Food Labeling: Health Claims; Soluble Dietary Fiber From Certain Foods and Coronary Heart Disease, 29248-29250 [06-4703]

Download as PDF 29248 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations erjones on PROD1PC71 with RULES military activities. All flight operations in the Range will be subsonic. In addition, this amendment makes a minor correction to two points in the descriptions of R–3007B and R–3007C, respectively. The point published in the NPRM as 31°33′16″ N., long. 81°31′14″ W., is corrected to lat. 31°33′18″ N., long. 81°31′13″ W. The point published as 31°31′16″ N., long. 81°31′59″ W., is corrected to lat. 31°31′26″ N., long. 81°31′58″ W. These corrections are the result of a more accurate plot of the airspace boundaries. The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Environmental Review In November 1995, the Air National Guard (ANG) issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the ‘‘Proposed Wing Conversion and Modification to Airspace in Southeastern Georgia.’’ On January 3, 1996, the ANG issued a Record of Decision (ROD). In 2005, due to the lapse in time since issuance of the 1995 FEIS and 1996 ROD, the ANG prepared a Supplemental Environmental Assessment (SEA) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as amended, of the proposed reconfiguration of R–3007 and a separate nonrulemaking proposal to modify military operations areas (MOA) in southeastern Georgia. The nonrulemaking proposal involves the revocation of the existing Quick Thrust and Gator MOAs and the establishment of the Coastal MOAs, which will take effect concurrent with the effective date of this rule. The SEA process included both the rulemaking and nonrulemaking proposed actions. The FAA participated in the SEA process as a Cooperating Agency. The ANG provided a 30-day public comment period on the draft SEA, which ended on November 20, 2005. They received no comments. The VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:15 May 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 ANG then issued a Final SEA and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on December 22, 2005. Pursuant to FAA Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Polices and Procedures,’’ the FAA conducted an independent review of the Final SEA. On March 2, 2006, in accordance with paragraph 404d in the Order, the FAA adopted the December 2005 Final SEA, and in accordance with paragraph 406 in the Order, the FAA issued a FONSI. The FONSI signifies that the FAA will not prepare an environmental impact statement and has completed the NEPA process for the proposed actions. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73 Airspace, Navigation (air). The Adoption of the Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration will amend 14 CFR part 73 as follows: I PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389. § 73.30 [Amended] 2. Section 73.30 is amended as follows: * * * * * I R–3007A Townsend, GA [Revised] Boundaries. A circular area with a 1.5-mile radius centered at lat. 31°33′16″ N., long. 81°34′44″ W. Designated altitudes. Surface to but not including 13,000 feet MSL. Time of designation. 0700–2200 local time, Monday–Friday; other times by NOTAM at least 24 hours in advance. Controlling agency. FAA, Jacksonville ARTCC. Using agency. ANG, Savannah Combat Readiness Training Center, GA. R–3007B Townsend, GA [Revised] Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31°38′01″ N., long. 81°28′59″ W.; to lat. 31°37′31″ N., long. 81°28′14″ W.; to lat. 31°32′31″ N., long. 81°27′29″ W.; to lat. 31°26′16″ N., long. 81°31′29″ W.; to lat. 31°25′31″ N., long. 81°35′59″ W.; to lat. 31°27′26″ N., long. 81°33′39″ W.; to lat. 31°31′26″ N., long. 81°31′58″ W.; thence clockwise along a 1 NM radius arc from a point centered at lat. 31°32′26″ N., long. 81°31′49″ W.; to lat. 31°33′18″ N., long. 81°31′13″ W.; to the point of beginning. Designated altitudes. 1,200 feet AGL to but not including 13,000 feet MSL. Time of designation. 0700–2200 local time, Monday–Friday; other times by NOTAM at least 24 hours in advance. Controlling agency. FAA, Jacksonville ARTCC. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Using agency. ANG, Savannah Combat Readiness Training Center, GA. R–3007C Townsend, GA [Revised] Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31°38′01″ N., long. 81°46′59″ W.; to lat. 31°42′31″ N., long. 81°33′59″ W.; to lat. 31°38′01″ N., long. 81°28′59″ W.; to lat. 31°33′18″ N., long. 81°31′13″ W.; thence counterclockwise along a 1 NM radius arc from a point centered at lat. 31°32′26″ N., long. 81°31′49″ W.; to lat. 31°31′26″ N., long. 81°31′58″ W.; to lat. 31°27′26″ N., long. 81°33′39″ W.; to lat. 31°25′31″ N., long. 81°35′59″ W.; thence west along the Altamaha River to the point of beginning; excluding R–3007A. Designated altitudes. 100 feet AGL to but not including 13,000 feet MSL. Time of designation. 