The President's Spectrum Policy Initiative Spectrum Sharing Innovation Test-Bed, 33282-33284 [E6-8874]
Download as PDF
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
33282
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Notices
Southeast Region, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, Saint Petersburg, Florida
33701; phone (727) 824–5312; fax (727)
824–5309.
Written comments or requests for a
public hearing on this application
should be mailed to the Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
F/PR1, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Those
individuals requesting a hearing should
set forth the specific reasons why a
hearing on this particular request would
be appropriate.
Comments may also be submitted by
facsimile at (301)427–2521, provided
the facsimile is confirmed by hard copy
submitted by mail and postmarked no
later than the closing date of the
comment period.
Comments may also be submitted by
e-mail. The mailbox address for
providing e-mail comments is
NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov. Include
in the subject line of the e-mail
comment the following document
identifier: File No. 116–1843.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Skidmore or Kate Swails,
(301)713–2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subject permit is requested under the
authority of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the regulations
governing the taking and importing of
marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).
The applicant requests authorization
to import three male, adult beluga whale
(Delphinapterus leucas) from the
Marineland of Canada in Ontario,
Canada to Sea World of Florida in
Orlando, Florida. The applicant requests
this import for the purpose of public
display. The receiving facility, Sea
World of Florida, 7007 Sea World Drive,
Orlando, Florida 32821 is: (1) open to
the public on regularly scheduled basis
with access that is not limited or
restricted other than by charging for an
admission fee; (2) offers an educational
program based on professionally
accepted standards of the AZA and the
Alliance for Marine Mammal Parks and
Aquariums; and (3) holds an Exhibitor’s
License, number 58–C–0077, issued by
the U.S. Department of Agriculture
under the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C.
2131 – 59).
In addition to determining whether
the applicant meets the three public
display criteria, NMFS must determine
whether the applicant has demonstrated
that the proposed activity is humane
and does not represent any unnecessary
risks to the health and welfare of marine
mammals; that the proposed activity by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
itself, or in combination with other
activities, will not likely have a
significant adverse impact on the
species or stock; and that the applicant’s
expertise, facilities and resources are
adequate to accomplish successfully the
objectives and activities stated in the
application.
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), an initial
determination has been made that the
activity proposed is categorically
excluded from the requirement to
prepare an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
Concurrent with the publication of
this notice in the Federal Register,
NMFS is forwarding copies of this
application to the Marine Mammal
Commission and its Committee of
Scientific Advisors.
Dated: June 2, 2006.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–8959 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
[Docket No. 060602142-6142-01]
The President’s Spectrum Policy
Initiative Spectrum Sharing Innovation
Test-Bed
National Telecommunications
and Information Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry.
AGENCY:
The reports developed by the
U.S. Department of Commerce in
response to the President’s Spectrum
Policy Initiative included a
recommendation that the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) and the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC)
develop a plan to increase sharing of
spectrum between Federal and nonFederal users which includes evaluation
of technologies that are proposed to
enhance sharing.1 This Notice seeks
SUMMARY:
1 Spectrum Policy for the 21st Century -- The
President’s Spectrum Policy Initiative: Report 1
Recommendations of the Federal Government
Spectrum Task Force and Spectrum Policy for the
21st Century -- The President’s Spectrum Policy
Initiative: Report 2 Recommendations From State
and Local Governments and Private Sector
Responders, National Telecommunications and
Information Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce (June 2004), available at https://
www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
public comment to address the
implementation of the Spectrum
Sharing Innovation Test-Bed (Test-Bed)
where Federal and non-Federal users
can study the feasibility of increasing
the efficient use of the spectrum.
DATES: Written comments and papers in
response to this Notice are requested to
be submitted on or before July 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit an original and two
copies of written comments to the Office
of the Chief Counsel, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Room 4713, Attention: Spectrum
Sharing Innovation Test-Bed Notice,
Washington, DC 20230. Paper
submissions should include a three and
one-half inch computer diskette in
HTML, ASCII, Word, or WordPerfect
format (please specify version).
