Au Pair Exchange Programs, 33237-33239 [E6-8958]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Approval of this supplemental NADA did not require review of additional safety or effectiveness data or information. Therefore, a freedom of information summary is not required. The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.33(d)(1) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. This rule does not meet the definition of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’ Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801–808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520 Animal drugs. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 520 is amended as follows: I PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 520 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b. § 520.1638 [Amended] 2. In paragraph (c)(3) of § 520.1638, remove ‘‘Not for use in horses intended for food.’’ and add in its place ‘‘Not for use in horses intended for human consumption.’’ I Dated: May 26, 2006. Steven D. Vaughn, Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine. [FR Doc. E6–8894 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S Food and Drug Administration Melanie R. Berson, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV–110), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–7540, email: melanie.berson@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pfizer, Inc., 235 East 42d St., New York, NY 10017–5755, filed a supplement to NADA 109–722 for use of ANTHELCIDE EQ (oxibendazole) Suspension administered orally to horses as an antiparasitic. The supplemental NADA provides for revised food safety labeling. The supplemental application is approved as of April 17, 2006, and the regulations are amended in 21 CFR 520.1640 to reflect the approval. Approval of this supplemental NADA did not require review of additional safety or effectiveness data or information. Therefore, a freedom of information summary is not required. The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.33(d)(1) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. This rule does not meet the definition of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’ Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801–808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520 Animal drugs. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 520 is amended as follows: PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS 21 CFR Part 520 Oral Dosage Form New Animal Drugs; Oxibendazole Suspension Food and Drug Administration, 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 520 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES HHS. ACTION: Final rule. § 520.1640 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect approval of a supplemental new animal drug application (NADA) filed by Pfizer, VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:35 Jun 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 Dated: May 26, 2006. Steven D. Vaughn, Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine. [FR Doc. E6–8953 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: I DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY: Inc. The supplemental NADA provides for revised food safety labeling for oxibendazole suspension administered orally to horses as an antiparasitic. DATES: This rule is effective June 8, 2006. 33237 [Amended] 2. Amend paragraph (c)(3) of § 520.1640 by removing ‘‘Not for use in horses intended for food.’’ and adding in its place ‘‘Not for use in horses intended for human consumption.’’. I PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Part 62 [Public Notice 5437] RIN 1400–AC16 Au Pair Exchange Programs State Department. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Department of State (Department) adopts as final certain proposed amendments to existing au pair regulations. These changes will permit au pair sponsors to request a one-time extension of six, nine, or 12 months beyond an au pair participant’s original 12-month period of program participation). Effective Date: This rule is effective July 10, 2006. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley S. Colvin, Director, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, U.S. Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 734, Washington, DC 20547; or email at jexchanges@state.gov. In February 2004, the Department of State announced a pilot program whereby Department designated au pair sponsors could request the extension of program participation beyond the original 12month maximum period afforded au pair participants. The Department has completed its review of the Au Pair Pilot Extension Program and has determined that au pair extensions enhance the overall success of this program. Both host families and au pair participants have enthusiastically embraced the extension concept. Accordingly, the Department is adopting the amendment of program regulations to permit designated sponsors of the au pair program to submit requests to the Department for consideration of program extensions for six, nine, or 12 month durations for first-year au pair participants beyond the maximum duration of participation allowed under Section 62.31(c)(1). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Analysis of Comments The Department received a total of 1 comment on the proposed rule for Au Pair extension requests. However, the E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM 08JNR1 33238 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations comment requested substantive changes to the existing au pair regulations and did not address the specific changes stated in the proposed rule. Regulatory Analysis and Notices Administrative Procedure Act The Department is publishing this rule as a final rule, after it was published as a proposed rule on February 2, 2006. These proposed changes to the regulations are hereby certified as not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601– 612, and Executive Order 13272, section 3(b). Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804 for the purposes of Congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801–808). This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and export markets. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES The Department has reviewed this regulation in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden. This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this regulation. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 62 Cultural Exchange Programs. Accordingly, 22 CFR part 62 is to be amended as follows: I PART 62—EXCHANGE VISITOR PROGRAM 1. The Authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J), 1182, 1184, 1258; 22 U.S.C. 1431–1442, 2451–2460; Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1977, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 200; E.O. 12048 of March 27, 1978; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp. p. 168. 