Business and Industry Guaranteed Loans-Tangible Balance Sheet Equity, 33181-33190 [E6-8891]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
PART 979—[REMOVED]
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, and under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 601–674, 7 CFR part 979 is
removed.
I
Dated: June 2, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–8895 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
7 CFR Parts 1980 and 4279
RIN 0570–AA49
Business and Industry Guaranteed
Loans—Tangible Balance Sheet Equity
Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this final rule the Rural
Business-Cooperative Service (the
Agency) amends existing regulations
relating to Business and Industry (B&I)
loans made or guaranteed by the Agency
by modifying the provisions that
address the evaluation of credit quality.
Changes to these underwriting
provisions were originally proposed on
January 16, 2004. The scope of this final
rule is more limited than originally
proposed but also implements a change
not originally discussed in the proposed
rule. Specifically, in the case of the
refinancing of USDA or other Federal
agency debt only, the Agency is
modifying the definition of tangible
balance sheet equity to include the off
balance sheet value of tangible assets to
the extent of the difference between the
depreciated book value of real property
assets and their current market value
supported by an appraisal or the
original book value, whichever is less.
In these limited cases, the adjusted
tangible balance sheet equity will also
include qualified subordinated debt
owed to the owner. As stated above,
these adjustments to the equity
calculation will apply only in cases
where the Agency is asked to guarantee
a refinancing of outstanding debt
currently owed to or guaranteed by a
Federal agency, including the Small
Business Administration. The intended
effect of this action is to facilitate
Agency guarantees of certain
refinancing loans that otherwise would
not meet the equity requirements
because the financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
accepted accounting principles do not
reflect the current market value of real
property assets owned by the borrower.
In the case of all direct or guaranteed
loan applications, the tangible net
equity calculation may include a
restricted universe of qualified
intellectual property. The Agency is also
increasing the equity requirements
applicable to energy businesses.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Kieferle, Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA, Stop 3224, Room 6845,
1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3224,
Telephone (202) 720–7818, Fax (202)
720–6003, or E-mail:
fred.kieferle@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Programs Affected
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Program number assigned to
the applicable programs is 10.768,
Business and Industry Loans.
Program Administration
These programs are administered
through the Business and Industry
Division of the Rural BusinessCooperative Service within the Rural
Development mission area of USDA and
delivered via the USDA Rural
Development State Directors.
Executive Order 12372
As stated in the Notice related to 7
CFR part 3015, subpart V, the programs
and activities within this rule are
subject to E.O. 12372 which requires
intergovernmental consultation in the
manner delineated in 7 CFR part 3015,
subpart V. Accordingly, agency
personnel advise all prospective
applicants of whether their state has
elected to participate in the consultation
process by designating a single point of
contact and name of that contact point.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the information
collection requirements contained in
this regulation have been approved by
OMB under control numbers 0570–0014
and 0570–0017.
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act
The Agency is committed to
compliance with the Government
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33181
Paperwork Elimination Act, which
requires Government agencies, in
general, to provide the public the option
of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
Environmental Impact Statement
It is the determination of the Agency
that this action is not a major Federal
action significantly affecting the
environment. Therefore, in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, an Environmental Impact
Statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed in
accordance with E.O. 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. In accordance with this
rule: (1) All state and local laws and
regulations that are in conflict with this
rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
in accordance with 7 CFR part 11 must
be exhausted before bringing suit in
court challenging action taken under
this rule unless those regulations
specifically allow bringing suit at an
earlier time.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on state, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
Under section 202 of the UMRA, USDA
must prepare a written statement,
including a cost benefit analysis, for
proposed and final rules with ‘‘Federal
mandates’’ that may result in
expenditures to state, local or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year. When such a statement
is needed for a rule, section 205 of
UMRA generally requires USDA to
identify and consider a reasonable
number of regulatory alternatives and
adopt the least costly, more cost
effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of title II of the UMRA) for
state, local, and tribal governments or
the private sector. Therefore this rule is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), the
undersigned has determined and
certified by signature of this document
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
33182
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Some
provisions published as a part of this
rule are, in fact, a benefit to small
entities.
The modified equity test in the case
of refinancing applies equally to large
and small entities, but in practice, the
Agency expects it to benefit smaller
entities disproportionately more than
larger businesses. In the Agency’s
experience, the largest single
component of off balance sheet value in
a small firm is the real property it owns.
Small firms that are real property rich,
but cash flow constrained, may find this
change to be the only means to achieve
flexibility in refinancing, while larger
businesses may have other ways, i.e.,
other assets to work with, to achieve the
same result. The scope of the final rule
is such that a larger number of small
firms, particularly those with loans
guaranteed by the Small Business
Administration, may be expected to
benefit. To the extent that any business
has qualified intellectual property, the
benefits of the change proposed for
qualified intellectual apply across the
board, and as such is estimated to have
no disproportionate impact, positive or
negative, accruing to one size of
business or another.
The change in equity requirements for
energy loans may make it more difficult
for small firms to qualify. The energy
business is a capital intensive business
and the corresponding risk is greater
when it is undertaken by
undercapitalized firms. It may be more
difficult for small firms to raise the
necessary equity for one project,
whereas a larger business can spread the
risk across more than one project.
The net effect of this rulemaking is
expected to be neutral in its overall
impact on smaller firms. Accordingly, a
regulatory flexibility analysis was not
performed.
economic, social and physical problems
in their state.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do
not have any substantial direct effect on
states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor does this rule
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on state and local governments.
This rule is intended to foster
cooperation between the Federal
Government and the states and local
governments, and reduces, where
possible, any regulatory burden
imposed by the Federal Government
that impedes the ability of states and
local governments to solve pressing
1 The meaning of the term generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) has evolved over
time. It used to refer to widely used, but uncodified, accounting policies and procedures. With
time, standard-setting bodies and professional
organizations came into being and became more
involved in recommending preferred practices by
means of issued pronouncements. Over the past
fifty years, principles were promulgated by different
groups, some of which were no longer in existence,
and some conflicts exist between the various
pronouncements. The American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants issued a statement of
auditing standards (SAS–69) to better organize and
clarify what is meant by GAAP. This statement
instructs financial statement preparers, auditors and
users of financial statements concerning the relative
priority of the different sources of GAAP (past and
present pronouncements by the many standardsetting entities) used by auditors to judge the
fairness of presentation in financial statements.
2 See, for example, Cal. Admin. Code title 28,
section 1300.76, where the state requires licensed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
I. Background
The current loan processing
regulations for the B&I Guaranteed Loan
Program provide that the lender is
primarily responsible for determining
credit quality and must address all of
the elements of credit quality in a
written credit analysis. The Agency
assumes this responsibility for the B&I
Direct Loan Program. One of the
elements of credit quality required in
the regulation is that borrowers
demonstrate a minimum level of
tangible balance sheet equity. The
threshold level of required tangible
balance sheet equity is higher for new
businesses than for existing businesses.
Conventional accounting policies and
procedures provide for a distinction
between tangible and intangible assets.
The net equity on a balance sheet
reflects the net book value of all assets,
after depreciation, less total liabilities.
The current regulations take a
conservative approach in evaluating the
equity component of a balance sheet,
specifying that acceptable equity for
credit quality purposes be restricted to
tangible balance sheet equity, as defined
in the regulation.
Where the accounting terms used in
the regulation coincide with terms used
in generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP),1 the GAAP
definitions are presumed in the
regulation. Tangible balance sheet
equity is not a term used in GAAP; there
is no commonly held definition. It is
perhaps more accurate to call it an
artificial construct than a term. It is
nevertheless a concept familiar to many
financial analysts and regulators who
craft customized definitions, tailored to
a specific industry or application, using
the commonly understood terms found
in GAAP as the basic building blocks.2
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
In this final rule, the Agency has elected
to allow some credit for off balance
sheet appreciation in real property as
well as certain subordinated debt in this
agency-defined formula for tangible
balance sheet equity. This final rule
provides that a restricted universe of
intellectual property assets may be
included in this adjusted equity
calculation as well. Whereas the real
property asset appreciation and
subordinated owner debt provisions
will apply only in the case of
refinancing loans, the adjustment for
qualified intellectual property assets
will apply in the case of all
applications.
Tangible balance sheet equity is a
refinement of the GAAP concept of
equity, typically arrived at by reducing
balance sheet equity by the book value
assigned to intangible assets, including
but not limited to assets such as
goodwill, going concern value,
organizational start up expenses, etc.
These items are recognized as capital
assets for purposes of GAAP but may or
may not be assets that can be readily
liquidated or pledged as security for
loans.
The modification proposed in this
rulemaking acknowledges that the
market value of real property assets may
increase at the same time the net book
value of such assets decrease. The net
book value of real property usually
decreases over time due to depreciation,
whereas the market value of real
property may stay the same or
appreciate over time.
In a lower interest rate environment,
refinancing is a reasonable business
strategy. The current regulation,
however, does not contemplate that any
credit can be given for a positive
difference between net book value and
market value for purposes of evaluating
the equity component of credit
worthiness when a borrower seeks
Agency-guaranteed refinancing at a
lower interest rate. It has happened that
borrowers that could have met a
modified balance sheet equity test have
been foreclosed from this option
because the equity ratio calculated using
the conventional GAAP values reported
on the balance sheet do not meet the
equity test in the current regulation at
the time the refinancing is of interest to
the borrower. When this happens, the
borrower is tied to the existing lender
that is the beneficiary of the original
Agency guarantee on what has become
health care service plans to maintain a minimum
tangible net equity and another, Federal, example
at 12 CFR 208.41 where tangible net equity is
incorporated into the capital adequacy
requirements required of state chartered banks that
are members of the Federal Reserve system.
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
an above market rate loan. This lender
has minimal incentive to refinance the
above market rate loan, and unless the
Agency can guarantee another lender
willing to refinance the first lender’s
exposure, the borrower is locked into
the higher interest rate. It is not able to
‘‘shop’’ for a lower interest rate. When
the loan in question is already
guaranteed by a Federal agency, the
taxpayer is in a position of guaranteeing
the higher interest rate when a lower
exposure could otherwise be affected
and there is a corresponding increased
risk of default under the guarantee. The
increased risk of default comes about
when these higher interest rates
undermine the financial health of the
borrowers and lead to what otherwise
could be avoidable financial defaults.
This final rule provides refinancing
flexibility to borrowers with Federal
direct or Federally guaranteed debt
when the market value of the real
property on the balance sheet justifies a
more flexible approach to the equity
requirement than is allowed by the
current regulation. The definition of a
refinancing loan in this rule provides
that all of the proceeds must be used to
extinguish pre-existing debt.
Accordingly, the amount of the
refinancing loan may not exceed the
outstanding balance of the loan(s) to be
refinanced. Where a refinancing request
is coupled with a ‘‘new money’’
guarantee application, the conventional,
unadjusted, tangible balance sheet
equity test will be applied to the
combined guarantee request. The
modified equity calculation does not
apply to all refinancing requests, only
those pertaining to debt that is directly
owed to a Federal agency or guaranteed
by a Federal agency. This limitation is
primarily due to policy considerations
relating to the relative economic impact
of refinancing actions versus new loans
and how the Agency’s use of its
obligational authority is accounted for
as a result of the Federal Credit Reform
Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–508). Further
elaboration on this may be found in the
comments section of this preamble
wherein the modified tangible balance
sheet equity calculation is discussed at
greater length.
In order to provide for an alternate
equity calculation in determining
whether the credit requirement is met
for refinancing loans, the Agency has
modified existing regulations to define
‘‘tangible balance sheet equity’’ and
added two new definitions that build
directly and indirectly on this term—
‘‘adjusted tangible net worth’’ and
‘‘allowed tangible asset appreciation.’’
The term ‘‘subordinated owner debt’’ is
also added. These new terms apply only
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
in the case of refinancing requests.
‘‘Subordinated owner debt’’ is defined
as subordinated debt owed to one or
more of the owners of the borrower.
An example that demonstrates the
practical effect of this change is as
follows. XYZ Company is capitalized
with $200,000 cash on day 1 and uses
$200,000 cash and $800,000 Agency
guaranteed debt to purchase a building
for $1,000,000 on day 2. Assume (1) the
building is depreciated at 10 percent a
year, (2) the market value of the
building at the end of year 2 has
appreciated to $1,200,000, (3) there are
no other assets on the balance sheet at
the end of year 2 for purposes of this
simplified example, (4) the mortgage
does not begin to amortize until the end
of year 4, and (5) the income statement
reflects a cumulative net loss of
($200,000) for the first two years of
operations. At the end of year 2 the
company would like to refinance the
mortgage debt. Under the existing
regulation, at this point in time tangible
balance sheet equity is $ -0-. Per the
revised regulation, however, the
tangible balance sheet can be adjusted
upwards by an increment equal to the
difference between the net book value of
the property ($800,000) and the lesser of
(1) its original book value ($1,000,000)
or (2) an appraisal supported current
market value ($1,200,000). Thus, the
adjusted tangible balance sheet equity in
that case would be $-0-plus $200,000, or
$200,000 for purposes of determining
eligibility for a refinancing loan
guarantee. In order to calculate the
equity ratio, (equity as a percentage of
equity plus total liabilities), the result
would be 200,000/1,000,000, or 20
percent.
