Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 18A, 28842-28849 [E6-7587]
Download as PDF
28842
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
proposed rule to determine whether it is
consistent with the FMP, the MagnusonStevens Act, and other applicable law.
If that determination is affirmative,
NMFS will publish the proposed rule in
the Federal Register for public review
and comment.
Consideration of Public Comments
Comments received by the end of the
comment period on the notice of
availability of the FMP, whether
specifically directed to the FMP or the
proposed rule, will be considered by
NMFS in its decision to approve,
disapprove, or partially approve
Amendment 13C. Comments received
after that date will not be considered by
NMFS in this decision. All comments
received by NMFS on Amendment 13C
or the proposed rule during their
respective comment periods will be
addressed in the preamble of the final
rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: May 12, 2006.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–7586 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 622 and 635
RIN 0648–AN09
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;
Amendment 18A
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this proposed
rule to implement Amendment 18A to
the Fishery Management Plan for the
Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of
Mexico (Amendment 18A) prepared by
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council (Council). This proposed rule
would prohibit vessels from retaining
reef fish caught under the recreational
size and bag/possession limits when
commercial quantities of Gulf reef fish
are on board; adjust the number of
persons allowed onboard when a vessel
17:24 May 17, 2006
Comments must be received no
later than 5 p.m., eastern time, on July
3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail: 0648–
AN09.Proposed@noaa.gov. Include in
the subject line the following document
identifier: 0648–AN09.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Peter Hood, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
• Fax: 727–824–5308; Attention: Peter
Hood.
Copies of the Amendment 18A, which
includes a Regulatory Impact Review
(RIR), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA), and an Environmental
Assessment, may be obtained from the
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council, 2203 N. Lois Avenue, Suite
1100, Tampa, FL 33607; telephone: 813–
348–1630; fax: 813–348–1711; e-mail:
gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org. Copies of
the amendments may also be
DATES:
[Docket No. 060425111–6111–01; I.D.
041906B]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
with both commercial and charter
vessel/headboat reef fish permits and a
Certificate of Inspection (COI) is fishing
commercially; prohibit use of Gulf reef
fish, except sand perch or dwarf sand
perch, as bait in any commercial or
recreational fishery in the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) of the Gulf of
Mexico, with a limited exception for
crustacean trap fisheries; require a
NMFS-approved vessel monitoring
system (VMS) on board vessels with
Federal commercial permits for Gulf
reef fish, including charter vessels/
headboats with such commercial
permits; and require owners and
operators of vessels with Federal
commercial or charter vessel/headboat
permits for Gulf reef fish to comply with
sea turtle and smalltooth sawfish release
protocols, possess on board specific gear
to ensure proper release of such species,
and comply with guidelines for proper
care and release of incidentally caught
sawfish and sea turtles. NMFS is also
proposing to require annual permit
application rather than application
every 2 years (biennial). In addition,
Amendment 18A would revise the total
allowable catch (TAC) framework
procedure to reflect current practices
and terminology. The intended effects of
this proposed rule are to improve
enforceability and monitoring in the reef
fish fishery in the Gulf of Mexico and
to reduce mortality of incidentally
caught sea turtles and smalltooth
sawfish.
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
downloaded from the Council’s Web
site at www.gulfcouncil.org.
Comments regarding the burden-hour
estimates or other aspects of the
collection-of-information requirements
contained in this proposed rule may be
submitted in writing to Jason Rueter at
the Southeast Regional Office address
and to David Rostker, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), by email at DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or
by fax to 202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Hood, telephone: 727–824–5305;
fax: 727–824–5308; e-mail:
Peter.Hood@noaa.gov.
The
fishery for reef fish is managed under
the Fishery Management Plan for the
Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of
Mexico (FMP) that was prepared by the
Council. The FMP was approved by
NMFS and implemented under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by
regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This proposed rule is intended to
resolve several issues related to
monitoring and enforcement of existing
regulations and to reduce bycatch
mortality of incidentally caught
endangered sea turtles and smalltooth
sawfish. In addition, Amendment 18A
would update the framework procedure
for setting TAC to reflect current
terminology and stock assessment
procedures.
Simultaneous Commercial and
Recreational Harvest on a Vessel
This proposed rule would improve
enforceability of the prohibition on sale
of reef fish caught under the recreational
bag limit by prohibiting persons aboard
a vessel with a commercial reef fish
permit from retaining reef fish species
caught under recreational size and
possession limits when the vessel has
commercial quantities, i.e., fish in
excess of applicable bag/possession
limits, of any Gulf reef fish species
aboard. By prohibiting retention of
recreational reef fish catches on a
commercial fishing trip, this alternative
adds an at-sea component to
enforcement of the prohibition on sale
of recreationally caught reef fish. This
measure also makes consistent across all
reef fish the rules regarding retention of
recreationally harvested fish on a
commercial fishing vessel. Regulations
for red grouper, gag, and black grouper
specifically prohibit commercial reef
fish vessels from possessing those
species during the February 15 to March
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
15 closed season, but possession of
recreational bag limits is allowed during
a quota closure for those species, and for
other reef fish during any commercial
closure of that species. This action
explicitly prohibits retention of
recreational bag limits of Gulf reef fish
on board a vessel that possesses
commercial quantities of Gulf reef fish.
Maximum Crew Size on a Charter
Vessel/Headboat When Fishing
Commercially
This proposed rule would resolve the
discrepancy between United States
Coast Guard (USCG) minimum crew
size regulations and NMFS’ maximum
crew size regulations, and address
potential safety issues related to
spearfishing under the maximum crew
size restrictions of the existing NMFS
regulations. The USCG regulations
currently require a minimum of four
persons (two captains and two crew)
when a vessel with a COI is out over 12
hours. NMFS’ current fishing
regulations limit the maximum number
of persons on board to three when a
vessel with both a commercial and
charter vessel/headboat permit is fishing
commercially. Since some charter
vessels and headboats must have a COI
in order to carry passengers for hire, this
creates a discrepancy in the regulations
for dual-permitted vessels, and there is
a need to resolve this discrepancy. In
addition, the Council received a request
from the operator of a dual-permitted
vessel who spearfishes commercially to
allow a crew size of four persons when
commercially spearfishing, so that for
safety purposes, there could be two
persons in the boat while there are two
divers in the water.
This proposed rule would address
these crew size issues by revising the
definitions of ‘‘Charter vessel’’ and
‘‘Headboat’’ to clarify that a vessel that
has a charter vessel/headboat permit for
Gulf reef fish, a commercial vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish, and a valid COI
issued by the USCG to carry passengers
for hire will not be considered to be
operating as a charter vessel/headboat
provided: (1) It is not carrying a
passenger who pays a fee; and (2) When
underway for more than 12 hours, that
vessel meets but does not exceed the
minimum manning requirements
outlined in its COI for vessels underway
over 12 hours; or when underway for
not more than 12 hours, that vessel
meets the minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI for
vessels underway for not more than 12hours (if any), and does not exceed the
minimum manning requirements
outlined in its COI for vessels that are
underway for more than 12 hours. A
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
vessel with a commercial vessel permit
for king mackerel and/or Spanish
mackerel and a charter vessel/headboat
permit for Gulf coastal migratory pelagic
fish would still be subject to the 3–
person maximum crew size limit if the
vessel has commercial quantities of
mackerel onboard, regardless of whether
the vessel also has a Gulf reef fish
charter vessel/headboat permit, a
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish, or commercial quantities of Gulf
reef fish onboard.
Use of Reef Fish in or from the EEZ for
Bait
It is illegal to cut up reef fish at sea
for use as bait. However, it is not illegal
to use cut up reef fish that were
purchased as bait on shore, nor is it
illegal to use a whole reef fish provided
it complies with applicable size and bag
limits. Allowing cut up reef fish to be
used when purchased compromises
enforcement of the rules prohibiting the
cutting up of reef fish caught at sea
because it is difficult to differentiate
between the two.
This proposed rule would prohibit
using any species in the reef fish
management unit or parts thereof,
except sand perch and dwarf sand
perch, as bait in any commercial or
recreational fishery. A limited exception
to this prohibition would be provided
for reef fish carcasses and offal to be
used for bait in trap fisheries for blue
crab, stone crab, deep-water crab, and
spiny lobster, unless such use was
otherwise restricted.
Vessel Monitoring System
The Reef Fish FMP contains several
area-specific regulations where fishing
is restricted or prohibited to protect
habitat or spawning aggregations, or to
reduce fishing pressure in areas that are
heavily fished. Unlike size, bag, and trip
limits, where the catch can be
monitored onshore when a vessel
returns to port, area restrictions require
at-sea enforcement. However, at-sea
enforcement of offshore area restrictions
is difficult due to the distance from
shore and limited number of patrol
vessels. There is a need to improve
enforceability of area fishing restrictions
through electronic methods.
This proposed rule would require
permitted commercial reef fish vessels,
including charter vessel/headboats with
commercial reef fish vessel permits even
when under charter, to be equipped
with an operating VMS approved by
NMFS for the Gulf reef fish fishery. An
operating VMS includes an operating
mobile transmitting unit on the vessel
and a functioning communication link
between the unit and NMFS as provided
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28843
by a NMFS-approved communication
service provider. NMFS would publish
in the Federal Register a list of
approved VMS mobile transmitting
units and associated communication
service providers that meet the
minimum standards for the Gulf reef
fish fishery. Upon installation of an
approved transmitting unit by a
qualified marine electrician and
activation of the communication
services, a vessel owner or operator
would be required to submit to NMFS,
Office of Enforcement, Southeast
Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701, a statement
certifying compliance with an
installation and activation checklist and
a vendor-completed installation
certification checklist that would be
available from NMFS. The VMS would
be required to transmit a signal
indicating the vessel’s accurate position
at least once per hour and must function
7 days a week, 24 hours a day unless
exempted by NMFS under the power
down exemption of the NOAA
Enforcement Draft Vessel Monitoring
System Requirements that is included as
Appendix E to Amendment 18A. Prior
to departure for each trip, a vessel
owner or operator would be required to
report to NMFS any fishery the vessel
would participate in on that trip and the
specific type(s) of fishing gear, using
NMFS-defined gear codes, that would
be on board the vessel. This information
could be reported via NMFS’ toll-free
number, 888–219–9228, or via an
attached VMS terminal. The vessel
owner would be responsible for the cost
of the VMS equipment, installation,
maintenance, and month-to-month
communications. These VMS
requirements would apply throughout
the Gulf of Mexico. Compliance with
the VMS requirements would be
required 120 days after publication of
the final rule implementing Amendment
18A.