Diskettes should be labeled with the
name and organizational affiliation of
the filer, and the name of the word
processing program used to create the
document. Alternatively, comments and
papers may be submitted electronically
to testbed@ntia.doc.gov. Comments
submitted via electronic mail also
should be submitted in one or more of
the formats specified above. Comments
submitted in response to this Notice
will be posted on NTIA’s Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about this Notice, contact:
Edward Drocella, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Room 6725, Washington, DC
20230, (202) 482–2608, or
edrocella@ntia.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In May 2003, President Bush
established the Spectrum Policy
Initiative to promote the development
and implementation of a United States
spectrum policy for the 21st century. In
response to the Spectrum Policy
Initiative, the Secretary of Commerce
established a Federal Government
Spectrum Task Force and initiated a
series of public meetings to address
policies affecting spectrum use by the
Federal, state, and local governments,
and the private sector. The
recommendations resulting from these
activities were included in two reports
released by the Secretary of Commerce
in June 2004 (Commerce Reports). Based
on the recommendations contained in
these reports, the President directed the
federal agencies on November 30, 2004,
to plan the implementation of the
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
recommendations contained in the
reports.2
One of the recommendations directed
NTIA, in coordination with the FCC, to
establish a Test-Bed to examine the
feasibility of increased sharing between
Federal and non-Federal users.3
Specifically, the Test-Bed
recommendation states:
Within two years of this report’s
publication, NTIA and the FCC should
establish a pilot program to allow for
increased sharing between Federal and
non-Federal users. NTIA and the FCC
should each identify a segment of
spectrum of equal bandwidth within
their respective jurisdiction for this
program. Each segment should be
approximately 10 MHz for assignment
on a shared basis for Federal and nonFederal use. The spectrum to be
identified for this pilot program could
come from bands currently allocated on
either an exclusive or shared basis. Two
years after the inception of the pilot
program, NTIA and the FCC should
provide reports outlining the results and
suggesting appropriate procedures for
expanding the program as appropriate.
The recommendation to establish the
Test-Bed recognized that the current use
of spectrum for Federal and non-Federal
communications necessitates increased
sharing to benefit both Federal and nonFederal users of the spectrum.
Establishment of the objectives, rules,
guidelines, and responsibilities for the
Test-Bed will be essential to the success
of this sharing effort and will be vital to
the consideration of any future followon sharing initiatives.
Examples of technologies/services
that could be considered in the Test-Bed
include: High-power broadband, public
safety interoperability, adaptive
technologies (geo-location, frequency
avoidance, waveform detection),
advanced antenna technologies, sharing
between Federal and non-Federal
mobile satellite systems, advanced
modulation techniques, multiple input/
multiple output systems, extensions to
third generation wireless services for
public safety and federal users, mobile
mesh networking, and geographic
sharing. The Test-Bed may also be used
to evaluate new frequency assignment/
coordination techniques such as the
web-based capability in the 70/80/90
2 White House Executive Memorandum,
Improving Spectrum Management for the 21st
Century (November 2004).
3 By this Notice of Inquiry, NTIA is implementing
its responsibilities under the President’s November
2004 Executive Memorandum. The FCC is also
soliciting comment on many of these same issues
through a public notice. Public Notice, Federal
Communications Commission Seeks Public
Comment on Creation of a Spectrum Sharing
Innovation Test-Bed, ET Docket No. 06-89.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
33283
GHz bands or sharing using the
interference temperature concept.4
increases sharing with other radio
services.
II. Invitation to Comment
Establishment of the objectives, rules,
guidelines, and responsibilities will be
essential to the success of the Test-Bed.
The questions related to the Test-Bed
will be divided into five categories: (A)
Identification of the technologies/
services to be considered in the TestBed; (B) establishment of the process,
principles, and guidelines governing the
Test-Bed; (C) identification of the
candidate frequency band(s) for the
Test-Bed; (D) activation/termination of
the Test-Bed; and (E) evaluation of the
Test-Bed.
