Port Access Routes Study of Potential Vessel Routing Measures to Reduce Vessel Strikes of North Atlantic Right Whales, 29876-29878 [E6-7859]
Download as PDF
29876
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(d) Regulations. The general
regulations in 33 CFR part 165 subpart
D, apply to any vessel or person in the
navigable waters of the United States to
which this section applies. No person or
vessel may enter the security zone
established in this section unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representatives. Vessels
and persons granted permission to enter
the security zone shall obey all lawful
orders or directions of the Captain of the
Port or his designated representatives.
All vessels entering or moving within
the security zone must operate at speeds
which are necessary to maintain a safe
course and which will not exceed 12
knots.
(e) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
may enforce the rules in this section. In
the navigable waters of the United
States to which this section applies,
when immediate action is required and
representatives of the Coast Guard are
not present or not present in sufficient
force to provide effective enforcement of
this section, any Federal Law
Enforcement Officer or Michigan Law
Enforcement Officer may enforce the
rules contained in this section pursuant
to 33 CFR § 6.04–11. In addition, the
Captain of the Port may be assisted by
other federal, state or local agencies in
enforcing this section pursuant to 33
CFR 6.04–11.
(f) Exemption. Public vessels as
defined in paragraph (a) of this section
are exempt from the requirements in
this section.
(g) Waiver. For any vessel, the Captain
of the Port Sault Ste. Marie may waive
any of the requirements of this section,
upon finding that operational
conditions or other circumstances are
such that application of this section is
unnecessary or impractical for the
purpose of port security, safety or
environmental safety.
(h) Enforcement period. This rule will
be in enforced Labor Day of each year;
6 a.m. to 11:59 p.m.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Dated: May 2, 2006.
E.Q. Kahler,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sault Ste. Marie.
[FR Doc. E6–7862 Filed 5–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:03 May 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 167
[USCG–2005–20380]
Port Access Routes Study of Potential
Vessel Routing Measures to Reduce
Vessel Strikes of North Atlantic Right
Whales
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of study results; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces
the completion of a Port Access Route
Study that analyzed potential vessel
routing measures and considered
adjusting existing vessel routing
measures in order to help reduce the
risk of vessel strikes of the highly
endangered North Atlantic right whale.
The study focused on the northern
region off the Atlantic Coast which
included Cape Cod Bay, the area off
Race Point at the northern end of Cape
Cod (Race Point) and the Great South
Channel; and in the southern region
which included areas along the seacoast
in the approaches to the Ports of
Jacksonville and Fernandina Beach,
Florida, and Brunswick, Georgia. This
notice summarizes the study’s
recommendations. Comments on these
recommendations are requested.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Docket Management
Facility on or before June 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as the
actual study and other documents
mentioned in this notice, are part of
docket USCG–2005–20380 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, room PL–
401, 400 Seventh Street SW.,
Washington, DC, 20590–0001, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. You
may also find this docket on the Internet
at https://dms.dot.gov.
You may submit comments identified
by Coast Guard docket number USCG–
2005–20380 to the Docket Management
Facility at the U.S. Department of
Transportation. To avoid duplication,
please use only one of the following
methods:
(1) Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001.
(3) Fax: 202–493–2251.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) Delivery: Room PL–401 on the
Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The telephone number is 202–366–
9329.
(5) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice of
study results, call George Detweiler,
Office of Navigation Systems, Coast
Guard, telephone 202–267–0574, or
send e-mail to
Gdetweiler@comdt.uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–493–0402–
0271.
You may
obtain a copy of the Port Access Route
Study by contacting either person listed
under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. A copy is also
available in the public docket at the
address listed under the ADDRESSES
section and electronically on the DMS
Web Site at https://dms.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to comment on the
study and its recommendations by
submitting comments and related
materials. All comments received will
be posted, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov and will include any
personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to use the Docket Management Facility.
Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’
paragraph below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a
comment, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this notice of study (USCG–2005–
20380), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. You may submit your
comments and material by electronic
means, mail, fax, or delivery to the
Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES; but please
submit your comments and material by
only one means. If you submit them by
mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 2006 / Proposed Rules
comments and material received during
the comment period.
