Safety Zone; Rockets for Schools, Sheboygan, WI, 27621-27623 [06-4473]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
at an installation, reassessment of the
community interest for reestablishing
the RAB is not necessary. When
additional environmental restoration
decisions have to be made resulting
from subsequent actions, such as longterm management and five-year reviews,
the installation will reassess community
interest for reestablishing the RAB.
Where the reassessment finds sufficient
and sustained community interest at
previously adjourned or dissolved
RABs, the Installation Commander
should reestablish a RAB. Where the
reassessment does not find sufficient
and sustained community interest in
reestablishing the RAB, the Installation
Commander shall document in a
memorandum for the record the
procedures followed in the reassessment
and the findings of the reassessment.
This document shall be included in the
Administrative Record for the
installation. If there is interest in
reestablishment at a previously
dissolved RAB, but the Installation
Commander determines that the same
conditions exist that required the
original dissolution, he or she will
request, through the chain-of-command
to the Military Component’s Deputy
Assistant Secretary, an exception to
reestablishing the RAB. If those
conditions no longer exist at a
previously dissolved RAB, and there is
sufficient and sustained interest in
reestablishment, the Installation
Commander should recommend to the
Deputy Assistant Secretary that the RAB
be reestablished. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary will take the Installation
Commander’s recommendation under
advisement and may approve that RAB
for reestablishment.
(d) Public comment. If the Installation
Commander intends to recommend
dissolution of a RAB or reestablish a
dissolved RAB, the Installation
Commander shall notify the public of
the proposal to dissolve or reestablish
the RAB and provide a 30-day public
comment period on the proposal. At the
conclusion of the public comment
period, the Installation Commander
shall review public comments; consult
with EPA and state, tribal, or local
government representatives, as
appropriate; prepare a responsiveness
summary; and render a
recommendation. The recommendation,
responsiveness summary, and all
supporting documentation should be
sent via the chain-of-command to the
Military Component’s Environmental
Deputy Assistant Secretary (or
equivalent) for approval or disapproval.
The Installation Commander shall notify
the public of the decision.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
§ 202.11
Documenting RAB activities.
(a) The installation shall document
information on the activities of a RAB
in the Information Repository. These
activities shall include, but are not
limited to:
(1) Installation’s efforts to survey
community interest in forming a RAB,
(2) Steps taken to establish a RAB
where there is sufficient and sustained
community interest,
(3) How the RAB related to the overall
community involvement program, and
(4) Steps taken to adjourn, dissolve, or
reestablish the RAB.
(b) When RAB input has been used in
decision-making, it should be
documented as part of the
Administrative Record.
Subpart C—Administrative Support,
Funding, and Reporting Requirements
§ 202.12 Administrative support and
eligible expenses.
(a) Administrative support. Subject to
the availability of funding, the
installation shall provide administrative
support to establish and operate a RAB.
(b) Eligible administrative expenses
for a RAB. The following activities
specifically and directly associated with
establishing and operating a RAB shall
qualify as an administrative expense of
a RAB:
(1) RAB establishment.
(2) Membership selection.
(3) Training if it is:
(i) Site specific and benefits the
establishment and operation of a RAB.
(ii) Relevant to the environmental
restoration activities occurring at the
installation.
(4) Meeting announcements.
(5) Meeting facilities.
(6) Meeting facilitators, including
translators.
(7) Preparation of meeting agenda
materials and minutes.
(8) RAB-member mailing list
maintenance and RAB materials
distribution.
(c) Funding. Subject to the availability
of funds, administrative support to
RABs may be funded as follows:
(1) At active installations,
administrative expenses for a RAB shall
be paid using funds from the Military
Component’s Environmental Restoration
accounts.
(2) At BRAC installations,
administrative expenses for a RAB shall
be paid using BRAC funds.
(3) At FUDS, administrative expenses
for a RAB shall be paid using funds
from the Environmental Restoration
account for the Formerly Used Defense
Sites program.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27621
§ 202.13 Technical assistance for public
participation.
Community members of a RAB or
TRC may request technical assistance
for interpreting scientific and
engineering issues with regard to the
nature of environmental hazards at the
installation and environmental
restoration activities conducted, or
proposed to be conducted, at the
installation in accordance with 10
U.S.C. 2705(e) and the TAPP regulations
located in 32 CFR Part 203.
