
Owners and operators subject to this proposed rule who use
stationary SI engines with a maximum engine power greater than 19 KW
(25 HP) that use fuels other than gasoline and that are not rich burn
engines greater than 19 KW (25 HP) that use LPG, must demonstrate
compliance by either using an engine certified to the emission
standards specified in Table 3 of this preamble or by conducting an
initial performance test to demonstrate compliance with the emission
standards specified in Table 3 of this preamble. If the owner or
operator purchases a certified engine, performance testing would not be
required (unless the engine is operated differently than specified by
the manufacturer). Owners and operators of uncertified engines that are
greater than 500 HP must conduct subsequent performance tests every 3
years, or 8,760 hours of operation, whichever comes first.
2. NESHAP
Consistent with the requirements for owners and operators subject
to the SI NSPS, owners and operators of stationary engines subject to
the requirements of the NESHAP must also operate and maintain their
stationary engine and exhaust aftertreatment device (if any) according
to the manufacturer's written instructions. This requirement applies to
stationary SI and CI engines regulated under this proposed rule.
Owners and operators subject to the NESHAP who use stationary SI
engines must demonstrate compliance by meeting the NMHC emission
standards specified in 40 CFR part 60, subpart JJJJ (unless they are
new or reconstructed non-emergency 4SLB SI stationary RICE between 250
and 500 HP located at major sources). Under 40 CFR part 60, subpart
JJJJ, as described in the previous section, certain stationary SI
engin