A second refinement to the GAAP
concept of equity in this rulemaking for
this credit evaluation criterion is to
include in the equity calculation
subordinated debt contributed to the
borrower by the business owner(s). In
order for this subordinated debt to count
as equity for purposes of the equity
criterion, the subordinated note must be
expressly subordinate to the Agency’s
B&I loan exposure, whether that
exposure is direct or guaranteed.
Moreover, the loan documentation must
provide that repayment of this
subordinated debt may not commence
until the earlier of the full repayment of
the B&I loan exposure or when a period
of three consecutive years has passed
during which the borrower has met all
loan covenants and evidenced operating
profit sufficient to commence partial
repayment of this subordinated debt
after giving effect to the annual debt
service requirements of the B&I loan
exposure. The partial repayment
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33183
schedule in the case of the latter
scenario may not be more accelerated
than the debt repayment schedule in
effect for the Agency’s B&I loan
exposure.
To carry our earlier example one step
further, assume (1) that an owner
provides $100,000 of subordinated debt
to XYZ Company in year 3 so that it can
purchase a patent. Also assume (2) the
market value of the building at the end
of year 3 remains at $1,200,000, (3) there
are no other assets on the balance sheet
at the end of year 3 for purposes of this
simplified example, and (4) the income
statement reflects a cumulative net loss
of ($300,000) for the first three years of
operations. Instead of refinancing at the
end of year two as described above, the
Company seeks a refinancing loan
guarantee at the end of year three. Total
liabilities equal the $800,000 mortgage
debt plus $100,000 in subordinated
owner debt. Tangible balance sheet
equity as defined in the current rule
equals total equity less the book value
of intangible assets, or ($100,000) minus
$100,000 = ($200,000). Per the revised
regulation, however, the tangible
balance sheet equity can be adjusted
upwards by an increment equal to the
difference between the net book value of
the property ($700,000) and the lesser of
(1) its original book value ($1,000,000)
or (2) an appraisal supported current
market value ($1,200,000). Thus, the
adjusted tangible balance sheet equity in
that case would be ($200,000) plus
$300,000, or $100,000 for purposes of
determining eligibility for a refinancing
loan guarantee. In order to calculate the
equity ratio, (equity as a percentage of
equity plus total liabilities), the result
would be 100,000/1,000,000, or 10
percent. Assuming the 10 percent equity
requirement for existing businesses
would apply and this borrower would
qualify for a refinancing loan as a result
of this regulatory change, then the
income statement shows three years of
consecutive accrual losses, but
breakeven cash flows.
In this final rule, the Agency has also
elected upon consideration to include
another refinement of the tangible
balance sheet equity computation,
applicable to all applications, not just
refinancing loans, whereby qualified
intellectual property may count as well.
Intellectual property falls within the
definition of intangible assets, and as
such, would not ordinarily be included
in a conventional tangible balance sheet
equity computation. But this formula is
subject to Agency definition in the final
analysis, and the Agency has elected to
recognize that the liquidity arguments
for tangible assets that gave rise to the
development of the adjusted equity
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
33184
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
calculation in the first place, may also
apply to a restricted universe of
qualified intellectual property as well.
In modern rural businesses, credit
should be given for these reasonably
liquid intangible assets in the adjusted
equity calculation.
The narrow universe of qualified
intellectual property that will count as
equity under the adjusted computation
consists of trademarks, patents or
copyrights that are included on current
(within one year) audited balance
sheets, for which an audit opinion has
been received that states the financial
reports fairly represent the values
therein, and the value of which has been
arrived at in accordance with GAAP
standards for valuing intellectual
property. Also, the work papers
supporting this valuation of intellectual
property must be satisfactory to the
Administrator in order for the asset to
be considered qualified for this purpose.
This final rule also increases the
equity requirement for certain energy
projects and provides that financing will
be guaranteed for energy projects only
when they have met certain
performance criteria. Financing for
energy projects will only be allowed
when the facility has been constructed
according to plans and specifications
and is producing at the design levels
projected in the application for
purposes of underwriting the loan or
loan guarantee. Based on comments
received, the Agency slightly lowered
the equity requirements for energy
loans, but continued to require higher
equity levels than other industries. The
higher equity requirements reflect the
Agency’s determination that energy
projects are riskier than the average B&I
portfolio loan and an intent to apply
equity criteria that more closely
conform to conventional lender
practice. The Agency’s energy borrowers
are typically not utilities in the
conventional sense. As a general rule,
conventional utilities have other sources
of financing and higher capital
requirements than can practicably be
met by Agency programs.
The final rule requires that energy
projects must demonstrate two complete
operating cycles at design performance
levels projected in the application. A
complete operating cycle consists of the
purchase of raw material inputs, their
input into the manufacturing process
and transformation into a design
specified number of output units for a
given level of raw material input within
a specified period of time and at a
design-specified quality level. In the
case of projects that produce steam or
electricity as an output, there is an
additional requirement that they be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
successfully interconnected with the
purchaser of the output. This is not the
same as being connected to the power
grid alone. Being connected to the grid,
without enforceable wheeling
agreements and physical
interconnection with the buyer at the
other end of the transmission route,
does not satisfy this requirement.
Successful interconnection with the
purchaser of the steam or electricity
means that everything is in place that is
required for the purchaser to receive the
steam or electricity output in
accordance with the contractual terms
specified and such delivery by the seller
and acceptance by the purchaser has
been demonstrated.
The Agency revised the definition for
energy projects to include both ‘power’
and ‘energy.’ The term ‘power plant’ is
commonly used to describe a facility
that uses fuels to produce electricity or
high pressure steam. In these type
plants, power and energy are
intrinsically related. The change in
definition makes it clear that electric or
steam facilities are also considered
‘‘energy projects,’’ as are facilities that
produce fuels such as ethanol or
biodiesel. The Agency also decided to
narrow the scope of energy projects that
require increased equity by removing
the production of batteries and fuel cells
from the definition based on comments
received.
II. Comments on the Proposed Rule and
Responses
The following paragraphs summarize
the comments received and the Agency
responses. We received 15 responses of
which, one is from an elected state
official, six are from borrowers or
borrower representatives (a producer
association, business consultants, etc.),
and eight are from the lender
community (two of the lender
comments are from the same bank).
A. Comments on the Modified Tangible
Balance Sheet Equity Test
All comments received regarding the
modified tangible balance sheet equity
requirement were positive. Eight of the
comments claimed we did not go far
enough; they urged that the new equity
test be applied to new loan guarantee
requests as well.
The most significant change in this
final rule from the proposed rulemaking
is the result of additional deliberation
within the Agency. The proposed
regulatory text applied to the
refinancing of any loan, whether or not
it is currently USDA guaranteed. Upon
further reflection, concern developed
with respect to the risk that an existing
lender, not presently guaranteed by
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
USDA, can get the equivalent of a
‘‘bailout’’ if the more flexible equity test
is applied. There is also sensitivity
within USDA as to the proportion of
obligational authority used for
refinancing. It is true that if USDA
issues a guarantee to Lender A for a
loan, the proceeds of which pay off a
USDA guaranteed loan held by Lender
B, there is no increase in risk or
exposure to the taxpayer. However (and
this may not be fully realized or
appreciated by the private sector
community), under federal budget rules,
in this circumstance the Agency’s
available obligational authority is
reduced as if a new loan guarantee had
been issued to Lender A. A refinancing
action is scored against the Agency’s
budget the same as a new loan action,
even though the net incremental risk to
the taxpayer differs significantly as
between the two scenarios.
The Agency must concern itself with
maximizing the economic benefit that
can be achieved in rural America with
limited Federal funding and recognize
that net new capital invested in rural
America has a greater economic impact
than the incremental cash flow
improvements associated with
refinancing loan guarantees.
We ultimately believe that a policy of
conforming the modified equity test to
recognize off balance sheet values
inherent in the appreciation of real
property is rooted in common sense.
However, the expectation is that this
rule could well result in a situation
where the Agency is presented with a
significant increase in the proportion of
refinancing requests relative to new loan
requests, with a concomitant reduction
in the net economic benefit per dollar of
budget authority. Therefore, this final
rule does not expand the scope of the
tangible balance sheet equity test
beyond direct Federal debt and
Federally guaranteed debt. It does not go
as far as many of those providing
comments would have wished, but it
reflects a balanced approach to the issue
in the current budget environment.
As explained in the preamble to the
proposed rule, the Agency considered,
but elected not to propose, revising the
tangible balance sheet equity test to
apply across the board, for all
borrowers, and not restrict its
availability to refinancing loan
applications. It may be that the Agency’s
experience with the limited
applicability of this rulemaking will
lead to proposing its wider application
in the future. For now, it was
determined to proceed with a more
limited applicability in order to bring
relief to at least some borrowers in a
more rapid period of time. The final rule
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
is narrower in scope than was the
proposed rule. The proposed rule
applied the modified equity calculation
to all refinancing loans; the final rule
limits its application to the refinancing
of debt owed to a Federal agency.
The Agency also considered allowing
full market value refinancing in the
proposed rulemaking. The potential for
abuse of market appraisals for purposes
of full market value refinancing is
thought to be greater than the potential
benefit of liberalizing the related equity
criterion to this maximum degree. In the
alternative, the Agency has opted to
allow consideration of market value
only with respect to the equity test
calculation; the amount of the
refinancing loan itself may not exceed
the outstanding balance of the loan to be
refinanced. Market value must be
determined by appraisals using armslength methodologies to arrive at an
unbiased ‘‘fair or current market value.’’
Allowing flexibility in the equity
requirement for refinancing loans where
the market value of real property assets
supports such flexibility will serve to
enhance the financial health of Agencyguaranteed borrowers and promote rural
development.
B. Comments on the Modified Equity
Requirement for Energy Projects
Seven of the 15 comments addressed
the increased equity requirements
proposed for energy loans—all were
critical, arguing that the equity
requirement should be no different than
for other types of businesses. One
argued for preferential treatment for non
profit borrowers. One lender, while
critical of the differentiated equity
requirement, nevertheless observed that
the requirement that energy projects
demonstrate two complete operating
cycles would ‘‘weed out’’ bad projects.
A commodity producer association
pointed out that many private sector
lenders require 50 percent equity, and if
the Agency implements the
modifications the Business and Industry
program will offer very little advantage
over private lender options already
available for producer owned
businesses.
We expect that most of the energy
loan applications will continue to be for
ethanol or similar projects. The
Agency’s experience in lending for
ethanol projects from the mid 1970s to
1990 was not good. This was due to the
combined factors of weak underwriting
criteria, underdeveloped technologies
and inexperienced managers. As of
1990, credit criteria were tightened up
and the technology has developed to the
point where it is now commercially
proven. The Agency is somewhat
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
conforming its equity requirement to
those found in the private sector
inasmuch as the technology is now
quite established and needs less
support. Agency-guaranteed loans will
still enjoy a better interest rate and the
available term may be advantageous
when compared to the non-guaranteed
private sector alternative.
As for energy projects that are not
ethanol or biodiesel, we observe that
many renewable energy projects find it
difficult to impossible to obtain private
sector financing even when project
equity ratios are high. Thus, while the
equity ratios implemented for energy
projects are higher than the
requirements for other industries, we
believe that Agency financing under
those circumstances nevertheless
represents a source of capital often
unavailable for these technologies
elsewhere. The higher equity ratios
strike a balance between no capital
available at all and the risk to the
taxpayer in providing support for
renewable energy projects. However, in
response to these comments, the Agency
modified the equity requirement for
energy projects, but still will require
higher equity levels than other
industries.
Several comments observe that project
risks can be mitigated by means other
than increased equity. The following
examples of possible risk mitigation
vehicles were suggested: a strong
contract for the purchase of the output
(off take agreement), the use of
established technologies, or
performance guarantees combined with
surety bonds to mitigate construction
risk. All of these address a particular
kind of risk—either the project doesn’t
get built, it doesn’t operate as expected
or the market for the output doesn’t
materialize at the price forecast. These
vehicles are all worthwhile
underwriting tools, but only increased
equity protects against unforeseen risks.
The lower the debt burden on a project,
the more likely the project will be able
to surmount any of these risks and pay
off the debt as and when due. With
respect to off take agreements in
particular, if the projected cash flow
stream associated with the off take
agreement is strong, it will cover both
debt service and an equity return. If the
imputed equity return is sufficient, this
should be attractive to third party
investors such that the equity
requirement can be met. If the off take
agreement is not sufficient for this, it
cannot be said that it is a substitute for
increased equity.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33185
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 1980
Loan programs—Business and
industry—Rural development
assistance, Rural areas.
