Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Major Transit Improvements in the University Corridor of Metropolitan Houston, TX, 29380-29381 [06-4730]
Download as PDF
29380
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices
6. Flagstaff Coconino County—Main
Library, 300 W. Aspen Avenue,
Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
An electronic copy of the FEIS also
will be available as of May 19, 2006, on
the project Web site. It can be accessed
at: https://www.airportsites.net/squ-eis.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 16,
2006.
Lowell H. Johnson,
Manager, Airports Division, Northwest
Mountain Region.
[FR Doc. 06–4751 Filed 5–18–06; 10:54 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent to Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for Major Transit
Improvements in the University
Corridor of Metropolitan Houston, TX
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and the
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris
County (METRO) intend to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to
evaluate proposed public transportation
improvements in the Houston
metropolitan area. The area being
studied, known as the University
Corridor, extends approximately ten
miles from the vicinity of the University
of Houston—Central Campus to the
Uptown/Galleria area in southwest
Houston. METRO is proposing to
construct an electric-powered light rail
transit line on one of several possible
alignments in the corridor. The EIS will
examine and evaluate a number of
transit alternatives including a
Transportation Systems Management
Alternative and various Build
Alternatives, consisting of light rail
vehicles powered from overhead wires,
by an internal diesel-electric system, or
by an alternative fuel hybrid-electric
system and alignment options within
the corridor; and any additional
alternatives generated by the scoping
process. The location and design of
needed ancillary facilities, such as
maintenance facilities, will also be
considered. Scoping of the EIS will be
accomplished through a series of public
meetings and stakeholder meetings,
through correspondence with interested
persons, organizations, and Federal,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:16 May 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
State, and local agencies, and through
posting a scoping information packet on
the internet and distributing the packet
in hardcopy upon request.
Comment Due Date: Written
comments on the scope of the EIS,
including the purpose and need for
transit improvements in the corridor,
the alternatives to be studied, and the
environmental and community impacts
to be considered should be sent to the
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris
County at the address under ADDRESSES
below no later than July 14, 2006.
Scoping Meeting Dates: Public
scoping meetings to discuss the scope of
the EIS will be held on June 27, 2006
and June 29, 2006. See ADDRESSES
below for meeting times and locations.
Formal presentations of the proposed
scope of the study will be made at the
meetings, and will be followed by an
opportunity for the public to comment
on the purpose and need, alternatives to
be evaluated, and environmental and
community impact issues to be
assessed. METRO staff will be available
for informal questions and comments
throughout the meeting. Scoping
information material will be available at
the meetings and may also be obtained
in advance of the meeting by contacting
METRO at the address or e-mail
identified in ADDRESSES below. The
scoping information will also be
available on the project Web site at
https://www.metrosolutions.org/go/doc/
1068/112145/. Oral or written
comments may be given at the scoping
meetings. A court reporter will be
present at the meetings to record oral
comments. Any person who requires
language interpretation or
communication accommodations is
encouraged to contact Karen Marshall at
METRO at (713) 739–4980 or by 2-mail
at METROSolutionsUniversity@ridemetro.org at least 72
hours prior to the scoping meetings.
Every reasonable effort will be made to
meet special needs. The location for the
meetings will be accessible to persons
with disabilities. A scoping meeting for
the public agencies invited to serve as
participating agencies in the EIS study
will be organized later through direct
mailouts or telephone invitations.
DATES:
Written comments on the
scope of the EIS should be sent to the
following address by July 14, 2006:
Rhonda Boyer, 1900 Main St., P.O. Box
61429, Houston, Texas 77208–1429,
METROSolutionsUniversity@ridemetro.org.
The public scoping meetings will be
held at the following locations and
times:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Third Ward Multi-Service Center,
Tuesday, June 27, 2006, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m.
at 3611 Ennis, Houston, Texas 77004.
2. San Jacinto Girl Scout
Headquarters, Thursday June 29, 2006,
4 p.m. to 7 p.m. at 3110 S.W. Freeway,
Houston, Texas 77098.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Sweek, Community Planner, FTA,
Region VI, 819 Taylor Street, Ft. Worth,
Texas 76102, Telephone (817) 978-0550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Scoping
METRO and FTA invite all interested
individuals and organizations, and
Federal, State, regional, and local
agencies to participate in defining the
purpose and need for transit action in
the University Corridor, in developing
alternatives to be evaluated to meet that
purpose and need, and in identifying
any social, economic and environmental
issues related to the alternatives. During
the scoping process, comments should
focus on refining the purpose and need
statement, developing alternatives to
meet the purpose and need that have
comparable or lower cost and less
adverse impact, and identifying specific
social, economic, or environmental
impacts to be evaluated.
