Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 29147-29148 [E6-7661]

Download as PDF wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Notices Use EPA’s electronic docket and comment system at https:// www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then key in the docket ID number identified above. Please note that EPA’s policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing at https://www.regulations.gov, as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Title: NESHAP for Brick and Structural Clay Manufacturing (Renewal). ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2022.03, OMB Control Number 2060– 0508. ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2006. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for brick and structural clay products (BSCP) manufacturing, were proposed on July 22, 2002 (67 FR 47894), promulgated on May 16, 2003 (68 FR 26690). These standards apply to each existing, new or reconstructed BSCP manufacturing facility. Owners or operators of the affected facilities must make the following notification: (1) Initial notification, (2) notification of initial performance test, (3) notification of compliance status. Affected sources must submit a compliance report, and a startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) plan. Respondents are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:37 May 18, 2006 Jkt 208001 duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction. Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart must maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the collection of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the EPA regional office. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 85 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Brick and structural clay manufacturing facilities. Estimated Number of Respondents: 72. Frequency of Response: On occasion, semiannually and initially. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 14,086. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $1,125,915, which includes $10,000 annualized capital, start up costs, $5,000 annualized O&M costs, and $1,110,915 O&M costs. Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 3,385 hours in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. The decrease in burden from the most recently approved ICR is due to the requirements of the standard that states all existing facilities must be in PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 29147 full compliance three years after promulgation, which would be the fourth year or the first year of this renewal ICR. All existing sources, along with the additional new source would be fulfilling the applicable standards thus, justifying the decrease in respondent’s burden as compared to the active ICR. There is a decrease in the capital/ startup and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs from the previous ICR. The reason for this decrease is also due to the fact that all existing facilities are required to be in full compliance during the fourth year, thus reflecting the decrease incurred in this renewal ICR. Dated: May 8, 2006. Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [FR Doc. E6–7652 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–6675–4] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 202–564–7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17845). Draft EISs EIS No. 20060083, ERP No. D–AFS– K65301–AZ, Jacob Ryan Vegetation Management Project, Implementation, Kaibab National Forest, North Kaibab Ranger District, Coconino County, AZ. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential effects to regional air quality, water quality, and old growth forest; and recommended that the final EIS include a more detailed air quality effects analysis, implementation plan for BMPs, and management strategy to maintain old growth forest. Rating EC2. Final EISs EIS No. 20060139, ERP No. F1–AFS– K65269–CA, Southern California National Forests Land Management Plans, Revision of the Angeles, Cleveland, Los Padres, and San Bernardino National Forests Land E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM 19MYN1 29148 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Notices Management Plans, Implementation, San Bernardino, Riverside, and San Diego Counties, CA. Summary: No comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. EIS No. 20060076, ERP No. F–CGD– G39043–00, Main Pass Energy Hub Deepwater Port License Application, Proposes to Construct a Deepwater Port and Associated Anchorages, U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Gulf of Mexico (GOM), southeast of the coast of Louisiana in Main Pass Lease Block (MP) 2999 and from the Mississippi coast in MP 164. Summary: EPA appreciates the improvements that have been incorporated into the proposed LNG project; therefore, concludes that the ORV technology would result in minor adverse impacts to water quality and biological resources. EPA recommends that USCG and the Maritime Administration consider operational modifications to further reduce impacts. EIS No. 20060111, ERP No. FC–COE– H36012–MO, St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway Project, Channel Enlargement and Improvement, Revised Information to Clarify and Address Issues of Concern, Flood Control National Economic Development (NED), New Madrid, Mississippi and Scott Counties, MO. Summary: EPA does not object to proposed project. Dated: May 16, 2006. Robert W. Hargrove, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. E6–7661 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–6675–3] wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed May 8, 2006 Through May 12, 2006. Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. EIS No. 20060178, Draft EIS, WPA, 00, Big Stone II Power Plant and Transmission Project, Propose Power Plant, Transmission Alternatives, and Substation Modification, (DOE/EIS– 0377), U.S. Army COE Section 10 and VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:37 May 18, 2006 Jkt 208001 404 Permits, Big Stone City, Grant County, SD and MN, Comment Period Ends: July 3, 2006, Contact: Nancy Werdel 720–962–7251. EIS No. 20060179, Final EIS, AFS, WY, Moose-Gypsum Project, Proposes to Authorize Vegetation Treatments, Watershed Improvements, and Travel Plan and Recreation Updates, Pinedale Ranger District, BridgerTeton National Forest, Sublette County, WY, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: Craig Trulock 307– 367–4326. EIS No. 20060180, Final EIS, AFS, IN, Tell City Windthrow 2004 Project, Salvage Harvest and Prescribed Burning of Windthrow Timber, Implementation, Hoosier National Forest, Perry, Crawford and Dubois Counties, IN, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: Ron Ellis 812–275– 5987. EIS No. 20060181, Draft EIS, BLM, 00, Devers-Palo Verde No. 2 Transmission Line Project, Construction and Operation a New 230-mile 500 kV Electric Transmission Line between Devers Substation in California and Harquahala Generating Substation in Arizona, Comment Period Ends: July 5, 2006, Contact: Greg Hill 760–251– 4840. EIS No. 20060182, Draft EIS, COE, CA, San Clemente Dam Seismic Safety Project, Increase Dam Safety to Meet Current Design Standards, Monterey County, CA, Comment Period Ends: July 3, 2006, Contact: Robert Smith 415–977–8450. EIS No. 20060183, Final EIS, FAA, UT, St. George Municipal Airport Replacement, Funding, City of St. George, Washington County, UT, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: T.J. Stetz 425–227–2611. EIS No. 20060184, Draft EIS, COE, MD, Masonville Dredge Material Containment Facility (DMCF), Construction from Baltimore Harbor Channel north of Point-Rock Point Line, U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Baltimore, MD, Comment Period Ends: July 7, 2006, Contact: Jon Romeo 410–962–6079. EIS No. 20060185, Final EIS, AFS, MI, Hiawatha National Forest, Proposed Land and Resource Management Plan, Forest Plan Revision, Implementation, Alger, Cheboygan, Chippewa, Delta, Luce, Mackinac, Marquette and Schoolcraft Counties, MI, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: Dave Maercklein 906–789–3301. EIS No. 20060186, Final Supplement, TPT, CA, Presidio Trust Public Health Service Hospital (PUSH or Building PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1801) at the Presidio of San Francisco (Area B) of Presidio Trust Management Plan, Rehabilitation and Reuse of Buildings, Gold Gate National Recreation Area, San Francisco Bay, Marin County, CA, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: John G. Pelka 415–561–5300. EIS No. 20060187, Draft EIS, AFS, WI, Long Rail Vegetation and Transportation Management Project, Implementation, Eagle River-Florence Ranger District, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Florence and Forest Counties, WI, Comment Period Ends: July 3, 2006, Contact: Christine Brunner 715–479–2827. EIS No. 20060188, Draft EIS, NOA, CA, Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Management Plan Review, Implementation, Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties, CA, Comment Period Ends: July 21, 2006, Contact: Chris Mobley 805–966–7107 x465. EIS No. 20060189, Final EIS, NRC, OH, American Centrifuge Plant, Gas Centrifuge Uranium Enrichment Facility, Construction, Operation, and Decommission, License Issuance, Piketon, OH, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: Matthew Blevins 301–415–7684. EIS No. 20060190, Final EIS, AFS, MI, Ottawa National Forest, Proposed Land and Resource Management Plan, Forest Plan Revision, Implementation, Baraga, Gogebic, Houghton, Iron, Marquette and Ontonagan Counties, MI, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: Robert Brenner 906–931– 1330 x317. EIS No. 20060191, Final EIS, FAA, FL, Panama City-Bay County International Airport (PFN), Proposed Relocation to a New Site, NPDES Permit and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, Bay County, FL, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: Virginia Lane 407– 872–6331 Ext. 129. EIS No. 20060192, Draft EIS, AFS, ID, Myrtle Creek Healthy Forest Restoration Act Project, Proposes Aquatic and Vegetation Improvement Treatments, Panhandle National Forests, Bonners Ferry Ranger District, City of Bonners Ferry, Boundary County, ID, Comment Period Ends: July 3, 2006, Contact: Doug Nishek 208–267–5561. EIS No. 20060193, Final EIS, AFS, UT, Ogden Ranger District Travel Plan, To Update the Travel Management Plan, Wasatch-Cache National Plan, Ogden Ranger District, Box Elder, Cache, Morgan, Weber and Rich Counties, UT, Wait Period Ends: June 19, 2006, Contact: Rick Vallejos 801–625–5112. E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM 19MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29147-29148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6675-4]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. 
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings 
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published 
in FR dated April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17845).