7 CFR Part 4279
Loan programs—Business and
industry—Rural development
assistance, Rural areas.
I Accordingly, Chapters XVIII and XLII,
title 7, of the Code of Federal
Regulations are amended as follows:
CHAPTER XVIII—RURAL HOUSING
SERVICE, RURAL BUSINESSCOOPERATIVE SERVICE, RURAL UTILITIES
SERVICE, AND FARM SERVICE AGENCY,
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PART 1980—GENERAL
1. The authority citation for part 1980
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart E also issued under 7 U.S.C.
1932(a).
Subpart E—Business and Industrial
Loan Program
2. Section 1980.402 is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 1980.402
Definitions.
(a) The following general definitions
are applicable to the terms used in this
subpart. Adjusted tangible net worth.
Tangible balance sheet equity plus
allowed tangible asset appreciation and
subordinated owner debt.
Allowed tangible asset appreciation.
The difference between the current net
book value recorded on the financial
statements (original cost less cumulative
depreciation) of real property assets and
the lesser of their current market value
or original cost, where current market
value is determined using an appraisal
satisfactory to the Agency.
Area of high unemployment. An area
in which a B&I loan guarantee can be
issued, consisting of a county or group
of contiguous counties or equivalent
subdivisions of a State which, on the
basis of the most recent 12-month
average or the most recent annual
average data, has a rate of
unemployment 150 percent or more of
the national rate. Data used must be
those published by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.
Biogas. Biomass converted to gaseous
fuel.
Biomass. Any organic material that is
available on a renewable or recurring
basis including agricultural crops, trees
grown for energy production, wood
waste and wood residues, plants,
including aquatic plants and grasses,
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
33186
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
fibers, animal waste and other waste
materials, fats, oils, greases, including
recycled fats, oils and greases. It does
not include paper that is commonly
recycled or unsegregated solid waste.
Borrower. A borrower may be a
cooperative organization, corporation,
partnership, trust or other legal entity
organized and operated on a profit or
nonprofit basis; an Indian Tribe on a
Federal or State reservation or other
Federally recognized tribal group; a
municipality, county or other political
subdivision of a State; or an individual.
Such borrower must be engaged in or
proposing to engage in improving,
developing or financing business,
industry and employment and
improving the economic and
environmental climate in rural areas,
including pollution abatement and
control.
Business and Industry Disaster Loans.
Business and Industry loans guaranteed
under the authority of the Dire
Emergency Supplemental
Appropriations Act, 1992, Public Law
102–368. These guaranteed loans cover
costs arising from the direct
consequences of natural disasters such
as Hurricanes Andrew and Iniki and
Typhoon Omar that occur after August
23, 1992, and receive a Presidential
declaration. Also included are the costs
to any producer of crops and livestock
that are a direct consequence of at least
a 40 percent loss to a crop, 25 percent
loss to livestock, or damage to building
structures from a microburst wind
occurrence in calendar year 1992.
Commercially available. Energy
projects utilizing technology that has a
proven operating history, and for which
there is an established industry for the
design, installation, and service
(including spare parts) of the
equipment.
Community facilities. For the
purposes of this subpart, community
facilities are those facilities designed to
aid in the development of private
business and industry in rural areas.
Such facilities include, but are not
limited to, acquisition and site
preparation of land for industrial sites
(but not for improvements erected
thereon), access streets and roads
serving the site, parking areas extension
or improvement of community
transportation systems serving the site
and utility extensions all incidental to
site preparation. Projects eligible for
assistance under Subpart A of Part 1942
of this chapter are not eligible for
assistance under this subpart.
Development cost. These costs
include, but are not limited to, those for
acquisition, planning, construction,
repair or enlargement of the proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
facility; purchase of buildings,
machinery, equipment, land easements,
rights of way; payment of startup
operating costs, and interest during the
period before the first principal
payment becomes due, including
interest on interim financing.
Disaster Assistance for Rural Business
Enterprises. Guaranteed loans
authorized by section 401 of the Disaster
Assistance Act of 1989 (Pub. L. 101–82),
providing for the guarantee of loans to
assist in alleviating distress caused to
rural business entities, directly or
indirectly, by drought, freeze, storm,
excessive moisture, earthquake, or
related conditions occurring in 1988 or
1989, and providing for the guarantee of
loans to such rural business entities that
refinance or restructure debt as a result
of losses incurred, directly or indirectly,
because of such natural disasters. See
this subpart and its appendices,
especially Appendix K, containing
additional regulations for these loans.
Drought and Disaster Guaranteed
Loans. Guaranteed loans authorized by
section 331 of the Disaster Assistance
Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100–387), providing
for the guarantee of loans to assist in
alleviating distress caused to rural
business entities, directly or indirectly,
by drought, hail, excessive moisture, or
related conditions occurring in 1988,
and providing for the guarantee of loans
to such rural business entities that
refinance or restructure debt as a result
of losses incurred, directly or indirectly,
because of such natural disasters.
Energy projects. Commercially
available projects that produce or
distribute energy or power and/or
projects that produce biomass or biogas
fuel.
Farmers Home Administration
(FmHA). The former agency of USDA
that previously administered the
programs of this Agency. Many
Instructions and forms of FmHA are still
applicable to Agency programs.
Hurricane Andrew. A hurricane that
caused damage in southern Florida on
August 24, 1992, and in Louisiana on
August 26, 1992.
Hurricane Iniki. A hurricane that
caused damage in Hawaii on September
11, 1992.
Letter of conditions. Letter issued by
Rural Development under Public Law
103–354 to a borrower setting forth the
conditions under which Rural
Development will make a direct
(insured) loan from the Rural
Development Insurance Fund.
Loan classification system. The
process by which loans are examined
and categorized by degree of potential
for loss in the event of default.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Microburst wind. A violently
descending column of air associated
with a thunderstorm which causes
straight-line wind damage.
Problem loan. A loan which is not
performing according to its original
terms and conditions or which is not
expected in the future to perform
according to those terms and conditions.
Public body. A municipality, political
subdivision, public authority, district,
or similar organization.
Qualified Intellectual Property.
Trademarks, patents or copyrights
included on current (within one year)
audited balance sheets for which an
audit opinion has been received that
states the financial reports fairly
represent the values therein and the
reported value has been arrived at in
accordance with GAAP standards for
valuing intellectual property. The
supporting work papers must be
satisfactory to the Administrator.
Refinancing loan. A loan, all of the
proceeds of which are applied to
extinguish the entire balance of an
outstanding debt.
Seasoned loan. A loan which:
(1) Has a remaining principal
guaranteed loan balance of two-thirds or
less of the original aggregate of all
existing B&I guaranteed loans made to
that business.
(2) Is in compliance with all loan
conditions and B&I regulations.
(3) Has been current on the B&I
guaranteed loan(s) payments for 24
consecutive months.
(4) Is secured by collateral which is
determined to be adequate to ensure
there will be no loss on the B&I
guaranteed loan.
State. Any of the 50 States, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands of the United States,
Guam, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Republic of Palau, the
Federated States of Micronesia, and the
Republic of the Marshall Islands.
Subordinated owner debt. Debt owed
by the borrower to one or more of the
owner(s) that is subordinated to debt
owed by the borrower to the Agency or
guaranteed by the Agency (aggregate B&I
loan exposure) pursuant to a
subordination agreement satisfactory to
the Agency. The debt must have been
issued in exchange for cash loaned to
the borrower for the benefit of the
borrower’s business. The terms of the
subordination agreement must provide
that repayment will not commence until
the earlier of the date all aggregate B&I
loan exposure has been repaid or when
a period of three consecutive years has
passed during which the borrower has
met all loan covenants and evidenced
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
operating profit sufficient to commence
partial repayment of this subordinated
debt after giving effect to the annual
debt service requirements of the
aggregate B&I loan exposure. The partial
repayment schedule in the case of the
latter scenario is subject to annual
Agency concurrence and may not be
more accelerated than the rate of the
debt repayment schedule in effect for
the Agency’s aggregate B&I loan
exposure.
Tangible balance sheet equity. Total
equity less the value of intangible assets
recorded on the financial statements, as
determined from balance sheets
prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP),
plus qualified intellectual property.
Typhoon Omar. A typhoon that
caused damage in Guam on August 28,
1992.
Working capital. The excess of current
assets over current liabilities. It
identifies the relatively liquid portion of
total enterprise capital which
constitutes a margin or buffer for
meeting obligations within the ordinary
operating cycle of the business.
(b) Accounting terms not otherwise
defined in this part shall have the
definition ascribed to them under
generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP).
I 3. Section 1980.411 is amended by
adding new paragraphs (a)(11)(iv) and
(a)(11)(v) and by adding a new
paragraph (a)(16) to read as follows:
§ 1980.411
Loan purposes.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(11) * * *
(iv) It does not refinance subordinated
owner debt; or
(v) (Except where the amount to be
refinanced is owed directly to the
Federal government or is Federally
guaranteed) the amount to be refinanced
by the Agency is a secondary part (less
than 50 percent) of the overall loan
requested.
*
*
*
*
*
(16) Energy projects. Commercially
available energy projects that produce
biomass fuel or biogas as an output must
have completed two operating cycles at
design performance levels submitted to
the Agency. Projects that produce steam
or electricity as an output must have
met or exceeded acceptance test
performance criteria submitted to the
Agency and be successfully
interconnected with the purchaser of
the output. Performance or acceptance
test requirements for all other energy
projects will be determined by the
Agency on a case by case basis.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Financing for energy projects will only
be allowed when the facility has been
constructed according to plans and
specifications and is producing at the
quality and quantity projected in the
application.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. Section 1980.441 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 1980.441
Borrower equity requirements.
(a) A minimum of 10 percent tangible
balance sheet equity will be required for
existing businesses at loan closing. A
minimum of 20 percent tangible balance
sheet equity will be required for new
businesses at loan closing. For energy
projects, the minimum tangible balance
sheet equity requirement range will be
between 25 percent and 40 percent.
Criteria for considering the minimum
equity required for an individual
application will be based on: existing
businesses with successful financial and
management history vs. start-up
businesses; personal/corporate
guarantees offered; contractual
relationships with suppliers and buyers;
credit rating; and strength of the
business plan/feasibility study. Where
the application is a request to refinance
outstanding Federal direct or guaranteed
loans, without any new financing, the
equity requirement may be determined
using adjusted tangible net worth. An
application that combines a refinancing
loan or guarantee request with a new
loan or guarantee request is subject to
the standard, unadjusted, equity
requirement except as provided in
paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section.
Increases or decreases in the equity
requirements may be imposed or
granted as follows:
(1) A reduction in the equity
requirement for existing businesses may
be permitted by the Administrator. In
order for a reduction to be considered,
the borrower must furnish the
following:
(i) Collateralized personal and
corporate guarantees, including any
parent, subsidiary, or affiliated
company, when feasible and legally
permissible, and
(ii) Pro forma and historical financial
statements that indicate the business to
be financed meets or exceeds the
median quartile (as identified in the
Risk Management Association’s Annual
Statement Studies or similar
publication) for the current ratio, quick
ratio, debt-to-worth ratio, debt coverage
ratio, and working capital.
(2) The approval official may require
more than the minimum equity
requirements provided in this paragraph
if the official makes a written
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33187
determination that special
circumstances necessitate this course of
action.
(b) The equity requirement must be
met in the form of either cash or
tangible earning assets contributed to
the business and reflected on the
balance sheet.
(c) The equity requirement must be
determined using balance sheets
prepared in accordance with GAAP and
met upon giving effect to the entirety of
the loan in the calculation, whether or
not the loan itself is fully advanced, as
of the date the loan is closed; a
certification to this effect is required of
all guaranteed lenders.
(d) The modified formula for
determining whether the equity
requirement is met, ‘‘adjusted tangible
net worth,’’ may be used only in cases
where the guarantee requested is for a
loan, the proceeds of which are to be
used entirely to refinance a debt owed
to the Federal government or Federally
guaranteed debt. In all other situations,
the equity requirement must be
determined using tangible net worth.
CHAPTER XLII—RURAL BUSINESSCOOPERATIVE SERVICE AND RURAL
UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
PART 4279—GUARANTEED
LOANMAKING
5. The authority citation for part 4279
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7 U.S.C. 1989 and
7 U.S.C. 1932(a).
Subpart A—General
6. Section 4279.2 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 4279.2
Definitions and abbreviations.
(a) Definitions.
Adjusted tangible net worth. Tangible
balance sheet equity plus allowed
tangible asset appreciation and
subordinated owner debt.
