Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act; Atlantic Striped Bass Fishery, 30386-30387 [06-4894]
Download as PDF
30386
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Notices
Dated: May 19, 2006.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–8181 Filed 5–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 041806D]
Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation
Act; Atlantic Striped Bass Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of scoping process;
extension of comment period.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In a document published in
the Federal Register on April 24, 2006,
NMFS announced its intention to reopen the scoping process and accept
further comments on the
recommendations contained in
Amendment 6 to Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission’s (ASMFC)
Interstate Fishery Management Plan for
Atlantic Striped Bass (Amendment 6).
NMFS originally conducted scoping on
the matter in 2003, but decided to reopen the scoping process and accept
further comments due to the passage of
significant time and the availability of
new information. The intent of this
document is to announce the extension
of the public comment period from May
26, 2006, to June 26, 2006.
DATES: Comments on this action must be
received (see ADDRESSES) no later than
5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on or
before June 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
requests for copies of the draft
document should be sent to: Tom
Meyer, State-Federal Fisheries Division,
Office of Sustainable Fisheries, NMFS,
1315 East West Highway, Room 13248,
Silver Spring, MD 20910. Mark the
outside of the envelope ‘‘Striped Bass
Scoping.’’ An electronic copy of the
draft document and supporting
documents (ANPR and a Notice of
Intent to Prepare an EIS (NOI)) may also
be obtained on the State-Federal
Fisheries Division’s Web site under
Regulatory Activities at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/statelfederal/
statelfederal.htm. Comments may also
be sent via fax to (301) 713–0596, or via
e-mail to: StripedBass.Comments@noaa.gov. Include in
the subject line of the fax or e-mail the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:12 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
following document identifier: Striped
Bass Scoping.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Meyer, telephone (301) 713–2334, x173.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As
announced in the Federal Register on
July 21, 2003 (68 FR 43074), NMFS
requested comments on potential
revisions to the Federal Atlantic striped
bass regulations for the U.S. EEZ in
response to recommendations from the
Commission to the Secretary. The
comment period was subsequently
reopened on August 26, 2003 (68 FR
51232), for an additional 30–days. A
‘‘Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and Notice of Scoping Process’’ (NOI)
was published in the Federal Register
on October 20, 2003 (68 FR 59906) and
public meetings were held in nine
Atlantic coast states between November
5 - December 10, 2003, and the public
comment period closed on December
22, 2003.
Significant time has passed since the
nine initial scoping hearings.
Accordingly, NMFS thought it prudent
to seek additional scoping on its
preliminary draft analyses of Federal
management options to open the EEZ to
the harvest of Atlantic Striped Bass.
NMFS, therefore, re-opened the scoping
process in a Federal Register Notice on
April 24, 2006 (71 FR 20984) and
established a 30 day public comment
period. NMFS believes that extending
the comment period an additional 30
days would provide the public a more
appropriate opportunity to provide
meaningful commentary on the agency’s
list of potential alternatives and other
management measures. See ADDRESSES
for information on how to obtain a copy
of the draft document and where to send
comments.
Background
Atlantic striped bass management is
based on ASMFC’s Atlantic Striped Bass
Interstate Fishery Management Plan
(ISFMP), first adopted in 1981. From
1981 - 1994, four ISFMP Amendments
were developed that provided a series of
management measures that led to the
rebuilding of the stocks. In 1995,
ASMFC declared the Atlantic striped
bass population fully restored and
implemented Amendment 5 to the
ISFMP to perpetuate the stock so as to
allow a commercial and recreational
harvest consistent with the long-term
maintenance of the striped bass stock.
Since then the population has expanded
to record levels of abundance. To
maintain this recovered population,
ASMFC approved Amendment 6 in
February 2003 (copies of Amendment 6
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
are available via ASMFC’s website
under Interstate Fisheries Managementstriped bass at https://www.asmfc.org).
ASMFC believes that the measures
contained in Amendment 6 are
necessary to prevent the overfishing of
the Atlantic striped bass resource while
allowing growth in both the commercial
and recreational fishery. Development
of Amendment 6 took almost 4 years
and involved extensive input from
technical and industry advisors, and
provided numerous opportunities for
the public to comment on the future
management of the species.
