Publication, Coordination, and Reporting of International Agreements: Amendments, 28831-28835 [E6-7596]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
July 11, 2003; and Honeywell Service
Bulletin 7510100–34–0037, dated July 8,
2004; to ensure that the NRM is at the Mod
T configuration. Once the actions in this
paragraph are completed, the AFM revision
required by paragraph (h) of this AD may be
removed from the AFM.
Note 4: Honeywell Service Bulletin
7510100–34–A0035, dated July 11, 2003,
refers to Honeywell Service Bulletin
7510100–34–A0034, dated February 28,
2003, as an additional source of service
information for inspecting to determine the
NRM part number, marking the modification
plates of the NRM and INU accordingly,
testing the INU for discrepant signals, and
replacing the unit with a new or modified
INU, as applicable. Honeywell Service
Bulletin 7510100–34–A0034 refers to
Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510134–34–
A0016, currently at Revision 001, dated
March 4, 2003, as an additional source of
service information for marking the
modification plates of the NRM and INU.
Note 5: Honeywell Service Bulletin
7510100–34–0037, dated July 8, 2004, refers
to Honeywell Service Bulletin 7510134–34–
0018, dated July 8, 2004, as an additional
source of service information for modifying
the NRM to the Mod T configuration.
(k) If the inspection specified by paragraph
(j) of this AD is done within the compliance
time specified in paragraph (f) of this AD,
paragraph (g) of this AD does not need to be
done.
No Reporting Requirement
(l) Where Honeywell Service Bulletin
7510100–34–A0035 (or any of the related
service information referenced therein)
specifies to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
(m)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
the appropriate principal inspector in the
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding
District Office.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 9,
2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–7559 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 181
[Public Notice: 5402]
RIN 1400–AC21
Publication, Coordination, and
Reporting of International Agreements:
Amendments
State Department.
Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
28831
regulations.gov Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/index.cfm. You
must include the RIN in the subject line
of your message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
J. Kim, Assistant Legal Adviser for
Treaty Affairs, Office of the Legal
Adviser, Department of State, 202–647–
1660.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ACTION:
Background
SUMMARY: The Department of State is
proposing to update the regulations
implementing 1 U.S.C. 112a and 112b in
order to reflect amendments to the
statutes governing publication of U.S.
international agreements and their
transmittal to the Congress. It is further
proposing not to publish certain
categories of international agreements in
the compilation entitled ‘‘United States
Treaties and Other International
Agreements’’ or in the Treaties and
Other International Acts series. These
categories of agreements are of a highly
technical or specialized nature and are
of limited interest to the public. Further,
the regulations are proposed to be
amended to reflect adjustments to
certain internal procedures within the
State Department on the reporting of
international agreements to Congress.
Finally, the Department is adding a new
requirement concerning procedures for
consultation with the Secretary of State
in the negotiation and conclusion of
international agreements. Where an
international agreement could
reasonably require for its
implementation the issuance of a
significant domestic regulatory action,
agencies proposing the agreement are to
consult in a timely manner with the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), and the Department of State
should confirm that timely
consultations were undertaken.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 17, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by any of the following
methods: E-mail: treatyoffice@state.gov.
You must include the Regulatory
Identification Number (RIN) in the
subject line of your message.
Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM
submissions): An original and three
copies of comments should be sent to
the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty
Affairs, Office of the Legal Adviser,
Room 5420, Department of State,
Washington, DC 20520.
Persons with access to the internet
may also view this notice and provide
comments by going to the
Two statutes set forth the Secretary’s
unique role and important
responsibilities in the area of
publishing, coordinating, and reporting
international agreements. Pursuant to 1
U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of State is
required to publish annually a
compilation of all treaties and
international agreements to which the
United States is a party that were
signed, proclaimed, or ‘‘with reference
to which any other final formality ha[d]
been executed’’ during the calendar
year. The Secretary of State, however,
may determine that certain categories of
agreements should not be published if
certain criteria are met. Any such
determination must be published in the
Federal Register.
Under the second statute, 1 U.S.C.
112b, the Secretary of State is required
to transmit to the Congress the text of
any international agreement other than
a treaty to which the United States is a
party as soon as practicable but no later
than 60 days after it enters into force.
Those agreements that the President
determines should be classified are to be
transmitted, not to Congress as a whole,
but to the House Committee on
International Relations (at that time
called ‘‘the House Committee on
Foreign Affairs’’) and to the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee under an
injunction of secrecy. The statute
further recognizes the Secretary of
State’s special role in the negotiation
and conclusion of all U.S. international
agreements, providing that
‘‘[n]otwithstanding any other provision
of law, an international agreement may
not be signed or otherwise concluded on
behalf of the United States without prior
consultation with the Secretary of State.
Such consultation may encompass a
class of agreements rather than a
particular agreement.’’
The Department of State has issued
regulations to implement these statutory
provisions. These regulations are
codified in Part 181 of Chapter 22 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
Congress has amended both 1 U.S.C.
112a and 1 U.S.C. 112b several times,
most recently in section 7121 of the
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
28832
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Prevention Act of 2004, Public Law
108–458 (Dec. 17, 2004). This proposed
rule amends certain sections of 22 CFR
part 181 in order to reflect (1) the
changes made to 1 U.S.C. 112a and 112b
in December 2004; (2) certain changes
made to internal Departmental
procedures; (3) four additional
categories of international agreements
that meet the non-publication criteria of
1 U.S.C. 112(a).
In addition, this proposed rule
amends the procedures regarding
consultation with the Secretary of State
with respect to the negotiation and
conclusion of international agreements.
