Domestic Sugar Program-2005-Crop Cane Sugar and Sugar Beet Marketing Allotments and Company Allocations, 30373-30375 [06-4875]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
imported commodity. Additionally,
importers of breeding swine or swine
semen must include the results of tests
conducted on the imported swine or
donor boars.
We are asking the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
approve our use of these information
collection activities for an additional 3
years.
The purpose of this notice is to solicit
comments from the public (as well as
affected agencies) concerning our
information collection. These comments
will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond, through use, as appropriate,
of automated, electronic, mechanical,
and other collection technologies, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Estimate of burden: The public
reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 1
hour per response.
Respondents: Importers of breeding
swine, pork and pork products, and
swine semen, officials of the national
government for the region of origin, and
salaried veterinary officers of the
national government of the country of
origin.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 30.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 10.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 300.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 300 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Done in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of
May 2006.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6–8155 Filed 5–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:12 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
Domestic Sugar Program—2005-Crop
Cane Sugar and Sugar Beet Marketing
Allotments and Company Allocations
Commodity Credit Corporation,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the
establishment and adjustments to the
sugar overall allotment quantity (OAQ)
for the 2005-crop year (FY 2006) which
runs from October 1, 2005 through
September 30, 2006. Although CCC
already announced all of the
information in this notice, CCC is
statutorily required to publish in the
Federal Register determinations
establishing or adjusting sugar
marketing allotments. CCC set the 2005crop OAQ to 8.600 million short tons
raw value (STRV) on August 12, 2005.
On August 19, 2005, CCC allocated the
cane sector allotment to cane-producing
States and cane processors and
reassigned an expected cane supply
shortfall of 120,000 STRV to imports.
On September 29, 2005, CCC increased
the OAQ to 8.825 million STRV and
reassigned another 276,000 STRV of
expected cane shortfall to imports. The
next day, CCC announced the FY 2006
beet company allocations. On December
2, 2006, CCC reassigned another 450,000
STRV of an updated cane supply
shortfall to imports. On February 2,
2006, CCC increased the OAQ to 9.350
million STRV and reassigned 500,000
STRV of the anticipated domestic
supply deficit to imports. The revised
FY 2006 cane state allotments and cane
and beet sugar processor allocations
were announced on March 22, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Barbara Fecso, Dairy and
Sweeteners Analysis Group, Economic
Policy and Analysis Staff, Farm Service
Agency, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0516, Washington,
DC 20250–0516; telephone (202) 720–
4146; FAX (202) 690–1480; e-mail:
barbara.fecso@wdc.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Fecso at (202) 720–4146.
Section
359b(b)(1) of the Agricultural
Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, (7
U.S.C. 1359bb(a)(1)) requires the
Secretary to establish, by the beginning
of each crop year, an appropriate
allotment for the marketing by
processors of sugar processed from
sugar beets and from domestically
produced sugarcane at a level the
Secretary estimates will result in no
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30373
forfeitures of sugar to the CCC under the
loan program.
When CCC announced an 8.600
million ton OAQ in August 2005, it
noted the existence of sugar market
uncertainties and that the OAQ could be
adjusted as warranted. On August 19,
2005, when cane processor allocations
were first announced, CCC determined
that the cane sugar supply was
insufficient to fill the cane sector
allotment. As a result, CCC suspended
Louisiana proportionate shares and
reassigned 120,000 STRV to the FY 2006
raw sugar Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ).
On September 29, 2005, in response
to preliminary damage estimates to
Louisiana production from Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita, CCC increased the FY
2006 OAQ another 225,000 tons. While
this action released 122,288 STRV of
domestic beet sugar stocks into the
market, the cane sector carried a supply
deficit which caused CCC to reassign
276,000 STRV to Mexican refined or
raw imports.
On December 2, 2006, with domestic
cane crop damages further compounded
by Hurricane Wilma in Florida, CCC
increased its forecast of the cane supply
shortfall and reassigned another 450,000
STRV to imports. This was allocated
between the WTO raw sugar TRQ
(300,000 STRV) and the refined global,
first-come, first-served TRQ (150,000
STRV). Since company-specific
damages were not known then, CCC did
not announce the impact of the
reassignment on cane processors.
