The Continued Transition of the Technical Coordination and Management of the Internet Domain Name and Addressing System, 30388-30389 [E6-8077]
Download as PDF
30388
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Notices
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), an environmental
assessment was prepared analyzing the
effects of the permitted activities. After
a Finding of No Significant Impact, the
determination was made that it was not
necessary to prepare an environmental
impact statement.
Issuance of this permit, as required by
the ESA, was based on a finding that
such permit: (1) was applied for in good
faith; (2) will not operate to the
disadvantage of such endangered
species; and (3) is consistent with the
purposes and policies set forth in
section 2 of the ESA.
Dated: May 23, 2006.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–8174 Filed 5–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
[Docket No. 060519136-6136-01]
The Continued Transition of the
Technical Coordination and
Management of the Internet Domain
Name and Addressing System
National Telecommunications
and Information Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry, Notice of
Public Meeting
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Department
of Commerce’s National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) seeks comment
on the continuation of the transition of
the technical coordination and
management of the Internet domain
name and addressing system (Internet
DNS) to the private sector. In June 1998,
the Department issued a statement of
policy on the privatization of the
Internet DNS, which among other things
articulated four primary functions for
global Internet DNS coordination and
management, the need to have these
functions performed by the private
sector and four principles to guide the
transition to private sector management
of the Internet DNS. On June 30, 2005,
NTIA released the U.S. Principles on the
Internet’s Domain Name and
Addressing System further elaborating
on these issues. The Department of
Commerce seeks comment regarding the
progress of this transition and
announces a public meeting to be held
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:12 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
on July 26, 2006, to discuss issues
associated with this transition.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
July 7, 2006. The public meeting will be
held from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. on July 26,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by U.S. mail to Fiona
Alexander, Office of International
Affairs, National Telecommunications
and Information Administration, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 4701,
Washington, DC 20230. Paper
submissions should include a three and
one-half inch computer diskette in
HTML, ASCII, Word or WordPerfect
format (please specify version).
Diskettes should be labeled with the
name and organizational affiliation of
the filer, and the name of the word
processing program used to create the
document. Alternatively, comments
may be submitted electronically to
DNSTransition@ntia.doc.gov.
Comments provided via electronic mail
should also be submitted in one of the
formats specified above. All comments
will be posted to NTIA’s Web site at
https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/
domainname/dnstransition.html. The
public meeting will be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Auditorium,
Washington, DC (Entrance to the
Department of Commerce is on 14th
Street between Constitution and
Pennsylvania Avenues, NW.).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about this Notice or the Public
Meeting, contact: Fiona Alexander,
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 4701,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1866; or e-mail:
falexander@ntia.doc.gov. Please direct
media inquiries to the Office of Public
Affairs, NTIA, at (202) 482–7002.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: A July 1, 1997, Executive
Memorandum directed the Secretary of
Commerce to privatize the Internet
domain name and addressing system
(Internet DNS) in a manner that
increases competition and facilitates
international participation in its
management.1 In order to fulfill this
Presidential directive, the Department of
Commerce, in June 1998, issued a
statement of policy on the privatization
of the Internet DNS, known as the DNS
White Paper.2 This document
1 Memorandum on Electronic Commerce, 2 Pub.
Papers 898 (July 1, 1997).
2 Management of Internet Names and Addresses,
63 Fed. Reg. 31,741 (June 10, 1998).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
articulated four primary functions for
global Internet DNS coordination and
management:
1. To set policy for and direct the
allocation of IP number blocks;
2. To oversee the operation of the
Internet root server system;
3. To oversee policy for determining
the circumstances under which new top
level domains (TLDs) would be added to
the root server system; and
4. To coordinate the assignment of
other technical protocol parameters as
needed to maintain universal
connectivity on the Internet.
