Authority of Agencies in the Fair Housing Assistance Program To Investigate Allegations of Discrimination in Lending Complaints, 33138 [E6-8845]
Download as PDF
33138
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 109 / Wednesday June 7, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 115
[Docket No. FR–5047–N–01]
Authority of Agencies in the Fair
Housing Assistance Program To
Investigate Allegations of
Discrimination in Lending Complaints
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity, HUD.
ACTION: Statement of policy.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_2
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This statement of policy
advises the public that HUD does not
view two recent fair housing federal
court decisions as in any way affecting
the authority of state and local agencies
to enforce their own fair housing laws
that HUD has certified as substantially
equivalent to the federal Fair Housing
Act. State and local fair housing
enforcement agencies administering
substantially equivalent fair housing
laws have the authority to enforce those
statutes and ordinances against any
respondent, including a national bank,
within their jurisdictions. This is not a
new policy. This statement of policy
clarifies existing regulations at 24 CFR
115.202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Greene, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Programs, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 5204, Washington, DC
20410–8000; telephone (202) 619–8046
(this is not a toll-free number). Persons
with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Two
recent, related decisions in the United
States District Court for the Southern
District of New York (The Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency v. Spitzer,
396 F.Supp.2d 383 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
(‘‘OCC v. Spitzer’’) and The Clearing
House Association, L.L.C. v. Spitzer, 394
F.Supp.2d 620 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
(‘‘Clearing House v. Spitzer’’)), rejected
the New York Attorney General’s
assertion of visitorial authority over
national banks in order to enforce the
state’s fair housing law. As a result of
these decisions, a question has arisen
regarding the authority of state and local
agencies to conduct investigations
under laws that HUD has certified as
being substantially equivalent to the
federal Fair Housing Act.
It is HUD’s position that these cases
do not affect the authority of state and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:02 Jun 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
local agencies to enforce laws that HUD
has certified as substantially equivalent.
In reaching its decision in Clearing
House v. Spitzer, the Court took notice
of the fact that the New York Attorney
General was not the entity authorized to
bring actions under the state’s certified
law. The Court noted, however, that the
federal Fair Housing Act ‘‘establishes
several means of enforcing these
provisions and the other antidiscrimination provisions in the Act,
including administrative enforcement
by the U.S. Secretary of Housing and
Urban Development; administrative
enforcement by certified state and local
agencies; private causes of action by
aggrieved persons; and civil
enforcement by the U.S. Attorney
General where that federal official
discerns a ‘pattern and practice’ of
violations.’’ Id. at 628 (Emphasis
added.)
Therefore, it is HUD’s statement of
policy that state and local fair housing
enforcement agencies who are
administering fair housing laws that
HUD has certified as substantially
equivalent to the Federal Fair Housing
Act have the authority to enforce those
statutes and ordinances against any
respondent, including a national bank,
within their jurisdictions.
Dated: May 12, 2006.
Karen A. Newton,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Operations
and Management, Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity.
[FR Doc. E6–8845 Filed 6–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 203
[Docket No. FR–4911–F–02]
RIN 2502–AI18
Prohibition of Property Flipping in
HUD’s Single Family Mortgage
Insurance Programs; Additional
Exceptions to Time Restriction on
Sales
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule amends HUD’s
regulations that address the predatory
practice of property ‘‘flipping’’ and
establishes certain time restrictions
regarding the sale of properties whose
purchase is being financed with Federal
Housing Administration (FHA)
mortgage insurance. The final rule
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
broadens the exceptions to the time
restrictions on sales to include
government-sponsored enterprises
(GSEs), state- and federally chartered
financial institutions, nonprofits
organizations approved to purchase
HUD Real Estate-Owned (REO) singlefamily properties at a discount with
resale restrictions, local and state
governments and their
instrumentalities, and, upon
announcement by HUD through
issuance of a notice, sales of properties
in areas designated by the President as
Federal disaster areas. This final rule
follows publication of a December 23,
2004, interim rule, and takes into
consideration the public comments
received on the interim rule.
