Establishment of Advisory Committee and Clarification of Deemed Export-Related Regulatory Requirements, 29301-29303 [E6-7778]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices
its implementing regulations at 5 CFR
part 1320 do not apply.
Dated: April 10, 2006.
Dale N. Bosworth,
Chief, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. E6–7753 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Risk Management Agency
Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To
Conduct an Information Collection
AGENCY:
Risk Management Agency,
USDA.
Notice and request for
comments.
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the intention of the
Risk Management Agency to request
approval for the collection of
information in support of the agency’s
mission under section 522(d) of the
Federal Crop Insurance Act to develop
and implement risk management tools
for producers of agricultural
commodities through partnership
agreements.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
will be accepted until close of business
July 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments to
Virginia Guzman, United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Research and Evaluation Division,
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation,
Risk Management Agency, 6501 Beacon
Drive, Mail Stop 813, Kansas City, MO
64133. Written comments may also be
submitted electronically to:
RMARED.PRA@rma.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Virginia Guzman or David Fulk, at the
Kansas City, MO address listed above,
telephone (816) 926–6343.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Agricultural Risk Management,
Research and Evaluation, Organic
Transition Simulation Model and
Online Training Course Project.
OMB Number: 0563–NEW.
Type of Request: New Information
Collection.
Abstract: The Risk Management
Agency intends to collect information
for purposes of product development
and program evaluation. The product
development data collection is
necessary to obtain feedback from
experts and potential users of a Webbased simulation model designed to
assist farmers and agricultural extension
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:16 May 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
specialists in understanding the
economic and environmental
consequences in making a transition
from traditional to organic production
techniques. Results of this collection
will be used to revise and improve the
simulation model. The program
evaluation component of the data
collection is required to assess the
effectiveness of the fully developed
simulation model and the
accompanying training course. All data
collections will be conducted online
using an automated web-survey system.
We are asking the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) to approve this
information collection activity for 3
years.
The purpose of this notice is to solicit
comments from the public concerning
the information collection activities.
These comments will help us:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection information;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, through use, as
appropriate, of automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other collection
technologies, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Estimate of Burden: The public
reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 3 to
10 minutes per response, depending on
the survey.
Respondents/Affected Entities:
Farmers who are growing organic crops
or are considering the production of
organic crops and Cooperative
Extension specialists who advise
farmers and educators on the basics of
organic production and marketing.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 1,660.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 8,120.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 1,111 hours.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29301
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 16,
2006.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E6–7752 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 060505121–6121–01]
Establishment of Advisory Committee
and Clarification of Deemed ExportRelated Regulatory Requirements
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) is announcing the
creation of a Federal Advisory
Committee that will review and provide
recommendations to the Department of
Commerce on deemed export policy.
The Deemed Export Advisory
Committee (DEAC) will help ensure that
the deemed export licensing policy most
effectively protects national security
while ensuring the U.S. continues to be
at the leading edge of technological
innovation. This notice also provides an
overview of steps that BIS has taken to
improve understanding of deemed
export policy within academia and
industry, including outreach activities
conducted by BIS.
ADDRESSES: Although there is no official
comment period for this notice, you
may submit comments, identified by
Docket No. 060505121–6121–01, by any
of the following methods:
E-mail: publiccomments@bis.doc.gov.
Include ‘‘060505121–6121–01’’ in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 482–3355.
Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Regulatory Policy
Division, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC
20230, ATTN: Docket No. 060505121–
6121–01.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marcus Cohen, Regulatory Policy
Division, Office of Exporter Services,
Bureau of Industry and Security,
telephone: (202) 482–2440 or e-mail:
mcohen@bis.doc.gov. Copies of the
referenced Department of Commerce
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Report
are available at: https://www.oig.doc.gov/
oig/reports/2004/BIS-IPE-1676-032004.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
29302
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices
Public comments received by BIS in
response to the ANPR are available at:
https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/.