Viewing comments and documents:
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://dms.dot.gov at any time and
conduct a simple search using the
docket number. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in room
PL–401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the Department of
Transportation’s Privacy Act Statement
in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Definitions
The following definitions are from the
International Maritime Organization’s
(IMO’s) publication ‘‘Ships’ Routeing’’
and should help you review this notice:
Area to be avoided or ATBA means a
routing measure comprising an area
within defined limits in which either
navigation is particularly hazardous or
it is exceptionally important to avoid
casualties and which should be avoided
by all vessels, or certain classes of
vessels.
Precautionary area means a routing
measure comprising an area within
defined limits where vessels must
navigate with particular caution and
within which the direction of traffic
flow may be recommended.
Recommended route means a route of
undefined width, for the convenience of
vessels in transit, which is often marked
by centerline buoys.
Recommended track is a route which
has been specially examined to ensure
so far as possible that it is free of
dangers and along which vessels are
advised to navigate.
Separation Zone or separation line
means a zone or line separating the
traffic lanes in which vessels are
proceeding in opposite or nearly
opposite directions; or from the adjacent
sea area; or separating traffic lanes
designated for particular classes of
vessels proceeding in the same
direction.
Traffic lane means an area within
defined limits in which one-way traffic
is established. Natural obstacles,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:03 May 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
including those forming separation
zones, may constitute a boundary.
Traffic Separation Scheme or TSS
means a routing measure aimed at the
separation of opposing streams of traffic
by appropriate means and by the
establishment of traffic lanes.
Two-way route means a route within
defined limits inside which two-way
traffic is established, aimed at providing
safe passage of ships through waters
where navigation is difficult or
dangerous.
Vessel routing system means any
system of one or more routes or routing
measures aimed at reducing the risk of
casualties; it includes traffic separation
schemes, two-way routes, recommended
tracks, areas to be avoided, no anchoring
areas, inshore traffic zones,
roundabouts, precautionary areas, and
deep-water routes.
Background and Purpose
When did the Coast Guard conduct this
Port Access Route Study (PARS)?
We conducted this PARS following
our announcement of the PARS in a
notice published in the Federal Register
on February 18, 2005, (70 FR 8312).
This notice had a comment submission
deadline of April 19, 2005.
What is the study area?
The study area encompassed the two
regions described as follows:
1. Northern region: Cape Cod Bay; the
area off Race Point at the northern end
of Cape Cod (Race Point) and the Great
South Channel.
2. Southern region: The area bounded
to the north by a line drawn at latitude
31°27′ N (which coincides with the
northernmost boundary of the
mandatory ship reporting system) and to
the south by a line drawn at latitude
line 29°45′ N. The eastern offshore
boundary is formed by a line drawn at
longitude 81°00′ W and the western
boundary is formed by the shoreline.
Included in this area are the ports of
Jacksonville and Fernandina, FL, and
Brunswick, GA.
Why did the Coast Guard conduct this
PARS?
The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
published an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking (NMFS ANPRM)
(69 FR 30857, June 1, 2004) in the
Federal Register, which announced that
it is considering regulations to
implement a strategy to reduce ship
strikes of right whales (Strategy). The
goal of the Strategy is to assist in the
recovery of the right whale by reducing
the likelihood and threat of ship strikes.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29877
Section 626 of the Coast Guard and
Maritime Transportation Act of 2004
(the 2004 Act) (enacted August 9, 2004)
mandates that the Coast Guard shall: (1)
Cooperate with the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration in
analyzing potential vessel routing
measures for reducing vessel strikes of
North Atlantic Right Whales, as
described in the notice published at
pages 30857 through 30861 of volume
69 of the Federal Register; and (2)
provide a final report of the analysis to
Congress within 18 months after the
date of enactment of the Act.
