Establishment of Advisory Committee and Clarification of Deemed Export-Related Regulatory Requirements, 29301-29303 [E6-7778]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices its implementing regulations at 5 CFR part 1320 do not apply. Dated: April 10, 2006. Dale N. Bosworth, Chief, Forest Service. [FR Doc. E6–7753 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Risk Management Agency Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To Conduct an Information Collection AGENCY: Risk Management Agency, USDA. Notice and request for comments. cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES ACTION: SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the intention of the Risk Management Agency to request approval for the collection of information in support of the agency’s mission under section 522(d) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act to develop and implement risk management tools for producers of agricultural commodities through partnership agreements. DATES: Written comments on this notice will be accepted until close of business July 21, 2006. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to Virginia Guzman, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Research and Evaluation Division, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, Risk Management Agency, 6501 Beacon Drive, Mail Stop 813, Kansas City, MO 64133. Written comments may also be submitted electronically to: RMARED.PRA@rma.usda.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Virginia Guzman or David Fulk, at the Kansas City, MO address listed above, telephone (816) 926–6343. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Agricultural Risk Management, Research and Evaluation, Organic Transition Simulation Model and Online Training Course Project. OMB Number: 0563–NEW. Type of Request: New Information Collection. Abstract: The Risk Management Agency intends to collect information for purposes of product development and program evaluation. The product development data collection is necessary to obtain feedback from experts and potential users of a Webbased simulation model designed to assist farmers and agricultural extension VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:16 May 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 specialists in understanding the economic and environmental consequences in making a transition from traditional to organic production techniques. Results of this collection will be used to revise and improve the simulation model. The program evaluation component of the data collection is required to assess the effectiveness of the fully developed simulation model and the accompanying training course. All data collections will be conducted online using an automated web-survey system. We are asking the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve this information collection activity for 3 years. The purpose of this notice is to solicit comments from the public concerning the information collection activities. These comments will help us: 1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; 2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection information; 3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and 4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through use, as appropriate, of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other collection technologies, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses. Estimate of Burden: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 to 10 minutes per response, depending on the survey. Respondents/Affected Entities: Farmers who are growing organic crops or are considering the production of organic crops and Cooperative Extension specialists who advise farmers and educators on the basics of organic production and marketing. Estimated annual number of respondents: 1,660. Estimated annual number of responses: 8,120. Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 1,111 hours. All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also become a matter of public record. PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 29301 Signed in Washington, DC, on May 16, 2006. Eldon Gould, Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. [FR Doc. E6–7752 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–08–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security [Docket No. 060505121–6121–01] Establishment of Advisory Committee and Clarification of Deemed ExportRelated Regulatory Requirements Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is announcing the creation of a Federal Advisory Committee that will review and provide recommendations to the Department of Commerce on deemed export policy. The Deemed Export Advisory Committee (DEAC) will help ensure that the deemed export licensing policy most effectively protects national security while ensuring the U.S. continues to be at the leading edge of technological innovation. This notice also provides an overview of steps that BIS has taken to improve understanding of deemed export policy within academia and industry, including outreach activities conducted by BIS. ADDRESSES: Although there is no official comment period for this notice, you may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 060505121–6121–01, by any of the following methods: E-mail: publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include ‘‘060505121–6121–01’’ in the subject line of the message. Fax: (202) 482–3355. Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, Regulatory Policy Division, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230, ATTN: Docket No. 060505121– 6121–01. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcus Cohen, Regulatory Policy Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security, telephone: (202) 482–2440 or e-mail: mcohen@bis.doc.gov. Copies of the referenced Department of Commerce Office of Inspector General (OIG) Report are available at: https://www.oig.doc.gov/ oig/reports/2004/BIS-IPE-1676-032004.pdf. E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1 29302 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices Public comments received by BIS in response to the ANPR are available at: https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/. Background BIS is proposing the establishment of a ‘‘Deemed Export Advisory Committee’’ (DEAC) under the terms of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C., App. 2). The DEAC will serve as forum to address complex questions related to an evolving deemed export control policy. Specifically, the DEAC will be charged with reviewing the current deemed export policy and determining whether to recommend any changes to that policy. A separate notice will specifically address the comments received in response to the ‘‘Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Revision and Clarification of Deemed Export Related Regulatory Requirements’’ (ANPR) published in the Federal Register on March 28, 2005. cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES A. Deemed Export Advisory Committee (DEAC); Notice of Recruitment of Private-Sector Members The nature of research and technological development is constantly changing and there is evidence of growing participation of foreign nationals in U.S.