Publication, Coordination, and Reporting of International Agreements: Amendments, 28831-28835 [E6-7596]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules July 11, 2003; and Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510100–34–0037, dated July 8, 2004; to ensure that the NRM is at the Mod T configuration. Once the actions in this paragraph are completed, the AFM revision required by paragraph (h) of this AD may be removed from the AFM. Note 4: Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510100–34–A0035, dated July 11, 2003, refers to Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510100–34–A0034, dated February 28, 2003, as an additional source of service information for inspecting to determine the NRM part number, marking the modification plates of the NRM and INU accordingly, testing the INU for discrepant signals, and replacing the unit with a new or modified INU, as applicable. Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510100–34–A0034 refers to Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510134–34– A0016, currently at Revision 001, dated March 4, 2003, as an additional source of service information for marking the modification plates of the NRM and INU. Note 5: Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510100–34–0037, dated July 8, 2004, refers to Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510134–34– 0018, dated July 8, 2004, as an additional source of service information for modifying the NRM to the Mod T configuration. (k) If the inspection specified by paragraph (j) of this AD is done within the compliance time specified in paragraph (f) of this AD, paragraph (g) of this AD does not need to be done. No Reporting Requirement (l) Where Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510100–34–A0035 (or any of the related service information referenced therein) specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS (m)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding District Office. Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 9, 2006. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E6–7559 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:24 May 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Part 181 [Public Notice: 5402] RIN 1400–AC21 Publication, Coordination, and Reporting of International Agreements: Amendments State Department. Proposed rule with request for comments. AGENCY: 28831 regulations.gov Web site at: https:// www.regulations.gov/index.cfm. You must include the RIN in the subject line of your message. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John J. Kim, Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, 202–647– 1660. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ACTION: Background SUMMARY: The Department of State is proposing to update the regulations implementing 1 U.S.C. 112a and 112b in order to reflect amendments to the statutes governing publication of U.S. international agreements and their transmittal to the Congress. It is further proposing not to publish certain categories of international agreements in the compilation entitled ‘‘United States Treaties and Other International Agreements’’ or in the Treaties and Other International Acts series. These categories of agreements are of a highly technical or specialized nature and are of limited interest to the public. Further, the regulations are proposed to be amended to reflect adjustments to certain internal procedures within the State Department on the reporting of international agreements to Congress. Finally, the Department is adding a new requirement concerning procedures for consultation with the Secretary of State in the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements. Where an international agreement could reasonably require for its implementation the issuance of a significant domestic regulatory action, agencies proposing the agreement are to consult in a timely manner with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Department of State should confirm that timely consultations were undertaken. DATES: Submit comments on or before July 17, 2006. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by any of the following methods: E-mail: treatyoffice@state.gov. You must include the Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) in the subject line of your message. Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions): An original and three copies of comments should be sent to the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, Office of the Legal Adviser, Room 5420, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. Persons with access to the internet may also view this notice and provide comments by going to the Two statutes set forth the Secretary’s unique role and important responsibilities in the area of publishing, coordinating, and reporting international agreements. Pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of State is required to publish annually a compilation of all treaties and international agreements to which the United States is a party that were signed, proclaimed, or ‘‘with reference to which any other final formality ha[d] been executed’’ during the calendar year. The Secretary of State, however, may determine that certain categories of agreements should not be published if certain criteria are met. Any such determination must be published in the Federal Register. Under the second statute, 1 U.S.C. 112b, the Secretary of State is required to transmit to the Congress the text of any international agreement other than a treaty to which the United States is a party as soon as practicable but no later than 60 days after it enters into force. Those agreements that the President determines should be classified are to be transmitted, not to Congress as a whole, but to the House Committee on International Relations (at that time called ‘‘the House Committee on Foreign Affairs’’) and to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee under an injunction of secrecy. The statute further recognizes the Secretary of State’s special role in the negotiation and conclusion of all U.S. international agreements, providing that ‘‘[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, an international agreement may not be signed or otherwise concluded on behalf of the United States without prior consultation with the Secretary of State. Such consultation may encompass a class of agreements rather than a particular agreement.’’ The Department of State has issued regulations to implement these statutory provisions. These regulations are codified in Part 181 of Chapter 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Congress has amended both 1 U.S.C. 112a and 1 U.S.C. 112b several times, most recently in section 7121 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM 18MYP1 28832 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules Prevention Act of 2004, Public Law 108–458 (Dec. 17, 2004). This proposed rule amends certain sections of 22 CFR part 181 in order to reflect (1) the changes made to 1 U.S.C. 112a and 112b in December 2004; (2) certain changes made to internal Departmental procedures; (3) four additional categories of international agreements that meet the non-publication criteria of 1 U.S.C. 112(a). In addition, this proposed rule amends the procedures regarding consultation with the Secretary of State with respect to the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements. These procedures are set forth in 22 CFR 181.4 and in the Circular 175 procedure referenced therein. In particular, if a proposed international agreement embodies a commitment that could reasonably be expected to require (for its implementation) the issuance of a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ (as defined in section 3 of Executive Order 12866), the agency proposing the agreement shall consult in a timely manner with the OMB regarding such commitment. This amendment is aimed at ensuring that OMB is apprised of international commitments that may have a significant regulatory impact on domestic entities