The Coast Guard is charged with
enforcing the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA), the Endangered
Species Act (ESA), and the regulations
issued under those statutes. One of the
Coast Guard’s primary strategic goals is
the protection of the marine
environment, including the
conservation of living marine resources
and enforcement of living marine
resource laws.
The Coast Guard works
independently, and in collaboration
with NMFS, to prevent ship strikes and
promote right whale conservation. The
Coast Guard issues local and written
periodic notices to mariners concerning
ship strikes, issues NAVTEX messages
alerting mariners to the location of right
whales, and actively participates in the
Mandatory Ship Reporting (MSR)
System that provides information to
mariners entering right whale habitat. In
addition, the Coast Guard provides
patrols dedicated to enforcement of the
ESA and the MMPA, provides limited
vessel and aircraft support to facilitate
right whale research and monitoring,
and disseminates NMFS information
packets to vessels boarded in or near
right whale waters. As part of its
Strategy development, and consistent
with section 626 of the 2004 Act, NMFS
asked the Coast Guard for assistance in
its ship-strike rulemaking by conducting
a Port Access Route Study (PARS).
How did the Coast Guard conduct this
PARS?
During the course of a routine PARS,
the Coast Guard would review port data,
which would include vessel types,
vessel traffic density, types of cargo,
economic impacts, port improvements,
vessel safety, and overall environmental
impacts. In addition, the Coast Guard
would review comments received on the
PARS notice. Further, if meetings of any
type were held, comments received at
those meetings would also be
considered.
In analyzing potential vessel routing
measures for reducing vessel strikes of
North Atlantic right whales, the Coast
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
29878
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 24, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Guard and NMFS agreed this PARS
would be narrower in scope than a
routine PARS because the Coast Guard
did not consider economic impacts.
Economic impacts are being considered
by NMFS as part of an economic
analysis it is conducting as part of the
implementation of its Strategy. The
Coast Guard analyzed ship transit data
and reviewed research papers published
and/or provided by NMFS. These
papers discussed right whale habitat
and migration patterns, and also
analyzed ship transit data, including
Mandatory Ship Reporting System data.
Comments received on its PARS
announcement in the Federal Register
as well as comments NMFS received on
its ANPRM were also reviewed by the
Coast Guard.
charts will be published in the
appropriate Local Notice to Mariners.
3. Changes to aids to navigation
resulting from the above actions will be
accomplished through the following
established procedures—notification of
proposed changes in the Local Notice to
Mariners with an opportunity for
comment and notification of the final
changes in the Local Notice to Mariners.
Study Recommendations
Dated: May 15, 2006.
Howard L. Hime,
Acting Director of Standards, Assistant
Commandant for Prevention.
[FR Doc. E6–7859 Filed 5–23–06; 8:45 am]
The PARS recommendations include
the following:
1. Establish precautionary areas at the
entrance to the ports of Jacksonville and
Fernandina Beach, FL, and Brunswick,
GA.
2. Establish six, two-way routes for
the ports of Jacksonville and Fernandina
Beach, FL, and Brunswick, GA.
3. Establish precautionary areas at the
entrance to Cape Cod Canal and in the
vicinity of New Inlet, MA.
4. Establish three, two-way routes in
Cape Cod Bay to the ports of Boston and
Provincetown, MA, and the entrance to
Cape Cod Canal.
5. Establish a two-way recommended
track from the Cape Cod Canal entrance
to Provincetown, MA.
6. Realign and modify the location
and size of the western portion of the
TSS ‘‘In the Approach to Boston,
Massachusetts.’’
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Next Steps
A brief synopsis of how the PARS
recommendations will proceed towards
implementation follows:
1. Changes to the TSS will be
implemented through submission of a
proposal by the United States to the
International Maritime Organization
(IMO). Upon IMO approval, adoption,
and implementation, NOAA charts will
be revised to reflect changes to the TSS
and the Coast Guard will revise the list
of TSSs at 33 CFR part 167.