-based research as well as their employment in U.S.-based hightechnology industries. There is also an increasing interdependence between commercial and academic research. Over the course of the past decade, these changes have inevitably led to the increased transfer of controlled information to foreign nationals in the course of research and commercial technology development. To ensure that the deemed export policy best protects U.S. national security, while striving not to impede the ability of U.S. industry and academic research to continue at the leading edge of technological innovation, BIS is establishing a ‘‘Deemed Export Advisory Committee’’ (DEAC) under the terms of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92–463, 5 U.S.C., App. 2). The DEAC will undertake a comprehensive review of the national security, technology, and competitiveness dimensions of the deemed export issue and provide recommendations for potential changes to the current deemed export policy. The DEAC’s review will include, but not be limited to, the recommendations made in the Department of Commerce Office of Inspector General (OIG) Report entitled ‘‘Deemed Export Controls May Not Stop the Transfer of Sensitive Technology to Foreign Nationals in the VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:16 May 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 U.S.’’ (Final Inspection Report No. IPE– 16176–March 2004). The DEAC, which will not exceed 12 members, will be structured to ensure a balanced membership that will offer a comprehensive point of view on the complex technical and policy questions at issue. The advisory committee will consist of representatives from industry, academia, and other experts in the field to ensure a full discussion of all aspects of deemed exports and knowledge transfer from the corporate, academic, and national security perspectives. Members will be called upon to advise BIS on highly technical issues surrounding technology transfer and to help ensure that BIS effectively carries out its critical national security function. To that end, the DEAC shall have a diverse membership with expertise in national security affairs, scientific research and development (R&D) policy, and the various forms of technology subject to the EAR, such as nuclear, chemical, missile, electronics, computer, telecommunications, and avionic technology. For a full list of technology and software subject to the EAR, see 15 CFR part 774, Supp. 1. DEAC members will be appointed by the Secretary of Commerce and serve a term of not more than one year. DEAC members must obtain a secret security clearance prior to appointment. These clearances are necessary so that members may be permitted access to the classified information needed to formulate recommendations to the Department of Commerce. The DEAC will convene as appropriate, but in no case less than quarterly. To respond to this recruitment notice, please send a copy of your resume to Ms. Yvette Springer at Yspringer@bis.doc.gov. This Notice of Recruitment will be open until July 21, 2006. B. Current Deemed Export Policy Given the extended public discussion of the OIG recommendations and the coming review of the deemed export policy by the DEAC, a reiteration of the current BIS deemed export policy regarding country of birth, the existing definition of ‘‘use’’ in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), and the relationship of fundamental research to deemed exports is warranted. BIS has decided not to make any changes at this time to current regulations and policy on these three issues. C. BIS Activities Related to Deemed Exports In the past year, BIS has undertaken an enhanced and targeted deemed export outreach program. Since the issuance of the report by the OIG, BIS PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 has significantly increased its outreach to the academic and research communities. This outreach has focused on the concerns identified by the OIG report to raise the level of awareness and to improve the understanding of the deemed exports regulatory requirements. In fiscal year 2004 and fiscal year 2005, over 120 outreach events were conducted annually, almost tripling that conducted in previous years. A third of these events—which range in content from presentations to large audiences, seminars, one-on-one consultations, and site visits—have been with the university and government research organizations and laboratories. These organizations were identified by the OIG report as needing additional knowledge of the EAR’s deemed export requirements. BIS is on track to conduct over 100 deemed export outreach events in the current fiscal year. BIS has already seen the benefit of increased outreach to, and communication with, the regulated community and believes that the DEAC will provide a particularly advantageous forum for further in-depth technical information exchange between and among BIS and the academic, corporate, and other interested sectors. In addition to onsite visits, seminars, and the information provided in Supplement No.1 to Part 734 of the EAR, BIS has also provided deemed export related guidance on its Web site. (See Deemed Export FAQ’s at https:// www.bis.doc.gov/ policiesandregulations/index.htm) In particular, this guidance has addressed issues related to a foreign national’s country of origin—an issue highlighted by the OIG report. This particular guidance explains that if the status of a foreign national is uncertain, it is important to consult with BIS to determine where the stronger ties lie, based on the facts of the specific case. BIS is committed to providing continued deemed export guidance and assistance to the regulated community on this important issue. BIS has also participated in several Task Forces to address the deemed export issue, including an American Association of Universities/Council on Government Relations Task Force, the National Academies’ GovernmentUniversity-Industry-Research Roundtable, the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s National Security Higher Education Advisory Board, and a White House, Office of Science and Technology Policy Interagency Working Group comprised of agency representatives with research laboratories (e.g., Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture, National Institutes of Health, Food and Drug Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, etc.). The goal of each of these groups is to assess the impact of the OIG’s recommendations and to address concerns raised by the regulated communities. BIS has also increased its enforcement focus on deemed exports. A