or persons prior to the negotiation or conclusion of the international agreement containing the commitment. wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS Discussion First, Public Law 108–458 made significant changes to certain legal definitions, including a change in the factors to be considered in assessing whether an agreement is a reportable international agreement under 1 U.S.C. 112a and the Case-Zablocki Act. Subsection (e) of 1 U.S.C. 112b was amended to provide in relevant part: (2)(A) An arrangement shall constitute an international agreement within the meaning of this section * * * irrespective of the duration of activities under the arrangement or the arrangement itself. (B) Arrangements that constitute an international agreement within the meaning of this section * * * include the following: (i) A bilateral or multilateral counterterrorism agreement. (ii) A bilateral agreement with a country that is subject to a determination under section 6(j)(1)(A) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)A), section 620A(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(a)), or section 40(d) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)). VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:24 May 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 We propose to amend the provisions of 22 CFR 181.2 (which describe criteria to be applied in determining whether an undertaking, oral agreement, document or set of documents constitutes an international agreement) to incorporate these statutory amendments. Second, this proposed rule amends 22 CFR 181.4(e) to provide an additional basis on which agencies must consult with OMB prior to the negotiation or conclusion of an international agreement. Currently, 22 CFR 181.4(e) states that if a proposed international agreement embodies a commitment to furnish funds, goods, or services that are beyond or in addition to those authorized in an approved budget, the agency proposing the agreement shall state what arrangements have been planned or carried out concerning consultation with OMB on such a commitment. The Department of State makes sure that the relevant budget contains funds for the commitment, or that the President has made a determination to seek the funds. The proposed rule adds a second paragraph to subsection (e) to ensure OMB consultation on proposed international agreements that reasonably may require, for their implementation, significant domestic regulatory action. OMB is responsible for overseeing and coordinating the Administration’s legislative initiatives and its domestic regulatory policy. Commitments contained in international agreements may be implemented through domestic regulations. This revision to subsection (e) is designed to ensure that OMB is consulted, in a timely manner, prior to negotiation or conclusion of an international agreement that contains a commitment that reasonably could be expected to require, for its implementation, the issuance of a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as defined in section 3 of Executive Order 12866. Third, the proposed rule amends 22 CFR 181.7 to reflect that the State Department has modified its internal procedures so that the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, instead of the Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional Relations, transmits classified agreements to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and to the House Committee on International Relations. Similarly, the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, instead of the Assistant Secretary for Congressional Relations, transmits to the Congress any agreements between the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and the governing authorities in Taiwan, or between AIT and an agency in the U.S. government. In order to enhance PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 accountability and avoid the possibility of classified agreements or agreements involving AIT getting lost or misplaced between the two bureaus, the Department decided to centralize responsibility for all Case Act reporting in the Office of the Legal Adviser. Fourth, as provided in section 7121(b) of Public Law 108–458, any references in 22 CFR 181.7 to the ‘‘House Committee on Foreign Affairs’’ have been replaced with the ‘‘House Committee on International Relations,’’ which is the current name of the committee. Fifth, the Department proposes to amend 22 CFR 181.8(a) to add four additional categories of documents that it believes no longer should be published in ‘‘United States Treaties and Other International Agreements’’. As set forth in 1 U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of State is authorized to— determine that publication of certain categories of agreements is not required if the following criteria are met: (1) Such agreements are not treaties which have been brought into force for the United States after having received Senate advice and consent pursuant to section 2(2) of Article II of the Constitution of the United States; (2) The public interest in such agreements is insufficient to justify their publication, because (A) as of the date of enactment of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995, the agreements are no longer in force; (B) the agreements do not create private rights or duties, or establish standards intended to govern government action in the treatment of private individuals; (C) in view of the limited or specialized nature of the public interest in such agreements, such interest can adequately be satisfied by an alternative means; or (D) the public disclosure of the text of the agreement would, in the opinion of the President, be prejudicial to the national security of the United States; and (3) Copies of such agreements (other than those in paragraph (2)(D)), including certified copies where necessary for litigation or similar purposes, will be made available by the Department of State upon request. This statute requires publication in the Federal Register of any such determination that publication of certain categories of agreements is not required. In selecting the following categories of agreements, the Department has focused on four areas comprising a large volume of agreements that are rather specialized and do not appear to be of general public interest. Routine non-publication of the following categories of E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM 18MYP1 wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules agreements will moderate future publication requirements, thus permitting agreements of greater interest to be published in a more timely manner. Also, these agreements do not appear to create private rights or duties. In any event, copies of these agreements will be provided by the Department upon request. For the above-stated reasons, the Department proposes not to publish routinely the following: United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Implementing Agreements. Consistent with the Foreign Assistance Act and the Agricultural Trade and Development Act of 1954, USAID negotiates agreements with foreign governments under which specific activities and programs financed with USAIDadministered foreign assistance funding are implemented. The Department seeks to exclude all such bilateral ‘‘implementing’’ agreements from the routine publication requirement, which is consistent with current practice. There is little, if any, public interest in these agreements. We note that the Department of State already forgoes the reporting of such agreements to Congress (under 1 U.S.C. 112b) when they involve grants of $25 million or less. The Department will continue to report to Congress those USAID agreements that exceed $25 million. Letters of Agreement and Memoranda of Understanding for Bilateral Assistance on Counter-Narcotics and Anti-Crime Cooperation. Pursuant to the Foreign Assistance Act and the President’s constitutional authority, the United States negotiates bilateral agreements with other countries regarding the control of narcotic