Au Pair Exchange Programs, 33237-33239 [E6-8958]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Approval of this supplemental NADA
did not require review of additional
safety or effectiveness data or
information. Therefore, a freedom of
information summary is not required.
The agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.33(d)(1) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in 5
U.S.C. 801–808.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520
Animal drugs.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 520 is amended as follows:
I
PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM
NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 520 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
§ 520.1638
[Amended]
2. In paragraph (c)(3) of § 520.1638,
remove ‘‘Not for use in horses intended
for food.’’ and add in its place ‘‘Not for
use in horses intended for human
consumption.’’
I
Dated: May 26, 2006.
Steven D. Vaughn,
Director, Office of New Animal Drug
Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. E6–8894 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
Food and Drug Administration
Melanie R. Berson, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–110), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–7540, email: melanie.berson@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pfizer,
Inc., 235 East 42d St., New York, NY
10017–5755, filed a supplement to
NADA 109–722 for use of ANTHELCIDE
EQ (oxibendazole) Suspension
administered orally to horses as an
antiparasitic. The supplemental NADA
provides for revised food safety labeling.
The supplemental application is
approved as of April 17, 2006, and the
regulations are amended in 21 CFR
520.1640 to reflect the approval.
Approval of this supplemental NADA
did not require review of additional
safety or effectiveness data or
information. Therefore, a freedom of
information summary is not required.
The agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.33(d)(1) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in 5
U.S.C. 801–808.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520
Animal drugs.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 520 is amended as follows:
PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM
NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
21 CFR Part 520
Oral Dosage Form New Animal Drugs;
Oxibendazole Suspension
Food and Drug Administration,
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 520 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
§ 520.1640
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect
approval of a supplemental new animal
drug application (NADA) filed by Pfizer,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Dated: May 26, 2006.
Steven D. Vaughn,
Director, Office of New Animal Drug
Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. E6–8953 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
AGENCY:
Inc. The supplemental NADA provides
for revised food safety labeling for
oxibendazole suspension administered
orally to horses as an antiparasitic.
DATES: This rule is effective June 8,
2006.
33237
[Amended]
2. Amend paragraph (c)(3) of
§ 520.1640 by removing ‘‘Not for use in
horses intended for food.’’ and adding
in its place ‘‘Not for use in horses
intended for human consumption.’’.
I
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 62
[Public Notice 5437]
RIN 1400–AC16
Au Pair Exchange Programs
State Department.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of State
(Department) adopts as final certain
proposed amendments to existing au
pair regulations. These changes will
permit au pair sponsors to request a
one-time extension of six, nine, or 12
months beyond an au pair participant’s
original 12-month period of program
participation).
Effective Date: This rule is
effective July 10, 2006.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley S. Colvin, Director, Office of
Exchange Coordination and
Designation, U.S. Department of State,
SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 734,
Washington, DC 20547; or email at
jexchanges@state.gov.
In
February 2004, the Department of State
announced a pilot program whereby
Department designated au pair sponsors
could request the extension of program
participation beyond the original 12month maximum period afforded au
pair participants. The Department has
completed its review of the Au Pair
Pilot Extension Program and has
determined that au pair extensions
enhance the overall success of this
program. Both host families and au pair
participants have enthusiastically
embraced the extension concept.
Accordingly, the Department is
adopting the amendment of program
regulations to permit designated
sponsors of the au pair program to
submit requests to the Department for
consideration of program extensions for
six, nine, or 12 month durations for
first-year au pair participants beyond
the maximum duration of participation
allowed under Section 62.31(c)(1).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Analysis of Comments
The Department received a total of 1
comment on the proposed rule for Au
Pair extension requests. However, the
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
33238
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
comment requested substantive changes
to the existing au pair regulations and
did not address the specific changes
stated in the proposed rule.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this
rule as a final rule, after it was
published as a proposed rule on
February 2, 2006.
These proposed changes to the
regulations are hereby certified as not
expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612, and Executive Order 13272, section
3(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million in any
year and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804 for the purposes
of Congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801–808). This rule will
not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
The Department has reviewed this
regulation in light of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this
rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this regulation.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 62
Cultural Exchange Programs.
