Irish Potatoes Grown in Certain Designated Counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon; Modification of Handling Regulation, 29565-29567 [06-4748]
Download as PDF
29565
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 99
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 945
[Docket No. FV06–945–1 FR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Certain
Designated Counties in Idaho, and
Malheur County, Oregon; Modification
of Handling Regulation
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule removes the
minimum quantity exemption for
yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes
from the handling regulations issued
under the Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato
marketing order. The marketing order
regulates the handling of Irish potatoes
grown in certain designated counties in
Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon,
and is administered locally by the
Idaho-Eastern Oregon Potato Committee
(Committee). A minimum quantity
shipment exemption of up to 200
hundredweight per day is provided for
yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes.
Because yellow fleshed Finnish-type
potatoes are no longer produced in the
production area covered under the
marketing order, the exemption from
handling and assessment regulations is
no longer necessary.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule
becomes effective May 24, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barry Broadbent, Marketing Specialist,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW., Third Avenue,
Suite 385, Portland, OR 97204;
Telephone: (503) 326–2724, Fax: (503)
326–7440.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:30 May 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202)720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 98 and Marketing Order
No. 945, both as amended (7 CFR part
945), regulating the handling of Irish
potatoes grown in certain designated
counties in Idaho, and Malheur County,
Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule removes the exception
for yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes
from the minimum quantity exemption
paragraph of the handling regulations
issued under the order. The minimum
quantity exemption in the regulation
allows handlers to ship up to five
hundredweight of potatoes without
regard to the inspection and assessment
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirements of the order. An exception
for yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes
is included in the exemption which
allows up to 200 hundredweight per day
to be shipped without regard to
inspection or assessment requirements.
The Committee unanimously
recommended the removal of the
exception at its meeting on November 2,
2005.
Section 945.42 of the order provides
authority to assess first handlers of
potatoes to provide funds to cover the
expenses of the Committee. Sections
945.51 and 945.52 provide authority for
the establishment and modification of
regulations applicable to the handling of
potatoes, including required
inspections. Section 945.54 provides
authority to establish exemptions from
the regulations based on shipment size.
Section 945.341 establishes minimum
quality, maturity, pack, and inspection
requirements for potatoes handled
subject to the order. Paragraphs (e), (f),
and (g) of § 945.341 delineate the
circumstances in which the shipment of
potatoes subject to the order may be
granted an exemption from regulation.
Paragraph (g) of that section specifies
the five hundredweight or less per day
shipment exemption, and the exception
of up to 200 hundredweight per day for
yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes.
At its meeting on November 2, 2005,
the Committee unanimously
recommended the removal of the special
exception for yellow fleshed Finnishtype from the handling regulations. In
its deliberations, the Committee
commented that yellow fleshed Finnishtype potatoes are no longer produced
within the production area and that the
exception is no longer needed.
The exception to the minimum
quantity exemption for yellow fleshed
Finnish-type potatoes was added to the
regulation in 1987, specifically to
promote the production and marketing
of this new type potato by relieving
shipments of less than 200
hundredweight of the burden of
inspection and assessment. In spite of
this advantage, the production of yellow
fleshed Finnish-type potatoes declined
over time and is currently nonexistent.
The Committee noted, however, that the
production of other colorful varieties
(some with yellow flesh but not
Finnish-type) has increased and that the
exception, if retained, may cause
confusion to industry participants.
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
29566
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
Since the niche market for which the
exception was intended no longer
exists, and there remains the potential
for misunderstanding within the
industry, the Committee believes that
the exception should be removed from
the handling regulations.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) has considered the economic
impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 48 handlers
of Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes who
are subject to regulation under the order
and about 1,000 potato producers in the
regulated area. Small agricultural
service firms, which include potato
handlers, are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA)(13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $6,500,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $750,000.
Based on a three-year average fresh
potato production of 33,623,000
hundredweight as calculated from
Committee records, a three-year average
of producer prices of $4.64 per
hundredweight reported by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, and
1,000 Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato
producers, the average annual producer
revenue is approximately $156,000. It
can be concluded, therefore, that a
majority of these producers would be
classified as small entities.
