Storage, Handling, and Ginning Requirements for Cotton Marketing Assistance Loan Collateral, 30318-30323 [E6-8161]
Download as PDF
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
30318
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules
104–427, 7 U.S.C. 7401–7425) (Act), a
referendum is to be conducted not later
than seven years after assessments first
begin under an order to ascertain
whether continuance of the Order is
favored by producers and importers of
blueberries. The Order is authorized
under the Act.
The initial referendum was conducted
during the period of March 13 through
April 14, 2000. The final results of the
initial referendum were that 67.84
percent of the voters in the referendum
favored implementation of the Order.
Those voting in favor represented 73.15
percent of the volume represented in the
referendum. Therefore, the Order
became effective July 17, 2000.
Under § 1218.71 of the Order, the
Department of Agriculture (Department)
is authorized to conduct a referendum
every five years or when 10 percent or
more of the eligible voters petition the
Secretary of Agriculture to hold a
referendum to determine if persons
subject to assessment favor continuance
of the Order. The Department would
continue the Order if continuance of the
Order is approved by a majority of the
producers and importers voting in the
referendum who also represent a
majority of the volume of blueberries
produced or imported during the
representative period determined by the
Secretary.
The representative period for
establishing voter eligibility for the
referendum shall be the period from
November 1, 2004 through October 31,
2005. Persons who are producers and
importers of blueberries and paid
assessments during the representative
period are eligible to vote. Persons who
received an exemption from
assessments for the entire representative
period are ineligible to vote. The
referendum shall be conducted by mail
from August 1, 2006 through August 22,
2006.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the referendum ballot has
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0093. It is
estimated that there are approximately
1,586 producers and 135 importers who
will be eligible to vote in the
referendum. It will take an average of 25
minutes for each voter to read the voting
instructions and complete the
referendum ballot.
Referendum Order
Deborah S. Simmons, Marlene M.
Betts and Margaret B. Irby, RP, FV,
AMS, USDA, Stop 0244, Room 2535–S,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, are designated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
as the referendum agents to conduct this
referendum. The referendum procedures
7 CFR 1218.100 through 1218.107,
which were issued pursuant to the Act,
shall be used to conduct the
referendum.
The referendum agents will mail the
ballots to be cast in the referendum and
voting instructions to all known
producers and importers prior to the
first day of the voting period. Persons
who are producers and importers and
who paid assessments during the
representative period are eligible to
vote. Ballots must be received by the
referendum agent beginning August 1,
2006, through 4:30 p.m., Eastern
Daylight Savings Time, August 22, 2006,
in order to be counted.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7401–7425.
Dated: May 22, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–8101 Filed 5–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
Background
7 CFR Part 1427
RIN 0560–AH48
Storage, Handling, and Ginning
Requirements for Cotton Marketing
Assistance Loan Collateral
Commodity Credit Corporation,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule proposes amending
regulations governing the cotton
Marketing Assistance Loan Program of
the Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC) that is authorized by the Farm
Security and Rural Investment Act of
2002 (2002 Act). The major proposed
regulatory changes would impact the
administration of the program by
amending regulations governing: The
outside storage of upland cotton
pledged as collateral for CCC loans; the
certification provided by approved
ginners to produce bales that are
compliant with CCC loan eligibility
requirements; the reconcentration and
transfer of upland cotton pledged as
collateral for CCC loans; and the storage
credit provided to producers when an
upland cotton marketing assistance loan
is repaid.
DATES: Comments should be received on
or before June 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: CCC invites interested
persons to submit comments on this
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
proposed rule and on the collection of
information required to administer the
affected regulations. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• E-Mail: Send comments to
gene.rosera@wdc.usda.gov.
• Fax: Submit comments by facsimile
transmission to: (202) 690–1536.
• Mail: Send comments to: Director,
Price Support Division, Farm Service
Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), Rm. 4095–S, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0512.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
comments to the above address.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
All written comments will be
available for public inspection at the
above address during business hours
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene Rosera; phone: (202) 720–8481; email: gene.rosera@wdc.usda.gov; or fax:
(202) 690–1536.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Sfmt 4702
CCC regulations generally require that
cotton loan collateral must be stored
inside a warehouse for the cotton to be
eligible for marketing assistance loan.
Cotton regulations at 7 CFR 1427.5
provide that for a bale of cotton to be
eligible to be pledged as collateral for a
marketing assistance loan, the bale must
be stored inside a warehouse approved
by CCC. An exception to this general
requirement is provided by regulations
at 7 CFR 1427.10 that provide that a
commercial entity involved in handling
or storage of cotton in a county or area
determined and announced by CCC may
be approved for outside storage of 2003
and subsequent crops of extra long
staple (ELS) cotton. Such outside
storage is subject to site requirements
and terms and conditions regarding
collateral identification and location as
provided in an appendix to the ELS
cotton note and security agreement.
According to the January 2006 Crop
Production Summary of the USDA
Agricultural Statistics Board, total
cotton production in Texas, estimated at
4.374 million bales in 2003, increased to
7.778 million bales in 2004 (about a 78
percent increase) and to 8.245 million
bales in 2005 (a 6 percent increase from
the prior year.) The available approved
cotton storage warehouse capacity in
West Texas has not kept pace with these
production increases, and the result has
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules
been that loan cotton was stored outside
for extended periods both years. In
response to this shortage of approved
cotton storage, on May 13, 2005, the
CCC informed cotton warehouse
operators through Notice to the Trade
BCD–97 that they could apply for
approval of short-term temporary
storage subject to placing any 2004-crop
cotton loan collateral in conventional
space by June 1, 2005 (later extended to
June 27, 2005). In early March, 2005, the
quantity of loan cotton stored outside
exceeded 118,000 bales.
In response to storage shortages that
began in December, 2005, CCC, on
January 18, 2006, issued Notice to the
Trade BCD–117, allowing warehouse
operators to again request temporary use
of yard storage for 2005-crop cotton loan
collateral, to be limited to the earlier of
90 days from the original storage date or
April 1, 2006. This deadline was
subsequently extended to May 1, 2006.
By early March, 2006, the quantity of
loan cotton stored outside topped
435,000 bales, equal to 93 percent of the
Texas crop increase for the year.
These recent authorizations by CCC of
outside storage for upland cotton are
viewed by some industry entities as
counterproductive to CCC’s interests.
The traditional requirement for inside
storage of loan cotton has wide support
for being essential to prevent quality
losses from sun, dust, and moisture.
This view has been bolstered by
complaints from cotton buyers regarding
U.S. cotton quality. In the end, CCC has
strived to provide a balance between the
practical needs for storing back-to-back
bumper crops with the need for
reasonable crop protection to protect the
quality and reputation of U.S. cotton for
domestic and export buyers.
Cotton regulations at 7 CFR 1427.5
provide that for a bale of cotton to be
eligible to be pledged as collateral for a
marketing assistance loan, the bale must
be in good condition and not be falsepacked or water-packed. False-packed
cotton is defined by regulations at 7 CFR
1427.3 as containing damaged cotton in
the interior with or without any
indication of the damage on the exterior;
or cotton composed of good cotton on
the exterior and decidedly inferior
cotton in the interior, but not detectable
by customary examination. Waterpacked cotton is defined by 7 CFR
28.40(h) as cotton in a bale that has been
penetrated by water during the baling
process, causing damage to the fiber, or
a bale that through exposure to the
weather or by other means, while
apparently dry on the exterior, has been
damaged by water in the interior.
The incidence of water damage in
cotton loan collateral has historically
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
been minimal. The wet bales that have
occasionally been produced at gins
have, most commonly, occurred as a
result of the variability of moisture in
seed cotton. It is common practice for
cotton gins to dry excessively moist
seed cotton, if required, before ginning,
or to add some moisture if the cotton is
too dry. The moisture restoration
systems at cotton gins use humidified
air, liquid water sprays, or a
combination of both systems. These
systems may be employed before the gin
stand, at the battery condenser, or at the
lint slide before the cotton is pressed.
