Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA); Request for Grant Proposals: Regional Educational Advising Coordinator Program, 28897-28902 [E6-7601]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Notices
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2005–61 on the
subject line.
Congress that the following countries
are not cooperating fully with United
States antiterrorism efforts:
Cuba
Iran
Paper Comments
North Korea
• Send paper comments in triplicate
Syria
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Venezuela
Securities and Exchange Commission,
I hereby notify that the decision not
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
to include Libya on the list of countries
20549–1090.
not cooperating fully with U.S.
All submissions should refer to File
antiterrorism efforts comes as the result
Number SR–Phlx–2005–61. This file
of a comprehensive review of Libya’s
number should be included on the
record of support for terrorism over the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the last three years. Libya has taken
Commission process and review your
significant and meaningful steps during
comments more efficiently, please use
this time to repudiate its past support
only one method. The Commission will for terrorism and to cooperate with the
post all comments on the Commission’s United States in our antiterrorism
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
efforts.
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
This determination and certification
submission, all subsequent
shall be transmitted to the Congress and
amendments, all written statements
published in the Federal Register.
with respect to the proposed rule
Dated: May 8, 2006.
change, as amended, that are filed with
Condoleezza Rice,
the Commission, and all written
Secretary of State, Department of State.
communications relating to the
[FR Doc. 06–4656 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
proposed rule change, as amended,
BILLING CODE 4710–10–P
between the Commission and any
person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will DEPARTMENT OF STATE
be available for inspection and copying
[Public Notice 5410]
in the Commission’s Public Reference
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
Affairs (ECA); Request for Grant
available for inspection and copying at
Proposals: Regional Educational
the principal office of the Phlx. All
Advising Coordinator Program
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
Announcement Type: New
not edit personal identifying
Cooperative Agreement.
information from submissions. You
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
should submit only information that
A/S/A–07–03.
you wish to make available publicly. All
Catalog of Federal Domestic
submissions should refer to File
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Number SR–Phlx–2005–61 and should
Key Dates: Program start date: October
be submitted on or before June 8, 2006.
1, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–7566 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5411]
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Determination and Certification Under
Section 40A of the Arms Export
Control Act
Pursuant to section 40A of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2781), and
Executive Order 11958, as amended, I
hereby determine and certify to the
16 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
Application Deadline: July 10, 2006.
Executive Summary: The Educational
Information and Resources Branch in
the Office of Global Educational
Programs of the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs (ECA) announces
an open competition for a cooperative
agreement to support the Regional
Educational Advising Coordinator
(REAC) Program. The underlying goal of
this cooperative agreement is to foster
international student mobility between
the United States and the rest of the
world. The grantee organization will
provide programmatic oversight and
coordination, communication and
information channels, training and
logistical support, and human resource
services to eight REACs, thus assuring
their capacity to supply the
EducationUSA network of 450 State
Department-supported educational
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28897
advising centers with adequate
resources and professional training, and
in turn, hundreds of thousands of
overseas students with objective,
accurate and timely information on U.S.
higher education. The grantee
organization will also ensure that the
Bureau, U.S. embassies and Fulbright
commissions receive thoughtful
assessments of issues concerning
advising centers and regional trends in
student mobility from the REACs.
Non-profit higher education
organizations with the infrastructure to
manage programs in all regions of the
world may submit proposals which
demonstrate their knowledge of
international student mobility,
understanding of the needs of the
EducationUSA network, and the
capacity to support REACs based in
Ghana, Germany, Mexico, Morocco,
Pakistan, Peru, Russia, and Thailand.
Pending availability of FY07 funding,
this grant will provide an assistance
award in the range of $1,273,000 to
$1,433,000.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries* * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations...and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose
The State Department and ECA are
committed to facilitating and increasing
the flow of international students to the
U.S. in order to provide future world
leaders with opportunities to
understand U.S. society, culture and
values. The REACs’ role is critical to the
Bureau’s pursuit of this objective.
REACs and the EducationUSA
advisers they support are catalysts for
the exchange of U.S. Governmentsponsored students and scholars as well
as those who pursue U.S. educational
programs through their own means or
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
28898
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
with the aid of other sponsors. REACs
and the EducationUSA network market
U.S. higher education abroad, promote
study by international students, scholars
and professionals in the U.S., and
encourage study abroad by Americans.
