Medicare Program; Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System Payment Update for Rate Year Beginning July 1, 2006 (RY 2007), 27040-27156 [06-4202]

Download as PDF 27040 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 42 CFR Parts 412 and 424 [CMS–1306–F] RIN 0938–AN82 Medicare Program; Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System Payment Update for Rate Year Beginning July 1, 2006 (RY 2007) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for Medicare inpatient hospital services provided by inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs). These changes are applicable to IPF discharges occurring during the rate year beginning July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. In addition, we are adopting the new Office of Management and Budget (OMB) labor market area definitions for the purpose of geographic classification and the wage index. We are also making revisions to existing policies and implementing new polices. DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on July 1, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorothy Colbert, (410) 786–4533 for general information. Mary Lee Seifert, (410) 786–0030 for information regarding the market basket and laborrelated share. Theresa Bean, (410) 786– 2287 for information regarding the regulatory impact analysis. Matthew Quarrick, (410) 786–9867 for information on the wage index. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Table of Contents To assist readers in referencing sections contained in this document, we are providing the following table of contents. I. Background A. General and Legislative History B. Overview of the Establishment of the IPF PPS C. Applicability of the IPF PPS II. Overview for Updating the IPF PPS A. Requirements for Updating the IPF PPS B. Transition Period for Implementation of the IPF PPS III. Provisions of the Proposed Regulation IV. Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments V. Updates to the IPF PPS for RY Beginning July 1, 2006 A. Calculation of the Average Per Diem Cost VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 B. Determining the Standardized BudgetNeutral Federal Per Diem Base Rate 1. Standardization of the Federal Per Diem Base Rate 2. Calculation of the Budget Neutrality Adjustment a. Outlier Adjustment b. Stop-Loss Provision Adjustment c. Behavioral Offset 3. Revision of Standardization Factor C. Update of the Federal Per Diem Base Rate 1. Market Basket for IPFs Reimbursed Under the IPF PPS a. Market Basket Index for IPF PPS b. Overview of the RPL Market Basket 2. Methodology for Operating Portion of the RPL Market Basket 3. Methodology for Capital Portion of the RPL Market Basket 4. Labor-Related Share VI. Update of the IPF PPS Adjustment Factors A. Overview of the IPF PPS Adjustment Factors B. Patient-Level Adjustments 1. Adjustment for DRG Assignment 2. Payment for Comorbid Conditions 3. Patient Age Adjustments 4. Variable Per Diem Adjustments C. Facility-Level Adjustments 1. Wage Index Adjustment a. Revisions of IPF PPS Geographic Classifications b. Current IPF PPS Labor Market Areas Based on MSAs c. Core-Based Statistical Areas d. Revision of the IPF PPS Labor Market Areas i. New England MSAs ii. Metropolitan Divisions iii. Micropolitan Areas e. Implementation of the Revised Labor Market Areas Under the IPF PPS f. Wage Index Budget Neutrality 2. Adjustment for Rural Location 3. Teaching Adjustment 4. Cost of Living Adjustment for IPFs Located in Alaska and Hawaii 5. Adjustment for IPFs With a Qualifying Emergency Department (ED) a. New Source of Admission Code To Implement the ED Adjustment b. Applicability of the ED Adjustment to IPFs in Critical Access Hospitals D. Other Payment Adjustments and Policies 1. Outlier Payments a. Update to the Outlier Fixed Dollar Loss Threshold Amount b. Statistical Accuracy of Cost-to-Charge Ratios 2. Stop-Loss Provision 3. Patients Who Receive Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) 4. Physician Certification and Recertification Requirements 5. Provision of Therapeutic Recreation in IPFs 6. Same Day Transfers VII. Miscellaneous Public Comments Within the Scope of the Proposed Rule VIII. Provisions of the Final Rule IX. Collection of Information Requirements X. Regulatory Impact Analysis PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 Acronyms Because of the many terms to which we refer by acronym in this final rule, we are listing the acronyms used and their corresponding terms in alphabetical order below: BBA Balanced Budget Act of 1997, (Pub. L. 105–33) BBRA Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP [State Children’s Health Insurance Program] Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999, (Pub. L. 106–113) BIPA Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP [State Children’s Health Insurance Program] Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000, (Pub. L. 106–554) CBSA Core-Based Statistical Area CCR Cost-to-charge ratio CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CMSA Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area DSM–IV–TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition—Text Revision DRGs Diagnosis-related groups FY Federal fiscal year HCRIS Hospital Cost Report Information System ICD–9–CM International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification IPFs Inpatient psychiatric facilities IRFs Inpatient rehabilitation facilities LTCHs Long-term care hospitals MedPAR Medicare provider analysis and review file MMA Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, (Pub. L. 108–173) MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area NECMA New England County Metropolitan Area OMB Office of Management and Budget PIP Periodic Interim Payments RY Rate Year (July 1 through June 30) TEFRA Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, (Pub. L. 97– 248) I. Background A. General and Legislative History The Congress directed implementation of a prospective payment system (PPS) for acute care hospitals with the enactment of Pub. L. 98–21. Section 601 of the Social Security Amendments of 1983 (Pub. L. 98–21) added a new section 1886(d) to the Social Security Act (the Act) that replaced the reasonable cost-based payment system for most hospital inpatient services with a PPS. Although most hospital inpatient services became subject to the PPS, certain hospitals, including IPFs, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), long term care hospitals (LTCHs), and children’s hospitals were excluded from the PPS for acute care hospitals. These hospitals and units were paid their reasonable costs for inpatient services, E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations subject to a per discharge limitation or target amount under the authority of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub. L. 97–248. The regulations implementing the TEFRA (reasonable cost-based) payment provisions are located at 42 CFR part 413. Cancer hospitals were added to the list of excluded hospitals by section 6004(a) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, (Pub. L. 101–239). The Congress enacted various provisions in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) (Pub. L. 105–33), the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP (State Children’s Health Insurance Program) Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (BBRA) (Pub. L. 106–113), and the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (BIPA) (Pub. L. 106–554) to replace the reasonable cost-based method of reimbursement with a PPS for IRFs, LTCHs, and IPFs. Section 124 of the BBRA required implementation of the IPF PPS. Section 124 of the BBRA mandated that the Secretary—(1) Develop a per diem PPS for inpatient hospital services furnished in psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric units; (2) include in the PPS an adequate patient classification system that reflects the differences in patient resource use and costs among psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric units; (3) maintain budget neutrality; (4) permit the Secretary to require psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric units to submit information necessary for the development of the PPS; and (5) submit a report to the Congress describing the development of the PPS. Section 124 of the BBRA also required that the IPF PPS be implemented for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2002. Section 405(g)(2) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108–173) extended the IPF PPS to distinct part psychiatric units of critical access hospitals (CAHs). To implement these provisions, the following were published: a proposed rule in the Federal Register on November 28, 2003 (68 FR 66920); a final rule on November 15, 2004 (69 FR 66922); and a correction notice to the final rule on April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16724). For more detail, see the program memorandum Web site, https:// www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/ 01_overview.asp. VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 B. Overview of the Establishment of the IPF PPS The November 2004 IPF PPS final rule established regulations for the IPF PPS under 42 CFR 412, subpart N. The IPF PPS established the Federal per diem base rate for each patient day in an IPF derived from the national average daily routine operating, ancillary, and capital costs in IPFs in FY 2002. The average per diem cost was updated to the midpoint of the first year under the IPF PPS, standardized to account for the overall positive effects of the IPF PPS payment adjustments, and adjusted for budget neutrality. The Federal per diem payment under the IPF PPS is comprised of the Federal per diem base rate described above and certain patient and facility payment adjustments that were found in the regression analysis to be associated with statistically significant per diem cost differences (see 69 FR 66933 through 66936 for a description of the regression analysis). The patient-level adjustments include age, DRG assignment, comorbidities, and variable per diem adjustments to reflect the higher cost incurred in the early days of a psychiatric stay. Facility-level adjustments include adjustments for the IPF’s wage index, rural location, teaching status, a cost of living adjustment for IPFs located in Alaska and Hawaii, and presence of a qualifying emergency department (ED). The IPF PPS provides additional payments for outlier cases, stop-loss protection which is applicable only during the IPF PPS transition period, includes special payment provisions for interrupted stays, and a per treatment adjustment for patients who undergo electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). We refer readers to the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule for a comprehensive discussion of the research and data that supported the establishment of the IPF PPS. We established a CMS Web site that contains useful information regarding the IPF PPS including the proposed rules, final rules, and the correction notices. The Web site URL is https:// www.cms.hhs.gov/ InpatientPsychFacilPPS/ and may be accessed to download or view publications and other information pertinent to the IPF PPS. C. Applicability of the IPF PPS The IPF PPS is applicable to freestanding psychiatric hospitals, including government-operated psychiatric hospitals, and distinct part psychiatric units of acute care hospitals and CAHs. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27041 The regulations at § 412.402 define an IPF as a hospital that meets the requirements specified in § 412.22, § 412.23(a), § 482.60, § 482.61, and § 482.62, and units that meet the requirements specified in § 412.22, § 412.25, and § 412.27. However, the following hospitals are paid under a special payment provision, as described in § 412.22(c) and, therefore, are not subject to the IPF PPS rules: • Veterans Administration hospitals. • Hospitals that are reimbursed under State cost control systems approved under 42 CFR part 403. • Hospitals that are reimbursed in accordance with demonstration projects specified in section 402(a) of Pub. L. 90– 248 (42 U.S.C. 1395b–1) or section 222(a) of Pub. L. 92–603 (42 U.S.C. 1395b–1(note)). • Non-participating hospitals furnishing emergency services to Medicare beneficiaries. II. Overview for Updating the IPF PPS A. Requirements for Updating the IPF PPS Section 124 of the BBRA does not specify an update strategy for the IPF PPS and is broadly written to give the Secretary discretion in establishing an update methodology. Therefore, we reviewed the update approach used in other hospital PPSs (specifically, the IRF and LTCH PPS update methodologies). As a result of this analysis, we stated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66966) that we would implement the IPF PPS using the following update strategy—(1) Calculate the final Federal per diem base rate to be budget neutral for the 18month period (that is, January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006); (2) use a July 1 through June 30 annual update cycle; and (3) allow the IPF PPS first update to be effective for discharges July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. As explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we believe it is important to delay updating the adjustment factors derived from the regression analysis until we have IPF PPS data that include as much information as possible regarding the patient-level characteristics of the population that each IPF serves. For this reason, we do not intend to update the regression analysis and recalculate the Federal per diem base rate until we analyze IPF PPS data (that is, no earlier than FY 2008). Until that analysis is complete, we stated our intention to publish a notice in the Federal Register each spring to update the IPF PPS as specified in § 412.428. E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27042 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations However, since the implementation of the IPF PPS, a new market basket index was announced in the August 2005 IPPS final rule. We believe that this new market basket should be implemented in the IPF PPS as well in order to update the system using the best data available. Therefore, rather than publish a notice to update the IPF PPS in 2006, we published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on January 23, 2006 (71 FR 3616) to allow interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed changes. Updates to the IPF PPS as specified in § 412.428 include: • A description of the methodology and data used to calculate the updated Federal per diem base payment amount. • The rate of increase factor as described in § 412.424(a)(2)(iii), which is based on the excluded hospital with capital market basket under the update methodology of 1886(b)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act for each year. • The best available hospital wage index and information regarding whether an adjustment to the Federal per diem base rate is needed to maintain budget neutrality. • Updates to the fixed dollar loss amount in order to maintain the appropriate outlier percentage. • Describe the ICD–9–CM coding and DRG classification changes discussed in the annual update to the hospital IPPS regulations. • Update the ECT adjustment by a factor specified by CMS. B. Transition Period for Implementation of the IPF PPS In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we established § 412.426 to provide for a 3-year transition period from reasonable cost-based reimbursement to full prospective payment for IPFs. New IPFs, as defined in § 412.426(c), are paid 100 percent of the Federal per diem rate. However, for those IPFs that are transitioning to the new system, during the 3-year period as specified in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, payment is based on an increasing percentage of the PPS payment and a decreasing percentage of each IPF’s facility-specific TEFRA reimbursement rate. The blend percentages are as follows: TABLE 1.—IPF PPS FINAL RULE TRANSITION BLEND FACTORS Transition year 1 .................. 2 .................. 3 .................. January January January January 1, 1, 1, 1, 2005 2006 2007 2008 ............................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................. mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Changes to the blend percentages occur at the beginning of an IPF’s cost reporting period. We note that we are currently in year two of the transition period. As a result, for discharges occurring during IPF cost reporting periods beginning in calendar year (CY) 2006, IPFs would receive a blended payment consisting of 50 percent of the facility-specific TEFRA payment and 50 percent of the IPF PPS payment amount. However, regardless of when an IPF’s cost reporting year begins, the payment update will be effective for discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. We note that we are not making any changes to the transition approach established in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule. III. Provisions of the Proposed Regulation In January 2006, we published a proposed rule that appeared in the Federal Register at (71 FR 3616), and on February 24, 2006, a correction notice appeared in the Federal Register (71 FR 9505) to correct technical errors in the proposed rule and to extend the comment period for our policy concerning Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). The January 2006 proposed rule (hereinafter referred to as the Rate Year (RY) 2007 proposed rule) set forth the proposed annual update to the proposed prospective payment for IPFs for discharges occurring during the RY VerDate Aug<31>2005 TEFRA rate percentage Cost reporting periods beginning on or after 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 beginning July 1, 2006. As part of the update, we proposed to incorporate OMB’s revised definitions for MSAs and its new definitions of Micropolitan Statistical Areas and Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs). In addition, we proposed the following—— • Update payments for IPFs using a market basket reflecting the operating and capital cost structures of IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs. • Develop cost weights for benefits, contract labor, and blood and blood products using the FY 2002-based IPPS market basket. • Provide weights and proxies for the FY 2002-based RPL market basket. • Indicate the methodology for the capital portion of the FY 2002-based RPL market basket. • Update the outlier threshold amount to maintain total estimated outlier payments at 2 percent of total estimated payments. • Use source code ‘‘D’’ to identify IPF patients who have been transferred to the IPF from the same hospital or CAH. • Retain the 17 percent adjustment for IPFs located in rural areas, the 1.31 adjustment for IPFs with a qualifying ED, the 0.5150 teaching adjustment to the Federal per diem base rate, and the DRG adjustment factors currently being paid to IPFs for discharges occurring during RY 2007. • Update the payment rate for ECT. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 75 50 25 0 IPF PPS Federal rate percentage 25 50 75 100 • Update the DRG listing and comorbidity categories to reflect the ICD–9–CM revisions effective October 1, 2005. In addition to addressing these issues in the proposed rule for RY 2007, we also proposed making the following specific revisions to the existing text of the regulations. We proposed to make conforming changes in 42 CFR parts 412 and 424, as discussed throughout this preamble. In § 412.27, we proposed to revise paragraph (b) to remove the reference to recreational therapy. In § 412.402, we proposed to revise the heading of ‘‘Fixed dollar lossthreshold’’ to ‘‘Fixed dollar loss threshold amount’’ and revise the definitions of ‘‘Fixed dollar loss threshold amount’’, ‘‘Qualifying emergency department’’, ‘‘Rural area’’ and ‘‘Urban area.’’ For consistency, we proposed to make conforming changes to these terminologies wherever they appear in the regulations text. In § 412.424, we proposed to add paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(E) to clarify that the teaching adjustment is made on a claim basis as an interim payment and the final payment in full is made during the final settlement of the cost report. For clarity, we also proposed to revise paragraph (d)(2) introductory text. The current language in (d)(2)(iii) would become the introductory text for paragraph (d)(2) and paragraph E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations (d)(2)(iii) would be removed. In addition, we proposed to revise § 412.424(d)(3)(i)(A) to clarify that an outlier payment is made if an IPF’s estimated total cost for a case exceeds a fixed dollar loss threshold amount plus the Federal payment amount for the case. In § 412.426(a), we proposed to correct the cross reference to the Federal per diem payment amount. We incorrectly referenced the Federal per diem base rate as § 412.424(c). The correct cross reference to the Federal per diem payment amount is § 412.424(d). In § 412.428, we proposed to revise paragraph (b) to specify that for discharges occurring on or after January 1, 2005 but before July 1, 2006 the rate of increase factor for the Federal portion of the payment is based on the FY 1997based excluded hospital with capital market basket and for discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2006, the rate of increase factor for the Federal portion of the payment is based on the FY 2002-based Rehabilitation, Psychiatric, and Long-Term Care (RPL) market basket. In addition, we proposed to add a new paragraph (g) to state that we would update the national urban and rural cost to charge ratio medians and ceilings. Paragraph (1) through (3) would specify the types of IPFs in which to apply the national cost to charge ratio. Furthermore, we proposed to add a new paragraph (h) to update the cost of living adjustment factors, if appropriate. In § 424.14, we proposed to revise the title to read, ‘‘Requirements for inpatient services of inpatient psychiatric facilities,’’ to ensure consistency in compliance with the requirements among all IPFs. We also proposed to add a new paragraph (c)(3) to clarify for purposes of payment under the IPF PPS, that the physician would also recertify that the patient continues to need, on a daily basis, active inpatient psychiatric care (furnished directly by or requiring the supervision of inpatient psychiatric facility personnel) or other professional services that can only be provided on an inpatient basis. In addition, we proposed to revise paragraph (d)(2) to state that the first recertification is required as of the 12th day of hospitalization. Subsequent recertifications would be required at intervals established by the hospital’s utilization review committee (on a caseby-case basis if it so chooses), but no less frequently than every 30 days. VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 IV. Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments We provided for a 60 day comment period on the RY 2007 proposed rule. The correction notice to correct technical errors that appeared in the RY 2007 proposed rule appeared in the Federal Register on February 24, 2006. The correction notice extended the public comment period on the ECT policy, to allow the public an opportunity to comment on the corrected policy. We received approximately 32 public comments from hospital associations, psychiatric hospitals and units, and acute care hospitals. In general, commenters expressed some concern about a few of our proposals and suggested that we wait to implement specific updates to the IPF PPS until we can analyze 2005 claims data. A few commenters requested that we provide the provider impact files that are comparable to the files prepared for the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS). In addition, several commenters requested that we retain the rural adjustment or provide a 3-year hold harmless provision for IPFs that would lose their rural adjustment if we adopted the proposed CBSA definitions. Several commenters supported the proposed changes to the IPF PPS. Summaries of the public comments received and our responses to those comments are provided in the appropriate sections in the preamble of this final rule. V. Updates to the IPF PPS for RY Beginning July 1, 2006 The IPF PPS is based on a standardized Federal per diem base rate calculated from IPF average per diem costs and adjusted for budget-neutrality in the implementation year. The Federal per diem base rate is used as the standard payment per day under the IPF PPS and is adjusted by the applicable wage index factor and the patient-level and facility-level adjustments that are applicable to the IPF stay. The following is an explanation of how we calculated the Federal per diem base rate and the standardization and budget neutrality factors as described in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule. A. Calculation of the Average Per Diem Cost As indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, to calculate the Federal per diem base rate, we estimated the average cost per day for— (1) routine services from FY 2002 cost reports (supplemented with FY 2001 cost reports if the FY 2002 cost report PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27043 was missing); and (2) ancillary services using data from the FY 2002 Medicare claims and corresponding data from facility cost reports. For routine services, the per diem operating and capital costs were used to develop the average per diem cost amount. The per diem routine costs were obtained from each facility’s Medicare cost report. To estimate the costs for routine services included in the Federal per diem base rate calculation, we added the total routine costs (including costs for capital) submitted on the cost report for each provider and divided it by the total Medicare days. Some average routine costs per day were determined to be aberrant, that is, the costs were extraordinarily high or low and most likely contained data errors. We provided a detailed discussion in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66926 through 66927) of the method used to trim extraordinarily high or low cost values from the per diem rate development file in order to improve the accuracy of our results. For ancillary services, we calculated the costs by converting charges from the FY 2002 Medicare claims into costs using facility-specific, cost-center specific cost-to-charge ratios obtained from each provider’s applicable cost reports. We matched each provider’s departmental cost-tocharge ratios from their Medicare cost report to each charge on their claims reported in the MedPAR file. Multiplying the total charges for each type of ancillary service by the corresponding cost-to-charge ratio provided an estimate of the costs for all ancillary services received by the patient during the stay. We determined the average ancillary amount per day by dividing the total ancillary costs for all stays by the total number of covered Medicare days. Adding the average ancillary costs per day and the average routine costs per day including capital costs provided the estimated average per diem cost for each patient day of inpatient psychiatric care in FY 2002. B. Determining the Standardized Budget-Neutral Federal Per Diem Base Rate Section 124(a)(1) of the BBRA requires that the implementing IPF PPS be budget neutral. In other words, the amount of total payments under the IPF PPS, including any payment adjustments, must be projected to be equal to the amount of total payments that would have been made if the IPF PPS were not implemented. Therefore, in the November 2004 IPF PPS final E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 27044 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations rule, we calculated the budget neutrality factor by setting the total estimated IPF PPS payments to be equal to the total estimated payments that would have been made under the TEFRA methodology had the IPF PPS not been implemented. The November 2004 IPF PPS final rule includes a step-by-step description of the methodology we used to estimate payments under the TEFRA payment system (69 FR 66930). For the IPF PPS methodology, we calculated the final Federal per diem base rate to be budget neutral during the implementation period under the IPF PPS using a July 1 update cycle. Thus, the implementation period for the IPF PPS is the 18-month period January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. We updated the average cost per day to the midpoint of the IPF PPS implementation period (that is, October 1, 2005). We used the most recent projection of the full percentage increase in the 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket index for FY 2003 and later in accordance with § 413.40(c)(3)(viii). The updated average cost per day was used in the payment model to establish the budget neutrality adjustment. Public comments and our responses on changes for determining the standardized budget neutral federal per diem base rate are summarized below. Comment: We received several comments regarding the determination of the target amount and the temporary caps on the facility-specific TEFRA payments which expired in FY 2002. Specifically, the commenters stated that even though the temporary caps on the facility-specific (TEFRA) payments expired in FY 2002, the capped payment amounts which were used to establish the baseline for budget neutrality purposes, were inflated by the market basket rate for each year until the PPS began in 2005. The commenters believe that CMS should have used what would have been spent, absent the expired temporary caps inflated using the market basket rate, to establish the baseline rather than capped payments. The commenters stated that using the capped payments could have inappropriately reduced the allowed aggregate spending under the PPS each year. Response: We are aware that there have been concerns over the method we used for calculating the target amount for cost reporting periods beginning after FY 2002 for those hospitals and units that were subject to the ‘‘payment caps’’ in accordance with section 1886(b)(3)(H) of the Act and regulations VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 at § 413.40(c)(4)(iii). We have addressed this issue several times, but most recently in the FY 2006 IPPS final rule (70 FR 47278 and 70 FR 47464). Specifically, we addressed the issue of whether § 413.40(c)(4)(iii) (specifically paragraph (c)(4)(iii)(A)) continues to apply beyond FY 2002. In that rule, we stated that § 413.40(c)(4)(iii) applies only to cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997 through September 30, 2002, for IPFs, IRFs, and LTCHs. In addition, we clarify that once the 75th percentile cap provision in paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of § 413.40 expired, the target amount is then determined based on § 413.40(c)(4)(ii) which states that, ‘‘Subject to the provisions of [§ 413.40] paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section, for subsequent cost reporting periods, the target amount equals the hospital’s target amount for the previous cost reporting period increased by the update factor for the subject cost reporting period’’ unless the provisions of paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this section apply. Thus, under the requirements of § 413.40 (c)(4)(ii), in this instance, the previous cost reporting period’s target amount would be increased by the applicable update factor to arrive at the target amount for FY 2003. Similarly, for cost reporting periods beginning in years subsequent to FY 2003, we calculate a hospital’s target amount by taking its previous year’s target amount and updating it by the updated factor for the subject cost reporting period unless the provision of paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this section apply. We followed the methodology in § 413.40(c)(4)(ii) and therefore our projections of what would have been spent under TEFRA and the budget neutrality adjustment are correct. Final Rule Action: To clarify, in order to calculate the target amounts for cost reporting periods beginning in FY 2003, our policy is that the target amounts for cost reporting periods beginning in FY 2002 are updated as described in § 413.40(c)(4)(ii). Similarly, for cost reporting periods beginning in years subsequent to FY 2003, we calculate target amounts by taking the previous year’s target amount and updating it, consistent with § 413.40(c)(4)(ii). 1. Standardization of the Federal Per Diem Base Rate In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we standardized the IPF PPS Federal per diem base rate in order to account for the overall positive effects of the IPF PPS payment adjustment factors. To standardize the IPF PPS payments, we compared the IPF PPS payment amounts calculated from the FY 2002 MedPAR file to the projected TEFRA payments from the FY 2002 cost report PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 file updated to the midpoint of the IPF PPS implementation period (that is, October 2005). The standardization factor was calculated by dividing total estimated payments under the TEFRA payment system by estimated payments under the IPF PPS. The standardization factor was calculated to be 0.8367. As a result, in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, the $724.43 average cost per day was reduced by 16.33 percent (100 percent minus 83.67 percent). 2. Calculation of the Budget Neutrality Adjustment To compute the budget neutrality adjustment for the IPF PPS, we separately identified each component of the adjustment, that is, the outlier adjustment, stop-loss adjustment, and behavioral offset. a. Outlier Adjustment Since the IPF PPS payment amount for each IPF includes applicable outlier amounts, we reduced the standardized Federal per diem base rate to account for aggregate IPF PPS payments estimated to be made as outlier payments. The appropriate outlier amount was determined by comparing the adjusted prospective payment for the entire stay to the computed cost per case. If costs were above the prospective payment plus the adjusted fixed dollar loss threshold amount, an outlier payment was computed using the applicable risk-sharing percentages (see section VI.D.1 of this final rule). The outlier amount was computed for all stays, and the total outlier amount was added to the final IPF PPS payment. The outlier adjustment was calculated to be 2 percent. As a result, the standardized Federal per diem base rate was reduced by 2 percent to account for projected outlier payments. b. Stop-Loss Provision Adjustment As explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we provide a stoploss payment to ensure that an IPF’s total PPS payments are no less than a minimum percentage of their TEFRA payment, had the IPF PPS not been implemented. We reduced the standardized Federal per diem base rate by the percentage of aggregate IPF PPS payments estimated to be made for stoploss payments. The stop-loss payment amount was determined by comparing aggregate prospective payments that the provider would receive under the IPF PPS to aggregate TEFRA payments that the provider would have otherwise received without implementation of the IPF PPS. If an IPF’s aggregate IPF PPS payments are less than 70 percent of its aggregate E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 payments under TEFRA, a stop-loss payment was computed for that IPF. The stop-loss payment amounts were computed for those IPFs that were projected to receive the payments, and the total amount was added to the final IPF PPS payment amount. As a result, the standardized Federal per diem base rate was reduced by 0.39 percent to account for stop-loss payments. c. Behavioral Offset As explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, implementation of the IPF PPS may result in certain changes in IPF practices especially with respect to coding for comorbid medical conditions. As a result, Medicare may incur higher payments than assumed in our calculations. Accounting for these effects through an adjustment is commonly known as a behavioral offset. Based on accepted actuarial practices and consistent with the assumptions made in other prospective payment systems, we assumed in determining the behavioral offset that IPFs would regain 15 percent of potential ‘‘losses’’ and augment payment increases by 5 percent. We applied this actuarial assumption, which is based on our historical experience with new payment systems, to the estimated ‘‘losses’’ and ‘‘gains’’ among the IPFs. The behavioral offset for the IPF PPS was calculated to be 2.66 percent. As a result, we reduced the standardized Federal per diem base rate by 2.66 percent to account for behavioral changes. To summarize, the $724.43 updated average per diem cost was reduced by 16.33 percent to account for standardization to projected TEFRA payments for the implementation period, by 2 percent to account for outlier payments, by 0.39 percent to account for stop-loss payments, and by 2.66 percent reduction to account for the behavioral offset. The final standardized budget-neutral Federal per diem base rate for the IPF PPS implementation year was calculated to be $575.95. We discuss the Federal per diem base rate for RY 2007 below. Public comments and our responses on the behavioral offset are summarized below. Comment: Several commenters expressed concern that CMS continues to maintain the behavioral offset which is intended to account for changes in provider practice patterns as a result of movement to prospective payment which could result in higher Medicare payments. A few commenters stated that accurate coding is already a high priority in distinct part units and freestanding facilities. Therefore, coding practices in these facilities should not VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 undergo major changes. The commenters suggested that because the PPS is being phased in, and only 50 percent of the payment in the second year would be based on the IPF PPS, the incentive for behavior change is diminished. Several commenters recommended that CMS analyze the preliminary 2005 claims data and adjust the calculations for the behavioral offset to maintain IPF spending at appropriate levels. A few commenters expressed concern that CMS did not indicate whether an analysis was conducted to determine if continuing the adjustment for behavioral offset is warranted. They believe the assumptions made for both the proposed RY and the implementation year of the IPF PPS overestimated the likely impact of changes in hospital behavior. Response: We explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule and the RY 2007 proposed rule that we believe it is reasonable to expect changes in IPFs’ practices especially with respect to coding for comorbid medical conditions and changes in length of stay (LOS), as a result of the implementation of the IPF PPS. In addition, based on accepted actuarial practices and consistent with the assumptions made in implementing other prospective payment systems, we assumed in determining the behavioral offset, that IPFs would regain 15 percent of potential ‘‘losses’’ and augment payment increases by 5 percent. We applied this actuarial assumption, which is based on our historical experience with new payment systems, to the estimated ‘‘losses’’ and ‘‘gains’’ among the IPFs. As indicated in the RY 2007 proposed rule, we do not plan to change adjustment factors or projections, including the behavioral offset, until we analyze IPF PPS data. At that time, we will re-assess the accuracy of the behavioral offset along with the other factors impacting budget neutrality. We anticipate analyzing 2005 IPF PPS claims and cost report data in the future. Comment: Several commenters inquired why CMS is continuing to include budget neutrality factors in the Federal per diem base rate (behavioral offset, stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment), effectively lowering the base rate. Since the PPS is only budget neutral for the implementation year, the commenters believe the base rate should not reflect budget neutrality factors that effectively lower the amount. Response: We acknowledge that the PPS is only budget neutral for the implementation year. The standardization factor, behavioral offset, PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27045 stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment were included in the 2005 Federal per diem base rate of $575.95. In implementing the RY 2007 final rule, we adjust the standardization factor (see section V.B.3 of this final rule), and apply the market basket update and the wage index budget neutrality factor to the base rate. As indicated above, we do not plan to change any adjustment factors or projections, including the budget neutrality factors (behavioral offset, stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment), until we analyze IPF PPS data. We will revisit all assumptions used to calculate the budget neutrality adjustment and make any necessary prospective changes to the Federal per diem base rate. In section VI.D.3 of this final rule, we address these comments with respect to the calculation of the ECT rate. Final Rule Action: In summary, for future RYs, we will reassess the appropriateness of the behavior offset along with the other factors impacting budget neutrality. For the RY 2007 IPF PPS, we will continue to adjust the standardization factor and apply the market basket updates and the wage index budget neutrality factors. 3. Revision of the Standardization Factor In reviewing the methodology used to simulate the IPF PPS payments used for the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we discovered that the computer code incorrectly assigned non-teaching status to most teaching facilities. As a result, total IPF PPS payments were underestimated by about 1.36 percent. The underestimated IPF PPS payment total was used in calculating the IPF PPS standardization factor. The standardization factor represents the amount by which the IPF PPS per diem payment rate and the ECT rate must be reduced in order to make total IPF PPS payments equal to estimated total TEFRA payments assuming IPFs continued to be paid solely under TEFRA for the first PPS payment year. The standardization factor is calculated as the ratio of estimated total TEFRA payments to estimated total IPF PPS payments assuming no reduction to the per diem and ECT payment rates. Since the IPF PPS payment total should have been larger than the estimated figure, the standardization factor should have been smaller (0.8254 vs. 0.8367). In turn, the Federal per diem base rate and the ECT rate should have been reduced by 0.8254 instead of 0.8367. To resolve this issue, we proposed to amend the Federal per diem base rate and the ECT payment rate prospectively. Using the standardization E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27046 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations factor of 0.8254, the base rate should have been $568.17 for the implementation year of the IPF PPS. It is this base rate that we proposed to update using the market basket rate of increase of 4.3 percent and the budgetneutral wage index factor of 1.0042 (see section VI.C.1.f of this final rule). Applying these factors yields a proposed Federal per diem base rate of $595.09 for the RY beginning July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. Public comments and our responses on the revision of the standardization factor are summarized below. Comment: One commenter asked whether the overall increase in the base rate is appropriately calculated and sufficient. Response: As explained above and in the RY 2007 proposed rule, the correction of the standardization factor reveals that last year’s per diem rate should have been $568.17, and not $575.95. To correct this error prospectively, we apply the market basket increase of 4.3 percent to $568.17, and then apply the wage index budget neutrality factor to compute the Federal per diem base rate. Final Rule Action: In summary, we are finalizing our decision to revise the standardization factor prospectively, and the Federal per diem base rate for RY 2007 is $595.09. C. Update of the Federal Per Diem Base Rate mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 1. Market Basket for IPFs Reimbursed Under the IPF PPS a. Market Basket Index for IPF PPS The market basket index used to develop the IPF PPS is the excluded hospital with capital market basket. This market basket was based on 1997 Medicare cost report data and includes data for Medicare participating IPFs, IRFs, LTCHs, cancer, and children’s hospitals. We are presently unable to create a separate market basket specifically for psychiatric hospitals due to the small number of facilities and the limited data that are provided (for instance, approximately 4 percent of psychiatric facilities reported contract labor cost data for FY 2002). However, since all IRFs, LTCHs, and IPFs are now paid under a PPS, we are updating PPS payments made under the IRF PPS, the LTCH PPS, and the IPF PPS using a market basket reflecting the operating and capital cost structures for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs (hereafter referred to as the rehabilitation, psychiatric, long-term care (RPL) market basket). We have excluded children’s and cancer hospitals from the RPL market basket VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 because their payments are based entirely on reasonable costs subject to rate-of-increase limits established under the authority of section 1886(b) of the Act, which is implemented in regulations at § 413.40. They are not reimbursed under a PPS. Also, the FY 2002 cost structures for children’s and cancer hospitals are noticeably different than the cost structures of the IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs. The services offered in IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs are typically more laborintensive than those offered in cancer and children’s hospitals. Therefore, the compensation cost weights for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs are larger than those in cancer and children’s hospitals. In addition, the depreciation cost weights for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs are noticeably smaller than those for children’s and cancer hospitals. In the following discussion, we provide an overview on the market basket and describe the methodologies we are using for purposes of determining the operating and capital portions of the FY 2002-based RPL market basket. b. Overview of the RPL Market Basket The RPL market basket is a fixed weight, Laspeyres-type price index that was constructed in three steps. First, a base period was selected (in this case, FY 2002) and total base period expenditures were estimated for a set of mutually exclusive and exhaustive spending categories based upon type of expenditure. Then the proportion of total costs that each category represents was determined. These proportions are called cost or expenditure weights. Second, each expenditure category was matched to an appropriate price or wage variable, referred to as a price proxy. In nearly every instance, these price proxies are price levels derived from publicly available statistical series that are published on a consistent schedule, preferably at least on a quarterly basis. Finally, the expenditure weight for each cost category was multiplied by the level of its respective price proxy for a given period. The sum of these products (that is, the expenditure weights multiplied by their price levels) for all cost categories yields the composite index level of the market basket in a given period. Repeating this step for other periods produces a series of market basket levels over time. Dividing an index level for a given period by an index level for an earlier period produces a rate of growth in the input price index over that time period. A market basket is described as a fixed-weight index because it answers the question of how much it would cost, PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 at another time, to purchase the same mix of goods and services purchased to provide hospital services in a base period. The effects on total expenditures resulting from changes in the quantity or mix of goods and services (intensity) purchased subsequent to the base period are not measured. In this manner, the market basket measures only pure price change. Only when the index is rebased would the quantity and intensity effects be captured in the cost weights. Therefore, we rebase the market basket periodically so that cost weights reflect changes in the mix of goods and services that hospitals purchase (hospital inputs) to furnish patient care between base periods. The terms rebasing and revising, while often used interchangeably, actually denote different activities. Rebasing means moving the base year for the structure of costs of an input price index (for example, shifting the base year cost structure from FY 1997 to FY 2002). Revising means changing data sources, methodology, or price proxies used in the input price index. We have rebased and revised the market basket used to update the IPF PPS. 2. Methodology for Operating Portion of the RPL Market Basket The operating portion of the FY 2002based RPL market basket consists of several major cost categories derived from the FY 2002 Medicare cost reports for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs: wages, drugs, professional liability insurance, and a residual. We chose to use FY 2002 as the base year because we believe this is the most recent, complete year of Medicare cost reports. Due to insufficient Medicare cost report data for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs, we have developed cost weights for benefits, contract labor, and blood and blood products using the FY 2002-based IPPS market basket (70 FR 23384), which we explain in more detail later in this section. For example, less than 30 percent of IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs reported benefit cost data in FY 2002. We have noticed an increase in cost data for these expense categories over the last 4 years. The next time we rebase the RPL market basket there may be sufficient IRF, IPF, and LTCH cost report data to develop the weights for these expenditure categories. Since the cost weights for the RPL market basket are based on facility costs, as proposed and for this final rule, we are limiting our sample to hospitals with a Medicare average LOS within a comparable range of the total facility average LOS. We believe this provides a more accurate reflection of the structure of costs for Medicare covered E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations days. Our goal is to measure cost shares that are reflective of case mix and practice patterns associated with providing services to Medicare beneficiaries. As proposed and for this final rule, we are using those cost reports for IRFs and LTCHs whose Medicare average LOS is within 15 percent (that is, 15 percent higher or lower) of the total facility average LOS for the hospital. This is the same edit applied to the FY 1992-based and FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. We are using 15 percent because it includes those LTCHs and IRFs whose Medicare LOS is within approximately 5 days of the facility LOS. As proposed and for this final rule, we use a less stringent measure of Medicare LOS for IPFs whose average LOS is within 30 or 50 percent (depending on the total facility average LOS) of the total facility average LOS. Using this less stringent edit allows us to increase our sample size by over 150 cost reports and produce a cost weight more consistent with the overall facility. The edit we applied to IPFs when developing the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket was based on the best available data at the time. Public comments and our responses on the proposed changes for implementing the methodology for the operating portion of the RPL market basket are summarized below. Comment: One commenter disagreed with our proposed LOS methodology, which included those cost reports for IRFs and LTCHs whose Medicare average LOS is within 15 percent (that is, 15 percent higher or lower) of the total facility average LOS and those cost reports for IPFs whose average LOS is within 30 or 50 percent (depending on the total facility average LOS) of the total facility average LOS. A commenter stated that the LOS methodology appears to factor into the calculation a disproportionate share of 27047 psychiatric facilities with a longer LOS. In addition, the commenter indicated that the RY 2007 proposed rule stated that costs decrease further into a patient’s stay and that CMS assumes that IPFs have an incompatible cost per discharge when grouped with the lower LOS in the IRFs and LTCHs. Response: As stated previously, since the cost weights for the RPL market basket are based on facility costs, we limited our sample to hospitals with a Medicare average LOS within a comparable range of the total facility average LOS. We believe this provides a more accurate reflection of the structure of costs for Medicare treatments. We disagree with the commenter that the IPF LOS edit includes a disproportionate share of IPFs with a longer LOS. For clarity, we are providing below a table that compares the distribution of the Medicare and facility LOSs for IPFs using no edit and the proposed 30/50 edit. TABLE 2.—IPFS FY 2002 MEDICARE AND FACILITY LOS DISTRIBUTIONS Medicare length of stay No trim mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 100% Max ........................................................................................................ 99% .................................................................................................................. 95% .................................................................................................................. 90% .................................................................................................................. 75% Q3 ............................................................................................................ 50% Median ..................................................................................................... 25% Q1 ............................................................................................................ 10% .................................................................................................................. 5% .................................................................................................................... 1% .................................................................................................................... 0% Min ............................................................................................................. The Medicare and facility LOS distributions are consistent when the proposed edit is applied. However, not applying the edit would include in the market basket those IPFs whose facility LOS are dramatically different from their Medicare LOS. In addition, the Medicare LOS distribution with the 30/ 50 edit is similar to the Medicare LOS distribution with no edit. Therefore, we believe that the proposed edit does not include a disproportionate share of IPFs with a longer LOS in the market basket. Applying these LOS edits left us with a sample of hospitals whose average Medicare utilization was approximately 50 percent, while those excluded from the market basket had a Medicare utilization of approximately 10 percent. Given this, we firmly believe that these LOS edits help us meet our goal to measure cost shares that are reflective of case mix and practice patterns VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 30/50 trim 93 86 59 49 28 13 10 8 7 4 1 associated with providing services to Medicare beneficiaries. The detailed cost categories under the residual (that is, the remaining portion of the market basket after excluding wages and salaries, drugs, and professional liability cost weights) are derived from the FY 2002-based IPPS market basket and the 1997 Benchmark Input-Output (I-O) Tables published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce. The FY 2002based IPPS market basket was developed using FY 2002 Medicare hospital cost reports with the most recent and detailed cost data (see the August 12, 2005 IPPS final rule (70 FR 47388)). The 1997 Benchmark I-O is the most recent, comprehensive source of cost data for all hospitals. The RPL cost weights for benefits, contract labor, and blood and blood products were derived using the FY 2002-based IPPS market basket. For example, the ratio of the PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 Facility length of stay No trim 70 54 36 23 15 11 9 7 7 5 3 5334 822 333 227 57 13 8 6 6 5 1 30/50 trim 75 63 39 26 15 10 8 6 5 5 3 benefit cost weight to the wages and salaries cost weight in the FY 2002based IPPS market basket was applied to the RPL wages and salaries cost weight to derive a benefit cost weight for the RPL market basket. As proposed and for this final rule, the remaining RPL operating cost categories were derived using the 1997 Benchmark I-O Tables, aged to 2002 using relative price changes. (The methodology we used to age the data involves applying the annual price changes from the price proxies to the appropriate cost categories. We repeated this practice for each year.) Therefore, using this methodology, roughly 59 percent of the RPL market basket was accounted for by wages, drugs, and professional liability insurance data from FY 2002 Medicare cost report data for IRFs, LTCHs, and IPFs. Additional comments and our responses on the methodology for E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27048 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations operating portion of the RPL market basket are summarized below. Comment: Several commenters proposed that CMS regularly re-analyze the RPL cost report data, which are the basis of the RPL market basket. The commenters indicated that the methodology used for the RPL market basket includes data from the IPPS hospital market basket rather than relying solely on IPF, IRF, and LTCH data. The commenters recommended that CMS work with providers to improve the cost reports from rehabilitation, psychiatric, and LTCHs in order to ensure that the data used for the market basket represent only the types of excluded hospitals for which the RPL market basket was developed. The commenters believe that improving the data reported on the RPL cost reports would not only refine the RPL market basket but also improve the accuracy of the labor-related share to which the wage index is applied. Response: We rely on the IPPS cost report data to supplement the IRF, IPF, and LTCH Medicare cost report data for benefits, contract labor, and blood and blood products. For example, the ratio of the benefit cost weight to the wages and salaries cost weight in the FY 2002based IPPS market basket was applied to the RPL wages and salaries cost weight to derive a benefit cost weight for the RPL market basket. We did not use expenditure levels from the IPPS data directly but, as explained, we developed and used the ratios from IPPS data to determine these RPL cost weights. The wages and salaries cost weight was derived using the IRF, IPF, and LTCH Medicare cost reports and accounts for 50 percent of the RPL market basket. Due to data limitations, this was the best methodology for developing the latter cost weights. We agree with the commenters that improving the data reported on the RPL cost reports could improve the RPL market basket and labor-related share. We have noticed this data improvement on other provider-type cost reports and encourage IRF, IPF, and LTCH providers to fully complete their cost reports. We believe that this would help us develop the most complete and accurate market basket possible. We will analyze RPL cost report data on a regular basis and continue to consider the possibility of provider-specific market basket indices. Comment: One commenter requested that CMS explain how it computes cost category weights based on Medicare cost report data. The commenter stated that if they understood which data elements were used and how they were used, CMS could develop educational programs to improve their member hospitals’ reporting. Response: The RPL market basket cost weights are based on freestanding Medicare cost report data for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs. We mainly rely on data from worksheets A through G to derive the cost weights. Worksheet S–3, part II is the only worksheet which allows for the reporting of benefits and contract labor data; however, it is not a required worksheet for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs. As stated previously, we relied on the IPPS Medicare cost report worksheet S–3, part II data to derive the relationships for benefits and contract labor to wages and salaries. Additionally, capital cost weights are derived using worksheet A–7. The estimates generated using this worksheet, as well as worksheet G, could be enhanced with higher reporting rates. Again, we encourage IRF, IPF, and LTCH providers to fully complete their cost reports to help us in developing the most complete and accurate market basket. Table 3 below sets forth the complete 2002-based RPL market basket including cost categories, weights, and price proxies. For comparison purposes, the corresponding FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket is listed as well. As proposed and for this final rule, wages and salaries are 52.895 percent of total costs in the FY 2002-based RPL market basket compared to 47.335 percent for the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. Employee benefits are 12.982 percent in the FY 2002-based RPL market basket compared to 10.244 percent for the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. As a result, compensation costs (wages and salaries plus employee benefits) for the FY 2002based RPL market basket are 65.877 percent of costs compared to 57.579 percent for the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. Of the 8 percentage-point difference between the compensation shares, approximately 3 percentage points were due to the new base year (FY 2002 instead of FY 1997), 3 percentage points were due to the revised LOS edit, and the remaining 2 percentage points were due to the exclusion of other hospitals (that is, only including IPFs, IRFs, and LTCHs in the market basket). Following the table is a summary outlining the choice of the proxies we chose to use for the operating portion of the market basket. The price proxies for the capital portion are described in more detail in the capital methodology section (see section V.C.3 of this final rule). TABLE 3.—FY 2002-BASED RPL MARKET BASKET COST CATEGORIES, WEIGHTS, AND PROXIES WITH FY 1997-BASED EXCLUDED HOSPITAL WITH CAPITAL MARKET BASKET USED FOR COMPARISON FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket Expense categories FY 2002-based RPL market basket mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Total .................................................................. Compensation ................................................... Wages and Salaries * ................................ Employee Benefits * .................................. Professional Fees, Non-Medical ...................... 100.000 57.579 47.335 10.244 4.423 100.000 65.877 52.895 12.982 2.892 Utilities .............................................................. Electricity ................................................... Fuel Oil, Coal, etc ..................................... Water and Sewage .................................... Professional Liability Insurance ........................ All Other Products and Services ...................... All Other Products ..................................... Pharmaceuticals ................................. Food: Direct Purchase ....................... Food: Contract Service ...................... 1.180 0.726 0.248 0.206 0.733 27.117 17.914 6.318 1.122 1.043 0.656 0.351 0.108 0.197 1.161 19.265 13.323 5.103 0.873 0.620 VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 FY 2002 market basket price proxies ECI—Wages and Salaries, Civilian Hospital Workers. ECI—Benefits, Civilian Hospital Workers. ECI—Compensation for Professional, Specialty & Technical Workers. PPI—Commercial Electric Power. PPI—Commercial Natural Gas. CPI–U—Water & Sewage Maintenance. CMS Professional Liability Premium Index. PPI Prescription Drugs. PPI Processed Foods & Feeds. CPI U Food Away From Home. E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27049 TABLE 3.—FY 2002-BASED RPL MARKET BASKET COST CATEGORIES, WEIGHTS, AND PROXIES WITH FY 1997-BASED EXCLUDED HOSPITAL WITH CAPITAL MARKET BASKET USED FOR COMPARISON—Continued FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket Expense categories FY 2002-based RPL market basket FY 2002 market basket price proxies Chemicals ........................................... Blood and Blood Products ** .............. Medical Instruments ........................... Photographic Supplies ....................... Rubber and Plastics ........................... Paper Products .................................. Apparel ............................................... Machinery and Equipment ................. Miscellaneous Products ..................... All Other Services ..................................... Telephone .......................................... Postage .............................................. All Other: Labor Intensive ......................... All Other: Non-labor Intensive ................... Capital-Related Costs ....................................... Depreciation .............................................. Fixed Assets ....................................... Movable Equipment ........................... Interest Costs ............................................ Nonprofit ............................................. 2.133 0.748 1.795 0.167 1.366 1.110 0.478 0.852 0.783 9.203 0.348 0.702 4.453 3.700 8.968 5.586 3.503 2.083 2.682 2.280 1.100 PPI Industrial Chemicals. 1.014 0.096 1.052 1.000 0.207 0.297 1.963 5.942 0.240 0.682 2.219 2.800 10.149 6.186 4.250 1.937 2.775 2.081 PPI PPI PPI PPI PPI PPI PPI Medical Instruments & Equipment. Photographic Supplies. Rubber & Plastic Products. Converted Paper & Paperboard Products. Apparel. Machinery & Equipment. Finished Goods less Food & Energy. For Profit ............................................ 0.402 0.694 Other Capital-Related Costs ..................... 0.699 1.187 CPI–U Telephone Services. CPI–U Postage. ECI-Compensation for Private Service Occupations. CPI–U All Items. Boeckh Institutional Construction 23-year useful life. WPI Machinery & Equipment 11-year useful life. Average yield on domestic municipal bonds (Bond Buyer 20 bonds) vintage-weighted (23 years). Average yield on Moody’s Aaa bonds vintage weighted (23 years). CPI–U Residential Rent. mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 * Labor-related ** Blood and blood-related products is included in miscellaneous products Note: Due to rounding, weights may not sum to total. Below we provide the proxies that we are using for the FY 2002-based RPL market basket. With the exception of the Professional Liability proxy, all the price proxies for the operating portion of the RPL market basket are based on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data and are grouped into one of the following BLS categories: • Producer Price Indexes—Producer Price Indexes (PPIs) measure price changes for goods sold in other than retail markets. PPIs are preferable price proxies for goods that hospitals purchase as inputs in producing their outputs because the PPIs would better reflect the prices faced by hospitals. For example, we use a special PPI for prescription drugs, rather than the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for prescription drugs because hospitals generally purchase drugs directly from the wholesaler. The PPIs that we use measure price change at the final stage of production. • Consumer Price Indexes— Consumer Price Indexes (CPIs) measure change in the prices of final goods and services bought by the typical consumer. Because they may not represent the price faced by a producer, we use CPIs only if an appropriate PPI were not available, or if the expenditures were more similar to those VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 of retail consumers in general rather than purchases at the wholesale level. For example, the CPI for food purchases away from home is used as a proxy for contracted food services. • Employment Cost Indexes— Employment Cost Indexes (ECIs) measure the rate of change in employee wage rates and employer costs for employee benefits per hour worked. These indexes are fixed-weight indexes and strictly measure the change in wage rates and employee benefits per hour. Appropriately, they are not affected by shifts in employment mix. We evaluated the price proxies using the criteria of reliability, timeliness, availability, and relevance. Reliability indicates that the index is based on valid statistical methods and has low sampling variability. Timeliness implies that the proxy is published regularly, preferably at least once a quarter. Availability means that the proxy is publicly available. Finally, relevance means that the proxy is applicable and representative of the cost category weight to which it is applied. The CPIs, PPIs, and ECIs in this regulation meet these criteria. We note that the proxies are the same as those used for the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. Because these proxies meet our criteria of reliability, timeliness, PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 availability, and relevance, we believe they continue to be the best measure of price changes for the cost categories. For further discussion on the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket, see the August 1, 2002 IPPS final rule (67 FR at 50042). Wages and Salaries For measuring the price growth of wages in the FY 2002-based RPL market basket, we are using the ECI for wages and salaries for civilian hospital workers as the proxy for wages in the RPL market basket. The rehabilitation, psychiatric, and long-term care hospital (RPL) market basket uses the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Employment Cost Indexes (ECIs) as proxies for wages and salaries, and benefits for civilian industry workers classified in the Standard Industrial Code (SIC) 806, Hospitals. However, beginning April 28, 2006 with the publication of March 2006 data, the ECIs will be converted from the SIC system to the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). The NAICS-based ECI for hospitals (NAICS 622) is similar (at least 90 percent identical) to the SIC-based ECI for hospitals. Therefore, when they are available, we will use the NAICS-based ECIs for hospitals as proxies to reflect the rate-of-price change for the wages E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27050 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations and salaries and employee benefits cost categories in the 2002-based RPL market basket. The RPL market basket and laborrelated share in this final rule will use the most recent data available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. We do not expect the RPL market basket and laborrelated share to change significantly when the conversion from the SIC system to the NAICS system takes place. Employee Benefits The FY 2002-based RPL market basket uses the ECI for employee benefits for civilian hospital workers. Nonmedical Professional Fees The ECI for compensation for professional and technical workers in private industry is applied to this category since it includes occupations such as management and consulting, legal, accounting, and engineering services. identified a preferred option, therefore no change is made for the proxy in this final rule. Pharmaceuticals The percentage change in the price of prescription drugs as measured by the PPI (PPI Code #PPI32541DRX) is used as a proxy for this cost category. This is a special index produced by BLS as a proxy in the 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. Food, Direct Purchases The percentage change in the price of processed foods and feeds as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #02) is applied to this component. Food, Contract Service The percentage change in the price of food purchased away from home as measured by the CPI for all urban consumers (CPI Code #CUUR0000SEFV) is applied to this component. Fuel, Oil, and Gasoline Chemicals The percentage change in the price of gas fuels as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #0552) is applied to this component. The percentage change in the price of industrial chemical products as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #061) is applied to this component. While the chemicals hospitals purchase include industrial as well as other types of chemicals, the industrial chemicals component constitutes the largest proportion by far. Thus we believe that Commodity Code #061 is the appropriate proxy. Electricity The percentage change in the price of commercial electric power as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #0542) is applied to this component. Water and Sewerage The percentage change in the price of water and sewage maintenance as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all urban consumers (CPI Code #CUUR0000SEHG01) is applied to this component. mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Professional Liability Insurance The FY 2002-based RPL market basket uses the percentage change in hospital professional liability insurance (PLI) premiums as estimated by the CMS Hospital Professional Liability Index for the proxy of this category. In the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket, the same proxy was used. We continue to research options for improving our proxy for professional liability insurance. This research includes exploring various options for expanding our current survey, including the identification of another entity that would be willing to work with us to collect more complete and comprehensive data. We are also exploring other options such as third party or industry data that might assist us in creating a more precise measure of PLI premiums. At this time we have not VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 Medical Instruments The percentage change in the price of medical and surgical instruments as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #1562) is applied to this component. Photographic Supplies The percentage change in the price of photographic supplies as measured by the PPI Commodity Code #1542) is applied to this component. Rubber and Plastics The percentage change in the price of rubber and plastic products as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #07) is applied to this component. Paper Products The percentage change in the price of converted paper and paperboard products as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #0915) is applied to this component. Apparel The percentage change in the price of apparel as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #381) is applied to this component. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 Machinery and Equipment The percentage change in the price of machinery and equipment as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #11) is applied to this component. Miscellaneous Products The percentage change in the price of all finished goods less food and energy as measured by the PPI (Commodity Code #SOP3500) is applied to this component. Using this index removes the double-counting of food and energy prices, which are captured elsewhere in the market basket. The weight for this cost category is higher, in part, than in the 1997-based index because the weight for blood and blood products (1.188) is added to it. In the 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket, we included a separate cost category for blood and blood products, using the BLS PPI for blood and derivatives as a price proxy. A review of recent trends in the PPI for blood and derivatives suggests that its movements may not be consistent with the trends in blood costs faced by hospitals. While this proxy did not match exactly with the product hospitals are buying, its trend over time appears to be reflective of the historical price changes of blood purchased by hospitals. However, an apparent divergence over recent years led us to reevaluate whether the PPI for blood and derivatives was an appropriate measure of the changing price of blood. We ran test market baskets classifying blood in three separate cost categories: Blood and blood products, contained within chemicals as was done for the 1992based excluded hospital with capital market basket, and within miscellaneous products. These categories use as proxies the following PPIs: The PPI for blood and blood products, the PPI for chemicals, and the PPI for finished goods less food and energy, respectively. Of these three proxies, the PPI for finished goods less food and energy moved most like the recent blood cost and price trends. In addition, the impact on the overall market basket by using different proxies for blood was negligible, mostly due to the relatively small weight for blood in the market basket. Therefore, as proposed and for this final rule, we are using the PPI for finished goods less food and energy for the blood proxy because we believe it more appropriately proxies the price changes (not quantities or required tests) associated with blood purchased by hospitals. We will continue to evaluate this proxy for its appropriateness and will explore the development of E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations alternative price indexes to proxy the price changes associated with this cost. Telephone The percentage change in the price of telephone services as measured by the CPI for all urban consumers (CPI Code #CUUR0000SEED) is applied to this component. Postage The percentage change in the price of postage as measured by the CPI for all urban consumers (CPI Code # CUUR0000SEEC01) is applied to this component. All Other Services, Labor Intensive The percentage change in the ECI for compensation paid to service workers employed in private industry is applied to this component. All Other Services, Nonlabor Intensive The percentage change in the all items component of the CPI for all urban consumers (CPI Code # CUUR0000SA0) is applied to this component. mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 3. Methodology for Capital Portion of the RPL Market Basket Unlike for the operating costs of the FY 2002-based RPL market basket, we did not have IRF, IPF, and LTCH FY 2002 Medicare cost report data for the capital cost weights, due to a change in the FY 2002 reporting requirements. Rather, as proposed and for this final rule, we are using these hospitals’ expenditure data for the capital cost categories of depreciation, interest, and other capital expenses for FY 2001, and aged the data to a FY 2002 base year using relevant price proxies. We calculated weights for the RPL market basket capital costs using the same set of Medicare cost reports used to develop the operating share for IRFs, IPFS, and LTCHs. The resulting capital weight for the FY 2002 base year is 10.149 percent. This is based on FY 2001 Medicare cost report data for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs, aged to FY 2002 using relevant price proxies. Lease expenses are not a separate cost category in the market basket, but are distributed among the cost categories of depreciation, interest, and other, reflecting the assumption that the underlying cost structure of leases is similar to capital costs in general. We assumed 10 percent of lease expenses were overhead and assigned them to the other capital expenses cost category as overhead. We base this assignment of 10 percent of lease expenses to overhead on the common assumption that overhead is 10 percent of costs. The remaining lease expenses were VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 distributed to the three cost categories based on the weights of depreciation, interest, and other capital expenses not including lease expenses. Depreciation contains two subcategories: Building and fixed equipment and movable equipment. As proposed and for this final rule, the split between building and fixed equipment and movable equipment was determined using the FY 2001 Medicare cost reports for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs. This methodology was also used to compute the 1997-based index (67 FR at 50044). As proposed and for this final rule, the total interest expense cost category is split between the government/ nonprofit and for-profit hospitals. The 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket allocated 85 percent of the total interest cost weight to the government nonprofit interest, proxies by average yield on domestic municipal bonds, and 15 percent to forprofit interest, proxies by average yield on Moody’s Aaa bonds. We derived the split using the relative FY 2001 Medicare cost report data for PPS hospitals on interest expenses for the government/nonprofit and for-profit hospitals. Due to insufficient Medicare cost report data for IPFs, IRFs, and LTCHs, as proposed and for this final rule, we use the same split used in the IPPS capital input price index. We believe it is important that this split reflect the latest relative cost structure of interest expenses for hospitals and, therefore, we have used a 75–25 split to allocate interest expenses to government/nonprofit and for-profit (70 FR at 47408). Since capital is acquired and paid for over time, capital expenses in any given year are determined by both past and present purchases of physical and financial capital. The vintage-weighted capital index is intended to capture the long-term consumption of capital, using vintage weights for depreciation (physical capital) and interest (financial capital). These vintage weights reflect the purchase patterns of building and fixed equipment and movable equipment over time. Depreciation and interest expenses were determined by the amount of past and current capital purchases. Therefore, as proposed and for this final rule, we are using the vintage weights to compute vintageweighted price changes associated with depreciation and interest expense. Vintage weights are an integral part of the FY 2002-based RPL market basket. Capital costs are inherently complicated and are determined by complex capital purchasing decisions, over time, based on such factors as interest rates and debt PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27051 financing. In addition, capital is depreciated over time instead of being consumed in the same period it is purchased. The capital portion of the FY 2002-based RPL market basket reflects the annual price changes associated with capital costs, and is a useful simplification of the actual capital investment process. By accounting for the vintage nature of capital, we have provided an accurate, stable annual measure of price changes. Annual nonvintage price changes for capital are unstable due to the volatility of interest rate changes and, therefore, do not reflect the actual annual price changes for Medicare capital-related costs. The capital component of the FY 2002-based RPL market basket reflects the underlying stability of the capital acquisition process and provides hospitals with the ability to plan for changes in capital payments. To calculate the vintage weights for depreciation and interest expenses, we needed a time series of capital purchases for building and fixed equipment and movable equipment. We found no single source that provides the best time series of capital purchases by hospitals for all of the above components of capital purchases. The early Medicare Cost Reports did not have sufficient capital data to meet this need. While the American Hospital Association (AHA) Panel Survey provided a consistent database back to 1963, it did not provide annual capital purchases. However, the AHA Panel Survey provided a time series of depreciation expenses through 1997 which could be used to infer capital purchases over time. From 1998 to 2001, hospital depreciation expenses were calculated by multiplying the AHA Annual Survey total hospital expenses by the ratio of depreciation to total hospital expenses from the Medicare cost reports. Beginning in 2001, the AHA Annual Survey began collecting depreciation expenses. We hope to be able to use these data in future rebasings. In order to estimate capital purchases from AHA data on depreciation and interest expenses, the expected life for each cost category (building and fixed equipment, movable equipment, and debt instruments) is needed. Due to insufficient Medicare cost report data for IPFs, IRFs, and LTCHs, as proposed and for this final rule, we are using FY 2001 Medicare Cost Reports for IPPS hospitals to determine the expected life of building and fixed equipment and movable equipment. We believe this data source reflects the latest relative cost structure of depreciation expenses for hospitals and is analogous to IPFs, E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27052 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations IRFs, and LTCHs. The expected life of any piece of equipment was determined by dividing the value of the asset (excluding fully depreciated assets) by its current year depreciation amount. This calculation yields the estimated useful life of an asset if depreciation were to continue at current year levels, assuming straight-line depreciation. From the FY 2001 Medicare cost reports for IPPS hospitals the expected life of building and fixed equipment was determined to be 23 years, and the expected life of movable equipment was determined to be 11 years. As proposed and for this final rule, we are also using the fixed and movable weights derived from FY 2001 Medicare cost reports for IPFs, IRFs, and LTCHs to separate the depreciation expenses into annual amounts of building and fixed equipment depreciation and movable equipment depreciation. By multiplying the annual depreciation amounts by the expected life calculations from the FY 2001 Medicare cost reports, year-end asset costs for building and fixed equipment and movable equipment were determined. We then calculated a time series back to 1963 of annual capital purchases by subtracting the previous year asset costs from the current year asset costs. From this capital purchase time series we were able to calculate the vintage weights for building and fixed equipment, movable equipment, and debt instruments. An explanation of each of these sets of vintage weights follows. As proposed and for this final rule, for building and fixed equipment vintage weights, the real annual capital purchase amounts for building and fixed equipment derived from the AHA Panel Survey were used. The real annual purchase amount was used to capture the actual amount of the physical acquisition, net of the effect of price inflation. This real annual purchase amount for building and fixed equipment was produced by deflating the nominal annual purchase amount by the building and fixed equipment price proxy, the Boeckh Institutional Construction Index. This is the same proxy used for the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. We believe this proxy continues to meet our criteria of reliability, timeliness, availability, and relevance. Since building and fixed equipment has an expected life of 23 years, the vintage weights for building and fixed equipment are deemed to represent the average purchase pattern of building and fixed equipment over 23-year periods. With real building and fixed equipment purchase estimates back to 1963, sixteen 23-year periods were averaged to determine the average vintage weights for building and fixed equipment that are representative of average building and fixed equipment purchase patterns over time. Vintage weights for each 23-year period were calculated by dividing the real building and fixed capital purchase amount in any given year by the total amount of purchases in the 23-year period. This calculation was done for each year in the 23-year period, and for each of the sixteen 23-year periods. The average of each year across the sixteen 23-year periods was used to determine the 2002 average building and fixed equipment vintage weights. As proposed and for this final rule, for movable equipment vintage weights, the real annual capital purchase amounts for movable equipment derived from the AHA Panel Survey were used to capture the actual amount of the physical acquisition, net of price inflation. This real annual purchase amount for movable equipment was calculated by deflating the nominal annual purchase amount by the movable equipment price proxy, the PPI for Machinery and Equipment. This was the same proxy used for the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. We believe this proxy, which meets our criteria, is the best measure of price changes for this cost category. Since movable equipment has an expected life of 11 years, the vintage weights for movable equipment were deemed to represent the average purchase pattern of movable equipment over an 11-year period. With real movable equipment purchase estimates available back to 1963, twenty-eight 11-year periods could be averaged to determine the average vintage weights for movable equipment that are representative of average movable equipment purchase patterns over time. Vintage weights for each 11-year period were calculated by dividing the real movable capital purchase amount for any given year by the total amount of purchases in the 11-year period. This calculation was done for each year in the 11-year period, and for each of the twenty-eight 11-year periods. The average of the twenty-eight 11-year periods were used to determine the FY 2002 average movable equipment vintage weights. As proposed and for this final rule, for interest vintage weights, the nominal annual capital purchase amounts for total equipment (building and fixed and movable) derived from the AHA Panel and Annual Surveys were used. Nominal annual purchase amounts were used to capture the value of the debt instrument. Since hospital debt instruments have an expected life of 23 years, the vintage weights for interest were deemed to represent the average purchase pattern of total equipment over 23-year periods. With nominal total equipment purchase estimates available back to 1963, sixteen 23-year periods were averaged to determine the average vintage weights for interest that are representative of average capital purchase patterns over time. Vintage weights for each 23-year period were calculated by dividing the nominal total capital purchase amount for any given year by the total amount of purchases in the 23-year period. This calculation was done for each year in the 23-year period and for each of the sixteen 23-year periods. The average of the sixteen 23year periods were used to determine the FY 2002 average interest vintage weights. The vintage weights for the index are presented in Table 4 below. In addition to the price proxies for depreciation and interest costs described above in the vintage weighted capital section, as proposed and for this final rule, we used the CPI–U for Residential Rent as a price proxy for other capital-related costs. The price proxies for each of the capital cost categories are the same as those used for the IPPS final rule (67 FR at 50044) capital input price index. TABLE 4.