drugs and other anti-crime purposes. These agreements are of a limited and specialized nature, and there has been no indication of public interest in their substance. We note that the Department already forgoes the reporting of such agreements to Congress when they involve grants of less than $25 million. The Department will continue to report to Congress those letters of agreement and memoranda of understanding for bilateral assistance over $25 million. Educational and Leadership Development Agreements. The U.S. Government enters into a number of agreements that regulate practical or technical arrangements for targeted programs or assignments designed to acquaint U.S. and foreign armed forces, law enforcement, homeland security, or related personnel with limited, specialized aspects of each other’s practices or operations. These VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:24 May 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 agreements are of a limited and specialized nature, and there has been no indication of public interest in their substance. Bilateral Aviation Technical Assistance Agreements. The United States enters into international agreements which provide for managerial, operational, and technical assistance to other countries in developing and modernizing their civil aviation infrastructure for specific aviation projects. These agreements address only identified aviation objectives and can sometimes be highly technical in nature. There has been no indication of public interest in the publication of these agreements. The Department of State does not intend to publish agreements in the above categories that were signed before publication of this notice and not previously published in the compilation entitled ‘‘United States Treaties and Other International Agreements.’’ Agreements in the above categories (except classified agreements) will continue to be listed in the Department of State’s annual publication entitled ‘‘Treaties in Force.’’ These four additional categories of agreements that meet the non-publication criteria will be reflected in four additional subparagraphs in 22 CFR 181.8(a). Sixth, we propose to add a new paragraph to 22 CFR 181.8 (‘‘Publication’’) to implement a new, additional reporting requirement. In Public Law 108–458, Congress amended 1 U.S.C. 112b to add the following: (d)(1) The Secretary of State shall annually submit to Congress a report that contains an index of all international agreements, listed by country, date, title, and summary of each such agreement (including a description of the duration of activities under the agreement and the agreement itself), that the United States— (A) Has signed, proclaimed, or with reference to which any other final formality has been executed, or that has been extended or otherwise modified, during the preceding calendar year; and (B) Has not been published, or is not proposed to be published, in the compilation entitled ‘‘United States Treaties and Other International Agreements’’. The Department submitted such an index for the past two years and has taken steps to continue to meet this reporting requirement. Finally, the Department proposes to add a new section 22 CFR 181.9 that implements an Internet publication requirement. Public Law 108–458 specifically added subsection (d) to 1 U.S.C. 112a, establishing that ‘‘[t]he PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 28833 Secretary of State shall make publicly available through the Internet Web site of the Department of State each treaty or international agreement proposed to be published in the compilation entitled ‘United States Treaties and Other International Agreements’ not later than 180 days after the date on which the treaty or agreement enters into force.’’ The Department of State has been meeting this requirement by making available through its Internet FOIA webpage copies of those agreements reported to Congress under 1 U.S.C. 112b. Regulatory Analysis Administrative Procedure Act In accordance with provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act governing rules promulgated by Federal agencies that affect the public (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department is publishing these proposed regulations and inviting public comment. Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business These proposed changes to the regulations are hereby certified as not expected to have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, and Executive Order No. 13272, section 3(b). The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 These proposed regulations do not constitute a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104–121. These regulations would not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign based companies in domestic and export markets. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA), Public Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State, local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. These proposed regulations would not result in any such expenditure nor would it significantly or uniquely affect small governments. E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM 18MYP1 28834 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism These regulations would not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor would the regulations have federalism implications warranting the application of Executive Order No. 12372 and No. 13132. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review Because a portion of this proposed rule directly involves the participation of OMB, the Department of State has submitted it to OMB for its review. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through regulation. The Department of State has determined that this proposal contains no new collection of information requirements for the purposes of the PRA. List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 181 Treaties. For the reasons set forth above, part 181 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 181—COORDINATION, REPORTING AND PUBLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS Authority: 1 U.S.C. 112a, 112b; and 22 U.S.C. 2651a. 2. 22 CFR 181.2 is amended by: A. Adding a new sentence after the second sentence of paragraph (a) (2); B. Removing the third and fourth sentences of paragraph (a) (2); and C. Adding new paragraph (f). The additions read as follows: Criteria. (a) * * * (2) * * * The duration of the activities pursuant to the undertaking or the duration of the undertaking itself VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:24 May 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 § 181.4 State. Consultations with the Secretary of * * * * * (e) (1) * * * (2) If a proposed agreement embodies a commitment that could reasonably be expected to require (for its implementation) the issuance of a significant regulatory action (as defined in section 3 of Executive Order 12866), the agency proposing the arrangement shall state what arrangements have been planned or carried out concerning timely consultation with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for such commitment. The Department of State should receive confirmation that OMB has been consulted in a timely manner concerning the proposed commitment. * * * * * § 181.7 1. The authority citation for part 181 will continue to read: § 181.2 shall not be a factor in determining whether it constitutes an international agreement. * * * * * * * * (f) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, arrangements that constitute international agreements within the meaning of this section include (1) Bilateral or multilateral counterterrorism agreements and (2) Bilateral agreements with a country that is subject to a determination under section 6(j)(1)(A) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)(A)), section 620A(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(a)), or section 40(d) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)). 3. 