EducationUSA advisers counsel
international students, parents and
foreign government officials, and bring
U.S. educational opportunities to the
attention of a broad and diverse segment
of young people. Advisers also facilitate
outreach by U.S. institutions to these
populations. (For more information,
please see https://
www.educationUSA.state.gov.)
Program Information
The grantee organization will ensure
that REACs have the necessary logistical
and programmatic support to provide
comprehensive and accurate
information to EducationUSA advisers
through regional listservs and
newsletters; to evaluate the need of
advising centers for resources and
training and to provide advisers
appropriate training through regional
workshops, internships and other
professional opportunities; to conduct
site visits to centers and report to ECA’s
Educational Information and Resources
Branch (ECA/A/S/A); and to provide
analyses to the Public Affairs and
Consular sections of U.S. embassies on
issues concerning the advising centers
and trends in student mobility, with
special reference to underserved groups.
The grantee should also ensure that
REACs represent the views of advisers
and international students to
educational institutions in the United
States for the purpose of facilitating the
enrollment of students in U.S.
institutions.
REACs have been employed
previously through a variety of
mechanisms, including grants to U.S.based non-governmental organizations
as well as transfers of funds to U.S.
embassies and Fulbright Commissions.
Through this cooperative agreement, the
Bureau intends to provide a coherent
administrative structure for the REACs,
while maintaining the Bureau’s
traditionally substantial level of
involvement in overseeing the format
and content of assistance provided by
the REACs to EducationUSA advisers.
The grantee organization will use
funding made available through this
agreement to provide a uniform and
equitable structure for REACs’ salaries,
health insurance, pensions, professional
development, travel, equipment, and
logistical support. The grantee
organization should serve as a partner to
REACs by facilitating and supporting
them to conduct an adequate number of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
regional adviser training sessions and
workshops. The grantee should facilitate
communication and information flow
among and between REACs via a listserv
or other means. Ongoing REAC office
expenses, including rent, are also
eligible for funding. Should additional
monies become available, the agreement
will also pay for a part-time assistant for
each REAC, where feasible and not
already furnished from other sources;
applicants should discuss in their
proposals how they would provide parttime assistants.
Applicant organizations should
include in their proposals a plan to
maintain REACs in the cities and
countries where they are currently
based. Applicants must be willing to
enter into a sub-grant agreement with
certain current REAC host
organizations, and to pay any applicable
office rental fees as needed. Please
contact ECA/A/S/A Program Officer
Rachel Waldstein for more information
on individual incumbent REAC
situations. If a vacancy occurs, the
grantee organization will be expected to
recruit and select new REACs, in close
consultation with ECA/A/S/A.
Please see the Program Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI) for
further details on REAC responsibilities
and qualifications, grantee organization
responsibilities and the ECA/A/S/A
role.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. Under this cooperative
agreement, ECA/A/S/A will be
substantially involved in program
activities above and beyond routine
grant monitoring. It will play a central
role in reviewing staff selection, travel
plans and budget, and issues requiring
consultation with Fulbright Commission
or U.S. embassy personnel. Please see
the POGI for details.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2007.
Approximate Total Funding:
Minimum of $1,273,000 and up to
$1,433,000, pending availability of FY07
funds.
Approximate Number of Awards:
One.
Approximate Average Award:
Minimum of $1,273,000 and up to
$1,433,000, pending availability of
funds.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, October 1, 2006.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
December 31, 2007.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew this grant for two
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
additional fiscal years, before openly
competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding possible in support of its
programs. Proposals that include
significant cost sharing will be deemed
more competitive.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates awarding one grant, in an
amount of approximately $1,273,000 to
$1,433,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to
implement this program. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges are ineligible to apply under
this competition. The Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
(b.) Organizations may collaborate in
the submission of an application to
manage this program. In such a case, the
agreement will be made with one
organization that should be prepared to
work with its institutional partners on
the basis of one or more sub-agreements.