Generally, cotton is thought to gin best
at 6 to 7 percent moisture content (wet
basis) which minimizes breakage and
allows for fiber separation. Moisture in
this range also aids in the bale
compression by reducing the amount of
needed pressure.
During the 2005 marketing year for
cotton, CCC determined that the cotton
produced at two gins was water
damaged and, therefore, ineligible as
collateral for a loan. The damage to the
bales was discovered after the cotton
had been accepted by CCC as loan
collateral, and some cotton merchants
had been designated as agents for the
cotton, implying that the cotton had
figured into their marketing plans. Still
other cotton from the gins had already
been sold. Both of the gins employed
direct liquid water spray systems. As a
result of the losses and marketing
disruptions resulting from these bales
being water damaged, CCC has received
comments with respect to whether
policy changes are needed in this
matter. One national organization
commented that cotton lint exposed to
direct liquid water spray at a gin should
not be eligible to be used as collateral
for CCC loans. Others have commented
that direct liquid spray equipment has
been used by many gins without
damaging the cotton.
Discussion of Comments
CCC published an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking on February 13,
2006 at 71 FR 7445. During the 60-day
comment period, CCC received 43
comments. Respondents included 4
national organizations, 8 regional
organizations, 15 cotton storage
warehouses, and 16 individuals or
companies. Regarding CCC’s overall
storage requirements regarding upland
loan cotton, the comments received
indicate a lack of industry consensus as
to appropriate policy. Generally,
warehouses support use of outside
storage on a temporary, case-by-case
basis when justified by extraordinary
circumstances, with such storage subject
to requirements such as use of dunnage
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30319
or additional protection of the cotton.
Cotton merchants stated that outside
storage contributes to the damage of
such cotton and is detrimental to
producers and cotton users. Many
specific recommendations were
provided as to how CCC might restrict
the use of such outside storage.
Generally, there is no support for CCC
to reduce the loan rate for loan cotton
that might be stored outside, but some
comments are that CCC should reduce
or provide no storage credit for outsidestored cotton as an incentive to
producers and warehouses to store
cotton indoors. Regarding the storage
credit provided for outside-stored loan
collateral, many comments supported
CCC providing the full storage credit,
and others commented that the storage
costs affect U.S. cotton competitiveness.
Other comments are that outside storage
has its own unique costs, or that no
reduction in the storage credit is
warranted because the incidence of
damage to loan cotton from the use of
outside storage has been minimal. Two
national producer or industry
organizations support a policy of
requiring loan cotton to be stored inside
except to accommodate temporary,
extraordinary or unforeseen conditions.
Although respondents support a storage
policy to ensure that cotton is protected,
their views differ as to whether outside
storage constitutes a risk to the cotton.
Some maintain that there are no
procedures that can mitigate the
incidence of rain, dust, or sun damage,
while other comments minimize such
risks, or contend that outside storage
has been justified due to extraordinary,
localized production increases. The
comments, in general, support the
conclusion that outside storage exposes
cotton to specific risks of damage from
water, dust, sun bleaching, and possibly
mold from water trapped by double
bagging. Those supporting use of
temporary outside storage generally
contend that practices such as use of
dunnage and double wrapping or
covering of bales provides sufficient
protection; other contend that the
packaging standards of the Joint Cotton
Industry Bale Packaging Committee
were not established for outside storage
and, thus, there are no materials
determined appropriate for outside use.
There were many comments regarding
CCC allowing producers or agents of
producers to request ‘‘re-concentration’’
of loan cotton. Reconcentration is the
term used to describe the movement of
CCC loan cotton from one warehouse to
another. Two national organizations
stated that any reconcentration policy
should not affect the integrity of
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
30320
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
electronic warehouse receipts, and that
CCC should pay accrued storage to
warehouses prior to reconcentrations.
Other comments supported
reconcentrations only under limited
circumstances, such as for cotton stored
outside or other warehouse violations.
Concern was stated that any unlimited
opportunities for merchants to relocate
loan cotton would benefit a few and
possibly add to cotton flow problems.
CCC has concluded from the
comments provided that the relocation
of loan cotton, at the expense of the
producer or producer’s agent, is a
reasonable course of action regardless of
whether the original storing warehouse
consents to the movement of the cotton.
The transfer of loan collateral should
ameliorate the risks of quality
deterioration of the cotton, relieve
regional shortage congestion, and
facilitate more efficient marketing of
cotton.
Regarding the existing 4.5 percent
weekly minimum shipping standard,
several comments suggested that the
standard should be amended to be based
on the higher of approved capacity or
the quantity of bales on hand. A few
commented that the weekly minimum
standard is inadequate and should be
raised to meet needs of the growing
export-oriented market. Other
comments suggested that USDA should
enforce the existing standard or support
steps to improve warehouse shipping
performance through weekly
performance reporting or new
standards. At this time, and based on its
current statutory authorities, CCC is not
proposing any new warehouse
performance or reporting requirements
related to the 4.5 percent weekly
shipping requirement. CCC continues to
examine warehouse performance against
this current standard and has not
completed its review. However, CCC
understands the importance of the
enforcement of a standard to the
efficient flow of cotton, and is receptive
to support any improvements in the
standard, or enforcement procedures,
that may be developed and
recommended by a consensus of
industry representatives.
Proposed Changes
CCC proposes to revise regulations at
7 CFR part 1427 to: Provide cotton loan
eligibility consistent with any shortterm needs for outside storage of upland
cotton loan collateral; improve the flow
of cotton by removing excessive
incentives to store cotton; and protect
CCC from assuming losses that result
from accepting upland cotton as
collateral for a loan that has unpaid
charges.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
A. Outside Storage of Upland Loan
Cotton
Based on the comments received, and
consistent with CCC objectives in
administering the marketing assistance
loan program for upland cotton, CCC
has concluded that, in spite of the
inherent risk of increasing the damage
to cotton by storing it outside, the use
of outside storage may be unavoidable
under some circumstances beyond the
control of the producer. Depriving the
producer of eligibility for marketing
assistance loan benefits based on
circumstances that may arise after the
production of the crop would raise
concerns over the fairness of policy and
could disrupt the marketing of the
cotton. However, CCC is mindful that a
relaxed storage policy may also increase
the use of outside storage when inside
storage may be available nearby or
within economically practicable
distances. CCC, therefore, concludes
that its policy regarding the storage of
cotton needs to accommodate special
circumstances without creating
incentives that might indirectly increase
the use of outside storage when it may
not be warranted. Accordingly, CCC
proposes to amend the cotton loan
eligibility requirements to amend the
storage requirements for a bale of cotton
to be eligible as collateral for a
marketing assistance loan. Generally,
CCC will continue to require that a bale
of cotton must be stored inside a cotton
storage warehouse but will annually
determine in which counties outside
storage for cotton pledged as collateral
for a CCC loan may be used subject to
the following special provisions: (1) As
part of the application for approval of
the use of outside storage, the
warehouse must agree to implement
special storage requirements, including
but not limited to, additional packaging,
dunnage, security, and insurance
coverage with CCC named as the loss
payee, and (2) the loan repayment
amount will not be reduced by any
storage credit as would apply to loan
cotton stored inside.