On February 2, 2006, CCC increased
the OAQ to 9.350 million STRV and
reassigned 500,000 STRV of expected
supply shortfalls from both the beet
(242,000 STRV) and cane (258,000
STRV) sectors evenly between the WTO
raw sugar TRQ and the refined TRQ.
CCC took these actions in response to a
continuing tight supply resulting largely
from the disastrous weather events in
August, September, and October 2005.
Because Puerto Rico forecast zero
production for the 2005 crop, whenever
the OAQ was either set or changed, its
allotment was immediately reassigned
to the mainland states based on their
respective shares of the cane sugar
allotment. Hawaii did not receive a
share of Puerto Rico’s allocation because
it was not expected to use all of its own
allocation.
The established 2005-crop beet and
cane sugar marketing allotments are
listed in the following table, along with
the subsequent adjustments:
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:12 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
..................
..................
54,699
214,900
269,599
Total ....................................................................................
this amount, 27,558 STRV to Canada, 65,421 to Mexico and 157,021 to global.
..................
..................
180,000
1 Of
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
155,960
146,915
140,000
89,804
94,696
175,393
415,959
130,962
98,096
1,447,785
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
1,908,516
792,262
324,343
791,911
3,805,900
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
4,796,388
Total ....................................................................................
Texas:
Rio Grande Valley .....................................................................
Hawaii:
Gay & Robinson, Inc .................................................................
Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company .................................
Total ....................................................................................
Louisiana:
Alma Plantation .........................................................................
Cajun Sugar Co-op ....................................................................
Cora-Texas Mfg. Co ..................................................................
Lafourche Sugars Corp .............................................................
Louisiana Sugarcane Co-op ......................................................
Lula Westfield, LLC ...................................................................
M.A. Patout & Sons ...................................................................
St. Mary Sugar Co-op ...............................................................
So. Louisiana Sugars Co-op .....................................................
Total Cane Sugar ...............................................................
Cane Processors’ Marketing Allocations:
Florida:
Florida Crystals ..........................................................................
Growers Co-op. of FL ................................................................
U.S. Sugar Corp ........................................................................
1,908,516
1,447,785
180,000
269,599
0
..................
999,303
1,715,584
482,017
299,233
629,936
477,233
63,985
129,096
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
Total OAQ ..................................................................................
Beet Processors’ Marketing Allocations:
Amalgamated Sugar Co ............................................................
American Crystal Sugar Co .......................................................
Michigan Sugar Co ....................................................................
Minn-Dak Farmers Co-op ..........................................................
So. Minn Beet Sugar Co-op ......................................................
Western Sugar Co .....................................................................
Wyoming Sugar Co ...................................................................
PNW Allocation Held in Reserve ...............................................
Total Beet Sugar ................................................................
State Cane Sugar Allotments:
Florida ........................................................................................
Louisiana ...................................................................................
Texas .........................................................................................
Hawaii ........................................................................................
Puerto Rico ................................................................................
225,000
8,600,000
Beet Sugar ........................................................................................
Cane Sugar .......................................................................................
WTO Raw Sugar TRQ ......................................................................
Mexico TRQ Raw or Refined ...........................................................
Refined TRQ (global first-come, first-served) ...................................