In the DNS White Paper, the
Department of Commerce concluded
that these functions were relevant to the
state of the Internet DNS and should be
primarily performed through private
sector management. To this end, the
Department of Commerce stated that it
was prepared to enter into agreement
with a new not-for-profit corporation
formed by private sector Internet
stakeholders. Private sector interests
formed the Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
for this purpose.3 In the fall of 1998, the
Department of Commerce entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
with ICANN, a California non-profit
corporation, to transition technical
Internet DNS coordination and
management functions to the private
sector.4
The MOU contains a series of core
tasks for ICANN, which include
establishing appropriate relationships
with the organizations that form the
technical underpinnings of the Internet
DNS, as well as date-specific milestones
designed to help ICANN reach full
corporate maturity. It has been amended
six times5, most recently in September
2003 and will expire on September 30,
2006.6
On June 30, 2005, NTIA released the
U.S. Principles on the Internet’s Domain
Name and Addressing System, which
provides in general: the United States
Government intends to preserve the
security and stability of the Internet
3 For more information on the private sector
proposals received see https://www.ntia.doc.gov/
ntiahome/domainname/background.htm.
4 Memorandum of Understanding Between the
U.S. Department of Commerce and the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
(November 25, 1998), available at https://
www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/icannmemorandum.htm.
5 All MOU Amendments are available online at
https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/
icann.htm.
6 Memorandum of Understanding Between U.S.
Department of Commerce and the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers,
Amendment 6, available at https://
www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/
agreements/amendment6l09162003.htm.
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
30389
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Notices
DNS by maintaining its historic role in
authorizing changes or modifications to
the authoritative root zone file;
governments have legitimate interest in
the management of their country code
top level domains (ccTLD); ICANN is
the appropriate technical manager of the
Internet DNS; and dialogue related to
Internet governance should continue in
relevant multiple fora.7
Request for Comment: Because the
current MOU will expire on September
30, 2006, NTIA seeks comment on the
progress to date of the transition of the
technical coordination and management
of the Internet DNS to the private sector.
The questions below are intended to
assist in identifying the issues and
should not be construed as a limitation
on comments that may be submitted.
When referencing, in your comments,
any studies, research, and other
empirical data that are not widely
published, please provide copies of the
referenced materials with the submitted
comments.
1. The DNS White Paper articulated
principles (i.e., stability; competition;
private, bottom-up coordination; and
representation) necessary for guiding
the transition to private sector
management of the Internet DNS. Are
these principles still relevant? Should
additional principles be considered in
light of: The advance in Internet
technology; the expanded global reach
of the Internet; the experience gained
over the eight years since the
Department of Commerce issued the
DNS White Paper; and the international
dialogue, including the discussions
related to Internet governance at the
United Nations World Summit on the
Information Society (WSIS)?
2. The DNS White Paper articulated a
number of actions that should be taken
in order for the U.S. Government to
transition its Internet DNS technical
coordination and management
responsibilities to the private sector.
These actions appear in the MOU as a
series of core tasks and milestones. Has
ICANN achieved sufficient progress in
its tasks, as agreed in the MOU, for the
transition to take place by September
30, 2006?
3. Are these core tasks and milestones
still relevant to facilitate this transition
and meet the goals outlined in the DNS
White Paper and the U.S. Principles on
the Internet’s Domain Name and
Addressing System? Should new or
revised tasks/methods be considered in
order for the transition to occur? And on
7 U.S.
Department of Commerce, U.S. Principles
on the Internet’s Domain Name and Addressing
System (June 30, 2005), https://www.ntia.doc.gov/
ntiahome/domainname/
usdnsprinciplesl06302005.htm.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:12 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
what time frame and by what method
should a transition occur?
4. The DNS White Paper listed several
key stakeholder groups whose
meaningful participation is necessary
for effective technical coordination and
management of the Internet DNS. Are all
of these groups involved effectively in
the ICANN process? If not, how could
their involvement be improved? Are
there key stakeholder groups not listed
in the DNS White Paper, such as those
with expertise in the area of Internet
security or infrastructure technologies,
that could provide valuable input into
the technical coordination and
management of the Internet DNS? If so,
how could their involvement be
facilitated?
5. The DNS White Paper listed
principles and mechanisms for
technical coordination and management
of the Internet DNS to encourage
meaningful participation and
representation of key stakeholders.