0700–2200 local time, Monday–Friday; other times by NOTAM at least 24 hours in advance. Controlling agency. FAA, Jacksonville ARTCC. Using agency. ANG, Savannah Combat Readiness Training Center, GA. R–3007D Townsend, GA [Revised] Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 31°38′01″ N., long. 81°46′59″ W.; to lat. 31°42′31″ N., long. 81°33′59″ W.; to lat. 31°38′01″ N., long. 81°28′59″ W.; to lat. 31°37′31″ N., long. 81°28′14″ W.; to lat. 31°32′31″ N., long. 81°27′29″ W.; to lat. 31°26′16″ N., long. 81°31′29″ W.; to lat. 31°25′31″ N., long. 81°35′59″ W.; thence northwest along the Altamaha River to the point of beginning. Designated altitudes. 13,000 feet MSL to FL 250. Time of designation. 0700–2200 local time, Monday–Friday; other times by NOTAM at least 24 hours in advance. Controlling agency. FAA, Jacksonville ARTCC. Using agency. ANG, Savannah Combat Readiness Training Center, GA. R–3007E Townsend, GA [Revoked] * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC, on May 12, 2006. Edith V. Parish, Manager, Airspace and Rules. [FR Doc. 06–4734 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 101 [Docket No. 2004P–0512] Food Labeling: Health Claims; Soluble Dietary Fiber From Certain Foods and Coronary Heart Disease AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is adopting as a E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM 22MYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations erjones on PROD1PC71 with RULES final rule, without change, the provisions of the interim final rule that amended the regulation authorizing a health claim on the relationship between beta-glucan soluble fiber from whole oat sources and reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) by adding barley as an additional source of betaglucan soluble fiber eligible for the health claim. FDA is taking this action to complete the rulemaking initiated with the interim final rule. DATES: This rule is effective May 22, 2006. The Director of the Office of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of certain publications in 21 CFR 101.81(c)(2)(ii)(A)(5) as of December 23, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James E. Hoadley, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS– 830), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740–3835, 301–436–1450. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background In the Federal Register of December 23, 2005 (70 FR 76150), FDA published an interim final rule to amend the regulation that authorizes a health claim on the relationship between soluble fiber from certain foods and CHD risk (§ 101.81 (21 CFR 101.81)) to include beta-glucan soluble fiber from barley. Under sections 403(r)(3)(B)(i) and (r)(7) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(3)(B)(i) and (r)(7)), FDA issued this interim final rule in response to a petition filed under section 403(r)(4) of the act. Section 403(r)(3)(B)(i) of the act states that the Secretary of Health and Human Services (and, by delegation, FDA) shall issue a regulation authorizing a health claim only if FDA ‘‘determines, based on the totality of publicly available scientific evidence (including evidence from welldesigned studies conducted in a manner which is consistent with generally recognized scientific procedures and principles), that there is significant scientific agreement, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate such claims, that the claim is supported by such evidence’’ (see also 21 CFR 101.14(c)). Section 403(r)(4) of the act sets out the procedures that FDA is to follow upon receiving a health claim petition. Section 403(r)(7) of the act permits FDA to make proposed regulations issued under section 403(r) effective upon publication pending consideration of public comment and publication of a final regulation if the agency determines VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:15 May 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 that such action is necessary for public health reasons (70 FR 76150 at 76157). On August 3, 2004, the National Barley Foods Council (petitioner), submitted a health claim petition to FDA requesting that the agency amend the ‘‘Soluble fiber from certain foods and coronary heart disease health claim’’ at § 101.81 to include barley and barley products as an additional source of beta-glucan soluble fiber eligible for the health claim. FDA filed the petition for comprehensive review in accordance with section 403(r)(4) of the act on November 10, 2004. The petitioner requested that FDA grant an interim final rule by which labeling of barleycontaining foods could bear the health claim prior to publication of a final rule. FDA considered the scientific evidence presented in the petition as part of its review of the scientific literature on barley beta-glucan soluble fiber and CHD risk, as well as information previously considered by the agency on the relationship of consumption of beta-glucan containing oat foods and blood (serum or plasma) cholesterol levels. The agency summarized this evidence in the interim final rule (70 FR 76150 at 76153— 76155). Based on the available evidence, FDA concluded that consuming whole grain barley and dry