122,288
102,713
0
0
0
4,674,100
3,805,900
120,000
0
0
Distribution
225 increase in
OAQ on
9/30/05
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
0
0
¥276,000
0
276,000
0
Reassignment to
imports on
9/30/05
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
0
0
¥450,000
300,000
0
150,000
Reassignment on
12/02/06
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
8,825,000
4,796,388
3,182,613
420,000
276,000
150,000
Allotments/
Allocations
as of
12/02/06
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
525,000
285,338
239,663
0
0
0
Increase in
OAQ on
2/2/06
Total
change
from OAQ
increases
from last
processor
announcements
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
0
0
0
15,997
142,359
13,551
14,395
13,223
7,754
10,946
16,811
39,994
14,500
11,186
184,019
75,765
33,102
75,151
342,375
184,019
142,359
15,997
0
0
285,338
59,449
110,046
28,675
17,801
37,475
28,085
3,806
0
627,713
¥242,000
¥258,000
250,000
0
1 250,000
0
285,338
342,375
0
0
0
Reassignment on
2/2/06
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
FY 2006 OVERALL BEET/CANE ALLOTMENTS AND ALLOCATIONS
FY 2006
allotments
as of
8/19/05
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
0
¥242,000
..................
..................
..................
¥984,000
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
¥360,906
¥92,316
¥193,520
..................
¥646,742
¥317,090
¥15,572
¥4,596
0
0
129,096
0
0
0
0
0
¥129,096
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reassignment of
PNW reserve
3/3/06
99,264
¥223,608
¥43,662
¥37,797
10,346
¥32,271
¥14,271
0
0
¥242,000
¥984,000
550,000
276,000
400,000
Total
change
from reassignments of
9/30/05,
12/2/06
and 2/2/06
¥646,742
¥38,208
¥36,683
¥222
¥24,483
¥11,606
¥23,985
¥110,757
¥39,211
¥31,935
¥317,090
¥15,572
¥61
¥4,535
¥4,596
265,003
54,638
210,366
180,425
1,273,054
131,302
124,626
153,001
73,075
94,036
168,219
345,197
106,250
77,347
1,445,792
507,121
265,129
673,542
3,164,275
1,445,792
1,273,054
180,425
265,003
0
4,839,725
1,158,015
1,731,118
467,030
279,237
677,756
473,047
53,521
0
9,350,000
4,839,725
3,164,275
670,000
276,000
400,000
Allotments/
Allocations
as of
3/22/06
30374
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 102 / Friday, May 26, 2006 / Notices
These actions apply to all domestic
sugar marketed for human consumption
in the United States from October 1,
2005, through September 30, 2006.
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 15,
2006.
Teresa C. Lasseter,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 06–4875 Filed 5–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Eastern Washington Cascades
Provincial Advisory Committee and the
Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington
Cascades Provincial Advisory
Committee and the Yakima Provincial
Advisory Committee will meet on
Wednesday, June 7, 2006 and
Wednesday, June 21, 2006 at the
Okanogan and Wenatchee National
Forests Headquarters Office, 215
Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA. These
meetings will begin at 9 a.m. and
continue until 3 p.m. During these
meetings Provincial Advisory
Committee members will continue the
collaboration process on forest plan
issues relating to the preparation of a
revised forest plan for the Okanogan and
Wenatchee National Forests. All Eastern
Washington Cascades and Yakima
Province Advisory Committee meetings
are open to the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting
to Paul Hart, Designated Federal
Official, USDA, Wenatchee National
Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee,
Washington 98801, 509–664–9200.
Dated: May 11, 2006.
Paul Hart,
Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and
Wenatchee National Forests.
[FR Doc. 06–4878 Filed 5–25–06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
RIN 0596–AC44
Notice of Proposed Native Plant
Material Policy, Forest Service Manual
(FSM) 2070
AGENCY:
Forest Service, USDA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:12 May 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
Notice of proposed directive;
request for comment.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is
proposing to establish a new directive to
Forest Service Manual (FSM) 2070 for
native plant materials, which will
provide direction for the use, growth,
development, and storage of native
plant materials. Public comment is
invited and will be considered in
development of the final directive. A
copy of the proposed directive is
available at
https://www.fs.fed.us/rangelands/
whoweare/documents/
FSM2070_Final_2_062905.pdf.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by July 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments via
the U.S. Postal Service to; Native Plant
Materials Proposed Directive, Rangeland
Management Staff, MAIL STOP 1103,
Forest Service, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, or by facsimile
to (202) 205–1096 or by e-mail to
nativeplant@fs.fed.us. If comments are
sent via facsimile or e-mail, the public
is asked not to submit duplicate written
comments by mail. Please confine
comments to issues pertinent to the
proposed directive and explain the
reasons for any recommended changes.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying at 201 14th
Street, SW., Washington, DC, during
regular business hours, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. Persons wishing to inspect the
comments are encouraged to call in
advance to Brian Boyd, (202) 205–1496
to facilitate entrance into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Stritch, Rangeland Management
Staff, USDA Forest Service, Mailstop
1103, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250, (202) 205–1279.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 36
CFR 219.10(b) states: ‘‘The overall goal
of the ecological element of
sustainability is to provide a framework
to contribute to sustaining native
ecological systems by providing
ecological conditions to support
diversity of native plant and animal
species in the plan area.’’ Executive
Order 13112 (February 3, 1999, sec.