Amendment 6 incorporates results of
the 2001 Atlantic striped bass stock
assessment, developed by the Atlantic
Coast States, ASMFC, NMFS, and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see
section 1.2.2 of Amendment 6 for
summary). Amendment 6 also included
recommendations to the Secretary on
the development of complementary
measures in the EEZ. Management of
Atlantic striped bass in the EEZ was one
of the issues that was considered
throughout development of Amendment
6.
Recommendation to the Secretary
In addition to the recommendations to
the Secretary in Amendment 6, the
Secretary also received a letter on April
24, 2003, from ASMFC with the
following three recommendations for
implementation of regulations in the
EEZ: (1) Remove the moratorium on the
harvest of Atlantic striped bass in the
EEZ; (2) implement a 28–inch (71.1–cm)
minimum size limit for recreational and
commercial Atlantic striped bass
fisheries in the EEZ; and (3) allow states
the ability to adopt more restrictive
rules for fishermen and vessels licensed
in their jurisdictions.
In support of its request, ASMFC cited
a number of reasons, including: ASMFC
declared the striped bass stock restored
in 1995; commercial harvest is
controlled by individual state quotas;
with the EEZ closed striped bass caught
there are required to be discarded, and
are often dead when thrown back Opening the EEZ will convert some of
the discarded bycatch of striped bass to
landings; and Amendment 6
incorporates measures that would
address future concerns about the stock
status. See ADDRESSES for information
on how to obtain a copy of the NOI,
which has a complete list of ASMFC’s
cited reasons.
ASMFC also stated that its Atlantic
Striped Bass Technical Committee
would monitor annually the Atlantic
striped bass population, and, if at some
point in the future ASMFC determines
that the Atlantic striped bass population
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Notices
Addendum I to Amendment 6
is overfished or that overfishing is
occurring, it may recommend further
management measures for the EEZ.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Delay in the Development of an EIS
In September 2004, ASMFC’s Striped
Bass Technical Committee prepared its
2004 Stock Assessment Report for use
by the Striped Bass Management Board
(Board), which included data through
2003. That assessment contradicted
previous assessments, which had
indicated that the striped bass
population was not overfished and
continued to grow in abundance.
Instead, the results of the modeling
portion of the 2004 assessment
indicated that the stock was overfished
and that spawning stock biomass had
been reduced to below target levels.
However, the members of the Technical
Committee did not feel the assessment
provided an accurate representation of
stock status, especially given that results
of tagging study analyses did not show
a similar increase in fishing mortality.
The Technical Committee was
concerned with any conclusions that
might be derived from these estimated
and recommended the 2004 assessment
results not be used for management
decisions until both the modeling
software and the input data sets were
reevaluated during the 2005 assessment
process. The results from the 2004 stock
assessment have not been used by
ASMFC for management decisions.
With the great uncertainty in
estimates of spawning stock biomass,
and fishing mortality rates during 2003,
as presented in the 2004 stock
assessment, NMFS decided to delay the
completion of the EIS to be able to
incorporate the 2005 stock assessment
in the EIS.
During 2005, the Technical
Committee and Stock Assessment
Subcommittee reviewed model inputs
and the model itself to determine if the
results from the 2004 assessment truly
reflected status of the population or
were an artifact of data or model errors.
They concluded that a number of the
indices used in the 2004 effort were not
consistent with what was observed in
the population as a whole, or were
contradictory to the majority of other
reliable time series. Those indices were
removed from subsequent model runs.
The Technical Committee believes
the current assessment reflects the
true status of the population (within
reasonable ranges of certainty). Both the
2004 and 2005 Striped Bass Stock
Assessments are available on ASMFC’s
website under Interstate Fisheries
Management-striped bass at https://
www.asmfc.org.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:12 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
30387
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
During the development of
Amendment 6, there were concerns over
the impacts of bycatch mortality on the
overall population. To address these
concerns, ASMFC is currently
developing Addendum 1 to Amendment
6 to increase the accuracy of data on
striped bass bycatch in all sectors of the
striped bass fishery. Addendum I will
outline mandatory data collection and
bycatch mortality studies for the
commercial, recreational, and for-hire
fisheries for striped bass.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Further Public Participation
Due to the significant time that has
passed since the nine initial scoping
hearings were held in NovemberDecember 2003, NMFS is seeking
additional scoping on its preliminary
draft analyses of Federal management
options to open the EEZ to the harvest
of Atlantic Striped Bass. See ADDRESSES
for information on how to obtain a copy
of the draft document and where to send
comments.