These procedures are set forth in 22 CFR
181.4 and in the Circular 175 procedure
referenced therein. In particular, if a
proposed international agreement
embodies a commitment that could
reasonably be expected to require (for its
implementation) the issuance of a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ (as
defined in section 3 of Executive Order
12866), the agency proposing the
agreement shall consult in a timely
manner with the OMB regarding such
commitment. This amendment is aimed
at ensuring that OMB is apprised of
international commitments that may
have a significant regulatory impact on
domestic entities or persons prior to the
negotiation or conclusion of the
international agreement containing the
commitment.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Discussion
First, Public Law 108–458 made
significant changes to certain legal
definitions, including a change in the
factors to be considered in assessing
whether an agreement is a reportable
international agreement under 1 U.S.C.
112a and the Case-Zablocki Act.
Subsection (e) of 1 U.S.C. 112b was
amended to provide in relevant part:
(2)(A) An arrangement shall constitute
an international agreement within the
meaning of this section * * *
irrespective of the duration of activities
under the arrangement or the
arrangement itself.
(B) Arrangements that constitute an
international agreement within the
meaning of this section * * * include
the following:
(i) A bilateral or multilateral
counterterrorism agreement.
(ii) A bilateral agreement with a
country that is subject to a
determination under section 6(j)(1)(A) of
the Export Administration Act of 1979
(50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)A), section
620A(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of
1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(a)), or section
40(d) of the Arms Export Control Act
(22 U.S.C. 2780(d)).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
We propose to amend the provisions
of 22 CFR 181.2 (which describe criteria
to be applied in determining whether an
undertaking, oral agreement, document
or set of documents constitutes an
international agreement) to incorporate
these statutory amendments.
Second, this proposed rule amends 22
CFR 181.4(e) to provide an additional
basis on which agencies must consult
with OMB prior to the negotiation or
conclusion of an international
agreement. Currently, 22 CFR 181.4(e)
states that if a proposed international
agreement embodies a commitment to
furnish funds, goods, or services that are
beyond or in addition to those
authorized in an approved budget, the
agency proposing the agreement shall
state what arrangements have been
planned or carried out concerning
consultation with OMB on such a
commitment. The Department of State
makes sure that the relevant budget
contains funds for the commitment, or
that the President has made a
determination to seek the funds.
The proposed rule adds a second
paragraph to subsection (e) to ensure
OMB consultation on proposed
international agreements that reasonably
may require, for their implementation,
significant domestic regulatory action.
OMB is responsible for overseeing and
coordinating the Administration’s
legislative initiatives and its domestic
regulatory policy. Commitments
contained in international agreements
may be implemented through domestic
regulations. This revision to subsection
(e) is designed to ensure that OMB is
consulted, in a timely manner, prior to
negotiation or conclusion of an
international agreement that contains a
commitment that reasonably could be
expected to require, for its
implementation, the issuance of a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3 of Executive Order
12866.
Third, the proposed rule amends 22
CFR 181.7 to reflect that the State
Department has modified its internal
procedures so that the Assistant Legal
Adviser for Treaty Affairs, instead of the
Assistant Secretary of State for
Congressional Relations, transmits
classified agreements to the Senate
Committee on Foreign Relations and to
the House Committee on International
Relations. Similarly, the Assistant Legal
Adviser for Treaty Affairs, instead of the
Assistant Secretary for Congressional
Relations, transmits to the Congress any
agreements between the American
Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and the
governing authorities in Taiwan, or
between AIT and an agency in the U.S.
government. In order to enhance
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
accountability and avoid the possibility
of classified agreements or agreements
involving AIT getting lost or misplaced
between the two bureaus, the
Department decided to centralize
responsibility for all Case Act reporting
in the Office of the Legal Adviser.
Fourth, as provided in section 7121(b)
of Public Law 108–458, any references
in 22 CFR 181.7 to the ‘‘House
Committee on Foreign Affairs’’ have
been replaced with the ‘‘House
Committee on International Relations,’’
which is the current name of the
committee.
Fifth, the Department proposes to
amend 22 CFR 181.8(a) to add four
additional categories of documents that
it believes no longer should be
published in ‘‘United States Treaties
and Other International Agreements’’.
As set forth in 1 U.S.C. 112a, the
Secretary of State is authorized to—
determine that publication of certain
categories of agreements is not required
if the following criteria are met:
(1) Such agreements are not treaties
which have been brought into force for
the United States after having received
Senate advice and consent pursuant to
section 2(2) of Article II of the
Constitution of the United States;
(2) The public interest in such
agreements is insufficient to justify their
publication, because (A) as of the date
of enactment of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994
and 1995, the agreements are no longer
in force; (B) the agreements do not
create private rights or duties, or
establish standards intended to govern
government action in the treatment of
private individuals; (C) in view of the
limited or specialized nature of the
public interest in such agreements, such
interest can adequately be satisfied by
an alternative means; or (D) the public
disclosure of the text of the agreement
would, in the opinion of the President,
be prejudicial to the national security of
the United States; and
(3) Copies of such agreements (other
than those in paragraph (2)(D)),
including certified copies where
necessary for litigation or similar
purposes, will be made available by the
Department of State upon request.