In addition, based on Committee
records and 2004–05 f.o.b. shipping
point prices ranging from about $4.00 to
$28.00 per hundredweight reported by
USDA’s Market News Service, most of
the Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato
handlers do not ship over $6,500,000
worth of potatoes. In view of the
foregoing, it can be concluded that a
majority of the handlers would be
classified as small entities as defined by
the SBA.
This final rule removes the exception
for yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes
from the minimum quantity exemption
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:30 May 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
in the order. The exception was added
to the regulation in 1987 to allow less
restrictive requirements for yellow
fleshed Finnish-type potatoes. The
intent was to facilitate the production
and marketing of this new experimental
type potato. In the years that have
followed, though, the production and
marketing of this type potato has shifted
to other potato producing regions.
Consequently, yellow fleshed Finnishtype potatoes currently are not
produced within the production area
covered by the order and the exception
to the minimum quantity exemption in
handling regulations is no longer
warranted. Authority for the
establishment and modification of
minimum quantity exemptions is
provided in § 945.54 of the order.
At the November 2, 2005, meeting, the
Committee discussed the impact of this
change on producers and handlers.
Since there currently is not any
production of the type of potato covered
by the exception, producers and
handlers should not be adversely
impacted. In addition, there should be
no increased costs associated with this
modification of the handling
regulations.
As an alternative to the proposal, the
Committee discussed leaving the
handling regulation as it was issued.
The Committee rejected this idea
because it would have left outdated
language in the rules and regulations.
They also felt that the exception, if
unchanged, could be misinterpreted by
the industry and applied to other
colored flesh type potatoes that are not
yellow fleshed Finnish-type. No other
alternatives were discussed.
This final rule does not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
potato handlers or importers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sectors. The USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the potato
industry, and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Committee deliberations.
Like all Committee meetings, the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
November 2, 2005, meeting was a public
meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express their views
on this issue. Finally, interested persons
were invited to submit information on
the regulatory and informational
impacts of this action on small
businesses.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on February 22, 2006 (71 FR
9002). Copies of the rule were mailed or
sent via facsimile to all Committee
members and potato handlers. Finally,
the rule was made available through the
Internet by the Office of the Federal
Register. A 60-day comment period
ending April 24, 2006, was provided to
allow interested persons to respond to
the proposal. No comments were
received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at the following Web site:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at
the previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because this rule removes
provisions that are no longer necessary.
Further, handlers are shipping potatoes
from the 2005–2006 crop. Moreover,
handlers are aware of this rule, which
was recommended at a public meeting.
Also, a 60-day comment period was
provided in the proposed rule and no
comments were received.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 945
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR
part 945 is amended as follows:
I
PART 945—IRISH POTATOES GROWN
IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES
IN IDAHO, AND MALHEUR COUNTY,
OREGON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 945 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
2. In § 945.341, paragraph (g) is
revised to read as follows:
I
§ 945.341
Handling regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Minimum quantity exemption.
Each handler may ship up to, but not to
exceed, five hundredweight of potatoes
any day without regard to the inspection
and assessment requirements of this
part, but this exception shall not apply
to any shipment that exceeds five
hundredweight of potatoes.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–4748 Filed 5–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Docket No. FV06–989–2 IFR]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown
in California; Final Free and Reserve
Percentages for 2005–06 Crop Natural
(Sun-Dried) Seedless Raisins
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule establishes final
volume regulation percentages for 2005–
06 crop Natural (sun-dried) Seedless
(NS) raisins covered under the Federal
marketing order for California raisins
(order). The order regulates the handling
of raisins produced from grapes grown
in California and is locally administered
by the Raisin Administrative Committee
(Committee). The volume regulation
percentages are 82.50 percent free and
17.50 percent reserve. The percentages
are intended to help stabilize raisin
supplies and prices, and strengthen
market conditions.
DATES: Effective August 1, 2005, through
July 31, 2006. The volume regulation
percentages apply to acquisitions of NS
raisins from the 2005–06 crop until the
reserve raisins from that crop are
disposed of under the marketing order.
Comments received by July 24, 2006,
will be considered prior to issuance of
a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:30 May 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt
Kimmel, Officer-in-Charge, or Rose M.
Aguayo, Marketing Specialist, California
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901; Fax: (559)
487–5906.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 989 (7 CFR part 989),
both as amended, regulating the
handling of raisins produced from
grapes grown in California, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the order provisions now
in effect, final free and reserve
percentages may be established for
raisins acquired by handlers during the
crop year. This rule establishes final free
and reserve percentages for NS raisins
for the 2005–06 crop year, which began
August 1, 2005, and ends July 31, 2006.