22 CFR 181.4 is amended in paragraph (e) as follows: A. By designating the existing text as paragraph (e)(1); and B. Adding a new paragraph (e)(2) as follows: [Amended] 4. 22 CFR 181.7 is amended as follows: A. In paragraph (b): By removing ‘‘Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional Relations’’ wherever it appears and adding ‘‘Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs’’ in its place; and removing ‘‘House Committee on Foreign Affairs’’ wherever it appears and adding ‘‘House Committee on International Relations’’ in its place. B. In paragraph (c): By removing ‘‘, the negotiations, the effect of the agreement,’’ in the third sentence; and by removing, in the last sentence the phrase ‘‘Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional Relations’’ and adding ‘‘Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs’’, and removing ‘‘House PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Committee on Foreign Affairs’’ and adding ‘‘House Committee on International Relations’’ in its place. C. In paragraph (d), by removing ‘‘Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional Relations’’ wherever it appears and adding ‘‘Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs’’ in its place. 5. 22 CFR 181.8 is amended as follows: A. By adding paragraphs (a)(10) through (13); B. By adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (b); and C. By adding a new paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 181.8 Publication. (a) * * * (10) Bilateral agreements with other governments that apply to specific activities and programs financed with foreign assistance funds administered by the United States Agency for International Development pursuant to the Foreign Assistance Act, as amended, and the Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act of 1954, as amended; (11) Letters of agreements and memoranda of understanding with other governments that apply to bilateral assistance for counter-narcotics and other anti-crime purposes furnished pursuant to the Foreign Assistance Act, as amended; (12) Bilateral agreements that apply to specified education and leadership development programs designed to acquaint U.S. and foreign armed forces, law enforcement, homeland security, or related personnel with limited, specialized aspects of each other’s practices or operations; and (13) Bilateral agreements between aviation agencies governing specified aviation technical assistance projects for the provision of managerial, operational, and technical assistance in developing and modernizing the civil aviation infrastructure; (b) * * * Agreements on the subjects listed in paragraphs (a)(10) through (13) of this section that had not been published as of [date of publication of final rule in Federal Register]. * * * * * (d) The Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs shall annually submit to Congress a report that contains an index of all international agreements, listed by country, date, title, and summary of each such agreement (including a description of the duration of activities under the agreement and the agreement itself), that the United States: (1) Has signed, proclaimed, or with reference to which any other final formality has been executed, or that has E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM 18MYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules been extended or otherwise modified, during the preceding calendar year; and (2) Has not been published, or is not proposed to be published, in the compilation entitled ‘‘United States Treaties and Other International Agreements.’’ 6. Add new § 181.9 to read as follows: § 181.9 Internet Web site publication. The Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, with the cooperation of other bureaus in the Department, shall be responsible for making publicly available on the Internet Web site of the Department of State each treaty or international agreement proposed to be published in the compilation entitled ‘‘United States Treaties and Other International Agreements’’ not later than 180 days after the date on which the treaty or agreement enters into force. Dated: May 11, 2006. John J. Kim, Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E6–7596 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–08–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [COTP Charleston 06–070] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone; Lowcountry Splash, Charleston Harbor, Charleston, SC Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS ACTION: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to create a temporary safety zone in the Wando River, Cooper River, and Charleston Harbor from Hobcaw Yacht Club to Charleston Harbor Marina along the coast of Mount Pleasant, SC, to approximately 150 yards offshore, during the Lowcountry Splash swimming event on June 24, 2006. A safety zone is necessary to prevent commercial or recreational boating traffic from interfering with swimmers on the racecourse. This rule provides for the safety of swimmers and vessels transiting the area. DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before June 19, 2006. ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Charleston, Waterways VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:24 May 17, 2006 Jkt 208001 Management Division, Charleston, South Carolina 29401. Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Charleston, Waterways Management Office between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Warrant Officer James J. McHugh, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Charleston, Waterways Management Division, (843) 724–7647. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Request for Comments We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (COTP Charleston 06– 070), indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them. Public Meeting We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a request for a meeting by writing to Chief Warrant Officer James J. McHugh, address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register. Background and Purpose The Lowcountry Splash is a 2.4 mile open water swimming event in the Wando River and Charleson Harbor, parallel to Mt. Pleasant, SC This regulation is needed to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters because of the inherent dangers associated with an open-water swimming event in a highly transited body of water. The event sponsor will provide 20–30 kayaks to keep swimmers on course and assist the Coast Guard in patrolling the area. This rule creates a regulated area that will prohibit nonparticipant vessels from entering the regulated area during the event without PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 28835 the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Discussion of Proposed Rule This rule allows the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Charleston, South Carolina, to establish a temporary safety zone in order to provide for a safe area for the swimming event. The safety zone will have patrol vessels to enforce the zone and the event sponsor will provide 20 to 30 kayaks in order to assist the swimmers and ensure they are staying within the designated areas. The safety zone is necessary to protect the swimmers from the dangers of commercial and recreational vessel traffic in the vicinity of the race. Sector Charleston will notify the maritime community of periods during which these safety zones will be in effect via a broadcast notice to mariners on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 16 (156.8 MHz), or by having on-scene assets inform vessel traffic as necessary. Regulatory Evaluation This proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ‘‘Significant’’ under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary, because the safety zone will only be in effect for a limited time and for a limited area. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM 18MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28831-28835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7596]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Part 181

