Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Massalina Bayou, Panama City, FL, 30058-30060 [E6-8072]
Download as PDF
30058
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Providers and their affiliated NPPs may
communicate as necessary to preserve
the safety and reliability of the grid, the
interconnection, and the NPP. The
Commission agrees with Exelon that it
may be necessary for the Transmission
Provider and the NPP to discuss specific
technical information.
11. Accordingly, the Commission
specifically clarifies that ‘‘information
on grid disturbances and the duration of
power unavailability’’ as used in the
Interpretive Order encompasses specific
information about transmission system
conditions on a real-time basis,
including: (i) A technical description of
the grid disturbance, along with its
specific location on the system; (ii) the
grid elements, whether lines,
substations, or other elements, that may
be affected by the disturbance, and their
specific locations on the system; (iii) the
projected duration of the disturbance;
and (iv) steps being taken by the
Transmission Provider to resolve the
disturbance.
III. Document Availability
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
12. In addition to publishing the full
text of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all
interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents of this
document via the Internet through the
Commission’s Home Page (https://
www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission’s
Public Reference Room during normal
business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Eastern time) at 888 First Street, NE.,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
13. From the Commission’s Home
Page on the Internet, this information is
available in the Commission’s document
management system, eLibrary. The full
text of this document is available on
eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word
format for viewing, printing, and/or
downloading. To access this document
in eLibrary, type the docket number
excluding the last three digits of this
document in the docket number field.
14. User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the Commission’s Web site
during normal business hours. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at 1–866–208–3676 (toll free) or
(202) 502–8222 (e-mail at
FERCOnlineSupport@FERC.gov), or the
Public Reference Room at (202) 502–
8371, TTY (202) 502–8659 (e-mail at
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov).
By the Commission.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–4841 Filed 5–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:40 May 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08–06–016]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Massalina Bayou, Panama City, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, has temporarily
changed the regulation governing the
operation of the Tarpon Dock bascule
span drawbridge across Massalina
Bayou, mile 0.0, at Panama City, Bay
County, Florida. The regulation will
allow the draw of the bridge to remain
closed to navigation for one hour to
facilitate the American Heart Walk.
DATES: This temporary rule is effective
from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. on October 28,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket [CGD08–06–
016] and are available for inspection or
copying at the office of the Eighth Coast
Guard District, Bridge Administration
Branch, 500 Poydras Street, New
Orleans, Louisiana 70130–3310,
between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The telephone number is (504) 589–
2965. The Eighth District Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, (504) 589–2965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Good Cause for Not Publishing an
NPRM
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. Thousands
of pedestrians will cross the bridge
during the event and this temporary rule
is necessary to ensure their safety as
they cross the bridge. Additionally, the
event will only impact the waterway
users for one hour and will open for
vessels in distress.
Background and Purpose
The American Heart Association, on
behalf of the City of Panama City, has
requested a temporary rule changing the
operation of the Tarpon Dock bascule
span drawbridge across Massalina
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bayou, mile 0.0, in Panama City, Bay
County, Florida. This temporary rule is
needed to accommodate approximately
2,000 pedestrians that are expected to
participate in a 3.5-mile walk. The
bridge is near the beginning of the walk
and allowing the bridge to open for
navigation during this short time period
would disrupt the event and could
result in injury. The bridge has a
vertical clearance of 7 feet above mean
high water in the closed-to-navigation
position and unlimited in the open-tonavigation position. Navigation on the
waterway consists primarily of
commercial fishing vessels, sailing
vessels and other recreational craft.
Presently, 33 CFR 117.301 states: ‘‘The
draw of the Tarpon Dock bascule span
bridge, Massalina Bayou, mile 0.0, shall
open on signal; except that from 9 p.m.
until 11 p.m. on July 4, each year, the
draw need not open for the passage of
vessels. The draw will open at any time
for a vessel in distress.’’ This temporary
rule will allow the bridge to be
maintained in the closed-to-navigation
position from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. on
October 28, 2006 to facilitate the
American Heart Walk.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is temporarily
changing the regulation in 33 CFR part
117. The temporary change allows the
bridge to remain closed for one hour to
facilitate a community activity and will
minimally affect waterway users
wishing to transit through the bridge on
this date. This event is an annual event
and waterway users have never
expressed any concerns regarding the
delays to facilitate this event.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. This temporary
rule will be only one hour in duration
and is therefore expected to have only
a minor affect on the local economy.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM
25MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this temporary rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
Tarpon dock bridge across Massalina
Bayou during the closure. There is not
expected to be a significant impact due
to the short duration of the closure and
the publicity given to the event.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:40 May 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in the
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not cause an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30059
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g. specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g);
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1; section 117.255 also issued under
the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106 Stat.