milled barley products that provide at least 3 grams of beta-glucan soluble fiber per day, is effective in lowering blood total and LDL cholesterol; and that the cholesterol-lowering effects of betaglucan soluble fiber in dry milled barley products is comparable to that of the oat sources of beta-soluble glucan fiber now listed in § 101.81(c)(2)(ii)(A). Consequently, FDA amended § 101.81 to broaden the health claim to include whole grain barley and dry milled barley products as an additional source of beta-glucan soluble fiber eligible for the health claim. II. Summary of Comments and the Agency’s Response FDA solicited comments on the interim final rule. The comment period closed on March 8, 2006. The agency received no comments related to the requirements in the interim final rule. Therefore, FDA is adopting, without change, as a final rule, the interim final rule that amended § 101.81 to include dry milled barley products as an eligible source of beta-glucan soluble fiber for the soluble fiber from certain foods and CHD health claim. III. Analysis of Impacts FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 29249 U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4). Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives analyzed in the interim final rule (70 FR 76150) are adopted without change in this final rule. By now reaffirming that interim final rule, FDA has not imposed any new requirements. Therefore, there are no additional costs and benefits associated with this final rule. A. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis We have examined the economic implications of this final rule, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612). If a rule has a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze regulatory options that would minimize the economic impact of the rule on small entities. As this final rule does not make any changes to the interim final rule or our analysis included therein, this final rule does not impose any new costs on firms. Accordingly, we certify that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. B. Unfunded Mandates Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., 1532) requires that agencies prepare a written statement, of anticipated costs and benefits before proposing any rule that may result in an expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 in any one year (adjusted annually for inflation). This final rule does not create such a mandate. The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $115 million, using the most current (2003) Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this final rule to result in any 1–year expenditure that would meet or exceed this amount. IV. Environmental Impact FDA has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(p) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM 22MYR1 29250 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 98 / Monday, May 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. erjones on PROD1PC71 with RULES V. Paperwork Reduction Act FDA has concluded that the labeling provisions of this final rule are not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget because they do not constitute a ‘‘collection of information’’ under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). Rather, the food labeling health claim on the association between consumption of barley beta-glucan soluble fiber and CHD risk is a ‘‘public disclosure of information originally supplied by the Federal Government to the recipient for the purpose of disclosure to the public’’ (see 5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)). VI. Federalism FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule will have a preemptive effect on State law. Section 4(a) of the Executive Order requires agencies to ‘‘construe * * * a Federal statute to preempt State law only where the statute contains an express preemption provision, or there is some other clear evidence that the Congress intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of State authority conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the Federal statute.’’ Section 403A of the act (21 U.S.C. 343–1) is an express preemption provision. Section 403A (a) (5) of the act (21 U.S.C. 343–1(a)(5)) provides that * * * no State or political subdivision of a State may directly or indirectly establish under any authority or continue in effect as to any food in interstate commerce— * * * (5) any requirement respecting any claim of the type described in section 403(r)(1) made in the label or labeling of food that is not identical to the requirement of section 403(r). * * * Currently, this provision operates to pre-empt States from imposing health claim labeling requirements concerning barley beta-glucan soluble fiber and reduced risk of CHD. On December 23, 2005, FDA published an interim final rule which imposed requirements under section 403(r) of the act. This final rule affirms the December 23, 2005, amendment of food labeling regulations to add whole grain barley and dry