[Public Notice: 5402]
RIN 1400-AC21


Publication, Coordination, and Reporting of International 
Agreements: Amendments

AGENCY: State Department.

ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is proposing to update the regulations 
implementing 1 U.S.C. 112a and 112b in order to reflect amendments to 
the statutes governing publication of U.S. international agreements and 
their transmittal to the Congress. It is further proposing not to 
publish certain categories of international agreements in the 
compilation entitled ``United States Treaties and Other International 
Agreements'' or in the Treaties and Other International Acts series. 
These categories of agreements are of a highly technical or specialized 
nature and are of limited interest to the public. Further, the 
regulations are proposed to be amended to reflect adjustments to 
certain internal procedures within the State Department on the 
reporting of international agreements to Congress. Finally, the 
Department is adding a new requirement concerning procedures for 
consultation with the Secretary of State in the negotiation and 
conclusion of international agreements. Where an international 
agreement could reasonably require for its implementation the issuance 
of a significant domestic regulatory action, agencies proposing the 
agreement are to consult in a timely manner with the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and the Department of State should confirm 
that timely consultations were undertaken.

DATES: Submit comments on or before July 17, 2006.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by any of the following 
methods: E-mail: treatyoffice@state.gov. You must include the 
Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) in the subject line of your 
message.
    Mail (paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions): An original and three 
copies of comments should be sent to the Assistant Legal Adviser for 
Treaty Affairs, Office of the Legal Adviser, Room 5420, Department of 
State, Washington, DC 20520.
    Persons with access to the internet may also view this notice and 
provide comments by going to the regulations.gov Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/index.cfm. You must include the RIN in the subject 
line of your message.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John J. Kim, Assistant Legal Adviser 
for Treaty Affairs, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, 
202-647-1660.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Two statutes set forth the Secretary's unique role and important 
responsibilities in the area of publishing, coordinating, and reporting 
international agreements. Pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of 
State is required to publish annually a compilation of all treaties and 
international agreements to which the United States is a party that 
were signed, proclaimed, or ``with reference to which any other final 
formality ha[d] been executed'' during the calendar year. The Secretary 
of State, however, may determine that certain categories of agreements 
should not be published if certain criteria are met. Any such 
determination must be published in the Federal Register.
    Under the second statute, 1 U.S.C. 112b, the Secretary of State is 
required to transmit to the Congress the text of any international 
agreement other than a treaty to which the United States is a party as 
soon as practicable but no later than 60 days after it enters into 
force. Those agreements that the President determines should be 
classified are to be transmitted, not to Congress as a whole, but to 
the House Committee on International Relations (at that time called 
``the House Committee on Foreign Affairs'') and to the Senate Foreign 
Relations Committee under an injunction of secrecy. The statute further 
recognizes the Secretary of State's special role in the negotiation and 
conclusion of all U.S. international agreements, providing that 
``[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, an international 
agreement may not be signed or otherwise concluded on behalf of the 
United States without prior consultation with the Secretary of State. 
Such consultation may encompass a class of agreements rather than a 
particular agreement.''
    The Department of State has issued regulations to implement these 
statutory provisions. These regulations are codified in Part 181 of 
Chapter 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Congress has 
amended both 1 U.S.C. 112a and 1 U.S.C. 112b several times, most 
recently in section 7121 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism

[[Page 28832]]

Prevention Act of 2004, Public Law 108-458 (Dec. 17, 2004). This 
proposed rule amends certain sections of 22 CFR part 181 in order to 
reflect (1) the changes made to 1 U.S.C. 112a and 112b in December 
2004; (2) certain changes made to internal Departmental procedures; (3) 
four additional categories of international agreements that meet the 
non-publication criteria of 1 U.S.C. 112(a).
    In addition, this proposed rule amends the procedures regarding 
consultation with the Secretary of State with respect to the 
negotiation and conclusion of international agreements. These 
procedures are set forth in 22 CFR 181.4 and in the Circular 175 
procedure referenced therein. In particular, if a proposed 
international agreement embodies a commitment that could reasonably be 
expected to require (for its implementation) the issuance of a 
``significant regulatory action'' (as defined in section 3 of Executive 
Order 12866), the agency proposing the agreement shall consult in a 
timely manner with the OMB regarding such commitment. This amendment is 
aimed at ensuring that OMB is apprised of international commitments 
that may have a significant regulatory impact on domestic entities or 
persons prior to the negotiation or conclusion of the international 
agreement containing the commitment.