This rule will not preempt any State or
local laws, regulations, or policies,
unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29567
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule establishes final volume
regulation percentages for 2005–06 crop
NS raisins covered under the order. The
volume regulation percentages are 82.50
percent free and 17.50 percent reserve.
Free tonnage raisins may be sold by
handlers to any market. Reserve raisins
must be held in a pool for the account
of the Committee and are disposed of
through various programs authorized
under the order. For example, reserve
raisins may be sold by the Committee to
handlers for free use or to replace part
of the free tonnage raisins they
exported; used in diversion programs;
carried over as a hedge against a short
crop; or disposed of in other outlets not
competitive with those for free tonnage
raisins, such as government purchase,
distilleries, or animal feed.
The volume regulation percentages
are intended to help stabilize raisin
supplies and prices, and strengthen
market conditions. The Committee
unanimously recommended final
percentages on January 26, 2006, and
further justified their recommendation
on March 16, 2006.
Computation of Trade Demands
Section 989.54 of the order prescribes
procedures and time frames to be
followed in establishing volume
regulation. This includes methodology
used to calculate percentages. Pursuant
to § 989.54(a) of the order, the
Committee met on August 15, 2005, to
review shipment and inventory data,
and other matters relating to the
supplies of raisins of all varietal types.
The Committee computed a trade
demand for each varietal type for which
a free tonnage percentage might be
recommended. Trade demand is
computed using a formula specified in
the order and, for each varietal type, is
equal to 90 percent of the prior year’s
shipments of free tonnage and reserve
tonnage raisins sold for free use into all
market outlets, adjusted by subtracting
the carryin on August 1 of the current
crop year, and adding the desirable
carryout at the end of that crop year. As
specified in § 989.154(a), the desirable
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 23, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29565-29567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4748]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 23, 2006 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 29565]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 945
[Docket No. FV06-945-1 FR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Certain Designated Counties in Idaho, and
Malheur County, Oregon; Modification of Handling Regulation
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule removes the minimum quantity exemption for yellow
fleshed Finnish-type potatoes from the handling regulations issued
under the Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato marketing order. The marketing
order regulates the handling of Irish potatoes grown in certain
designated counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon, and is
administered locally by the Idaho-Eastern Oregon Potato Committee
(Committee). A minimum quantity shipment exemption of up to 200
hundredweight per day is provided for yellow fleshed Finnish-type
potatoes. Because yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes are no longer
produced in the production area covered under the marketing order, the
exemption from handling and assessment regulations is no longer
necessary.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule becomes effective May 24, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Broadbent, Marketing Specialist,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW., Third
Avenue, Suite 385, Portland, OR 97204; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax:
(503) 326-7440.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 98 and Marketing Order No. 945, both as amended (7 CFR
part 945), regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in certain
designated counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule removes the exception for yellow fleshed Finnish-
type potatoes from the minimum quantity exemption paragraph of the
handling regulations issued under the order. The minimum quantity
exemption in the regulation allows handlers to ship up to five
hundredweight of potatoes without regard to the inspection and
assessment requirements of the order. An exception for yellow fleshed
Finnish-type potatoes is included in the exemption which allows up to
200 hundredweight per day to be shipped without regard to inspection or
assessment requirements. The Committee unanimously recommended the
removal of the exception at its meeting on November 2, 2005.
Section 945.42 of the order provides authority to assess first
handlers of potatoes to provide funds to cover the expenses of the
Committee. Sections 945.51 and 945.52 provide authority for the
establishment and modification of regulations applicable to the
handling of potatoes, including required inspections. Section 945.54
provides authority to establish exemptions from the regulations based
on shipment size.
Section 945.341 establishes minimum quality, maturity, pack, and
inspection requirements for potatoes handled subject to the order.
Paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) of Sec. 945.341 delineate the
circumstances in which the shipment of potatoes subject to the order
may be granted an exemption from regulation. Paragraph (g) of that
section specifies the five hundredweight or less per day shipment
exemption, and the exception of up to 200 hundredweight per day for
yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes.