This statute requires publication in
the Federal Register of any such
determination that publication of
certain categories of agreements is not
required.
In selecting the following categories of
agreements, the Department has focused
on four areas comprising a large volume
of agreements that are rather specialized
and do not appear to be of general
public interest. Routine non-publication
of the following categories of
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
agreements will moderate future
publication requirements, thus
permitting agreements of greater interest
to be published in a more timely
manner. Also, these agreements do not
appear to create private rights or duties.
In any event, copies of these agreements
will be provided by the Department
upon request. For the above-stated
reasons, the Department proposes not to
publish routinely the following:
United States Agency for
International Development (USAID)
Implementing Agreements. Consistent
with the Foreign Assistance Act and the
Agricultural Trade and Development
Act of 1954, USAID negotiates
agreements with foreign governments
under which specific activities and
programs financed with USAIDadministered foreign assistance funding
are implemented. The Department seeks
to exclude all such bilateral
‘‘implementing’’ agreements from the
routine publication requirement, which
is consistent with current practice.
There is little, if any, public interest in
these agreements.
We note that the Department of State
already forgoes the reporting of such
agreements to Congress (under 1 U.S.C.
112b) when they involve grants of $25
million or less. The Department will
continue to report to Congress those
USAID agreements that exceed $25
million.
Letters of Agreement and Memoranda
of Understanding for Bilateral
Assistance on Counter-Narcotics and
Anti-Crime Cooperation. Pursuant to the
Foreign Assistance Act and the
President’s constitutional authority, the
United States negotiates bilateral
agreements with other countries
regarding the control of narcotic drugs
and other anti-crime purposes. These
agreements are of a limited and
specialized nature, and there has been
no indication of public interest in their
substance.
We note that the Department already
forgoes the reporting of such agreements
to Congress when they involve grants of
less than $25 million. The Department
will continue to report to Congress those
letters of agreement and memoranda of
understanding for bilateral assistance
over $25 million.
Educational and Leadership
Development Agreements. The U.S.
Government enters into a number of
agreements that regulate practical or
technical arrangements for targeted
programs or assignments designed to
acquaint U.S. and foreign armed forces,
law enforcement, homeland security, or
related personnel with limited,
specialized aspects of each other’s
practices or operations. These
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
agreements are of a limited and
specialized nature, and there has been
no indication of public interest in their
substance.
Bilateral Aviation Technical
Assistance Agreements. The United
States enters into international
agreements which provide for
managerial, operational, and technical
assistance to other countries in
developing and modernizing their civil
aviation infrastructure for specific
aviation projects. These agreements
address only identified aviation
objectives and can sometimes be highly
technical in nature. There has been no
indication of public interest in the
publication of these agreements.
The Department of State does not
intend to publish agreements in the
above categories that were signed before
publication of this notice and not
previously published in the compilation
entitled ‘‘United States Treaties and
Other International Agreements.’’
Agreements in the above categories
(except classified agreements) will
continue to be listed in the Department
of State’s annual publication entitled
‘‘Treaties in Force.’’ These four
additional categories of agreements that
meet the non-publication criteria will be
reflected in four additional
subparagraphs in 22 CFR 181.8(a).
Sixth, we propose to add a new
paragraph to 22 CFR 181.8
(‘‘Publication’’) to implement a new,
additional reporting requirement. In
Public Law 108–458, Congress amended
1 U.S.C. 112b to add the following:
(d)(1) The Secretary of State shall
annually submit to Congress a report
that contains an index of all
international agreements, listed by
country, date, title, and summary of
each such agreement (including a
description of the duration of activities
under the agreement and the agreement
itself), that the United States—
(A) Has signed, proclaimed, or with
reference to which any other final
formality has been executed, or that has
been extended or otherwise modified,
during the preceding calendar year; and
(B) Has not been published, or is not
proposed to be published, in the
compilation entitled ‘‘United States
Treaties and Other International
Agreements’’.
The Department submitted such an
index for the past two years and has
taken steps to continue to meet this
reporting requirement.
Finally, the Department proposes to
add a new section 22 CFR 181.9 that
implements an Internet publication
requirement. Public Law 108–458
specifically added subsection (d) to 1
U.S.C. 112a, establishing that ‘‘[t]he
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28833
Secretary of State shall make publicly
available through the Internet Web site
of the Department of State each treaty or
international agreement proposed to be
published in the compilation entitled
‘United States Treaties and Other
International Agreements’ not later than
180 days after the date on which the
treaty or agreement enters into force.’’
The Department of State has been
meeting this requirement by making
available through its Internet FOIA
webpage copies of those agreements
reported to Congress under 1 U.S.C.
112b.
Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act
In accordance with provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act governing
rules promulgated by Federal agencies
that affect the public (5 U.S.C. 553), the
Department is publishing these
proposed regulations and inviting
public comment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
These proposed changes to the
regulations are hereby certified as not
expected to have a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, and
Executive Order No. 13272, section 3(b).
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
These proposed regulations do not
constitute a major rule, as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804, for purposes of
congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, Public Law 104–121. These
regulations would not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign based companies
in domestic and export markets.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C.