§ 202.14 Documenting and reporting
activities and expenses.
The installation at which a RAB is
established shall document the
activities and meeting minutes and
record the administrative expenses
associated with the RAB in the
information repository at a publicly
accessible location. Installations shall
use internal department and Military
Component-specific reporting
mechanisms to submit required
information on RAB activities and
expenditures.
Dated: May 1, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06–4246 Filed 5–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09–06–024]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Rockets for Schools,
Sheboygan, WI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
Sheboygan, WI, for the Rockets for
Schools model rocket launch. This
safety zone is needed to protect
personnel and property from hazards
associated with the storage, preparation,
launching and recovery of model
rockets, as well as for protection of the
general public and vessels near where
the rockets are being launched. Entry
into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his duly appointed representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
(local) on May 13, 2006 through 5 p.m.
(local) on May 13, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
27622
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket CGD09–06–
024 and are available for inspection or
copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, 2420 South Lincoln Memorial
Drive, Milwaukee, WI 53207 between 7
a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Warrant Officer Brad Hinken,
Sector Lake Michigan, (414) 747–7154.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The permit
application was not submitted in time to
allow for publication of an NPRM
followed by a temporary final rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days from the date of publication. Any
delay of the effective date of this rule
would be contrary to the public interest
by exposing the public to the known
dangers associated with launching large
rockets and the possible loss of life,
injury, and damage to property. For this
particular event, numerous model
rockets will be launched, which could
potentially create a very hazardous
condition.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Background and Purpose
This safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of the public and
boating traffic in the Sheboygan area
during this event. This safety zone is
intended to restrict vessel traffic from a
portion of Lake Michigan and
Sheboygan Harbor. The size of the zone
was determined by using launch
trajectory and previous experiences in
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
zone and local knowledge about wind,
waves, and currents in this particular
area.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone will encompass all
waters within Lake Michigan and
Sheboygan Harbor bounded by the arc
of a circle with a 1500-yard radius with
its center in position 43°–44.9′ N,
087°42.0′ W. These coordinates are
based upon North American Datum
1983 (NAD 83).
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan or his
designated on-scene patrol personnel.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
Port Lake Michigan or his designated
on-scene representative. The Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
This determination is based upon the
size and location of the safety zone
within the waterway. Vessels will only
be restricted from the safety zone for a
short period of time. Vessels may transit
through the safety zone with permission
from the COTP Lake Michigan or his
designated on-scene patrol commander.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor
near Sheboygan, WI, within the safety
zone.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule will
only be in effect for nine hours. Vessel
traffic may enter or transit through the
safety zone with the permission of the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his
designated on-scene representative.
Before the effective period, we will
issue maritime advisories and ensure
they are widely available to users of the
Port of Sheboygan.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process. If
the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance; please contact Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan (See ADDRESSES).
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local government and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedure; and related management
system practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
27623
(2) The ‘‘duly appointed
representative’’ of the Captain of the
Port is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan to act on his behalf. The
representative of the Captain of the Port
will be aboard either a Coast Guard or
Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port or his
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
shall comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port or his
representative.
(4) The Captain of the Port may be
contacted by telephone via the Sector
Lake Michigan Operations Center at
(414) 747–7182 during working hours.
Vessels assisting in the enforcement of
the safety zone may be contacted on
VHF–FM channels 16 or 23A. Vessel
operators may determine the restrictions
in effect for the safety zone by coming
alongside a vessel patrolling the
perimeter of the safety zone.
(5) Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan
will issue a Marine Safety Information
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to notify
the maritime community of the safety
zone and restriction imposed.
Dated: April 26, 2006.
S.P. LaRochelle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 06–4473 Filed 5–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
2. Add § 165.T09–024 to read as
follows:
RIN 3095–AB45
I
§ 165.T09–024 Safety Zone; Rockets for
Schools Sheboygan, Wisconsin
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: The area bounded by the
arc of a circle with a 1500-yard radius
with its center in position 43°–44.9′ N,
087°42.0′ W, NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. This rule is
effective from 8 a.m. (local) on May 13,
2006 until 5 p.m. (local) on May 13,
2006.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR 165.23
of this part, entry into this zone is
subject to the following requirements:
(1) This safety zone is closed to all
marine traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port or
his duly appointed representative.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36 CFR Part 1206
National Historical Publications and
Records Commission Grant Program
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NARA is revising the
regulations relating to the National
Historical Publications and Records
Commission (NHPRC) grant program to
reflect changes in the operation of the
NHPRC and to clarify provisions.
