Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Pima County Department of Environmental Quality, and Pinal County Air Quality Control District, 28289-28290 [06-4515]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 2006 / Proposed Rules 28289 Actions Compliance (2) The parts that this AD requires to be replaced as well as those to be installed could have replacement parts approved under 14 CFR 21.303. Any such parts approved per this regulation and installed are subject to thee actions of this AD. In addition, nothing in this AD prevents the installation of such alternatively approved parts provided they meet current airworthiness standards including those actions cited in this AD.. (3) Incorporate changes in the FAA-approved sailplane flight manual, as specified in paragraph 6a) of the Instructions section of DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical Note No. 413/ 3, dated April 28, 2004. Not Applicable .................................................. Not Applicable. Within the next 25 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD. (4) Do not install any rod end 5St94 (or FAAapproved equivalent part) unless it is modified to DG Flugzeugbau GmbH rod-end part 10St97/1 (or FAA-approved equivalent part).. As of the effective date of this AD. .................. The owner/operator holding at least a private pilot certificate as authorized by section 43.7 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may do the flight manual change requirement of this AD. Make an entry in the aircraft records showing compliance with this portion of the AD following section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.9). Not Applicable. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCS) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (f) The Manager, Standards Office, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, ATTN: Gregory Davison, Glider Project Manager, ACE–112, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4130; facsimile: (816) 329–4090, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Related Information (g) German AD Number D–2004–300, dated June 15, 2004, also addresses the subject of this AD. To get copies of the service information referenced in this AD, contact DG-Flugzeugbau, Postbox 41 20, D–76625 Bruchsal, Federal Republic of Germany; telephone: ++49 7257 890; facsimile: ++45 7257 8922; e-mail: www.dg-flugzeugbau.de. To view the AD docket, go to the Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington, DC, or on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov. The docket number is Docket No. FAA– 2006–24255; Directorate Identifier 2006–CE– 25–AD. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 9, 2006. David R. Showers, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E6–7394 Filed 5–15–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:12 May 15, 2006 Jkt 208001 Procedures 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2006–0272; FRL–8159–8] Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Pima County Department of Environmental Quality, and Pinal County Air Quality Control District Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PCDEQ), and Pinal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD) portions of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern particulate matter (PM–10) emissions from open burning. We are proposing to approve local rules that help regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by June 15, 2006. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA–R09– OAR–2006–0272, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions. • E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. • Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. https://www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM 16MYP1 28290 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 2006 / Proposed Rules Al Petersen, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 4118, petersen.alfred@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local rules: ADEQ Rule R18–2–602, ADEQ Rules R18–2–1501 through R18–2–1513, PCDEQ Rule 17.12.480, and PCAQCD Rules 3–8–700 and 3–8–710. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are approving these local rules in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dated: March 22, 2006. Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 06–4515 Filed 5–15–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [PA 182–4196b; FRL–8170–7] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Withdrawal of Proposed Rule; Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program—Request for Delay in the Incorporation of On-Board Diagnostics Testing cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: EPA is withdrawing a proposed rule published on June 6, 2002, pertaining to Pennsylvania’s timing in incorporating on-board diagnostic (OBD) checks as an element of its motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. EPA’s I/M requirements rule, or I/M rule, established deadlines by which states 15:12 May 15, 2006 Jkt 208001 The proposed rule is withdrawn as of May 16, 2006. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule. AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 were to add OBD checks to their I/M programs (i.e., no later than January 1, 2002). However, EPA’s I/M rule provided states the option to submit a request to EPA to delay OBD testing for no more than one additional year. Pennsylvania submitted a SIP revision requesting this optional one-year deadline extension on December 14, 2001. On June 6, 2002, EPA published a direct final rule (67 FR 38894) to approve Pennsylvania’s request to delay OBD testing as a revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA received adverse comments during the comment period established for that rule. On August 5, 2002 EPA published a withdrawal notice (67 FR 50602) of its June 2002 direct final rule. As stated in EPA’s direct final rule, upon EPA’s withdrawal of the direct final rule, a proposed rulemaking action remained in place. EPA never took final action upon that proposed rule. Pennsylvania subsequently submitted two SIP revisions (on December 1, 2003 and January 30, 2004) that revised its I/M program in its entirety—including the incorporation of OBD checks as an element of its program. EPA published a final rule fully approving the Commonwealth’s revamped I/M program on October 6, 2005 (70 FR 58313). Since EPA has fully approved the Commonwealth’s I/M program (including the OBD check component of the program), EPA’s proposed rule to grant the Commonwealth’s request for an extension of the deadline to incorporate OBD checks is no longer necessary. On November 17, 2005, Pennsylvania formally requested withdrawal of its December 14, 2001 SIP revision from EPA. Therefore, EPA is today withdrawing its proposed rule (67 FR 38924) to grant the Commonwealth’s OBD deadline extension. Brian Rehn, Air Quality Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Phone (215) 814–2176, or e-mail rehn.brian@epa.gov. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Dated: May 5, 2006. Donald S. Welsh, Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. E6–7409 Filed 5–15–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2006–0225; FRL–8170–9] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and oxides of sulfur (SOx) emissions from facilities emitting 4 tons or more per year of NOX or SOx in the year 1990 or subsequent year under the SCAQMD’s Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) program. We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. DATES: Any comments must arrive by June 15, 2006. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA–R09– OAR–2006–0225, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions. 2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through https:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. https:// www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA will not know E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM 16MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28289-28290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2006-0272; FRL-8159-8]


Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Arizona 
Department of Environmental Quality, Pima County Department of 
Environmental Quality, and Pinal County Air Quality Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the Arizona Department of 
Environmental Quality (ADEQ), Pima County Department of Environmental 
Quality (PCDEQ), and Pinal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD) 
portions of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). These 
revisions concern particulate matter (PM-10) emissions from open 
burning. We are proposing to approve local rules that help regulate 
these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA 
or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by June 15, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2006-0272, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions.
     E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
     Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
Francisco, CA 94105.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket 
without change and may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, 
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or 
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be 
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. https://www.regulations.gov is an 
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or 
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. 
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If 
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot 
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your 
comment.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available 
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA 
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all 
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may 
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location 
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an 
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

[[Page 28290]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Petersen, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4118, petersen.alfred@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local 
rules: ADEQ Rule R18-2-602, ADEQ Rules R18-2-1501 through R18-2-1513, 
PCDEQ Rule 17.12.480, and PCAQCD Rules 3-8-700 and 3-8-710. In the 
Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are 
approving these local rules in a direct final action without prior 
proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. 
If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely 
withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in 
subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if EPA 
receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this 
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the 
rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not 
the subject of an adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone 
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not 
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further 
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: March 22, 2006.
Wayne Nastri,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 06-4515 Filed 5-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.