number of cases involving violations of deemed export requirements have been concluded with criminal and civil penalties and BIS will continue to pursue violations of the EAR’s deemed export requirements to ensure U.S. national security is not compromised by unauthorized technology transfers to foreign nationals. In addition, BIS is collaborating with the Federal Bureau of Investigation on related enforcement issues through the National Security Higher Education Advisory Board. Finally, BIS received funding in the FY2006 budget to implement an Enhanced Deemed Export Control Initiative. This initiative has two components—licensing and enforcement. The initiative will enable BIS to: (1) Process an increased volume of license applications in a timely manner, in order to ensure that U.S. entities are able to gain access to the expertise of foreign nationals who do not pose security concerns; and (2) ensure that U.S. entities are aware of and comply with U.S. deemed export license requirements through expanded outreach and enforcement activities. Both aspects are necessary to enhance U.S. national and economic security. Dated: May 17, 2006. Matthew Borman, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration. [FR Doc. E6–7778 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–33–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES [A–570–900] Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 22, 2006. AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:16 May 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 SUMMARY: On December 29, 2005, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published its preliminary determination of sales at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) and preliminary determination of partial affirmative critical circumstances in the antidumping investigation of certain diamond sawblades and parts thereof (‘‘diamond sawblades’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’) is October 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005. The investigation covers four manufacturers/exporters which are mandatory respondents and twenty–one separate rate applicants. We invited interested parties to comment on our preliminary determination of sales at LTFV and partial affirmative critical circumstances. Based on our analysis of the comments we received, we have made changes to our calculations for certain of the mandatory respondents and the weight–averaged margins for the separate rate applicants.1 We have also granted a separate rate to four additional applicants. The final dumping margins for this investigation are listed in the ‘‘Final Determination Margins’’ section below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anya Naschak or Carrie Blozy, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6375 or 482–5403, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Final Determination We determine that diamond sawblades from the PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at LTFV as provided in section 735 of 1 Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Danyang Youhe Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Fujian Quanzhou Wanlong Stone Co. Ltd., Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co. Ltd., Huzhou Gu Import & Export Co., Ltd, Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Jiangyin LIKN Industry Co. Ltd., Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd., Rizhao Hein Saw Co. Ltd., Shanghai Deda Industry & Trading Co. Ltd., Sichuan Huili Tools Co., Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrail Co., Ltd., Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Company, Ltd., Xiamen ZL Diamond Tools Co. Ltd., Zhejiang Tea Import & Export Co. Ltd., Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wanli’’), Zhenjiang Inter-China Import & Export Co., Ltd., (collectively, ‘‘preliminary separate rate applicants’’), as well as four additional separate rate companies, Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. (‘‘Qingdao Shinhan’’), Shijiazhuang Global New Century Tools Co., Ltd. (‘‘Global’’), Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (‘‘Robtol’’), and Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (‘‘Huachang’’) (collectively with preliminary separate rate applicants, ‘‘final separate rate companies’’). PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 29303 the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). The estimated margins of sales at LTFV are shown in the ‘‘Final Determination Margins’’ section of this notice. Case History The Department published its preliminary determination of sales at LTFV on December 29, 2005. See Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Preliminary Partial Determination of Critical Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 77121 (December 29, 2005) (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). The Department conducted verification of Bosun Tools Group Co., Ltd. (‘‘Bosun’’), Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Product Company (‘‘BGY’’), and Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co. Ltd. (‘‘Hebei Jikai’’) (collectively, ‘‘respondents’’), the three mandatory respondents participating in this investigation2 in both the PRC and the United States (where applicable), and Shanghai Deda Industry & Trading Co. Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Deda’’), one of the separate rate applicants. See the ‘‘Verification’’ section below for additional information. On February 6, 2006, the Department solicited comments from all interested parties regarding changes to its calculation of financial ratios. On February 7, 2006, Bosun and Petitioner submitted additional comments on the valuation of factors of production (‘‘FOPs’’) for the final determination. On February 13, 2006, BGY also submitted additional comments on the valuation of FOPs for the final determination. On February 21, 2006, Bosun submitted a rebuttal to Petitioner’s February 7, 2006, comments. On February 1, 2006, the Department received a separate rate application from Qingdao Shinhan. The Department determined on February 24, 2006, that Qingdao Shinhan’s separate rate application was timely filed. See Memorandum to the File from Catherine Bertrand dated February 24, 2006. On March 22, 2006, the Department preliminarily determined that the information contained in Qingdao Shinhan’s separate rate application demonstrated that it qualified for a separate rate in this investigation. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Determination. We received comments from the Diamond Sawblade Manufacturers’ Coalition (‘‘Petitioner’’), 2 One mandatory respondent, Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘Saint Gobain’’) did not participate in this investigation. E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29301-29303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7778]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