Discussion

    First, Public Law 108-458 made significant changes to certain legal 
definitions, including a change in the factors to be considered in 
assessing whether an agreement is a reportable international agreement 
under 1 U.S.C. 112a and the Case-Zablocki Act. Subsection (e) of 1 
U.S.C. 112b was amended to provide in relevant part:
    (2)(A) An arrangement shall constitute an international agreement 
within the meaning of this section * * * irrespective of the duration 
of activities under the arrangement or the arrangement itself.
    (B) Arrangements that constitute an international agreement within 
the meaning of this section * * * include the following:
    (i) A bilateral or multilateral counterterrorism agreement.
    (ii) A bilateral agreement with a country that is subject to a 
determination under section 6(j)(1)(A) of the Export Administration Act 
of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)A), section 620A(a) of the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(a)), or section 40(d) of the 
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)).
    We propose to amend the provisions of 22 CFR 181.2 (which describe 
criteria to be applied in determining whether an undertaking, oral 
agreement, document or set of documents constitutes an international 
agreement) to incorporate these statutory amendments.
    Second, this proposed rule amends 22 CFR 181.4(e) to provide an 
additional basis on which agencies must consult with OMB prior to the 
negotiation or conclusion of an international agreement. Currently, 22 
CFR 181.4(e) states that if a proposed international agreement embodies 
a commitment to furnish funds, goods, or services that are beyond or in 
addition to those authorized in an approved budget, the agency 
proposing the agreement shall state what arrangements have been planned 
or carried out concerning consultation with OMB on such a commitment. 
The Department of State makes sure that the relevant budget contains 
funds for the commitment, or that the President has made a 
determination to seek the funds.
    The proposed rule adds a second paragraph to subsection (e) to 
ensure OMB consultation on proposed international agreements that 
reasonably may require, for their implementation, significant domestic 
regulatory action. OMB is responsible for overseeing and coordinating 
the Administration's legislative initiatives and its domestic 
regulatory policy. Commitments contained in international agreements 
may be implemented through domestic regulations. This revision to 
subsection (e) is designed to ensure that OMB is consulted, in a timely 
manner, prior to negotiation or conclusion of an international 
agreement that contains a commitment that reasonably could be expected 
to require, for its implementation, the issuance of a ``significant 
regulatory action'' as defined in section 3 of Executive Order 12866.
    Third, the proposed rule amends 22 CFR 181.7 to reflect that the 
State Department has modified its internal procedures so that the 
Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, instead of the Assistant 
Secretary of State for Congressional Relations, transmits classified 
agreements to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and to the 
House Committee on International Relations. Similarly, the Assistant 
Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, instead of the Assistant Secretary 
for Congressional Relations, transmits to the Congress any agreements 
between the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and the governing 
authorities in Taiwan, or between AIT and an agency in the U.S. 
government. In order to enhance accountability and avoid the 
possibility of classified agreements or agreements involving AIT 
getting lost or misplaced between the two bureaus, the Department 
decided to centralize responsibility for all Case Act reporting in the 
Office of the Legal Adviser.
    Fourth, as provided in section 7121(b) of Public Law 108-458, any 
references in 22 CFR 181.7 to the ``House Committee on Foreign 
Affairs'' have been replaced with the ``House Committee on 
International Relations,'' which is the current name of the committee.
    Fifth, the Department proposes to amend 22 CFR 181.8(a) to add four 
additional categories of documents that it believes no longer should be 
published in ``United States Treaties and Other International 
Agreements''. As set forth in 1 U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of State is 
authorized to--determine that publication of certain categories of 
agreements is not required if the following criteria are met:
    (1) Such agreements are not treaties which have been brought into 
force for the United States after having received Senate advice and 
consent pursuant to section 2(2) of Article II of the Constitution of 
the United States;
    (2) The public interest in such agreements is insufficient to 
justify their publication, because (A) as of the date of enactment of 
the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995, 
the agreements are no longer in force; (B) the agreements do not create 
private rights or duties, or establish standards intended to govern 
government action in the treatment of private individuals; (C) in view 
of the limited or specialized nature of the public interest in such 
agreements, such interest can adequately be satisfied by an alternative 
means; or (D) the public disclosure of the text of the agreement would, 
in the opinion of the President, be prejudicial to the national 
security of the United States; and
    (3) Copies of such agreements (other than those in paragraph 
(2)(D)), including certified copies where necessary for litigation or 
similar purposes, will be made available by the Department of State 
upon request.
    This statute requires publication in the Federal Register of any 
such determination that publication of certain categories of agreements 
is not required.
    In selecting the following categories of agreements, the Department 
has focused on four areas comprising a large volume of agreements that 
are rather specialized and do not appear to be of general public 
interest. Routine non-publication of the following categories of

