Anchorage Regulations; Port of New York and Vicinity, 30615-30617 [E6-8298]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: May 15, 2006.
S. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth
Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. E6–8219 Filed 5–26–06; 8:45 am]
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
2. Add temporary § 100.35-T05–020 to
read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 100.35–T05–020,
Sharptown, MD.
Coast Guard
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
I
Nanticoke River,
(a) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the Bo Bowman
Memorial—Sharptown Regatta under
the auspices of the Marine Event Permit
issued to the event sponsor and
approved by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore.
(b) Regulated area includes all waters
of the Nanticoke River, near Sharptown,
Maryland, between Maryland S.R. 313
Highway Bridge and Nanticoke River
Light 43 (LLN 24175), bounded by a line
drawn between the following points:
southeasterly from latitude 38°32′46″ N,
longitude 075°43′14″ W; to latitude
38°32′42″ N, longitude 075°43′09″ W;
thence northeasterly to latitude
38°33′04″ N, longitude 075°42′39″ W;
thence northwesterly to latitude
38°33′09″ N, longitude 075°42′44″ W;
thence southwesterly to latitude
38°32′46″ N, longitude 075°43′14″ W.
All coordinates reference Datum NAD
1983.
(c) Special local regulations: (1)
Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that reduces
wake near the race course.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 9:30 a.m. to 6:30
p.m. on June 17 and 18, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:16 May 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
33 CFR Part 110
[CG01–05–101]
RIN 1625–AA01 (Previously reported as RIN
1625–AA98)
Anchorage Regulations; Port of New
York and Vicinity
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a Special Anchorage Area
in Haverstraw Bay on the Hudson River
adjacent to Haverstraw, NY. This action
is necessary to facilitate safe navigation
in that area and provide safe and secure
anchorages for vessels not more than 20
meters in length. This action is intended
to increase the safety of life and
property on the Hudson River, improve
the safety of anchored vessels, and
provide for the overall safe and efficient
flow of recreational vessel traffic and
commerce.
DATES: This rule is effective June 29,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket (CGD01–05–101) and are
available for inspection or copying at
Waterways Management Division
(CGD01–05–101), Coast Guard Sector
New York, 212 Coast Guard Drive, room
321, Staten Island, New York 10305
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Commander M. McBrady,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Sector New York at (718) 354–
2353.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On January 19, 2006, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Anchorage Regulations; Port of
New York and Vicinity in the Federal
Register (71 FR 3025). We received no
letters commenting on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30615
Background and Purpose
As part of a waterfront revitalization
effort the Village of Haverstraw is
encouraging waterfront use by the
general public. This rule is in response
to a request made by the Village of
Haverstraw to ensure the safe navigation
of increased vessel traffic expected to
arrive along the village waterfront due
to this revitalization effort.
The Coast Guard is designating an
area as a special anchorage area in
accordance with 33 U.S.C. 471. In
accordance with that statute, vessels
will not be required to sound signals or
exhibit anchor lights or shapes which
are otherwise required by rule 30 and 35
of the Inland Navigation Rules, codified
at 33 U.S.C. 2030 and 2035.
The special anchorage area will be
located on the west side of the Hudson
River about 1,800 yards south of
Bowline Point, well removed from the
channel and located where general
navigation will not endanger or be
endangered by unlighted vessels.
Providing anchorage well removed from
the channel and general navigation will
greatly increase navigational safety.
This special anchorage area is part of
a waterfront revitalization project
authorized under U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers permit number 2004–00596–
YR.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received, and no
changes were made from the proposed
rule.
Discussion of Rule
This rule creates a new special
anchorage area located on the Hudson
River at the Village of Haverstraw, New
York, on Haverstraw Bay. It includes all
waters of the Hudson River bound by
the following points: 41°11′25.2″ N,
073°57′19.9″ W; thence to 41°11′34.2″ N,
073°57′00.8″ W; thence to 41°11′41.9″ N,
073°57′07.5″ W; thence to 41°11′31.8″ N,
073°57′26.5″ W; thence to 41°11′30.8″ N,
073°57′24.9″ W; thence to the point of
origin (NAD 1983). All coordinates are
North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83).
The special anchorage area is limited
to vessels no greater than 20 meters in
length. Vessels not more than 20 meters
in length are not required to sound
signals as required by rule 35 of the
Inland Navigation Rules (33 U.S.C.
2035) nor exhibit anchor lights or
shapes required by rule 30 of the Inland
Navigation Rules (33 U.S.C 2030) when
at anchor in a special anchorage area.
