Blood Vessels Recovered With Organs and Intended for Use in Organ Transplantation; Companion Document to Direct Final Rule, 27649-27652 [06-4370]
Download as PDF
27649
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 92
Friday, May 12, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
comments. If we receive any significant
adverse comments that warrant
terminating the direct final rule, we will
consider such comments on the
proposed rule in developing the final
rule.
Submit written or electronic
comments on the proposed rule by July
26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. 2006N–0051,
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following ways:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the agency Web site.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For
paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions]:
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
To ensure more timely processing of
comments, FDA is no longer accepting
comments submitted to the agency by email. FDA encourages you to continue
to submit electronic comments by using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal or the
agency Web site, as described in the
Electronic Submissions portion of this
paragraph. FDA will share all comments
received with HRSA.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name (FDA)
and Docket No. 2006N–0051 for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
default.htm, including any personal
information provided. For additional
information on submitting comments
see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading in section
IX of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
default.htm and insert the docket
number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
DATES:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 1271
[Docket No. 2006N–0051]
Health Resources and Services
Administration
42 CFR Part 121
Blood Vessels Recovered With Organs
and Intended for Use in Organ
Transplantation; Companion
Document to Direct Final Rule
Food and Drug
Administration, Health Resources and
Services Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: The Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA) and the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
are proposing to amend their regulations
to consider as part of an organ those
blood vessels recovered with the organ
that are intended for use in organ
transplantation (HRSA regulation); and
to exclude such blood vessels from the
definition of human cells, tissues, and
cellular and tissue-based products
(HCT/Ps) (FDA regulation). We (HRSA
and FDA) are taking this action to
provide that blood vessels recovered
with organs and intended for use in
organ transplantation will be governed
by the regulations pertaining to organs.
The regulation of other recovered blood
vessels would remain unchanged. We
believe that this change will eliminate
the unnecessary burden resulting from
an organ procurement organization’s
efforts to comply with both FDA and
HRSA rules with respect to blood
vessels (FDA jurisdiction) and organs
(HRSA jurisdiction). This proposed rule
is a companion document to the direct
final rule published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register. We are
taking this action because the proposed
changes are noncontroversial, and we
do not anticipate any significant adverse
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 May 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For information regarding FDA’s rule:
Paula S. McKeever, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(HFM–17), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville
Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD
20852–1448, 301–827–6210.
For information regarding HRSA’s
rule: Jim Burdick, Division of
Transplantation, Healthcare
Systems Bureau, Health Resources
and Services Administration
(HRSA), 5600 Fishers Lane, rm.
12C–06, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–
443–7577.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
We propose to amend certain
regulations to:
• Revise the definition of ‘‘organ’’ to
include blood vessels (usually segments
of iliac arteries and veins) recovered
from an organ donor during the same
recovery procedure of such organ(s) and
intended for use in organ
transplantation (hereinafter referred to
as ‘‘blood vessels intended for use in
organ transplantation’’); and
• Exclude blood vessels intended for
use in organ transplantation from the
definition of human cells, tissues, and
cellular and tissue-based products
(HCT/Ps).
By taking this action, blood vessels
labeled and intended solely for use in
organ transplantation would be subject
to HRSA requirements in 42 CFR part
121 and any enforceable organ
procurement and transplantation
network (OPTN) policies established
under 42 CFR part 121. This action
would keep blood vessels intended for
use in organ transplantation and organs
under the same regulatory scheme,
making blood vessels intended for use
in organ transplantation readily
available to meet organ transplant
needs.
II. Background
HRSA oversees transplantation of
organs through the OPTN, which sets
policies related to the procurement,
transplantation, and allocation of
human organs. An ‘‘organ’’ is ordinarily
defined as a bodily part that performs a
function or cooperates in an activity.
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
27650
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Vascularized human organs for
transplantation are under the purview of
HRSA and are excluded from FDA’s
tissue regulations in §§ 1270.3(j)(4) and
1271.3(d)(1) (21 CFR 1270.3(j)(4) and
1271.3(d)(1)). Blood vessels are
currently regulated by FDA. Blood
vessels are included in the definition of
‘‘human tissue’’ under FDA regulations
in § 1270.3(j) (applicable to tissue
recovered before May 25, 2005), and in
the definition of ‘‘human cells, tissues,
or cellular or tissue-based products
(HCT/P’s)’’ in § 1271.3(d) (applicable to
tissue recovered on or after May 25,
2005).