B. Reconcentration of Cotton
The changes in domestic cotton
marketing caused by strong export
market demand have altered domestic
cotton marketing channels and, as a
result, have created more urgency to
move cotton efficiently through
marketing channels. The 9-month loan
term for marketing assistance loans,
coupled with crediting the repayment of
the loan for accrued storage charges,
may create incentives to maintain the
upland cotton in the loan program and
adversely delay marketings. In order to
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ameliorate risks of quality deterioration
to CCC marketing loan collateral, relieve
regional storage congestion, and
facilitate more efficient cotton
marketing, CCC proposes to amend
regulations at 7 CFR 1427.16,
Reconcentration of Cotton, to allow the
transfer of 2006 and subsequent crop
cotton under loan from one CCCapproved warehouse to another CCCapproved warehouse. Under the
proposed process, upon receipt of a
transfer application from the producer
or producer’s authorized agent, CCC
will enter into a transfer agreement
providing that: (1) CCC will continue to
be holder of the negotiable electronic
warehouse receipts from the original
storing warehouse during the period of
the transfer; (2) the cotton will be
moved at the expense of the producer to
another CCC-approved cotton storage
warehouse (the receiving warehouse)
which must have signed the transfer
application to indicate its ability to
accept the cotton; (3) the receiving
warehouse will issue a non-negotiable
electronic warehouse receipt in
coverage of the depositor obligation
represented by the negotiable electronic
warehouse receipts for the transferred
cotton; (4) the receiving warehouse will,
when requested, cancel and replace the
non-negotiable electronic warehouse
receipt with negotiable electronic
warehouse receipts; (5) the original
storing warehouse operator must agree
to cancel the negotiable electronic
warehouse receipts and deliver the nonnegotiable electronic warehouse receipt
to the receiving warehouse operator
promptly upon notice by the producer
or CCC; and (6) all CCC loan servicing,
including, but not limited to the loan
and repayment rates and warehouse
charges, will be based on the terms and
conditions of the original storage
location. The producer or the requestor
of any transfer of loan cotton is
responsible for all costs associated with
relocating loan cotton, regardless of the
circumstances prompting the relocation.
This includes any costs of moving loan
cotton to inside storage for its delivery
to CCC in satisfaction of a loan
obligation. CCC assumes responsibility
only for the costs of relocating cotton it
owns.
C. Ginner Agreement and Certification
Existing regulations at 7 CFR 1427.5,
General eligibility requirements,
provide that as a condition for loan
eligibility, a bale must be ginned by a
ginner that has entered into a
Cooperating Ginners’ Bagging and Bale
Ties Certification and Agreement on a
form prescribed by CCC, or certified that
the bale is wrapped with bagging and
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
bale ties meeting the requirements of 7
CFR 1427.5(b)(10). All U.S. commercial
cotton gins have entered into this
agreement with CCC. This agreement
remains in effect until terminated by
either the gin or by CCC.
CCC proposes to amend this
regulation to provide that, effective for
the 2006 and subsequent crops, cotton
must be ginned by a ginner that
additionally certifies that the bale, upon
ginning, meets the quality requirements
for loan eligibility of 7 CFR 1427.5(b)
that provide for the bale to be in good
condition and not false-packed, waterpacked, mixed-packed, re-ginned, or
repacked. To administer this new
agreement and certification for the 2006
and subsequent cotton crops, CCC
proposes to notify all U.S. ginners that
previous agreements are terminated. A
revised agreement providing the
additional certifications explained
above will be made available for ginners
to sign prior to the 2006-crop harvest.
D. Repayment of Loans
Current regulations at 7 CFR
1427.19(h) provide that at the time of an
upland cotton loan repayment, if the
repayment rate is less than the loan
level and charges, plus interest, CCC
will pay to the producer or agent of the
producer the warehouse storage charges
that have accrued during the period the
cotton was pledged for loan. The
amount of this payment may be reduced
at times when the adjusted world price
is above the national average loan rate
by less than the sum of the accrued
interest and warehouse storage charges
that accrued during the period the
cotton was pledged for loan. CCC’s
payment of the accrued warehouse
storage charges under this regulation
has, in all cases, been based upon the
tariff rate for the cotton storage
warehouse where the loan cotton has
been stored. CCC has not provided for
a uniform storage payment rate to
producers or their agents designated to
repay the producer’s loan obligation
even though the loan gain or LDP rate
is uniform and provided regardless of
location. The tariff rates established by
warehouses vary considerably, from
below $2.00 to over $5.00 per bale per
month. The tariff rates generally appear
to be unrelated to the approved capacity
of the individual warehouse, with the
highest rates occurring in California and
Arizona. For the 2005 crop, the average
warehouse tariff rate, weighted by
quantity of loan bales, is $2.61 per bale
per month. About 52 percent of 2005crop loan cotton was placed into storage
in states where the tariff rate, weighted
by loan volume, averages $2.15 per bale
per month or less. Tariff rates in storage-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
deficit areas of Texas, including
warehouses that recently stored loan
cotton outside, fall below the $2.15 per
bale level and are among the lowest
rates being charged nationwide.
The storage credits provided by CCC
have been provided so that as storage
charges accrue on un-sold cotton, the
cost of the cotton and charges does not
become uncompetitive relative to the
adjusted world price level. However, if
the tariff charges levied by the
warehouse are especially profitable, the
credits provided by CCC will induce
producers and ginners to ship their
cotton to locations that maximize their
storage returns or warehouse rebates. In
these cases, the warehouse may be
chosen without regard to whether the
cotton will be stored inside, or because
it is at a location that provides timely
load-out when requested by a merchant.
For these reasons, CCC has concluded
that providing unrestricted storage
credits may have a negative impact on
both the maintenance of bale quality
and on the flow of cotton pledged under
the CCC loan program.
To improve the equity of program
benefits among all producers, to reduce
incentives for cotton to be held in
storage to maximize CCC-storage
payments, and to improve cotton flow,
CCC proposes, effective for the 2006 and
subsequent crops of upland cotton, to
amend the regulations at 7 CFR
1427.19(h), Repayment of Loans, to
provide that any storage credit that may
be provided by CCC shall be: (1) Based
on a maximum monthly storage-credit
payment rate that will not exceed the
rate used in 2005 at the location where
the 2006 and 2007 crops are stored, not
to exceed $2.15, for all loan cotton
stored inside an approved cotton storage
warehouse; and (2) zero, for a cotton
loan, for which one or more bales are
stored outside during the period of the
loan, even if these bales are later moved
to inside storage. Comments are
specifically requested as to whether the
proposed maximum rate of $2.15 per
bale per month will promote the flow of
cotton and provide more equitable
program benefits compared to use of
individual warehouse tariff rates.
E. Liens
Current regulations at 7 CFR 1427.12,
Liens, provide that if there are any liens
or encumbrances on cotton provided as
collateral for a marketing assistance loan
CCC must obtain waivers that fully
protect the interest of CCC before
disbursement of the loan even though
the liens or encumbrances are satisfied
from the loan proceeds. Additionally,
no liens or encumbrances shall be
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30321
placed on the cotton after the loan is
approved.
Additionally, 7 CFR 1427.19(h)
provides that, depending on the level of
the adjusted world price determined
under 7 CFR 1427.25, CCC may pay to
the producer or producer’s agent, at the
time of the loan repayment, all or a
portion of the warehouse storage
charges that have accrued during the
period the cotton was pledged for loan.
Loan cotton stored in approved
warehouses also accrues receiving,
storage and load-out charges that are
paid by the buyer before taking delivery
of the cotton from the warehouse. For
cotton delivered to CCC in satisfaction
of the loan obligation, and to minimize
the administrative burden of receiving
lien waivers for these charges, CCC has
paid the receiving and accrued storage
charges to the storing warehouse and
then billed the producer for both the
receiving charges and any amount of
storage that accrued up to the date the
cotton was pledged for loan.
CCC proposes to revise 7 CFR 1427.12
to establish consistency between these
two requirements, and to clarify that
CCC shall not be responsible for any
charges attached to a bale other than for
the storage charges as provided in 7 CFR
1427.19(h).
