Controlled Substances and Alcohol Misuse Testing, 32298-32300 [06-5073]
Download as PDF
32298
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 107 / Monday, June 5, 2006 / Proposed Rules
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This proposed
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: May 23, 2006.
Betty J. Berry,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. E6–8661 Filed 6–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No. FTA–2006–24592]
RIN 2132–AA86
Controlled Substances and Alcohol
Misuse Testing
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) proposes to
eliminate duplicative requirements for
safety-sensitive employees of some
public (mass) transportation systems,
who are subject to the alcohol and
controlled substances (D&A) testing
requirements of both FTA and the
United States Coast Guard (USCG), or
FTA and the Federal Motor Carriers
Safety Administration (FMCSA).
Recipients could concurrently comply
with FTA’s D&A testing program as they
comply with the testing requirements of
the USCG or FMCSA. However, FTA’s
post-accident and reasonable suspicion
testing requirements would continue to
apply when accidents occur while
14:50 Jun 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
For
program issues, Gerald Powers, Office of
Safety and Security, (202) 366–1080
(telephone); (202) 366–7951 (fax); or
Gerald.Powers@dot.gov (e-mail). For
legal issues, Bruce Walker, Office of the
Chief Counsel, (202) 366–4011
(telephone); (202) 366–3809 (fax); or
Bruce.Walker@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
49 CFR Part 655
VerDate Aug<31>2005
performing public (mass) transportation
activities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 4, 2006. Late filed
comments will be considered to the
extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written Comments: Submit
written comments to the Docket
Management System, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Room PL–401, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001. You may submit comments
identified by the docket number (FTA–
2006–24592) by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2478.
• Hand Delivery: To the Docket
Management System, Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number or Regulatory Identification
Number (RIN) for this notice. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://dms.dot.gov,
including any personal information
provided.
I. Background
Authority for This Proposal
Section 3030 of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: a Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU)
(Pub. L. 109–59, August 10, 2005),
provides the Secretary of the
Department of Transportation (DOT)
discretion to determine whether a
public transportation provider is
adequately covered for drug and alcohol
(D&A) testing purposes, by the D&A
alcohol testing requirements of the
USCG or another DOT agency.
Previous Action by FMSCA and FTA
FMCSA published a Federal Register
notice on August 17, 2001 which
eliminated duplicative D&A testing
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requirements for holders of Commercial
Drivers Licenses (CDLs) who provide
public transportation services. These
motor carrier operators are subject to
FMCSA regulations; however, because
they receive Federal funding for public
transportation activities, they are also
subject to FTA’s D&A regulation.
FMSCA stated that its testing
requirements do not apply to transit
employers who are required to comply
with FTA testing requirements (see 49
CFR 382.103(d)). However, FMCSA
made a policy determination that CDL
holders would remain subject to its rule
for specific violations; hence, the
potential for duplicative oversight may
continue to exist.
Subsequently, FTA undertook
administrative steps to eliminate
duplicative testing requirements for
ferry operators by revising its policy for
these operators with its Federal Register
notice dated April 22, 2002. Before the
notice, ferry operators receiving Federal
transit funds were required to comply
with the testing requirements of both
FTA and USCG.
FTA consulted with the USCG and
both agencies agreed that ferries were
primarily regulated by the USCG. FTA
determined that for safety purposes, it
was sufficient for these operators to
comply with USCG’s D&A testing
requirements. However, because the
USCG does not require random alcohol
testing, it was determined the operators
would remain subject to FTA’s random
alcohol testing requirements.
FTA now proposes to adopt a
regulatory provision that parallels
FMCSA’s rule for motor carrier
operators who receive Federal transmit
funding and to codify its previously
published policy guidance for ferry
operators. FTA seeks comments on this
proposed rule which would allow
safety-sensitive employers to
concurrently comply with FTA testing
requirements when they comply with
FMCSA or USCG D&A requirements.
II. Overview and General Discussion of
the Proposed Rule
A. This notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) would provide
regulatory relief to public transportation
providers by eliminating duplicative
testing requirements. The NPRM
proposes to amend the applicability
section of the FTA’s D&A regulation at
49 CFR 655.3 by revising the
introductory text of paragraph (a) and
adding new paragraphs (c), (d), and (e).
