Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 29147-29148 [E6-7661]
Download as PDF
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Notices
Use EPA’s electronic docket and
comment system at https://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and
to access those documents in the docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then
key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing at https://www.regulations.gov,
as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket,
go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Title: NESHAP for Brick and
Structural Clay Manufacturing
(Renewal).
ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number
2022.03, OMB Control Number 2060–
0508.
ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to
expire on May 31, 2006. Under OMB
regulations, the Agency may continue to
conduct or sponsor the collection of
information while this submission is
pending at OMB. An Agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control numbers for EPA’s
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after
appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9,
and displayed either by publication in
the Federal Register or by other
appropriate means, such as on the
related collection instrument or form, if
applicable. The display of OMB control
numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
Abstract: The National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) for brick and structural clay
products (BSCP) manufacturing, were
proposed on July 22, 2002 (67 FR
47894), promulgated on May 16, 2003
(68 FR 26690). These standards apply to
each existing, new or reconstructed
BSCP manufacturing facility.
Owners or operators of the affected
facilities must make the following
notification: (1) Initial notification, (2)
notification of initial performance test,
(3) notification of compliance status.
Affected sources must submit a
compliance report, and a startup,
shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) plan.
Respondents are also required to
maintain records of the occurrence and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
duration of any startup, shutdown, or
malfunction.
Any owner or operator subject to the
provisions of this subpart must maintain
a file of these measurements, and retain
the file for at least five years following
the collection of such measurements,
maintenance reports, and records. All
reports are sent to the delegated state or
local authority. In the event that there
is no such delegated authority, the
reports are sent directly to the EPA
regional office.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
Control Number. The OMB Control
Numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed
in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15,
and are identified on the form and/or
instrument, if applicable.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 85 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
Respondents/Affected Entities: Brick
and structural clay manufacturing
facilities.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
72.
Frequency of Response: On occasion,
semiannually and initially.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
14,086.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$1,125,915, which includes $10,000
annualized capital, start up costs,
$5,000 annualized O&M costs, and
$1,110,915 O&M costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a
decrease of 3,385 hours in the total
estimated burden currently identified in
the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens. The decrease in burden from
the most recently approved ICR is due
to the requirements of the standard that
states all existing facilities must be in
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29147
full compliance three years after
promulgation, which would be the
fourth year or the first year of this
renewal ICR. All existing sources, along
with the additional new source would
be fulfilling the applicable standards
thus, justifying the decrease in
respondent’s burden as compared to the
active ICR.
There is a decrease in the capital/
startup and operations and maintenance
(O&M) costs from the previous ICR. The
reason for this decrease is also due to
the fact that all existing facilities are
required to be in full compliance during
the fourth year, thus reflecting the
decrease incurred in this renewal ICR.
Dated: May 8, 2006.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E6–7652 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6675–4]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17845).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20060083, ERP No. D–AFS–
K65301–AZ, Jacob Ryan Vegetation
Management Project, Implementation,
Kaibab National Forest, North Kaibab
Ranger District, Coconino County, AZ.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about potential
effects to regional air quality, water
quality, and old growth forest; and
recommended that the final EIS include
a more detailed air quality effects
analysis, implementation plan for
BMPs, and management strategy to
maintain old growth forest. Rating EC2.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20060139, ERP No. F1–AFS–
K65269–CA, Southern California
National Forests Land Management
Plans, Revision of the Angeles,
Cleveland, Los Padres, and San
Bernardino National Forests Land
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
29148
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Notices
Management Plans, Implementation,
San Bernardino, Riverside, and San
Diego Counties, CA.
Summary: No comment letter was
sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20060076, ERP No. F–CGD–
G39043–00, Main Pass Energy Hub
Deepwater Port License Application,
Proposes to Construct a Deepwater
Port and Associated Anchorages, U.S.
Army COE Section 10 and 404
Permits, Gulf of Mexico (GOM),
southeast of the coast of Louisiana in
Main Pass Lease Block (MP) 2999 and
from the Mississippi coast in MP 164.