1532, generally requires agencies to
prepare a statement before proposing
any rule that may result in an annual
expenditure of $100 million or more by
State, local, or tribal governments, or by
the private sector. These proposed
regulations would not result in any such
expenditure nor would it significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
28834
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism
These regulations would not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor would the
regulations have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order No. 12372 and No.
13132.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Review
Because a portion of this proposed
rule directly involves the participation
of OMB, the Department of State has
submitted it to OMB for its review.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
The Department has reviewed the
regulations in light of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from OMB for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulation. The
Department of State has determined that
this proposal contains no new collection
of information requirements for the
purposes of the PRA.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 181
Treaties.
For the reasons set forth above, part
181 is proposed to be amended as
follows:
PART 181—COORDINATION,
REPORTING AND PUBLICATION OF
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Authority: 1 U.S.C. 112a, 112b; and 22
U.S.C. 2651a.
2. 22 CFR 181.2 is amended by:
A. Adding a new sentence after the
second sentence of paragraph (a) (2);
B. Removing the third and fourth
sentences of paragraph (a) (2); and
C. Adding new paragraph (f).
The additions read as follows:
Criteria.
(a) * * *
(2) * * * The duration of the
activities pursuant to the undertaking or
the duration of the undertaking itself
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
§ 181.4
State.
Consultations with the Secretary of
*
*
*
*
*
(e) (1) * * *
(2) If a proposed agreement embodies
a commitment that could reasonably be
expected to require (for its
implementation) the issuance of a
significant regulatory action (as defined
in section 3 of Executive Order 12866),
the agency proposing the arrangement
shall state what arrangements have been
planned or carried out concerning
timely consultation with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
such commitment. The Department of
State should receive confirmation that
OMB has been consulted in a timely
manner concerning the proposed
commitment.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 181.7
1. The authority citation for part 181
will continue to read:
§ 181.2
shall not be a factor in determining
whether it constitutes an international
agreement. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Notwithstanding the other
provisions of this section, arrangements
that constitute international agreements
within the meaning of this section
include
(1) Bilateral or multilateral
counterterrorism agreements and
(2) Bilateral agreements with a
country that is subject to a
determination under section 6(j)(1)(A) of
the Export Administration Act of 1979
(50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)(A)), section
620A(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of
1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(a)), or section
40(d) of the Arms Export Control Act
(22 U.S.C. 2780(d)).
3. 22 CFR 181.4 is amended in
paragraph (e) as follows:
A. By designating the existing text as
paragraph (e)(1); and
B. Adding a new paragraph (e)(2) as
follows:
[Amended]
4. 22 CFR 181.7 is amended as
follows:
A. In paragraph (b): By removing
‘‘Assistant Secretary of State for
Congressional Relations’’ wherever it
appears and adding ‘‘Assistant Legal
Adviser for Treaty Affairs’’ in its place;
and removing ‘‘House Committee on
Foreign Affairs’’ wherever it appears
and adding ‘‘House Committee on
International Relations’’ in its place.
B. In paragraph (c): By removing ‘‘,
the negotiations, the effect of the
agreement,’’ in the third sentence; and
by removing, in the last sentence the
phrase ‘‘Assistant Secretary of State for
Congressional Relations’’ and adding
‘‘Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty
Affairs’’, and removing ‘‘House
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Committee on Foreign Affairs’’ and
adding ‘‘House Committee on
International Relations’’ in its place.
C. In paragraph (d), by removing
‘‘Assistant Secretary of State for
Congressional Relations’’ wherever it
appears and adding ‘‘Assistant Legal
Adviser for Treaty Affairs’’ in its place.
5. 22 CFR 181.8 is amended as
follows:
A. By adding paragraphs (a)(10)
through (13);
B. By adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (b); and
C. By adding a new paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
§ 181.8
Publication.
(a) * * *
(10) Bilateral agreements with other
governments that apply to specific
activities and programs financed with
foreign assistance funds administered
by the United States Agency for
International Development pursuant to
the Foreign Assistance Act, as amended,
and the Agricultural Trade Development
and Assistance Act of 1954, as
amended;
(11) Letters of agreements and
memoranda of understanding with other
governments that apply to bilateral
assistance for counter-narcotics and
other anti-crime purposes furnished
pursuant to the Foreign Assistance Act,
as amended;
(12) Bilateral agreements that apply to
specified education and leadership
development programs designed to
acquaint U.S. and foreign armed forces,
law enforcement, homeland security, or
related personnel with limited,
specialized aspects of each other’s
practices or operations; and
(13) Bilateral agreements between
aviation agencies governing specified
aviation technical assistance projects for
the provision of managerial, operational,
and technical assistance in developing
and modernizing the civil aviation
infrastructure;
(b) * * * Agreements on the subjects
listed in paragraphs (a)(10) through (13)
of this section that had not been
published as of [date of publication of
final rule in Federal Register].
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The Assistant Legal Adviser for
Treaty Affairs shall annually submit to
Congress a report that contains an index
of all international agreements, listed by
country, date, title, and summary of
each such agreement (including a
description of the duration of activities
under the agreement and the agreement
itself), that the United States:
(1) Has signed, proclaimed, or with
reference to which any other final
formality has been executed, or that has
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
been extended or otherwise modified,
during the preceding calendar year; and
(2) Has not been published, or is not
proposed to be published, in the
compilation entitled ‘‘United States
Treaties and Other International
Agreements.’’