Specifically, FTA proposes that a
private or nonprofit motor-carrier
employer, with employees who perform
safety-sensitive functions regulated by
both FTA and FMCSA, may determine
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 107 / Monday, June 5, 2006 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
whether or not a majority (more than 50
percent) of these employees are
regulated by FMSCA. If so, the employer
may opt to comply with the FMSCA
testing requirements only for that class
of employees. However, for safety
purposes, FTA’s post-accident
requirements, section 655.44, would
apply when an accident, as defined in
section 655.4 occurs in the performance
of public (mass) transportation
activities.
In exercising this option, an employer
would also have discretion in
determining the timeframe and the
manner in which the employees’ safetysensitive functions are apportioned (i.e.,
daily, monthly, or annually). For audit
purposes this determination would be
made annually, at the beginning of the
calendar year, and remain applicable
throughout that calendar year.
We note that FMSCA testing
regulations do not apply to transit
maintenance employees. Therefore,
maintenance workers servicing transit
vehicles would remain subject to 49
CFR part 655.
B. The USCG has primary oversight
over maritime operations, including
ferryboats, whereas FTA’s regulatory
oversight stems from the fact that it
provides Federal transit funding to a
limited number of ferry operations.
Therefore, FTA proposes as ferry
operators comply with the D&A testing
requirements of the USCG, they be
deemed in concurrent compliance with
FTA’s D&A regulation.
USCG and FTA testing requirements
are substantially similar. FTA believes
that the USCG regulatory scheme
sufficiently addresses transit safety
concerns; therefore, it would be prudent
for ferry operators to comply with only
one set of Federal testing requirements.
However, since USCG regulations do
not require random alcohol testing, for
safety purposes, ferry operators would
remain subject to FTA’s random alcohol
testing requirements at 49 CFR 655.45.
FTA remains responsible for ensuring
compliance for recipients of public
(mass) transportation. Therefore, to
facilitate oversight, the administrative
requirements of subpart G, H, and I of
49 CFR part 655 would continue to
apply to ferry operators and motor
carrier operators receiving Federal
public (mass) transportation funds.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review
Under Executive Order 12866, 58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993, the Department
of Transportation (DOT) must examine
whether this proposed rule is a
‘‘significant regulatory action.’’ A
significant regulatory action is subject to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Jun 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) review and the requirements of
the Executive Order. The Executive
Order defines ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as one that is likely to result in
a rule that may: (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $120 million
or more or adversely affect in a material
way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) creates
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
This proposed rule provides
administrative relief from current
regulatory alcohol misuse and
controlled substance testing
requirements for public transportation
providers; therefore, FTA believes this
proposed rule is a nonsignificant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
This proposed rule is not expected to
impose any new compliance costs. The
only entities affected by this proposed
rule are those public transportation
providers that are currently subject to
the alcohol misuse and controlled
substance testing regimen. These
requirements, if adopted will relieve
these entities of duplicative Federal
testing requirements. There would be no
significant changes to the existing
program with the publication of this
rulemaking. Further, this discretionary
rulemaking is provided for under the
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: a Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU) (Pub. L. 109–59,
August 10, 2005).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act requires a Federal agency
to conduct an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis describing impacts to
small entities when developing a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 553. Currently,
approximately 3000 employers are
subject to FTA D&A testing
requirements. Of this number, a small
percentage is also subject to the D&A
testing requirements of FMSCA or the
USCG. This proposed rule would have
the effect of eliminating the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32299
administrative burden on those few
employers who are subject to multiple
testing requirements by permitting them
to comply with the testing requirements
of only one Federal agency. The
lessening of this administrative burden
on these affected entities will result in
no significant economic impact to these
employers.
This proposed rule will not impose
any additional costs on small entities
that are subject to alcohol misuse and
controlled substance testing
requirements. As noted above, certain
public transportation providers who
may be subject to the testing
requirements of more than one DOT
agency or the USCG will be provided
statutory relief by complying with the
testing requirements of only one Federal
agency. FTA certifies that no further
analysis is necessary because the
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. FTA invites
public comment on this analysis.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain
a collection of information that is
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). Under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, FTA may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to or may not be penalized for
failing to comply with, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 sets forth
principles and criteria that agencies
must adhere to in formulating and
implementing policies that have
Federalism implications, that is,
regulations that have substantial direct
effects on the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Federal agencies
must closely examine the statutory
authority supporting any action that
would limit the policymaking discretion
of the States, and to the extent
practicable, must consult with State and
local officials before implementing any
such action.