Agency. The Rural BusinessCooperative Service or successor
Agency assigned by the Secretary of
Agriculture to administer the B&I
program. References to the National
Office, Finance Office, State Office or
other Agency offices or officials should
be read as prefaced by ‘‘Agency’’ or
‘‘Rural Development’’ as applicable.
Allowed tangible asset appreciation.
The difference between the current net
book value recorded on the financial
statements (original cost less cumulative
depreciation) of real property assets and
the lesser of their current market value
or original cost, where current market
value is determined using an appraisal
satisfactory to the Agency.
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
33188
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Arm’s-length transaction. The sale,
release, or disposition of assets in which
the title to the property passes to a
ready, willing, and able disinterested
third party that is not affiliated with or
related to and has no security, monetary
or stockholder interest in the borrower
or transferor at the time of the
transaction.
Assignment Guarantee Agreement
(Business and Industry). Form RD 4279–
6, the signed agreement among the
Agency, the lender, and the holder
containing the terms and conditions of
an assignment of a guaranteed portion of
a loan, using the single note system.
Biogas. Biomass converted to gaseous
fuel.
Biomass. Any organic material that is
available on a renewable or recurring
basis including agricultural crops, trees
grown for energy production, wood
waste and wood residues, plants,
including aquatic plants and grasses,
fibers, animal waste and other waste
materials, fats, oils, greases, including
recycled fats, oils and greases. It does
not include paper that is commonly
recycled or unsegregated solid waste.
Borrower. All parties liable for the
loan except for guarantors.
Commercially available. Energy
projects utilizing technology that has a
proven operating history, and for which
there is an established industry for the
design, installation, and service
(including spare parts) of the
equipment.
Conditional Commitment (Business
and Industry). Form RD 4279–3, the
Agency’s notice to the lender that the
loan guarantee it has requested is
approved subject to the completion of
all conditions and requirements set
forth by the Agency.
Deficiency balance. The balance
remaining on a loan after all collateral
has been liquidated.
Deficiency judgment. A monetary
judgment rendered by a court of
competent jurisdiction after foreclosure
and liquidation of all collateral securing
the loan.
Energy projects. Commercially
available projects that produce or
distribute energy or power and/or
produce biomass or biogas fuel.
Commercially available energy projects
that utilize technology that has a proven
operating history, and for which there is
an established industry for the design,
installation, and service (including
spare parts) of the equipment.
Existing lender debt. A debt not
guaranteed by the Agency, but owed by
a borrower to the same lender that is
applying for or has received the Agency
guarantee.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Fair market value. The price that
could reasonably be expected for an
asset in an arm’s-length transaction
between a willing buyer and a willing
seller under ordinary economic and
business conditions.
Farmer’s Home Administration
(FmHA). The former agency of USDA
that previously administered the
programs of this Agency. Many
Instructions and forms of FmHA are still
applicable to Agency programs.
Finance Office. The office which
maintains the Agency financial
accounting records located in St. Louis,
Missouri.
High-impact business. A business that
offers specialized products and services
that permit high prices for the products
produced, may have a strong presence
in international market sales, may
provide a market for existing local
business products and services, and
which is locally owned and managed.
Holder. A person or entity, other than
the lender, who owns all or part of the
guaranteed portion of the loan with no
servicing responsibilities. When the
single note option is used and the
lender assigns a part of the guaranteed
note to an assignee, the assignee
becomes a holder only when the Agency
receives notice and the transaction is
completed through the use of Form RD
4279–6 or predecessor form.
Interim financing. A temporary or
short-term loan made with the clear
intent that it will be repaid through
another loan. Interim financing is
frequently used to pay construction and
other costs associated with a planned
project, with permanent financing to be
obtained after project completion.
Lender. The organization making,
servicing, and collecting the loan which
is guaranteed under the provision of the
appropriate subpart.
Lender’s Agreement (Business and
Industry). Form RD 4279–4 or
predecessor form between the Agency
and the lender setting forth the lender’s
loan responsibilities when the Loan
Note Guarantee is issued.
Loan Agreement. The agreement
between the borrower and lender
containing the terms and conditions of
the loan and the responsibilities of the
borrower and lender.
Loan Note Guarantee (Business and
Industry). Form RD 4279–5 or
predecessor form, issued and executed
by the Agency containing the terms and
conditions of the guarantee.
Loan-to-value. The ratio of the dollar
amount of a loan to the dollar value of
the collateral pledged as security for the
loan.
Natural resource value-added
product. Any naturally occurring
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
product that is processed to add value
to the product. For example, straw is
processed into particle board.
Negligent servicing. The failure to
perform those services which a
reasonably prudent lender would
perform in servicing (including
liquidation of) its own portfolio of loans
that are not guaranteed. The term
includes not only the concept of a
failure to act, but also not acting in a
timely manner, or acting in a manner
contrary to the manner in which a
reasonably prudent lender would act.
Parity. A lien position whereby two or
more lenders share a security interest of
equal priority in collateral. In the event
of default, each lender will be affected
on a pro rata basis.
Participation. Sale of an interest in a
loan by the lender wherein the lender
retains the note, collateral securing the
note, and all responsibility for loan
servicing and liquidation.
Poor. A community or area is
considered poor if, based on the most
recent decennial census data, either the
county, city, or census tract where the
community or area is located has a
median household income at or below
the poverty line for a family of four; has
a median household income below the
nonmetropolitan median household
income for the State; or has a population
of which 25 percent or more have
income at or below the poverty line.
Promissory Note. Evidence of debt.
‘‘Note’’ or ‘‘Promissory Note’’ shall also
be construed to include ‘‘Bond’’ or other
evidence of debt where appropriate.
Qualified Intellectual Property.
Trademarks, patents or copyrights
included on current (within one year)
audited balance sheets for which an
audit opinion has been received that
states the financial reports fairly
represent the values therein and the
reported value has been arrived at in
accordance with GAAP standards for
valuing intellectual property. The
supporting work papers must be
satisfactory to the Administrator.
Refinancing loan. A loan, all of the
proceeds of which are applied to
extinguish the entire balance of an
outstanding debt.
Rural Development. The Under
Secretary for Rural Development has
policy and operational oversight
responsibilities for RHS, RBS and RUS.
Spreadsheet. A table containing data
from a series of financial statements of
a business over a period of time.
Financial statement analysis normally
contains spreadsheets for balance sheet
items and income statements and may
include funds flow statement data and
commonly used ratios. The spreadsheets
enable a reviewer to easily scan the
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
data, spot trends, and make
comparisons.
State. Any of the 50 States, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands of the United States,
Guam, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Republic of Palau, the
Federated States of Micronesia, and the
Republic of the Marshall Islands.
Subordinated owner debt. Debt owed
by the borrower to one or more of the
owner(s) that is subordinated to debt
owed by the borrower to the Agency or
guaranteed by the Agency (aggregate B&I
loan exposure) pursuant to a
subordination agreement satisfactory to
the Agency. The debt must have been
issued in exchange for cash loaned to
the borrower for the benefit of the
borrower’s business. The terms of the
subordination agreement must provide
that repayment will not commence until
the earlier of the date all aggregate B&I
loan exposure has been repaid or when
a period of three consecutive years has
passed during which the borrower has
met all loan covenants and evidenced
operating profit sufficient to commence
partial repayment of this subordinated
debt after giving effect to the annual
debt service requirements of the
aggregate B&I loan exposure. The partial
repayment schedule in the case of the
latter scenario is subject to annual
Agency concurrence and may not be
more accelerated than the rate of the
debt repayment schedule in effect for
the Agency’s aggregate B&I loan
exposure.
Subordination. An agreement
between the lender and borrower
whereby lien priorities on certain assets
pledged to secure payment of the
guaranteed loan will be reduced to a
position junior to, or on parity with, the
lien position of another loan in order for
the Agency borrower to obtain
additional financing, not guaranteed by
the Agency, from the lender or a third
party.
Tangible balance sheet equity. Total
equity less the value of intangible assets
recorded on the financial statements, as
determined from balance sheets
prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP),
plus qualified intellectual property.
Veteran. For the purposes of assigning
priority points, a veteran is a person
who is a veteran of any war, as defined
in section 101(12) of title 38, United
States Code.
(b) Abbreviations.
B&I—Business and Industry
CF—Community Facilities
CLP—Certified Lenders Program
FSA—Farm Service Agency
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
FMI—Forms Manual Insert
NAD—National Appeals Division
OGC—Office of the General Counsel
RBS—Rural Business-Cooperative
Service
RHS—Rural Housing Service
RUS—Rural Utilities Service
SBA—Small Business Administration
USDA—United States Department of
Agriculture
(c) Accounting terms not otherwise
defined in this part shall have the
definition ascribed to them under
GAAP.
Subpart B—Business and Industry
Loans
7. Section 4279.113 is amended by
revising paragraph (r) and by adding a
paragraph (cc) to read as follows:
I
§ 4279.113
Eligible loan purposes.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) To refinance outstanding debt
when it is determined that the project is
viable and refinancing is necessary to
improve cash flow and create new or
save existing jobs. Except as provided
for in § 4279.108(d)(4) of this subpart,
existing lender debt may be included
provided that, at the time of the
application, the loan has been current
for at least the past 12 months (unless
such status is achieved by the lender
forgiving the borrower’s debt) and the
lender is providing better rates or terms.
Subordinated owner debt is not eligible
under this paragraph. Unless the
amount to be refinanced is owed
directly to the Federal government or is
Federally guaranteed, the refinancing
must be a secondary part (less than 50
percent) of the overall loan.
*
*
*
*
*
(cc) To finance energy projects.
Commercially available energy projects
that produce biomass fuel or biogas as
an output must have completed two
operating cycles at design performance
levels submitted to the Agency. Projects
that produce steam or electricity as an
output must have met or exceeded
acceptance test performance criteria
submitted to the Agency and be
successfully interconnected with the
purchaser of the output. Performance or
acceptance test requirements for all
other energy projects will be determined
by the Agency on a case by case basis.
Financing for energy projects will only
be allowed when the facility has been
constructed according to plans and
specifications and is producing at the
quality and quantity projected in the
application.
I 8. Section 4279.131 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 4279.131
33189
Credit quality.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Equity. (1) A minimum of 10
percent tangible balance sheet equity
will be required for existing businesses
at loan closing. A minimum of 20
percent tangible balance sheet equity
will be required for new businesses at
loan closing. For energy projects, the
minimum tangible balance sheet equity
requirement range will be between 25
percent and 40 percent. Criteria for
considering the minimum equity
required for an individual application
will be based on: existing businesses
with successful financial and
management history vs. start-up
businesses; personal/corporate
guarantees offered; contractual
relationships with suppliers and buyers;
credit rating; and strength of the
business plan/feasibility study. Where
the application is a request to refinance
outstanding Federal direct or guaranteed
loans, without any new financing, the
equity requirement may be determined
using adjusted tangible net worth. An
application that combines a refinancing
guarantee request with a new loan
guarantee request is subject to the
standard, unadjusted, equity
requirement except as provided in
paragraphs (d)(1)(i) or (d)(1)(ii) of this
section. Increases or decreases in the
equity requirements may be imposed or
granted as follows:
(i) A reduction in the equity
requirement for existing businesses may
be permitted by the Administrator. In
order for a reduction to be considered,
the borrower must furnish the
following:
(A) Collateralized personal and
corporate guarantees, including any
parent, subsidiary, or affiliated
company, when feasible and legally
permissible (in accordance with
§ 4279.149 of this subpart), and
(B) Pro forma and historical financial
statements that indicate the business to
be financed meets or exceeds the
median quartile (as identified in the
Risk Management Association’s Annual
Statement Studies or similar
publication) for the current ratio, quick
ratio, debt-to-worth ratio, debt coverage
ratio, and working capital.
(ii) The approval official may require
more than the minimum equity
requirements provided in this paragraph
if the official makes a written
determination that special
circumstances necessitate this course of
action.
(2) The equity requirement must be
met in the form of either cash or
tangible earning assets contributed to
the business and reflected on the
balance sheet.
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
33190
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The lender must certify that the
equity requirement was determined
using balance sheets prepared in
accordance with GAAP and met upon
giving effect to the entirety of the loan
in the calculation, whether or not the
loan itself is fully advanced, as of the
date the guaranteed loan is closed.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 30, 2006.
Thomas C. Dorr,
Under Secretary, Rural Development.
[FR Doc. E6–8891 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
certificates, registrations, and approvals
who either filed for termination of their
licenses or approvals or filed for
possession only/storage licenses before
October 1, 2005, and permanently
ceased licensed activities entirely by
September 30, 2005.’’
§ 171.19
[Corrected]
4. On page 30756, in the first complete
paragraph, the third sentence is
corrected to read, ‘‘The materials
licensees that are billed on the
anniversary date of the license are those
covered by fee categories 1C, 1D,
2(A)(2), 2(A)(3), 2(A)(4), 2B, 2C, 3A
through 3P, and 4B through 9D.’’