Vessels fishing exclusively with fish
traps would be exempted from the VMS
requirement through February 7, 2007,
but would remain subject to mandatory
trip origination and termination
reporting requirements through
February 7, 2007. The use of fish traps
in the Gulf reef fishery is prohibited
after February 7, 2007.
Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish
Bycatch
NMFS concluded in a biological
opinion that reasonable and prudent
measures should be taken to minimize
stress and increase survival rates of any
sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish taken
in the reef fish fishery. Therefore,
measures are needed to comply with the
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
28844
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
biological opinion and to enhance the
protection of endangered sea turtles and
smalltooth sawfish.
This proposed rule would require
vessels with commercial or charter
vessel/headboat permits for Gulf reef
fish to possess a document provided by
NMFS titled, ‘‘Careful Release Protocols
for Sea Turtle Release With Minimal
Injury’’; post the sea turtle handling and
release guidelines provided by NMFS
on the vessel; follow specified release
handling measures for any smalltooth
sawfish that are caught incidentally; and
have sea turtle release gear onboard.
Measure Proposed by NMFS
NMFS is proposing to revise the
renewal requirements applicable to all
Magnuson-Stevens Act vessel permits,
licenses, endorsements, and dealer
permits issued by NMFS’ Southeast
Regional Office, including applicable
highly migratory species permits, to
require submission of an application
every year rather than requiring
submission only every two years (i.e.,
biennial application). NMFS believes
that requiring an annual application
would: Provide better permit
accountability, particularly regarding
permit transfers; provide for better
verification of permit application data;
and simplify permit financial
accounting through annual application
payments. Fees for annual application
would be half of the current biennial
fee; therefore, there would be no
increased cost to applicants.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Modifications to the TAC Framework
Procedure
In addition to the measures contained
in this proposed rule as discussed
above, Amendment 18A proposes to
modify the framework procedure for
setting TAC by incorporating the
Southeast Data, Assessment, and
Review (SEDAR) process and adopting
minor wording changes to update the
terminology in the framework. The
administrative procedures for setting
TAC have changed with the
development of SEDAR to assess stock
status. The framework procedure
currently specifies that the Reef Fish
Stock Assessment Panel (RFSAP)
evaluate stock assessments and
recommend acceptable biological catch
(ABC) ranges. However, the RFSAP has
been discontinued, and stock
assessments and ABC recommendations
are now conducted through the SEDAR
process. In addition, some of the
terminology and agency or department
names have changed since the last
revision of the framework procedure
and must be updated accordingly.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
Classification
At this time, NMFS has not
determined whether Amendment 18A,
which this proposed rule would
implement, is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable laws. NMFS, in making that
determination, will take into account
the data, views, and comments received
during the comment periods on this
amendment and on this proposed rule.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required
by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The IRFA describes the
economic impact this proposed rule, if
adopted, would have on small entities.
A description of the action, why it is
being considered, and the legal basis for
this action are contained at the
beginning of this section in the
preamble and in the SUMMARY section
of the preamble. A copy of the full
analysis is available from the Council
office (see ADDRESSES). A summary of
the analysis follows.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides
the statutory basis for the proposed rule.
The proposed rule would: (1) Continue
allowing vessels to possess both
commercial and for-hire vessel permits
but disallow retention of reef fish
species caught under recreational size
and possession limits when the vessel
has commercial harvests of any reef fish
species aboard; (2) allow a charter
vessel/headboat with a USCG COI to
increase its crew size but not in excess
of its minimum manning requirements
outlined in its COI when fishing for reef
fish under its commercial fishing
license; (3) prohibit the use of any
species in the reef fish management unit
or parts thereof as bait, with certain
exceptions; (4) require the use of VMS
systems Gulf-wide for all commercially
permitted reef fish vessels, including
charter vessels with commercial reef
fish permits; and (5) require vessels
with commercial and/or charter vessel/
headboat reef fish permits to comply
with sea turtle and smalltooth sawfish
release protocols, possess a set of release
gear required by the NMFS’ Office of
Protected Resources (OPR), and comply
with specific guidelines for the proper
care of incidentally caught sawfish.
The main objectives of the proposed
rule are to resolve certain issues related
to monitoring and enforcement of
existing regulations and reduce bycatch
mortality of incidentally caught
endangered sea turtles and smalltooth
sawfish.
The proposed rule would impact
three types of businesses in the Gulf reef
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
fish fishery, namely, commercial fishing
vessels, recreational for-hire vessels,
and fish dealers. At present, the
commercial reef fish permits are under
a license limitation program, and forhire reef fish permits are under a
moratorium, which is proposed to be
converted into a license limitation
under a separate amendment. Hence, no
new commercial or for-hire reef fish
permits will be issued when
Amendment 18A is implemented.
Currently, there are 1,145 commercial
and 1,574 for-hire active vessel permits
for the Gulf reef fish fishery. Of these
permittees, 237 vessels have both
commercial and for-hire vessel permits.
Reef fish dealers in the Gulf are required
to obtain permits to handle reef fish
caught in the Gulf. There are currently
227 dealers permitted to buy and sell
reef fish caught in the Gulf. The
proposed rule is expected to affect these
commercial vessels, for-hire vessels, and
fish dealers. The direct effects on
dealers would mainly come from the
restriction of bait use and only to the
extent that dealers supply bait to some
fishermen. Data are not available to
quantify the extent of this impact.
Average annual gross receipts of
commercial reef fish vessels in the Gulf
range from $24,095 for low-volume
vertical line vessels to $116,989 for
high-volume longline vessels. The
corresponding annual net incomes range
from $4,479 for low-volume vertical line
vessels to $28,466 for high-volume
vertical line vessels. Permit records
indicate that the maximum number of
commercial reef fish permits owned by
any single entity is six, so at the
maximum this entity would generate a
total of $701,934 in gross receipts. For
the for-hire vessels, gross annual
receipts range from $76,960 for charter
vessels to $404,172 for headboats. The
corresponding annual operating profits
range from $36,758 for charter vessels to
$338,209 for headboats. Permit records
indicate a maximum of 12 permits held
by any single entity. At a maximum, this
entity would generate a total of
$4,850,064 in gross receipts. A fishing
business is considered a small entity if
it is independently owned and operated
and not dominant in its field of
operation, and if it has annual receipts
not in excess of $4.0 million in the case
of commercial harvesting entities or
$6.5 million in the case of for-hire
entities. Relative to these thresholds,
both the commercial vessel and for-hire
vessel entities affected by the proposed
rule are determined to be small business
entities.
According to a survey of reef fish
processors, employment (both part and
full time) by all reef fish processors in
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
the Southeast totaled 700 individuals.
There is no information regarding
employment by fish dealers, although it
is safe to assume that dealers employ
fewer individuals than processors. A
seafood processor (fish dealer) is a small
business if it is independently owned
and operated, not dominant in its field
of operation, and employs 500 (100) or
fewer persons on a full-time, part-time,
temporary, or other basis. Given the
employment information, it is very
unlikely for any processor that holds a
reef fish dealer permit to employ 500 or
more persons. Although there are no
actual data on employment by fish
dealers, between 1997 and 2000, on
average, in excess of 100 reef fish
dealers operated in the Gulf. It is
assumed that all processors must be
dealers, yet a dealer need not be a
processor. Total dealer employment,
therefore, is expected to be slightly more
than 700 individuals. Given the number
of reef fish dealers and estimates of
dealer employment, it is unlikely any
dealer employs more than 100 persons.
Based on earnings information, the
commercial and recreational fishing
business entities affected by the
proposed rule are determined to be
small business entities. It is also very
likely that most, if not all, permitted fish
dealers affected by the proposed rule are
also small business entities. However, as
previously noted, this proposed rule’s
direct effects on dealers would mainly
come from the restriction of bait use and
only to the extent that dealers supply
bait to some fishermen. Data are not
available to quantify the extent of this
impact. Allowing vessels to be dually
permitted (commercial and for-hire)
would enable some 227 vessels to
continue their usual operations.
Disallowing these vessels to possess
recreationally caught reef fish when
commercial quantities of reef fish are
aboard would improve enforcement
without significantly impacting the
operations of these dually permitted
vessels. Allowing a for-hire vessel to
increase its crew size but not in excess
of its minimum manning requirements
outlined in its COI affords flexibility in
operation and helps to assure safety at
sea of the crew, particularly for vessels
using spearfish gear. This would also
eliminate the discrepancy between
current fishing rules and USCG
requirements with respect to crew size
of for-hire vessels. The prohibition on
the use of reef fish, except sand perch
and dwarf sand perch, as bait reinforces
the current ban on cutting up reef fish
at sea and regulations on bait. The
economic impact of this provision on
commercial and for-hire vessels cannot
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
be estimated but is expected to be
relatively small. The VMS requirement
is expected to improve the efficacy of
enforcement efforts and the
effectiveness and timeliness of at-sea
rescue efforts. One-time and recurring
costs would be incurred by all
commercial reef fish vessels, including
for-hire vessels with commercial reef
fish permits. First-year compliance costs
range from $2,032 to $3,651 per vessel.
These costs could be substantial,
particularly relative to the profits of
small-time vessel operations. The
various requirements addressing the
bycatch issue relative to sea turtles and
smalltooth sawfish would affect all
commercial and for-hire vessels in the
reef fish fishery. Out-of-pocket expenses
are estimated between $267 and $459
per vessel. These are mainly costs for
equipping vessels with the required
gear. Because some of the gear would
last for some time, costs would in effect
be spread over a number of years.
The proposed rule would alter some
reporting, record-keeping, and other
compliance requirements. The VMS
requirement would affect all vessels
with commercial and/or for-hire reef
fish permits. Including installation by a
qualified marine electrician, equipment
costs range from $1,600 to $2,900 per
vessel. In addition, yearly
communication costs range from $432 to
$751 per vessel. The proposed rule also
contains changes to the application
process for renewal of permits.