FTA has reviewed this proposed rule
under the threshold criteria of Executive
Order 13132 on Federalism and certifies
that the rule would not have Federalism
implications as defined by the Executive
Order. The rule provides for relief from
duplicative Federal alcohol misuse and
controlled substance testing
requirements for certain public
transportation providers. The rule
would not significantly affect the rights,
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
32300
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 107 / Monday, June 5, 2006 / Proposed Rules
roles, and responsibilities of States, and
would involve no preemption of State
law, nor would it limit State
policymaking discretion.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The proposed rule would not be an
unfunded Federal mandate within the
meaning of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq., and any enforceable duties that
FTA would impose are a condition of
Federal assistance or a duty arising from
participation in a voluntary Federal
program.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 655
Alcohol testing, Drug testing, Grant
programs—Transportation, Mass
transportation, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety,
transit, and transportation.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Transit
Administration proposes to amend part
655 of title 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 655—PREVENTION OF
ALCOHOL MISUSE AND PROHIBITED
DRUG USE IN TRANSIT OPERATIONS
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
1. The authority citation for part 655
continues to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Jun 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5331 (as amended); 49
CFR 1.51.
2. Amend § 655.3 to revise the
introductory text of paragraph (a) and to
add paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) to read
as follows:
§ 655.3
Applicability.
(a) Except as specifically excluded in
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this
section, this part applies to:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(c) A recipient operating a ferry
regulated by the United States Coast
Guard (USCG) and receiving Federal
funding for public (mass) transportation
activities shall follow 46 CFR parts 4
and 16, 33 CFR part 95. However,
section 655.45 of this part is applicable
for random alcohol testing.
(d) A private or nonprofit employer
with safety-sensitive employees, per
both this part and 49 CFR part 382, may
annually determine whether or not a
majority (more than 50 percent) of these
employees are regulated by part 382. If
so, the employer may comply with the
drug and alcohol testing requirements of
part 382 for that calendar year.
However, reasonable suspicion and
post-accident testing per this part
(§§ 655.43 and 655.44) remain
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
applicable for operators when
performing public (mass) transportation
activities. In addition, the provisions of
this part remain applicable for those
safety-sensitive employees who perform
maintenance on vehicles or equipment
used for public (mass) transportation
service.
(e) A recipient’s failure to comply
with the alcohol misuse and controlled
substances testing requirements of the
USCG or the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, as described in
paragraphs (c) and (d) above, may result
in a finding of noncompliance by FTA.
(1) A finding of noncompliance may
cause a recipient to become ineligible
for Federal public transportation
funding.
(2) Subpart G of this part is applicable
to a covered employee: (i) With a
verified positive drug test result, (ii)
who has a confirmed alcohol test result
of 0.04 or greater, or (iii) who refuses to
submit to a test.
(3) Recipients remain subject to
subparts H and I of this part.
Issued on: May 30, 2006.
Sandra K. Bushue,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 06–5073 Filed 6–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–M
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 107 (Monday, June 5, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32298-32300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5073]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 655
[Docket No. FTA-2006-24592]
RIN 2132-AA86
Controlled Substances and Alcohol Misuse Testing
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) proposes to eliminate
duplicative requirements for safety-sensitive employees of some public
(mass) transportation systems, who are subject to the alcohol and
controlled substances (D&A) testing requirements of both FTA and the
United States Coast Guard (USCG), or FTA and the Federal Motor Carriers
Safety Administration (FMCSA). Recipients could concurrently comply
with FTA's D&A testing program as they comply with the testing
requirements of the USCG or FMCSA. However, FTA's post-accident and
reasonable suspicion testing requirements would continue to apply when
accidents occur while performing public (mass) transportation
activities.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 4, 2006. Late
filed comments will be considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written Comments: Submit written comments to the Docket
Management System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room PL-401, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You may submit comments
identified by the docket number (FTA-2006-24592) by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
Fax: 1-202-493-2478.
Hand Delivery: To the Docket Management System, Room PL-
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for this
notice. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://dms.dot.gov, including any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For program issues, Gerald Powers,
Office of Safety and Security, (202) 366-1080 (telephone); (202) 366-
7951 (fax); or Gerald.Powers@dot.gov (e-mail). For legal issues, Bruce
Walker, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-4011 (telephone); (202)
366-3809 (fax); or Bruce.Walker@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Authority for This Proposal
Section 3030 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: a Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) (Pub. L.
109-59, August 10, 2005), provides the Secretary of the Department of
Transportation (DOT) discretion to determine whether a public
transportation provider is adequately covered for drug and alcohol
(D&A) testing purposes, by the D&A alcohol testing requirements of the
USCG or another DOT agency.
