Environmental Impact Statement; Stark, Mahoning, Columbiana Counties, OH, 33332-33333 [06-5217]
Download as PDF
33332
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5403]
Notice of Intent To Amend the Charter
of the Secretary of State’s Advisory
Committee on Transformational
Diplomacy
Summary: Pursuant to section 9(a) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the general
authority of the Secretary and the
Department of State, as derived from the
President’s constitutional authority and
as set forth in sections 2656 and 2651a
of Title 22 of the United States Code and
other relevant statutes, this is a notice
of intent to amend the charter
established for the Secretary of State’s
Advisory Committee on
Transformational Diplomacy.
The Advisory Committee is to provide
private sector expertise related to
transformational diplomacy and other
institutional challenges facing the
Department of State, in particular as
they concern the effective structuring,
leadership and management of a global
diplomacy enterprise. Members of the
Advisory Committee may include
private sector individuals, including
former U.S. Government officials. All
meetings of this Committee will be
published ahead of time in the Federal
Register.
Additionally, the Secretary of State’s
Advisory Committee on
Transformational Diplomacy is essential
to the conduct of Department of State
business, and is in the public interest.
Further information regarding this
committee may be obtained from
Madelyn S. Marchessault, Office of
Management Policy, U.S. Department of
State, Washington, DC 20520, phone
(202) 647–1068.
Dated: May 16, 2006.
Marguerite Coffey,
Acting Director, Office of Management Policy,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–8957 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–35–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement;
Stark, Mahoning, Columbiana
Counties, OH
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT, 200
North High Street, 3rd Floor, Columbus,
Ohio, 43215.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this
notice to advise the public that an
Environmental Impact Statement will be
prepared for a proposed highway project
in Stark, Mahoning, and Columbiana
Counties, Ohio.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy Blalock, Senior Transportation
Engineer, Federal Highway
Administration, 200 N. High Street,
Room 328, Columbus, Ohio 43215,
Telephone: (614) 280–6823.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
FHWA, in cooperation with the Ohio
Department of Transportation, will
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for a proposal to
improve transportation in the United
States Route 62/State Route 14 corridor
that begins at the existing SR173/US62
interchange on the west side of the City
of Alliance (western terminus) in Stark
County to State Route 11 (eastern
terminus) in Columbiana County. The
purpose of the project is to support local
economic development activities,
address traffic congestion, and fix
existing deficiencies in the US62/SR14
transportation corridor. Alternatives
under consideration will include, at a
minimum: taking no action; building a
4-lane controlled access facility on new
alignment; building a 2-lane facility
within 4-lane right-of-way on new
location; building a 2-lane facility
within 2-lane right-of-way on new
location; and improving/widening the
existing roadway.
The limits of the study are from the
SR173/US62 interchange west of
Alliance to SR11 between the cities of
Salem and Columbiana, a distance of
approximately 22 miles. The US62/
SR14 corridor passes through portions
of Stark, Mahoning, and Columbiana
counties. Through Alliance, the existing
roadway consists of a five-lane section
between the US62/SR173 interchange
and Western Avenue, and a four-lane
section from Western Avenue to a point
near the eastern corporation limits. At
this point, the existing roadway tapers
to a two-lane section that continues out
of Alliance and Stark County to follow
the border between Mahoning and
Columbiana counties and continuing
toward Salem. The roadway then enters
Columbiana County and continues
through Salem, mostly as a two-lane
roadway with auxiliary turn lanes at
major intersections. A short section of
the roadway on the eastern side of
Salem is three lanes with two lanes
running eastbound and one lane
westbound.
The proposed improvement of US62/
SR14 would meet the goals of ACCESS
OHIO which is to improve the mobility
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
along the macro-corridor in order to
encourage economic development.
Completion of Ohio’s Macro Highway
Corridor System was recommended in
the 1993 ACCESS OHIO Macro Phase as
an important goal for Ohio. Completion
for these corridors was also
recommended in Governor Taft’s 2003
Jobs and Progress Plan and again
recommended by ACCESS OHIO 2004–
2030.
The existing US62/SR14 corridor has
many deficiencies that contribute to a
variety of transportation problems.
These problems include poor levels of
service at signals in both Alliance and
Salem, high number of access points on
US62 in both Alliance and Salem, high
crash rates at existing intersections, and
steep grades and tight curves,
particularly between Salem and SR11.
These inadequacies lead to safety
problems, reduced levels of service, and
transportation inefficiencies.
FHWA, ODOT, and other local
agencies invite participation in defining
the alternatives to be evaluated in the
EIS, and any significant social,
economic, or environmental issues
related to the alternatives. Information
describing the purpose of the project,
the project area to be studied, the
existing and future conditions of the
project area, the public involvement
plan, and the preliminary project
schedule may be obtained from the
FHWA at the address provided above.
