Criteria for the Safe and Environmentally Protective Use of Granular Mine Tailings Known as “Chat”; Reopening the Comment Period, 29117-29118 [E6-7653]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—REGATTAS AND MARINE
PARADES
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 100.35–T05–036
to read as follows:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
§ 100.35–T05–036
Charles, Virginia
Chesapeake Bay, Cape
(a) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads
with a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the East Coast Boat
Racing Club power boat race under the
auspices of a Marine Event Permit
issued to the event sponsor and
approved by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Hampton Roads.
(4) Regulated area includes the waters
of the Chesapeake Bay, along the
shoreline adjacent to Cape Charles,
Virginia, to and including waters up to
300 yards offshore, parallel with the
Cape Charles Beach shoreline in this
area. The area is bounded on the south
by a line running northwesterly from
the Cape Charles shoreline at latitude
37°16′.2″ North, longitude 076°01′28.5″
West, to a point offshore approximately
300 yards at latitude 37°16′3.4″ North,
longitude 076°01′36.6″ West, and
bounded on the north by a line running
northwesterly from the Cape Charles
shoreline at latitude 37°16′26.2″ North,
longitude 076°01′14″ West, to a point
offshore approximately 300 yards at
latitude 37°16′28.9″ North, longitude
076°01′24.1″ West. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Special local regulations. (1)
Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the race course.
(c) Effective period. This section will
be enforced from 11:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
on August 5, 2006. If the race is
postponed due to weather, then the
temporary special local regulations will
be enforced during the same time period
the next day, August 6, 2006.
Dated: May 2, 2006.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–7618 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 278
[EPA–HQ–RCRA–2006–0097; FRL–8171–9]
RIN 2050–AG27
Criteria for the Safe and
Environmentally Protective Use of
Granular Mine Tailings Known as
‘‘Chat’’; Reopening the Comment
Period
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is reopening the comment
period for the proposed rule entitled
‘‘Criteria for the Safe and
Environmentally Protective Use of
Granular Mine Tailings Known as
‘Chat’.’’ This proposal was published on
April 4, 2006 (71 FR 16729), and the
comment period ended on May 4, 2006.
However, because a commenter has
requested additional time to respond to
the issues raised in the proposal, we are
reopening the comment period to allow
for an additional 30 day comment
period.
Comments may now be
submitted until June 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
RCRA–2006–0097, by one of the
following methods:
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29117
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: rcra-docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: 202–566–0272.
• Mail: send comments to RCRA
Docket, (5305T), Attention Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ–RCRA–2006–0097, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Please include
two copies. We request that you also
send a separate copy of the comment to
the contact person listed below (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
• Hand Delivery: In person or by
courier, deliver comments to: RCRA
Docket, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–RCRA–2006–0097, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room B–
108, Washington, DC 20004. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Please include two copies. We request
that you also send a separate copy of the
comment to the contact person listed
below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–RCRA–2006–
0097. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Do not submit information that
you consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Send or
deliver information identified as CBI to
only the following address: Ms. LaShan
Haynes, RCRA Document Control
Officer, EPA (Mail Code 5305W),
Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
RCRA–2006–0097, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, Washington, DC 20460. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
29118
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
We also request that interested parties
who would like information they
previously submitted to EPA to be
considered as part of this
reconsideration action identify the
relevant information by docket entry
numbers and page numbers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Hoffman, Office of Solid Waste
(5306W), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Ariel Rios Building, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0002, telephone
(703) 308–8413, e-mail address
hoffman.stephen@epa.gov. For more
information on this rulemaking, please
visit www.epa.gov/epaoswer/other/
mining/chat/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed rule that is the subject of this
notice, and which was published in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Federal Register on April 4, 2006 (71 FR
16729), proposes mandatory criteria for
the environmentally protective use of
chat for transportation construction
projects carried out in whole or in part
with Federal funds, and a certification
requirement. Chat used in
transportation projects must be
encapsulated in hot mix asphalt
concrete or Portland cement concrete
unless the use of chat is otherwise
authorized by a State or Federal
response action undertaken pursuant to
applicable Federal or State
environmental laws. In the proposal we
are also recommending criteria as
guidance on the environmentally
protective use of chat in nontransportation cement and concrete
projects.
The comment period for the proposed
rule ended on May, 4, 2006. However,
a public commenter (the U.S. Public
Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG)) has
requested that EPA extend the comment
period by 60 days, noting that the
additional time is needed to evaluate
and comment intelligently on this
important issue. This commenter also
noted that they need additional time to
consult with experts who understand
not only the chemistry of encapsulating
mine tailing, but also the different risks
if the final rule allows use of the chat
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in non-highway activities. In addition,
the commenter noted that the additional
time is needed to coordinate so that, as
much as possible, their comments
reflect the expertise and views of a
broad segment of their members.