2. The final locations of the
precautionary areas, two-way routes,
and the two-way recommended track
will be determined and approved by the
Coast Guard and NOAA. After approval
they will be placed on the appropriate
charts by NOAA. Notification of the
establishment of these routing measures
and their placement on applicable
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:03 May 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
Conclusion
We appreciate the comments we
received concerning the PARS. We will
provide opportunity for additional
comments on any recommended
changes to existing routing or
operational measures listed in 33 CFR
part 167 through notices published in
the Federal Register.
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[R04–OAR–2005–KY–0002–200531(b); FRL–
8173–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Kentucky;
Redesignation of the Boyd County SO2
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On May 13, 2005, and later
clarified in a July 12, 2005,
supplemental submittal, the
Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted
a request to redesignate the sulfur
dioxide (SO2) nonattainment area of
Boyd County to attainment of the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) for SO2. Boyd County is
located within the Huntington-Ashland,
West Virginia (WV)—Kentucky (KY)—
Ohio (OH) Metropolitan Statistical Area
(MSA), and the Boyd County SO2
nonattainment area is comprised of the
southern portion of Boyd County. The
Commonwealth also submitted, as
revisions to the Kentucky State
Implementation Plan (SIP), a
maintenance plan for the area and a
source-specific SIP revision for the
Calgon Carbon Corporation facility in
Catlettsburg, Kentucky. EPA is
proposing to approve the redesignation
request for the Boyd County SO2
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
nonattainment area and the
maintenance plan for this area. The
maintenance plan provides for the
maintenance of the SO2 NAAQS in
Boyd County for the next ten years. EPA
is also proposing to approve the sourcespecific SIP revision for the Calgon
Carbon Corporation facility.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
Stacy DiFrank, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
Please follow the detailed instructions
described in the direct final rule,
ADDRESSES section which is published
in the Rules Section of this Federal
Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stacy DiFrank, (404) 562–9042, or by
electronic mail at
difrank.stacy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
additional information on the approval
of Kentucky’s redesignation request and
maintenance plan for the Boyd County
SO2 nonattainment area, and sourcespecific SIP revision, please see the
direct final rule which is published in
the Rules Section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: May 12, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E6–7934 Filed 5–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2004–0441; FRL–8174–4]
RIN 2060–AI66
National Emission Standards for the
Printing and Publishing Industry
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On May 30, 1996, EPA issued
national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for
the printing and publishing industry
under section 112 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA). We are proposing to amend the
final rule to resolve issues and questions
raised after promulgation of the final
rule and to correct errors in the
regulatory text. This action also
proposes to amend the Paper and Other
E:\FR\FM\24MYP1.SGM
24MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29876-29878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7859]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 167
[USCG-2005-20380]
Port Access Routes Study of Potential Vessel Routing Measures to
Reduce Vessel Strikes of North Atlantic Right Whales
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of study results; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces the completion of a Port Access
Route Study that analyzed potential vessel routing measures and
considered adjusting existing vessel routing measures in order to help
reduce the risk of vessel strikes of the highly endangered North
Atlantic right whale. The study focused on the northern region off the
Atlantic Coast which included Cape Cod Bay, the area off Race Point at
the northern end of Cape Cod (Race Point) and the Great South Channel;
and in the southern region which included areas along the seacoast in
the approaches to the Ports of Jacksonville and Fernandina Beach,
Florida, and Brunswick, Georgia. This notice summarizes the study's
recommendations. Comments on these recommendations are requested.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Docket Management
Facility on or before June 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
the actual study and other documents mentioned in this notice, are part
of docket USCG-2005-20380 and are available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, 20590-0001,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov.
You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket number
USCG-2005-20380 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
(1) Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(3) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(4) Delivery: Room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
(5) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice
of study results, call George Detweiler, Office of Navigation Systems,
Coast Guard, telephone 202-267-0574, or send e-mail to
Gdetweiler@comdt.uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-493-0402-0271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may obtain a copy of the Port Access
Route Study by contacting either person listed under the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. A copy is also available in the public
docket at the address listed under the ADDRESSES section and
electronically on the DMS Web Site at https://dms.dot.gov.