In conjunction with providing
information for consideration by NTIA,
interested parties are requested to
address the following questions and file
comments that will assist NTIA in
implementing a Test-Bed that will
benefit both Federal and non-Federal
users. Commenters may include any
other issue that is relevant to the areas
outlined below and should provide
copies of studies, reports, research or
other empirical data referenced in their
responses. Comments will be posted on
NTIA’s Web site at https://
www.ntia.doc.gov. These questions are
intended to promote discussion and
comment across a range of issues and
are not intended to limit the scope of
the comments filed in response to this
Notice.
B. Identification of the Candidate
Frequency Band(s) for the Test-Bed
The Test-Bed recommendation
included in the Commerce Reports
called for approximately 20 MHz to be
dedicated to the Test-Bed. How much
spectrum should be identified for the
Test-Bed?
What candidate frequency band(s)
should be used in the Test-Bed? What
criteria should be used in identifying
candidate frequency band(s) for the
Test-Bed? Please provide supporting
information for frequency band(s)
selected.
What limitations should apply to the
candidate frequency band(s) identified
for the Test-Bed (e.g., geographic,
power, antenna gain, time of day, etc.)?
What steps should be taken to protect
incumbent users in the candidate
frequency bands? Should an initial
electromagnetic compatibility analysis
(e.g., computer simulations) be
performed to develop the operating
conditions for the Test-Bed (e.g., limits
on radiated power levels, restrictions on
antenna, geographic limitations)?
A. Identification of Technologies/
Services Considered in the Test-Bed
What technologies, services,
assignment techniques, or sharing
techniques should be implemented in
the Test-Bed?
What relationships should the
technologies, services, assignment
techniques, or sharing techniques have
with the candidate frequency band(s)
identified for the Test-Bed?
Should the Test-Bed be limited to
prototype/operational equipment or can
hardware simulation also be employed?
If simulation can be employed, explain
the conditions under which it is
appropriate.
How does the proposed technology or
service achieve the goal of the Test-Bed
(e.g., increase sharing)? Please provide a
detailed description explaining how the
proposed technology or service
4 As part of the President’s Initiative to streamline
U.S. spectrum policy, fiber-speed wireless
communications links in the 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz,
92-94 GHz and 94.1-95 GHz bands may now be
coordinated and approved for non-Federal use in a
manner of minutes using a web-based capability
developed by NTIA. The public may access the
automated system at the following webpage: https://
freqcoord.ntia.doc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
C. Establishment of the Process,
Principles, and Guidelines Governing
the Test-Bed
What resources (including the
equipment to be evaluated in the TestBed), funding, personnel, or test
facilities are necessary for the Test-Bed?
How should the process, principles,
and guidelines for the Test-Bed be
specified (e.g., Cooperative Research
and Development Agreement (CRADA),
FCC Experimental License)?
What information should be included
in the controlling document (e.g.,
CRADA or FCC Experimental License)
for the Test-Bed? How should the terms
and conditions be specified for the TestBed (e.g., general, band-by-band)?
What procedures should be defined
for resolving conflicts that might arise
between operational incumbents and
the technologies/services implemented
in the Test-Bed?
At the completion of the Test-Bed,
what should happen to the technology/
service that is operating in the candidate
frequency band? Should the technology/
service be permitted to continue
operating on a permanent basis and new
spectrum identified for the next TestBed? If the technology/service is shown
to be compatible, should a procedure be
developed to find a permanent
frequency band?
Under what circumstances should the
initial conditions of the Test-Bed be
modified (e.g., spectrum resources
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
33284
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Notices
increased, locations expanded, timeframe increased)?
Who should be responsible for
providing the test personnel and
equipment for the Test-Bed?
Should organizations with proprietary
technology or information be permitted
to participate in the Test-Bed? If so, how
should release of data based on their
technology be handled?
D. Activation/Termination of the TestBed
Should computer simulations be
performed before the Test-Bed is
activated?
Should a test plan be developed and
agreed to by all parties before the TestBed is activated? If so, who should be
responsible for developing the test plan?
What process should be used to review
the test plan?
Under what conditions should the
Test-Bed be terminated (e.g., problems
with equipment)?