ICANN, in conjunction with many of
these key stakeholders, has created
various supporting organizations and
committees to facilitate stakeholder
participation in ICANN processes. Is
participation in these organizations
meeting the needs of key stakeholders
and the Internet community? Are there
ways to improve or expand
participation in these organizations and
committees?
6. What methods and/or processes
should be considered to encourage
greater efficiency and responsiveness to
governments and ccTLD managers in
processing root management requests to
address public policy and sovereignty
concerns? Please keep in mind the need
to preserve the security and stability of
the Internet DNS and the goal of
decision-making at the local level. Are
there new technology tools available
that could improve this process, such as
automation of request processing?
7. Many public and private
organizations have various roles and
responsibilities related to the Internet
DNS, and more broadly, to Internet
governance. How can information
exchange, collaboration and enhanced
cooperation among these organizations
be achieved as called for by the WSIS?8
Public Meeting: NTIA announces a
public meeting to be held on July 26,
2006, to discuss issues associated with
this transition. The agenda for the
meeting will be posted on NTIA’s Web
site, https://www.ntia.doc.gov, one week
prior to the meeting.
8 See,
e.g., World Summit on the Information
Society, Tunis Agenda for the Information Society
(November 18, 2005), WSIS-05/TUNIS/DOC/6(Rev.
1)-E, available at https://www.itu.int/wsis/docs2/
tunis/off/6rev1.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The meeting will be open to the
public and press on a first-come, firstserved basis. Space is limited. Due to
security requirements and to facilitate
entry to the Department of Commerce
building, anyone wishing to attend must
contact Tanika Hawkins at (202) 482–
1866 or thawkins@ntia.doc.gov at least
five (5) days prior to the meeting in
order to provide the necessary clearance
information. When arriving for the
meeting, attendees must present photo
or passport identification and/or a U.S.
Government building pass, if applicable,
and should arrive at least one-half hour
prior to the start time of the meeting.
The public meeting is physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Individuals requiring special services,
such as sign language interpretation or
other ancillary aids are asked to indicate
this to Ms. Hawkins.
Dated: May 22, 2006.
Kathy D. Smith,
Chief Counsel, National Telecommunications
and Information Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–8077 Filed 5–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–60–S
COMMITTEE FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE
AGREEMENTS
Determination under the Textile and
Apparel Commercial Availability
Provision of the Dominican RepublicCentral America-United States Free
Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR
Agreement)
May 23, 2006.
Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements
(CITA).
AGENCY:
Determination to add a product
in unrestricted quantities to Annex 3.25
of the CAFTA-DR Agreement.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements
(CITA) has determined that certain
100% cotton flannel fabrics, as specified
below, are not available in commercial
quantities in a timely manner in the
CAFTA-DR region. The product will be
added to the list in Annex 3.25 of the
CAFTA-DR Agreement in unrestricted
quantities.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
May 26, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Stetson, Office of Textiles and
Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce,
(202) 482 2582.
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30388-30389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8077]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
[Docket No. 060519136-6136-01]
The Continued Transition of the Technical Coordination and
Management of the Internet Domain Name and Addressing System
AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry, Notice of Public Meeting
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Department of Commerce's National
Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) seeks comment
on the continuation of the transition of the technical coordination and
management of the Internet domain name and addressing system (Internet
DNS) to the private sector. In June 1998, the Department issued a
statement of policy on the privatization of the Internet DNS, which
among other things articulated four primary functions for global
Internet DNS coordination and management, the need to have these
functions performed by the private sector and four principles to guide
the transition to private sector management of the Internet DNS. On
June 30, 2005, NTIA released the U.S. Principles on the Internet's
Domain Name and Addressing System further elaborating on these issues.
The Department of Commerce seeks comment regarding the progress of this
transition and announces a public meeting to be held on July 26, 2006,
to discuss issues associated with this transition.