There is a routine practice of
recovering blood vessels intended for
use in organ transplantation during
organ procurement and using such
blood vessels to connect donor organ
and recipient vessels. We propose to
regulate such blood vessels intended for
use in organ transplantation as part of
the organ under 42 CFR part 121.
Therefore, the applicable provisions of
42 CFR part 121 would apply. We
propose that such blood vessels do not
need to be attached to the organ(s), nor
transplanted simultaneously with such
organs to the same recipient, nor
transplanted together with the organ(s)
from the same donor. Occasionally,
blood vessels not used immediately for
the transplantation of a donated organ
are stored for a number of days and
subsequently used to modify the organ
transplant in the same recipient or to
accomplish transplantation in the
recipient of an organ from a different
donor.
Currently, FDA’s jurisdiction over
blood vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation overlaps with HRSA’s
oversight of the OPTN. OPTN’s
membership compliance review
activities are required under 42 CFR
121.10(b)(1)(iii). In addition, under 42
CFR 121.10(c), the Secretary of Health
and Human Services (the Secretary) may
take actions against OPTN members
(including, but not limited to
termination of a transplant hospital’s
participation in or reimbursement under
Medicare and Medicaid and removal of
a transplant program’s designation
under 42 CFR 121.9) for noncompliance
with 42 CFR part 121 or enforceable
OPTN policies (those approved by the
Secretary) and for actions that indicate
a risk to the health of patients or to the
public safety. Because blood vessels
intended for use in organ
transplantation are recovered by organ
procurement organizations (OPOs) and
stored temporarily at transplant centers,
having two Federal inspectional
programs for such facilities without a
medical or public health need for such
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 May 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
dual oversight would be inefficient and
burdensome.
FDA requirements and
recommendations for determining HCT/
P donor eligibility are different than
HRSA provisions for screening and
testing organ donors. This is because of
a different risk/benefit assessment for
most HCT/P recipients than for
vascularized human organ transplant
recipients. HCT/Ps from a single donor
can affect up to 100 recipients, they are
often life extending, and alternative
materials usually exist; whereas organs
from a single donor go to fewer
recipients, are almost always life saving,
and are in short supply.
Therefore, in order to avoid
duplication of efforts and reduce the
burden on affected facilities, we are
proposing to transfer jurisdiction over
blood vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation and labeled as such
from FDA to HRSA. The proposed rule
would not affect regulation of blood
vessels intended for transplantation but
not involving organ transplantation.
Jurisdiction over such blood vessels
would remain with FDA. Ordinarily,
non-organ transplant uses will have a
different risk/benefit assessment and the
current FDA requirements are
appropriate for these blood vessels.
III. Legal Authority
We are proposing to issue these
regulations under the authority of the
National Organ Transplant Act as
amended (NOTA) and section 361 of the
Public Health Service Act (the PHS Act).
NOTA authorizes HRSA, by delegation
from the Secretary, to issue regulations
governing the operation of the OPTN.
NOTA, as amended, also authorizes the
Secretary to define human organs to be
covered by the OPTN. Section 374 of the
PHS Act specifically states, ‘‘[t]he term
‘organ’ means the human kidney, liver,
heart, lung, pancreas, and any other
human organ (other than corneas and
eyes) specified by the Secretary by
regulation * * *’’ (42 U.S.C.
274b(d)(2)) (emphasis supplied).
Accordingly, HRSA is proposing to
issue this regulation to modify the
definition of ‘‘organ,’’ and to make
blood vessels labeled and intended for
use in the transplantation of organs
subject to regulations governing the
operation of the OPTN. Extending the
definition of organs governed by HRSA
in 42 CFR 121.2 to add blood vessels
recovered with organs that are intended
for use in organ transplantation, and
labeled as such, furthers the Secretary’s
charge under NOTA.