EPA believes the request for
additional time is reasonable, however,
we believe 30 additional days is
adequate. The Agency believes an
additional 30 days is adequate because
this proposal is very narrow in scope
and the technical background
documents supporting this rule are not
extensive. In addition, it should be
noted that since the comment period
closed on May 4th and the Agency is
reopening the comment period,
commenters, in fact, will have more
than 30 days from the date that the
comment period closed. Therefore, we
are extending the comment period for
this proposal until June 19, 2006.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 278
Environmental protection, Chat,
Indians-lands, Mine tailings, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Waste.
Dated: May 12, 2006.
Matthew Hale,
Director, Office of Solid Waste.
[FR Doc. E6–7653 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29117-29118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7653]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 278
[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2006-0097; FRL-8171-9]
RIN 2050-AG27
Criteria for the Safe and Environmentally Protective Use of
Granular Mine Tailings Known as ``Chat''; Reopening the Comment Period
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reopening the
comment period for the proposed rule entitled ``Criteria for the Safe
and Environmentally Protective Use of Granular Mine Tailings Known as
`Chat'.'' This proposal was published on April 4, 2006 (71 FR 16729),
and the comment period ended on May 4, 2006. However, because a
commenter has requested additional time to respond to the issues raised
in the proposal, we are reopening the comment period to allow for an
additional 30 day comment period.
DATES: Comments may now be submitted until June 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2006-0097, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: rcra-docket@epa.gov.
Fax: 202-566-0272.
Mail: send comments to RCRA Docket, (5305T), Attention
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2006-0097, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Please include two copies. We request that you
also send a separate copy of the comment to the contact person listed
below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Hand Delivery: In person or by courier, deliver comments
to: RCRA Docket, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2006-0097, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room B-108, Washington, DC 20004. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. Please include two copies. We request that you also
send a separate copy of the comment to the contact person listed below
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-
2006-0097. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Send or deliver information identified
as CBI to only the following address: Ms. LaShan Haynes, RCRA Document
Control Officer, EPA (Mail Code 5305W), Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2006-0097, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20460. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in
[[Page 29118]]
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For
additional information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket
Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. We also
request that interested parties who would like information they
previously submitted to EPA to be considered as part of this
reconsideration action identify the relevant information by docket
entry numbers and page numbers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Hoffman, Office of Solid Waste
(5306W), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Building,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460-0002, telephone
(703) 308-8413, e-mail address hoffman.stephen@epa.gov. For more
information on this rulemaking, please visit www.epa.gov/epaoswer/
other/mining/chat/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule that is the subject of
this notice, and which was published in the Federal Register on April
4, 2006 (71 FR 16729), proposes mandatory criteria for the
environmentally protective use of chat for transportation construction
projects carried out in whole or in part with Federal funds, and a
certification requirement. Chat used in transportation projects must be
encapsulated in hot mix asphalt concrete or Portland cement concrete
unless the use of chat is otherwise authorized by a State or Federal
response action undertaken pursuant to applicable Federal or State
environmental laws. In the proposal we are also recommending criteria
as guidance on the environmentally protective use of chat in non-
transportation cement and concrete projects.
The comment period for the proposed rule ended on May, 4, 2006.
However, a public commenter (the U.S. Public Interest Research Group
(U.S. PIRG)) has requested that EPA extend the comment period by 60
days, noting that the additional time is needed to evaluate and comment
intelligently on this important issue. This commenter also noted that
they need additional time to consult with experts who understand not
only the chemistry of encapsulating mine tailing, but also the
different risks if the final rule allows use of the chat in non-highway
activities. In addition, the commenter noted that the additional time
is needed to coordinate so that, as much as possible, their comments
reflect the expertise and views of a broad segment of their members.
EPA believes the request for additional time is reasonable,
however, we believe 30 additional days is adequate. The Agency believes
an additional 30 days is adequate because this proposal is very narrow
in scope and the technical background documents supporting this rule
are not extensive. In addition, it should be noted that since the
comment period closed on May 4th and the Agency is reopening the
comment period, commenters, in fact, will have more than 30 days from
the date that the comment period closed. Therefore, we are extending
the comment period for this proposal until June 19, 2006.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 278
Environmental protection, Chat, Indians-lands, Mine tailings,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waste.
Dated: May 12, 2006.
Matthew Hale,
Director, Office of Solid Waste.
[FR Doc. E6-7653 Filed 5-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P