Summary: EPA appreciates the
improvements that have been
incorporated into the proposed LNG
project; therefore, concludes that the
ORV technology would result in minor
adverse impacts to water quality and
biological resources. EPA recommends
that USCG and the Maritime
Administration consider operational
modifications to further reduce impacts.
EIS No. 20060111, ERP No. FC–COE–
H36012–MO, St. Johns Bayou and
New Madrid Floodway Project,
Channel Enlargement and
Improvement, Revised Information to
Clarify and Address Issues of
Concern, Flood Control National
Economic Development (NED), New
Madrid, Mississippi and Scott
Counties, MO.
Summary: EPA does not object to
proposed project.
Dated: May 16, 2006.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E6–7661 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6675–3]
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed May 8, 2006 Through May 12,
2006.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20060178, Draft EIS, WPA, 00,
Big Stone II Power Plant and
Transmission Project, Propose Power
Plant, Transmission Alternatives, and
Substation Modification, (DOE/EIS–
0377), U.S. Army COE Section 10 and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
404 Permits, Big Stone City, Grant
County, SD and MN, Comment Period
Ends: July 3, 2006, Contact: Nancy
Werdel 720–962–7251.
EIS No. 20060179, Final EIS, AFS, WY,
Moose-Gypsum Project, Proposes to
Authorize Vegetation Treatments,
Watershed Improvements, and Travel
Plan and Recreation Updates,
Pinedale Ranger District, BridgerTeton National Forest, Sublette
County, WY, Wait Period Ends: June
19, 2006, Contact: Craig Trulock 307–
367–4326.
EIS No. 20060180, Final EIS, AFS, IN,
Tell City Windthrow 2004 Project,
Salvage Harvest and Prescribed
Burning of Windthrow Timber,
Implementation, Hoosier National
Forest, Perry, Crawford and Dubois
Counties, IN, Wait Period Ends: June
19, 2006, Contact: Ron Ellis 812–275–
5987.
EIS No. 20060181, Draft EIS, BLM, 00,
Devers-Palo Verde No. 2 Transmission
Line Project, Construction and
Operation a New 230-mile 500 kV
Electric Transmission Line between
Devers Substation in California and
Harquahala Generating Substation in
Arizona, Comment Period Ends: July
5, 2006, Contact: Greg Hill 760–251–
4840.
EIS No. 20060182, Draft EIS, COE, CA,
San Clemente Dam Seismic Safety
Project, Increase Dam Safety to Meet
Current Design Standards, Monterey
County, CA, Comment Period Ends:
July 3, 2006, Contact: Robert Smith
415–977–8450.
EIS No. 20060183, Final EIS, FAA, UT,
St. George Municipal Airport
Replacement, Funding, City of St.
George, Washington County, UT, Wait
Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact:
T.J. Stetz 425–227–2611.
EIS No. 20060184, Draft EIS, COE, MD,
Masonville Dredge Material
Containment Facility (DMCF),
Construction from Baltimore Harbor
Channel north of Point-Rock Point
Line, U.S. Army COE Section 10 and
404 Permits, Baltimore, MD,
Comment Period Ends: July 7, 2006,
Contact: Jon Romeo 410–962–6079.
EIS No. 20060185, Final EIS, AFS, MI,
Hiawatha National Forest, Proposed
Land and Resource Management Plan,
Forest Plan Revision, Implementation,
Alger, Cheboygan, Chippewa, Delta,
Luce, Mackinac, Marquette and
Schoolcraft Counties, MI, Wait Period
Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: Dave
Maercklein 906–789–3301.
EIS No. 20060186, Final Supplement,
TPT, CA, Presidio Trust Public Health
Service Hospital (PUSH or Building
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1801) at the Presidio of San Francisco
(Area B) of Presidio Trust
Management Plan, Rehabilitation and
Reuse of Buildings, Gold Gate
National Recreation Area, San
Francisco Bay, Marin County, CA,
Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006,
Contact: John G. Pelka 415–561–5300.