Background
BIS is proposing the establishment of
a ‘‘Deemed Export Advisory
Committee’’ (DEAC) under the terms of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) (Pub. L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C., App.
2). The DEAC will serve as forum to
address complex questions related to an
evolving deemed export control policy.
Specifically, the DEAC will be charged
with reviewing the current deemed
export policy and determining whether
to recommend any changes to that
policy. A separate notice will
specifically address the comments
received in response to the ‘‘Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking:
Revision and Clarification of Deemed
Export Related Regulatory
Requirements’’ (ANPR) published in the
Federal Register on March 28, 2005.
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
A. Deemed Export Advisory Committee
(DEAC); Notice of Recruitment of
Private-Sector Members
The nature of research and
technological development is constantly
changing and there is evidence of
growing participation of foreign
nationals in U.S.-based research as well
as their employment in U.S.-based hightechnology industries. There is also an
increasing interdependence between
commercial and academic research.
Over the course of the past decade,
these changes have inevitably led to the
increased transfer of controlled
information to foreign nationals in the
course of research and commercial
technology development.
To ensure that the deemed export
policy best protects U.S. national
security, while striving not to impede
the ability of U.S. industry and
academic research to continue at the
leading edge of technological
innovation, BIS is establishing a
‘‘Deemed Export Advisory Committee’’
(DEAC) under the terms of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub.
L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C., App. 2). The DEAC
will undertake a comprehensive review
of the national security, technology, and
competitiveness dimensions of the
deemed export issue and provide
recommendations for potential changes
to the current deemed export policy.
The DEAC’s review will include, but not
be limited to, the recommendations
made in the Department of Commerce
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Report
entitled ‘‘Deemed Export Controls May
Not Stop the Transfer of Sensitive
Technology to Foreign Nationals in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:16 May 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
U.S.’’ (Final Inspection Report No. IPE–
16176–March 2004).
The DEAC, which will not exceed 12
members, will be structured to ensure a
balanced membership that will offer a
comprehensive point of view on the
complex technical and policy questions
at issue. The advisory committee will
consist of representatives from industry,
academia, and other experts in the field
to ensure a full discussion of all aspects
of deemed exports and knowledge
transfer from the corporate, academic,
and national security perspectives.
Members will be called upon to advise
BIS on highly technical issues
surrounding technology transfer and to
help ensure that BIS effectively carries
out its critical national security
function. To that end, the DEAC shall
have a diverse membership with
expertise in national security affairs,
scientific research and development
(R&D) policy, and the various forms of
technology subject to the EAR, such as
nuclear, chemical, missile, electronics,
computer, telecommunications, and
avionic technology. For a full list of
technology and software subject to the
EAR, see 15 CFR part 774, Supp. 1.
DEAC members will be appointed by
the Secretary of Commerce and serve a
term of not more than one year. DEAC
members must obtain a secret security
clearance prior to appointment. These
clearances are necessary so that
members may be permitted access to the
classified information needed to
formulate recommendations to the
Department of Commerce. The DEAC
will convene as appropriate, but in no
case less than quarterly. To respond to
this recruitment notice, please send a
copy of your resume to Ms. Yvette
Springer at Yspringer@bis.doc.gov. This
Notice of Recruitment will be open until
July 21, 2006.
B. Current Deemed Export Policy
Given the extended public discussion
of the OIG recommendations and the
coming review of the deemed export
policy by the DEAC, a reiteration of the
current BIS deemed export policy
regarding country of birth, the existing
definition of ‘‘use’’ in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR), and
the relationship of fundamental research
to deemed exports is warranted. BIS has
decided not to make any changes at this
time to current regulations and policy
on these three issues.