At this time, a preferred option has
not been identified. Options being
considered in this draft document
include: (1) open the entire EEZ,
implement a 28–inch (71.1–cm)
minimum size limit, and allow states to
adopt more restrictive regulations for
fishermen and vessels licensed in their
state (ASMFC recommendation); (2)
open the entire EEZ, implement a 28–
inch (71.1–cm) minimum size limit,
allow states to adopt more restrictive
regulations for fishermen and vessels
licensed in their state, implement a
recreational bag limit of 2 fish per day,
require circle hooks for all commercial
and recreational hook and line fishing
using bait, and commercial trip limits
and bycatch trip limit options; (3) open
the entire EEZ, implement a 28–inch
(71.1–cm) minimum size limit, allow
states to adopt more restrictive
regulations for fishermen and vessels
licensed in their state, allow hook and
line gear only, implement a recreational
bag limit of 2 fish per day, require circle
hooks for all commercial and
recreational hook and line fishing using
bait, and implement a commercial trip
limit of 30 fish per trip or day
whichever is greater; and (4) status quo
- maintain moratorium in the EEZ.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5151 et seq.
Dated: May 23, 2006.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 06–4894 Filed 5–23–06; 2:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[I.D. 051206A]
Marine Mammals; File No. 945-1776
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve
(Christine M. Gabriele, Principal
Investigator) P.O. Box 140, Gustavus,
AK 99826, (File No. 945-1776) has been
issued a permit to conduct scientific
research.
ADDRESSES: The permit and related
documents are available for review
upon written request or by appointment
in the following office(s):
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301)713–2289; fax (301)427–2521; and
Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box
21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668; phone
(907)586–7221; fax (907)586–7249.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carrie Hubard or Amy Hapeman,
(301)713–2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 17, 2005, notice was published
in the Federal Register (70 FR 8076)
that a request for a scientific research
permit to take marine mammals had
been submitted by the above-named
organization. The requested permit has
been issued under the authority of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the
Regulations Governing the Taking and
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR
part 216), the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), and the regulations governing
the taking, importing, and exporting of
endangered and threatened species (50
CFR parts 222–226).
Permit No. 945–1776 authorizes
Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve
to conduct population studies on
numerous cetacean species with a
particular emphasis on humpback
(Megaptera novaeangliae), minke
(Balaenoptera acutorostrata), and killer
whales (Orcinus orca). Takes will occur
by close approach via vessel survey for
photo-identification, behavioral
observation, passive acoustic recording,
collection of sloughed skin and feces,
prey sampling, and incidental
harassment. The permit is valid for five
years.
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30386-30387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4894]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 041806D]
Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act; Atlantic Striped Bass
Fishery
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of scoping process; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In a document published in the Federal Register on April 24,
2006, NMFS announced its intention to re-open the scoping process and
accept further comments on the recommendations contained in Amendment 6
to Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission's (ASMFC) Interstate
Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Striped Bass (Amendment 6). NMFS
originally conducted scoping on the matter in 2003, but decided to re-
open the scoping process and accept further comments due to the passage
of significant time and the availability of new information. The intent
of this document is to announce the extension of the public comment
period from May 26, 2006, to June 26, 2006.