[Docket No. 060505121-6121-01]


Establishment of Advisory Committee and Clarification of Deemed 
Export-Related Regulatory Requirements

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is announcing the 
creation of a Federal Advisory Committee that will review and provide 
recommendations to the Department of Commerce on deemed export policy. 
The Deemed Export Advisory Committee (DEAC) will help ensure that the 
deemed export licensing policy most effectively protects national 
security while ensuring the U.S. continues to be at the leading edge of 
technological innovation. This notice also provides an overview of 
steps that BIS has taken to improve understanding of deemed export 
policy within academia and industry, including outreach activities 
conducted by BIS.

ADDRESSES: Although there is no official comment period for this 
notice, you may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 060505121-
6121-01, by any of the following methods:
    E-mail: publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include ``060505121-6121-01'' 
in the subject line of the message.
    Fax: (202) 482-3355.
    Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau 
of Industry and Security, Regulatory Policy Division, 14th & 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230, ATTN: Docket 
No. 060505121-6121-01.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcus Cohen, Regulatory Policy 
Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security, 
telephone: (202) 482-2440 or e-mail: mcohen@bis.doc.gov. Copies of the 
referenced Department of Commerce Office of Inspector General (OIG) 
Report are available at: https://www.oig.doc.gov/oig/reports/2004/BIS-
IPE-1676-03-2004.pdf.

[[Page 29302]]

    Public comments received by BIS in response to the ANPR are 
available at: https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/.

Background

    BIS is proposing the establishment of a ``Deemed Export Advisory 
Committee'' (DEAC) under the terms of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App. 2). The DEAC will serve as 
forum to address complex questions related to an evolving deemed export 
control policy. Specifically, the DEAC will be charged with reviewing 
the current deemed export policy and determining whether to recommend 
any changes to that policy. A separate notice will specifically address 
the comments received in response to the ``Advance Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking: Revision and Clarification of Deemed Export Related 
Regulatory Requirements'' (ANPR) published in the Federal Register on 
March 28, 2005.

A. Deemed Export Advisory Committee (DEAC); Notice of Recruitment of 
Private-Sector Members

    The nature of research and technological development is constantly 
changing and there is evidence of growing participation of foreign 
nationals in U.S.-based research as well as their employment in U.S.-
based high-technology industries. There is also an increasing 
interdependence between commercial and academic research. Over the 
course of the past decade, these changes have inevitably led to the 
increased transfer of controlled information to foreign nationals in 
the course of research and commercial technology development.
    To ensure that the deemed export policy best protects U.S. national 
security, while striving not to impede the ability of U.S. industry and 
academic research to continue at the leading edge of technological 
innovation, BIS is establishing a ``Deemed Export Advisory Committee'' 
(DEAC) under the terms of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App. 2). The DEAC will undertake a 
comprehensive review of the national security, technology, and 
competitiveness dimensions of the deemed export issue and provide 
recommendations for potential changes to the current deemed export 
policy. The DEAC's review will include, but not be limited to, the 
recommendations made in the Department of Commerce Office of Inspector 
General (OIG) Report entitled ``Deemed Export Controls May Not Stop the 
Transfer of Sensitive Technology to Foreign Nationals in the U.S.'' 
(Final Inspection Report No. IPE-16176-March 2004).
    The DEAC, which will not exceed 12 members, will be structured to 
ensure a balanced membership that will offer a comprehensive point of 
view on the complex technical and policy questions at issue. The 
advisory committee will consist of representatives from industry, 
academia, and other experts in the field to ensure a full discussion of 
all aspects of deemed exports and knowledge transfer from the 
corporate, academic, and national security perspectives. Members will 
be called upon to advise BIS on highly technical issues surrounding 
technology transfer and to help ensure that BIS effectively carries out 
its critical national security function. To that end, the DEAC shall 
have a diverse membership with expertise in national security affairs, 
scientific research and development (R&D) policy, and the various forms 
of technology subject to the EAR, such as nuclear, chemical, missile, 
electronics, computer, telecommunications, and avionic technology. For 
a full list of technology and software subject to the EAR, see 15 CFR 
part 774, Supp. 1.
    DEAC members will be appointed by the Secretary of Commerce and 
serve a term of not more than one year. DEAC members must obtain a 
secret security clearance prior to appointment. These clearances are 
necessary so that members may be permitted access to the classified 
information needed to formulate recommendations to the Department of 
Commerce. The DEAC will convene as appropriate, but in no case less 
than quarterly. To respond to this recruitment notice, please send a 
copy of your resume to Ms. Yvette Springer at Yspringer@bis.doc.gov. 
This Notice of Recruitment will be open until July 21, 2006.