II. Purpose and Need
The University Corridor study area is
defined as beginning at the University of
Houston—Central Campus and
extending westward to the inner
southwest part of Houston, generally
bounded by Calhoun Street on the east,
Chimney Rock on the west, Westheimer
on the north and Bissonnet on the
south. The University Corridor extends
approximately 10 miles east to west and
includes the Greenway Plaza, the
Uptown/Galleria, the University of
Houston—Central Campus, the Texas
Southern University, and the St.
Thomas University areas. Portions of the
alignment are densely developed. New
development and redevelopment is
occurring along the corridor and is
expected to generate increases in travel
demand.
A key component of the University
Corridor is the regional connectivity the
transit line will offer. A number of
travel destinations are located along the
corridor. The alignment will provide a
transfer opportunity at the Wheeler
Station providing a direct connection to
the existing Main Street LRT line, which
provides service to Downtown,
Midtown, the Museum District and the
Texas Medical Center. A transfer
opportunity to the proposed Southeast
Corridor BRT project will also be
provided at Scott Street.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Notices
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
From Calhoun Street to Chimney
Rock, the corridor is characterized by
fairly dense residential and commercial
development. Two major employment
centers, Uptown/Galleria and Greenway
Plaza, will be directly serviced by the
University line, and Downtown and the
Texas Medical Center may be reached
by a light rail connection at the Wheeler
station. The corridor will also provide
direct service to four major universities:
University of Houston—Central
Campus, Texas Southern University,
Houston Community College—Central
Campus, and St. Thomas University.
Current local bus routes that operate in
the University Corridor study area tend
to be heavily utilized, and represent a
significant share of the daily local bus
ridership.
Transit connection of major
population, employment, and
entertainment centers, including
Downtown Houston, Uptown/Galleria,
and Greenway Plaza, is a key purpose of
this proposal. FTA and METRO seek
public and agency comment on the
purpose and need for transit action in
the University Corridor.
III. Alternatives
The alternatives presently proposed
for consideration in the EIS are:
• Future No Build Alternative—
Outside the study area, this alternative
consists of the transportation network in
the metropolitan transportation plan
adopted by the Houston-Galveston Area
Council (H–GAC). Inside the study area,
this alternative assumes that transit
service will be continued and expanded
to meet future population and
employment growth in accordance with
existing service policies.
• TSM Alternative: Bus service
improvements beyond those of the
Future No Build Alternative, which
represent the best that can be done to
meet the project’s purpose and need
without constructing a new transit
guideway.
• LRT on Westpark and US 59: Rail
vehicles and tracks on Westpark and US
59 with one of three alignments for
transitioning west of Spur 527 in the
vicinity of Edloe, Weslayan, or the
Bellaire Juncture Railroad right-of-way
and with one of three alignments for
transitioning east of Spur 527 on Elgin,
Alabama, or Wheeler. The impacts and
costs alternative traction-power
technologies for the light rail vehicles,
including electric power from overhead
wires, an on-vehicle diesel-electric
system, and an alternative fuel hybridelectric system, will be studied. A
hybrid-powered LRT system has not yet
been used elsewhere in the United
States.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:16 May 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
• LRT on Richmond: Rail vehicles
and tracks on Richmond with one of
three alignments for transitioning west
of Spur 527 in the vicinity of Edloe,
Weslayan, or the Bellaire Juncture
Railroad right-of-way and with one of
three alignments for transitioning east of
Spur 527 on Elgin, Alabama, or
Wheeler. As with the Westpark/US 59
LRT alignment, alternative tractionpower LRT technologies will be studied.
Additional reasonable alternatives
suggested during the scoping process,
including those involving other modes
or alignments, will also be considered.
Alternative locations and designs for
ancillary facilities, such as the transit
vehicle storage and maintenance
facility, traction power substations for
electrically-powered vehicles, and
stormwater management facilities, will
be developed and presented in the EIS.