6. Add new § 181.9 to read as follows:
§ 181.9
Internet Web site publication.
The Office of the Assistant Legal
Adviser for Treaty Affairs, with the
cooperation of other bureaus in the
Department, shall be responsible for
making publicly available on the
Internet Web site of the Department of
State each treaty or international
agreement proposed to be published in
the compilation entitled ‘‘United States
Treaties and Other International
Agreements’’ not later than 180 days
after the date on which the treaty or
agreement enters into force.
Dated: May 11, 2006.
John J. Kim,
Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–7596 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Charleston 06–070]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Lowcountry Splash,
Charleston Harbor, Charleston, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
create a temporary safety zone in the
Wando River, Cooper River, and
Charleston Harbor from Hobcaw Yacht
Club to Charleston Harbor Marina along
the coast of Mount Pleasant, SC, to
approximately 150 yards offshore,
during the Lowcountry Splash
swimming event on June 24, 2006. A
safety zone is necessary to prevent
commercial or recreational boating
traffic from interfering with swimmers
on the racecourse. This rule provides for
the safety of swimmers and vessels
transiting the area.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
June 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Charleston, Waterways
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
Management Division, Charleston,
South Carolina 29401. Comments and
material received from the public, as
well as documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, will become part of this docket
and will be available for inspection or
copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Charleston, Waterways Management
Office between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Warrant Officer James J. McHugh,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Charleston,
Waterways Management Division, (843)
724–7647.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (COTP Charleston 06–
070), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Chief
Warrant Officer James J. McHugh,
address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Lowcountry Splash is a 2.4 mile
open water swimming event in the
Wando River and Charleson Harbor,
parallel to Mt. Pleasant, SC This
regulation is needed to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waters
because of the inherent dangers
associated with an open-water
swimming event in a highly transited
body of water. The event sponsor will
provide 20–30 kayaks to keep swimmers
on course and assist the Coast Guard in
patrolling the area. This rule creates a
regulated area that will prohibit nonparticipant vessels from entering the
regulated area during the event without
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28835
the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This rule allows the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port Charleston, South
Carolina, to establish a temporary safety
zone in order to provide for a safe area
for the swimming event. The safety zone
will have patrol vessels to enforce the
zone and the event sponsor will provide
20 to 30 kayaks in order to assist the
swimmers and ensure they are staying
within the designated areas. The safety
zone is necessary to protect the
swimmers from the dangers of
commercial and recreational vessel
traffic in the vicinity of the race. Sector
Charleston will notify the maritime
community of periods during which
these safety zones will be in effect via
a broadcast notice to mariners on VHF
Marine Band Radio, Channel 16 (156.8
MHz), or by having on-scene assets
inform vessel traffic as necessary.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘Significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary, because the safety
zone will only be in effect for a limited
time and for a limited area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28831-28835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7596]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 181
[Public Notice: 5402]
RIN 1400-AC21
Publication, Coordination, and Reporting of International
Agreements: Amendments
AGENCY: State Department.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State is proposing to update the regulations
implementing 1 U.S.C. 112a and 112b in order to reflect amendments to
the statutes governing publication of U.S. international agreements and
their transmittal to the Congress. It is further proposing not to
publish certain categories of international agreements in the
compilation entitled ``United States Treaties and Other International
Agreements'' or in the Treaties and Other International Acts series.
These categories of agreements are of a highly technical or specialized
nature and are of limited interest to the public. Further, the
regulations are proposed to be amended to reflect adjustments to
certain internal procedures within the State Department on the
reporting of international agreements to Congress. Finally, the
Department is adding a new requirement concerning procedures for
consultation with the Secretary of State in the negotiation and
conclusion of international agreements. Where an international
agreement could reasonably require for its implementation the issuance
of a significant domestic regulatory action, agencies proposing the
agreement are to consult in a timely manner with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and the Department of State should confirm
that timely consultations were undertaken.
DATES: Submit comments on or before July 17, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by any of the following
methods: E-mail: treatyoffice@state.gov. You must include the
Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) in the subject line of your
message.
Mail (paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions): An original and three
copies of comments should be sent to the Assistant Legal Adviser for
Treaty Affairs, Office of the Legal Adviser, Room 5420, Department of
State, Washington, DC 20520.
Persons with access to the internet may also view this notice and
provide comments by going to the regulations.gov Web site at: https://
www.regulations.gov/index.cfm. You must include the RIN in the subject
line of your message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John J. Kim, Assistant Legal Adviser
for Treaty Affairs, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State,
202-647-1660.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Two statutes set forth the Secretary's unique role and important
responsibilities in the area of publishing, coordinating, and reporting
international agreements. Pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of
State is required to publish annually a compilation of all treaties and
international agreements to which the United States is a party that
were signed, proclaimed, or ``with reference to which any other final
formality ha[d] been executed'' during the calendar year. The Secretary
of State, however, may determine that certain categories of agreements
should not be published if certain criteria are met. Any such
determination must be published in the Federal Register.
Under the second statute, 1 U.S.C. 112b, the Secretary of State is
required to transmit to the Congress the text of any international
agreement other than a treaty to which the United States is a party as
soon as practicable but no later than 60 days after it enters into
force. Those agreements that the President determines should be
classified are to be transmitted, not to Congress as a whole, but to
the House Committee on International Relations (at that time called
``the House Committee on Foreign Affairs'') and to the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee under an injunction of secrecy. The statute further
recognizes the Secretary of State's special role in the negotiation and
conclusion of all U.S. international agreements, providing that
``[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, an international
agreement may not be signed or otherwise concluded on behalf of the
United States without prior consultation with the Secretary of State.
