Choccolocco Creek Multipurpose Dam No. 11, Calhoun County, AL, 32302-32304 [E6-8591]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
32302
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 107 / Monday, June 5, 2006 / Notices
Total Annual Burden: 3,156 hours.
Dated: May 25, 2006.
Roberto Salazar,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. E6–8655 Filed 6–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Information Collection; Request for
Comment; Homeowner Risk Reduction
Behaviors Concerning Wildfire Risks
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Forest Service is seeking comments
from all interested individuals and
organizations on a new, one-time
information collection, Homeowner
Risk Reduction Behaviors Concerning
Wildfire Risks. The information will be
collected from homeowner groups, such
as homeowners associations, that have
been affected by wildfires.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing on or before August 4, 2006 to
be assured of consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this
notice should be addressed to Dr. Brian
Kent, Project Leader, Rocky Mountain
Research Station, Forest Service, USDA,
2150 Centre Avenue, Building A, Fort
Collins, CO 80526.
Comments also may be submitted via
facsimile to (970) 295–5959 or by e-mail
to bkent@fs.fed.us.
The public may inspect comments
received at the Rocky Mountain
Research Station, Forest Service, USDA,
2150 Centre Avenue, Building A, Fort
Collins, Colorado, during normal
business hours. Visitors are encouraged
to call ahead to (970) 295–5955 to
facilitate entry to the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Brian Kent, Rocky Mountain Research
Station, at (970) 295–5955. Individuals
who use telecommunication devices for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339
twenty-four hours a day, every day of
the year, including holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Homeowner Risk Reduction
Behaviors Concerning Wildfire Risks.
OMB Number: 0596–New.
Expiration Date of Approval: N/A.
Type of Request: New.
Abstract: The threat of wildfire to
residents located in areas next to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Jun 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
forested public lands has increased
significantly during the last decade. As
homeowners migrate to areas that are at
increased risk from wildfire, they face
important decisions regarding how
much risk to accept from various
sources. An important component of
making decisions regarding risk is to
understand the behaviors that are
effective at reducing the risk and the
information sources that are considered
reliable for risk reduction information.
To gain a better insight into
homeowners’ perceptions of wildfire
risk, behaviors that reduce wildfire risk,
and most effective methods of
communicating the risk of wildfire, it is
important to collect information directly
from the homeowners that are at risk.
The results of the collection will
provide important information for
public land managers and private
homeowners that will improve the
understanding of the issues and options
between both groups.
Homeowners located in the wildlandurban interface in areas that were
affected by wildfires, will be asked to
return surveys. The homeowners are
members of organized homeowners
associations and their participation is
voluntary. The survey will be presented
to three focus groups, each comprised of
seven Homeowner Association
members; after which, the survey will
be mailed to homeowners by Integrated
Resource Solutions in Boulder,
Colorado, operating under a Research
Joint Venture with the Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Research Station in
Fort Collins, Colorado.
The type of information collection
will include: (1) Risk perceptions
regarding wildfire, (2) risk reduction
behaviors associated with wildfire, (3)
sources of information regarding
wildfires and wildfire risk reduction,
and (4) socio-economic information.
The data collected will be analyzed by
Forest Service researchers at the Rocky
Mountain Research Station and the
following cooperators: Drs. Ingrid and
Wade Martin of California State
University of Long Beach, Long Beach,
California, and Dr. Holly Bender of
Integrated Resource Solutions, Boulder,
Colorado. The results will be made
available to Forest Service land
managers, the respondents, and other
interested parties.
This information will enhance the
ability of Forest Service land managers
on National Forests to understand
public preferences regarding the
management of wildfire risk. Without
this type of information, Forest Service
land managers and the public will
continue to interact on the issues of
wildfire risk without a broad-based
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
understanding of the factors that lessen
wildfire risk, factors that are important
to homeowners.
Estimate of Annual Burden: 20
minutes for homeowners; 1 hour for
each focus group member.
Type of Respondents: Homeowners
located in the wildland-urban interface
in the western United States.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 1,500 homeowners; 21
Homeowner Association focus group
participants.
Estimated Annual Number of
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 500 hours—homeowners;
21 hours Homeowner Association focus
group members.