[[Page 28833]]

agreements will moderate future publication requirements, thus 
permitting agreements of greater interest to be published in a more 
timely manner. Also, these agreements do not appear to create private 
rights or duties. In any event, copies of these agreements will be 
provided by the Department upon request. For the above-stated reasons, 
the Department proposes not to publish routinely the following:
    United States Agency for International Development (USAID) 
Implementing Agreements. Consistent with the Foreign Assistance Act and 
the Agricultural Trade and Development Act of 1954, USAID negotiates 
agreements with foreign governments under which specific activities and 
programs financed with USAID-administered foreign assistance funding 
are implemented. The Department seeks to exclude all such bilateral 
``implementing'' agreements from the routine publication requirement, 
which is consistent with current practice. There is little, if any, 
public interest in these agreements.
    We note that the Department of State already forgoes the reporting 
of such agreements to Congress (under 1 U.S.C. 112b) when they involve 
grants of $25 million or less. The Department will continue to report 
to Congress those USAID agreements that exceed $25 million.
    Letters of Agreement and Memoranda of Understanding for Bilateral 
Assistance on Counter-Narcotics and Anti-Crime Cooperation. Pursuant to 
the Foreign Assistance Act and the President's constitutional 
authority, the United States negotiates bilateral agreements with other 
countries regarding the control of narcotic drugs and other anti-crime 
purposes. These agreements are of a limited and specialized nature, and 
there has been no indication of public interest in their substance.
    We note that the Department already forgoes the reporting of such 
agreements to Congress when they involve grants of less than $25 
million. The Department will continue to report to Congress those 
letters of agreement and memoranda of understanding for bilateral 
assistance over $25 million.
    Educational and Leadership Development Agreements. The U.S. 
Government enters into a number of agreements that regulate practical 
or technical arrangements for targeted programs or assignments designed 
to acquaint U.S. and foreign armed forces, law enforcement, homeland 
security, or related personnel with limited, specialized aspects of 
each other's practices or operations. These agreements are of a limited 
and specialized nature, and there has been no indication of public 
interest in their substance.
    Bilateral Aviation Technical Assistance Agreements. The United 
States enters into international agreements which provide for 
managerial, operational, and technical assistance to other countries in 
developing and modernizing their civil aviation infrastructure for 
specific aviation projects. These agreements address only identified 
aviation objectives and can sometimes be highly technical in nature. 
There has been no indication of public interest in the publication of 
these agreements.
    The Department of State does not intend to publish agreements in 
the above categories that were signed before publication of this notice 
and not previously published in the compilation entitled ``United 
States Treaties and Other International Agreements.'' Agreements in the 
above categories (except classified agreements) will continue to be 
listed in the Department of State's annual publication entitled 
``Treaties in Force.'' These four additional categories of agreements 
that meet the non-publication criteria will be reflected in four 
additional subparagraphs in 22 CFR 181.8(a).
    Sixth, we propose to add a new paragraph to 22 CFR 181.8 
(``Publication'') to implement a new, additional reporting requirement. 
In Public Law 108-458, Congress amended 1 U.S.C. 112b to add the 
following:
    (d)(1) The Secretary of State shall annually submit to Congress a 
report that contains an index of all international agreements, listed 
by country, date, title, and summary of each such agreement (including 
a description of the duration of activities under the agreement and the 
agreement itself), that the United States--
    (A) Has signed, proclaimed, or with reference to which any other 
final formality has been executed, or that has been extended or 
otherwise modified, during the preceding calendar year; and
    (B) Has not been published, or is not proposed to be published, in 
the compilation entitled ``United States Treaties and Other 
International Agreements''.
    The Department submitted such an index for the past two years and 
has taken steps to continue to meet this reporting requirement.
    Finally, the Department proposes to add a new section 22 CFR 181.9 
that implements an Internet publication requirement. Public Law 108-458 
specifically added subsection (d) to 1 U.S.C. 112a, establishing that 
``[t]he Secretary of State shall make publicly available through the 
Internet Web site of the Department of State each treaty or 
international agreement proposed to be published in the compilation 
entitled `United States Treaties and Other International Agreements' 
not later than 180 days after the date on which the treaty or agreement 
enters into force.'' The Department of State has been meeting this 
requirement by making available through its Internet FOIA webpage 
copies of those agreements reported to Congress under 1 U.S.C. 112b.

Regulatory Analysis

Administrative Procedure Act

    In accordance with provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act 
governing rules promulgated by Federal agencies that affect the public 
(5 U.S.C. 553), the Department is publishing these proposed regulations 
and inviting public comment.

Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business

    These proposed changes to the regulations are hereby certified as 
not expected to have a significant impact on a substantial number of 
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
U.S.C. 601-612, and Executive Order No. 13272, section 3(b).

The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

    These proposed regulations do not constitute a major rule, as 
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of congressional review of agency 
rulemaking under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 
of 1996, Public Law 104-121. These regulations would not result in an 
annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase 
in costs or prices; or adverse effects on competition, employment, 
investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-
based companies to compete with foreign based companies in domestic and 
export markets.

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA), 
Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires 
agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may 
result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State, 
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. These proposed 
regulations would not result in any such expenditure nor would it 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments.

[[Page 28834]]

Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism

    These regulations would not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. Nor would the regulations have federalism 
implications warranting the application of Executive Order No. 12372 
and No. 13132.

Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review

    Because a portion of this proposed rule directly involves the 
participation of OMB, the Department of State has submitted it to OMB 
for its review.

Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform

    The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections 
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, 
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce 
burden.