Notice and Comment
Section 1601(c) of the 2002 Act
provides that the regulations needed to
implement Title I of the 2002 Act,
which include those involved here, may
be promulgated without regard to the
notice and comment provisions of 5
U.S.C. 553 or the Statement of Policy of
the Secretary of Agriculture effective
July 24, 1971 relating to notices of
proposed rulemaking and public
participation in rulemaking.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is issued in conformance
with Executive Order 12866, was
determined to be not significant and has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
It has been determined that the
Regulatory Flexibility Act is not
applicable to this rule because the CCC
is not required by 5 U.S.C. 533 or any
other law to publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking for the subject
matter of this rule.
Environmental Assessment
The environmental impacts of this
rule have been considered consistent
with the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., the
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
30322
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts
1500–1508), and the FSA regulations for
compliance with NEPA, 7 CFR part 799.
FSA concluded that the rule requires no
further environmental review because it
is categorically excluded. No
extraordinary circumstances or other
unforeseeable factors exist which would
require preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988.
This rule will preempt State laws that
are inconsistent with it. Before any legal
action may be brought regarding a
determination under this rule, the
administrative appeal provisions set
forth at 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be
exhausted.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the notice related to 7 CFR
part 3014, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115 (June 24, 1983).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The rule contains no Federal
mandates under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
for State, local, and tribal governments
or the private sector. Thus, this rule is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 1601(c) of the 2002 Act
provides that the promulgation of
regulations and the administration of
Title I of the 2002 Act shall be made
without regard to chapter 5 of title 44
of the United States Code (the
Paperwork Reduction Act). Accordingly,
these regulations and the forms and
other information collection activities
needed to administer the program
authorized by these regulations are not
subject to review by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
Executive Order 12612
This rule does not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment.
The provisions contained in this rule
will not have substantial direct effect on
States or their political subdivisions or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act
CCC is committed to compliance with
the Government Paperwork Elimination
Act (GPEA) and the Freedom to E-File
Act, which require Government
agencies in general and FSA in
particular to provide the public the
option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to
the maximum extent possible. The
forms and other information collection
activities required for participation in
the program are available electronically
through the USDA eForms Web site at
https://www.sc.egov.usda.gov for
downloading. The regulation is
available at FSA’s Price Support
Division Internet site at https://
www.fsa.usda.gov/dafp/psd.
Applications may be submitted at the
FSA county offices, by mail or by FAX.
At this time, electronic submission is
not available. Full development of
electronic submission is underway.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal
assistance program found in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance to which
this final rule applies are Commodity
Loans and Loan Deficiency Payments,
10.051.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1427
Agricultural commodities, Cotton,
Loan programs-agriculture, Price
support programs, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 1427 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 1427—COTTON
1. The authority citation for part 1427
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7231–7237 and 7931–
7939; and 15 U.S.C. 714b and 714c.
Subpart A—Nonrecourse Cotton Loan
and Loan Deficiency Payments
2. Amend § 1427.5 by revising
paragraph (b)(2) and adding paragraph
(b)(11)(iii) to read as follows:
§ 1427.5
General eligibility requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Be in existence and good
condition, be covered by fire insurance,
and at the time of disbursement of the
loan proceeds, be stored inside an
approved storage warehouse unless, as
determined under § 1427.10, CCC has
approved a warehouse to use outside
storage for cotton loan collateral for the
period of the loan.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(11) * * *
(iii) For the 2006 and subsequent
crops has provided a certification to
CCC on a form prescribed by CCC, that
upon ginning, the bales meet the
condition and quality requirements for
loan eligibility as provided in
§ 1427.5(b) and;
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 1427.10 by revising
paragraph (b), redesignating paragraphs
(c), (d), and (e) as (d), (e), and (f), and
adding a new paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
§ 1427.10
Approved storage.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) When the operator of a warehouse
receives notice from CCC that a loan has
been made by CCC on a bale of cotton,
the operator shall, if such cotton is not
stored within the warehouse, as directed
by CCC place such cotton within such
warehouse.
(c) CCC will annually determine and
announce geographic areas where
approved cotton storage warehouses
may apply for approval to store cotton
pledged as collateral outside. The
application for approval to use outside
storage shall be on a form prescribed by
CCC that provides all applicable outside
storage requirements related to the
duration of such storage, use of
dunnage, insurance, packaging, or other
storage and handling requirements as
determined by CCC. As a condition for
approval to store loan cotton outside,
CCC may require the warehouse to
consent to reconcentration and transfer
orders approved by CCC applicable to
any cotton stored at the applicant’s
warehouse.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Revise § 1427.12 to read as follows:
§ 1427.12
Liens.
Notwithstanding provisions in
§ 1427.19(h) that provide that CCC may
pay for some or all of the warehouse
storage charges that accrued for the
cotton during the period the cotton was
pledged for loan, if there are any liens
or encumbrances on the cotton tendered
as collateral for a loan, waivers that
fully protect the interest of CCC must be
obtained before disbursement even
though the liens or encumbrances are
satisfied from the loan proceeds, except
that CCC may elect to accept as loan
collateral cotton that has warehouse
receiving, compression, load-out or
other charges if the producer, at the time
of loan application, agrees to reimburse
CCC for any such charges that CCC may
pay on behalf of the producer or that
reduce the value of the cotton delivered
to CCC.
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules
5. Amend § 1427.16 by adding
paragraph (b)(3) as follows:
§ 1427.16
Reconcentration of cotton.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Effective for the 2006 and
subsequent crops of cotton, CCC may
approve a request for relocation of
cotton loan collateral, submitted by a
producer or a properly designated agent
of the producer, and approved by the
receiving warehouse operator. Such
relocation shall be based on, but are not
limited to, the original loan rate,
repayment rate, and other terms and
conditions of the original loan storage
location. Any charges, fees, costs, or
expenses incident to such
reconcentration or transfer shall be paid
by the requestor of such transfer.
6. Amend § 1427.19 by revising
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 1427.19
Repayment of loans.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(1) Below the national average loan
rate for upland cotton, CCC will pay at
the time of loan repayment to the
producer of agent or subsequent agent
authorized by the producer in the
manner prescribed by CCC, for the
period the cotton was pledged as
collateral for such loan:
(i) The warehouse storage charges
which have accrued, and
(ii) With respect to the 2006 and
subsequent-crops of upland cotton, if
the entire quantity of the loan was
stored inside an approved cotton
warehouse during the entire period of
the loan, the storage charges that
accrued based on a maximum monthly
storage-credit payment rate will not
exceed the rate used in 2005 at the
location where the 2006 and 2007 crops
are stored, not to exceed $2.15. With
respect to those producers who store
cotton at a warehouse that was not in
existence in 2005, CCC will assign the
county average credit that was used in
2005. CCC shall not pay any storage
charges if at any time while pledged as
collateral for such loan the cotton was
stored outside.
(2) Above the national average loan
rate by less than the sum of the accrued
interest and warehouse storage charges
that accrued during the period the
cotton was pledged for loan, CCC will
pay at the time of loan repayment to the
producer or agent or subsequent agent
authorized by the producer in the
manner prescribed by CCC, without
regard to any warehouse charges that
accrued before the cotton was pledged
for loan:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
(i) That portion of the warehouse
storage charges that accrued during the
period the cotton was pledged for loan,
that are determined to be necessary to
permit the loan to be repaid at the
adjusted world price; and
(ii) With respect to the 2006 and
subsequent crops of upland cotton, CCC
shall not pay any storage charges if at
any time while pledged as collateral for
such loan the cotton was stored outside.