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Notices
IV. Application and Submission
Information
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request
an Application Package:
Please contact the Office of Global
Educational Programs, ECA/A/S/A,
Room 349, U.S. Department of State,
SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, telephone: 202–
453–8866, fax number: 202–453–8890,
e-mail: Waldsteinre@state.gov to request
a Solicitation Package. Please refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/
A/S/A–07–03 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document, which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Rachel Waldstein,
Program Officer, and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/
S/A–07–03 located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Submission Dates and Times section’’
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please refer to the solicitation
package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa: For applicants’
information only, the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is
placing renewed emphasis on the secure
and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by grantees and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements. The Grantee will be
responsible for issuing DS–2019 forms
to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547. Telephone:
(202) 203–5029. FAX: (202) 453–8640.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28899
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and physical challenges.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
grantee will track participants or
partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including
satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and
effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work
or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding
as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
28900
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Notices
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
Describe your plans for: i.e.
sustainability, overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA and PAS or any other requirements
etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Budget: Applicants must
submit a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each
REAC or for each program component,
phase, location, or activity to provide
clarification. Administrative and
indirect costs may not exceed 30% and
may not be charged against program
costs such as REAC per diem, or lodging
and per diem for advisers attending
regionally based training.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
(1) REAC salaries, benefits, health
insurance, retirement.
(2) Costs for REAC professional
development and for facilitating
communication and information flow
among REACs and with advising
centers.
(3) Part-time assistant salaries.
(4) REAC travel.
(5) Logistical support and equipment.
(6) Cost of organizing regional adviser
training programs.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: July 10,
2006.
Reference Number: ECA/A/S/A–07–
03.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(2) electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and seven copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/A/S/A–07–03, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.2.—Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Notices
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.) of the closing date to ensure that
their entire applications have been
uploaded to the grants.gov site.
Applications uploaded to the site after
midnight of the application deadline
date will be automatically rejected by
the grants.gov system, and will be
technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process:
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards (cooperative agreements) resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation.
Please see POGI for a description of
each criterion.
1. Program planning/Ability to
achieve program objectives.
2. Institution’s capacity/record.
3. Cost effectiveness/cost sharing.
4. Multiplier effect/impact.
5. Support of diversity.
6. Project evaluation.
7. Area expertise.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Assistance Award Document
(AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The AAD and the original grant
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
proposal with subsequent modifications
(if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments.’’
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following
reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) Quarterly program and financial
reports. Program reports should include
travel and budget updates for each
REAC.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28901
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
Program Data Requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants (REACs and
EducationUSA advisers) and activities
in an electronically accessible database
format that can be shared with the
Bureau as required. As a minimum, the
data must include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the grant or who
benefit from the grant funding but do
not travel.
(2) Information on international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least seven work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Rachel
Waldstein, Program Officer, Educational
Information and Resources Branch,
Office of Global Educational Programs,
ECA/A/S/A, Room 349, ECA/A/S/A–
07–03, U.S. Department of State, SA–44,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, telephone: 202–453–8866, fax:
202–453–8890, e-mail address:
Waldsteinre@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/S/A–
07–03.
Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and
may not be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
28902
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Notices
Dated: May 12, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–7601 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5385]
Shipping Coordinating Committee;
Notice of Meeting
The Shipping Coordinating
Committee (SHC) will conduct an open
meeting from 10 a.m. until 11 a.m. on
Thursday, June 1, in Room 4420, at U.S.
Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593–
0001. The purpose of the meeting is to
finalize preparations for the 56th
Session of the Technical Co-operation
Committee and the 96th Session of the
Council of the International Maritime
Organization (IMO), which are
scheduled for June 13–23, at the IMO
Headquarters in London. Discussion
will focus on papers received and draft
U.S. positions.
Items of particular interest include:
—Reports of Committees;
—Resource Management;
—Reports and financing of the
Integrated Technical Co-operation
Programme; and
—Strategy and planning.
Members of the public may attend
these meetings up to the seating
capacity of the room. Interested persons
can obtain information by writing:
Director, International Affairs, U.S.
Coast Guard Headquarters,
Commandant (G–CI), room 2114, 2100
Second Street, SW., Washington, DC
20593–0001 or by calling: (202) 267–
2280.
Dated: April 27, 2006.
Clay Diamond,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating
Committee, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–7578 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5386]
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Shipping Coordinating Committee;
Notice of Meeting
The Shipping Coordinating
Committee (SHC) will conduct an open
meeting at 1 p.m. on Thursday, June 22,
2006, in Room 6319 of the United States
Coast Guard Headquarters Building,
2100 2nd Street SW., Washington, DC
20593–0001. The primary purpose of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
the meeting is to complete preparations
for the 49th Session of the International
Maritime Organization (IMO) SubCommittee on Stability and Load Lines
and on Fishing Vessels Safety to be held
at IMO Headquarters in London,
England from July 24th to 28th.