Additionally, mariners utilizing the
anchorage areas are encouraged to
contact local and state authorities, such
as the local harbormaster, to ensure
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
30616
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
compliance with additional applicable
state and local laws. Such laws may
involve, for example, compliance with
direction from the local harbormaster
when placing or using moorings within
the anchorage.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
This finding is based on the fact that
this special anchorage area does not
extend past the 18-foot contour on the
west side of the Hudson River, which
leaves approximately 1,680 yards of safe
water before reaching the 18-foot
contour on the east side of the Hudson
River. The resulting impact to vessel
transits in this area is so minimal,
because the special anchorage area
leaves more than enough room for the
navigation of all vessels. This will allow
for greater safety of navigation and
traffic in the area, while also providing
for a substantial improvement to the
safety of anchorages in the area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
recreational or commercial vessels
intending to transit in a portion of the
Hudson River near or through the
special anchorage area. However, this
special anchorage area will not have a
significant economic impact on these
entities for the following reasons. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:16 May 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
special anchorage area does not extend
past the 18-foot contour on the west side
of the Hudson River. This leaves
approximately 1,680 yards of safe water
before reaching the 18-foot contour on
the east side of the Hudson River. It is
also about 800 yards from the 600-foot
wide Hudson River Federal Project
Channel. This is more than enough
room for the types of vessels currently
operating on the river, which include
both small and large commercial
vessels. Thus this special anchorage
area will not impede safe and efficient
vessel transits on the Hudson River.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. The Coast Guard did not
receive any requests for assistance with
this rulemaking.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 30, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(f), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(f) as it establishes a special
anchorage area.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are available
in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471; 1221 through
1236, 2030, 2035 and 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g);
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 110.60 to add new
paragraph (p)(p–3) to read as follows:
I
§ 110.60
Port of New York and vicinity.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(p) * * *
(p–3) Hudson River, at Village of
Haverstraw. That portion of the Hudson
River bound by the following points:
41°11′25.2″ N, 073°57′19.9″ W; thence to
41°11′34.2″ N, 073°57′00.8″ W; thence to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:16 May 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
41°11′41.9″ N, 073°57′07.5″ W; thence to
41°11′31.8″ N, 073°57′26.5″ W; thence to
41°11′30.8″ N, 073°57′24.9″ W; thence to
the point of origin (NAD 1983).
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 11, 2006.
Mark J. Campbell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–8298 Filed 5–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 36
RIN 2900–AM38
Amended Delegation of Authority—
Property Management Contractor
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending its delegation
of authority to the property management
contractor under its housing loan
program. This amendment will permit
the property management contractor’s
Regional Managers to execute
documents necessary for the
management and sale of single-family
properties acquired by VA under its
housing loan guaranty program.
DATES: Effective Date: May 30, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William W. Lutes, Assistant Director for
Property Management and Strategic
Development (263), Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., Washington,
DC 20420, telephone 202–273–7379.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
provisions of 38 U.S.C. chapter 37
authorize the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs to guarantee (or make) loans to
veterans. Following the termination of
guaranteed loans that have been in
serious default, the holder of such loan
may, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 3732(c),
elect to convey to the Secretary the
property which had secured the loan.
VA sells the properties so acquired to
the general public in order to reduce the
loss to the Federal Treasury on the
guaranteed loan. The sale of such
properties is not a veterans’ benefit
granted under title 38, United States
Code.
VA has contracted with a private
entity to handle the management and
resale of VA’s inventory of acquired
properties. To facilitate the contract’s
objectives, VA, in 38 CFR 36.4342(f)(2),
has delegated to designated officials of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30617
that entity the authority to execute, on
behalf of VA, routine documents
necessary for the management and sale
of VA acquired properties. The
designated officials under such
delegation are the Senior Vice President,
Vice President, Assistant Vice President,
Assistant Secretary, Director, and Senior
Manager.
This rule amends 38 CFR
36.4342(f)(2) to add the position of
‘‘Regional Manager’’ to the list of
officers of the contractor to whom the
Secretary has delegated authority to
execute such property management and
sales documents. Workload and staffing
of the contractor has led VA to conclude
that so expanding the list of positions to
which this authority is delegated will
increase the efficiency of the
administration of the property
management contract.
Administrative Procedure Act
This final rule concerns agency
statements of policy, organization,
procedure, or practice, and pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553, is exempt from the notice
and comment and delayed effective date
requirements.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies
prepare an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule that may result in an expenditure
by State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector
of $100 million or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) in any given year.
This final rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs
hereby certifies that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The
final rule relates to agency management
and personnel and does not contain
substantive provisions affecting small
entities. Accordingly, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is exempt
from the initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 30, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30615-30617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8298]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[CG01-05-101]
RIN 1625-AA01 (Previously reported as RIN 1625-AA98)
Anchorage Regulations; Port of New York and Vicinity
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a Special Anchorage Area in
Haverstraw Bay on the Hudson River adjacent to Haverstraw, NY. This
action is necessary to facilitate safe navigation in that area and
provide safe and secure anchorages for vessels not more than 20 meters
in length. This action is intended to increase the safety of life and
property on the Hudson River, improve the safety of anchored vessels,
and provide for the overall safe and efficient flow of recreational
vessel traffic and commerce.