C. BIS Activities Related to Deemed
Exports
In the past year, BIS has undertaken
an enhanced and targeted deemed
export outreach program. Since the
issuance of the report by the OIG, BIS
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
has significantly increased its outreach
to the academic and research
communities. This outreach has focused
on the concerns identified by the OIG
report to raise the level of awareness
and to improve the understanding of the
deemed exports regulatory
requirements. In fiscal year 2004 and
fiscal year 2005, over 120 outreach
events were conducted annually, almost
tripling that conducted in previous
years. A third of these events—which
range in content from presentations to
large audiences, seminars, one-on-one
consultations, and site visits—have been
with the university and government
research organizations and laboratories.
These organizations were identified by
the OIG report as needing additional
knowledge of the EAR’s deemed export
requirements. BIS is on track to conduct
over 100 deemed export outreach events
in the current fiscal year. BIS has
already seen the benefit of increased
outreach to, and communication with,
the regulated community and believes
that the DEAC will provide a
particularly advantageous forum for
further in-depth technical information
exchange between and among BIS and
the academic, corporate, and other
interested sectors.
In addition to onsite visits, seminars,
and the information provided in
Supplement No.1 to Part 734 of the
EAR, BIS has also provided deemed
export related guidance on its Web site.
(See Deemed Export FAQ’s at https://
www.bis.doc.gov/
policiesandregulations/index.htm) In
particular, this guidance has addressed
issues related to a foreign national’s
country of origin—an issue highlighted
by the OIG report. This particular
guidance explains that if the status of a
foreign national is uncertain, it is
important to consult with BIS to
determine where the stronger ties lie,
based on the facts of the specific case.
BIS is committed to providing
continued deemed export guidance and
assistance to the regulated community
on this important issue.
BIS has also participated in several
Task Forces to address the deemed
export issue, including an American
Association of Universities/Council on
Government Relations Task Force, the
National Academies’ GovernmentUniversity-Industry-Research
Roundtable, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation’s National Security Higher
Education Advisory Board, and a White
House, Office of Science and
Technology Policy Interagency Working
Group comprised of agency
representatives with research
laboratories (e.g., Department of Energy,
Department of Defense, Department of
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices
Health and Human Services,
Department of Agriculture, National
Institutes of Health, Food and Drug
Administration, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, etc.). The
goal of each of these groups is to assess
the impact of the OIG’s
recommendations and to address
concerns raised by the regulated
communities.
BIS has also increased its enforcement
focus on deemed exports. A number of
cases involving violations of deemed
export requirements have been
concluded with criminal and civil
penalties and BIS will continue to
pursue violations of the EAR’s deemed
export requirements to ensure U.S.
national security is not compromised by
unauthorized technology transfers to
foreign nationals. In addition, BIS is
collaborating with the Federal Bureau of
Investigation on related enforcement
issues through the National Security
Higher Education Advisory Board.
Finally, BIS received funding in the
FY2006 budget to implement an
Enhanced Deemed Export Control
Initiative. This initiative has two
components—licensing and
enforcement. The initiative will enable
BIS to: (1) Process an increased volume
of license applications in a timely
manner, in order to ensure that U.S.
entities are able to gain access to the
expertise of foreign nationals who do
not pose security concerns; and (2)
ensure that U.S. entities are aware of
and comply with U.S. deemed export
license requirements through expanded
outreach and enforcement activities.
Both aspects are necessary to enhance
U.S. national and economic security.
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Matthew Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–7778 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
[A–570–900]
Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Final Partial
Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 22, 2006.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:16 May 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
SUMMARY: On December 29, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published its preliminary
determination of sales at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’) and preliminary
determination of partial affirmative
critical circumstances in the
antidumping investigation of certain
diamond sawblades and parts thereof
(‘‘diamond sawblades’’) from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).
