Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Regulations, 29096-29112 [06-4670]
Download as PDF
29096
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
flight. Do all the actions in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin in paragraph (f)(1)
or (f)(2) of this AD, except as provided by
paragraph (g) of this AD. Where the airplane
maintenance manuals (AMMs) and
component maintenance manuals (CMMs)
referenced by the applicable service bulletin
include procedures that allow bending the
girt bar retention spring, this AD does not
allow that procedure. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24
months, or after each maintenance task
where removal of and installation of the girt
bar is necessary, whichever occurs earlier.
(1) For Boeing Model 757–200 and –200CB
series airplanes: Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 757–52–0085, dated March
24, 2005.
(2) For Boeing Model 757–300 series
airplanes: Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 757–52–0086, dated March 24, 2005.
Equivalent Procedures
(g) Where Part 2—‘‘Inspection’’ of the
applicable service bulletin in paragraph (f)(1)
or (f)(2) of this AD specifies that actions may
be accomplished in accordance with an
‘‘approved equivalent procedure’’: The
corrective actions must be accomplished in
accordance with the applicable chapter/
section of the Boeing 757 AMM or Boeing
757 CMM specified in the applicable service
bulletin. Where the AMMs and CMMs
include procedures that allow bending the
girt bar retention spring, this AD does not
allow that procedure.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 11,
2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–7633 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
15 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. 060222048–6048–01]
RIN 0648–AT17
Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary Regulations
National Marine Sanctuary
Program (NMSP), National Ocean
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of public
availability of draft management plan/
draft environmental impact statement.
SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is
proposing a revised management plan
and a revised set of regulations for the
Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary (CINMS or Sanctuary). The
proposed set of regulations includes
both new regulations as well as changes
to existing regulations. Proposed new
regulations include prohibitions on:
Exploring for, developing, or producing
minerals within the Sanctuary;
abandoning matter on or in Sanctuary
submerged lands; taking marine
mammals, seabirds, or sea turtles within
or above the Sanctuary; possessing
within the Sanctuary any marine
mammal, sea turtle, or seabird; marking,
defacing, damaging, moving, removing,
or tampering with Sanctuary signs,
monuments, boundary markers, or
similar items; introducing or otherwise
releasing from within or into the
Sanctuary an introduced species; and
operating motorized personal watercraft
within waters of the Channel Islands
National Park. There are also proposed
changes to help clarify or refine existing
regulations.
The NMSP is also proposing certain
revisions to the Sanctuary’s Designation
Document. These include proposed
revisions of the Description of the Area
and proposed changes to the Scope of
Regulations, as well as changes to help
clarify, update, and refine other sections
of the Designation Document. No
changes are proposed for the ‘‘Fishing’’
and ‘‘Defense Activities’’ sections
within Article V (Relation to Other
Regulatory Programs) of the Designation
Document.
DATES: NOAA is publishing this
proposed rule to provide notice to the
public and invite advice,
recommendations, information, and
other comments from interested parties
on the proposed rule and Draft
Management Plan/Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DMP/DEIS). Public
hearings will be held as detailed below:
(1) Tuesday, June 27, 2006, at the
Sheraton Four Points hotel, San
Buenaventura Ballroom, 1050 Schooner
Drive, in Ventura, California.
(2) Thursday, June 29, 2006, at the
Earl Warren Showgrounds, Warren Hall,
3400 Calle Real Street, in Santa Barbara,
California.
Comments will be considered if
received by July 21, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Copies of the DMP/DEIS are
available at Channel Islands National
Marine Sanctuary, 113 Harbor Way,
Suite 150, Santa Barbara, California and
on the web at https://
channelislands.noaa.gov. You may
submit comments, identified by RIN
0648–AT17, by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: cinms.mgtplan@noaa.gov.
• Fax: (805) 568–1582.
• Mail: Chris Mobley,
Superintendent, Channel Islands
National Marine Sanctuary, 113 Harbor
Way, Suite 150, Santa Barbara,
California, 93109.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Channel
Islands National Marine Sanctuary, 113
Harbor Way, Suite 150, Santa Barbara,
California, 93109.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Murray at (805) 884–1464 or
michael.murray@noaa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
Pursuant to section 304(e) of the
NMSA, 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq. the
National Marine Sanctuary Program
(NMSP) conducted a review of the
management plan and regulations for
the Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary (CINMS or Sanctuary),
located off the coast of southern
California. The review has resulted in a
proposed new management plan for the
Sanctuary, some proposed changes to
existing regulations, and some proposed
new regulations. The proposed new
regulations include prohibitions on:
• Exploring for, developing, or
producing minerals within the
Sanctuary, except producing byproducts incidental to authorized
hydrocarbon production;
• Abandoning any structure, material,
or other matter on or in the submerged
lands of the Sanctuary;
• Taking any marine mammal, sea
turtle, or seabird within or above the
Sanctuary, except as expressly
authorized by the Marine Mammal
Protection Act, as amended, (MMPA),
16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., Endangered
Species Act, as amended, (ESA), 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq., Migratory Bird
Treaty Act, as amended, (MBTA), 16
U.S.C. 703 et seq., or any regulation, as
amended, promulgated under the
MMPA, ESA, or MBTA.
• Possessing within the Sanctuary
(regardless of where taken from, moved,
or removed from) any marine mammal,
sea turtle, or seabird, except as
expressly authorized by the MMPA,
ESA, MBTA, or any regulation, as
amended, promulgated under the
MMPA, ESA, or MBTA;
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
• Marking, defacing, damaging,
moving, removing, or tampering with
any sign, notice or placard, whether
temporary or permanent, or any
monument, stake, post, or other
boundary marker related to the
Sanctuary;
• Introducing or otherwise releasing
from within or into the Sanctuary an
introduced species, except striped bass
(Roccus saxatilis) released during catch
and release fishing activity; and
• Operating a motorized personal
watercraft (MPWC) within waters of the
Channel Islands National Park.
These measures would afford better
protection to the natural and cultural
resources of CINMS.
Existing regulations would also be
revised to:
• Clarify that Sanctuary boundaries
encompass the submerged lands;
• Correct some inaccuracies and
ambiguities in the coordinates and
description of the Sanctuary’s outer and
shoreline boundaries;
• Remove outdated and unnecessary
oil spill contingency equipment
requirements;
• Clarify that discharges allowed from
marine sanitation devices apply only to
Type I and Type II marine sanitation
devices;
• Provide an exemption for
discharges by vessels of the Armed
Forces allowed under section 312(n) of
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
as amended, (uniform national
discharge standards for vessels of the
Armed Forces);
• Specify that the existing exception
for discharging or depositing fish, fish
parts, or chumming materials (bait)
applies only to such discharge or
deposit during the conduct of lawful
fishing activity within the Sanctuary;
• Remove an exception for
discharging or depositing meals on
board vessels;
• Prohibit discharges or deposits of
any material or other matter from
beyond the boundary of the Sanctuary
that subsequently enters the Sanctuary
and injures a Sanctuary resource or
quality;
• Extend from 2 NM to the outer
Sanctuary boundary (approximately 6
NM) the existing prohibition on
alteration of the submerged lands of the
Sanctuary;
• Prohibit not just vessels engaged in
the trade of carrying cargo and vessels
engaged in the trade of servicing
offshore installations, but also vessels of
300 gross registered tons or more
(excluding fishing and kelp harvesting
vessels) from operating within 1 NM of
any island;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
• Revise and strengthen the existing
protection of cultural resources to
prohibit moving, possessing, injuring, or
attempting to move, remove, injure, or
possess any Sanctuary historical
resource;
• Clarify, update, and refine the
regulation of Department of Defense
activities occurring within the
Sanctuary to, among other things,
provide more consistency with the
NMSA (as it now reads); and
• Conform wording, where
appropriate, to wording used for more
recently designated sanctuaries.
The permit regulations for the
Sanctuary are also being revised and
clarified. Activities that assist in
Sanctuary management or further
salvage or recovery operations for
certain abandoned shipwrecks would be
added to the list of activities for which
the Director of the NMSP (Director), or
designee, may issue a permit. The
modified permit regulations also specify
that the Director may only issue permits
for specific activities that would
otherwise (without a permit) violate
certain prohibitions: discharging and
depositing; altering the submerged
lands; abandoning (structures, material
or other matter on the submerged lands);
nearshore operation of vessels;
disturbing a seabird or marine mammal
by aircraft overflight below 1000 feet
within 1 NM of the Islands; moving,
removing, injuring or possessing, or
attempting to move, remove, injure or
possess a Sanctuary historical resource;
taking any marine mammal, sea turtle or
seabird within or above the Sanctuary;
possessing within the Sanctuary
(regardless of where taken from, moved,
or removed from) any marine mammal,
sea turtle, or seabird; and operating a
MPWC within waters of the Channel
Islands National Park. In deciding
whether to issue a permit, the Director
of the NMSP would be required to
consider the proposed activity in terms
of: duration; effects on Sanctuary
resources and qualities; potential
indirect, secondary, or cumulative
effects; and whether it is necessary to
conduct the activity in the Sanctuary. In
addition, the proposed modifications to
the permit procedures and criteria (15
CFR 922.72) would further refine
current requirements and procedures
found in the general NMSP regulations
(15 CFR 922.48(a) and (c)). The
proposed modifications would also
clarify existing requirements for permit
applications found in the Office of
Management and Budget approved
applicant guidelines (OMB Control
Number 0648–0141). The proposed
modifications to the permit regulations
would also expressly require that the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29097
permittee agree to hold the United
States harmless against any claims
arising out of the permitted activities.
The proposed revised management
plan for the Sanctuary contains a series
of action plans that outline
management, research, education,
operational, and performance
measurement activities planned for the
next five years. The activities are
designed to address specific issues
facing the Sanctuary and, in doing so,
help achieve the mandates of the NMSP
and the Sanctuary’s designation.
This document publishes the
proposed new regulations and the
proposed changes to existing
regulations, publishes the text of the
proposed Revised Designation
Document for the Sanctuary, and
announces the availability of the draft
management plan and the draft
environmental impact statement (DMP/
DEIS). The existing CINMS Designation
Document was published in 1980 upon
establishment of the Sanctuary and, per
the NMSA (at 16 U.S.C. 1434(a)(4)),
describes the geographic area proposed
to be included within the Sanctuary, the
characteristics of the area that give it
conservation, recreational, ecological,
historical, research, educational, or
esthetic value, and the types of activities
that will be subject to regulation by the
Secretary to protect those
characteristics. The NMSP is proposing
certain revisions to the Sanctuary’s
Designation Document, which include
changes to the description of the area,
an updated and more accurate
description of characteristics that give
the Sanctuary particular value, an
updated explanation of the relation to
other regulatory programs, and a
number of substantive changes to the
Sanctuary’s scope of regulations.
Since designation, the area of CINMS
has been described as approximately
1252.5 square nautical miles (NM).
However, as a result of the proposed
regulation changes that correct
inaccuracies and ambiguities in the
coordinates and the description of the
Sanctuary’s outer and shoreline
boundaries, the CINMS area is now
calculated as approximately 1243 square
NM. The legal description of CINMS is
proposed to be updated to reflect this
change.
This update would not constitute a
change in the geographic area of the
Sanctuary but rather an improvement in
the estimate of its size.
Because this proposed action includes
changes to the terms of designation of
the Sanctuary, as defined at 16 U.S.C.
1434(a)(4), as required by 16 U.S.C.
1434(a)(2), a DEIS has been developed
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
29098
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
consistent with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Marine Reserves and Conservation
Areas
In 2002 NOAA considered merging
environmental review processes for
consideration of establishing marine
reserves (no-take zones) and/or marine
conservation areas (limited-take zones)
within the Sanctuary, and the
management plan revision, but
subsequently decided to proceed with
two separate processes. Consequently, a
separate DEIS and draft proposed rule
are being prepared to address
consideration of marine reserves and
conservation areas. As such, the
consideration of marine reserves and
conservation areas is outside the scope
of this proposed rule. No part of this
proposed rule directs or influences a
future decision on the separate process
to consider establishing marine reserves
and conservation areas within the
Sanctuary.
Sanctuary Environment
Designated on October 2, 1980 (45 FR
65200), the Sanctuary consists of an area
off the coast of California of
approximately 1243 square NM adjacent
to the following islands and offshore
rocks: San Miguel Island, Santa Cruz
Island, Santa Rosa Island, Anacapa
Island, Santa Barbara Island, Richardson
Rock, and Castle Rock (the Islands)
extending seaward to a distance of
approximately six NM. The Sanctuary is
located within the upper portion of the
Southern California Bight (SCB), which
is formed by a transition in the
California coastline wherein the northsouth trending coast begins to trend east
to west. The SCB stretches from Point
Conception in the north to Punta
Eugenia (Mexico) in the south. Due to
the oceanographic features of the SCB,
its three bioregions, and the complex
bottom topography and diversity of
habitats found at the Islands, the
Sanctuary has a great diversity of
marine life.
The Sanctuary is located within a
300-mile long oceanographic region
known as the Continental Borderland, a
unique region of the continental shelf
characterized by basins and elevated
ridges. The California Current, the major
ocean current moving through the
region, transports cold water southward
from upwelling centers along the coast.
Point Conception, on the mainland
coast north of San Miguel Island, is the
southernmost major upwelling center on
the west coast of the United States. This
upwelling results in increased primary
productivity and large zooplankton
populations that support exceptionally
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
abundant populations of small
schooling fish. The Southern California
Countercurrent transports warm water
northward from the U.S.-Mexico border
into the Santa Barbara Channel. Point
Conception marks a transition zone
between these cool surface waters to the
north and warm waters to the south.
The confluence of the California Current
and Southern California Countercurrent
creates three distinct bioregions in and
around the Sanctuary: (1) The cold
Oregonian Province; (2) the warm
California Province; and (3) the
transition zone between the two. These
bioregions often overlap within the
Sanctuary, resulting in a unique and
highly diverse array of marine life
including cold water species at the
southern end of their range and warm
water species at the northern end of
their range.
Numerous important habitats are
represented within the Sanctuary
including kelp forests, surfgrass and
eelgrass, intertidal, nearshore subtidal,
deep-water benthic, and pelagic
habitats. Giant kelp beds are highly
productive Sanctuary habitats that
provide food, shelter, attachment sites,
and nursery habitat for myriad
invertebrates and fishes. Greater habitat
heterogeneity within the Sanctuary has
resulted in increased kelp forest species
diversity compared to that of mainland
kelp forests. The extent of kelp beds
varies considerably based on
environmental conditions such as water
temperature and natural predation.
Surfgrass and eelgrass beds are also
highly productive and complex
microhabitats that support a wide
variety of marine species. Intertidal
habitat within the Sanctuary is
composed of approximately 94.5 miles
of rocky coastline interspersed with
approximately 47 miles of sandy
beaches. Rocky shores support a rich
assortment of plants and animals,
including numerous green, brown, and
red algae, as well as beds of surfgrass.
Nearshore subtidal habitats include
mud, sand, gravel, cobble, and bedrock
substrates. Rocky nearshore subtidal
habitats are widespread, especially high
relief volcanic reefs with walls, ledges,
caves, and pinnacles. Typical shallow
subtidal areas in the Sanctuary contain
assemblages of plants, invertebrates, and
fishes, with giant kelp dominating.
Many shallow reefs grazed by sea
urchins have less giant kelp and greatly
reduced species diversity. Deeper reefs
have well-developed invertebrate cover.
Deep-water benthic or bottom habitats
in the Sanctuary are 90% fine sediment
or clay, with the remainder consisting of
rocky areas. High relief pinnacles and
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ridges occur off the northwest end of
San Miguel Island. While offshore
benthic habitats do not support marine
plants, they do support numerous
invertebrates and demersal fishes such
as various species of rockfish. Pelagic
habitat, within the water column,
supports numerous marine plants,
fishes, and invertebrates, including
plankton.
Diversity of marine plants is greater in
the SCB, which includes the Sanctuary,
as indicated above, than along coastal
central California. In the SCB, there are
at least 492 species of algae and 4
species of seagrasses known to occur of
the 673 species described for California.
The total number of invertebrate
species in the SCB is estimated at more
than 5,000, not including
microinvertebrates. Select invertebrates
in the Sanctuary include many species
of corals, prawns, spiny lobster, crabs,
sea urchins, sea cucumbers, sea star,
abalone, nudibranchs, scallops, mussels,
squid, clams, barnacles, snails, salps,
tunicates, jellyfish, sea slugs, and
anemones. White abalone is protected
by the Endangered Species Act.
About 481 species of fish inhabit the
SCB. Abundance of fish assemblages is
greater surrounding the Islands than at
nearby coastal regions of the southern
California mainland. Select fishes
commonly found in the Sanctuary
include: albacore, anchovy (northern),
bass (various species), cabezon,
California sheephead, California halibut,
garibaldi, rockfish (various species),
salmon (king), sardine (Pacific), shark
(various species), surfperch (various
species), swordfish, and white sea bass.
Four species of sea turtles have been
reported in the offshore southern
California region: green, loggerhead,
olive Ridley, and leatherback. Southern
California sea turtle stranding data
indicate that all four species of sea turtle
found in the region may be found
within the Sanctuary at any time of
year. All sea turtles are protected by the
Endangered Species Act.
Over 195 species of birds use open
water, shore, or island habitats in the
SCB. The Sanctuary provides stopover
habitat during both northern and
southern bird migrations along the
Pacific Flyway. The Sanctuary provides
important habitat for eight seabirds that
have special status under federal or state
law: ashy storm-petrel, black stormpetrel, California brown pelican,
California least tern, double-crested
cormorant, rhinoceros auklet, western
snowy plover, and Xantus’ murrelet.
There are three marine mammal
groups in the Sanctuary: Whales,
dolphins, and porpoises (cetaceans);
seals and sea lions (pinnipeds); and the
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
southern sea otter. All marine mammals
are protected under the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972. In addition,
some marine mammals are protected
under both the federal and state
endangered species acts. At least 33
species of cetaceans have been reported
in the Sanctuary region. Species
commonly found in the Sanctuary
include: long-beaked common dolphin,
short-beaked common dolphin,
bottlenose dolphin, Pacific white-sided
dolphin, northern right whale dolphin,
Risso’s dolphin, California gray whale,
blue whale, and humpback whale.
Seven species of pinnipeds are found
throughout or in part of the Sanctuary:
The California sea lion (common),
northern fur seal (uncommon), northern
elephant seal (common), Pacific harbor
seal (common), Guadalupe fur seal
(extremely rare), Steller sea lion (rare),
and ribbon seal (rare). The Sanctuary
provides vital pinniped habitat
including important feeding areas,
breeding sites, and haul outs. Sea otters
were common around the Islands until
prolonged periods of hunting led to
local extinction at the Islands and
severe depletion along the mainland
California coast. Rare sightings of sea
otters in the Sanctuary have been
reported since the 1987-to-1990 U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
translocation of 139 sea otters to San
Nicolas Island. The southern sea otter is
listed as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act.