Accordingly, 22 CFR part 62 is to be
amended as follows:
I
PART 62—EXCHANGE VISITOR
PROGRAM
1. The Authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J), 1182,
1184, 1258; 22 U.S.C. 1431–1442, 2451–2460;
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act
of 1998, Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 et
seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1977, 3
CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 200; E.O. 12048 of
March 27, 1978; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp. p. 168.
2. Section 62.31 is amended by
revising paragraph (k) and adding
paragraphs (o) and (p) to read as
follows:
I
Executive Order 12866
The Department of State does not
consider this rule to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory
Planning and Review. In addition, the
Department is exempt from Executive
Order 12866 except to the extent that it
is promulgating regulations in
conjunction with a domestic agency that
are significant regulatory actions. The
Department has nevertheless reviewed
the regulation to ensure its consistency
with the regulatory philosophy and
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Executive Order 12988
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
VerDate Aug<31>2005
principles set forth in that Executive
Order.
Jkt 208001
§ 62.31
Au pairs.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Educational component. Sponsors
must:
(1) Require that during their initial
period of program participation, all
EduCare au pair participants complete
not less than 12 semester hours (or their
equivalent) of academic credit in formal
educational settings at accredited U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
post-secondary institutions and that all
other au pair participants complete not
less than six semester hours (or their
equivalent) of academic credit in formal
educational settings at accredited U.S.
post-secondary institutions. As a
condition of program participation, host
family participants must agree to
facilitate the enrollment and attendance
of au pairs in accredited U.S. post
secondary institutions and to pay the
cost of such academic course work in an
amount not to exceed $1,000 for
EduCare au pair participants and in an
amount not to exceed $500 for all other
au pair participants.
(2) Require that during any extension
of program participation, all
participants (i.e., Au Pair or EduCare)
satisfy an additional educational
requirement, as follows:
(i) For a nine or 12-month extension,
all au pair participants and host families
shall have the same obligation for
coursework and payment therefore as is
required during the initial period of
program participation.
(ii) For a six-month extension,
EduCare au pair participants must
complete not less than six semester
hours (or their equivalent) of academic
credit in formal educational settings at
accredited U.S. post-secondary
institutions. As a condition of
participation, host family participants
must agree to facilitate the enrollment
and attendance of au pairs at accredited
U.S. post secondary institutions and to
pay the cost of such academic
coursework in an amount not to exceed
$500. All other au pair participants
must complete not less than three
semester hours (or their equivalent) of
academic credit in formal educational
settings at accredited U.S. postsecondary institutions. As a condition of
program participation, host family
participants must agree to facilitate the
enrollment and attendance of au pairs at
accredited U.S. post secondary
institutions and to pay the cost of such
academic coursework in an amount not
to exceed $250.
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Extension of Program. The
Department, in its sole discretion, may
approve extensions for au pair
participants beyond the initial 12-month
program. Applications to the
Department for extensions of six, nine,
or 12 months, must be received by the
Department not less than 30 calendar
days prior to the expiration of the
exchange visitor’s initial authorized stay
in either the Au Pair or EduCare
program (i.e., 30-calendar days prior to
the program end date listed on the
exchange visitor’s Form DS–2019). The
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
request for an extension beyond the
maximum duration of the initial 12month program must be submitted
electronically in the Department of
Homeland Security’s Student and
Exchange Visitor Information System
(SEVIS). Supporting documentation
must be submitted to the Department on
the sponsor’s organizational letterhead
and contain the following information:
(1) Au pair’s name, SEVIS
identification number, date of birth, the
length of the extension period being
requested;
(2) Verification that the au pair
completed the educational requirements
of the initial program; and
(3) Payment of the required nonrefundable fee (see 22 CFR 62.90) via
Pay.gov.
(p) Repeat Participation. Exchange
visitors who have participated in the Au
Pair Program are not eligible for repeat
participation.
Dated: June 2, 2006.
Stanley S. Colvin,
Director, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–8958 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
Background
Background on Viticultural Areas
The final regulations (TD 9254) that
are the subject of this correction are
under section 1502 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
TTB Authority
Need for Correction
As published, final regulations (TD
9254) contains an error that may prove
to be misleading and is in need of
clarification.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the final regulations (TD
9254) which was the subject of FR Doc.