Under the authority of section 361 of
the PHS Act delegated to the
Commissioner of FDA, the Department
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of Health and Human Services may
make and enforce regulations necessary
to prevent the introduction,
transmission, or spread of
communicable diseases between the
States or from foreign countries into the
States. This modification of FDA’s
existing regulation reflects FDA’s reevaluation of the level of regulation that
is necessary to prevent disease
transmission involving blood vessels
intended for use in organ
transplantation.
IV. Description of the Proposed Rule
To transfer from FDA to HRSA
jurisdiction over blood vessels intended
for use in organ transplantation, we
propose the following revisions to 21
CFR 1271.3(d), 42 CFR 121.2, and 42
CFR 121.7.
A. 21 CFR 1271.3(d)
21 CFR 1271.3(d) defines HCT/Ps as
‘‘articles containing or consisting of
human cells or tissues that are intended
for implantation, transplantation,
infusion, or transfer into a human
recipient.’’ In the definition, we also
identify articles not considered HCT/Ps.
This proposed rule would add
§ 1271.3(d)(8), in order to exclude blood
vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation from the definition of
HCT/Ps. The rule excludes such blood
vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation only when they are
labeled as ‘‘For use in organ
transplantation only’’ to distinguish
such vessels from blood vessels not
intended for use in organ
transplantation. By labeling such blood
vessels ‘‘For use in organ
transplantation only’’ we expect that
they would not be used for other
purposes. Under the proposal, blood
vessels intended for other uses would
remain subject to 21 CFR part 1271 (or
21 CFR part 1270, for tissue recovered
prior to May 25, 2005).
B. 42 CFR 121.2
Under 42 CFR 121.2, ‘‘Organ’’ means
a human kidney, liver, heart, lung, or
pancreas. This proposed rule adds to
that definition ‘‘Blood vessels recovered
from an organ donor during the recovery
of such organ(s) are considered part of
an organ with which they are procured
for purposes of this Part if the vessels
are intended for use in organ
transplantation and labeled ‘‘For use in
organ transplantation only.’’ Blood
vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation would be required to be
in compliance with HRSA provisions
for donor screening and testing. The
labeling provision would be a distinct
requirement in order for such blood
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
vessels to fall under the regulation
governing the operation of the OPTN.
Any OPTN labeling policies, whether
voluntary or enforceable, would
supplement this requirement.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
C. 42 CFR 121.7
In 42 CFR 121.7, we are proposing to
redesignate paragraph (e) as paragraph
(f), and to add a new paragraph (e).
Under proposed 42 CFR 121.7(e), a
blood vessel intended for use in organ
transplantation would be subject to the
allocation requirements under 42 CFR
part 121 and enforceable OPTN policies
pertaining to the organ with which the
blood vessel is procured. These
provisions would apply until the
transplant center receiving the organ
determines that the blood vessel is not
needed for the transplantation of that
organ. This allocation priority will
assure that vessels that may be
necessary for the immediate
transplantation of the organs with
which they are recovered are made
available for that use prior to being
diverted to other organ transplant uses.
V. Analysis of Impacts
FDA and HRSA have examined the
impacts of the proposed rule under
Executive Order 12866 and the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612), and the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4).
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). FDA
and HRSA believe that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action
as defined by the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because the agencies do not
expect that the transfer of jurisdiction
over the blood vessels described in this
rule from FDA to HRSA will result in
substantial changes in the way
transplant hospitals and OPOs procure,
store, and transplant such blood vessels,
FDA and HRSA certify that the
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 May 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $115
million, using the most current (2003)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA and HRSA do
not expect this proposed rule to result
in any 1-year expenditure that would
meet or exceed this amount.
VI. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
This proposed rule contains no
collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
VII. Environmental Impact
FDA and HRSA have determined
under 21 CFR 25.30(j) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
VIII. Federalism
FDA and HRSA have analyzed this
proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order
13132. FDA and HRSA have determined
that the rule does not contain policies
that have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, FDA
and HRSA have concluded that the rule
does not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
IX. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
X. Proposed Effective Date
FDA and HRSA propose that any final
rule that may issue based on this
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27651
proposal become effective on the date of
its publication in the Federal Register.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 1271
Biologics, Communicable diseases,
Drugs, HIV/AIDS, Human cells, tissues,
and cellular and tissue-based products,
Medical Devices, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 121
Healthcare, Hospitals, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Public Health
Service Act and under authority
delegated to the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs and to the Administrator,
Health Resources and Services
Administration it is proposed that 21
CFR part 1271 and 42 CFR part 121 be
amended as follows:
21 CFR Chapter I
PART 1271—HUMAN CELLS, TISSUES,
AND CELLULAR AND TISSUE-BASED
PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 1271 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 216, 243, 263a, 264,
271.