Beginning in FY 2005, the NHPRC
began publishing online grant
announcements (linked to Grants.gov).
This rule will affect State and local
government agencies; United States
nonprofit organizations and institutions,
including institutions of higher
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27621-27623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4473]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09-06-024]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Rockets for Schools, Sheboygan, WI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in
Sheboygan, WI, for the Rockets for Schools model rocket launch. This
safety zone is needed to protect personnel and property from hazards
associated with the storage, preparation, launching and recovery of
model rockets, as well as for protection of the general public and
vessels near where the rockets are being launched. Entry into this zone
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his duly
appointed representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. (local) on May 13, 2006
through 5 p.m. (local) on May 13, 2006.
[[Page 27622]]
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket CGD09-06-024 and are available for
inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, 2420
South Lincoln Memorial Drive, Milwaukee, WI 53207 between 7 a.m. and
3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Warrant Officer Brad Hinken,
Sector Lake Michigan, (414) 747-7154.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The permit application was not
submitted in time to allow for publication of an NPRM followed by a
temporary final rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days from the date
of publication. Any delay of the effective date of this rule would be
contrary to the public interest by exposing the public to the known
dangers associated with launching large rockets and the possible loss
of life, injury, and damage to property. For this particular event,
numerous model rockets will be launched, which could potentially create
a very hazardous condition.
Background and Purpose
This safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of the public
and boating traffic in the Sheboygan area during this event. This
safety zone is intended to restrict vessel traffic from a portion of
Lake Michigan and Sheboygan Harbor. The size of the zone was determined
by using launch trajectory and previous experiences in the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan zone and local knowledge about wind, waves, and
currents in this particular area.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone will encompass all waters within Lake Michigan and
Sheboygan Harbor bounded by the arc of a circle with a 1500-yard radius
with its center in position 43[deg]-44.9' N, 087[deg]42.0' W. These
coordinates are based upon North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83).
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his designated on-scene patrol
personnel. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
This determination is based upon the size and location of the
safety zone within the waterway. Vessels will only be restricted from
the safety zone for a short period of time. Vessels may transit through
the safety zone with permission from the COTP Lake Michigan or his
designated on-scene patrol commander.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor near Sheboygan, WI, within the safety zone.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will only be in effect for nine hours. Vessel traffic may enter or
transit through the safety zone with the permission of the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan or his designated on-scene representative.
Before the effective period, we will issue maritime advisories and
ensure they are widely available to users of the Port of Sheboygan.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance; please contact Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan
(See ADDRESSES).
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
government and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
[[Page 27623]]
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedure; and related management
system practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive
5100.1, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-024 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-024 Safety Zone; Rockets for Schools Sheboygan,
Wisconsin
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: The area bounded
by the arc of a circle with a 1500-yard radius with its center in
position 43[deg]-44.9' N, 087[deg]42.0' W, NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. This rule is effective from 8 a.m. (local) on
May 13, 2006 until 5 p.m. (local) on May 13, 2006.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is subject to the
following requirements:
(1) This safety zone is closed to all marine traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port or his duly appointed
representative.
(2) The ``duly appointed representative'' of the Captain of the
Port is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has
been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to act on his
behalf. The representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard
either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port or his representative to
obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter
or operate in the safety zone shall comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port or his representative.
(4) The Captain of the Port may be contacted by telephone via the
Sector Lake Michigan Operations Center at (414) 747-7182 during working
hours. Vessels assisting in the enforcement of the safety zone may be
contacted on VHF-FM channels 16 or 23A. Vessel operators may determine
the restrictions in effect for the safety zone by coming alongside a
vessel patrolling the perimeter of the safety zone.
(5) Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan will issue a Marine Safety
Information Broadcast Notice to Mariners to notify the maritime
community of the safety zone and restriction imposed.
Dated: April 26, 2006.
S.P. LaRochelle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 06-4473 Filed 5-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P