Such consultation may encompass a class of agreements rather than a
particular agreement.''
The Department of State has issued regulations to implement these
statutory provisions. These regulations are codified in Part 181 of
Chapter 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Congress has
amended both 1 U.S.C. 112a and 1 U.S.C. 112b several times, most
recently in section 7121 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
[[Page 28832]]
Prevention Act of 2004, Public Law 108-458 (Dec. 17, 2004). This
proposed rule amends certain sections of 22 CFR part 181 in order to
reflect (1) the changes made to 1 U.S.C. 112a and 112b in December
2004; (2) certain changes made to internal Departmental procedures; (3)
four additional categories of international agreements that meet the
non-publication criteria of 1 U.S.C. 112(a).
In addition, this proposed rule amends the procedures regarding
consultation with the Secretary of State with respect to the
negotiation and conclusion of international agreements. These
procedures are set forth in 22 CFR 181.4 and in the Circular 175
procedure referenced therein. In particular, if a proposed
international agreement embodies a commitment that could reasonably be
expected to require (for its implementation) the issuance of a
``significant regulatory action'' (as defined in section 3 of Executive
Order 12866), the agency proposing the agreement shall consult in a
timely manner with the OMB regarding such commitment. This amendment is
aimed at ensuring that OMB is apprised of international commitments
that may have a significant regulatory impact on domestic entities or
persons prior to the negotiation or conclusion of the international
agreement containing the commitment.
Discussion
First, Public Law 108-458 made significant changes to certain legal
definitions, including a change in the factors to be considered in
assessing whether an agreement is a reportable international agreement
under 1 U.S.C. 112a and the Case-Zablocki Act. Subsection (e) of 1
U.S.C. 112b was amended to provide in relevant part:
(2)(A) An arrangement shall constitute an international agreement
within the meaning of this section * * * irrespective of the duration
of activities under the arrangement or the arrangement itself.
(B) Arrangements that constitute an international agreement within
the meaning of this section * * * include the following:
(i) A bilateral or multilateral counterterrorism agreement.
(ii) A bilateral agreement with a country that is subject to a
determination under section 6(j)(1)(A) of the Export Administration Act
of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)A), section 620A(a) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(a)), or section 40(d) of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)).
We propose to amend the provisions of 22 CFR 181.2 (which describe
criteria to be applied in determining whether an undertaking, oral
agreement, document or set of documents constitutes an international
agreement) to incorporate these statutory amendments.
Second, this proposed rule amends 22 CFR 181.4(e) to provide an
additional basis on which agencies must consult with OMB prior to the
negotiation or conclusion of an international agreement. Currently, 22
CFR 181.4(e) states that if a proposed international agreement embodies
a commitment to furnish funds, goods, or services that are beyond or in
addition to those authorized in an approved budget, the agency
proposing the agreement shall state what arrangements have been planned
or carried out concerning consultation with OMB on such a commitment.
The Department of State makes sure that the relevant budget contains
funds for the commitment, or that the President has made a
determination to seek the funds.
The proposed rule adds a second paragraph to subsection (e) to
ensure OMB consultation on proposed international agreements that
reasonably may require, for their implementation, significant domestic
regulatory action. OMB is responsible for overseeing and coordinating
the Administration's legislative initiatives and its domestic
regulatory policy. Commitments contained in international agreements
may be implemented through domestic regulations. This revision to
subsection (e) is designed to ensure that OMB is consulted, in a timely
manner, prior to negotiation or conclusion of an international
agreement that contains a commitment that reasonably could be expected
to require, for its implementation, the issuance of a ``significant
regulatory action'' as defined in section 3 of Executive Order 12866.
Third, the proposed rule amends 22 CFR 181.7 to reflect that the
State Department has modified its internal procedures so that the
Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, instead of the Assistant
Secretary of State for Congressional Relations, transmits classified
agreements to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and to the
House Committee on International Relations. Similarly, the Assistant
Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, instead of the Assistant Secretary
for Congressional Relations, transmits to the Congress any agreements
between the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and the governing
authorities in Taiwan, or between AIT and an agency in the U.S.
government. In order to enhance accountability and avoid the
possibility of classified agreements or agreements involving AIT
getting lost or misplaced between the two bureaus, the Department
decided to centralize responsibility for all Case Act reporting in the
Office of the Legal Adviser.
Fourth, as provided in section 7121(b) of Public Law 108-458, any
references in 22 CFR 181.7 to the ``House Committee on Foreign
Affairs'' have been replaced with the ``House Committee on
International Relations,'' which is the current name of the committee.