2. Section 1271.3 is amended by
adding paragraph (d)(8) to read as
follows:
§ 1271.3 How does FDA define important
terms in this part?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(8) Blood vessels recovered with an
organ, as defined in 42 CFR 121.2, that
are intended for use in organ
transplantation and labeled ‘‘For use in
organ transplantation only.’’
*
*
*
*
*
42 CFR Chapter I
PART 121—ORGAN PROCUREMENT
AND TRANSPLANTATION NETWORK
3. The authority citation for 42 CFR
part 121 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 215, 371–376 of the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 216,
273–274d); and sections 1102, 1106, 1138,
and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1302, 1306, 1320b–8 and 1395hh).
4. Section 121.2 is amended by
adding a sentence at the end of the
definition of ‘‘Organ’’ to read as follows:
§ 121.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Organ *** Blood vessels recovered
from an organ donor during the recovery
of such organ(s) are considered part of
an organ with which they are procured
for purposes of this part if the vessels
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
27652
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
are intended for use in organ
transplantation and labeled ‘‘For use in
organ transplantation only.’’
*
*
*
*
*
5. Section 121.7 is amended by
redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph
(f) and by adding paragraph (e) to read
as follows:
§ 121.7
Identification of organ recipient.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Blood vessels considered part of an
organ. A blood vessel that is considered
part of an organ under this part shall be
subject to the allocation requirements
and policies pertaining to the organ
with which the blood vessel is procured
until and unless the transplant center
receiving the organ determines that the
blood vessel is not needed for the
transplantation of that organ.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 10, 2006.
Elizabeth M. Duke,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services
and Administration.
Dated: February 8, 2006.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy, Food and
Drug Administration.
[FR Doc. 06–4370 Filed 5–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 551
[BOP Docket No. 1140–P]
RIN 1120–AB42
Smoking/No Smoking Areas
Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In this document, the Bureau
of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to revise
regulations pertaining to smoking/no
smoking for inmates in Bureau facilities.
The revised regulations indicate that
smoking is generally prohibited in and
on the grounds of Bureau institutions
and offices, with the following two
exceptions: Smoking is permitted as
part of an authorized inmate religious
activity; and, for Bureau staff and
official visitors, smoking is permitted
only in smoking areas designated by the
Warden. This rule also clarifies that
possession of smoking apparatus and
tobacco in any form is prohibited for
inmates, unless as part of an authorized
inmate religious activity. Smoking is
defined as inhaling the smoke of any
substance through the use of smoking
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 May 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
apparatus including, but not limited to,
cigars, cigarettes, or pipes. We intend
this amendment to promote a clean air
environment and to protect the health
and safety of staff and inmates.
DATES: Comments due by July 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Our e-mail address is
BOPRULES@BOP.GOV. Comments
should be submitted to the Rules Unit,
Office of General Counsel, Bureau of
Prisons, 320 First Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20534. You may view
an electronic version of this rule at
www.regulations.gov. You may also
comment via the Internet to BOP at
BOPRULES@BOP.GOV or by using the
https://www.regulations.gov comment
form for this regulation. When
submitting comments electronically you
must include the BOP Docket No. in the
subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Qureshi, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202)
307–2105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In this
document, the Bureau proposes to
revise regulations pertaining to
smoking/no smoking for inmates in
Bureau facilities. The revised
regulations indicate that smoking is
generally prohibited in and on the
grounds of Bureau institutions and
offices, with the following two
exceptions: Smoking is permitted as
part of an authorized inmate religious
activity; and, for Bureau staff and
official visitors, smoking is permitted
only in smoking areas designated by the
Warden. This rule also clarifies that
possession of smoking apparatus and
tobacco in any form is prohibited for
inmates, unless as part of an authorized
inmate religious activity. Smoking is
defined as inhaling the smoke of any
substance through the use of smoking
apparatus including, but not limited to,
cigars, cigarettes, or pipes. We intend
this amendment to promote a clean air
environment and to protect the health
and safety of staff and inmates.