The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’) is
October 1, 2004, through March 31,
2005. The investigation covers four
manufacturers/exporters which are
mandatory respondents and twenty–one
separate rate applicants. We invited
interested parties to comment on our
preliminary determination of sales at
LTFV and partial affirmative critical
circumstances. Based on our analysis of
the comments we received, we have
made changes to our calculations for
certain of the mandatory respondents
and the weight–averaged margins for the
separate rate applicants.1 We have also
granted a separate rate to four additional
applicants. The final dumping margins
for this investigation are listed in the
‘‘Final Determination Margins’’ section
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anya Naschak or Carrie Blozy, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–6375 or 482–5403,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Final Determination
We determine that diamond
sawblades from the PRC are being, or
are likely to be, sold in the United States
at LTFV as provided in section 735 of
1 Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.,
Danyang Youhe Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Fujian
Quanzhou Wanlong Stone Co. Ltd., Guilin Tebon
Superhard Material Co. Ltd., Huzhou Gu Import &
Export Co., Ltd, Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tools
Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Jiangyin LIKN Industry Co.
Ltd., Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd.,
Rizhao Hein Saw Co. Ltd., Shanghai Deda Industry
& Trading Co. Ltd., Sichuan Huili Tools Co., Weihai
Xiangguang Mechanical Industrail Co., Ltd., Wuhan
Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Company, Ltd.,
Xiamen ZL Diamond Tools Co. Ltd., Zhejiang Tea
Import & Export Co. Ltd., Zhejiang Wanli Tools
Group Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wanli’’), Zhenjiang Inter-China
Import & Export Co., Ltd., (collectively,
‘‘preliminary separate rate applicants’’), as well as
four additional separate rate companies, Qingdao
Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. (‘‘Qingdao
Shinhan’’), Shijiazhuang Global New Century Tools
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Global’’), Shanghai Robtol Tool
Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (‘‘Robtol’’), and Huachang
Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Huachang’’) (collectively with preliminary
separate rate applicants, ‘‘final separate rate
companies’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29303
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’). The estimated margins of sales at
LTFV are shown in the ‘‘Final
Determination Margins’’ section of this
notice.
Case History
The Department published its
preliminary determination of sales at
LTFV on December 29, 2005. See
Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of
Final Determination, and Preliminary
Partial Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China, 70 FR 77121
(December 29, 2005) (‘‘Preliminary
Determination’’). The Department
conducted verification of Bosun Tools
Group Co., Ltd. (‘‘Bosun’’), Beijing Gang
Yan Diamond Product Company
(‘‘BGY’’), and Hebei Jikai Industrial
Group Co. Ltd. (‘‘Hebei Jikai’’)
(collectively, ‘‘respondents’’), the three
mandatory respondents participating in
this investigation2 in both the PRC and
the United States (where applicable),
and Shanghai Deda Industry & Trading
Co. Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Deda’’), one of the
separate rate applicants. See the
‘‘Verification’’ section below for
additional information.
On February 6, 2006, the Department
solicited comments from all interested
parties regarding changes to its
calculation of financial ratios. On
February 7, 2006, Bosun and Petitioner
submitted additional comments on the
valuation of factors of production
(‘‘FOPs’’) for the final determination. On
February 13, 2006, BGY also submitted
additional comments on the valuation of
FOPs for the final determination. On
February 21, 2006, Bosun submitted a
rebuttal to Petitioner’s February 7, 2006,
comments.
On February 1, 2006, the Department
received a separate rate application from
Qingdao Shinhan. The Department
determined on February 24, 2006, that
Qingdao Shinhan’s separate rate
application was timely filed. See
Memorandum to the File from Catherine
Bertrand dated February 24, 2006. On
March 22, 2006, the Department
preliminarily determined that the
information contained in Qingdao
Shinhan’s separate rate application
demonstrated that it qualified for a
separate rate in this investigation.
We invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Determination. We received
comments from the Diamond Sawblade
Manufacturers’ Coalition (‘‘Petitioner’’),
2 One mandatory respondent, Saint-Gobain
Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘Saint Gobain’’) did
not participate in this investigation.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29301-29303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7778]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 060505121-6121-01]
Establishment of Advisory Committee and Clarification of Deemed
Export-Related Regulatory Requirements
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is announcing the
creation of a Federal Advisory Committee that will review and provide
recommendations to the Department of Commerce on deemed export policy.