The ecological and cultural values of
the Islands and surrounding waters are
recognized nationally and
internationally by several special
designations, including that as a
national marine sanctuary. In 1980 the
United States not only designated the
Sanctuary, but also designated Anacapa,
San Miguel, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz,
and Santa Rosa Islands and 125,000
acres of submerged lands surrounding
them as the Channel Islands National
Park. In addition, the United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization’s (UNESCO) Man and the
Biosphere Program designated the
Sanctuary as a Biosphere Reserve in
1986.
The Sanctuary’s cultural values stem
largely from its rich array of maritime
heritage resources (shipwrecks, aircraft
wrecks, material associated with
wharves, piers and landings, prehistoric
archaeological sites and their associated
artifacts, and paleontological remains).
Carbon dating indicates that humans
were present at the Islands as early as
13,000 years ago, with a site on Santa
Rosa Island presenting the oldest human
remains yet discovered in North
America. The Islands and surrounding
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Sanctuary contain an abundance of
prehistoric Native American Chumash
artifacts and are still revered as a
homeland by Chumash descendants.
Historical remains may exist from as
early as Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo’s
European voyage of discovery (1542 to
1543) through modern times. Known
historical remains are represented in an
inventory of over 140 shipwrecks and
aircraft wrecks documented in the
Sanctuary since 1853.
The uniqueness of the Sanctuary
region and its proximity to several major
ports and harbors along the mainland
coast has made it a popular destination
for numerous recreational and
commercial activities. Sportfishing,
diving, snorkeling, whale watching,
pleasure boating, kayaking, surfing, and
sightseeing are all popular pastimes
within the Sanctuary, which is often
referred to as ‘‘the Galapagos of the
north.’’ In 1999, recreation and tourism
businesses represented almost 480
thousand person-days of activity within
the Sanctuary. The Sanctuary also has
very productive commercial fishing
grounds. Key commercially targeted
species include: Squid, sea urchin,
spiny lobster, prawn, nearshore and
offshore finfishes, coastal pelagic
species, flatfishes, rock crab, sea
cucumber, tuna, and kelp. Of these
market squid, sea urchin, spiny lobster,
and halibut are the most economically
valuable. In 1999 the ex-vessel value of
species commercially caught within the
Sanctuary was approximately
$42,777,444. Other human uses that
occur adjacent to and in the Sanctuary
are oil and gas activities, shipping,
Department of Defense and Department
of Homeland Security activities, and
scientific research and education.
The Sanctuary is located near an area
of southern California coastline that has
experienced a dramatic increase in
population. Whereas the population of
southern California (Imperial, Los
Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San
Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Barbara,
and Ventura counties) was
approximately 13.5 million in 1980,
population levels now reach nearly 20
million. This represents a regional
increase in population of approximately
43%. Aerial and on-water surveys
indicate that visitation to CINMS has
increased significantly since 1980. With
continued technological innovations
such as global positioning systems
(GPS) and improved watercraft design,
it is likely that there will be continued
increasing visitation to the Sanctuary
and added pressure on its resources.
With its proposed revised management
plan and regulations, NOAA hopes to
continue to protect CINMS for
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29099
continued appreciation and appropriate
use by current and future generations.
Proposed Revised Designation
Document
The Designation Document for the
Sanctuary contains the terms of
designation as defined in the NMSA (16
U.S.C. 1434(a)(4)). NOAA is proposing
some changes to the Designation
Document as part of this management
plan review process. Specifically,
NOAA is proposing to clarify in the
Designation Document that the
submerged lands at CINMS are legally
part of the Sanctuary and are included
in the boundary description. At the time
the Sanctuary was designated in 1980,
Title III of the Marine Protection,
Research, and Sanctuaries Act (now
known as the NMSA) characterized
national marine sanctuaries as
consisting of coastal and ocean waters
but did not expressly mention
submerged lands thereunder. NOAA has
consistently interpreted its authority
under the NMSA as extending to
submerged lands, and amendments to
the NMSA in 1984 (Pub. L. 98–498)
clarified that submerged lands may be
designated by the Secretary of
Commerce as part of a national marine
sanctuary (16 U.S.C. 1432(3)). Therefore,
NOAA is updating the Designation
Document and the boundary
description, and is also replacing the
term ‘‘seabed’’ with ‘‘submerged lands
of the Sanctuary.’’ In addition, boundary
coordinates in the revised Designation
Document and in the Sanctuary
regulations would be expressed by
coordinates based on the North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
Since designation the area of CINMS has
been described as approximately 1252.5
square NM. However, adjusting for
technical corrections and using updated
technologies, the CINMS area is now
calculated as approximately 1243 square
NM. The legal description of CINMS is
proposed to be updated to reflect this
change. This update would not
constitute a change in the geographic
area of the Sanctuary but rather an
improvement in the estimate of its size.
The Designation Document is also
proposed to be modified to authorize
Sanctuary regulation of: Exploring for,
developing, or producing minerals
within the Sanctuary; discharging or
depositing from beyond the boundary of
the Sanctuary any material or other
matter that subsequently enters the
Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary
resource or quality; placing or
abandoning any structure, material, or
other matter on or in the submerged
lands of the Sanctuary; moving,
injuring, possessing, or attempting to
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
29100
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
move, injure, or possess a Sanctuary
historical resource; taking any marine
mammal, sea turtle, or seabird within or
above the Sanctuary; possessing within
the Sanctuary (regardless of where taken
from, moved, or removed from) any
marine mammal, sea turtle or seabird;
marking, defacing, damaging, moving,
removing, or tampering with any sign,
notice, or placard, whether temporary or
permanent, or any monument, stake,
post, or other boundary marker related
to the Sanctuary; and introducing or
otherwise releasing from within or into
the Sanctuary an introduced species.
These proposed revisions to and
addition of new activities subject to
Sanctuary regulation would enable new
and emerging resource management
issues to be addressed, and are
necessary in order to ensure the
protection, preservation, and
management of the conservation,
recreational, ecological, historical,
cultural, educational, archeological,
scientific, and esthetic resources and
qualities of the Sanctuary.
Additional proposed changes to the
Designation Document would provide:
An updated and more complete
description of characteristics that give
the Sanctuary particular value; greater
clarity on the applicability of Sanctuary
emergency regulations (in keeping with
the National Marine Sanctuary Program
regulations of general applicability, 15
CFR part 922, subpart E); revision of the
Scope of Regulations section on
consistency with international law with
language taken directly from sec. 305(a)
of the NMSA, which deals with
application of regulations; an updated
explanation of the effect of Sanctuary
authority on preexisting leases, permits,
licenses, and rights; an update of the
section entitled Alterations to This
Designation to reflect the NMSA as
currently written; and occasional
wording fine-tuning in order to conform
wording of the Designation Document,
where appropriate, to wording used for
more recently designated sanctuaries.
No changes are proposed to be made to
the ‘‘Fishing’’ and ‘‘Defense Activities’’
sections within Article V (Relation to
Other Regulatory Programs) of the
Designation Document.
The NMSP has carefully considered
existing state and federal authorities in
proposing new regulatory authorities to
ensure protection and management of
sanctuary resources. Proposed new
authorities are intended to complement
existing authorities.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Proposed Revised Designation
Document for the Channel Islands
National Marine Sanctuary
Article I. Effect of Designation
The Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary was designated on October 2,
1980 (45 FR 65200). Section 308 of the
National Marine Sanctuaries Act, 16
U.S.C. 1431 et seq., (NMSA) authorizes
the issuance of such regulations as may
be necessary to implement the
designation, including managing,
protecting and preserving the
conservation, recreational, ecological,
historical, cultural, archeological,
scientific, educational, and esthetic
resources and qualities of the Channel
Islands National Marine Sanctuary
(Sanctuary). Section 1 of Article IV of
this Designation Document lists
activities of the types that either are to
be regulated on the effective date of
designation or may be regulated at some
later date in order to protect Sanctuary
resources and qualities. Listing does not
necessarily mean that a type of activity
will be regulated; however, if a type of
activity is not listed it may not be
regulated, except on an emergency
basis, unless Section 1 of Article IV is
amended to include the type of activity
by the same procedures by which the
original designation was made.
Article II. Description of the Area
The Sanctuary consists of an area of
approximately 1243 square nautical
miles (NM) of coastal and ocean waters,
and the submerged lands thereunder, off
the southern coast of California. The
Sanctuary boundary begins at the Mean
High Water Line of and extends seaward
to a distance of approximately six NM
from the following islands and offshore
rocks: San Miguel Island, Santa Cruz
Island, Santa Rosa Island, Anacapa
Island, Santa Barbara Island, Richardson
Rock, and Castle Rock (the Islands). The
seaward boundary coordinates are listed
in the Appendix to this Designation
Document.
Article III. Characteristics of the Area
That Give It Particular Value
The Islands and surrounding
ecosystems are unique and highly
valued, as demonstrated by, for
example, several national and
international designations. The Islands
and surrounding ecosystems are
characterized by a unique combination
of features including: Complex
oceanography, varied bathymetry,
diverse habitats, remarkable
biodiversity, rich maritime heritage,
remote yet accessible location, and
relative lack of development. These
features yield high existence values as
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
well as human use values for research,
education, recreation, and commerce.
The Islands are located within a 300mile long oceanographic region known
as the Continental Borderland, a unique
region of the continental shelf
characterized by basins and elevated
ridges. Within this region the
confluence of the cool California
Current and warm Southern California
Countercurrent creates three distinct
bioregions in and around the Sanctuary:
the cold Oregonian Province, the warm
California Province, and the transition
zone between the two. The overlap of
these bioregions results in a unique and
highly diverse array of marine life
within the Sanctuary, including cold
water species at the southern end of
their range and warm water species at
the northern end of their range. In
addition, the Sanctuary is located
offshore from Point Conception, the
southernmost major upwelling center on
the west coast of the United States.
Upwelling yields increased primary
productivity essential to the marine
food web.
Diverse bathymetry and habitats are
also important and unique
characteristics of the Islands and
surrounding ecosystems. The Sanctuary
contains many important and varied
physical and geological features
including a complex of plateaus,
continental slope, gyres, banks, subsea
canyons, and rocky reefs. The diversity
of accentuated bottom relief, abrupt
change in depth, and varied substrate
provide a spectrum of marine habitats.
Some of the key marine habitats are
sandy beach, rocky intertidal, kelp
forest, rocky reef, and sandy bottom.
The Sanctuary’s oceanographic and
physical features support a great
diversity of marine species, many of
which are extremely rare and afforded
special protection by federal and state
law. At least 33 species of cetaceans are
found within the Sanctuary, including
blue, gray, and humpback whales and
numerous dolphin species. While
historically seven species of pinnipeds
have been found throughout or in part
of the Sanctuary, at least four species
maintain important rookery and/or haul
out sites on the Islands. Following the
1987 to 1990 translocation of southern
sea otters to San Nicolas Island, rare sea
otter sightings have been reported in the
Sanctuary. Over 60 species of seabird
occur within the Sanctuary, eleven of
which utilize breeding habitat at the
Islands. In addition, over 400 species of
fish and more than 5,000 species of
invertebrates are found in the
Sanctuary. Stranding data indicate that
green, loggerhead, olive Ridley, and
leatherback sea turtles may also be
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
found within the Sanctuary. Finally,
numerous marine algae and plant
species occur within the Sanctuary, the
most notable among these being giant
kelp and eelgrass.
The quality and abundance of natural
resources at the Islands and surrounding
waters have attracted man from the
earliest prehistoric times to the present.
As a result, the Sanctuary contains
significant prehistoric and historic
maritime heritage resources. Prehistoric
maritime heritage resources include
submerged Native American sites, the
significance of which is underscored by
a terrestrial Islands site with human
remains dated to 13,000 years ago, the
oldest human remains yet discovered in
North America. Maritime heritage
resources date back as far as 1542 and
include over 140 historic shipwreck and
aircraft sites. These wrecks reveal the
diverse range of activities and
nationalities that have traversed the
Santa Barbara Channel. Following the
mission era human occupation of the
Islands transitioned from significant
Chumash Native American villages, to
land grant and ranching settlements,
and finally to joint public-private
ownership and management aimed at
resource conservation and compatible
public use. Modern-day descendants of
the Chumash people still value and
enjoy the Islands and surrounding
Sanctuary waters, and work to keep
preserve aspects of Chumash cultural
history and practices. Despite this long
history of human presence on the
Islands, they remain remote yet
accessible, and undeveloped relative to
the burgeoning populations of nearby
mainland southern California.
The physical, biological, and cultural
characteristics of the Sanctuary combine
to provide outstanding opportunities for
appropriate scientific research,
education, recreation, commerce, and
natural and maritime heritage resource
protection, preservation, and
management. The Islands and
surrounding Sanctuary are the subject of
extensive research, primarily in the
following categories: Physical and
biological science research;
socioeconomic, cultural, and historic
research; and political science research.
Since its designation in 1980 the
Sanctuary has played an important role
in marine science education for all ages
on a local, regional, national, and
international scale. Popular Sanctuary
recreation activities include wildlife
viewing, boating, sailing, kayaking,
diving, and sportfishing. Commercial
activities within the Sanctuary include
maritime shipping, oil and gas activities
(two leases pre-date the Sanctuary), kelp
harvesting, and commercial fishing.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Some of the state’s most valuable
commercial fisheries occur within the
Sanctuary. A complex web of county,
state, and federal agencies manages the
resources of the Islands and
surrounding area and human uses
thereof.
Several special designations recognize
the Islands’ and surrounding
ecosystems’ unique value. In 1980 the
United States designated both the
Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary, as well as the islands of
Anacapa, San Miguel, Santa Barbara,
Santa Cruz, and Santa Rosa and 125,000
acres of submerged lands surrounding
them as the Channel Islands National
Park. In addition, the United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization’s (UNESCO) Man and the
Biosphere Program designated the
Sanctuary as a Biosphere Reserve in
1986.
Article IV. Scope of Regulations
Section 1. Activities Subject to
Regulation. The following activities are
subject to regulation, including
prohibition, as may be necessary to
ensure the management, protection, and
preservation of the conservation,
recreational, ecological, historical,
cultural, archeological, scientific,
educational, and esthetic resources and
qualities of this area:
a. Exploring for, developing, or
producing hydrocarbons or minerals
within the Sanctuary;
b. Discharging or depositing from
within or into the Sanctuary any
material or other matter;
c. Discharging or depositing from
beyond the boundary of the Sanctuary
any material or other matter that
subsequently enters the Sanctuary and
injures a Sanctuary resource or quality;
d. Drilling into, dredging, or
otherwise altering the submerged lands
of the Sanctuary; or constructing,
placing, or abandoning any structure,
material, or other matter on or in the
submerged lands of the Sanctuary;
e. Operating a vessel (i.e., watercraft
of any description) within the Sanctuary
except fishing vessels or vessels
traveling within a Vessel Traffic
Separation Scheme or Port Access Route
designated by the Coast Guard outside
of 1 NM from any Island;
f. Disturbing a marine mammal or
seabird by an overflight below 1000 feet;
g. Moving, removing, injuring,
possessing, or attempting to move,
remove, injure, or possess a Sanctuary
historical resource;
h. Taking any marine mammal, sea
turtle, or seabird within or above the
Sanctuary;
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29101
i. Possessing within the Sanctuary
(regardless of where taken from, moved,
or removed from) any marine mammal,
sea turtle, or seabird;
j. Marking, defacing, damaging,
moving, removing, or tampering with
any sign, notice, or placard, whether
temporary or permanent, or any
monument, stake, post, or other
boundary marker related to the
Sanctuary;
k. Introducing or otherwise releasing
from within or into the Sanctuary an
introduced species.
Section 2. Consistency with
International Law. The regulations
governing the activities listed in Section
1 of this article shall be applied in
accordance with generally recognized
principles of international law, and in
accordance with treaties, conventions,
and other agreements to which the
United States is a party. No regulation
shall apply to or be enforced against a
person who is not a citizen, national, or
resident alien of the United States,
unless in accordance with: generally
recognized principles of international
law; an agreement between the United
States and the foreign state of which the
person is a citizen; or an agreement
between the United States and the flag
state of a foreign vessel, if the person is
a crewmember of the vessel.
Section 3. Emergency Regulations.
Where necessary to prevent or minimize
the destruction of, loss of, or injury to
a Sanctuary resource or quality, or
minimize the imminent risk of such
destruction, loss, or injury, any and all
activities, including those not listed in
section 1 of this Article, are subject to
immediate temporary regulation,
including prohibition, consistent with
the Administrative Procedure Act.
Article V. Relation to Other Regulatory
Programs
Section 1. Fishing. The regulation of
fishing is not authorized under Article
IV. However, fishing vessels may be
regulated with respect to discharges in
accordance with Article IV, Section 1,
paragraphs (b) and (c) and aircraft
conducting kelp bed surveys below
1000 feet can be regulated in accordance
with Article IV, Section 1, paragraph (f).
All regulatory programs pertaining to
fishing, including particularly
regulations promulgated under the
California Fish and Game Code and
Fishery Management Plans promulgated
under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, 16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq., shall remain in
effect. All permits, licenses and other
authorizations issued pursuant thereto
shall be valid within the Sanctuary
unless authorizing any activity
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
29102
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
prohibited by any regulation
implementing Article IV. Fishing as
used in this article and in Article IV
includes kelp harvesting.
Section 2. Defense Activities. The
regulation of those activities listed in
Article IV shall not prohibit any activity
conducted by the Department of Defense
that is essential for national defense or
because of an emergency. Such
activities shall be consistent with the
regulations to the maximum extent
practicable.
Section 3. Effect on Leases, Permits,
Licenses, and Rights. Pursuant to
section 304(c) of the NMSA, 16 U.S.C.
1434(c), no valid lease, permit, license,
approval, or other authorization issued
by any federal, state, or local authority
of competent jurisdiction, or any right of
subsistence use or access, may be
terminated by the Secretary of
Commerce or designee as a result of this
designation or as a result of any
Sanctuary regulation if such
authorization or right was in existence
on the effective date of this designation.
The Secretary of Commerce, or
designee, however, may regulate the
exercise (including, but not limited to,
the imposition of terms and conditions)
of such authorization or right consistent
with the purposes for which the
Sanctuary is designated.
Article VI. Alterations to This
Designation
The terms of designation, as defined
under section 304(a) of the NMSA, may
be modified only by the same
procedures by which the original
designation is made, including public
hearings, consultation with interested
federal and state agencies and the
Pacific Fishery Management Council,
approved by the Secretary of Commerce
or designee, and after the close of a
review period of forty-five days of
continuous session of Congress.
Appendix—Channel Islands National
Marine Sanctuary Boundary
Coordinates
Coordinates listed in this Appendix
are unprojected (Geographic) and based
on the North American Datum of 1983.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Point ID No.
1 ....................
2 ....................
3 ....................
4 ....................
5 ....................
6 ....................
7 ....................
8 ....................
9 ....................