Comment Is Invited
Comment is invited on: (1) Whether
this collection of information is
necessary for the stated purposes and
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical or
scientific utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
All comments received in response to
this notice, including names and
addresses when provided, will be a
matter of public record. Comments will
be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval.
Dated: May 26, 2006.
Jimmy L. Reaves,
Associate Deputy Chief, Research and
Development.
[FR Doc. E6–8641 Filed 6–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Choccolocco Creek Multipurpose Dam
No. 11, Calhoun County, AL
Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a
finding of no significant impact.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 107 / Monday, June 5, 2006 / Notices
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102[2][c]
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations [40
CFR part 1500]; and the Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Regulations [7 CFR part 650]; the
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives
notice that an environmental impact
statement is not being prepared for the
Choccolocco Creek Multipurpose Dam
No. 11, Calhoun County, Alabama.
Ken
Aycock, Hydraulic Engineer, USDA
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
3381 Skyway Drive, Auburn, Alabama
36830, Telephone [334] 887–4525, email ken.aycock@al.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
Environmental Assessment of this
federally assisted action indicates that
the project will not cause significant
local, regional, or national impacts on
the environment. As a result of these
findings, Gary Kobylski, State
Conservationist, has determined that the
preparation and review of an
environmental impact statement is not
needed for this project.
The project purpose is continued
municipal water supply and flood
prevention. The planned works of
improvement include upgrading an
existing municipal water supply, floodprevention dam.
The Notice of a Finding of No
Significant Impact [FONSI] has been
forwarded to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and to various
Federal, state, and local agencies and
interest parties. A limited number of the
FONSI are available to fill single copy
requests at the above address. Basic data
developed during the environmental
assessment are on file and may be
reviewed by contacting Ken Aycock at
the above number.
No administrative action on
implementation of the proposal will be
taken until 30 days after the date of this
publication in the Federal Register.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Signed in Auburn, Alabama, on May 22,
2006.
Gary Kobylski,
State Conservationist.
[This activity is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance under 10.904,
Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention,
and is subject to the provisions of Executive
Order 12372, which requires intergovernment consultation with State and local
officials].
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Jun 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
Finding of No Significant Impact for
Choccolocco Creek Watershed
Multipurpose Dam No. 11, Calhoun
County, Alabama
May 22, 2006.
Introduction
The Choccolocco Creek Watershed is
a federally assisted action authorized for
planning under Public Law 106–472,
the Small Watershed Rehabilitation Act,
which amends Public Law 83–566, the
Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention Act. An environmental
assessment was undertaken in
conjunction with development of the
watershed plan. This assessment was
conducted in consultation with local,
State, and Federal agencies as well as
with interested organizations and
individuals. Data developed during the
assessment are available for public
review at the following location: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, 3381
Skyway Drive, Auburn, Alabama 36830.
Recommended Action
This document describes a plan for
upgrading an existing municipal water
supply, and flood-prevention structure,
Choccolocco Creek Watershed
Multipurpose Dam No. 11 [MPD No.
11], to meet current dam safety criteria
for a high-hazard dam. The plan calls
for raising the dam with a concrete
parapet wall, raising/reinforcing the
auxiliary spillway, and reinforcing
downstream toe of dam. Works of
improvement will be accomplished by
providing financial and technical
assistance through the Water Works and
Sewer Board of the City of Anniston,
Alabama.
The principal project measures are to:
1. Construct a concrete parapet wall
on top of the existing earth embankment
to increase height of dam 5 feet and
store flood water from the probable
maximum precipitation rainfall event.
2. Raise the auxiliary spillway 0.5 feet
and reinforcing the surface utilizing turf
reinforcement.
3. Reinforce the downstream toe of
dam using grouted riprap.
The measures will be planned and
installed by developing a contract with
the current operator of the dam.
Effects of Recommended Action
Installing these measures will bring
MPD No. 11 into compliance with
current dam safety criteria for a highhazard dam. This will essentially
eliminate the risk to loss of life for
individuals in 21 homes, 1 water
treatment plant, 1 mile of roadway, and
2 bridges. Additional effects will
include retention of the municipal water
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32303
supply and continued protection against
flooding, water quality benefits, fishing
activities, recreational opportunities,
protected land values, protected road
and utility networks, and reduced
maintenance costs for public
infrastructure.