The primary matters to be considered
include:
—Development of explanatory notes for
harmonized SOLAS Chapter II–1;
—Passenger ship safety;
—Review of the Intact Stability Code;
—Safety of small fishing vessels;
—Tonnage measurement of open-top
containerships;
—Review of the SPS Code.
Members of the public may attend
this meeting up to the seating capacity
of the room.
Interested persons may seek
information by writing to Mr. Paul
Cojeen, Commandant (G–PSE), U.S.
Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second
Street SW., Room 1308, Washington, DC
20593–0001 or by calling (202) 267–
2988.
Dated: April 27, 2006.
Clay L. Diamond,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating
Committee, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–7580 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5391]
Shipping Coordinating Committee;
Notice of Meeting
The Shipping Coordinating
Committee (SHC) will conduct an open
meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May
30, 2006, in Room 2415 of the United
States Coast Guard Headquarters
Building, 2100 2nd Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20593–0001. The
primary purpose of the meeting is to
prepare for the 14th Session of the
International Maritime Organization
(IMO) Sub-Committee on Flag State
Implementation to be held at IMO
Headquarters in London, England from
June 5th to 9th.
The primary matters to be considered
include:
—Responsibilities of Governments and
measures to encourage flag State
compliance;
—Port State Control (PSC) on seafarer’s
working hours;
—Harmonization of port State control
activities;
—Comprehensive analysis of difficulties
encountered in the implementation of
IMO instruments;
—Mandatory reports under
International Convention for the
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Prevention of Pollution from Ships,
1973, as modified by the Protocol of
1978 (MARPOL 73/78);
—Casualty statistics and investigations;
—Review of the Code for the
investigation of marine casualties and
incidents;
—Review of the Survey Guidelines
under the Harmonized System of
Survey and Certification (HSSC)—
(resolution A.948(23));
—Development of guidelines on port
State control under the 2004 Ballast
Water Management (BWM)
Convention;
—Development of survey guidelines
required by regulation E–1 of the 2004
BWM Convention;
—Port reception facilities-related issues;
—Illegal, unregulated and unreported
(IUU) fishing and implementation of
resolution A.925(22);
—Consideration of International
Association of Classification Societies
(IACS) unified interpretations;
Members of the public may attend
this meeting up to the seating capacity
of the room. Interested persons may
seek information by writing to Mr. E.J.
Terminella, Commandant (G–PCV), U.S.
Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second
Street, SW., Room 1116, Washington,
DC 20593–0001 or by calling (202) 267–
2978.
Dated: May 5, 2006.
Clay Diamond,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating
Committee, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–7581 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Delegation of Authority 292]
Delegation by the Deputy Secretary of
State to the Assistant Secretary for
Near Eastern Affairs of Authority To
Submit Certain Iraq Reports to the
Congress
By virtue of the authority vested in
the Secretary of State, including section
1 of the State Department Basic
Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C.
2651a) and the Presidential
Memorandum For the Secretary of
State—Delegation of Certain Reporting
Authority, dated July 2, 2004 (69 FR
43723), and delegated to the Deputy
Secretary of State pursuant to
Delegation of Authority 245 of April 23,
2001, I hereby delegate to the Assistant
Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs the
authority to approve submission of
reports to the Congress pursuant to
section 4 (a) of the Authorization for
Use of Military Force Against Iraq
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28897-28902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7601]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5410]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA); Request for
Grant Proposals: Regional Educational Advising Coordinator Program
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/S/A-07-03.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Program start date: October 1, 2006.
Application Deadline: July 10, 2006.
Executive Summary: The Educational Information and Resources Branch
in the Office of Global Educational Programs of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) announces an open competition
for a cooperative agreement to support the Regional Educational
Advising Coordinator (REAC) Program. The underlying goal of this
cooperative agreement is to foster international student mobility
between the United States and the rest of the world. The grantee
organization will provide programmatic oversight and coordination,
communication and information channels, training and logistical
support, and human resource services to eight REACs, thus assuring
their capacity to supply the EducationUSA network of 450 State
Department-supported educational advising centers with adequate
resources and professional training, and in turn, hundreds of thousands
of overseas students with objective, accurate and timely information on
U.S. higher education. The grantee organization will also ensure that
the Bureau, U.S. embassies and Fulbright commissions receive thoughtful
assessments of issues concerning advising centers and regional trends
in student mobility from the REACs.