However, the new requirement for
yearly application is not expected to
alter burden time or costs to
respondents. The availability of the
permit renewal application as an on-line
document, as well as the reduced
burden time attributable to the changes
of the income qualification affidavit,
should offset any increases in burden
hours generated by the yearly renewal.
Permit applications would cost half of
their previous amount, but would be
required twice as often, thereby offsetting any changes in overall cost.
Compliance with sea turtle and
smalltooth sawfish release protocols
would also affect all vessels with
commercial and/or for-hire reef fish
permits. Costs range from $267 to $459
per vessel.
Other than the provision on vessel
manning requirements, which removes
the conflict between NMFS and USCG
regulations, no other Federal rules have
been identified that would duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the proposed
rule.
The proposed rule is expected to
affect a substantial number of small
entities. A total of 908 commercial
vessels only, 1,337 for-hire vessels only,
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28845
and 237 commercial/for-hire vessels
would be affected. Since practically all
entities affected by the proposed rule
are small entities, the issue of
disproportional effects on small versus
large entities does not arise. Mainly
because of the VMS requirement, for
which compliance costs range from
$1,600 to $2,900 per vessel, and the sea
turtle and smalltooth sawfish release
protocols, for which compliance costs
range from $267 to $459 per vessel, the
proposed rule would have substantial
adverse impacts on the profitability of
affected vessels, particularly the smaller
and marginal operations.
This amendment considered several
alternatives to the proposed rule. For
vessels with both commercial and forhire reef fish permits (dual-permitted
vessels), two other alternatives have
been considered. Alternative 1 (status
quo) continues to allow vessels to be
dually permitted, but it does not resolve
the problem of identifying whether
caught fish are saleable (commercial
trip) or not (charter trip). Alternative 3,
which would preclude a vessel from
being dual-permitted, would adversely
affect the fishing operations of dualpermitted vessels by forcing them to
divest of either the commercial or forhire permit. Regarding crew size of forhire vessels fishing under their
commercial permits, four other
alternatives have been considered.
Alternative 1 (status quo), which limits
for-hire vessel crew size to 3 persons,
would not be compatible with minimum
USCG manning requirements.
Alternative 3, which is similar to the
proposed rule except for spearfishing
vessels, would benefit the spearfishing
vessels but at the same time make the
crew size for these vessels incompatible
with USCG manning requirements.
Alternative 4, which allows a maximum
crew size of 4 persons, would also be
incompatible with USCG manning
requirements. Alternative 5, which
removes the maximum crew size
requirements for dual-permitted vessels,
creates the same enforcement problem
as the status quo and also allows a
potential increase in fishing effort.
Regarding use of reef fish as bait, two
other alternatives (with various subalternatives) have been considered.
Alternative 1 (status quo), which allows
whole reef fish that meet the specified
requirements for bait or cut-up reef fish
purchased at shore for bait, complicates
the enforcement of the ban on cutting
up reef fish at sea and potentially
increases the mortality of certain reef
fish species. Alternative 3, which
effectively requires enforcement
officials to identify reef fish species
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
28846
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
used as bait before assessing any
potential violation, would tend to
complicate enforcement. For the VMS
requirement, two other alternatives have
been considered. Alternative 1 (status
quo), which does not require VMS, is
the least costly to small entities, but it
does not address vital enforcement and
rescue-at-sea issues. Similar to the
proposed rule, Alternative 3 requires
VMS, but vessel owners would shoulder
only the yearly communication costs. If
government resources are available, this
alternative would be better for the
industry than the proposed rule.
Regarding sea turtle and smalltooth
sawfish bycatch, five other alternatives
have been considered. Alternative 1
(status quo) is the least costly of all
alternatives to small entities, but it
would not address the bycatch of sea
turtles and smalltooth sawfish in
commercial and for-hire reef fish
vessels. Alternative 2, which requires
commercial vessels to abide by the
release protocols in effect in the HMS
bottom longline fishery, would impose
a compliance cost ranging from $202 to
$380. Alternative 3, which requires the
commercial reef fish fleet to comply
with the more stringent requirement in
place in the HMS pelagic longline
fishery, would carry a compliance cost
of $712 to $1,282 per vessel. Alternative
4 requires for-hire reef fish vessels to
comply with either the less stringent
release protocol as in Alternative 2 or
the more stringent release protocol as in
Alternative 3. The corresponding
compliance costs per vessel would be
similar to those in Alternative 2 or 3.
Alternative 5, which requires
commercial and for-hire reef fish vessels
to comply with the sea turtle release
protocols in place for the Atlantic HMS
bottom longline vessels, would impose
a compliance cost of $202 to $380 per
vessel.
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA)--namely, requirements for: (1)
VMS installation; (2) completion and
submission of certification of VMS
installation and activation; (3)
transmission of position reports; (4)
fishing activity reports; (5) annual
maintenance of VMS; (6) submission of
requests for power down exemptions;
and (7) annual renewal of all permits.
These requirements have been
submitted to OMB for approval. The
public reporting burdens per response
for these collections of information are
estimated to average 4 hours, 15
minutes, 24 seconds, 1 minute, 2 hours,
10 minutes, and 15 minutes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
respectively. These estimates of the
public reporting burdens include the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collections of information. Public
comment is sought regarding: Whether
these proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimates;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collections of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to NMFS and
to OMB (see ADDRESSES) and by e-mail
to DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or fax
to 202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
50 CFR Part 635
Endangered and threatened species,
Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels,
Foreign relations, Intergovernmental
relations, Penalties, Statistics, Treaties.
Dated: May 12, 2006.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR parts 622 and 635 are
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.2, the definitions of
‘‘Charter vessel’’ and ‘‘Headboat’’ are
revised in alphabetical order to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 622.2
Definitions and acronyms.
*
*
*
*
*
Charter vessel means a vessel less
than 100 gross tons (90.8 mt) that is
subject to the requirements of the USCG
to carry six or fewer passengers for hire
and that engages in charter fishing at
any time during the calendar year. A
charter vessel with a commercial
permit, as required under § 622.4(a)(2),
is considered to be operating as a
charter vessel when it carries a
passenger who pays a fee or when there
are more than three persons aboard,
including operator and crew. However,
a charter vessel that has a charter vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish, a commercial
vessel permit for Gulf reef fish, and a
valid Certificate of Inspection (COI)
issued by the USCG to carry passengers
for hire will not be considered to be
operating as a charter vessel provided—
(1) It is not carrying a passenger who
pays a fee; and
(2) When underway for more than 12
hours, that vessel meets, but does not
exceed the minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI for
vessels underway over 12 hours; or
when underway for not more than 12
hours, that vessel meets the minimum
manning requirements outlined in its
COI for vessels underway for not more
than 12-hours (if any), and does not
exceed the minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI for
vessels that are underway for more than
12 hours.
*
*
*
*
*
Headboat means a vessel that holds a
valid Certificate of Inspection (COI)
issued by the USCG to carry more than
six passengers for hire.
(1) A headboat with a commercial
vessel permit, as required under
§ 622.4(a)(2), is considered to be
operating as a headboat when it carries
a passenger who pays a fee or—
(i) In the case of persons aboard
fishing for or possessing South Atlantic
snapper-grouper, when there are more
persons aboard than the number of crew
specified in the vessel’s COI; or
(ii) In the case of persons aboard
fishing for or possessing coastal
migratory pelagic fish, when there are
more than three persons aboard,
including operator and crew.
(2)However a vessel that has a
headboat permit for Gulf reef fish, a
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish, and a valid COI issued by the
USCG to carry passengers for hire will
not be considered to be operating as a
headboat provided—
(i) It is not carrying a passenger who
pays a fee; and
(ii) When underway for more than 12
hours, that vessel meets, but does not
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
exceed the minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI for
vessels underway over 12 hours; or
when underway for not more than 12
hours, that vessel meets the minimum
manning requirements outlined in its
COI for vessels underway for not more
than 12-hours (if any), and does not
exceed the minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI for
vessels that are underway for more than
12 hours.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 622.4, paragraph (h)(1) is
revised, and a sentence is added at the
end of paragraph (m)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 622.4
Permits and fees.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(1) Vessel permits, licenses, and
endorsements and dealer permits. A
vessel owner or dealer who has been
issued a permit, license, or endorsement
under this section must renew such
permit, license, or endorsement on an
annual basis. The RA will mail a vessel
owner or dealer whose permit, license,
or endorsement is expiring an
application for renewal approximately 2
months prior to the expiration date. A
vessel owner or dealer who does not
receive a renewal application from the
RA by 45 days prior to the expiration
date of the permit, license, or
endorsement must contact the RA and
request a renewal application. The
applicant must submit a completed
renewal application form and all
required supporting documents to the
RA prior to the applicable deadline for
renewal of the permit, license, or
endorsement and at least 30 days prior
to the date on which the applicant
desires to have the permit made
effective. If the RA receives an
incomplete application, the RA will
notify the applicant of the deficiency. If
the applicant fails to correct the
deficiency within 30 days of the date of
the RA’s letter of notification, the
application will be considered
abandoned. A permit, license, or
endorsement that is not renewed within
the applicable deadline will not be
reissued.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(1) * * * An application for renewal
or transfer of a commercial vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish will not be
considered complete until proof of
purchase, installation, activation, and
operational status of an approved VMS
for the vessel receiving the permit has
been verified by NMFS VMS personnel.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
4. In § 622.7, paragraph (ff) is added
to read as follows:
§ 622.7
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(ff) Fail to comply with the protected
species conservation measures as
specified in § 622.10.
5. Section 622.9 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 622.9 Vessel monitoring systems
(VMSs).
(a) Requirements for use of a VMS—
(1) South Atlantic rock shrimp. An
owner or operator of a vessel that has
been issued a limited access
endorsement for South Atlantic rock
shrimp must ensure that such vessel has
an operating VMS approved by NMFS
for use in the South Atlantic rock
shrimp fishery on board when on a trip
in the South Atlantic. An operating
VMS includes an operating mobile
transmitting unit on the vessel and a
functioning communication link
between the unit and NMFS as provided
by a NMFS-approved communication
service provider.