Wildlife habitat will be minimally
disturbed during installation activities
since most construction activity will
occur on the dam and spillway which
are covered in grass. No wetlands,
wildlife habitat, fisheries, prime
farmland, or cultural resources will be
destroyed or threatened by this project.
The disturbance of soil from dam
modification activities will temporarily
impact a 0.5 acre wetland. The 175-acre
lake area and the beneficial
characteristics it provides to the
environment (pollutant filtration,
ecological diversity, wildlife habitat,
etc.) will be maintained. Fishery
habitats will also be maintained.
No endangered or threatened plant or
animal species will be adversely
affected by the project.
There are no wilderness areas in the
watershed.
Alternatives
Six alternative plans of action were
considered in project planning. No
significant adverse environmental
impacts are anticipated from installation
of the selected alternative. Also, the
planned action is the most practical,
complete, and acceptable means of
protecting life and property of
downstream residents and maintaining
the municipal water supply.
Consultation—Public Participation
Original sponsoring organizations
include the Water Works and Sewer
Board of the City of Anniston, Alabama;
Calhoun, Clay, Cleburne, and Talladega
County Soil and Water Conservation
Districts; Calhoun, Clay, Cleburne, and
Talladega County Commissions; and the
Choccolocco Creek Watershed
Conservancy District. At the initiation of
the planning process, meetings were
held with representatives of the original
sponsoring organizations to ascertain
their interest and concerns regarding the
Choccolocco Creek Watershed. The
Water Works and Sewer Board of the
City of Anniston, Alabama, agreed to
serve as ‘‘lead sponsor’’ being
responsible for leading the planning
process with assistance from NRCS. As
lead sponsor they also agreed to provide
non-Federal cost-share, property rights,
operation and maintenance, and public
participation during, and beyond, the
planning process.
An Interdisciplinary Planning Team
provided for the ‘‘technical’’
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
32304
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 107 / Monday, June 5, 2006 / Notices
administration of this project. Technical
administration includes tasks pursuant
to the NRCS nine-step planning process,
and planning procedures outlined in the
NRCS-National Planning Procedures
Handbook. Examples of tasks completed
by the Planning Team include, but are
not limited to, Preliminary
Investigations, Hydrologic Analysis,
Reservoir Sedimentation Surveys,
Economic Analysis, Formulating and
Evaluating Alternatives, and Writing the
Watershed Plan—Environmental
Assessment. Data collected from partner
agencies, databases, landowners, and
others throughout the entire planning
process, were presented at the public
meeting on June 28, 2005. Informal
discussions amongst planning team
members, partner agencies, and
landowners were conducted throughout
the entire planning period.
Public Participation
A public meeting was held on June
28, 2005 to explain the Small Watershed
Rehabilitation Program and to scope
resource problems, issues, and concerns
of local residents associated with the
MPD No. 11 project area. Potential
alternative solutions to bring MPD No.
11 into compliance with current dam
safety criteria for a high-hazard dam
were also presented. Twenty-one
meeting participants heard summaries
of planning accomplishments to date,
provided input on issues and concerns
to be considered in the planning
process, and identified which planning
alternative [i.e. No Action,
Decommission, Structural, NonStructural] was most desirable.
Conclusion
The Environmental Assessment
summarized above indicates that this
Federal action will not cause significant
adverse local, regional, or national
impacts on the environment. Therefore,
based on the above findings, I have
determined that an environmental
impact statement for the recommended
plan of action on Choccolocco Creek
Watershed MPD No. 11 is not required.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Dated: May 22, 2006.
Gary Kobylski,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. E6–8591 Filed 6–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Jun 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
Notice of Request for Extension of a
Currently Approved Information
Collection
Rural Housing Service, USDA.
Proposed collection; comments
AGENCY:
ACTION:
request.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the Rural Housing
Service’s (RHS) intention to request an
extension for the currently approved
information collection in support of our
program for Complaints and
Compensation for Construction Defects.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by August 4, 2006 to be
assured of consideration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nica
Mathes, Loan Specialist, Single Family
Housing Direct Loan Division, RHS,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP
0783, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0783,
Telephone (202) 205–3656.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: RD Instruction 1924–F,
‘‘Complaints and Compensation for
Construction Defects.’’