If the entire quantity of the loan was
stored inside an approved cotton
warehouse during the entire period of
the loan, that portion of the warehouse
storage charges that accrued during the
period the cotton was pledged for loan
based on a maximum monthly storagecredit payment rate will not exceed the
rate used in 2005 at the location where
the 2006 and 2007 crops are stored, not
to exceed $2.15. With respect to those
producers who store cotton at a
warehouse that was not in existence in
2005, CCC will assign the county
average credit that was used in 2005; or
*
*
*
*
*
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 18,
2006.
Teresa C. Lasseter,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E6–8161 Filed 5–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 120
RIN 3245–AF23
Business Loan Programs; Premier
Certified Lenders Program Alternative
Loan Loss Reserve Pilot Program
Small Business Administration.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business
Administration (‘‘SBA’’ or ‘‘the
Administration’’) proposes to amend its
Premier Certified Lenders Program
(‘‘PCLP’’) in accordance with recent
statutory amendments to the PCLP.
Presently, under the PCLP, participating
Certified Development Companies
(‘‘CDCs’’) have increased authority in
connection with making and servicing
loans made under SBA’s development
company loan program (‘‘504
Program’’). One PCLP requirement
relates to a loan loss reserve fund
(‘‘LLRF’’) which a CDC participating in
the PCLP (‘‘PCLP CDC’’) must maintain
to cover losses it may incur in
connection with the 504 Program loans
(‘‘504 Loans’’) it has made under the
PCLP (‘‘PCLP loans’’). Recent statutory
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30323
changes to the PCLP include two pilot
programs related to PCLP LLRF
requirements. One pilot (‘‘Pilot 1’’)
changes LLRF requirements by requiring
the value of an LLRF to equal 1 percent
of the combined outstanding balances of
each debenture issued by a PCLP CDC
to fund a PCLP loan (‘‘PCLP
Debenture’’), instead of the combined
original face value of those PCLP
Debentures. Another pilot (‘‘Pilot 2’’)
authorizes certain PCLP CDCs with
significantly large LLRFs to elect to
meet alternative LLRF requirements in
lieu of certain existing PCLP LLRF
requirements. The proposed regulations
would implement requirements,
procedures, and guidelines relating to
Pilot 1 and Pilot 2.
DATES: SBA must receive comments on
or before July 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN number, by any of the
following methods: (1) Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov; (2) E-mail:
Charles.Thomas@SBA.gov. Include RIN
Number in the subject line of the
message; (3) Fax: (202) 205–7722; (4)
Mail: Charles Thomas, Director,
Program Development Division, Office
of Financial Assistance, U.S. Small
Business Administration, 409 Third
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416; (5)
Hand Delivery/Courier: 409 3rd Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20416, c/o Charles
Thomas.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Thomas, Director, Program
Development Division, Office of
Financial Assistance, Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6656,
Charles.Thomas@SBA.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Statutory Basis for This Proposed
Rulemaking
SBA must amend the PCLP LLRF
regulatory requirements established
pursuant to Title V (‘‘Title V’’) of the
Small Business Investment Act of 1958,
as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), to conform
with amendments to Title V contained
in Public Law 108–232, enacted on May
28, 2004 (‘‘Pilot 1 and Pilot 2’’). Pilot 1
and Pilot 2 were enacted with the
ultimate goal of having each PCLP LLRF
more accurately correspond to the risk
of loss it secures.
Overview of the PCLP and the Basis for
Pilot 1 and Pilot 2
While access to capital is vital to the
success of small businesses, many find
it difficult to access financing,
particularly long term financing. SBA’s
lending programs address these
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30318-30323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8161]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1427
RIN 0560-AH48
Storage, Handling, and Ginning Requirements for Cotton Marketing
Assistance Loan Collateral
AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes amending regulations governing the cotton
Marketing Assistance Loan Program of the Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC) that is authorized by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act
of 2002 (2002 Act). The major proposed regulatory changes would impact
the administration of the program by amending regulations governing:
The outside storage of upland cotton pledged as collateral for CCC
loans; the certification provided by approved ginners to produce bales
that are compliant with CCC loan eligibility requirements; the
reconcentration and transfer of upland cotton pledged as collateral for
CCC loans; and the storage credit provided to producers when an upland
cotton marketing assistance loan is repaid.
DATES: Comments should be received on or before June 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: CCC invites interested persons to submit comments on this
proposed rule and on the collection of information required to
administer the affected regulations. Comments may be submitted by any
of the following methods:
E-Mail: Send comments to gene.rosera@wdc.usda.gov.
Fax: Submit comments by facsimile transmission to: (202)
690-1536.
Mail: Send comments to: Director, Price Support Division,
Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Rm. 4095-S, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0512.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver comments to the above
address.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
All written comments will be available for public inspection at the
above address during business hours from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Rosera; phone: (202) 720-8481; e-
mail: gene.rosera@wdc.usda.gov; or fax: (202) 690-1536.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
CCC regulations generally require that cotton loan collateral must
be stored inside a warehouse for the cotton to be eligible for
marketing assistance loan. Cotton regulations at 7 CFR 1427.5 provide
that for a bale of cotton to be eligible to be pledged as collateral
for a marketing assistance loan, the bale must be stored inside a
warehouse approved by CCC. An exception to this general requirement is
provided by regulations at 7 CFR 1427.10 that provide that a commercial
entity involved in handling or storage of cotton in a county or area
determined and announced by CCC may be approved for outside storage of
2003 and subsequent crops of extra long staple (ELS) cotton. Such
outside storage is subject to site requirements and terms and
conditions regarding collateral identification and location as provided
in an appendix to the ELS cotton note and security agreement.
According to the January 2006 Crop Production Summary of the USDA
Agricultural Statistics Board, total cotton production in Texas,
estimated at 4.374 million bales in 2003, increased to 7.778 million
bales in 2004 (about a 78 percent increase) and to 8.245 million bales
in 2005 (a 6 percent increase from the prior year.) The available
approved cotton storage warehouse capacity in West Texas has not kept
pace with these production increases, and the result has
[[Page 30319]]
been that loan cotton was stored outside for extended periods both
years. In response to this shortage of approved cotton storage, on May
13, 2005, the CCC informed cotton warehouse operators through Notice to
the Trade BCD-97 that they could apply for approval of short-term
temporary storage subject to placing any 2004-crop cotton loan
collateral in conventional space by June 1, 2005 (later extended to
June 27, 2005). In early March, 2005, the quantity of loan cotton
stored outside exceeded 118,000 bales.
In response to storage shortages that began in December, 2005, CCC,
on January 18, 2006, issued Notice to the Trade BCD-117, allowing
warehouse operators to again request temporary use of yard storage for
2005-crop cotton loan collateral, to be limited to the earlier of 90
days from the original storage date or April 1, 2006. This deadline was
subsequently extended to May 1, 2006. By early March, 2006, the
quantity of loan cotton stored outside topped 435,000 bales, equal to
93 percent of the Texas crop increase for the year.
These recent authorizations by CCC of outside storage for upland
cotton are viewed by some industry entities as counterproductive to
CCC's interests. The traditional requirement for inside storage of loan
cotton has wide support for being essential to prevent quality losses
from sun, dust, and moisture. This view has been bolstered by
complaints from cotton buyers regarding U.S. cotton quality. In the
end, CCC has strived to provide a balance between the practical needs
for storing back-to-back bumper crops with the need for reasonable crop
protection to protect the quality and reputation of U.S. cotton for
domestic and export buyers.
Cotton regulations at 7 CFR 1427.5 provide that for a bale of
cotton to be eligible to be pledged as collateral for a marketing
assistance loan, the bale must be in good condition and not be false-
packed or water-packed. False-packed cotton is defined by regulations
at 7 CFR 1427.3 as containing damaged cotton in the interior with or
without any indication of the damage on the exterior; or cotton
composed of good cotton on the exterior and decidedly inferior cotton
in the interior, but not detectable by customary examination. Water-
packed cotton is defined by 7 CFR 28.40(h) as cotton in a bale that has
been penetrated by water during the baling process, causing damage to
the fiber, or a bale that through exposure to the weather or by other
means, while apparently dry on the exterior, has been damaged by water
in the interior.