A final rule was published on this
subject on March 24, 2004 (69 FR
13735), after publication of a proposed
rule on November 25, 1998 (63 FR
65502), and a modification on May 6,
1999 (64 FR 24468). The 2004 final rule
prohibited indoor smoking areas for
general inmate use, but allowed
Wardens to designate outdoor smoking
areas for general inmate use.
Several comments to the proposed
rule and modification objected to
allowing even outdoor smoking areas for
inmates. These commenters instead
proposed a total ban on the possession
and use of lighted tobacco products for
all prisoners. The commenters
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
expressed dissatisfaction with the
enforcement of the then-current
smoking policy. Also, commenters
expressed a general belief that
prohibiting indoor smoking within
Bureau facilities would have little
impact on reducing smoking and
improving the air quality. Two
commenters on the original proposed
rule also suggested that all tobacco
products be banned and no tobacco
products be sold in federal prisons.
As stated in the 2004 final rule
document, the Bureau does not believe
that removing tobacco products from the
institution’s commissary will have a
significant economic impact as defined
by the controlling statutes noted below.
While there may be some impact on
commissary profits, the Bureau believes
that the health benefits outweigh any
potential drop in such profits.
Also, when the 2004 regulations were
implemented, Bureau policy mandated
smoking cessation programs for inmates
at all institutions to help ease inmate
concerns about the possibility of no
smoking areas. Nicotine patches are
now available at the inmate’s expense
through commissary purchase.
In consideration of the concerns
raised by these commenters and to
further strengthen the Bureau’s
intention to protect the health and
safety of both staff and inmates, we
propose to revise the Bureau’s smoking
regulations to indicate that smoking is
generally prohibited in and on the
grounds of Bureau institutions and
offices, with the following two
exceptions: Smoking is permitted as
part of an authorized inmate religious
activity; and, for Bureau staff and
official visitors, smoking is permitted
only in smoking areas designated by the
Warden.
Also in consideration of the
commenters’ concerns, this rule will
prohibit inmate possession of smoking
apparatus and tobacco in any form,
unless as part of an authorized inmate
religious activity.
The hazards associated with tobacco
smoke and second-hand inhalation of
smoke by nonsmokers is well
documented and the known health risks
associated with smoking support
implementation of stricter smoking/no
smoking rules. The Bureau believes that
prohibiting smoking, including inmate
possession of smoking apparatus and
tobacco in any form, with only limited
exceptions for authorized inmate
religious activity and for Bureau staff
and official visitors, designated smoking
areas is the most practicable step toward
promoting a clean air environment and
protecting the health and safety of staff
and inmates.
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27649-27652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4370]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 92 / Friday, May 12, 2006 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 27649]]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 1271
[Docket No. 2006N-0051]
Health Resources and Services Administration
42 CFR Part 121
Blood Vessels Recovered With Organs and Intended for Use in Organ
Transplantation; Companion Document to Direct Final Rule
AGENCIES: Food and Drug Administration, Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are proposing to amend their
regulations to consider as part of an organ those blood vessels
recovered with the organ that are intended for use in organ
transplantation (HRSA regulation); and to exclude such blood vessels
from the definition of human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-
based products (HCT/Ps) (FDA regulation). We (HRSA and FDA) are taking
this action to provide that blood vessels recovered with organs and
intended for use in organ transplantation will be governed by the
regulations pertaining to organs. The regulation of other recovered
blood vessels would remain unchanged. We believe that this change will
eliminate the unnecessary burden resulting from an organ procurement
organization's efforts to comply with both FDA and HRSA rules with
respect to blood vessels (FDA jurisdiction) and organs (HRSA
jurisdiction). This proposed rule is a companion document to the direct
final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
We are taking this action because the proposed changes are
noncontroversial, and we do not anticipate any significant adverse
comments. If we receive any significant adverse comments that warrant
terminating the direct final rule, we will consider such comments on
the proposed rule in developing the final rule.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the proposed rule by
July 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 2006N-
0051, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following ways:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the agency Web site.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions]: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
To ensure more timely processing of comments, FDA is no longer
accepting comments submitted to the agency by e-mail. FDA encourages
you to continue to submit electronic comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal or the agency Web site, as described in the
Electronic Submissions portion of this paragraph. FDA will share all
comments received with HRSA.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
(FDA) and Docket No. 2006N-0051 for this rulemaking. All comments
received may be posted without change to https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/
dockets/default.htm, including any personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting comments see the ``Comments''
heading in section IX of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm
and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this
document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to
the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For information regarding FDA's rule: Paula S. McKeever, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-17), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-
1448, 301-827-6210.