milled barley products as eligible sources of beta-glucan fiber to the soluble fiber from certain foods and CHD health claim. Although this rule has a pre-emptive effect, in that it would preclude States from issuing any health claim labeling requirements for barley VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:15 May 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 and reduced risk of CHD that are not identical to those required by this final rule, this pre-emptive effect is consistent with what Congress set forth in section 403A of the act. Section 403A(a)(5) of the act displaces both State legislative requirements and State common law duties. Medtronic v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 503 (1996) (Breyer, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); id. at 510 (O’Connor, J., joined by Rehnquist, C.J., Scalia, J., and Thomas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504, 521 (1992) (plurality opinion); id. at 548–49 (Scalia, J., joined by Thomas, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part). FDA believes that the pre-emptive effect of the final rule is consistent with Executive order 13132. Section 4(e) of the Executive Order provides that ‘‘when an agency proposes to act through adjudication or rulemaking to preempt State law, the agency shall provide all affected State and local officials notice and an opportunity for appropriate participation in the proceedings.’’ FDA provided the States with an opportunity for appropriate participation in this rulemaking when it sought input from all stakeholders through publication of the interim final rule in the Federal Register on December 23, 2005. FDA received no comments from any States on the interim rulemaking. In addition, on January 13, 2006, FDA’s Division of Federal and State Relations provided notice via fax and email transmission to State health commissioners, State agriculture commissioners, food program directors, and drug program directors as well as FDA field personnel, of FDA’s intended amendment to add barley beta-glucan soluble fiber to the soluble fiber from certain foods and CHD health claim (§ 101.81). The notice provided the States with further opportunity for input on the rule. It advised the States of the publication of the interim final rule and encouraged State and local governments to review the notice and to provide any comments to the docket (Docket No. 2004P–0512), opened in the December 23, 2005 Federal Register notice, by the close of the comment period indicated in the Federal Register notice (i.e., by March 8, 2006), or to contact certain named individuals. FDA received no comments in response to this notice. The notice has been filed in the above numbered docket. In conclusion, the agency believes that it has complied with all of the applicable requirements under the Executive order and has determined that PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 the pre-emptive effects of this rule are consistent with Executive Order 13132. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 101 Food labeling, Incorporation by Reference, Nutrition, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. I Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 101 is amended as follows: PART 101—FOOD LABELING Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 21 CFR part 101 which was published at 70 FR 76150 on December 23, 2005, is adopted as a final rule without change. I Dated: May 15, 2006. Jeffrey Shuren, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 06–4703 Filed 5–19–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of Labor-Management Standards Employment Standards Administration 29 CFR Part 220 RIN 1215–AB55 Airline Employee Protection Program; Rescission of Regulations Pursuant to Pub. L. 105–220, Which Repealed the Airline Employee Protection Program Office of Labor-Management Standards, Employment Standards Administration, Labor. ACTION: Final rule, rescission of regulations. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Section 199(a)(6) of the Workforce Investment Act, Pub. L. 105– 220, 112 Stat. 1059 (1998), repealed the Airline Employee Protection Program, originally established pursuant to Section 43 of the Airline Deregulation Act, Pub. L. 95–504, 92 Stat. 1705 (1978), and subsequently codified at 49 U.S.C. 42101–42106. In accordance with the provisions of the Workforce Investment Act, the Department of Labor (Department) is issuing this final rule to rescind its regulations established by 29 CFR Part 220, to administer the Airline Employee Protection Program. DATES: Effective Date: May 22, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick A. Hyde, Chief, Division of Statutory Programs, Office of Labor- E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM 22MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 98 (Monday, May 22, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29248-29250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4703]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 101