The incidence of water damage in cotton loan collateral has
historically been minimal. The wet bales that have occasionally been
produced at gins have, most commonly, occurred as a result of the
variability of moisture in seed cotton. It is common practice for
cotton gins to dry excessively moist seed cotton, if required, before
ginning, or to add some moisture if the cotton is too dry. The moisture
restoration systems at cotton gins use humidified air, liquid water
sprays, or a combination of both systems. These systems may be employed
before the gin stand, at the battery condenser, or at the lint slide
before the cotton is pressed. Generally, cotton is thought to gin best
at 6 to 7 percent moisture content (wet basis) which minimizes breakage
and allows for fiber separation. Moisture in this range also aids in
the bale compression by reducing the amount of needed pressure.
During the 2005 marketing year for cotton, CCC determined that the
cotton produced at two gins was water damaged and, therefore,
ineligible as collateral for a loan. The damage to the bales was
discovered after the cotton had been accepted by CCC as loan
collateral, and some cotton merchants had been designated as agents for
the cotton, implying that the cotton had figured into their marketing
plans. Still other cotton from the gins had already been sold. Both of
the gins employed direct liquid water spray systems. As a result of the
losses and marketing disruptions resulting from these bales being water
damaged, CCC has received comments with respect to whether policy
changes are needed in this matter. One national organization commented
that cotton lint exposed to direct liquid water spray at a gin should
not be eligible to be used as collateral for CCC loans. Others have
commented that direct liquid spray equipment has been used by many gins
without damaging the cotton.
Discussion of Comments
CCC published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on February
13, 2006 at 71 FR 7445. During the 60-day comment period, CCC received
43 comments. Respondents included 4 national organizations, 8 regional
organizations, 15 cotton storage warehouses, and 16 individuals or
companies. Regarding CCC's overall storage requirements regarding
upland loan cotton, the comments received indicate a lack of industry
consensus as to appropriate policy. Generally, warehouses support use
of outside storage on a temporary, case-by-case basis when justified by
extraordinary circumstances, with such storage subject to requirements
such as use of dunnage or additional protection of the cotton. Cotton
merchants stated that outside storage contributes to the damage of such
cotton and is detrimental to producers and cotton users. Many specific
recommendations were provided as to how CCC might restrict the use of
such outside storage. Generally, there is no support for CCC to reduce
the loan rate for loan cotton that might be stored outside, but some
comments are that CCC should reduce or provide no storage credit for
outside-stored cotton as an incentive to producers and warehouses to
store cotton indoors. Regarding the storage credit provided for
outside-stored loan collateral, many comments supported CCC providing
the full storage credit, and others commented that the storage costs
affect U.S. cotton competitiveness. Other comments are that outside
storage has its own unique costs, or that no reduction in the storage
credit is warranted because the incidence of damage to loan cotton from
the use of outside storage has been minimal. Two national producer or
industry organizations support a policy of requiring loan cotton to be
stored inside except to accommodate temporary, extraordinary or
unforeseen conditions. Although respondents support a storage policy to
ensure that cotton is protected, their views differ as to whether
outside storage constitutes a risk to the cotton. Some maintain that
there are no procedures that can mitigate the incidence of rain, dust,
or sun damage, while other comments minimize such risks, or contend
that outside storage has been justified due to extraordinary, localized
production increases. The comments, in general, support the conclusion
that outside storage exposes cotton to specific risks of damage from
water, dust, sun bleaching, and possibly mold from water trapped by
double bagging. Those supporting use of temporary outside storage
generally contend that practices such as use of dunnage and double
wrapping or covering of bales provides sufficient protection; other
contend that the packaging standards of the Joint Cotton Industry Bale
Packaging Committee were not established for outside storage and, thus,
there are no materials determined appropriate for outside use.
There were many comments regarding CCC allowing producers or agents
of producers to request ``re-concentration'' of loan cotton.
Reconcentration is the term used to describe the movement of CCC loan
cotton from one warehouse to another. Two national organizations stated
that any reconcentration policy should not affect the integrity of
[[Page 30320]]
electronic warehouse receipts, and that CCC should pay accrued storage
to warehouses prior to reconcentrations. Other comments supported
reconcentrations only under limited circumstances, such as for cotton
stored outside or other warehouse violations. Concern was stated that
any unlimited opportunities for merchants to relocate loan cotton would
benefit a few and possibly add to cotton flow problems.
CCC has concluded from the comments provided that the relocation of
loan cotton, at the expense of the producer or producer's agent, is a
reasonable course of action regardless of whether the original storing
warehouse consents to the movement of the cotton. The transfer of loan
collateral should ameliorate the risks of quality deterioration of the
cotton, relieve regional shortage congestion, and facilitate more
efficient marketing of cotton.
Regarding the existing 4.5 percent weekly minimum shipping
standard, several comments suggested that the standard should be
amended to be based on the higher of approved capacity or the quantity
of bales on hand. A few commented that the weekly minimum standard is
inadequate and should be raised to meet needs of the growing export-
oriented market. Other comments suggested that USDA should enforce the
existing standard or support steps to improve warehouse shipping
performance through weekly performance reporting or new standards. At
this time, and based on its current statutory authorities, CCC is not
proposing any new warehouse performance or reporting requirements
related to the 4.5 percent weekly shipping requirement. CCC continues
to examine warehouse performance against this current standard and has
not completed its review. However, CCC understands the importance of
the enforcement of a standard to the efficient flow of cotton, and is
receptive to support any improvements in the standard, or enforcement
procedures, that may be developed and recommended by a consensus of
industry representatives.
Proposed Changes
CCC proposes to revise regulations at 7 CFR part 1427 to: Provide
cotton loan eligibility consistent with any short-term needs for
outside storage of upland cotton loan collateral; improve the flow of
cotton by removing excessive incentives to store cotton; and protect
CCC from assuming losses that result from accepting upland cotton as
collateral for a loan that has unpaid charges.
A. Outside Storage of Upland Loan Cotton
Based on the comments received, and consistent with CCC objectives
in administering the marketing assistance loan program for upland
cotton, CCC has concluded that, in spite of the inherent risk of
increasing the damage to cotton by storing it outside, the use of
outside storage may be unavoidable under some circumstances beyond the
control of the producer. Depriving the producer of eligibility for
marketing assistance loan benefits based on circumstances that may
arise after the production of the crop would raise concerns over the
fairness of policy and could disrupt the marketing of the cotton.
However, CCC is mindful that a relaxed storage policy may also increase
the use of outside storage when inside storage may be available nearby
or within economically practicable distances. CCC, therefore, concludes
that its policy regarding the storage of cotton needs to accommodate
special circumstances without creating incentives that might indirectly
increase the use of outside storage when it may not be warranted.
Accordingly, CCC proposes to amend the cotton loan eligibility
requirements to amend the storage requirements for a bale of cotton to
be eligible as collateral for a marketing assistance loan. Generally,
CCC will continue to require that a bale of cotton must be stored
inside a cotton storage warehouse but will annually determine in which
counties outside storage for cotton pledged as collateral for a CCC
loan may be used subject to the following special provisions: (1) As
part of the application for approval of the use of outside storage, the
warehouse must agree to implement special storage requirements,
including but not limited to, additional packaging, dunnage, security,
and insurance coverage with CCC named as the loss payee, and (2) the
loan repayment amount will not be reduced by any storage credit as
would apply to loan cotton stored inside.