The Deemed Export Advisory Committee (DEAC) will help ensure that the
deemed export licensing policy most effectively protects national
security while ensuring the U.S. continues to be at the leading edge of
technological innovation. This notice also provides an overview of
steps that BIS has taken to improve understanding of deemed export
policy within academia and industry, including outreach activities
conducted by BIS.
ADDRESSES: Although there is no official comment period for this
notice, you may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 060505121-
6121-01, by any of the following methods:
E-mail: publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include ``060505121-6121-01''
in the subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 482-3355.
Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau
of Industry and Security, Regulatory Policy Division, 14th &
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230, ATTN: Docket
No. 060505121-6121-01.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcus Cohen, Regulatory Policy
Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security,
telephone: (202) 482-2440 or e-mail: mcohen@bis.doc.gov. Copies of the
referenced Department of Commerce Office of Inspector General (OIG)
Report are available at: https://www.oig.doc.gov/oig/reports/2004/BIS-
IPE-1676-03-2004.pdf.
[[Page 29302]]
Public comments received by BIS in response to the ANPR are
available at: https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/.
Background
BIS is proposing the establishment of a ``Deemed Export Advisory
Committee'' (DEAC) under the terms of the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App. 2). The DEAC will serve as
forum to address complex questions related to an evolving deemed export
control policy. Specifically, the DEAC will be charged with reviewing
the current deemed export policy and determining whether to recommend
any changes to that policy. A separate notice will specifically address
the comments received in response to the ``Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking: Revision and Clarification of Deemed Export Related
Regulatory Requirements'' (ANPR) published in the Federal Register on
March 28, 2005.
A. Deemed Export Advisory Committee (DEAC); Notice of Recruitment of
Private-Sector Members
The nature of research and technological development is constantly
changing and there is evidence of growing participation of foreign
nationals in U.S.-based research as well as their employment in U.S.-
based high-technology industries. There is also an increasing
interdependence between commercial and academic research. Over the
course of the past decade, these changes have inevitably led to the
increased transfer of controlled information to foreign nationals in
the course of research and commercial technology development.
To ensure that the deemed export policy best protects U.S. national
security, while striving not to impede the ability of U.S. industry and
academic research to continue at the leading edge of technological
innovation, BIS is establishing a ``Deemed Export Advisory Committee''
(DEAC) under the terms of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App. 2). The DEAC will undertake a
comprehensive review of the national security, technology, and
competitiveness dimensions of the deemed export issue and provide
recommendations for potential changes to the current deemed export
policy. The DEAC's review will include, but not be limited to, the
recommendations made in the Department of Commerce Office of Inspector
General (OIG) Report entitled ``Deemed Export Controls May Not Stop the
Transfer of Sensitive Technology to Foreign Nationals in the U.S.''
(Final Inspection Report No. IPE-16176-March 2004).
The DEAC, which will not exceed 12 members, will be structured to
ensure a balanced membership that will offer a comprehensive point of
view on the complex technical and policy questions at issue. The
advisory committee will consist of representatives from industry,
academia, and other experts in the field to ensure a full discussion of
all aspects of deemed exports and knowledge transfer from the
corporate, academic, and national security perspectives. Members will
be called upon to advise BIS on highly technical issues surrounding
technology transfer and to help ensure that BIS effectively carries out
its critical national security function. To that end, the DEAC shall
have a diverse membership with expertise in national security affairs,
scientific research and development (R&D) policy, and the various forms
of technology subject to the EAR, such as nuclear, chemical, missile,
electronics, computer, telecommunications, and avionic technology. For
a full list of technology and software subject to the EAR, see 15 CFR
part 774, Supp. 1.
DEAC members will be appointed by the Secretary of Commerce and
serve a term of not more than one year. DEAC members must obtain a
secret security clearance prior to appointment. These clearances are
necessary so that members may be permitted access to the classified
information needed to formulate recommendations to the Department of
Commerce. The DEAC will convene as appropriate, but in no case less
than quarterly. To respond to this recruitment notice, please send a
copy of your resume to Ms. Yvette Springer at Yspringer@bis.doc.gov.