06–2411, is corrected as follows:
On page 13009, column 2, in the
preamble, under the paragraph heading
‘‘Special Analyses’’, line 4 from the
bottom of the paragraph, the language
‘‘these regulations was submitted to
the’’ is corrected to read ‘‘these
regulations were submitted to the’’.
Guy R. Traynor,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E6–8890 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
27 CFR Part 9
26 CFR Part 1
[T.D. TTB–46; Re: Notice No. 45]
[TD 9254]
RIN 1545–BB25
RIN: 1513–AB02
Guidance Under Section 1502;
Suspension of Losses on Certain
Stock Dispositions; Correction
Establishment of the San Antonio
Valley Viticultural Area (2004R–599P)
This document contains
corrections to final regulations that were
published in the Federal Register on
Tuesday, March 14, 2006 (71 FR 13008).
The regulations apply when a member
of a consolidated group transfers
subsidiary stock at a loss. They also
apply when a member holds loss shares
of subsidiary stock and the subsidiary
ceases to be a member of the group.
DATES: This correction is effective
March 14, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theresa Abell (202) 622–7700 or Martin
Huck (202) 622–7750 (not toll-free
numbers).
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correction to final regulations.
AGENCY:
33239
SUMMARY: This Treasury decision
establishes the San Antonio Valley
viticultural area in southwestern
Monterey County, California, within the
existing Central Coast viticultural area.
We designate viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may
purchase.
DATES:
Effective Date: July 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Berry, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, Regulations and
Rulings Division, P.O. Box 18152,
Roanoke, VA 24014; telephone 540–
344–9333.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (the FAA Act, 27
U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol
beverage labels provide consumers with
adequate information regarding product
identity and prohibits the use of
misleading information on such labels.
The FAA Act also authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury to issue
regulations to carry out its provisions.
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these
regulations.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) allows the establishment of
definitive viticultural areas and the use
of their names as appellations of origin
on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains the
list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region
distinguishable by geographical
features, the boundaries of which have
been recognized and defined in part 9
of the regulations. These designations
allow vintners and consumers to
attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from
grapes grown in an area to its
geographical origin. The establishment
of viticultural areas allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of a viticultural
area is neither an approval nor an
endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations outlines the procedure for
proposing an American viticultural area
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as a viticultural area.
Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations
requires the petition to include—
• Evidence that the proposed
viticultural area is locally and/or
nationally known by the name specified
in the petition;
• Historical or current evidence that
supports setting the boundary of the
proposed viticultural area as the
petition specifies;
• Evidence relating to the
geographical features, such as climate,
soils, elevation, and physical features,
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33237-33239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8958]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 62
[Public Notice 5437]
RIN 1400-AC16
Au Pair Exchange Programs
AGENCY: State Department.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State (Department) adopts as final certain
proposed amendments to existing au pair regulations. These changes will
permit au pair sponsors to request a one-time extension of six, nine,
or 12 months beyond an au pair participant's original 12-month period
of program participation).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective July 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley S. Colvin, Director, Office of
Exchange Coordination and Designation, U.S. Department of State, SA-44,
301 4th Street, SW., Room 734, Washington, DC 20547; or email at
jexchanges@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In February 2004, the Department of State
announced a pilot program whereby Department designated au pair
sponsors could request the extension of program participation beyond
the original 12-month maximum period afforded au pair participants. The
Department has completed its review of the Au Pair Pilot Extension
Program and has determined that au pair extensions enhance the overall
success of this program. Both host families and au pair participants
have enthusiastically embraced the extension concept. Accordingly, the
Department is adopting the amendment of program regulations to permit
designated sponsors of the au pair program to submit requests to the
Department for consideration of program extensions for six, nine, or 12
month durations for first-year au pair participants beyond the maximum
duration of participation allowed under Section 62.31(c)(1).