Coordination with concerned federal,
state, and local agencies will be
conducted at five established
concurrence points in ODOT’s Project
Development Process. Coordination will
be continued throughout the study with
Federal, State, and local agencies, and
with private organizations and citizens
who express or are known to have
interest in this proposal. The draft EIS
(DEIS) will be available for public and
agency review and comment prior to the
public hearing. The final EIS (FEIS) will
be available for public and agency
review and comment prior to the
approval of the Record of Decision
(ROD).
To ensure that the full range of issues
relating to this proposed action are
addressed, and all significant issues
identified, comments and suggestions
are invited from all interested parties.
Comments or questions concerning this
proposed action and the EIS should be
sent to the FHWA at the address
provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program).
be accomplished by creating an
additional travel lane in each direction
(east and west), separating the east and
Victoria Peters,
west bound lanes by a median,
Director, Office of Engineering Operations,
improving inside and outside widths,
Federal Highway Administration, Columbus,
and providing left-turn channelization
Ohio.
at all public road intersections within
[FR Doc. 06–5217 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
the project limits. Safety would also be
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
improved at the State Route 46/41
junction by replacing the at grade
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION intersection with a new interchange for
the connection. The FHWA project
reference number is H240 00PE (006).
Federal Highway Administration
The actions by the Federal agencies, and
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions the laws under which such actions were
on Proposed Highway in California
taken, are described in the
Environmental Assessment (EA)/
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Finding of No Significant Impact
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
(FONSI) for the project, approved on
ACTION: Notice of limitation on claims
May 19th, 2006, and in other documents
for judicial review of actions by FHWA
in the FHWA administrative record. The
and other Federal agencies.
EA/FONSI, and other documents in the
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions FHWA administrative record file are
available by contacting the FHWA or the
taken by the FHWA and other Federal
California Department of Transportation
agencies that are final within the
at the addresses provided above. The
meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). These
FHWA EA/FONSI can be reviewed and
actions relate to a proposed highway
downloaded from the project Web site at
project, State Route 46 Corridor
Improvement Project between Kilo Posts https://safer46.dot.ca.gov/.
The notice applies to all Federal
51.8 to 90.6 (Post Miles 32.2 to 56.3) in
agency decisions as of the issuance date
San Luis Obispo County, State of
of this notice and all laws under which
California. These actions grant
such actions were taken, including but
approvals for the project.
not limited to:
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is
1. General: National Environmental
advising the public of final agency
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A
4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23
claim seeking judicial review of the
U.S.C. 109].
Federal agency actions on the highway
2. Air: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401–
project will be barred unless the claim
7671(q).
is filed on or before December 5, 2006.
3. Land: Landscaping and Scenic
If the Federal law that authorizes
Enhancement (Wildflowers), 23 U.S.C.
judicial review of a claim provides a
319.
time period of less than 180 days for
4. Wildlife: Endangered Species Act
filing such claim, then that shorter time
[16 U.S.C. 1531–1544 and section 1536],
period still applies.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
U.S.C. 661–667(d)], Migratory Bird
Dominic Hoang, Project Development
Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712].
Engineer, Federal Highway
5. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Administration, 650 Capitol Mall, #4–
Section 106 of the National Historic
100, Sacramento, CA 95814, weekdays
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
between 7 a.m. and 4 p.m., telephone
[16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]; Archeological
916–498–5002,
Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16
dominic.hoang@fhwa.dot.gov. John
U.S.C. 470(aa)–11]; Archeological and
Luchetta, Senior Environmental
Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C.
Planner, California Department of
469–469(c)]; Native American Grave
Transportation, 50 Higuera Street, San
Protection and Repatriation Act
Luis Obispo, CA 93402, weekdays
(NAGPRA) [25 U.S.C. 2001–3013].
between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., (805)
6. Social and Economic: Civil Rights
549–3493, johnlLuchetta@dot.ca.gov.
Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000(d)–
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
2000(d)(1)]; American Indian Religious
hereby given that the FHWA and other
Freedom Act [42 U.S.C. 1996]; Farmland
Federal agencies have taken final agency Protection Policy Act (FPPA) [7 U.S.C.
actions by issuing approvals for the
4201–4209]; The Uniform Relocation
following highway project in the State
Assistance and Real Property
of California. This project would
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as
improve safety and provide congestion
amended.
7. Hazardous Materials:
relief on State Route 46, San Luis
Comprehensive Environmental
Obispo County, California. This would
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Jun 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33333
Response, Compensation, and Liabiilty
Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675;
Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 19086 (SARA);
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6901–6992(k).
8. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990
Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988
Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898,
Fedeal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income
Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and
Enhancement of Cultural Resources;
E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O.
13287 Preserve America; E.O. 13175
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514
Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112
Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Fedeal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation of
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
(Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1)).
Issued on: June 1, 2006.