2. Section 62.31 is amended by revising paragraph (k) and adding paragraphs (o) and (p) to read as follows: I Executive Order 12866 The Department of State does not consider this rule to be a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. In addition, the Department is exempt from Executive Order 12866 except to the extent that it is promulgating regulations in conjunction with a domestic agency that are significant regulatory actions. The Department has nevertheless reviewed the regulation to ensure its consistency with the regulatory philosophy and 15:35 Jun 07, 2006 Executive Order 12988 Executive Orders 12372 and 13132 Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business VerDate Aug<31>2005 principles set forth in that Executive Order. Jkt 208001 § 62.31 Au pairs. * * * * * (k) Educational component. Sponsors must: (1) Require that during their initial period of program participation, all EduCare au pair participants complete not less than 12 semester hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal educational settings at accredited U.S. PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 post-secondary institutions and that all other au pair participants complete not less than six semester hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal educational settings at accredited U.S. post-secondary institutions. As a condition of program participation, host family participants must agree to facilitate the enrollment and attendance of au pairs in accredited U.S. post secondary institutions and to pay the cost of such academic course work in an amount not to exceed $1,000 for EduCare au pair participants and in an amount not to exceed $500 for all other au pair participants. (2) Require that during any extension of program participation, all participants (i.e., Au Pair or EduCare) satisfy an additional educational requirement, as follows: (i) For a nine or 12-month extension, all au pair participants and host families shall have the same obligation for coursework and payment therefore as is required during the initial period of program participation. (ii) For a six-month extension, EduCare au pair participants must complete not less than six semester hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal educational settings at accredited U.S. post-secondary institutions. As a condition of participation, host family participants must agree to facilitate the enrollment and attendance of au pairs at accredited U.S. post secondary institutions and to pay the cost of such academic coursework in an amount not to exceed $500. All other au pair participants must complete not less than three semester hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal educational settings at accredited U.S. postsecondary institutions. As a condition of program participation, host family participants must agree to facilitate the enrollment and attendance of au pairs at accredited U.S. post secondary institutions and to pay the cost of such academic coursework in an amount not to exceed $250. * * * * * (o) Extension of Program. The Department, in its sole discretion, may approve extensions for au pair participants beyond the initial 12-month program. Applications to the Department for extensions of six, nine, or 12 months, must be received by the Department not less than 30 calendar days prior to the expiration of the exchange visitor’s initial authorized stay in either the Au Pair or EduCare program (i.e., 30-calendar days prior to the program end date listed on the exchange visitor’s Form DS–2019). The E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM 08JNR1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations request for an extension beyond the maximum duration of the initial 12month program must be submitted electronically in the Department of Homeland Security’s Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS). Supporting documentation must be submitted to the Department on the sponsor’s organizational letterhead and contain the following information: (1) Au pair’s name, SEVIS identification number, date of birth, the length of the extension period being requested; (2) Verification that the au pair completed the educational requirements of the initial program; and (3) Payment of the required nonrefundable fee (see 22 CFR 62.90) via Pay.gov. (p) Repeat Participation. Exchange visitors who have participated in the Au Pair Program are not eligible for repeat participation. Dated: June 2, 2006. Stanley S. Colvin, Director, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E6–8958 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am] Background Background on Viticultural Areas The final regulations (TD 9254) that are the subject of this correction are under section 1502 of the Internal Revenue Code. TTB Authority Need for Correction As published, final regulations (TD 9254) contains an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification. Correction of Publication Accordingly, the final regulations (TD 9254) which was the subject of FR Doc. 06–2411, is corrected as follows: On page 13009, column 2, in the preamble, under the paragraph heading ‘‘Special Analyses’’, line 4 from the bottom of the paragraph, the language ‘‘these regulations was submitted to the’’ is corrected to read ‘‘these regulations were submitted to the’’. Guy R. Traynor, Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration). [FR Doc. E6–8890 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830–01–P BILLING CODE 4710–05–P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 27 CFR Part 9 26 CFR Part 1 [T.D. TTB–46; Re: Notice No. 45] [TD 9254] RIN 1545–BB25 RIN: 1513–AB02 Guidance Under Section 1502; Suspension of Losses on Certain Stock Dispositions; Correction Establishment of the San Antonio Valley Viticultural Area (2004R–599P) This document contains corrections to final regulations that were published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 (71 FR 13008). The regulations apply when a member of a consolidated group transfers subsidiary stock at a loss. They also apply when a member holds loss shares of subsidiary stock and the subsidiary ceases to be a member of the group. DATES: This correction is effective March 14, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theresa Abell (202) 622–7700 or Martin Huck (202) 622–7750 (not toll-free numbers). cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES SUMMARY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:35 Jun 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury. ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision. AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Correction to final regulations. AGENCY: 33239 SUMMARY: This Treasury decision establishes the San Antonio Valley viticultural area in southwestern Monterey County, California, within the existing Central Coast viticultural area. We designate viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines they may purchase. DATES: Effective Date: July 10, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Berry, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Regulations and Rulings Division, P.O. Box 18152, Roanoke, VA 24014; telephone 540– 344–9333. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (the FAA Act, 27 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol beverage labels provide consumers with adequate information regarding product identity and prohibits the use of misleading information on such labels. The FAA Act also authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to issue regulations to carry out its provisions. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these regulations. Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains the list of approved viticultural areas. Definition Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-growing region distinguishable by geographical features, the boundaries of which have been recognized and defined in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to its geographical origin. The establishment of viticultural areas allows vintners to describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of a viticultural area is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in that area. Requirements Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure for proposing an American viticultural area and provides that any interested party may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as a viticultural area. Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations requires the petition to include— • Evidence that the proposed viticultural area is locally and/or nationally known by the name specified in the petition; • Historical or current evidence that supports setting the boundary of the proposed viticultural area as the petition specifies; • Evidence relating to the geographical features, such as climate, soils, elevation, and physical features, E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM 08JNR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33237-33239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8958]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Part 62