DATES: Comments are due on or before July 7, 2006. The public meeting
will be held from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. on July 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by U.S. mail to Fiona
Alexander, Office of International Affairs, National Telecommunications
and Information Administration, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room
4701, Washington, DC 20230. Paper submissions should include a three
and one-half inch computer diskette in HTML, ASCII, Word or WordPerfect
format (please specify version). Diskettes should be labeled with the
name and organizational affiliation of the filer, and the name of the
word processing program used to create the document. Alternatively,
comments may be submitted electronically to DNSTransition@ntia.doc.gov.
Comments provided via electronic mail should also be submitted in one
of the formats specified above. All comments will be posted to NTIA's
Web site at https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/
dnstransition.html. The public meeting will be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Auditorium,
Washington, DC (Entrance to the Department of Commerce is on 14th
Street between Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenues, NW.).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this Notice or the
Public Meeting, contact: Fiona Alexander, National Telecommunications
and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 4701, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-1866; or e-mail: falexander@ntia.doc.gov. Please direct media
inquiries to the Office of Public Affairs, NTIA, at (202) 482-7002.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: A July 1, 1997, Executive
Memorandum directed the Secretary of Commerce to privatize the Internet
domain name and addressing system (Internet DNS) in a manner that
increases competition and facilitates international participation in
its management.\1\ In order to fulfill this Presidential directive, the
Department of Commerce, in June 1998, issued a statement of policy on
the privatization of the Internet DNS, known as the DNS White Paper.\2\
This document articulated four primary functions for global Internet
DNS coordination and management:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Memorandum on Electronic Commerce, 2 Pub. Papers 898 (July
1, 1997).
\2\ Management of Internet Names and Addresses, 63 Fed. Reg.
31,741 (June 10, 1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. To set policy for and direct the allocation of IP number blocks;
2. To oversee the operation of the Internet root server system;
3. To oversee policy for determining the circumstances under which
new top level domains (TLDs) would be added to the root server system;
and
4. To coordinate the assignment of other technical protocol
parameters as needed to maintain universal connectivity on the
Internet.
In the DNS White Paper, the Department of Commerce concluded that
these functions were relevant to the state of the Internet DNS and
should be primarily performed through private sector management. To
this end, the Department of Commerce stated that it was prepared to
enter into agreement with a new not-for-profit corporation formed by
private sector Internet stakeholders. Private sector interests formed
the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) for
this purpose.\3\ In the fall of 1998, the Department of Commerce
entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with ICANN, a
California non-profit corporation, to transition technical Internet DNS
coordination and management functions to the private sector.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For more information on the private sector proposals
received see https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/
background.htm.
\4\ Memorandum of Understanding Between the U.S. Department of
Commerce and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
(November 25, 1998), available at https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/
domainname/icann-memorandum.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MOU contains a series of core tasks for ICANN, which include
establishing appropriate relationships with the organizations that form
the technical underpinnings of the Internet DNS, as well as date-
specific milestones designed to help ICANN reach full corporate
maturity. It has been amended six times\5\, most recently in September
2003 and will expire on September 30, 2006.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ All MOU Amendments are available online at https://
www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/icann.htm.
\6\ Memorandum of Understanding Between U.S. Department of
Commerce and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers, Amendment 6, available at https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/
domainname/agreements/amendment6_09162003.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 30, 2005, NTIA released the U.S. Principles on the
Internet's Domain Name and Addressing System, which provides in
general: the United States Government intends to preserve the security
and stability of the Internet
[[Page 30389]]
DNS by maintaining its historic role in authorizing changes or
modifications to the authoritative root zone file; governments have
legitimate interest in the management of their country code top level
domains (ccTLD); ICANN is the appropriate technical manager of the
Internet DNS; and dialogue related to Internet governance should
continue in relevant multiple fora.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Principles on the
Internet's Domain Name and Addressing System (June 30, 2005), http:/
/www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/usdnsprinciples_06302005.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Comment: Because the current MOU will expire on
September 30, 2006, NTIA seeks comment on the progress to date of the
transition of the technical coordination and management of the Internet
DNS to the private sector.