DATES: Effective Date: July 7, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret Burns, Director, Office of
Single Family Program Development,
Office of Insured Single Family
Housing, Room 9266, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20410–8000; telephone (202) 708–2121
(this is not a toll-free number). Hearingor speech-impaired individuals may
access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On December 23, 2004 (69 FR 77114),
HUD published an interim rule revising
its regulations addressing property
‘‘flipping’’ in the Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) single-family
mortgage insurance programs at 24 CFR
203.37a. Property ‘‘flipping’’ is a
predatory lending practice whereby a
property that was acquired is quickly
resold for a considerable profit with an
artificially inflated value, often assisted
by a mortgagee’s collusion with the
property appraiser and with others
involved in the mortgage loan
transaction. Most property flipping
occurs within a matter of days after the
initial property acquisition. Minor
cosmetic improvements, if any, may be
made to the property to make it appeal
to an unwary homeowner.
Among other requirements, § 203.37a
sets forth time restrictions that make
properties that have recently been
resold ineligible as security for FHAinsured mortgage financing.
Specifically, § 203.37a prohibits FHAinsured mortgage financing for any
property being sold in 90 days or less
after acquisition by the seller. Properties
that are sold between 91 and 180 days
after acquisition by the sellers to
homebuyers seeking FHA-insured
E:\FR\FM\07JNR2.SGM
07JNR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 7, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8845]
[[Page 33137]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part IV
Department of Housing and Urban Development
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
24 CFR Parts 81, 115, and 203
Authority of Agencies in the Fair Housing Assistance Program To
Investigate Allegations of Discrimination in Lending Complaints
Prohibition of Property Flipping in Single Family Mortgage Insurance
Programs
Regulatory Amendments To Strengthen Prevention of Predatory Lending
Practices; Rules and Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 109 / Wednesday June 7, 2006 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 33138]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 115
[Docket No. FR-5047-N-01]
Authority of Agencies in the Fair Housing Assistance Program To
Investigate Allegations of Discrimination in Lending Complaints
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity, HUD.
ACTION: Statement of policy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This statement of policy advises the public that HUD does not
view two recent fair housing federal court decisions as in any way
affecting the authority of state and local agencies to enforce their
own fair housing laws that HUD has certified as substantially
equivalent to the federal Fair Housing Act. State and local fair
housing enforcement agencies administering substantially equivalent
fair housing laws have the authority to enforce those statutes and
ordinances against any respondent, including a national bank, within
their jurisdictions. This is not a new policy. This statement of policy
clarifies existing regulations at 24 CFR 115.202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Greene, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Programs, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 5204, Washington, DC 20410-
8000; telephone (202) 619-8046 (this is not a toll-free number).
Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service
at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Two recent, related decisions in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York (The Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency v. Spitzer, 396 F.Supp.2d 383
(S.D.N.Y. 2005) (``OCC v. Spitzer'') and The Clearing House
Association, L.L.C. v. Spitzer, 394 F.Supp.2d 620 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
(``Clearing House v. Spitzer'')), rejected the New York Attorney
General's assertion of visitorial authority over national banks in
order to enforce the state's fair housing law. As a result of these
decisions, a question has arisen regarding the authority of state and
local agencies to conduct investigations under laws that HUD has
certified as being substantially equivalent to the federal Fair Housing
Act.
It is HUD's position that these cases do not affect the authority
of state and local agencies to enforce laws that HUD has certified as
substantially equivalent. In reaching its decision in Clearing House v.
Spitzer, the Court took notice of the fact that the New York Attorney
General was not the entity authorized to bring actions under the
state's certified law. The Court noted, however, that the federal Fair
Housing Act ``establishes several means of enforcing these provisions
and the other anti-discrimination provisions in the Act, including
administrative enforcement by the U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban
Development; administrative enforcement by certified state and local
agencies; private causes of action by aggrieved persons; and civil
enforcement by the U.S. Attorney General where that federal official
discerns a `pattern and practice' of violations.'' Id. at 628 (Emphasis
added.)
Therefore, it is HUD's statement of policy that state and local
fair housing enforcement agencies who are administering fair housing
laws that HUD has certified as substantially equivalent to the Federal
Fair Housing Act have the authority to enforce those statutes and
ordinances against any respondent, including a national bank, within
their jurisdictions.
Dated: May 12, 2006.
Karen A. Newton,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Operations and Management, Fair Housing
and Equal Opportunity.
[FR Doc. E6-8845 Filed 6-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P