2(a)(2)(IV)) on invasive species states
the agencies will ‘‘provide for
restoration of native species and habitat
conditions in ecosystems that have been
invaded [by non-native species].’’ In
accordance with the executive order and
regulation, the Forest Service is
developing a new proposed directive to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30375
Forest Service Manual (FSM) 2070,
Native Plant Materials, which addresses
the uses of native plant materials in the
revegetation, restoration, and
rehabilitation of National Forest System
lands in order to achieve the Agency’s
goal of providing for the diversity of
plant and animal communities. The
proposed policy would direct
collaboration with federal, State, and
local government entities and the public
to develop and implement a program for
native plant materials for use in
revegetation, restoration, and
rehabilitation.
In proposing this new policy, the
Forest Service’s goal is to promote the
use of native plant materials in
revegetation for restoration and
rehabilitation in order to manage and
conserve terrestrial and aquatic
biological diversity. The proposed
policy defines a native plant as: All
indigenous terrestrial and aquatic plant
species that evolved naturally in an
ecosystem. The proposed policy also
requires the use of best available
information to choose ecologically
adapted plant materials for the site and
situation. Further, the proposed policy
states that native plants are to be used
when timely natural regeneration of the
native plant community is not likely to
occur; native plant materials are the first
choice in revegatation for restoration
and rehabilitation efforts. Nonnative,
non-invasive plant species may be used
when needed: (1) In emergency
conditions to protect basic resource
values such as soil stability and water
quality; (2) as an interim, non-persistent
measure designed to aid in new
establishment of native plants (unless
natural soil, water and biotic conditions
have been permanently altered); (3)
native plant species are not available;
and (4) when working in permanently
altered plant communities. Under no
circumstances will nonnative invasive
plant species be used.
When the proposed policy is issued as
final, the Forest Service will: (1)
Undertake a comprehensive assessment
of needs (type and amount) for native
plant materials; (2) invest in a long-term
commitment to research and
development, education, and
technology transfer for native plant
materials; (3) expand efforts to increase
the availability of native plant materials;
and (4) collaborate with other federal
agencies; tribal, State, and local
governments; academic institutions; and
the private sector.
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30373-30375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4875]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
Domestic Sugar Program--2005-Crop Cane Sugar and Sugar Beet
Marketing Allotments and Company Allocations
AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the establishment and adjustments to
the sugar overall allotment quantity (OAQ) for the 2005-crop year (FY
2006) which runs from October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006.
Although CCC already announced all of the information in this notice,
CCC is statutorily required to publish in the Federal Register
determinations establishing or adjusting sugar marketing allotments.
CCC set the 2005-crop OAQ to 8.600 million short tons raw value (STRV)
on August 12, 2005. On August 19, 2005, CCC allocated the cane sector
allotment to cane-producing States and cane processors and reassigned
an expected cane supply shortfall of 120,000 STRV to imports. On
September 29, 2005, CCC increased the OAQ to 8.825 million STRV and
reassigned another 276,000 STRV of expected cane shortfall to imports.