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each 
collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through 
regulation. The Department of State has determined that this proposal 
contains no new collection of information requirements for the purposes 
of the PRA.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 181

    Treaties.
    For the reasons set forth above, part 181 is proposed to be amended 
as follows:

PART 181--COORDINATION, REPORTING AND PUBLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL 
AGREEMENTS

    1. The authority citation for part 181 will continue to read:

    Authority: 1 U.S.C. 112a, 112b; and 22 U.S.C. 2651a.

    2. 22 CFR 181.2 is amended by:
    A. Adding a new sentence after the second sentence of paragraph (a) 
(2);
    B. Removing the third and fourth sentences of paragraph (a) (2); 
and
    C. Adding new paragraph (f).
    The additions read as follows:


Sec.  181.2  Criteria.

    (a) * * *
    (2) * * * The duration of the activities pursuant to the 
undertaking or the duration of the undertaking itself shall not be a 
factor in determining whether it constitutes an international 
agreement. * * *
* * * * *
    (f) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, 
arrangements that constitute international agreements within the 
meaning of this section include
    (1) Bilateral or multilateral counterterrorism agreements and
    (2) Bilateral agreements with a country that is subject to a 
determination under section 6(j)(1)(A) of the Export Administration Act 
of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)(A)), section 620A(a) of the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(a)), or section 40(d) of the 
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)).
    3. 22 CFR 181.4 is amended in paragraph (e) as follows:
    A. By designating the existing text as paragraph (e)(1); and
    B. Adding a new paragraph (e)(2) as follows:


Sec.  181.4  Consultations with the Secretary of State.

* * * * *
    (e) (1) * * *
    (2) If a proposed agreement embodies a commitment that could 
reasonably be expected to require (for its implementation) the issuance 
of a significant regulatory action (as defined in section 3 of 
Executive Order 12866), the agency proposing the arrangement shall 
state what arrangements have been planned or carried out concerning 
timely consultation with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
such commitment. The Department of State should receive confirmation 
that OMB has been consulted in a timely manner concerning the proposed 
commitment.
* * * * *


Sec.  181.7  [Amended]

    4. 22 CFR 181.7 is amended as follows:
    A. In paragraph (b): By removing ``Assistant Secretary of State for 
Congressional Relations'' wherever it appears and adding ``Assistant 
Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs'' in its place; and removing ``House 
Committee on Foreign Affairs'' wherever it appears and adding ``House 
Committee on International Relations'' in its place.
    B. In paragraph (c): By removing ``, the negotiations, the effect 
of the agreement,'' in the third sentence; and by removing, in the last 
sentence the phrase ``Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional 
Relations'' and adding ``Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs'', 
and removing ``House Committee on Foreign Affairs'' and adding ``House 
Committee on International Relations'' in its place.
    C. In paragraph (d), by removing ``Assistant Secretary of State for 
Congressional Relations'' wherever it appears and adding ``Assistant 
Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs'' in its place.
    5. 22 CFR 181.8 is amended as follows:
    A. By adding paragraphs (a)(10) through (13);
    B. By adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (b); and
    C. By adding a new paragraph (d) to read as follows:


Sec.  181.8  Publication.

    (a) * * *
    (10) Bilateral agreements with other governments that apply to 
specific activities and programs financed with foreign assistance funds 
administered by the United States Agency for International Development 
pursuant to the Foreign Assistance Act, as amended, and the 
Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act of 1954, as amended;
    (11) Letters of agreements and memoranda of understanding with 
other governments that apply to bilateral assistance for counter-
narcotics and other anti-crime purposes furnished pursuant to the 
Foreign Assistance Act, as amended;
    (12) Bilateral agreements that apply to specified education and 
leadership development programs designed to acquaint U.S. and foreign 
armed forces, law enforcement, homeland security, or related personnel 
with limited, specialized aspects of each other's practices or 
operations; and
    (13) Bilateral agreements between aviation agencies governing 
specified aviation technical assistance projects for the provision of 
managerial, operational, and technical assistance in developing and 
modernizing the civil aviation infrastructure;
    (b) * * * Agreements on the subjects listed in paragraphs (a)(10) 
through (13) of this section that had not been published as of [date of 
publication of final rule in Federal Register].
* * * * *
    (d) The Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs shall annually 
submit to Congress a report that contains an index of all international 
agreements, listed by country, date, title, and summary of each such 
agreement (including a description of the duration of activities under 
the agreement and the agreement itself), that the United States:
    (1) Has signed, proclaimed, or with reference to which any other 
final formality has been executed, or that has

[[Page 28835]]

been extended or otherwise modified, during the preceding calendar 
year; and
    (2) Has not been published, or is not proposed to be published, in 
the compilation entitled ``United States Treaties and Other 
International Agreements.''
    6. Add new Sec.  181.9 to read as follows:


Sec.  181.9  Internet Web site publication.

    The Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, with 
the cooperation of other bureaus in the Department, shall be 
responsible for making publicly available on the Internet Web site of 
the Department of State each treaty or international agreement proposed 
to be published in the compilation entitled ``United States Treaties 
and Other International Agreements'' not later than 180 days after the 
date on which the treaty or agreement enters into force.

    Dated: May 11, 2006.
John J. Kim,
Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E6-7596 Filed 5-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.