Draft EISs

EIS No. 20060083, ERP No. D-AFS-K65301-AZ, Jacob Ryan Vegetation 
Management Project, Implementation, Kaibab National Forest, North 
Kaibab Ranger District, Coconino County, AZ.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential 
effects to regional air quality, water quality, and old growth forest; 
and recommended that the final EIS include a more detailed air quality 
effects analysis, implementation plan for BMPs, and management strategy 
to maintain old growth forest. Rating EC2.

Final EISs

EIS No. 20060139, ERP No. F1-AFS-K65269-CA, Southern California 
National Forests Land Management Plans, Revision of the Angeles, 
Cleveland, Los Padres, and San Bernardino National Forests Land

[[Page 29148]]

Management Plans, Implementation, San Bernardino, Riverside, and San 
Diego Counties, CA.

    Summary: No comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.

EIS No. 20060076, ERP No. F-CGD-G39043-00, Main Pass Energy Hub 
Deepwater Port License Application, Proposes to Construct a Deepwater 
Port and Associated Anchorages, U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 
Permits, Gulf of Mexico (GOM), southeast of the coast of Louisiana in 
Main Pass Lease Block (MP) 2999 and from the Mississippi coast in MP 
164.

    Summary: EPA appreciates the improvements that have been 
incorporated into the proposed LNG project; therefore, concludes that 
the ORV technology would result in minor adverse impacts to water 
quality and biological resources. EPA recommends that USCG and the 
Maritime Administration consider operational modifications to further 
reduce impacts.

EIS No. 20060111, ERP No. FC-COE-H36012-MO, St. Johns Bayou and New 
Madrid Floodway Project, Channel Enlargement and Improvement, Revised 
Information to Clarify and Address Issues of Concern, Flood Control 
National Economic Development (NED), New Madrid, Mississippi and Scott 
Counties, MO.

    Summary: EPA does not object to proposed project.

    Dated: May 16, 2006.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E6-7661 Filed 5-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.