DATES: This rule is effective June 29, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket (CGD01-05-101) and are available for inspection or
copying at Waterways Management Division (CGD01-05-101), Coast Guard
Sector New York, 212 Coast Guard Drive, room 321, Staten Island, New
York 10305 between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander M. McBrady,
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard Sector New York at (718)
354-2353.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On January 19, 2006, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Anchorage Regulations; Port of New York and Vicinity in
the Federal Register (71 FR 3025). We received no letters commenting on
the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
As part of a waterfront revitalization effort the Village of
Haverstraw is encouraging waterfront use by the general public. This
rule is in response to a request made by the Village of Haverstraw to
ensure the safe navigation of increased vessel traffic expected to
arrive along the village waterfront due to this revitalization effort.
The Coast Guard is designating an area as a special anchorage area
in accordance with 33 U.S.C. 471. In accordance with that statute,
vessels will not be required to sound signals or exhibit anchor lights
or shapes which are otherwise required by rule 30 and 35 of the Inland
Navigation Rules, codified at 33 U.S.C. 2030 and 2035.
The special anchorage area will be located on the west side of the
Hudson River about 1,800 yards south of Bowline Point, well removed
from the channel and located where general navigation will not endanger
or be endangered by unlighted vessels. Providing anchorage well removed
from the channel and general navigation will greatly increase
navigational safety.
This special anchorage area is part of a waterfront revitalization
project authorized under U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit number
2004-00596-YR.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received, and no changes were made from the
proposed rule.
Discussion of Rule
This rule creates a new special anchorage area located on the
Hudson River at the Village of Haverstraw, New York, on Haverstraw Bay.
It includes all waters of the Hudson River bound by the following
points: 41[deg]11'25.2'' N, 073[deg]57'19.9'' W; thence to
41[deg]11'34.2'' N, 073[deg]57'00.8'' W; thence to 41[deg]11'41.9'' N,
073[deg]57'07.5'' W; thence to 41[deg]11'31.8'' N, 073[deg]57'26.5'' W;
thence to 41[deg]11'30.8'' N, 073[deg]57'24.9'' W; thence to the point
of origin (NAD 1983). All coordinates are North American Datum 1983
(NAD 83).
The special anchorage area is limited to vessels no greater than 20
meters in length. Vessels not more than 20 meters in length are not
required to sound signals as required by rule 35 of the Inland
Navigation Rules (33 U.S.C. 2035) nor exhibit anchor lights or shapes
required by rule 30 of the Inland Navigation Rules (33 U.S.C 2030) when
at anchor in a special anchorage area. Additionally, mariners utilizing
the anchorage areas are encouraged to contact local and state
authorities, such as the local harbormaster, to ensure
[[Page 30616]]
compliance with additional applicable state and local laws. Such laws
may involve, for example, compliance with direction from the local
harbormaster when placing or using moorings within the anchorage.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
This finding is based on the fact that this special anchorage area
does not extend past the 18-foot contour on the west side of the Hudson
River, which leaves approximately 1,680 yards of safe water before
reaching the 18-foot contour on the east side of the Hudson River. The
resulting impact to vessel transits in this area is so minimal, because
the special anchorage area leaves more than enough room for the
navigation of all vessels. This will allow for greater safety of
navigation and traffic in the area, while also providing for a
substantial improvement to the safety of anchorages in the area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of recreational or
commercial vessels intending to transit in a portion of the Hudson
River near or through the special anchorage area. However, this special
anchorage area will not have a significant economic impact on these
entities for the following reasons. The special anchorage area does not
extend past the 18-foot contour on the west side of the Hudson River.
This leaves approximately 1,680 yards of safe water before reaching the
18-foot contour on the east side of the Hudson River. It is also about
800 yards from the 600-foot wide Hudson River Federal Project Channel.
This is more than enough room for the types of vessels currently
operating on the river, which include both small and large commercial
vessels. Thus this special anchorage area will not impede safe and
efficient vessel transits on the Hudson River.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. The
Coast Guard did not receive any requests for assistance with this
rulemaking.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency
[[Page 30617]]
provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials,
performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures;
and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(f), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(f) as it establishes a special anchorage area.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471; 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035 and
2071; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 110.60 to add new paragraph (p)(p-3) to read as follows:
Sec. 110.60 Port of New York and vicinity.
* * * * *
(p) * * *
(p-3) Hudson River, at Village of Haverstraw. That portion of the
Hudson River bound by the following points: 41[deg]11'25.2'' N,
073[deg]57'19.9'' W; thence to 41[deg]11'34.2'' N, 073[deg]57'00.8'' W;
thence to 41[deg]11'41.9'' N, 073[deg]57'07.5'' W; thence to
41[deg]11'31.8'' N, 073[deg]57'26.5'' W; thence to 41[deg]11'30.8'' N,
073[deg]57'24.9'' W; thence to the point of origin (NAD 1983).
* * * * *
Dated: May 11, 2006.
Mark J. Campbell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E6-8298 Filed 5-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P