Analysis of Comments
The Department received a total of 1 comment on the proposed rule
for Au Pair extension requests. However, the
[[Page 33238]]
comment requested substantive changes to the existing au pair
regulations and did not address the specific changes stated in the
proposed rule.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this rule as a final rule, after it
was published as a proposed rule on February 2, 2006.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
These proposed changes to the regulations are hereby certified as
not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, and Executive Order 13272, section
3(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under
the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804 for the
purposes of Congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801-
808). This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
Executive Order 12866
The Department of State does not consider this rule to be a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, section
3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. In addition, the Department is
exempt from Executive Order 12866 except to the extent that it is
promulgating regulations in conjunction with a domestic agency that are
significant regulatory actions. The Department has nevertheless
reviewed the regulation to ensure its consistency with the regulatory
philosophy and principles set forth in that Executive Order.
Executive Order 12988
The Department has reviewed this regulation in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6
of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this regulation.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 62
Cultural Exchange Programs.
0
Accordingly, 22 CFR part 62 is to be amended as follows:
PART 62--EXCHANGE VISITOR PROGRAM
0
1. The Authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J), 1182, 1184, 1258; 22 U.S.C.
1431-1442, 2451-2460; Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act
of 1998, Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681 et seq.; Reorganization
Plan No. 2 of 1977, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 200; E.O. 12048 of March
27, 1978; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp. p. 168.
0
2. Section 62.31 is amended by revising paragraph (k) and adding
paragraphs (o) and (p) to read as follows:
Sec. 62.31 Au pairs.
* * * * *
(k) Educational component. Sponsors must:
(1) Require that during their initial period of program
participation, all EduCare au pair participants complete not less than
12 semester hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal
educational settings at accredited U.S. post-secondary institutions and
that all other au pair participants complete not less than six semester
hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal educational
settings at accredited U.S. post-secondary institutions. As a condition
of program participation, host family participants must agree to
facilitate the enrollment and attendance of au pairs in accredited U.S.
post secondary institutions and to pay the cost of such academic course
work in an amount not to exceed $1,000 for EduCare au pair participants
and in an amount not to exceed $500 for all other au pair participants.
(2) Require that during any extension of program participation, all
participants (i.e., Au Pair or EduCare) satisfy an additional
educational requirement, as follows:
(i) For a nine or 12-month extension, all au pair participants and
host families shall have the same obligation for coursework and payment
therefore as is required during the initial period of program
participation.
(ii) For a six-month extension, EduCare au pair participants must
complete not less than six semester hours (or their equivalent) of
academic credit in formal educational settings at accredited U.S. post-
secondary institutions. As a condition of participation, host family
participants must agree to facilitate the enrollment and attendance of
au pairs at accredited U.S. post secondary institutions and to pay the
cost of such academic coursework in an amount not to exceed $500. All
other au pair participants must complete not less than three semester
hours (or their equivalent) of academic credit in formal educational
settings at accredited U.S. post-secondary institutions. As a condition
of program participation, host family participants must agree to
facilitate the enrollment and attendance of au pairs at accredited U.S.
post secondary institutions and to pay the cost of such academic
coursework in an amount not to exceed $250.
* * * * *
(o) Extension of Program. The Department, in its sole discretion,
may approve extensions for au pair participants beyond the initial 12-
month program. Applications to the Department for extensions of six,
nine, or 12 months, must be received by the Department not less than 30
calendar days prior to the expiration of the exchange visitor's initial
authorized stay in either the Au Pair or EduCare program (i.e., 30-
calendar days prior to the program end date listed on the exchange
visitor's Form DS-2019). The
[[Page 33239]]
request for an extension beyond the maximum duration of the initial 12-
month program must be submitted electronically in the Department of
Homeland Security's Student and Exchange Visitor Information System
(SEVIS). Supporting documentation must be submitted to the Department
on the sponsor's organizational letterhead and contain the following
information:
(1) Au pair's name, SEVIS identification number, date of birth, the
length of the extension period being requested;
(2) Verification that the au pair completed the educational
requirements of the initial program; and
(3) Payment of the required non-refundable fee (see 22 CFR 62.90)
via Pay.gov.
(p) Repeat Participation. Exchange visitors who have participated
in the Au Pair Program are not eligible for repeat participation.
Dated: June 2, 2006.
Stanley S. Colvin,
Director, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6-8958 Filed 6-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P