For information regarding HRSA's rule: Jim Burdick, Division of
Transplantation, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA), 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 12C-06,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-7577.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
We propose to amend certain regulations to:
Revise the definition of ``organ'' to include blood
vessels (usually segments of iliac arteries and veins) recovered from
an organ donor during the same recovery procedure of such organ(s) and
intended for use in organ transplantation (hereinafter referred to as
``blood vessels intended for use in organ transplantation''); and
Exclude blood vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation from the definition of human cells, tissues, and
cellular and tissue-based products (HCT/Ps).
By taking this action, blood vessels labeled and intended solely
for use in organ transplantation would be subject to HRSA requirements
in 42 CFR part 121 and any enforceable organ procurement and
transplantation network (OPTN) policies established under 42 CFR part
121. This action would keep blood vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation and organs under the same regulatory scheme, making
blood vessels intended for use in organ transplantation readily
available to meet organ transplant needs.
II. Background
HRSA oversees transplantation of organs through the OPTN, which
sets policies related to the procurement, transplantation, and
allocation of human organs. An ``organ'' is ordinarily defined as a
bodily part that performs a function or cooperates in an activity.
[[Page 27650]]
Vascularized human organs for transplantation are under the purview of
HRSA and are excluded from FDA's tissue regulations in Sec. Sec.
1270.3(j)(4) and 1271.3(d)(1) (21 CFR 1270.3(j)(4) and 1271.3(d)(1)).
Blood vessels are currently regulated by FDA. Blood vessels are
included in the definition of ``human tissue'' under FDA regulations in
Sec. 1270.3(j) (applicable to tissue recovered before May 25, 2005),
and in the definition of ``human cells, tissues, or cellular or tissue-
based products (HCT/P's)'' in Sec. 1271.3(d) (applicable to tissue
recovered on or after May 25, 2005).
There is a routine practice of recovering blood vessels intended
for use in organ transplantation during organ procurement and using
such blood vessels to connect donor organ and recipient vessels. We
propose to regulate such blood vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation as part of the organ under 42 CFR part 121. Therefore,
the applicable provisions of 42 CFR part 121 would apply. We propose
that such blood vessels do not need to be attached to the organ(s), nor
transplanted simultaneously with such organs to the same recipient, nor
transplanted together with the organ(s) from the same donor.
Occasionally, blood vessels not used immediately for the
transplantation of a donated organ are stored for a number of days and
subsequently used to modify the organ transplant in the same recipient
or to accomplish transplantation in the recipient of an organ from a
different donor.
Currently, FDA's jurisdiction over blood vessels intended for use
in organ transplantation overlaps with HRSA's oversight of the OPTN.
OPTN's membership compliance review activities are required under 42
CFR 121.10(b)(1)(iii). In addition, under 42 CFR 121.10(c), the
Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) may take actions
against OPTN members (including, but not limited to termination of a
transplant hospital's participation in or reimbursement under Medicare
and Medicaid and removal of a transplant program's designation under 42
CFR 121.9) for noncompliance with 42 CFR part 121 or enforceable OPTN
policies (those approved by the Secretary) and for actions that
indicate a risk to the health of patients or to the public safety.
Because blood vessels intended for use in organ transplantation are
recovered by organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and stored
temporarily at transplant centers, having two Federal inspectional
programs for such facilities without a medical or public health need
for such dual oversight would be inefficient and burdensome.