Previous Action by FMSCA and FTA
FMCSA published a Federal Register notice on August 17, 2001 which
eliminated duplicative D&A testing requirements for holders of
Commercial Drivers Licenses (CDLs) who provide public transportation
services. These motor carrier operators are subject to FMCSA
regulations; however, because they receive Federal funding for public
transportation activities, they are also subject to FTA's D&A
regulation. FMSCA stated that its testing requirements do not apply to
transit employers who are required to comply with FTA testing
requirements (see 49 CFR 382.103(d)). However, FMCSA made a policy
determination that CDL holders would remain subject to its rule for
specific violations; hence, the potential for duplicative oversight may
continue to exist.
Subsequently, FTA undertook administrative steps to eliminate
duplicative testing requirements for ferry operators by revising its
policy for these operators with its Federal Register notice dated April
22, 2002. Before the notice, ferry operators receiving Federal transit
funds were required to comply with the testing requirements of both FTA
and USCG.
FTA consulted with the USCG and both agencies agreed that ferries
were primarily regulated by the USCG. FTA determined that for safety
purposes, it was sufficient for these operators to comply with USCG's
D&A testing requirements. However, because the USCG does not require
random alcohol testing, it was determined the operators would remain
subject to FTA's random alcohol testing requirements.
FTA now proposes to adopt a regulatory provision that parallels
FMCSA's rule for motor carrier operators who receive Federal transmit
funding and to codify its previously published policy guidance for
ferry operators. FTA seeks comments on this proposed rule which would
allow safety-sensitive employers to concurrently comply with FTA
testing requirements when they comply with FMCSA or USCG D&A
requirements.
II. Overview and General Discussion of the Proposed Rule
A. This notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) would provide
regulatory relief to public transportation providers by eliminating
duplicative testing requirements. The NPRM proposes to amend the
applicability section of the FTA's D&A regulation at 49 CFR 655.3 by
revising the introductory text of paragraph (a) and adding new
paragraphs (c), (d), and (e).
Specifically, FTA proposes that a private or nonprofit motor-
carrier employer, with employees who perform safety-sensitive functions
regulated by both FTA and FMCSA, may determine
[[Page 32299]]
whether or not a majority (more than 50 percent) of these employees are
regulated by FMSCA. If so, the employer may opt to comply with the
FMSCA testing requirements only for that class of employees. However,
for safety purposes, FTA's post-accident requirements, section 655.44,
would apply when an accident, as defined in section 655.4 occurs in the
performance of public (mass) transportation activities.
In exercising this option, an employer would also have discretion
in determining the timeframe and the manner in which the employees'
safety-sensitive functions are apportioned (i.e., daily, monthly, or
annually). For audit purposes this determination would be made
annually, at the beginning of the calendar year, and remain applicable
throughout that calendar year.
We note that FMSCA testing regulations do not apply to transit
maintenance employees. Therefore, maintenance workers servicing transit
vehicles would remain subject to 49 CFR part 655.
B. The USCG has primary oversight over maritime operations,
including ferryboats, whereas FTA's regulatory oversight stems from the
fact that it provides Federal transit funding to a limited number of
ferry operations. Therefore, FTA proposes as ferry operators comply
with the D&A testing requirements of the USCG, they be deemed in
concurrent compliance with FTA's D&A regulation.
USCG and FTA testing requirements are substantially similar. FTA
believes that the USCG regulatory scheme sufficiently addresses transit
safety concerns; therefore, it would be prudent for ferry operators to
comply with only one set of Federal testing requirements. However,
since USCG regulations do not require random alcohol testing, for
safety purposes, ferry operators would remain subject to FTA's random
alcohol testing requirements at 49 CFR 655.45.