OMB Number: 0575–0082.
Expiration Date of Approval: October
31, 2006.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: The Complaints and
Compensation for Construction Defects
program under section 509C of Title V
of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended,
provides eligible persons who have
structural defects with their Agency
financed homes to correct these
problems. Structural defects are defects
in the dwelling, installation of a
manufactured home, or a related facility
or a deficiency in the site or site
development which directly and
significantly reduces the useful life,
habitability, or integrity of the dwelling
or unit. The defect may be due to faulty
material, poor workmanship, or latent
causes that existed when the dwelling
or unit was constructed. The period in
which to place a claim for a defect is
within 18 months after the date that
financial assistance was granted. If the
defect is determined to be structural and
is covered by the builders/dealerscontractor’s warranty, the contractor is
expected to correct the defect. If the
contractor cannot or will not correct the
defect, the borrower may be
compensated for having the defect
corrected, under the Complaints and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Compensation for Construction Defects
program. Provisions of this subpart do
not apply to dwellings financed with
guaranteed section 502 loans.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
for this collection of information is
estimated to average .25 hours per
response.
Respondents: Individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
500.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.00.
Estimated Number of Responses: 500.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 125 hours.
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Brigitte Sumter,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, at (202) 692–0042.
Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of RHS, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
RHS’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including a variety of methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to Brigitte
Sumter, Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Rural Development,
STOP 0742, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
0743. All responses to this notice will
be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All
comments will also become a matter of
public record.
Dated: May 26, 2006.
Russell T. Davis,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. E6–8654 Filed 6–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 107 (Monday, June 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32302-32304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8591]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Choccolocco Creek Multipurpose Dam No. 11, Calhoun County, AL
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a finding of no significant impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 32303]]
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102[2][c] of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations
[40 CFR part 1500]; and the Natural Resources Conservation Service
Regulations [7 CFR part 650]; the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the
Choccolocco Creek Multipurpose Dam No. 11, Calhoun County, Alabama.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Aycock, Hydraulic Engineer, USDA
Natural Resources Conservation Service, 3381 Skyway Drive, Auburn,
Alabama 36830, Telephone [334] 887-4525, e-mail ken.aycock@al.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Environmental Assessment of this
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As
a result of these findings, Gary Kobylski, State Conservationist, has
determined that the preparation and review of an environmental impact
statement is not needed for this project.
The project purpose is continued municipal water supply and flood
prevention. The planned works of improvement include upgrading an
existing municipal water supply, flood-prevention dam.
The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact [FONSI] has been
forwarded to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and to various
Federal, state, and local agencies and interest parties. A limited
number of the FONSI are available to fill single copy requests at the
above address. Basic data developed during the environmental assessment
are on file and may be reviewed by contacting Ken Aycock at the above
number.
No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal
Register.
Signed in Auburn, Alabama, on May 22, 2006.
Gary Kobylski,
State Conservationist.
[This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention,
and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, which
requires inter-government consultation with State and local
officials].
Finding of No Significant Impact for Choccolocco Creek Watershed
Multipurpose Dam No. 11, Calhoun County, Alabama
May 22, 2006.
Introduction
The Choccolocco Creek Watershed is a federally assisted action
authorized for planning under Public Law 106-472, the Small Watershed
Rehabilitation Act, which amends Public Law 83-566, the Watershed
Protection and Flood Prevention Act. An environmental assessment was
undertaken in conjunction with development of the watershed plan. This
assessment was conducted in consultation with local, State, and Federal
agencies as well as with interested organizations and individuals. Data
developed during the assessment are available for public review at the
following location: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, 3381 Skyway Drive, Auburn, Alabama 36830.
Recommended Action
This document describes a plan for upgrading an existing municipal
water supply, and flood-prevention structure, Choccolocco Creek
Watershed Multipurpose Dam No. 11 [MPD No. 11], to meet current dam
safety criteria for a high-hazard dam. The plan calls for raising the
dam with a concrete parapet wall, raising/reinforcing the auxiliary
spillway, and reinforcing downstream toe of dam. Works of improvement
will be accomplished by providing financial and technical assistance
through the Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Anniston,
Alabama.
The principal project measures are to:
1. Construct a concrete parapet wall on top of the existing earth
embankment to increase height of dam 5 feet and store flood water from
the probable maximum precipitation rainfall event.