10 ..................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Latitude
North
33.94138
33.96776
34.02607
34.07339
34.10185
34.11523
34.11611
34.11434
34.11712
34.11664
14:37 May 18, 2006
Longitude
West
–119.27422
–119.25010
–119.23642
–119.25686
–119.29178
–119.33040
–119.39120
–119.40212
–119.42896
–119.44844
Jkt 208001
Point ID No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
PO 00000
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
Frm 00013
Latitude
North
34.13389
34.13825
34.14784
34.15466
34.15142
34.13411
34.14635
34.15988
34.15906
34.15928
34.16213
34.16962
34.17266
34.17588
34.17682
34.17258
34.13535
34.13698
34.12994
34.12481
34.12519
34.11008
34.11128
34.13632
34.15341
34.16408
34.18231
34.19117
34.20224
34.20707
34.20520
34.19254
34.20540
34.20486
34.18182
34.10208
34.08151
34.05848
34.01940
34.01349
33.98698
33.95039
33.92694
33.92501
33.91403
33.91712
33.90956
33.88976
33.84444
33.83146
33.81763
33.81003
33.79425
33.79379
33.79983
33.81076
33.81450
33.84125
33.84865
33.87038
33.86804
33.86110
33.86351
33.85995
33.86233
33.87330
33.88594
33.88688
33.88809
33.89414
33.90064
33.91569
33.91094
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Longitude
West
–119.48081
–119.49198
–119.51194
–119.59059
–119.61254
–119.66024
–119.69780
–119.76688
–119.77800
–119.79327
–119.80347
–119.83643
–119.85240
–119.88903
–119.93357
–119.95830
–120.01964
–120.04206
–120.08582
–120.11104
–120.16076
–120.21190
–120.22707
–120.25292
–120.28627
–120.29310
–120.31224
–120.32576
–120.35122
–120.41801
–120.42859
–120.46041
–120.50728
–120.53987
–120.60041
–120.64208
–120.63894
–120.62862
–120.58567
–120.57464
–120.56582
–120.53282
–120.46132
–120.42170
–120.37585
–120.32506
–120.30857
–120.29540
–120.25482
–120.22927
–120.20284
–120.18731
–120.13422
–120.10207
–120.06995
–120.04351
–120.03158
–119.96508
–119.92316
–119.88247
–119.87060
–119.79017
–119.77130
–119.74390
–119.68783
–119.65504
–119.62617
–119.59423
–119.58278
–119.54861
–119.51936
–119.48263
–119.46137
Point ID No.
84 ..................
85 ..................
86 ..................
87 ..................
88 ..................
89 ..................
90 ..................
91 ..................
92 ..................
93 ..................
94 ..................
95 ..................
96 ..................
97 ..................
98 ..................
99 ..................
100 ................
101 ................
102 ................
103 ................
104 ................
105 ................
106 ................
107 ................
108 ................
109 ................
110 ................
111 ................
112 ................
113 ................
Latitude
North
33.90424
33.90219
33.90131
33.90398
33.90635
33.91304
33.91829
33.48250
33.44235
33.40555
33.39059
33.36804
33.36375
33.36241
33.36379
33.36879
33.37441
33.38001
33.38914
33.40515
33.44006
33.48414
33.52444
33.53834
33.58616
33.59018
33.58516
33.58011
33.54367
33.51161
Longitude
West
–119.42422
–119.40730
–119.38373
–119.36333
–119.35345
–119.33280
–119.32206
–119.16874
–119.16797
–119.14878
–119.13283
–119.08891
–119.06803
–119.04812
–119.02811
–118.99797
–118.98194
–118.96972
–118.95492
–118.93661
–118.91519
–118.90712
–118.91492
–118.92271
–118.99540
–119.02374
–119.06745
–119.08521
–119.14460
–119.16367
Summary of the Proposed Regulatory
Amendments
The proposed regulatory changes
would clarify that ‘‘submerged lands’’
are within the Sanctuary boundary, i.e.,
part of the Sanctuary. This would
update the boundary regulation to make
it consistent with the revised
Designation Document. (See explanation
of boundary clarification in preceding
discussion of proposed revised
Designation Document.) The
Sanctuary’s outer boundary coordinates
and description of the shoreline
boundary demarcation are also
proposed for technical corrections using
the North American Datum of 1983, and
to clarify that the shoreline boundary is
the Mean High Water Line (MHWL) of
Island shores. Since designation the area
of CINMS has been described as
approximately 1252.5 square NM.
However, adjusting for technical
corrections and using updated
technologies, the CINMS area is now
calculated as approximately 1243 square
NM. The legal description of CINMS is
proposed to be updated to reflect this
change. This update would not
constitute a change in the geographic
area of the Sanctuary but rather an
improvement in the estimate of its size.
The proposed regulations would also
modify the existing (1982) oil and gas
regulation by removing the oil spill
contingency equipment requirements,
and modifying exceptions to this
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
prohibition. The equipment
requirements are outdated and
unnecessary since Minerals
Management Service lease agreement
terms prescribe more stringent
mandatory oil spill contingency plans.
The following exceptions would be
omitted for this prohibition: national
defense; to respond to an emergency
threatening life, property, or the
environment; and as may be permitted
by the Director in accordance with 15
CFR 922.48 and 922.72. These
exceptions are not specific to the
current regulation, but rather are
‘‘boilerplate’’ generic exceptions to the
current prohibitions. The proposed
revised regulations fine-tune the
exceptions, as has been done in the
regulations for more recently designated
sanctuaries, so only if an exception is
possibly applicable is it referenced for a
particular prohibition. Accordingly,
removal of the above exceptions is
proposed because the limited exception
for hydrocarbon exploration,
development, or production is already
provided within the regulation itself,
because exploring for, developing, and
producing hydrocarbons is not
envisionable as a necessary activity to
respond to an emergency threatening
life, property, or the environment, and
because such an activity could not meet
the permit criteria requirements under
15 CFR 922.48 and 922.72. Department
of Defense activities are addressed
elsewhere in the regulations. Further, no
such exceptions have ever been sought
at CINMS.
The proposed regulations would also
prohibit exploring for, developing, or
producing minerals within the
Sanctuary, except producing byproducts incidental to hydrocarbon
production allowed under the
regulations. ‘‘Mineral’’ is defined by the
NMSP program-wide regulations as
clay, stone, sand, gravel, metalliferous
ore, non-metalliferous ore, or any other
solid material or other matter of
commercial value. 15 CFR 922.3.
Mineral extraction activities could
involve scraping the Sanctuary’s seabed
surface and/or excavation of pits and
tunnels into the seabed. This
prohibition would protect Sanctuary
resources and qualities from potentially
damaging effects of offshore mining
activities, including but not limited to:
Destruction and direct smothering of the
benthic biota; alteration of the seabed
surface profile; potential harm to
fisheries; introduction of pollutants
(e.g., drill cuttings and mud) that could
cause interference with the filtering,
feeding, or respiratory functions of
marine organisms; loss of food sources
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
and habitat for some species; possible
lowered photosynthesis and oxygen
levels; and degraded appearance of the
water itself. Finally, prohibition of
mining within the Sanctuary would
reduce the risk of potential disturbance
to underwater historical resources either
through physical disturbance or
increased turbidity, which would result
in direct long-term beneficial impact to
historical resources. A prohibition on
mineral activities within the Sanctuary
would be consistent with the
prohibition on alteration of or
construction on or in the submerged
lands discussed below.
The proposed regulations would also
clarify and otherwise modify the
existing (1982) regulation prohibiting
discharging or depositing any material
or other matter. Clarifications include
that: the regulation applies to discharges
and deposits ‘‘from within or into the
Sanctuary’’ (‘‘into’’ is intended to make
clear that not only discharges and
deposits originating in the Sanctuary
(including from vessels in the
Sanctuary), but also discharges and
deposits from aircraft above the
Sanctuary, from docks and piers
extending over the Sanctuary, and from
cliffs and other land adjacent to the
Sanctuary, for example, are included in
the prohibition); the exception for fish,
fish parts, or chumming materials (bait)
applies only to such discharges or
deposits made during the conduct of
lawful fishing activity within the
Sanctuary; and the exception for
biodegradable effluent discharges from
marine sanitation devices applies only
to operable Type I or II marine
sanitation devices approved by the
United States Coast Guard in
accordance with the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended. The
existing exception for vessel wastes
‘‘generated by marine sanitation
devices’’ was intended to prohibit the
discharge of untreated sewage into the
Sanctuary; the proposed clarification to
this exception makes express that such
discharges are only allowed if generated
by Type I or II marine sanitation
devices. (Type I and Type II marine
sanitation devices treat wastes, but Type
III marine sanitation devices do not.) In
addition, the discharge and deposit
regulation would be modified by
removing the exception for discharging
or depositing meals onboard vessels.
Coast Guard regulations prohibit
discharge of food wastes (garbage)
within three NM and prohibit discharge
of food wastes unless ground to less
than one inch within three to twelve
NM. The proposed Sanctuary regulation
modification would mirror the Coast
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29103
Guard regulations within three NM and
provide increased protection to
Sanctuary resources and qualities from
`
such marine debris vis-a-vis the Coast
Guard regulations in the area of the
Sanctuary beyond three NM. The
proposed clarifications and
modification are intended to achieve
increased protection of Sanctuary
resources and qualities.
Finally, the discharge and deposit
regulation would be augmented by
adding a prohibition on discharging or
depositing any material or other matter
from beyond the boundary of the
Sanctuary that subsequently enters the
Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary
resource or quality. ‘‘Sanctuary
resource’’ is defined at 15 CFR 922.3 as
‘‘any living or non-living resource of a
National Marine Sanctuary that
contributes to the conservation,
recreational, ecological, historical,
research, educational, or aesthetic value
of the Sanctuary, including, but not
limited to, the substratum of the area of
the Sanctuary, other submerged features
and the surrounding seabed, carbonate
rock, corals and other bottom
formations, coralline algae and other
marine plants and algae, marine
invertebrates, brine-seep biota,
phytoplankton, zooplankton, fish,
seabirds, sea turtles and other marine
reptiles, marine mammals and historical
resources.’’ ‘‘Sanctuary quality’’ is
defined at 15 CFR 922.3 as ‘‘any of those
ambient conditions, physical-chemical
characteristics and natural processes,
the maintenance of which is essential to
the ecological health of the Sanctuary,
including, but not limited to, water
quality, sediment quality and air
quality.’’ This modification would
provide consistency with the regulatory
language of other more recently
designated sanctuaries, and help to
protect Sanctuary resources and
qualities from negative influences
originating outside the boundaries of the
CINMS.
The proposed regulatory changes
would also modify the existing
prohibition against altering the seabed
of the Sanctuary or constructing a
structure thereon. The term ‘‘seabed’’
would be replaced with ‘‘submerged
lands’’ to be consistent with language
used in the NMSA. In addition, the
geographic extent of this regulation
would be expanded from the first 2 NM
offshore to the entire area of the
Sanctuary in order to ensure protection
of the diverse accentuated bottom relief,
varied substrate, and concomitant
benthic habitats of the Sanctuary, and
wording would be conformed with
similar regulations at more recently
designated sanctuaries. Another
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
29104
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
proposed change to this regulation
would modify the exception for ‘‘bottom
trawling from a commercial vessel’’ to
provide an exception for activities
incidental and necessary to ‘‘conduct
lawful fishing activity.’’ This
broadening of the exception would
encompass other bottom-touching gear
types, such as pots and traps, which the
drafters of the original regulations
apparently did not realize could alter
the seabed. This proposed change
would thus remove any uncertainty
about the existing regulation’s
applicability to such gear types.
The proposed regulatory changes
would also specify that abandoning, by
which is meant leaving without intent
to remove, any structure, material, or
other matter on or in the submerged
lands of the Sanctuary, is prohibited.
This change would be consistent with
similar regulations at more recently
designated sanctuaries and would help
protect the Sanctuary from debris (e.g.,
wrecked vessels or seabed research
equipment) abandoned by Sanctuary
users. This change is consistent with the
U.S. Ocean Action Plan: The Bush
Administration’s Response to the U.S.
Commission on Ocean Policy. In this
Action Plan the Administration
acknowledges the harmful effects
marine debris has on valuable marine
resources, and calls for the reestablishment of the Interagency Marine
Debris Coordinating Committee (reestablished in December 2004), of which
NOAA is a member.
The proposed regulatory changes
would also modify the existing (1982)
vessel approach regulation so that the
prohibition against vessel operation
within 1 NM of any of the Islands would
apply not only to vessels engaged in the
trade of carrying cargo and vessels
engaged in the trade of servicing
offshore installations but also to all
vessels of 300 gross registered tons or
more (excluding fishing and kelp
harvesting vessels). The intent of this
modification is to protect the sensitive
nearshore areas off the Islands,
including kelp forests, rocky reefs, and
other areas, from the potential impacts
of large-vessel groundings and
collisions, including, but not limited to,
cruise ships. The NMSP developed the
proposed modified prohibition to more
directly address the Sanctuary’s concern
that very large vessels, regardless of
their purpose, not approach and put at
risk sensitive nearshore areas of the
Sanctuary.
The proposed regulatory changes
would also include a modification to the
existing (1982) prohibition on removing
or damaging any historical or cultural
resource. The proposed modification
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
would add ‘‘moving’’ and ‘‘possessing’’
to the existing prohibition; would
replace ‘‘damage’’ with ‘‘injure,’’ a term
defined at 15 CFR 922.3; and add
‘‘attempting’’ to move, remove, injure,
or possess as a prohibition. The intent
of this modification is to provide added
protection to these fragile, finite, and
non-renewable resources so they may be
studied, and so appropriate information
about them may be made available for
the benefit of the public. The proposed
regulation would also replace
‘‘historical or cultural resource’’ with
‘‘Sanctuary historical resource’’ to be
consistent with regulatory language
used at several other more recently
designated national marine sanctuaries.
‘‘Historical resource’’ is defined in
NMSP program-wide regulations as
‘‘any resource possessing historical,
cultural, archaeological or
paleontological significance, including
sites, contextual information, structures,
districts, and objects significantly
associated with or representative of
earlier people, cultures, maritime
heritage, and human activities and
events. Historical resources include
‘submerged cultural resources’, and also
include ‘historical properties’, as
defined in the National Historic
Preservation Act, as amended, and its
implementing regulations, as amended.’’
(15 CFR 922.3).
The proposed regulatory changes
would also include a new prohibition
on take of marine mammals, seabirds,
and sea turtles, except as expressly
authorized by the MMPA, ESA, MBTA,
or any regulation, as amended,
promulgated under one of these acts.
The intent of this regulation is to bring
a special focus to protection of the
diverse and vital marine mammal and
seabird populations and the sea turtles
of the Sanctuary. This area-specific
focus is complementary to the
prohibitions against taking promulgated
by other resource protection agencies,
especially given that other federal and
state authorities must spread limited
resources over much wider geographic
areas. This regulation would be
consistent with regulations at several
other more recently designated national
marine sanctuaries, and would provide
a greater deterrent due to the higher
civil penalties afforded under the
NMSA than the penalties provided by
the MMPA, ESA, and MBTA. Further,
the prohibition would cover all marine
mammals, sea turtles, and seabirds
within or above the Sanctuary. The
Sanctuary’s proposed regulation would
not apply if an activity (including
fishing in a federally or state-approved
fishery) that does or might cause take of
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
marine mammals, seabirds, or sea
turtles has been expressly authorized to
do so under the MMPA, ESA, or MBTA
or an implementing regulation. With
this proposed regulation, if NMFS or the
USFWS issue a permit for the take of a
marine mammal, seabird, or sea turtle,
such taking would not be prohibited by
the NMSP and therefore would not
require a permit from the Sanctuary
unless the activity would also violate
another Sanctuary prohibition.
‘‘Take’’ is defined in the NMSP
program-wide regulations at 15 CFR
922.3. The proposed prohibition on take
of marine mammals, seabirds, and sea
turtles would be complementary to the
current regulation prohibiting
disturbing seabirds or marine mammals
by flying motorized aircraft at less than
1000 feet over the waters within one
NM of any Island. The current
regulation remains unique and
important in that it provides a special
focus on a specific type of activity,
operation of motorized aircraft, within
the particularly sensitive environments
of the Sanctuary. The current regulation
includes several exceptions (for
enforcement purposes, to engage in kelp
bed surveys, or to transport persons or
supplies to or from an Island), which are
still required to comply with the
MMPA, ESA, MBTA, and any
regulations, as amended, promulgated
under these acts.
The proposed regulatory changes
would also prohibit possessing within
the Sanctuary (regardless of where taken
from, moved, or removed from) any
marine mammal, sea turtle, or seabird,
except as expressly authorized by the
MMPA, ESA, MBTA, or any regulation,
as amended, promulgated under the
MMPA, ESA, or MBTA. This proposed
regulation would serve to provide a
greater deterrent against violations of
existing laws protecting marine
mammals, seabirds, and sea turtles than
that offered by those other laws alone.
This proposed regulation would also be
consistent with recent regulations
adopted by other national marine
sanctuaries and would enhance
protection provided by the prohibition
on the take of marine mammals,
seabirds, and sea turtles discussed
above. With this proposed regulation, if
NMFS or the USFWS issues a permit for
the possession of a marine mammal,
seabird, or sea turtle, it would not be
prohibited by the NMSP and therefore
would not require a permit from the
Sanctuary unless the activity would also
violate another Sanctuary prohibition.
The proposed regulatory changes
would include a prohibition on
marking, defacing, damaging, moving,
removing, or tampering with any sign,
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
notice or placard, whether temporary or
permanent, or any monument, stake,
post, or other boundary marker related
to the Sanctuary. This prohibition is
designed to protect Sanctuary property
used for purposes including
demarcation, enforcement, regulatory
information, education, outreach, and
research. This new proposed regulation
would be consistent with other
sanctuaries’ regulations.
The proposed regulatory changes
would prohibit introducing or otherwise
releasing from within or into the
Sanctuary an introduced species, except
striped bass (Roccus saxatilis) released
during catch and release fishing activity.
‘‘Introduced species’’ is defined to
mean: (1) A species (including but not
limited to any of its biological matter
capable of propagation) that is nonnative to the ecosystems protected by
the Sanctuary; or (2) any organism into
which genetic matter from another
species has been transferred in order
that the host organism acquires the
genetic traits of the transferred genes.
This prohibition is designed to help
reduce the risk from introduced species,
including their seeds, eggs, spores, and
other biological material capable of
propagating. The intent of the
prohibition is to prevent injury to
Sanctuary resources and qualities, to
protect the biodiversity of the Sanctuary
ecosystems, and to preserve the native
functional aspects of the Sanctuary
ecosystems, all of which are put at risk
by introduced species. Introduced
species may become a new form of
predator, competitor, disturber, parasite,
or disease that can have devastating
effects upon ecosystems. For example,
introduced species impacts on native
coastal marine species of the Sanctuary
could include: Replacement of a
functionally similar native species
through competition; reduction in
abundance or elimination of an entire
population of a native species, which
can affect native species richness;
inhibition of normal growth or
increased mortality of the host and
associated species; increased intra-or
interspecies competition with native
species; creation or alteration of original
substrate and habitat; hybridization
with native species; and direct or
indirect toxicity (e.g., toxic diatoms).