I
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of June, 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Peter J. Rabideau,
Acting Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–8923 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
10 CFR Parts 170 and 171
RIN: 3150–AH83
Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee
Recovery for FY 2006; Correction
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
11 CFR Part 109
This document corrects a
final rule appearing in the Federal
Register on May 30, 2006 (71 FR 30722)
concerning the licensing, inspection,
and annual fees charged to NRC
applicants and licensees in compliance
with the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended.
This action is necessary to correct
typographical and printing errors.
DATES: Effective Date: July 31, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tammy Croote, telephone 301–415–
6041; Office of the Chief Financial
Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. On page 30735, in the third column,
in the last line of the continued
paragraph, the reference to ‘‘Section
III.B.3.a–’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Section
III.B.3.a–h’’.
I 2. On page 30741, under Table XIV.—
ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY
CALCULATIONS FOR THE SPENT
FUEL STORAGE/REACTOR
DECOMMISSIONING FEE CLASS, in
the first column, in the fourth line, the
phrase ‘‘60 prorated annual fee’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘60 percent prorated
annual fee’’.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
I
§ 171.16
[Corrected]
3. On page 30755, the second sentence
of footnote 1 is corrected to read,
‘‘However, the annual fee is waived for
those materials licenses and holders of
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
[Notice 2006–10]
Coordinated Communications
Federal Election Commission.
ACTION: Final rules and transmittal of
rules to Congress.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Election
Commission is revising its regulations
regarding communications that are
coordinated with Federal candidates
and political party committees. The
Commission’s rules set out a threeprong test for determining whether a
communication is ‘‘coordinated’’ with,
and therefore an in-kind contribution to,
a Federal candidate or a political party
committee. These final rules implement
the recent decision of the Court of
Appeals in Shays v. Federal Election
Commission, in which the court
determined that the Commission needs
to provide a more complete explanation
and justification for its rules pursuant to
the Administrative Procedure Act. To
comply with the court’s decision, and to
address other issues involving the
coordinated communication rules, the
Commission is issuing these Final Rules
and Explanation and Justification.
Further information is provided in the
supplementary information that follows.
DATES: Effective July 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Brad C. Deutsch, Assistant General
Counsel, Mr. Ron B. Katwan, Ms.
Margaret G. Perl, or Ms. Esa L. Sferra,
Attorneys, 999 E Street, NW.,
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694–1650
or (800) 424–9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of Regulatory Changes
The Commission is revising its
regulations regarding communications
that are coordinated with Federal
candidates and political party
committees. The Commission is: (1)
Revising the fourth content standard at
11 CFR 109.21(c)(4) to establish separate
time frames for communications
referring to political parties,
Congressional and Presidential
candidates; (2) creating a safe harbor for
certain endorsements and solicitations
by Federal candidates; (3) revising the
temporal limit of the common vendor
and former employee conduct
standards; (4) creating a safe harbor for
the use of publicly available
information; (5) creating a safe harbor
for the establishment and use of a
firewall; (6) clarifying that the payment
prong of the coordinated
communication test is satisfied if an
outside person pays for only part of the
costs of a communication; and (7)
revising 11 CFR 109.37 to include the
applicable time frame and safe harbor
revisions in 11 CFR 109.21.
Transmission of Final Rules to
Congress
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(d), and the
Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1),
agencies must submit final rules to the
Speaker of the House of Representatives
and the President of the Senate and
publish them in the Federal Register at
least 30 calendar days before they take
effect. The final rules that follow were
transmitted to Congress on June 2, 2006.
Explanation and Justification
I. Background
A. Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and
2002 Coordination Rulemaking
The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
of 2002,1 (‘‘BCRA’’), repealed the
Commission’s pre-BCRA regulations
regarding ‘‘coordinated general public
political communications’’ and directed
the Commission to promulgate new
regulations on ‘‘coordinated
communications’’ in their place.2
Congress specified in BCRA that the
Commission’s new regulations ‘‘shall
not require agreement or formal
collaboration to establish coordination.’’
1 Pub. L. 107–155, 116 Stat. 81 (2002); amending
the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as
amended, 2 U.S.C. 431 et seq. (the ‘‘Act’’ or
‘‘FECA’’).
2 Pub. L. 107–155, sec. 214(b), (c) (2002).
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33181-33190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8891]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
7 CFR Parts 1980 and 4279
RIN 0570-AA49
Business and Industry Guaranteed Loans--Tangible Balance Sheet
Equity
AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this final rule the Rural Business-Cooperative Service (the
Agency) amends existing regulations relating to Business and Industry
(B&I) loans made or guaranteed by the Agency by modifying the
provisions that address the evaluation of credit quality. Changes to
these underwriting provisions were originally proposed on January 16,
2004. The scope of this final rule is more limited than originally
proposed but also implements a change not originally discussed in the
proposed rule. Specifically, in the case of the refinancing of USDA or
other Federal agency debt only, the Agency is modifying the definition
of tangible balance sheet equity to include the off balance sheet value
of tangible assets to the extent of the difference between the
depreciated book value of real property assets and their current market
value supported by an appraisal or the original book value, whichever
is less. In these limited cases, the adjusted tangible balance sheet
equity will also include qualified subordinated debt owed to the owner.
As stated above, these adjustments to the equity calculation will apply
only in cases where the Agency is asked to guarantee a refinancing of
outstanding debt currently owed to or guaranteed by a Federal agency,
including the Small Business Administration. The intended effect of
this action is to facilitate Agency guarantees of certain refinancing
loans that otherwise would not meet the equity requirements because the
financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles do not reflect the current market value of real
property assets owned by the borrower. In the case of all direct or
guaranteed loan applications, the tangible net equity calculation may
include a restricted universe of qualified intellectual property. The
Agency is also increasing the equity requirements applicable to energy
businesses.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 10, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Kieferle, Rural Business-
Cooperative Service, USDA, Stop 3224, Room 6845, 1400 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-3224, Telephone (202) 720-7818, Fax
(202) 720-6003, or E-mail: fred.kieferle@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 and, therefore, has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Programs Affected
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program number assigned
to the applicable programs is 10.768, Business and Industry Loans.
Program Administration
These programs are administered through the Business and Industry
Division of the Rural Business-Cooperative Service within the Rural
Development mission area of USDA and delivered via the USDA Rural
Development State Directors.
Executive Order 12372
As stated in the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V, the
programs and activities within this rule are subject to E.O. 12372
which requires intergovernmental consultation in the manner delineated
in 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V. Accordingly, agency personnel advise all
prospective applicants of whether their state has elected to
participate in the consultation process by designating a single point
of contact and name of that contact point.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
information collection requirements contained in this regulation have
been approved by OMB under control numbers 0570-0014 and 0570-0017.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
The Agency is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act, which requires Government agencies, in general, to
provide the public the option of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
Environmental Impact Statement
It is the determination of the Agency that this action is not a
major Federal action significantly affecting the environment.
Therefore, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with E.O. 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. In accordance with this rule: (1) All state and
local laws and regulations that are in conflict with this rule will be
preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this rule; and
(3) administrative proceedings in accordance with 7 CFR part 11 must be
exhausted before bringing suit in court challenging action taken under
this rule unless those regulations specifically allow bringing suit at
an earlier time.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, USDA must prepare a
written statement, including a cost benefit analysis, for proposed and
final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that may result in expenditures
to state, local or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, section 205 of UMRA generally requires
USDA to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives and adopt the least costly, more cost effective or least
burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of title II of the UMRA) for state, local, and tribal
governments or the private sector. Therefore this rule is not subject
to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), the undersigned has determined and certified by signature of this
document
[[Page 33182]]
that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Some provisions published as a
part of this rule are, in fact, a benefit to small entities.
The modified equity test in the case of refinancing applies equally
to large and small entities, but in practice, the Agency expects it to
benefit smaller entities disproportionately more than larger
businesses. In the Agency's experience, the largest single component of
off balance sheet value in a small firm is the real property it owns.
Small firms that are real property rich, but cash flow constrained, may
find this change to be the only means to achieve flexibility in
refinancing, while larger businesses may have other ways, i.e., other
assets to work with, to achieve the same result. The scope of the final
rule is such that a larger number of small firms, particularly those
with loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration, may be
expected to benefit. To the extent that any business has qualified
intellectual property, the benefits of the change proposed for
qualified intellectual apply across the board, and as such is estimated
to have no disproportionate impact, positive or negative, accruing to
one size of business or another.
The change in equity requirements for energy loans may make it more
difficult for small firms to qualify. The energy business is a capital
intensive business and the corresponding risk is greater when it is
undertaken by undercapitalized firms. It may be more difficult for
small firms to raise the necessary equity for one project, whereas a
larger business can spread the risk across more than one project.
The net effect of this rulemaking is expected to be neutral in its
overall impact on smaller firms. Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility
analysis was not performed.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this rule do not have any substantial
direct effect on states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this
rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments. This rule is intended to foster cooperation between the
Federal Government and the states and local governments, and reduces,
where possible, any regulatory burden imposed by the Federal Government
that impedes the ability of states and local governments to solve
pressing economic, social and physical problems in their state.
I. Background
The current loan processing regulations for the B&I Guaranteed Loan
Program provide that the lender is primarily responsible for
determining credit quality and must address all of the elements of
credit quality in a written credit analysis. The Agency assumes this
responsibility for the B&I Direct Loan Program. One of the elements of
credit quality required in the regulation is that borrowers demonstrate
a minimum level of tangible balance sheet equity. The threshold level
of required tangible balance sheet equity is higher for new businesses
than for existing businesses.
Conventional accounting policies and procedures provide for a
distinction between tangible and intangible assets. The net equity on a
balance sheet reflects the net book value of all assets, after
depreciation, less total liabilities. The current regulations take a
conservative approach in evaluating the equity component of a balance
sheet, specifying that acceptable equity for credit quality purposes be
restricted to tangible balance sheet equity, as defined in the
regulation.
Where the accounting terms used in the regulation coincide with
terms used in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP),\1\ the
GAAP definitions are presumed in the regulation. Tangible balance sheet
equity is not a term used in GAAP; there is no commonly held
definition. It is perhaps more accurate to call it an artificial
construct than a term. It is nevertheless a concept familiar to many
financial analysts and regulators who craft customized definitions,
tailored to a specific industry or application, using the commonly
understood terms found in GAAP as the basic building blocks.\2\ In this
final rule, the Agency has elected to allow some credit for off balance
sheet appreciation in real property as well as certain subordinated
debt in this agency-defined formula for tangible balance sheet equity.
This final rule provides that a restricted universe of intellectual
property assets may be included in this adjusted equity calculation as
well. Whereas the real property asset appreciation and subordinated
owner debt provisions will apply only in the case of refinancing loans,
the adjustment for qualified intellectual property assets will apply in
the case of all applications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The meaning of the term generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) has evolved over time. It used to refer to widely
used, but un-codified, accounting policies and procedures. With
time, standard-setting bodies and professional organizations came
into being and became more involved in recommending preferred
practices by means of issued pronouncements. Over the past fifty
years, principles were promulgated by different groups, some of
which were no longer in existence, and some conflicts exist between
the various pronouncements. The American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants issued a statement of auditing standards (SAS-69)
to better organize and clarify what is meant by GAAP. This statement
instructs financial statement preparers, auditors and users of
financial statements concerning the relative priority of the
different sources of GAAP (past and present pronouncements by the
many standard-setting entities) used by auditors to judge the
fairness of presentation in financial statements.
\2\ See, for example, Cal. Admin. Code title 28, section
1300.76, where the state requires licensed health care service plans
to maintain a minimum tangible net equity and another, Federal,
example at 12 CFR 208.41 where tangible net equity is incorporated
into the capital adequacy requirements required of state chartered
banks that are members of the Federal Reserve system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tangible balance sheet equity is a refinement of the GAAP concept
of equity, typically arrived at by reducing balance sheet equity by the
book value assigned to intangible assets, including but not limited to
assets such as goodwill, going concern value, organizational start up
expenses, etc. These items are recognized as capital assets for
purposes of GAAP but may or may not be assets that can be readily
liquidated or pledged as security for loans.
The modification proposed in this rulemaking acknowledges that the
market value of real property assets may increase at the same time the
net book value of such assets decrease. The net book value of real
property usually decreases over time due to depreciation, whereas the
market value of real property may stay the same or appreciate over
time.