FDA requirements and recommendations for determining HCT/P donor
eligibility are different than HRSA provisions for screening and
testing organ donors. This is because of a different risk/benefit
assessment for most HCT/P recipients than for vascularized human organ
transplant recipients. HCT/Ps from a single donor can affect up to 100
recipients, they are often life extending, and alternative materials
usually exist; whereas organs from a single donor go to fewer
recipients, are almost always life saving, and are in short supply.
Therefore, in order to avoid duplication of efforts and reduce the
burden on affected facilities, we are proposing to transfer
jurisdiction over blood vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation and labeled as such from FDA to HRSA. The proposed rule
would not affect regulation of blood vessels intended for
transplantation but not involving organ transplantation. Jurisdiction
over such blood vessels would remain with FDA. Ordinarily, non-organ
transplant uses will have a different risk/benefit assessment and the
current FDA requirements are appropriate for these blood vessels.
III. Legal Authority
We are proposing to issue these regulations under the authority of
the National Organ Transplant Act as amended (NOTA) and section 361 of
the Public Health Service Act (the PHS Act). NOTA authorizes HRSA, by
delegation from the Secretary, to issue regulations governing the
operation of the OPTN. NOTA, as amended, also authorizes the Secretary
to define human organs to be covered by the OPTN. Section 374 of the
PHS Act specifically states, ``[t]he term `organ' means the human
kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas, and any other human organ (other
than corneas and eyes) specified by the Secretary by regulation * * *''
(42 U.S.C. 274b(d)(2)) (emphasis supplied). Accordingly, HRSA is
proposing to issue this regulation to modify the definition of
``organ,'' and to make blood vessels labeled and intended for use in
the transplantation of organs subject to regulations governing the
operation of the OPTN. Extending the definition of organs governed by
HRSA in 42 CFR 121.2 to add blood vessels recovered with organs that
are intended for use in organ transplantation, and labeled as such,
furthers the Secretary's charge under NOTA.
Under the authority of section 361 of the PHS Act delegated to the
Commissioner of FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services may
make and enforce regulations necessary to prevent the introduction,
transmission, or spread of communicable diseases between the States or
from foreign countries into the States. This modification of FDA's
existing regulation reflects FDA's re-evaluation of the level of
regulation that is necessary to prevent disease transmission involving
blood vessels intended for use in organ transplantation.
IV. Description of the Proposed Rule
To transfer from FDA to HRSA jurisdiction over blood vessels
intended for use in organ transplantation, we propose the following
revisions to 21 CFR 1271.3(d), 42 CFR 121.2, and 42 CFR 121.7.
A. 21 CFR 1271.3(d)
21 CFR 1271.3(d) defines HCT/Ps as ``articles containing or
consisting of human cells or tissues that are intended for
implantation, transplantation, infusion, or transfer into a human
recipient.'' In the definition, we also identify articles not
considered HCT/Ps. This proposed rule would add Sec. 1271.3(d)(8), in
order to exclude blood vessels intended for use in organ
transplantation from the definition of HCT/Ps. The rule excludes such
blood vessels intended for use in organ transplantation only when they
are labeled as ``For use in organ transplantation only'' to distinguish
such vessels from blood vessels not intended for use in organ
transplantation. By labeling such blood vessels ``For use in organ
transplantation only'' we expect that they would not be used for other
purposes. Under the proposal, blood vessels intended for other uses
would remain subject to 21 CFR part 1271 (or 21 CFR part 1270, for
tissue recovered prior to May 25, 2005).
B. 42 CFR 121.2
Under 42 CFR 121.2, ``Organ'' means a human kidney, liver, heart,
lung, or pancreas. This proposed rule adds to that definition ``Blood
vessels recovered from an organ donor during the recovery of such
organ(s) are considered part of an organ with which they are procured
for purposes of this Part if the vessels are intended for use in organ
transplantation and labeled ``For use in organ transplantation only.''
Blood vessels intended for use in organ transplantation would be
required to be in compliance with HRSA provisions for donor screening
and testing. The labeling provision would be a distinct requirement in
order for such blood
[[Page 27651]]
vessels to fall under the regulation governing the operation of the
OPTN. Any OPTN labeling policies, whether voluntary or enforceable,
would supplement this requirement.