[Public Notice 5437]
RIN 1400-AC16


Au Pair Exchange Programs

AGENCY: State Department.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State (Department) adopts as final certain 
proposed amendments to existing au pair regulations. These changes will 
permit au pair sponsors to request a one-time extension of six, nine, 
or 12 months beyond an au pair participant's original 12-month period 
of program participation).

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective July 10, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley S. Colvin, Director, Office of 
Exchange Coordination and Designation, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 
301 4th Street, SW., Room 734, Washington, DC 20547; or email at 
jexchanges@state.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In February 2004, the Department of State 
announced a pilot program whereby Department designated au pair 
sponsors could request the extension of program participation beyond 
the original 12-month maximum period afforded au pair participants. The 
Department has completed its review of the Au Pair Pilot Extension 
Program and has determined that au pair extensions enhance the overall 
success of this program. Both host families and au pair participants 
have enthusiastically embraced the extension concept. Accordingly, the 
Department is adopting the amendment of program regulations to permit 
designated sponsors of the au pair program to submit requests to the 
Department for consideration of program extensions for six, nine, or 12 
month durations for first-year au pair participants beyond the maximum 
duration of participation allowed under Section 62.31(c)(1).

Analysis of Comments

    The Department received a total of 1 comment on the proposed rule 
for Au Pair extension requests. However, the

[[Page 33238]]

comment requested substantive changes to the existing au pair 
regulations and did not address the specific changes stated in the 
proposed rule.

Regulatory Analysis and Notices

Administrative Procedure Act

    The Department is publishing this rule as a final rule, after it 
was published as a proposed rule on February 2, 2006.

Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business

    These proposed changes to the regulations are hereby certified as 
not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, and Executive Order 13272, section 
3(b).

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local and 
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 
million in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under 
the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

    This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804 for the 
purposes of Congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801-
808). This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of 
$100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or 
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, 
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based 
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and 
export markets.