Changes in species interactions can lead
to disrupted nutrient cycles and altered
energy flows that ripple with
unpredictable results through an entire
ecosystem. Exotic species may also pose
threats to endangered species, and
native species diversity. A number of
non-native species now found in the
Sanctuary region were introduced
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
elsewhere on the west coast but have
spread through hull-fouling and
accidental introductions.
The proposed introduced species
regulation includes an exception for
striped bass (Roccus saxatilis) released
during catch and release fishing activity.
Striped bass were intentionally
introduced in California in 1879, and in
1980 the California Department of Fish
and Game initiated a striped bass
hatchery program to support the striped
bass sport fishery, which according to
the California Department of Fish and
Game is one of the most important
fisheries on the Pacific Coast. The
California Department of Fish and Game
manages the striped bass fishery
through a Striped Bass Management
Conservation Plan. The proposed
regulation is intended to acknowledge
that striped bass are the focus of an
established state-managed sport fishery
and, since they consequently may be
caught within the Sanctuary, make an
exception for striped bass released
during catch and release fishing activity.
The proposed regulatory changes
would prohibit operating a MPWC
within waters of the Channel Islands
National Park, established by 16 U.S.C.
410(ff), which states that the boundaries
of Channel Islands National Park
include San Miguel and Prince Islands,
Santa Rosa, Santa Cruz, Anacapa and
Santa Barbara Islands, including the
rocks, islets, submerged lands, and
waters within one NM of each island, as
depicted on the map entitled, ‘‘Proposed
Channel Islands National Park’’
numbered 159–20,008 and dated April
1979. This proposed regulation would
mirror an existing National Park Service
ban on use of MPWC within waters of
the Channel Islands National Park, and
is intended to provide added deterrence
for purposes of ensuring protection of
the Sanctuary’s sensitive nearshore
marine wildlife and habitats. The
Channel Islands National Park staff have
observed an increase in use of MPWC
within the park over the last several
years, and park staff issue several dozen
warnings per year for violation of this
ban. For consistency (including
enforcement) purposes the existing
National Park Service definition of
MPWC is proposed to be adopted for
this proposed Sanctuary regulation. The
National Park Service definition is as
follows:
‘‘Motorized personal watercraft’’ means a
vessel, usually less than 16 feet in length,
which uses an inboard, internal combustion
engine powering a water jet pump as its
primary source of propulsion. The vessel is
intended to be operated by a person or
persons sitting, standing or kneeling on the
vessel, rather than within the confines of the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29105
hull. The length is measured from end to end
over the deck excluding sheer, meaning a
straight line measurement of the overall
length from the foremost part of the vessel to
the aftermost part of the vessel, measured
parallel to the centerline. Bow sprits,
bumpkins, rudders, outboard motor brackets,
and similar fittings or attachments, are not
included in the measurement. Length is
stated in feet and inches. 36 CFR 1.4(a).
MPWCs operate in a manner unique
among recreational vehicles and pose a
threat to wildlife. Their shallow draft
enables them to penetrate areas not
available to conventional motorized
watercraft (NPS 2000, MOCZM 2002).
The high speed and maneuverability of
MPWCs, along with the tendency to
operate them near the shore and in a
repeated fashion within a confined area,
results in recurring disturbance to
animals and habitats (Rodgers and
Smith 1997, Snow 1989). Studies have
shown that the use of MPWCs in
nearshore areas can increase flushing
rates, reduce nesting success of certain
bird species, impact spawning fish, and
reduce fishing success (Burger 1998,
Snow 1989). The National Park Service
(2000, 2004) identified several of these
impacts along with interruption of
normal activity, avoidance and
displacement, loss of habitat use,
interference with movement, direct
mortality, interference with courtship,
alteration of behavior, change in
community structure, elevated noise
levels, and damage to aquatic
vegetation. Further, offshore marine
mammals or surfacing birds may be
unaware of the presence of these
vehicles due to their low frequency
sound; when the inability to detect the
vehicles is combined with their high
speed and rapid and unpredictable
movements, both animals and operators
are at risk (Snow 1989).
Water quality concerns related to use
of MPWC, and in particular those with
two-stroke engines, include discharge of
oil and gas, and air pollutants. MPWC
using two-stroke engines may discharge
as much as 25 percent of their gas and
oil emissions directly into the water
(NPS 2000). Two-stroke engines may
also expel lubricating oil as part of their
exhaust, and emit air pollutants such as
volatile organic compounds, nitrogen
oxides, particulate matter, and carbon
monoxide (NPS 2004).
A review of information currently
available from MPWC manufacturers
indicates that they have made efforts to
reduce emissions and noise through use
of more efficient four-stroke engines as
well as other technology (e.g.,
Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc.
2005a, 2005b; Personal Watercraft
Industry Association 2005). However, it
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
29106
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
is not clear that such improvements
have rendered emission and noise
impacts due to MPWC insignificant.
While industry sponsored studies
indicate that MPWCs are no louder than
similar motorized vessels under
analogous conditions, other studies
indicate that because MPWCs travel
repeatedly in the same area, continually
leaving and reentering the water, they
create rapid cycles of noise that disturb
humans and wildlife (MOCZM 2002).
Industry improvements in noise and
other emissions do not address impacts
associated with the high speed,
maneuverability, shallow draft, and
nearshore operation of MPWC.
The area within one NM of island
shores experiences the greatest visitor
use and impact to sensitive nearshore
Sanctuary marine resources. The
proposed regulation would serve as an
added deterrent to illegal MPWC use
within the nearshore area and other
waters of the Channel Islands National
Park, and would carry a maximum civil
penalty of $130,000 per incident, per
day.
The proposed regulatory changes
would modify the existing (1982)
regulation that states that all activities
currently, (i.e., at the time of
designation) carried out by the
Department of Defense within the
Sanctuary are essential for the national
defense and, therefore, not subject to the
prohibitions contained within the other
Sanctuary regulations. As part of this
modification the list of exempt military
activities occurring within the
Sanctuary would be updated to include
present military activities if specifically
identified in the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) to be released
for this rule (see proposed regulatory
text for precise requirements). In
addition, consistent with the NMSA,
mitigation and restoration or
replacement of Sanctuary resources and
qualities would be required when
Department of Defense activity results
in their injury, destruction, or loss. All
Department of Defense activities would
be required to be carried out in a
manner that avoids to the maximum
extent practicable any adverse impacts
on Sanctuary resources and qualities.
The proposed regulatory changes
would also add one exception
pertaining to vessels of the Armed
Forces to the two discharge regulations
discussed earlier. Namely, an exception
would be made for discharges allowed
under section 312(n) of the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act. Section
312(n), which was enacted in 1996,
provides for uniform national standards
for discharges, other than sewage,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
incidental to normal operation of
vessels of the Armed Forces.
The proposed regulatory changes
would also modify the Sanctuary’s
permit regulations by slightly
augmenting the types of activities for
which the Director may issue a permit,
and by specifying the Sanctuary
prohibitions to which permits may be
applied. Activities that ‘‘assist in
managing the Sanctuary’’ would be
added to the types of activities (i.e.,
currently, research, education, and
salvage) for which the Director may
issue a permit. This addition provides a
mechanism by which the Director may
issue permits for otherwise prohibited
activities that will further Sanctuary
management. In addition, ‘‘salvage or
recovery operations’’ would be divided
into two activities for which the
Director may issue a permit: those that
further salvage or recovery operations in
connection with an abandoned
shipwreck in the Sanctuary title to
which is held by the State of California
pursuant to the Abandoned Shipwreck
Act of 1987, 43 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.; and
those that further salvage or recovery
operations in or near the Sanctuary in
connection with a recent air or marine
casualty. The intent of this proposed
modification is to clarify that the
Director may issue permits for salvage
activities pertaining to both abandoned
shipwrecks (invoking maritime heritage
resource protection concerns) and
recent air or marine casualties (invoking
prompt response concerns). The permit
regulation would authorize the Director
to issue permits with regard to the
prohibitions on: Discharging and
depositing; altering the submerged
lands; abandoning structures, material,
or other matter on or in the submerged
lands; nearshore operation of vessels;
disturbing a seabird or marine mammal
by aircraft overflight below 1000 feet
within 1 NM of the Islands; moving,
removing, injuring or possessing, or
attempting to move, remove, injure or
possess a Sanctuary historical resource;
taking any marine mammal, sea turtle or
seabird within or above the Sanctuary;
possessing within the Sanctuary
(regardless of where taken from, moved,
or removed from) any marine mammal,
sea turtle, or seabird; and operating a
MPWC within waters of the Channel
Islands National Park.
Another proposed modification to the
permit regulations would, based on the
decades of permitting experience the
NMSP now has, strengthen and augment
the criteria the Director is to use when
evaluating permit applications. Whereas
the existing regulation simply indicates
that the Director shall evaluate certain
matters in deciding whether to grant a
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
permit, the proposed modified
regulation would state that the Director
may not issue a permit unless the
Director finds that: The proposed
activity will have at most short-term and
negligible adverse effects on Sanctuary
resources and qualities; the duration of
the proposed activity is no longer than
necessary to achieve its stated purpose;
the proposed activity will be conducted
in a manner compatible with the
primary objective of protection of
Sanctuary resources and qualities,
considering the extent to which the
conduct of the activity may diminish or
enhance Sanctuary resources and
qualities, any potential indirect,
secondary, or cumulative effects of the
activity, and the duration of such
effects; and it is necessary to conduct
the proposed activity within the
Sanctuary. The required findings would
also include modifications of several
concepts that serve as review criteria in
the existing regulation. Whereas the
existing regulation simply requires the
Director to evaluate the general
professional and financial responsibility
of the applicant, the revised review
criteria clarify that the Director must
find that the applicant is professionally
qualified to conduct and complete the
proposed activity; and that the applicant
has adequate financial resources
available to conduct and complete the
proposed activity. In addition to several
minor changes to the existing review
criteria regarding the appropriateness of
the methods proposed to conduct the
activity, a new clause would be added
emphasizing the consideration of
potential indirect, secondary, and
cumulative effects of the proposed
activity on Sanctuary resources and
qualities. In addition to minor
modifications to the existing review
criteria regarding whether permitted
activities may diminish or enhance the
value of the Sanctuary as a source of
recreation, or as a source of educational
or scientific information, consideration
of the extent to which the conduct of the
activity may result in conflicts between
different users of the Sanctuary, and the
duration of such effects, would be
added. Finally, the modified regulation
would require that the Director find that
the reasonably expected end value of
the proposed activity furthers Sanctuary
goals and purposes and outweighs any
potential adverse effects on Sanctuary
resources and qualities from the
conduct of the activity. The proposed
modifications to the permit regulations
would also state that in addition to the
information listed in 15 CFR 922.48(b),
all permit applications must include
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
information the Director needs to make
the findings described above.
The proposed modifications to the
permit procedures and criteria would
also further refine current requirements
and procedures from general National
Marine Sanctuary Program regulations
(15 CFR 922.48(a) and (c)). The
proposed modifications would also
clarify existing requirements for permit
applications found in the Office of
Management and Budget approved
applicant guidelines (OMB Control
Number 0648–0141). The revised
section would also add language to the
CINMS permit regulations about permit
duration, timelines, and procedures for
permit processing, permit review, and
procedures and criteria for permit
renewal.
The proposed modifications to the
permit regulations would also expressly
require that in addition to any other
terms and conditions the Director deems
appropriate, Sanctuary permits must
require that the permittee agree to hold
the United States harmless against any
claims arising out of the permitted
activities.
Although the NMSP is not currently
proposing a prohibition on lightering in
the Sanctuary, the NMSP is soliciting
comments on such a potential
prohibition and may issue a rule with
such a prohibition at a future date.
‘‘Lightering’’ is defined at 15 CFR 922.3
as ‘‘at-sea transfer of petroleum-based
products, materials, or other matter from
vessel to vessel.’’
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Miscellaneous Rulemaking
Requirements
National Marine Sanctuaries Act
Section 304(a)(4) of the NMSA (16
U.S.C. 1434(a)(4)) requires that the
procedures specified in section 304 for
designating a National Marine
Sanctuary be followed in modifying any
term of designation. In particular,
section 304 requires that the Secretary
of Commerce submit to the Committee
on Resources of the United States House
of Representatives and the Committee
on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation of the United States
Senate, no later than the same day as
this notice is published, documents
including a copy of this notice, the
terms of the proposed designation (in
this case, the proposed changes thereto),
the proposed regulations, a draft
management plan detailing the
proposed goals and objectives,
management responsibilities, and
research activities for the area, and a
draft environmental impact statement.
In accordance with section 304, the
required documents have been
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
submitted to the specified congressional
committees.
National Environmental Policy Act
When changing a term of designation
of a National Marine Sanctuary, section
304 of the NMSA (16 U.S.C. 1434)
requires the preparation of a draft
environmental impact statement (DEIS),
as defined by the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and that the DEIS
be made available to the public. NOAA
has prepared a DMP/DEIS on the
proposal and copies are available at the
address and website listed in the
Address section of this proposed rule.
Responses to comments received on the
DMP/DEIS will be published in the
Final Management Plan (FMP)/FEIS and
preamble to the final rule.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Impact
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant within
the meaning of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12612: Federalism
Assessment
NOAA has concluded that this
regulatory action does not have
federalism implications sufficient to
warrant preparation of a federalism
assessment under Executive Order
12612. As members of the Sanctuary
Advisory Council, the California
Resources Agency, California
Department of Fish and Game, and the
California Coastal Commission have
been closely involved with the
development of the management plan
and proposed regulatory changes. In
addition, staff from the NMSP’s west
coast region have consulted with the
California Department of Boating and
Waterways, California Department of
Fish and Game, California State Lands
Commission, and California Resources
Agency. Also, in 2003, the NMSP
consulted in writing with the above
mentioned state agencies in addition to:
the Office of the Governor of California,
the California Department of Parks and
Recreation, the California Department of
Water Resources, the California
Department of Conservation, the
California Environmental Protection
Agency, the California State Water
Resources Control Board, and the
California Assembly Committee on
Natural Resources.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29107
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this certification is
as follows:
Small business concerns operating
within the Sanctuary include over 500
commercial fishermen, approximately
28 consumptive recreational charter
businesses, approximately 27 nonconsumptive recreational charter
businesses, one MPWC business,
approximately 20 marine salvage
companies, and one aviation business.
The approximately 40 small
organizations operating within the
Sanctuary include non-governmental
organizations (NGO’s) and/or non-profit
organizations (NPO’s) dedicated to
environmental education, research,
restoration, and conservation
concerning marine and maritime
heritage resources. There are no small
governmental jurisdictions in the
Sanctuary.
The proposed prohibition on
exploring for, developing or producing
minerals within the Sanctuary would
not have a significant adverse impact on
small entities. No small entities practice
mining activities within the Sanctuary.
The proposed prohibition on
abandoning any structure, material, or
other matter on or in the submerged
lands of the Sanctuary would have no
significant adverse impacts on small
entities within the Sanctuary because
none of these operations are dependent
upon a practice of abandoning
structures or other matter on or in the
submerged lands of the Sanctuary.
However, should a small entity, such as
a research entity, occasionally want to
temporarily leave materials on the
submerged lands of the Sanctuary, such
as research equipment, a Sanctuary
research permit could be applied for. In
addition, this prohibition may offer an
indirect beneficial effect to marine
salvage companies whose services may
be called upon to remove grounded,
sinking, or submerged vessels that
would be illegal to leave abandoned
upon the submerged lands of the
Sanctuary.
The proposed prohibitions on take
and possession of certain animals are
not expected to result in a significant
adverse impact on small entities
because those entities’ operations may
lawfully involve such takes under
authorization granted by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA),
Endangered Species Act (ESA),
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), or
any regulation promulgated under one
of these acts. In addition, nonconsumptive recreational charter
businesses may receive indirect
beneficial effects from these proposed
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
29108
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
regulations because the added
protection to marine mammals,
seabirds, and sea turtles could
complement business activities focused
on whale watching, kayaking, or other
marine excursion tours. For example,
the additional protection this
prohibition affords to certain animals
may potentially result in improved
status of such animals at the Islands.
This in turn may lead to the beneficial
effect of more consumer interest in
services rendered by non-consumptive
recreational charter businesses.
The proposed prohibition on marking,
defacing, damaging, moving, removing,
or tampering with any Sanctuary-related
sign, notice, placard, monument, stake,
post, or other boundary marker is not
expected to significantly adversely
affect any of the small entities within
the Sanctuary because routine small
entity operations neither involve nor are
likely to cause such damage.
The proposed prohibition on
introducing or otherwise releasing from
within or into the Sanctuary an
introduced species is not expected to
significantly adversely impact small
entities because introducing or
otherwise releasing an introduced
species is not part of the business or
operational practices associated with
most of the identified small entities, and
because, for those small entities whose
operational practices may include catch
and release of striped bass (Roccus
saxatilis), (i.e., consumptive recreational
charter businesses), an exception has
been provided for striped bass released
during catch and release fishing activity.
By prohibiting such introductions,
indirect benefits may result for certain
small entities since their activities could
potentially be negatively impacted by
the spread of introduced species.
The proposed prohibition on
operation of MPWC within waters of the
Channel Islands National Park is not
expected to have any significant adverse
impact on these small entities. This
activity is already illegal within the
same area per a ban in place by the
National Park Service (36 CFR 3.24),
and as such MPWC businesses would
not be subjected to any additional
impact from this proposed regulation.
None of the small entities conducting
activities within the Sanctuary is
expected to be significantly adversely
impacted by the proposed clarifications
and corrections to the Sanctuary’s
boundary for the following reasons. The
clarification that submerged lands are
part of the existing Sanctuary boundary
would not have a significant adverse
impact on small entities within the
Sanctuary because the Sanctuary has
managed the submerged lands through
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
administering protective measures for
them since designation in 1980. The
National Marine Sanctuary Program
(NMSP) manages submerged lands as
part of national marine sanctuaries and
this is reflected in amendments to the
NMSA passed in 1984 (16 U.S.C.
1432(3)). Similarly, proposed
corrections and clarifications to the
Sanctuary’s boundary coordinates
would not significantly adversely
impact any of the small entities
operating within the Sanctuary because
the proposed corrections and
clarifications are merely technical in
nature. This update would not
constitute a change in the geographic
area of the sanctuary but rather an
improvement in the estimate of its size.
For example, boundary coordinates are
proposed to be updated using the NAD
83, which provides more accurate
information than that originally used to
describe the Sanctuary boundary
coordinates.