E. Evaluation of the Test-Bed
What metrics should be used in
evaluating the results of the Test-Bed?
Should status reports be prepared
throughout the duration of the Test-Bed
(e.g., 6 months)?
Who should be responsible for
analyzing the data from the Test-Bed
and preparing the final report?
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
III. Selection Criteria for Test-Bed
The following criteria are being
proposed to evaluate and select the
proposed technology or service to be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
implemented in the Test-Bed.
Comments are requested on the
proposed Test-Bed selection criteria.
How well does the proposed
technology or service achieve the goal of
the Test-Bed?
How readily available is the
equipment proposed for the Test-Bed?
How well does the proposed
technology or service explore creative
and original concepts in spectrum
sharing?
For the proposed technology or
service can the results of the Test-Bed
be disseminated broadly to enhance
scientific and technologic
understanding? If so, how broadly can
the results be applied?
How well does the proposed
technology or service address the
potential impact on the incumbent
spectrum user(s)?
How much and in what ways does the
proposed technology or service benefit
the public?
Are there any technical factors that
limit the proposed technology or service
to a specific frequency range?
Will the necessary technical support
be provided to assure performance of
the equipment during the Test-Bed? If
so, how sufficient is the proposed
support?
Dated: June 2, 2006.
Milton E. Brown,
Acting Chief Counsel, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–8874 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–60–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 06–32]
36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification
Defense Security Cooperation
Agency, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is
publishing the unclassified text of a
section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.
This is published to fulfill the
requirements of section 155 of Public
Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604–
6575.
The following is a copy of a letter to
the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, Transmittal 06–32 with
attached transmittal and policy
justification.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33282-33284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8874]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
[Docket No. 060602142-6142-01]
The President's Spectrum Policy Initiative Spectrum Sharing
Innovation Test-Bed
AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The reports developed by the U.S. Department of Commerce in
response to the President's Spectrum Policy Initiative included a
recommendation that the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
develop a plan to increase sharing of spectrum between Federal and non-
Federal users which includes evaluation of technologies that are
proposed to enhance sharing.\1\ This Notice seeks public comment to
address the implementation of the Spectrum Sharing Innovation Test-Bed
(Test-Bed) where Federal and non-Federal users can study the
feasibility of increasing the efficient use of the spectrum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Spectrum Policy for the 21\st\ Century -- The President's
Spectrum Policy Initiative: Report 1 Recommendations of the Federal
Government Spectrum Task Force and Spectrum Policy for the 21\st\
Century -- The President's Spectrum Policy Initiative: Report 2
Recommendations From State and Local Governments and Private Sector
Responders, National Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (June 2004), available
at https://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/.
DATES: Written comments and papers in response to this Notice are
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
requested to be submitted on or before July 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit an original and two copies of written comments to the
Office of the Chief Counsel, National Telecommunications and
Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 4713, Attention: Spectrum Sharing
Innovation Test-Bed Notice, Washington, DC 20230. Paper submissions
should include a three and one-half inch computer diskette in HTML,
ASCII, Word, or WordPerfect format (please specify version). Diskettes
should be labeled with the name and organizational affiliation of the
filer, and the name of the word processing program used to create the
document. Alternatively, comments and papers may be submitted
electronically to testbed@ntia.doc.gov. Comments submitted via
electronic mail also should be submitted in one or more of the formats
specified above. Comments submitted in response to this Notice will be
posted on NTIA's Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this Notice,
contact: Edward Drocella, National Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Room 6725, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-2608, or
edrocella@ntia.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In May 2003, President Bush established the Spectrum Policy
Initiative to promote the development and implementation of a United
States spectrum policy for the 21\st\ century. In response to the
Spectrum Policy Initiative, the Secretary of Commerce established a
Federal Government Spectrum Task Force and initiated a series of public
meetings to address policies affecting spectrum use by the Federal,
state, and local governments, and the private sector. The
recommendations resulting from these activities were included in two
reports released by the Secretary of Commerce in June 2004 (Commerce
Reports). Based on the recommendations contained in these reports, the
President directed the federal agencies on November 30, 2004, to plan
the implementation of the
[[Page 33283]]
recommendations contained in the reports.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ White House Executive Memorandum, Improving Spectrum
Management for the 21\st\ Century (November 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the recommendations directed NTIA, in coordination with the
FCC, to establish a Test-Bed to examine the feasibility of increased
sharing between Federal and non-Federal users.\3\ Specifically, the
Test-Bed recommendation states:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ By this Notice of Inquiry, NTIA is implementing its
responsibilities under the President's November 2004 Executive
Memorandum. The FCC is also soliciting comment on many of these same
issues through a public notice. Public Notice, Federal
Communications Commission Seeks Public Comment on Creation of a
Spectrum Sharing Innovation Test-Bed, ET Docket No. 06-89.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Within two years of this report's publication, NTIA and the FCC
should establish a pilot program to allow for increased sharing between
Federal and non-Federal users. NTIA and the FCC should each identify a
segment of spectrum of equal bandwidth within their respective
jurisdiction for this program. Each segment should be approximately 10
MHz for assignment on a shared basis for Federal and non-Federal use.