Executive Order 12866

    The Department of State does not consider this rule to be a 
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, section 
3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. In addition, the Department is 
exempt from Executive Order 12866 except to the extent that it is 
promulgating regulations in conjunction with a domestic agency that are 
significant regulatory actions. The Department has nevertheless 
reviewed the regulation to ensure its consistency with the regulatory 
philosophy and principles set forth in that Executive Order.

Executive Order 12988

    The Department has reviewed this regulation in light of sections 
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, 
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce 
burden.

Executive Orders 12372 and 13132

    This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 
of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have 
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant 
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The 
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding 
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do 
not apply to this regulation.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping 
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 62

    Cultural Exchange Programs.

0
Accordingly, 22 CFR part 62 is to be amended as follows:

PART 62--EXCHANGE VISITOR PROGRAM

0
1. The Authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J), 1182, 1184, 1258; 22 U.S.C. 
1431-1442, 2451-2460; Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act 
of 1998, Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681 et seq.; Reorganization 
Plan No. 2 of 1977, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 200; E.O. 12048 of March 
27, 1978; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp. p. 168.


0
2. Section 62.31 is amended by revising paragraph (k) and adding 
paragraphs (o) and (p) to read as follows:


Sec.  62.31  Au pairs.

* * * * *
    (k) Educational component. Sponsors must:
    (1) Require that during their initial period of program 
participation, all EduCare au pair participants complete not less than 
12 semester hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal 
educational settings at accredited U.S. post-secondary institutions and 
that all other au pair participants complete not less than six semester 
hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal educational 
settings at accredited U.S. post-secondary institutions. As a condition 
of program participation, host family participants must agree to 
facilitate the enrollment and attendance of au pairs in accredited U.S. 
post secondary institutions and to pay the cost of such academic course 
work in an amount not to exceed $1,000 for EduCare au pair participants 
and in an amount not to exceed $500 for all other au pair participants.
    (2) Require that during any extension of program participation, all 
participants (i.e., Au Pair or EduCare) satisfy an additional 
educational requirement, as follows:
    (i) For a nine or 12-month extension, all au pair participants and 
host families shall have the same obligation for coursework and payment 
therefore as is required during the initial period of program 
participation.
    (ii) For a six-month extension, EduCare au pair participants must 
complete not less than six semester hours (or their equivalent) of 
academic credit in formal educational settings at accredited U.S. post-
secondary institutions. As a condition of participation, host family 
participants must agree to facilitate the enrollment and attendance of 
au pairs at accredited U.S. post secondary institutions and to pay the 
cost of such academic coursework in an amount not to exceed $500. All 
other au pair participants must complete not less than three semester 
hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal educational 
settings at accredited U.S. post-secondary institutions. As a condition 
of program participation, host family participants must agree to 
facilitate the enrollment and attendance of au pairs at accredited U.S. 
post secondary institutions and to pay the cost of such academic 
coursework in an amount not to exceed $250.
* * * * *
    (o) Extension of Program. The Department, in its sole discretion, 
may approve extensions for au pair participants beyond the initial 12-
month program. Applications to the Department for extensions of six, 
nine, or 12 months, must be received by the Department not less than 30 
calendar days prior to the expiration of the exchange visitor's initial 
authorized stay in either the Au Pair or EduCare program (i.e., 30-
calendar days prior to the program end date listed on the exchange 
visitor's Form DS-2019). The

[[Page 33239]]

request for an extension beyond the maximum duration of the initial 12-
month program must be submitted electronically in the Department of 
Homeland Security's Student and Exchange Visitor Information System 
(SEVIS). Supporting documentation must be submitted to the Department 
on the sponsor's organizational letterhead and contain the following 
information:
    (1) Au pair's name, SEVIS identification number, date of birth, the 
length of the extension period being requested;
    (2) Verification that the au pair completed the educational 
requirements of the initial program; and
    (3) Payment of the required non-refundable fee (see 22 CFR 62.90) 
via Pay.gov.
    (p) Repeat Participation. Exchange visitors who have participated 
in the Au Pair Program are not eligible for repeat participation.

    Dated: June 2, 2006.
Stanley S. Colvin,
Director, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, Bureau of 
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E6-8958 Filed 6-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.