Release of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Third Edition of the Peer Review Handbook, 32088 [E6-8612]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
32088
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 106 / Friday, June 2, 2006 / Notices
policy and program implementation
issues, and science issues associated
with evaluating and reducing risks from
use of pesticides. It is determined that
PPDC is in the public interest in
connection with the performance of
duties imposed on the Agency by law.
The following sectors are represented on
the PPDC: Pesticide industry and trade
associations; environmental/public
interest, consumer, and animal rights
groups; farm worker organizations;
pesticide user, grower, and commodity
groups; Federal and State/local/Tribal
governments; the general public;
academia; and public health
organizations.
Copies of the PPDC Charter are filed
with appropriate committees of
Congress and the Library of Congress
and are available upon request.
III. How Can I Request to Participate in
this Meeting?
PPDC meetings are open to the public
and seating is available on a first-come
basis. Persons interested in attending do
not need to register in advance of the
meeting.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection,
Agricultural workers, Agriculture,
Chemicals, Foods, Pesticides and pests,
Public health.
Dated: May 22, 2006.
James Jones,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E6–8671 Filed 6–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
has a long and exemplary history at the
EPA. In response to recommendations
in the 1993 SAB report Safeguarding the
Future: Credible Science, Credible
Decisions, EPA issued an Agency-wide
policy for peer review. In 1994 EPA
reaffirmed the central role of peer
review and instituted an Agency-wide
implementation program. In 1998, a
Peer Review Handbook was created as a
single, centralized form of
implementation guidance for Agency
staff and managers. An updated Peer
Review Policy was signed by the
Administrator on January 31, 2006. A
third edition of the Peer Review
Handbook is now being released. It
incorporates insights gained from
implementing the program over the last
decade as well as the provisions of the
OMB Final Information Quality Bulletin
for Peer Review (PRB). The OMB PRB
contains provisions for the conduct of
peer review at all federal agencies in
order to enhance transparency and
accountability. The OMB Bulletin
applies to ‘‘influential scientific
information’’ and ‘‘highly influential
scientific assessments.’’ Peer Review
brings independent expert experience
and judgment to Agency issues and
plays a large part in ensuring that EPA’s
decisions rest on sound, credible
science and data.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Go
to https://www.epa.gov/peerreview or
contact Barbara Klieforth,
(202.564.6787) Science Policy Council
Staff, Office of the Science Advisor, U.S.
EPA.
Dated: May 24, 2006.
George Gray,
EPA Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. E6–8612 Filed 6–1–06; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8178–2]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Release of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency’s Third Edition of
the Peer Review Handbook
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R04–OW–2006–0183; FRL–8179–3]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is committed
to providing quality environmental
information to its partners and the
public. This commitment is integral to
its mission to protect human health and
the environment. High quality
information enables stakeholders to
effectively participate in managing
human health and environmental risks.
Peer Review, the evaluation of a product
by experts in that field, is a critical tool
used to ensure that only high-quality,
sound science is released. Peer Review
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:05 Jun 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
Public Water Supply Supervision
Program Rules for the State of
Alabama
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Tentative approval.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
the State of Alabama’s drinking water
regulations for the Interim Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment, Disinfectants
and Disinfection By-Products, and Filter
Backwash Recycling Rules. EPA has
determined that these revisions are no
less stringent than the corresponding
federal regulations. Therefore, EPA
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
intends on approving this State program
revision.
DATES: All interested parties may
request a public hearing and/or submit
comments on or before July 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your requests and/
or comments, identified by Docket ID
No. EPA–R04–OW–2006–0183, in one
of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: plouff.tom@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9476.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–W–2006–0183,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, Water Management Division,
Ground Water and Drinking Water
Branch, Drinking Water Section, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Tom
Plouff, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, Water Management
Division, Drinking Water Section, 15th
Floor, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta,
Georgia 30303. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business is
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–04–W–2006–0183.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM
02JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 106 (Friday, June 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 32088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8612]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8178-2]
Release of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Third
Edition of the Peer Review Handbook
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is committed to
providing quality environmental information to its partners and the
public. This commitment is integral to its mission to protect human
health and the environment. High quality information enables
stakeholders to effectively participate in managing human health and
environmental risks. Peer Review, the evaluation of a product by
experts in that field, is a critical tool used to ensure that only
high-quality, sound science is released. Peer Review has a long and
exemplary history at the EPA. In response to recommendations in the
1993 SAB report Safeguarding the Future: Credible Science, Credible
Decisions, EPA issued an Agency-wide policy for peer review. In 1994
EPA reaffirmed the central role of peer review and instituted an
Agency-wide implementation program. In 1998, a Peer Review Handbook was
created as a single, centralized form of implementation guidance for
Agency staff and managers. An updated Peer Review Policy was signed by
the Administrator on January 31, 2006. A third edition of the Peer
Review Handbook is now being released. It incorporates insights gained
from implementing the program over the last decade as well as the
provisions of the OMB Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer
Review (PRB). The OMB PRB contains provisions for the conduct of peer
review at all federal agencies in order to enhance transparency and
accountability. The OMB Bulletin applies to ``influential scientific
information'' and ``highly influential scientific assessments.'' Peer
Review brings independent expert experience and judgment to Agency
issues and plays a large part in ensuring that EPA's decisions rest on
sound, credible science and data.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Go to https://www.epa.gov/peerreview
or contact Barbara Klieforth, (202.564.6787) Science Policy Council
Staff, Office of the Science Advisor, U.S. EPA.
Dated: May 24, 2006.
George Gray,
EPA Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. E6-8612 Filed 6-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