IV. Probable Effects and Potential
Impacts for Analysis
The purpose of the EIS is to evaluate
the environmental consequences of
alternative means of accomplishing the
purpose and need for transit in the
University Corridor study area in
advance of a decision to commit
substantial financial or other resources
toward the project implementation. The
EIS will examine the extent to which
the study alternatives result in adverse
environmental and community impacts
and corresponding actions to reduce,
mitigate, or eliminate such impacts.
METRO and the FTA will evaluate all
social, economic, and environmental
impacts of the alternatives analyzed in
the EIS. Primary issues known to the
study team at present include:
• Land acquisition, displacement and
relocation of existing residences and
businesses;
• Historic, archaeological, and
cultural resources;
• Parklands and recreation areas;
• Adverse impacts on neighborhoods
and communities;
• Transit vehicle noise;
• Vibration of buildings due to rail
vehicles; and
• Traffic impacts.
Mitigation options for all adverse
impacts will be developed and
presented in the EIS. To ensure that all
significant issues related to this
proposed project are identified and
addressed, comments and suggestions
are encouraged from all interested
parties during scoping. Comments or
questions concerning the impacts of the
various alternatives should be directed
to METRO at the address given under
ADDRESSES above.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29381
V. FTA Procedures
FTA and METRO will combine the
draft EIS with the planning Alternatives
Analysis required for New Starts
projects (projects proposed for funding
assistance through 49 U.S.C. 5309(d)).
Following the public hearing and
comment period for the draft EIS,
METRO and H–GAC will select a locally
preferred alternative (LPA), and METRO
will apply to FTA for entry into the
Preliminary Engineering (PE) phase of
project development. It is conceivable
that the LPA may be combination of one
or more alternative options studied.
Wherever the LPA has adverse impacts,
METRO and FTA will develop
additional alignment and design
alternatives during PE to avoid those
adverse effects. If avoidance is
determined not to be feasible and
prudent, then minimization and
mitigation options will be developed
and evaluated. The final EIS will
present the alternatives developed and
evaluated during PE and commit to
specific mitigation of adverse impacts.
In accordance with FTA policy, all
Federal laws, regulations and executive
orders affecting project development,
including but not limited to the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality and FTA
implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts
1500–1508 and 23 CFR part 771), the
project-level conformity provisions of
the Clean Air Act, Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act, Executive Orders
11990 regarding wetlands, 11988
regarding floodplains, and 12898
regarding environmental justice, Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act, and Section
4(f) of the Department of Transportation
Act (49 U.S.C. 303), will be addressed
to the maximum extent practicable
during the NEPA process.
Issued on: May 17, 2006.
Robert C. Patrick,
Regional Administrator, Federal Transit
Administration, Fort Worth, Texas.
[FR Doc. 06–4730 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–M
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29380-29381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4730]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Major
Transit Improvements in the University Corridor of Metropolitan
Houston, TX
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Metropolitan
Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO) intend to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to evaluate proposed public
transportation improvements in the Houston metropolitan area. The area
being studied, known as the University Corridor, extends approximately
ten miles from the vicinity of the University of Houston--Central
Campus to the Uptown/Galleria area in southwest Houston. METRO is
proposing to construct an electric-powered light rail transit line on
one of several possible alignments in the corridor. The EIS will
examine and evaluate a number of transit alternatives including a
Transportation Systems Management Alternative and various Build
Alternatives, consisting of light rail vehicles powered from overhead
wires, by an internal diesel-electric system, or by an alternative fuel
hybrid-electric system and alignment options within the corridor; and
any additional alternatives generated by the scoping process. The
location and design of needed ancillary facilities, such as maintenance
facilities, will also be considered. Scoping of the EIS will be
accomplished through a series of public meetings and stakeholder
meetings, through correspondence with interested persons,
organizations, and Federal, State, and local agencies, and through
posting a scoping information packet on the internet and distributing
the packet in hardcopy upon request.
DATES: Comment Due Date: Written comments on the scope of the EIS,
including the purpose and need for transit improvements in the
corridor, the alternatives to be studied, and the environmental and
community impacts to be considered should be sent to the Metropolitan
Transit Authority of Harris County at the address under ADDRESSES below
no later than July 14, 2006.