(2) Gulf reef fish. An owner or
operator of a vessel that has been issued
a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish, including a charter vessel/headboat
issued such a permit even when under
charter, must ensure that such vessel
has an operating VMS approved by
NMFS for use in the Gulf reef fish
fishery on board at all times whether or
not the vessel is underway, unless
exempted by NMFS under the power
down exemption of the NOAA
Enforcement Draft Vessel Monitoring
System Requirements as included in
Appendix E to Final Amendment 18A to
the Fishery Management Plan for the
Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of
Mexico. The NOAA Enforcement Draft
Vessel Monitoring System Requirements
document is available from NMFS,
Office of Enforcement, Southeast
Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701; phone: 800–758–
4833. An operating VMS includes an
operating mobile transmitting unit on
the vessel and a functioning
communication link between the unit
and NMFS as provided by a NMFSapproved communication service
provider. Unless exempted under the
power down exemption, a VMS must
transmit a signal indicating the vessel’s
accurate position at least once an hour,
24 hours a day every day. Prior to
departure for each trip, a vessel owner
or operator must report to NMFS any
fishery the vessel will participate in on
that trip and the specific type(s) of
fishing gear, using NMFS-defined gear
codes, that will be on board the vessel.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28847
This information may be reported to
NMFS using the toll-free number, 888–
219–9228, or via an attached VMS
terminal. The VMS requirements of this
paragraph apply throughout the Gulf of
Mexico. An owner or operator of a
vessel that has been issued a
commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish with a fish trap endorsement and
that fishes exclusively with fish traps is
exempt from the VMS requirements of
this paragraph through February 7,
2007.
(b) Installation and activation of a
VMS. Only a VMS that has been
approved by NMFS for the applicable
fishery may be used, and the VMS must
be installed by a qualified marine
electrician. When installing and
activating the NMFS-approved VMS, or
when reinstalling and reactivating such
VMS, the vessel owner or operator
must—
(1) Follow procedures indicated on a
NMFS-approved installation and
activation checklist for the applicable
fishery, which is available from NMFS,
Office of Enforcement, Southeast
Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701; phone: 800–758–
4833; and
(2) Submit to NMFS, Office of
Enforcement, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701,
a statement certifying compliance with
the checklist, as prescribed on the
checklist.
(3) Submit to NMFS, Office of
Enforcement, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701,
a vendor-completed installation
certification checklist, which is
available from NMFS, Office of
Enforcement, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
phone: 800–758–4833.
(c) Interference with the VMS. No
person may interfere with, tamper with,
alter, damage, disable, or impede the
operation of the VMS, or attempt any of
the same.
(d) Interruption of operation of the
VMS. When a vessel’s VMS is not
operating properly, the owner or
operator must immediately contact
NMFS, Office of Enforcement, Southeast
Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701, phone: 800–758–
4833, and follow instructions from that
office. If notified by NMFS that a
vessel’s VMS is not operating properly,
the owner and operator must follow
instructions from that office. In either
event, such instructions may include,
but are not limited to, manually
communicating to a location designated
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
28848
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
by NMFS the vessel’s positions or
returning to port until the VMS is
operable.
(e) Access to position data. As a
condition of authorized fishing for or
possession of fish in a fishery subject to
VMS requirements in this section, a
vessel owner or operator subject to the
requirements for a VMS in this section
must allow NMFS, the USCG, and their
authorized officers and designees access
to the vessel’s position data obtained
from the VMS.
6. In subpart A, § 622.10 is added to
read as follows:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
§ 622.10 Conservation measures for
protected resources.
(a) Atlantic dolphin and wahoo
pelagic longliners. The owner or
operator of a vessel for which a
commercial permit for Atlantic dolphin
and wahoo has been issued, as required
under § 622.4(a)(2)(xii), and that has on
board a pelagic longline must post
inside the wheelhouse the sea turtle
handling and release guidelines
provided by NMFS. Such owner or
operator must also comply with the sea
turtle bycatch mitigation measures,
including gear requirements and sea
turtle handling requirements, as
specified in § 635.21(c)(5)(i) and (ii) of
this chapter, respectively. For the
purpose of this paragraph, a vessel is
considered to have pelagic longline gear
on board when a power-operated
longline hauler, a mainline, floats
capable of supporting the mainline, and
leaders (gangions) with hooks are on
board. Removal of any one of these
elements constitutes removal of pelagic
longline gear.
(b) Gulf reef fish commercial vessels
and charter vessels/headboats—(1) Sea
turtle conservation measures. The
owner or operator of a vessel for which
a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef
fish or a charter vessel/headboat permit
for Gulf reef fish has been issued, as
required under §§ 622.4(a)(2)(v) and
622.4(a)(1)(i), respectively, must post
inside the wheelhouse, or within a
waterproof case if no wheelhouse, a
copy of the document provided by
NMFS titled, ‘‘Careful Release Protocols
for Sea Turtle Release With Minimal
Injury,’’ and must post inside the
wheelhouse, or in an easily viewable
area if no wheelhouse, the sea turtle
handling and release guidelines
provided by NMFS. Those permitted
vessels with a freeboard height of 4 ft
(1.2 m) or less must have on board a
dipnet, short-handled dehooker, longnose or needle-nose pliers, bolt cutters,
monofilament line cutters, and at least
two types of mouth openers/mouth gags.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
This equipment must meet the
specifications described in 50 CFR
635.21(c)(5)(i)(E-L) with the following
modifications: the dipnet handle can be
of variable length, only one NMFS
approved short-handled dehooker is
required (i.e., CFR 635.21(c)(5)(i)(G or
H)); and life rings, seat cushions, life
jackets, and life vests may be used as
alternatives to tires for cushioned
surfaces as specified in 50 CFR
635.21(c)(5)(i)(F). Those permitted
vessels with a freeboard height of
greater than 4 ft (1.2 m) must have on
board a dipnet, long-handled line
clipper, a short-handled and a longhandled dehooker, long-nose or needlenose pliers, bolt cutters, monofilament
line cutters, and at least two types of
mouth openers/mouth gags. This
equipment must meet the specifications
described in 50 CFR 635.21(c)(5)(i) (AL) with the following modifications:
only one NMFS approved long-handled
dehooker (50 CFR 635.21(c)(5)(i)(B or
C)) and one NMFS-approved shorthandled dehooker (50 CFR
635.21(c)(5)(i)(G or H)) are required; and
life rings, seat cushions, life jackets, and
life vests may be used as alternatives to
tires for cushioned surfaces as specified
in 50 CFR 635.21(c)(5)(i)(F).
(2) Smalltooth sawfish conservation
measures. The owner or operator of a
vessel for which a commercial vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish or a charter
vessel/headboat permit for Gulf reef fish
has been issued, as required under
§§ 622.4(a)(2)(v) and 622.4(a)(1)(i),
respectively, that incidentally catches a
smalltooth sawfish must-(i) Keep the sawfish in the water at all
times;
(ii) If it can be done safely, untangle
the line if it is wrapped around the saw;
(iii) Cut the line as close to the hook
as possible; and
(iv) Not handle the animal or attempt
to remove any hooks on the saw, except
for with a long-handled dehooker.
7. In § 622.31, paragraph (n) is added
to read as follows:
§ 622.34 Gulf EEZ seasonal and/or area
closures.
§ 622.31
§ 622.39
Prohibited gear and methods.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) Gulf reef fish other than sand
perch or dwarf sand perch may not be
used as bait in any fishery, except that,
when purchased from a fish processor,
the filleted carcasses and offal of Gulf
reef fish may be used as bait in trap
fisheries for blue crab, stone crab, deepwater crab, and spiny lobster.
8. In § 622.34, a sentence is added at
the end of paragraph (l) to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * * Also note that if commercial
quantities of Gulf reef fish, i.e., Gulf reef
fish in excess of applicable bag/
possession limits, are on board the
vessel, no bag limit of Gulf reef fish may
be possessed, as specified in
§ 622.39(a)(5).
*
*
*
*
*
9. In § 622.36, a sentence is added at
the end of paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
§ 622.36
Seasonal harvest limitations.
(a) * * * Also note that if commercial
quantities of Gulf reef fish, i.e., Gulf reef
fish in excess of applicable bag/
possession limits, are on board the
vessel, no bag limit of Gulf reef fish may
be possessed, as specified in
§ 622.39(a)(5).
*
*
*
*
*
10. In § 622.37, paragraph (d)(4) is
added to read as follows:
§ 622.37
Size limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) A person aboard a vessel that has
a Federal commercial vessel permit for
Gulf reef fish and commercial quantities
of Gulf reef fish, i.e., Gulf reef fish in
excess of applicable bag/possession
limits, may not possess any Gulf reef
fish that do not comply with the
applicable commercial minimum size
limit.
*
*
*
*
*
11. In § 622.38, a sentence is added at
the end of paragraph (d)(1) introductory
text to read as follows:
§ 622.38
Landing fish intact.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * * See § 622.31(m) regarding a
prohibition on the use of Gulf reef fish
as bait.
*
*
*
*
*
12. In § 622.39, paragraph (a)(2)(iii) is
revised, and paragraph (a)(5) is added to
read as follows:
Bag and possession limits.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) For a species/species group when
its quota has been reached and closure
has been effected, provided that no
commercial quantities of Gulf reef fish,
i.e., Gulf reef fish in excess of applicable
bag/possession limits, are on board as
specified in § 622.39(a)(5).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) A person aboard a vessel that has
a Federal commercial vessel permit for
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 96 / Thursday, May 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Gulf reef fish and commercial quantities
of Gulf reef fish, i.e., Gulf reef fish in
excess of applicable bag/possession
limits, may not possess Gulf reef fish
caught under a bag limit.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 622.41
[Amended]
13. In § 622.41, paragraph (l)(2) is
removed and reserved.
14. In § 622.43, paragraph (a)(1)(iii) is
removed; the suspension of paragraph
(a)(1)(i) is lifted; and paragraph (a)(1)(i)
is revised to read as follows:
§ 622.43
Closures.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Commercial quotas. The
application of bag limits described in
this paragraph (a)(1)(i) notwithstanding,
bag limits of Gulf reef fish may not be
possessed on board a vessel with
commercial quantities of Gulf reef fish,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 May 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
i.e., Gulf reef fish in excess of applicable
bag/possession limits, on board, as
specified in § 622.39(a)(5).