B. Reconcentration of Cotton
The changes in domestic cotton marketing caused by strong export
market demand have altered domestic cotton marketing channels and, as a
result, have created more urgency to move cotton efficiently through
marketing channels. The 9-month loan term for marketing assistance
loans, coupled with crediting the repayment of the loan for accrued
storage charges, may create incentives to maintain the upland cotton in
the loan program and adversely delay marketings. In order to ameliorate
risks of quality deterioration to CCC marketing loan collateral,
relieve regional storage congestion, and facilitate more efficient
cotton marketing, CCC proposes to amend regulations at 7 CFR 1427.16,
Reconcentration of Cotton, to allow the transfer of 2006 and subsequent
crop cotton under loan from one CCC-approved warehouse to another CCC-
approved warehouse. Under the proposed process, upon receipt of a
transfer application from the producer or producer's authorized agent,
CCC will enter into a transfer agreement providing that: (1) CCC will
continue to be holder of the negotiable electronic warehouse receipts
from the original storing warehouse during the period of the transfer;
(2) the cotton will be moved at the expense of the producer to another
CCC-approved cotton storage warehouse (the receiving warehouse) which
must have signed the transfer application to indicate its ability to
accept the cotton; (3) the receiving warehouse will issue a non-
negotiable electronic warehouse receipt in coverage of the depositor
obligation represented by the negotiable electronic warehouse receipts
for the transferred cotton; (4) the receiving warehouse will, when
requested, cancel and replace the non-negotiable electronic warehouse
receipt with negotiable electronic warehouse receipts; (5) the original
storing warehouse operator must agree to cancel the negotiable
electronic warehouse receipts and deliver the non-negotiable electronic
warehouse receipt to the receiving warehouse operator promptly upon
notice by the producer or CCC; and (6) all CCC loan servicing,
including, but not limited to the loan and repayment rates and
warehouse charges, will be based on the terms and conditions of the
original storage location. The producer or the requestor of any
transfer of loan cotton is responsible for all costs associated with
relocating loan cotton, regardless of the circumstances prompting the
relocation. This includes any costs of moving loan cotton to inside
storage for its delivery to CCC in satisfaction of a loan obligation.
CCC assumes responsibility only for the costs of relocating cotton it
owns.
C. Ginner Agreement and Certification
Existing regulations at 7 CFR 1427.5, General eligibility
requirements, provide that as a condition for loan eligibility, a bale
must be ginned by a ginner that has entered into a Cooperating Ginners'
Bagging and Bale Ties Certification and Agreement on a form prescribed
by CCC, or certified that the bale is wrapped with bagging and
[[Page 30321]]
bale ties meeting the requirements of 7 CFR 1427.5(b)(10). All U.S.
commercial cotton gins have entered into this agreement with CCC. This
agreement remains in effect until terminated by either the gin or by
CCC.
CCC proposes to amend this regulation to provide that, effective
for the 2006 and subsequent crops, cotton must be ginned by a ginner
that additionally certifies that the bale, upon ginning, meets the
quality requirements for loan eligibility of 7 CFR 1427.5(b) that
provide for the bale to be in good condition and not false-packed,
water-packed, mixed-packed, re-ginned, or repacked. To administer this
new agreement and certification for the 2006 and subsequent cotton
crops, CCC proposes to notify all U.S. ginners that previous agreements
are terminated. A revised agreement providing the additional
certifications explained above will be made available for ginners to
sign prior to the 2006-crop harvest.
D. Repayment of Loans
Current regulations at 7 CFR 1427.19(h) provide that at the time of
an upland cotton loan repayment, if the repayment rate is less than the
loan level and charges, plus interest, CCC will pay to the producer or
agent of the producer the warehouse storage charges that have accrued
during the period the cotton was pledged for loan. The amount of this
payment may be reduced at times when the adjusted world price is above
the national average loan rate by less than the sum of the accrued
interest and warehouse storage charges that accrued during the period
the cotton was pledged for loan. CCC's payment of the accrued warehouse
storage charges under this regulation has, in all cases, been based
upon the tariff rate for the cotton storage warehouse where the loan
cotton has been stored. CCC has not provided for a uniform storage
payment rate to producers or their agents designated to repay the
producer's loan obligation even though the loan gain or LDP rate is
uniform and provided regardless of location. The tariff rates
established by warehouses vary considerably, from below $2.00 to over
$5.00 per bale per month. The tariff rates generally appear to be
unrelated to the approved capacity of the individual warehouse, with
the highest rates occurring in California and Arizona. For the 2005
crop, the average warehouse tariff rate, weighted by quantity of loan
bales, is $2.61 per bale per month. About 52 percent of 2005-crop loan
cotton was placed into storage in states where the tariff rate,
weighted by loan volume, averages $2.15 per bale per month or less.
Tariff rates in storage-deficit areas of Texas, including warehouses
that recently stored loan cotton outside, fall below the $2.15 per bale
level and are among the lowest rates being charged nationwide.
The storage credits provided by CCC have been provided so that as
storage charges accrue on un-sold cotton, the cost of the cotton and
charges does not become uncompetitive relative to the adjusted world
price level. However, if the tariff charges levied by the warehouse are
especially profitable, the credits provided by CCC will induce
producers and ginners to ship their cotton to locations that maximize
their storage returns or warehouse rebates. In these cases, the
warehouse may be chosen without regard to whether the cotton will be
stored inside, or because it is at a location that provides timely
load-out when requested by a merchant. For these reasons, CCC has
concluded that providing unrestricted storage credits may have a
negative impact on both the maintenance of bale quality and on the flow
of cotton pledged under the CCC loan program.
To improve the equity of program benefits among all producers, to
reduce incentives for cotton to be held in storage to maximize CCC-
storage payments, and to improve cotton flow, CCC proposes, effective
for the 2006 and subsequent crops of upland cotton, to amend the
regulations at 7 CFR 1427.19(h), Repayment of Loans, to provide that
any storage credit that may be provided by CCC shall be: (1) Based on a
maximum monthly storage-credit payment rate that will not exceed the
rate used in 2005 at the location where the 2006 and 2007 crops are
stored, not to exceed $2.15, for all loan cotton stored inside an
approved cotton storage warehouse; and (2) zero, for a cotton loan, for
which one or more bales are stored outside during the period of the
loan, even if these bales are later moved to inside storage. Comments
are specifically requested as to whether the proposed maximum rate of
$2.15 per bale per month will promote the flow of cotton and provide
more equitable program benefits compared to use of individual warehouse
tariff rates.
E. Liens
Current regulations at 7 CFR 1427.12, Liens, provide that if there
are any liens or encumbrances on cotton provided as collateral for a
marketing assistance loan CCC must obtain waivers that fully protect
the interest of CCC before disbursement of the loan even though the
liens or encumbrances are satisfied from the loan proceeds.
Additionally, no liens or encumbrances shall be placed on the cotton
after the loan is approved.
Additionally, 7 CFR 1427.19(h) provides that, depending on the
level of the adjusted world price determined under 7 CFR 1427.25, CCC
may pay to the producer or producer's agent, at the time of the loan
repayment, all or a portion of the warehouse storage charges that have
accrued during the period the cotton was pledged for loan.
Loan cotton stored in approved warehouses also accrues receiving,
storage and load-out charges that are paid by the buyer before taking
delivery of the cotton from the warehouse. For cotton delivered to CCC
in satisfaction of the loan obligation, and to minimize the
administrative burden of receiving lien waivers for these charges, CCC
has paid the receiving and accrued storage charges to the storing
warehouse and then billed the producer for both the receiving charges
and any amount of storage that accrued up to the date the cotton was
pledged for loan.
CCC proposes to revise 7 CFR 1427.12 to establish consistency
between these two requirements, and to clarify that CCC shall not be
responsible for any charges attached to a bale other than for the
storage charges as provided in 7 CFR 1427.19(h).