The next day, CCC announced the FY 2006 beet company allocations. On
December 2, 2006, CCC reassigned another 450,000 STRV of an updated
cane supply shortfall to imports. On February 2, 2006, CCC increased
the OAQ to 9.350 million STRV and reassigned 500,000 STRV of the
anticipated domestic supply deficit to imports. The revised FY 2006
cane state allotments and cane and beet sugar processor allocations
were announced on March 22, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Barbara Fecso, Dairy and Sweeteners Analysis Group, Economic
Policy and Analysis Staff, Farm Service Agency, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0516, Washington, DC 20250-0516; telephone (202) 720-
4146; FAX (202) 690-1480; e-mail: barbara.fecso@wdc.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Fecso at (202) 720-4146.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 359b(b)(1) of the Agricultural
Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, (7 U.S.C. 1359bb(a)(1)) requires
the Secretary to establish, by the beginning of each crop year, an
appropriate allotment for the marketing by processors of sugar
processed from sugar beets and from domestically produced sugarcane at
a level the Secretary estimates will result in no forfeitures of sugar
to the CCC under the loan program.
When CCC announced an 8.600 million ton OAQ in August 2005, it
noted the existence of sugar market uncertainties and that the OAQ
could be adjusted as warranted. On August 19, 2005, when cane processor
allocations were first announced, CCC determined that the cane sugar
supply was insufficient to fill the cane sector allotment. As a result,
CCC suspended Louisiana proportionate shares and reassigned 120,000
STRV to the FY 2006 raw sugar Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ).
On September 29, 2005, in response to preliminary damage estimates
to Louisiana production from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, CCC increased
the FY 2006 OAQ another 225,000 tons. While this action released
122,288 STRV of domestic beet sugar stocks into the market, the cane
sector carried a supply deficit which caused CCC to reassign 276,000
STRV to Mexican refined or raw imports.
On December 2, 2006, with domestic cane crop damages further
compounded by Hurricane Wilma in Florida, CCC increased its forecast of
the cane supply shortfall and reassigned another 450,000 STRV to
imports. This was allocated between the WTO raw sugar TRQ (300,000
STRV) and the refined global, first-come, first-served TRQ (150,000
STRV). Since company-specific damages were not known then, CCC did not
announce the impact of the reassignment on cane processors.
On February 2, 2006, CCC increased the OAQ to 9.350 million STRV
and reassigned 500,000 STRV of expected supply shortfalls from both the
beet (242,000 STRV) and cane (258,000 STRV) sectors evenly between the
WTO raw sugar TRQ and the refined TRQ. CCC took these actions in
response to a continuing tight supply resulting largely from the
disastrous weather events in August, September, and October 2005.
Because Puerto Rico forecast zero production for the 2005 crop,
whenever the OAQ was either set or changed, its allotment was
immediately reassigned to the mainland states based on their respective
shares of the cane sugar allotment. Hawaii did not receive a share of
Puerto Rico's allocation because it was not expected to use all of its
own allocation.