(A) If the recreational fishery for the
indicated species is open, the bag and
possession limits specified in
§ 622.39(b) apply to all harvest or
possession in or from the Gulf EEZ of
the indicated species, and the sale or
purchase of the indicated species taken
from the Gulf EEZ is prohibited. In
addition, the bag and possession limits
for red snapper, when applicable, apply
on board a vessel for which a
commercial permit for Gulf reef fish has
been issued, as required under
§ 622.4(a)(2)(v), without regard to where
such red snapper were harvested.
(B) If the recreational fishery for the
indicated species is closed, all harvest
or possession in or from the Gulf EEZ
of the indicated species is prohibited.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28849
PART 635—ATLANTIC HIGHLY
MIGRATORY SPECIES
15. The authority citation for part 635
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
16. In § 635.4, the second sentence of
paragraph (m)(1) is revised to read as
follows:
§ 635.4
Permits and fees.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(1) * * * A renewal application must
be submitted to NMFS, at an address
designated by NMFS, at least 30 days
before a permit’s expiration to avoid a
lapse of permitted status. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–7587 Filed 5–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 96 (Thursday, May 18, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28842-28849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-7587]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 622 and 635
[Docket No. 060425111-6111-01; I.D. 041906B]
RIN 0648-AN09
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 18A
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this proposed rule to implement Amendment 18A to
the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of
Mexico (Amendment 18A) prepared by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council (Council). This proposed rule would prohibit vessels
from retaining reef fish caught under the recreational size and bag/
possession limits when commercial quantities of Gulf reef fish are on
board; adjust the number of persons allowed onboard when a vessel with
both commercial and charter vessel/headboat reef fish permits and a
Certificate of Inspection (COI) is fishing commercially; prohibit use
of Gulf reef fish, except sand perch or dwarf sand perch, as bait in
any commercial or recreational fishery in the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ) of the Gulf of Mexico, with a limited exception for crustacean
trap fisheries; require a NMFS-approved vessel monitoring system (VMS)
on board vessels with Federal commercial permits for Gulf reef fish,
including charter vessels/headboats with such commercial permits; and
require owners and operators of vessels with Federal commercial or
charter vessel/headboat permits for Gulf reef fish to comply with sea
turtle and smalltooth sawfish release protocols, possess on board
specific gear to ensure proper release of such species, and comply with
guidelines for proper care and release of incidentally caught sawfish
and sea turtles. NMFS is also proposing to require annual permit
application rather than application every 2 years (biennial). In
addition, Amendment 18A would revise the total allowable catch (TAC)
framework procedure to reflect current practices and terminology. The
intended effects of this proposed rule are to improve enforceability
and monitoring in the reef fish fishery in the Gulf of Mexico and to
reduce mortality of incidentally caught sea turtles and smalltooth
sawfish.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than 5 p.m., eastern time, on
July 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
E-mail: 0648-AN09.Proposed@noaa.gov. Include in the
subject line the following document identifier: 0648-AN09.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Peter Hood, Southeast Regional Office, NMFS, 263
13\th\ Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Fax: 727-824-5308; Attention: Peter Hood.
Copies of the Amendment 18A, which includes a Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), and an
Environmental Assessment, may be obtained from the Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council, 2203 N. Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa, FL
33607; telephone: 813-348-1630; fax: 813-348-1711; e-mail:
gulfcouncil@gulfcouncil.org. Copies of the amendments may also be
downloaded from the Council's Web site at www.gulfcouncil.org.
Comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of
the collection-of-information requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted in writing to Jason Rueter at the Southeast
Regional Office address and to David Rostker, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), by e-mail at David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to
202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Hood, telephone: 727-824-5305;
fax: 727-824-5308; e-mail: Peter.Hood@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The fishery for reef fish is managed under
the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of
Mexico (FMP) that was prepared by the Council. The FMP was approved by
NMFS and implemented under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by
regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
Background
This proposed rule is intended to resolve several issues related to
monitoring and enforcement of existing regulations and to reduce
bycatch mortality of incidentally caught endangered sea turtles and
smalltooth sawfish. In addition, Amendment 18A would update the
framework procedure for setting TAC to reflect current terminology and
stock assessment procedures.
Simultaneous Commercial and Recreational Harvest on a Vessel
This proposed rule would improve enforceability of the prohibition
on sale of reef fish caught under the recreational bag limit by
prohibiting persons aboard a vessel with a commercial reef fish permit
from retaining reef fish species caught under recreational size and
possession limits when the vessel has commercial quantities, i.e., fish
in excess of applicable bag/possession limits, of any Gulf reef fish
species aboard. By prohibiting retention of recreational reef fish
catches on a commercial fishing trip, this alternative adds an at-sea
component to enforcement of the prohibition on sale of recreationally
caught reef fish. This measure also makes consistent across all reef
fish the rules regarding retention of recreationally harvested fish on
a commercial fishing vessel. Regulations for red grouper, gag, and
black grouper specifically prohibit commercial reef fish vessels from
possessing those species during the February 15 to March
[[Page 28843]]
15 closed season, but possession of recreational bag limits is allowed
during a quota closure for those species, and for other reef fish
during any commercial closure of that species. This action explicitly
prohibits retention of recreational bag limits of Gulf reef fish on
board a vessel that possesses commercial quantities of Gulf reef fish.
Maximum Crew Size on a Charter Vessel/Headboat When Fishing
Commercially
This proposed rule would resolve the discrepancy between United
States Coast Guard (USCG) minimum crew size regulations and NMFS'
maximum crew size regulations, and address potential safety issues
related to spearfishing under the maximum crew size restrictions of the
existing NMFS regulations. The USCG regulations currently require a
minimum of four persons (two captains and two crew) when a vessel with
a COI is out over 12 hours. NMFS' current fishing regulations limit the
maximum number of persons on board to three when a vessel with both a
commercial and charter vessel/headboat permit is fishing commercially.
Since some charter vessels and headboats must have a COI in order to
carry passengers for hire, this creates a discrepancy in the
regulations for dual-permitted vessels, and there is a need to resolve
this discrepancy. In addition, the Council received a request from the
operator of a dual-permitted vessel who spearfishes commercially to
allow a crew size of four persons when commercially spearfishing, so
that for safety purposes, there could be two persons in the boat while
there are two divers in the water.
This proposed rule would address these crew size issues by revising
the definitions of ``Charter vessel'' and ``Headboat'' to clarify that
a vessel that has a charter vessel/headboat permit for Gulf reef fish,
a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish, and a valid COI issued
by the USCG to carry passengers for hire will not be considered to be
operating as a charter vessel/headboat provided: (1) It is not carrying
a passenger who pays a fee; and (2) When underway for more than 12
hours, that vessel meets but does not exceed the minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI for vessels underway over 12 hours; or
when underway for not more than 12 hours, that vessel meets the minimum
manning requirements outlined in its COI for vessels underway for not
more than 12-hours (if any), and does not exceed the minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI for vessels that are underway for more
than 12 hours. A vessel with a commercial vessel permit for king
mackerel and/or Spanish mackerel and a charter vessel/headboat permit
for Gulf coastal migratory pelagic fish would still be subject to the
3-person maximum crew size limit if the vessel has commercial
quantities of mackerel onboard, regardless of whether the vessel also
has a Gulf reef fish charter vessel/headboat permit, a commercial
vessel permit for Gulf reef fish, or commercial quantities of Gulf reef
fish onboard.
Use of Reef Fish in or from the EEZ for Bait
It is illegal to cut up reef fish at sea for use as bait. However,
it is not illegal to use cut up reef fish that were purchased as bait
on shore, nor is it illegal to use a whole reef fish provided it
complies with applicable size and bag limits. Allowing cut up reef fish
to be used when purchased compromises enforcement of the rules
prohibiting the cutting up of reef fish caught at sea because it is
difficult to differentiate between the two.
This proposed rule would prohibit using any species in the reef
fish management unit or parts thereof, except sand perch and dwarf sand
perch, as bait in any commercial or recreational fishery. A limited
exception to this prohibition would be provided for reef fish carcasses
and offal to be used for bait in trap fisheries for blue crab, stone
crab, deep-water crab, and spiny lobster, unless such use was otherwise
restricted.
Vessel Monitoring System
The Reef Fish FMP contains several area-specific regulations where
fishing is restricted or prohibited to protect habitat or spawning
aggregations, or to reduce fishing pressure in areas that are heavily
fished. Unlike size, bag, and trip limits, where the catch can be
monitored onshore when a vessel returns to port, area restrictions
require at-sea enforcement. However, at-sea enforcement of offshore
area restrictions is difficult due to the distance from shore and
limited number of patrol vessels. There is a need to improve
enforceability of area fishing restrictions through electronic methods.
This proposed rule would require permitted commercial reef fish
vessels, including charter vessel/headboats with commercial reef fish
vessel permits even when under charter, to be equipped with an
operating VMS approved by NMFS for the Gulf reef fish fishery. An
operating VMS includes an operating mobile transmitting unit on the
vessel and a functioning communication link between the unit and NMFS
as provided by a NMFS-approved communication service provider. NMFS
would publish in the Federal Register a list of approved VMS mobile
transmitting units and associated communication service providers that
meet the minimum standards for the Gulf reef fish fishery. Upon
installation of an approved transmitting unit by a qualified marine
electrician and activation of the communication services, a vessel
owner or operator would be required to submit to NMFS, Office of
Enforcement, Southeast Region, 263 13\th\ Avenue South, St. Petersburg,
FL 33701, a statement certifying compliance with an installation and
activation checklist and a vendor-completed installation certification
checklist that would be available from NMFS. The VMS would be required
to transmit a signal indicating the vessel's accurate position at least
once per hour and must function 7 days a week, 24 hours a day unless
exempted by NMFS under the power down exemption of the NOAA Enforcement
Draft Vessel Monitoring System Requirements that is included as
Appendix E to Amendment 18A. Prior to departure for each trip, a vessel
owner or operator would be required to report to NMFS any fishery the
vessel would participate in on that trip and the specific type(s) of
fishing gear, using NMFS-defined gear codes, that would be on board the
vessel. This information could be reported via NMFS' toll-free number,
888-219-9228, or via an attached VMS terminal. The vessel owner would
be responsible for the cost of the VMS equipment, installation,
maintenance, and month-to-month communications. These VMS requirements
would apply throughout the Gulf of Mexico. Compliance with the VMS
requirements would be required 120 days after publication of the final
rule implementing Amendment 18A.