The proposed modification to the
Sanctuary’s discharge/deposit
regulation that would clarify that
discharges allowed from marine
sanitation devices apply only to Type I
and Type II marine sanitation devices
would not introduce any new
restrictions on small entities and would
merely clarify the original intent of the
Sanctuary’s discharge regulation. To the
extent that this clarification might affect
customary, though illegal, sewage
discharge practices of some small
entities within the Sanctuary’s 6 NM
boundary, the adverse affect on those
operations is expected to be less than
significant because such discharges may
legally occur beyond the Sanctuary’s 6
NM boundary, or vessel sewage may be
pumped out and disposed of at
mainland ports and harbors. In addition,
some small entities may receive indirect
benefits from this clarification,
especially as it might pertain to
preventing large volume discharges
from larger vessels, since it may
contribute to sustaining favorable
environmental quality in their area of
operation.
The proposed modification to the
Sanctuary’s discharge/deposit
regulation that would specify that the
exception from the prohibition on
discharging or depositing fish, fish
parts, or chumming materials (bait) into
the Sanctuary is valid only during the
conduct of lawful fishing activity within
the Sanctuary is not expected to have a
significant adverse impact on small
entities because it would not apply to
conduct of lawful fishing activity within
the Sanctuary. Although in some areas
‘‘chumming’’ marine waters is a practice
that has been associated with non-
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consumptive recreational activities (e.g.,
attracting sharks for photography) or in
some cases research activities (e.g.,
attracting seabirds for study), the NMSP
is not aware of any such practices
occurring within the Sanctuary.
Furthermore, small entities not engaged
in lawful fishing could apply for and, if
appropriate, be granted a Sanctuary
permit to conduct this otherwise
prohibited discharge/deposit.
The proposed modification that
would result in meals on board vessels
no longer being excepted from the
Sanctuary discharge/deposit prohibition
would not result in a significant impact
to small entities because it would
merely introduce a new requirement
that boaters not discard food wastes
within three to six NM from Island
shores. Such discharges/deposits are
already prohibited under the Act to
Prevent Pollution from Ships, 33 U.S.C.
1901 et seq., within the first three NM
from Island shores, and also out to
twelve NM unless the food wastes are
ground to less than one inch. Therefore,
boaters could either properly dispose of
food waste at port or appropriately
discard it beyond six NM (the
Sanctuary’s boundary) and out to twelve
NM, when food wastes are ground to
less than one inch. Resulting impacts
may include additional costs and time
potentially involved in traveling the
additional distance from three to six NM
offshore to appropriately dispose of food
waste; however, these are not expected
to be significant.
Significant adverse impacts are not
expected to result for any of the
Sanctuary’s small entities from the
proposed prohibition on discharging or
depositing any material or other matter
from beyond the boundary of the
Sanctuary that subsequently enters the
Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary
resource or quality because in the
course of normal, lawful operations, no
small entity activities (e.g., commercial
fishing businesses, recreational fishing
businesses, non-consumptive charter
businesses, marine salvage companies,
research and education entities, aircraft
businesses) are expected to produce
such discharges/deposits beyond the
Sanctuary boundary. In addition, this
proposed regulation would except
discharges/deposits likely to come from
vessel-based small entities, including:
biodegradable effluent incidental to
vessel use and generated by an operable
Type I or II marine sanitation device
(U.S. Coast Guard classification)
approved in accordance with section
312 of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1321 et seq.);
biodegradable matter from a vessel
resulting from deck wash down, vessel
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
engine cooling water, or graywater as
defined by section 312 of the FWPCA;
vessel engine or generator exhaust; and
fish, fish parts, or chumming materials
(bait) used in or resulting from lawful
fishing activity beyond the boundary of
the Sanctuary, provided that such
discharge or deposit is during the
conduct of lawful fishing activity there.
No significant impact on small
entities is expected to result from the
proposed regulation change that would
extend the prohibition on alteration of
the submerged lands of the Sanctuary
from 2 NM to the outer 6 NM Sanctuary
boundary, and would include a
prohibition on placing any structure,
material, or other matter on or in the
submerged lands of the Sanctuary. The
proposed regulation would modify the
exception for ‘‘bottom trawling from a
commercial vessel’’ to provide an
exception for activities incidental and
necessary to ‘‘conduct lawful fishing
activity.’’ This broadening of the
exception would encompass other
bottom-touching gear types, such as pots
and traps, which the drafters of the
original regulations apparently did not
realize could alter the seabed. This
proposed change would thus remove
any uncertainty about the existing
regulation’s applicability to such gear
types. Most other small entity
operations do not normally involve,
depend upon, or result in alteration of
and/or placement of structures,
material, or other matter on or in the
submerged lands of the Sanctuary, and
as such would not be significantly
adversely affected by this regulation.
Marine salvage companies, when
engaged in salvage recovery operations
to respond to a recent air or marine
casualty, may have the potential to alter
submerged lands. Such companies may
apply for a Sanctuary permit. For those
entities that do occasionally need to
temporarily place materials on the
submerged lands of the Sanctuary, such
as research entities, the Sanctuary
permitting process may also be used to
potentially allow acceptable activities.
None of the small entities operating
within the Sanctuary is expected to
incur significant adverse impacts from
the proposed prohibition of vessels of
300 gross registered tons or more
(excluding fishing and kelp harvesting
vessels) from operating within one NM
of the Islands. Vessels larger than 300
gross registered tons are not utilized
within the Sanctuary by consumptive or
non-consumptive recreational charter
businesses known to frequent the
Sanctuary. Many cruise ships are larger
than 300 gross registered tons, but
cruise ships have not been seen within
the Sanctuary for more than ten years,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
and the NMSP is not aware of any
nearshore routes near the Islands
planned by the cruise line industry. It
is unlikely that a marine salvage vessel
would ever be large enough to be
affected by this prohibition, but if
necessary a Sanctuary salvage permit
could be applied for. The operations of
vessels larger than 300 gross registered
tons conducting research or education
activities that cannot be conducted
without approaching the Islands inside
of one NM from shore, an uncommon—
less than once per year—but anticipated
occurrence, may apply for and
potentially be granted a Sanctuary
research or education permit to do so.
Indirect beneficial effects from this
prohibition may result for some small
entities that may benefit from a
nearshore marine environment that is
not subjected to large-scale grounding,
collision, hazardous spill, and wildlife
disturbance risks that very large vessels
can pose.
Significant adverse impacts to small
entities are not expected to result from
the revision and strengthening of the
Sanctuary’s regulation protecting
historical resources because the
regulation would remain essentially the
same with regard to how small entities
may conduct their activities. For
example, non-consumptive recreational
charter businesses are expected to
continue to operate chartered dive trips
in a manner that does not involve the
currently unlawful practice of damaging
or removing submerged cultural
resources. Thus, although the proposed
revised regulation would be more
comprehensive in the protection
provided to these resources (prohibiting
moving, possessing, injuring or
attempting to move, remove, possess, or
injure any Sanctuary historical
resource), no significant adverse impact
is expected for existing lawful business
practices. The proposed regulation may
offer an indirect beneficial effect for
non-consumptive recreational charter
businesses, as it would help ensure that
submerged cultural resources remain
intact for divers to enjoy.
The proposed modification of permit
issuance criteria and procedures is not
expected to significantly adversely
affect any of the small entities within
the Sanctuary as most of their activities
do not require a Sanctuary permit.
Furthermore, the proposed revised
permit regulations not only maintain the
status quo scope of activities for which
a permit may potentially be issued
(research, education, and salvage), but
also add one more such activity category
(for activities that will assist in
managing the Sanctuary), in effect
broadening the types of otherwise
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29109
prohibited activities for which a permit
may be granted. On the occasion that a
Sanctuary-based research, education,
salvage, or other project might require a
permit, the proposed modified criteria
and procedures are not expected to
significantly adversely affect the
activities of the requesting entities,
because the proposed revised permit
regulation in essence merely explicitly
clarifies other concepts implicit in the
current regulation or a part of agency
practice with regard to it.
Because this action would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, no
initial regulatory flexibility analysis was
prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule involves an
existing information collection
requirement currently approved by
OMB (OMB Control Number 0648–
0141) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
The proposed revised permit
regulations would require the Director
of the NMSP to consider the proposed
activity for which a permit application
has been received in terms of: duration;
effects on Sanctuary resources, qualities,
and users; indirect, secondary, and
cumulative effects; and whether it is
necessary to conduct the activity in the
Sanctuary. The proposed modifications
to the permit procedures and criteria (15
CFR 922.72) would further refine
current requirements and procedures of
the general National Marine Sanctuary
Program regulations (15 CFR 922.48(a)
and (c)). The proposed modifications
would also clarify existing requirements
for permit applications found in the
Office of Management and Budget
approved applicant guidelines (OMB
Control Number 0648–0141). The
revised permit regulations would add
language about: permit duration,
timelines and procedures for permit
processing, permit review, permit
renewal, and liability.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Request for Comments
In this proposed rule, NOAA is
publishing in its entirety 15 CFR Part
922, Subpart G, as it would read with
the amendments described above. Those
amendments are the subject of this
proposed rule and request for
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
29110
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
comments. NOAA’s publishing of the
entire body of regulations specifically
governing the CINMS, showing the
proposed changes, is meant to facilitate
the reader’s understanding of the
regulations and better inform public
comments.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 922
Administrative practice and
procedure, Coastal zone, Historic
preservation, Intergovernmental
relations, Marine resources, Natural
resources, Penalties, Recreation and
recreation areas, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog
Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary Program)
Dated: May 15, 2006.
Mitchell Luxenberg,
Chief Financial Officer (Acting), Management
and Budget Office, National Ocean Service.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, 15 CFR Part 922 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 922—NATIONAL MARINE
SANCTUARY PROGRAM
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for Part 922
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
2. Subpart G (CINMS regulations) is
revised to read as follows:
Subpart G—Channel Islands National
Marine Sanctuary
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Boundary.
The Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary (Sanctuary) consists of an
area of approximately 1243 square
nautical miles (NM) of coastal and
ocean waters, and the submerged lands
thereunder, off the southern coast of
California. The Sanctuary boundary
begins at the Mean High Water Line of
and extends seaward to a distance of
approximately six NM from the
following islands and offshore rocks:
San Miguel Island, Santa Cruz Island,
Santa Rosa Island, Anacapa Island,
Santa Barbara Island, Richardson Rock,
and Castle Rock (the Islands). The
seaward boundary coordinates are listed
in the Appendix to this subpart.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Definitions.
In addition to those definitions found
at 15 CFR 922.3, the following
definitions apply to this subpart:
Introduced species means:
(1) A species (including but not
limited to any of its biological matter
capable of propagation) that is nonnative to the ecosystems protected by
the Sanctuary; or
(2) Any organism into which genetic
matter from another species has been
transferred in order that the host
organism acquires the genetic traits of
the transferred genes.
Motorized personal watercraft means
a vessel, usually less than 16 feet in
length, which uses an inboard, internal
combustion engine powering a water jet
pump as its primary source of
propulsion. The vessel is intended to be
operated by a person or persons sitting,
standing or kneeling on the vessel,
rather than within the confines of the
hull. The length is measured from end
to end over the deck excluding sheer,
meaning a straight line measurement of
the overall length from the foremost part
of the vessel to the aftermost part of the
vessel, measured parallel to the
centerline. Bowsprits, bumpkins,
rudders, outboard motor brackets, and
similar fittings or attachments, are not
included in the measurement. Length is
stated in feet and inches.
§ 922.72 Prohibited or otherwise regulated
activities.
Subpart G—Channel Islands National
Marine Sanctuary
Sec.
922.70 Boundary.
922.71 Definitions.
922.72 Prohibited or otherwise regulated
activities.
922.73 Permit procedures and issuance
criteria.
Appendix to Subpart G—Channel Islands
National Marine Sanctuary Boundary
Coordinates
§ 922.70
§ 922.71
(a) Except as specified in paragraphs
(b) through (e) of this section, the
following activities are prohibited by
these regulations and thus unlawful for
any person to conduct or cause to be
conducted:
(1) Exploring for, developing, or
producing hydrocarbons within the
Sanctuary, except pursuant to leases
executed prior to March 30, 1981, and
except the laying of pipeline pursuant to
exploring for, developing, or producing
hydrocarbons.
(2) Exploring for, developing, or
producing minerals within the
Sanctuary, except producing byproducts incidental to hydrocarbon
production allowed by paragraph (a)(1)
of this section.
(3)(i) Discharging or depositing from
within or into the Sanctuary any
material or other matter except:
(A) Fish, fish parts, or chumming
materials (bait) used in or resulting from
lawful fishing activity within the
Sanctuary, provided that such discharge
or deposit is during the conduct of
lawful fishing activity within the
Sanctuary;
(B) Biodegradable effluent incidental
to vessel use and generated by an
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
operable Type I or II marine sanitation
device (U.S. Coast Guard classification)
approved in accordance with section
312 of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended, (FWPCA), 33
U.S.C. 1321 et seq. Vessel operators
must lock all marine sanitation devices
in a manner that prevents discharge of
untreated sewage;
(C) Biodegradable matter from a vessel
resulting from deck wash down, vessel
engine cooling water, or graywater as
defined by section 312 of the FWPCA;
(D) Vessel engine or generator
exhaust;
(E) Effluents routinely and necessarily
discharged or deposited incidental to
hydrocarbon exploration, development,
or production allowed by paragraph
(a)(1) of this section;
(F) Discharges allowed under section
312(n) of the FWPCA; or
(ii) Discharging or depositing from
beyond the boundary of the Sanctuary
any material or other matter that
subsequently enters the Sanctuary and
injures a Sanctuary resource or quality,
except those listed in paragraphs
(a)(3)(i)(B) through (F) of this section
and fish, fish parts, or chumming
materials (bait) used in or resulting from
lawful fishing activity beyond the
boundary of the Sanctuary, provided
that such discharge or deposit is during
the conduct of lawful fishing activity
there.
(4) Drilling into, dredging, or
otherwise altering the submerged lands
of the Sanctuary; or constructing or
placing any structure, material, or other
matter on or in the submerged lands of
the Sanctuary, except as incidental to
and necessary to:
(i) Anchor a vessel;
(ii) Install an authorized navigational
aid;
(iii) Conduct lawful fishing activity;
(iv) Lay pipeline pursuant to
exploring for, developing, or producing
hydrocarbons; or
(v) Explore for, develop, or produce
hydrocarbons as allowed by paragraph
(a)(1) of this section.
(5) Abandoning any structure,
material, or other matter on or in the
submerged lands of the Sanctuary.
(6) Except to transport persons or
supplies to or from any Island, operating
within one NM of any Island any vessel
engaged in the trade of carrying cargo,
including, but not limited to, tankers
and other bulk carriers and barges, any
vessel engaged in the trade of servicing
offshore installations, or any vessel of
three hundred gross registered tons or
more, except fishing or kelp harvesting
vessels.
(7) Disturbing a seabird or marine
mammal by flying a motorized aircraft
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
at less than 1000 feet over the waters
within one NM of any Island, except, if
allowed under paragraph (a)(9) of this
section:
(i) To engage in kelp bed surveys; or
(ii) To transport persons or supplies to
or from an Island.
(8) Moving, removing, injuring, or
possessing, or attempting to move,
remove, injure, or possess a Sanctuary
historical resource.
(9) Taking any marine mammal, sea
turtle, or seabird within or above the
Sanctuary, except as expressly
authorized by the Marine Mammal
Protection Act, as amended, (MMPA),
16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq., Endangered
Species Act, as amended, (ESA), 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq., Migratory Bird
Treaty Act, as amended, (MBTA), 16
U.S.C. 703 et seq., or any regulation, as
amended, promulgated under the
MMPA, ESA, or MBTA.
(10) Possessing within the Sanctuary
(regardless of where taken from, moved,
or removed from) any marine mammal,
sea turtle, or seabird, except as
expressly authorized by the MMPA,
ESA, MBTA, or any regulation, as
amended, promulgated under the
MMPA, ESA, or MBTA.
(11) Marking, defacing, damaging,
moving, removing, or tampering with
any sign, notice, or placard, whether
temporary or permanent, or any
monument, stake, post, or other
boundary marker related to the
Sanctuary.
(12) Introducing or otherwise
releasing from within or into the
Sanctuary an introduced species, except
striped bass (Roccus saxatilis) released
during catch and release fishing activity.
(13) Operating a motorized personal
watercraft within waters of the Channel
Islands National Park, established by 16
U.S.C. 410(ff).
(b)(1) The prohibitions in paragraphs
(a)(3) through (13) of this section do not
apply to military activities carried out
by DOD as of the effective date of these
regulations and specifically identified in
section 3.5.9 (Department of Defense
Activities) of the Final Channel Islands
National Marine Sanctuary Management
Plan/Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FMP/FEIS), Volume II:
Environmental Impact Statement, 2006,
authored and published by NOAA
(‘‘pre-existing activities’’). Copies of the
document are available from the
Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary, 113 Harbor Way, Santa
Barbara, CA 93109. Other military
activities carried out by DOD may be
exempted by the Director after
consultation between the Director and
DOD.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:37 May 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
(2) A military activity carried out by
DOD as of the effective date of these
regulations and specifically identified in
the section entitled ‘‘Department of
Defense Activities’’ of the FMP/FEIS is
not considered a pre-existing activity if:
(i) It is modified in such a way that
requires the preparation of an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under
the National Environmental Policy Act,
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., relevant to a
Sanctuary resource or quality;
(ii) It is modified, including but not
limited to changes in location or
frequency, in such a way that its
possible adverse effects on Sanctuary
resources or qualities are significantly
greater than previously considered for
the unmodified activity;
(iii) It is modified, including but not
limited to changes in location or
frequency, in such a way that its
possible adverse effects on Sanctuary
resources or qualities are significantly
different in manner than previously
considered for the unmodified activity;
or
(iv) There are new circumstances or
information relevant to a Sanctuary
resource or quality that were not
addressed in the FMP/FEIS.
(3) In the event of destruction of, loss
of, or injury to a Sanctuary resource or
quality resulting from an incident,
including, but not limited to,
discharges, deposits, and groundings,
caused by a DOD activity, DOD, in
coordination with the Director, must
promptly prevent and mitigate further
damage and must restore or replace the
Sanctuary resource or quality in a
manner approved by the Director.
(4) All DOD activities must be carried
out in a manner that avoids to the
maximum extent practicable any
adverse impacts on Sanctuary resources
and qualities.
(c) The prohibitions in paragraphs
(a)(3) through (10), (a)(12), and (a)(13) of
this section do not apply to any activity
conducted under and in accordance
with the scope, purpose, terms, and
conditions of a National Marine
Sanctuary permit issued pursuant to 15
CFR 922.48 and 922.73.
(d) The prohibitions in paragraphs
(a)(3) through (11) and (a)(13) of this
section do not apply to an activity
necessary to respond to an emergency
threatening life, property, or the
environment.
(e) The prohibitions in paragraphs
(a)(3) through (11) and (a)(13) of this
section do not apply to an activity
necessary for valid law enforcement
purposes in the Sanctuary.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 922.73
criteria.