The established 2005-crop beet and cane sugar marketing allotments
are listed in the following table, along with the subsequent
adjustments:
[[Page 30374]]
FY 2006 Overall Beet/Cane Allotments and Allocations
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total change Total change
FY 2006 225 Allotments/ from OAQ from Reassignment Allotments/
allotments increase Reassignment Reassignment Allocations Increase Reassignment increases reassignments of PNW Allocations
Distribution as of 8/ in OAQ on to imports on 12/02/06 as of 12/ in OAQ on on 2/2/06 from last of 9/30/05, reserve 3/3/ as of 3/22/
19/05 9/30/05 on 9/30/05 02/06 2/2/06 processor 12/2/06 and 2/ 06 06
announcements 2/06
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beet Sugar.................................. 4,674,100 122,288 0 0 4,796,388 285,338 -242,000 285,338 -242,000 0 4,839,725
Cane Sugar.................................. 3,805,900 102,713 -276,000 -450,000 3,182,613 239,663 -258,000 342,375 -984,000 0 3,164,275
WTO Raw Sugar TRQ........................... 120,000 0 0 300,000 420,000 0 250,000 0 550,000 0 670,000
Mexico TRQ Raw or Refined................... 0 0 276,000 0 276,000 0 0 0 276,000 0 276,000
Refined TRQ (global first-come, first- 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 0 \1\ 250,000 0 400,000 0 400,000
served)....................................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total OAQ............................... 8,600,000 225,000 0 0 8,825,000 525,000 0 627,713 0 0 9,350,000
Beet Processors' Marketing Allocations:
Amalgamated Sugar Co.................... .......... 999,303 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 59,449 99,264 0 1,158,015
American Crystal Sugar Co............... .......... 1,715,584 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 110,046 -223,608 129,096 1,731,118
Michigan Sugar Co....................... .......... 482,017 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 28,675 -43,662 0 467,030
Minn-Dak Farmers Co-op.................. .......... 299,233 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 17,801 -37,797 0 279,237
So. Minn Beet Sugar Co-op............... .......... 629,936 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 37,475 10,346 0 677,756
Western Sugar Co........................ .......... 477,233 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 28,085 -32,271 0 473,047
Wyoming Sugar Co........................ .......... 63,985 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 3,806 -14,271 0 53,521
PNW Allocation Held in Reserve.......... .......... 129,096 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 0 0 -129,096 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Beet Sugar.................... .......... 4,796,388 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 285,338 -242,000 0 4,839,725
State Cane Sugar Allotments:
Florida................................. 1,908,516 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 184,019 -646,742 ............ 1,445,792
Louisiana............................... 1,447,785 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 142,359 -317,090 ............ 1,273,054
Texas................................... 180,000 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 15,997 -15,572 ............ 180,425
Hawaii.................................. 269,599 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 0 -4,596 ............ 265,003
Puerto Rico............................. 0 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 0 0 ............ 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Cane Sugar.................... 3,805,900 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 342,375 -984,000 ............ 3,164,275
Cane Processors' Marketing Allocations:
Florida:
Florida Crystals........................ 792,262 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 75,765 -360,906 ............ 507,121
Growers Co-op. of FL.................... 324,343 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 33,102 -92,316 ............ 265,129
U.S. Sugar Corp......................... 791,911 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 75,151 -193,520 ............ 673,542
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 1,908,516 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 184,019 -646,742 ............ 1,445,792
Louisiana:
Alma Plantation......................... 155,960 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 13,551 -38,208 ............ 131,302
Cajun Sugar Co-op....................... 146,915 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 14,395 -36,683 ............ 124,626
Cora-Texas Mfg. Co...................... 140,000 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 13,223 -222 ............ 153,001
Lafourche Sugars Corp................... 89,804 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 7,754 -24,483 ............ 73,075
Louisiana Sugarcane Co-op............... 94,696 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 10,946 -11,606 ............ 94,036
Lula Westfield, LLC..................... 175,393 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 16,811 -23,985 ............ 168,219
M.A. Patout & Sons...................... 415,959 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 39,994 -110,757 ............ 345,197
St. Mary Sugar Co-op.................... 130,962 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 14,500 -39,211 ............ 106,250
So. Louisiana Sugars Co-op.............. 98,096 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 11,186 -31,935 ............ 77,347
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 1,447,785 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 142,359 -317,090 ............ 1,273,054
Texas:
Rio Grande Valley....................... 180,000 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 15,997 -15,572 ............ 180,425
Hawaii:
Gay & Robinson, Inc..................... 54,699 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 0 -61 ............ 54,638
Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company..... 214,900 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 0 -4,535 ............ 210,366
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 269,599 .......... ............ ............ ........... .......... ............ 0 -4,596 ............ 265,003
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Of this amount, 27,558 STRV to Canada, 65,421 to Mexico and 157,021 to global.
[[Page 30375]]
These actions apply to all domestic sugar marketed for human
consumption in the United States from October 1, 2005, through
September 30, 2006.
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 15, 2006.
Teresa C. Lasseter,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. 06-4875 Filed 5-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