DATES: Comments on this action must be received (see ADDRESSES) no
later than 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on or before June 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests for copies of the draft
document should be sent to: Tom Meyer, State-Federal Fisheries
Division, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, NMFS, 1315 East West
Highway, Room 13248, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Mark the outside of the
envelope ``Striped Bass Scoping.'' An electronic copy of the draft
document and supporting documents (ANPR and a Notice of Intent to
Prepare an EIS (NOI)) may also be obtained on the State-Federal
Fisheries Division's Web site under Regulatory Activities at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/state_federal/state_federal.htm. Comments may
also be sent via fax to (301) 713-0596, or via e-mail to: Striped-
Bass.Comments@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line of the fax or e-
mail the following document identifier: Striped Bass Scoping.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Meyer, telephone (301) 713-2334,
x173.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As announced in the Federal Register on July
21, 2003 (68 FR 43074), NMFS requested comments on potential revisions
to the Federal Atlantic striped bass regulations for the U.S. EEZ in
response to recommendations from the Commission to the Secretary. The
comment period was subsequently reopened on August 26, 2003 (68 FR
51232), for an additional 30-days. A ``Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Notice of Scoping Process''
(NOI) was published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2003 (68 FR
59906) and public meetings were held in nine Atlantic coast states
between November 5 - December 10, 2003, and the public comment period
closed on December 22, 2003.
Significant time has passed since the nine initial scoping
hearings. Accordingly, NMFS thought it prudent to seek additional
scoping on its preliminary draft analyses of Federal management options
to open the EEZ to the harvest of Atlantic Striped Bass. NMFS,
therefore, re-opened the scoping process in a Federal Register Notice
on April 24, 2006 (71 FR 20984) and established a 30 day public comment
period. NMFS believes that extending the comment period an additional
30 days would provide the public a more appropriate opportunity to
provide meaningful commentary on the agency's list of potential
alternatives and other management measures. See ADDRESSES for
information on how to obtain a copy of the draft document and where to
send comments.
Background
Atlantic striped bass management is based on ASMFC's Atlantic
Striped Bass Interstate Fishery Management Plan (ISFMP), first adopted
in 1981. From 1981 - 1994, four ISFMP Amendments were developed that
provided a series of management measures that led to the rebuilding of
the stocks. In 1995, ASMFC declared the Atlantic striped bass
population fully restored and implemented Amendment 5 to the ISFMP to
perpetuate the stock so as to allow a commercial and recreational
harvest consistent with the long-term maintenance of the striped bass
stock. Since then the population has expanded to record levels of
abundance. To maintain this recovered population, ASMFC approved
Amendment 6 in February 2003 (copies of Amendment 6 are available via
ASMFC's website under Interstate Fisheries Management-striped bass at
https://www.asmfc.org). ASMFC believes that the measures contained in
Amendment 6 are necessary to prevent the overfishing of the Atlantic
striped bass resource while allowing growth in both the commercial and
recreational fishery. Development of Amendment 6 took almost 4 years
and involved extensive input from technical and industry advisors, and
provided numerous opportunities for the public to comment on the future
management of the species.
Amendment 6 incorporates results of the 2001 Atlantic striped bass
stock assessment, developed by the Atlantic Coast States, ASMFC, NMFS,
and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see section 1.2.2 of Amendment
6 for summary). Amendment 6 also included recommendations to the
Secretary on the development of complementary measures in the EEZ.
Management of Atlantic striped bass in the EEZ was one of the issues
that was considered throughout development of Amendment 6.
Recommendation to the Secretary
In addition to the recommendations to the Secretary in Amendment 6,
the Secretary also received a letter on April 24, 2003, from ASMFC with
the following three recommendations for implementation of regulations
in the EEZ: (1) Remove the moratorium on the harvest of Atlantic
striped bass in the EEZ; (2) implement a 28-inch (71.1-cm) minimum size
limit for recreational and commercial Atlantic striped bass fisheries
in the EEZ; and (3) allow states the ability to adopt more restrictive
rules for fishermen and vessels licensed in their jurisdictions.
In support of its request, ASMFC cited a number of reasons,
including: ASMFC declared the striped bass stock restored in 1995;
commercial harvest is controlled by individual state quotas; with the
EEZ closed striped bass caught there are required to be discarded, and
are often dead when thrown back - Opening the EEZ will convert some of
the discarded bycatch of striped bass to landings; and Amendment 6
incorporates measures that would address future concerns about the
stock status. See ADDRESSES for information on how to obtain a copy of
the NOI, which has a complete list of ASMFC's cited reasons.