Non-profit higher education organizations with the infrastructure
to manage programs in all regions of the world may submit proposals
which demonstrate their knowledge of international student mobility,
understanding of the needs of the EducationUSA network, and the
capacity to support REACs based in Ghana, Germany, Mexico, Morocco,
Pakistan, Peru, Russia, and Thailand. Pending availability of FY07
funding, this grant will provide an assistance award in the range of
$1,273,000 to $1,433,000.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries* * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations...and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose
The State Department and ECA are committed to facilitating and
increasing the flow of international students to the U.S. in order to
provide future world leaders with opportunities to understand U.S.
society, culture and values. The REACs' role is critical to the
Bureau's pursuit of this objective.
REACs and the EducationUSA advisers they support are catalysts for
the exchange of U.S. Government-sponsored students and scholars as well
as those who pursue U.S. educational programs through their own means
or
[[Page 28898]]
with the aid of other sponsors. REACs and the EducationUSA network
market U.S. higher education abroad, promote study by international
students, scholars and professionals in the U.S., and encourage study
abroad by Americans. EducationUSA advisers counsel international
students, parents and foreign government officials, and bring U.S.
educational opportunities to the attention of a broad and diverse
segment of young people. Advisers also facilitate outreach by U.S.
institutions to these populations. (For more information, please see
https://www.educationUSA.state.gov.)
Program Information
The grantee organization will ensure that REACs have the necessary
logistical and programmatic support to provide comprehensive and
accurate information to EducationUSA advisers through regional
listservs and newsletters; to evaluate the need of advising centers for
resources and training and to provide advisers appropriate training
through regional workshops, internships and other professional
opportunities; to conduct site visits to centers and report to ECA's
Educational Information and Resources Branch (ECA/A/S/A); and to
provide analyses to the Public Affairs and Consular sections of U.S.
embassies on issues concerning the advising centers and trends in
student mobility, with special reference to underserved groups. The
grantee should also ensure that REACs represent the views of advisers
and international students to educational institutions in the United
States for the purpose of facilitating the enrollment of students in
U.S. institutions.
REACs have been employed previously through a variety of
mechanisms, including grants to U.S.-based non-governmental
organizations as well as transfers of funds to U.S. embassies and
Fulbright Commissions. Through this cooperative agreement, the Bureau
intends to provide a coherent administrative structure for the REACs,
while maintaining the Bureau's traditionally substantial level of
involvement in overseeing the format and content of assistance provided
by the REACs to EducationUSA advisers. The grantee organization will
use funding made available through this agreement to provide a uniform
and equitable structure for REACs' salaries, health insurance,
pensions, professional development, travel, equipment, and logistical
support. The grantee organization should serve as a partner to REACs by
facilitating and supporting them to conduct an adequate number of
regional adviser training sessions and workshops. The grantee should
facilitate communication and information flow among and between REACs
via a listserv or other means. Ongoing REAC office expenses, including
rent, are also eligible for funding. Should additional monies become
available, the agreement will also pay for a part-time assistant for
each REAC, where feasible and not already furnished from other sources;
applicants should discuss in their proposals how they would provide
part-time assistants.
Applicant organizations should include in their proposals a plan to
maintain REACs in the cities and countries where they are currently
based. Applicants must be willing to enter into a sub-grant agreement
with certain current REAC host organizations, and to pay any applicable
office rental fees as needed. Please contact ECA/A/S/A Program Officer
Rachel Waldstein for more information on individual incumbent REAC
situations. If a vacancy occurs, the grantee organization will be
expected to recruit and select new REACs, in close consultation with
ECA/A/S/A.
Please see the Program Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI)
for further details on REAC responsibilities and qualifications,
grantee organization responsibilities and the ECA/A/S/A role.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. Under this cooperative
agreement, ECA/A/S/A will be substantially involved in program
activities above and beyond routine grant monitoring. It will play a
central role in reviewing staff selection, travel plans and budget, and
issues requiring consultation with Fulbright Commission or U.S. embassy
personnel. Please see the POGI for details.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2007.