The spectrum to be identified for this pilot program could come from
bands currently allocated on either an exclusive or shared basis. Two
years after the inception of the pilot program, NTIA and the FCC should
provide reports outlining the results and suggesting appropriate
procedures for expanding the program as appropriate.
The recommendation to establish the Test-Bed recognized that the
current use of spectrum for Federal and non-Federal communications
necessitates increased sharing to benefit both Federal and non-Federal
users of the spectrum. Establishment of the objectives, rules,
guidelines, and responsibilities for the Test-Bed will be essential to
the success of this sharing effort and will be vital to the
consideration of any future follow-on sharing initiatives.
Examples of technologies/services that could be considered in the
Test-Bed include: High-power broadband, public safety interoperability,
adaptive technologies (geo-location, frequency avoidance, waveform
detection), advanced antenna technologies, sharing between Federal and
non-Federal mobile satellite systems, advanced modulation techniques,
multiple input/multiple output systems, extensions to third generation
wireless services for public safety and federal users, mobile mesh
networking, and geographic sharing. The Test-Bed may also be used to
evaluate new frequency assignment/coordination techniques such as the
web-based capability in the 70/80/90 GHz bands or sharing using the
interference temperature concept.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ As part of the President's Initiative to streamline U.S.
spectrum policy, fiber-speed wireless communications links in the
71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz, 92-94 GHz and 94.1-95 GHz bands may now be
coordinated and approved for non-Federal use in a manner of minutes
using a web-based capability developed by NTIA. The public may
access the automated system at the following webpage: https://
freqcoord.ntia.doc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Invitation to Comment
Establishment of the objectives, rules, guidelines, and
responsibilities will be essential to the success of the Test-Bed. The
questions related to the Test-Bed will be divided into five categories:
(A) Identification of the technologies/services to be considered in the
Test-Bed; (B) establishment of the process, principles, and guidelines
governing the Test-Bed; (C) identification of the candidate frequency
band(s) for the Test-Bed; (D) activation/termination of the Test-Bed;
and (E) evaluation of the Test-Bed.
In conjunction with providing information for consideration by
NTIA, interested parties are requested to address the following
questions and file comments that will assist NTIA in implementing a
Test-Bed that will benefit both Federal and non-Federal users.
Commenters may include any other issue that is relevant to the areas
outlined below and should provide copies of studies, reports, research
or other empirical data referenced in their responses. Comments will be
posted on NTIA's Web site at https://www.ntia.doc.gov. These questions
are intended to promote discussion and comment across a range of issues
and are not intended to limit the scope of the comments filed in
response to this Notice.
A. Identification of Technologies/Services Considered in the Test-Bed
What technologies, services, assignment techniques, or sharing
techniques should be implemented in the Test-Bed?
What relationships should the technologies, services, assignment
techniques, or sharing techniques have with the candidate frequency
band(s) identified for the Test-Bed?
Should the Test-Bed be limited to prototype/operational equipment
or can hardware simulation also be employed? If simulation can be
employed, explain the conditions under which it is appropriate.