ASMFC also stated that its Atlantic Striped Bass Technical
Committee would monitor annually the Atlantic striped bass population,
and, if at some point in the future ASMFC determines that the Atlantic
striped bass population
[[Page 30387]]
is overfished or that overfishing is occurring, it may recommend
further management measures for the EEZ.
Delay in the Development of an EIS
In September 2004, ASMFC's Striped Bass Technical Committee
prepared its 2004 Stock Assessment Report for use by the Striped Bass
Management Board (Board), which included data through 2003. That
assessment contradicted previous assessments, which had indicated that
the striped bass population was not overfished and continued to grow in
abundance. Instead, the results of the modeling portion of the 2004
assessment indicated that the stock was overfished and that spawning
stock biomass had been reduced to below target levels. However, the
members of the Technical Committee did not feel the assessment provided
an accurate representation of stock status, especially given that
results of tagging study analyses did not show a similar increase in
fishing mortality. The Technical Committee was concerned with any
conclusions that might be derived from these estimated and recommended
the 2004 assessment results not be used for management decisions until
both the modeling software and the input data sets were reevaluated
during the 2005 assessment process. The results from the 2004 stock
assessment have not been used by ASMFC for management decisions.
With the great uncertainty in estimates of spawning stock biomass,
and fishing mortality rates during 2003, as presented in the 2004 stock
assessment, NMFS decided to delay the completion of the EIS to be able
to incorporate the 2005 stock assessment in the EIS.
During 2005, the Technical Committee and Stock Assessment
Subcommittee reviewed model inputs and the model itself to determine if
the results from the 2004 assessment truly reflected status of the
population or were an artifact of data or model errors. They concluded
that a number of the indices used in the 2004 effort were not
consistent with what was observed in the population as a whole, or were
contradictory to the majority of other reliable time series. Those
indices were removed from subsequent model runs. The Technical
Committee believes
the current assessment reflects the true status of the population
(within reasonable ranges of certainty). Both the 2004 and 2005 Striped
Bass Stock Assessments are available on ASMFC's website under
Interstate Fisheries Management-striped bass at https://www.asmfc.org.
Addendum I to Amendment 6
During the development of Amendment 6, there were concerns over the
impacts of bycatch mortality on the overall population. To address
these concerns, ASMFC is currently developing Addendum 1 to Amendment 6
to increase the accuracy of data on striped bass bycatch in all sectors
of the striped bass fishery. Addendum I will outline mandatory data
collection and bycatch mortality studies for the commercial,
recreational, and for-hire fisheries for striped bass.
Further Public Participation
Due to the significant time that has passed since the nine initial
scoping hearings were held in November-December 2003, NMFS is seeking
additional scoping on its preliminary draft analyses of Federal
management options to open the EEZ to the harvest of Atlantic Striped
Bass. See ADDRESSES for information on how to obtain a copy of the
draft document and where to send comments.
At this time, a preferred option has not been identified. Options
being considered in this draft document include: (1) open the entire
EEZ, implement a 28-inch (71.1-cm) minimum size limit, and allow states
to adopt more restrictive regulations for fishermen and vessels
licensed in their state (ASMFC recommendation); (2) open the entire
EEZ, implement a 28-inch (71.1-cm) minimum size limit, allow states to
adopt more restrictive regulations for fishermen and vessels licensed
in their state, implement a recreational bag limit of 2 fish per day,
require circle hooks for all commercial and recreational hook and line
fishing using bait, and commercial trip limits and bycatch trip limit
options; (3) open the entire EEZ, implement a 28-inch (71.1-cm) minimum
size limit, allow states to adopt more restrictive regulations for
fishermen and vessels licensed in their state, allow hook and line gear
only, implement a recreational bag limit of 2 fish per day, require
circle hooks for all commercial and recreational hook and line fishing
using bait, and implement a commercial trip limit of 30 fish per trip
or day whichever is greater; and (4) status quo - maintain moratorium
in the EEZ.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5151 et seq.
Dated: May 23, 2006.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 06-4894 Filed 5-23-06; 2:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S