This Notice of Recruitment will be open until July 21, 2006.
B. Current Deemed Export Policy
Given the extended public discussion of the OIG recommendations and
the coming review of the deemed export policy by the DEAC, a
reiteration of the current BIS deemed export policy regarding country
of birth, the existing definition of ``use'' in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR), and the relationship of fundamental
research to deemed exports is warranted. BIS has decided not to make
any changes at this time to current regulations and policy on these
three issues.
C. BIS Activities Related to Deemed Exports
In the past year, BIS has undertaken an enhanced and targeted
deemed export outreach program. Since the issuance of the report by the
OIG, BIS has significantly increased its outreach to the academic and
research communities. This outreach has focused on the concerns
identified by the OIG report to raise the level of awareness and to
improve the understanding of the deemed exports regulatory
requirements. In fiscal year 2004 and fiscal year 2005, over 120
outreach events were conducted annually, almost tripling that conducted
in previous years. A third of these events--which range in content from
presentations to large audiences, seminars, one-on-one consultations,
and site visits--have been with the university and government research
organizations and laboratories. These organizations were identified by
the OIG report as needing additional knowledge of the EAR's deemed
export requirements. BIS is on track to conduct over 100 deemed export
outreach events in the current fiscal year. BIS has already seen the
benefit of increased outreach to, and communication with, the regulated
community and believes that the DEAC will provide a particularly
advantageous forum for further in-depth technical information exchange
between and among BIS and the academic, corporate, and other interested
sectors.
In addition to onsite visits, seminars, and the information
provided in Supplement No.1 to Part 734 of the EAR, BIS has also
provided deemed export related guidance on its Web site. (See Deemed
Export FAQ's at https://www.bis.doc.gov/policiesandregulations/
index.htm) In particular, this guidance has addressed issues related to
a foreign national's country of origin--an issue highlighted by the OIG
report. This particular guidance explains that if the status of a
foreign national is uncertain, it is important to consult with BIS to
determine where the stronger ties lie, based on the facts of the
specific case. BIS is committed to providing continued deemed export
guidance and assistance to the regulated community on this important
issue.
BIS has also participated in several Task Forces to address the
deemed export issue, including an American Association of Universities/
Council on Government Relations Task Force, the National Academies'
Government-University-Industry-Research Roundtable, the Federal Bureau
of Investigation's National Security Higher Education Advisory Board,
and a White House, Office of Science and Technology Policy Interagency
Working Group comprised of agency representatives with research
laboratories (e.g., Department of Energy, Department of Defense,
Department of
[[Page 29303]]
Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture, National
Institutes of Health, Food and Drug Administration, National Institute
of Standards and Technology, etc.). The goal of each of these groups is
to assess the impact of the OIG's recommendations and to address
concerns raised by the regulated communities.
BIS has also increased its enforcement focus on deemed exports. A
number of cases involving violations of deemed export requirements have
been concluded with criminal and civil penalties and BIS will continue
to pursue violations of the EAR's deemed export requirements to ensure
U.S. national security is not compromised by unauthorized technology
transfers to foreign nationals. In addition, BIS is collaborating with
the Federal Bureau of Investigation on related enforcement issues
through the National Security Higher Education Advisory Board.
Finally, BIS received funding in the FY2006 budget to implement an
Enhanced Deemed Export Control Initiative. This initiative has two
components--licensing and enforcement. The initiative will enable BIS
to: (1) Process an increased volume of license applications in a timely
manner, in order to ensure that U.S. entities are able to gain access
to the expertise of foreign nationals who do not pose security
concerns; and (2) ensure that U.S. entities are aware of and comply
with U.S. deemed export license requirements through expanded outreach
and enforcement activities. Both aspects are necessary to enhance U.S.
national and economic security.
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Matthew Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-7778 Filed 5-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P