5039.
2. Effective 9 a.m. until 10 a.m. on
October 28, 2006, § 117.301 is
temporarily suspended and a new
§ 117.T302 is added to read as follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM
25MYR1
30060
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
§ 117.T302
Massalina Bayou.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The draw of the Tarpon Dock bascule
span bridge, Massalina Bayou, mile 0.0,
shall open on signal; except that from 9
a.m. until 10 a.m. on October 28, 2006,
the draw need not open for the passage
of vessels. The draw will open at any
time for a vessel in distress.
Dated: May 16, 2006.
Ronald W. Branch,
Captain, U.S.Coast Guard, Commander, 8th
Coast Guard Dist., Acting.
[FR Doc. E6–8072 Filed 5–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05–06–052]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Severn River and
College Creek, Annapolis, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
encompassing the waters of the Severn
River and College Creek in order to
safeguard high-ranking public officials
from terrorist acts and incidents during
the U.S. Naval Academy graduation
ceremony on May 26, 2006. This action
is necessary to ensure the safety of
persons and property, and prevent
terrorist acts or incidents. This rule
prohibits vessels and people from
entering the security zone and requires
vessels and persons in the security zone
to depart the security zone, unless
specifically exempt under the
provisions in this rule or granted
specific permission from the Coast
Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30
a.m. to 2 p.m. on May 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CGD05–06–
052 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point
Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226–1791,
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ronald Houck, Waterways Management
Division, at Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point
Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21226–1791,
telephone number (410) 576–2674.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:40 May 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM and for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. The Coast Guard is
establishing this security zone to
coordinate security operations and
establish a secure environment for this
highly visible and publicized event. The
publication of an NPRM is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as immediate action is
necessary to protect high-ranking public
officials and the public from terrorist
acts and incidents during the U.S. Naval
Academy graduation ceremony on May
26, 2006. This temporary security zone
of short duration is necessary to provide
for the security of high-ranking officials
and the public at large.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The
measures contemplated by the rule are
intended to protect high-ranking public
officials and the public from waterborne
acts of terrorism, which terrorists have
demonstrated a capability to carry out.
Immediate action is needed to defend
against and deter these terrorist acts.
Any delay in the effective date of this
rule is contrary to public and national
interests.
Background and Purpose
On May 26, 2006, the Vice President
of the United States, Richard B. Cheney,
will attend the commencement at the
U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis,
Maryland. Due to increased awareness
that future terrorist attacks are possible
the Coast Guard, as lead federal agency
for maritime homeland security, has
determined that the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port must have the means
to be aware of, deter, detect, intercept,
and respond to asymmetric threats, acts
of aggression, and attacks by terrorists
on the American homeland while still
maintaining our freedoms and
sustaining the flow of commerce. This
security zone is part of a comprehensive
port security regime designed to
safeguard human life, vessels, and
waterfront facilities against sabotage or
terrorist attacks.
The Captain of the Port is establishing
a security zone to address the
aforementioned security concerns and
to take steps to prevent the catastrophic
impact that a terrorist attack against a
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
gathering of high-ranking officials at or
near Annapolis, Maryland, would have.