[Docket No. 2004P-0512]


Food Labeling: Health Claims; Soluble Dietary Fiber From Certain 
Foods and Coronary Heart Disease

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is adopting as a

[[Page 29249]]

final rule, without change, the provisions of the interim final rule 
that amended the regulation authorizing a health claim on the 
relationship between beta-glucan soluble fiber from whole oat sources 
and reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) by adding barley as an 
additional source of beta-glucan soluble fiber eligible for the health 
claim. FDA is taking this action to complete the rulemaking initiated 
with the interim final rule.

DATES: This rule is effective May 22, 2006. The Director of the Office 
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference in 
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of certain 
publications in 21 CFR 101.81(c)(2)(ii)(A)(5) as of December 23, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James E. Hoadley, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-830), Food and Drug Administration, 
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 301-436-1450.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of December 23, 2005 (70 FR 76150), FDA 
published an interim final rule to amend the regulation that authorizes 
a health claim on the relationship between soluble fiber from certain 
foods and CHD risk (Sec.  101.81 (21 CFR 101.81)) to include beta-
glucan soluble fiber from barley. Under sections 403(r)(3)(B)(i) and 
(r)(7) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 
343(r)(3)(B)(i) and (r)(7)), FDA issued this interim final rule in 
response to a petition filed under section 403(r)(4) of the act. 
Section 403(r)(3)(B)(i) of the act states that the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services (and, by delegation, FDA) shall issue a regulation 
authorizing a health claim only if FDA ``determines, based on the 
totality of publicly available scientific evidence (including evidence 
from well-designed studies conducted in a manner which is consistent 
with generally recognized scientific procedures and principles), that 
there is significant scientific agreement, among experts qualified by 
scientific training and experience to evaluate such claims, that the 
claim is supported by such evidence'' (see also 21 CFR 101.14(c)). 
Section 403(r)(4) of the act sets out the procedures that FDA is to 
follow upon receiving a health claim petition. Section 403(r)(7) of the 
act permits FDA to make proposed regulations issued under section 
403(r) effective upon publication pending consideration of public 
comment and publication of a final regulation if the agency determines 
that such action is necessary for public health reasons (70 FR 76150 at 
76157).
    On August 3, 2004, the National Barley Foods Council (petitioner), 
submitted a health claim petition to FDA requesting that the agency 
amend the ``Soluble fiber from certain foods and coronary heart disease 
health claim'' at Sec.  101.81 to include barley and barley products as 
an additional source of beta-glucan soluble fiber eligible for the 
health claim. FDA filed the petition for comprehensive review in 
accordance with section 403(r)(4) of the act on November 10, 2004. The 
petitioner requested that FDA grant an interim final rule by which 
labeling of barley-containing foods could bear the health claim prior 
to publication of a final rule.
    FDA considered the scientific evidence presented in the petition as 
part of its review of the scientific literature on barley beta-glucan 
soluble fiber and CHD risk, as well as information previously 
considered by the agency on the relationship of consumption of beta-
glucan containing oat foods and blood (serum or plasma) cholesterol 
levels. The agency summarized this evidence in the interim final rule 
(70 FR 76150 at 76153--76155). Based on the available evidence, FDA 
concluded that consuming whole grain barley and dry milled barley 
products that provide at least 3 grams of beta-glucan soluble fiber per 
day, is effective in lowering blood total and LDL cholesterol; and that 
the cholesterol-lowering effects of beta-glucan soluble fiber in dry 
milled barley products is comparable to that of the oat sources of 
beta-soluble glucan fiber now listed in Sec.  101.81(c)(2)(ii)(A). 
Consequently, FDA amended Sec.  101.81 to broaden the health claim to 
include whole grain barley and dry milled barley products as an 
additional source of beta-glucan soluble fiber eligible for the health 
claim.

II. Summary of Comments and the Agency's Response

    FDA solicited comments on the interim final rule. The comment 
period closed on March 8, 2006. The agency received no comments related 
to the requirements in the interim final rule. Therefore, FDA is 
adopting, without change, as a final rule, the interim final rule that 
amended Sec.  101.81 to include dry milled barley products as an 
eligible source of beta-glucan soluble fiber for the soluble fiber from 
certain foods and CHD health claim.

III. Analysis of Impacts

    FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive 
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and 
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive 
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of 
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to 
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including 
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other 
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The costs and benefits 
of available regulatory alternatives analyzed in the interim final rule 
(70 FR 76150) are adopted without change in this final rule. By now 
reaffirming that interim final rule, FDA has not imposed any new 
requirements. Therefore, there are no additional costs and benefits 
associated with this final rule.

A. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    We have examined the economic implications of this final rule, as 
required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). If a 
rule has a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze 
regulatory options that would minimize the economic impact of the rule 
on small entities. As this final rule does not make any changes to the 
interim final rule or our analysis included therein, this final rule 
does not impose any new costs on firms. Accordingly, we certify that 
this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.

B. Unfunded Mandates

    Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 
U.S.C. 1501 et seq., 1532) requires that agencies prepare a written 
statement, of anticipated costs and benefits before proposing any rule 
that may result in an expenditure by State, local, and tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of 
$100,000,000 in any one year (adjusted annually for inflation). This 
final rule does not create such a mandate. The current threshold after 
adjustment for inflation is $115 million, using the most current (2003) 
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not 
expect this final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would 
meet or exceed this amount.

IV. Environmental Impact

    FDA has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(p) that this action is of a 
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an

[[Page 29250]]

environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required.