Fifth, the Department proposes to amend 22 CFR 181.8(a) to add four
additional categories of documents that it believes no longer should be
published in ``United States Treaties and Other International
Agreements''. As set forth in 1 U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of State is
authorized to--determine that publication of certain categories of
agreements is not required if the following criteria are met:
(1) Such agreements are not treaties which have been brought into
force for the United States after having received Senate advice and
consent pursuant to section 2(2) of Article II of the Constitution of
the United States;
(2) The public interest in such agreements is insufficient to
justify their publication, because (A) as of the date of enactment of
the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995,
the agreements are no longer in force; (B) the agreements do not create
private rights or duties, or establish standards intended to govern
government action in the treatment of private individuals; (C) in view
of the limited or specialized nature of the public interest in such
agreements, such interest can adequately be satisfied by an alternative
means; or (D) the public disclosure of the text of the agreement would,
in the opinion of the President, be prejudicial to the national
security of the United States; and
(3) Copies of such agreements (other than those in paragraph
(2)(D)), including certified copies where necessary for litigation or
similar purposes, will be made available by the Department of State
upon request.
This statute requires publication in the Federal Register of any
such determination that publication of certain categories of agreements
is not required.
In selecting the following categories of agreements, the Department
has focused on four areas comprising a large volume of agreements that
are rather specialized and do not appear to be of general public
interest. Routine non-publication of the following categories of
[[Page 28833]]
agreements will moderate future publication requirements, thus
permitting agreements of greater interest to be published in a more
timely manner. Also, these agreements do not appear to create private
rights or duties. In any event, copies of these agreements will be
provided by the Department upon request. For the above-stated reasons,
the Department proposes not to publish routinely the following:
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Implementing Agreements. Consistent with the Foreign Assistance Act and
the Agricultural Trade and Development Act of 1954, USAID negotiates
agreements with foreign governments under which specific activities and
programs financed with USAID-administered foreign assistance funding
are implemented. The Department seeks to exclude all such bilateral
``implementing'' agreements from the routine publication requirement,
which is consistent with current practice. There is little, if any,
public interest in these agreements.
We note that the Department of State already forgoes the reporting
of such agreements to Congress (under 1 U.S.C. 112b) when they involve
grants of $25 million or less. The Department will continue to report
to Congress those USAID agreements that exceed $25 million.
Letters of Agreement and Memoranda of Understanding for Bilateral
Assistance on Counter-Narcotics and Anti-Crime Cooperation. Pursuant to
the Foreign Assistance Act and the President's constitutional
authority, the United States negotiates bilateral agreements with other
countries regarding the control of narcotic drugs and other anti-crime
purposes. These agreements are of a limited and specialized nature, and
there has been no indication of public interest in their substance.
We note that the Department already forgoes the reporting of such
agreements to Congress when they involve grants of less than $25
million. The Department will continue to report to Congress those
letters of agreement and memoranda of understanding for bilateral
assistance over $25 million.
Educational and Leadership Development Agreements. The U.S.
Government enters into a number of agreements that regulate practical
or technical arrangements for targeted programs or assignments designed
to acquaint U.S. and foreign armed forces, law enforcement, homeland
security, or related personnel with limited, specialized aspects of
each other's practices or operations. These agreements are of a limited
and specialized nature, and there has been no indication of public
interest in their substance.
Bilateral Aviation Technical Assistance Agreements. The United
States enters into international agreements which provide for
managerial, operational, and technical assistance to other countries in
developing and modernizing their civil aviation infrastructure for
specific aviation projects. These agreements address only identified
aviation objectives and can sometimes be highly technical in nature.
There has been no indication of public interest in the publication of
these agreements.
The Department of State does not intend to publish agreements in
the above categories that were signed before publication of this notice
and not previously published in the compilation entitled ``United
States Treaties and Other International Agreements.'' Agreements in the
above categories (except classified agreements) will continue to be
listed in the Department of State's annual publication entitled
``Treaties in Force.'' These four additional categories of agreements
that meet the non-publication criteria will be reflected in four
additional subparagraphs in 22 CFR 181.8(a).
Sixth, we propose to add a new paragraph to 22 CFR 181.8
(``Publication'') to implement a new, additional reporting requirement.
In Public Law 108-458, Congress amended 1 U.S.C. 112b to add the
following:
(d)(1) The Secretary of State shall annually submit to Congress a
report that contains an index of all international agreements, listed
by country, date, title, and summary of each such agreement (including
a description of the duration of activities under the agreement and the
agreement itself), that the United States--
(A) Has signed, proclaimed, or with reference to which any other
final formality has been executed, or that has been extended or
otherwise modified, during the preceding calendar year; and
(B) Has not been published, or is not proposed to be published, in
the compilation entitled ``United States Treaties and Other
International Agreements''.
The Department submitted such an index for the past two years and
has taken steps to continue to meet this reporting requirement.
Finally, the Department proposes to add a new section 22 CFR 181.9
that implements an Internet publication requirement. Public Law 108-458
specifically added subsection (d) to 1 U.S.C. 112a, establishing that
``[t]he Secretary of State shall make publicly available through the
Internet Web site of the Department of State each treaty or
international agreement proposed to be published in the compilation
entitled `United States Treaties and Other International Agreements'
not later than 180 days after the date on which the treaty or agreement
enters into force.'' The Department of State has been meeting this
requirement by making available through its Internet FOIA webpage
copies of those agreements reported to Congress under 1 U.S.C. 112b.
Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act
In accordance with provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act
governing rules promulgated by Federal agencies that affect the public
(5 U.S.C. 553), the Department is publishing these proposed regulations
and inviting public comment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
These proposed changes to the regulations are hereby certified as
not expected to have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612, and Executive Order No. 13272, section 3(b).