C. 42 CFR 121.7
In 42 CFR 121.7, we are proposing to redesignate paragraph (e) as
paragraph (f), and to add a new paragraph (e). Under proposed 42 CFR
121.7(e), a blood vessel intended for use in organ transplantation
would be subject to the allocation requirements under 42 CFR part 121
and enforceable OPTN policies pertaining to the organ with which the
blood vessel is procured. These provisions would apply until the
transplant center receiving the organ determines that the blood vessel
is not needed for the transplantation of that organ. This allocation
priority will assure that vessels that may be necessary for the
immediate transplantation of the organs with which they are recovered
are made available for that use prior to being diverted to other organ
transplant uses.
V. Analysis of Impacts
FDA and HRSA have examined the impacts of the proposed rule under
Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary,
to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). FDA and HRSA believe
that this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because the agencies do not expect that the transfer
of jurisdiction over the blood vessels described in this rule from FDA
to HRSA will result in substantial changes in the way transplant
hospitals and OPOs procure, store, and transplant such blood vessels,
FDA and HRSA certify that the proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $115 million, using the most current (2003) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA and HRSA do not
expect this proposed rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that
would meet or exceed this amount.
VI. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule contains no collections of information.
Therefore, clearance by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
is not required.
VII. Environmental Impact
FDA and HRSA have determined under 21 CFR 25.30(j) that this action
is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
VIII. Federalism
FDA and HRSA have analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with
the principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA and HRSA have
determined that the rule does not contain policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Accordingly, FDA and HRSA have concluded that the rule does not contain
policies that have federalism implications as defined in the Executive
order and, consequently, a federalism summary impact statement is not
required.
IX. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
X. Proposed Effective Date
FDA and HRSA propose that any final rule that may issue based on
this proposal become effective on the date of its publication in the
Federal Register.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 1271
Biologics, Communicable diseases, Drugs, HIV/AIDS, Human cells,
tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products, Medical Devices,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 121
Healthcare, Hospitals, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Public Health Service Act and under authority
delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and to the
Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration it is
proposed that 21 CFR part 1271 and 42 CFR part 121 be amended as
follows:
21 CFR Chapter I
PART 1271--HUMAN CELLS, TISSUES, AND CELLULAR AND TISSUE-BASED
PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 1271 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 216, 243, 263a, 264, 271.
2. Section 1271.3 is amended by adding paragraph (d)(8) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1271.3 How does FDA define important terms in this part?
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(8) Blood vessels recovered with an organ, as defined in 42 CFR
121.2, that are intended for use in organ transplantation and labeled
``For use in organ transplantation only.''
* * * * *
42 CFR Chapter I
PART 121--ORGAN PROCUREMENT AND TRANSPLANTATION NETWORK
3. The authority citation for 42 CFR part 121 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Sections 215, 371-376 of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 216, 273-274d); and sections 1102, 1106, 1138, and
1871 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302, 1306, 1320b-8 and
1395hh).
4. Section 121.2 is amended by adding a sentence at the end of the
definition of ``Organ'' to read as follows:
Sec. 121.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Organ *** Blood vessels recovered from an organ donor during the
recovery of such organ(s) are considered part of an organ with which
they are procured for purposes of this part if the vessels
[[Page 27652]]
are intended for use in organ transplantation and labeled ``For use in
organ transplantation only.''
* * * * *
5. Section 121.7 is amended by redesignating paragraph (e) as
paragraph (f) and by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 121.7 Identification of organ recipient.
* * * * *
(e) Blood vessels considered part of an organ. A blood vessel that
is considered part of an organ under this part shall be subject to the
allocation requirements and policies pertaining to the organ with which
the blood vessel is procured until and unless the transplant center
receiving the organ determines that the blood vessel is not needed for
the transplantation of that organ.
* * * * *
Dated: April 10, 2006.
Elizabeth M. Duke,
Administrator, Health Resources and Services and Administration.
Dated: February 8, 2006.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy, Food and Drug Administration.
[FR Doc. 06-4370 Filed 5-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S