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to comment on the study and its recommendations by
submitting comments and related materials. All comments received will
be posted, without change, to https://dms.dot.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management
Facility. Please see DOT's ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include your
name and address, identify the docket number for this notice of study
(USCG-2005-20380), indicate the specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. You
may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail, fax,
or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one
means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
[[Page 29877]]
comments and material received during the comment period.
Viewing comments and documents: To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time and conduct a simple search using
the docket number. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh
Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Definitions
The following definitions are from the International Maritime
Organization's (IMO's) publication ``Ships' Routeing'' and should help
you review this notice:
Area to be avoided or ATBA means a routing measure comprising an
area within defined limits in which either navigation is particularly
hazardous or it is exceptionally important to avoid casualties and
which should be avoided by all vessels, or certain classes of vessels.
Precautionary area means a routing measure comprising an area
within defined limits where vessels must navigate with particular
caution and within which the direction of traffic flow may be
recommended.
Recommended route means a route of undefined width, for the
convenience of vessels in transit, which is often marked by centerline
buoys.
Recommended track is a route which has been specially examined to
ensure so far as possible that it is free of dangers and along which
vessels are advised to navigate.
Separation Zone or separation line means a zone or line separating
the traffic lanes in which vessels are proceeding in opposite or nearly
opposite directions; or from the adjacent sea area; or separating
traffic lanes designated for particular classes of vessels proceeding
in the same direction.
Traffic lane means an area within defined limits in which one-way
traffic is established. Natural obstacles, including those forming
separation zones, may constitute a boundary.
Traffic Separation Scheme or TSS means a routing measure aimed at
the separation of opposing streams of traffic by appropriate means and
by the establishment of traffic lanes.
Two-way route means a route within defined limits inside which two-
way traffic is established, aimed at providing safe passage of ships
through waters where navigation is difficult or dangerous.
Vessel routing system means any system of one or more routes or
routing measures aimed at reducing the risk of casualties; it includes
traffic separation schemes, two-way routes, recommended tracks, areas
to be avoided, no anchoring areas, inshore traffic zones, roundabouts,
precautionary areas, and deep-water routes.
Background and Purpose
When did the Coast Guard conduct this Port Access Route Study (PARS)?
We conducted this PARS following our announcement of the PARS in a
notice published in the Federal Register on February 18, 2005, (70 FR
8312). This notice had a comment submission deadline of April 19, 2005.
What is the study area?
The study area encompassed the two regions described as follows:
1. Northern region: Cape Cod Bay; the area off Race Point at the
northern end of Cape Cod (Race Point) and the Great South Channel.
2. Southern region: The area bounded to the north by a line drawn
at latitude 31[deg]27' N (which coincides with the northernmost
boundary of the mandatory ship reporting system) and to the south by a
line drawn at latitude line 29[deg]45' N. The eastern offshore boundary
is formed by a line drawn at longitude 81[deg]00' W and the western
boundary is formed by the shoreline. Included in this area are the
ports of Jacksonville and Fernandina, FL, and Brunswick, GA.
Why did the Coast Guard conduct this PARS?
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) published an advance
notice of proposed rulemaking (NMFS ANPRM) (69 FR 30857, June 1, 2004)
in the Federal Register, which announced that it is considering
regulations to implement a strategy to reduce ship strikes of right
whales (Strategy). The goal of the Strategy is to assist in the
recovery of the right whale by reducing the likelihood and threat of
ship strikes.
Section 626 of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of
2004 (the 2004 Act) (enacted August 9, 2004) mandates that the Coast
Guard shall: (1) Cooperate with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration in analyzing potential vessel routing measures for
reducing vessel strikes of North Atlantic Right Whales, as described in
the notice published at pages 30857 through 30861 of volume 69 of the
Federal Register; and (2) provide a final report of the analysis to
Congress within 18 months after the date of enactment of the Act.
The Coast Guard is charged with enforcing the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and the
regulations issued under those statutes. One of the Coast Guard's
primary strategic goals is the protection of the marine environment,
including the conservation of living marine resources and enforcement
of living marine resource laws.