2. Raise the auxiliary spillway 0.5 feet and reinforcing the
surface utilizing turf reinforcement.
3. Reinforce the downstream toe of dam using grouted riprap.
The measures will be planned and installed by developing a contract
with the current operator of the dam.
Effects of Recommended Action
Installing these measures will bring MPD No. 11 into compliance
with current dam safety criteria for a high-hazard dam. This will
essentially eliminate the risk to loss of life for individuals in 21
homes, 1 water treatment plant, 1 mile of roadway, and 2 bridges.
Additional effects will include retention of the municipal water supply
and continued protection against flooding, water quality benefits,
fishing activities, recreational opportunities, protected land values,
protected road and utility networks, and reduced maintenance costs for
public infrastructure.
Wildlife habitat will be minimally disturbed during installation
activities since most construction activity will occur on the dam and
spillway which are covered in grass. No wetlands, wildlife habitat,
fisheries, prime farmland, or cultural resources will be destroyed or
threatened by this project. The disturbance of soil from dam
modification activities will temporarily impact a 0.5 acre wetland. The
175-acre lake area and the beneficial characteristics it provides to
the environment (pollutant filtration, ecological diversity, wildlife
habitat, etc.) will be maintained. Fishery habitats will also be
maintained.
No endangered or threatened plant or animal species will be
adversely affected by the project.
There are no wilderness areas in the watershed.
Alternatives
Six alternative plans of action were considered in project
planning. No significant adverse environmental impacts are anticipated
from installation of the selected alternative. Also, the planned action
is the most practical, complete, and acceptable means of protecting
life and property of downstream residents and maintaining the municipal
water supply.
Consultation--Public Participation
Original sponsoring organizations include the Water Works and Sewer
Board of the City of Anniston, Alabama; Calhoun, Clay, Cleburne, and
Talladega County Soil and Water Conservation Districts; Calhoun, Clay,
Cleburne, and Talladega County Commissions; and the Choccolocco Creek
Watershed Conservancy District. At the initiation of the planning
process, meetings were held with representatives of the original
sponsoring organizations to ascertain their interest and concerns
regarding the Choccolocco Creek Watershed. The Water Works and Sewer
Board of the City of Anniston, Alabama, agreed to serve as ``lead
sponsor'' being responsible for leading the planning process with
assistance from NRCS. As lead sponsor they also agreed to provide non-
Federal cost-share, property rights, operation and maintenance, and
public participation during, and beyond, the planning process.
An Interdisciplinary Planning Team provided for the ``technical''
[[Page 32304]]
administration of this project. Technical administration includes tasks
pursuant to the NRCS nine-step planning process, and planning
procedures outlined in the NRCS-National Planning Procedures Handbook.
Examples of tasks completed by the Planning Team include, but are not
limited to, Preliminary Investigations, Hydrologic Analysis, Reservoir
Sedimentation Surveys, Economic Analysis, Formulating and Evaluating
Alternatives, and Writing the Watershed Plan--Environmental Assessment.
Data collected from partner agencies, databases, landowners, and others
throughout the entire planning process, were presented at the public
meeting on June 28, 2005. Informal discussions amongst planning team
members, partner agencies, and landowners were conducted throughout the
entire planning period.
Public Participation
A public meeting was held on June 28, 2005 to explain the Small
Watershed Rehabilitation Program and to scope resource problems,
issues, and concerns of local residents associated with the MPD No. 11
project area. Potential alternative solutions to bring MPD No. 11 into
compliance with current dam safety criteria for a high-hazard dam were
also presented. Twenty-one meeting participants heard summaries of
planning accomplishments to date, provided input on issues and concerns
to be considered in the planning process, and identified which planning
alternative [i.e. No Action, Decommission, Structural, Non-Structural]
was most desirable.
Conclusion
The Environmental Assessment summarized above indicates that this
Federal action will not cause significant adverse local, regional, or
national impacts on the environment. Therefore, based on the above
findings, I have determined that an environmental impact statement for
the recommended plan of action on Choccolocco Creek Watershed MPD No.
11 is not required.
Dated: May 22, 2006.
Gary Kobylski,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. E6-8591 Filed 6-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