29111
Permit procedures and issuance
(a) A person may conduct an activity
prohibited by § 922.72(a)(3) through
(10), (a)(12), and (a)(13) if such activity
is specifically authorized by, and
conducted in accordance with the
scope, purpose, terms, and conditions
of, a permit issued under § 922.48 and
this section.
(b) The Director, at his or her sole
discretion, may issue a permit, subject
to terms and conditions as he or she
deems appropriate, to conduct an
activity prohibited by § 922.72(a)(3)
through (10), (a)(12), and (a)(13) if the
Director finds that the activity:
(1) Is appropriate research designed to
further understanding of Sanctuary
resources and qualities;
(2) Will further the educational value
of the Sanctuary;
(3) Will further salvage or recovery
operations in or near the Sanctuary in
connection with a recent air or marine
casualty;
(4) Will assist in managing the
Sanctuary; or
(5) Will further salvage or recovery
operations in connection with an
abandoned shipwreck in the Sanctuary
title to which is held by the State of
California.
(c) The Director may not issue a
permit under § 922.48 and this section
unless the Director also finds that:
(1) The proposed activity will have at
most short-term and negligible adverse
effects on Sanctuary resources and
qualities;
(2) The applicant is professionally
qualified to conduct and complete the
proposed activity;
(3) The applicant has adequate
financial resources available to conduct
and complete the proposed activity;
(4) The duration of the proposed
activity is no longer than necessary to
achieve its stated purpose;
(5) The methods and procedures
proposed by the applicant are
appropriate to achieve the goals of the
proposed activity, especially in relation
to the potential effects of the proposed
activity on Sanctuary resources and
qualities;
(6) The proposed activity will be
conducted in a manner compatible with
the primary objective of protection of
Sanctuary resources and qualities,
considering the extent to which the
conduct of the activity may diminish or
enhance Sanctuary resources and
qualities, any potential indirect,
secondary, or cumulative effects of the
activity, and the duration of such
effects;
(7) The proposed activity will be
conducted in a manner compatible with
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
29112
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
the value of the Sanctuary as a source
of recreation and as a source of
educational and scientific information,
considering the extent to which the
conduct of the activity may result in
conflicts between different users of the
Sanctuary and the duration of such
effects;
(8) It is necessary to conduct the
proposed activity within the Sanctuary;
(9) The reasonably expected end value
of the proposed activity furthers
Sanctuary goals and purposes and
outweighs any potential adverse effects
on Sanctuary resources and qualities
from the conduct of the activity; and
(10) Any other matters the Director
deems appropriate do not make the
issuance of a permit for the proposed
activity inappropriate.
(d) Applications. (1) Applications for
permits should be addressed to the
Director, Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries; ATTN: Manager, Channel
Islands National Marine Sanctuary, 113
Harbor Way, Santa Barbara, CA 93109.
(2) In addition to the information
listed in § 922.48(b), all applications
must include information the Director
needs to make the findings in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(e) In addition to any other terms and
conditions that the Director deems
appropriate, a permit issued pursuant to
this section must require that the
permittee agree to hold the United
States harmless against any claims
arising out of the conduct of the
permitted activities.
Appendix to Subpart G—Channel
Islands National Marine Sanctuary
Boundary Coordinates
Coordinates listed in this Appendix are
unprojected (Geographic) and based on the
North American Datum of 1983.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Point ID No.
1 ....................
2 ....................
3 ....................
4 ....................
5 ....................
6 ....................
7 ....................
8 ....................
9 ....................
10 ..................
11 ..................
12 ..................
13 ..................
14 ..................
15 ..................
16 ..................
17 ..................
18 ..................
19 ..................
20 ..................
21 ..................
22 ..................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Latitude
North
33.94138
33.96776
34.02607
34.07339
34.10185
34.11523
34.11611
34.11434
34.11712
34.11664
34.13389
34.13825
34.14784
34.15466
34.15142
34.13411
34.14635
34.15988
34.15906
34.15928
34.16213
34.16962
14:37 May 18, 2006
Longitude
West
–119.27422
–119.25010
–119.23642
–119.25686
–119.29178
–119.33040
–119.39120
–119.40212
–119.42896
–119.44844
–119.48081
–119.49198
–119.51194
–119.59059
–119.61254
–119.66024
–119.69780
–119.76688
–119.77800
–119.79327
–119.80347
–119.83643
Jkt 208001
Point ID No.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
PO 00000
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
Frm 00023
Latitude
North
34.17266
34.17588
34.17682
34.17258
34.13535
34.13698
34.12994
34.12481
34.12519
34.11008
34.11128
34.13632
34.15341
34.16408
34.18231
34.19117
34.20224
34.20707
34.20520
34.19254
34.20540
34.20486
34.18182
34.10208
34.08151
34.05848
34.01940
34.01349
33.98698
33.95039
33.92694
33.92501
33.91403
33.91712
33.90956
33.88976
33.84444
33.83146
33.81763
33.81003
33.79425
33.79379
33.79983
33.81076
33.81450
33.84125
33.84865
33.87038
33.86804
33.86110
33.86351
33.85995
33.86233
33.87330
33.88594
33.88688
33.88809
33.89414
33.90064
33.91569
33.91094
33.90424
33.90219
33.90131
33.90398
33.90635
33.91304
33.91829
33.48250
33.44235
33.40555
33.39059
33.36804
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Longitude
West
–119.85240
–119.88903
–119.93357
–119.95830
–120.01964
–120.04206
–120.08582
–120.11104
–120.16076
–120.21190
–120.22707
–120.25292
–120.28627
–120.29310
–120.31224
–120.32576
–120.35122
–120.41801
–120.42859
–120.46041
–120.50728
–120.53987
–120.60041
–120.64208
–120.63894
–120.62862
–120.58567
–120.57464
–120.56582
–120.53282
–120.46132
–120.42170
–120.37585
–120.32506
–120.30857
–120.29540
–120.25482
–120.22927
–120.20284
–120.18731
–120.13422
–120.10207
–120.06995
–120.04351
–120.03158
–119.96508
–119.92316
–119.88247
–119.87060
–119.79017
–119.77130
–119.74390
–119.68783
–119.65504
–119.62617
–119.59423
–119.58278
–119.54861
–119.51936
–119.48263
–119.46137
–119.42422
–119.40730
–119.38373
–119.36333
–119.35345
–119.33280
–119.32206
–119.16874
–119.16797
–119.14878
–119.13283
–119.08891
Point ID No.
96 ..................
97 ..................
98 ..................
99 ..................
100 ................
101 ................
102 ................
103 ................
104 ................
105 ................
106 ................
107 ................
108 ................
109 ................
110 ................
111 ................
112 ................
113 ................
Latitude
North
33.36375
33.36241
33.36379
33.36879
33.37441
33.38001
33.38914
33.40515
33.44006
33.48414
33.52444
33.53834
33.58616
33.59018
33.58516
33.58011
33.54367
33.51161
Longitude
West
–119.06803
–119.04812
–119.02811
–118.99797
–118.98194
–118.96972
–118.95492
–118.93661
–118.91519
–118.90712
–118.91492
–118.92271
–118.99540
–119.02374
–119.06745
–119.08521
–119.14460
–119.16367
[FR Doc. 06–4670 Filed 5–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3511–32–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD 11–06–004]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Event; Sacramento River Bridge-toBridge Waterfront Festival, San
Francisco Bay and Sacramento River,
CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish special local regulations in the
navigable waters of the Sacramento
River for a waterfront festival to be held
on July 21 through July 23, 2006. The
event includes boat racing, speed trials,
water-skiing, and wakeboard
competitions. The proposed special
local regulations are intended to
prohibit vessels and people from
entering into or remaining within a
regulated area in order to ensure the
safety of participants and spectators.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
June 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to the Waterways
Safety Branch, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
San Francisco, Yerba Buena Island, San
Francisco, California 94130. The
Waterways Safety Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29096-29112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4670]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. 060222048-6048-01]
RIN 0648-AT17
Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Regulations
AGENCY: National Marine Sanctuary Program (NMSP), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of public availability of draft
management plan/draft environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is
proposing a revised management plan and a revised set of regulations
for the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary (CINMS or Sanctuary).
The proposed set of regulations includes both new regulations as well
as changes to existing regulations. Proposed new regulations include
prohibitions on: Exploring for, developing, or producing minerals
within the Sanctuary; abandoning matter on or in Sanctuary submerged
lands; taking marine mammals, seabirds, or sea turtles within or above
the Sanctuary; possessing within the Sanctuary any marine mammal, sea
turtle, or seabird; marking, defacing, damaging, moving, removing, or
tampering with Sanctuary signs, monuments, boundary markers, or similar
items; introducing or otherwise releasing from within or into the
Sanctuary an introduced species; and operating motorized personal
watercraft within waters of the Channel Islands National Park. There
are also proposed changes to help clarify or refine existing
regulations.
The NMSP is also proposing certain revisions to the Sanctuary's
Designation Document. These include proposed revisions of the
Description of the Area and proposed changes to the Scope of
Regulations, as well as changes to help clarify, update, and refine
other sections of the Designation Document. No changes are proposed for
the ``Fishing'' and ``Defense Activities'' sections within Article V
(Relation to Other Regulatory Programs) of the Designation Document.
DATES: NOAA is publishing this proposed rule to provide notice to the
public and invite advice, recommendations, information, and other
comments from interested parties on the proposed rule and Draft
Management Plan/Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DMP/DEIS). Public
hearings will be held as detailed below:
(1) Tuesday, June 27, 2006, at the Sheraton Four Points hotel, San
Buenaventura Ballroom, 1050 Schooner Drive, in Ventura, California.
(2) Thursday, June 29, 2006, at the Earl Warren Showgrounds, Warren
Hall, 3400 Calle Real Street, in Santa Barbara, California.
Comments will be considered if received by July 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the DMP/DEIS are available at Channel Islands
National Marine Sanctuary, 113 Harbor Way, Suite 150, Santa Barbara,
California and on the web at https://channelislands.noaa.gov. You may
submit comments, identified by RIN 0648-AT17, by any of the following
methods:
E-mail: cinms.mgtplan@noaa.gov.
Fax: (805) 568-1582.
Mail: Chris Mobley, Superintendent, Channel Islands
National Marine Sanctuary, 113 Harbor Way, Suite 150, Santa Barbara,
California, 93109.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary, 113 Harbor Way, Suite 150, Santa Barbara, California, 93109.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Murray at (805) 884-1464 or
michael.murray@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
Pursuant to section 304(e) of the NMSA, 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq. the
National Marine Sanctuary Program (NMSP) conducted a review of the
management plan and regulations for the Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary (CINMS or Sanctuary), located off the coast of southern
California. The review has resulted in a proposed new management plan
for the Sanctuary, some proposed changes to existing regulations, and
some proposed new regulations. The proposed new regulations include
prohibitions on:
Exploring for, developing, or producing minerals within
the Sanctuary, except producing by-products incidental to authorized
hydrocarbon production;
Abandoning any structure, material, or other matter on or
in the submerged lands of the Sanctuary;
Taking any marine mammal, sea turtle, or seabird within or
above the Sanctuary, except as expressly authorized by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act, as amended, (MMPA), 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.,
Endangered Species Act, as amended, (ESA), 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.,
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as amended, (MBTA), 16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.,
or any regulation, as amended, promulgated under the MMPA, ESA, or
MBTA.
Possessing within the Sanctuary (regardless of where taken
from, moved, or removed from) any marine mammal, sea turtle, or
seabird, except as expressly authorized by the MMPA, ESA, MBTA, or any
regulation, as amended, promulgated under the MMPA, ESA, or MBTA;
[[Page 29097]]
Marking, defacing, damaging, moving, removing, or
tampering with any sign, notice or placard, whether temporary or
permanent, or any monument, stake, post, or other boundary marker
related to the Sanctuary;
Introducing or otherwise releasing from within or into the
Sanctuary an introduced species, except striped bass (Roccus saxatilis)
released during catch and release fishing activity; and
Operating a motorized personal watercraft (MPWC) within
waters of the Channel Islands National Park.
These measures would afford better protection to the natural and
cultural resources of CINMS.
Existing regulations would also be revised to:
Clarify that Sanctuary boundaries encompass the submerged
lands;
Correct some inaccuracies and ambiguities in the
coordinates and description of the Sanctuary's outer and shoreline
boundaries;
Remove outdated and unnecessary oil spill contingency
equipment requirements;
Clarify that discharges allowed from marine sanitation
devices apply only to Type I and Type II marine sanitation devices;
Provide an exemption for discharges by vessels of the
Armed Forces allowed under section 312(n) of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended, (uniform national discharge
standards for vessels of the Armed Forces);
Specify that the existing exception for discharging or
depositing fish, fish parts, or chumming materials (bait) applies only
to such discharge or deposit during the conduct of lawful fishing
activity within the Sanctuary;
Remove an exception for discharging or depositing meals on
board vessels;
Prohibit discharges or deposits of any material or other
matter from beyond the boundary of the Sanctuary that subsequently
enters the Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary resource or quality;
Extend from 2 NM to the outer Sanctuary boundary
(approximately 6 NM) the existing prohibition on alteration of the
submerged lands of the Sanctuary;
Prohibit not just vessels engaged in the trade of carrying
cargo and vessels engaged in the trade of servicing offshore
installations, but also vessels of 300 gross registered tons or more
(excluding fishing and kelp harvesting vessels) from operating within 1
NM of any island;
Revise and strengthen the existing protection of cultural
resources to prohibit moving, possessing, injuring, or attempting to
move, remove, injure, or possess any Sanctuary historical resource;
Clarify, update, and refine the regulation of Department
of Defense activities occurring within the Sanctuary to, among other
things, provide more consistency with the NMSA (as it now reads); and
Conform wording, where appropriate, to wording used for
more recently designated sanctuaries.
The permit regulations for the Sanctuary are also being revised and
clarified. Activities that assist in Sanctuary management or further
salvage or recovery operations for certain abandoned shipwrecks would
be added to the list of activities for which the Director of the NMSP
(Director), or designee, may issue a permit. The modified permit
regulations also specify that the Director may only issue permits for
specific activities that would otherwise (without a permit) violate
certain prohibitions: discharging and depositing; altering the
submerged lands; abandoning (structures, material or other matter on
the submerged lands); nearshore operation of vessels; disturbing a
seabird or marine mammal by aircraft overflight below 1000 feet within
1 NM of the Islands; moving, removing, injuring or possessing, or
attempting to move, remove, injure or possess a Sanctuary historical
resource; taking any marine mammal, sea turtle or seabird within or
above the Sanctuary; possessing within the Sanctuary (regardless of
where taken from, moved, or removed from) any marine mammal, sea
turtle, or seabird; and operating a MPWC within waters of the Channel
Islands National Park. In deciding whether to issue a permit, the
Director of the NMSP would be required to consider the proposed
activity in terms of: duration; effects on Sanctuary resources and
qualities; potential indirect, secondary, or cumulative effects; and
whether it is necessary to conduct the activity in the Sanctuary. In
addition, the proposed modifications to the permit procedures and
criteria (15 CFR 922.72) would further refine current requirements and
procedures found in the general NMSP regulations (15 CFR 922.48(a) and
(c)). The proposed modifications would also clarify existing
requirements for permit applications found in the Office of Management
and Budget approved applicant guidelines (OMB Control Number 0648-
0141). The proposed modifications to the permit regulations would also
expressly require that the permittee agree to hold the United States
harmless against any claims arising out of the permitted activities.
The proposed revised management plan for the Sanctuary contains a
series of action plans that outline management, research, education,
operational, and performance measurement activities planned for the
next five years. The activities are designed to address specific issues
facing the Sanctuary and, in doing so, help achieve the mandates of the
NMSP and the Sanctuary's designation.
This document publishes the proposed new regulations and the
proposed changes to existing regulations, publishes the text of the
proposed Revised Designation Document for the Sanctuary, and announces
the availability of the draft management plan and the draft
environmental impact statement (DMP/DEIS). The existing CINMS
Designation Document was published in 1980 upon establishment of the
Sanctuary and, per the NMSA (at 16 U.S.C. 1434(a)(4)), describes the
geographic area proposed to be included within the Sanctuary, the
characteristics of the area that give it conservation, recreational,
ecological, historical, research, educational, or esthetic value, and
the types of activities that will be subject to regulation by the
Secretary to protect those characteristics. The NMSP is proposing
certain revisions to the Sanctuary's Designation Document, which
include changes to the description of the area, an updated and more
accurate description of characteristics that give the Sanctuary
particular value, an updated explanation of the relation to other
regulatory programs, and a number of substantive changes to the
Sanctuary's scope of regulations.
Since designation, the area of CINMS has been described as
approximately 1252.5 square nautical miles (NM). However, as a result
of the proposed regulation changes that correct inaccuracies and
ambiguities in the coordinates and the description of the Sanctuary's
outer and shoreline boundaries, the CINMS area is now calculated as
approximately 1243 square NM. The legal description of CINMS is
proposed to be updated to reflect this change.
This update would not constitute a change in the geographic area of
the Sanctuary but rather an improvement in the estimate of its size.
Because this proposed action includes changes to the terms of
designation of the Sanctuary, as defined at 16 U.S.C. 1434(a)(4), as
required by 16 U.S.C. 1434(a)(2), a DEIS has been developed
[[Page 29098]]
consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
Marine Reserves and Conservation Areas
In 2002 NOAA considered merging environmental review processes for
consideration of establishing marine reserves (no-take zones) and/or
marine conservation areas (limited-take zones) within the Sanctuary,
and the management plan revision, but subsequently decided to proceed
with two separate processes. Consequently, a separate DEIS and draft
proposed rule are being prepared to address consideration of marine
reserves and conservation areas. As such, the consideration of marine
reserves and conservation areas is outside the scope of this proposed
rule. No part of this proposed rule directs or influences a future
decision on the separate process to consider establishing marine
reserves and conservation areas within the Sanctuary.
Sanctuary Environment
Designated on October 2, 1980 (45 FR 65200), the Sanctuary consists
of an area off the coast of California of approximately 1243 square NM
adjacent to the following islands and offshore rocks: San Miguel
Island, Santa Cruz Island, Santa Rosa Island, Anacapa Island, Santa
Barbara Island, Richardson Rock, and Castle Rock (the Islands)
extending seaward to a distance of approximately six NM. The Sanctuary
is located within the upper portion of the Southern California Bight
(SCB), which is formed by a transition in the California coastline
wherein the north-south trending coast begins to trend east to west.
The SCB stretches from Point Conception in the north to Punta Eugenia
(Mexico) in the south. Due to the oceanographic features of the SCB,
its three bioregions, and the complex bottom topography and diversity
of habitats found at the Islands, the Sanctuary has a great diversity
of marine life.
The Sanctuary is located within a 300-mile long oceanographic
region known as the Continental Borderland, a unique region of the
continental shelf characterized by basins and elevated ridges. The
California Current, the major ocean current moving through the region,
transports cold water southward from upwelling centers along the coast.