FTA remains responsible for ensuring compliance for recipients of
public (mass) transportation. Therefore, to facilitate oversight, the
administrative requirements of subpart G, H, and I of 49 CFR part 655
would continue to apply to ferry operators and motor carrier operators
receiving Federal public (mass) transportation funds.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993, the
Department of Transportation (DOT) must examine whether this proposed
rule is a ``significant regulatory action.'' A significant regulatory
action is subject to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and
the requirements of the Executive Order. The Executive Order defines
``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a
rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $120 million
or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) creates a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
This proposed rule provides administrative relief from current
regulatory alcohol misuse and controlled substance testing requirements
for public transportation providers; therefore, FTA believes this
proposed rule is a nonsignificant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
This proposed rule is not expected to impose any new compliance
costs. The only entities affected by this proposed rule are those
public transportation providers that are currently subject to the
alcohol misuse and controlled substance testing regimen. These
requirements, if adopted will relieve these entities of duplicative
Federal testing requirements. There would be no significant changes to
the existing program with the publication of this rulemaking. Further,
this discretionary rulemaking is provided for under the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: a Legacy
for Users (SAFETEA-LU) (Pub. L. 109-59, August 10, 2005).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires a Federal
agency to conduct an initial regulatory flexibility analysis describing
impacts to small entities when developing a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553. Currently, approximately
3000 employers are subject to FTA D&A testing requirements. Of this
number, a small percentage is also subject to the D&A testing
requirements of FMSCA or the USCG. This proposed rule would have the
effect of eliminating the administrative burden on those few employers
who are subject to multiple testing requirements by permitting them to
comply with the testing requirements of only one Federal agency. The
lessening of this administrative burden on these affected entities will
result in no significant economic impact to these employers.
This proposed rule will not impose any additional costs on small
entities that are subject to alcohol misuse and controlled substance
testing requirements. As noted above, certain public transportation
providers who may be subject to the testing requirements of more than
one DOT agency or the USCG will be provided statutory relief by
complying with the testing requirements of only one Federal agency. FTA
certifies that no further analysis is necessary because the proposed
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. FTA invites public comment on this analysis.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain a collection of information
that is subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, FTA may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to or may
not be penalized for failing to comply with, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 sets forth principles and criteria that
agencies must adhere to in formulating and implementing policies that
have Federalism implications, that is, regulations that have
substantial direct effects on the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Federal agencies must closely examine the statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit the policymaking discretion of
the States, and to the extent practicable, must consult with State and
local officials before implementing any such action.
FTA has reviewed this proposed rule under the threshold criteria of
Executive Order 13132 on Federalism and certifies that the rule would
not have Federalism implications as defined by the Executive Order. The
rule provides for relief from duplicative Federal alcohol misuse and
controlled substance testing requirements for certain public
transportation providers. The rule would not significantly affect the
rights,
[[Page 32300]]
roles, and responsibilities of States, and would involve no preemption
of State law, nor would it limit State policymaking discretion.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The proposed rule would not be an unfunded Federal mandate within
the meaning of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501
et seq., and any enforceable duties that FTA would impose are a
condition of Federal assistance or a duty arising from participation in
a voluntary Federal program.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 655
Alcohol testing, Drug testing, Grant programs--Transportation, Mass
transportation, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety,
transit, and transportation.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Federal Transit
Administration proposes to amend part 655 of title 49 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 655--PREVENTION OF ALCOHOL MISUSE AND PROHIBITED DRUG USE IN
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 655 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5331 (as amended); 49 CFR 1.51.
2. Amend Sec. 655.3 to revise the introductory text of paragraph
(a) and to add paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 655.3 Applicability.
(a) Except as specifically excluded in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d)
of this section, this part applies to:
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(c) A recipient operating a ferry regulated by the United States
Coast Guard (USCG) and receiving Federal funding for public (mass)
transportation activities shall follow 46 CFR parts 4 and 16, 33 CFR
part 95. However, section 655.45 of this part is applicable for random
alcohol testing.
(d) A private or nonprofit employer with safety-sensitive
employees, per both this part and 49 CFR part 382, may annually
determine whether or not a majority (more than 50 percent) of these
employees are regulated by part 382. If so, the employer may comply
with the drug and alcohol testing requirements of part 382 for that
calendar year. However, reasonable suspicion and post-accident testing
per this part (Sec. Sec. 655.43 and 655.44) remain applicable for
operators when performing public (mass) transportation activities. In
addition, the provisions of this part remain applicable for those
safety-sensitive employees who perform maintenance on vehicles or
equipment used for public (mass) transportation service.
(e) A recipient's failure to comply with the alcohol misuse and
controlled substances testing requirements of the USCG or the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration, as described in paragraphs (c) and
(d) above, may result in a finding of noncompliance by FTA.
(1) A finding of noncompliance may cause a recipient to become
ineligible for Federal public transportation funding.
(2) Subpart G of this part is applicable to a covered employee: (i)
With a verified positive drug test result, (ii) who has a confirmed
alcohol test result of 0.04 or greater, or (iii) who refuses to submit
to a test.
(3) Recipients remain subject to subparts H and I of this part.
Issued on: May 30, 2006.
Sandra K. Bushue,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 06-5073 Filed 6-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-M