The Coast Guard works independently, and in collaboration with
NMFS, to prevent ship strikes and promote right whale conservation. The
Coast Guard issues local and written periodic notices to mariners
concerning ship strikes, issues NAVTEX messages alerting mariners to
the location of right whales, and actively participates in the
Mandatory Ship Reporting (MSR) System that provides information to
mariners entering right whale habitat. In addition, the Coast Guard
provides patrols dedicated to enforcement of the ESA and the MMPA,
provides limited vessel and aircraft support to facilitate right whale
research and monitoring, and disseminates NMFS information packets to
vessels boarded in or near right whale waters. As part of its Strategy
development, and consistent with section 626 of the 2004 Act, NMFS
asked the Coast Guard for assistance in its ship-strike rulemaking by
conducting a Port Access Route Study (PARS).
How did the Coast Guard conduct this PARS?
During the course of a routine PARS, the Coast Guard would review
port data, which would include vessel types, vessel traffic density,
types of cargo, economic impacts, port improvements, vessel safety, and
overall environmental impacts. In addition, the Coast Guard would
review comments received on the PARS notice. Further, if meetings of
any type were held, comments received at those meetings would also be
considered.
In analyzing potential vessel routing measures for reducing vessel
strikes of North Atlantic right whales, the Coast
[[Page 29878]]
Guard and NMFS agreed this PARS would be narrower in scope than a
routine PARS because the Coast Guard did not consider economic impacts.
Economic impacts are being considered by NMFS as part of an economic
analysis it is conducting as part of the implementation of its
Strategy. The Coast Guard analyzed ship transit data and reviewed
research papers published and/or provided by NMFS. These papers
discussed right whale habitat and migration patterns, and also analyzed
ship transit data, including Mandatory Ship Reporting System data.
Comments received on its PARS announcement in the Federal Register as
well as comments NMFS received on its ANPRM were also reviewed by the
Coast Guard.
Study Recommendations
The PARS recommendations include the following:
1. Establish precautionary areas at the entrance to the ports of
Jacksonville and Fernandina Beach, FL, and Brunswick, GA.
2. Establish six, two-way routes for the ports of Jacksonville and
Fernandina Beach, FL, and Brunswick, GA.
3. Establish precautionary areas at the entrance to Cape Cod Canal
and in the vicinity of New Inlet, MA.
4. Establish three, two-way routes in Cape Cod Bay to the ports of
Boston and Provincetown, MA, and the entrance to Cape Cod Canal.
5. Establish a two-way recommended track from the Cape Cod Canal
entrance to Provincetown, MA.
6. Realign and modify the location and size of the western portion
of the TSS ``In the Approach to Boston, Massachusetts.''
Next Steps
A brief synopsis of how the PARS recommendations will proceed
towards implementation follows:
1. Changes to the TSS will be implemented through submission of a
proposal by the United States to the International Maritime
Organization (IMO). Upon IMO approval, adoption, and implementation,
NOAA charts will be revised to reflect changes to the TSS and the Coast
Guard will revise the list of TSSs at 33 CFR part 167.
2. The final locations of the precautionary areas, two-way routes,
and the two-way recommended track will be determined and approved by
the Coast Guard and NOAA. After approval they will be placed on the
appropriate charts by NOAA. Notification of the establishment of these
routing measures and their placement on applicable charts will be
published in the appropriate Local Notice to Mariners.
3. Changes to aids to navigation resulting from the above actions
will be accomplished through the following established procedures--
notification of proposed changes in the Local Notice to Mariners with
an opportunity for comment and notification of the final changes in the
Local Notice to Mariners.
Conclusion
We appreciate the comments we received concerning the PARS. We will
provide opportunity for additional comments on any recommended changes
to existing routing or operational measures listed in 33 CFR part 167
through notices published in the Federal Register.
Dated: May 15, 2006.
Howard L. Hime,
Acting Director of Standards, Assistant Commandant for Prevention.
[FR Doc. E6-7859 Filed 5-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P