Approximate Total Funding: Minimum of $1,273,000 and up to
$1,433,000, pending availability of FY07 funds.
Approximate Number of Awards: One.
Approximate Average Award: Minimum of $1,273,000 and up to
$1,433,000, pending availability of funds.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, October 1,
2006.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: December 31, 2007.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew this grant for two additional fiscal years,
before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding possible in support of its programs. Proposals that include
significant cost sharing will be deemed more competitive.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates awarding one
grant, in an amount of approximately $1,273,000 to $1,433,000 to
support program and administrative costs required to implement this
program. Therefore, organizations with less than four years experience
in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under
this competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum
levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
(b.) Organizations may collaborate in the submission of an
application to manage this program. In such a case, the agreement will
be made with one organization that should be prepared to work with its
institutional partners on the basis of one or more sub-agreements.
[[Page 28899]]
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package:
Please contact the Office of Global Educational Programs, ECA/A/S/
A, Room 349, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, telephone: 202-453-8866, fax number: 202-453-
8890, e-mail: Waldsteinre@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package.
Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/S/A-07-03 located
at the top of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document, which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Rachel Waldstein, Program Officer, and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/S/A-07-03 located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov. Please read all
information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Submission Dates and
Times section'' below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please refer to the solicitation package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa: For
applicants' information only, the Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is placing renewed emphasis on the secure and proper
administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by
grantees and sponsors to all regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should demonstrate the applicant's capacity to
meet all requirements governing the administration of the Exchange
Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62, including the
oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program participants, provision of pre-
arrival information and orientation to participants, monitoring of
participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, record-keeping,
reporting and other requirements. The Grantee will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. Telephone: (202) 203-5029.
FAX: (202) 453-8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and physical
challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in program administration and in
program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the `Support
for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in
carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries
whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau
``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee
will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as
well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
[[Page 28900]]
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
Describe your plans for: i.e. sustainability, overall program
management, staffing, coordination with ECA and PAS or any other
requirements etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Budget: Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for
the entire program. There must be a summary budget as well as
breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program budgets.
Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each REAC or for each
program component, phase, location, or activity to provide
clarification. Administrative and indirect costs may not exceed 30% and
may not be charged against program costs such as REAC per diem, or
lodging and per diem for advisers attending regionally based training.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
(1) REAC salaries, benefits, health insurance, retirement.
(2) Costs for REAC professional development and for facilitating
communication and information flow among REACs and with advising
centers.
(3) Part-time assistant salaries.
(4) REAC travel.
(5) Logistical support and equipment.
(6) Cost of organizing regional adviser training programs.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: July 10, 2006.
Reference Number: ECA/A/S/A-07-03.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and seven copies of the application should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/A/S/A-07-03, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room
534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.2.--Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the `Get Started' portion of the site (http:/
/www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
[[Page 28901]]
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.) of the closing date to
ensure that their entire applications have been uploaded to the
grants.gov site. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process:
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards (cooperative agreements) resides with the Bureau's
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation. Please
see POGI for a description of each criterion.
1. Program planning/Ability to achieve program objectives.
2. Institution's capacity/record.
3. Cost effectiveness/cost sharing.
4. Multiplier effect/impact.
5. Support of diversity.
6. Project evaluation.
7. Area expertise.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance
Award Document (AAD) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the
original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient
and the U.S. Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments.''
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm# articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) Quarterly program and financial reports. Program reports should
include travel and budget updates for each REAC.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
Program Data Requirements: Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on program participants (REACs and
EducationUSA advisers) and activities in an electronically accessible
database format that can be shared with the Bureau as required. As a
minimum, the data must include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or
who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.
(2) Information on international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least seven work days prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Rachel Waldstein,
Program Officer, Educational Information and Resources Branch, Office
of Global Educational Programs, ECA/A/S/A, Room 349, ECA/A/S/A-07-03,
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, telephone: 202-453-8866, fax: 202-453-8890, e-mail address:
Waldsteinre@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/A/S/A-07-03.
Please read the complete Federal Register announcement before
sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding
and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory
information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language
will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award
commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right
to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the
needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be
subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section
VI.3 above.
[[Page 28902]]
Dated: May 12, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E6-7601 Filed 5-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P