How does the proposed technology or service achieve the goal of the
Test-Bed (e.g., increase sharing)? Please provide a detailed
description explaining how the proposed technology or service increases
sharing with other radio services.
B. Identification of the Candidate Frequency Band(s) for the Test-Bed
The Test-Bed recommendation included in the Commerce Reports called
for approximately 20 MHz to be dedicated to the Test-Bed. How much
spectrum should be identified for the Test-Bed?
What candidate frequency band(s) should be used in the Test-Bed?
What criteria should be used in identifying candidate frequency band(s)
for the Test-Bed? Please provide supporting information for frequency
band(s) selected.
What limitations should apply to the candidate frequency band(s)
identified for the Test-Bed (e.g., geographic, power, antenna gain,
time of day, etc.)?
What steps should be taken to protect incumbent users in the
candidate frequency bands? Should an initial electromagnetic
compatibility analysis (e.g., computer simulations) be performed to
develop the operating conditions for the Test-Bed (e.g., limits on
radiated power levels, restrictions on antenna, geographic
limitations)?
C. Establishment of the Process, Principles, and Guidelines Governing
the Test-Bed
What resources (including the equipment to be evaluated in the
Test-Bed), funding, personnel, or test facilities are necessary for the
Test-Bed?
How should the process, principles, and guidelines for the Test-Bed
be specified (e.g., Cooperative Research and Development Agreement
(CRADA), FCC Experimental License)?
What information should be included in the controlling document
(e.g., CRADA or FCC Experimental License) for the Test-Bed? How should
the terms and conditions be specified for the Test-Bed (e.g., general,
band-by-band)?
What procedures should be defined for resolving conflicts that
might arise between operational incumbents and the technologies/
services implemented in the Test-Bed?
At the completion of the Test-Bed, what should happen to the
technology/service that is operating in the candidate frequency band?
Should the technology/service be permitted to continue operating on a
permanent basis and new spectrum identified for the next Test-Bed? If
the technology/service is shown to be compatible, should a procedure be
developed to find a permanent frequency band?
Under what circumstances should the initial conditions of the Test-
Bed be modified (e.g., spectrum resources
[[Page 33284]]
increased, locations expanded, time-frame increased)?
Who should be responsible for providing the test personnel and
equipment for the Test-Bed?
Should organizations with proprietary technology or information be
permitted to participate in the Test-Bed? If so, how should release of
data based on their technology be handled?
D. Activation/Termination of the Test-Bed
Should computer simulations be performed before the Test-Bed is
activated?
Should a test plan be developed and agreed to by all parties before
the Test-Bed is activated? If so, who should be responsible for
developing the test plan? What process should be used to review the
test plan?
Under what conditions should the Test-Bed be terminated (e.g.,
problems with equipment)?
E. Evaluation of the Test-Bed
What metrics should be used in evaluating the results of the Test-
Bed?
Should status reports be prepared throughout the duration of the
Test-Bed (e.g., 6 months)?
Who should be responsible for analyzing the data from the Test-Bed
and preparing the final report?
III. Selection Criteria for Test-Bed
The following criteria are being proposed to evaluate and select
the proposed technology or service to be implemented in the Test-Bed.
Comments are requested on the proposed Test-Bed selection criteria.
How well does the proposed technology or service achieve the goal
of the Test-Bed?
How readily available is the equipment proposed for the Test-Bed?
How well does the proposed technology or service explore creative
and original concepts in spectrum sharing?
For the proposed technology or service can the results of the Test-
Bed be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technologic
understanding? If so, how broadly can the results be applied?
How well does the proposed technology or service address the
potential impact on the incumbent spectrum user(s)?
How much and in what ways does the proposed technology or service
benefit the public?
Are there any technical factors that limit the proposed technology
or service to a specific frequency range?
Will the necessary technical support be provided to assure
performance of the equipment during the Test-Bed? If so, how sufficient
is the proposed support?
Dated: June 2, 2006.
Milton E. Brown,
Acting Chief Counsel, National Telecommunications and Information
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-8874 Filed 6-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-60-S