Maiser Khaled,
Director, Project Development &
Environment, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 06–5202 Filed 6–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA 2006–24322; Notice 2]
Yokohama Tire Corporation, Grant of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Yokohama Tire Corporation
(Yokohama) has determined that certain
tires that it produced in 2005 and 2006
do not comply with S4.3.2 of 49 CFR
571.109, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 109, ‘‘New
pneumatic tires.’’ Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h), Yokohama has
petitioned for a determination that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety and has filed an
appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR
part 573, ‘‘Defect and Noncompliance
Reports.’’ Notice of receipt of a petition
was published, with a 30-day comment
period, on April 7, 2006, in the Federal
Register (71 FR 17954). NHTSA
received no comments.
Affected are a total of approximately
1,918 Yokohama brand T155/70D17
110M Y870B temporary-use-only tires
produced from August 2005 to February
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33332-33333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5217]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement; Stark, Mahoning, Columbiana
Counties, OH
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT, 200 North High
Street, 3rd Floor, Columbus, Ohio, 43215.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an
Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared for a proposed highway
project in Stark, Mahoning, and Columbiana Counties, Ohio.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Blalock, Senior Transportation
Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, 200 N. High Street, Room 328,
Columbus, Ohio 43215, Telephone: (614) 280-6823.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Ohio
Department of Transportation, will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for a proposal to improve transportation in the United
States Route 62/State Route 14 corridor that begins at the existing
SR173/US62 interchange on the west side of the City of Alliance
(western terminus) in Stark County to State Route 11 (eastern terminus)
in Columbiana County. The purpose of the project is to support local
economic development activities, address traffic congestion, and fix
existing deficiencies in the US62/SR14 transportation corridor.
Alternatives under consideration will include, at a minimum: taking no
action; building a 4-lane controlled access facility on new alignment;
building a 2-lane facility within 4-lane right-of-way on new location;
building a 2-lane facility within 2-lane right-of-way on new location;
and improving/widening the existing roadway.
The limits of the study are from the SR173/US62 interchange west of
Alliance to SR11 between the cities of Salem and Columbiana, a distance
of approximately 22 miles. The US62/SR14 corridor passes through
portions of Stark, Mahoning, and Columbiana counties. Through Alliance,
the existing roadway consists of a five-lane section between the US62/
SR173 interchange and Western Avenue, and a four-lane section from
Western Avenue to a point near the eastern corporation limits. At this
point, the existing roadway tapers to a two-lane section that continues
out of Alliance and Stark County to follow the border between Mahoning
and Columbiana counties and continuing toward Salem. The roadway then
enters Columbiana County and continues through Salem, mostly as a two-
lane roadway with auxiliary turn lanes at major intersections. A short
section of the roadway on the eastern side of Salem is three lanes with
two lanes running eastbound and one lane westbound.
The proposed improvement of US62/SR14 would meet the goals of
ACCESS OHIO which is to improve the mobility along the macro-corridor
in order to encourage economic development. Completion of Ohio's Macro
Highway Corridor System was recommended in the 1993 ACCESS OHIO Macro
Phase as an important goal for Ohio. Completion for these corridors was
also recommended in Governor Taft's 2003 Jobs and Progress Plan and
again recommended by ACCESS OHIO 2004-2030.
The existing US62/SR14 corridor has many deficiencies that
contribute to a variety of transportation problems. These problems
include poor levels of service at signals in both Alliance and Salem,
high number of access points on US62 in both Alliance and Salem, high
crash rates at existing intersections, and steep grades and tight
curves, particularly between Salem and SR11. These inadequacies lead to
safety problems, reduced levels of service, and transportation
inefficiencies.
FHWA, ODOT, and other local agencies invite participation in
defining the alternatives to be evaluated in the EIS, and any
significant social, economic, or environmental issues related to the
alternatives. Information describing the purpose of the project, the
project area to be studied, the existing and future conditions of the
project area, the public involvement plan, and the preliminary project
schedule may be obtained from the FHWA at the address provided above.
Coordination with concerned federal, state, and local agencies will
be conducted at five established concurrence points in ODOT's Project
Development Process. Coordination will be continued throughout the
study with Federal, State, and local agencies, and with private
organizations and citizens who express or are known to have interest in
this proposal. The draft EIS (DEIS) will be available for public and
agency review and comment prior to the public hearing. The final EIS
(FEIS) will be available for public and agency review and comment prior
to the approval of the Record of Decision (ROD).
To ensure that the full range of issues relating to this proposed
action are addressed, and all significant issues identified, comments
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be sent to
the FHWA at the address provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
[[Page 33333]]
Federal programs and activities apply to this program).
Victoria Peters,
Director, Office of Engineering Operations, Federal Highway
Administration, Columbus, Ohio.
[FR Doc. 06-5217 Filed 6-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P