Scoping Meeting Dates: Public scoping meetings to discuss the scope
of the EIS will be held on June 27, 2006 and June 29, 2006. See
ADDRESSES below for meeting times and locations. Formal presentations
of the proposed scope of the study will be made at the meetings, and
will be followed by an opportunity for the public to comment on the
purpose and need, alternatives to be evaluated, and environmental and
community impact issues to be assessed. METRO staff will be available
for informal questions and comments throughout the meeting. Scoping
information material will be available at the meetings and may also be
obtained in advance of the meeting by contacting METRO at the address
or e-mail identified in ADDRESSES below. The scoping information will
also be available on the project Web site at https://
www.metrosolutions.org/go/doc/1068/112145/. Oral or written comments
may be given at the scoping meetings. A court reporter will be present
at the meetings to record oral comments. Any person who requires
language interpretation or communication accommodations is encouraged
to contact Karen Marshall at METRO at (713) 739-4980 or by 2-mail at
METROSolutions-University@ridemetro.org at least 72 hours prior to the
scoping meetings. Every reasonable effort will be made to meet special
needs. The location for the meetings will be accessible to persons with
disabilities. A scoping meeting for the public agencies invited to
serve as participating agencies in the EIS study will be organized
later through direct mailouts or telephone invitations.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS should be sent to
the following address by July 14, 2006: Rhonda Boyer, 1900 Main St.,
P.O. Box 61429, Houston, Texas 77208-1429, METROSolutions-
University@ridemetro.org.
The public scoping meetings will be held at the following locations
and times:
1. Third Ward Multi-Service Center, Tuesday, June 27, 2006, 4 p.m.
to 7 p.m. at 3611 Ennis, Houston, Texas 77004.
2. San Jacinto Girl Scout Headquarters, Thursday June 29, 2006, 4
p.m. to 7 p.m. at 3110 S.W. Freeway, Houston, Texas 77098.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Sweek, Community Planner, FTA,
Region VI, 819 Taylor Street, Ft. Worth, Texas 76102, Telephone (817)
978-0550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Scoping
METRO and FTA invite all interested individuals and organizations,
and Federal, State, regional, and local agencies to participate in
defining the purpose and need for transit action in the University
Corridor, in developing alternatives to be evaluated to meet that
purpose and need, and in identifying any social, economic and
environmental issues related to the alternatives. During the scoping
process, comments should focus on refining the purpose and need
statement, developing alternatives to meet the purpose and need that
have comparable or lower cost and less adverse impact, and identifying
specific social, economic, or environmental impacts to be evaluated.
II. Purpose and Need
The University Corridor study area is defined as beginning at the
University of Houston--Central Campus and extending westward to the
inner southwest part of Houston, generally bounded by Calhoun Street on
the east, Chimney Rock on the west, Westheimer on the north and
Bissonnet on the south. The University Corridor extends approximately
10 miles east to west and includes the Greenway Plaza, the Uptown/
Galleria, the University of Houston--Central Campus, the Texas Southern
University, and the St. Thomas University areas. Portions of the
alignment are densely developed. New development and redevelopment is
occurring along the corridor and is expected to generate increases in
travel demand.
A key component of the University Corridor is the regional
connectivity the transit line will offer. A number of travel
destinations are located along the corridor. The alignment will provide
a transfer opportunity at the Wheeler Station providing a direct
connection to the existing Main Street LRT line, which provides service
to Downtown, Midtown, the Museum District and the Texas Medical Center.
A transfer opportunity to the proposed Southeast Corridor BRT project
will also be provided at Scott Street.
[[Page 29381]]
From Calhoun Street to Chimney Rock, the corridor is characterized
by fairly dense residential and commercial development. Two major
employment centers, Uptown/Galleria and Greenway Plaza, will be
directly serviced by the University line, and Downtown and the Texas
Medical Center may be reached by a light rail connection at the Wheeler
station. The corridor will also provide direct service to four major
universities: University of Houston--Central Campus, Texas Southern
University, Houston Community College--Central Campus, and St. Thomas
University. Current local bus routes that operate in the University
Corridor study area tend to be heavily utilized, and represent a
significant share of the daily local bus ridership.
Transit connection of major population, employment, and
entertainment centers, including Downtown Houston, Uptown/Galleria, and
Greenway Plaza, is a key purpose of this proposal. FTA and METRO seek
public and agency comment on the purpose and need for transit action in
the University Corridor.