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
These proposed regulations do not constitute a major rule, as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
of 1996, Public Law 104-121. These regulations would not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or adverse effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-
based companies to compete with foreign based companies in domestic and
export markets.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires
agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may
result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State,
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. These proposed
regulations would not result in any such expenditure nor would it
significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
[[Page 28834]]
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism
These regulations would not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor would the regulations have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Order No. 12372
and No. 13132.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review
Because a portion of this proposed rule directly involves the
participation of OMB, the Department of State has submitted it to OMB
for its review.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each
collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through
regulation. The Department of State has determined that this proposal
contains no new collection of information requirements for the purposes
of the PRA.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 181
Treaties.
For the reasons set forth above, part 181 is proposed to be amended
as follows:
PART 181--COORDINATION, REPORTING AND PUBLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL
AGREEMENTS
1. The authority citation for part 181 will continue to read:
Authority: 1 U.S.C. 112a, 112b; and 22 U.S.C. 2651a.
2. 22 CFR 181.2 is amended by:
A. Adding a new sentence after the second sentence of paragraph (a)
(2);
B. Removing the third and fourth sentences of paragraph (a) (2);
and
C. Adding new paragraph (f).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 181.2 Criteria.
(a) * * *
(2) * * * The duration of the activities pursuant to the
undertaking or the duration of the undertaking itself shall not be a
factor in determining whether it constitutes an international
agreement. * * *
* * * * *
(f) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section,
arrangements that constitute international agreements within the
meaning of this section include
(1) Bilateral or multilateral counterterrorism agreements and
(2) Bilateral agreements with a country that is subject to a
determination under section 6(j)(1)(A) of the Export Administration Act
of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)(A)), section 620A(a) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371(a)), or section 40(d) of the
Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)).
3. 22 CFR 181.4 is amended in paragraph (e) as follows:
A. By designating the existing text as paragraph (e)(1); and
B. Adding a new paragraph (e)(2) as follows:
Sec. 181.4 Consultations with the Secretary of State.
* * * * *
(e) (1) * * *
(2) If a proposed agreement embodies a commitment that could
reasonably be expected to require (for its implementation) the issuance
of a significant regulatory action (as defined in section 3 of
Executive Order 12866), the agency proposing the arrangement shall
state what arrangements have been planned or carried out concerning
timely consultation with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
such commitment. The Department of State should receive confirmation
that OMB has been consulted in a timely manner concerning the proposed
commitment.
* * * * *
Sec. 181.7 [Amended]
4. 22 CFR 181.7 is amended as follows:
A. In paragraph (b): By removing ``Assistant Secretary of State for
Congressional Relations'' wherever it appears and adding ``Assistant
Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs'' in its place; and removing ``House
Committee on Foreign Affairs'' wherever it appears and adding ``House
Committee on International Relations'' in its place.
B. In paragraph (c): By removing ``, the negotiations, the effect
of the agreement,'' in the third sentence; and by removing, in the last
sentence the phrase ``Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional
Relations'' and adding ``Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs'',
and removing ``House Committee on Foreign Affairs'' and adding ``House
Committee on International Relations'' in its place.
C. In paragraph (d), by removing ``Assistant Secretary of State for
Congressional Relations'' wherever it appears and adding ``Assistant
Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs'' in its place.
5. 22 CFR 181.8 is amended as follows:
A. By adding paragraphs (a)(10) through (13);
B. By adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (b); and
C. By adding a new paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 181.8 Publication.
(a) * * *
(10) Bilateral agreements with other governments that apply to
specific activities and programs financed with foreign assistance funds
administered by the United States Agency for International Development
pursuant to the Foreign Assistance Act, as amended, and the
Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act of 1954, as amended;
(11) Letters of agreements and memoranda of understanding with
other governments that apply to bilateral assistance for counter-
narcotics and other anti-crime purposes furnished pursuant to the
Foreign Assistance Act, as amended;
(12) Bilateral agreements that apply to specified education and
leadership development programs designed to acquaint U.S. and foreign
armed forces, law enforcement, homeland security, or related personnel
with limited, specialized aspects of each other's practices or
operations; and
(13) Bilateral agreements between aviation agencies governing
specified aviation technical assistance projects for the provision of
managerial, operational, and technical assistance in developing and
modernizing the civil aviation infrastructure;
(b) * * * Agreements on the subjects listed in paragraphs (a)(10)
through (13) of this section that had not been published as of [date of
publication of final rule in Federal Register].
* * * * *
(d) The Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs shall annually
submit to Congress a report that contains an index of all international
agreements, listed by country, date, title, and summary of each such
agreement (including a description of the duration of activities under
the agreement and the agreement itself), that the United States:
(1) Has signed, proclaimed, or with reference to which any other
final formality has been executed, or that has
[[Page 28835]]
been extended or otherwise modified, during the preceding calendar
year; and
(2) Has not been published, or is not proposed to be published, in
the compilation entitled ``United States Treaties and Other
International Agreements.''
6. Add new Sec. 181.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 181.9 Internet Web site publication.
The Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, with
the cooperation of other bureaus in the Department, shall be
responsible for making publicly available on the Internet Web site of
the Department of State each treaty or international agreement proposed
to be published in the compilation entitled ``United States Treaties
and Other International Agreements'' not later than 180 days after the
date on which the treaty or agreement enters into force.
Dated: May 11, 2006.
John J. Kim,
Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6-7596 Filed 5-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P