V. Paperwork Reduction Act

    FDA has concluded that the labeling provisions of this final rule 
are not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget 
because they do not constitute a ``collection of information'' under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). Rather, the 
food labeling health claim on the association between consumption of 
barley beta-glucan soluble fiber and CHD risk is a ``public disclosure 
of information originally supplied by the Federal Government to the 
recipient for the purpose of disclosure to the public'' (see 5 CFR 
1320.3(c)(2)).

VI. Federalism

    FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles 
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule 
will have a pre-emptive effect on State law. Section 4(a) of the 
Executive Order requires agencies to ``construe * * * a Federal statute 
to preempt State law only where the statute contains an express 
preemption provision, or there is some other clear evidence that the 
Congress intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of 
State authority conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under 
the Federal statute.'' Section 403A of the act (21 U.S.C. 343-1) is an 
express pre-emption provision. Section 403A (a) (5) of the act (21 
U.S.C. 343-1(a)(5)) provides that * * * no State or political 
subdivision of a State may directly or indirectly establish under any 
authority or continue in effect as to any food in interstate commerce-- 
* * * (5) any requirement respecting any claim of the type described in 
section 403(r)(1) made in the label or labeling of food that is not 
identical to the requirement of section 403(r). * * *
    Currently, this provision operates to pre-empt States from imposing 
health claim labeling requirements concerning barley beta-glucan 
soluble fiber and reduced risk of CHD. On December 23, 2005, FDA 
published an interim final rule which imposed requirements under 
section 403(r) of the act. This final rule affirms the December 23, 
2005, amendment of food labeling regulations to add whole grain barley 
and dry milled barley products as eligible sources of beta-glucan fiber 
to the soluble fiber from certain foods and CHD health claim. Although 
this rule has a pre-emptive effect, in that it would preclude States 
from issuing any health claim labeling requirements for barley and 
reduced risk of CHD that are not identical to those required by this 
final rule, this pre-emptive effect is consistent with what Congress 
set forth in section 403A of the act. Section 403A(a)(5) of the act 
displaces both State legislative requirements and State common law 
duties. Medtronic v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 503 (1996) (Breyer, J., 
concurring in part and concurring in judgment); id. at 510 (O'Connor, 
J., joined by Rehnquist, C.J., Scalia, J., and Thomas, J., concurring 
in part and dissenting in part); Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 
U.S. 504, 521 (1992) (plurality opinion); id. at 548-49 (Scalia, J., 
joined by Thomas, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in 
part).
    FDA believes that the pre-emptive effect of the final rule is 
consistent with Executive order 13132. Section 4(e) of the Executive 
Order provides that ``when an agency proposes to act through 
adjudication or rulemaking to preempt State law, the agency shall 
provide all affected State and local officials notice and an 
opportunity for appropriate participation in the proceedings.'' FDA 
provided the States with an opportunity for appropriate participation 
in this rulemaking when it sought input from all stakeholders through 
publication of the interim final rule in the Federal Register on 
December 23, 2005. FDA received no comments from any States on the 
interim rulemaking.
    In addition, on January 13, 2006, FDA's Division of Federal and 
State Relations provided notice via fax and e-mail transmission to 
State health commissioners, State agriculture commissioners, food 
program directors, and drug program directors as well as FDA field 
personnel, of FDA's intended amendment to add barley beta-glucan 
soluble fiber to the soluble fiber from certain foods and CHD health 
claim (Sec.  101.81). The notice provided the States with further 
opportunity for input on the rule. It advised the States of the 
publication of the interim final rule and encouraged State and local 
governments to review the notice and to provide any comments to the 
docket (Docket No. 2004P-0512), opened in the December 23, 2005 Federal 
Register notice, by the close of the comment period indicated in the 
Federal Register notice (i.e., by March 8, 2006), or to contact certain 
named individuals. FDA received no comments in response to this notice. 
The notice has been filed in the above numbered docket.
    In conclusion, the agency believes that it has complied with all of 
the applicable requirements under the Executive order and has 
determined that the pre-emptive effects of this rule are consistent 
with Executive Order 13132.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 101

    Food labeling, Incorporation by Reference, Nutrition, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
101 is amended as follows:

PART 101--FOOD LABELING

0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 21 CFR part 101 which was 
published at 70 FR 76150 on December 23, 2005, is adopted as a final 
rule without change.

    Dated: May 15, 2006.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 06-4703 Filed 5-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.