III. Alternatives
The alternatives presently proposed for consideration in the EIS
are:
Future No Build Alternative--Outside the study area, this
alternative consists of the transportation network in the metropolitan
transportation plan adopted by the Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-
GAC). Inside the study area, this alternative assumes that transit
service will be continued and expanded to meet future population and
employment growth in accordance with existing service policies.
TSM Alternative: Bus service improvements beyond those of
the Future No Build Alternative, which represent the best that can be
done to meet the project's purpose and need without constructing a new
transit guideway.
LRT on Westpark and US 59: Rail vehicles and tracks on
Westpark and US 59 with one of three alignments for transitioning west
of Spur 527 in the vicinity of Edloe, Weslayan, or the Bellaire
Juncture Railroad right-of-way and with one of three alignments for
transitioning east of Spur 527 on Elgin, Alabama, or Wheeler. The
impacts and costs alternative traction-power technologies for the light
rail vehicles, including electric power from overhead wires, an on-
vehicle diesel-electric system, and an alternative fuel hybrid-electric
system, will be studied. A hybrid-powered LRT system has not yet been
used elsewhere in the United States.
LRT on Richmond: Rail vehicles and tracks on Richmond with
one of three alignments for transitioning west of Spur 527 in the
vicinity of Edloe, Weslayan, or the Bellaire Juncture Railroad right-
of-way and with one of three alignments for transitioning east of Spur
527 on Elgin, Alabama, or Wheeler. As with the Westpark/US 59 LRT
alignment, alternative traction-power LRT technologies will be studied.
Additional reasonable alternatives suggested during the scoping
process, including those involving other modes or alignments, will also
be considered. Alternative locations and designs for ancillary
facilities, such as the transit vehicle storage and maintenance
facility, traction power substations for electrically-powered vehicles,
and stormwater management facilities, will be developed and presented
in the EIS.
IV. Probable Effects and Potential Impacts for Analysis
The purpose of the EIS is to evaluate the environmental
consequences of alternative means of accomplishing the purpose and need
for transit in the University Corridor study area in advance of a
decision to commit substantial financial or other resources toward the
project implementation. The EIS will examine the extent to which the
study alternatives result in adverse environmental and community
impacts and corresponding actions to reduce, mitigate, or eliminate
such impacts.
METRO and the FTA will evaluate all social, economic, and
environmental impacts of the alternatives analyzed in the EIS. Primary
issues known to the study team at present include:
Land acquisition, displacement and relocation of existing
residences and businesses;
Historic, archaeological, and cultural resources;
Parklands and recreation areas;
Adverse impacts on neighborhoods and communities;
Transit vehicle noise;
Vibration of buildings due to rail vehicles; and
Traffic impacts.
Mitigation options for all adverse impacts will be developed and
presented in the EIS. To ensure that all significant issues related to
this proposed project are identified and addressed, comments and
suggestions are encouraged from all interested parties during scoping.
Comments or questions concerning the impacts of the various
alternatives should be directed to METRO at the address given under
ADDRESSES above.
V. FTA Procedures
FTA and METRO will combine the draft EIS with the planning
Alternatives Analysis required for New Starts projects (projects
proposed for funding assistance through 49 U.S.C. 5309(d)). Following
the public hearing and comment period for the draft EIS, METRO and H-
GAC will select a locally preferred alternative (LPA), and METRO will
apply to FTA for entry into the Preliminary Engineering (PE) phase of
project development. It is conceivable that the LPA may be combination
of one or more alternative options studied. Wherever the LPA has
adverse impacts, METRO and FTA will develop additional alignment and
design alternatives during PE to avoid those adverse effects. If
avoidance is determined not to be feasible and prudent, then
minimization and mitigation options will be developed and evaluated.
The final EIS will present the alternatives developed and evaluated
during PE and commit to specific mitigation of adverse impacts.
In accordance with FTA policy, all Federal laws, regulations and
executive orders affecting project development, including but not
limited to the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality and
FTA implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508 and 23 CFR part 771), the
project-level conformity provisions of the Clean Air Act, Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, Executive Orders 11990 regarding wetlands,
11988 regarding floodplains, and 12898 regarding environmental justice,
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act, and Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 303), will be addressed to the maximum
extent practicable during the NEPA process.
Issued on: May 17, 2006.
Robert C. Patrick,
Regional Administrator, Federal Transit Administration, Fort Worth,
Texas.
[FR Doc. 06-4730 Filed 5-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-M