B. Current Deemed Export Policy

    Given the extended public discussion of the OIG recommendations and 
the coming review of the deemed export policy by the DEAC, a 
reiteration of the current BIS deemed export policy regarding country 
of birth, the existing definition of ``use'' in the Export 
Administration Regulations (EAR), and the relationship of fundamental 
research to deemed exports is warranted. BIS has decided not to make 
any changes at this time to current regulations and policy on these 
three issues.

C. BIS Activities Related to Deemed Exports

    In the past year, BIS has undertaken an enhanced and targeted 
deemed export outreach program. Since the issuance of the report by the 
OIG, BIS has significantly increased its outreach to the academic and 
research communities. This outreach has focused on the concerns 
identified by the OIG report to raise the level of awareness and to 
improve the understanding of the deemed exports regulatory 
requirements. In fiscal year 2004 and fiscal year 2005, over 120 
outreach events were conducted annually, almost tripling that conducted 
in previous years. A third of these events--which range in content from 
presentations to large audiences, seminars, one-on-one consultations, 
and site visits--have been with the university and government research 
organizations and laboratories. These organizations were identified by 
the OIG report as needing additional knowledge of the EAR's deemed 
export requirements. BIS is on track to conduct over 100 deemed export 
outreach events in the current fiscal year. BIS has already seen the 
benefit of increased outreach to, and communication with, the regulated 
community and believes that the DEAC will provide a particularly 
advantageous forum for further in-depth technical information exchange 
between and among BIS and the academic, corporate, and other interested 
sectors.
    In addition to onsite visits, seminars, and the information 
provided in Supplement No.1 to Part 734 of the EAR, BIS has also 
provided deemed export related guidance on its Web site. (See Deemed 
Export FAQ's at https://www.bis.doc.gov/policiesandregulations/
index.htm) In particular, this guidance has addressed issues related to 
a foreign national's country of origin--an issue highlighted by the OIG 
report. This particular guidance explains that if the status of a 
foreign national is uncertain, it is important to consult with BIS to 
determine where the stronger ties lie, based on the facts of the 
specific case. BIS is committed to providing continued deemed export 
guidance and assistance to the regulated community on this important 
issue.
    BIS has also participated in several Task Forces to address the 
deemed export issue, including an American Association of Universities/
Council on Government Relations Task Force, the National Academies' 
Government-University-Industry-Research Roundtable, the Federal Bureau 
of Investigation's National Security Higher Education Advisory Board, 
and a White House, Office of Science and Technology Policy Interagency 
Working Group comprised of agency representatives with research 
laboratories (e.g., Department of Energy, Department of Defense, 
Department of

[[Page 29303]]

Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture, National 
Institutes of Health, Food and Drug Administration, National Institute 
of Standards and Technology, etc.). The goal of each of these groups is 
to assess the impact of the OIG's recommendations and to address 
concerns raised by the regulated communities.
    BIS has also increased its enforcement focus on deemed exports. A 
number of cases involving violations of deemed export requirements have 
been concluded with criminal and civil penalties and BIS will continue 
to pursue violations of the EAR's deemed export requirements to ensure 
U.S. national security is not compromised by unauthorized technology 
transfers to foreign nationals. In addition, BIS is collaborating with 
the Federal Bureau of Investigation on related enforcement issues 
through the National Security Higher Education Advisory Board.
    Finally, BIS received funding in the FY2006 budget to implement an 
Enhanced Deemed Export Control Initiative. This initiative has two 
components--licensing and enforcement. The initiative will enable BIS 
to: (1) Process an increased volume of license applications in a timely 
manner, in order to ensure that U.S. entities are able to gain access 
to the expertise of foreign nationals who do not pose security 
concerns; and (2) ensure that U.S. entities are aware of and comply 
with U.S. deemed export license requirements through expanded outreach 
and enforcement activities. Both aspects are necessary to enhance U.S. 
national and economic security.

    Dated: May 17, 2006.
Matthew Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration.
 [FR Doc. E6-7778 Filed 5-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.