Vessels fishing exclusively with fish traps would be exempted from
the VMS requirement through February 7, 2007, but would remain subject
to mandatory trip origination and termination reporting requirements
through February 7, 2007. The use of fish traps in the Gulf reef
fishery is prohibited after February 7, 2007.
Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Bycatch
NMFS concluded in a biological opinion that reasonable and prudent
measures should be taken to minimize stress and increase survival rates
of any sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish taken in the reef fish
fishery. Therefore, measures are needed to comply with the
[[Page 28844]]
biological opinion and to enhance the protection of endangered sea
turtles and smalltooth sawfish.
This proposed rule would require vessels with commercial or charter
vessel/headboat permits for Gulf reef fish to possess a document
provided by NMFS titled, ``Careful Release Protocols for Sea Turtle
Release With Minimal Injury''; post the sea turtle handling and release
guidelines provided by NMFS on the vessel; follow specified release
handling measures for any smalltooth sawfish that are caught
incidentally; and have sea turtle release gear onboard.
Measure Proposed by NMFS
NMFS is proposing to revise the renewal requirements applicable to
all Magnuson-Stevens Act vessel permits, licenses, endorsements, and
dealer permits issued by NMFS' Southeast Regional Office, including
applicable highly migratory species permits, to require submission of
an application every year rather than requiring submission only every
two years (i.e., biennial application). NMFS believes that requiring an
annual application would: Provide better permit accountability,
particularly regarding permit transfers; provide for better
verification of permit application data; and simplify permit financial
accounting through annual application payments. Fees for annual
application would be half of the current biennial fee; therefore, there
would be no increased cost to applicants.
Modifications to the TAC Framework Procedure
In addition to the measures contained in this proposed rule as
discussed above, Amendment 18A proposes to modify the framework
procedure for setting TAC by incorporating the Southeast Data,
Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) process and adopting minor wording
changes to update the terminology in the framework. The administrative
procedures for setting TAC have changed with the development of SEDAR
to assess stock status. The framework procedure currently specifies
that the Reef Fish Stock Assessment Panel (RFSAP) evaluate stock
assessments and recommend acceptable biological catch (ABC) ranges.
However, the RFSAP has been discontinued, and stock assessments and ABC
recommendations are now conducted through the SEDAR process. In
addition, some of the terminology and agency or department names have
changed since the last revision of the framework procedure and must be
updated accordingly.
Classification
At this time, NMFS has not determined whether Amendment 18A, which
this proposed rule would implement, is consistent with the Magnuson-
Stevens Act and other applicable laws. NMFS, in making that
determination, will take into account the data, views, and comments
received during the comment periods on this amendment and on this
proposed rule.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed
rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description of the
action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action
are contained at the beginning of this section in the preamble and in
the SUMMARY section of the preamble. A copy of the full analysis is
available from the Council office (see ADDRESSES). A summary of the
analysis follows.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the statutory basis for the
proposed rule. The proposed rule would: (1) Continue allowing vessels
to possess both commercial and for-hire vessel permits but disallow
retention of reef fish species caught under recreational size and
possession limits when the vessel has commercial harvests of any reef
fish species aboard; (2) allow a charter vessel/headboat with a USCG
COI to increase its crew size but not in excess of its minimum manning
requirements outlined in its COI when fishing for reef fish under its
commercial fishing license; (3) prohibit the use of any species in the
reef fish management unit or parts thereof as bait, with certain
exceptions; (4) require the use of VMS systems Gulf-wide for all
commercially permitted reef fish vessels, including charter vessels
with commercial reef fish permits; and (5) require vessels with
commercial and/or charter vessel/headboat reef fish permits to comply
with sea turtle and smalltooth sawfish release protocols, possess a set
of release gear required by the NMFS' Office of Protected Resources
(OPR), and comply with specific guidelines for the proper care of
incidentally caught sawfish.
The main objectives of the proposed rule are to resolve certain
issues related to monitoring and enforcement of existing regulations
and reduce bycatch mortality of incidentally caught endangered sea
turtles and smalltooth sawfish.
The proposed rule would impact three types of businesses in the
Gulf reef fish fishery, namely, commercial fishing vessels,
recreational for-hire vessels, and fish dealers. At present, the
commercial reef fish permits are under a license limitation program,
and for-hire reef fish permits are under a moratorium, which is
proposed to be converted into a license limitation under a separate
amendment. Hence, no new commercial or for-hire reef fish permits will
be issued when Amendment 18A is implemented. Currently, there are 1,145
commercial and 1,574 for-hire active vessel permits for the Gulf reef
fish fishery. Of these permittees, 237 vessels have both commercial and
for-hire vessel permits. Reef fish dealers in the Gulf are required to
obtain permits to handle reef fish caught in the Gulf. There are
currently 227 dealers permitted to buy and sell reef fish caught in the
Gulf. The proposed rule is expected to affect these commercial vessels,
for-hire vessels, and fish dealers. The direct effects on dealers would
mainly come from the restriction of bait use and only to the extent
that dealers supply bait to some fishermen. Data are not available to
quantify the extent of this impact.
Average annual gross receipts of commercial reef fish vessels in
the Gulf range from $24,095 for low-volume vertical line vessels to
$116,989 for high-volume longline vessels. The corresponding annual net
incomes range from $4,479 for low-volume vertical line vessels to
$28,466 for high-volume vertical line vessels. Permit records indicate
that the maximum number of commercial reef fish permits owned by any
single entity is six, so at the maximum this entity would generate a
total of $701,934 in gross receipts. For the for-hire vessels, gross
annual receipts range from $76,960 for charter vessels to $404,172 for
headboats. The corresponding annual operating profits range from
$36,758 for charter vessels to $338,209 for headboats. Permit records
indicate a maximum of 12 permits held by any single entity. At a
maximum, this entity would generate a total of $4,850,064 in gross
receipts. A fishing business is considered a small entity if it is
independently owned and operated and not dominant in its field of
operation, and if it has annual receipts not in excess of $4.0 million
in the case of commercial harvesting entities or $6.5 million in the
case of for-hire entities. Relative to these thresholds, both the
commercial vessel and for-hire vessel entities affected by the proposed
rule are determined to be small business entities.
According to a survey of reef fish processors, employment (both
part and full time) by all reef fish processors in
[[Page 28845]]
the Southeast totaled 700 individuals. There is no information
regarding employment by fish dealers, although it is safe to assume
that dealers employ fewer individuals than processors. A seafood
processor (fish dealer) is a small business if it is independently
owned and operated, not dominant in its field of operation, and employs
500 (100) or fewer persons on a full-time, part-time, temporary, or
other basis. Given the employment information, it is very unlikely for
any processor that holds a reef fish dealer permit to employ 500 or
more persons. Although there are no actual data on employment by fish
dealers, between 1997 and 2000, on average, in excess of 100 reef fish
dealers operated in the Gulf. It is assumed that all processors must be
dealers, yet a dealer need not be a processor. Total dealer employment,
therefore, is expected to be slightly more than 700 individuals. Given
the number of reef fish dealers and estimates of dealer employment, it
is unlikely any dealer employs more than 100 persons.
Based on earnings information, the commercial and recreational
fishing business entities affected by the proposed rule are determined
to be small business entities. It is also very likely that most, if not
all, permitted fish dealers affected by the proposed rule are also
small business entities. However, as previously noted, this proposed
rule's direct effects on dealers would mainly come from the restriction
of bait use and only to the extent that dealers supply bait to some
fishermen. Data are not available to quantify the extent of this
impact. Allowing vessels to be dually permitted (commercial and for-
hire) would enable some 227 vessels to continue their usual operations.
Disallowing these vessels to possess recreationally caught reef fish
when commercial quantities of reef fish are aboard would improve
enforcement without significantly impacting the operations of these
dually permitted vessels. Allowing a for-hire vessel to increase its
crew size but not in excess of its minimum manning requirements
outlined in its COI affords flexibility in operation and helps to
assure safety at sea of the crew, particularly for vessels using
spearfish gear. This would also eliminate the discrepancy between
current fishing rules and USCG requirements with respect to crew size
of for-hire vessels. The prohibition on the use of reef fish, except
sand perch and dwarf sand perch, as bait reinforces the current ban on
cutting up reef fish at sea and regulations on bait. The economic
impact of this provision on commercial and for-hire vessels cannot be
estimated but is expected to be relatively small. The VMS requirement
is expected to improve the efficacy of enforcement efforts and the
effectiveness and timeliness of at-sea rescue efforts. One-time and
recurring costs would be incurred by all commercial reef fish vessels,
including for-hire vessels with commercial reef fish permits. First-
year compliance costs range from $2,032 to $3,651 per vessel. These
costs could be substantial, particularly relative to the profits of
small-time vessel operations. The various requirements addressing the
bycatch issue relative to sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish would
affect all commercial and for-hire vessels in the reef fish fishery.
Out-of-pocket expenses are estimated between $267 and $459 per vessel.
These are mainly costs for equipping vessels with the required gear.
Because some of the gear would last for some time, costs would in
effect be spread over a number of years.
The proposed rule would alter some reporting, record-keeping, and
other compliance requirements. The VMS requirement would affect all
vessels with commercial and/or for-hire reef fish permits. Including
installation by a qualified marine electrician, equipment costs range
from $1,600 to $2,900 per vessel. In addition, yearly communication
costs range from $432 to $751 per vessel. The proposed rule also
contains changes to the application process for renewal of permits.
However, the new requirement for yearly application is not expected to
alter burden time or costs to respondents. The availability of the
permit renewal application as an on-line document, as well as the
reduced burden time attributable to the changes of the income
qualification affidavit, should offset any increases in burden hours
generated by the yearly renewal. Permit applications would cost half of
their previous amount, but would be required twice as often, thereby
off-setting any changes in overall cost. Compliance with sea turtle and
smalltooth sawfish release protocols would also affect all vessels with
commercial and/or for-hire reef fish permits. Costs range from $267 to
$459 per vessel.
Other than the provision on vessel manning requirements, which
removes the conflict between NMFS and USCG regulations, no other
Federal rules have been identified that would duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the proposed rule.