Point Conception, on the mainland coast north of San Miguel Island, is
the southernmost major upwelling center on the west coast of the United
States. This upwelling results in increased primary productivity and
large zooplankton populations that support exceptionally abundant
populations of small schooling fish. The Southern California
Countercurrent transports warm water northward from the U.S.-Mexico
border into the Santa Barbara Channel. Point Conception marks a
transition zone between these cool surface waters to the north and warm
waters to the south. The confluence of the California Current and
Southern California Countercurrent creates three distinct bioregions in
and around the Sanctuary: (1) The cold Oregonian Province; (2) the warm
California Province; and (3) the transition zone between the two. These
bioregions often overlap within the Sanctuary, resulting in a unique
and highly diverse array of marine life including cold water species at
the southern end of their range and warm water species at the northern
end of their range.
Numerous important habitats are represented within the Sanctuary
including kelp forests, surfgrass and eelgrass, intertidal, nearshore
subtidal, deep-water benthic, and pelagic habitats. Giant kelp beds are
highly productive Sanctuary habitats that provide food, shelter,
attachment sites, and nursery habitat for myriad invertebrates and
fishes. Greater habitat heterogeneity within the Sanctuary has resulted
in increased kelp forest species diversity compared to that of mainland
kelp forests. The extent of kelp beds varies considerably based on
environmental conditions such as water temperature and natural
predation. Surfgrass and eelgrass beds are also highly productive and
complex microhabitats that support a wide variety of marine species.
Intertidal habitat within the Sanctuary is composed of approximately
94.5 miles of rocky coastline interspersed with approximately 47 miles
of sandy beaches. Rocky shores support a rich assortment of plants and
animals, including numerous green, brown, and red algae, as well as
beds of surfgrass. Nearshore subtidal habitats include mud, sand,
gravel, cobble, and bedrock substrates. Rocky nearshore subtidal
habitats are widespread, especially high relief volcanic reefs with
walls, ledges, caves, and pinnacles. Typical shallow subtidal areas in
the Sanctuary contain assemblages of plants, invertebrates, and fishes,
with giant kelp dominating. Many shallow reefs grazed by sea urchins
have less giant kelp and greatly reduced species diversity. Deeper
reefs have well-developed invertebrate cover. Deep-water benthic or
bottom habitats in the Sanctuary are 90% fine sediment or clay, with
the remainder consisting of rocky areas. High relief pinnacles and
ridges occur off the northwest end of San Miguel Island. While offshore
benthic habitats do not support marine plants, they do support numerous
invertebrates and demersal fishes such as various species of rockfish.
Pelagic habitat, within the water column, supports numerous marine
plants, fishes, and invertebrates, including plankton.
Diversity of marine plants is greater in the SCB, which includes
the Sanctuary, as indicated above, than along coastal central
California. In the SCB, there are at least 492 species of algae and 4
species of seagrasses known to occur of the 673 species described for
California.
The total number of invertebrate species in the SCB is estimated at
more than 5,000, not including microinvertebrates. Select invertebrates
in the Sanctuary include many species of corals, prawns, spiny lobster,
crabs, sea urchins, sea cucumbers, sea star, abalone, nudibranchs,
scallops, mussels, squid, clams, barnacles, snails, salps, tunicates,
jellyfish, sea slugs, and anemones. White abalone is protected by the
Endangered Species Act.
About 481 species of fish inhabit the SCB. Abundance of fish
assemblages is greater surrounding the Islands than at nearby coastal
regions of the southern California mainland. Select fishes commonly
found in the Sanctuary include: albacore, anchovy (northern), bass
(various species), cabezon, California sheephead, California halibut,
garibaldi, rockfish (various species), salmon (king), sardine
(Pacific), shark (various species), surfperch (various species),
swordfish, and white sea bass.
Four species of sea turtles have been reported in the offshore
southern California region: green, loggerhead, olive Ridley, and
leatherback. Southern California sea turtle stranding data indicate
that all four species of sea turtle found in the region may be found
within the Sanctuary at any time of year. All sea turtles are protected
by the Endangered Species Act.
Over 195 species of birds use open water, shore, or island habitats
in the SCB. The Sanctuary provides stopover habitat during both
northern and southern bird migrations along the Pacific Flyway. The
Sanctuary provides important habitat for eight seabirds that have
special status under federal or state law: ashy storm-petrel, black
storm-petrel, California brown pelican, California least tern, double-
crested cormorant, rhinoceros auklet, western snowy plover, and Xantus'
murrelet.
There are three marine mammal groups in the Sanctuary: Whales,
dolphins, and porpoises (cetaceans); seals and sea lions (pinnipeds);
and the
[[Page 29099]]
southern sea otter. All marine mammals are protected under the Marine
Mammal Protection Act of 1972. In addition, some marine mammals are
protected under both the federal and state endangered species acts. At
least 33 species of cetaceans have been reported in the Sanctuary
region. Species commonly found in the Sanctuary include: long-beaked
common dolphin, short-beaked common dolphin, bottlenose dolphin,
Pacific white-sided dolphin, northern right whale dolphin, Risso's
dolphin, California gray whale, blue whale, and humpback whale. Seven
species of pinnipeds are found throughout or in part of the Sanctuary:
The California sea lion (common), northern fur seal (uncommon),
northern elephant seal (common), Pacific harbor seal (common),
Guadalupe fur seal (extremely rare), Steller sea lion (rare), and
ribbon seal (rare). The Sanctuary provides vital pinniped habitat
including important feeding areas, breeding sites, and haul outs. Sea
otters were common around the Islands until prolonged periods of
hunting led to local extinction at the Islands and severe depletion
along the mainland California coast. Rare sightings of sea otters in
the Sanctuary have been reported since the 1987-to-1990 U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) translocation of 139 sea otters to San Nicolas
Island. The southern sea otter is listed as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act.
The ecological and cultural values of the Islands and surrounding
waters are recognized nationally and internationally by several special
designations, including that as a national marine sanctuary. In 1980
the United States not only designated the Sanctuary, but also
designated Anacapa, San Miguel, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, and Santa
Rosa Islands and 125,000 acres of submerged lands surrounding them as
the Channel Islands National Park. In addition, the United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization's (UNESCO) Man and
the Biosphere Program designated the Sanctuary as a Biosphere Reserve
in 1986.
The Sanctuary's cultural values stem largely from its rich array of
maritime heritage resources (shipwrecks, aircraft wrecks, material
associated with wharves, piers and landings, prehistoric archaeological
sites and their associated artifacts, and paleontological remains).
Carbon dating indicates that humans were present at the Islands as
early as 13,000 years ago, with a site on Santa Rosa Island presenting
the oldest human remains yet discovered in North America. The Islands
and surrounding Sanctuary contain an abundance of prehistoric Native
American Chumash artifacts and are still revered as a homeland by
Chumash descendants. Historical remains may exist from as early as Juan
Rodriguez Cabrillo's European voyage of discovery (1542 to 1543)
through modern times. Known historical remains are represented in an
inventory of over 140 shipwrecks and aircraft wrecks documented in the
Sanctuary since 1853.
The uniqueness of the Sanctuary region and its proximity to several
major ports and harbors along the mainland coast has made it a popular
destination for numerous recreational and commercial activities.
Sportfishing, diving, snorkeling, whale watching, pleasure boating,
kayaking, surfing, and sightseeing are all popular pastimes within the
Sanctuary, which is often referred to as ``the Galapagos of the
north.'' In 1999, recreation and tourism businesses represented almost
480 thousand person-days of activity within the Sanctuary. The
Sanctuary also has very productive commercial fishing grounds. Key
commercially targeted species include: Squid, sea urchin, spiny
lobster, prawn, nearshore and offshore finfishes, coastal pelagic
species, flatfishes, rock crab, sea cucumber, tuna, and kelp. Of these
market squid, sea urchin, spiny lobster, and halibut are the most
economically valuable. In 1999 the ex-vessel value of species
commercially caught within the Sanctuary was approximately $42,777,444.
Other human uses that occur adjacent to and in the Sanctuary are oil
and gas activities, shipping, Department of Defense and Department of
Homeland Security activities, and scientific research and education.
The Sanctuary is located near an area of southern California
coastline that has experienced a dramatic increase in population.
Whereas the population of southern California (Imperial, Los Angeles,
Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Barbara, and
Ventura counties) was approximately 13.5 million in 1980, population
levels now reach nearly 20 million. This represents a regional increase
in population of approximately 43%. Aerial and on-water surveys
indicate that visitation to CINMS has increased significantly since
1980. With continued technological innovations such as global
positioning systems (GPS) and improved watercraft design, it is likely
that there will be continued increasing visitation to the Sanctuary and
added pressure on its resources. With its proposed revised management
plan and regulations, NOAA hopes to continue to protect CINMS for
continued appreciation and appropriate use by current and future
generations.
Proposed Revised Designation Document
The Designation Document for the Sanctuary contains the terms of
designation as defined in the NMSA (16 U.S.C. 1434(a)(4)). NOAA is
proposing some changes to the Designation Document as part of this
management plan review process. Specifically, NOAA is proposing to
clarify in the Designation Document that the submerged lands at CINMS
are legally part of the Sanctuary and are included in the boundary
description. At the time the Sanctuary was designated in 1980, Title
III of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (now known
as the NMSA) characterized national marine sanctuaries as consisting of
coastal and ocean waters but did not expressly mention submerged lands
thereunder. NOAA has consistently interpreted its authority under the
NMSA as extending to submerged lands, and amendments to the NMSA in
1984 (Pub. L. 98-498) clarified that submerged lands may be designated
by the Secretary of Commerce as part of a national marine sanctuary (16
U.S.C. 1432(3)). Therefore, NOAA is updating the Designation Document
and the boundary description, and is also replacing the term ``seabed''
with ``submerged lands of the Sanctuary.'' In addition, boundary
coordinates in the revised Designation Document and in the Sanctuary
regulations would be expressed by coordinates based on the North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83). Since designation the area of CINMS
has been described as approximately 1252.5 square NM. However,
adjusting for technical corrections and using updated technologies, the
CINMS area is now calculated as approximately 1243 square NM. The legal
description of CINMS is proposed to be updated to reflect this change.
This update would not constitute a change in the geographic area of the
Sanctuary but rather an improvement in the estimate of its size.
The Designation Document is also proposed to be modified to
authorize Sanctuary regulation of: Exploring for, developing, or
producing minerals within the Sanctuary; discharging or depositing from
beyond the boundary of the Sanctuary any material or other matter that
subsequently enters the Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary resource or
quality; placing or abandoning any structure, material, or other matter
on or in the submerged lands of the Sanctuary; moving, injuring,
possessing, or attempting to
[[Page 29100]]
move, injure, or possess a Sanctuary historical resource; taking any
marine mammal, sea turtle, or seabird within or above the Sanctuary;
possessing within the Sanctuary (regardless of where taken from, moved,
or removed from) any marine mammal, sea turtle or seabird; marking,
defacing, damaging, moving, removing, or tampering with any sign,
notice, or placard, whether temporary or permanent, or any monument,
stake, post, or other boundary marker related to the Sanctuary; and
introducing or otherwise releasing from within or into the Sanctuary an
introduced species. These proposed revisions to and addition of new
activities subject to Sanctuary regulation would enable new and
emerging resource management issues to be addressed, and are necessary
in order to ensure the protection, preservation, and management of the
conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, cultural,
educational, archeological, scientific, and esthetic resources and
qualities of the Sanctuary.
Additional proposed changes to the Designation Document would
provide: An updated and more complete description of characteristics
that give the Sanctuary particular value; greater clarity on the
applicability of Sanctuary emergency regulations (in keeping with the
National Marine Sanctuary Program regulations of general applicability,
15 CFR part 922, subpart E); revision of the Scope of Regulations
section on consistency with international law with language taken
directly from sec. 305(a) of the NMSA, which deals with application of
regulations; an updated explanation of the effect of Sanctuary
authority on preexisting leases, permits, licenses, and rights; an
update of the section entitled Alterations to This Designation to
reflect the NMSA as currently written; and occasional wording fine-
tuning in order to conform wording of the Designation Document, where
appropriate, to wording used for more recently designated sanctuaries.
No changes are proposed to be made to the ``Fishing'' and ``Defense
Activities'' sections within Article V (Relation to Other Regulatory
Programs) of the Designation Document.
The NMSP has carefully considered existing state and federal
authorities in proposing new regulatory authorities to ensure
protection and management of sanctuary resources. Proposed new
authorities are intended to complement existing authorities.
Proposed Revised Designation Document for the Channel Islands National
Marine Sanctuary
Article I. Effect of Designation
The Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary was designated on
October 2, 1980 (45 FR 65200). Section 308 of the National Marine
Sanctuaries Act, 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq., (NMSA) authorizes the issuance
of such regulations as may be necessary to implement the designation,
including managing, protecting and preserving the conservation,
recreational, ecological, historical, cultural, archeological,
scientific, educational, and esthetic resources and qualities of the
Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary (Sanctuary). Section 1 of
Article IV of this Designation Document lists activities of the types
that either are to be regulated on the effective date of designation or
may be regulated at some later date in order to protect Sanctuary
resources and qualities. Listing does not necessarily mean that a type
of activity will be regulated; however, if a type of activity is not
listed it may not be regulated, except on an emergency basis, unless
Section 1 of Article IV is amended to include the type of activity by
the same procedures by which the original designation was made.
Article II. Description of the Area
The Sanctuary consists of an area of approximately 1243 square
nautical miles (NM) of coastal and ocean waters, and the submerged
lands thereunder, off the southern coast of California. The Sanctuary
boundary begins at the Mean High Water Line of and extends seaward to a
distance of approximately six NM from the following islands and
offshore rocks: San Miguel Island, Santa Cruz Island, Santa Rosa
Island, Anacapa Island, Santa Barbara Island, Richardson Rock, and
Castle Rock (the Islands). The seaward boundary coordinates are listed
in the Appendix to this Designation Document.
Article III. Characteristics of the Area That Give It Particular Value
The Islands and surrounding ecosystems are unique and highly
valued, as demonstrated by, for example, several national and
international designations. The Islands and surrounding ecosystems are
characterized by a unique combination of features including: Complex
oceanography, varied bathymetry, diverse habitats, remarkable
biodiversity, rich maritime heritage, remote yet accessible location,
and relative lack of development. These features yield high existence
values as well as human use values for research, education, recreation,
and commerce.
The Islands are located within a 300-mile long oceanographic region
known as the Continental Borderland, a unique region of the continental
shelf characterized by basins and elevated ridges. Within this region
the confluence of the cool California Current and warm Southern
California Countercurrent creates three distinct bioregions in and
around the Sanctuary: the cold Oregonian Province, the warm California
Province, and the transition zone between the two. The overlap of these
bioregions results in a unique and highly diverse array of marine life
within the Sanctuary, including cold water species at the southern end
of their range and warm water species at the northern end of their
range. In addition, the Sanctuary is located offshore from Point
Conception, the southernmost major upwelling center on the west coast
of the United States. Upwelling yields increased primary productivity
essential to the marine food web.
Diverse bathymetry and habitats are also important and unique
characteristics of the Islands and surrounding ecosystems. The
Sanctuary contains many important and varied physical and geological
features including a complex of plateaus, continental slope, gyres,
banks, subsea canyons, and rocky reefs. The diversity of accentuated
bottom relief, abrupt change in depth, and varied substrate provide a
spectrum of marine habitats. Some of the key marine habitats are sandy
beach, rocky intertidal, kelp forest, rocky reef, and sandy bottom.
The Sanctuary's oceanographic and physical features support a great
diversity of marine species, many of which are extremely rare and
afforded special protection by federal and state law. At least 33
species of cetaceans are found within the Sanctuary, including blue,
gray, and humpback whales and numerous dolphin species. While
historically seven species of pinnipeds have been found throughout or
in part of the Sanctuary, at least four species maintain important
rookery and/or haul out sites on the Islands. Following the 1987 to
1990 translocation of southern sea otters to San Nicolas Island, rare
sea otter sightings have been reported in the Sanctuary. Over 60
species of seabird occur within the Sanctuary, eleven of which utilize
breeding habitat at the Islands. In addition, over 400 species of fish
and more than 5,000 species of invertebrates are found in the
Sanctuary. Stranding data indicate that green, loggerhead, olive
Ridley, and leatherback sea turtles may also be
[[Page 29101]]
found within the Sanctuary. Finally, numerous marine algae and plant
species occur within the Sanctuary, the most notable among these being
giant kelp and eelgrass.
The quality and abundance of natural resources at the Islands and
surrounding waters have attracted man from the earliest prehistoric
times to the present. As a result, the Sanctuary contains significant
prehistoric and historic maritime heritage resources. Prehistoric
maritime heritage resources include submerged Native American sites,
the significance of which is underscored by a terrestrial Islands site
with human remains dated to 13,000 years ago, the oldest human remains
yet discovered in North America. Maritime heritage resources date back
as far as 1542 and include over 140 historic shipwreck and aircraft
sites. These wrecks reveal the diverse range of activities and
nationalities that have traversed the Santa Barbara Channel. Following
the mission era human occupation of the Islands transitioned from
significant Chumash Native American villages, to land grant and
ranching settlements, and finally to joint public-private ownership and
management aimed at resource conservation and compatible public use.
Modern-day descendants of the Chumash people still value and enjoy the
Islands and surrounding Sanctuary waters, and work to keep preserve
aspects of Chumash cultural history and practices. Despite this long
history of human presence on the Islands, they remain remote yet
accessible, and undeveloped relative to the burgeoning populations of
nearby mainland southern California.
The physical, biological, and cultural characteristics of the
Sanctuary combine to provide outstanding opportunities for appropriate
scientific research, education, recreation, commerce, and natural and
maritime heritage resource protection, preservation, and management.
The Islands and surrounding Sanctuary are the subject of extensive
research, primarily in the following categories: Physical and
biological science research; socioeconomic, cultural, and historic
research; and political science research. Since its designation in 1980
the Sanctuary has played an important role in marine science education
for all ages on a local, regional, national, and international scale.
Popular Sanctuary recreation activities include wildlife viewing,
boating, sailing, kayaking, diving, and sportfishing. Commercial
activities within the Sanctuary include maritime shipping, oil and gas
activities (two leases pre-date the Sanctuary), kelp harvesting, and
commercial fishing. Some of the state's most valuable commercial
fisheries occur within the Sanctuary. A complex web of county, state,
and federal agencies manages the resources of the Islands and
surrounding area and human uses thereof.
Several special designations recognize the Islands' and surrounding
ecosystems' unique value. In 1980 the United States designated both the
Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary, as well as the islands of
Anacapa, San Miguel, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, and Santa Rosa and
125,000 acres of submerged lands surrounding them as the Channel
Islands National Park. In addition, the United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization's (UNESCO) Man and the Biosphere
Program designated the Sanctuary as a Biosphere Reserve in 1986.