Notice and Comment
Section 1601(c) of the 2002 Act provides that the regulations
needed to implement Title I of the 2002 Act, which include those
involved here, may be promulgated without regard to the notice and
comment provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 or the Statement of Policy of the
Secretary of Agriculture effective July 24, 1971 relating to notices of
proposed rulemaking and public participation in rulemaking.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is issued in conformance with Executive Order 12866, was
determined to be not significant and has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
It has been determined that the Regulatory Flexibility Act is not
applicable to this rule because the CCC is not required by 5 U.S.C. 533
or any other law to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking for the
subject matter of this rule.
Environmental Assessment
The environmental impacts of this rule have been considered
consistent with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., the
[[Page 30322]]
regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-
1508), and the FSA regulations for compliance with NEPA, 7 CFR part
799. FSA concluded that the rule requires no further environmental
review because it is categorically excluded. No extraordinary
circumstances or other unforeseeable factors exist which would require
preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact
statement.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12988. This rule will preempt State laws that are inconsistent with it.
Before any legal action may be brought regarding a determination under
this rule, the administrative appeal provisions set forth at 7 CFR
parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the notice related to 7 CFR part 3014, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115 (June 24, 1983).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The rule contains no Federal mandates under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) for State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector.
Thus, this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and
205 of the UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 1601(c) of the 2002 Act provides that the promulgation of
regulations and the administration of Title I of the 2002 Act shall be
made without regard to chapter 5 of title 44 of the United States Code
(the Paperwork Reduction Act). Accordingly, these regulations and the
forms and other information collection activities needed to administer
the program authorized by these regulations are not subject to review
by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Executive Order 12612
This rule does not have sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment. The provisions
contained in this rule will not have substantial direct effect on
States or their political subdivisions or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
CCC is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA) and the Freedom to E-File Act, which require
Government agencies in general and FSA in particular to provide the
public the option of submitting information or transacting business
electronically to the maximum extent possible. The forms and other
information collection activities required for participation in the
program are available electronically through the USDA eForms Web site
at https://www.sc.egov.usda.gov for downloading. The regulation is
available at FSA's Price Support Division Internet site at https://
www.fsa.usda.gov/dafp/psd. Applications may be submitted at the FSA
county offices, by mail or by FAX. At this time, electronic submission
is not available. Full development of electronic submission is
underway.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal assistance program found in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance to which this final rule applies
are Commodity Loans and Loan Deficiency Payments, 10.051.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1427
Agricultural commodities, Cotton, Loan programs-agriculture, Price
support programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1427 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1427--COTTON
1. The authority citation for part 1427 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7231-7237 and 7931-7939; and 15 U.S.C. 714b
and 714c.
Subpart A--Nonrecourse Cotton Loan and Loan Deficiency Payments
2. Amend Sec. 1427.5 by revising paragraph (b)(2) and adding
paragraph (b)(11)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 1427.5 General eligibility requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Be in existence and good condition, be covered by fire
insurance, and at the time of disbursement of the loan proceeds, be
stored inside an approved storage warehouse unless, as determined under
Sec. 1427.10, CCC has approved a warehouse to use outside storage for
cotton loan collateral for the period of the loan.
* * * * *
(11) * * *
(iii) For the 2006 and subsequent crops has provided a
certification to CCC on a form prescribed by CCC, that upon ginning,
the bales meet the condition and quality requirements for loan
eligibility as provided in Sec. 1427.5(b) and;
* * * * *
3. Amend Sec. 1427.10 by revising paragraph (b), redesignating
paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) as (d), (e), and (f), and adding a new
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1427.10 Approved storage.
* * * * *
(b) When the operator of a warehouse receives notice from CCC that
a loan has been made by CCC on a bale of cotton, the operator shall, if
such cotton is not stored within the warehouse, as directed by CCC
place such cotton within such warehouse.
(c) CCC will annually determine and announce geographic areas where
approved cotton storage warehouses may apply for approval to store
cotton pledged as collateral outside. The application for approval to
use outside storage shall be on a form prescribed by CCC that provides
all applicable outside storage requirements related to the duration of
such storage, use of dunnage, insurance, packaging, or other storage
and handling requirements as determined by CCC. As a condition for
approval to store loan cotton outside, CCC may require the warehouse to
consent to reconcentration and transfer orders approved by CCC
applicable to any cotton stored at the applicant's warehouse.
* * * * *
4. Revise Sec. 1427.12 to read as follows:
Sec. 1427.12 Liens.
Notwithstanding provisions in Sec. 1427.19(h) that provide that
CCC may pay for some or all of the warehouse storage charges that
accrued for the cotton during the period the cotton was pledged for
loan, if there are any liens or encumbrances on the cotton tendered as
collateral for a loan, waivers that fully protect the interest of CCC
must be obtained before disbursement even though the liens or
encumbrances are satisfied from the loan proceeds, except that CCC may
elect to accept as loan collateral cotton that has warehouse receiving,
compression, load-out or other charges if the producer, at the time of
loan application, agrees to reimburse CCC for any such charges that CCC
may pay on behalf of the producer or that reduce the value of the
cotton delivered to CCC.
[[Page 30323]]
5. Amend Sec. 1427.16 by adding paragraph (b)(3) as follows:
Sec. 1427.16 Reconcentration of cotton.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Effective for the 2006 and subsequent crops of cotton, CCC may
approve a request for relocation of cotton loan collateral, submitted
by a producer or a properly designated agent of the producer, and
approved by the receiving warehouse operator. Such relocation shall be
based on, but are not limited to, the original loan rate, repayment
rate, and other terms and conditions of the original loan storage
location. Any charges, fees, costs, or expenses incident to such
reconcentration or transfer shall be paid by the requestor of such
transfer.
6. Amend Sec. 1427.19 by revising paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1427.19 Repayment of loans.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) Below the national average loan rate for upland cotton, CCC
will pay at the time of loan repayment to the producer of agent or
subsequent agent authorized by the producer in the manner prescribed by
CCC, for the period the cotton was pledged as collateral for such loan:
(i) The warehouse storage charges which have accrued, and
(ii) With respect to the 2006 and subsequent-crops of upland
cotton, if the entire quantity of the loan was stored inside an
approved cotton warehouse during the entire period of the loan, the
storage charges that accrued based on a maximum monthly storage-credit
payment rate will not exceed the rate used in 2005 at the location
where the 2006 and 2007 crops are stored, not to exceed $2.15. With
respect to those producers who store cotton at a warehouse that was not
in existence in 2005, CCC will assign the county average credit that
was used in 2005. CCC shall not pay any storage charges if at any time
while pledged as collateral for such loan the cotton was stored
outside.
(2) Above the national average loan rate by less than the sum of
the accrued interest and warehouse storage charges that accrued during
the period the cotton was pledged for loan, CCC will pay at the time of
loan repayment to the producer or agent or subsequent agent authorized
by the producer in the manner prescribed by CCC, without regard to any
warehouse charges that accrued before the cotton was pledged for loan:
(i) That portion of the warehouse storage charges that accrued
during the period the cotton was pledged for loan, that are determined
to be necessary to permit the loan to be repaid at the adjusted world
price; and
(ii) With respect to the 2006 and subsequent crops of upland
cotton, CCC shall not pay any storage charges if at any time while
pledged as collateral for such loan the cotton was stored outside. If
the entire quantity of the loan was stored inside an approved cotton
warehouse during the entire period of the loan, that portion of the
warehouse storage charges that accrued during the period the cotton was
pledged for loan based on a maximum monthly storage-credit payment rate
will not exceed the rate used in 2005 at the location where the 2006
and 2007 crops are stored, not to exceed $2.15. With respect to those
producers who store cotton at a warehouse that was not in existence in
2005, CCC will assign the county average credit that was used in 2005;
or
* * * * *
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 18, 2006.
Teresa C. Lasseter,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. E6-8161 Filed 5-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P