The proposed rule is expected to affect a substantial number of
small entities. A total of 908 commercial vessels only, 1,337 for-hire
vessels only, and 237 commercial/for-hire vessels would be affected.
Since practically all entities affected by the proposed rule are small
entities, the issue of disproportional effects on small versus large
entities does not arise. Mainly because of the VMS requirement, for
which compliance costs range from $1,600 to $2,900 per vessel, and the
sea turtle and smalltooth sawfish release protocols, for which
compliance costs range from $267 to $459 per vessel, the proposed rule
would have substantial adverse impacts on the profitability of affected
vessels, particularly the smaller and marginal operations.
This amendment considered several alternatives to the proposed
rule. For vessels with both commercial and for-hire reef fish permits
(dual-permitted vessels), two other alternatives have been considered.
Alternative 1 (status quo) continues to allow vessels to be dually
permitted, but it does not resolve the problem of identifying whether
caught fish are saleable (commercial trip) or not (charter trip).
Alternative 3, which would preclude a vessel from being dual-permitted,
would adversely affect the fishing operations of dual-permitted vessels
by forcing them to divest of either the commercial or for-hire permit.
Regarding crew size of for-hire vessels fishing under their commercial
permits, four other alternatives have been considered. Alternative 1
(status quo), which limits for-hire vessel crew size to 3 persons,
would not be compatible with minimum USCG manning requirements.
Alternative 3, which is similar to the proposed rule except for
spearfishing vessels, would benefit the spearfishing vessels but at the
same time make the crew size for these vessels incompatible with USCG
manning requirements. Alternative 4, which allows a maximum crew size
of 4 persons, would also be incompatible with USCG manning
requirements. Alternative 5, which removes the maximum crew size
requirements for dual-permitted vessels, creates the same enforcement
problem as the status quo and also allows a potential increase in
fishing effort. Regarding use of reef fish as bait, two other
alternatives (with various sub-alternatives) have been considered.
Alternative 1 (status quo), which allows whole reef fish that meet the
specified requirements for bait or cut-up reef fish purchased at shore
for bait, complicates the enforcement of the ban on cutting up reef
fish at sea and potentially increases the mortality of certain reef
fish species. Alternative 3, which effectively requires enforcement
officials to identify reef fish species
[[Page 28846]]
used as bait before assessing any potential violation, would tend to
complicate enforcement. For the VMS requirement, two other alternatives
have been considered. Alternative 1 (status quo), which does not
require VMS, is the least costly to small entities, but it does not
address vital enforcement and rescue-at-sea issues. Similar to the
proposed rule, Alternative 3 requires VMS, but vessel owners would
shoulder only the yearly communication costs. If government resources
are available, this alternative would be better for the industry than
the proposed rule. Regarding sea turtle and smalltooth sawfish bycatch,
five other alternatives have been considered. Alternative 1 (status
quo) is the least costly of all alternatives to small entities, but it
would not address the bycatch of sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish in
commercial and for-hire reef fish vessels. Alternative 2, which
requires commercial vessels to abide by the release protocols in effect
in the HMS bottom longline fishery, would impose a compliance cost
ranging from $202 to $380. Alternative 3, which requires the commercial
reef fish fleet to comply with the more stringent requirement in place
in the HMS pelagic longline fishery, would carry a compliance cost of
$712 to $1,282 per vessel. Alternative 4 requires for-hire reef fish
vessels to comply with either the less stringent release protocol as in
Alternative 2 or the more stringent release protocol as in Alternative
3. The corresponding compliance costs per vessel would be similar to
those in Alternative 2 or 3. Alternative 5, which requires commercial
and for-hire reef fish vessels to comply with the sea turtle release
protocols in place for the Atlantic HMS bottom longline vessels, would
impose a compliance cost of $202 to $380 per vessel.
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA)--namely, requirements for: (1) VMS installation; (2) completion
and submission of certification of VMS installation and activation; (3)
transmission of position reports; (4) fishing activity reports; (5)
annual maintenance of VMS; (6) submission of requests for power down
exemptions; and (7) annual renewal of all permits. These requirements
have been submitted to OMB for approval. The public reporting burdens
per response for these collections of information are estimated to
average 4 hours, 15 minutes, 24 seconds, 1 minute, 2 hours, 10 minutes,
and 15 minutes respectively. These estimates of the public reporting
burdens include the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing
data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing
and reviewing the collections of information. Public comment is sought
regarding: Whether these proposed collections of information are
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; the
accuracy of the burden estimates; ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collections of information, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology. Send comments on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to NMFS and to OMB (see ADDRESSES) and by e-
mail to David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202-395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements
of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
50 CFR Part 635
Endangered and threatened species, Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing
vessels, Foreign relations, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Statistics, Treaties.
Dated: May 12, 2006.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR parts 622 and 635
are proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 622.2, the definitions of ``Charter vessel'' and
``Headboat'' are revised in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 622.2 Definitions and acronyms.
* * * * *
Charter vessel means a vessel less than 100 gross tons (90.8 mt)
that is subject to the requirements of the USCG to carry six or fewer
passengers for hire and that engages in charter fishing at any time
during the calendar year. A charter vessel with a commercial permit, as
required under Sec. 622.4(a)(2), is considered to be operating as a
charter vessel when it carries a passenger who pays a fee or when there
are more than three persons aboard, including operator and crew.
However, a charter vessel that has a charter vessel permit for Gulf
reef fish, a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish, and a valid
Certificate of Inspection (COI) issued by the USCG to carry passengers
for hire will not be considered to be operating as a charter vessel
provided--
(1) It is not carrying a passenger who pays a fee; and
(2) When underway for more than 12 hours, that vessel meets, but
does not exceed the minimum manning requirements outlined in its COI
for vessels underway over 12 hours; or when underway for not more than
12 hours, that vessel meets the minimum manning requirements outlined
in its COI for vessels underway for not more than 12-hours (if any),
and does not exceed the minimum manning requirements outlined in its
COI for vessels that are underway for more than 12 hours.
* * * * *
Headboat means a vessel that holds a valid Certificate of
Inspection (COI) issued by the USCG to carry more than six passengers
for hire.
(1) A headboat with a commercial vessel permit, as required under
Sec. 622.4(a)(2), is considered to be operating as a headboat when it
carries a passenger who pays a fee or--
(i) In the case of persons aboard fishing for or possessing South
Atlantic snapper-grouper, when there are more persons aboard than the
number of crew specified in the vessel's COI; or
(ii) In the case of persons aboard fishing for or possessing
coastal migratory pelagic fish, when there are more than three persons
aboard, including operator and crew.
(2)However a vessel that has a headboat permit for Gulf reef fish,
a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish, and a valid COI issued
by the USCG to carry passengers for hire will not be considered to be
operating as a headboat provided--
(i) It is not carrying a passenger who pays a fee; and
(ii) When underway for more than 12 hours, that vessel meets, but
does not
[[Page 28847]]
exceed the minimum manning requirements outlined in its COI for vessels
underway over 12 hours; or when underway for not more than 12 hours,
that vessel meets the minimum manning requirements outlined in its COI
for vessels underway for not more than 12-hours (if any), and does not
exceed the minimum manning requirements outlined in its COI for vessels
that are underway for more than 12 hours.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 622.4, paragraph (h)(1) is revised, and a sentence is
added at the end of paragraph (m)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 622.4 Permits and fees.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) Vessel permits, licenses, and endorsements and dealer permits.
A vessel owner or dealer who has been issued a permit, license, or
endorsement under this section must renew such permit, license, or
endorsement on an annual basis. The RA will mail a vessel owner or
dealer whose permit, license, or endorsement is expiring an application
for renewal approximately 2 months prior to the expiration date. A
vessel owner or dealer who does not receive a renewal application from
the RA by 45 days prior to the expiration date of the permit, license,
or endorsement must contact the RA and request a renewal application.
The applicant must submit a completed renewal application form and all
required supporting documents to the RA prior to the applicable
deadline for renewal of the permit, license, or endorsement and at
least 30 days prior to the date on which the applicant desires to have
the permit made effective. If the RA receives an incomplete
application, the RA will notify the applicant of the deficiency. If the
applicant fails to correct the deficiency within 30 days of the date of
the RA's letter of notification, the application will be considered
abandoned. A permit, license, or endorsement that is not renewed within
the applicable deadline will not be reissued.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(1) * * * An application for renewal or transfer of a commercial
vessel permit for Gulf reef fish will not be considered complete until
proof of purchase, installation, activation, and operational status of
an approved VMS for the vessel receiving the permit has been verified
by NMFS VMS personnel.
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 622.7, paragraph (ff) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(ff) Fail to comply with the protected species conservation
measures as specified in Sec. 622.10.
5. Section 622.9 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.9 Vessel monitoring systems (VMSs).
(a) Requirements for use of a VMS--(1) South Atlantic rock shrimp.
An owner or operator of a vessel that has been issued a limited access
endorsement for South Atlantic rock shrimp must ensure that such vessel
has an operating VMS approved by NMFS for use in the South Atlantic
rock shrimp fishery on board when on a trip in the South Atlantic. An
operating VMS includes an operating mobile transmitting unit on the
vessel and a functioning communication link between the unit and NMFS
as provided by a NMFS-approved communication service provider.
(2) Gulf reef fish. An owner or operator of a vessel that has been
issued a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish, including a
charter vessel/headboat issued such a permit even when under charter,
must ensure that such vessel has an operating VMS approved by NMFS for
use in the Gulf reef fish fishery on board at all times whether or not
the vessel is underway, unless exempted by NMFS under the power down
exemption of the NOAA Enforcement Draft Vessel Monitoring System
Requirements as included in Appendix E to Final Amendment 18A to the
Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of
Mexico. The NOAA Enforcement Draft Vessel Monitoring System
Requirements document is available from NMFS, Office of Enforcement,
Southeast Region, 263 13\th\ Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
phone: 800-758-4833. An operating VMS includes an operating mobile
transmitting unit on the vessel and a functioning communication link
between the unit and NMFS as provided by a NMFS-approved communication
service provider. Unless exempted under the power down exemption, a VMS
must transmit a signal indicating the vessel's accurate position at
least once an hour, 24 hours a day every day. Prior to departure for
each trip, a vessel owner or operator must report to NMFS any fishery
the vessel will participate in on that trip and the specific type(s) of
fishing gear, using NMFS-defined gear codes, that will be on board the
vessel. This information may be reported to NMFS using the toll-free
number, 888-219-9228, or via an attached VMS terminal. The VMS
requirements of this paragraph apply throughout the Gulf of Mexico. An
owner or operator of a vessel that has been issued a commercial vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish with a fish trap endorsement and that fishes
exclusively with fish traps is exempt from the VMS requirements of this
paragraph through February 7, 2007.