EIS No. 20060187, Draft EIS, AFS, WI,
Long Rail Vegetation and
Transportation Management Project,
Implementation, Eagle River-Florence
Ranger District, Chequamegon-Nicolet
National Forest, Florence and Forest
Counties, WI, Comment Period Ends:
July 3, 2006, Contact: Christine
Brunner 715–479–2827.
EIS No. 20060188, Draft EIS, NOA, CA,
Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary Management Plan Review,
Implementation, Santa Barbara and
Ventura Counties, CA, Comment
Period Ends: July 21, 2006, Contact:
Chris Mobley 805–966–7107 x465.
EIS No. 20060189, Final EIS, NRC, OH,
American Centrifuge Plant, Gas
Centrifuge Uranium Enrichment
Facility, Construction, Operation, and
Decommission, License Issuance,
Piketon, OH, Wait Period Ends: June
19, 2006, Contact: Matthew Blevins
301–415–7684.
EIS No. 20060190, Final EIS, AFS, MI,
Ottawa National Forest, Proposed
Land and Resource Management Plan,
Forest Plan Revision, Implementation,
Baraga, Gogebic, Houghton, Iron,
Marquette and Ontonagan Counties,
MI, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006,
Contact: Robert Brenner 906–931–
1330 x317.
EIS No. 20060191, Final EIS, FAA, FL,
Panama City-Bay County International
Airport (PFN), Proposed Relocation to
a New Site, NPDES Permit and U.S.
Army COE Section 404 Permit, Bay
County, FL, Wait Period Ends: June
19, 2006, Contact: Virginia Lane 407–
872–6331 Ext. 129.
EIS No. 20060192, Draft EIS, AFS, ID,
Myrtle Creek Healthy Forest
Restoration Act Project, Proposes
Aquatic and Vegetation Improvement
Treatments, Panhandle National
Forests, Bonners Ferry Ranger
District, City of Bonners Ferry,
Boundary County, ID, Comment
Period Ends: July 3, 2006, Contact:
Doug Nishek 208–267–5561.
EIS No. 20060193, Final EIS, AFS, UT,
Ogden Ranger District Travel Plan, To
Update the Travel Management Plan,
Wasatch-Cache National Plan, Ogden
Ranger District, Box Elder, Cache,
Morgan, Weber and Rich Counties,
UT, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006,
Contact: Rick Vallejos 801–625–5112.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29147-29148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7661]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6675-4]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17845).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20060083, ERP No. D-AFS-K65301-AZ, Jacob Ryan Vegetation
Management Project, Implementation, Kaibab National Forest, North
Kaibab Ranger District, Coconino County, AZ.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential
effects to regional air quality, water quality, and old growth forest;
and recommended that the final EIS include a more detailed air quality
effects analysis, implementation plan for BMPs, and management strategy
to maintain old growth forest. Rating EC2.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20060139, ERP No. F1-AFS-K65269-CA, Southern California
National Forests Land Management Plans, Revision of the Angeles,
Cleveland, Los Padres, and San Bernardino National Forests Land
[[Page 29148]]
Management Plans, Implementation, San Bernardino, Riverside, and San
Diego Counties, CA.
Summary: No comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20060076, ERP No. F-CGD-G39043-00, Main Pass Energy Hub
Deepwater Port License Application, Proposes to Construct a Deepwater
Port and Associated Anchorages, U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404
Permits, Gulf of Mexico (GOM), southeast of the coast of Louisiana in
Main Pass Lease Block (MP) 2999 and from the Mississippi coast in MP
164.
Summary: EPA appreciates the improvements that have been
incorporated into the proposed LNG project; therefore, concludes that
the ORV technology would result in minor adverse impacts to water
quality and biological resources. EPA recommends that USCG and the
Maritime Administration consider operational modifications to further
reduce impacts.
EIS No. 20060111, ERP No. FC-COE-H36012-MO, St. Johns Bayou and New
Madrid Floodway Project, Channel Enlargement and Improvement, Revised
Information to Clarify and Address Issues of Concern, Flood Control
National Economic Development (NED), New Madrid, Mississippi and Scott
Counties, MO.
Summary: EPA does not object to proposed project.
Dated: May 16, 2006.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E6-7661 Filed 5-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P