The questions below are intended to assist in identifying the
issues and should not be construed as a limitation on comments that may
be submitted. When referencing, in your comments, any studies,
research, and other empirical data that are not widely published,
please provide copies of the referenced materials with the submitted
comments.
1. The DNS White Paper articulated principles (i.e., stability;
competition; private, bottom-up coordination; and representation)
necessary for guiding the transition to private sector management of
the Internet DNS. Are these principles still relevant? Should
additional principles be considered in light of: The advance in
Internet technology; the expanded global reach of the Internet; the
experience gained over the eight years since the Department of Commerce
issued the DNS White Paper; and the international dialogue, including
the discussions related to Internet governance at the United Nations
World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS)?
2. The DNS White Paper articulated a number of actions that should
be taken in order for the U.S. Government to transition its Internet
DNS technical coordination and management responsibilities to the
private sector. These actions appear in the MOU as a series of core
tasks and milestones. Has ICANN achieved sufficient progress in its
tasks, as agreed in the MOU, for the transition to take place by
September 30, 2006?
3. Are these core tasks and milestones still relevant to facilitate
this transition and meet the goals outlined in the DNS White Paper and
the U.S. Principles on the Internet's Domain Name and Addressing
System? Should new or revised tasks/methods be considered in order for
the transition to occur? And on what time frame and by what method
should a transition occur?
4. The DNS White Paper listed several key stakeholder groups whose
meaningful participation is necessary for effective technical
coordination and management of the Internet DNS. Are all of these
groups involved effectively in the ICANN process? If not, how could
their involvement be improved? Are there key stakeholder groups not
listed in the DNS White Paper, such as those with expertise in the area
of Internet security or infrastructure technologies, that could provide
valuable input into the technical coordination and management of the
Internet DNS? If so, how could their involvement be facilitated?
5. The DNS White Paper listed principles and mechanisms for
technical coordination and management of the Internet DNS to encourage
meaningful participation and representation of key stakeholders. ICANN,
in conjunction with many of these key stakeholders, has created various
supporting organizations and committees to facilitate stakeholder
participation in ICANN processes. Is participation in these
organizations meeting the needs of key stakeholders and the Internet
community? Are there ways to improve or expand participation in these
organizations and committees?
6. What methods and/or processes should be considered to encourage
greater efficiency and responsiveness to governments and ccTLD managers
in processing root management requests to address public policy and
sovereignty concerns? Please keep in mind the need to preserve the
security and stability of the Internet DNS and the goal of decision-
making at the local level. Are there new technology tools available
that could improve this process, such as automation of request
processing?
7. Many public and private organizations have various roles and
responsibilities related to the Internet DNS, and more broadly, to
Internet governance. How can information exchange, collaboration and
enhanced cooperation among these organizations be achieved as called
for by the WSIS?\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See, e.g., World Summit on the Information Society, Tunis
Agenda for the Information Society (November 18, 2005), WSIS-05/
TUNIS/DOC/6(Rev. 1)-E, available at https://www.itu.int/wsis/docs2/
tunis/off/6rev1.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Meeting: NTIA announces a public meeting to be held on July
26, 2006, to discuss issues associated with this transition. The agenda
for the meeting will be posted on NTIA's Web site, https://
www.ntia.doc.gov, one week prior to the meeting.
The meeting will be open to the public and press on a first-come,
first-served basis. Space is limited. Due to security requirements and
to facilitate entry to the Department of Commerce building, anyone
wishing to attend must contact Tanika Hawkins at (202) 482-1866 or
thawkins@ntia.doc.gov at least five (5) days prior to the meeting in
order to provide the necessary clearance information. When arriving for
the meeting, attendees must present photo or passport identification
and/or a U.S. Government building pass, if applicable, and should
arrive at least one-half hour prior to the start time of the meeting.
The public meeting is physically accessible to people with
disabilities. Individuals requiring special services, such as sign
language interpretation or other ancillary aids are asked to indicate
this to Ms. Hawkins.
Dated: May 22, 2006.
Kathy D. Smith,
Chief Counsel, National Telecommunications and Information
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-8077 Filed 5-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-60-S