(b) Installation and activation of a VMS. Only a VMS that has been
approved by NMFS for the applicable fishery may be used, and the VMS
must be installed by a qualified marine electrician. When installing
and activating the NMFS-approved VMS, or when reinstalling and
reactivating such VMS, the vessel owner or operator must--
(1) Follow procedures indicated on a NMFS-approved installation and
activation checklist for the applicable fishery, which is available
from NMFS, Office of Enforcement, Southeast Region, 263 13\th\ Avenue
South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701; phone: 800-758-4833; and
(2) Submit to NMFS, Office of Enforcement, Southeast Region, 263
13\th\ Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, a statement certifying
compliance with the checklist, as prescribed on the checklist.
(3) Submit to NMFS, Office of Enforcement, Southeast Region, 263
13\th\ Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, a vendor-completed
installation certification checklist, which is available from NMFS,
Office of Enforcement, Southeast Region, 263 13\th\ Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701; phone: 800-758-4833.
(c) Interference with the VMS. No person may interfere with, tamper
with, alter, damage, disable, or impede the operation of the VMS, or
attempt any of the same.
(d) Interruption of operation of the VMS. When a vessel's VMS is
not operating properly, the owner or operator must immediately contact
NMFS, Office of Enforcement, Southeast Region, 263 13\th\ Avenue South,
St. Petersburg, FL 33701, phone: 800-758-4833, and follow instructions
from that office. If notified by NMFS that a vessel's VMS is not
operating properly, the owner and operator must follow instructions
from that office. In either event, such instructions may include, but
are not limited to, manually communicating to a location designated
[[Page 28848]]
by NMFS the vessel's positions or returning to port until the VMS is
operable.
(e) Access to position data. As a condition of authorized fishing
for or possession of fish in a fishery subject to VMS requirements in
this section, a vessel owner or operator subject to the requirements
for a VMS in this section must allow NMFS, the USCG, and their
authorized officers and designees access to the vessel's position data
obtained from the VMS.
6. In subpart A, Sec. 622.10 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.10 Conservation measures for protected resources.
(a) Atlantic dolphin and wahoo pelagic longliners. The owner or
operator of a vessel for which a commercial permit for Atlantic dolphin
and wahoo has been issued, as required under Sec. 622.4(a)(2)(xii),
and that has on board a pelagic longline must post inside the
wheelhouse the sea turtle handling and release guidelines provided by
NMFS. Such owner or operator must also comply with the sea turtle
bycatch mitigation measures, including gear requirements and sea turtle
handling requirements, as specified in Sec. 635.21(c)(5)(i) and (ii)
of this chapter, respectively. For the purpose of this paragraph, a
vessel is considered to have pelagic longline gear on board when a
power-operated longline hauler, a mainline, floats capable of
supporting the mainline, and leaders (gangions) with hooks are on
board. Removal of any one of these elements constitutes removal of
pelagic longline gear.
(b) Gulf reef fish commercial vessels and charter vessels/
headboats--(1) Sea turtle conservation measures. The owner or operator
of a vessel for which a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish or
a charter vessel/headboat permit for Gulf reef fish has been issued, as
required under Sec. Sec. 622.4(a)(2)(v) and 622.4(a)(1)(i),
respectively, must post inside the wheelhouse, or within a waterproof
case if no wheelhouse, a copy of the document provided by NMFS titled,
``Careful Release Protocols for Sea Turtle Release With Minimal
Injury,'' and must post inside the wheelhouse, or in an easily viewable
area if no wheelhouse, the sea turtle handling and release guidelines
provided by NMFS. Those permitted vessels with a freeboard height of 4
ft (1.2 m) or less must have on board a dipnet, short-handled dehooker,
long-nose or needle-nose pliers, bolt cutters, monofilament line
cutters, and at least two types of mouth openers/mouth gags. This
equipment must meet the specifications described in 50 CFR
635.21(c)(5)(i)(E-L) with the following modifications: the dipnet
handle can be of variable length, only one NMFS approved short-handled
dehooker is required (i.e., CFR 635.21(c)(5)(i)(G or H)); and life
rings, seat cushions, life jackets, and life vests may be used as
alternatives to tires for cushioned surfaces as specified in 50 CFR
635.21(c)(5)(i)(F). Those permitted vessels with a freeboard height of
greater than 4 ft (1.2 m) must have on board a dipnet, long-handled
line clipper, a short-handled and a long-handled dehooker, long-nose or
needle-nose pliers, bolt cutters, monofilament line cutters, and at
least two types of mouth openers/mouth gags. This equipment must meet
the specifications described in 50 CFR 635.21(c)(5)(i) (A-L) with the
following modifications: only one NMFS approved long-handled dehooker
(50 CFR 635.21(c)(5)(i)(B or C)) and one NMFS-approved short-handled
dehooker (50 CFR 635.21(c)(5)(i)(G or H)) are required; and life rings,
seat cushions, life jackets, and life vests may be used as alternatives
to tires for cushioned surfaces as specified in 50 CFR
635.21(c)(5)(i)(F).
(2) Smalltooth sawfish conservation measures. The owner or operator
of a vessel for which a commercial vessel permit for Gulf reef fish or
a charter vessel/headboat permit for Gulf reef fish has been issued, as
required under Sec. Sec. 622.4(a)(2)(v) and 622.4(a)(1)(i),
respectively, that incidentally catches a smalltooth sawfish must--
(i) Keep the sawfish in the water at all times;
(ii) If it can be done safely, untangle the line if it is wrapped
around the saw;
(iii) Cut the line as close to the hook as possible; and
(iv) Not handle the animal or attempt to remove any hooks on the
saw, except for with a long-handled dehooker.
7. In Sec. 622.31, paragraph (n) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.31 Prohibited gear and methods.
* * * * *
(n) Gulf reef fish other than sand perch or dwarf sand perch may
not be used as bait in any fishery, except that, when purchased from a
fish processor, the filleted carcasses and offal of Gulf reef fish may
be used as bait in trap fisheries for blue crab, stone crab, deep-water
crab, and spiny lobster.
8. In Sec. 622.34, a sentence is added at the end of paragraph (l)
to read as follows:
Sec. 622.34 Gulf EEZ seasonal and/or area closures.
* * * * *
(l) * * * Also note that if commercial quantities of Gulf reef
fish, i.e., Gulf reef fish in excess of applicable bag/possession
limits, are on board the vessel, no bag limit of Gulf reef fish may be
possessed, as specified in Sec. 622.39(a)(5).
* * * * *
9. In Sec. 622.36, a sentence is added at the end of paragraph (a)
to read as follows:
Sec. 622.36 Seasonal harvest limitations.
(a) * * * Also note that if commercial quantities of Gulf reef
fish, i.e., Gulf reef fish in excess of applicable bag/possession
limits, are on board the vessel, no bag limit of Gulf reef fish may be
possessed, as specified in Sec. 622.39(a)(5).
* * * * *
10. In Sec. 622.37, paragraph (d)(4) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.37 Size limits.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) A person aboard a vessel that has a Federal commercial vessel
permit for Gulf reef fish and commercial quantities of Gulf reef fish,
i.e., Gulf reef fish in excess of applicable bag/possession limits, may
not possess any Gulf reef fish that do not comply with the applicable
commercial minimum size limit.
* * * * *
11. In Sec. 622.38, a sentence is added at the end of paragraph
(d)(1) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 622.38 Landing fish intact.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * * See Sec. 622.31(m) regarding a prohibition on the use of
Gulf reef fish as bait.
* * * * *
12. In Sec. 622.39, paragraph (a)(2)(iii) is revised, and
paragraph (a)(5) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.39 Bag and possession limits.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) For a species/species group when its quota has been reached
and closure has been effected, provided that no commercial quantities
of Gulf reef fish, i.e., Gulf reef fish in excess of applicable bag/
possession limits, are on board as specified in Sec. 622.39(a)(5).
* * * * *
(5) A person aboard a vessel that has a Federal commercial vessel
permit for
[[Page 28849]]
Gulf reef fish and commercial quantities of Gulf reef fish, i.e., Gulf
reef fish in excess of applicable bag/possession limits, may not
possess Gulf reef fish caught under a bag limit.
* * * * *
Sec. 622.41 [Amended]
13. In Sec. 622.41, paragraph (l)(2) is removed and reserved.
14. In Sec. 622.43, paragraph (a)(1)(iii) is removed; the
suspension of paragraph (a)(1)(i) is lifted; and paragraph (a)(1)(i) is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.43 Closures.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Commercial quotas. The application of bag limits described in
this paragraph (a)(1)(i) notwithstanding, bag limits of Gulf reef fish
may not be possessed on board a vessel with commercial quantities of
Gulf reef fish, i.e., Gulf reef fish in excess of applicable bag/
possession limits, on board, as specified in Sec. 622.39(a)(5).
(A) If the recreational fishery for the indicated species is open,
the bag and possession limits specified in Sec. 622.39(b) apply to all
harvest or possession in or from the Gulf EEZ of the indicated species,
and the sale or purchase of the indicated species taken from the Gulf
EEZ is prohibited. In addition, the bag and possession limits for red
snapper, when applicable, apply on board a vessel for which a
commercial permit for Gulf reef fish has been issued, as required under
Sec. 622.4(a)(2)(v), without regard to where such red snapper were
harvested.
(B) If the recreational fishery for the indicated species is
closed, all harvest or possession in or from the Gulf EEZ of the
indicated species is prohibited.
* * * * *
PART 635--ATLANTIC HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES
15. The authority citation for part 635 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
16. In Sec. 635.4, the second sentence of paragraph (m)(1) is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 635.4 Permits and fees.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(1) * * * A renewal application must be submitted to NMFS, at an
address designated by NMFS, at least 30 days before a permit's
expiration to avoid a lapse of permitted status. * * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-7587 Filed 5-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S