In a lower interest rate environment, refinancing is a reasonable
business strategy. The current regulation, however, does not
contemplate that any credit can be given for a positive difference
between net book value and market value for purposes of evaluating the
equity component of credit worthiness when a borrower seeks Agency-
guaranteed refinancing at a lower interest rate. It has happened that
borrowers that could have met a modified balance sheet equity test have
been foreclosed from this option because the equity ratio calculated
using the conventional GAAP values reported on the balance sheet do not
meet the equity test in the current regulation at the time the
refinancing is of interest to the borrower. When this happens, the
borrower is tied to the existing lender that is the beneficiary of the
original Agency guarantee on what has become
[[Page 33183]]
an above market rate loan. This lender has minimal incentive to
refinance the above market rate loan, and unless the Agency can
guarantee another lender willing to refinance the first lender's
exposure, the borrower is locked into the higher interest rate. It is
not able to ``shop'' for a lower interest rate. When the loan in
question is already guaranteed by a Federal agency, the taxpayer is in
a position of guaranteeing the higher interest rate when a lower
exposure could otherwise be affected and there is a corresponding
increased risk of default under the guarantee. The increased risk of
default comes about when these higher interest rates undermine the
financial health of the borrowers and lead to what otherwise could be
avoidable financial defaults.
This final rule provides refinancing flexibility to borrowers with
Federal direct or Federally guaranteed debt when the market value of
the real property on the balance sheet justifies a more flexible
approach to the equity requirement than is allowed by the current
regulation. The definition of a refinancing loan in this rule provides
that all of the proceeds must be used to extinguish pre-existing debt.
Accordingly, the amount of the refinancing loan may not exceed the
outstanding balance of the loan(s) to be refinanced. Where a
refinancing request is coupled with a ``new money'' guarantee
application, the conventional, unadjusted, tangible balance sheet
equity test will be applied to the combined guarantee request. The
modified equity calculation does not apply to all refinancing requests,
only those pertaining to debt that is directly owed to a Federal agency
or guaranteed by a Federal agency. This limitation is primarily due to
policy considerations relating to the relative economic impact of
refinancing actions versus new loans and how the Agency's use of its
obligational authority is accounted for as a result of the Federal
Credit Reform Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-508). Further elaboration on
this may be found in the comments section of this preamble wherein the
modified tangible balance sheet equity calculation is discussed at
greater length.
In order to provide for an alternate equity calculation in
determining whether the credit requirement is met for refinancing
loans, the Agency has modified existing regulations to define
``tangible balance sheet equity'' and added two new definitions that
build directly and indirectly on this term--``adjusted tangible net
worth'' and ``allowed tangible asset appreciation.'' The term
``subordinated owner debt'' is also added. These new terms apply only
in the case of refinancing requests. ``Subordinated owner debt'' is
defined as subordinated debt owed to one or more of the owners of the
borrower.
An example that demonstrates the practical effect of this change is
as follows. XYZ Company is capitalized with $200,000 cash on day 1 and
uses $200,000 cash and $800,000 Agency guaranteed debt to purchase a
building for $1,000,000 on day 2. Assume (1) the building is
depreciated at 10 percent a year, (2) the market value of the building
at the end of year 2 has appreciated to $1,200,000, (3) there are no
other assets on the balance sheet at the end of year 2 for purposes of
this simplified example, (4) the mortgage does not begin to amortize
until the end of year 4, and (5) the income statement reflects a
cumulative net loss of ($200,000) for the first two years of
operations. At the end of year 2 the company would like to refinance
the mortgage debt. Under the existing regulation, at this point in time
tangible balance sheet equity is $ -0-. Per the revised regulation,
however, the tangible balance sheet can be adjusted upwards by an
increment equal to the difference between the net book value of the
property ($800,000) and the lesser of (1) its original book value
($1,000,000) or (2) an appraisal supported current market value
($1,200,000). Thus, the adjusted tangible balance sheet equity in that
case would be $-0-plus $200,000, or $200,000 for purposes of
determining eligibility for a refinancing loan guarantee. In order to
calculate the equity ratio, (equity as a percentage of equity plus
total liabilities), the result would be 200,000/1,000,000, or 20
percent.
A second refinement to the GAAP concept of equity in this
rulemaking for this credit evaluation criterion is to include in the
equity calculation subordinated debt contributed to the borrower by the
business owner(s). In order for this subordinated debt to count as
equity for purposes of the equity criterion, the subordinated note must
be expressly subordinate to the Agency's B&I loan exposure, whether
that exposure is direct or guaranteed. Moreover, the loan documentation
must provide that repayment of this subordinated debt may not commence
until the earlier of the full repayment of the B&I loan exposure or
when a period of three consecutive years has passed during which the
borrower has met all loan covenants and evidenced operating profit
sufficient to commence partial repayment of this subordinated debt
after giving effect to the annual debt service requirements of the B&I
loan exposure. The partial repayment schedule in the case of the latter
scenario may not be more accelerated than the debt repayment schedule
in effect for the Agency's B&I loan exposure.
To carry our earlier example one step further, assume (1) that an
owner provides $100,000 of subordinated debt to XYZ Company in year 3
so that it can purchase a patent. Also assume (2) the market value of
the building at the end of year 3 remains at $1,200,000, (3) there are
no other assets on the balance sheet at the end of year 3 for purposes
of this simplified example, and (4) the income statement reflects a
cumulative net loss of ($300,000) for the first three years of
operations. Instead of refinancing at the end of year two as described
above, the Company seeks a refinancing loan guarantee at the end of
year three. Total liabilities equal the $800,000 mortgage debt plus
$100,000 in subordinated owner debt. Tangible balance sheet equity as
defined in the current rule equals total equity less the book value of
intangible assets, or ($100,000) minus $100,000 = ($200,000). Per the
revised regulation, however, the tangible balance sheet equity can be
adjusted upwards by an increment equal to the difference between the
net book value of the property ($700,000) and the lesser of (1) its
original book value ($1,000,000) or (2) an appraisal supported current
market value ($1,200,000). Thus, the adjusted tangible balance sheet
equity in that case would be ($200,000) plus $300,000, or $100,000 for
purposes of determining eligibility for a refinancing loan guarantee.
In order to calculate the equity ratio, (equity as a percentage of
equity plus total liabilities), the result would be 100,000/1,000,000,
or 10 percent. Assuming the 10 percent equity requirement for existing
businesses would apply and this borrower would qualify for a
refinancing loan as a result of this regulatory change, then the income
statement shows three years of consecutive accrual losses, but
breakeven cash flows.
In this final rule, the Agency has also elected upon consideration
to include another refinement of the tangible balance sheet equity
computation, applicable to all applications, not just refinancing
loans, whereby qualified intellectual property may count as well.
Intellectual property falls within the definition of intangible assets,
and as such, would not ordinarily be included in a conventional
tangible balance sheet equity computation. But this formula is subject
to Agency definition in the final analysis, and the Agency has elected
to recognize that the liquidity arguments for tangible assets that gave
rise to the development of the adjusted equity
[[Page 33184]]
calculation in the first place, may also apply to a restricted universe
of qualified intellectual property as well. In modern rural businesses,
credit should be given for these reasonably liquid intangible assets in
the adjusted equity calculation.
The narrow universe of qualified intellectual property that will
count as equity under the adjusted computation consists of trademarks,
patents or copyrights that are included on current (within one year)
audited balance sheets, for which an audit opinion has been received
that states the financial reports fairly represent the values therein,
and the value of which has been arrived at in accordance with GAAP
standards for valuing intellectual property. Also, the work papers
supporting this valuation of intellectual property must be satisfactory
to the Administrator in order for the asset to be considered qualified
for this purpose.
This final rule also increases the equity requirement for certain
energy projects and provides that financing will be guaranteed for
energy projects only when they have met certain performance criteria.
Financing for energy projects will only be allowed when the facility
has been constructed according to plans and specifications and is
producing at the design levels projected in the application for
purposes of underwriting the loan or loan guarantee. Based on comments
received, the Agency slightly lowered the equity requirements for
energy loans, but continued to require higher equity levels than other
industries. The higher equity requirements reflect the Agency's
determination that energy projects are riskier than the average B&I
portfolio loan and an intent to apply equity criteria that more closely
conform to conventional lender practice. The Agency's energy borrowers
are typically not utilities in the conventional sense. As a general
rule, conventional utilities have other sources of financing and higher
capital requirements than can practicably be met by Agency programs.
The final rule requires that energy projects must demonstrate two
complete operating cycles at design performance levels projected in the
application. A complete operating cycle consists of the purchase of raw
material inputs, their input into the manufacturing process and
transformation into a design specified number of output units for a
given level of raw material input within a specified period of time and
at a design-specified quality level. In the case of projects that
produce steam or electricity as an output, there is an additional
requirement that they be successfully interconnected with the purchaser
of the output. This is not the same as being connected to the power
grid alone. Being connected to the grid, without enforceable wheeling
agreements and physical interconnection with the buyer at the other end
of the transmission route, does not satisfy this requirement.
Successful interconnection with the purchaser of the steam or
electricity means that everything is in place that is required for the
purchaser to receive the steam or electricity output in accordance with
the contractual terms specified and such delivery by the seller and
acceptance by the purchaser has been demonstrated.
The Agency revised the definition for energy projects to include
both `power' and `energy.' The term `power plant' is commonly used to
describe a facility that uses fuels to produce electricity or high
pressure steam. In these type plants, power and energy are
intrinsically related. The change in definition makes it clear that
electric or steam facilities are also considered ``energy projects,''
as are facilities that produce fuels such as ethanol or biodiesel. The
Agency also decided to narrow the scope of energy projects that require
increased equity by removing the production of batteries and fuel cells
from the definition based on comments received.
II. Comments on the Proposed Rule and Responses
The following paragraphs summarize the comments received and the
Agency responses. We received 15 responses of which, one is from an
elected state official, six are from borrowers or borrower
representatives (a producer association, business consultants, etc.),
and eight are from the lender community (two of the lender comments are
from the same bank).
A. Comments on the Modified Tangible Balance Sheet Equity Test
All comments received regarding the modified tangible balance sheet
equity requirement were positive. Eight of the comments claimed we did
not go far enough; they urged that the new equity test be applied to
new loan guarantee requests as well.
The most significant change in this final rule from the proposed
rulemaking is the result of additional deliberation within the Agency.
The proposed regulatory text applied to the refinancing of any loan,
whether or not it is currently USDA guaranteed. Upon further
reflection, concern developed with respect to the risk that an existing
lender, not presently guaranteed by USDA, can get the equivalent of a
``bailout'' if the more flexible equity test is applied. There is also
sensitivity within USDA as to the proportion of obligational authority
used for refinancing. It is true that if USDA issues a guarantee to
Lender A for a loan, the proceeds of which pay off a USDA guaranteed
loan held by Lender B, there is no increase in risk or exposure to the
taxpayer. However (and this may not be fully realized or appreciated by
the private sector community), under federal budget rules, in this
circumstance the Agency's available obligational authority is reduced
as if a new loan guarantee had been issued to Lender A. A refinancing
action is scored against the Agency's budget the same as a new loan
action, even though the net incremental risk to the taxpayer differs
significantly as between the two scenarios.
The Agency must concern itself with maximizing the economic benefit
that can be achieved in rural America with limited Federal funding and
recognize that net new capital invested in rural America has a greater
economic impact than the incremental cash flow improvements associated
with refinancing loan guarantees.
We ultimately believe that a policy of conforming the modified
equity test to recognize off balance sheet values inherent in the
appreciation of real property is rooted in common sense. However, the
expectation is that this rule could well result in a situation where
the Agency is presented with a significant increase in the proportion
of refinancing requests relative to new loan requests, with a
concomitant reduction in the net economic benefit per dollar of budget
authority. Therefore, this final rule does not expand the scope of the
tangible balance sheet equity test beyond direct Federal debt and
Federally guaranteed debt. It does not go as far as many of those
providing comments would have wished, but it reflects a balanced
approach to the issue in the current budget environment.
As explained in the preamble to the proposed rule, the Agency
considered, but elected not to propose, revising the tangible balance
sheet equity test to apply across the board, for all borrowers, and not
restrict its availability to refinancing loan applications. It may be
that the Agency's experience with the limited applicability of this
rulemaking will lead to proposing its wider application in the future.
For now, it was determined to proceed with a more limited applicability
in order to bring relief to at least some borrowers in a more rapid
period of time. The final rule
[[Page 33185]]
is narrower in scope than was the proposed rule. The proposed rule
applied the modified equity calculation to all refinancing loans; the
final rule limits its application to the refinancing of debt owed to a
Federal agency.
The Agency also considered allowing full market value refinancing
in the proposed rulemaking. The potential for abuse of market
appraisals for purposes of full market value refinancing is thought to
be greater than the potential benefit of liberalizing the related
equity criterion to this maximum degree. In the alternative, the Agency
has opted to allow consideration of market value only with respect to
the equity test calculation; the amount of the refinancing loan itself
may not exceed the outstanding balance of the loan to be refinanced.
Market value must be determined by appraisals using arms-length
methodologies to arrive at an unbiased ``fair or current market
value.''