At its meeting on November 2, 2005, the Committee unanimously
recommended the removal of the special exception for yellow fleshed
Finnish-type from the handling regulations. In its deliberations, the
Committee commented that yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes are no
longer produced within the production area and that the exception is no
longer needed.
The exception to the minimum quantity exemption for yellow fleshed
Finnish-type potatoes was added to the regulation in 1987, specifically
to promote the production and marketing of this new type potato by
relieving shipments of less than 200 hundredweight of the burden of
inspection and assessment. In spite of this advantage, the production
of yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes declined over time and is
currently nonexistent. The Committee noted, however, that the
production of other colorful varieties (some with yellow flesh but not
Finnish-type) has increased and that the exception, if retained, may
cause confusion to industry participants.
[[Page 29566]]
Since the niche market for which the exception was intended no longer
exists, and there remains the potential for misunderstanding within the
industry, the Committee believes that the exception should be removed
from the handling regulations.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 48 handlers of Idaho-Eastern Oregon
potatoes who are subject to regulation under the order and about 1,000
potato producers in the regulated area. Small agricultural service
firms, which include potato handlers, are defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA)(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of
less than $6,500,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $750,000.
Based on a three-year average fresh potato production of 33,623,000
hundredweight as calculated from Committee records, a three-year
average of producer prices of $4.64 per hundredweight reported by the
National Agricultural Statistics Service, and 1,000 Idaho-Eastern
Oregon potato producers, the average annual producer revenue is
approximately $156,000. It can be concluded, therefore, that a majority
of these producers would be classified as small entities.
In addition, based on Committee records and 2004-05 f.o.b. shipping
point prices ranging from about $4.00 to $28.00 per hundredweight
reported by USDA's Market News Service, most of the Idaho-Eastern
Oregon potato handlers do not ship over $6,500,000 worth of potatoes.
In view of the foregoing, it can be concluded that a majority of the
handlers would be classified as small entities as defined by the SBA.
This final rule removes the exception for yellow fleshed Finnish-
type potatoes from the minimum quantity exemption in the order. The
exception was added to the regulation in 1987 to allow less restrictive
requirements for yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes. The intent was
to facilitate the production and marketing of this new experimental
type potato. In the years that have followed, though, the production
and marketing of this type potato has shifted to other potato producing
regions. Consequently, yellow fleshed Finnish-type potatoes currently
are not produced within the production area covered by the order and
the exception to the minimum quantity exemption in handling regulations
is no longer warranted. Authority for the establishment and
modification of minimum quantity exemptions is provided in Sec. 945.54
of the order.
At the November 2, 2005, meeting, the Committee discussed the
impact of this change on producers and handlers. Since there currently
is not any production of the type of potato covered by the exception,
producers and handlers should not be adversely impacted. In addition,
there should be no increased costs associated with this modification of
the handling regulations.
As an alternative to the proposal, the Committee discussed leaving
the handling regulation as it was issued. The Committee rejected this
idea because it would have left outdated language in the rules and
regulations. They also felt that the exception, if unchanged, could be
misinterpreted by the industry and applied to other colored flesh type
potatoes that are not yellow fleshed Finnish-type. No other
alternatives were discussed.
This final rule does not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large potato handlers or
importers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sectors. The USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this final rule.
AMS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires Government agencies in general
to provide the public the option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the potato industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend
the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the November 2, 2005, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their
views on this issue. Finally, interested persons were invited to submit
information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on February 22, 2006 (71 FR 9002). Copies of the rule were
mailed or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and potato
handlers. Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by
the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period ending
April 24, 2006, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to
the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at the
following Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because this rule removes provisions
that are no longer necessary. Further, handlers are shipping potatoes
from the 2005-2006 crop. Moreover, handlers are aware of this rule,
which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 60-day comment
period was provided in the proposed rule and no comments were received.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 945
Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR part 945 is amended as follows:
PART 945--IRISH POTATOES GROWN IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
IDAHO, AND MALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 945 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
[[Page 29567]]
0
2. In Sec. 945.341, paragraph (g) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 945.341 Handling regulation.
* * * * *
(g) Minimum quantity exemption. Each handler may ship up to, but
not to exceed, five hundredweight of potatoes any day without regard to
the inspection and assessment requirements of this part, but this
exception shall not apply to any shipment that exceeds five
hundredweight of potatoes.
* * * * *
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-4748 Filed 5-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P