This temporary security zone applies to
all waters of the Severn River, between
Horseshoe Point and Biemans Point,
and all waters of College Creek eastward
of the King George Street Bridge. Marine
vessel travel in the area of the Naval
Academy Bridge in the Severn River
and College Creek will be restricted. The
area affected covers nearly 2000 yards of
the Severn River’s length. Vessels
underway at the time this security zone
is implemented will immediately
proceed out of the zone. We will issue
Broadcast Notices to Mariners to further
publicize the security zone and any
revisions to the zone. This security zone
is issued under authority contained in
50 U.S.C. 191 and 33 U.S.C. 1226.
Except for Public vessels and vessels
at berth, mooring or at anchor, this rule
temporarily requires all vessels in the
designated security zone as defined by
this rule to depart the security zone.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate or transit on
the Severn River, between Horseshoe
Point and Biemans Point, and on
College Creek, eastward of the King
George Street Bridge, from 7:30 a.m. to
2 p.m. on May 26, 2006. This security
zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities due to the
E:\FR\FM\25MYR1.SGM
25MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 101 (Thursday, May 25, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30058-30060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-8072]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08-06-016]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Massalina Bayou, Panama City,
FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District, has temporarily
changed the regulation governing the operation of the Tarpon Dock
bascule span drawbridge across Massalina Bayou, mile 0.0, at Panama
City, Bay County, Florida. The regulation will allow the draw of the
bridge to remain closed to navigation for one hour to facilitate the
American Heart Walk.
DATES: This temporary rule is effective from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. on
October 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket [CGD08-06-016] and are available for
inspection or copying at the office of the Eighth Coast Guard District,
Bridge Administration Branch, 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans,
Louisiana 70130-3310, between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone number is (504) 589-2965. The
Eighth District Bridge Administration Branch maintains the public
docket for this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, (504) 589-2965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Good Cause for Not Publishing an NPRM
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Thousands of pedestrians will
cross the bridge during the event and this temporary rule is necessary
to ensure their safety as they cross the bridge. Additionally, the
event will only impact the waterway users for one hour and will open
for vessels in distress.
Background and Purpose
The American Heart Association, on behalf of the City of Panama
City, has requested a temporary rule changing the operation of the
Tarpon Dock bascule span drawbridge across Massalina Bayou, mile 0.0,
in Panama City, Bay County, Florida. This temporary rule is needed to
accommodate approximately 2,000 pedestrians that are expected to
participate in a 3.5-mile walk. The bridge is near the beginning of the
walk and allowing the bridge to open for navigation during this short
time period would disrupt the event and could result in injury. The
bridge has a vertical clearance of 7 feet above mean high water in the
closed-to-navigation position and unlimited in the open-to-navigation
position. Navigation on the waterway consists primarily of commercial
fishing vessels, sailing vessels and other recreational craft.
Presently, 33 CFR 117.301 states: ``The draw of the Tarpon Dock bascule
span bridge, Massalina Bayou, mile 0.0, shall open on signal; except
that from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. on July 4, each year, the draw need not
open for the passage of vessels. The draw will open at any time for a
vessel in distress.'' This temporary rule will allow the bridge to be
maintained in the closed-to-navigation position from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m.
on October 28, 2006 to facilitate the American Heart Walk.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the regulation in 33 CFR
part 117. The temporary change allows the bridge to remain closed for
one hour to facilitate a community activity and will minimally affect
waterway users wishing to transit through the bridge on this date. This
event is an annual event and waterway users have never expressed any
concerns regarding the delays to facilitate this event.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. This temporary rule will be only one hour in
duration and is therefore expected to have only a minor affect on the
local economy.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered
[[Page 30059]]
whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this temporary
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
through the Tarpon dock bridge across Massalina Bayou during the
closure. There is not expected to be a significant impact due to the
short duration of the closure and the publicity given to the event.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in the preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not cause an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g. specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction,
an ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
0
2. Effective 9 a.m. until 10 a.m. on October 28, 2006, Sec. 117.301 is
temporarily suspended and a new Sec. 117.T302 is added to read as
follows:
[[Page 30060]]
Sec. 117.T302 Massalina Bayou.
The draw of the Tarpon Dock bascule span bridge, Massalina Bayou,
mile 0.0, shall open on signal; except that from 9 a.m. until 10 a.m.
on October 28, 2006, the draw need not open for the passage of vessels.
The draw will open at any time for a vessel in distress.
Dated: May 16, 2006.
Ronald W. Branch,
Captain, U.S.Coast Guard, Commander, 8th Coast Guard Dist., Acting.
[FR Doc. E6-8072 Filed 5-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P