Allowing flexibility in the equity requirement for refinancing
loans where the market value of real property assets supports such
flexibility will serve to enhance the financial health of Agency-
guaranteed borrowers and promote rural development.
B. Comments on the Modified Equity Requirement for Energy Projects
Seven of the 15 comments addressed the increased equity
requirements proposed for energy loans--all were critical, arguing that
the equity requirement should be no different than for other types of
businesses. One argued for preferential treatment for non profit
borrowers. One lender, while critical of the differentiated equity
requirement, nevertheless observed that the requirement that energy
projects demonstrate two complete operating cycles would ``weed out''
bad projects. A commodity producer association pointed out that many
private sector lenders require 50 percent equity, and if the Agency
implements the modifications the Business and Industry program will
offer very little advantage over private lender options already
available for producer owned businesses.
We expect that most of the energy loan applications will continue
to be for ethanol or similar projects. The Agency's experience in
lending for ethanol projects from the mid 1970s to 1990 was not good.
This was due to the combined factors of weak underwriting criteria,
underdeveloped technologies and inexperienced managers. As of 1990,
credit criteria were tightened up and the technology has developed to
the point where it is now commercially proven. The Agency is somewhat
conforming its equity requirement to those found in the private sector
inasmuch as the technology is now quite established and needs less
support. Agency-guaranteed loans will still enjoy a better interest
rate and the available term may be advantageous when compared to the
non-guaranteed private sector alternative.
As for energy projects that are not ethanol or biodiesel, we
observe that many renewable energy projects find it difficult to
impossible to obtain private sector financing even when project equity
ratios are high. Thus, while the equity ratios implemented for energy
projects are higher than the requirements for other industries, we
believe that Agency financing under those circumstances nevertheless
represents a source of capital often unavailable for these technologies
elsewhere. The higher equity ratios strike a balance between no capital
available at all and the risk to the taxpayer in providing support for
renewable energy projects. However, in response to these comments, the
Agency modified the equity requirement for energy projects, but still
will require higher equity levels than other industries.
Several comments observe that project risks can be mitigated by
means other than increased equity. The following examples of possible
risk mitigation vehicles were suggested: a strong contract for the
purchase of the output (off take agreement), the use of established
technologies, or performance guarantees combined with surety bonds to
mitigate construction risk. All of these address a particular kind of
risk--either the project doesn't get built, it doesn't operate as
expected or the market for the output doesn't materialize at the price
forecast. These vehicles are all worthwhile underwriting tools, but
only increased equity protects against unforeseen risks. The lower the
debt burden on a project, the more likely the project will be able to
surmount any of these risks and pay off the debt as and when due. With
respect to off take agreements in particular, if the projected cash
flow stream associated with the off take agreement is strong, it will
cover both debt service and an equity return. If the imputed equity
return is sufficient, this should be attractive to third party
investors such that the equity requirement can be met. If the off take
agreement is not sufficient for this, it cannot be said that it is a
substitute for increased equity.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 1980
Loan programs--Business and industry--Rural development assistance,
Rural areas.
7 CFR Part 4279
Loan programs--Business and industry--Rural development assistance,
Rural areas.
0
Accordingly, Chapters XVIII and XLII, title 7, of the Code of Federal
Regulations are amended as follows:
CHAPTER XVIII--RURAL HOUSING SERVICE, RURAL BUSINESS-COOPERATIVE
SERVICE, RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, AND FARM SERVICE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE
PART 1980--GENERAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 1980 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart E also issued under 7 U.S.C. 1932(a).
Subpart E--Business and Industrial Loan Program
0
2. Section 1980.402 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1980.402 Definitions.
(a) The following general definitions are applicable to the terms
used in this subpart. Adjusted tangible net worth. Tangible balance
sheet equity plus allowed tangible asset appreciation and subordinated
owner debt.
Allowed tangible asset appreciation. The difference between the
current net book value recorded on the financial statements (original
cost less cumulative depreciation) of real property assets and the
lesser of their current market value or original cost, where current
market value is determined using an appraisal satisfactory to the
Agency.
Area of high unemployment. An area in which a B&I loan guarantee
can be issued, consisting of a county or group of contiguous counties
or equivalent subdivisions of a State which, on the basis of the most
recent 12-month average or the most recent annual average data, has a
rate of unemployment 150 percent or more of the national rate. Data
used must be those published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.
Department of Labor.
Biogas. Biomass converted to gaseous fuel.
Biomass. Any organic material that is available on a renewable or
recurring basis including agricultural crops, trees grown for energy
production, wood waste and wood residues, plants, including aquatic
plants and grasses,
[[Page 33186]]
fibers, animal waste and other waste materials, fats, oils, greases,
including recycled fats, oils and greases. It does not include paper
that is commonly recycled or unsegregated solid waste.
Borrower. A borrower may be a cooperative organization,
corporation, partnership, trust or other legal entity organized and
operated on a profit or nonprofit basis; an Indian Tribe on a Federal
or State reservation or other Federally recognized tribal group; a
municipality, county or other political subdivision of a State; or an
individual. Such borrower must be engaged in or proposing to engage in
improving, developing or financing business, industry and employment
and improving the economic and environmental climate in rural areas,
including pollution abatement and control.
Business and Industry Disaster Loans. Business and Industry loans
guaranteed under the authority of the Dire Emergency Supplemental
Appropriations Act, 1992, Public Law 102-368. These guaranteed loans
cover costs arising from the direct consequences of natural disasters
such as Hurricanes Andrew and Iniki and Typhoon Omar that occur after
August 23, 1992, and receive a Presidential declaration. Also included
are the costs to any producer of crops and livestock that are a direct
consequence of at least a 40 percent loss to a crop, 25 percent loss to
livestock, or damage to building structures from a microburst wind
occurrence in calendar year 1992.
Commercially available. Energy projects utilizing technology that
has a proven operating history, and for which there is an established
industry for the design, installation, and service (including spare
parts) of the equipment.
Community facilities. For the purposes of this subpart, community
facilities are those facilities designed to aid in the development of
private business and industry in rural areas. Such facilities include,
but are not limited to, acquisition and site preparation of land for
industrial sites (but not for improvements erected thereon), access
streets and roads serving the site, parking areas extension or
improvement of community transportation systems serving the site and
utility extensions all incidental to site preparation. Projects
eligible for assistance under Subpart A of Part 1942 of this chapter
are not eligible for assistance under this subpart.
Development cost. These costs include, but are not limited to,
those for acquisition, planning, construction, repair or enlargement of
the proposed facility; purchase of buildings, machinery, equipment,
land easements, rights of way; payment of startup operating costs, and
interest during the period before the first principal payment becomes
due, including interest on interim financing.
Disaster Assistance for Rural Business Enterprises. Guaranteed
loans authorized by section 401 of the Disaster Assistance Act of 1989
(Pub. L. 101-82), providing for the guarantee of loans to assist in
alleviating distress caused to rural business entities, directly or
indirectly, by drought, freeze, storm, excessive moisture, earthquake,
or related conditions occurring in 1988 or 1989, and providing for the
guarantee of loans to such rural business entities that refinance or
restructure debt as a result of losses incurred, directly or
indirectly, because of such natural disasters. See this subpart and its
appendices, especially Appendix K, containing additional regulations
for these loans.
Drought and Disaster Guaranteed Loans. Guaranteed loans authorized
by section 331 of the Disaster Assistance Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-
387), providing for the guarantee of loans to assist in alleviating
distress caused to rural business entities, directly or indirectly, by
drought, hail, excessive moisture, or related conditions occurring in
1988, and providing for the guarantee of loans to such rural business
entities that refinance or restructure debt as a result of losses
incurred, directly or indirectly, because of such natural disasters.
Energy projects. Commercially available projects that produce or
distribute energy or power and/or projects that produce biomass or
biogas fuel.
Farmers Home Administration (FmHA). The former agency of USDA that
previously administered the programs of this Agency. Many Instructions
and forms of FmHA are still applicable to Agency programs.
Hurricane Andrew. A hurricane that caused damage in southern
Florida on August 24, 1992, and in Louisiana on August 26, 1992.
Hurricane Iniki. A hurricane that caused damage in Hawaii on
September 11, 1992.
Letter of conditions. Letter issued by Rural Development under
Public Law 103-354 to a borrower setting forth the conditions under
which Rural Development will make a direct (insured) loan from the
Rural Development Insurance Fund.
Loan classification system. The process by which loans are examined
and categorized by degree of potential for loss in the event of
default.
Microburst wind. A violently descending column of air associated
with a thunderstorm which causes straight-line wind damage.
Problem loan. A loan which is not performing according to its
original terms and conditions or which is not expected in the future to
perform according to those terms and conditions.
Public body. A municipality, political subdivision, public
authority, district, or similar organization.
Qualified Intellectual Property. Trademarks, patents or copyrights
included on current (within one year) audited balance sheets for which
an audit opinion has been received that states the financial reports
fairly represent the values therein and the reported value has been
arrived at in accordance with GAAP standards for valuing intellectual
property. The supporting work papers must be satisfactory to the
Administrator.
Refinancing loan. A loan, all of the proceeds of which are applied
to extinguish the entire balance of an outstanding debt.
Seasoned loan. A loan which:
(1) Has a remaining principal guaranteed loan balance of two-thirds
or less of the original aggregate of all existing B&I guaranteed loans
made to that business.
(2) Is in compliance with all loan conditions and B&I regulations.
(3) Has been current on the B&I guaranteed loan(s) payments for 24
consecutive months.
(4) Is secured by collateral which is determined to be adequate to
ensure there will be no loss on the B&I guaranteed loan.
State. Any of the 50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands of the United States, Guam, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of Palau,
the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of the Marshall
Islands.
Subordinated owner debt. Debt owed by the borrower to one or more
of the owner(s) that is subordinated to debt owed by the borrower to
the Agency or guaranteed by the Agency (aggregate B&I loan exposure)
pursuant to a subordination agreement satisfactory to the Agency. The
debt must have been issued in exchange for cash loaned to the borrower
for the benefit of the borrower's business. The terms of the
subordination agreement must provide that repayment will not commence
until the earlier of the date all aggregate B&I loan exposure has been
repaid or when a period of three consecutive years has passed during
which the borrower has met all loan covenants and evidenced
[[Page 33187]]
operating profit sufficient to commence partial repayment of this
subordinated debt after giving effect to the annual debt service
requirements of the aggregate B&I loan exposure. The partial repayment
schedule in the case of the latter scenario is subject to annual Agency
concurrence and may not be more accelerated than the rate of the debt
repayment schedule in effect for the Agency's aggregate B&I loan
exposure.
Tangible balance sheet equity. Total equity less the value of
intangible assets recorded on the financial statements, as determined
from balance sheets prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP), plus qualified intellectual property.
Typhoon Omar. A typhoon that caused damage in Guam on August 28,
1992.
Working capital. The excess of current assets over current
liabilities. It identifies the relatively liquid portion of total
enterprise capital which constitutes a margin or buffer for meeting
obligations within the ordinary operating cycle of the business.
(b) Accounting terms not otherwise defined in this part shall have
the definition ascribed to them under generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP).
0
3. Section 1980.411 is amended by adding new paragraphs (a)(11)(iv) and
(a)(11)(v) and by adding a new paragraph (a)(16) to read as follows:
Sec. 1980.411 Loan purposes.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(11) * * *
(iv) It does not refinance subordinated owner debt; or
(v) (Except where the amount to be refinanced is owed directly to
the Federal government or is Federally guaranteed) the amount to be
refinanced by the Agency is a secondary part (less than 50 percent) of
the overall loan requested.
* * * * *
(16) Energy projects. Commercially available energy projects that
produce biomass fuel or biogas as an output must have completed two
operating cycles at design performance levels submitted to the Agency.
Projects that produce steam or electricity as an output must have met
or exceeded acceptance test performance criteria submitted to the
Agency and be successfully interconnected with the purchaser of the
output. Performance or acceptance test requirements for all other
energy projects will be determined by the Agency on a case by case
basis. Financing for energy projects will only be allowed when the
facility has been constructed according to plans and specifications and
is producing at the quality and quantity projected in the application.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 1980.441 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1980.441 Borrower equity requirements.