Article IV. Scope of Regulations
Section 1. Activities Subject to Regulation. The following
activities are subject to regulation, including prohibition, as may be
necessary to ensure the management, protection, and preservation of the
conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, cultural,
archeological, scientific, educational, and esthetic resources and
qualities of this area:
a. Exploring for, developing, or producing hydrocarbons or minerals
within the Sanctuary;
b. Discharging or depositing from within or into the Sanctuary any
material or other matter;
c. Discharging or depositing from beyond the boundary of the
Sanctuary any material or other matter that subsequently enters the
Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary resource or quality;
d. Drilling into, dredging, or otherwise altering the submerged
lands of the Sanctuary; or constructing, placing, or abandoning any
structure, material, or other matter on or in the submerged lands of
the Sanctuary;
e. Operating a vessel (i.e., watercraft of any description) within
the Sanctuary except fishing vessels or vessels traveling within a
Vessel Traffic Separation Scheme or Port Access Route designated by the
Coast Guard outside of 1 NM from any Island;
f. Disturbing a marine mammal or seabird by an overflight below
1000 feet;
g. Moving, removing, injuring, possessing, or attempting to move,
remove, injure, or possess a Sanctuary historical resource;
h. Taking any marine mammal, sea turtle, or seabird within or above
the Sanctuary;
i. Possessing within the Sanctuary (regardless of where taken from,
moved, or removed from) any marine mammal, sea turtle, or seabird;
j. Marking, defacing, damaging, moving, removing, or tampering with
any sign, notice, or placard, whether temporary or permanent, or any
monument, stake, post, or other boundary marker related to the
Sanctuary;
k. Introducing or otherwise releasing from within or into the
Sanctuary an introduced species.
Section 2. Consistency with International Law. The regulations
governing the activities listed in Section 1 of this article shall be
applied in accordance with generally recognized principles of
international law, and in accordance with treaties, conventions, and
other agreements to which the United States is a party. No regulation
shall apply to or be enforced against a person who is not a citizen,
national, or resident alien of the United States, unless in accordance
with: generally recognized principles of international law; an
agreement between the United States and the foreign state of which the
person is a citizen; or an agreement between the United States and the
flag state of a foreign vessel, if the person is a crewmember of the
vessel.
Section 3. Emergency Regulations. Where necessary to prevent or
minimize the destruction of, loss of, or injury to a Sanctuary resource
or quality, or minimize the imminent risk of such destruction, loss, or
injury, any and all activities, including those not listed in section 1
of this Article, are subject to immediate temporary regulation,
including prohibition, consistent with the Administrative Procedure
Act.
Article V. Relation to Other Regulatory Programs
Section 1. Fishing. The regulation of fishing is not authorized
under Article IV. However, fishing vessels may be regulated with
respect to discharges in accordance with Article IV, Section 1,
paragraphs (b) and (c) and aircraft conducting kelp bed surveys below
1000 feet can be regulated in accordance with Article IV, Section 1,
paragraph (f). All regulatory programs pertaining to fishing, including
particularly regulations promulgated under the California Fish and Game
Code and Fishery Management Plans promulgated under the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et
seq., shall remain in effect. All permits, licenses and other
authorizations issued pursuant thereto shall be valid within the
Sanctuary unless authorizing any activity
[[Page 29102]]
prohibited by any regulation implementing Article IV. Fishing as used
in this article and in Article IV includes kelp harvesting.
Section 2. Defense Activities. The regulation of those activities
listed in Article IV shall not prohibit any activity conducted by the
Department of Defense that is essential for national defense or because
of an emergency. Such activities shall be consistent with the
regulations to the maximum extent practicable.
Section 3. Effect on Leases, Permits, Licenses, and Rights.
Pursuant to section 304(c) of the NMSA, 16 U.S.C. 1434(c), no valid
lease, permit, license, approval, or other authorization issued by any
federal, state, or local authority of competent jurisdiction, or any
right of subsistence use or access, may be terminated by the Secretary
of Commerce or designee as a result of this designation or as a result
of any Sanctuary regulation if such authorization or right was in
existence on the effective date of this designation. The Secretary of
Commerce, or designee, however, may regulate the exercise (including,
but not limited to, the imposition of terms and conditions) of such
authorization or right consistent with the purposes for which the
Sanctuary is designated.
Article VI. Alterations to This Designation
The terms of designation, as defined under section 304(a) of the
NMSA, may be modified only by the same procedures by which the original
designation is made, including public hearings, consultation with
interested federal and state agencies and the Pacific Fishery
Management Council, approved by the Secretary of Commerce or designee,
and after the close of a review period of forty-five days of continuous
session of Congress.
Appendix--Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Boundary
Coordinates
Coordinates listed in this Appendix are unprojected (Geographic)
and based on the North American Datum of 1983.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
Point ID No. North West
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1........................................... 33.94138 -119.27422
2........................................... 33.96776 -119.25010
3........................................... 34.02607 -119.23642
4........................................... 34.07339 -119.25686
5........................................... 34.10185 -119.29178
6........................................... 34.11523 -119.33040
7........................................... 34.11611 -119.39120
8........................................... 34.11434 -119.40212
9........................................... 34.11712 -119.42896
10.......................................... 34.11664 -119.44844
11.......................................... 34.13389 -119.48081
12.......................................... 34.13825 -119.49198
13.......................................... 34.14784 -119.51194
14.......................................... 34.15466 -119.59059
15.......................................... 34.15142 -119.61254
16.......................................... 34.13411 -119.66024
17.......................................... 34.14635 -119.69780
18.......................................... 34.15988 -119.76688
19.......................................... 34.15906 -119.77800
20.......................................... 34.15928 -119.79327
21.......................................... 34.16213 -119.80347
22.......................................... 34.16962 -119.83643
23.......................................... 34.17266 -119.85240
24.......................................... 34.17588 -119.88903
25.......................................... 34.17682 -119.93357
26.......................................... 34.17258 -119.95830
27.......................................... 34.13535 -120.01964
28.......................................... 34.13698 -120.04206
29.......................................... 34.12994 -120.08582
30.......................................... 34.12481 -120.11104
31.......................................... 34.12519 -120.16076
32.......................................... 34.11008 -120.21190
33.......................................... 34.11128 -120.22707
34.......................................... 34.13632 -120.25292
35.......................................... 34.15341 -120.28627
36.......................................... 34.16408 -120.29310
37.......................................... 34.18231 -120.31224
38.......................................... 34.19117 -120.32576
39.......................................... 34.20224 -120.35122
40.......................................... 34.20707 -120.41801
41.......................................... 34.20520 -120.42859
42.......................................... 34.19254 -120.46041
43.......................................... 34.20540 -120.50728
44.......................................... 34.20486 -120.53987
45.......................................... 34.18182 -120.60041
46.......................................... 34.10208 -120.64208
47.......................................... 34.08151 -120.63894
48.......................................... 34.05848 -120.62862
49.......................................... 34.01940 -120.58567
50.......................................... 34.01349 -120.57464
51.......................................... 33.98698 -120.56582
52.......................................... 33.95039 -120.53282
53.......................................... 33.92694 -120.46132
54.......................................... 33.92501 -120.42170
55.......................................... 33.91403 -120.37585
56.......................................... 33.91712 -120.32506
57.......................................... 33.90956 -120.30857
58.......................................... 33.88976 -120.29540
59.......................................... 33.84444 -120.25482
60.......................................... 33.83146 -120.22927
61.......................................... 33.81763 -120.20284
62.......................................... 33.81003 -120.18731
63.......................................... 33.79425 -120.13422
64.......................................... 33.79379 -120.10207
65.......................................... 33.79983 -120.06995
66.......................................... 33.81076 -120.04351
67.......................................... 33.81450 -120.03158
68.......................................... 33.84125 -119.96508
69.......................................... 33.84865 -119.92316
70.......................................... 33.87038 -119.88247
71.......................................... 33.86804 -119.87060
72.......................................... 33.86110 -119.79017
73.......................................... 33.86351 -119.77130
74.......................................... 33.85995 -119.74390
75.......................................... 33.86233 -119.68783
76.......................................... 33.87330 -119.65504
77.......................................... 33.88594 -119.62617
78.......................................... 33.88688 -119.59423
79.......................................... 33.88809 -119.58278
80.......................................... 33.89414 -119.54861
81.......................................... 33.90064 -119.51936
82.......................................... 33.91569 -119.48263
83.......................................... 33.91094 -119.46137
84.......................................... 33.90424 -119.42422
85.......................................... 33.90219 -119.40730
86.......................................... 33.90131 -119.38373
87.......................................... 33.90398 -119.36333
88.......................................... 33.90635 -119.35345
89.......................................... 33.91304 -119.33280
90.......................................... 33.91829 -119.32206
91.......................................... 33.48250 -119.16874
92.......................................... 33.44235 -119.16797
93.......................................... 33.40555 -119.14878
94.......................................... 33.39059 -119.13283
95.......................................... 33.36804 -119.08891
96.......................................... 33.36375 -119.06803
97.......................................... 33.36241 -119.04812
98.......................................... 33.36379 -119.02811
99.......................................... 33.36879 -118.99797
100......................................... 33.37441 -118.98194
101......................................... 33.38001 -118.96972
102......................................... 33.38914 -118.95492
103......................................... 33.40515 -118.93661
104......................................... 33.44006 -118.91519
105......................................... 33.48414 -118.90712
106......................................... 33.52444 -118.91492
107......................................... 33.53834 -118.92271
108......................................... 33.58616 -118.99540
109......................................... 33.59018 -119.02374
110......................................... 33.58516 -119.06745
111......................................... 33.58011 -119.08521
112......................................... 33.54367 -119.14460
113......................................... 33.51161 -119.16367
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of the Proposed Regulatory Amendments
The proposed regulatory changes would clarify that ``submerged
lands'' are within the Sanctuary boundary, i.e., part of the Sanctuary.
This would update the boundary regulation to make it consistent with
the revised Designation Document. (See explanation of boundary
clarification in preceding discussion of proposed revised Designation
Document.) The Sanctuary's outer boundary coordinates and description
of the shoreline boundary demarcation are also proposed for technical
corrections using the North American Datum of 1983, and to clarify that
the shoreline boundary is the Mean High Water Line (MHWL) of Island
shores. Since designation the area of CINMS has been described as
approximately 1252.5 square NM. However, adjusting for technical
corrections and using updated technologies, the CINMS area is now
calculated as approximately 1243 square NM. The legal description of
CINMS is proposed to be updated to reflect this change. This update
would not constitute a change in the geographic area of the Sanctuary
but rather an improvement in the estimate of its size.
The proposed regulations would also modify the existing (1982) oil
and gas regulation by removing the oil spill contingency equipment
requirements, and modifying exceptions to this
[[Page 29103]]
prohibition. The equipment requirements are outdated and unnecessary
since Minerals Management Service lease agreement terms prescribe more
stringent mandatory oil spill contingency plans. The following
exceptions would be omitted for this prohibition: national defense; to
respond to an emergency threatening life, property, or the environment;
and as may be permitted by the Director in accordance with 15 CFR
922.48 and 922.72. These exceptions are not specific to the current
regulation, but rather are ``boilerplate'' generic exceptions to the
current prohibitions. The proposed revised regulations fine-tune the
exceptions, as has been done in the regulations for more recently
designated sanctuaries, so only if an exception is possibly applicable
is it referenced for a particular prohibition. Accordingly, removal of
the above exceptions is proposed because the limited exception for
hydrocarbon exploration, development, or production is already provided
within the regulation itself, because exploring for, developing, and
producing hydrocarbons is not envisionable as a necessary activity to
respond to an emergency threatening life, property, or the environment,
and because such an activity could not meet the permit criteria
requirements under 15 CFR 922.48 and 922.72. Department of Defense
activities are addressed elsewhere in the regulations. Further, no such
exceptions have ever been sought at CINMS.
The proposed regulations would also prohibit exploring for,
developing, or producing minerals within the Sanctuary, except
producing by-products incidental to hydrocarbon production allowed
under the regulations. ``Mineral'' is defined by the NMSP program-wide
regulations as clay, stone, sand, gravel, metalliferous ore, non-
metalliferous ore, or any other solid material or other matter of
commercial value. 15 CFR 922.3. Mineral extraction activities could
involve scraping the Sanctuary's seabed surface and/or excavation of
pits and tunnels into the seabed. This prohibition would protect
Sanctuary resources and qualities from potentially damaging effects of
offshore mining activities, including but not limited to: Destruction
and direct smothering of the benthic biota; alteration of the seabed
surface profile; potential harm to fisheries; introduction of
pollutants (e.g., drill cuttings and mud) that could cause interference
with the filtering, feeding, or respiratory functions of marine
organisms; loss of food sources and habitat for some species; possible
lowered photosynthesis and oxygen levels; and degraded appearance of
the water itself. Finally, prohibition of mining within the Sanctuary
would reduce the risk of potential disturbance to underwater historical
resources either through physical disturbance or increased turbidity,
which would result in direct long-term beneficial impact to historical
resources. A prohibition on mineral activities within the Sanctuary
would be consistent with the prohibition on alteration of or
construction on or in the submerged lands discussed below.
The proposed regulations would also clarify and otherwise modify
the existing (1982) regulation prohibiting discharging or depositing
any material or other matter. Clarifications include that: the
regulation applies to discharges and deposits ``from within or into the
Sanctuary'' (``into'' is intended to make clear that not only
discharges and deposits originating in the Sanctuary (including from
vessels in the Sanctuary), but also discharges and deposits from
aircraft above the Sanctuary, from docks and piers extending over the
Sanctuary, and from cliffs and other land adjacent to the Sanctuary,
for example, are included in the prohibition); the exception for fish,
fish parts, or chumming materials (bait) applies only to such
discharges or deposits made during the conduct of lawful fishing
activity within the Sanctuary; and the exception for biodegradable
effluent discharges from marine sanitation devices applies only to
operable Type I or II marine sanitation devices approved by the United
States Coast Guard in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended. The existing exception for vessel wastes
``generated by marine sanitation devices'' was intended to prohibit the
discharge of untreated sewage into the Sanctuary; the proposed
clarification to this exception makes express that such discharges are
only allowed if generated by Type I or II marine sanitation devices.
(Type I and Type II marine sanitation devices treat wastes, but Type
III marine sanitation devices do not.) In addition, the discharge and
deposit regulation would be modified by removing the exception for
discharging or depositing meals onboard vessels. Coast Guard
regulations prohibit discharge of food wastes (garbage) within three NM
and prohibit discharge of food wastes unless ground to less than one
inch within three to twelve NM. The proposed Sanctuary regulation
modification would mirror the Coast Guard regulations within three NM
and provide increased protection to Sanctuary resources and qualities
from such marine debris vis-[agrave]-vis the Coast Guard regulations in
the area of the Sanctuary beyond three NM. The proposed clarifications
and modification are intended to achieve increased protection of
Sanctuary resources and qualities.
Finally, the discharge and deposit regulation would be augmented by
adding a prohibition on discharging or depositing any material or other
matter from beyond the boundary of the Sanctuary that subsequently
enters the Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary resource or quality.
``Sanctuary resource'' is defined at 15 CFR 922.3 as ``any living or
non-living resource of a National Marine Sanctuary that contributes to
the conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, research,
educational, or aesthetic value of the Sanctuary, including, but not
limited to, the substratum of the area of the Sanctuary, other
submerged features and the surrounding seabed, carbonate rock, corals
and other bottom formations, coralline algae and other marine plants
and algae, marine invertebrates, brine-seep biota, phytoplankton,
zooplankton, fish, seabirds, sea turtles and other marine reptiles,
marine mammals and historical resources.'' ``Sanctuary quality'' is
defined at 15 CFR 922.3 as ``any of those ambient conditions, physical-
chemical characteristics and natural processes, the maintenance of
which is essential to the ecological health of the Sanctuary,
including, but not limited to, water quality, sediment quality and air
quality.'' This modification would provide consistency with the
regulatory language of other more recently designated sanctuaries, and
help to protect Sanctuary resources and qualities from negative
influences originating outside the boundaries of the CINMS.
The proposed regulatory changes would also modify the existing
prohibition against altering the seabed of the Sanctuary or
constructing a structure thereon. The term ``seabed'' would be replaced
with ``submerged lands'' to be consistent with language used in the
NMSA. In addition, the geographic extent of this regulation would be
expanded from the first 2 NM offshore to the entire area of the
Sanctuary in order to ensure protection of the diverse accentuated
bottom relief, varied substrate, and concomitant benthic habitats of
the Sanctuary, and wording would be conformed with similar regulations
at more recently designated sanctuaries. Another
[[Page 29104]]
proposed change to this regulation would modify the exception for
``bottom trawling from a commercial vessel'' to provide an exception
for activities incidental and necessary to ``conduct lawful fishing
activity.'' This broadening of the exception would encompass other
bottom-touching gear types, such as pots and traps, which the drafters
of the original regulations apparently did not realize could alter the
seabed. This proposed change would thus remove any uncertainty about
the existing regulation's applicability to such gear types.
The proposed regulatory changes would also specify that abandoning,
by which is meant leaving without intent to remove, any structure,
material, or other matter on or in the submerged lands of the
Sanctuary, is prohibited. This change would be consistent with similar
regulations at more recently designated sanctuaries and would help
protect the Sanctuary from debris (e.g., wrecked vessels or seabed
research equipment) abandoned by Sanctuary users. This change is
consistent with the U.S. Ocean Action Plan: The Bush Administration's
Response to the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. In this Action Plan
the Administration acknowledges the harmful effects marine debris has
on valuable marine resources, and calls for the re-establishment of the
Interagency Marine Debris Coordinating Committee (re-established in
December 2004), of which NOAA is a member.
The proposed regulatory changes would also modify the existing
(1982) vessel approach regulation so that the prohibition against
vessel operation within 1 NM of any of the Islands would apply not only
to vessels engaged in the trade of carrying cargo and vessels engaged
in the trade of servicing offshore installations but also to all
vessels of 300 gross registered tons or more (excluding fishing and
kelp harvesting vessels). The intent of this modification is to protect
the sensitive nearshore areas off the Islands, including kelp forests,
rocky reefs, and other areas, from the potential impacts of large-
vessel groundings and collisions, including, but not limited to, cruise
ships. The NMSP developed the proposed modified prohibition to more
directly address the Sanctuary's concern that very large vessels,
regardless of their purpose, not approach and put at risk sensitive
nearshore areas of the Sanctuary.
The proposed regulatory changes would also include a modification
to the existing (1982) prohibition on removing or damaging any
historical or cultural resource. The proposed modification would add
``moving'' and ``possessing'' to the existing prohibition; would
replace ``damage'' with ``injure,'' a term defined at 15 CFR 922.3; and
add ``attempting'' to move, remove, injure, or possess as a
prohibition. The intent of this modification is to provide added
protection to these fragile, finite, and non-renewable resources so
they may be studied, and so appropriate information about them may be
mad