(a) A minimum of 10 percent tangible balance sheet equity will be
required for existing businesses at loan closing. A minimum of 20
percent tangible balance sheet equity will be required for new
businesses at loan closing. For energy projects, the minimum tangible
balance sheet equity requirement range will be between 25 percent and
40 percent. Criteria for considering the minimum equity required for an
individual application will be based on: existing businesses with
successful financial and management history vs. start-up businesses;
personal/corporate guarantees offered; contractual relationships with
suppliers and buyers; credit rating; and strength of the business plan/
feasibility study. Where the application is a request to refinance
outstanding Federal direct or guaranteed loans, without any new
financing, the equity requirement may be determined using adjusted
tangible net worth. An application that combines a refinancing loan or
guarantee request with a new loan or guarantee request is subject to
the standard, unadjusted, equity requirement except as provided in
paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section. Increases or decreases in
the equity requirements may be imposed or granted as follows:
(1) A reduction in the equity requirement for existing businesses
may be permitted by the Administrator. In order for a reduction to be
considered, the borrower must furnish the following:
(i) Collateralized personal and corporate guarantees, including any
parent, subsidiary, or affiliated company, when feasible and legally
permissible, and
(ii) Pro forma and historical financial statements that indicate
the business to be financed meets or exceeds the median quartile (as
identified in the Risk Management Association's Annual Statement
Studies or similar publication) for the current ratio, quick ratio,
debt-to-worth ratio, debt coverage ratio, and working capital.
(2) The approval official may require more than the minimum equity
requirements provided in this paragraph if the official makes a written
determination that special circumstances necessitate this course of
action.
(b) The equity requirement must be met in the form of either cash
or tangible earning assets contributed to the business and reflected on
the balance sheet.
(c) The equity requirement must be determined using balance sheets
prepared in accordance with GAAP and met upon giving effect to the
entirety of the loan in the calculation, whether or not the loan itself
is fully advanced, as of the date the loan is closed; a certification
to this effect is required of all guaranteed lenders.
(d) The modified formula for determining whether the equity
requirement is met, ``adjusted tangible net worth,'' may be used only
in cases where the guarantee requested is for a loan, the proceeds of
which are to be used entirely to refinance a debt owed to the Federal
government or Federally guaranteed debt. In all other situations, the
equity requirement must be determined using tangible net worth.
CHAPTER XLII--RURAL BUSINESS-COOPERATIVE SERVICE AND RURAL UTILITIES
SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PART 4279--GUARANTEED LOANMAKING
0
5. The authority citation for part 4279 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7 U.S.C. 1989 and 7 U.S.C. 1932(a).
Subpart A--General
0
6. Section 4279.2 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 4279.2 Definitions and abbreviations.
(a) Definitions.
Adjusted tangible net worth. Tangible balance sheet equity plus
allowed tangible asset appreciation and subordinated owner debt.
Agency. The Rural Business-Cooperative Service or successor Agency
assigned by the Secretary of Agriculture to administer the B&I program.
References to the National Office, Finance Office, State Office or
other Agency offices or officials should be read as prefaced by
``Agency'' or ``Rural Development'' as applicable.
Allowed tangible asset appreciation. The difference between the
current net book value recorded on the financial statements (original
cost less cumulative depreciation) of real property assets and the
lesser of their current market value or original cost, where current
market value is determined using an appraisal satisfactory to the
Agency.
[[Page 33188]]
Arm's-length transaction. The sale, release, or disposition of
assets in which the title to the property passes to a ready, willing,
and able disinterested third party that is not affiliated with or
related to and has no security, monetary or stockholder interest in the
borrower or transferor at the time of the transaction.
Assignment Guarantee Agreement (Business and Industry). Form RD
4279-6, the signed agreement among the Agency, the lender, and the
holder containing the terms and conditions of an assignment of a
guaranteed portion of a loan, using the single note system.
Biogas. Biomass converted to gaseous fuel.
Biomass. Any organic material that is available on a renewable or
recurring basis including agricultural crops, trees grown for energy
production, wood waste and wood residues, plants, including aquatic
plants and grasses, fibers, animal waste and other waste materials,
fats, oils, greases, including recycled fats, oils and greases. It does
not include paper that is commonly recycled or unsegregated solid
waste.
Borrower. All parties liable for the loan except for guarantors.
Commercially available. Energy projects utilizing technology that
has a proven operating history, and for which there is an established
industry for the design, installation, and service (including spare
parts) of the equipment.
Conditional Commitment (Business and Industry). Form RD 4279-3, the
Agency's notice to the lender that the loan guarantee it has requested
is approved subject to the completion of all conditions and
requirements set forth by the Agency.
Deficiency balance. The balance remaining on a loan after all
collateral has been liquidated.
Deficiency judgment. A monetary judgment rendered by a court of
competent jurisdiction after foreclosure and liquidation of all
collateral securing the loan.
Energy projects. Commercially available projects that produce or
distribute energy or power and/or produce biomass or biogas fuel.
Commercially available energy projects that utilize technology that has
a proven operating history, and for which there is an established
industry for the design, installation, and service (including spare
parts) of the equipment.
Existing lender debt. A debt not guaranteed by the Agency, but owed
by a borrower to the same lender that is applying for or has received
the Agency guarantee.
Fair market value. The price that could reasonably be expected for
an asset in an arm's-length transaction between a willing buyer and a
willing seller under ordinary economic and business conditions.
Farmer's Home Administration (FmHA). The former agency of USDA that
previously administered the programs of this Agency. Many Instructions
and forms of FmHA are still applicable to Agency programs.
Finance Office. The office which maintains the Agency financial
accounting records located in St. Louis, Missouri.
High-impact business. A business that offers specialized products
and services that permit high prices for the products produced, may
have a strong presence in international market sales, may provide a
market for existing local business products and services, and which is
locally owned and managed.
Holder. A person or entity, other than the lender, who owns all or
part of the guaranteed portion of the loan with no servicing
responsibilities. When the single note option is used and the lender
assigns a part of the guaranteed note to an assignee, the assignee
becomes a holder only when the Agency receives notice and the
transaction is completed through the use of Form RD 4279-6 or
predecessor form.
Interim financing. A temporary or short-term loan made with the
clear intent that it will be repaid through another loan. Interim
financing is frequently used to pay construction and other costs
associated with a planned project, with permanent financing to be
obtained after project completion.
Lender. The organization making, servicing, and collecting the loan
which is guaranteed under the provision of the appropriate subpart.
Lender's Agreement (Business and Industry). Form RD 4279-4 or
predecessor form between the Agency and the lender setting forth the
lender's loan responsibilities when the Loan Note Guarantee is issued.
Loan Agreement. The agreement between the borrower and lender
containing the terms and conditions of the loan and the
responsibilities of the borrower and lender.
Loan Note Guarantee (Business and Industry). Form RD 4279-5 or
predecessor form, issued and executed by the Agency containing the
terms and conditions of the guarantee.
Loan-to-value. The ratio of the dollar amount of a loan to the
dollar value of the collateral pledged as security for the loan.
Natural resource value-added product. Any naturally occurring
product that is processed to add value to the product. For example,
straw is processed into particle board.
Negligent servicing. The failure to perform those services which a
reasonably prudent lender would perform in servicing (including
liquidation of) its own portfolio of loans that are not guaranteed. The
term includes not only the concept of a failure to act, but also not
acting in a timely manner, or acting in a manner contrary to the manner
in which a reasonably prudent lender would act.
Parity. A lien position whereby two or more lenders share a
security interest of equal priority in collateral. In the event of
default, each lender will be affected on a pro rata basis.
Participation. Sale of an interest in a loan by the lender wherein
the lender retains the note, collateral securing the note, and all
responsibility for loan servicing and liquidation.
Poor. A community or area is considered poor if, based on the most
recent decennial census data, either the county, city, or census tract
where the community or area is located has a median household income at
or below the poverty line for a family of four; has a median household
income below the nonmetropolitan median household income for the State;
or has a population of which 25 percent or more have income at or below
the poverty line.
Promissory Note. Evidence of debt. ``Note'' or ``Promissory Note''
shall also be construed to include ``Bond'' or other evidence of debt
where appropriate.
Qualified Intellectual Property. Trademarks, patents or copyrights
included on current (within one year) audited balance sheets for which
an audit opinion has been received that states the financial reports
fairly represent the values therein and the reported value has been
arrived at in accordance with GAAP standards for valuing intellectual
property. The supporting work papers must be satisfactory to the
Administrator.
Refinancing loan. A loan, all of the proceeds of which are applied
to extinguish the entire balance of an outstanding debt.
Rural Development. The Under Secretary for Rural Development has
policy and operational oversight responsibilities for RHS, RBS and RUS.
Spreadsheet. A table containing data from a series of financial
statements of a business over a period of time. Financial statement
analysis normally contains spreadsheets for balance sheet items and
income statements and may include funds flow statement data and
commonly used ratios. The spreadsheets enable a reviewer to easily scan
the
[[Page 33189]]
data, spot trends, and make comparisons.
State. Any of the 50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands of the United States, Guam, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of Palau,
the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of the Marshall
Islands.
Subordinated owner debt. Debt owed by the borrower to one or more
of the owner(s) that is subordinated to debt owed by the borrower to
the Agency or guaranteed by the Agency (aggregate B&I loan exposure)
pursuant to a subordination agreement satisfactory to the Agency. The
debt must have been issued in exchange for cash loaned to the borrower
for the benefit of the borrower's business. The terms of the
subordination agreement must provide that repayment will not commence
until the earlier of the date all aggregate B&I loan exposure has been
repaid or when a period of three consecutive years has passed during
which the borrower has met all loan covenants and evidenced operating
profit sufficient to commence partial repayment of this subordinated
debt after giving effect to the annual debt service requirements of the
aggregate B&I loan exposure. The partial repayment schedule in the case
of the latter scenario is subject to annual Agency concurrence and may
not be more accelerated than the rate of the debt repayment schedule in
effect for the Agency's aggregate B&I loan exposure.
Subordination. An agreement between the lender and borrower whereby
lien priorities on certain assets pledged to secure payment of the
guaranteed loan will be reduced to a position junior to, or on parity
with, the lien position of another loan in order for the Agency
borrower to obtain additional financing, not guaranteed by the Agency,
from the lender or a third party.
Tangible balance sheet equity. Total equity less the value of
intangible assets recorded on the financial statements, as determined
from balance sheets prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP), plus qualified intellectual property.
Veteran. For the purposes of assigning priority points, a veteran
is a person who is a veteran of any war, as defined in section 101(12)
of title 38, United States Code.
(b) Abbreviations.
B&I--Business and Industry
CF--Community Facilities
CLP--Certified Lenders Program
FSA--Farm Service Agency
FMI--Forms Manual Insert
NAD--National Appeals Division
OGC--Office of the General Counsel
RBS--Rural Business-Cooperative Service
RHS--Rural Housing Service
RUS--Rural Utilities Service
SBA--Small Business Administration
USDA--United States Department of Agriculture
(c) Accounting terms not otherwise defined in this part shall have
the definition ascribed to them under GAAP.
Subpart B--Business and Industry Loans
0
7. Section 4279.113 is amended by revising paragraph (r) and by adding
a paragraph (cc) to read as follows:
Sec. 4279.113 Eligible loan purposes.
* * * * *
(r) To refinance outstanding debt when it is determined that the
project is viable and refinancing is necessary to improve cash flow and
create new or save existing jobs. Except as provided for in Sec.
4279.108(d)(4) of this subpart, existing lender debt may be included
provided that, at the time of the application, the loan has been
current for at least the past 12 months (unless such status is achieved
by the lender forgiving the borrower's debt) and the lender is
providing better rates or terms. Subordinated owner debt is not
eligible under this paragraph. Unless the amount to be refinanced is
owed directly to the Federal government or is Federally guaranteed, the
refinancing must be a secondary part (less than 50 percent) of the
overall loan.
* * * * *
(cc) To finance energy projects. Commercially available energy
projects that produce biomass fuel or biogas as an output must have
completed two operating cycles at design performance levels submitted
to the Agency. Projects that produce steam or electricity as an output
must have met or exceeded acceptance test performance criteria
submitted to the Agency and be successfully interconnected with the
purchaser of the output. Performance or acceptance test requirements
for all other energy projects will be determined by the Agency on a
case by case basis. Financing for energy projects will only be allowed
when the facility has been constructed according to plans and
specifications and is producing at the quality and quantity projected
in the application.
0
8. Section 4279.131 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 4279.131 Credit quality.
* * * * *
(d) Equity. (1) A minimum of 10 percent tangible balance sheet
equity will be required for existing businesses at loan closing. A
minimum of 20 percent tangible balance sheet equity will be required
for new businesses at loan closing. For energy projects, the minimum
tangible balance sheet equity requirement range will be between 25
percent and 40 percent. Criteria for considering the minimum equity
required for an individual application will be based on: existing
businesses with successful financial and management history vs. start-
up businesses; personal/corporate guarantees offered; contractual
relationships with suppliers and buyers; credit rating; and strength of
the business plan/feasibility study. Where the application is a request
to refinance outstanding Federal direct or guaranteed loans, without
any new financing, the equity requirement may be determined using
adjusted tangible net worth. An application that combines a refinancing
guarantee request with a new loan guarantee request is subject to the
standard, unadjusted, equity requirement except as provided in
paragraphs (d)(1)(i) or (d)(1)(ii) of this section. Increases or
decreases in the equity requirements may be imposed or granted as
follows:
(i) A