—CMS FY 2002-BASED RPL MARKET BASKET CAPITAL VINTAGE WEIGHTS Fixed assets (23 year weights) mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Year 1 2 3 4 ............................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................... VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Movable assets (11 year weights) 0.021 0.022 0.025 0.027 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 0.065 0.071 0.077 0.082 09MYR2 Interest: capitalrelated (23 year weights) 0.010 0.012 0.014 0.016 27053 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 4.—CMS FY 2002-BASED RPL MARKET BASKET CAPITAL VINTAGE WEIGHTS—Continued Fixed assets (23 year weights) Year Interest: capitalrelated (23 year weights) Movable assets (11 year weights) 5 ............................................................................................................... 6 ............................................................................................................... 7 ............................................................................................................... 8 ............................................................................................................... 9 ............................................................................................................... 10 ............................................................................................................. 11 ............................................................................................................. 12 ............................................................................................................. 13 ............................................................................................................. 14 ............................................................................................................. 15 ............................................................................................................. 16 ............................................................................................................. 17 ............................................................................................................. 18 ............................................................................................................. 19 ............................................................................................................. 20 ............................................................................................................. 21 ............................................................................................................. 22 ............................................................................................................. 23 ............................................................................................................. 0.029 0.031 0.033 0.035 0.038 0.040 0.042 0.045 0.047 0.049 0.051 0.053 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.060 0.060 0.061 0.061 0.086 0.091 0.095 0.100 0.106 0.112 0.117 .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... 0.019 0.023 0.026 0.029 0.033 0.036 0.039 0.043 0.048 0.053 0.056 0.059 0.062 0.064 0.066 0.070 0.071 0.074 0.076 Total .................................................................................................. 1.000 1.000 1.000 The RY (that is, beginning July 1, 2006) update for the IPF PPS using the FY 2002-based RPL market basket and Global Insight’s 1st quarter 2006 forecast is 4.3 percent. This includes increases in both the operating section and the capital section for the 18-month period (that is, January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006). Global Insight, Inc. is a nationally recognized economic and financial forecasting firm that contracts with CMS to forecast the components of the market baskets. Using the current FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket (66 FR 41427), Global Insight’s 1st quarter 2006 forecast for the RY beginning July 1, 2006 is 3.4 percent. Table 5 below compares the RY 2002-based RPL market basket and the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket percent changes. For both the historical and forecasted periods between RY 2000 and RY 2008, the difference between the two market baskets is minor with the exception of RY 2002, where the FY–2002-based RPL market basket increased three tenths of a percentage point higher than the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. This is primarily due to the FY 2002-based RPL having a larger compensation (that is, the sum of wages and salaries and benefits) cost weight than the FY 1997-based index and the price changes associated with compensation costs increasing much faster than the prices of other market basket components. Also contributing is the ‘‘all other nonlabor intensive’’ cost weight, which is smaller in the FY 2002based RPL market basket than in the FY 1997-based index, as well as the slower price changes associated with these costs. TABLE 5.—FY 2002-BASED RPL MARKET BASKET AND FY 1997-BASED EXCLUDED HOSPITAL WITH CAPITAL MARKET BASKET, PERCENT CHANGES FY 2002-based RPL market basket mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Rate year (RY) Historical data: RY 2000 ................................................................................................................................................ RY 2001 ................................................................................................................................................ RY 2002 ................................................................................................................................................ RY 2003 ................................................................................................................................................ RY 2004 ................................................................................................................................................ RY 2005 ................................................................................................................................................ Average RY 2000–2005 ....................................................................................................................... Forecast: RY 2006 ................................................................................................................................................ RY 2007 ................................................................................................................................................ RY 2008 ................................................................................................................................................ Average RY 2006–2008 ....................................................................................................................... FY 1997-based excluded hospital market basket with capital 2.8 3.8 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.8 3.7 2.7 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 4.0 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.8 3.4 3.1 3.4 Source: Global Insight, Inc. 1stQtr 2006, @USMACRO/CONTROL0306 @CISSIM/CNTL08R3.SIM. Note: The RY forecasts are based on the standard 12-month period of July 1 to June 30. For this rule, we are moving from an 18-month period to a 12-month period. VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27054 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 4. Labor-Related Share As described below in this file rule, due to the variations in costs and geographic wage levels, we believe that payment rates under the IPF PPS should continue to be adjusted by a geographic wage index. This wage index applies to the labor-related portion of the proposed Federal per diem base rate, hereafter referred to as the labor-related share. The labor-related share is determined by identifying the national average proportion of operating costs that are related to, influenced by, or vary with the local labor market. Using our current definition of labor-related, the laborrelated share is the sum of the relative importance of wages and salaries, fringe benefits, professional fees, laborintensive services, and a portion of the capital share from an appropriate market basket. We used the FY 2002based RPL market basket costs to determine the labor-related share for the IPF PPS. The labor-related share for RY 2007 is the sum of the RY 2007 relative importance of each labor-related cost category, and reflects the different rates of price change for these cost categories between the base year (FY 2002) and RY 2007. The sum of the relative importance for RY 2007 for operating costs (wages and salaries, employee benefits, professional fees, and laborintensive services) is 71.586, as shown in Table 6 below. The portion of capital that is influenced by the local labor market is estimated to be 46 percent, which is the same percentage used in the FY 1997-based IRF and IPF payment systems. Since the relative importance for capital is 8.867 percent of the FY 2002-based RPL market basket in RY 2007, we are taking 46 percent of 8.867 percent to determine the labor-related share of capital for RY 2007. The result is 4.079 percent, which we added to 71.586 percent for the operating cost amount to determine the total laborrelated share for RY 2007. Thus, the labor-related share that we are using for IPF PPS in RY 2007 is 75.665 percent. This labor-related share is determined using the same methodology as employed in calculating all previous IPF labor-related shares (69 FR 66952). Comment: One commenter noted that the proposed labor-related share based on the RPL market basket would benefit hospitals with a wage index greater than or equal to 1.000. The commenter also recommended that CMS ensure that the labor-related share is calculated appropriately, based on recent and comprehensive data for the facilities in the market basket. Response: We recognize that the labor-related share would benefit hospitals with a wage index greater than 1.000. However, the wage index is estimated independently from the laborrelated share. We do not take into consideration which hospitals would benefit from the revised and rebased labor-related share. We calculated the labor-related share using the same methodology used for the IPF implementation year and reflected the most recent and comprehensive data available. The labor-related share represents the national average while the wage index reflects geographical cost differences. The proposed change in the laborrelated share is primarily attributable to the exclusion of children’s and cancer hospitals (which are less labor intensive than IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs) and the update of the base year to reflect FY 2002 data. The FY 2002 data, the most recent and comprehensive data available, reflects that labor-related costs are increasing faster than aggregate non-labor-related costs. We will continue to analyze RPL cost report data on a regular basis to ensure it accurately reflects the cost structures facing IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs serving Medicare beneficiaries. Table 6 below shows the RY 2007 relative importance of labor-related shares using the FY 2002-based RPL market basket and the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket. TABLE 6.—TOTAL LABOR-RELATED SHARE—RELATIVE IMPORTANCE FOR RY 2007 FY 2002-based RPL market basket relative importance (percent) RY 2007 FY 1997 excluded hospital with capital market basket relative importance (percent) RY 2007 Wages and salaries ................................................................................................................................. Employee benefits ................................................................................................................................... Professional fees ..................................................................................................................................... All other labor-intensive services ............................................................................................................. 52.506 14.042 2.886 2.152 48.021 11.534 4.495 4.411 Subtotal ............................................................................................................................................. Labor-related share of capital costs ........................................................................................................ 71.586 4.079 68.461 3.222 Total ........................................................................................................................................... 75.665 71.683 Cost category mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 IPFs Paid Based on a Blend of the Reasonable Cost-Based Payments Under the broad authority of sections 1886(b)(3)(A) and (b)(3)(B) of the Act and as stated in the FY 2006 IPPS final rule (70 FR 47399), for IPFs that are transitioning to the fully Federal prospective payment rate, we are now using the rebased and revised FY 2002based excluded hospital market basket to update the reasonable cost-based portion of their payments. We rebase the market basket periodically so that the cost weights reflect changes in the mix VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 of goods and services that hospitals purchase to furnish inpatient care between base periods. We chose FY 2002 as the base year for the excluded hospital market basket because we believe this is the most recent, complete year of Medicare cost report data. The reasonable cost-based payments, subject to TEFRA limits, are determined on a FY basis. The FY 2007 update factor for the portion of the IPF PPS transitional blend payment based on reasonable costs will be published in the FY 2007 IPPS proposed and final rules. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 VI. Update of the IPF PPS Adjustment Factors A. Overview of the IPF PPS Adjustment Factors In developing the IPF PPS, in order to ensure that the IPF PPS would be able to account adequately for each IPF’s case-mix, we performed an extensive regression analysis of the relationship between the per diem costs and certain patient and facility characteristics to determine those characteristics associated with statistically significant cost differences on a per diem basis. For E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations characteristics with statistically significant cost differences, we used the regression coefficients of those variables to determine the size of the corresponding payment adjustments. The IPF PPS payment adjustments were derived from a regression analysis of 100 percent of the FY 2002 MedPAR data file which contained 483,038 cases. We are using the same results of this regression analysis to implement the RY 2007 IPF PPS final rule (See 69 FR 66935 through 66936 for a more detailed description of the data file used for the regression analysis.) We computed a per diem cost for each Medicare inpatient psychiatric stay, including routine operating, ancillary, and capital components using information from the FY 2002 MedPAR file and data from the FY 2002 Medicare cost reports. To calculate the cost per day for each inpatient psychiatric stay, routine costs were estimated by multiplying the routine cost per day from the IPF’s FY 2002 Medicare cost report by the number of Medicare covered days on the FY 2002 MedPAR stay record. Ancillary costs were estimated by multiplying each departmental cost-to-charge ratio by the corresponding ancillary charges on the MedPAR stay record. The total cost per day was calculated by summing routine and ancillary costs for the stay and dividing it by the number of Medicare covered days for each day of the stay. The IPF PPS includes a payment adjustment for IPFs with qualifying Emergency Departments (EDs), and IPFs that are part of acute care hospitals and CAHs with qualifying EDs. As a result, ED costs were excluded from the dependent variable used in the cost regression in order to remove the effects of ED costs from other payment adjustment factors with which ED costs may be correlated and thus avoid overpaying ED costs. The log of per diem cost, like most health care cost measures, appeared to be normally distributed. Therefore, the natural logarithm of the per diem cost was the dependent variable in the regression analysis. We included variables in the regression to control for psychiatric hospitals that do not bill ancillary costs and for ECT costs that we pay separately. The per diem cost was adjusted for differences in labor cost across geographic areas using the FY 2005 hospital wage index unadjusted for geographic reclassifications, in order to be consistent with our use of the market basket labor share in applying the wage index adjustment. As discussed in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66936), we computed a wage adjustment factor for VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 each case by multiplying the Medicare 2005 hospital wage index based on MSA definitions defined by OMB in 1993 for each facility by the labor-related share and adding the non-labor share. We used the 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market basket to determine the labor-related share. The per diem cost for each case was divided by this factor before taking the natural logarithm. The payment adjustment for the wage index was computed consistently with the wage adjustment factor, which is equivalent to separating the per diem cost into a labor portion and a non-labor portion and adjusting the labor portion by the wage index. With the exception of the teaching adjustment, the independent variables were specified as one or more categorical variables. Once the regression model was finalized based on the log normal variables, the regression coefficients for these variables were converted to payment adjustment factors by treating each coefficient as an exponent of the base ‘‘e’’ for natural logarithms, which is approximately equal to 2.718. The payment adjustment factors represent the proportional effect of each variable relative to a reference variable. As a result of the regression analysis, we established patient-level payment adjustments for age, DRG assignment based on patients’ principal diagnoses, selected comorbidities, and a day of stay adjustment (the variable per diem adjustments) to reflect higher resource use in the early days of an IPF stay. We also established facility-level payment adjustments for wage area, rural location, teaching status, cost of living adjustment for IPFs located in Alaska and Hawaii, and an adjustment for IPFs with a qualifying ED. We do not plan to update the regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data (that is, no earlier than RY 2008). CMS plans to monitor claims and payment data independently from cost report data to assess issues, or whether changes in case-mix or payment shifts have occurred between free standing governmental, non-profit, and private psychiatric hospitals, and/or psychiatric units of general hospital, and other impact issues of importance to psychiatric facilities. B. Patient-Level Adjustments In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we provided payment adjustments for the following payment-level characteristics: DRG assignment of the patient’s principal diagnosis, selected comorbidities, patient age, and the variable per diem adjustments. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27055 1. Adjustment for DRG Assignment The IPF PPS includes payment adjustments for the psychiatric DRG assigned to the claim based on each patient’s principal diagnosis. In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we explained that the IPF PPS includes 15 diagnosis-related group (DRG) adjustment factors (69 FR 66936). The adjustment factors were expressed relative to the most frequently reported DRG in FY 2002, that is, DRG 430. The coefficient values and adjustment factors were derived from the regression analysis. In accordance with § 412.27, payment under the IPF PPS is made for claims with a principal diagnosis included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder—Fourth Edition—Text Revision (DSM–IV–TR) or Chapter Five of the International Classification of Diseases—9th Revision—Clinical Modifications (ICD–9–CM). The Standards for Electronic Transaction final rule published in the Federal Register on August 17, 2000 (65 FR 50312), adopted the ICD–9–CM as the designated code set for reporting diseases, injuries, impairments, other health related problems, their manifestations, and causes of injury, disease, impairment, or other healthrelated problems. As a result, the DSM– IV–TR, while essential for the diagnosis and treatment of mentally ill patients, may not be reported on Medicare claims. However, in order to recognize the importance of the DSM–IV–TR in mental health treatment, we updated the reference to the DSM in § 412.27 from DSM–III–TR to DSM–IV–TR in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule. As a result, under the revised § 412.27, IPFs that are distinct part psychiatric units of acute care hospitals and CAHs may only admit patients who have a principal diagnosis in the DSM–IV–TR or Chapter Five of the ICD–9–CM although DSM codes may not be reported on medical claims. IPF claims with a principal diagnosis included in Chapter Five of the ICD–9– CM or the DSM–IV–TR will be paid the Federal per diem base rate under the IPF PPS. Psychiatric principal diagnoses that do not group to one of the 15 designated DRGs receive the Federal per diem base rate and all other applicable adjustments, but the payment would not include a DRG adjustment. Only those claims with diagnoses that group to one of these psychiatric DRGs would receive a DRG adjustment. We believe it is vital to maintain the same diagnostic coding and DRG classification for IPFs that is used under the IPPS for providing the same E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27056 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations psychiatric care. As we explained in the IPF PPS proposed rule (68 FR 66924), all changes to the ICD–9–CM coding system that would impact the IPF PPS are addressed annually in the IPPS proposed and final rules published each year. The updated codes are effective October 1 of each year and must be used to report diagnostic or procedure information. The official version of the ICD–9–CM is available on CD–ROM from the U.S. Government Printing Office. The FY 2006 version can be ordered by contacting the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Department 50, Washington, DC 20402–9329, telephone number (202) 512–1800. The stock number is 017–022–01544–7, and the price is $25.00. In addition, private vendors publish the ICD–9–CM. Questions concerning the ICD–9–CM should be directed to Patricia E. Brooks, Co-Chairperson, ICD–9–CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee, CMS, Center for Medicare Management, Hospital and Ambulatory Policy Group, Division of Acute Care, Mailstop C4–08–06, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244– 1850. Questions and comments may be sent via e-mail to: Patricia.Brooks1@cms.hhs.gov. Further information concerning the Official Version of the ICD–9–CM can be found in the IPPS final regulation, ‘‘Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems and Fiscal Year 2006 Rates; Final Rule,’’ in the August 12, 2005 Federal Register (70 FR 47278) and at https://www.cms.hhs.gov/ QuarterlyProviderUpdates/downloads/ cms1500f.pdf. The following two tables below list the FY 2006 new ICD diagnosis codes and FY 2006 revised diagnosis code titles, respectively. These tables are only a listing of FY 2006 changes and do not reflect all of the currently valid and applicable ICD codes classified in the DRGs. Table 7 below lists the new FY 2006 ICD diagnosis codes that are classified to one of the 15 DRGs that are provided a DRG adjustment in the IPF PPS. When coded as a principal code or diagnosis, these codes receive the correlating DRG adjustment. TABLE 7.—FY 2006 NEW DIAGNOSIS CODES Diagnosis code 291.82 292.85 327.00 327.01 327.02 327.09 327.10 327.11 327.12 327.13 327.14 327.15 327.19 Description ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... DRG Alcohol induced sleep disorders .............................................................................. Drug induced sleep disorders .................................................................................. Organic insomnia, unspecified ................................................................................ Insomnia due to medical condition classified elsewhere ........................................ Insomnia due to mental disorder ............................................................................. Other organic insomnia ........................................................................................... Organic hypersomnia, unspecified .......................................................................... Idiopathic hypersomnia with long sleep time .......................................................... Idiopathic hypersomnia without long sleep time ..................................................... Recurrent hypersomnia ........................................................................................... Hypersomnia due to medical condition classified elsewhere .................................. Hypersomnia due to mental disorder ...................................................................... Other organic hypersomnia ..................................................................................... Table 8 below lists ICD diagnosis codes whose titles have been modified in FY 2006. Title changes do not impact the DRG adjustment. When used as a 521, 522, 523 521, 522, 523 432 432 432 432 432 432 432 432 432 432 432 principal diagnosis, these codes still receive the correlating DRG adjustment. TABLE 8.—REVISED DIAGNOSIS CODE TITLES Diagnosis code mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 307.45 780.52 780.54 780.55 780.58 Description ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... Circadian rhythm sleep disorder of nonorganic origin ............................................ Insomnia, unspecified .............................................................................................. Hypersomnia, unspecified ....................................................................................... Disruption of 24 hour sleep wake cycle, unspecified .............................................. Sleep related movement disorder, unspecified ....................................................... In addition to the aforementioned, in the August 2005 IPPS final rule, we finalized ICD code 305.1, Tobacco Use Disorder, in order to designate this code as a noncovered Medicare service when reported as the principal diagnosis. Below we have republished the explanation that was included in the IPPS final rule (70 FR 47312) and published on the CMS Web site at https://www.cms.hhs.gov/ QuarterlyProviderUpdates/downloads/ cms1500f.pdf. ‘‘We have become aware of the possible need to add code 305.1 (Tobacco use disorder) to the MCE in order to make admissions for tobacco use disorder a noncovered Medicare VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 DRG service when code 305.1 is reported as the principal diagnosis. On March 22, 2005, CMS published a final decision memorandum and related national coverage determination (NCD) on smoking cessation counseling services on its Web site: (https:// www.cms.hhs.gov/coverage/). Among other things, this NCD provides that: ‘Inpatient hospital stays with the principal diagnosis of 305.1, Tobacco Use Disorder, are not reasonable and necessary for the effective delivery of tobacco cessation counseling services. Therefore, we will not cover tobacco cessation services if tobacco cessation is the primary reason for the patient’s hospital stay.’ Therefore, in order to maintain internal consistency with CMS programs and decisions, we proposed to add code 305.1 to the MCE edit ‘Questionable Admission— PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 432 432 432 432 432 Principal Diagnosis Only’ in order to make tobacco use disorder a noncovered admission.’’ (70 FR 47312). In order to maintain consistency with the IPPS, for discharges on or after October 1, 2005, ICD code 305.1, Tobacco Use Disorder, will not be a covered principal diagnosis under the IPF PPS. Although we are updating the IPF PPS to reflect ICD–9–CM coding changes and DRG classification changes discussed in the annual update to the IPPS, in the RY 2007 IPF PPS final rule, the DRG adjustment factors currently being paid to IPFs will remain the same (that is, for discharges occurring during the RY July E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007). As indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we do not plan to update the regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data. As a result, we are adopting the DRG adjustments factors, the ICD–9–CM 27057 coding changes and the DRG classification changes that are currently being paid as indicated in Table 9 below. TABLE 9.—FY 2006 DRGS AND ADJUSTMENT FACTOR DRG mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG 424 ................................................... 425 ................................................... 426 ................................................... 427 ................................................... 428 ................................................... 429 ................................................... 430 ................................................... 431 ................................................... 432 ................................................... 433 ................................................... 521 ................................................... 522 ................................................... 523 ................................................... 12 ..................................................... 23 ..................................................... O.R. Procedure with Principal Diagnosis of Mental Illness ......................................... Acute Adjustment Reaction & Psychosocial Dysfunction ............................................ Depressive Neurosis .................................................................................................... Neurosis, Except Depressive ....................................................................................... Disorders of Personality & Impulse Control ................................................................. Organic Disturbances & Mental Retardation ............................................................... Psychoses .................................................................................................................... Childhood Mental Disorders ......................................................................................... Other Mental Disorder Diagnoses ............................................................................... Alcohol/Drug Abuse or Dependence, Leave Against Medical Advice (LAMA) ........... Alcohol/Drug Abuse or Dependence with CC ............................................................. Alcohol/Drug Abuse or Dependence with RehabilitationTherapy without CC ............. Alcohol/Drug Abuse or Dependence without Rehabilitation Therapy without CC ...... Degenerative Nervous System Disorders .................................................................... Non-traumatic Stupor & Coma ..................................................................................... Section 412.424(d) separately identifies both ‘‘Diagnosis-related group assignment’’ and ‘‘Principal diagnosis’’ as patient level adjustments. Since publication of the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we have received inquiries related to whether the IPF PPS includes two patient-level payment adjustments for principal diagnosis, an adjustment for the diagnosis-related group assignment, and a separate adjustment for providing a principal diagnosis in general. We intended that the IPF PPS provide one patient-level adjustment for principal diagnosis, which is ‘‘Diagnosis-related group assignment.’’ In order to clarify our policy, we proposed to modify the language in section 412.424(d) by deleting subparagraph § 412.424(d)(2)(iii). We received no public comments on the proposed amendment. We are adopting this change in our final rule. Public comments and our responses on the proposed changes on the adjustment for DRG assignment are summarized below. Comment: We received several comments concerning the update to the DRG adjustment factors. Overall, the commenters supported our decision to delay updating the patient-level adjustment factors, stating that a delay in running the regression analysis would allow CMS to use more comprehensive and accurate patientlevel coding data. However, one commenter recommended that CMS update the DRGs and adjustment factors on an ongoing basis. VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Adjustment factor DRG definition Jkt 208001 Response: We do not plan to update the regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data. We believe that this will provide the best indication of current IPF practices. Therefore, the DRG adjustment factors currently being paid to IPFs will remain the same for the RY 2007 (that is, for discharges occurring during the RY July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007). Comment: Several commenters requested clarification on the ‘‘code first’’ instructions, believing them to be contrary to regulations at § 412.27. The commenters stated that § 412.27 requires that psychiatric units only admit those patients who have a psychiatric principal diagnosis listed in the DSM or the Chapter Five of the ICD. Response: Section 412.27 and the ‘‘code first’’ instructions are not contrary to each other. As explained in the November 2004 final rule (69 FR 66922) and in three subsequent Change Requests (CR) (that is, CR 3541, published December 1, 2004; CR 3678, published January 21, 2005; and CR 3752, published March 4, 2005), correct coding conventions should always be followed, including ‘‘code first’’ situations. According to the ICD–9–CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, when a primary diagnosis code has a code first notation, the provider follows the applicable ICD–9– CM coding convention which requires the underlying condition (etiology) to be sequenced first, followed by the manifestation due to the underlying condition. Therefore, we consider ‘‘code first’’ diagnoses to be the primary diagnosis. The submitted claim goes through the IPF PPS claims processing PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 1.22 1.05 0.99 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.00 0.99 0.92 0.97 1.02 0.98 0.88 1.05 1.07 system which identifies the primary diagnosis code as non-psychiatric and searches the secondary codes for a psychiatric code to assign the DRG in order to pay ‘‘code first’’ claims properly. For more coding guidance, please refer to the ICD–9–CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting which can be located on the CMS Web site at https://new.cms.hhs.gov/ ICD9ProviderDiagnosticCodes/. Comment: Commenters requested that CMS include the ICD–9–CM obstetrical series of codes 648.30 to 648.34 and 648.40 to 648.44, since they are subject to sequencing priority guidelines, in our code first logic. Response: At this point in time, we do not intend to update the regression analysis until we have analyzed one year of IPF PPS claims and cost report data. However, when we update the regression analysis, we will review the obstetric codes noted above and consider the appropriateness of including them in our code first logic. For RY 2007, no DRG Adjustment will be made to these codes. Final Rule Action: In summary, we received no public comments concerning the proposal to amend § 412.424(d). In order to clarify our policy that the IPF PPS provides one patient level adjustment for principal diagnoses, we are modifying the language in section § 412.424(d) by deleting sub-paragraph § 412.424(d)(2)(iii). In addition, we are adopting the DRG adjustment currently in effect and as shown in Table 9. E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27058 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 2. Payment for Comorbid Conditions In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we established 17 comorbidity categories and identified the ICD–9–CM diagnosis codes that generate a payment adjustment under the IPF PPS. Comorbidities are specific patient conditions that are secondary to the patient’s primary diagnosis, and that require treatment during the stay. Diagnoses that relate to an earlier episode of care and have no bearing on the current hospital stay are excluded and not reported on IPF claims. Comorbid conditions must co-exist at the time of admission, develop subsequently, affect the treatment received, affect the length of stay or affect both treatment and LOS. The intent of the comorbidity adjustment was to recognize the increased cost associated with comorbid conditions by providing additional payments for certain concurrent medical or psychiatric conditions that are expensive to treat. For each claim, an IPF may receive only one comorbidity adjustment per comorbidity category, but it may receive an adjustment for more than one comorbidity category. Billing instructions require that IPFs must enter the full ICD–9–CM codes for up to 8 additional diagnoses if they coexist at the time of admission or developed subsequently. The comorbidity adjustments were determined based on regression analysis using the diagnoses reported by hospitals in FY 2002. The principal diagnoses were used to establish the DRG adjustment and were not accounted for in establishing the comorbidity category adjustments, except where ICD–9–CM ‘‘code first’’ instructions apply. As we explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66922), the code first rule applies when a condition has both an underlying etiology and a manifestation due to the underlying etiology. For these conditions, the ICD–9–CM has a coding convention that requires the underlying conditions to be sequenced first followed by the manifestation. Whenever a combination exists, there is a ‘‘use additional code’’ note at the etiology code and a ‘‘code first’’ note at the manifestation code. Although we are updating the IPF PPS to reflect updates to the ICD–9–CM codes, the comorbidity adjustment factors currently in effect will remain in effect for the RY beginning July 1, 2006. As we indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we do not plan to update the regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data. The comorbidity adjustments are shown in Table 12 below. As previously discussed in the DRG section, we believe it is essential to maintain the same diagnostic coding set for IPFs that is used under the IPPS for providing the same psychiatric care. Therefore, as proposed and in this final rule, we are using the most current FY 2006 ICD codes. They are reflected in the FY 2006 GROUPER, version 23.0 and are effective for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2005. Table 10 lists the updated FY 2006 new ICD diagnosis codes that impact the comorbidity adjustment under the IPF PPS and Table 11 lists the invalid ICD codes no longer applicable for the comorbidity adjustment. Table 10 only lists the FY 2006 new codes and does not reflect all of the currently valid ICD codes applicable for the IPF PPS comorbidity adjustment. We note that ICD diagnosis code 585 Chronic Renal Failure was modified in two ways—(1) By expanding the level of specificity to include seven new codes; and (2) by changing the original code of 585 to invalid, thereby leaving the remaining more specific codes reportable. Since diagnosis code 585 is no longer valid, we are eliminating this code from the comorbidity category ‘‘Renal Failure, Chronic.’’ ICD diagnosis code 585 ‘‘Chronic Renal Failure’’ is defined in the ICD–9– CM as ‘‘Progressive, persistent inadequate kidney function characterized by anuria, accumulation of urea and other nitrogenous bodies in the blood, nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding, and yellowishbrown discoloration of the skin.’’ This code included the various stages of chronic kidney disease, but it is no longer valid. The new codes listed below reflect the various stages of chronic kidney failure. In this final rule, we are adopting as proposed comorbidity adjustments for 585.3, ‘‘Chronic kidney disease, Stage III (moderate),’’ 585.4, ‘‘Chronic kidney disease, Stage IV (severe),’’ 585.5, ‘‘Chronic kidney disease, Stage V,’’ 585.6, ‘‘End Stage renal disease,’’ and 585.9, ‘‘Chronic kidney disease, unspecified.’’ However, since the purpose of the comorbidity adjustment is to account for the higher resource costs associated with comorbid conditions that are expensive to treat on a per diem basis, we are not providing a comorbidity adjustment for 585.1, ‘‘Chronic kidney disease, Stage I’’ and 585.2, ‘‘Chronic kidney disease, Stage II (mild).’’ We believe that these conditions (585.1 and 585.2) are less costly to treat on a per diem basis because patients with these conditions are either asymptomatic or may have only mild symptoms. These conditions represent a minimal to mild decrease in kidney function that is almost completely compensated such that the only finding is typically an abnormal laboratory test. Unlike patients with more significant kidney dysfunction, these patients do not usually require more costly patient care interventions such as additional laboratory tests to monitor renal function, special pharmacy attention to reduced dosages or kidney-sparing medications, or fluid and electrolyte precautions with special diets, frequent weights, input/output balance, and fluid restriction. The resources and costs that these patients require for staff time, medications and supplies, and administrative services are expected to be similar to other patients without these conditions. TABLE 10.—FY 2006 NEW ICD CODES APPLICABLE FOR THE COMORBIDITY ADJUSTMENT mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Diagnosis code Description DRG 585.3 ....... 585.4 ....... 585.5 ....... 585.6 ....... 585.9 ....... V46.13 ..... V46.14 ..... Chronic kidney disease, Stage III (moderate) ..................... Chronic kidney disease, Stage IV(severe) .......................... Chronic kidney disease, Stage V ........................................ End stage renal disease ...................................................... Chronic kidney disease, unspecified ................................... Encounter for weaning from respirator [ventilator] .............. Mechanical complication of respirator [ventilator] ............... 315–316 315–316 315–316 315–316 315–316 467 467 VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 Comorbidity category Renal Failure, Chronic. Renal Failure, Chronic. Renal Failure,Chronic. Renal Failure,Chronic. Renal Failure, Chronic. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations In Table 11 below, we list the FY 2006 invalid ICD diagnosis code 585 that we will be removing from the comorbidity adjustment under the IPF PPS. This table does not reflect all of the currently 27059 valid ICD codes applicable for the IPF PPS comorbidity adjustment. TABLE 11.—FY 2006 INVALID ICD CODES NO LONGER APPLICABLE FOR THE COMORBIDITY ADJUSTMENT Diagnosis code Description 585 .......... Chronic renal failure ............................................................ The seventeen comorbidity categories for which we are providing an DR 315–36 Comorbidity category Renal Failure, Chronic. adjustment, their respective codes, including the new FY 2006 ICD codes, and their respective adjustment factors, are listed below in Table 12. TABLE 12.—FY 2006 DIAGNOSIS CODES AND ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR COMORBIDITY CATEGORIES Description of comorbidity ICD–9CM code Developmental Disabilities ............................................................. Coagulation Factor Deficits ............................................................ Tracheostomy ................................................................................. Renal Failure, Acute ....................................................................... 317, 3180, 3181, 3182, and 319 .................................................... 2860 through 2864 ......................................................................... 51900—through 51909 and V440 .................................................. 5845 through 5849, 63630, 63631, 63632, 63730, 63731, 63732, 6383, 6393, 66932, 66934, 9585. 40301, 40311, 40391, 40402, 40412, 40413, 40492, 40493, 5853, 5854, 5855, 5856, 5859, 586, V451, V560, V561, and V562. 1400 through 2390 with a radiation therapy code 92.21–92.29 or chemotherapy code 99.25. 25002, 25003, 25012, 25013, 25022, 25023, 25032, 25033, 25042, 25043, 25052, 25053, 25062, 25063, 25072, 25073, 25082, 25083, 25092, and 25093. 260 through 262 ............................................................................. 3071, 30750, 31203, 31233, and 31234 ........................................ 01000 through 04110, 042, 04500 through 05319, 05440 through 05449, 0550 through 0770, 0782 through 07889, and 07950 through 07959. 2910, 2920, 29212, 2922, 30300, and 30400 ................................ 3910, 3911, 3912, 40201, 40403, 4160, 4210, 4211, and 4219 ... 44024 and 7854 ............................................................................. 49121, 4941, 5100, 51883, 51884, V4611 and V4612, V4613 and V4614. 56960 through 56969, 9975, and V441 through V446 .................. 6960, 7100, 73000 through 73009, 73010 through 73019, and 73020 through 73029. 96500 through 96509, 9654, 9670 through 9699, 9770, 9800 through 9809,9830 through 9839, 986, 9890 through 9897. Renal Failure, Chronic .................................................................... Oncology Treatment ....................................................................... Uncontrolled Diabetes-Mellitus with or without complications ....... Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition ............................................... Eating and Conduct Disorders ....................................................... Infectious Disease .......................................................................... Drug and/or Alcohol Induced Mental Disorders ............................. Cardiac Conditions ......................................................................... Gangrene ........................................................................................ Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ....................................... Artificial Openings—Digestive and Urinary .................................... Severe Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Diseases ........... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Poisoning ........................................................................................ We received several comments offering suggestions on how we could improve the comorbidity adjustment category list. The suggestions ranged from requests for the addition of a single ICD–9–CM code to a request for expanding the comorbidity categories to account for every ICD–9–CM code. Public comments and our responses to the proposed changes to payment for comorbid conditions are summarized below. Comment: We received a comment expressing concern that the comorbidity adjustment list does not include the more common conditions seen in psychiatric patients. This commenter indicated that most psychiatric patients are treated for multiple common conditions and illnesses (for example, heart conditions, and stroke), none of VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 which would trigger a payment adjustment under the IPF PPS. Response: We explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66922), that the data used in calculating the Federal per diem base rate included all the costs for comorbid diagnoses submitted in the FY 2002 claims. Therefore, the cost for providing patient care (for example, medications, routine nursing care) required for common conditions seen in the psychiatric population, and recommended for comorbidity adjustment by commenters (that is, heart conditions or strokes) are already included in the Federal per diem base rate and a comorbidity adjustment for their presence was duplicative and unnecessary. PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 Adjustment factor 1.04 1.13 1.06 1.11 1.11 1.07 1.05 1.13 1.12 1.07 1.03 1.11 1.10 1.12 1.08 1.09 1.11 Further, the design of the IPF PPS with its Federal per diem base rate, provides numerous adjustments for complex cases and the availability of outlier payments, and stop loss payments during the 3-year transition. Comment: A few commenters stated that the range of diagnostic codes proposed for adjustment did not include all the ICD–9–CM codes within a diagnostic category. A particular commenter indicated that the list of codes under diabetes did not include all the diabetes codes. In addition, other commenters provided a list of ICD–9– CM codes and comorbidity adjustments that they believe should be included in the comorbidity adjustment category list. Response: The intent of the comorbidity adjustment is to provide E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27060 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 additional payments for concurrent medical or psychiatric conditions that are expensive to treat and require comparatively more costly treatment during an IPF stay than other comorbid conditions. Although we are updating the IPF PPS to reflect updates to the ICD–9–CM codes, the comorbidity adjustment categories and factors currently in effect will remain in effect for the RY beginning July 1, 2006. As indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we do not plan to update the regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data. Comment: A commenter recommended that code 404.03 hypertensive heart and renal disease, malignant, with heart failure and renal failure continue to qualify for both Cardiac Conditions and Chronic Renal Failure comorbidity adjustments. Response: We are aware that ICD code 404.03, hypertensive heart and renal disease, malignant, with heart failure and renal failure, has caused confusion since this ICD code is currently used to code an adjustment in two separate IPF comorbidity categories, (that is, both ‘‘Renal Failure, Chronic’’ and ‘‘Cardiac Conditions’’). We believe that it more appropriately corresponds to the ‘‘Cardiac Conditions’’ comorbidity than to the ‘‘Renal Failure, Chronic’’ comorbidity. Therefore, to be more clinically cohesive and to eliminate confusion, we are removing ICD code 404.03 from the comorbidity adjustment category ‘‘Renal Failure, Chronic,’’ but retaining it in the ‘‘Cardiac Conditions’’ comorbidity category. Since both comorbidity categories have the same adjustment factor of 1.11, we believe no negative payment consequence will result from this change. Final Rule Action: We are adopting the comorbidity adjustments currently in effect and as shown in Table 12 above for RY 2007 beginning July 1, 2006. 3. Patient Age Adjustments As explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we analyzed the impact of age on per diem cost by examining the age variable (that is, the range of ages) for payment adjustments. In general, we found that the cost per day increases with increasing age. The older age groups are more costly than the under 45 years of age group; the differences in per diem cost increase for each successive age group, and the differences are statistically significant. Based on the results of the regression analysis, we established 8 adjustment factors for age beginning with age groupings 45 and under 50, 50 and under 55, 55 and under 60, 60 and under 65, 65 and under 70, 70 and VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 under 75, 75 and under 80, and 80 years of age and over. Patients under 45 years of age are assigned an age adjustment factor of 1.00. As we indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we do not plan to update the regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data. As a result, we are adopting the patient age adjustments currently in effect and shown in Table 13 below. emergency department (ED). If an IPF has a qualifying ED, it receives a 1.31 adjustment for day 1 of each patient stay. If an IPF does not have a qualifying ED, it receives a 1.19 adjustment for day 1 of the stay. The ED adjustment is explained in more detail in section VI.C.5 of this final rule. As we indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we do not plan to make changes to the regression TABLE 13.—AGE GROUPINGS AND analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS As a result, for the RY beginning July 1, Adjustment 2006, we are adopting the variable per Age factor diem adjustment factors currently in effect. Table 14 below shows the Under 45 ................................... 1.00 variable per diem adjustments that we 45 and under 50 ....................... 1.01 50 and under 55 ....................... 1.02 will be using for updating the IPF PPS. 55 60 65 70 75 80 and and and and and and under 60 ....................... under 65 ....................... under 70 ....................... under 75 ....................... under 80 ....................... over .............................. 1.04 1.07 1.10 1.13 1.15 1.17 Final Rule Action: In response to the RY 2007 proposed rule, we received no comments concerning the age adjustment. We are adopting the age adjustments currently in effect and as shown in Table 13 above, for RY 2007. 4. Variable Per Diem Adjustments We explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule that cost regressions indicated that per diem cost declines as the LOS increases (69 FR 66947). The variable per diem adjustments to the Federal per diem base rate account for ancillary and administrative costs that occur disproportionately in the first days after admission to an IPF. We used regression analysis to estimate the average differences in per diem cost among stays of different length. Regression analysis simultaneously controls for cost differences associated with the other variables (for example, age, DRG, and presence of specific comorbidities). The regression coefficients measure the relative average cost per day for stays of differing lengths compared to a reference group’s LOS. We analyzed through cost regression the relative cost per day for day 1 through day 30. We determined that the average per diem cost declined smoothly until the 22nd day. As a result of this analysis, we established variable per diem adjustments that begin on day 1 and decline gradually until day 21 of a patient’s stay. For day 22 and thereafter, the variable per diem adjustment remains the same each day for the remainder of the stay. However, the adjustment applied to day 1 depends upon whether the IPF has a qualifying PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 TABLE 14.—VARIABLE PER DIEM ADJUSTMENTS Day-of-stay Day 1—IPF Without a Qualified ED ......................................... Day 1—IPF With a Qualified ED ......................................... Day 2 ........................................ Day 3 ........................................ Day 4 ........................................ Day 5 ........................................ Day 6 ........................................ Day 7 ........................................ Day 8 ........................................ Day 9 ........................................ Day 10 ...................................... Day 11 ...................................... Day 12 ...................................... Day 13 ...................................... Day 14 ...................................... Day 15 ...................................... Day 16 ...................................... Day 17 ...................................... Day 18 ...................................... Day 19 ...................................... Day 20 ...................................... Day 21 ...................................... After Day 21 ............................. Adjustment factor 1.19 1.31 1.12 1.08 1.05 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 Final Rule Action: In response to the RY 2007 proposed rule, we received no comments concerning the proposed variable per diem adjustments. We are adopting the variable per diem adjustment factors currently in effect, and as shown in Table 14 above for RY 2007. C. Facility-Level Adjustments The IPF PPS includes facility-level adjustments for the wage index, IPFs located in rural areas, teaching IPFs, cost of living adjustments for IPFs located in Alaska and Hawaii, and IPFs with a qualifying ED. E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 1. Wage Index Adjustment a. Revisions of IPF PPS Geographic Classifications In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we explained that in establishing an adjustment for area wage levels, the labor-related portion of an IPF’s Federal prospective payment is adjusted by using an appropriate wage index. We also explained that an IPF’s wage index is determined based on the location of the IPF in an urban or rural area as defined in § 412.62(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii), respectively. An urban area under the IPF PPS is defined at § 412.62(f)(1)(ii)(A) and (B). In general, an urban area is defined as a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or New England County Metropolitan Area (NECMA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). In addition, a few counties located outside of MSAs are considered urban as specified at § 412.62(f)(1)(ii)(B). Under § 412.62(f)(1)(iii), a rural area is defined as any area outside of an urban area. The geographic classifications defined in § 412.62(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii), were used under the IPPS from FYs 1984 through 2004 (§ 412.62(f) and § 412.63(b)), and have been used under the IPF PPS since it was implemented for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005. Under the IPPS, the wage index is calculated and assigned to hospitals on the basis of the labor market area in which the hospital is located or geographically reclassified to in accordance with sections 1886(d)(8) and (d)(10) of the Act. Under the IPF PPS, the wage index is calculated using IPPS wage index data (as discussed below in section VI.C.1.d of this preamble) on the basis of the labor market area in which the IPF is located, without taking into account geographic reclassification under sections 1886(d)(8) and (d)(10) of the Act and without applying the ‘‘rural floor’’ established under section 4410 of the BBA. (Section 4410 of the BBA provides that for the purposes of section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Act, the area wage index applicable to hospitals located in an urban area of a State may not be less than the area wage index applicable to hospitals located in rural areas in the State. This provision is commonly referred to as the ‘‘rural floor’’ under the IPPS.) However, when we established the IPF PPS, we did not apply the rural floor to IPFs. For this reason, the hospital wage index used for IPFs is commonly referred to as the ‘‘pre-floor’’ hospital wage index indicating that the ‘‘rural floor’’ provision of the BBA is not applied. As a result, the applicable IPF wage index value is assigned to the IPF VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 27061 on the basis of the labor market area in which the IPF is geographically located. As noted above, the current IPF PPS labor market areas are defined based on the definitions of MSAs, Primary MSAs (PMSAs), and NECMAs issued by the OMB (commonly referred to collectively as ‘‘MSAs’’). The MSA definitions, which are discussed in greater detail below, are currently used under the IPF PPS and other PPSs (that is, the IRF PPS, the LTCH PPS, and the PPSs for home health agencies (HHA PPS) and skilled nursing facilities (SNF PPS)). In the FY 2005 IPPS final rule (69 FR 49026 through 49034), revised labor market area definitions were adopted under the IPPS (§ 412.64(b)), which were effective October 1, 2004. These new standards, called Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs), were announced by the OMB late in CY 2000 and are discussed in greater detail below. b. Current IPF PPS Labor Market Areas Based on MSAs When we published the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we explained that we were not adopting the new statistical area definitions defined by OMB for the following reasons. First, the change in labor market areas under the IPPS had not changed at the time we published the IPF PPS proposed rule on November 28, 2003. As a result, IPFs and other interested parties were not afforded an opportunity to comment on the use of the new labor market area definitions under the IPF PPS. Second, we wanted to conduct a thorough analysis of the impact of the new labor market area definitions on payments under the IPF PPS. Finally, in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we indicated our intent to publish in a proposed rule any changes we were considering for new labor market definitions. The analysis of the impact of the new labor market definitions has been completed. In the RY 2007 proposed rule, we proposed to adopt the new CBSA-based labor market area definitions. In this final rule, we are adopting these labor market area definitions for the IPF PPS. We believe it is helpful to provide a detailed description of the current IPF PPS labor market areas to help explain the changes to the IPF PPS labor market areas. As mentioned earlier, since the implementation of the IPF PPS, we have used labor market areas to further characterize urban and rural areas as determined under § 412.62(f)(1)(ii) and (iii). To this end, we have defined labor market areas under the IPF PPS based on the definitions of MSAs, PMSAs, and NECMAs issued by the OMB in 1993, which is consistent with the IPPS approach prior to FY 2005. We note that OMB also defines Consolidated MSAs (CMSAs). A CMSA is a metropolitan area with a population of 1 million or more, comprising two or more PMSAs (identified by their separate economic and social character). However, for purposes of the wage index, we use the PMSAs rather than CMSAs because they allow a more precise breakdown of labor costs. If a metropolitan area is not designated as part of a PMSA, we use the applicable MSA. These different designations use counties as the building blocks upon which they are based. Therefore, under the IPF PPS, hospitals are assigned to either an MSA, PMSA, or NECMA based on whether the county in which the IPF is located is part of that area. All of the counties in a State outside a designated MSA, PMSA, or NECMA are designated as rural. c. Core-Based Statistical Areas The OMB reviews its Metropolitan Area definitions preceding each decennial census. As discussed in the FY 2005 IPPS final rule (69 FR 49026), in the fall of 1998, OMB chartered the Metropolitan Area Standards Review Committee to examine the Metropolitan Area standards and develop recommendations for possible changes to those standards. Three notices related to the review of the standards, providing an opportunity for public comment on the recommendations of the Committee, were published in the Federal Register on the following dates: December 21, 1998 (63 FR 70526); October 20, 1999 (64 FR 56628); and August 22, 2000 (65 FR 51060). In the December 27, 2000 Federal Register (65 FR 82228 through 82238), OMB announced its new standards. In that notice, OMB defines a Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA), beginning in 2003, as ‘‘a geographic entity associated with at least one core of 10,000 or more population, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core as measured by commuting ties. The standards designate and define two categories of CBSAs: Metropolitan Statistical Areas and Micropolitan Statistical Areas.’’ (65 FR 82236 through 82238). According to the OMB, MSAs are based on urbanized areas of 50,000 or more population, and Micropolitan Statistical Areas (referred to in this discussion as Micropolitan Areas) are based on urban clusters of at least 10,000 population, but less than 50,000 population. Counties that do not fall PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27062 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 within CBSAs (either MSAs or Micropolitan Areas) are deemed ‘‘Outside CBSAs.’’ In the past, OMB defined MSAs around areas with a minimum core population of 50,000, and smaller areas were ‘‘Outside MSAs.’’ On June 6, 2003, the OMB announced the new CBSAs, comprised of MSAs and the new Micropolitan Areas based on Census 2000 data. (A copy of the announcement may be obtained at the following Internet address: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ omb/bulletins/fy04/b04-03.html.) The new CBSA designations recognize 49 new MSAs and 565 new Micropolitan Areas, and extensively revise the composition of many of the existing MSAs. There are 1,090 counties in MSAs under the new CBSA designations (previously, there were 848 counties in MSAs). Of these 1,090 counties, 737 are in the same MSA as they were prior to the change in designations, 65 are in a different MSA, and 288 were not previously designated to any MSA. There are 674 counties in Micropolitan Areas. Of these, 41 were previously in an MSA, while 633 were not previously designated to an MSA. There are five counties that previously were designated to an MSA but are no longer designated to either an MSA or a new Micropolitan Area: Carter County, KY; St. James Parish, LA; Kane County, UT; Culpepper County, VA; and King George County, VA. For a more detailed discussion of the conceptual basis of the new CBSAs, refer to the FY 2005 IPPS final rule (67 FR 49026 through 49034). d. Revision of the IPF PPS Labor Market Areas In its June 6, 2003 announcement, OMB cautioned that these new definitions ‘‘should not be used to develop and implement Federal, State, and local nonstatistical programs and policies without full consideration of the effects of using these definitions for such purposes. These areas should not serve as a general-purpose geographic framework for nonstatistical activities, and they may or may not be suitable for use in program funding formulas.’’ We currently use MSAs to define labor market areas for purposes of Medicare wage indices in the IPF PPS since its implementation for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005. Until recently, MSAs were used to define labor market areas for purposes of the wage index for many of the other Medicare payment systems (for example, IRF PPS, SNF PPS, HHA PPS, and Outpatient PPS). While we recognize MSAs are not designed specifically to define labor market areas, we believe they represent a useful proxy VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 for this purpose, because they are based upon characteristics we believe also generally reflect the characteristics of unified labor market areas. For example, CBSAs consist of a core population plus an adjacent territory that reflects a high degree of social and economic integration. This integration is measured by commuting ties, thus demonstrating that these areas may draw workers from the same general areas. In addition, the most recent CBSAs reflect the most upto-date information. Our analysis and discussion here are focused on issues related to adopting the new CBSA designations to define labor market areas for the purposes of the IPF PPS. Historically, Medicare PPSs have utilized Metropolitan Area definitions developed by the OMB. As noted above, the labor market areas currently used under the IPF PPS are based on the Metropolitan Area definitions issued by the OMB and the OMB reviews its Metropolitan Area definitions preceding each decennial census to reflect more recent population changes. The CBSAs are OMB’s latest Metropolitan Area definitions based on the Census 2000 data. Because we believe that the OMB’s latest Metropolitan Area designations more accurately reflect the local economies and wage levels of the areas in which hospitals are currently located, we adopted the revised labor market area designations based on the OMB’s CBSA designations under the IPPS effective October 1, 2004. When we implemented the wage index adjustment at § 412.424(d)(1)(i) under the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66952 through 66954), we explained that the IPF PPS wage index adjustment was intended to reflect the relative hospital wage levels in the geographic area of the hospital as compared to the national average hospital wage level. The OMB’s CBSA designations based on Census 2000 data reflect the most recent available geographic classifications (Metropolitan Area definitions). Therefore, we are revising the labor market area definitions used under the IPF PPS based on the OMB’s CBSA designations. This change ensures that the IPF PPS wage index adjustment most appropriately accounts for and reflects the relative hospital wage levels in the geographic area of the hospital as compared to the national average hospital wage level. Specifically, we are revising the IPF PPS labor market definitions based on the OMB’s new CBSA designations (as discussed in greater detail below) effective for IPF PPS discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2006. Accordingly, we are revising § 412.402, PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 definitions for rural and urban areas. Effective for discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2006, ‘‘rural’’ and ‘‘urban’’ areas will be defined in § 412.64(b)(1)(ii)(A) through (C). These definitions are the labor market definitions based on OMB’s CBSA designations. For clarity, we are also revising the regulation text to include the urban and rural definitions applicable to discharges occurring during cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005, but before July 1, 2006, under § 412.62(f)(1)(ii) and § 412.62(f)(1)(iii). We note that these are the same labor market area definitions (based on the OMB’s new CBSA designations) implemented for acute care hospitals under the IPPS at § 412.64(b), which were effective for those hospitals beginning October 1, 2004 as discussed in the FY 2005 IPPS final rule (69 FR 49026–49034). The IPF PPS uses the acute care inpatient hospitals’ wage data in calculating the IPF PPS wage index. However, unlike the IPPS, and similar to other Medicare payment systems (for example, SNF PPS and IRF PPS), the IPF PPS uses the pre-floor, prereclassified hospital wage index. Below, we discuss the composition of the RY 2007 IPF PPS labor market areas based on OMB’s new CBSA designations. It should be noted that OMB’s new CBSA designations are comprised of several county-based area definitions as explained above, which include Metropolitan Areas, Micropolitan Areas, and areas ‘‘outside CBSAs.’’ We implemented the IPF PPS using two types of labor market areas, that is, urban and rural. In this final rule, we are adopting the revised labor market areas based on OMB’s new CBSA-based designations. As proposed in the RY 2007 proposed rule, we will continue to have 2 types of labor market areas (urban and rural). In the discussion that follows, we explain how we are recognizing Metropolitan Areas, which include New England MSAs and Metropolitan Divisions, as urban. We also explain how we are recognizing Micropolitan Areas and areas ‘‘outside CBSAs’’ as rural. As discussed below in this final rule and as described in the RY 2007 proposed rule, we describe the methodology for mapping OMB’s CBSAbased designations into the IPF PPS (urban area or rural area) format. i. New England MSAs As stated above, we currently use NECMAs to define labor market areas in New England, because these are countybased designations, rather than the 1990 MSA definitions for New England, which used minor civil divisions such E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 as cities and towns. Under the current MSA definitions, NECMAs provided more consistency in labor market definitions for New England compared with the rest of the country, where MSAs are county-based. Under the new CBSAs, the OMB has now defined the MSAs and Micropolitan Areas in New England on the basis of counties. The OMB also established New England City and Town Areas, which are similar to the previous New England MSAs. In order to create consistency across all IPF labor market areas, as proposed and in this final rule, we are using the county-based areas for all MSAs in the nation, including those in New England. The OMB has now defined the New England area based on counties, creating a city- and town-based system as an alternative. We believe that adopting county-based labor market areas for the entire country except those in New England will lead to inconsistencies in our designations. Adopting countybased labor market areas for the entire country provides consistency and stability in Medicare program payment because all of the labor market areas throughout the country, including New England, will be defined using the same system (that is, counties) rather than different systems in different areas of the county, and minimizes programmatic complexity. In addition, we have consistently employed a county-based system for New England for precisely that reason: To maintain consistency with the labor market definitions used throughout the country. Since we have never used cities and towns for defining IPF labor market areas, employing a county-based system in New England maintains that consistent practice. We note that this is consistent with the implementation of the CBSA-based designations under the IPPS for New England (69 FR 49028). Accordingly, for the IPF PPS, we are using the New England MSAs as determined under the new CBSA-based labor market area definitions in defining the revised IPF PPS labor market areas. ii. Metropolitan Divisions Under OMB’s new CBSA designations, a Metropolitan Division is a county or group of counties within a CBSA that contains a core population of at least 2.5 million, representing an employment center, plus adjacent counties associated with the main county or counties through commuting ties. A county qualifies as a main county if 65 percent or more of its employed residents work within the county and the ratio of the number of jobs located in the county to the number of employed residents is at least 0.75. A VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 county qualifies as a secondary county if 50 percent or more, but less than 65 percent, of its employed residents work within the county and the ratio of the number of jobs located in the county to the number of employed residents is at least 0.75. After all the main and secondary counties are identified and grouped, each additional county that already has qualified for inclusion in the MSA falls within the Metropolitan Division associated with the main/ secondary county or counties with which the county at issue has the highest employment interchange measure. Counties in a Metropolitan Division must be contiguous (65 FR 82236). The construct of relatively large MSAs being comprised of Metropolitan Divisions is similar to the current construct of CMSAs comprised of PMSAs. As noted above, in the past, the OMB designated CMSAs as Metropolitan Areas with a population of 1 million or more and comprised of two or more PMSAs. Under the IPF PPS, we currently use the PMSAs rather than CMSAs to define labor market areas because they comprise a smaller geographic area with potentially varying labor costs due to different local economies. We believe that CMSAs may be too large of an area with a relatively large number of hospitals, to accurately reflect the local labor costs of all of the individual hospitals included in that relatively ‘‘large’’ area. A large market area designation increases the likelihood of including many hospitals located in areas with very different labor market conditions within the same market area designation. This variation could increase the difficulty in calculating a single wage index that will be relevant for all hospitals within the market area designation. Similarly, we believe that MSAs with a population of 2.5 million or greater may be too large of an area to accurately reflect the local labor costs of all of the individual hospitals included in that relatively ‘‘large’’ area. Furthermore, as indicated above, Metropolitan Divisions represent the closest approximation to PMSAs, the building block of the current IPF PPS labor market area definitions, and therefore, will most accurately maintain our current structuring of the IPF PPS labor market areas. As implemented under the IPPS (69 FR 49029), we proposed and for this final rule, we are using the Metropolitan Divisions where applicable (as described below) under the new CBSA-based labor market area definitions. In addition to being comparable to the organization of the labor market areas under current MSA designations (that PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27063 is, the use of PMSAs rather than CMSAs), we believe that using Metropolitan Divisions where applicable (as described below) under the IPF PPS will result in a more accurate adjustment for the variation in local labor market areas for IPFs. Specifically, if we recognize the relatively ‘‘larger’’ CBSA that comprises two or more Metropolitan Divisions as an independent labor market area for purposes of the wage index, it will be too large and include data from too many hospitals to compute a wage index that will accurately reflect the various local labor costs of all of the individual hospitals included in that relatively ‘‘large’’ CBSA. As mentioned earlier, a large market area designation increases the likelihood of including many hospitals located in areas with very different labor market conditions within the same market area designation. This variation could increase the difficulty in calculating a single wage index that will be relevant for all hospitals within the market area designation. Rather, by recognizing the Metropolitan Divisions where applicable (as described below) under the proposed new CBSA-based labor market area definitions under the IPF PPS, we believe that in addition to more accurately maintaining the current structuring of the IPF PPS labor market areas, the local labor costs will be more accurately reflected, thereby resulting in a wage index adjustment that better reflects the variation in the local labor costs of the local economies of the IPFs located in these relatively ‘‘smaller’’ areas. Below we describe where Metropolitan Divisions will be applicable under the new CBSA-based labor market area definitions under the IPF PPS. Under OMB’s new CBSA-based designations, there are 11 MSAs containing Metropolitan Divisions: Boston; Chicago; Dallas; Detroit; Los Angeles; Miami; New York; Philadelphia; San Francisco; Seattle; and Washington, D.C. Although these MSAs were also CMSAs under the prior definitions, in some cases these areas have been significantly altered. Under the current IPF PPS MSA designations, Boston is a single NECMA. Under the CBSA-based labor market area designations, it is comprised of four Metropolitan Divisions. Los Angeles will go from four PMSAs under the current IPF PPS MSA designations to two Metropolitan Divisions under the CBSA-based labor market area designations because two MSAs became separate MSAs. The New York CMSA will go from 15 PMSAs under the E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27064 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 current IPF PPS MSA designations to only four Metropolitan Divisions under the CBSA-based labor market area designations. The five PMSAs in Connecticut under the current IPF PPS MSA designations will become separate MSAs under the CBSA-based labor market area designations, and the number of PMSAs in New Jersey under the current IPF PPS MSA designations will go from five to two, with the consolidation of two New Jersey PMSAs (Bergen-Passaic and Jersey City) into the New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY–NJ Division, under the CBSA-based labor market area designations. In San Francisco, under the CBSA-based labor market area designations, there are only two Metropolitan Divisions. Currently, there are six PMSAs, some of which are now separate MSAs under the current IPF PPS labor market area designations. Under the current IPF PPS labor market area designations, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Denver, Houston, Milwaukee, Portland, Sacramento, and San Juan are all designated as CMSAs, but will no longer be designated as CMSAs under the CBSA-based labor market area designations. As noted previously, the population threshold to be designated as a CMSA under the current IPF PPS labor market area designations is 1 million. In most of these cases, counties currently in a PMSA under the current IPF PPS labor market area designations will become separate, independent MSAs under the CBSA-based labor market area designations. We note that subsequent to the publication of the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule, titles to certain CBSAs were changed based on OMB Bulletin No. 06–01 (December 2005). The title changes listed below are nomenclatures that do not result in substantive changes to the CBSA-based designations. Thus, these changes are listed below and will be incorporated into the FY 2007 CBSAbased urban wage index tables. • CBSA 26900: Indianapolis-Carmel, IN • CBSA 42680: Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL • CBSA 19780: Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA • CBSA 47644: Warren-TroyFarmington Hills, MI • CBSA 31140: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY–IN iii. Micropolitan Areas Under OMB’s new CBSA-based designations, Micropolitan Areas are essentially a third area definition consisting primarily of currently rural areas, but also include some or all of areas that are currently designated as an VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 urban MSA. As discussed in greater detail in the FY 2005 IPPS final rule (69 FR 49029 through 49032), how these areas are treated will have significant impacts on the calculation and application of the wage index. Specifically, whether or not Micropolitan Areas are included as part of the respective statewide rural wage indices will impact the value of statewide rural wage index of any State that contains a Micropolitan Area because a hospital’s classification as urban or rural affects which hospitals’ wage data are included in the statewide rural wage index. We combine all of the counties in a State outside a designated urban area together to calculate the statewide rural wage index for each State. Including Micropolitan Areas as part of the statewide rural labor market area would result in an increase to the statewide rural wage index because hospitals located in those Micropolitan Areas typically have higher labor costs than other rural hospitals in the State. Alternatively, if Micropolitan Areas were to be recognized as independent labor market areas, because there would be so few hospitals in each labor market area, the wage indices for IPFs in those areas could become relatively unstable as they might change considerably from year to year. We currently use MSAs to define urban labor market areas and group all the hospitals in counties within each State that are not assigned to an MSA together into a statewide rural labor market area. We have used the terms ‘‘urban’’ and ‘‘rural’’ wage indexes in the past for ease of reference. However, the introduction of Micropolitan Areas by the OMB potentially complicates this terminology because these areas include many hospitals that are currently included in the statewide rural labor market areas. We proposed to treat Micropolitan Areas as rural labor market areas under the IPF PPS for the reasons outlined below. That is, counties that are assigned to a Micropolitan Area under the CBSA-based designations would be treated the same as other ‘‘rural’’ counties that are not assigned to either an MSA (Metropolitan Statistical Area) or a Micropolitan Area. Therefore, in determining an IPF’s applicable wage index (based on IPPS hospital wage index data), an IPF in a Micropolitan Area under OMB’s CBSA-based designations would be classified as ‘‘rural’’ and would be assigned the statewide rural wage index for the State in which it resides. In the FY 2005 IPPS final rule (69 FR 49029 through 49032), we discuss our PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 evaluation of the impact of treating Micropolitan Areas as part of the statewide rural labor market area instead of treating Micropolitan Areas as independent labor market areas for hospitals paid under the IPPS. As discussed in that same final rule, one of the reasons Micropolitan Areas have such a dramatic impact on the wage index is because Micropolitan Areas encompass smaller populations than MSAs. In addition, they tend to include fewer hospitals per Micropolitan Area. Currently, there are only 25 MSAs with one hospital in the MSA. However, under the new CBSA-based definitions, there are 373 Micropolitan Areas with one hospital, and 49 MSAs with only one hospital. Since Micropolitan Areas encompass smaller populations than MSAs, they tend to include fewer hospitals per Micropolitan Area, recognizing Micropolitan Areas as independent labor market areas will generally increase the potential for dramatic shifts in those areas’ wage indices from 1 year to the next because a single hospital (or group of hospitals) could have a disproportionate effect on the wage index of the area. The large number of labor market areas with only one hospital and the increased potential for dramatic shifts in the wage indexes from 1 year to the next is a problem for several reasons. First, it creates instability in the wage index from year to year for a large number of hospitals. Second, it reduces the averaging effect (averaging effect allows for more data points to be used to calculate a representative standard of measured labor costs within a market area.) lessening some of the incentive for hospitals to operate efficiently. This incentive is inherent in a system based on the average hourly wages for a large number of hospitals, as hospitals could profit more by operating below that average. In labor market areas with a single hospital, high wage costs are passed directly into the wage index with no counterbalancing averaging with lower wages paid at nearby competing hospitals. Third, it creates an arguably inequitable system when so many hospitals have wage indexes based solely on their own wages, while other hospitals’ wage indexes are based on an average hourly wage across many hospitals. For the reasons noted above, and consistent with the treatment of these areas under the IPPS, as proposed and consist with this final rule, we are not adopting Micropolitan Areas as independent labor market areas under the IPF PPS. Under the CBSA-based labor market area definitions, E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Micropolitan Areas are considered a part of the statewide rural labor market area. Accordingly, we will determine an IPF PPS statewide rural wage index using the acute-care IPPS hospital wage data from hospitals located in non-MSA areas (for example, rural areas, including Micropolitan Areas) and that statewide rural wage index will be assigned to IPFs located in those nonMSA areas. e. Implementation of the Revised Labor Market Areas Under the IPF PPS Section 124 of the BBRA is broadly written and gives the Secretary discretion in developing and making adjustments to the IPF PPS. When the revised labor market areas based on the OMB’s new CBSA-based designations were adopted under the acute care hospital IPPS beginning on October 1, 2004, a transition to the new labor market area designations was established due to the scope and substantial implications of these new boundaries and to buffer the subsequent significant impacts it may have on payments to numerous hospitals. As discussed in the FY 2005 IPPS final rule (69 FR 49032), during FY 2005, a blend of wage indexes is calculated for those acute care IPPS hospitals experiencing a drop in their wage indexes because of the adoption of the new labor market areas. While we recognize that, just like IPPS hospitals, some IPFs may experience decreases in their wage index as a result of the labor market area changes, our analysis shows that a majority of IPFs either expect no change in wage index or an increase in wage index based on CBSA definitions. In addition, a very small number of IPFs (fewer than 3 percent) will experience a decline of 5 percent or more in the wage index based on CBSA designations. We also found that a very small number of IPFs (approximately 5 percent) will experience a change in either rural or urban designation under the CBSAbased definitions. Since a majority of IPFs will not be significantly impacted by the labor market areas, we believe it is not necessary for a transition to the new CBSA-based labor market area for the purposes of the IPF PPS wage index. We received several comments on our proposed changes for implementing the area wage adjustments. Public comments and our responses on the proposed changes for implementing the area wage adjustments are summarized below: Comment: Several commenters requested that CMS provide a transition period to phase in the CBSA-based labor market definitions. One commenter VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 requested that IPFs should be allowed to choose whether or not they wanted a phase-in of the CBSA wage indices. Response: For cost reporting periods beginning in 2006, IPFs are paid based on a blend of 50 percent reasonable cost payments and 50 percent PPS payments. The wage index adjustment is being phased in on the PPS portion of the payment. Since we are already in the middle of a transition to a full wageindex adjustment under the IPF PPS, we believe that the effects on the IPF PPS wage index from the changes to the IPF PPS labor market areas definitions will be mitigated. Specifically, most IPFs will be in their FY 2006 cost reporting period and therefore will be in the second year of the 3-year phase-in of the IPF PPS wage index adjustment when the revised labor market area designations will be applied. During the second year of the transition to the IPF PPS, the applicable wage index value is one-half (50 percent) of the applicable full IPF PPS wage index adjustment. Since most IPFs will be in the second year of the 3-year phase-in of the wage index adjustment, for most IPFs, the labor-related portion of the Federal rate is only adjusted by 50 percent of the applicable full wage index (that is, onehalf wage index value). As noted above, the IPF PPS wage index adjustment is made by multiplying the labor-related share of the IPF PPS Federal per diem base rate (75.66 percent) by the applicable wage index value. Consequently, for most IPFs, only approximately 38 percent of the Federal per diem base rate is affected by the wage index adjustment (75.665 percent × 0.50 = 37.8325 percent), and the revision to the labor market area definitions based on OMB’s new CBSAbased designations will only have a minimal impact on IPF PPS payments. For the reasons discussed above, and also addressed in the RY 2007 proposed rule (71 FR 3633), we are not providing a transition under the IPF PPS from the current MSA-based labor market areas designations to the new CBSA-based labor market area designations. Rather, we are adopting the current CBSA-based labor market area definitions beginning July 1, 2006 without a transition period. Comment: Several commenters do not believe that because the IPF PPS is in the second year of the transition blend, the effects of the wage index changes would be mitigated. The commenters stated that similar wage transitions have been applied in HHA and IRF, and therefore inconsistencies exist between payment systems. Response: We do not believe a need exists to implement a separate transition for the wage index changes. We PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27065 acknowledge that similar wage transitions exist in other PPSs. However, unlike the IPF PPS, in those instances, the payment systems were not already in a transition period (as described above). Comment: Several commenters agreed with CMS’s approach to wait 1 full year until IPF PPS claims and cost report data could be analyzed before changing the wage index definitions. Other commenters indicated that if CMS were to implement this change now, it would be inconsistent with the approach to wait a year before analyzing IPF PPS data. The same commenters expressed concern that if CMS changes urban and rural classifications without any recourse (such as the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB)) when CMS analyzes the PPS data and compares urban and rural IPFs, rural IPF data under MSA definitions would not be comparable to rural IPF data under CBSA definitions. Response: In the November 2004 IPF PPS rule, we stated that we would use the best available hospital wage index data, and that we would propose any changes to the wage index in a proposed rule. We note that all of the other PPSs have adopted, or begun to adopt, the CBSA definitions. Consistent with other Medicare PPSs, and in order to utilize the best available data, as we indicated we would do, the IPF PPS will adopt the CBSA definitions. We want to ensure that the IPF PPS wage index adjustment most appropriately accounts for and reflects the relative hospital wage levels in the geographic area of the hospital as compared to the national average hospital wage level, and we believe that OMB’s CBSA designations based on Census 2000 data reflect the most recent available geographic classifications. With respect to the last comment, the meaning is not completely clear. If the commenters are concerned that changes to the area wage definitions will limit our ability to analyze the impact of the IPF PPS, CMS does not believe this is an issue. When we analyze the first year of IPF PPS claims and cost report data, the urban and rural designations will be under MSA definitions. We are now adopting the latest OMB definitions of urban and rural under CBSAs and we will view rural IPFs under these definitions. Finally, we want to note that, since the IPF PPS Provider Specific File is cumulative, CMS will have a record of which IPFs changed designations. Comment: One commenter expressed support for the proposed change to the CBSA-based labor market definitions. The commenter believes that the CBSAs E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 27066 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations provide an accurate measure of the labor market areas in the United States. Response: We agree with the commenter that the CBSAs represent the best available wage data. Comment: The IPPS adopted a holdharmless policy and an ‘‘out-commuting adjustment.’’ Several commenters believe that since the majority of IPFs are distinct part units, there is an inconsistency when the acute care hospitals are paid the out-commuting or out-migration adjustment and the IPFs are not paid the adjustment. The commenters stated that CMS should assume that IPF employees follow the same commuting patterns as those who work in the acute care hospital. In addition, the commenters indicated that distinct part units would be at a disadvantage in recruiting and retaining workers for the IPF unless CMS adopted an out-commuting or out-migration adjustment. Response: We are not providing a hold harmless policy or an ‘‘outcommuting’’ adjustment under the IPF PPS from the current MSA-based labor market areas designations to the new CBSA-based labor market area designations. Nor do we believe that we are required to provide an outcommuting adjustment. We note that section 505 of the MMA established new section 1886(d)(13) of the Act. Section 1886(d)(13) of the Act requires that the Secretary establish a process to make adjustments to the hospital wage index based on commuting patterns of hospital employees. We believe that this requirement for an ‘‘out-commuting’’ or ‘‘out-migration’’ adjustment applies specifically to the IPPS and not to other PPS. Therefore, consistent with other PPS (for example, IRF and LTCH PPS), we did not propose out-commuting or out-migration adjustment under the IPF PPS, nor are we establishing such an adjustment under the IPF PPS in this final rule. We believe that our decisions not to adopt a transition or an out-commuting adjustment are appropriate for IPFs because, despite some similarities between the IPF PPS and the IPPS, there are clear distinctions between the payment systems, particularly regarding wage index issues. For example, a wage index adjustment has been a stable feature of the acute care hospital IPPS since its 1983 implementation and the IPPS had utilized the prior MSA-based labor market area designation for over 10 years. The IPF PPS has only been implemented since January 1, 2005. The most significant distinction between acute care hospitals under the IPPS and IPFs is that acute care VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 hospitals have been paid using full wage index adjusted payments since 1983 and had used the previous IPPS MSA-based labor market area designations for over 10 years, whereas under the IPF PPS, a wage index adjustment is being phasedin over a 3-year period. As previously explained, the impact that the wage index can have on IPF PPS payments is limited at this point, since only a small percentage of the IPF PPS Federal per diem base rate is affected by the wage index (approximately 38 percent in most cases) because of the 3-year phasein of the wage index adjustment. In contrast, a transition policy to the revised IPPS labor market area definitions under the IPPS was appropriate because there is no phasein of a wage index adjustment under the IPPS and the full labor-related share of the IPPS standardized amount (that is, Federal rate) is affected by the IPPS wage index adjustment, which resulted in a more significant projected impact for acute care hospitals under the IPPS. Comment: Several commenters indicated that IPFs that are distinct part units should be allowed to be reclassified to the same geographic area as the acute care hospital. The commenters also stated that wage issues between acute care hospitals and IPFs are similar, and that it is not logical for IPFs that are distinct part units to receive a different area wage index value than the acute care hospital. Commenters requested that CMS implement a rural floor like that of IPPS. Response: As stated above, the IPF PPS wage index is calculated using IPPS wage index data on the basis of the labor market area in which the IPF is located, without taking into account geographic reclassification under sections 1886(d)(8) and (d)(10) of the Act and without applying the ‘‘rural floor’’ established under section 4410 of the BBA. We believe that the actual location of an IPF (as opposed to the location of affiliated providers) is most appropriate for determining the wage adjustment because the prevailing wages in the area in which the IPF is located influence the cost of a case. In addition, we are using the latest OMB labor market area definitions based on 2000 Census data. Since these data are more recent than the data used for the wage index in the IPF PPS implementation year (2000 versus 1993 data), we do not see a need for a reclassification policy. Finally, as discussed above, by recognizing the Metropolitan Divisions where applicable under the new CBSA-based labor market area definitions under the IPF PPS, we believe that the local labor costs will be more accurately reflected, thereby resulting in a wage index PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 adjustment that better reflects the variation in the local labor costs of the local economies of the IPFs located in these relatively ‘‘smaller’’ areas when compared with CMSAs. Although some commenters request CMS to develop a ‘‘rural floor’’ like the IPPS, we believe the ‘‘rural floor’’ is required only for the acute care hospital payment system because, as stated in section VI.B.2, section 4410 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105–33) applies specifically to acute care hospitals and not excluded hospitals and excluded units. We believe that the ‘‘pre-reclassification and pre-floor’’ wage data is the best proxy and most appropriate wage index for IPFs. Comment: Many commenters expressed concern regarding those IPFs who would lose the rural adjustment if they are redefined as urban under the CBSA-based labor market definitions. Specifically, the commenters stated that IPFs’ reimbursement would decrease over the next several years due to the wage index changes. The commenters also indicated that the loss of the rural adjustment would increase the financial vulnerability of IPFs that are necessary to provide continued access to care in previously rural areas. As a result, the commenters requested that CMS provide a grandfathering provision to allow IPFs to continue to receive the rural adjustment or a hold harmless provision that would prevent payments from dropping below what the IPF would have received had they remained designated as a rural IPF. Response: We are finalizing our proposal to transition IPFs to CBSAbased labor market definitions. We recognize that IPFs that were previously considered rural will lose the 17 percent rural facility-level adjustment when they are redesignated as urban. However, as discussed above, since we are currently in the middle of a transition period from reasonable-cost based payments to PPS payments, the effects of changing to CBSA-based definitions are mitigated, since currently the wage index affects approximately 38 percent of an IPF’s payment, and the rural adjustment affects 50 percent of an IPF’s payment. In addition, the IPF PPS has a stoploss policy in place to protect IPFs that receive less than 70 percent of what they would have received under TEFRA. In general, the group of providers that stands to lose the rural adjustment did well under TERFA, and the purpose of the transition from TERFA to PPS is to allow IPFs to control and reduce their costs. E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations As discussed in the August 11, 2004 IPPS final rule (69 FR 49032), during FY 2005, a hold harmless policy was implemented to minimize the overall impact of hospitals that were designated in FY 2004 as urban under the MSA designations, but would become rural under the CBSA designations. In the same final rule, hospitals were afforded a 3-year hold harmless policy because the IPPS determined that acute-care hospitals that changed designations from urban to rural would be substantially impacted by the significant change in wage index. Currently, under the IPF PPS, urban facilities that become rural would receive the rural facility adjustment (that is, 17 percent). As discussed in section VI.C.2 of this final rule, we are adopting the 17 percent rural adjustment. The rural facility adjustment will be applied in the same way to urban facilities that will become rural under the CBSA-based definitions. Thus, we believe that the impact of the wage index changes on any urban facilities that become rural under the new definitions will be mitigated by the rural adjustment. Finally, as discussed above, the IPF PPS has a stop-loss policy in effect during the transition from TEFRA to PPS payments. Therefore, we do not believe it is appropriate or necessary to adopt a hold harmless policy for facilities that would experience a change in designation under the CBSA-based definitions. We note that for the CBSA designations, we identified some geographic areas where there were no hospitals, and thus no hospital wage index data on which to base the calculation of the RY 2007 IPF PPS wage index. In addressing this situation, we proposed approaches that we believe would serve as proxies for hospital wage data and provide an appropriate standard that accounts for geographic variation in labor costs. The first situation involves rural locations in Massachusetts and Puerto Rico. We have determined that there are no rural hospitals in those locations. Since there is no reasonable proxy for more recent rural data within those areas, we are using last year’s wage index value for rural Massachusetts and rural Puerto Rico. This approach is consistent with other Medicare PPSs (for example, SNF PPS and IRF PPS). The second situation has to do with the urban area of Hinesville, GA (CBSA 25980). Under the new labor market areas there are no urban hospitals within this area. Therefore, we are using the urban areas within the State to serve as a reasonable proxy for the urban areas without specific hospital wage index data in determining the IPF PPS wage VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 index. In this final rule, we are calculating the urban wage index value for purposes of the wage index for these areas without urban hospital data as the average wage index for all urban areas within the State. This approach is consistent with other Medicare PPSs (for example, SNF PPS and IRF PPS). We could not apply a similar averaging in rural areas because in the rural areas there are no State rural hospital wage data available for averaging on a State-wide basis. We did not receive comments on these approaches for calculating the wage index values for areas without hospitals for RY 2007 and subsequent years. We are adopting the proposed approach in this final rule. To facilitate an understanding of the policies related to the changes to the IPF PPS labor market areas discussed above, in the MSA/CBSA Crosswalk included as Addendum B of this final rule, we are providing a listing of each Social Security Administration (SSA) State and county location code; State and county name; existing MSA-based labor market area designation; MSA-based wage index value; CBSA-based labor market area; and the new CBSA-based wage index value. We are also providing in Addenda C the wage index for urban and rural areas based on CBSA labor market areas. Final Rule Action: In summary, we are finalizing our proposal to adopt the CBSA labor market area definitions without a transition, without a holdharmless policy, and without an outcommuting or out-migration adjustment. f. Wage Index Budget Neutrality Any adjustment or update to the IPF wage index will be made in a budget neutral manner that assures that the estimated aggregated payments under this subsection in the RY beginning July 1, 2006 are not greater or less than those that would have been made in the year without such an adjustment. Therefore, as proposed and in this final rule, we calculate a budget-neutral wage index adjustment factor using the following steps: Steps 1: Determine the total amount of the estimated IPF PPS payments for the implementation year using the laborrelated share and wage indices from FY 2005 (based on MSAs). Step 2: Calculate the total amount of estimated IPF PPS payments for RY 2007 using the labor-related share and wage indices from FY 2006 (based on CBSAs). Step 3: Divide the amount calculated in Step 1 by the amount calculated in Step 2 which yields a RY 2007 budgetneutral wage adjustment of 1.0042. PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27067 This factor is applied in the update of the Federal per diem base rate for RY 2007. 2. Adjustment for Rural Location In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we provided a 17 percent payment adjustment for IPFs located in a rural area. This adjustment was based on the regression analysis which indicated that the per diem cost of rural facilities was 17 percent higher than that of urban facilities after accounting for the influence of the other variables included in the regression. Many rural IPFs are small psychiatric units within small general acute care hospitals. We also stated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule that small-scale facilities are more costly on a per diem basis because there are minimum levels of fixed costs that cannot be avoided, and they do not have the economies of size advantage. Based on the results of our regression analysis, we provided a payment adjustment for IPFs located in rural areas of 17 percent. In this final rule, we are not changing this adjustment factor. In addition, we stated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule that we do not plan to conduct another regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data. At that time, we can compare rural and urban IPFs to determine how much more costly rural facilities are on a per diem basis under the IPF PPS. In the meantime, we are applying a 17 percent payment adjustment for IPFs located in a rural area as defined at § 412.64(b)(1)(ii)(C). Final Rule Action: In summary, we are adopting the 17 percent rural adjustment currently in effect for RY 2007. 3. Teaching Adjustment In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we established a facility-level adjustment for IPFs that are, or are part of, teaching institutions. The teaching status adjustment accounts for the higher indirect operating costs experienced by facilities that participate in graduate medical education (GME) programs. We have received numerous requests for clarification of the IPF PPS teaching adjustment, especially with regard to comparisons with the IPPS IME adjustment that were included in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule. As a result, we are including an expanded explanation of the IPF PPS teaching status adjustment and are clarifying the changes to § 412.424(d)(1)(iii) regarding the teaching adjustment. Medicare makes direct GME payments (for direct costs such as resident and teaching physician salaries, and other E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 27068 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations direct teaching costs) to all teaching hospitals including those paid under the IPPS, and those that were once paid under the TEFRA rate-of-increase limits but are now paid under other PPSs. These direct GME payments are made separately from payments for hospital operating costs and are not part of the PPSs. However, the direct GME payments do not address the higher indirect operating costs experienced by teaching hospitals. For teaching hospitals paid under the TEFRA rate-ofincrease limits, Medicare did not make separate medical education payments because payments to these hospitals were based on the hospitals’ reasonable costs. Since payments under TEFRA were based on hospitals’ reasonable costs, the higher indirect costs that might be associated with teaching programs would automatically have been factored into the TEFRA payments. As previously mentioned, we conducted regression analysis of FY 2002 IPF data as the basis for the payment adjustments included in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule. In conducting the analysis, we used the resident counts reported on hospital cost reports (worksheet S–3, Part 1, line 12, column 7 for freestanding psychiatric hospitals and worksheet S– 3, Part 1, line 14 (or line 14.01 for subprovider 2), column 7 for psychiatric units of acute care hospitals). That is, for the freestanding psychiatric hospitals, we used the number of residents and interns reported for the entire hospital. For the psychiatric units of acute care hospitals, we used the number of residents and interns reported for the psychiatric unit, which are reported separately on the cost report from the number reported for the rest of the hospital. The regression analysis (with the logarithm of costs as the dependent variable) showed that the indirect teaching cost variable is significant in explaining the higher costs of IPFs that have teaching programs. We calculated the teaching adjustment based on the IPF’s ‘‘teaching variable,’’ which is one plus the ratio of the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) residents training in the IPF (subject to limitations described below) to the IPF’s average daily census (ADC). In the cost regressions conducted for the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, the logarithm of the teaching variable had a coefficient value of 0.5150. We converted this cost effect to a teaching payment adjustment by treating the regression coefficient as an exponent and raising the teaching variable to a power equal to the coefficient value. In other words, the teaching adjustment is VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 calculated by raising the teaching variable (1 + FTE residents/ADC) to the 0.5150 power. To compute the percentage increase in the IPF PPS payment attributable to the teaching adjustment (that is, the amount to be reconciled at cost report settlement), raise the teaching variable (1 + FTE residents/ADC) to the 0.5150 power. For example, for an IPF with a teaching variable of 0.10 and using a coefficient value of 0.5150, the per diem payment would increase by 5.03 percent; for an IPF with a teaching variable of 0.05, the per diem payment would increase by 2.54 percent. We note that the coefficient value of 0.5150 was based on regression analysis holding all other components of the payment system constant. In addition, we established the teaching adjustment in a manner that limited the incentives for IPFs to add FTE residents for the purpose of increasing their teaching adjustment. We imposed a cap on the number of FTE residents that may be counted for purposes of calculating the teaching adjustment, similar to that established by sections 4621 (IME FTE cap for IPPS hospitals) and 4623 (direct GME FTE cap for all hospitals) of the BBA. We emphasize that the cap limits the number of FTE residents that teaching IPFs may count for the purposes of calculating the IPF PPS teaching adjustment, not the number of residents teaching institutions can hire or train. The FTE resident cap is applied the same way in freestanding teaching psychiatric hospitals and in distinct part psychiatric units with GME programs. Similar to the regulations for counting FTE residents under the IPPS as described in § 412.105(f), we calculated the number of FTE residents that trained in the IPF during a ‘‘base year’’ and use that FTE resident number as the cap. An IPF’s FTE resident cap would ultimately be determined based on the final settlement of the IPF’s most recent cost report filed before November 15, 2004 (that is, the publication date of the IPF PPS final rule). Similar to teaching hospitals under the IPPS, IPFs that first begin training residents after November 15, 2004 initially receive an FTE cap of ‘‘0’’. The FTE caps for teaching IPFs (whether they are new or existing IPFs) that start training residents in a new GME program may be subsequently adjusted in accordance with the IPPS policies described in § 412.105(f)(1)(vii) and GME policies described in § 413.79(e)(1)(i) and (ii). For purposes of the teaching status adjustment for IPFs, a new graduate medical education program means a medical education PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 program that receives initial accreditation by the appropriate accrediting body or begins training residents on or after November 15, 2004. However, contrary to the policy for IME FTE resident caps under the IPPS, we do not allow IPFs to aggregate the FTE resident caps used to compute the IPF PPS teaching adjustment through affiliation agreements. We included these policies because we believe it is important to limit the total pool of resident FTE cap positions within the IPF community and avoid incentives for IPFs to add FTE residents in order to increase their payments. Residents with less than full-time status and residents rotating through the psychiatric hospital or unit for less than the entire cost reporting period are counted in proportion to the time they spend in their assignment with the IPF. For example, a 3-month rotation by a full-time resident to the IPF during a 12month cost reporting period will be counted as 0.25 FTE for purposes of counting residents to calculate the ratio. No FTE resident time counted for purposes of the IPPS IME adjustment is permitted to be counted for purposes of the teaching status adjustment for the IPF PPS. As noted previously, the denominator used to calculate the teaching adjustment under the IPF PPS is the IPF’s ADC from the current cost reporting period. We chose to use the ADC because it is closely related to the IPF’s patient load, which affects the number of interns and residents the IPF can train. We also believe the ADC is a measure that can be defined precisely and is difficult to manipulate. Although the IPPS IME adjustment uses the hospital’s number of beds as the denominator, the capital PPS (as specified at § 412.322) and the IRF PPS (as specified at § 412.624(e)(4) both use the ADC as the denominator for the indirect medical education and teaching adjustments, respectively. If a psychiatric hospital’s or unit’s FTE count of residents in a given year is higher than the FTE count in the base year (the base year being used to establish the cap), we base payments in that year on the lower number (the cap amount). This approach is consistent with the IME adjustment under the IPPS and the teaching adjustment under the IRF PPS. The IPF remains free to add FTE residents above the cap amount, but it cannot count the number of FTE residents above the cap for purposes of calculating the teaching adjustment. This means that the cap serves as an upper limit on the number of FTE residents that may be counted for purposes of calculating the teaching E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations status adjustment. IPFs can adjust their number of FTE residents counted for purposes of calculating the teaching adjustment as long as they remain under the cap. On the other hand, if a psychiatric hospital or unit were to have fewer FTE residents in a given year than in the base year (that is, fewer residents than its FTE resident cap), teaching adjustment payments in that year would be based on the lower number (that is, the current year’s FTE count of resident). In response to inquiries about how the teaching adjustment is applied under the IPF PPS, we proposed to add a new paragraph § 412.424(d)(1)(iii)(E) to clarify that the teaching adjustment is made on a claim basis as an interim payment and the final payment for the claim would be made in full during the final settlement of the cost report. The difference between those interim payments and the actual teaching adjustment amount computed in the cost report would be adjusted through lump sum payments/recoupments when the cost report is filed and later settled. As noted in section VI.D.1.a of this final rule, in reviewing the methodology used to simulate the IPF PPS payments used for the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we discovered that the computer code incorrectly assigned non-teaching status to most teaching facilities. As a result, total IPF PPS payments were underestimated by about 1.36 percent. To resolve the issue, as discussed in section V.B.3 of this final rule, we are amending the Federal per diem base rate prospectively for all IPFs. As with other adjustment factors derived through the regression analysis, we do not plan to rerun the regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data. Until then, as proposed, we are retaining the 0.5150 teaching adjustment to the Federal per diem base rate. Public comments and our responses on the proposed changes for implementing the teaching adjustment are summarized below: Comment: A commenter stated that the use of ‘‘final settled’’ cost reports may allow hospitals to report accurate counts during the audit process. However, the commenter indicated that if this is not correct, or if certain hospitals’ 2004 cost reports have already gone through final settlement, CMS should take action to ensure that accurate resident counts for purposes of determining the IPF teaching adjustment resident cap. The commenter indicated that for the regression analysis, CMS used the resident count reported on Worksheet S–3, Part 1, lines 14 and 14.01, column VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 7 for psychiatric units of acute care hospitals. The commenter expressed concern regarding the data used for the regression analysis due to the ambiguity of the cost reporting instructions. The commenter believes that this count may not accurately reflect the resident count in the hospital’s psychiatric unit. Specifically, since the cost reporting instructions state that one should ‘‘enter the number of interns and full time equivalents in an approved program determined in accordance with 42 CFR 412.105(g) for the indirect medical education adjustment.’’ The commenter further stated that for cost reports before November 15, 2004, psychiatric unit resident counts were not eligible to be counted for purposes of the acute inpatient IME adjustment. Response: As explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule and the RY 2007 proposed rule, similar to the regulations for counting FTE residents under the IPPS as described in § 412.105(f), we calculate the number of FTE residents that trained in the IPF during a ‘‘base year’’ and use that FTE resident number as the cap. An IPF’s FTE resident cap would ultimately be determined based on the final settlement of the IPF’s most recent cost report filed before November 15, 2004. Although we are concerned about the accuracy of the information reported in the cost report, including the number of FTE residents reported on Wkst. S–3, Part 1, Column 7, it is, foremost, the hospital’s responsibility to report this data accurately. An official of the hospital certifies that the information on all the worksheets in the cost report is correct to the best of his or her knowledge and belief. Although the instructions for Column 7 of Wkst. S–3, Part I contain an outdated reference to § 412.105(g) (that is, this reference was changed in the Code of Federal Regulations to § 412.105(f) in 1997 but the Wkst. S–3, Part I instructions were not updated accordingly), these instructions specify that the FTE resident count to be reported in Column 7 is determined in accordance with the policies for IME adjustment. We do not believe the redesignation of the relevant regulation should have caused confusion. If the hospitals believe that the FTE resident counts on the base year cost report are incorrect, they have an option of submitting an amended cost report or requesting a reopening. Comment: One commenter indicated a discrepancy between the reference to the regulation regarding the base period for determining the IPF’s FTE resident in the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule (71 FR 3653) and the reference to that PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27069 regulation in the current Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The commenter stated that the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule cited § 412.424(d)(1)(iii)(C) as the relevant regulation, while the current CFR reference can be found at § 412.424(d)(1)(iii)(B)(1). Response: The existing regulation at § 412.424(d)(1)(iii)(C) implements the FTE resident cap for purposes of the IPF teaching status adjustment. The FTE resident cap is established in the base period as specified in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66979), and codified in regulations at § 412.424(d)(1)(iii)(B)(1). The reference in the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule (71 FR 3653) reflects the proposal to redesignate portions of the reference to the teaching status adjustment. In this final rule, we will finalize the reference (and all other changes as proposed) to the base period to be § 412.424(d)(1)(iii)(C) and will replace § 412.424(d)(1)(iii)(B)(1) currently in the CFR. Comment: One commenter requested clarification about application of the FTE resident cap for those IPFs that begin training residents after November 15, 2004. Response: As we indicated in the RY 2007 proposed rule, IPFs that did not train interns and residents during the time period of the IPF’s most recent cost report filed before November 15, 2005 would receive an FTE cap of ‘‘zero’’. As a result, we would not apply a teaching adjustment to claims submitted by the IPF. However, if the IPF (whether it is new or existing) begins training residents in a new medical residency training program after that date, the IPF will begin to receive the teaching adjustment under the IPF PPS in the next cost reporting period based on the FTE intern and resident count in accordance with the policies applicable under the IPPS. In this case, the FTE resident cap would not be revised until the beginning of the fourth year of the new training program. The cap is set based on a review of the number of interns and residents in each of the first three program years. Before the completion of the third year of the new training program, the actual intern and resident count is reported on the cost report and used for the calculation of the teaching adjustment for the first three years of the new teaching program. After the third year of the new program, we revise the IPF’s FTE resident cap to reflect the new training program. The revised cap is calculated by multiplying the highest number of interns and residents in any program year by the number of years in E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27070 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 which residents are expected to complete the program. For subsequent years, we compare the actual number of interns and residents trained in the IPF that year to the revised FTE resident cap and base the teaching adjustment on the lower number. Final Rule Action: In summary, we are retaining the coefficient value of 0.5150 for the teaching adjustment. In § 412.402, we are providing a definition for ‘‘new graduate medical education program’’ to mean a medical education program that receives initial accreditation by the appropriate accrediting body or begins training residents on or after November 15, 2004. We are also clarifying at § 412.424(d)(1)(iii)(E) that the teaching adjustment is made on a claim basis as an interim payment, and the final payment in full for the claim is made during the final settlement of the cost report. 4. Cost of Living Adjustment for IPFs Located in Alaska and Hawaii The IPF PPS includes a payment adjustment for IPFs located in Alaska and Hawaii based upon the county in which the IPF is located. As we explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, the FY 2002 data demonstrated that IPFs in Alaska and Hawaii had per diem costs that were disproportionately higher than other IPFs. Other Medicare PPSs (for example, IPPS and IRF PPS) have adopted a cost of living adjustment (COLA) to account for the cost differential of care furnished in Alaska and Hawaii. We analyzed the effect of applying a COLA to payments for IPFs located in Alaska and Hawaii. The results of our analysis demonstrated that a COLA for IPFs located in Alaska and Hawaii would improve payment equity for these facilities. As a result of this analysis, we provided a COLA adjustment in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule. We are also adopting the same COLA adjustment in this final rule. In general, the COLA accounts for the higher costs in the IPF and eliminates the projected loss that IPFs in Alaska and Hawaii would experience absent the COLA. A COLA factor for IPFs located in Alaska and Hawaii is made by multiplying the non-labor share of the Federal per diem base rate by the applicable COLA factor based on the county in which the IPF is located. Table 15 below lists the specific COLA for Alaska and Hawaii IPFs. The COLA factors were obtained from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The COLA factors are published on the U.S. Office of Personnel VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 Management (OPM) Web site (https:// www.opm.gov/oca/cola/rates.asp). As proposed and in this final rule, we are adopting the COLA adjustments obtained from OPM. We will update the COLA factors if OPM updates them and as updated by OPM. Any change in the COLA factors will be made in one of our IPF PPS RY update documents. We are also amending § 412.428 to enable us to update the COLA factors if appropriate. receives a 19 percent adjustment as the variable per diem adjustment for day 1 of each patient stay. While any IPF with a qualifying ED receives the adjustment, the adjustment is paid most often to IPFs that are psychiatric units of acute care hospitals or critical access hospitals because these providers are more likely to have an ED that meets the definition of a qualified ED in § 412.424(d)(1)(v). We defined a qualifying ED in order to avoid TABLE 15.—PROPOSED COLA FAC- providing the ED adjustment to an TORS FOR ALASKA AND HAWAII IPFS intake unit that is not comparable to a full-service ED with respect to the array Location COLA of emergency services available or cost. We defined a qualifying ED as one that Alaska .... All areas ................. 1.25 is staffed and equipped to furnish a Hawaii .... Honolulu County ..... 1.25 comprehensive array of emergency Hawaii County ........ 1.165 Kauai County .......... 1.2325 services and that meets the definition of Maui County ........... 1.2375 a ‘‘dedicated emergency department’’ as Kalawao County ..... 1.2375 specified in § 489.24(b) and the definition of ‘‘provider-based status’’ as Final Rule Action: In summary, we specified in § 413.65. We intended that did not receive any public comments on a qualifying ED provide a the proposed COLA for IPFs located in comprehensive array of medical and Alaska and Hawaii. We are adopting the psychiatric services. In order to clarify COLA adjustments obtained from OPM that a comprehensive array of currently in effect, and as shown in emergency services includes medical as Table 15 above. We will update the well as psychiatric services, we COLA factors as updated by OPM. In proposed to amend addition, we are amending § 412.428 to § 412.424(d)(1)(v)(A). enable us to update the COLA factors, As specified in § 489.24, a dedicated if appropriate. ED means ‘‘any department or facility of the hospital, regardless of whether it is 5. Adjustment for IPFs With a located on or off the main hospital Qualifying Emergency Department (ED) campus, that meets at least one of the Currently, the IPF PPS includes a following requirements: facility-level adjustment for IPFs with • It is licensed by the State in which qualifying EDs. As explained in the it is located under applicable State law November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we as an emergency room or emergency provide an adjustment to the standardized Federal per diem base rate department; • It is held out to the public (by to account for the costs associated with name, posted signs, advertising, or other maintaining a full-service ED. The means) as a place that provides care for adjustment is intended to account for emergency medical conditions on an ED costs allocated to the hospital’s urgent basis without requiring a distinct part psychiatric unit for previously scheduled appointment; or preadmission services otherwise • During the calendar year payable under Medicare Part B immediately preceding the calendar furnished to a beneficiary during the year in which a determination under day immediately preceding the date of this section is being made, based on a admission to the IPF (see § 413.40(c)) representative sample of patient visits and the overhead cost of maintaining that occurred during the calendar year, the ED. This payment is a facility-level it provides at least one-third of all its adjustment that applies to all IPF outpatient visits for the treatment of admissions (with the one exception as described below), regardless of whether emergency medical conditions on an urgent basis without requiring a a particular patient receives previously scheduled appointment.’’ preadmission services in the hospital’s As specified in § 413.65, providerED. based status means ‘‘the relationship The ED adjustment is incorporated between a main provider and a into the variable per diem adjustment provider-based entity or a department of for the first day of each stay for IPFs with a qualifying ED. That is, IPFs with a provider, remote location of a hospital, a qualifying ED receive a 31 percent or satellite facility that complies with adjustment as the variable per diem the provisions.’’ Including provideradjustment for day 1 of each stay. If an based status in the definition of a IPF does not have a qualifying ED, it qualifying ED reflects the common PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations ownership of the hospital and the distinct part psychiatric unit. As discussed in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, three steps were involved in the calculation of the ED adjustment factor. Step 1: We estimated the proportion by which the ED costs of a case would increase the cost of the first day of the stay. Using the IPFs with ED admissions in FY 2002, we divided their average ED cost per stay admitted through the ED ($198) by their average cost per day ($715), which equals 0.28. Step 2: We adjusted the factor estimated in step 1 to account for the fact that we would pay the higher first day adjustment for all cases in the qualifying IPFs, not just the cases admitted through the ED. Since on average, 44 percent of the cases in IPFs with ED admissions are admitted through the ED, we multiplied 0.28 by 0.44, which equals 0.12. Step 3: We added the adjusted factor calculated in the previous 2 steps to the variable per diem adjustment derived from the regression equation that we used to derive our other payment adjustment factors. The first day payment factor from this regression is 1.19. Adding the 0.12, we obtained a first day variable per diem adjustment for IPFs with a qualifying ED equal to 1.31. The ED adjustment is made on every qualifying claim except as described below. As specified in § 412.424(d)(1)(v)(B), the ED adjustment is not made where a patient is discharged from an acute care hospital or CAH and admitted to the same hospital’s or CAH’s psychiatric unit. An ED adjustment is not made in this case because the costs associated with ED services are reflected in the DRG payment to the acute care hospital or through the reasonable cost payment made to the CAH. As we explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, if we provided the ED adjustment in these cases, the hospital would be paid twice for the overhead costs of the ED (69 FR 66960). Therefore, when patients are discharged from an acute care hospital or CAH and admitted to the same hospital’s or CAH’s psychiatric unit, the IPF receives the 1.19 adjustment factor as the variable per diem adjustment for the first day of the patient’s stay in the IPF. We do not intend to conduct a new regression analysis for this IPF PPS update. Rather, we plan to wait until we analyze IPF PPS data. Therefore, we are retaining the 1.31 adjustment factor for IPFs with qualifying EDs for the RY beginning July 1, 2006. VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 As we indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, in FY 2002, one third of the IPFs admissions were through the ED. In the November 2003 IPF proposed rule (68 FR 66920) the percentage of admissions through the ED were understated. We plan to monitor claims data to determine the number of IPF admissions admitted through the ED. Public comments and our responses on the proposed adjustment for IPFs with qualifying EDs are summarized below: Comment: A few commenters questioned whether IPFs would have to reapply for the ED adjustment annually. Specifically, commenters asked whether it is necessary to re-submit verification of a qualifying ED each year. Other commenters asked for clarification as to whether the ED adjustment can still be applied based on the date the attestation letter is received or would the IPFs lose the adjustment for the entire cost reporting year. Response: We indicated in instructions ( Transmittal 384, CR 3541 dated December 1, 2004 and Transmittal 444, CR 3678 dated January 21, 2005) that IPFs should notify their FIs 30 days before the beginning of their cost reporting period regarding if they have a qualifying ED. FIs have the discretion as to how they wish to be notified and as to the type of documentation they require. Once the FI is satisfied that the IPF has a qualifying ED, the FI should enter the information in the providerspecific file within a reasonable timeframe so that the IPF can begin to receive the ED adjustment. This is a one-time verification. Application of the ED adjustment is prospective. FIs may also use the date the documentation was received from the IPF to implement the ED adjustment. The provider-specific file can be updated from the date of the attestation and claims processed from that date will receive the ED adjustment. We do not intend that IPFs would have to wait until the beginning of their next cost report period to receive the ED adjustment. However, if an IPF no longer meets the definition of a qualified ED, the IPF must notify their FI. The FI would immediately remove the flag from the provider-specific file and the provider will not receive the ED adjustment. If the provider should once again meet the definition of a qualified ED, they should contact their FI immediately in order to update their file. Comment: One commenter asked what criteria CMS would use to determine what constitutes a ‘‘comprehensive’’ array of medical as PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27071 well as psychiatric services. In addition, the commenter asked if the criteria are appropriate and would ensure highquality care for psychiatric patients. Response: In most cases, the FI would be familiar enough with the providers they service to know if the hospital has a qualifying ED. In those rare cases where the FI does not know whether the hospital’s ED meets our definition of a qualifying ED (for example, new IPFs), the FI will establish that the IPF’s ED is staffed and equipped to furnish a comprehensive array of emergency services. In response to the comment, we are clarifying in § 412.424(d)(1)(v)(A) that a qualifying ED is staffed and equipped to furnish both medical as well as psychiatric emergency services. Final Rule Action: We are retaining the 1.31 percent adjustment factor for IPFs with qualifying EDs for the RY 2007. a. New Source of Admission Code to Implement the ED Adjustment In order to ensure that the ED adjustment is not paid for patients who are discharged from an acute care hospital or CAH and admitted to the same hospital’s or CAH’s psychiatric unit, we directed IPFs to enter source of admission code ‘‘4’’ (transfers from hospital inpatient) on those claims. The source of admission code is a required field on Medicare claims and indicates the source of the patient admissions. However, as we implemented the IPF PPS, we realized that admission code ‘‘4’’ is too broad to distinguish these claims because it reflects transfers from any acute care hospital or CAH. Currently, where admission code ‘‘4’’ is entered on a claim, the ED adjustment is not paid, even if the patient is transferred from a different acute hospital or CAH. In order to pay these IPF claims appropriately, CMS requested a new source of admission code from the National Uniform Billing Committee to identify transfers from the same hospital or CAH. On June 07, 2005, the National Uniform Billing Committee granted our request to establish a new source of admission code to indicate transfers from the same hospital or CAH. The new source of admission code ‘‘D’’ is effective April 1, 2006. As proposed and in this final rule, the new code will be used by IPFs to identify IPF patients who have been transferred to the IPF from the same hospital or CAH. Claims with source of admission code ‘‘D’’ will not receive the ED adjustment. Public comments and our response on the proposed new source of admission code to implement the ED adjustment are summarized below: E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 27072 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Comment: Several commenters indicated that CMS should not penalize IPFs if they receive a transfer from the acute care medical-surgical units of the same hospital. A commenter stated that there may only be one hospital with a psychiatric emergency department in a particular area. The commenter believes that to penalize the transfers is unfair; each facility whether it is the ED, surgical unit, medical unit or psychiatric unit is doing their job and should be appropriately compensated. Response: As stated in the November 2004 final rule and the RY 2007 proposed rule, in § 412.424(d)(1)(v)(B) we specify that the ED adjustment is not made when a patient is discharged from an acute care hospital or CAH and admitted to the same hospital’s or CAH’s psychiatric unit. The ED adjustment is not made in this case because the costs associated with the ED services are already reflected in the DRG payment paid to the acute care hospital or through the reasonable cost payment made to the CAH. As explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule and in the RY 2007 proposed rule, if we provided the ED adjustment in these cases, the hospital would be paid twice for overhead costs of the ED (see 69 FR 66960 and 71 FR 3641 respectively). We note that the ED adjustment is a facility-level adjustment, rather than a patient-level adjustment. This facilitylevel adjustment applies to psychiatric hospitals and acute care hospitals with distinct part units, and CAHs that maintain a qualifying ED. We are providing the adjustment to psychiatric units in acute care hospitals or CAHs, and psychiatric hospitals because the costs of the ED are allocated to all hospital departments, including the psychiatric units. Also, the adjustment is intended to account for ED costs allocated to the distinct part psychiatric unit for preadmission services otherwise payable under Medicare Part B furnished to a beneficiary during the day immediately preceding the date of admission to the IPF and the overhead cost of maintaining the ED. In order to ensure that Medicare does not pay twice for these types of transfers, we proposed that admission code ‘‘D’’ be used by IPFs to identify IPF patients who have been transferred to the IPF from the same hospital or CAH. Claims with source of admission code ‘‘D’’ will not receive the ED adjustment. Final Rule Action: We are finalizing our decision to adopt the new source of admission code ‘‘D’’. Claims with source of admission code ‘‘D’’ will not receive the ED adjustment. VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 b. Applicability of the ED Adjustment to IPFs in Critical Access Hospitals The BBA created the CAH program, designed to represent a separate provider type to provide acute care services in rural areas. Generally, in order to qualify as a CAH, a hospital must— • Be located in a rural area; • Provide 24-hour emergency care services; • Have an average LOS of 96 hours or less; • Operate up to 25 beds for inpatient critical access care; • Be located more than 35 miles from a hospital or another CAH or more than 15 miles in mountainous terrain or only secondary roads; • Or be certified by the State as of December 31, 2005 as being a ‘‘necessary provider’’ of health care services to residents in the area. Section 405(g) of the MMA authorizes CAHs to establish distinct part psychiatric and rehabilitation units of up to 10 beds effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2004. Services in these units are paid under the payment methodology that would apply if the services were provided in a distinct part psychiatric or rehabilitation unit of a hospital. As a result, IPFs that are distinct part units of CAHs are paid the same as if they were a distinct part unit of a hospital. Otherwise, the CAH is paid on a reasonable cost basis for inpatient critical access services. In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we amended § 413.70(e) to clarify that payments for services of distinct part psychiatric units in CAHs are made in accordance with the IPF PPS. In order to pay CAHs the same as other IPFs, CAHs would be subject to the 1-day preadmission services bundling provision specified in § 413.40(c)(2) for patients who are admitted to the CAH’s IPF. As a result, the cost of preadmission services, including ED services furnished to CAH IPF patients would be allocated to the IPF. D. Other Payment Adjustments and Policies The IPF PPS includes the following payment adjustments: (1) An outlier policy to promote access to IPF care for those patients who require expensive care and to limit the financial risk of IPFs treating unusually costly patients; (2) a stop-loss provision, applicable during the transition period, to reduce financial risk to IPFs projected to experience substantial reductions in Medicare payments under the IPF PPS; (3) an interrupted stay policy to avoid PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 overpaying stays that include a brief absence from the IPF followed by readmission to the IPF; and (4) a payment for patients who receive ECT. As proposed, we are updating those policies in this final rule. We are also making clarifications to the physician certification and recertification requirements in order to ensure consistent practices across IPFs. In addition, we are clarifying coverage of recreation therapy. 1. Outlier Payments In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we implemented regulations at § 412.424(d)(3)(i) to provide a payment adjustment for IPF stays that have extraordinarily high costs. Providing additional payments for outlier cases to IPFs that are beyond the IPF’s control strongly improves the accuracy of the IPF PPS in determining resource costs at the patient and facility level because facilities receive additional compensation over and above the adjusted Federal prospective payment amount for uniquely high-cost cases. These additional payments reduce the financial losses that would otherwise be caused by treating patients who require more costly care and, therefore, reduce the incentives to under-serve these patients. Under the IPF PPS, outlier payments are made on a per case basis rather than on a per diem basis because it is the overall financial ‘‘gain’’ or ‘‘loss’’ of the case, and not of individual days, that determines an IPF’s financial risk. In addition, because patient-level charges (from which costs are estimated) are typically aggregated for the entire IPF stay, they are not reported in a manner that would permit accurate accounting on a daily basis. Currently, we make outlier payments for discharges in which an IPF’s estimated total cost for a case exceeds a fixed dollar loss threshold amount (multiplied by the IPF’s facility-level adjustments) plus the Federal per diem payment amount for the case. In instances when the case qualifies for an outlier payment, we pay 80 percent of the difference between the estimated cost for the case and the adjusted threshold amount for days 1 through 9 of the stay (consistent with the median length of stay for IPFs in FY 2002), and 60 percent of the difference for day 10 and thereafter. We established the 80 percent and 60 percent loss sharing ratios because we were concerned that a single ratio established at 80 percent (like other Medicare hospital PPSs) might provide an incentive under the IPF per diem payment system to increase length of E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 stay in order to receive additional payments. After establishing the loss sharing ratios, we determined the current fixed dollar loss threshold amount of $5,700 through payment simulations designed to compute a dollar loss beyond which payments are estimated to meet the 2 percent outlier spending target. a. Update to the Outlier Fixed Dollar Loss Threshold Amount As indicated in section II.A. of this final rule, in accordance with the update methodology described in § 412.428(d), we are updating the fixed dollar loss threshold amount used under the IPF PPS outlier policy. Based on the regression analysis and payment simulations used to develop the IPF PPS, we established a 2 percent outlier policy to make an appropriate balance between protecting IPFs from extraordinarily costly cases while ensuring the adequacy of the Federal per diem base rate for all other cases that are not outlier cases. We continue to believe a 2 percent outlier policy is an appropriate target percentage and proposed to retain the 2 percent outlier policy. However, we believe it is necessary to update the fixed dollar loss threshold amount because analysis of the latest available data and rate increases indicates adjusting the fixed dollar loss amount is necessary in order to maintain an outlier percentage that equals 2 percent of total estimated IPF PPS payments. We intend to continue to analyze estimated outlier payments for subsequent years using the best available data in order to maintain estimated outlier payments at 2 percent of total estimated IPF PPS payments. We have determined that in certain sections of the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we used the phrase ‘‘Fixeddollar loss threshold’’ and, in other sections, we used the phrase ‘‘Fixeddollar loss amount’’ to describe the dollar amount by which the costs of a case exceed payment in order to qualify for an outlier payment. In order to avoid confusion regarding these phrases, we are using the term ‘‘fixed-dollar loss threshold amount’’ when we are referring to the dollar amount by which the costs of a case exceed payment in order to qualify for an outlier payment. As a result of this clarification, in § 412.402, we are revising the term ‘‘Fixed dollar loss threshold’’ to ‘‘Fixed dollar loss threshold amount.’’ We are also making clarifying changes to § 412.424(d)(3)(i) and § 412.424(d)(3)(i)(A) to state that we will provide an outlier payment if an IPF’s estimated total cost for a case exceeds a ‘‘fixed dollar loss threshold amount’’ VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 plus the total IPF adjusted payment amount for the stay, and that it is the fixed dollar loss threshold amount that is adjusted by the IPF’s facility-level adjustments. Aside from updating the terminology ‘‘fixed dollar loss threshold amount’’ and making the conforming changes to the regulation text described above, we did not propose to make any other changes to the outlier policy. Therefore, we will continue to adjust the fixed dollar loss threshold amount by the applicable facility-level payment adjustments and add this amount to the IPF PPS payment amount in order to determine if a case qualifies for an outlier payment. For cases that meet the threshold amount, we will pay 80 percent for days 1 through 9 and 60 percent for day 10 and thereafter. In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we described the process by which we calculate the outlier fixed dollar loss threshold amount. We will continue to use this process in this final rule. We begin by simulating aggregate payments with and without an outlier policy, and applying an iterative process to a fixed dollar loss amount that will result in outlier payments being equal to 2 percent of total simulated payments under the simulation. Based on this process, we proposed a fixed dollar loss threshold amount of $6200 for RY 2007. In this final rule, we are finalizing this amount. For RY 2007, IPF PPS will use $6200 as the fixed dollar loss threshold amount in the outlier calculation in order to maintain the proposed 2 percent outlier policy. We note that the simulation analysis used to calculate the $6200 fixed dollar loss threshold amount includes all of the changes to the IPF PPS discussed in this final rule. Public comments and our responses to changes to the outlier fixed dollar loss threshold amount are summarized below. Comment: Several commenters requested that CMS use FY 2005 claims data to ensure that the fixed dollar loss threshold amount is correctly set, and if that data are not available, the commenters recommended that CMS keep the threshold at its current level. Other commenters suggested that since CMS is not making any other changes to the major adjustments, changes should not be made to adjust the fixed dollar loss threshold amount. They felt that an increase in the threshold is unnecessary and might lead to a financial burden on IPFs. One commenter asked how CMS could accurately determine that 2 percent is the best outlier percentage and that the threshold amounts are appropriate. PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27073 Response: A complete set of FY 2005 claims data will not be available until later in the year, therefore we will not be able to analyze this data in time for publication of this final rule. It is necessary to update the fixed dollar loss threshold amount because we are increasing the Federal per diem base rate and the ECT payment rate. We are using the best available data to compute the updated fixed dollar loss threshold amount in our payment simulations. As stated above, we believe 2 percent is the optimal outlier percentage because it strikes an appropriate balance between protecting IPFs from extraordinarily costly cases while ensuring the adequacy of the Federal per diem base rate for all other cases that are not outlier cases. In the future, as IPF PPS data becomes available, we can analyze the accuracy of the fixed dollar loss threshold amount. Comment: Several commenters recommended that CMS provide a detailed description of the methodology used in calculating the fixed dollar loss threshold amount. Response: We estimate the cost of each case and inflate these costs to RY 2007 dollars in our simulations. We used FY 2002 claims and cost report data to estimate the cost per stay. We calculated these costs by taking routine per diem costs from the cost report (for the routine costs) and by taking departmental charges and cost-to-charge ratios (for the ancillary costs). These are the costs we then inflated to RY 2007 dollars in our payment simulations. We then applied RY 2007 rates and policies in our payment simulations to compute the updated fixed dollar loss threshold amount. Comment: Several commenters requested that CMS use the same methodology as IPPS to calculate the threshold. Response: The cost-to-charge ratio applied to charges provides Medicare the most accurate measure of a provider’s per-case cost for the purpose of paying for high-cost outlier cases at the point that we process the initial claim. The cost-to-charge ratio is based on the providers’ own cost and charge information as reported by the providers. In this final rule, we have applied the cost-to-charge ratios to the reported charges to estimate the cost per case, and inflated the costs to current dollars. In the future, when more recent data is available, we will consider whether using the IPPS methodology of inflating the charges and applying the latest cost-to-charge ratios to estimate the cost per case is an even more accurate method of calculating the threshold amount. E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27074 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Comment: One commenter suggested that CMS investigate the possibility and legality of carrying over any unused outlier money from year to year. Response: We have responded to similar comments a number of times in the context of other PPS regulations, ((70 FR 24168), (70 FR 24196 through 24197), (57 FR 39784), (58 FR 46347), (59 FR 45408), (60 FR 45856), (61 FR 27496), (56 FR 43227), and (61 FR 46229 through 46230)). As we have explained before and as explained below, we do not make adjustments to PPS payment rates to account for differences between projected and actual outlier payments in a previous year. We implemented the IPF PPS outlier policy at § 412.424(d)(3)(i). We set outlier criteria so that outlier payments are projected to equal 2 percent of estimated total IPF PPS payments. In doing so, we use the best available data at the time to make our estimates. Outlier payments are ‘‘funded’’ through a prospective adjustment to the base rate. We do not set money aside into a discrete ‘‘pool’’ dedicated solely for outlier payments. Outlier payments are based on estimates. If outlier payments for a given year are greater than projected, we do not recoup money from IPFs; if outlier payments for a given year are lower than projected, we do not make an adjustment to account for the difference. If estimates turn out to be inaccurate, we believe the more appropriate action is to continue to examine the outlier policy and to try to refine the methodology for setting outlier thresholds. Thus, consistent with this approach, for this final rule we are finalizing our decision to update the outlier threshold amount to $6200 for RY 2007 to make estimated outlier payments equal to 2 percent of total estimated IRF PPS payments in RY 2007. Final Rule Action: In this final rule, we are adopting $6200 as the fixed dollar loss threshold amount for RY 2007. b. Statistical Accuracy of Cost-to-Charge Ratios As stated previously, under the IPF PPS, an outlier payment is made if an IPF’s cost for a stay exceeds a fixed dollar loss threshold amount. In order to establish an IPF’s cost for a particular case, we multiply the IPF’s reported charges on the discharge bill by their overall cost to charge ratio (CCR). This approach to determining a provider’s cost is consistent with the approach used under the IPPS and other prospective payment systems. In FY 2004, we implemented changes to the IPPS outlier policy used to determine VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 CCRs for acute care hospitals because we became aware that payment vulnerabilities resulted in inappropriate outlier payments. Under the IPPS, we established a statistical measure of accuracy for CCRs in order to ensure that aberrant CCR data did not result in inappropriate outlier payments. As we indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, because we believe the IPF outlier policy is susceptible to the same payment vulnerabilities as the IPPS, we adopted an approach to ensure the statistical accuracy of CCRs under the IPF PPS. Therefore, we adopted the following in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule: • We calculated two national ceilings, one for IPFs located in rural areas and one for IPFs located in urban areas. We computed the ceilings by first calculating the national average and the standard deviation of the CCR for both urban and rural IPFs. To determine the rural and urban ceilings, we multiplied each of the standard deviations by 3 and added the result to the appropriate national CCR average (either rural or urban). The upper threshold CCR for IPFs in RY 2007 is 1.7447 for rural IPFs, and 1.7179 for urban IPFs, based upon CBSA-based geographic designations. If an IPF’s CCR is above the applicable ceiling, the ratio is considered statistically inaccurate and we assign the appropriate national (either rural or urban) median CCR to the IPF. Additional information regarding the national median CCRs is included in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66961). • We do not apply the applicable national median CCR when an IPF’s CCR falls below a floor. We made this decision because using the national median CCR in place of the provider’s actual CCR would overstate the IPF’s costs. We are applying the national CCRs to the following situations: ++ New IPFs that have not yet submitted their first Medicare cost report. ++ IPFs whose operating or capital CCR is in excess of 3 standard deviations above the corresponding national geometric mean (that is, above the ceiling). ++ Other IPFs for whom the fiscal intermediary obtains inaccurate or incomplete data with which to calculate either an operating or capital CCR or both. For new facilities, we are using these national ratios until the facility’s actual CCR can be computed using the first tentatively settled or final settled cost report, which will then be used for the subsequent cost report period. PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 We are not making any changes to the procedures for ensuring the statistical accuracy of CCRs in RY 2007. However, we are updating the national urban and rural CCRs (ceilings and medians) for IPFs for RY 2007 based on the full CY 2005 CCRs entered in the providerspecific file. In addition, we are updating the ceilings and national median CCRs will be based on CBSAbased geographic designations because the CBSAs are the geographic designations we are adopting for purposes of computing the proposed wage index adjustment to IPF payments beginning July 1, 2006. The national CCRs for RY 2007 were estimated to be 0.7100 for rural IPFs and 0.5500 for urban IPFs and will be used in each of the three situations cited above. These estimates were based on the IPF’s location (either urban or rural) using the CBSA-based geographic designations. In this final rule, we are finalizing our decision to update the national urban and rural CCRs (median and ceilings) based on the previous full CYs’ provider-specific file. These CCRs will be announced in each year’s annual notice of prospective payment rates published in the Federal Register. We are adding a new paragraph (g) to § 412.428 to clarify that we intend to update the national urban and rural ceilings and medians as part of the annual update of the IPF PPS and to specify when the national median urban and rural CCRs will be used. Comment: One commenter asked that a provision be added to the national median CCR policy that an exception to the computed CCR be allowed to be filed with the FI if using the national median CCR overstates the IPF’s costs. Response: CMS believes that the actual CCR reported on the cost report should be used to calculate outlier payments. In the vast majority of cases, the IPF’s CCR will be updated within a year, when the next cost report is filed. An interim cost report can be filed for special cases, in which case the updated CCR can be used. However, allowing IPFs to continually submit cost and charge data could create a burden for Fiscal Intermediaries. Finally, if the IPF is dissatisfied with the amount of payment, they can invoke existing appeal rights. 2. Stop-Loss Provision In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we implemented a stop-loss policy to reduce financial risk for those facilities expected to experience substantial reductions in Medicare payments during the IPF PPS transition period. This stop-loss policy guarantees that each facility receives total IPF PPS E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations payments that are no less than 70 percent of its TEFRA payments, had the IPF PPS not been implemented. This policy is applied to the IPF PPS portion of Medicare payments during the 3-year transition. Hence, during year 1, when three-quarters of the payment were based on TEFRA and one-quarter on the IPF PPS; stop loss payments guarantee payments which are at least 70 percent of the TEFRA payments. The resulting 92.5 percent of TEFRA payments in year 1 is the sum of 75 percent and 25 percent times 70 percent. In year 2, one-half of the payment will be based on TEFRA and one-half on the IPF PPS. In year 3, one-quarter of the payment will be based on TEFRA and three-quarters on the IPF PPS. In year 4 of the IPF PPS, Medicare payments are based 100 percent on the IPF PPS. The combined effects of the transition and the stop-loss policies will be to ensure that the total estimated IPF PPS payments are no less than 92.5 percent in year 1, 85 percent in year 2, and 77.5 percent in year 3. We are not making any changes to the Stop-Loss provision. mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 3. Patients Who Receive Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) In developing the IPF PPS, we received numerous public comments recommending that we include a payment adjustment for patients who receive ECT treatments during their IPF stay because furnishing ECT treatment, either directly or under arrangements, adds significantly to the cost of these stays. When we analyzed the FY 2002 MedPAR data, we found that ECT cases comprised about 6 percent of all cases and that almost 95 percent of ECT cases were treated in IPFs that are psychiatric units of acute care hospitals. Even among psychiatric units, ECT cases are concentrated among a relatively small number of facilities. Overall, approximately 450 facilities had cases with ECT. Among these facilities, we estimated the mean number of ECT cases per facility to be approximately 25. In addition, approximately one-half of the IPFs providing ECT had no more than 15 cases in FY 2002. Our analysis confirmed that cases with ECT are substantially more costly than cases without ECT. We found that on a per case basis, ECT cases are approximately twice as expensive as non-ECT cases ($16,287 compared to $7,684). Most of this difference is due to variation in LOS (20.5 days for ECT cases compared to 11.6 days for nonECT cases). In addition, the ancillary costs per case for ECT cases are $2,740 higher than those for non-ECT cases. VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 Although we are able to determine the cost of stays with ECT, we are unable to develop an ECT cost per treatment using the FY 2002 IPF claims data because the claims do not include the number of treatments. As a result, in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we established the following methodology for calculating the IPF PPS ECT payment adjustment. We established an ECT base rate using the pre-scaled and pre-adjusted median hospital cost for CPT procedure code 90870 used for payment under hospital outpatient PPS (OPPS), based on hospital claims data. The median cost for all OPPS services are posted after publication of the OPPS proposed rule at the following address: https:// www.cms.hhs.gov/ hospitaloutpatientPPS. We used unadjusted hospital claims data under the OPPS, that is, the pre-scaled and pre-adjusted median hospital cost per treatment, to establish the ECT base rate because we did not want the ECT payment under the IPF PPS to be affected by factors that are relevant to OPPS but not specifically applicable to IPFs. The median cost ($311.88) was then standardized and adjusted for budget neutrality, resulting in an ECT payment adjustment of $247.96 per treatment. The ECT base rate is adjusted for wage and COLA differences in the same manner that we adjust the Federal per diem base rate. In order to receive the payment adjustment, IPFs must indicate on their claims the revenue code for ECT (901), along with the total number of units (ECT treatments) provided to the patient during their IPF stay. In addition, IPFs must include the ICD–9–CM procedure code for ECT (94.27) and the date of the last ECT treatment the patient received. As we stated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, although we established the ECT adjustment as a distinct payment under the IPF PPS, our preferred approach would be to include a patient level adjustment as a component of the model (for example, determined through the regression analyses) to account for the higher costs associated with ECT (69 FR 66951). We believe the approach will better control incentives towards over-utilization and be more consistent with the approach used for other patient level adjustments under the PPS. During the transition period we expect to collect more data on the number of ECT treatments per stay, and associated costs. We will utilize these data to evaluate alternative approaches for incorporating an adjustment for ECT in the payment system. To the extent that we change the payment methodology, we would PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27075 propose the change first in a future rulemaking. Although our analysis will continue, we do not plan to redo the regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data. It is important to note that since ECT treatment is a specialized procedure, not all providers are equipped to provide the treatment. Therefore, many patients who need ECT treatment during their IPF stay must be referred to other providers to receive the ECT treatments, and then return to the IPF. In accordance with § 412.404(d)(3), in these cases where the IPF is not able to furnish necessary treatment directly, the IPF would furnish ECT under arrangements with another provider. While a patient is an inpatient of the IPF, the IPF is responsible for all services furnished, including those furnished under arrangements by another provider. As a result, the IPF claim for these cases should reflect the services furnished under arrangements by other providers. Public comments and our responses on the proposed ECT payment policy are summarized below. Comment: Several commenters asked why CMS was continuing to adjust the ECT rate by the standardization factor, behavioral offset, stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment when the IPF PPS is no longer budget neutral after the implementation year. Response: We proposed to treat the ECT rate in a similar manner to the Federal per diem base rate. Specifically, we proposed to adjust the CY 2006 OPPS median rate for ECT by the standardization factor, behavioral offset, stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment in addition to applying the wage index budget neutrality factor. This way, all of the adjustments that are incorporated into the Federal per diem base rate would be incorporated into the ECT rate. However, based on the comments we received, and in order to improve consistency and give more predictability in the ECT rate from year to year, we believe it is more appropriate to use the CY 2005 ECT rate as a base, and then update that amount by the market basket each rate year. This methodology, we believe, will be even more consistent with the methodology we use to update the Federal per diem base rate because we will use the RPL market basket increase to increase both rates. Exactly as the standardization factor, behavioral offset, stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment are already built into the Federal per diem base rate before we apply the market basket and the wage index budget neutrality factor, the implementation year ECT rate of E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27076 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 $247.96 includes the standardization factor, behavioral offset, stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment. Then, just as we updated the federal per diem base rate, we will then apply the corrected standardization factor (please see section V.B for a discussion of how we adjust this factor on Federal per diem base rate), the market basket increase of 4.3 percent, and the wage index budget neutrality factor of 1.0042 to compute a RY 2007 ECT rate of $256.20. We will monitor ECT payments and usage under the IPF PPS and the OPPS to ensure that the increased payments for ECT do not lead to changes in the frequency of utilization by reviewing the FY 2005 MedPAR claims data. Comment: One commenter stated that CMS should ensure that the ECT amount adequately reflects the cost of providing the treatment. Response: We believe using the CY 2005 median cost for ECT under the OPPS as a basis for our ECT payment rate is the best option at this time to ensure the most appropriate payment for ECT. We will continue to monitor ECT payments as new data become available, and will make changes, if warranted. Final Rule Action: In summary, we will finalize the update methodology for the ECT rate by using the CY 2005 ECT rate as a base and then updating that amount by the market basket increase each rate year. We will also continue to monitor ECT payments under the IPF PPS and the OPPS. 4. Physician Certification and Recertification Requirements Since the publication of the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we have received inquiries related to physician certification and recertification. It appears that some psychiatric units in acute care hospitals have been following the timeframes that are applicable to the acute care hospital of which they are a part (as specified in § 424.13) rather than those that apply to psychiatric hospitals (as specified in § 424.14). To eliminate the confusion that we believe may be caused by the titles of § 424.13 and § 424.14 and to ensure consistency in compliance with the requirements among all IPFs, in the RY 2007 proposed rule (71 FR 3616), we proposed to revise the title of § 424.14 from ‘‘Requirements for inpatient services of psychiatric hospitals’’ to ‘‘Requirements for inpatient services of inpatient psychiatric facilities.’’ In addition, we proposed that for the purposes of payment under the IPF PPS, all IPFs would follow the physician VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 certification and recertification requirements as specified in § 424.14. In the November 28, 2003 IPF PPS proposed rule (68 FR 66920), we proposed to—(1) amend § 424.14 to state that in recertifying a patient’s need for continued inpatient care in an IPF, a physician must indicate that the patient continues to need, on a daily basis, inpatient psychiatric care (furnished directly by or requiring the supervision of IPF personnel) or other professional services that, as a practical matter, can be provided only on an inpatient basis; and (2) revise § 424.14(d) to require that a physician recertify a patient’s continued need for inpatient psychiatric care on the 10th day following admission to the IPF rather than the 18th day following admission to the IPF (68 FR 66939). However, in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we did not include the proposed physician recertification requirement changes because most of the public comments we received on this issue did not support the proposed changes and indicated that there are inconsistencies in the timeframes currently required for IPFs that warranted additional analysis. Instead, we stated that we would continue to require that a physician recertify a patient’s continued need for inpatient psychiatric care on the 18th day following admission to the IPF. Since publication of the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we have received additional inquiries related to the physician certification and recertification timeframes that currently apply to IPFs. As noted above, it appears that some psychiatric units in acute care hospitals have continued to follow the timeframes that are applicable to the acute care hospital of which they are a part (as specified in § 424.13) rather than those that apply to psychiatric hospitals (as specified in § 424.14). Section 424.13(d) requires the initial certification no later than as of the 12th day of hospitalization and the first recertification is required no later than as of the 18th day of hospitalization. Section § 424.14(d) requires certification at the time of admission or as soon thereafter as is reasonable and practicable and the first recertification is required as of the 18th day of hospitalization. In order to clarify requirements and establish further consistency among provider types, for purposes of payment under the IPF PPS, we proposed that all IPFs (distinct part units of acute care hospitals and CAHs and psychiatric hospitals) meet the physician certification and recertification timeframes in § 424.14. PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 As proposed, we are revising § 424.14(d) to provide that the initial physician certification will be required at the time of admission or as soon thereafter as is reasonable and practicable and the first recertification will be required as of the 12th day of hospitalization. Subsequent recertifications will be required at intervals established by the hospital’s UR committee (on a case-by-case basis if desired), but no less frequently then every 30 days. We chose to propose the 12th day because it is more in line with the median LOS and it is current practice for certification in psychiatric units. In addition, we received inquiries from FIs requesting guidance on the content requirement of physician certifications at § 424.14(c), relating to the medical necessity of continued inpatient psychiatric care. As a result, we are adding language to clarify that for purposes of payment under the IPF PPS, the physician will also recertify that the patient continues to need, on a daily basis, active treatment furnished directly by or requiring the supervision of inpatient psychiatric facility personnel. We received several comments related to the various changes we proposed making to the Certification and Plan of Treatment Requirements of § 424.14. Commenters were silent with respect to our proposed title revision to § 424.14 from ‘‘Requirements for inpatient services of psychiatric hospitals’’ to ‘‘Requirements for inpatient services of inpatient psychiatric facilities.’’ We are finalizing the title revision for § 424.14 as ‘‘Requirements for inpatient services of inpatient psychiatric facilities.’’ Overall, commenters supported making the physician certification requirements consistent among distinct part psychiatric units of acute care hospitals and CAHs and psychiatric hospitals. Therefore, for the purposes of payment under the IPF PPS, we are requiring that all IPFs (distinct part psychiatric units of acute care hospitals and CAHs and psychiatric hospitals) follow the physician certification and recertification requirements as specified in § 424.14. We received mixed responses from commenters concerning our proposed physician certification and recertification timeframes. Specific comments and our responses on the proposed changes implementing physician certification and recertification requirements are summarized below. Comment: One hospital association expressed support for a 12-day recertification requirement, finding it E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations preferable to 18 days. Other commenters requested the current requirement of 18 days for the initial recertification remain in place, citing added administrative burden since most patients are discharged before the 18th day. A couple of the commenters recommended maintaining the 18-day recertification requirement since it is part of the original language for § 424.14 and further believe it is the established practice in psychiatric hospitals. Response: When § 424.14(d)(2) was developed in the 1980s, the average LOS for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization was much longer than the current median LOS of 9 days, thereby necessitating a parallel recertification requirement of 18 days, which was reflective of current treatment practice at that time. However, as inpatient psychiatric treatment has evolved with the development of new medications and therapies, so has the average length of inpatient care. According to the MedPar 2002 claims data, the median LOS for Medicare beneficiaries in IPFs is 9 days. Since the duration of inpatient psychiatric hospitalization stays have shortened, the certification and recertification timeframe and practices need to be updated in order to remain consistent with current practice. Thus, an earlier recertification timeframe is indicated by the shorter LOS for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization. Therefore, we continue to believe that an 18-day recertification requirement is outdated and not reflective of current inpatient psychiatric treatment. As a result, we are finalizing that for § 424.14(d)(2), the first recertification is required as of the 12th day of hospitalization. Subsequent recertifications will be required at intervals established by the hospital’s Utilization Review committee (on a case-by-case basis if desired), but no less frequently then every 30 days. Comment: In general, commenters were silent concerning our proposal to modify the certification and recertification language of § 424.14(c), relating to the medical necessity of continued inpatient psychiatric care. However, a couple of commenters requested that the language required for certification and recertification remain consistent with § 424.14(b) and § 424.14(c). Another commenter requested clarification on the proposed language requiring ‘‘the physician would recertify that the patient continues to need, on a daily basis* * *’’. The commenter questioned whether physicians would need to chart daily in the patient’s VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 record that the patient continues to need active treatment. Response: We proposed only one modification to § 424.14(c), ‘‘Content of recertification’’, by adding language requiring that the physician would also recertify that the patient continues to need, on a daily basis, active treatment furnished directly by or requiring the supervision of inpatient psychiatric facility personnel. This means, the patient continues to need daily, active treatment that is furnished directly by or requiring the supervision of inpatient psychiatric facility personnel. To clarify, physician certification and recertification, under § 424.14, are not the same as progress notes. A physician must certify the necessity of the services and, in some instances, recertify the continued need for those services to ensure that Medicare pays only for services of the type appropriate for Medicare coverage. Progress notes, under § 412.27(c)(4), must also be recorded by the patient’s physician, in addition to a nurse, social worker, and when appropriate, others significantly involved in active treatment modalities, but are used to document the progress of the patient’s treatment, and are more frequent than the certification and recertification timelines. In addition to the purpose of clarifying the recertification content requirements, this modification is consistent with the medical necessity requirement for continued inpatient psychiatric care. As a result, for purposes of payment under the IPF PPS, the physician would also recertify that the patient continues to need, on a daily basis, active treatment furnished directly by or requiring the supervision of inpatient psychiatric facility personnel. Final Rule Action: In summary, we are changing the title for § 424.14 from ‘‘Requirements for inpatient services of psychiatric hospitals’’ to ‘‘Requirements for inpatient services of inpatient psychiatric facilities.’’ In addition, for the purposes of payment under the IPF PPS, we are requiring that all IPFs (distinct part psychiatric units of acute care hospitals and CAHs and psychiatric hospitals) follow the physician certification and recertification requirements as specified in § 424.14. Furthermore, § 424.14(d)(2) will require the first recertification as of the 12th day of hospitalization. Subsequent recertifications will be required at intervals established by the hospital’s UR committee (on a case-by-case basis if desired), but no less frequently than every 30 days. We are also finalizing the content requirement of physician certifications PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27077 at § 424.14(c)(iii) by adding the following language, ‘‘the physician will also recertify that the patient continues to need, on a daily basis, active treatment furnished directly by or requiring the supervision of inpatient psychiatric facility personnel.’’ 5. Provision of Therapeutic Recreation in IPFs Before the implementation of the IPPS payment methodology, Medicare coverage guidelines gave specific recognition to therapeutic recreation in inpatient psychiatric hospitals. The guidelines in § 3102.1.A of the Medicare Intermediary Manual, Part 3 (MIM–3), and in § 212.1 of the Medicare Hospital Manual (which now appear in the CMS Internet Online Manual at Pub. 100–02, Chapter 2, § 20.1ff.) specifically identify therapeutic recreation as one of the services that can constitute ‘‘active treatment’’ in this setting when they are— • Provided under an individualized treatment or diagnostic plan; • Reasonably expected to improve the patient’s condition or for the purpose of diagnosis; and • Supervised and evaluated by a physician. However, these guidelines refer to therapeutic recreation in terms of being an ‘‘adjunctive’’ therapy, indicating that even in this setting, it will not independently serve as a patient’s sole or primary form of therapeutic treatment, but rather, will be furnished in support of (but subordinate to) some other, primary form of therapy. When the IPPS was developed in 1983, to the extent that therapeutic recreation and other services had been furnished during the IPPS base period, the bundled IPPS payment for that setting would reflect these costs. However, during the IPPS rulemaking process, we received public comments concerned that, ‘‘the cost-saving incentives of the PPS would lead hospitals paid under the system to stop providing recreational therapy services.’’ In response, in the January 3, 1984 IPPS final rule (49 FR 242) we indicated that implementation of the IPPS would not, in fact, prohibit the provision of recreational therapy services, and that ‘‘these services will continue to be covered to the same extent they always have been under existing Medicare policies’’. In implementing the IPPS regulations, we included criteria for identifying certain types of institutions (for example, psychiatric hospitals) that would be excluded from the IPPS and, thus, would continue to be paid under some other methodology. The E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 27078 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations regulations also introduced criteria for identifying an IPPS-excluded inpatient psychiatric unit housed within a larger acute-care hospital that would itself be subject to the IPPS. One of these identifying criteria at 42 CFR 405.471(c)(4)(ii)(B) (later recodified at 42 CFR 412.27(b)) was the provision, through the use of qualified personnel, of a number of specified types of services, including psychological services, social work services, psychiatric nursing, occupational therapy, and recreational therapy. As we explained in the IPPS interim final rule published on September 1, 1983 (48 FR 39758), the regulations designated these particular services because their provision ‘‘is typical of units which treat patients whose characteristics are like those in psychiatric hospitals. Consequently, the provision of these services is an identifier of such a patient population’’. We note that the designation of these particular services in this context did not serve to define the scope of their coverage under Medicare, nor to mandate their provision in this setting, but merely to identify them as being characteristic of the type of psychiatric unit that would qualify for exclusion from the IPPS. At the same time the IPPS was being developed, a parallel evolution was taking place in the certification requirements that facilities must meet in order to participate in the Medicare program: a shift from primarily ‘‘process-oriented’’ requirements to more ‘‘outcome-oriented’’ requirements, which focus more on direct indicators of the quality of care actually being furnished to the facility’s patients (as reflected in the presence of positive results and the absence of negative ones), and less on the specific ‘‘process’’ through which the facility achieves the desired outcome. In order to participate in the Medicare program, psychiatric hospitals not only had to meet the conditions of participation (COPs) that apply to general, acute-care hospitals, but additionally had to meet special conditions related to medical records and staffing. Consistent with the recognition of therapeutic recreation as constituting active treatment in this one particular setting (as discussed above), the original COPs for psychiatric hospitals at 42 CFR 405.1038(g) mandated the presence of qualified therapists, assistants, or aides ‘‘sufficient in number to provide comprehensive therapeutic activities, including at least occupational, recreational and physical therapy, as needed, to assure that appropriate VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 treatment is rendered for each patient, and to establish and maintain a therapeutic milieu.’’ Furthermore, 42 CFR 405.1038(g)(3) specified that ‘‘recreational or activity therapy services are available under the direct supervision of a member of the staff who has demonstrated competence in therapeutic recreation programs,’’ and § 405.1038(g)(4) and § 405.1038(g)(5) went on to prescribe additional standards regarding therapy assistants or aides and overall staffing for recreational and activity therapy. However, when the special medical record and staffing COPs for psychiatric hospitals were subsequently recodified at § 482.62(g), the specific references to recreation therapy were deleted and replaced with a more general requirement to provide a therapeutic activities program. In response to public comments that recommended us to restore the deleted requirements, we indicated that we believe that the deleted requirements concerning therapeutic activities were overly and unnecessarily prescriptive and that the hospital should have the flexibility to determine which activities are most appropriate to its patient population and to determine the criteria to be met by employees providing these services. (See the IPPS PPS rule published on June 17, 1986 (51 FR 22032)). However, when the 1986 COP changes applicable to psychiatric hospitals were made, we inadvertently retained specific references to recreation therapy in § 412.27. Since the intent of § 412.27(b) is to identify services provided in psychiatric units that are characteristic of services furnished in psychiatric hospitals, we believe it is no longer appropriate to include references to specific therapies in § 412.27. Therefore, in order to have consistent requirements among IPFs, in the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule, we proposed removing recreational therapy from § 412.27(b). We went on to further explain in the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule that in addition to being consistent with current provisions, we believe the IPF PPS base rate which was developed using FY 2002 data, already reflects the provision of recreation therapy. We received a few public comments concerning our proposal to remove reference to recreational therapy in § 412.27(b). Overall the commenters recommended that we not delete the reference to recreational therapy. Public comments and our responses on the proposed changes for removing the reference to recreational therapy are summarized below: PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 Comment: An industry organization suggested that if CMS’; goal is to maintain consistency, CMS should adopt the language as specified in § 482.62 from the COPs for § 412.27(b). Response: We believe that this commenter raises a valid concern in terms of maintaining consistency. We also agree with the suggestion of applying the same language to both § 482.62 and § 412.27(b), thereby maintaining consistent requirements among IPFs. Since § 482.62 refers to ‘‘therapeutic activities,’’ we are revising § 412.27(b), to be consistent with § 482.62, by replacing the reference to recreational and occupational therapy with the term ‘‘therapeutic activities.’’ Comment: Several commenters stated that the inclusion of recreational therapy in § 412.27(b), is no more specific than the references included for social work or occupational therapy. Response: As we indicated in the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule, since the intent of § 412.27(b) is to identify services provided in psychiatric units that are characteristic of services furnished in psychiatric hospitals, we believe it is essential to maintain consistency among the provisions for § 482.62 and § 412.27(b). Therefore, we are removing the reference to both recreational and occupational therapy from § 412.27(b) and replacing them with the more general reference to therapeutic activities which is currently used in § 482.62. However, we believe it is important to maintain the reference to social work services in § 412.27, since it is currently included in § 482.62. Comment: One commenter requested that CMS continue to pay for recreational therapy. Other commenters were concerned that if the reference to recreational therapy is removed, people may not know that Medicare has traditionally recognized recreational therapy as an adjunctive therapy in psychiatric facilities. Response: As we discussed in the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule, we believe the IPF PPS base rate, which was developed using FY 2002 data, reflects the provision of recreation and occupational therapy. Even though we are removing the specific reference to recreation and occupational therapy in § 412.27(b), both recreational and occupational therapy services will continue to be covered to the same extent they always have been under existing Medicare policies. In addition, although we are removing the specific references to recreational and occupational therapy from § 412.27(b), we want to emphasize that both therapies are, and continue to be, E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 valuable therapeutic interventions in psychiatric treatment. Final Rule Action: In summary, for consistency, we are adopting the language as specified in § 482.62 from the COPs for § 412.27(b). Specifically, 412.27(b) will state—‘‘Furnish, through the use of qualified personnel, psychological services, social work services, psychiatric nursing services and therapeutic activities.’’ 6. Same Day Transfers Currently, when a transfer, discharge, or death occurs on the same day as an admission to an IPF, the IPF PPS PRICER does not recognize any covered IPF days and the IPF claims are suspended. Based on review of a limited sample of the IPF and subsequent IPPS claims, it appears that many of these patients are first seen in a hospital’s ED, are admitted to the hospital’s psychiatric unit and, later the same day, determined to be too medically compromised to be managed in the psychiatric unit. This scenario may occur because the patient presents at the ED and is admitted to the psychiatric unit in the middle of the night, and when the patient’s admission to the unit is reviewed by a psychiatrist the next morning, the physician determines that the patient should be discharged for acute care. In other cases, a patient may have been admitted to a freestanding psychiatric hospital based on the information furnished by an ED of an acute care hospital. However, after admission, the psychiatric hospital staff evaluates the patient and determines that the patient has medical needs that they are not staffed or equipped to meet. The Provider Reimbursement Manual addresses the same day transfer issue from the perspective of counting Medicare days for the purpose of Medicare cost reporting. Section 2205 indicates that only full patient days may be used to apportion inpatient routine care service costs and that a day begins at midnight and ends 24 hours later. However, section 2205.1 explains how to count a day if the day of admission and the day of discharge are the same. Section 2205.1 indicates that when a patient is admitted and then transferred from one participating provider to another before midnight of the same day, a day (except for utilization purposes) is counted at both providers. A day of Medicare utilization is charged only for the admission to the second provider. This distinction is important for psychiatric admissions because IPF stays are subject to the 190-day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric care. Section 1812(b) of the Act and 42 CFR 409.62 indicate that payment is not VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 available for inpatient psychiatric hospital services furnished beyond the 190-day lifetime limit. Thus, Medicare coverage of IPF services, specifically IPF services furnished in freestanding psychiatric hospitals is limited to 190 days. In consideration of the limit on coverage of IPF services, where there is a same day transfer between Medicare participating providers, we only count the second admission for utilization purposes. Therefore, the initial admission to the IPF does not count against a beneficiary’s lifetime psychiatric services limit. We have some concerns regarding same day transfers from an IPF. Under TEFRA, a hospital receives its cost up to the hospital’s TEFRA limit. The TEFRA limit is based on the hospital’s average cost per discharge in a base period. When an admission and discharge occur on the same day, the hospital’s cost is unlikely to exceed the TEFRA limit, so the hospital receives its cost for the day. These same day transfers also improve the hospital’s payment under TEFRA by slightly reducing its cost per discharge. We are also concerned that when the transfer occurs in the same hospital, this practice circumvents bundling rules under the IPPS, in that it unbundles the ED charges from the IPPS claim and allocates the ED costs to the psychiatric unit even though the patient may have been inappropriately admitted to the unit. Based on the review of IPF PPS claims we conducted, it did not appear that the admissions to the IPF were medically reasonable and necessary. However, we believe it is important to base a decision regarding coverage of these days on a comprehensive review of the claims. Therefore, in the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule, we did not propose a change in payment policy. However, we did consider several alternative methods for addressing same day transfers under the IPF PPS which are described below. Any change to treatment of same day transfers would be made prospectively. We could treat these days as covered days under the IPF PPS. However, under the IPF PPS, a 19 percent adjustment to the base rate is applied to day 1 of the stay to reflect the additional administrative and clinical costs associated with admission and the day 1 adjustment is increased to 31 percent when the IPF has a qualifying ED. The IPF may also receive, for example, a teaching adjustment or rural adjustment, for these partial days of care. Several of the claims in our analysis indicate a stay of 2 hours. We are concerned that this approach would overpay IPFs and PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27079 encourage inappropriate admissions and transfers. Another option would be to make no PPS payment, but continue making TEFRA payments during the IPF PPS transition period. For example, for cost reporting periods beginning in 2006, IPFs would receive a blended payment consisting of 50 percent PPS and 50 percent TEFRA. Therefore, under this approach we would allow some payment for these days for cost reporting periods in 2006 and 2007, but once the IPF PPS transition period is over, the IPFs would receive no payment for these days. We think this approach would encourage changes in admission practices in order to avoid the need to transfer patients. However, once the IPF PPS transition is over, there would be no payment mechanism to pay IPFs for stays in which there is a circumstance, not reasonably foreseeable by the admitting IPF, for example, a serious change in health status on the day of admission. We could treat these same day transfer cases as covered days under the IPF PPS but limit payment to the Federal per diem base rate or some other payment amount, for example, half the Federal per diem base rate. This approach would limit payment to IPFs in order to provide an incentive for IPFs to make medical clearance determinations as early in the IPF stay as possible. However, we are concerned that this approach would not lead to changes in admission practices to avoid inappropriate admissions and the need for subsequent transfers. It is important to note that the cost for these days was included in the cost reports used to develop the IPF PPS, and, as a result, the average cost per day that was used to establish the Federal per diem base rate is higher than it would otherwise have been had those days not been included. We specifically request public comment from IPFs on this issue to help us to develop a payment policy that pays IPFs appropriately for these days and provides an incentive to avoid same day transfers wherever possible. Public comments and our responses on the proposed changes for implementing the same day transfers are summarized below. Comment: We received several comments concerning the issue of an appropriate payment for same day transfers. Many commenters indicated that CMS should conduct a thorough examination of the 2005 claims because they do not believe that same day transfers would be found to be prevalent occurrences. The same commenters also stated that if CMS decides to investigate E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27080 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 other options, the agency should convene the field through an open-door forum or other such venue to discuss the possibilities. In addition, several commenters requested that when sufficient data is available to fully evaluate same day transfers, CMS should request input from the field before making any changes to current policy. Other commenters also indicated that CMS should continue to reimburse same day transfers as 1-day stays unless it can demonstrate empirically that the cost of the former is sufficiently less than the cost of the latter to justify a partial payment. Another commenter requested that CMS release a version of the MedPar with relevant information to qualified researchers who would be pleased to conduct an empirical analysis for the agency. Many commenters supported CMS’ instructions for its payment methodology for the suspended IPF PPS same day transfer claims from January 1, 2005. The instructions counted these days as covered for cost reporting purposes if the day of admission and the day of discharge are the same. Other commenters indicated that CMS should not penalize provider’s evaluation and treatment efforts, stating that the work was done, therefore providers should be compensated. Furthermore, commenters support the way section 2205.1 of the Provider Reimbursement Manual instructs FIs to count a day if the day of admission and the day of discharge are the same. The majority of the commenters recommended paying the PPS per diem for these transfers. Response: We will take all comments into consideration as we develop a payment policy that not only pays appropriately for these days, but will also provide an incentive to avoid same day transfers wherever possible. Final Rule Action: In summary, we received multiple comments on the same day transfer. We will take all comments into consideration as we develop a payment policy for same day transfers. We will develop the policy for same day transfers in the future, after we analyze IPF PPS data. Response: We did not include an explicit payment adjustment for inner city facilities in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule nor did we propose an urban adjustment in the RY 2007 proposed rule. As indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66954), we did not include an adjustment for urban IPFs because the regression analysis we conducted did not indicate that urban IPFs were more costly on a per diem basis. As previously stated, we do not plan to rerun the regression analysis until we analyze IPF PPS data (that is no earlier than FY 2008). When we rerun the regression analysis, we will test for the need for an urban or inner city adjustment. Comment: A commenter objected to CMS not posting the proposed rule to the CMS Web site until January 18, 2006 while the rule actually went on public display January 13, 2006 and was not published in the Federal Register until January 23, 2006. The commenter stated that if CMS chooses to start the comment period based on the date of display, CMS must ensure that the display copy is promptly posted on the Web site to provide interested parties sufficient time to review the rule and draft comments before the comment period ends. Response: It is our general practice to post Federal Register documents on our website as soon as practicable after the documents are on public display at the Office of the Federal Register. When we chose to start the comment period from the day of public display, while we are not required to do so, it was our intent to post the proposed rule on CMS website immediately. However, due to circumstances out of our control, we were unable to immediately do so because our Web site at https:// www.cms.hhs.gov was being redesigned. However, we did publish a press release on January 13, 2006, announcing the IPF PPS proposed rule went on public display at the Federal Register on January 13, 2006 and that it would be published in the Federal Register on January 23, 2006. In addition, we posted the rule as soon as was practicable for us to do so, on Wednesday, January 18, 2006. VII. Miscellaneous Public Comments Within the Scope of the Proposed Rule Comment: A commenter requested an inner-city adjustment, indicating that the difficulties of inner-city IPFs are related to a high volume of nonpayment in contrast to the more likely rural under use and low volume costs. The commenter suggested a 20 percent adjustment at least, for inner-city IPFs. VIII. Provisions of the Final Rule This final rule essentially incorporates the provisions of the proposed rule, in which we proposed to update the IPF PPS for RY 2007 applicable to IPF discharges occurring during the RY beginning July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. In addition, we proposed to adopt the new OMB labor market area definitions for our VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 geographic classifications. The provisions of this final rule that differ from the proposed rule are as follows. ECT policy Payment In the RY 2007 IPF PPS proposed rule, we proposed to update the ECT base rate using the pre-scaled preadjusted hospital median cost for ECT used for the CY 2006 update of the OPPS. The median cost would then be standardized, adjusted for budget neutrality, and adjusted for wage and COLA differences in the same manner that we adjust the per diem rate. However, based on the public comments, we are changing the methodology used for calculating the ECT policy payment rate. In order to improve consistency with our updates to the Federal per diem base rate and provide IPFs more predictability for the ECT rate from year to year, we will use the CY 2005 ECT rate as a base, and then update that amount by the market basket increase each rate year. Section 412.402 Definition In § 412.402, we are adding the definition of ‘‘New GME education program’’ to mean a medical education program that receives initial accreditation by the appropriate accrediting body or begins training residents on or after November 15, 2004. Section 412.27 Excluded psychiatric units: Additional requirements. In § 412.27, we are amending paragraph (b) to remove the specific reference to ‘‘occupational therapy, and recreational therapy.’’ We are adding in its place ‘‘therapeutic activities’’ in order to maintain consistency with current provisions and since the IPF PPS base rate already reflects the provision of recreational therapy. Section 412.428 Publication of updates to the inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system. In § 412.428, we are revising paragraph (b)(3) to reflect that the rate of increase factor is revised as of October 1 of each year. Other Issues In the Inpatient Prospective Payment System proposed rule, published April 25, 2006 (71 FR 23996), we discussed in detail the Health Care Information Transparency Initiative and our efforts to promote effective use of health information technology (HIT) as a means to help improve health care quality and improve efficiency. Specifically, with regard to the transparency initiative, we discuss several potential options for making E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations pricing and quality information available to the public (71 FR 24120 through 24121). We solicited comments on ways the Department can encourage transparency in health care quality and pricing whether through its leadership on voluntary initiatives or through regulatory requirements. We also are seeking comment on the Department’s statutory authority to impose such requirements. In addition, we discussed the potential for HIT to facilitate improvements in the quality and efficiency of health care services (71 FR 24100 through 24101). We solicited comments on our statutory authority to encourage the adoption and use of HIT. The 2007 Budget states that ‘‘the Administration supports the adoption of health information technology (IT) as a normal cost of doing business to ensure patients receive high quality care.’’ We also are seeking comments on the appropriate role of HIT in potential value-based purchasing program, beyond the intrinsic incentives of a PPS to provide efficient care, encourage the avoidance of unnecessary costs, and increase quality of care. In addition, we are seeking comments on promotion of the use of effective HIT through Medicare conditions of participation. We intend to consider both the health care information transparency initiative and the use of health information technology as we refine and update all Medicare payment systems. Therefore, while these initiatives are not included in this final rule, we are in the process of seeking input on these initiatives in various proposed Medicare payment rules being issued this year and may pursue these policies in future rulemaking for the IPF PPS. IX. Collection of Information Requirement This document does not impose information collection and recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. X. Regulatory Impact Analysis mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 A. Overall Impact We have examined the impact of this final rule as required by Executive Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96–354), section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104–4), and Executive Order 13132. VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 Executive Order 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 13258, which merely reassigns responsibility of duties) directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). Based on the impact analysis, we estimate the expenditures from the IPF PPS implementation year to the 2007 IPF PPS RY will be increased by $160 million. The updates to the IPF laborrelated share and wage indices are made in a budget neutral manner and thus have no effect on estimated costs to the Medicare program. Therefore, the estimated increased cost to the Medicare program is the result of a combination of the updated IPF market baskets, which is offset by the transition blend and the revision of the standardization factor. The IPF PPS was budget neutral in the implementation year, but it is not budget neutral in RY 2007. As discussed in section V.B.2 of this final rule, the standardization factor and budget neutrality factors (behavioral offset, stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment) are built into the Federal per diem base rate and the ECT rate. We are increasing these rates by the market basket, resulting in a $160 million increase in payments from the implementation year to RY 2007. We note that aspects of the transition, including the stop-loss policy and the transition to the 50/50 percent blend in RY 2007 and the transition to the 75/25 percent blend in the 2008 IPF PPS RY, were included in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule and thus are not incremental to this rule. Nevertheless, it is essential to analyze the impact of the transition blend in order to calculate the increase in cost to the Medicare program. The impact of the transition blend is an approximately 0.2 percent (about $10 million) decrease in overall payments in RY 2007 and the distribution of that impact is summarized in Table 15. Therefore, the impact attributable to the policy changes finalized in this rulemaking, primarily the market basket update and the standardization correction, is approximately $170 million in the IPF PPS RY 2007. Since costs to the Medicare program are estimated to be greater than $100 million, this final rule is considered a PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27081 major economic rule, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 40(2). The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief of small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and governmental jurisdictions. Most IPFs and most other providers and suppliers are considered small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of $6 million to $29 million in any 1 year. (For details, see the Small Business Administration’s regulation that set forth size standards for health care industries at (65 FR 69432).) HHS considers that a substantial number of entities are affected if the rule impacts more than 5 percent of the total number of small entities as it does in this rule. We included all freestanding psychiatric hospitals (79 are non-profit hospitals) in the analysis since their total revenues do not exceed the $29 million threshold. We also included psychiatric units of small hospitals, that is, those hospitals with fewer than 100 beds. We did not include psychiatric units within larger hospitals in the analysis because we believe this final rule would not significantly impact total revenues of the entire hospital that supports the unit. We have provided the following RFA analysis in section V.B to emphasize that, although the final rule will impact a substantial number of IPFs that were identified as small entities, we do not believe it will have a significant economic impact. Based on the analysis of the 1063 psychiatric facilities that were classified as small entities as described above, we estimate the combined impact of the IPF PPS will be a 4.2 percent increase in payments in RY 2007 relative to their payments in the implementation year of the IPF PPS. Based on the information available, we believe that Medicare payments may constitute a small portion of governmental IPFs’ revenue stream. We have prepared the impact analysis in section X.B.2 to describe the impact of the final rule in order to provide a factual basis for our conclusions regarding small business impact. In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a regulatory impact analysis if a final rule may have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. With the exception of hospitals located in certain New England counties, for purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we previously defined a small rural hospital as a hospital with fewer than 100 beds that is located outside of a Metropolitan Statistical E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27082 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Area (MSA) or New England County Metropolitan Area (NECMA). However, under the new labor market definitions, we will no longer employ NECMAs to define urban areas in New England. Therefore, for purposes of this analysis, we now define a small rural hospital as a hospital with fewer than 100 beds that is located outside of an MSA. We have determined that this final rule will have a substantial impact on hospitals classified as located in rural areas. As discussed earlier in this preamble, we will continue to provide a payment adjustment of 17 percent for IPFs located in rural areas. In addition, we have established a 3-year transition to the new system to allow IPFs an opportunity to adjust to the new system. Therefore, the impacts shown in Table 15 below reflect the adjustments that are designed to minimize or eliminate any potentially significant negative impact that the IPF PPS may otherwise have on small rural IPFs. Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any final rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. That threshold level is currently approximately $120 million. This final rule will not mandate any requirements for State, local, or tribal governments, nor would it affect private sector costs. Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a final rule that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. We have reviewed this final rule under the criteria set forth in Executive Order 13132 and have determined that the final rule will not have any substantial impact on the rights, roles, and responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments. mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 B. Anticipated Effects of the Final Rule We discuss below the impact of this final rule on the Federal Medicare budget and on IPFs. 1. Budgetary Impact As discussed in detail in the IPF PPS proposed rule and summarized in section V.B. of this final rule, we applied a budget neutrality factor to the Federal per diem and ECT base rates to ensure that total payments under the IPF PPS in the implementation period would equal the amount that would have been paid if the IPF PPS had not been implemented. The budget VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 neutrality factor includes the following components: outlier adjustment, stoploss adjustment, and the behavioral offset. We do not plan to change any of these adjustment factors or projections until we analyze IPF PPS data. In accordance with § 412.424(c)(3)(ii), we will evaluate the accuracy of the budget neutrality adjustment within the first 5 years after implementation of the payment system. We may make a onetime prospective adjustment to the Federal per diem and ECT base rates to account for differences between the historical data on cost-based TEFRA payments (the basis of the budget neutrality adjustment) and estimates of TEFRA payments based on actual data from the first year of the IPF PPS. As part of that process, we will re-assess the accuracy of all of the factors impacting budget neutrality. In addition, as discussed in section VI.C.1 of this final rule, we are adopting the new CBSAs and labor market share in a budget neutral manner by applying a wage index budget neutrality factor to the Federal per diem and ECT base rates. Thus, the budgetary impact to the Medicare program by the update of the IPF PPS will be the combination of the market basket updates (see section V.C of this final rule), the revision of the standardization factor (see section V.B.3 of this final rule), and the planned update of the payment blend discussed below. 2. Impacts on Providers To understand the impact of the changes to the IPF PPS discussed in this final rule on providers, it is necessary to compare estimated payments under the IPF PPS rates and factors for the RY 2007 to estimated payments under the IPF PPS rates and factors for the IPF PPS implementation year. The estimated payments for the IPF implementation year are a blend of: 75 percent of the facility-specific TEFRA payment and 25 percent of the IPF PPS payment with stop loss payment. The estimated payments for the IPF PPS RY 2007 are a blend of: 50 percent of the facilityspecific TEFRA payment and 50 percent of the IPF PPS payment with stop loss payment. We determined the percent change of estimated 2007 IPF PPS RY payments to estimated IPF PPS implementation year payments for each category of IPFs. In addition, for each category of IPFs, we have included the estimated percent change in payments resulting from the revision of the standardization factor (as discussed in section V.B.3 of this final rule, the ratio of estimated total TEFRA payments to estimated total PPS payments in the implementation year was overestimated PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 and therefore needed to be reduced. We will apply the revised standardization factor prospectively to the Federal per diem base rate and ECT amount), the wage index changes for the IPF PPS RY 2007, the market basket update to IPF PPS payments, and the transition blend for the IPF PPS RY 2007 payment and the facility-specific TEFRA payment. To illustrate the impacts of the final RY 2007 changes, our analysis begins with an implementation year baseline simulation model based on FY 2002 IPF payments inflated to 2005 with market baskets; the estimated outlier payments in 2005; the estimated stop-loss payments in 2005; the MSA designations for IPFs based on OMB’s MSA definitions before June 2003; the 2005 MSA wage index; the implementation year labor-market share; and the implementation year percentage amount of the rural adjustment. During the simulation, the outlier payment is maintained at the target of 2 percent of total PPS payments. Each of the following changes is added incrementally to this baseline model in order for us to isolate the effects of each change: • IPF PPS payments adjusted by the revised standardization factor. • The new CBSAs based on new geographic area definitions announced by OMB in June 2003 and the RY 2007 final budget-neutral labor-related share and wage index adjustment. • A blended market basket update of 4.5 percent resulting in an update to the hospital-specific TEFRA target amount and an update to the IPF PPS base rates as discussed below. ++ In the IPPS final rule published August 12, 2005 (70 FR 47707), we established an update factor of 3.8 percent effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2005 using the 2002-based excluded hospital market basket. The 3.8 percent update is applied to the IPF’s established TEFRA target amount for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2005. However, since the midpoints of the RY 2007 and the IPF PPS implementation period are 15 months apart, the TEFRA payment increase is projected to be 4.6 percent. ++ An update to the Federal per diem base rate of 4.3 percent based on the 2002-based RPL market basket (see section V.C.1.b of this final rule). The market basket update is based on a 15month time period (from the midpoint of the IPF PPS implementation period to the midpoint of the RY 2007). • The transition to 50 percent IPF PPS payment and 50 percent facilityspecific TEFRA payment. E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Our final comparison illustrates the percent change in payments from the IPF PPS implementation year (that is, January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006) to RY 27083 2007 (that is, July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007). TABLE 15.—PROJECTED IMPACTS mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Facility by type (1) Number of facilities (2) All Facilities By Type of Ownership: Psychiatric Hospitals: Government Non-profit For-profit Psychiatric Units Rural Urban By Urban or Rural Classification: Urban by Facility Type: Psychiatric Hospitals: Government Non-profit For-profit Psychiatric Units Rural by Facility Type: Psychiatric Hospitals: Government Non-profit For-profit Psychiatric Units By Teaching Status: Non-teaching Less than 10% interns and residents to beds 10% to 30% interns and residents to beds More than 30% interns and residents to beds By Region: New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic East North Central East South Central West North Central West South Central Mountain Pacific By Bed Size: VerDate Aug<31>2005 Standardization factor correction (percent) (3) 00:49 May 09, 2006 CBSA wage index and labor share (percent) (4) Market basket (percent) (5) Transition blend (percent) (6) Total (percent) (7) 1,806 ¥0.3 0.0 4.5 ¥0.2 4.0 178 79 150 ¥0.5 ¥0.4 ¥0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 4.5 4.5 4.5 11.0 1.6 4.3 15.6 6.0 8.7 1,399 385 1,421 ¥0.3 ¥0.3 ¥0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 ¥1.8 ¥0.9 ¥0.1 2.3 3.2 4.1 144 73 143 ¥0.5 ¥0.4 ¥0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 4.5 4.5 4.5 10.9 1.7 4.4 15.4 6.1 8.8 1,061 ¥0.3 0.0 4.5 ¥1.7 2.4 34 6 7 ¥0.5 ¥0.3 ¥0.2 ¥0.1 0.3 ¥0.1 4.5 4.5 4.5 12.0 ¥0.7 ¥1.8 16.3 3.9 2.4 338 ¥0.3 0.0 4.5 ¥2.0 2.1 1,537 ¥0.3 0.0 4.5 ¥0.4 3.8 148 ¥0.3 0.1 4.5 0.5 4.7 72 ¥0.3 0.0 4.5 0.4 4.6 49 ¥0.4 0.1 4.5 0.0 4.3 126 306 ¥0.3 ¥0.4 0.0 0.2 4.5 4.5 ¥0.4 2.9 3.8 7.3 238 ¥0.3 ¥0.2 4.5 0.1 4.0 325 ¥0.3 ¥0.1 4.5 ¥1.5 2.6 159 ¥0.4 ¥0.1 4.5 ¥0.3 3.7 169 ¥0.3 ¥0.2 4.5 ¥1.0 3.0 237 83 156 ¥0.3 ¥0.3 ¥0.3 ¥0.1 ¥0.1 0.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 ¥2.7 ¥0.4 ¥0.5 1.4 3.7 4.0 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27084 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 15.—PROJECTED IMPACTS—Continued Facility by type (1) Standardization factor correction (percent) (3) Number of facilities (2) Psychiatric Hospitals: Under 12 beds 12 to 25 beds 25 to 50 beds 50 to 75 beds Over 75 beds Psychiatric Units: Under 12 beds 12 to 25 beds 25 to 50 beds 50 to 75 beds Over 75 beds mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 Transition blend (percent) (6) Total (percent) (7) ¥0.2 0.1 4.5 ¥3.8 0.6 46 ¥0.3 ¥0.2 4.5 0.2 4.3 91 ¥0.4 0.1 4.5 4.2 8.6 82 ¥0.4 0.1 4.5 3.8 8.3 162 ¥0.5 0.1 4.5 8.6 13.0 600 ¥0.3 ¥0.1 4.5 ¥4.5 ¥0.5 474 ¥0.3 0.0 4.5 ¥1.9 2.2 228 ¥0.3 0.0 4.5 ¥0.6 3.5 58 ¥0.3 0.0 4.5 0.1 4.3 39 ¥0.4 0.0 4.5 1.3 5.5 Table 15 above displays the results of our analysis. The table groups IPFs into the categories listed below based on characteristics provided in the Online Survey and Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) file and the FY 2002 cost report data from HCRIS: • Facility Type • Location • Teaching Status Adjustment • Census Region • Size The top row of the table shows the overall impact on the 1,806 IPFs included in the analysis. In column 3, we present the effects of the revised standardization factor (see section V.B.3 of this final rule for a discussion of this revision). This is defined to be the comparison of the simulated implementation year payments under the revised standardization factor to the simulated implementation year payments under the original standardization factor. In aggregate, the revision is projected to result in a 0.3 percent decrease in overall payments to IPFs. There are small distributional effects among different categories of IPFs. For example, urban and rural government psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric hospitals with over 75 beds will receive the largest decrease of 0.5 percent, while rural for-profit psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric hospitals with fewer than 12 00:49 May 09, 2006 Market basket (percent) (5) 26 3. Results VerDate Aug<31>2005 CBSA wage index and labor share (percent) (4) Jkt 208001 beds will receive the smallest decrease of 0.2 percent. In column 4, we present the effects of the budget-neutral update to the laborrelated share and the wage index adjustment under the new CBSA geographic area definitions announced by OMB in June 2003. This is a comparison of the simulated implementation year payments under revised budget neutral factor and laborrelated share and wage index under CBSA classification to the simulated implementation year payments under revised budget neutral factor and laborrelated share and wage index under current MSA classifications. There is no projected change in aggregate payments to IPFs, as indicated in the first row of column 4. There would, however, be small distributional effects among different categories of IPFs. For example, several categories of IPFs, such as IPFs located in the South Atlantic and West North Central regions, and psychiatric hospitals with between 12 and 25 beds, will experience a 0.2 percent decrease in payments. Rural non-profit hospitals and hospitals located in the Pacific region will receive the largest increase of 0.3 percent. In column 5, we present the effects of the market basket update to the IPF PPS payments by applying the TEFRA and PPS updates to payments under revised budget neutral factor and labor-related share and wage index under CBSA classification. In the aggregate this PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 update is projected to be a 4.5 percent increase in overall payments to IPFs. This 4.5 percent reflects the current blend of the 4.6 percent update for IPF TEFRA payments and the 4.3 percent update for the IPF PPS payments. In column 6, we present the effects of the payment change in transition blend percentages to transition year 2 (TEFRA Rate Percentage = 50 percent, IPF PPS Federal Rate Percentage = 50 percent) from transition year 1 (TEFRA Rate Percentage = 75 percent, IPF PPS Federal Rate Percentage = 25 percent) of the IPF PPS under revised budget neutral factor, labor-related share and wage index under CBSA classification, and TEFRA and PPS updates to RY 2007. The overall aggregate effect, across all hospital groups, is projected to be a 0.2 percent decrease in payments to IPFs. There are distributional effects of these changes among different categories of IPFs. The largest increases will be among government psychiatric hospitals, with rural government hospitals receiving a 12.0 percent increase and urban government hospitals receiving a 10.9 percent increase. Alternatively, psychiatric hospitals and units with fewer than 12 beds will receive the largest decreases of 3.8 percent and 4.5 percent, respectively. Column 7 compares our estimates of the changes reflected in this final rule for RY 2007, to our estimates of payments in the implementation year E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations (without these changes). This column reflects all RY 2007 changes relative to the implementation year (as shown in columns 3 through 6). The average increase for all IPFs is approximately 4.0 percent. This increase includes the effects of the market basket updates resulting in a 4.5 percent increase in total RY 2007 payments. It also includes a 0.3 percent decrease in RY 2007 payments for the standardization factor revision and a 0.2 percent decrease in RY 2007 payments for the transition blend. Overall, the largest payment increase is projected to be among government IPFs. Urban government psychiatric hospitals will receive a 15.4 percent increase and rural government psychiatric hospitals will receive a 16.3 percent increase. Psychiatric hospitals with fewer than 12 beds will receive a 0.6 percent increase and psychiatric units with fewer than 12 beds will receive a 0.5 percent decrease. 4. Effect on the Medicare Program Based on actuarial projections resulting from our experience with other PPSs, we estimate that Medicare spending (total Medicare program payments) for IPF services over the next 5 years would be as follows: TABLE 16.—ESTIMATED PAYMENTS Rate year mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007 .................................. July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008 .................................. July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009 .................................. July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010 .................................. July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 .................................. Dollars in millions 5. Effect on Beneficiaries $4,299 4,427 4,613 4,813 5,033 These estimates are based on the current estimate of increases in the excluded hospital with capital market basket as follows: • 3.4 percent for RY 2007; • 3.1 percent for RY 2008; • 2.8 percent for RY 2009; • 2.3 percent for RY 2010; and • 2.7 percent for RY 2011. We estimate that there would be a change in fee-for-service Medicare beneficiary enrollment as follows: • ¥0.3 percent in RY 2007; • 0.1 percent in RY 2008; • 0.2 percent in RY 2009; • ¥0.3 percent in RY 2010; and • ¥0.2 percent in RY 2011. In the implementation year we estimated aggregate payments under the IPF PPS to equal the estimated aggregate VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 payments that would be made if the IPF PPS were not implemented. Our methodology for estimating payments for purposes of the budget-neutrality calculations uses the best available data. We will evaluate the accuracy of the assumptions used to compute the budget-neutrality calculation in the implementation year. We intend to analyze claims and cost report data from the implementation year of the IPF PPS to determine whether the factors used to develop the Federal per diem base rate are not significantly different from the actual results experienced in that year. We plan to compare payments under the final IPF PPS (which relies on an estimate of cost-based TEFRA payments using historical data from a base year and assumptions that trend the data to the initial implementation period) to estimated cost-based TEFRA payments based on actual data from the first year of the IPF PPS. If we find that an adjustment is necessary, the percent difference (either positive or negative) would be applied prospectively to the established prospective payment rates to ensure the rates accurately reflect the payment levels intended by the statute. Section 124 of Pub. L. 106–113 provides the Secretary broad authority to make an adjustment. We intend to perform this analysis within the first 5 years of the implementation of the IPF PPS. Under the IPF PPS, IPFs will receive payment based on the average resources consumed by patients for each day. We do not expect changes in the quality of care or access to services for Medicare beneficiaries under the IPF PPS. In fact, we believe that access to IPF services will be enhanced due to the patient and facility level adjustment factors, all of which are intended to adequately reimburse IPFs for expensive cases. Finally, the stop-loss policy is intended to assist IPFs during the transition. In addition, we expect that setting payment rates prospectively for IPF services would enhance the efficiency of the Medicare program. 6. Computer Hardware and Software We do not anticipate that IPFs would incur additional systems operating costs in order to effectively participate in the IPF PPS. We believe that IPFs and CAHs possess the computer hardware capability to handle the billing requirements under the IPF PPS. Our belief is based on indications that approximately 99 percent of hospital inpatient claims are submitted electronically. In addition, we are not PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27085 adopting significant changes in claims processing. C. Accounting Statement As required by OMB Circular A–4 (available at https:// www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/ a004/a-4.pdf), in Table 17 below, we have prepared an accounting statement showing the classification of the expenditures associated with the provisions of this final rule. This table provides our best estimate of the increase in Medicare payments under the IPF PPS as a result of the changes presented in this final rule based on the data for 1,806 IPFs in our database. All expenditures are classified as transfers to Medicare providers (that is, IPFs). TABLE 17.—ACCOUNTING STATEMENT: CLASSIFICATION OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES, FROM THE 2006 IPF PPS RY TO THE 2007 IPF PPS RY [In millions] Category Annualized Monetized Transfers. From Whom To Whom?. Transfers $170. Federal Government To IPFs Medicare Providers. D. Alternatives Considered We considered the following alternatives in developing the update to the IPF PPS: One option we considered was incorporating a transition from MSAbased labor market definitions to CBSAbased labor market definitions for the purpose of applying the area wage index. As stated in section VI.C.1.e of this final rule, we are not adopting a transition policy here because IPFs are already in a transition from reasonable cost based reimbursement to IPF PPS payments. In addition, as evident in Table 15 above, the wage index change does not appear to have a large impact on IPFs. We also considered increasing our outlier percentage so that outlier payments would be projected to be 3 percent (or higher) of total PPS payments. However, this approach would not target the truly costly cases. Instead, implementing such a policy would have the effect of lowering the fixed dollar loss threshold amount, therefore spreading outlier payments across more IPFs. In addition, the Federal per diem base rate would have to be reduced by another percentage point. E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27086 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations In this final rule, we used the best available complete data set (that is, FY 2002 claims and cost report data) to assess the impact of the various policy changes. As previously stated, we will not know the true impact of the wage index changes, the transition blend period, or the market basket increases until we analyze IPF PPS data. We considered alternative policies in order to reduce financial risk to facilities in the event that they experience substantial reductions in Medicare payments during the period of transition to the IPF PPS. The stop-loss adjustment is applied to the IPF PPS portion of Medicare payments during the transition. We estimate that about 10 percent of IPFs would receive additional payments under the stop-loss policy. The 70 percent of TEFRA stop-loss policy required a reduction in the per diem rate to make the stop-loss policy budget neutral during the implementation year. As a result, in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we made a reduction to the Federal per diem base rate of 0.4 percent for budget neutrality. In developing this final rule, we again considered an 80 percent stop-loss policy for RY 2007. Adopting an 80 percent policy would require a reduction in the Federal per diem base rate of over 2.5 percent, and we estimate that about 29 percent of IPFs would receive additional payments. We chose to stay with the 70 percent policy for the same reasons discussed in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule. Specifically, the 70 percent stop-loss policy targets the IPFs that experience the greatest impact relative to current payments, and it limits the size of the reduction to the Federal per diem base rate. In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this rule was previously reviewed by OMB. List of Subjects 42 CFR Part 412 Administrative practice and procedure, Health facilities, Medicare, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 42 CFR Part 424 Emergency medical services, Health facilities, Health professions, Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services amends 42 CFR chapter IV as follows: I VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PART 412—PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEMS FOR HOSPITAL SERVICES 1. The authority citation for part 412 is revised to read as follows: I Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh), Sec. 124 of Pub. L. 106–113, 113 Stat. 1515, and Sec. 405 of Pub. L. 108–173, 117 Stat. 2266. 2. Amend § 412.27 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: I § 412.27 Excluded psychiatric units: Additional requirements. * * * * * (b) Furnish, through the use of qualified personnel, psychological services, social work services, psychiatric nursing, and therapeutic activities. * * * * * I 3. Section 412.402 is amended by— I A. Republishing the introductory text. I B. Removing the definition of ‘‘Fixed dollar loss threshold.’’ I C. Adding the definitions of ‘‘Fixed dollar loss threshold amount,’’ and ‘‘new graduate medical education program’’ in alphabetical order. I D. Revising the definitions of ‘‘Qualifying emergency department,’’ ‘‘Rural area,’’ and ‘‘Urban area.’’ The revisions and additions read as follows: § 412.402 Definitions. As used in this subpart— * * * * * Fixed dollar loss threshold amount means a dollar amount which, when added to the Federal payment amount for a case, the estimated costs of a case must exceed in order for the case to qualify for an outlier payment. * * * * * New graduate medical education program means a medical education program that receives initial accreditation by the appropriate accrediting body or begins training residents on or after November 15, 2004. * * * * * Qualifying emergency department means an emergency department that is staffed and equipped to furnish a comprehensive array of emergency services and meeting the definitions of a dedicated emergency department as specified in § 489.24(b) of this chapter and the definition of ‘‘provider-based status’’ as specified in § 413.65 of this chapter. Rural area means for cost reporting periods beginning January 1, 2005, with respect to discharges occurring during the period covered by such cost reports but before July 1, 2006, an area as PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 defined in § 412.62(f)(1)(iii). For discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2006, rural area means an area as defined in § 412.64(b)(1)(ii)(C). Urban area means for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005, with respect to discharges occurring during the period covered by such cost reports but before July 1, 2006, an area as defined in § 412.62(f)(1)(ii). For discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2006, urban area means an area as defined in § 412.64(b)(1)(ii)(A) and § 412.64(b)(1)(ii)(B). I 4. Section 412.424 is amended by— I A. Revising paragraph (d)(l)(iii). I B. Republishing the heading of paragraph (d)(1)(v). I C. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(v)(A). I D. Adding paragraph (d)(2) introductory text. I E. Removing and reserving paragraph (d)(2)(iii). I F. Revising paragraphs (d)(3)(i) introductory text and (d)(3)(i)(A). The revisions and additions read as follows: § 412.424 Methodology for calculating the Federal per diem payment amount. * * * * * (d) * * * (1) * * * (iii) Teaching adjustment. CMS adjusts the Federal per diem base rate by a factor to account for indirect teaching costs. (A) An inpatient psychiatric facility’s teaching adjustment is based on the ratio of the number of full-time equivalent residents training in the inpatient psychiatric facility divided by the facility’s average daily census. (B) Residents with less than full-time status and residents rotating through the inpatient psychiatric facility for less than a full year will be counted in proportion to the time they spend in the inpatient psychiatric facility. (C) Except as described in paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(D) of this section, the actual number of current year full-time equivalent residents used in calculating the teaching adjustment is limited to the number of full-time equivalent residents in the inpatient psychiatric facility’s most recently filed cost report filed with its fiscal intermediary before November 15, 2004 (base year). (D) If the inpatient psychiatric facility first begins training residents in a new approved graduate medical education program after November 15, 2004, the number of full-time equivalent residents determined under paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(C) of this section may be adjusted using the method described in § 413.79(e)(1)(i) and (ii) of this chapter. (E) The teaching adjustment is made on a claim basis as an interim payment, E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations and the final payment in full for the claim is made during the final settlement of the cost report. * * * * * (v) Adjustment for IPF with qualifying emergency departments. (A) CMS adjusts the Federal per diem base rate to account for the costs associated with maintaining a qualifying emergency department. A qualifying emergency department is staffed and equipped to furnish a comprehensive array of emergency services (medical and psychiatric) and meets the requirements of § 489.24(b) and § 413.65 of this chapter. * * * * * (2) Patient-level adjustments. The inpatient psychiatric facility must identify a principal psychiatric diagnosis as specified in § 412.27(a) for each patient. CMS adjusts the Federal per diem base rate by a factor to account for the diagnosis-related group assignment associated with the principal diagnosis, as specified by CMS. * * * * * (3) Other adjustments. (i) Outlier payments. CMS provides an outlier payment if an inpatient psychiatric facility’s estimated total cost for a case exceeds a fixed dollar loss threshold amount for an inpatient psychiatric facility as defined in § 412.402 plus the Federal payment amount for the case. (A) The fixed dollar loss threshold amount is adjusted for the inpatient psychiatric facility’s adjustments for wage area, teaching, rural locations, and cost of living adjustment for facilities located in Alaska and Hawaii. * * * * * § 412.426 [Amended] 5. In § 412.426, paragraph (a) introductory text is amended by removing the reference ‘‘§ 412.424(c)’’ and adding the reference ‘‘§ 412.424(d)’’ in its place. I 6. Section 412.428 is amended by— I A. Republishing the introductory text. I B. Revising paragraph (b) and (d). I C. Adding a new paragraph (g). I D. Adding a new paragraph (h). The revision and additions reads as follows: I PART 424—CONDITIONS FOR MEDICARE PAYMENT mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 § 412.428 Publication of updates to the inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 7. The authority citation for part 424 continues to read as follows: I CMS will publish annually in the Federal Register information pertaining to updates to the inpatient psychiatric facility prospective payment system. This information includes: * * * * * (b)(1) For discharges occurring on or after January 1, 2005 but before July 1, VerDate Aug<31>2005 2006, the rate of increase factor, described in § 412.424(a)(2)(iii), for the Federal portion of the inpatient psychiatric facility’s payment is based on the excluded hospital with capital market basket under the update methodology described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act for each year. (2) For discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2006, the rate of increase factor for the Federal portion of the inpatient psychiatric facility’s payment is based on the Rehabilitation, Psychiatric, and Long-Term Care (RPL) market basket. (3) For discharges occurring on or after January 1, 2005 but before October 1, 2005, the rate of increase factor, described in § 412.424(a)(2)(iii), for the reasonable cost portion of the inpatient psychiatric facility’s payment is based on the 1997-based excluded hospital market basket under the updated methodology described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(ii) of the Act for each year. (4) For discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2005, the rate of increase factor for the reasonable cost portion of the inpatient psychiatric facility’s payment is based on the 2002based excluded hospital market basket. * * * * * (d) Updates to the fixed dollar loss threshold amount in order to maintain the appropriate outlier percentage. * * * * * (g) Update the national urban and rural cost to charge ratio median and ceilings. CMS will apply the national cost to charge ratio to— (1) New inpatient psychiatric facilities that have not submitted their first Medicare cost report. (2) Inpatient psychiatric facilities whose operating or capital cost to charge ratio is in excess of 3 standard deviations above the corresponding national geometric mean. (3) Other inpatient psychiatric facilities for which the fiscal intermediary obtains inaccurate or incomplete data with which to calculate either an operating or capital cost to charge ratio or both. (h) Update the cost of living adjustment factor if appropriate. Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh). I I I I 8. Section 424.14 is amended by— A. Revising the heading. B. Adding a new paragraph (c)(3). C. Revising paragraph (d)(2). PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 27087 The addition and revisions read as follows: § 424.14 Requirements for inpatient services of inpatient psychiatric facilities. * * * * * (c) * * * (3) The patient continues to need, on a daily basis, active inpatient psychiatric care (furnished directly by or requiring the supervision of inpatient psychiatric facility personnel) or other professional services that can only be provided on an inpatient basis. (d) * * * (2) The first recertification is required as of the 12th day of hospitalization. Subsequent recertifications are required at intervals established by the UR committee (on a case-by-case basis if it so chooses), but no less frequently than every 30 days. * * * * * (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance Program) (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare—Supplementary Medical Insurance Program) Dated: April 19, 2006. Mark B. McClellan, Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Approved: April 28, 2006. Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary. Addendum A—Rate and Adjustment Factors PER DIEM RATE Federal Per Diem Base Rate ....... Labor Share (0.75665) ................. Non-Labor Share (0.24335) ......... $595.09 450.27 144.82 FIXED DOLLAR LOSS THRESHOLD AMOUNT $6200 FACILITY ADJUSTMENTS Rural Adjustment Factor. Teaching Adjustment Factor. Wage Index ............... 1.17. 0.5150. Pre-reclass Hospital Wage Index (FY2006). COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENTS (COLAS) Alaska ........................................... Hawaii: E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 1.25 27088 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENTS (COLAS)—Continued Honolulu County .................... Hawaii County ....................... Kauai County ......................... Maui County .......................... Kalawao County .................... VARIABLE PER DIEM ADJUSTMENTS— Continued 1.25 1.165 1.2325 1.2375 1.2375 PATIENT ADJUSTMENTS ECT—Per Treatment .................... $256.20 VARIABLE PER DIEM ADJUSTMENTS Adjustment factor Day 1—Facility Without a Qualifying Emergency Department ................................ Day 1—Facility With a Qualifying Emergency Department 1.19 1.31 VARIABLE PER DIEM ADJUSTMENTS— Continued Adjustment factor Adjustment factor Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day 2 ........................................ 3 ........................................ 4 ........................................ 5 ........................................ 6 ........................................ 7 ........................................ 8 ........................................ 9 ........................................ 10 ...................................... 11 ...................................... 12 ...................................... 13 ...................................... 14 ...................................... 15 ...................................... 16 ...................................... 17 ...................................... 18 ...................................... 19 ...................................... 20 ...................................... 1.12 1.08 1.05 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.95 Day 21 ...................................... After Day 21 ............................. 0.95 0.92 AGE ADJUSTMENTS Adjustment factor Age (in years) Under 45 ................................... 45 and under 50 ....................... 50 and under 55 ....................... 55 and under 60 ....................... 60 and under 65 ....................... 65 and under 70 ....................... 70 and under 75 ....................... 75 and under 80 ....................... 80 and over .............................. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.04 1.07 1.10 1.13 1.15 1.17 DRG ADJUSTMENTS DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG DRG 424 ........... 425 ........... 426 ........... 427 ........... 428 ........... 429 ........... 430 ........... 431 ........... 432 ........... 433 ........... 521 ........... 522 ........... 523 ........... 12 ............. 23 ............. O.R. Procedure with Principal Diagnosis of Mental Illness ..................................................................................... Acute Adjustment Reaction & Psychosocial Dysfunction ........................................................................................ Depressive Neurosis ................................................................................................................................................ Neurosis, Except Depressive ................................................................................................................................... Disorders of Personality & Impulse Control ............................................................................................................. Organic Disturbances & Mental Retardation ........................................................................................................... Psychosis ................................................................................................................................................................. Childhood Mental Disorders ..................................................................................................................................... Other Mental Disorders Diagnoses .......................................................................................................................... Alcohol/Drug Abuse or Dependence Leave Against Medical Advice (LAMA) ........................................................ Alcohol/Drug Abuse or Dependence with Comorbid Conditions ............................................................................. Alcohol/Drug Abuse or Dependence with Rehabilitation Therapy without Comorbid Conditions ........................... Alcohol/Drug Abuse or Dependence without Rehabilitation Therapy ...................................................................... Degenerative Nervous System Disorders without Comorbid Conditions ................................................................ Non-traumatic Stupor & Coma ................................................................................................................................. COMORBIDITY ADJUSTMENTS Comorbidity COMORBIDITY ADJUSTMENTS— Continued Adjustment factor mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 1.04 1.13 1.06 1.12 1.07 1.11 1.11 1.07 1.05 Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition ................................. Drug/Alcohol Induced Mental Disorders ............................... Cardiac Conditions ................... Gangrene .................................. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ................................. County name Autauga County, Alabama .................................................... Baldwin County, Alabama ..................................................... Barbour County, Alabama ..................................................... Bibb County, Alabama .......................................................... Blount County, Alabama ....................................................... Bullock County, Alabama ...................................................... Butler County, Alabama ........................................................ Calhoun County, Alabama .................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 1.13 1.03 1.11 1.10 1.12 MSA No. Frm 00050 Fmt 4701 5240 5160 01 01 1000 01 01 0450 Sfmt 4700 1.22 1.05 0.99 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.00 0.99 0.92 0.97 1.02 0.98 0.88 1.05 1.07 COMORBIDITY ADJUSTMENTS— Continued Adjustment factor Comorbidity Developmental Disabilities ....... Coagulation Factor Deficit ........ Tracheostomy ........................... Eating and Conduct Disorders Infectious Diseases .................. Renal Failure, Acute ................. Renal Failure, Chronic .............. Oncology Treatment ................. Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus with or without Complications 01000 01010 01020 01030 01040 01050 01060 01070 Adjustment factor DRG definition MSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Adjustment factor Comorbidity Artificial Openings - Digestive & Urinary ................................... Severe Musculoskeletal & Connective Tissue Diseases ....... Poisoning .................................. 1.08 1.09 1.11 Addendum B—RY 2007 IPF PPS Wage Index Table 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8618 0.7861 0.7432 0.7432 0.9000 0.7432 0.7432 0.7682 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 33860 99901 99901 13820 13820 99901 99901 11500 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8618 0.7446 0.7446 0.8959 0.8959 0.7446 0.7446 0.7682 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 01080 01090 01100 01110 01120 01130 01140 01150 01160 01170 01180 01190 01200 01210 01220 01230 01240 01250 01260 01270 01280 01290 01300 01310 01320 01330 01340 01350 01360 01370 01380 01390 01400 01410 01420 01430 01440 01450 01460 01470 01480 01490 01500 01510 01520 01530 01540 01550 01560 01570 01580 01590 01600 01610 01620 01630 01640 01650 01660 02013 02016 02020 02030 02040 02050 02060 02068 02070 02080 02090 02100 02110 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Chambers County, Alabama ................................................. Cherokee County, Alabama .................................................. Chilton County, Alabama ...................................................... Choctaw County, Alabama ................................................... Clarke County, Alabama ....................................................... Clay County, Alabama .......................................................... Cleburne County, Alabama ................................................... Coffee County, Alabama ....................................................... Colbert County, Alabama ...................................................... Conecuh County, Alabama ................................................... Coosa County, Alabama ....................................................... Covington County, Alabama ................................................. Crenshaw County, Alabama ................................................. Cullman County, Alabama .................................................... Dale County, Alabama .......................................................... Dallas County, Alabama ....................................................... De Kalb County, Alabama .................................................... Elmore County, Alabama ...................................................... Escambia County, Alabama .................................................. Etowah County, Alabama ..................................................... Fayette County, Alabama ..................................................... Franklin County, Alabama ..................................................... Geneva County, Alabama ..................................................... Greene County, Alabama ..................................................... Hale County, Alabama .......................................................... Henry County, Alabama ........................................................ Houston County, Alabama .................................................... Jackson County, Alabama .................................................... Jefferson County, Alabama ................................................... Lamar County, Alabama ....................................................... Lauderdale County, Alabama ............................................... Lawrence County, Alabama .................................................. Lee County, Alabama ........................................................... Limestone County, Alabama ................................................. Lowndes County, Alabama ................................................... Macon County, Alabama ....................................................... Madison County, Alabama .................................................... Marengo County, Alabama ................................................... Marion County, Alabama ...................................................... Marshall County, Alabama .................................................... Mobile County, Alabama ....................................................... Monroe County, Alabama ..................................................... Montgomery County, Alabama ............................................. Morgan County, Alabama ..................................................... Perry County, Alabama ......................................................... Pickens County, Alabama ..................................................... Pike County, Alabama .......................................................... Randolph County, Alabama .................................................. Russell County, Alabama ...................................................... St Clair County, Alabama ..................................................... Shelby County, Alabama ...................................................... Sumter County, Alabama ...................................................... Talladega County, Alabama .................................................. Tallapoosa County, Alabama ................................................ Tuscaloosa County, Alabama ............................................... Walker County, Alabama ...................................................... Washington County, Alabama .............................................. Wilcox County, Alabama ....................................................... Winston County, Alabama .................................................... Aleutians County East, Alaska .............................................. Aleutians County West, Alaska ............................................. Anchorage County, Alaska ................................................... Angoon County, Alaska ........................................................ Barrow-North Slope County, Alaska ..................................... Bethel County, Alaska ........................................................... Bristol Bay Borough County, Alaska ..................................... Denali County, Alaska ........................................................... Bristol Bay County, Alaska ................................................... Cordova-Mc Carthy County, Alaska ..................................... Fairbanks County, Alaska ..................................................... Haines County, Alaska .......................................................... Juneau County, Alaska ......................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4701 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 2650 01 01 01 01 01 2180 01 01 5240 01 2880 01 01 01 01 01 01 2180 01 1000 01 2650 2030 0580 3440 01 01 3440 01 01 01 5160 01 5240 2030 01 01 01 01 1800 1000 1000 01 01 01 8600 01 01 01 01 02 02 0380 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.8272 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7701 0.7432 0.7432 0.8618 0.7432 0.7938 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7701 0.7432 0.9000 0.7432 0.8272 0.8469 0.8100 0.9146 0.7432 0.7432 0.9146 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7861 0.7432 0.8618 0.8469 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.8560 0.9000 0.9000 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.8764 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 0.7432 1.1888 1.1888 1.1784 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99901 99901 13820 99901 99901 99901 99901 99901 22520 99901 99901 99901 99901 99901 99901 99901 99901 33860 99901 23460 99901 99901 20020 46220 46220 20020 20020 99901 13820 99901 22520 19460 12220 26620 33860 99901 26620 99901 99901 99901 33660 99901 33860 19460 99901 99901 99901 99901 17980 13820 13820 99901 99901 99901 46220 13820 99901 99901 99901 99902 99902 11260 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 21820 99902 99902 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural 27089 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7446 0.7446 0.8959 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.8272 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.8618 0.7446 0.7938 0.7446 0.7446 0.7721 0.8645 0.8645 0.7721 0.7721 0.7446 0.8959 0.7446 0.8272 0.8469 0.8100 0.9146 0.8618 0.7446 0.9146 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.7891 0.7446 0.8618 0.8469 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.8560 0.8959 0.8959 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 0.8645 0.8959 0.7446 0.7446 0.7446 1.1977 1.1977 1.1895 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1408 1.1977 1.1977 27090 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 02120 02122 02130 02140 02150 02160 02164 02170 02180 02185 02188 02190 02200 02201 02210 02220 02230 02231 02232 02240 02250 02260 02261 02270 02280 02282 02290 03000 03010 03020 03030 03040 03050 03055 03060 03070 03080 03090 03100 03110 03120 03130 04000 04010 04020 04030 04040 04050 04060 04070 04080 04090 04100 04110 04120 04130 04140 04150 04160 04170 04180 04190 04200 04210 04220 04230 04240 04250 04260 04270 04280 04290 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Kenai-Cook Inlet County, Alaska .......................................... Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska ........................................ Ketchikan County, Alaska ..................................................... Kobuk County, Alaska ........................................................... Kodiak County, Alaska .......................................................... Kuskokwin County, Alaska .................................................... Lake and Peninsula Borough, Alaska ................................... Matanuska County, Alaska ................................................... Nome County, Alaska ........................................................... North Slope Borough, Alaska ............................................... Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska ........................................ Outer Ketchikan County, Alaska ........................................... Prince Of Wales County, Alaska .......................................... Prince of Wales-Outer Ketchikan Census Area, Alaska ...... Seward County, Alaska ......................................................... Sitka County, Alaska ............................................................. Skagway-Yakutat County, Alaska ......................................... Skagway-Yakutat-Angoon Census Area, Alaska .................. Skagway-Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, Alaska ................. Southeast Fairbanks County, Alaska .................................... Upper Yukon County, Alaska ................................................ Valdz-Chitna-Whitier County, Alaska .................................... Valdex-Cordove Census Area, Alaska ................................. Wade Hampton County, Alaska ............................................ Wrangell-Petersburg County, Alaska .................................... Yakutat Borough, Alaska ...................................................... Yukon-Koyukuk County, Alaska ............................................ Apache County, Arizona ....................................................... Cochise County, Arizona ...................................................... Coconino County, Arizona .................................................... Gila County, Arizona ............................................................. Graham County, Arizona ...................................................... Greenlee County, Arizona ..................................................... La Paz County, Arizona ........................................................ Maricopa County, Arizona ..................................................... Mohave County, Arizona ....................................................... Navajo County, Arizona ........................................................ Pima County, Arizona ........................................................... Pinal County, Arizona ........................................................... Santa Cruz County, Arizona ................................................. Yavapai County, Arizona ...................................................... Yuma County, Arizona .......................................................... Arkansas County, Arkansas .................................................. Ashley County, Arkansas ...................................................... Baxter County, Arkansas ...................................................... Benton County, Arkansas ..................................................... Boone County, Arkansas ...................................................... Bradley County, Arkansas .................................................... Calhoun County, Arkansas ................................................... Carroll County, Arkansas ...................................................... Chicot County, Arkansas ...................................................... Clark County, Arkansas ........................................................ Clay County, Arkansas ......................................................... Cleburne County, Arkansas .................................................. Cleveland County, Arkansas ................................................. Columbia County, Arkansas ................................................. Conway County, Arkansas .................................................... Craighead County, Arkansas ................................................ Crawford County, Arkansas .................................................. Crittenden County, Arkansas ................................................ Cross County, Arkansas ....................................................... Dallas County, Arkansas ....................................................... Desha County, Arkansas ...................................................... Drew County, Arkansas ........................................................ Faulkner County, Arkansas ................................................... Franklin County, Arkansas .................................................... Fulton County, Arkansas ....................................................... Garland County, Arkansas .................................................... Grant County, Arkansas ........................................................ Greene County, Arkansas ..................................................... Hempstead County, Arkansas .............................................. Hot Spring County, Arkansas ............................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4701 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 03 03 2620 03 03 03 03 6200 4120 03 8520 6200 03 03 9360 04 04 04 2580 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 3700 2720 4920 04 04 04 04 4400 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 1.1888 0.9045 0.9045 1.1845 0.9045 0.9045 0.9045 0.9045 1.0127 1.1155 0.9045 0.9007 1.0127 0.9045 0.9045 0.9126 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.8661 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7911 0.8246 0.9416 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.8747 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 11260 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99902 99903 99903 22380 99903 99903 99903 99903 38060 99903 99903 46060 38060 99903 39140 49740 99904 99904 99904 22220 99904 99904 99904 99904 99904 99904 99904 99904 38220 99904 99904 27860 22900 32820 99904 99904 99904 99904 30780 22900 99904 26300 30780 99904 99904 99904 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1895 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 1.1977 0.8768 0.8768 1.2092 0.8768 0.8768 0.8768 0.8768 1.0127 0.8768 0.8768 0.9007 1.0127 0.8768 0.9869 0.9126 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.8661 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.8680 0.7466 0.7466 0.7911 0.8230 0.9397 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.8747 0.8230 0.7466 0.9005 0.8747 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 04300 04310 04320 04330 04340 04350 04360 04370 04380 04390 04400 04410 04420 04430 04440 04450 04460 04470 04480 04490 04500 04510 04520 04530 04540 04550 04560 04570 04580 04590 04600 04610 04620 04630 04640 04650 04660 04670 04680 04690 04700 04710 04720 04730 04740 05000 05010 05020 05030 05040 05050 05060 05070 05080 05090 05100 05110 05120 05130 05140 05150 05160 05170 05200 05210 05300 05310 05320 05330 05340 05350 05360 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Howard County, Arkansas .................................................... Independence County, Arkansas .......................................... Izard County, Arkansas ......................................................... Jackson County, Arkansas ................................................... Jefferson County, Arkansas .................................................. Johnson County, Arkansas ................................................... Lafayette County, Arkansas .................................................. Lawrence County, Arkansas ................................................. Lee County, Arkansas ........................................................... Lincoln County, Arkansas ..................................................... Little River County, Arkansas ............................................... Logan County, Arkansas ....................................................... Lonoke County, Arkansas ..................................................... Madison County, Arkansas ................................................... Marion County, Arkansas ...................................................... Miller County, Arkansas ........................................................ Mississippi County, Arkansas ............................................... Monroe County, Arkansas .................................................... Montgomery County, Arkansas ............................................. Nevada County, Arkansas .................................................... Newton County, Arkansas .................................................... Ouachita County, Arkansas .................................................. Perry County, Arkansas ........................................................ Phillips County, Arkansas ..................................................... Pike County, Arkansas .......................................................... Poinsett County, Arkansas .................................................... Polk County, Arkansas .......................................................... Pope County, Arkansas ........................................................ Prairie County, Arkansas ...................................................... Pulaski County, Arkansas ..................................................... Randolph County, Arkansas ................................................. St Francis County, Arkansas ................................................ Saline County, Arkansas ....................................................... Scott County, Arkansas ........................................................ Searcy County, Arkansas ..................................................... Sebastian County, Arkansas ................................................. Sevier County, Arkansas ...................................................... Sharp County, Arkansas ....................................................... Stone County, Arkansas ....................................................... Union County, Arkansas ....................................................... Van Buren County, Arkansas ............................................... Washington County, Arkansas .............................................. White County, Arkansas ....................................................... Woodruff County, Arkansas .................................................. Yell County, Arkansas ........................................................... Alameda County, California .................................................. Alpine County, California ...................................................... Amador County, California .................................................... Butte County, California ........................................................ Calaveras County, California ................................................ Colusa County, California ..................................................... Contra Costa County, California ........................................... Del Norte County, California ................................................. Eldorado County, California .................................................. Fresno County, California ..................................................... Glenn County, California ....................................................... Humboldt County, California ................................................. Imperial County, California .................................................... Inyo County, California .......................................................... Kern County, California ......................................................... Kings County, California ....................................................... Lake County, California ......................................................... Lassen County, California ..................................................... Los Angeles County, California ............................................ Los Angeles County, California ............................................ Madera County, California .................................................... Marin County, California ....................................................... Mariposa County, California .................................................. Mendocino County, California ............................................... Merced County, California .................................................... Modoc County, California ...................................................... Mono County, California ....................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4701 04 04 04 04 6240 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 4400 04 04 8360 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 4400 04 04 4400 04 04 2720 04 04 04 04 04 2580 04 04 04 5775 05 05 1620 05 05 5775 05 6920 2840 05 05 05 05 0680 05 05 05 4480 4480 2840 7360 05 05 4940 05 05 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.8680 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.8747 0.7744 0.7744 0.8283 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.8747 0.7744 0.7744 0.8747 0.7744 0.7744 0.8246 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 0.8661 0.7744 0.7744 0.7744 1.5346 1.0775 1.0775 1.0511 1.0775 1.0775 1.5346 1.0775 1.3143 1.0428 1.0775 1.0775 1.0775 1.0775 1.0470 1.0775 1.0775 1.0775 1.1783 1.1783 1.0428 1.4994 1.0775 1.0775 1.1109 1.0775 1.0775 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99904 99904 99904 99904 38220 99904 99904 99904 99904 38220 99904 99904 30780 22220 99904 45500 99904 99904 99904 99904 99904 99904 30780 99904 99904 27860 99904 99904 99904 30780 99904 99904 30780 99904 99904 22900 99904 99904 99904 99904 99904 22220 99904 99904 99904 36084 99905 99905 17020 99905 99905 36084 99905 40900 23420 99905 99905 20940 99905 12540 25260 99905 99905 31084 31084 31460 41884 99905 99905 32900 99905 99905 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural 27091 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.8680 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.8680 0.7466 0.7466 0.8747 0.8661 0.7466 0.8283 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.8747 0.7466 0.7466 0.7911 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.8747 0.7466 0.7466 0.8747 0.7466 0.7466 0.8230 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 0.8661 0.7466 0.7466 0.7466 1.5346 1.1054 1.1054 1.0511 1.1054 1.1054 1.5346 1.1054 1.2969 1.0538 1.1054 1.1054 0.8906 1.1054 1.0470 1.0036 1.1054 1.1054 1.1783 1.1783 0.8713 1.4994 1.1054 1.1054 1.1109 1.1054 1.1054 27092 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 05370 05380 05390 05400 05410 05420 05430 05440 05450 05460 05470 05480 05490 05500 05510 05520 05530 05540 05550 05560 05570 05580 05590 05600 05610 05620 05630 05640 05650 05660 05670 05680 06000 06010 06020 06030 06040 06050 06060 06070 06080 06090 06100 06110 06120 06130 06140 06150 06160 06170 06180 06190 06200 06210 06220 06230 06240 06250 06260 06270 06280 06290 06300 06310 06320 06330 06340 06350 06360 06370 06380 06390 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Monterey County, California ................................................. Napa County, California ........................................................ Nevada County, California .................................................... Orange County, California .................................................... Placer County, California ...................................................... Plumas County, California .................................................... Riverside County, California ................................................. Sacramento County, California ............................................. San Benito County, California ............................................... San Bernardino County, California ....................................... San Diego County, California ............................................... San Francisco County, California ......................................... San Joaquin County, California ............................................ San Luis Obispo County, California ...................................... San Mateo County, California ............................................... Santa Barbara County, California ......................................... Santa Clara County, California ............................................. Santa Cruz County, California .............................................. Shasta County, California ..................................................... Sierra County, California ....................................................... Siskiyou County, California ................................................... Solano County, California ..................................................... Sonoma County, California ................................................... Stanislaus County, California ................................................ Sutter County, California ....................................................... Tehama County, California ................................................... Trinity County, California ....................................................... Tulare County, California ...................................................... Tuolumne County, California ................................................ Ventura County, California .................................................... Yolo County, California ......................................................... Yuba County, California ........................................................ Adams County, Colorado ...................................................... Alamosa County, Colorado ................................................... Arapahoe County, Colorado ................................................. Archuleta County, Colorado .................................................. Baca County, Colorado ......................................................... Bent County, Colorado .......................................................... Boulder County, Colorado ..................................................... Chaffee County, Colorado .................................................... Cheyenne County, Colorado ................................................. Clear Creek County, Colorado .............................................. Conejos County, Colorado .................................................... Costilla County, Colorado ..................................................... Crowley County, Colorado .................................................... Custer County, Colorado ...................................................... Delta County, Colorado ......................................................... Denver County, Colorado ..................................................... Dolores County, Colorado ..................................................... Douglas County, Colorado .................................................... Eagle County, Colorado ........................................................ Elbert County, Colorado ........................................................ El Paso County, Colorado .................................................... Fremont County, Colorado .................................................... Garfield County, Colorado .................................................... Gilpin County, Colorado ........................................................ Grand County, Colorado ....................................................... Gunnison County, Colorado .................................................. Hinsdale County, Colorado ................................................... Huerfano County, Colorado .................................................. Jackson County, Colorado .................................................... Jefferson County, Colorado .................................................. Kiowa County, Colorado ....................................................... Kit Carson County, Colorado ................................................ Lake County, Colorado ......................................................... La Plata County, Colorado .................................................... Larimer County, Colorado ..................................................... Las Animas County, Colorado .............................................. Lincoln County, Colorado ...................................................... Logan County, Colorado ....................................................... Mesa County, Colorado ........................................................ Mineral County, Colorado ..................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4701 7120 8720 05 5945 6920 05 6780 6920 05 6780 7320 7360 8120 7460 7360 7480 7400 7485 6690 05 05 8720 7500 5170 9340 05 05 8780 05 8735 9270 9340 2080 06 2080 06 06 06 1125 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 2080 06 2080 06 06 1720 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 2080 06 06 06 06 2670 06 06 06 2995 06 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 1.4128 1.3983 1.0775 1.1559 1.3143 1.0775 1.1027 1.3143 1.0775 1.1027 1.1413 1.4994 1.1307 1.1349 1.4994 1.1694 1.5118 1.5166 1.2203 1.0775 1.0775 1.3983 1.3493 1.1885 1.0921 1.0775 1.0775 1.0123 1.0775 1.1622 0.9950 1.0921 1.0723 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9734 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 0.9380 0.9468 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0122 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9550 0.9380 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 41500 34900 99905 42044 40900 99905 40140 40900 41940 40140 41740 41884 44700 42020 41884 42060 41940 42100 39820 99905 99905 46700 42220 33700 49700 99905 99905 47300 99905 37100 40900 49700 19740 99906 19740 99906 99906 99906 14500 99906 99906 19740 99906 99906 99906 99906 99906 19740 99906 19740 99906 19740 17820 99906 99906 19740 99906 99906 99906 99906 99906 19740 99906 99906 99906 99906 22660 99906 99906 99906 24300 99906 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 1.4128 1.2643 1.1054 1.1559 1.2969 1.1054 1.1027 1.2969 1.5099 1.1027 1.1413 1.4994 1.1307 1.1349 1.4994 1.1694 1.5099 1.5166 1.2203 1.1054 1.1054 1.4936 1.3493 1.1885 1.0921 1.1054 1.1054 1.0123 1.1054 1.1622 1.2969 1.0921 1.0723 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9734 0.9380 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 1.0723 0.9468 0.9380 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0122 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9550 0.9380 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 06400 06410 06420 06430 06440 06450 06460 06470 06480 06490 06500 06510 06520 06530 06540 06550 06560 06570 06580 06590 06600 06610 06620 06630 07000 07010 07020 07030 07040 07050 07060 07070 08000 08010 08020 09000 10000 10010 10020 10030 10040 10050 10060 10070 10080 10090 10100 10110 10120 10130 10140 10150 10160 10170 10180 10190 10200 10210 10220 10230 10240 10250 10260 10270 10280 10290 10300 10310 10320 10330 10340 10350 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Moffat County, Colorado ....................................................... Montezuma County, Colorado .............................................. Montrose County, Colorado .................................................. Morgan County, Colorado ..................................................... Otero County, Colorado ........................................................ Ouray County, Colorado ....................................................... Park County, Colorado .......................................................... Phillips County, Colorado ...................................................... Pitkin County, Colorado ........................................................ Prowers County, Colorado .................................................... Pueblo County, Colorado ...................................................... Rio Blanco County, Colorado ............................................... Rio Grande County, Colorado .............................................. Routt County, Colorado ........................................................ Saguache County, Colorado ................................................. San Juan County, Colorado .................................................. San Miguel County, Colorado ............................................... Sedgwick County, Colorado .................................................. Summit County, Colorado ..................................................... Teller County, Colorado ........................................................ Washington County, Colorado .............................................. Weld County, Colorado ......................................................... Yuma County, Colorado ........................................................ Broomfield County, Colorado ................................................ Fairfield County, Connecticut ................................................ Hartford County, Connecticut ................................................ Litchfield County, Connecticut .............................................. Middlesex County, Connecticut ............................................ New Haven County, Connecticut .......................................... New London County, Connecticut ........................................ Tolland County, Connecticut ................................................. Windham County, Connecticut ............................................. Kent County, Delaware ......................................................... New Castle County, Delaware .............................................. Sussex County, Delaware ..................................................... Washington Dc County, Dist Of Col ..................................... Alachua County, Florida ........................................................ Baker County, Florida ........................................................... Bay County, Florida .............................................................. Bradford County, Florida ....................................................... Brevard County, Florida ........................................................ Broward County, Florida ....................................................... Calhoun County, Florida ....................................................... Charlotte County, Florida ...................................................... Citrus County, Florida ........................................................... Clay County, Florida ............................................................. Collier County, Florida .......................................................... Columbia County, Florida ..................................................... Dade County, Florida ............................................................ De Soto County, Florida ....................................................... Dixie County, Florida ............................................................. Duval County, Florida ........................................................... Escambia County, Florida ..................................................... Flagler County, Florida .......................................................... Franklin County, Florida ........................................................ Gadsden County, Florida ...................................................... Gilchrist County, Florida ........................................................ Glades County, Florida ......................................................... Gulf County, Florida .............................................................. Hamilton County, Florida ...................................................... Hardee County, Florida ......................................................... Hendry County, Florida ......................................................... Hernando County, Florida ..................................................... Highlands County, Florida ..................................................... Hillsborough County, Florida ................................................. Holmes County, Florida ........................................................ Indian River County, Florida ................................................. Jackson County, Florida ....................................................... Jefferson County, Florida ...................................................... Lafayette County, Florida ...................................................... Lake County, Florida ............................................................. Lee County, Florida ............................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4701 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 6560 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 3060 06 2080 5483 3283 3283 3283 5483 5523 3283 07 2190 9160 08 8840 2900 10 6015 10 4900 2680 10 6580 10 3600 5345 10 5000 10 10 3600 6080 2020 10 8240 10 10 10 10 10 10 8280 10 8280 10 10 10 10 10 5960 2700 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.8623 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9570 0.9380 1.0723 1.2196 1.1073 1.1073 1.1073 1.2196 1.1345 1.1073 1.1730 0.9776 1.0527 0.9579 1.0976 0.9388 0.8677 0.8005 0.8677 0.9839 1.0432 0.8677 0.9255 0.8677 0.9299 1.0139 0.8677 0.9750 0.8677 0.8677 0.9299 0.8096 0.9325 0.8677 0.8688 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.9233 0.8677 0.9233 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.9464 0.9356 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99906 99906 99906 99906 99906 99906 19740 99906 99906 99906 39380 99906 99906 99906 99906 99906 99906 99906 99906 17820 99906 24540 99906 19740 14860 25540 25540 25540 35300 35980 25540 99907 20100 48864 99908 47894 23540 27260 37460 99910 37340 22744 99910 39460 99910 27260 34940 99910 33124 99910 99910 27260 37860 99910 99910 45220 23540 99910 99910 99910 99910 99910 45300 99910 45300 99910 42680 99910 45220 99910 36740 15980 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban 27093 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 1.0723 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.8623 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9380 0.9468 0.9380 0.9570 0.9380 1.0723 1.2592 1.1073 1.1073 1.1073 1.1887 1.1345 1.1073 1.1730 0.9776 1.0471 0.9579 1.0926 0.9388 0.9290 0.8005 0.8568 0.9839 1.0432 0.8568 0.9255 0.8568 0.9290 1.0139 0.8568 0.9750 0.8568 0.8568 0.9290 0.8096 0.8568 0.8568 0.8688 0.9388 0.8568 0.8568 0.8568 0.8568 0.8568 0.9233 0.8568 0.9233 0.8568 0.9434 0.8568 0.8688 0.8568 0.9464 0.9356 27094 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 10360 10370 10380 10390 10400 10410 10420 10430 10440 10450 10460 10470 10480 10490 10500 10510 10520 10530 10540 10550 10560 10570 10580 10590 10600 10610 10620 10630 10640 10650 10660 11000 11010 11011 11020 11030 11040 11050 11060 11070 11080 11090 11100 11110 11120 11130 11140 11150 11160 11161 11170 11180 11190 11200 11210 11220 11230 11240 11250 11260 11270 11280 11281 11290 11291 11300 11310 11311 11320 11330 11340 11341 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Leon County, Florida ............................................................. Levy County, Florida ............................................................. Liberty County, Florida .......................................................... Madison County, Florida ....................................................... Manatee County, Florida ....................................................... Marion County, Florida .......................................................... Martin County, Florida ........................................................... Monroe County, Florida ........................................................ Nassau County, Florida ........................................................ Okaloosa County, Florida ..................................................... Okeechobee County, Florida ................................................ Orange County, Florida ......................................................... Osceola County, Florida ....................................................... Palm Beach County, Florida ................................................. Pasco County, Florida ........................................................... Pinellas County, Florida ........................................................ Polk County, Florida .............................................................. Putnam County, Florida ........................................................ Johns County, Florida ........................................................... St Lucie County, Florida ....................................................... Santa Rosa County, Florida .................................................. Sarasota County, Florida ...................................................... Seminole County, Florida ...................................................... Sumter County, Florida ......................................................... Suwannee County, Florida .................................................... Taylor County, Florida ........................................................... Union County, Florida ........................................................... Volusia County, Florida ......................................................... Wakulla County, Florida ........................................................ Walton County, Florida ......................................................... Washington County, Florida .................................................. Appling County, Georgia ....................................................... Atkinson County, Georgia ..................................................... Bacon County, Georgia ......................................................... Baker County, Georgia ......................................................... Baldwin County, Georgia ...................................................... Banks County, Georgia ......................................................... Barrow County, Georgia ....................................................... Bartow County, Georgia ........................................................ Ben Hill County, Georgia ...................................................... Berrien County, Georgia ....................................................... Bibb County, Georgia ............................................................ Bleckley County, Georgia ..................................................... Brantley County, Georgia ...................................................... Brooks County, Georgia ........................................................ Bryan County, Georgia ......................................................... Bulloch County, Georgia ....................................................... Burke County, Georgia ......................................................... Butts County, Georgia ........................................................... Calhoun County, Georgia ..................................................... Camden County, Georgia ..................................................... Candler County, Georgia ...................................................... Carroll County, Georgia ........................................................ Catoosa County, Georgia ..................................................... Charlton County, Georgia ..................................................... Chatham County, Georgia .................................................... Chattahoochee County, Georgia .......................................... Chattooga County, Georgia .................................................. Cherokee County, Georgia ................................................... Clarke County, Georgia ........................................................ Clay County, Georgia ............................................................ Clayton County, Georgia ....................................................... Clinch County, Georgia ......................................................... Cobb County, Georgia .......................................................... Coffee County, Georgia ........................................................ Colquitt County, Georgia ....................................................... Columbia County, Georgia .................................................... Cook County, Georgia .......................................................... Coweta County, Georgia ....................................................... Crawford County, Georgia .................................................... Crisp County, Georgia .......................................................... Dade County, Georgia .......................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4701 8240 10 10 10 7510 5790 2710 10 3600 2750 10 5960 5960 8960 8280 8280 3980 10 3600 2710 6080 7510 5960 10 10 10 10 2020 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 0520 0520 11 11 4680 11 11 11 7520 11 11 11 11 11 11 0520 1560 11 7520 1800 11 0520 0500 11 0520 11 0520 11 11 0600 11 0520 11 11 1560 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8688 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.9639 0.8925 1.0123 0.8677 0.9299 0.8872 0.8677 0.9464 0.9464 1.0067 0.9233 0.9233 0.8912 0.8677 0.9299 1.0123 0.8096 0.9639 0.9464 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.9325 0.8677 0.8677 0.8677 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9793 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.9277 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9461 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9793 0.9088 0.8166 0.9461 0.8560 0.8166 0.9793 0.9855 0.8166 0.9793 0.8166 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.9808 0.8166 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.9088 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 45220 99910 99910 99910 42260 36100 38940 99910 27260 23020 99910 36740 36740 48424 45300 45300 29460 99910 27260 38940 37860 42260 36740 99910 99910 99910 99910 19660 45220 99910 99910 99911 99911 99911 10500 99911 99911 12060 12060 99911 99911 31420 99911 15260 46660 42340 99911 12260 12060 99911 99911 99911 12060 16860 99911 42340 17980 99911 12060 12020 99911 12060 99911 12060 99911 99911 12260 99911 12060 31420 99911 16860 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8688 0.8568 0.8568 0.8568 0.9639 0.8925 1.0123 0.8568 0.9290 0.8872 0.8568 0.9464 0.9464 1.0067 0.9233 0.9233 0.8912 0.8568 0.9290 1.0123 0.8096 0.9639 0.9464 0.8568 0.8568 0.8568 0.8568 0.9299 0.8688 0.8568 0.8568 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.8628 0.7662 0.7662 0.9793 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.9443 0.7662 0.9311 0.8866 0.9461 0.7662 0.9748 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.9793 0.9088 0.7662 0.9461 0.8560 0.7662 0.9793 0.9855 0.7662 0.9793 0.7662 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.9748 0.7662 0.9793 0.9443 0.7662 0.9088 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 11350 11360 11370 11380 11381 11390 11400 11410 11420 11421 11430 11440 11441 11450 11451 11460 11461 11462 11470 11471 11480 11490 11500 11510 11520 11530 11540 11550 11560 11570 11580 11581 11590 11591 11600 11601 11610 11611 11612 11620 11630 11640 11650 11651 11652 11660 11670 11680 11690 11691 11700 11701 11702 11703 11710 11720 11730 11740 11741 11750 11760 11770 11771 11772 11780 11790 11800 11801 11810 11811 11812 11820 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Dawson County, Georgia ...................................................... Decatur County, Georgia ...................................................... De Kalb County, Georgia ...................................................... Dodge County, Georgia ........................................................ Dooly County, Georgia .......................................................... Dougherty County, Georgia .................................................. Douglas County, Georgia ...................................................... Early County, Georgia ........................................................... Echols County, Georgia ........................................................ Effingham County, Georgia ................................................... Elbert County, Georgia ......................................................... Emanuel County, Georgia ..................................................... Evans County, Georgia ......................................................... Fannin County, Georgia ........................................................ Fayette County, Georgia ....................................................... Floyd County, Georgia .......................................................... Forsyth County, Georgia ....................................................... Franklin County, Georgia ...................................................... Fulton County, Georgia ......................................................... Gilmer County, Georgia ........................................................ Glascock County, Georgia .................................................... Glynn County, Georgia ......................................................... Gordon County, Georgia ....................................................... Grady County, Georgia ......................................................... Greene County, Georgia ....................................................... Gwinnett County, Georgia ..................................................... Habersham County, Georgia ................................................ Hall County, Georgia ............................................................. Hancock County, Georgia ..................................................... Haralson County, Georgia .................................................... Harris County, Georgia ......................................................... Hart County, Georgia ............................................................ Heard County, Georgia ......................................................... Henry County, Georgia ......................................................... Houston County, Georgia ..................................................... Irwin County, Georgia ........................................................... Jackson County, Georgia ...................................................... Jasper County, Georgia ........................................................ Jeff Davis County, Georgia ................................................... Jefferson County, Georgia .................................................... Jenkins County, Georgia ....................................................... Johnson County, Georgia ..................................................... Jones County, Georgia ......................................................... Lamar County, Georgia ......................................................... Lanier County, Georgia ......................................................... Laurens County, Georgia ...................................................... Lee County, Georgia ............................................................. Liberty County, Georgia ........................................................ Lincoln County, Georgia ....................................................... Long County, Georgia ........................................................... Lowndes County, Georgia .................................................... Lumpkin County, Georgia ..................................................... Mc Duffie County, Georgia ................................................... Mc Intosh County, Georgia ................................................... Macon County, Georgia ........................................................ Madison County, Georgia ..................................................... Marion County, Georgia ........................................................ Meriwether County, Georgia ................................................. Miller County, Georgia .......................................................... Mitchell County, Georgia ....................................................... Monroe County, Georgia ....................................................... Montgomery County, Georgia ............................................... Morgan County, Georgia ....................................................... Murray County, Georgia ........................................................ Muscogee County, Georgia .................................................. Newton County, Georgia ....................................................... Oconee County, Georgia ...................................................... Oglethorpe County, Georgia ................................................. Paulding County, Georgia ..................................................... Peach County, Georgia ......................................................... Pickens County, Georgia ...................................................... Pierce County, Georgia ......................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4701 11 11 0520 11 11 0120 0520 11 11 7520 11 11 11 11 0520 11 0520 11 0520 11 11 11 11 11 11 0520 11 11 11 11 1800 11 11 0520 4680 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 4680 11 11 11 0120 11 11 11 11 11 0600 11 11 0500 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1800 0520 0500 11 0520 4680 0520 11 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8166 0.8166 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.8628 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.9461 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9793 0.8166 0.9793 0.8166 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8560 0.8166 0.8166 0.9793 0.9277 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9277 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8628 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9808 0.8166 0.8166 0.9855 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8560 0.9793 0.9855 0.8166 0.9793 0.9277 0.9793 0.8166 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 12060 99911 12060 99911 99911 10500 12060 99911 46660 42340 99911 99911 99911 99911 12060 40660 12060 99911 12060 99911 99911 15260 99911 99911 99911 12060 99911 23580 99911 12060 17980 99911 12060 12060 47580 99911 99911 12060 99911 99911 99911 99911 31420 12060 46660 99911 10500 25980 99911 25980 46660 99911 12260 15260 99911 12020 17980 12060 99911 99911 31420 99911 99911 19140 17980 12060 12020 12020 12060 99911 12060 99911 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural 27095 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9793 0.7662 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.8628 0.9793 0.7662 0.8866 0.9461 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.9793 0.9414 0.9793 0.7662 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.9311 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.9793 0.7662 0.8874 0.7662 0.9793 0.8560 0.7662 0.9793 0.9793 0.8645 0.7662 0.7662 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.9443 0.9793 0.8866 0.7662 0.8628 1 0.91981 0.7662 1 0.91981 0.8866 0.7662 0.9748 0.9311 0.7662 0.9855 0.8560 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.9443 0.7662 0.7662 0.9079 0.8560 0.9793 0.9855 0.9855 0.9793 0.7662 0.9793 0.7662 27096 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 11821 11830 11831 11832 11833 11834 11835 11840 11841 11842 11850 11851 11860 11861 11862 11870 11880 11881 11882 11883 11884 11885 11890 11900 11901 11902 11903 11910 11911 11912 11913 11920 11921 11930 11940 11941 11950 11960 11961 11962 11963 11970 11971 11972 11973 11980 12005 12010 12020 12040 12050 13000 13010 13020 13030 13040 13050 13060 13070 13080 13090 13100 13110 13120 13130 13140 13150 13160 13170 13180 13190 13200 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Pike County, Georgia ............................................................ Polk County, Georgia ............................................................ Pulaski County, Georgia ....................................................... Putnam County, Georgia ...................................................... Quitman County, Georgia ..................................................... Rabun County, Georgia ........................................................ Randolph County, Georgia ................................................... Richmond County, Georgia ................................................... Rockdale County, Georgia .................................................... Schley County, Georgia ........................................................ Screven County, Georgia ...................................................... Seminole County, Georgia .................................................... Spalding County, Georgia ..................................................... Stephens County, Georgia .................................................... Stewart County, Georgia ....................................................... Sumter County, Georgia ....................................................... Talbot County, Georgia ......................................................... Taliaferro County, Georgia .................................................... Tattnall County, Georgia ....................................................... Taylor County, Georgia ......................................................... Telfair County, Georgia ......................................................... Terrell County, Georgia ......................................................... Thomas County, Georgia ...................................................... Tift County, Georgia .............................................................. Toombs County, Georgia ...................................................... Towns County, Georgia ........................................................ Treutlen County, Georgia ...................................................... Troup County, Georgia ......................................................... Turner County, Georgia ........................................................ Twiggs County, Georgia ....................................................... Union County, Georgia ......................................................... Upson County, Georgia ........................................................ Walker County, Georgia ........................................................ Walton County, Georgia ........................................................ Ware County, Georgia .......................................................... Warren County, Georgia ....................................................... Washington County, Georgia ................................................ Wayne County, Georgia ........................................................ Webster County, Georgia ..................................................... Wheeler County, Georgia ..................................................... White County, Georgia .......................................................... Whitfield County, Georgia ..................................................... Wilcox County, Georgia ........................................................ Wilkes County, Georgia ........................................................ Wilkinson County, Georgia ................................................... Worth County, Georgia ......................................................... Kalawao County, Hawaii ....................................................... Hawaii County, Hawaii .......................................................... Honolulu County, Hawaii ....................................................... Kauai County, Hawaii ............................................................ Maui County, Hawaii ............................................................. Ada County, Idaho ................................................................ Adams County, Idaho ........................................................... Bannock County, Idaho ........................................................ Bear Lake County, Idaho ...................................................... Benewah County, Idaho ........................................................ Bingham County, Idaho ........................................................ Blaine County, Idaho ............................................................. Boise County, Idaho ............................................................. Bonner County, Idaho ........................................................... Bonneville County, Idaho ...................................................... Boundary County, Idaho ....................................................... Butte County, Idaho .............................................................. Camas County, Idaho ........................................................... Canyon County, Idaho .......................................................... Caribou County, Idaho .......................................................... Cassia County, Idaho ............................................................ Clark County, Idaho .............................................................. Clearwater County, Idaho ..................................................... Custer County, Idaho ............................................................ Elmore County, Idaho ........................................................... Franklin County, Idaho .......................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4701 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 0600 0520 11 11 11 0520 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 4680 11 11 1560 0520 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 3320 12 12 1080 13 6340 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 1080 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9808 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.9277 0.8166 0.8166 0.9088 0.9793 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 0.8166 1.0551 1.0551 1.1214 1.0551 1.0551 0.9052 0.9097 0.9351 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9052 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 12060 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 12260 12060 99911 99911 99911 12060 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 10500 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 31420 99911 99911 16860 12060 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 99911 19140 99911 99911 99911 10500 99912 99912 26180 99912 99912 14260 99913 38540 99913 99913 99913 99913 14260 99913 26820 99913 99913 99913 14260 99913 99913 99913 99913 99913 99913 30860 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.9748 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.8628 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.9443 0.7662 0.7662 0.9088 0.9793 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.9079 0.7662 0.7662 0.7662 0.8628 1.0551 1.0551 1.1214 1.0551 1.0551 0.9052 0.8037 0.9351 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.9052 0.8037 0.9420 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.9052 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.9164 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 13210 13220 13230 13240 13250 13260 13270 13280 13290 13300 13310 13320 13330 13340 13350 13360 13370 13380 13390 13400 13410 13420 13430 14000 14010 14020 14030 14040 14050 14060 14070 14080 14090 14100 14110 14120 14130 14140 14141 14150 14160 14170 14180 14190 14250 14310 14320 14330 14340 14350 14360 14370 14380 14390 14400 14410 14420 14421 14440 14450 14460 14470 14480 14490 14500 14510 14520 14530 14540 14550 14560 14570 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Fremont County, Idaho ......................................................... Gem County, Idaho ............................................................... Gooding County, Idaho ......................................................... Idaho County, Idaho ............................................................. Jefferson County, Idaho ........................................................ Jerome County, Idaho ........................................................... Kootenai County, Idaho ........................................................ Latah County, Idaho ............................................................. Lemhi County, Idaho ............................................................. Lewis County, Idaho ............................................................. Lincoln County, Idaho ........................................................... Madison County, Idaho ......................................................... Minidoka County, Idaho ........................................................ Nez Perce County, Idaho ...................................................... Oneida County, Idaho ........................................................... Owyhee County, Idaho ......................................................... Payette County, Idaho .......................................................... Power County, Idaho ............................................................ Shoshone County, Idaho ...................................................... Teton County, Idaho ............................................................. Twin Falls County, Idaho ...................................................... Valley County, Idaho ............................................................. Washington County, Idaho .................................................... Adams County, Illinois .......................................................... Alexander County, Illinois ..................................................... Bond County, Illinois ............................................................. Boone County, Illinois ........................................................... Brown County, Illinois ........................................................... Bureau County, Illinois .......................................................... Calhoun County, Illinois ........................................................ Carroll County, Illinois ........................................................... Cass County, Illinois ............................................................. Champaign County, Illinois ................................................... Christian County, Illinois ....................................................... Clark County, Illinois ............................................................. Clay County, Illinois .............................................................. Clinton County, Illinois .......................................................... Coles County, Illinois ............................................................ Cook County, Illinois ............................................................. Crawford County, Illinois ....................................................... Cumberland County, Illinois .................................................. De Kalb County, Illinois ......................................................... De Witt County, Illinois .......................................................... Douglas County, Illinois ........................................................ Du Page County, Illinois ....................................................... Edgar County, Illinois ............................................................ Edwards County, Illinois ........................................................ Effingham County, Illinois ..................................................... Fayette County, Illinois .......................................................... Ford County, Illinois .............................................................. Franklin County, Illinois ......................................................... Fulton County, Illinois ............................................................ Gallatin County, Illinois ......................................................... Greene County, Illinois .......................................................... Grundy County, Illinois .......................................................... Hamilton County, Illinois ....................................................... Hancock County, Illinois ........................................................ Hardin County, Illinois ........................................................... Henderson County, Illinois .................................................... Henry County, Illinois ............................................................ Iroquois County, Illinois ......................................................... Jackson County, Illinois ........................................................ Jasper County, Illinois ........................................................... Jefferson County, Illinois ....................................................... Jersey County, Illinois ........................................................... Jo Daviess County, Illinois .................................................... Johnson County, Illinois ........................................................ Kane County, Illinois ............................................................. Kankakee County, Illinois ...................................................... Kendall County, Illinois .......................................................... Knox County, Illinois ............................................................. Lake County, Illinois .............................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4701 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 6880 14 14 14 14 14 1400 14 14 14 7040 14 1600 14 14 1600 14 14 1600 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 1600 14 14 14 14 1960 14 14 14 14 7040 14 14 1600 3740 1600 14 1600 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.9097 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.9984 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.9594 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8962 0.8301 1.0783 0.8301 0.8301 1.0783 0.8301 0.8301 1.0783 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 1.0783 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8724 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8962 0.8301 0.8301 1.0783 1.0721 1.0783 0.8301 1.0783 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99913 14260 99913 99913 26820 99913 17660 99913 99913 99913 99913 99913 99913 30300 99913 14260 99913 38540 99913 99913 99913 99913 99913 99914 99914 41180 40420 99914 99914 41180 99914 99914 16580 99914 99914 99914 41180 99914 16974 99914 99914 16974 99914 99914 16974 99914 99914 99914 99914 16580 99914 99914 99914 99914 16974 99914 99914 99914 99914 19340 99914 99914 99914 99914 41180 99914 99914 16974 28100 16974 99914 29404 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban 27097 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8037 0.9052 0.8037 0.8037 0.9420 0.8037 0.9647 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.9886 0.8037 0.9052 0.8037 0.9351 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8037 0.8271 0.8271 0.8954 0.9984 0.8271 0.8271 0.8954 0.8271 0.8271 0.9594 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8954 0.8271 1.0790 0.8271 0.8271 1.0790 0.8271 0.8271 1.0790 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.9594 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 1.0790 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8724 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8954 0.8271 0.8271 1.0790 1.0721 1.0790 0.8271 1.0429 27098 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 14580 14590 14600 14610 14620 14630 14640 14650 14660 14670 14680 14690 14700 14710 14720 14730 14740 14750 14760 14770 14780 14790 14800 14810 14820 14830 14831 14850 14860 14870 14880 14890 14900 14910 14920 14921 14940 14950 14960 14970 14980 14981 14982 14983 14984 14985 14986 14987 14988 14989 14990 14991 14992 15000 15010 15020 15030 15040 15050 15060 15070 15080 15090 15100 15110 15120 15130 15140 15150 15160 15170 15180 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. La Salle County, Illinois ........................................................ Lawrence County, Illinois ...................................................... Lee County, Illinois ................................................................ Livingston County, Illinois ..................................................... Logan County, Illinois ............................................................ Mc Donough County, Illinois ................................................. Mc Henry County, Illinois ...................................................... Mclean County, Illinois .......................................................... Macon County, Illinois ........................................................... Macoupin County, Illinois ...................................................... Madison County, Illinois ........................................................ Marion County, Illinois ........................................................... Marshall County, Illinois ........................................................ Mason County, Illinois ........................................................... Massac County, Illinois ......................................................... Menard County, Illinois ......................................................... Mercer County, Illinois .......................................................... Monroe County, Illinois ......................................................... Montgomery County, Illinois .................................................. Morgan County, Illinois ......................................................... Moultrie County, Illinois ......................................................... Ogle County, Illinois .............................................................. Peoria County, Illinois ........................................................... Perry County, Illinois ............................................................. Piatt County, Illinois .............................................................. Pike County, Illinois ............................................................... Pope County, Illinois ............................................................. Pulaski County, Illinois .......................................................... Putnam County, Illinois ......................................................... Randolph County, Illinois ...................................................... Richland County, Illinois ........................................................ Rock Island County, Illinois ................................................... St Clair County, Illinois .......................................................... Saline County, Illinois ............................................................ Sangamon County, Illinois .................................................... Schuyler County, Illinois ........................................................ Scott County, Illinois ............................................................. Shelby County, Illinois ........................................................... Stark County, Illinois ............................................................. Stephenson County, Illinois .................................................. Tazewell County, Illinois ....................................................... Union County, Illinois ............................................................ Vermilion County, Illinois ....................................................... Wabash County, Illinois ........................................................ Warren County, Illinois .......................................................... Washington County, Illinois ................................................... Wayne County, Illinois .......................................................... White County, Illinois ............................................................ Whiteside County, Illinois ...................................................... Will County, Illinois ................................................................ Williamson County, Illinois .................................................... Winnebago County, Illinois ................................................... Woodford County, Illinois ...................................................... Adams County, Indiana ......................................................... Allen County, Indiana ............................................................ Bartholomew County, Indiana ............................................... Benton County, Indiana ........................................................ Blackford County, Indiana ..................................................... Boone County, Indiana ......................................................... Brown County, Indiana .......................................................... Carroll County, Indiana ......................................................... Cass County, Indiana ............................................................ Clark County, Indiana ........................................................... Clay County, Indiana ............................................................. Clinton County, Indiana ......................................................... Crawford County, Indiana ..................................................... Daviess County, Indiana ....................................................... Dearborn County, Indiana ..................................................... Decatur County, Indiana ....................................................... De Kalb County, Indiana ....................................................... Delaware County, Indiana ..................................................... Dubois County, Indiana ......................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4701 14 14 14 14 14 14 1600 1040 2040 14 7040 14 14 14 14 7880 14 7040 14 14 14 6880 6120 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 1960 7040 14 7880 14 14 14 14 14 6120 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 1600 14 6880 6120 2760 2760 15 15 15 3480 15 15 15 4520 8320 3920 15 15 1640 15 2760 5280 15 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 1.0783 0.9075 0.8067 0.8301 0.8962 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8792 0.8301 0.8962 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.9984 0.8870 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8724 0.8962 0.8301 0.8792 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8870 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 0.8301 1.0783 0.8301 0.9984 0.8870 0.9706 0.9706 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.9865 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.9293 0.8337 0.8736 0.8739 0.8739 0.9734 0.8739 0.9706 0.8930 0.8739 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99914 99914 99914 99914 99914 99914 16974 14060 19500 41180 41180 99914 37900 99914 99914 44100 19340 41180 99914 99914 99914 99914 37900 99914 16580 99914 99914 99914 99914 99914 99914 19340 41180 99914 44100 99914 99914 99914 37900 99914 37900 99914 19180 99914 99914 99914 99914 99914 99914 16974 99914 40420 37900 99915 23060 18020 29140 99915 26900 26900 29140 99915 31140 45460 99915 99915 99915 17140 99915 99915 34620 99915 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 1.0790 0.9075 0.8067 0.8954 0.8954 0.8271 0.8870 0.8271 0.8271 0.8792 0.8724 0.8954 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8870 0.8271 0.9594 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8724 0.8954 0.8271 0.8792 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8870 0.8271 0.8870 0.8271 0.9028 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 0.8271 1.0790 0.8271 0.9984 0.8870 0.8624 0.9793 0.9588 0.8736 0.8624 0.9920 0.9920 0.8736 0.8624 0.9251 0.8304 0.8624 0.8624 0.8624 0.9615 0.8624 0.8624 0.8930 0.8624 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 15190 15200 15210 15220 15230 15240 15250 15260 15270 15280 15290 15300 15310 15320 15330 15340 15350 15360 15370 15380 15390 15400 15410 15420 15430 15440 15450 15460 15470 15480 15490 15500 15510 15520 15530 15540 15550 15560 15570 15580 15590 15600 15610 15620 15630 15640 15650 15660 15670 15680 15690 15700 15710 15720 15730 15740 15750 15760 15770 15780 15790 15800 15810 15820 15830 15840 15850 15860 15870 15880 15890 15900 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Elkhart County, Indiana ......................................................... Fayette County, Indiana ........................................................ Floyd County, Indiana ........................................................... Fountain County, Indiana ...................................................... Franklin County, Indiana ....................................................... Fulton County, Indiana .......................................................... Gibson County, Indiana ........................................................ Grant County, Indiana ........................................................... Greene County, Indiana ........................................................ Hamilton County, Indiana ...................................................... Hancock County, Indiana ...................................................... Harrison County, Indiana ...................................................... Hendricks County, Indiana .................................................... Henry County, Indiana .......................................................... Howard County, Indiana ....................................................... Huntington County, Indiana .................................................. Jackson County, Indiana ....................................................... Jasper County, Indiana ......................................................... Jay County, Indiana .............................................................. Jefferson County, Indiana ..................................................... Jennings County, Indiana ..................................................... Johnson County, Indiana ...................................................... Knox County, Indiana ............................................................ Kosciusko County, Indiana ................................................... Lagrange County, Indiana ..................................................... Lake County, Indiana ............................................................ La Porte County, Indiana ...................................................... Lawrence County, Indiana .................................................... Madison County, Indiana ...................................................... Marion County, Indiana ......................................................... Marshall County, Indiana ...................................................... Martin County, Indiana .......................................................... Miami County, Indiana .......................................................... Monroe County, Indiana ........................................................ Montgomery County, Indiana ................................................ Morgan County, Indiana ........................................................ Newton County, Indiana ........................................................ Noble County, Indiana .......................................................... Ohio County, Indiana ............................................................ Orange County, Indiana ........................................................ Owen County, Indiana .......................................................... Parke County, Indiana .......................................................... Perry County, Indiana ........................................................... Pike County, Indiana ............................................................. Porter County, Indiana .......................................................... Posey County, Indiana .......................................................... Pulaski County, Indiana ........................................................ Putnam County, Indiana ....................................................... Randolph County, Indiana .................................................... Ripley County, Indiana .......................................................... Rush County, Indiana ........................................................... St Joseph County, Indiana .................................................... Scott County, Indiana ............................................................ Shelby County, Indiana ......................................................... Spencer County, Indiana ...................................................... Starke County, Indiana ......................................................... Steuben County, Indiana ...................................................... Sullivan County, Indiana ....................................................... Switzerland County, Indiana ................................................. Tippecanoe County, Indiana ................................................. Tipton County, Indiana .......................................................... Union County, Indiana .......................................................... Vanderburgh County, Indiana ............................................... Vermillion County, Indiana .................................................... Vigo County, Indiana ............................................................. Wabash County, Indiana ....................................................... Warren County, Indiana ........................................................ Warrick County, Indiana ........................................................ Washington County, Indiana ................................................. Wayne County, Indiana ......................................................... Wells County, Indiana ........................................................... White County, Indiana ........................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4701 2330 15 4520 15 15 15 15 15 15 3480 3480 4520 3480 15 3850 2760 15 15 15 15 15 3480 15 15 15 2960 15 15 3480 3480 15 15 15 1020 15 3480 15 15 1640 15 15 15 15 15 2960 2440 15 15 15 15 15 7800 4520 3480 15 15 15 15 15 3920 3850 15 2440 8320 8320 15 15 2440 15 15 2760 15 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.9627 0.8739 0.9293 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.9865 0.9865 0.9293 0.9865 0.8739 0.9508 0.9706 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.9865 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.9395 0.8739 0.8739 0.9865 0.9865 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8447 0.8739 0.9865 0.8739 0.8739 0.9734 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.9395 0.8713 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.9788 0.9293 0.9865 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8739 0.8736 0.9508 0.8739 0.8713 0.8337 0.8337 0.8739 0.8739 0.8713 0.8739 0.8739 0.9706 0.8739 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 21140 99915 31140 99915 17140 99915 21780 99915 14020 26900 26900 31140 26900 99915 29020 99915 99915 23844 99915 99915 99915 26900 99915 99915 99915 23844 33140 99915 11300 26900 99915 99915 99915 14020 99915 26900 23844 99915 17140 99915 14020 99915 99915 99915 23844 21780 99915 26900 99915 99915 99915 43780 99915 26900 99915 99915 99915 45460 99915 29140 29020 99915 21780 45460 45460 99915 99915 21780 31140 99915 23060 99915 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural 27099 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9627 0.8624 0.9251 0.8624 0.9615 0.8624 0.8713 0.8624 0.8447 0.9920 0.9920 0.9251 0.9920 0.8624 0.9508 0.8624 0.8624 0.9395 0.8624 0.8624 0.8624 0.9920 0.8624 0.8624 0.8624 0.9395 0.9399 0.8624 0.8586 0.9920 0.8624 0.8624 0.8624 0.8447 0.8624 0.9920 0.9395 0.8624 0.9615 0.8624 0.8447 0.8624 0.8624 0.8624 0.9395 0.8713 0.8624 0.9920 0.8624 0.8624 0.8624 0.9788 0.8624 0.9920 0.8624 0.8624 0.8624 0.8304 0.8624 0.8736 0.9508 0.8624 0.8713 0.8304 0.8304 0.8624 0.8624 0.8713 0.9251 0.8624 0.9793 0.8624 27100 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 15910 16000 16010 16020 16030 16040 16050 16060 16070 16080 16090 16100 16110 16120 16130 16140 16150 16160 16170 16180 16190 16200 16210 16220 16230 16240 16250 16260 16270 16280 16290 16300 16310 16320 16330 16340 16350 16360 16370 16380 16390 16400 16410 16420 16430 16440 16450 16460 16470 16480 16490 16500 16510 16520 16530 16540 16550 16560 16570 16580 16590 16600 16610 16620 16630 16640 16650 16660 16670 16680 16690 16700 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Whitley County, Indiana ........................................................ Adair County, Iowa ................................................................ Adams County, Iowa ............................................................. Allamakee County, Iowa ....................................................... Appanoose County, Iowa ...................................................... Audubon County, Iowa .......................................................... Benton County, Iowa ............................................................. Black Hawk County, Iowa ..................................................... Boone County, Iowa ............................................................. Bremer County, Iowa ............................................................ Buchanan County, Iowa ........................................................ Buena Vista County, Iowa .................................................... Butler County, Iowa ............................................................... Calhoun County, Iowa ........................................................... Carroll County, Iowa ............................................................. Cass County, Iowa ................................................................ Cedar County, Iowa .............................................................. Cerro Gordo County, Iowa .................................................... Cherokee County, Iowa ........................................................ Chickasaw County, Iowa ....................................................... Clarke County, Iowa .............................................................. Clay County, Iowa ................................................................. Clayton County, Iowa ............................................................ Clinton County, Iowa ............................................................. Crawford County, Iowa ......................................................... Dallas County, Iowa .............................................................. Davis County, Iowa ............................................................... Decatur County, Iowa ........................................................... Delaware County, Iowa ......................................................... Des Moines County, Iowa ..................................................... Dickinson County, Iowa ........................................................ Dubuque County, Iowa ......................................................... Emmet County, Iowa ............................................................. Fayette County, Iowa ............................................................ Floyd County, Iowa ............................................................... Franklin County, Iowa ........................................................... Fremont County, Iowa ........................................................... Greene County, Iowa ............................................................ Grundy County, Iowa ............................................................ Guthrie County, Iowa ............................................................ Hamilton County, Iowa .......................................................... Hancock County, Iowa .......................................................... Hardin County, Iowa ............................................................. Harrison County, Iowa .......................................................... Henry County, Iowa .............................................................. Howard County, Iowa ............................................................ Humboldt County, Iowa ......................................................... Ida County, Iowa ................................................................... Iowa County, Iowa ................................................................ Jackson County, Iowa ........................................................... Jasper County, Iowa ............................................................. Jefferson County, Iowa ......................................................... Johnson County, Iowa .......................................................... Jones County, Iowa .............................................................. Keokuk County, Iowa ............................................................ Kossuth County, Iowa ........................................................... Lee County, Iowa .................................................................. Linn County, Iowa ................................................................. Louisa County, Iowa ............................................................. Lucas County, Iowa .............................................................. Lyon County, Iowa ................................................................ Madison County, Iowa .......................................................... Mahaska County, Iowa ......................................................... Marion County, Iowa ............................................................. Marshall County, Iowa .......................................................... Mills County, Iowa ................................................................. Mitchell County, Iowa ............................................................ Monona County, Iowa ........................................................... Monroe County, Iowa ............................................................ Montgomery County, Iowa .................................................... Muscatine County, Iowa ........................................................ O Brien County, Iowa ............................................................ 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4701 2760 16 16 16 16 16 16 8920 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 2120 16 16 16 16 16 2200 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 3500 16 16 16 16 1360 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.9706 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8557 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.9669 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.9024 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.9747 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8825 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 23060 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 16300 47940 99916 47940 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 19780 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 20220 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 47940 19780 99916 99916 99916 36540 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 26980 16300 99916 99916 99916 16300 99916 99916 99916 19780 99916 99916 99916 36540 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9793 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8825 0.8557 0.8509 0.8557 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.9669 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.9024 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8557 0.9669 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.9560 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.9747 0.8825 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8825 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.9669 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.9560 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 16710 16720 16730 16740 16750 16760 16770 16780 16790 16800 16810 16820 16830 16840 16850 16860 16870 16880 16890 16900 16910 16920 16930 16940 16950 16960 16970 16980 17000 17010 17020 17030 17040 17050 17060 17070 17080 17090 17100 17110 17120 17130 17140 17150 17160 17170 17180 17190 17200 17210 17220 17230 17240 17250 17260 17270 17280 17290 17300 17310 17320 17330 17340 17350 17360 17370 17380 17390 17391 17410 17420 17430 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Osceola County, Iowa ........................................................... Page County, Iowa ................................................................ Palo Alto County, Iowa ......................................................... Plymouth County, Iowa ......................................................... Pocahontas County, Iowa ..................................................... Polk County, Iowa ................................................................. Pottawattamie County, Iowa ................................................. Poweshiek County, Iowa ....................................................... Ringgold County, Iowa .......................................................... Sac County, Iowa .................................................................. Scott County, Iowa ................................................................ Shelby County, Iowa ............................................................. Sioux County, Iowa ............................................................... Story County, Iowa ................................................................ Tama County, Iowa ............................................................... Taylor County, Iowa .............................................................. Union County, Iowa ............................................................... Van Buren County, Iowa ....................................................... Wapello County, Iowa ........................................................... Warren County, Iowa ............................................................ Washington County, Iowa ..................................................... Wayne County, Iowa ............................................................. Webster County, Iowa ........................................................... Winnebago County, Iowa ...................................................... Winneshiek County, Iowa ..................................................... Woodbury County, Iowa ........................................................ Worth County, Iowa .............................................................. Wright County, Iowa .............................................................. Allen County, Kansas ............................................................ Anderson County, Kansas .................................................... Atchison County, Kansas ...................................................... Barber County, Kansas ......................................................... Barton County, Kansas ......................................................... Bourbon County, Kansas ...................................................... Brown County, Kansas ......................................................... Butler County, Kansas .......................................................... Chase County, Kansas ......................................................... Chautauqua County, Kansas ................................................ Cherokee County, Kansas .................................................... Cheyenne County, Kansas ................................................... Clark County, Kansas ........................................................... Clay County, Kansas ............................................................ Cloud County, Kansas .......................................................... Coffey County, Kansas ......................................................... Comanche County, Kansas .................................................. Cowley County, Kansas ........................................................ Crawford County, Kansas ..................................................... Decatur County, Kansas ....................................................... Dickinson County, Kansas .................................................... Doniphan County, Kansas .................................................... Douglas County, Kansas ...................................................... Edwards County, Kansas ...................................................... Elk County, Kansas ............................................................... Ellis County, Kansas ............................................................. Ellsworth County, Kansas ..................................................... Finney County, Kansas ......................................................... Ford County, Kansas ............................................................ Franklin County, Kansas ....................................................... Geary County, Kansas .......................................................... Gove County, Kansas ........................................................... Graham County, Kansas ....................................................... Grant County, Kansas ........................................................... Gray County, Kansas ............................................................ Greeley County, Kansas ....................................................... Greenwood County, Kansas ................................................. Hamilton County, Kansas ..................................................... Harper County, Kansas ......................................................... Harvey County, Kansas ........................................................ Haskell County, Kansas ........................................................ Hodgeman County, Kansas .................................................. Jackson County, Kansas ...................................................... Jefferson County, Kansas ..................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4701 16 16 16 16 16 2120 5920 16 16 16 1960 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 2120 16 16 16 16 16 7720 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 9040 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 4150 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 9040 17 17 17 17 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.9669 0.9560 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8724 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.9669 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.8594 0.9416 0.8594 0.8594 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.9175 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8537 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.9175 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 19780 36540 99916 99916 99916 19340 99916 99916 11180 99916 99916 99916 99916 99916 19780 26980 99916 99916 99916 99916 43580 99916 99916 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 48620 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 41140 29940 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 28140 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 48620 99917 99917 45820 45820 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban 27101 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.9669 0.9560 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8724 0.8509 0.8509 0.9536 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.9669 0.9747 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.8509 0.9381 0.8509 0.8509 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.9153 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.9519 0.8537 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.9476 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.9153 0.8035 0.8035 0.8920 0.8920 27102 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 17440 17450 17451 17470 17480 17490 17500 17510 17520 17530 17540 17550 17560 17570 17580 17590 17600 17610 17620 17630 17640 17650 17660 17670 17680 17690 17700 17710 17720 17730 17740 17750 17760 17770 17780 17790 17800 17810 17820 17830 17840 17841 17860 17870 17880 17890 17900 17910 17920 17921 17940 17950 17960 17970 17980 17981 17982 17983 17984 17985 17986 18000 18010 18020 18030 18040 18050 18060 18070 18080 18090 18100 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Jewell County, Kansas .......................................................... Johnson County, Kansas ...................................................... Kearny County, Kansas ........................................................ Kingman County, Kansas ..................................................... Kiowa County, Kansas .......................................................... Labette County, Kansas ........................................................ Lane County, Kansas ............................................................ Leavenworth County, Kansas ............................................... Lincoln County, Kansas ........................................................ Linn County, Kansas ............................................................. Logan County, Kansas .......................................................... Lyon County, Kansas ............................................................ Mc Pherson County, Kansas ................................................ Marion County, Kansas ......................................................... Marshall County, Kansas ...................................................... Meade County, Kansas ......................................................... Miami County, Kansas .......................................................... Mitchell County, Kansas ....................................................... Montgomery County, Kansas ................................................ Morris County, Kansas .......................................................... Morton County, Kansas ........................................................ Nemaha County, Kansas ...................................................... Neosho County, Kansas ....................................................... Ness County, Kansas ........................................................... Norton County, Kansas ......................................................... Osage County, Kansas ......................................................... Osborne County, Kansas ...................................................... Ottawa County, Kansas ........................................................ Pawnee County, Kansas ....................................................... Phillips County, Kansas ........................................................ Pottawatomie County, Kansas .............................................. Pratt County, Kansas ............................................................ Rawlins County, Kansas ....................................................... Reno County, Kansas ........................................................... Republic County, Kansas ...................................................... Rice County, Kansas ............................................................ Riley County, Kansas ............................................................ Rooks County, Kansas ......................................................... Rush County, Kansas ........................................................... Russell County, Kansas ........................................................ Saline County, Kansas .......................................................... Scott County, Kansas ........................................................... Sedgwick County, Kansas .................................................... Seward County, Kansas ....................................................... Shawnee County, Kansas ..................................................... Sheridan County, Kansas ..................................................... Sherman County, Kansas ..................................................... Smith County, Kansas .......................................................... Stafford County, Kansas ....................................................... Stanton County, Kansas ....................................................... Stevens County, Kansas ....................................................... Sumner County, Kansas ....................................................... Thomas County, Kansas ....................................................... Trego County, Kansas .......................................................... Wabaunsee County, Kansas ................................................ Wallace County, Kansas ....................................................... Washington County, Kansas ................................................. Wichita County, Kansas ........................................................ Wilson County, Kansas ......................................................... Woodson County, Kansas .................................................... Wyandotte County, Kansas .................................................. Adair County, Kentucky ........................................................ Allen County, Kentucky ......................................................... Anderson County, Kentucky ................................................. Ballard County, Kentucky ...................................................... Barren County, Kentucky ...................................................... Bath County, Kentucky ......................................................... Bell County, Kentucky ........................................................... Boone County, Kentucky ...................................................... Bourbon County, Kentucky ................................................... Boyd County, Kentucky ......................................................... Boyle County, Kentucky ........................................................ 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4701 17 3760 17 17 17 17 17 3760 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 3760 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 9040 17 8440 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 3760 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 1640 4280 3400 18 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8040 0.9490 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.9490 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.9490 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.9175 0.8040 0.8920 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.8040 0.9490 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.9734 0.8988 0.9477 0.7858 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99917 28140 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 28140 99917 28140 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 28140 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 45820 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 48620 99917 45820 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 48620 99917 99917 45820 99917 99917 99917 99917 99917 28140 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 17140 30460 26580 99918 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8035 0.9476 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.9476 0.8035 0.9476 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.9476 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8920 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.9153 0.8035 0.8920 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.9153 0.8035 0.8035 0.8920 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 0.9476 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.9615 0.9075 0.9477 0.7766 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 18110 18120 18130 18140 18150 18160 18170 18180 18190 18191 18210 18220 18230 18240 18250 18260 18270 18271 18290 18291 18310 18320 18330 18340 18350 18360 18361 18362 18390 18400 18410 18420 18421 18440 18450 18460 18470 18480 18490 18500 18510 18511 18530 18540 18550 18560 18570 18580 18590 18600 18610 18620 18630 18640 18650 18660 18670 18680 18690 18700 18710 18720 18730 18740 18750 18760 18770 18780 18790 18800 18801 18802 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Bracken County, Kentucky .................................................... Breathitt County, Kentucky ................................................... Breckinridge County, Kentucky ............................................. Bullitt County, Kentucky ........................................................ Butler County, Kentucky ....................................................... Caldwell County, Kentucky ................................................... Calloway County, Kentucky .................................................. Campbell County, Kentucky .................................................. Carlisle County, Kentucky ..................................................... Carroll County, Kentucky ...................................................... Carter County, Kentucky ....................................................... Casey County, Kentucky ....................................................... Christian County, Kentucky ................................................... Clark County, Kentucky ........................................................ Clay County, Kentucky .......................................................... Clinton County, Kentucky ...................................................... Crittenden County, Kentucky ................................................ Cumberland County, Kentucky ............................................. Daviess County, Kentucky .................................................... Edmonson County, Kentucky ................................................ Elliott County, Kentucky ........................................................ Estill County, Kentucky ......................................................... Fayette County, Kentucky ..................................................... Fleming County, Kentucky .................................................... Floyd County, Kentucky ........................................................ Franklin County, Kentucky .................................................... Fulton County, Kentucky ....................................................... Gallatin County, Kentucky ..................................................... Garrard County, Kentucky .................................................... Grant County, Kentucky ........................................................ Graves County, Kentucky ..................................................... Grayson County, Kentucky ................................................... Green County, Kentucky ....................................................... Greenup County, Kentucky ................................................... Hancock County, Kentucky ................................................... Hardin County, Kentucky ...................................................... Harlan County, Kentucky ...................................................... Harrison County, Kentucky ................................................... Hart County, Kentucky .......................................................... Henderson County, Kentucky ............................................... Henry County, Kentucky ....................................................... Hickman County, Kentucky ................................................... Hopkins County, Kentucky .................................................... Jackson County, Kentucky .................................................... Jefferson County, Kentucky .................................................. Jessamine County, Kentucky ................................................ Johnson County, Kentucky ................................................... Kenton County, Kentucky ..................................................... Knott County, Kentucky ........................................................ Knox County, Kentucky ......................................................... Larue County, Kentucky ........................................................ Laurel County, Kentucky ....................................................... Lawrence County, Kentucky ................................................. Lee County, Kentucky ........................................................... Leslie County, Kentucky ....................................................... Letcher County, Kentucky ..................................................... Lewis County, Kentucky ........................................................ Lincoln County, Kentucky ..................................................... Livingston County, Kentucky ................................................. Logan County, Kentucky ....................................................... Lyon County, Kentucky ......................................................... Mc Cracken County, Kentucky ............................................. Mc Creary County, Kentucky ................................................ Mc Lean County, Kentucky ................................................... Madison County, Kentucky ................................................... Magoffin County, Kentucky ................................................... Marion County, Kentucky ...................................................... Marshall County, Kentucky ................................................... Martin County, Kentucky ....................................................... Mason County, Kentucky ...................................................... Meade County, Kentucky ...................................................... Menifee County, Kentucky .................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4701 18 18 18 4520 18 18 18 1640 18 18 3400 18 1660 4280 18 18 18 18 5990 18 18 18 4280 18 18 18 18 1640 18 1640 18 18 18 3400 18 18 18 18 18 2440 18 18 18 18 4520 4280 18 1640 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 4280 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.9293 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.9734 0.7858 0.7858 0.9477 0.7858 0.8284 0.8988 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.8780 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.8988 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.9734 0.7858 0.9734 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.9477 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.8713 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.9293 0.8988 0.7858 0.9734 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.8988 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 17140 99918 99918 31140 99918 99918 99918 17140 99918 99918 99918 99918 17300 30460 99918 99918 99918 99918 36980 14540 99918 99918 30460 99918 99918 99918 99918 17140 99918 17140 99918 99918 99918 26580 36980 21060 99918 99918 99918 21780 31140 99918 99918 99918 31140 30460 99918 17140 99918 99918 21060 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 36980 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 31140 99918 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural 27103 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9615 0.7766 0.7766 0.9251 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.9615 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.8284 0.9075 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.8780 0.8211 0.7766 0.7766 0.9075 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.9615 0.7766 0.9615 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.9477 0.8780 0.8802 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.8713 0.9251 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.9251 0.9075 0.7766 0.9615 0.7766 0.7766 0.8802 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.8780 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.9251 0.7766 27104 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 18830 18831 18850 18860 18861 18880 18890 18900 18910 18920 18930 18931 18932 18960 18970 18971 18972 18973 18974 18975 18976 18977 18978 18979 18980 18981 18982 18983 18984 18985 18986 18987 18988 18989 18990 18991 18992 19000 19010 19020 19030 19040 19050 19060 19070 19080 19090 19100 19110 19120 19130 19140 19150 19160 19170 19180 19190 19200 19210 19220 19230 19240 19250 19260 19270 19280 19290 19300 19310 19320 19330 19340 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Mercer County, Kentucky ...................................................... Metcalfe County, Kentucky ................................................... Monroe County, Kentucky ..................................................... Montgomery County, Kentucky ............................................. Morgan County, Kentucky ..................................................... Muhlenberg County, Kentucky .............................................. Nelson County, Kentucky ...................................................... Nicholas County, Kentucky ................................................... Ohio County, Kentucky ......................................................... Oldham County, Kentucky .................................................... Owen County, Kentucky ....................................................... Owsley County, Kentucky ..................................................... Pendleton County, Kentucky ................................................. Perry County, Kentucky ........................................................ Pike County, Kentucky .......................................................... Powell County, Kentucky ...................................................... Pulaski County, Kentucky ..................................................... Robertson County, Kentucky ................................................ Rockcastle County, Kentucky ............................................... Rowan County, Kentucky ...................................................... Russell County, Kentucky ..................................................... Scott County, Kentucky ......................................................... Shelby County, Kentucky ...................................................... Simpson County, Kentucky ................................................... Spencer County, Kentucky ................................................... Taylor County, Kentucky ....................................................... Todd County, Kentucky ......................................................... Trigg County, Kentucky ......................................................... Trimble County, Kentucky ..................................................... Union County, Kentucky ....................................................... Warren County, Kentucky ..................................................... Washington County, Kentucky .............................................. Wayne County, Kentucky ...................................................... Webster County, Kentucky ................................................... Whitley County, Kentucky ..................................................... Wolfe County, Kentucky ........................................................ Woodford County, Kentucky ................................................. Acadia County, Louisiana ..................................................... Allen County, Louisiana ........................................................ Ascension County, Louisiana ................................................ Assumption County, Louisiana ............................................. Avoyelles County, Louisiana ................................................. Beauregard County, Louisiana ............................................. Bienville County, Louisiana ................................................... Bossier County, Louisiana .................................................... Caddo County, Louisiana ...................................................... Calcasieu County, Louisiana ................................................ Caldwell County, Louisiana ................................................... Cameron County, Louisiana ................................................. Catahoula County, Louisiana ................................................ Claiborne County, Louisiana ................................................. Concordia County, Louisiana ................................................ De Soto County, Louisiana ................................................... East Baton Rouge County, Louisiana ................................... East Carroll County, Louisiana ............................................. East Feliciana County, Louisiana ......................................... Evangeline County, Louisiana .............................................. Franklin County, Louisiana ................................................... Grant County, Louisiana ....................................................... Iberia County, Louisiana ....................................................... Iberville County, Louisiana .................................................... Jackson County, Louisiana ................................................... Jefferson County, Louisiana ................................................. Jefferson Davis County, Louisiana ....................................... Lafayette County, Louisiana ................................................. Lafourche County, Louisiana ................................................ La Salle County, Louisiana ................................................... Lincoln County, Louisiana ..................................................... Livingston County, Louisiana ................................................ Madison County, Louisiana ................................................... Morehouse County, Louisiana .............................................. Natchitoches County, Louisiana ........................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4701 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 4520 18 18 1640 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 4280 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 4280 3880 19 0760 19 19 19 19 7680 7680 3960 19 19 19 19 19 19 0760 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 5560 19 3880 3350 19 19 0760 19 19 19 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.9293 0.7858 0.7858 0.9734 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.8988 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.7858 0.8988 0.8251 0.7340 0.8643 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.8737 0.8737 0.7858 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.8643 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.8995 0.7340 0.8251 0.7894 0.7340 0.7340 0.8643 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 31140 99918 99918 31140 99918 99918 17140 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 99918 30460 31140 99918 31140 99918 99918 17300 31140 99918 14540 99918 99918 21780 99918 99918 30460 99919 99919 12940 99919 99919 99919 99919 43340 43340 29340 99919 29340 99919 99919 99919 43340 12940 99919 12940 99919 99919 10780 99919 12940 99919 35380 99919 29180 26380 99919 99919 12940 99919 99919 99919 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.9251 0.7766 0.7766 0.9251 0.7766 0.7766 0.9615 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.7766 0.9075 0.9251 0.7766 0.9251 0.7766 0.7766 0.8284 0.9251 0.7766 0.8211 0.7766 0.7766 0.8713 0.7766 0.7766 0.9075 0.7411 0.7411 0.8593 0.7411 0.7411 0.7411 0.7411 0.8760 0.8760 0.7833 0.7411 0.7833 0.7411 0.7411 0.7411 0.8760 0.8593 0.7411 0.8593 0.7411 0.7411 0.8033 0.7411 0.8593 0.7411 0.8995 0.7411 0.8428 0.7894 0.7411 0.7411 0.8593 0.7411 0.7411 0.7411 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 19350 19360 19370 19380 19390 19400 19410 19420 19430 19440 19450 19460 19470 19480 19490 19500 19510 19520 19530 19540 19550 19560 19570 19580 19590 19600 19610 19620 19630 20000 20010 20020 20030 20040 20050 20060 20070 20080 20090 20100 20110 20120 20130 20140 20150 21000 21010 21020 21030 21040 21050 21060 21070 21080 21090 21100 21110 21120 21130 21140 21150 21160 21170 21180 21190 21200 21210 21220 21230 22000 22010 22020 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Orleans County, Louisiana .................................................... Ouachita County, Louisiana .................................................. Plaquemines County, Louisiana ........................................... Pointe Coupee County, Louisiana ........................................ Rapides County, Louisiana ................................................... Red River County, Louisiana ................................................ Richland County, Louisiana .................................................. Sabine County, Louisiana ..................................................... St Bernard County, Louisiana ............................................... St Charles County, Louisiana ............................................... St Helena County, Louisiana ................................................ St James County, Louisiana ................................................. St John Baptist County, Louisiana ........................................ St Landry County, Louisiana ................................................. St Martin County, Louisiana .................................................. St Mary County, Louisiana .................................................... St Tammany County, Louisiana ............................................ Tangipahoa County, Louisiana ............................................. Tensas County, Louisiana .................................................... Terrebonne County, Louisiana .............................................. Union County, Louisiana ....................................................... Vermilion County, Louisiana ................................................. Vernon County, Louisiana ..................................................... Washington County, Louisiana ............................................. Webster County, Louisiana ................................................... West Baton Rouge County, Louisiana .................................. West Carroll County, Louisiana ............................................ West Feliciana County, Louisiana ........................................ Winn County, Louisiana ........................................................ Androscoggin County, Maine ................................................ Aroostook County, Maine ...................................................... Cumberland County, Maine .................................................. Franklin County, Maine ......................................................... Hancock County, Maine ........................................................ Kennebec County, Maine ...................................................... Knox County, Maine .............................................................. Lincoln County, Maine .......................................................... Oxford County, Maine ........................................................... Penobscot County, Maine ..................................................... Piscataquis County, Maine ................................................... Sagadahoc County, Maine .................................................... Somerset County, Maine ...................................................... Waldo County, Maine ............................................................ Washington County, Maine ................................................... York County, Maine .............................................................. Allegany County, Maryland ................................................... Anne Arundel County, Maryland ........................................... Baltimore County, Maryland .................................................. Baltimore City County, Maryland .......................................... Calvert County, Maryland ..................................................... Caroline County, Maryland ................................................... Carroll County, Maryland ...................................................... Cecil County, Maryland ......................................................... Charles County, Maryland .................................................... Dorchester County, Maryland ............................................... Frederick County, Maryland .................................................. Garrett County, Maryland ...................................................... Harford County, Maryland ..................................................... Howard County, Maryland .................................................... Kent County, Maryland ......................................................... Montgomery County, Maryland ............................................. Prince Georges County, Maryland ........................................ Queen Annes County, Maryland ........................................... St Marys County, Maryland .................................................. Somerset County, Maryland ................................................. Talbot County, Maryland ....................................................... Washington County, Maryland .............................................. Wicomico County, Maryland ................................................. Worcester County, Maryland ................................................ Barnstable County, Massachusetts ...................................... Berkshire County, Massachusetts ........................................ Bristol County, Massachusetts .............................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4701 5560 5200 5560 19 0220 19 19 19 5560 5560 19 5560 5560 3880 3880 19 5560 19 19 3350 19 19 19 19 7680 0760 19 19 19 4243 20 6403 20 20 20 20 20 20 0733 20 6403 20 20 20 6403 1900 0720 0720 0720 8840 21 0720 9160 8840 21 8840 21 0720 0720 21 8840 8840 0720 21 21 21 3180 21 21 0743 6323 1123 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8995 0.8044 0.8995 0.7340 0.8033 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.8995 0.8995 0.7340 0.8995 0.8995 0.8251 0.8251 0.7340 0.8995 0.7340 0.7340 0.7894 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.8737 0.8643 0.7340 0.7340 0.7340 0.9331 0.8843 1.0382 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 0.9993 0.8843 1.0382 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 1.0382 0.9317 0.9897 0.9897 0.9897 1.0976 0.9230 0.9897 1.0527 1.0976 0.9230 1.0976 0.9230 0.9897 0.9897 0.9230 1.0976 1.0976 0.9897 0.9230 0.9230 0.9230 0.9869 0.9230 0.9230 1.2600 1.0181 1.1178 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 35380 33740 35380 12940 10780 99919 99919 99919 35380 35380 12940 99919 35380 99919 29180 99919 35380 99919 99919 26380 33740 99919 99919 99919 99919 12940 99919 12940 99919 30340 99920 38860 99920 99920 99920 99920 99920 99920 12620 99920 38860 99920 99920 99920 38860 19060 12580 12580 12580 47894 99921 12580 48864 47894 99921 13644 99921 12580 12580 99921 13644 47894 12580 99921 41540 99921 25180 41540 99921 12700 38340 39300 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban 27105 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8995 0.8031 0.8995 0.8593 0.8033 0.7411 0.7411 0.7411 0.8995 0.8995 0.8593 0.7411 0.8995 0.7411 0.8428 0.7411 0.8995 0.7411 0.7411 0.7894 0.8031 0.7411 0.7411 0.7411 0.7411 0.8593 0.7411 0.8593 0.7411 0.9331 0.8843 1.0382 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 0.9993 0.8843 1.0382 0.8843 0.8843 0.8843 1.0382 0.9317 0.9897 0.9897 0.9897 1.0926 0.9353 0.9897 1.0471 1.0926 0.9353 1.1483 0.9353 0.9897 0.9897 0.9353 1.1483 1.0926 0.9897 0.9353 0.9064 0.9353 0.9489 0.9064 0.9353 1.2600 1.0181 1.0966 27106 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 22030 22040 22060 22070 22080 22090 22120 22130 22150 22160 22170 23000 23010 23020 23030 23040 23050 23060 23070 23080 23090 23100 23110 23120 23130 23140 23150 23160 23170 23180 23190 23200 23210 23220 23230 23240 23250 23260 23270 23280 23290 23300 23310 23320 23330 23340 23350 23360 23370 23380 23390 23400 23410 23420 23430 23440 23450 23460 23470 23480 23490 23500 23510 23520 23530 23540 23550 23560 23570 23580 23590 23600 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Dukes County, Massachusetts ............................................. Essex County, Massachusetts .............................................. Franklin County, Massachusetts ........................................... Hampden County, Massachusetts ........................................ Hampshire County, Massachusetts ...................................... Middlesex County, Massachusetts ....................................... Nantucket County, Massachusetts ....................................... Norfolk County, Massachusetts ............................................ Plymouth County, Massachusetts ......................................... Suffolk County, Massachusetts ............................................. Worcester County, Massachusetts ....................................... Alcona County, Michigan ...................................................... Alger County, Michigan ......................................................... Allegan County, Michigan ..................................................... Alpena County, Michigan ...................................................... Antrim County, Michigan ....................................................... Arenac County, Michigan ...................................................... Baraga County, Michigan ...................................................... Barry County, Michigan ......................................................... Bay County, Michigan ........................................................... Benzie County, Michigan ...................................................... Berrien County, Michigan ...................................................... Branch County, Michigan ...................................................... Calhoun County, Michigan .................................................... Cass County, Michigan ......................................................... Charlevoix County, Michigan ................................................ Cheboygan County, Michigan ............................................... Chippewa County, Michigan ................................................. Clare County, Michigan ......................................................... Clinton County, Michigan ...................................................... Crawford County, Michigan ................................................... Delta County, Michigan ......................................................... Dickinson County, Michigan .................................................. Eaton County, Michigan ........................................................ Emmet County, Michigan ...................................................... Genesee County, Michigan ................................................... Gladwin County, Michigan .................................................... Gogebic County, Michigan .................................................... Grand Traverse County, Michigan ........................................ Gratiot County, Michigan ...................................................... Hillsdale County, Michigan .................................................... Houghton County, Michigan .................................................. Huron County, Michigan ....................................................... Ingham County, Michigan ..................................................... Ionia County, Michigan ......................................................... Iosco County, Michigan ......................................................... Iron County, Michigan ........................................................... Isabella County, Michigan ..................................................... Jackson County, Michigan .................................................... Kalamazoo County, Michigan ............................................... Kalkaska County, Michigan ................................................... Kent County, Michigan .......................................................... Keweenaw County, Michigan ................................................ Lake County, Michigan ......................................................... Lapeer County, Michigan ...................................................... Leelanau County, Michigan .................................................. Lenawee County, Michigan ................................................... Livingston County, Michigan ................................................. Luce County, Michigan ......................................................... Mackinac County, Michigan .................................................. Macomb County, Michigan ................................................... Manistee County, Michigan ................................................... Marquette County, Michigan ................................................. Mason County, Michigan ...................................................... Mecosta County, Michigan .................................................... Menominee County, Michigan .............................................. Midland County, Michigan ..................................................... Missaukee County, Michigan ................................................ Monroe County, Michigan ..................................................... Montcalm County, Michigan .................................................. Montmorency County, Michigan ........................................... Muskegon County, Michigan ................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4701 22 1123 22 8003 8003 1123 22 1123 1123 1123 1123 23 23 3000 23 23 23 23 23 6960 23 0870 23 3720 23 23 23 23 23 4040 23 23 23 4040 23 2640 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 4040 23 23 23 23 3520 3720 23 3000 23 23 2160 23 0440 0440 23 23 2160 23 23 23 23 23 6960 23 2160 23 23 3000 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 1.0216 1.1178 1.0216 1.0263 1.0263 1.1178 1.0216 1.1178 1.1178 1.1178 1.1178 0.8824 0.8824 0.9445 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.9241 0.8824 0.8879 0.8824 1.0143 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.9794 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.9794 0.8824 1.0655 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.9794 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.9304 1.0143 0.8824 0.9445 0.8824 0.8824 1.0147 0.8824 1.0707 1.0707 0.8824 0.8824 1.0147 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.9241 0.8824 1.0147 0.8824 0.8824 0.9445 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99922 21604 44140 44140 44140 15764 99922 14484 14484 14484 49340 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 24340 13020 99923 35660 99923 12980 43780 99923 99923 99923 99923 29620 99923 99923 99923 29620 99923 22420 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 29620 24340 99923 99923 99923 27100 28020 99923 24340 99923 99923 47644 99923 99923 47644 99923 99923 47644 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 33780 99923 99923 34740 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban 2006 CBSAbased WI 1.0216 1.0538 1.0248 1.0248 1.0248 1.1172 1.0216 1.1558 1.1558 1.1558 1.1028 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.9390 0.9343 0.8895 0.8879 0.8895 0.9508 0.9788 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.9794 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.9794 0.8895 1.0655 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.9794 0.9390 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.9304 1.0381 0.8895 0.9390 0.8895 0.8895 0.9871 0.8895 0.8895 0.9871 0.8895 0.8895 0.9871 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.9468 0.8895 0.8895 0.9664 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 23610 23620 23630 23640 23650 23660 23670 23680 23690 23700 23710 23720 23730 23740 23750 23760 23770 23780 23790 23800 23810 23830 24000 24010 24020 24030 24040 24050 24060 24070 24080 24090 24100 24110 24120 24130 24140 24150 24160 24170 24180 24190 24200 24210 24220 24230 24240 24250 24260 24270 24280 24290 24300 24310 24320 24330 24340 24350 24360 24370 24380 24390 24400 24410 24420 24430 24440 24450 24460 24470 24480 24490 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Newaygo County, Michigan .................................................. Oakland County, Michigan .................................................... Oceana County, Michigan ..................................................... Ogemaw County, Michigan ................................................... Ontonagon County, Michigan ............................................... Osceola County, Michigan .................................................... Oscoda County, Michigan ..................................................... Otsego County, Michigan ...................................................... Ottawa County, Michigan ...................................................... Presque Isle County, Michigan ............................................. Roscommon County, Michigan ............................................. Saginaw County, Michigan ................................................... St Clair County, Michigan ..................................................... St Joseph County, Michigan ................................................. Sanilac County, Michigan ..................................................... Schoolcraft County, Michigan ............................................... Shiawassee County, Michigan .............................................. Tuscola County, Michigan ..................................................... Van Buren County, Michigan ................................................ Washtenaw County, Michigan .............................................. Wayne County, Michigan ...................................................... Wexford County, Michigan .................................................... Aitkin County, Minnesota ...................................................... Anoka County, Minnesota ..................................................... Becker County, Minnesota .................................................... Beltrami County, Minnesota .................................................. Benton County, Minnesota .................................................... Big Stone County, Minnesota ............................................... Blue Earth County, Minnesota .............................................. Brown County, Minnesota ..................................................... Carlton County, Minnesota ................................................... Carver County, Minnesota .................................................... Cass County, Minnesota ....................................................... Chippewa County, Minnesota ............................................... Chisago County, Minnesota .................................................. Clay County, Minnesota ........................................................ Clearwater County, Minnesota .............................................. Cook County, Minnesota ....................................................... Cottonwood County, Minnesota ............................................ Crow Wing County, Minnesota ............................................. Dakota County, Minnesota .................................................... Dodge County, Minnesota .................................................... Douglas County, Minnesota .................................................. Faribault County, Minnesota ................................................. Fillmore County, Minnesota .................................................. Freeborn County, Minnesota ................................................ Goodhue County, Minnesota ................................................ Grant County, Minnesota ...................................................... Hennepin County, Minnesota ................................................ Houston County, Minnesota .................................................. Hubbard County, Minnesota ................................................. Isanti County, Minnesota ...................................................... Itasca County, Minnesota ..................................................... Jackson County, Minnesota .................................................. Kanabec County, Minnesota ................................................. Kandiyohi County, Minnesota ............................................... Kittson County, Minnesota .................................................... Koochiching County, Minnesota ........................................... Lac Qui Parle County, Minnesota ......................................... Lake County, Minnesota ....................................................... Lake Of Woods County, Minnesota ...................................... Le Sueur County, Minnesota ................................................ Lincoln County, Minnesota .................................................... Lyon County, Minnesota ....................................................... Mc Leod County, Minnesota ................................................. Mahnomen County, Minnesota ............................................. Marshall County, Minnesota ................................................. Martin County, Minnesota ..................................................... Meeker County, Minnesota ................................................... Mille Lacs County, Minnesota ............................................... Morrison County, Minnesota ................................................. Mower County, Minnesota .................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4701 23 2160 23 23 23 23 23 23 3000 23 23 6960 2160 23 23 23 23 23 3720 0440 2160 23 24 5120 24 24 6980 24 24 24 24 5120 24 24 5120 2520 24 24 24 24 5120 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 5120 3870 24 5120 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8824 1.0147 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.9445 0.8824 0.8824 0.9241 1.0147 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 0.8824 1.0143 1.0707 1.0147 0.8824 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 0.9965 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.8486 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.9564 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 24340 47644 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 26100 99923 99923 40980 47644 99923 99923 99923 99923 99923 28020 11460 19804 99923 99924 33460 99924 99924 41060 99924 99924 99924 20260 33460 99924 99924 33460 22020 99924 99924 99924 99924 33460 40340 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 33460 29100 99924 33460 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 27107 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9390 0.9871 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.9055 0.8895 0.8895 0.9088 0.9871 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 0.8895 1.0381 1.0859 1.0424 0.8895 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 0.9965 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.0213 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.8486 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 1.1131 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.9564 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 27108 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 24500 24510 24520 24530 24540 24550 24560 24570 24580 24590 24600 24610 24620 24630 24640 24650 24660 24670 24680 24690 24700 24710 24720 24730 24740 24750 24760 24770 24780 24790 24800 24810 24820 24830 24840 24850 24860 25000 25010 25020 25030 25040 25050 25060 25070 25080 25090 25100 25110 25120 25130 25140 25150 25160 25170 25180 25190 25200 25210 25220 25230 25240 25250 25260 25270 25280 25290 25300 25310 25320 25330 25340 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Murray County, Minnesota .................................................... Nicollet County, Minnesota ................................................... Nobles County, Minnesota .................................................... Norman County, Minnesota .................................................. Olmsted County, Minnesota .................................................. Otter Tail County, Minnesota ................................................ Pennington County, Minnesota ............................................. Pine County, Minnesota ........................................................ Pipestone County, Minnesota ............................................... Polk County, Minnesota ........................................................ Pope County, Minnesota ....................................................... Ramsey County, Minnesota .................................................. Red Lake County, Minnesota ............................................... Redwood County, Minnesota ................................................ Renville County, Minnesota .................................................. Rice County, Minnesota ........................................................ Rock County, Minnesota ....................................................... Roseau County, Minnesota ................................................... St Louis County, Minnesota .................................................. Scott County, Minnesota ....................................................... Sherburne County, Minnesota .............................................. Sibley County, Minnesota ..................................................... Stearns County, Minnesota ................................................... Steele County, Minnesota ..................................................... Stevens County, Minnesota .................................................. Swift County, Minnesota ....................................................... Todd County, Minnesota ....................................................... Traverse County, Minnesota ................................................. Wabasha County, Minnesota ................................................ Wadena County, Minnesota .................................................. Waseca County, Minnesota .................................................. Washington County, Minnesota ............................................ Watonwan County, Minnesota .............................................. Wilkin County, Minnesota ..................................................... Winona County, Minnesota ................................................... Wright County, Minnesota ..................................................... Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota ..................................... Adams County, Mississippi ................................................... Alcorn County, Mississippi .................................................... Amite County, Mississippi ..................................................... Attala County, Mississippi ..................................................... Benton County, Mississippi ................................................... Bolivar County, Mississippi ................................................... Calhoun County, Mississippi ................................................. Carroll County, Mississippi .................................................... Chickasaw County, Mississippi ............................................. Choctaw County, Mississippi ................................................ Claiborne County, Mississippi ............................................... Clarke County, Mississippi .................................................... Clay County, Mississippi ....................................................... Coahoma County, Mississippi ............................................... Copiah County, Mississippi ................................................... Covington County, Mississippi .............................................. Desoto County, Mississippi ................................................... Forrest County, Mississippi ................................................... Franklin County, Mississippi ................................................. George County, Mississippi .................................................. Greene County, Mississippi .................................................. Grenada County, Mississippi ................................................ Hancock County, Mississippi ................................................ Harrison County, Mississippi ................................................. Hinds County, Mississippi ..................................................... Holmes County, Mississippi .................................................. Humphreys County, Mississippi ............................................ Issaquena County, Mississippi .............................................. Itawamba County, Mississippi ............................................... Jackson County, Mississippi ................................................. Jasper County, Mississippi ................................................... Jefferson County, Mississippi ............................................... Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi ..................................... Jones County, Mississippi ..................................................... Kemper County, Mississippi .................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4701 24 24 24 24 6820 24 24 24 24 2985 24 5120 24 24 24 24 24 24 2240 5120 5120 24 6980 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 5120 24 24 24 5120 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 4920 3285 25 25 25 25 0920 0920 3560 25 25 25 25 0920 25 25 25 25 25 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1131 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.7901 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.0213 1.1075 1.1075 0.9132 0.9965 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.9416 0.7601 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.8706 0.8706 0.8382 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.8706 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99924 99924 99924 99924 40340 99924 99924 99924 99924 24220 99924 33460 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 20260 33460 33460 99924 41060 99924 99924 99924 99924 99924 40340 99924 99924 33460 99924 99924 99924 33460 99924 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 27140 99925 32820 25620 99925 37700 99925 99925 25060 25060 27140 99925 99925 99925 99925 37700 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1131 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.7901 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.0213 1.1075 1.1075 0.9132 0.9965 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1131 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.9132 0.9132 1.1075 0.9132 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.8311 0.7674 0.9397 0.7601 0.7674 0.8156 0.7674 0.7674 0.8929 0.8929 0.8311 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.8156 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 25350 25360 25370 25380 25390 25400 25410 25420 25430 25440 25450 25460 25470 25480 25490 25500 25510 25520 25530 25540 25550 25560 25570 25580 25590 25600 25610 25620 25630 25640 25650 25660 25670 25680 25690 25700 25710 25720 25730 25740 25750 25760 25770 25780 25790 25800 25810 26000 26010 26020 26030 26040 26050 26060 26070 26080 26090 26100 26110 26120 26130 26140 26150 26160 26170 26180 26190 26200 26210 26220 26230 26240 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Lafayette County, Mississippi ............................................... Lamar County, Mississippi .................................................... Lauderdale County, Mississippi ............................................ Lawrence County, Mississippi ............................................... Leake County, Mississippi .................................................... Lee County, Mississippi ........................................................ Leflore County, Mississippi ................................................... Lincoln County, Mississippi ................................................... Lowndes County, Mississippi ................................................ Madison County, Mississippi ................................................. Marion County, Mississippi ................................................... Marshall County, Mississippi ................................................. Monroe County, Mississippi .................................................. Montgomery County, Mississippi .......................................... Neshoba County, Mississippi ................................................ Newton County, Mississippi .................................................. Noxubee County, Mississippi ................................................ Oktibbeha County, Mississippi .............................................. Panola County, Mississippi ................................................... Pearl River County, Mississippi ............................................ Perry County, Mississippi ...................................................... Pike County, Mississippi ....................................................... Pontotoc County, Mississippi ................................................ Prentiss County, Mississippi ................................................. Quitman County, Mississippi ................................................. Rankin County, Mississippi ................................................... Scott County, Mississippi ...................................................... Sharkey County, Mississippi ................................................. Simpson County, Mississippi ................................................ Smith County, Mississippi ..................................................... Stone County, Mississippi ..................................................... Sunflower County, Mississippi .............................................. Tallahatchie County, Mississippi ........................................... Tate County, Mississippi ....................................................... Tippah County, Mississippi ................................................... Tishomingo County, Mississippi ............................................ Tunica County, Mississippi ................................................... Union County, Mississippi ..................................................... Walthall County, Mississippi ................................................. Warren County, Mississippi .................................................. Washington County, Mississippi ........................................... Wayne County, Mississippi ................................................... Webster County, Mississippi ................................................. Wilkinson County, Mississippi ............................................... Winston County, Mississippi ................................................. Yalobusha County, Mississippi ............................................. Yazoo County, Mississippi .................................................... Adair County, Missouri .......................................................... Andrew County, Missouri ...................................................... Atchison County, Missouri .................................................... Audrain County, Missouri ...................................................... Barry County, Missouri .......................................................... Barton County, Missouri ........................................................ Bates County, Missouri ......................................................... Benton County, Missouri ....................................................... Bollinger County, Missouri .................................................... Boone County, Missouri ........................................................ Buchanan County, Missouri .................................................. Butler County, Missouri ......................................................... Caldwell County, Missouri ..................................................... Callaway County, Missouri .................................................... Camden County, Missouri ..................................................... Cape Girardeau County, Missouri ........................................ Carroll County, Missouri ........................................................ Carter County, Missouri ........................................................ Cass County, Missouri .......................................................... Cedar County, Missouri ........................................................ Chariton County, Missouri ..................................................... Christian County, Missouri .................................................... Clark County, Missouri .......................................................... Clay County, Missouri ........................................................... Clinton County, Missouri ....................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4701 25 3285 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 3560 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 3560 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 26 7000 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 1740 7000 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 3760 26 26 7920 26 3760 3760 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7634 0.7601 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.8382 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.8382 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7634 0.7959 0.9519 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.8345 0.9519 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.9490 0.7959 0.7959 0.8250 0.7959 0.9490 0.9490 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99925 25620 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 27140 99925 32820 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 25620 99925 99925 99925 99925 27140 99925 99925 27140 99925 25060 99925 99925 32820 99925 99925 32820 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99925 99926 41140 99926 99926 99926 99926 28140 99926 99926 17860 41140 99926 28140 27620 99926 99926 99926 99926 28140 99926 99926 44180 99926 28140 28140 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban 27109 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7674 0.7601 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.8311 0.7674 0.9397 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7601 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.8311 0.7674 0.7674 0.8311 0.7674 0.8929 0.7674 0.7674 0.9397 0.7674 0.7674 0.9397 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7674 0.7900 0.9519 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.9476 0.7900 0.7900 0.8345 0.9519 0.7900 0.9476 0.8387 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.9476 0.7900 0.7900 0.8237 0.7900 0.9476 0.9476 27110 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 26250 26260 26270 26280 26290 26300 26310 26320 26330 26340 26350 26360 26370 26380 26390 26400 26410 26411 26412 26440 26450 26460 26470 26480 26490 26500 26510 26520 26530 26540 26541 26560 26570 26580 26590 26600 26601 26620 26630 26631 26650 26660 26670 26680 26690 26700 26710 26720 26730 26740 26750 26751 26770 26780 26790 26800 26810 26820 26821 26840 26850 26860 26870 26880 26881 26900 26910 26911 26930 26940 26950 26960 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Cole County, Missouri ........................................................... Cooper County, Missouri ...................................................... Crawford County, Missouri .................................................... Dade County, Missouri .......................................................... Dallas County, Missouri ........................................................ Daviess County, Missouri ..................................................... De Kalb County, Missouri ..................................................... Dent County, Missouri ........................................................... Douglas County, Missouri ..................................................... Dunklin County, Missouri ...................................................... Franklin County, Missouri ..................................................... Gasconade County, Missouri ................................................ Gentry County, Missouri ....................................................... Greene County, Missouri ...................................................... Grundy County, Missouri ...................................................... Harrison County, Missouri ..................................................... Henry County, Missouri ......................................................... Hickory County, Missouri ...................................................... Holt County, Missouri ............................................................ Howard County, Missouri ...................................................... Howell County, Missouri ....................................................... Iron County, Missouri ............................................................ Jackson County, Missouri ..................................................... Jasper County, Missouri ....................................................... Jefferson County, Missouri ................................................... Johnson County, Missouri ..................................................... Knox County, Missouri .......................................................... Laclede County, Missouri ...................................................... Lafayette County, Missouri ................................................... Lawrence County, Missouri ................................................... Lewis County, Missouri ......................................................... Lincoln County, Missouri ....................................................... Linn County, Missouri ........................................................... Livingston County, Missouri .................................................. Mc Donald County, Missouri ................................................. Macon County, Missouri ....................................................... Madison County, Missouri ..................................................... Maries County, Missouri ....................................................... Marion County, Missouri ....................................................... Mercer County, Missouri ....................................................... Miller County, Missouri .......................................................... Mississippi County, Missouri ................................................. Moniteau County, Missouri ................................................... Monroe County, Missouri ...................................................... Montgomery County, Missouri .............................................. Morgan County, Missouri ...................................................... New Madrid County, Missouri ............................................... Newton County, Missouri ...................................................... Nodaway County, Missouri ................................................... Oregon County, Missouri ...................................................... Osage County, Missouri ........................................................ Ozark County, Missouri ......................................................... Pemiscot County, Missouri ................................................... Perry County, Missouri .......................................................... Pettis County, Missouri ......................................................... Phelps County, Missouri ....................................................... Pike County, Missouri ........................................................... Platte County, Missouri ......................................................... Polk County, Missouri ........................................................... Pulaski County, Missouri ....................................................... Putnam County, Missouri ...................................................... Ralls County, Missouri .......................................................... Randolph County, Missouri ................................................... Ray County, Missouri ............................................................ Reynolds County, Missouri ................................................... Ripley County, Missouri ........................................................ St Charles County, Missouri ................................................. St Clair County, Missouri ...................................................... St Francois County, Missouri ................................................ St Louis County, Missouri ..................................................... St Louis City County, Missouri .............................................. Ste Genevieve County, Missouri .......................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4701 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 7040 26 26 7920 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 3760 3710 7040 26 26 26 3760 26 26 7040 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 3710 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 3760 26 26 26 26 26 3760 26 26 7040 26 26 7040 7040 26 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.8962 0.7959 0.7959 0.8250 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.9490 0.8582 0.8962 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.9490 0.7959 0.7959 0.8962 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.8582 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.9490 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.9490 0.7959 0.7959 0.8962 0.7959 0.7959 0.8962 0.8962 0.7959 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 27620 99926 41180 99926 44180 99926 41140 99926 99926 99926 41180 99926 99926 44180 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 17860 99926 99926 28140 27900 41180 99926 99926 99926 28140 99926 99926 41180 99926 99926 22220 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 27620 99926 99926 99926 99926 27900 99926 99926 27620 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 28140 44180 99926 99926 99926 99926 28140 99926 99926 41180 99926 99926 41180 41180 99926 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8387 0.7900 0.8954 0.7900 0.8237 0.7900 0.9519 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.8954 0.7900 0.7900 0.8237 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.8345 0.7900 0.7900 0.9476 0.8582 0.8954 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.9476 0.7900 0.7900 0.8954 0.7900 0.7900 0.8661 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.8387 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.8582 0.7900 0.7900 0.8387 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.9476 0.8237 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.9476 0.7900 0.7900 0.8954 0.7900 0.7900 0.8954 0.8954 0.7900 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 26970 26980 26981 26982 26983 26984 26985 26986 26987 26988 26989 26990 26991 26992 26993 26994 26995 26996 27000 27010 27020 27030 27040 27050 27060 27070 27080 27090 27100 27110 27113 27120 27130 27140 27150 27160 27170 27180 27190 27200 27210 27220 27230 27240 27250 27260 27270 27280 27290 27300 27310 27320 27330 27340 27350 27360 27370 27380 27390 27400 27410 27420 27430 27440 27450 27460 27470 27480 27490 27500 27510 27520 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Saline County, Missouri ........................................................ Schuyler County, Missouri .................................................... Scotland County, Missouri .................................................... Scott County, Missouri .......................................................... Shannon County, Missouri .................................................... Shelby County, Missouri ....................................................... Stoddard County, Missouri .................................................... Stone County, Missouri ......................................................... Sullivan County, Missouri ...................................................... Taney County, Missouri ........................................................ Texas County, Missouri ........................................................ Vernon County, Missouri ....................................................... Warren County, Missouri ...................................................... Washington County, Missouri ............................................... Wayne County, Missouri ....................................................... Webster County, Missouri ..................................................... Worth County, Missouri ......................................................... Wright County, Missouri ........................................................ Beaverhead County, Montana .............................................. Big Horn County, Montana ................................................... Blaine County, Montana ........................................................ Broadwater County, Montana ............................................... Carbon County, Montana ...................................................... Carter County, Montana ........................................................ Cascade County, Montana ................................................... Chouteau County, Montana .................................................. Custer County, Montana ....................................................... Daniels County, Montana ...................................................... Dawson County, Montana ..................................................... Deer Lodge County, Montana ............................................... Yellowstone National Park, Montana .................................... Fallon County, Montana ........................................................ Fergus County, Montana ...................................................... Flathead County, Montana .................................................... Gallatin County, Montana ..................................................... Garfield County, Montana ..................................................... Glacier County, Montana ...................................................... Golden Valley County, Montana ........................................... Granite County, Montana ...................................................... Hill County, Montana ............................................................. Jefferson County, Montana ................................................... Judith Basin County, Montana .............................................. Lake County, Montana .......................................................... Lewis And Clark County, Montana ....................................... Liberty County, Montana ....................................................... Lincoln County, Montana ...................................................... Mc Cone County, Montana ................................................... Madison County, Montana .................................................... Meagher County, Montana ................................................... Mineral County, Montana ...................................................... Missoula County, Montana ................................................... Musselshell County, Montana ............................................... Park County, Montana .......................................................... Petroleum County, Montana ................................................. Phillips County, Montana ...................................................... Pondera County, Montana .................................................... Powder River County, Montana ............................................ Powell County, Montana ....................................................... Prairie County, Montana ....................................................... Ravalli County, Montana ....................................................... Richland County, Montana .................................................... Roosevelt County, Montana .................................................. Rosebud County, Montana ................................................... Sanders County, Montana .................................................... Sheridan County, Montana ................................................... Silver Bow County, Montana ................................................ Stillwater County, Montana ................................................... Sweet Grass County, Montana ............................................. Teton County, Montana ........................................................ Toole County, Montana ......................................................... Treasure County, Montana ................................................... Valley County, Montana ........................................................ 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4701 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 7040 26 26 7920 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 3040 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 5140 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.7959 0.8962 0.7959 0.7959 0.8250 0.7959 0.7959 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.9052 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.9473 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 99926 41180 41180 99926 44180 99926 99926 99927 99927 99927 99927 13740 99927 24500 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 33540 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 99927 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 27111 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.8954 0.8954 0.7900 0.8237 0.7900 0.7900 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8834 0.8762 0.9052 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.9473 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 27112 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 27530 27540 27550 28000 28010 28020 28030 28040 28050 28060 28070 28080 28090 28100 28110 28120 28130 28140 28150 28160 28170 28180 28190 28200 28210 28220 28230 28240 28250 28260 28270 28280 28290 28300 28310 28320 28330 28340 28350 28360 28370 28380 28390 28400 28410 28420 28430 28440 28450 28460 28470 28480 28490 28500 28510 28520 28530 28540 28550 28560 28570 28580 28590 28600 28610 28620 28630 28640 28650 28660 28670 28680 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Wheatland County, Montana ................................................ Wibaux County, Montana ...................................................... Yellowstone County, Montana .............................................. Adams County, Nebraska ..................................................... Antelope County, Nebraska .................................................. Arthur County, Nebraska ...................................................... Banner County, Nebraska ..................................................... Blaine County, Nebraska ...................................................... Boone County, Nebraska ...................................................... Box Butte County, Nebraska ................................................ Boyd County, Nebraska ........................................................ Brown County, Nebraska ...................................................... Buffalo County, Nebraska ..................................................... Burt County, Nebraska .......................................................... Butler County, Nebraska ....................................................... Cass County, Nebraska ........................................................ Cedar County, Nebraska ...................................................... Chase County, Nebraska ...................................................... Cherry County, Nebraska ..................................................... Cheyenne County, Nebraska ................................................ Clay County, Nebraska ......................................................... Colfax County, Nebraska ...................................................... Cuming County, Nebraska .................................................... Custer County, Nebraska ...................................................... Dakota County, Nebraska ..................................................... Dawes County, Nebraska ..................................................... Dawson County, Nebraska ................................................... Deuel County, Nebraska ....................................................... Dixon County, Nebraska ....................................................... Dodge County, Nebraska ...................................................... Douglas County, Nebraska ................................................... Dundy County, Nebraska ...................................................... Fillmore County, Nebraska ................................................... Franklin County, Nebraska ................................................... Frontier County, Nebraska .................................................... Furnas County, Nebraska ..................................................... Gage County, Nebraska ....................................................... Garden County, Nebraska .................................................... Garfield County, Nebraska .................................................... Gosper County, Nebraska .................................................... Grant County, Nebraska ....................................................... Greeley County, Nebraska .................................................... Hall County, Nebraska .......................................................... Hamilton County, Nebraska .................................................. Harlan County, Nebraska ...................................................... Hayes County, Nebraska ...................................................... Hitchcock County, Nebraska ................................................. Holt County, Nebraska .......................................................... Hooker County, Nebraska ..................................................... Howard County, Nebraska .................................................... Jefferson County, Nebraska ................................................. Johnson County, Nebraska ................................................... Kearney County, Nebraska ................................................... Keith County, Nebraska ........................................................ Keya Paha County, Nebraska .............................................. Kimball County, Nebraska .................................................... Knox County, Nebraska ........................................................ Lancaster County, Nebraska ................................................ Lincoln County, Nebraska ..................................................... Logan County, Nebraska ...................................................... Loup County, Nebraska ........................................................ Mc Pherson County, Nebraska ............................................. Madison County, Nebraska ................................................... Merrick County, Nebraska .................................................... Morrill County, Nebraska ...................................................... Nance County, Nebraska ...................................................... Nemaha County, Nebraska ................................................... Nuckolls County, Nebraska ................................................... Otoe County, Nebraska ........................................................ Pawnee County, Nebraska ................................................... Perkins County, Nebraska .................................................... Phelps County, Nebraska ..................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4701 27 27 0880 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 5920 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 7720 28 28 28 28 28 5920 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 4360 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8762 0.8762 0.8834 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9560 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9416 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9560 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 1.0214 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99927 99927 13740 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 36540 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 43580 99928 99928 99928 43580 99928 36540 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 30700 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8762 0.8762 0.8834 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9560 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9381 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9381 0.8657 0.9560 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 1.0214 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 28690 28700 28710 28720 28730 28740 28750 28760 28770 28780 28790 28800 28810 28820 28830 28840 28850 28860 28870 28880 28890 28900 28910 28920 29000 29010 29020 29030 29040 29050 29060 29070 29080 29090 29100 29110 29120 29130 29140 29150 29160 30000 30010 30020 30030 30040 30050 30060 30070 30080 30090 31000 31100 31150 31160 31180 31190 31200 31220 31230 31250 31260 31270 31290 31300 31310 31320 31340 31350 31360 31370 31390 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Pierce County, Nebraska ...................................................... Platte County, Nebraska ....................................................... Polk County, Nebraska ......................................................... Redwillow County, Nebraska ................................................ Richardson County, Nebraska .............................................. Rock County, Nebraska ........................................................ Saline County, Nebraska ...................................................... Sarpy County, Nebraska ....................................................... Saunders County, Nebraska ................................................. Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska .............................................. Seward County, Nebraska .................................................... Sheridan County, Nebraska .................................................. Sherman County, Nebraska .................................................. Sioux County, Nebraska ....................................................... Stanton County, Nebraska .................................................... Thayer County, Nebraska ..................................................... Thomas County, Nebraska ................................................... Thurston County, Nebraska .................................................. Valley County, Nebraska ...................................................... Washington County, Nebraska ............................................. Wayne County, Nebraska ..................................................... Webster County, Nebraska ................................................... Wheeler County, Nebraska ................................................... York County, Nebraska ......................................................... Churchill County, Nevada ..................................................... Clark County, Nevada ........................................................... Douglas County, Nevada ...................................................... Elko County, Nevada ............................................................ Esmeralda County, Nevada .................................................. Eureka County, Nevada ........................................................ Humboldt County, Nevada .................................................... Lander County, Nevada ........................................................ Lincoln County, Nevada ........................................................ Lyon County, Nevada ........................................................... Mineral County, Nevada ....................................................... Nye County, Nevada ............................................................. Carson City County, Nevada ................................................ Pershing County, Nevada ..................................................... Storey County, Nevada ......................................................... Washoe County, Nevada ...................................................... White Pine County, Nevada .................................................. Belknap County, New Hampshire ......................................... Carroll County, New Hampshire ........................................... Cheshire County, New Hampshire ....................................... Coos County, New Hampshire ............................................. Grafton County, New Hampshire .......................................... Hillsboro County, New Hampshire ........................................ Merrimack County, New Hampshire ..................................... Rockingham County, New Hampshire .................................. Strafford County, New Hampshire ........................................ Sullivan County, New Hampshire ......................................... Atlantic County, New Jersey ................................................. Bergen County, New Jersey ................................................. Burlington County, New Jersey ............................................ Camden County, New Jersey ............................................... Cape May County, New Jersey ............................................ Cumberland County, New Jersey ......................................... Essex County, New Jersey ................................................... Gloucester County, New Jersey ........................................... Hudson County, New Jersey ................................................ Hunterdon County, New Jersey ............................................ Mercer County, New Jersey ................................................. Middlesex County, New Jersey ............................................ Monmouth County, New Jersey ............................................ Morris County, New Jersey ................................................... Ocean County, New Jersey .................................................. Passaic County, New Jersey ................................................ Salem County, New Jersey .................................................. Somerset County, New Jersey ............................................. Sussex County, New Jersey ................................................. Union County, New Jersey ................................................... Warren County, New Jersey ................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4701 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 5920 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 5920 28 28 28 28 29 4120 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 4120 29 29 29 6720 29 30 30 30 30 30 1123 1123 1123 1123 30 0560 0875 6160 6160 0560 8760 5640 6160 3640 5015 8480 5015 5190 5640 5190 0875 6160 5015 5640 5640 5640 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9560 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9560 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9687 1.1155 0.9687 0.9687 0.9687 0.9687 0.9687 0.9687 0.9687 0.9687 0.9687 1.1155 0.9687 0.9687 0.9687 1.0982 0.9687 1.0817 1.0817 1.0817 1.0817 1.0817 1.1178 1.1178 1.1178 1.1178 1.0817 1.1496 1.1651 1.0922 1.0922 1.1496 0.9827 1.1834 1.0922 1.1338 1.1167 1.0834 1.1167 1.1260 1.1834 1.1260 1.1651 1.0922 1.1167 1.1834 1.1834 1.1834 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 36540 36540 99928 30700 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 99928 36540 99928 99928 99928 99928 99929 29820 99929 99929 99929 99929 99929 99929 99929 99929 99929 99929 16180 99929 39900 39900 99929 99930 99930 99930 99930 99930 31700 31700 40484 40484 99930 12100 35644 15804 15804 36140 47220 35084 15804 35644 35084 45940 20764 20764 35084 20764 35644 48864 20764 35084 35084 10900 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban 27113 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9560 0.9560 0.8657 1.0214 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9560 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.8657 0.9065 1.1437 0.9065 0.9065 0.9065 0.9065 0.9065 0.9065 0.9065 0.9065 0.9065 0.9065 1.0234 0.9065 1.0982 1.0982 0.9065 1.0817 1.0817 1.0817 1.0817 1.0817 1.0354 1.0354 1.0374 1.0374 1.0817 1.1615 1.3188 1.0517 1.0517 1.1011 0.9827 1.1883 1.0517 1.3188 1.1883 1.0834 1.1249 1.1249 1.1883 1.1249 1.3188 1.0471 1.1249 1.1883 1.1883 0.9818 27114 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 32000 32010 32020 32025 32030 32040 32050 32060 32070 32080 32090 32100 32110 32120 32130 32131 32140 32150 32160 32170 32180 32190 32200 32210 32220 32230 32240 32250 32260 32270 32280 32290 32300 33000 33010 33020 33030 33040 33050 33060 33070 33080 33090 33200 33210 33220 33230 33240 33260 33270 33280 33290 33300 33310 33320 33330 33331 33340 33350 33360 33370 33380 33400 33420 33500 33510 33520 33530 33540 33550 33560 33570 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Bernalillo County, New Mexico ............................................. Catron County, New Mexico ................................................. Chaves County, New Mexico ................................................ Cibola County, New Mexico .................................................. Colfax County, New Mexico .................................................. Curry County, New Mexico ................................................... De Baca County, New Mexico .............................................. Dona Ana County, New Mexico ............................................ Eddy County, New Mexico .................................................... Grant County, New Mexico ................................................... Guadalupe County, New Mexico .......................................... Harding County, New Mexico ............................................... Hidalgo County, New Mexico ................................................ Lea County, New Mexico ...................................................... Lincoln County, New Mexico ................................................ Los Alamos County, New Mexico ......................................... Luna County, New Mexico .................................................... Mc Kinley County, New Mexico ............................................ Mora County, New Mexico .................................................... Otero County, New Mexico ................................................... Quay County, New Mexico ................................................... Rio Arriba County, New Mexico ............................................ Roosevelt County, New Mexico ............................................ Sandoval County, New Mexico ............................................. San Juan County, New Mexico ............................................ San Miguel County, New Mexico .......................................... Santa Fe County, New Mexico ............................................. Sierra County, New Mexico .................................................. Socorro County, New Mexico ............................................... Taos County, New Mexico .................................................... Torrance County, New Mexico ............................................. Union County, New Mexico .................................................. Valencia County, New Mexico .............................................. Albany County, New York ..................................................... Allegany County, New York .................................................. Bronx County, New York ...................................................... Broome County, New York ................................................... Cattaraugus County, New York ............................................ Cayuga County, New York ................................................... Chautauqua County, New York ............................................ Chemung County, New York ................................................ Chenango County, New York ............................................... Clinton County, New York ..................................................... Columbia County, New York ................................................. Cortland County, New York .................................................. Delaware County, New York ................................................. Dutchess County, New York ................................................. Erie County, New York ......................................................... Essex County, New York ...................................................... Franklin County, New York ................................................... Fulton County, New York ...................................................... Genesee County, New York ................................................. Greene County, New York .................................................... Hamilton County, New York .................................................. Herkimer County, New York ................................................. Jefferson County, New York ................................................. Kings County, New York ....................................................... Lewis County, New York ....................................................... Livingston County, New York ................................................ Madison County, New York .................................................. Monroe County, New York .................................................... Montgomery County, New York ............................................ Nassau County, New York .................................................... New York County, New York ................................................ Niagara County, New York ................................................... Oneida County, New York .................................................... Onondaga County, New York ............................................... Ontario County, New York .................................................... Orange County, New York .................................................... Orleans County, New York ................................................... Oswego County, New York ................................................... Otsego County, New York .................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4701 0200 32 32 32 32 32 32 4100 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 7490 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 0200 32 32 7490 32 32 32 32 32 0200 0160 33 5600 0960 33 8160 3610 2335 33 33 33 33 33 2281 1280 33 33 33 6840 33 33 8680 33 5600 33 6840 8160 6840 0160 5380 5600 1280 8680 8160 6840 5660 6840 8160 33 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.9684 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8467 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 1.0748 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.9684 0.8563 0.8563 1.0748 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.8563 0.9684 0.8559 0.8395 1.3464 0.8562 0.8395 0.9492 0.7544 0.8250 0.8395 0.8395 0.8395 0.8395 0.8395 1.0475 0.9511 0.8395 0.8395 0.8395 0.9049 0.8395 0.8395 0.8358 0.8395 1.3464 0.8395 0.9049 0.9492 0.9049 0.8559 1.2719 1.3464 0.9511 0.8358 0.9492 0.9049 1.1207 0.9049 0.9492 0.8395 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 10740 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 29740 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 99932 10740 22140 99932 42140 99932 99932 99932 10740 99932 10740 10580 99933 35644 13780 99933 99933 99933 21300 99933 99933 99933 99933 99933 39100 15380 99933 99933 99933 99933 99933 99933 46540 99933 35644 99933 40380 45060 40380 99933 35004 35644 15380 46540 45060 40380 39100 40380 45060 99933 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9684 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8467 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.9684 0.8509 0.8635 1.0920 0.8635 0.8635 0.8635 0.9684 0.8635 0.9684 0.8589 0.8154 1.3188 0.8562 0.8154 0.8154 0.8154 0.8250 0.8154 0.8154 0.8154 0.8154 0.8154 1.0891 0.9511 0.8154 0.8154 0.8154 0.8154 0.8154 0.8154 0.8358 0.8154 1.3188 0.8154 0.9121 0.9574 0.9121 0.8154 1.2719 1.3188 0.9511 0.8358 0.9574 0.9121 1.0891 0.9121 0.9574 0.8154 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 33580 33590 33600 33610 33620 33630 33640 33650 33660 33670 33680 33690 33700 33710 33720 33730 33740 33750 33760 33770 33800 33900 33910 34000 34010 34020 34030 34040 34050 34060 34070 34080 34090 34100 34110 34120 34130 34140 34150 34160 34170 34180 34190 34200 34210 34220 34230 34240 34250 34251 34270 34280 34290 34300 34310 34320 34330 34340 34350 34360 34370 34380 34390 34400 34410 34420 34430 34440 34450 34460 34470 34480 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Putnam County, New York ................................................... Queens County, New York ................................................... Rensselaer County, New York .............................................. Richmond County, New York ................................................ Rockland County, New York ................................................. St Lawrence County, New York ............................................ Saratoga County, New York ................................................. Schenectady County, New York ........................................... Schoharie County, New York ................................................ Schuyler County, New York .................................................. Seneca County, New York .................................................... Steuben County, New York .................................................. Suffolk County, New York ..................................................... Sullivan County, New York ................................................... Tioga County, New York ....................................................... Tompkins County, New York ................................................ Ulster County, New York ...................................................... Warren County, New York .................................................... Washington County, New York ............................................. Wayne County, New York ..................................................... Westchester County, New York ............................................ Wyoming County, New York ................................................. Yates County, New York ....................................................... Alamance County, N Carolina .............................................. Alexander County, N Carolina .............................................. Alleghany County, N Carolina ............................................... Anson County, N Carolina .................................................... Ashe County, N Carolina ...................................................... Avery County, N Carolina ..................................................... Beaufort County, N Carolina ................................................. Bertie County, N Carolina ..................................................... Bladen County, N Carolina ................................................... Brunswick County, N Carolina .............................................. Buncombe County, N Carolina ............................................. Burke County, N Carolina ..................................................... Cabarrus County, N Carolina ................................................ Caldwell County, N Carolina ................................................. Camden County, N Carolina ................................................. Carteret County, N Carolina ................................................. Caswell County, N Carolina .................................................. Catawba County, N Carolina ................................................ Chatham County, N Carolina ................................................ Cherokee County, N Carolina ............................................... Chowan County, N Carolina ................................................. Clay County, N Carolina ....................................................... Cleveland County, N Carolina .............................................. Columbus County, N Carolina .............................................. Craven County, N Carolina ................................................... Cumberland County, N Carolina ........................................... Currituck County, N Carolina ................................................ Dare County, N Carolina ....................................................... Davidson County, N Carolina ............................................... Davie County, N Carolina ..................................................... Duplin County, N Carolina .................................................... Durham County, N Carolina .................................................. Edgecombe County, N Carolina ........................................... Forsyth County, N Carolina .................................................. Franklin County, N Carolina .................................................. Gaston County, N Carolina ................................................... Gates County, N Carolina ..................................................... Graham County, N Carolina ................................................. Granville County, N Carolina ................................................ Greene County, N Carolina .................................................. Guilford County, N Carolina .................................................. Halifax County, N Carolina ................................................... Harnett County, N Carolina ................................................... Haywood County, N Carolina ............................................... Henderson County, N Carolina ............................................. Hertford County, N Carolina ................................................. Hoke County, N Carolina ...................................................... Hyde County, N Carolina ...................................................... Iredell County, N Carolina ..................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4701 5600 5600 0160 5600 5600 33 0160 0160 0160 33 33 33 5380 33 0960 33 33 2975 2975 6840 5600 33 33 3120 3290 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 9200 0480 3290 1520 3290 34 34 34 3290 6640 34 34 34 34 34 34 2560 5720 34 3120 3120 34 6640 6895 3120 6640 1520 34 34 34 34 3120 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 1.3464 1.3464 0.8559 1.3464 1.3464 0.8395 0.8559 0.8559 0.8559 0.8395 0.8395 0.8395 1.2719 0.8395 0.8562 0.8395 0.8395 0.8559 0.8559 0.9049 1.3464 0.8395 0.8395 0.9018 0.8921 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.9582 0.9737 0.8921 0.9715 0.8921 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8921 1.0034 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.9416 0.8799 0.8462 0.9018 0.9018 0.8462 1.0034 0.8915 0.9018 1.0034 0.9715 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.9018 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 35644 35644 10580 35644 35644 99933 10580 10580 10580 99933 99933 99933 35004 99933 13780 27060 28740 24020 24020 40380 35644 99933 99933 15500 25860 99934 16740 99934 99934 99934 99934 99934 48900 11700 25860 16740 25860 99934 99934 99934 25860 20500 99934 99934 99934 99934 99934 99934 22180 47260 99934 99934 49180 99934 20500 40580 49180 39580 16740 99934 99934 99934 24780 24660 99934 99934 11700 11700 99934 22180 99934 99934 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural 27115 2006 CBSAbased WI 1.3188 1.3188 0.8589 1.3188 1.3188 0.8154 0.8589 0.8589 0.8589 0.8154 0.8154 0.8154 1.2719 0.8154 0.8562 0.9793 0.9255 0.8559 0.8559 0.9121 1.3188 0.8154 0.8154 0.8905 0.8921 0.8540 0.9750 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.9582 0.9285 0.8921 0.9750 0.8921 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8921 1.0244 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.9416 0.8799 0.8540 0.8540 0.8944 0.8540 1.0244 0.8915 0.8944 0.9691 0.9750 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.9425 0.9104 0.8540 0.8540 0.9285 0.9285 0.8540 0.9416 0.8540 0.8540 27116 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 34490 34500 34510 34520 34530 34540 34550 34560 34570 34580 34590 34600 34610 34620 34630 34640 34650 34660 34670 34680 34690 34700 34710 34720 34730 34740 34750 34760 34770 34780 34790 34800 34810 34820 34830 34840 34850 34860 34870 34880 34890 34900 34910 34920 34930 34940 34950 34960 34970 34980 34981 35000 35010 35020 35030 35040 35050 35060 35070 35080 35090 35100 35110 35120 35130 35140 35150 35160 35170 35180 35190 35200 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Jackson County, N Carolina ................................................. Johnston County, N Carolina ................................................ Jones County, N Carolina ..................................................... Lee County, N Carolina ........................................................ Lenoir County, N Carolina .................................................... Lincoln County, N Carolina ................................................... Mc Dowell County, N Carolina .............................................. Macon County, N Carolina .................................................... Madison County, N Carolina ................................................. Martin County, N Carolina .................................................... Mecklenburg County, N Carolina .......................................... Mitchell County, N Carolina .................................................. Montgomery County, N Carolina .......................................... Moore County, N Carolina .................................................... Nash County, N Carolina ...................................................... New Hanover County, N Carolina ........................................ Northampton County, N Carolina .......................................... Onslow County, N Carolina .................................................. Orange County, N Carolina .................................................. Pamlico County, N Carolina .................................................. Pasquotank County, N Carolina ........................................... Pender County, N Carolina ................................................... Perquimans County, N Carolina ........................................... Person County, N Carolina ................................................... Pitt County, N Carolina ......................................................... Polk County, N Carolina ....................................................... Randolph County, N Carolina ............................................... Richmond County, N Carolina .............................................. Robeson County, N Carolina ................................................ Rockingham County, N Carolina .......................................... Rowan County, N Carolina ................................................... Rutherford County, N Carolina ............................................. Sampson County, N Carolina ............................................... Scotland County, N Carolina ................................................ Stanly County, N Carolina .................................................... Stokes County, N Carolina ................................................... Surry County, N Carolina ...................................................... Swain County, N Carolina ..................................................... Transylvania County, N Carolina .......................................... Tyrrell County, N Carolina .................................................... Union County, N Carolina ..................................................... Vance County, N Carolina .................................................... Wake County, N Carolina ..................................................... Warren County, N Carolina ................................................... Washington County, N Carolina ........................................... Watauga County, N Carolina ................................................ Wayne County, N Carolina ................................................... Wilkes County, N Carolina .................................................... Wilson County, N Carolina .................................................... Yadkin County, N Carolina ................................................... Yancey County, N Carolina .................................................. Adams County, N Dakota ..................................................... Barnes County, N Dakota ..................................................... Benson County, N Dakota .................................................... Billings County, N Dakota ..................................................... Bottineau County, N Dakota ................................................. Bowman County, N Dakota .................................................. Burke County, N Dakota ....................................................... Burleigh County, N Dakota ................................................... Cass County, N Dakota ........................................................ Cavalier County, N Dakota ................................................... Dickey County, N Dakota ...................................................... Divide County, N Dakota ...................................................... Dunn County, N Dakota ........................................................ Eddy County, N Dakota ........................................................ Emmons County, N Dakota .................................................. Foster County, N Dakota ...................................................... Golden Valley County, N Dakota .......................................... Grand Forks County, N Dakota ............................................ Grant County, N Dakota ....................................................... Griggs County, N Dakota ...................................................... Hettinger County, N Dakota .................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4701 34 6640 34 34 34 1520 34 34 0480 34 1520 34 34 34 6895 9200 34 3605 6640 34 34 34 34 34 3150 34 3120 34 34 34 1520 34 34 34 34 3120 34 34 34 34 1520 34 6640 34 34 34 2980 34 34 3120 34 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 1010 2520 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 2985 35 35 35 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8462 1.0034 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.9715 0.8462 0.8462 0.9737 0.8462 0.9715 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8915 0.9582 0.8462 0.8236 1.0034 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.9425 0.8462 0.9018 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.9715 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.9018 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.9715 0.8462 1.0034 0.8462 0.8462 0.8462 0.8775 0.8462 0.8462 0.9018 0.8462 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7574 0.8486 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7901 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99934 39580 99934 99934 99934 99934 99934 99934 11700 99934 16740 99934 99934 99934 40580 48900 99934 27340 20500 99934 99934 48900 99934 20500 24780 99934 24660 99934 99934 24660 99934 99934 99934 99934 99934 49180 99934 99934 99934 99934 16740 99934 39580 99934 99934 99934 24140 99934 99934 49180 99934 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 13900 22020 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 24220 99935 99935 99935 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8540 0.9691 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.9285 0.8540 0.9750 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8915 0.9582 0.8540 0.8236 1.0244 0.8540 0.8540 0.9582 0.8540 1.0244 0.9425 0.8540 0.9104 0.8540 0.8540 0.9104 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8944 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.9750 0.8540 0.9691 0.8540 0.8540 0.8540 0.8775 0.8540 0.8540 0.8944 0.8540 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7574 0.8486 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7901 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 35210 35220 35230 35240 35250 35260 35270 35280 35290 35300 35310 35320 35330 35340 35350 35360 35370 35380 35390 35400 35410 35420 35430 35440 35450 35460 35470 35480 35490 35500 35510 35520 36000 36010 36020 36030 36040 36050 36060 36070 36080 36090 36100 36110 36120 36130 36140 36150 36160 36170 36190 36200 36210 36220 36230 36240 36250 36260 36270 36280 36290 36300 36310 36330 36340 36350 36360 36370 36380 36390 36400 36410 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Kidder County, N Dakota ...................................................... La Moure County, N Dakota ................................................. Logan County, N Dakota ...................................................... Mc Henry County, N Dakota ................................................. Mc Intosh County, N Dakota ................................................. Mc Kenzie County, N Dakota ............................................... Mc Lean County, N Dakota .................................................. Mercer County, N Dakota ..................................................... Morton County, N Dakota ..................................................... Mountrail County, N Dakota .................................................. Nelson County, N Dakota ..................................................... Oliver County, N Dakota ....................................................... Pembina County, N Dakota .................................................. Pierce County, N Dakota ...................................................... Ramsey County, N Dakota ................................................... Ransom County, N Dakota ................................................... Renville County, N Dakota .................................................... Richland County, N Dakota .................................................. Rolette County, N Dakota ..................................................... Sargent County, N Dakota .................................................... Sheridan County, N Dakota .................................................. Sioux County, N Dakota ....................................................... Slope County, N Dakota ....................................................... Stark County, N Dakota ........................................................ Steele County, N Dakota ...................................................... Stutsman County, N Dakota ................................................. Towner County, N Dakota .................................................... Traill County, N Dakota ......................................................... Walsh County, N Dakota ...................................................... Ward County, N Dakota ........................................................ Wells County, N Dakota ........................................................ Williams County, N Dakota ................................................... Adams County, Ohio ............................................................. Allen County, Ohio ................................................................ Ashland County, Ohio ........................................................... Ashtabula County, Ohio ........................................................ Athens County, Ohio ............................................................. Auglaize County, Ohio .......................................................... Belmont County, Ohio ........................................................... Brown County, Ohio .............................................................. Butler County, Ohio ............................................................... Carroll County, Ohio ............................................................. Champaign County, Ohio ...................................................... Clark County, Ohio ................................................................ Clermont County, Ohio ......................................................... Clinton County, Ohio ............................................................. Columbiana County, Ohio ..................................................... Coshocton County, Ohio ....................................................... Crawford County, Ohio ......................................................... Cuyahoga County, Ohio ........................................................ Darke County, Ohio .............................................................. Defiance County, Ohio .......................................................... Delaware County, Ohio ......................................................... Erie County, Ohio .................................................................. Fairfield County, Ohio ........................................................... Fayette County, Ohio ............................................................ Franklin County, Ohio ........................................................... Fulton County, Ohio .............................................................. Gallia County, Ohio ............................................................... Geauga County, Ohio ........................................................... Greene County, Ohio ............................................................ Guernsey County, Ohio ........................................................ Hamilton County, Ohio .......................................................... Hancock County, Ohio .......................................................... Hardin County, Ohio ............................................................. Harrison County, Ohio .......................................................... Henry County, Ohio .............................................................. Highland County, Ohio .......................................................... Hocking County, Ohio ........................................................... Holmes County, Ohio ............................................................ Huron County, Ohio .............................................................. Jackson County, Ohio ........................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4701 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 1010 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 36 4320 36 1680 36 4320 9000 1640 3200 1320 36 2000 1640 36 9320 36 4800 1680 36 36 1840 36 1840 36 1840 8400 36 1680 2000 36 1640 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7574 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.8921 0.9119 0.8921 0.9183 0.8921 0.9119 0.7161 0.9734 0.8951 0.8935 0.8921 0.8980 0.9734 0.8921 0.8848 0.8921 0.9891 0.9183 0.8921 0.8921 0.9874 0.8921 0.9874 0.8921 0.9874 0.9574 0.8921 0.9183 0.8980 0.8921 0.9734 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 13900 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99935 99936 30620 99936 99936 99936 99936 48540 17140 17140 15940 99936 44220 17140 99936 99936 99936 99936 17460 99936 99936 18140 41780 18140 99936 18140 45780 99936 17460 19380 99936 17140 99936 99936 99936 99936 99936 99936 99936 99936 99936 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 27117 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7574 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.7261 0.8826 0.9225 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.7161 0.9615 0.9615 0.8935 0.8826 0.8396 0.9615 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.9213 0.8826 0.8826 0.9860 0.9019 0.9860 0.8826 0.9860 0.9574 0.8826 0.9213 0.9064 0.8826 0.9615 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 27118 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 36420 36430 36440 36450 36460 36470 36480 36490 36500 36510 36520 36530 36540 36550 36560 36570 36580 36590 36600 36610 36620 36630 36640 36650 36660 36670 36680 36690 36700 36710 36720 36730 36740 36750 36760 36770 36780 36790 36800 36810 36820 36830 36840 36850 36860 36870 36880 36890 37000 37010 37020 37030 37040 37050 37060 37070 37080 37090 37100 37110 37120 37130 37140 37150 37160 37170 37180 37190 37200 37210 37220 37230 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Jefferson County, Ohio ......................................................... Knox County, Ohio ................................................................ Lake County, Ohio ................................................................ Lawrence County, Ohio ........................................................ Licking County, Ohio ............................................................. Logan County, Ohio .............................................................. Lorain County, Ohio .............................................................. Lucas County, Ohio .............................................................. Madison County, Ohio .......................................................... Mahoning County, Ohio ........................................................ Marion County, Ohio ............................................................. Medina County, Ohio ............................................................ Meigs County, Ohio .............................................................. Mercer County, Ohio ............................................................. Miami County, Ohio .............................................................. Monroe County, Ohio ............................................................ Montgomery County, Ohio .................................................... Morgan County, Ohio ............................................................ Morrow County, Ohio ............................................................ Muskingum County, Ohio ...................................................... Noble County, Ohio ............................................................... Ottawa County, Ohio ............................................................. Paulding County, Ohio .......................................................... Perry County, Ohio ............................................................... Pickaway County, Ohio ......................................................... Pike County, Ohio ................................................................. Portage County, Ohio ........................................................... Preble County, Ohio .............................................................. Putnam County, Ohio ............................................................ Richland County, Ohio .......................................................... Ross County, Ohio ................................................................ Sandusky County, Ohio ........................................................ Scioto County, Ohio .............................................................. Seneca County, Ohio ............................................................ Shelby County, Ohio ............................................................. Stark County, Ohio ................................................................ Summit County, Ohio ............................................................ Trumbull County, Ohio .......................................................... Tuscarawas County, Ohio ..................................................... Union County, Ohio ............................................................... Van Wert County, Ohio ......................................................... Vinton County, Ohio .............................................................. Warren County, Ohio ............................................................ Washington County, Ohio ..................................................... Wayne County, Ohio ............................................................. Williams County, Ohio ........................................................... Wood County, Ohio ............................................................... Wyandot County, Ohio .......................................................... Adair County, Oklahoma ....................................................... Alfalfa County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Atoka County, Oklahoma ...................................................... Beaver County, Oklahoma .................................................... Beckham County, Oklahoma ................................................ Blaine County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Bryan County, Oklahoma ...................................................... Caddo County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Canadian County, Oklahoma ................................................ Carter County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Cherokee County, Oklahoma ................................................ Choctaw County, Oklahoma ................................................. Cimarron County, Oklahoma ................................................ Cleveland County, Oklahoma ............................................... Coal County, Oklahoma ........................................................ Comanche County, Oklahoma .............................................. Cotton County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Craig County, Oklahoma ....................................................... Creek County, Oklahoma ...................................................... Custer County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Delaware County, Oklahoma ................................................ Dewey County, Oklahoma .................................................... Ellis County, Oklahoma ......................................................... Garfield County, Oklahoma ................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4701 8080 36 1680 3400 1840 36 1680 8400 1840 9320 36 1680 36 36 2000 36 2000 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 1840 36 0080 36 36 4800 36 36 36 36 36 1320 0080 9320 36 36 36 36 1640 6020 36 36 8400 36 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 5880 37 37 37 37 5880 37 4200 37 37 8560 37 37 37 37 2340 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7819 0.8921 0.9183 0.9477 0.9874 0.8921 0.9183 0.9574 0.9874 0.8848 0.8921 0.9183 0.8921 0.8921 0.8980 0.8921 0.8980 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.9874 0.8921 0.8982 0.8921 0.8921 0.9891 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8935 0.8982 0.8848 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.8921 0.9734 0.8270 0.8921 0.8921 0.9574 0.8921 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.9025 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.9025 0.7442 0.7872 0.7442 0.7442 0.8587 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.8666 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 48260 99936 17460 26580 18140 99936 17460 45780 18140 49660 99936 17460 99936 99936 19380 99936 19380 99936 18140 99936 99936 45780 99936 99936 18140 99936 10420 19380 99936 31900 99936 99936 99936 99936 99936 15940 10420 49660 99936 18140 99936 99936 17140 37620 99936 99936 45780 99936 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 36420 99937 99937 99937 99937 36420 99937 30020 99937 99937 46140 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7819 0.8826 0.9213 0.9477 0.9860 0.8826 0.9213 0.9574 0.9860 0.8603 0.8826 0.9213 0.8826 0.8826 0.9064 0.8826 0.9064 0.8826 0.9860 0.8826 0.8826 0.9574 0.8826 0.8826 0.9860 0.8826 0.8982 0.9064 0.8826 0.9891 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8826 0.8935 0.8982 0.8603 0.8826 0.9860 0.8826 0.8826 0.9615 0.8270 0.8826 0.8826 0.9574 0.8826 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.9031 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.9031 0.7581 0.7872 0.7581 0.7581 0.8543 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 37240 37250 37260 37270 37280 37290 37300 37310 37320 37330 37340 37350 37360 37370 37380 37390 37400 37410 37420 37430 37440 37450 37460 37470 37480 37490 37500 37510 37520 37530 37540 37550 37560 37570 37580 37590 37600 37610 37620 37630 37640 37650 37660 37670 37680 37690 37700 37710 37720 37730 37740 37750 37760 38000 38010 38020 38030 38040 38050 38060 38070 38080 38090 38100 38110 38120 38130 38140 38150 38160 38170 38180 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Garvin County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Grady County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Grant County, Oklahoma ...................................................... Greer County, Oklahoma ...................................................... Harmon County, Oklahoma .................................................. Harper County, Oklahoma .................................................... Haskell County, Oklahoma ................................................... Hughes County, Oklahoma ................................................... Jackson County, Oklahoma .................................................. Jefferson County, Oklahoma ................................................ Johnston County, Oklahoma ................................................. Kay County, Oklahoma ......................................................... Kingfisher County, Oklahoma ............................................... Kiowa County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Latimer County, Oklahoma ................................................... Le Flore County, Oklahoma .................................................. Lincoln County, Oklahoma .................................................... Logan County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Love County, Oklahoma ....................................................... Mc Clain County, Oklahoma ................................................. Mc Curtain County, Oklahoma .............................................. Mc Intosh County, Oklahoma ............................................... Major County, Oklahoma ...................................................... Marshall County, Oklahoma .................................................. Mayes County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Murray County, Oklahoma .................................................... Muskogee County, Oklahoma ............................................... Noble County, Oklahoma ...................................................... Nowata County, Oklahoma ................................................... Okfuskee County, Oklahoma ................................................ Oklahoma County, Oklahoma ............................................... Okmulgee County, Oklahoma ............................................... Osage County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Ottawa County, Oklahoma .................................................... Pawnee County, Oklahoma .................................................. Payne County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Pittsburg County, Oklahoma ................................................. Pontotoc County, Oklahoma ................................................. Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma ......................................... Pushmataha County, Oklahoma ........................................... Roger Mills County, Oklahoma ............................................. Rogers County, Oklahoma .................................................... Seminole County, Oklahoma ................................................ Sequoyah County, Oklahoma ............................................... Stephens County, Oklahoma ................................................ Texas County, Oklahoma ..................................................... Tillman County, Oklahoma .................................................... Tulsa County, Oklahoma ...................................................... Wagoner County, Oklahoma ................................................. Washington County, Oklahoma ............................................ Washita County, Oklahoma .................................................. Woods County, Oklahoma .................................................... Woodward County, Oklahoma .............................................. Baker County, Oregon .......................................................... Benton County, Oregon ........................................................ Clackamas County, Oregon .................................................. Clatsop County, Oregon ....................................................... Columbia County, Oregon .................................................... Coos County, Oregon ........................................................... Crook County, Oregon .......................................................... Curry County, Oregon ........................................................... Deschutes County, Oregon ................................................... Douglas County, Oregon ...................................................... Gilliam County, Oregon ......................................................... Grant County, Oregon ........................................................... Harney County, Oregon ........................................................ Hood River County, Oregon ................................................. Jackson County, Oregon ...................................................... Jefferson County, Oregon ..................................................... Josephine County, Oregon ................................................... Klamath County, Oregon ...................................................... Lake County, Oregon ............................................................ 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4701 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 5880 37 5880 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 5880 37 8560 37 37 37 37 37 5880 37 37 8560 37 2720 37 37 37 8560 8560 37 37 37 37 38 1890 6440 38 6440 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 4890 38 38 38 38 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.9025 0.7442 0.9025 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.9025 0.7442 0.8587 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.9025 0.7442 0.7442 0.8587 0.7442 0.8246 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.8587 0.8587 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 0.7442 1.0052 1.0729 1.1266 1.0052 1.1266 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0225 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99937 36420 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 22900 36420 36420 99937 36420 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 36420 46140 46140 99937 46140 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 99937 46140 99937 22900 99937 99937 99937 46140 46140 99937 99937 99937 99937 99938 18700 38900 99938 38900 99938 99938 99938 13460 99938 99938 99938 99938 99938 32780 99938 99938 99938 99938 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural 27119 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7581 0.9031 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.8230 0.9031 0.9031 0.7581 0.9031 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.9031 0.8543 0.8543 0.7581 0.8543 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.8543 0.7581 0.8230 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.8543 0.8543 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.7581 0.9826 1.0729 1.1266 0.9826 1.1266 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 1.0786 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 1.0225 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 27120 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 38190 38200 38210 38220 38230 38240 38250 38260 38270 38280 38290 38300 38310 38320 38330 38340 38350 39000 39010 39070 39080 39100 39110 39120 39130 39140 39150 39160 39180 39190 39200 39210 39220 39230 39240 39250 39260 39270 39280 39290 39310 39320 39330 39340 39350 39360 39370 39380 39390 39400 39410 39420 39440 39450 39460 39470 39480 39510 39520 39530 39540 39550 39560 39580 39590 39600 39610 39620 39630 39640 39650 39670 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Lane County, Oregon ............................................................ Lincoln County, Oregon ........................................................ Linn County, Oregon ............................................................. Malheur County, Oregon ....................................................... Marion County, Oregon ......................................................... Morrow County, Oregon ........................................................ Multnomah County, Oregon .................................................. Polk County, Oregon ............................................................. Sherman County, Oregon ..................................................... Tillamook County, Oregon .................................................... Umatilla County, Oregon ....................................................... Union County, Oregon .......................................................... Wallowa County, Oregon ...................................................... Wasco County, Oregon ......................................................... Washington County, Oregon ................................................. Wheeler County, Oregon ...................................................... Yamhill County, Oregon ........................................................ Adams County, Pennsylvania ............................................... Allegheny County, Pennsylvania .......................................... Armstrong County, Pennsylvania .......................................... Beaver County, Pennsylvania ............................................... Bedford County, Pennsylvania .............................................. Berks County, Pennsylvania ................................................. Blair County, Pennsylvania ................................................... Bradford County, Pennsylvania ............................................ Bucks County, Pennsylvania ................................................ Butler County, Pennsylvania ................................................. Cambria County, Pennsylvania ............................................. Cameron County, Pennsylvania ........................................... Carbon County, Pennsylvania .............................................. Centre County, Pennsylvania ............................................... Chester County, Pennsylvania .............................................. Clarion County, Pennsylvania ............................................... Clearfield County, Pennsylvania ........................................... Clinton County, Pennsylvania ............................................... Columbia County, Pennsylvania ........................................... Crawford County, Pennsylvania ............................................ Cumberland County, Pennsylvania ....................................... Dauphin County, Pennsylvania ............................................. Delaware County, Pennsylvania ........................................... Elk County, Pennsylvania ..................................................... Erie County, Pennsylvania .................................................... Fayette County, Pennsylvania .............................................. Forest County, Pennsylvania ................................................ Franklin County, Pennsylvania ............................................. Fulton County, Pennsylvania ................................................ Greene County, Pennsylvania .............................................. Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania ........................................ Indiana County, Pennsylvania .............................................. Jefferson County, Pennsylvania ........................................... Juniata County, Pennsylvania ............................................... Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania ...................................... Lancaster County, Pennsylvania .......................................... Lawrence County, Pennsylvania ........................................... Lebanon County, Pennsylvania ............................................ Lehigh County, Pennsylvania ............................................... Luzerne County, Pennsylvania ............................................. Lycoming County, Pennsylvania ........................................... Mc Kean County, Pennsylvania ............................................ Mercer County, Pennsylvania ............................................... Mifflin County, Pennsylvania ................................................. Monroe County, Pennsylvania .............................................. Montgomery County, Pennsylvania ...................................... Montour County, Pennsylvania ............................................. Northampton County, Pennsylvania ..................................... Northumberland County, Pennsylvania ................................ Perry County, Pennsylvania .................................................. Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania ....................................... Pike County, Pennsylvania ................................................... Potter County, Pennsylvania ................................................. Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania ........................................... Snyder County, Pennsylvania ............................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4701 2400 38 38 38 7080 38 6440 7080 38 38 38 38 38 38 6440 38 6440 39 6280 39 6280 39 6680 0280 39 6160 6280 3680 39 0240 8050 6160 39 39 39 7560 39 3240 3240 6160 39 2360 6280 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 7560 4000 39 3240 0240 7560 9140 39 7610 39 39 6160 39 0240 39 3240 6160 5660 39 39 39 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 1.0818 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0442 1.0052 1.1266 1.0442 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.0052 1.1266 1.0052 1.1266 0.8319 0.8860 0.8319 0.8860 0.8319 0.9686 0.8944 0.8319 1.0922 0.8860 0.8086 0.8319 0.9845 0.8356 1.0922 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8524 0.8319 0.9233 0.9233 1.0922 0.8319 0.8737 0.8860 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8524 0.9694 0.8319 0.9233 0.9845 0.8524 0.8364 0.8319 0.7793 0.8319 0.8319 1.0922 0.8319 0.9845 0.8319 0.9233 1.0922 1.1207 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 21660 99938 99938 99938 41420 99938 38900 41420 99938 99938 99938 99938 99938 99938 38900 99938 38900 99939 38300 38300 38300 99939 39740 11020 99939 37964 38300 27780 99939 10900 44300 37964 99939 99939 99939 99939 99939 25420 25420 37964 99939 21500 38300 99939 99939 99939 99939 99939 99939 99939 99939 42540 29540 99939 30140 10900 42540 48700 99939 49660 99939 99939 37964 99939 10900 99939 25420 37964 35084 99939 99939 99939 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 1.0818 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 1.0442 0.9826 1.1266 1.0442 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 0.9826 1.1266 0.9826 1.1266 0.8291 0.8845 0.8845 0.8845 0.8291 0.9686 0.8944 0.8291 1.1038 0.8845 0.8354 0.8291 0.9818 0.8356 1.1038 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.9313 0.9313 1.1038 0.8291 0.8737 0.8845 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8540 0.9694 0.8291 0.8459 0.9818 0.8540 0.8364 0.8291 0.8603 0.8291 0.8291 1.1038 0.8291 0.9818 0.8291 0.9313 1.1038 1.1883 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 39680 39690 39700 39710 39720 39730 39740 39750 39760 39770 39790 39800 40010 40020 40030 40040 40050 40060 40070 40080 40090 40100 40110 40120 40130 40140 40145 40150 40160 40170 40180 40190 40200 40210 40220 40230 40240 40250 40260 40265 40270 40280 40290 40300 40310 40320 40330 40340 40350 40360 40370 40380 40390 40400 40410 40420 40430 40440 40450 40460 40470 40480 40490 40500 40510 40520 40530 40540 40550 40560 40570 40580 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Somerset County, Pennsylvania ........................................... Sullivan County, Pennsylvania .............................................. Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania .................................... Tioga County, Pennsylvania ................................................. Union County, Pennsylvania ................................................. Venango County, Pennsylvania ............................................ Warren County, Pennsylvania .............................................. Washington County, Pennsylvania ....................................... Wayne County, Pennsylvania ............................................... Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania ................................... Wyoming County, Pennsylvania ........................................... York County, Pennsylvania ................................................... Adjuntas County, Puerto Rico ............................................... Aguada County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Aguadilla County, Puerto Rico .............................................. Aguas Buenas County, Puerto Rico ..................................... Aibonito County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Anasco County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Arecibo County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Arroyo County, Puerto Rico .................................................. Barceloneta County, Puerto Rico ......................................... Barranquitas County, Puerto Rico ........................................ Bayamon County, Puerto Rico ............................................. Cabo Rojo County, Puerto Rico ........................................... Caguas County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Camuy County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Canovanas County, Puerto Rico .......................................... Carolina County, Puerto Rico ............................................... Catano County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Cayey County, Puerto Rico .................................................. Ceiba County, Puerto Rico ................................................... Ciales County, Puerto Rico ................................................... Cidra County, Puerto Rico .................................................... Coamo County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Comerio County, Puerto Rico ............................................... Corozal County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Culebra County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Dorado County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Fajardo County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Florida County, Puerto Rico .................................................. Guanica County, Puerto Rico ............................................... Guayama County, Puerto Rico ............................................. Guayanilla County, Puerto Rico ............................................ Guaynabo County, Puerto Rico ............................................ Gurabo County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Hatillo County, Puerto Rico ................................................... Hormigueros County, Puerto Rico ........................................ Humacao County, Puerto Rico ............................................. Isabela County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Jayuya County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Juana Diaz County, Puerto Rico .......................................... Juncos County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Lajas County, Puerto Rico .................................................... Lares County, Puerto Rico .................................................... Las Marias County, Puerto Rico ........................................... Las Piedras County, Puerto Rico ......................................... Loiza County, Puerto Rico .................................................... Luquillo County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Manati County, Puerto Rico .................................................. Maricao County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Maunabo County, Puerto Rico .............................................. Mayaguez County, Puerto Rico ............................................ Moca County, Puerto Rico .................................................... Morovis County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Naguabo County, Puerto Rico .............................................. Naranjito County, Puerto Rico .............................................. Orocovis County, Puerto Rico .............................................. Patillas County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Penuelas County, Puerto Rico .............................................. Ponce County, Puerto Rico .................................................. Quebradillas County, Puerto Rico ........................................ Rincon County, Puerto Rico ................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4701 3680 39 39 39 39 39 39 6280 39 6280 7560 9280 40 0060 0060 7440 40 4840 0470 40 7440 40 7440 4840 1310 0470 7440 7440 7440 1310 7440 40 1310 40 7440 7440 40 7440 7440 7440 40 40 6360 7440 1310 0470 4840 7440 40 40 6360 7440 40 40 40 7440 7440 7440 7440 40 40 4840 0060 7440 7440 7440 40 40 6360 6360 40 40 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8086 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8319 0.8860 0.8319 0.8860 0.8524 0.9347 0.3604 0.4876 0.4876 0.4752 0.3604 0.4243 0.4112 0.3604 0.4752 0.3604 0.4752 0.4243 0.4120 0.4112 0.4752 0.4752 0.4752 0.4120 0.4752 0.3604 0.4120 0.3604 0.4752 0.4752 0.3604 0.4752 0.4752 0.4752 0.3604 0.3604 0.4881 0.4752 0.4120 0.4112 0.4243 0.4752 0.3604 0.3604 0.4881 0.4752 0.3604 0.3604 0.3604 0.4752 0.4752 0.4752 0.4752 0.3604 0.3604 0.4243 0.4876 0.4752 0.4752 0.4752 0.3604 0.3604 0.4881 0.4881 0.3604 0.3604 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99939 99939 99939 99939 99939 99939 99939 38300 99939 38300 42540 49620 99940 10380 10380 41980 41980 10380 41980 25020 41980 41980 41980 41900 41980 41980 41980 41980 41980 41980 21940 41980 41980 99940 41980 41980 99940 41980 21940 41980 49500 25020 49500 41980 41980 41980 32420 41980 10380 99940 38660 41980 41900 10380 99940 41980 41980 21940 41980 99940 41980 32420 10380 41980 41980 41980 41980 25020 49500 38660 41980 10380 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban 27121 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8291 0.8845 0.8291 0.8845 0.8540 0.9347 0.4047 0.4738 0.4738 0.4621 0.4621 0.4738 0.4621 0.3181 0.4621 0.4621 0.4621 0.4650 0.4621 0.4621 0.4621 0.4621 0.4621 0.4621 0.4153 0.4621 0.4621 0.4047 0.4621 0.4621 0.4047 0.4621 0.4153 0.4621 0.4408 0.3181 0.4408 0.4621 0.4621 0.4621 0.4020 0.4621 0.4738 0.4047 0.4939 0.4621 0.4650 0.4738 0.4047 0.4621 0.4621 0.4153 0.4621 0.4047 0.4621 0.4020 0.4738 0.4621 0.4621 0.4621 0.4621 0.3181 0.4408 0.4939 0.4621 0.4738 27122 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 40590 40610 40620 40630 40640 40650 40660 40670 40680 40690 40700 40710 40720 40730 40740 40750 40760 40770 41000 41010 41020 41030 41050 42000 42010 42020 42030 42040 42050 42060 42070 42080 42090 42100 42110 42120 42130 42140 42150 42160 42170 42180 42190 42200 42210 42220 42230 42240 42250 42260 42270 42280 42290 42300 42310 42320 42330 42340 42350 42360 42370 42380 42390 42400 42410 42420 42430 42440 42450 43010 43020 43030 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Rio Grande County, Puerto Rico .......................................... Sabana Grande County, Puerto Rico ................................... Salinas County, Puerto Rico ................................................. San German County, Puerto Rico ........................................ San Juan County, Puerto Rico ............................................. San Lorenzo County, Puerto Rico ........................................ San Sebastian County, Puerto Rico ..................................... Santa Isabel County, Puerto Rico ........................................ Toa Alta County, Puerto Rico ............................................... Toa Baja County, Puerto Rico .............................................. Trujillo Alto County, Puerto Rico ........................................... Utuado County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Vega Alta County, Puerto Rico ............................................. Vega Baja County, Puerto Rico ............................................ Vieques County, Puerto Rico ................................................ Villalba County, Puerto Rico ................................................. Yabucoa County, Puerto Rico .............................................. Yauco County, Puerto Rico .................................................. Bristol County, Rhode Island ................................................ Kent County, Rhode Island ................................................... Newport County, Rhode Island ............................................. Providence County, Rhode Island ........................................ Washington County, Rhode Island ....................................... Abbeville County, S Carolina ................................................ Aiken County, S Carolina ...................................................... Allendale County, S Carolina ................................................ Anderson County, S Carolina ............................................... Bamberg County, S Carolina ................................................ Barnwell County, S Carolina ................................................. Beaufort County, S Carolina ................................................. Berkeley County, S Carolina ................................................. Calhoun County, S Carolina ................................................. Charleston County, S Carolina ............................................. Cherokee County, S Carolina ............................................... Chester County, S Carolina .................................................. Chesterfield County, S Carolina ........................................... Clarendon County, S Carolina .............................................. Colleton County, S Carolina ................................................. Darlington County, S Carolina .............................................. Dillon County, S Carolina ...................................................... Dorchester County, S Carolina ............................................. Edgefield County, S Carolina ................................................ Fairfield County, S Carolina .................................................. Florence County, S Carolina ................................................. Georgetown County, S Carolina ........................................... Greenville County, S Carolina .............................................. Greenwood County, S Carolina ............................................ Hampton County, S Carolina ................................................ Horry County, S Carolina ...................................................... Jasper County, S Carolina .................................................... Kershaw County, S Carolina ................................................. Lancaster County, S Carolina ............................................... Laurens County, S Carolina .................................................. Lee County, S Carolina ......................................................... Lexington County, S Carolina ............................................... Mc Cormick County, S Carolina ........................................... Marion County, S Carolina .................................................... Marlboro County, S Carolina ................................................ Newberry County, S Carolina ............................................... Oconee County, S Carolina .................................................. Orangeburg County, S Carolina ........................................... Pickens County, S Carolina .................................................. Richland County, S Carolina ................................................. Saluda County, S Carolina ................................................... Spartanburg County, S Carolina ........................................... Sumter County, S Carolina ................................................... Union County, S Carolina ..................................................... Williamsburg County, S Carolina .......................................... York County, S Carolina ....................................................... Aurora County, S Dakota ...................................................... Beadle County, S Dakota ..................................................... Bennett County, S Dakota .................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4701 7440 4840 40 4840 7440 1310 40 40 7440 7440 7440 40 7440 7440 40 6360 7440 6360 6483 6483 6483 6483 6483 42 0600 42 3160 42 42 42 1440 42 1440 3160 42 42 42 42 42 42 1440 0600 42 2655 42 3160 42 42 5330 42 42 42 42 42 1760 42 42 42 42 42 42 3160 1760 42 3160 8140 42 42 1520 43 43 43 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.4752 0.4243 0.3604 0.4243 0.4752 0.4120 0.3604 0.3604 0.4752 0.4752 0.4752 0.3604 0.4752 0.4752 0.3604 0.4881 0.4752 0.4881 1.1058 1.1058 1.1058 1.1058 1.1058 0.8631 0.9808 0.8631 0.9615 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.9245 0.8631 0.9245 0.9615 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.9245 0.9808 0.8631 0.9042 0.8631 0.9615 0.8631 0.8631 0.8934 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.9082 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.8631 0.9615 0.9082 0.8631 0.9615 0.8377 0.8631 0.8631 0.9715 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 41980 41900 99940 41900 41980 41980 10380 99940 41980 41980 41980 99940 41980 41980 99940 38660 41980 49500 39300 39300 39300 39300 39300 99942 12260 99942 11340 99942 99942 99942 16700 17900 16700 99942 99942 99942 99942 99942 22500 99942 16700 12260 17900 22500 99942 24860 99942 99942 34820 99942 17900 99942 24860 99942 17900 99942 99942 99942 99942 99942 99942 24860 17900 17900 43900 44940 99942 99942 16740 99943 99943 99943 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.4621 0.4650 0.4047 0.4650 0.4621 0.4621 0.4738 0.4047 0.4621 0.4621 0.4621 0.4047 0.4621 0.4621 0.4047 0.4939 0.4621 0.4408 1.0966 1.0966 1.0966 1.0966 1.0966 0.8638 0.9748 0.8638 0.8997 0.8638 0.8638 0.8638 0.9245 0.9057 0.9245 0.8638 0.8638 0.8638 0.8638 0.8638 0.8947 0.8638 0.9245 0.9748 0.9057 0.8947 0.8638 1.0027 0.8638 0.8638 0.8934 0.8638 0.9057 0.8638 1.0027 0.8638 0.9057 0.8638 0.8638 0.8638 0.8638 0.8638 0.8638 1.0027 0.9057 0.9057 0.9172 0.8377 0.8638 0.8638 0.9750 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 43040 43050 43060 43070 43080 43090 43100 43110 43120 43130 43140 43150 43160 43170 43180 43190 43200 43210 43220 43230 43240 43250 43260 43270 43280 43290 43300 43310 43320 43330 43340 43350 43360 43370 43380 43390 43400 43410 43420 43430 43440 43450 43460 43470 43480 43490 43500 43510 43520 43530 43540 43550 43560 43570 43580 43590 43600 43610 43620 43630 43640 43650 43670 43680 44000 44010 44020 44030 44040 44050 44060 44070 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Bon Homme County, S Dakota ............................................ Brookings County, S Dakota ................................................. Brown County, S Dakota ...................................................... Brule County, S Dakota ........................................................ Buffalo County, S Dakota ..................................................... Butte County, S Dakota ........................................................ Campbell County, S Dakota ................................................. Charles Mix County, S Dakota ............................................. Clark County, S Dakota ........................................................ Clay County, S Dakota ......................................................... Codington County, S Dakota ................................................ Corson County, S Dakota ..................................................... Custer County, S Dakota ...................................................... Davison County, S Dakota .................................................... Day County, S Dakota .......................................................... Deuel County, S Dakota ....................................................... Dewey County, S Dakota ...................................................... Douglas County, S Dakota ................................................... Edmunds County, S Dakota ................................................. Fall River County, S Dakota ................................................. Faulk County, S Dakota ........................................................ Grant County, S Dakota ........................................................ Gregory County, S Dakota .................................................... Haakon County, S Dakota .................................................... Hamlin County, S Dakota ..................................................... Hand County, S Dakota ........................................................ Hanson County, S Dakota .................................................... Harding County, S Dakota .................................................... Hughes County, S Dakota .................................................... Hutchinson County, S Dakota ............................................... Hyde County, S Dakota ........................................................ Jackson County, S Dakota ................................................... Jerauld County, S Dakota ..................................................... Jones County, S Dakota ....................................................... Kingsbury County, S Dakota ................................................. Lake County, S Dakota ......................................................... Lawrence County, S Dakota ................................................. Lincoln County, S Dakota ..................................................... Lyman County, S Dakota ...................................................... Mc Cook County, S Dakota .................................................. Mc Pherson County, S Dakota ............................................. Marshall County, S Dakota ................................................... Meade County, S Dakota ...................................................... Mellette County, S Dakota .................................................... Miner County, S Dakota ........................................................ Minnehaha County, S Dakota ............................................... Moody County, S Dakota ...................................................... Pennington County, S Dakota .............................................. Perkins County, S Dakota ..................................................... Potter County, S Dakota ....................................................... Roberts County, S Dakota .................................................... Sanborn County, S Dakota ................................................... Shannon County, S Dakota .................................................. Spink County, S Dakota ........................................................ Stanley County, S Dakota ..................................................... Sully County, S Dakota ......................................................... Todd County, S Dakota ........................................................ Tripp County, S Dakota ........................................................ Turner County, S Dakota ...................................................... Union County, S Dakota ....................................................... Walworth County, S Dakota .................................................. Washabaugh County, S Dakota ........................................... Yankton County, S Dakota ................................................... Ziebach County, S Dakota .................................................... Anderson County, Tennessee .............................................. Bedford County, Tennessee ................................................. Benton County, Tennessee .................................................. Bledsoe County, Tennessee ................................................. Blount County, Tennessee .................................................... Bradley County, Tennessee .................................................. Campbell County, Tennessee ............................................... Cannon County, Tennessee ................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4701 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 7760 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 7760 43 6660 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 3840 44 44 44 3840 44 44 44 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.9635 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.9635 0.8551 0.8987 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8551 0.8397 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.8397 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 43620 99943 43620 99943 99943 39660 99943 99943 43620 99943 39660 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 99943 43620 43580 99943 99943 99943 99943 28940 99944 99944 99944 28940 17420 99944 34980 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban 27123 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.9635 0.8560 0.9635 0.8560 0.8560 0.8987 0.8560 0.8560 0.9635 0.8560 0.8987 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.9635 0.9381 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8560 0.8441 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.8441 0.8139 0.7895 0.9790 27124 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 44080 44090 44100 44110 44120 44130 44140 44150 44160 44170 44180 44190 44200 44210 44220 44230 44240 44250 44260 44270 44280 44290 44300 44310 44320 44330 44340 44350 44360 44370 44380 44390 44400 44410 44420 44430 44440 44450 44460 44470 44480 44490 44500 44510 44520 44530 44540 44550 44560 44570 44580 44590 44600 44610 44620 44630 44640 44650 44660 44670 44680 44690 44700 44710 44720 44730 44740 44750 44760 44770 44780 44790 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Carroll County, Tennessee ................................................... Carter County, Tennessee .................................................... Cheatham County, Tennessee ............................................. Chester County, Tennessee ................................................. Claiborne County, Tennessee .............................................. Clay County, Tennessee ....................................................... Cocke County, Tennessee .................................................... Coffee County, Tennessee ................................................... Crockett County, Tennessee ................................................ Cumberland County, Tennessee .......................................... Davidson County, Tennessee ............................................... Decatur County, Tennessee ................................................. De Kalb County, Tennessee ................................................. Dickson County, Tennessee ................................................. Dyer County, Tennessee ...................................................... Fayette County, Tennessee .................................................. Fentress County, Tennessee ................................................ Franklin County, Tennessee ................................................. Gibson County, Tennessee .................................................. Giles County, Tennessee ...................................................... Grainger County, Tennessee ................................................ Greene County, Tennessee .................................................. Grundy County, Tennessee .................................................. Hamblen County, Tennessee ............................................... Hamilton County, Tennessee ................................................ Hancock County, Tennessee ................................................ Hardeman County, Tennessee ............................................. Hardin County, Tennessee ................................................... Hawkins County, Tennessee ................................................ Haywood County, Tennessee ............................................... Henderson County, Tennessee ............................................ Henry County, Tennessee .................................................... Hickman County, Tennessee ................................................ Houston County, Tennessee ................................................ Humphreys County, Tennessee ........................................... Jackson County, Tennessee ................................................. Jefferson County, Tennessee ............................................... Johnson County, Tennessee ................................................ Knox County, Tennessee ...................................................... Lake County, Tennessee ...................................................... Lauderdale County, Tennessee ............................................ Lawrence County, Tennessee .............................................. Lewis County, Tennessee ..................................................... Lincoln County, Tennessee .................................................. Loudon County, Tennessee .................................................. Mc Minn County, Tennessee ................................................ Mc Nairy County, Tennessee ............................................... Macon County, Tennessee ................................................... Madison County, Tennessee ................................................ Marion County, Tennessee ................................................... Marshall County, Tennessee ................................................ Maury County, Tennessee .................................................... Meigs County, Tennessee .................................................... Monroe County, Tennessee .................................................. Montgomery County, Tennessee .......................................... Moore County, Tennessee .................................................... Morgan County, Tennessee .................................................. Obion County, Tennessee .................................................... Overton County, Tennessee ................................................. Perry County, Tennessee ..................................................... Pickett County, Tennessee ................................................... Polk County, Tennessee ....................................................... Putnam County, Tennessee ................................................. Rhea County, Tennessee ..................................................... Roane County, Tennessee ................................................... Robertson County, Tennessee ............................................. Rutherford County, Tennessee ............................................. Scott County, Tennessee ...................................................... Sequatchie County, Tennessee ............................................ Sevier County, Tennessee .................................................... Shelby County, Tennessee ................................................... Smith County, Tennessee ..................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4701 44 3660 5360 3580 44 44 44 44 44 44 5360 44 44 5360 44 4920 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 1560 44 44 44 3660 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 3840 44 44 44 44 44 3840 44 44 44 3580 1560 44 44 44 44 1660 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 5360 5360 44 44 3840 4920 44 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7935 0.8007 0.9808 0.8964 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.9808 0.7935 0.7935 0.9808 0.7935 0.9416 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.9088 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.8007 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.8397 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.8397 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.8964 0.9088 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.8284 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.9808 0.9808 0.7935 0.7935 0.8397 0.9416 0.7935 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99944 27740 34980 27180 99944 99944 99944 99944 99944 99944 34980 99944 99944 34980 99944 32820 99944 99944 99944 99944 34100 99944 99944 34100 16860 99944 99944 99944 28700 99944 99944 99944 34980 99944 99944 99944 34100 99944 28940 99944 99944 99944 99944 99944 28940 99944 99944 34980 27180 16860 99944 99944 99944 99944 17300 99944 99944 99944 99944 99944 99944 17420 99944 99944 99944 34980 34980 99944 16860 99944 32820 34980 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7895 0.7937 0.9790 0.8964 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.9790 0.7895 0.7895 0.9790 0.7895 0.9397 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7961 0.7895 0.7895 0.7961 0.9088 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.8054 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.9790 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7961 0.7895 0.8441 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.8441 0.7895 0.7895 0.9790 0.8964 0.9088 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.8284 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.8139 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.9790 0.9790 0.7895 0.9088 0.7895 0.9397 0.9790 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 44800 44810 44820 44830 44840 44850 44860 44870 44880 44890 44900 44910 44920 44930 44940 45000 45010 45020 45030 45040 45050 45060 45070 45080 45090 45100 45110 45113 45120 45130 45140 45150 45160 45170 45180 45190 45200 45201 45210 45220 45221 45222 45223 45224 45230 45240 45250 45251 45260 45270 45280 45281 45290 45291 45292 45300 45301 45310 45311 45312 45320 45321 45330 45340 45341 45350 45360 45361 45362 45370 45380 45390 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Stewart County, Tennessee .................................................. Sullivan County, Tennessee ................................................. Sumner County, Tennessee ................................................. Tipton County, Tennessee .................................................... Trousdale County, Tennessee .............................................. Unicoi County, Tennessee .................................................... Union County, Tennessee .................................................... Van Buren County, Tennessee ............................................. Warren County, Tennessee .................................................. Washington County, Tennessee ........................................... Wayne County, Tennessee ................................................... Weakley County, Tennessee ................................................ White County, Tennessee ..................................................... Williamson County, Tennessee ............................................ Wilson County, Tennessee ................................................... Anderson County, Texas ...................................................... Andrews County, Texas ........................................................ Angelina County, Texas ........................................................ Aransas County, Texas ......................................................... Archer County, Texas ........................................................... Armstrong County, Texas ..................................................... Atascosa County, Texas ....................................................... Austin County, Texas ............................................................ Bailey County, Texas ............................................................ Bandera County, Texas ........................................................ Bastrop County, Texas ......................................................... Baylor County, Texas ............................................................ Bee County, Texas ............................................................... Bell County, Texas ................................................................ Bexar County, Texas ............................................................ Blanco County, Texas ........................................................... Borden County, Texas .......................................................... Bosque County, Texas .......................................................... Bowie County, Texas ............................................................ Brazoria County, Texas ........................................................ Brazos County, Texas ........................................................... Brewster County, Texas ........................................................ qBriscoe County, Texas ........................................................ Brooks County, Texas ........................................................... Brown County, Texas ............................................................ Burleson County, Texas ........................................................ Burnet County, Texas ........................................................... Caldwell County, Texas ........................................................ Calhoun County, Texas ........................................................ Callahan County, Texas ........................................................ Cameron County, Texas ....................................................... Camp County, Texas ............................................................ Carson County, Texas .......................................................... Cass County, Texas .............................................................. Castro County, Texas ........................................................... Chambers County, Texas ..................................................... Cherokee County, Texas ...................................................... Childress County, Texas ....................................................... Clay County, Texas ............................................................... Cochran County, Texas ........................................................ Coke County, Texas ............................................................. Coleman County, Texas ....................................................... Collin County, Texas ............................................................. Collingsworth County, Texas ................................................ Colorado County, Texas ....................................................... Comal County, Texas ........................................................... Comanche County, Texas .................................................... Concho County, Texas ......................................................... Cooke County, Texas ........................................................... Coryell County, Texas ........................................................... Cottle County, Texas ............................................................ Crane County, Texas ............................................................ Crockett County, Texas ........................................................ Crosby County, Texas .......................................................... Culberson County, Texas ..................................................... Dallam County, Texas ........................................................... Dallas County, Texas ............................................................ 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4701 44 3660 5360 4920 44 3660 3840 44 44 3660 44 44 44 5360 5360 45 45 45 45 9080 45 45 45 45 45 0640 45 45 3810 7240 45 45 45 8360 1145 1260 45 45 45 45 45 45 0640 45 45 1240 45 45 45 45 3360 45 45 45 45 45 45 1920 45 45 7240 45 45 45 3810 45 45 45 45 45 45 1920 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7935 0.8007 0.9808 0.9416 0.7935 0.8007 0.8397 0.7935 0.7935 0.8007 0.7935 0.7935 0.7935 0.9808 0.9808 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8365 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.9437 0.7931 0.7931 0.8526 0.8984 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8283 0.8563 0.8900 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.9437 0.7931 0.7931 0.9804 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 1.0091 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 1.0205 0.7931 0.7931 0.8984 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8526 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 1.0205 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 17300 28700 34980 32820 34980 27740 28940 99944 99944 27740 99944 99944 99944 34980 34980 99945 99945 99945 18580 48660 11100 41700 26420 99945 41700 12420 99945 99945 28660 41700 99945 99945 99945 45500 26420 17780 99945 99945 99945 99945 17780 99945 12420 47020 10180 15180 99945 11100 99945 99945 26420 99945 99945 48660 99945 99945 99945 19124 99945 99945 41700 99945 99945 99945 28660 99945 99945 99945 31180 99945 99945 19124 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban 27125 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8284 0.8054 0.9790 0.9397 0.9790 0.7937 0.8441 0.7895 0.7895 0.7937 0.7895 0.7895 0.7895 0.9790 0.9790 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8550 0.8285 0.9156 0.8980 0.9996 0.8003 0.8980 0.9437 0.8003 0.8003 0.8526 0.8980 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8283 0.9996 0.8900 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8900 0.8003 0.9437 0.8160 0.7896 0.9804 0.8003 0.9156 0.8003 0.8003 0.9996 0.8003 0.8003 0.8285 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 1.0228 0.8003 0.8003 0.8980 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8526 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8783 0.8003 0.8003 1.0228 27126 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 45391 45392 45400 45410 45420 45421 45430 45431 45440 45450 45451 45460 45470 45480 45490 45500 45510 45511 45520 45521 45522 45530 45531 45540 45541 45542 45550 45551 45552 45560 45561 45562 45563 45564 45570 45580 45581 45582 45583 45590 45591 45592 45600 45610 45620 45621 45630 45631 45632 45640 45650 45651 45652 45653 45654 45660 45661 45662 45670 45671 45672 45680 45681 45690 45691 45700 45710 45711 45720 45721 45722 45730 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Dawson County, Texas ......................................................... Deaf Smith County, Texas .................................................... Delta County, Texas ............................................................. Denton County, Texas .......................................................... De Witt County, Texas .......................................................... Dickens County, Texas ......................................................... Dimmit County, Texas ........................................................... Donley County, Texas ........................................................... Duval County, Texas ............................................................. Eastland County, Texas ........................................................ Ector County, Texas ............................................................. Edwards County, Texas ........................................................ Ellis County, Texas ............................................................... El Paso County, Texas ......................................................... Erath County, Texas ............................................................. Falls County, Texas .............................................................. Fannin County, Texas ........................................................... Fayette County, Texas .......................................................... Fisher County, Texas ............................................................ Floyd County, Texas ............................................................. Foard County, Texas ............................................................ Fort Bend County, Texas ...................................................... Franklin County, Texas ......................................................... Freestone County, Texas ...................................................... Frio County, Texas ................................................................ Gaines County, Texas .......................................................... Galveston County, Texas ...................................................... Garza County, Texas ............................................................ Gillespie County, Texas ........................................................ Glasscock County, Texas ..................................................... Goliad County, Texas ........................................................... Gonzales County, Texas ....................................................... Gray County, Texas .............................................................. Grayson County, Texas ........................................................ Gregg County, Texas ............................................................ Grimes County, Texas .......................................................... Guadaloupe County, Texas .................................................. Hale County, Texas .............................................................. Hall County, Texas ................................................................ Hamilton County, Texas ........................................................ Hansford County, Texas ....................................................... Hardeman County, Texas ..................................................... Hardin County, Texas ........................................................... Harris County, Texas ............................................................ Harrison County, Texas ........................................................ Hartley County, Texas .......................................................... Haskell County, Texas .......................................................... Hays County, Texas .............................................................. Hemphill County, Texas ........................................................ Henderson County, Texas .................................................... Hidalgo County, Texas .......................................................... Hill County, Texas ................................................................. Hockley County, Texas ......................................................... Hood County, Texas ............................................................. Hopkins County, Texas ......................................................... Houston County, Texas ........................................................ Howard County, Texas ......................................................... Hudspeth County, Texas ...................................................... Hunt County, Texas .............................................................. Hutchinson County, Texas .................................................... Irion County, Texas ............................................................... Jack County, Texas .............................................................. Jackson County, Texas ......................................................... Jasper County, Texas ........................................................... Jeff Davis County, Texas ...................................................... Jefferson County, Texas ....................................................... Jim Hogg County, Texas ...................................................... Jim Wells County, Texas ...................................................... Johnson County, Texas ........................................................ Jones County, Texas ............................................................ Karnes County, Texas .......................................................... Kaufman County, Texas ....................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4701 45 45 45 1920 45 45 45 45 45 45 5800 45 1920 2320 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 3360 45 45 45 45 2920 45 45 45 45 45 45 7640 4420 45 7240 45 45 45 45 45 0840 3360 4420 45 45 0640 45 1920 4880 45 45 2800 45 45 45 45 1920 45 45 45 45 45 45 0840 45 45 2800 45 45 1920 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 1.0205 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.9741 0.7931 1.0205 0.8977 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 1.0091 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.9635 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.9507 0.8888 0.7931 0.8984 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8412 1.0091 0.8888 0.7931 0.7931 0.9437 0.7931 1.0205 0.8934 0.7931 0.7931 0.9522 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 1.0205 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8412 0.7931 0.7931 0.9522 0.7931 0.7931 1.0205 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99945 99945 19124 19124 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 36220 99945 19124 21340 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 26420 99945 99945 99945 99945 26420 99945 99945 99945 47020 99945 99945 43300 30980 99945 41700 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 13140 26420 99945 99945 99945 12420 99945 99945 32580 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 19124 99945 41660 99945 99945 99945 99945 13140 99945 99945 23104 10180 99945 19124 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8003 0.8003 1.0228 1.0228 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.9884 0.8003 1.0228 0.8977 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.9996 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.9996 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8160 0.8003 0.8003 0.9507 0.8730 0.8003 0.8980 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8412 0.9996 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.9437 0.8003 0.8003 0.8934 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 1.0228 0.8003 0.8271 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8412 0.8003 0.8003 0.9486 0.7896 0.8003 1.0228 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 45731 45732 45733 45734 45740 45741 45742 45743 45744 45750 45751 45752 45753 45754 45755 45756 45757 45758 45759 45760 45761 45762 45770 45771 45772 45780 45781 45782 45783 45784 45785 45790 45791 45792 45793 45794 45795 45796 45797 45800 45801 45802 45803 45804 45810 45820 45821 45822 45830 45831 45832 45840 45841 45842 45843 45844 45845 45850 45860 45861 45870 45871 45872 45873 45874 45875 45876 45877 45878 45879 45880 45881 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Kendall County, Texas .......................................................... Kenedy County, Texas .......................................................... Kent County, Texas .............................................................. Kerr County, Texas ............................................................... Kimble County, Texas ........................................................... King County, Texas ............................................................... Kinney County, Texas ........................................................... Kleberg County, Texas ......................................................... Knox County, Texas .............................................................. Lamar County, Texas ............................................................ Lamb County, Texas ............................................................. Lampasas County, Texas ..................................................... La Salle County, Texas ......................................................... Lavaca County, Texas .......................................................... Lee County, Texas ................................................................ Leon County, Texas .............................................................. Liberty County, Texas ........................................................... Limestone County, Texas ..................................................... Lipscomb County, Texas ...................................................... Live Oak County, Texas ....................................................... Llano County, Texas ............................................................. Loving County, Texas ........................................................... Lubbock County, Texas ........................................................ Lynn County, Texas .............................................................. Mc Culloch County, Texas .................................................... Mc Lennan County, Texas .................................................... Mc Mullen County, Texas ..................................................... Madison County, Texas ........................................................ Marion County, Texas ........................................................... Martin County, Texas ............................................................ Mason County, Texas ........................................................... Matagorda County, Texas ..................................................... Maverick County, Texas ....................................................... Medina County, Texas .......................................................... Menard County, Texas .......................................................... Midland County, Texas ......................................................... Milam County, Texas ............................................................ Mills County, Texas ............................................................... Mitchell County, Texas .......................................................... Montague County, Texas ...................................................... Montgomery County, Texas .................................................. Moore County, Texas ............................................................ Morris County, Texas ............................................................ Motley County, Texas ........................................................... Nacogdoches County, Texas ................................................ Navarro County, Texas ......................................................... Newton County, Texas .......................................................... Nolan County, Texas ............................................................ Nueces County, Texas .......................................................... Ochiltree County, Texas ....................................................... Oldham County, Texas ......................................................... Orange County, Texas .......................................................... Palo Pinto County, Texas ..................................................... Panola County, Texas ........................................................... Parker County, Texas ........................................................... Parmer County, Texas .......................................................... Pecos County, Texas ............................................................ Polk County, Texas ............................................................... Potter County, Texas ............................................................ Presidio County, Texas ......................................................... Rains County, Texas ............................................................. Randall County, Texas .......................................................... Reagan County, Texas ......................................................... Real County, Texas .............................................................. Red River County, Texas ...................................................... Reeves County, Texas .......................................................... Refugio County, Texas ......................................................... Roberts County, Texas ......................................................... Robertson County, Texas ..................................................... Rockwall County, Texas ....................................................... Runnels County, Texas ......................................................... Rusk County, Texas .............................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4701 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 3360 45 45 45 45 45 4600 45 45 8800 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 5800 45 45 45 45 3360 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 1880 45 45 0840 45 45 2800 45 45 45 0320 45 45 0320 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 1920 45 45 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 1.0091 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8783 0.7931 0.7931 0.8518 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.9741 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 1.0091 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8550 0.7931 0.7931 0.8412 0.7931 0.7931 0.9522 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.9156 0.7931 0.7931 0.9156 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 1.0205 0.7931 0.7931 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 41700 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 28660 99945 99945 99945 99945 26420 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 31180 99945 99945 47380 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 41700 99945 33260 99945 99945 99945 99945 26420 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 18580 99945 99945 13140 99945 99945 23104 99945 99945 99945 11100 99945 99945 11100 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 17780 19124 99945 30980 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban 27127 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8980 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8526 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.9996 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8783 0.8003 0.8003 0.8518 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8980 0.8003 0.9514 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.9996 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8550 0.8003 0.8003 0.8412 0.8003 0.8003 0.9486 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.9156 0.8003 0.8003 0.9156 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8900 1.0228 0.8003 0.8730 27128 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 45882 45883 45884 45885 45886 45887 45888 45889 45890 45891 45892 45893 45900 45901 45902 45903 45904 45905 45910 45911 45912 45913 45920 45921 45930 45940 45941 45942 45943 45944 45945 45946 45947 45948 45949 45950 45951 45952 45953 45954 45955 45960 45961 45962 45970 45971 45972 45973 45974 45980 45981 45982 45983 46000 46010 46020 46030 46040 46050 46060 46070 46080 46090 46100 46110 46120 46130 46140 46150 46160 46170 46180 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Sabine County, Texas ........................................................... San Augustine County, Texas .............................................. San Jacinto County, Texas ................................................... San Patricio County, Texas .................................................. San Saba County, Texas ...................................................... Schleicher County, Texas ..................................................... Scurry County, Texas ........................................................... Shackelford County, Texas ................................................... Shelby County, Texas ........................................................... Sherman County, Texas ....................................................... Smith County, Texas ............................................................. Somervell County, Texas ...................................................... Starr County, Texas .............................................................. Stephens County, Texas ....................................................... Sterling County, Texas .......................................................... Stonewall County, Texas ...................................................... Sutton County, Texas ........................................................... Swisher County, Texas ......................................................... Tarrant County, Texas .......................................................... Taylor County, Texas ............................................................ Terrell County, Texas ............................................................ Terry County, Texas ............................................................. Throckmorton County, Texas ................................................ Titus County, Texas .............................................................. Tom Green County, Texas ................................................... Travis County, Texas ............................................................ Trinity County, Texas ............................................................ Tyler County, Texas .............................................................. Upshur County, Texas .......................................................... Upton County, Texas ............................................................ Uvalde County, Texas ........................................................... Val Verde County, Texas ...................................................... Van Zandt County, Texas ..................................................... Victoria County, Texas .......................................................... Walker County, Texas ........................................................... Waller County, Texas ............................................................ Ward County, Texas ............................................................. Washington County, Texas ................................................... Webb County, Texas ............................................................ Wharton County, Texas ........................................................ Wheeler County, Texas ........................................................ Wichita County, Texas .......................................................... Wilbarger County, Texas ...................................................... Willacy County, Texas .......................................................... Williamson County, Texas .................................................... Wilson County, Texas ........................................................... Winkler County, Texas .......................................................... Wise County, Texas .............................................................. Wood County, Texas ............................................................ Yoakum County, Texas ......................................................... Young County, Texas ........................................................... Zapata County, Texas ........................................................... Zavala County, Texas ........................................................... Beaver County, Utah ............................................................. Box Elder County, Utah ........................................................ Cache County, Utah .............................................................. Carbon County, Utah ............................................................ Daggett County, Utah ........................................................... Davis County, Utah ............................................................... Duchesne County, Utah ........................................................ Emery County, Utah .............................................................. Garfield County, Utah ........................................................... Grand County, Utah .............................................................. Iron County, Utah .................................................................. Juab County, Utah ................................................................ Kane County, Utah ................................................................ Millard County, Utah ............................................................. Morgan County, Utah ............................................................ Piute County, Utah ................................................................ Rich County, Utah ................................................................. Salt Lake County, Utah ......................................................... San Juan County, Utah ......................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4701 45 45 45 1880 45 45 45 45 45 45 8640 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 2800 0040 45 45 45 45 7200 0640 45 45 4420 45 45 45 45 8750 45 3360 45 45 4080 45 45 9080 45 45 0640 7240 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 46 46 46 46 46 7160 46 46 46 46 46 46 2620 46 46 46 46 7160 46 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8550 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.9168 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.9522 0.8054 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8271 0.9437 0.7931 0.7931 0.8888 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8160 0.7931 1.0091 0.7931 0.7931 0.8068 0.7931 0.7931 0.8365 0.7931 0.7931 0.9437 0.8984 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.7931 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.9340 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 1.1845 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.9340 0.8762 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99945 99945 26420 18580 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 46340 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 23104 10180 99945 99945 99945 99945 41660 12420 99945 99945 30980 99945 99945 99945 99945 47020 99945 26420 99945 99945 29700 99945 99945 48660 99945 99945 12420 41700 99945 23104 99945 99945 99945 99945 99945 99946 99946 30860 99946 99946 36260 99946 99946 99946 99946 99946 39340 99946 99946 36260 99946 99946 41620 99946 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8003 0.8003 0.9996 0.8550 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.9168 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.9486 0.7896 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8271 0.9437 0.8003 0.8003 0.8730 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8160 0.8003 0.9996 0.8003 0.8003 0.8068 0.8003 0.8003 0.8285 0.8003 0.8003 0.9437 0.8980 0.8003 0.9486 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8003 0.8118 0.8118 0.9164 0.8118 0.8118 0.9029 0.8118 0.8118 0.8118 0.8118 0.8118 0.9500 0.8118 0.8118 0.9029 0.8118 0.8118 0.9421 0.8118 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 46190 46200 46210 46220 46230 46240 46250 46260 46270 46280 47000 47010 47020 47030 47040 47050 47060 47070 47080 47090 47100 47110 47120 47130 48010 48020 49000 49010 49011 49020 49030 49040 49050 49060 49070 49080 49088 49090 49100 49110 49111 49120 49130 49140 49141 49150 49160 49170 49180 49190 49191 49194 49200 49210 49211 49212 49213 49220 49230 49240 49241 49250 49260 49270 49280 49288 49290 49291 49300 49310 49320 49328 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Sanpete County, Utah ........................................................... Sevier County, Utah .............................................................. Summit County, Utah ............................................................ Tooele County, Utah ............................................................. Uintah County, Utah .............................................................. Utah County, Utah ................................................................ Wasatch County, Utah .......................................................... Washington County, Utah ..................................................... Wayne County, Utah ............................................................. Weber County, Utah ............................................................. Addison County, Vermont ..................................................... Bennington County, Vermont ................................................ Caledonia County, Vermont .................................................. Chittenden County, Vermont ................................................. Essex County, Vermont ........................................................ Franklin County, Vermont ..................................................... Grand Isle County, Vermont ................................................. Lamoille County, Vermont ..................................................... Orange County, Vermont ...................................................... Orleans County, Vermont ..................................................... Rutland County, Vermont ...................................................... Washington County, Vermont ............................................... Windham County, Vermont ................................................... Windsor County, Vermont ..................................................... St Croix County, Virgin Islands ............................................. St Thomas-John County, Virgin Islands ............................... Accomack County, Virginia ................................................... Albemarle County, Virginia ................................................... Alexandria City County, Virginia ........................................... Alleghany County, Virginia .................................................... Amelia County, Virginia ......................................................... Amherst County, Virginia ...................................................... Appomattox County, Virginia ................................................ Arlington County, Virginia ..................................................... Augusta County, Virginia ...................................................... Bath County, Virginia ............................................................ Bedford City County, Virginia ................................................ Bedford County, Virginia ....................................................... Bland County, Virginia .......................................................... Botetourt County, Virginia ..................................................... Bristol City County, Virginia .................................................. Brunswick County, Virginia ................................................... Buchanan County, Virginia ................................................... Buckingham County, Virginia ................................................ Buena Vista City County, Virginia ......................................... Campbell County, Virginia .................................................... Caroline County, Virginia ...................................................... Carroll County, Virginia ......................................................... Charles City County, Virginia ................................................ Charlotte County, Virginia ..................................................... Charlottesville City County, Virginia ...................................... Chesapeake County, Virginia ............................................... Chesterfield County, Virginia ................................................ Clarke County, Virginia ......................................................... Clifton Forge City County, Virginia ....................................... Colonial Heights County, Virginia ......................................... Covington City County, Virginia ............................................ Craig County, Virginia ........................................................... Culpeper County, Virginia ..................................................... Cumberland County, Virginia ................................................ Danville City County, Virginia ............................................... Dickenson County, Virginia ................................................... Dinniddie County, Virginia ..................................................... Emporia County, Virginia ...................................................... Essex County, Virginia .......................................................... Fairfax City County, Virginia ................................................. Fairfax County, Virginia ......................................................... Falls Church City County, Virginia ........................................ Fauquier County, Virginia ..................................................... Floyd County, Virginia ........................................................... Fluvanna County, Virginia ..................................................... Franklin City County, Virginia ............................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4701 46 46 46 46 46 6520 46 46 46 7160 47 47 47 1303 47 1303 1303 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 48 48 49 1540 8840 49 49 4640 49 8840 49 49 4640 4640 49 6800 3660 49 49 49 49 4640 49 49 6760 49 1540 5720 6760 8840 49 6760 49 49 8840 49 1950 49 6760 49 49 8840 8840 8840 8840 49 1540 49 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.9500 0.8762 0.8762 0.8762 0.9340 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9410 0.9830 0.9410 0.9410 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.7615 0.7615 0.8417 1.0187 1.0976 0.8417 0.8417 0.8691 0.8417 1.0976 0.8417 0.8417 0.8691 0.8691 0.8417 0.8387 0.8007 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8691 0.8417 0.8417 0.9328 0.8417 1.0187 0.8799 0.9328 1.0976 0.8417 0.9328 0.8417 0.8417 1.0976 0.8417 0.8489 0.8417 0.9328 0.8417 0.8417 1.0976 1.0976 1.0976 1.0976 0.8417 1.0187 0.8417 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99946 99946 41620 41620 99946 39340 99946 41100 99946 36260 99947 99947 99947 15540 99947 15540 15540 99947 99947 99947 99947 99947 99947 99947 99948 99948 99949 16820 47894 99949 40060 31340 31340 47894 99949 99949 31340 31340 99949 40220 28700 99949 99949 99949 99949 31340 40060 99949 40060 99949 16820 47260 40060 47894 99949 40060 99949 40220 99949 40060 19260 99949 40060 99949 99949 47894 47894 47894 47894 99949 16820 99949 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural 27129 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8118 0.8118 0.9421 0.9421 0.8118 0.9500 0.8118 0.9392 0.8118 0.9029 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9410 0.9830 0.9410 0.9410 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.7615 0.7615 0.8013 1.0187 1.0926 0.8013 0.9328 0.8691 0.8691 1.0926 0.8013 0.8013 0.8691 0.8691 0.8013 0.8374 0.8054 0.8013 0.8013 0.8013 0.8013 0.8691 0.9328 0.8013 0.9328 0.8013 1.0187 0.8799 0.9328 1.0926 0.8013 0.9328 0.8013 0.8374 0.8013 0.9328 0.8489 0.8013 0.9328 0.8013 0.8013 1.0926 1.0926 1.0926 1.0926 0.8013 1.0187 0.8013 27130 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 49330 49340 49342 49343 49350 49360 49370 49380 49390 49400 49410 49411 49420 49421 49430 49440 49450 49451 49460 49470 49480 49490 49500 49510 49520 49522 49530 49540 49550 49551 49560 49561 49563 49565 49570 49580 49590 49600 49610 49620 49621 49622 49641 49650 49660 49661 49670 49680 49690 49700 49701 49710 49711 49712 49720 49730 49740 49750 49770 49771 49780 49790 49791 49800 49801 49810 49820 49830 49838 49840 49850 49860 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Franklin County, Virginia ....................................................... Frederick County, Virginia ..................................................... Fredericksburg City County, Virginia .................................... Galax City County, Virginia ................................................... Giles County, Virginia ........................................................... Gloucester County, Virginia .................................................. Goochland County, Virginia .................................................. Grayson County, Virginia ...................................................... Greene County, Virginia ........................................................ Greensville County, Virginia .................................................. Halifax County, Virginia ......................................................... Hampton City County, Virginia .............................................. Hanover County, Virginia ...................................................... Harrisonburg City County, Virginia ....................................... Henrico County, Virginia ....................................................... Henry County, Virginia .......................................................... Highland County, Virginia ..................................................... Hopewell City County, Virginia ............................................. Isle Of Wight County, Virginia ............................................... James City Co County, Virginia ............................................ King And Queen County, Virginia ......................................... King George County, Virginia ............................................... King William County, Virginia ................................................ Lancaster County, Virginia .................................................... Lee County, Virginia .............................................................. Lexington County, Virginia .................................................... Loudoun County, Virginia ...................................................... Louisa County, Virginia ......................................................... Lunenburg County, Virginia .................................................. Lynchburg City County, Virginia ........................................... Madison County, Virginia ...................................................... Martinsville City County, Virginia .......................................... Manassas City County, Virginia ............................................ Manassas Park City County, Virginia ................................... Mathews County, Virginia ..................................................... Mecklenburg County, Virginia ............................................... Middlesex County, Virginia ................................................... Montgomery County, Virginia ................................................ Nansemond County, Virginia ................................................ Nelson County, Virginia ........................................................ New Kent County, Virginia .................................................... Newport News City County, Virginia ..................................... Norfolk City County, Virginia ................................................. Northampton County, Virginia ............................................... Northumberland County, Virginia .......................................... Norton City County, Virginia ................................................. Nottoway County, Virginia ..................................................... Orange County, Virginia ........................................................ Page County, Virginia ........................................................... Patrick County, Virginia ......................................................... Petersburg City County, Virginia ........................................... Pittsylvania County, Virginia ................................................. Portsmouth City County, Virginia .......................................... Poquoson City County, Virginia ............................................ Powhatan County, Virginia .................................................... Prince Edward County, Virginia ............................................ Prince George County, Virginia ............................................ Prince William County, Virginia ............................................. Pulaski County, Virginia ........................................................ Radford City County, Virginia ............................................... Rappahannock County, Virginia ........................................... Richmond County, Virginia ................................................... Richmond City County, Virginia ............................................ Roanoke County, Virginia ..................................................... Roanoke City County, Virginia .............................................. Rockbridge County, Virginia ................................................. Rockingham County, Virginia ................................................ Russell County, Virginia ........................................................ Salem County, Virginia ......................................................... Scott County, Virginia ........................................................... Shenandoah County, Virginia ............................................... Smyth County, Virginia ......................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4701 49 49 8840 49 49 5720 6760 49 1540 49 49 5720 6760 49 6760 49 49 6760 5720 5720 49 8840 49 49 49 49 8840 49 49 4640 49 49 8840 8840 5720 49 49 49 49 49 6760 5720 5720 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 6760 1950 5720 5720 6760 49 6760 8840 49 49 49 49 6760 6800 6800 49 49 49 6800 3660 49 49 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8417 0.8417 1.0976 0.8417 0.8417 0.8799 0.9328 0.8417 1.0187 0.8417 0.8417 0.8799 0.9328 0.8417 0.9328 0.8417 0.8417 0.9328 0.8799 0.8799 0.8417 1.0976 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 1.0976 0.8417 0.8417 0.8691 0.8417 0.8417 1.0976 1.0976 0.8799 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.9328 0.8799 0.8799 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.9328 0.8489 0.8799 0.8799 0.9328 0.8417 0.9328 1.0976 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.9328 0.8387 0.8387 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8387 0.8007 0.8417 0.8417 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 40220 49020 47894 99949 13980 47260 40060 99949 16820 99949 99949 47260 40060 25500 40060 99949 99949 40060 47260 47260 40060 99949 40060 99949 99949 99949 47894 40060 99949 31340 99949 99949 47894 47894 47260 99949 99949 13980 99949 16820 40060 47260 47260 99949 99949 99949 99949 99949 99949 99949 40060 19260 47260 47260 40060 99949 40060 47894 13980 13980 99949 99949 40060 40220 40220 99949 25500 99949 40220 28700 99949 99949 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8374 1.0214 1.0926 0.8013 0.7954 0.8799 0.9328 0.8013 1.0187 0.8013 0.8013 0.8799 0.9328 0.9088 0.9328 0.8013 0.8013 0.9328 0.8799 0.8799 0.9328 0.8013 0.9328 0.8013 0.8013 0.8013 1.0926 0.9328 0.8013 0.8691 0.8013 0.8013 1.0926 1.0926 0.8799 0.8013 0.8013 0.7954 0.8013 1.0187 0.9328 0.8799 0.8799 0.8013 0.8013 0.8013 0.8013 0.8013 0.8013 0.8013 0.9328 0.8489 0.8799 0.8799 0.9328 0.8013 0.9328 1.0926 0.7954 0.7954 0.8013 0.8013 0.9328 0.8374 0.8374 0.8013 0.9088 0.8013 0.8374 0.8054 0.8013 0.8013 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 49867 49870 49880 49890 49891 49892 49900 49910 49920 49921 49930 49950 49951 49960 49961 49962 49970 49980 49981 50000 50010 50020 50030 50040 50050 50060 50070 50080 50090 50100 50110 50120 50130 50140 50150 50160 50170 50180 50190 50200 50210 50220 50230 50240 50250 50260 50270 50280 50290 50300 50310 50320 50330 50340 50350 50360 50370 50380 51000 51010 51020 51030 51040 51050 51060 51070 51080 51090 51100 51110 51120 51130 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. South Boston City County, Virginia ...................................... Southampton County, Virginia .............................................. Spotsylvania County, Virginia ............................................... Stafford County, Virginia ....................................................... Staunton City County, Virginia .............................................. Suffolk City County, Virginia ................................................. Surry County, Virginia ........................................................... Sussex County, Virginia ........................................................ Tazewell County, Virginia ..................................................... Virginia Beach City County, Virginia ..................................... Warren County, Virginia ........................................................ Washington County, Virginia ................................................. Waynesboro City County, Virginia ........................................ Westmoreland County, Virginia ............................................ Williamsburg City County, Virginia ........................................ Winchester City County, Virginia .......................................... Wise County, Virginia ............................................................ Wythe County, Virginia ......................................................... York County, Virginia ............................................................ Adams County, Washington ................................................. Asotin County, Washington ................................................... Benton County, Washington ................................................. Chelan County, Washington ................................................. Clallam County, Washington ................................................. Clark County, Washington .................................................... Columbia County, Washington ............................................. Cowlitz County, Washington ................................................. Douglas County, Washington ............................................... Ferry County, Washington .................................................... Franklin County, Washington ................................................ Garfield County, Washington ................................................ Grant County, Washington .................................................... Grays Harbor County, Washington ....................................... Island County, Washington ................................................... Jefferson County, Washington .............................................. King County, Washington ..................................................... Kitsap County, Washington ................................................... Kittitas County, Washington .................................................. Klickitat County, Washington ................................................ Lewis County, Washington ................................................... Lincoln County, Washington ................................................. Mason County, Washington .................................................. Okanogan County, Washington ............................................ Pacific County, Washington .................................................. Pend Oreille County, Washington ......................................... Pierce County, Washington .................................................. San Juan County, Washington ............................................. Skagit County, Washington ................................................... Skamania County, Washington ............................................. Snohomish County, Washington ........................................... Spokane County, Washington .............................................. Stevens County, Washington ................................................ Thurston County, Washington .............................................. Wahkiakum County, Washington .......................................... Walla Walla County, Washington ......................................... Whatcom County, Washington ............................................. Whitman County, Washington .............................................. Yakima County, Washington ................................................. Barbour County, W Virginia .................................................. Berkeley County, W Virginia ................................................. Boone County, W Virginia ..................................................... Braxton County, W Virginia ................................................... Brooke County, W Virginia .................................................... Cabell County, W Virginia ..................................................... Calhoun County, W Virginia .................................................. Clay County, W Virginia ........................................................ Doddridge County, W Virginia .............................................. Fayette County, W Virginia ................................................... Gilmer County, W Virginia .................................................... Grant County, W Virginia ...................................................... Greenbrier County, W Virginia .............................................. Hampshire County, W Virginia .............................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4701 49 49 8840 8840 49 5720 49 49 49 5720 8840 3660 49 49 5720 49 49 49 5720 50 50 6740 50 50 6440 50 50 50 50 6740 50 50 50 7600 50 7600 1150 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 8200 50 50 50 7600 7840 50 5910 50 50 0860 50 9260 51 8840 51 51 8080 3400 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.8417 0.8417 1.0976 1.0976 0.8417 0.8799 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8799 1.0976 0.8007 0.8417 0.8417 0.8799 0.8417 0.8417 0.8417 0.8799 1.0217 1.0217 1.0619 1.0217 1.0217 1.1266 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.0619 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.1567 1.0217 1.1567 1.0675 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.0742 1.0217 1.0217 1.0217 1.1567 1.0905 1.0217 1.0927 1.0217 1.0217 1.1731 1.0217 1.0155 0.7900 1.0976 0.7900 0.7900 0.7819 0.9477 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 99949 99949 47894 47894 99949 47260 47260 40060 99949 47260 47894 28700 99949 99949 47260 49020 99949 99949 47260 99950 30300 28420 48300 99950 38900 99950 31020 48300 99950 28420 99950 99950 99950 99950 99950 42644 14740 99950 99950 99950 99950 99950 99950 99950 99950 45104 99950 34580 38900 42644 44060 99950 36500 99950 99950 13380 99950 49420 99951 25180 16620 99951 48260 26580 99951 16620 99951 99951 99951 99951 99951 49020 CBSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban 27131 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.8013 0.8013 1.0926 1.0926 0.8013 0.8799 0.8799 0.9328 0.8013 0.8799 1.0926 0.8054 0.8013 0.8013 0.8799 1.0214 0.8013 0.8013 0.8799 1.0510 0.9886 1.0619 1.0070 1.0510 1.1266 1.0510 0.9579 1.0070 1.0510 1.0619 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.1577 1.0675 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0742 1.0510 1.0454 1.1266 1.1577 1.0905 1.0510 1.0927 1.0510 1.0510 1.1731 1.0510 1.0155 0.7717 0.9489 0.8445 0.7717 0.7819 0.9477 0.7717 0.8445 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 1.0214 27132 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 51140 51150 51160 51170 51180 51190 51200 51210 51220 51230 51240 51250 51260 51270 51280 51290 51300 51310 51320 51330 51340 51350 51360 51370 51380 51390 51400 51410 51420 51430 51440 51450 51460 51470 51480 51490 51500 51510 51520 51530 51540 52000 52010 52020 52030 52040 52050 52060 52070 52080 52090 52100 52110 52120 52130 52140 52150 52160 52170 52180 52190 52200 52210 52220 52230 52240 52250 52260 52270 52280 52290 52300 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. Hancock County, W Virginia ................................................. Hardy County, W Virginia ..................................................... Harrison County, W Virginia ................................................. Jackson County, W Virginia .................................................. Jefferson County, W Virginia ................................................ Kanawha County, W Virginia ................................................ Lewis County, W Virginia ...................................................... Lincoln County, W Virginia .................................................... Logan County, W Virginia ..................................................... Mc Dowell County, W Virginia .............................................. Marion County, W Virginia .................................................... Marshall County, W Virginia ................................................. Mason County, W Virginia .................................................... Mercer County, W Virginia .................................................... Mineral County, W Virginia ................................................... Mingo County, W Virginia ..................................................... Monongalia County, W Virginia ............................................ Monroe County, W Virginia ................................................... Morgan County, W Virginia ................................................... Nicholas County, W Virginia ................................................. Ohio County, W Virginia ....................................................... Pendleton County, W Virginia ............................................... Pleasants County, W Virginia ............................................... Pocahontas County, W Virginia ............................................ Preston County, W Virginia ................................................... Putnam County, W Virginia ................................................... Raleigh County, W Virginia ................................................... Randolph County, W Virginia ................................................ Ritchie County, W Virginia .................................................... Roane County, W Virginia .................................................... Summers County, W Virginia ................................................ Taylor County, W Virginia ..................................................... Tucker County, W Virginia .................................................... Tyler County, W Virginia ....................................................... Upshur County, W Virginia ................................................... Wayne County, W Virginia .................................................... Webster County, W Virginia .................................................. Wetzel County, W Virginia .................................................... Wirt County, W Virginia ......................................................... Wood County, W Virginia ...................................................... Wyoming County, W Virginia ................................................ Adams County, Wisconsin .................................................... Ashland County, Wisconsin .................................................. Barron County, Wisconsin .................................................... Bayfield County, Wisconsin .................................................. Brown County, Wisconsin ..................................................... Buffalo County, Wisconsin .................................................... Burnett County, Wisconsin .................................................... Calumet County, Wisconsin .................................................. Chippewa County, Wisconsin ............................................... Clark County, Wisconsin ....................................................... Columbia County, Wisconsin ................................................ Crawford County, Wisconsin ................................................. Dane County, Wisconsin ....................................................... Dodge County, Wisconsin ..................................................... Door County, Wisconsin ....................................................... Douglas County, Wisconsin .................................................. Dunn County, Wisconsin ....................................................... Eau Claire County, Wisconsin .............................................. Florence County, Wisconsin ................................................. Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin .......................................... Forest County, Wisconsin ..................................................... Grant County, Wisconsin ...................................................... Green County, Wisconsin ..................................................... Green Lake County, Wisconsin ............................................ Iowa County, Wisconsin ........................................................ Iron County, Wisconsin ......................................................... Jackson County, Wisconsin .................................................. Jefferson County, Wisconsin ................................................ Juneau County, Wisconsin ................................................... Kenosha County, Wisconsin ................................................. Kewaunee County, Wisconsin .............................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4701 8080 51 51 51 8840 1480 51 51 51 51 51 9000 51 51 1900 51 51 51 51 51 9000 51 51 51 51 1480 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 3400 51 51 51 6020 51 52 52 52 52 3080 52 52 0460 2290 52 52 52 4720 52 52 2240 52 2290 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 3800 52 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.7819 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 1.0976 0.8445 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7161 0.7900 0.7900 0.9317 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7161 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.8445 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.9477 0.7900 0.7900 0.7900 0.8270 0.7900 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9483 0.9478 0.9478 0.9239 0.9201 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 1.0754 0.9478 0.9478 1.0213 0.9478 0.9201 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9760 0.9478 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 48260 99951 99951 99951 47894 16620 99951 16620 99951 99951 99951 48540 99951 99951 19060 99951 34060 99951 25180 99951 48540 99951 37620 99951 34060 16620 99951 99951 99951 99951 99951 99951 99951 99951 99951 26580 99951 99951 37620 37620 99951 99952 99952 99952 99952 24580 99952 99952 11540 20740 99952 31540 99952 31540 99952 99952 20260 99952 20740 99952 22540 99952 99952 99952 99952 31540 99952 99952 99952 99952 29404 24580 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.7819 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 1.0926 0.8445 0.7717 0.8445 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.7161 0.7717 0.7717 0.9317 0.7717 0.8420 0.7717 0.9489 0.7717 0.7161 0.7717 0.8270 0.7717 0.8420 0.8445 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.7717 0.9477 0.7717 0.7717 0.8270 0.8270 0.7717 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.9483 0.9509 0.9509 0.9288 0.9201 0.9509 1.0659 0.9509 1.0659 0.9509 0.9509 1.0213 0.9509 0.9201 0.9509 0.9640 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 1.0659 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 1.0429 0.9483 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 SSA State/ County Code 52310 52320 52330 52340 52350 52360 52370 52380 52381 52390 52400 52410 52420 52430 52440 52450 52460 52470 52480 52490 52500 52510 52520 52530 52540 52550 52560 52570 52580 52590 52600 52610 52620 52630 52640 52650 52660 52670 52680 52690 52700 53000 53010 53020 53030 53040 53050 53060 53070 53080 53090 53100 53110 53120 53130 53140 53150 53160 53170 53180 53190 53200 53210 53220 65010 65020 65030 65040 65050 65060 65070 65080 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 County name MSA No. La Crosse County, Wisconsin ............................................... Lafayette County, Wisconsin ................................................ Langlade County, Wisconsin ................................................ Lincoln County, Wisconsin .................................................... Manitowoc County, Wisconsin .............................................. Marathon County, Wisconsin ................................................ Marinette County, Wisconsin ................................................ Marquette County, Wisconsin ............................................... Menominee County, Wisconsin ............................................ Milwaukee County, Wisconsin .............................................. Monroe County, Wisconsin ................................................... Oconto County, Wisconsin .................................................... Oneida County, Wisconsin .................................................... Outagamie County, Wisconsin .............................................. Ozaukee County, Wisconsin ................................................. Pepin County, Wisconsin ...................................................... Pierce County, Wisconsin ..................................................... Polk County, Wisconsin ........................................................ Portage County, Wisconsin ................................................... Price County, Wisconsin ....................................................... Racine County, Wisconsin .................................................... Richland County, Wisconsin ................................................. Rock County, Wisconsin ....................................................... Rusk County, Wisconsin ....................................................... St Croix County, Wisconsin .................................................. Sauk County, Wisconsin ....................................................... Sawyer County, Wisconsin ................................................... Shawano County, Wisconsin ................................................ Sheboygan County, Wisconsin ............................................. Taylor County, Wisconsin ..................................................... Trempealeau County, Wisconsin .......................................... Vernon County, Wisconsin .................................................... Vilas County, Wisconsin ....................................................... Walworth County, Wisconsin ................................................ Washburn County, Wisconsin ............................................... Washington County, Wisconsin ............................................ Waukesha County, Wisconsin .............................................. Waupaca County, Wisconsin ................................................ Waushara County, Wisconsin ............................................... Winnebago County, Wisconsin ............................................. Wood County, Wisconsin ...................................................... Albany County, Wyoming ...................................................... Big Horn County, Wyoming .................................................. Campbell County, Wyoming ................................................. Carbon County, Wyoming ..................................................... Converse County, Wyoming ................................................. Crook County, Wyoming ....................................................... Fremont County, Wyoming ................................................... Goshen County, Wyoming .................................................... Hot Springs County, Wyoming .............................................. Johnson County, Wyoming ................................................... Laramie County, Wyoming .................................................... Lincoln County, Wyoming ..................................................... Natrona County, Wyoming .................................................... Niobrara County, Wyoming ................................................... Park County, Wyoming ......................................................... Platte County, Wyoming ....................................................... Sheridan County, Wyoming .................................................. Sublette County, Wyoming ................................................... Sweetwater County, Wyoming .............................................. Teton County, Wyoming ....................................................... Uinta County, Wyoming ........................................................ Washakie County, Wyoming ................................................. Weston County, Wyoming .................................................... Agana County, Guam ........................................................... Agana Heights County, Guam .............................................. Agat County, Guam .............................................................. Asan County, Guam .............................................................. Barrigada County, Guam ...................................................... Chalan Pago County, Guam ................................................. Dededo County, Guam ......................................................... Inarajan County, Guam ......................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4701 3870 52 52 52 52 8940 52 52 52 5080 52 52 52 0460 5080 52 5120 52 52 52 6600 52 3620 52 5120 52 52 52 7620 52 52 52 52 52 52 5080 5080 52 52 0460 52 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 1580 53 1350 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 Sfmt 4700 MSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.9564 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9590 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 1.0146 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9239 1.0146 0.9478 1.1075 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.8997 0.9478 0.9538 0.9478 1.1075 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.8911 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 0.9478 1.0146 1.0146 0.9478 0.9478 0.9239 0.9478 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.8775 0.9257 0.9026 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 29100 99952 99952 99952 99952 48140 99952 99952 99952 33340 99952 24580 99952 11540 33340 99952 33460 99952 99952 99952 39540 99952 27500 99952 33460 99952 99952 99952 43100 99952 99952 99952 99952 99952 99952 33340 33340 99952 99952 36780 99952 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 16940 99953 16220 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99953 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 CBSA urban/ rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 27133 2006 CBSAbased WI 0.9564 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.9590 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 1.0146 0.9509 0.9483 0.9509 0.9288 1.0146 0.9509 1.1075 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.8997 0.9509 0.9538 0.9509 1.1075 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.8911 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 0.9509 1.0146 1.0146 0.9509 0.9509 0.9183 0.9509 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.8775 0.9257 0.9026 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9257 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 27134 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations SSA State/ County Code 65090 65100 65110 65120 65130 65140 65150 65160 65170 65180 65190 65200 65210 65220 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... County name MSA No. Maite County, Guam ............................................................. Mangilao County, Guam ....................................................... Merizo County, Guam ........................................................... Mongmong County, Guam .................................................... Ordot County, Guam ............................................................. Piti County, Guam ................................................................. Santa Rita County, Guam ..................................................... Sinajana County, Guam ........................................................ Talofofo County, Guam ......................................................... Tamuning County, Guam ...................................................... Toto County, Guam ............................................................... Umatac County, Guam ......................................................... Yigo County, Guam ............................................................... Yona County, Guam ............................................................. 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 MSA urban/ rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 2006 MSAbased WI CBSA No. 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 99965 CBSA urban/ rural 2006 CBSAbased WI Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 0.9611 1 At this time, there are no hospitals located in these CBSA-based urban areas on which to base a wage index. Therefore, the wage index value is based on the average wage index for all urban areas within the state. Addendum C—Wage Index Tables In this addendum, we provide the tables referred to throughout the preamble in this final rule. Tables 1 and 2 below provide the CBSA-based wage index values for urban and rural providers. TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS CBSA code Urban area (constituent counties) Wage index 10180 ....... Abilene, TX ................................................................................................................................................................................ Callahan County, TX. Jones County, TX. Taylor County, TX. ´ Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastian, PR ....................................................................................................................................... Aguada Municipio, PR. Aguadilla Municipio, PR. ˜ Anasco Municipio, PR. Isabela Municipio, PR. Lares Municipio, PR. Moca Municipio, PR. ´ Rincon Municipio, PR. ˘ San Sebastia≤n Municipio, PR. Akron, OH .................................................................................................................................................................................. Portage County, OH. Summit County, OH. Albany, GA ................................................................................................................................................................................ Baker County, GA. Dougherty County, GA. Lee County, GA. Terrell County, GA. Worth County, GA. Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY .................................................................................................................................................. Albany County, NY. Rensselaer County, NY. Saratoga County, NY. Schenectady County, NY. Schoharie County, NY. Albuquerque, NM ...................................................................................................................................................................... Bernalillo County, NM. Sandoval County, NM. Torrance County, NM. Valencia County, NM. Alexandria, LA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Grant Parish, LA. Rapides Parish, LA. Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ ........................................................................................................................................ Warren County, NJ. Carbon County, PA. Lehigh County, PA. Northampton County, PA. Altoona, PA ............................................................................................................................................................................... Blair County, PA. Amarillo, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... 0.7896 10380 ....... 10420 ....... 10500 ....... 10580 ....... 10740 ....... 10780 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 10900 ....... 11020 ....... 11100 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.4738 0.8982 0.8628 0.8589 0.9684 0.8033 0.9818 0.8944 0.9156 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27135 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 11180 ....... 11260 ....... 11300 ....... 11340 ....... 11460 ....... 11500 ....... 11540 ....... 11700 ....... 12020 ....... 12060 ....... 12100 ....... 12220 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 12260 ....... 12420 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Armstrong County, TX. Carson County, TX. Potter County, TX. Randall County, TX. Ames, IA .................................................................................................................................................................................... Story County, IA. Anchorage, AK .......................................................................................................................................................................... Anchorage Municipality, AK. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK. Anderson, IN ............................................................................................................................................................................. Madison County, IN. Anderson, SC ............................................................................................................................................................................ Anderson County, SC. Ann Arbor, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................ Washtenaw County, MI. Anniston-Oxford, AL .................................................................................................................................................................. Calhoun County, AL. Appleton, WI .............................................................................................................................................................................. Calumet County, WI. Outagamie County, WI. Asheville, NC ............................................................................................................................................................................. Buncombe County, NC. Haywood County, NC. Henderson County, NC. Madison County, NC. Athens-Clarke County, GA ........................................................................................................................................................ Clarke County, GA. Madison County, GA. Oconee County, GA. Oglethorpe County, GA. Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA ......................................................................................................................................... Barrow County, GA. Bartow County, GA. Butts County, GA. Carroll County, GA. Cherokee County, GA. Clayton County, GA. Cobb County, GA. Coweta County, GA. Dawson County, GA. DeKalb County, GA. Douglas County, GA. Fayette County, GA. Forsyth County, GA. Fulton County, GA. Gwinnett County, GA. Haralson County, GA. Heard County, GA. Henry County, GA. Jasper County, GA. Lamar County, GA. Meriwether County, GA. Newton County, GA. Paulding County, GA. Pickens County, GA. Pike County, GA. Rockdale County, GA. Spalding County, GA. Walton County, GA. Atlantic City, NJ ......................................................................................................................................................................... Atlantic County, NJ. Auburn-Opelika, AL ................................................................................................................................................................... Lee County, AL. Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC .......................................................................................................................................... Burke County, GA. Columbia County, GA. McDuffie County, GA. Richmond County, GA. Aiken County, SC. Edgefield County, SC. Austin-Round Rock, TX ............................................................................................................................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9536 1.1895 0.8586 0.8997 1.0859 0.7682 0.9288 0.9285 0.9855 0.9793 1.1615 0.8100 0.9748 0.9437 27136 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 12540 ....... 12580 ....... 12620 ....... 12700 ....... 12940 ....... 12980 ....... 13020 ....... 13140 ....... 13380 ....... 13460 ....... 13644 ....... 13740 ....... 13780 ....... 13820 ....... 13900 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 13980 ....... 14020 ....... 14060 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Bastrop County, TX. Caldwell County, TX. Hays County, TX. Travis County, TX. Williamson County, TX. Bakersfield, CA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Kern County, CA. Baltimore-Towson, MD .............................................................................................................................................................. Anne Arundel County, MD. Baltimore County, MD. Carroll County, MD. Harford County, MD. Howard County, MD. Queen Anne’s County, MD. Baltimore City, MD. Bangor, ME ............................................................................................................................................................................... Penobscot County, ME. Barnstable Town, MA ................................................................................................................................................................ Barnstable County, MA. Baton Rouge, LA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Ascension Parish, LA. East Baton Rouge Parish, LA. East Feliciana Parish, LA. Iberville Parish, LA. Livingston Parish, LA. Pointe Coupee Parish, LA. St. Helena Parish, LA. West Baton Rouge Parish, LA. West Feliciana Parish, LA. Battle Creek, MI ........................................................................................................................................................................ Calhoun County, MI. Bay City, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................... Bay County, MI. Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX ......................................................................................................................................................... Hardin County, TX. Jefferson County, TX. Orange County, TX. Bellingham, WA ......................................................................................................................................................................... Whatcom County, WA. Bend, OR ................................................................................................................................................................................... Deschutes County, OR. Bethesda-Gaithersburg-Frederick, MD ..................................................................................................................................... Frederick County, MD. Montgomery County, MD. Billings, MT ................................................................................................................................................................................ Carbon County, MT. Yellowstone County, MT. Binghamton, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................ Broome County, NY. Tioga County, NY. Birmingham-Hoover, AL ............................................................................................................................................................ Bibb County, AL. Blount County, AL. Chilton County, AL. Jefferson County, AL. St. Clair County, AL. Shelby County, AL. Walker County, AL. Bismarck, ND ............................................................................................................................................................................ Burleigh County, ND. Morton County, ND. Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA ................................................................................................................................... Giles County, VA. Montgomery County, VA. Pulaski County, VA. Radford City, VA. Bloomington, IN ......................................................................................................................................................................... Greene County, IN. Monroe County, IN. Owen County, IN. Bloomington-Normal, IL ............................................................................................................................................................. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 1.0470 0.9897 0.9993 1.2600 0.8593 0.9508 0.9343 0.8412 1.1731 1.0786 1.1483 0.8834 0.8562 0.8959 0.7574 0.7954 0.8447 0.9075 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27137 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 14260 ....... 14484 ....... 14500 ....... 14540 ....... 14740 ....... 14860 ....... 15180 ....... 15260 ....... 15380 ....... 15500 ....... 15540 ....... 15764 ....... 15804 ....... 15940 ....... 15980 ....... 16180 ....... 16220 ....... 16300 ....... 16580 ....... 16620 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 16700 ....... 16740 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) McLean County, IL. Boise City-Nampa, ID ................................................................................................................................................................ Ada County, ID. Boise County, ID. Canyon County, ID. Gem County, ID. Owyhee County, ID. Boston-Quincy, MA ................................................................................................................................................................... Norfolk County, MA. Plymouth County, MA. Suffolk County, MA. Boulder, CO ............................................................................................................................................................................... Boulder County, CO. Bowling Green, KY .................................................................................................................................................................... Edmonson County, KY. Warren County, KY. Bremerton-Silverdale, WA ......................................................................................................................................................... Kitsap County, WA. Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT ............................................................................................................................................. Fairfield County, CT. Brownsville-Harlingen, TX ......................................................................................................................................................... Cameron County, TX. Brunswick, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Brantley County, GA. Glynn County, GA. McIntosh County, GA. Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY .......................................................................................................................................................... Erie County, NY. Niagara County, NY. Burlington, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................... Alamance County, NC. Burlington-South Burlington, VT ................................................................................................................................................ Chittenden County, VT. Franklin County, VT. Grand Isle County, VT. Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA ....................................................................................................................................... Middlesex County, MA. Camden, NJ .............................................................................................................................................................................. Burlington County, NJ. Camden County, NJ. Gloucester County, NJ. Canton-Massillon, OH ............................................................................................................................................................... Carroll County, OH. Stark County, OH. Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL ....................................................................................................................................................... Lee County, FL. Carson City, NV ........................................................................................................................................................................ Carson City, NV. Casper, WY ............................................................................................................................................................................... Natrona County, WY. Cedar Rapids, IA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Benton County, IA. Jones County, IA. Linn County, IA. Champaign-Urbana, IL .............................................................................................................................................................. Champaign County, IL. Ford County, IL. Piatt County, IL. Charleston, WV ......................................................................................................................................................................... Boone County, WV. Clay County, WV. Kanawha County, WV. Lincoln County, WV. Putnam County, WV. Charleston-North Charleston, SC ............................................................................................................................................. Berkeley County, SC. Charleston County, SC. Dorchester County, SC. Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC ........................................................................................................................................ Anson County, NC. Cabarrus County, NC. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9052 1.1558 0.9734 0.8211 1.0675 1.2592 0.9804 0.9311 0.9511 0.8905 0.9410 1.1172 1.0517 0.8935 0.9356 1.0234 0.9026 0.8825 0.9594 0.8445 0.9245 0.9750 27138 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 16820 ....... 16860 ....... 16940 ....... 16974 ....... 17020 ....... 17140 ....... 17300 ....... 17420 ....... 17460 ....... 17660 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 17780 ....... 17820 ....... 17860 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Gaston County, NC. Mecklenburg County, NC. Union County, NC. York County, SC. Charlottesville, VA ..................................................................................................................................................................... Albemarle County, VA. Fluvanna County, VA. Greene County, VA. Nelson County, VA. Charlottesville City, VA. Chattanooga, TN-GA ................................................................................................................................................................. Catoosa County, GA. Dade County, GA. Walker County, GA. Hamilton County, TN. Marion County, TN. Sequatchie County, TN. Cheyenne, WY .......................................................................................................................................................................... Laramie County, WY. Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL ..................................................................................................................................................... Cook County, IL. DeKalb County, IL. DuPage County, IL. Grundy County, IL. Kane County, IL. Kendall County, IL. McHenry County, IL. Will County, IL. Chico, CA .................................................................................................................................................................................. Butte County, CA. Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN ............................................................................................................................................. Dearborn County, IN. Franklin County, IN. Ohio County, IN. Boone County, KY. Bracken County, KY. Campbell County, KY. Gallatin County, KY. Grant County, KY. Kenton County, KY. Pendleton County, KY. Brown County, OH. Butler County, OH. Clermont County, OH. Hamilton County, OH. Warren County, OH. Clarksville, TN-KY ..................................................................................................................................................................... Christian County, KY. Trigg County, KY. Montgomery County, TN. Stewart County, TN. Cleveland, TN ............................................................................................................................................................................ Bradley County, TN. Polk County, TN. Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH .................................................................................................................................................... Cuyahoga County, OH. Geauga County, OH. Lake County, OH. Lorain County, OH. Medina County, OH. Coeur d’Alene, ID ...................................................................................................................................................................... Kootenai County, ID. College Station-Bryan, TX ......................................................................................................................................................... Brazos County, TX. Burleson County, TX. Robertson County, TX. Colorado Springs, CO ............................................................................................................................................................... El Paso County, CO. Teller County, CO. Columbia, MO ........................................................................................................................................................................... Boone County, MO. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 1.0187 0.9088 0.8775 1.0790 1.0511 0.9615 0.8284 0.8139 0.9213 0.9647 0.8900 0.9468 0.8345 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27139 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 17900 ....... 17980 ....... 18020 ....... 18140 ....... 18580 ....... 18700 ....... 19060 ....... 19124 ....... 19140 ....... 19180 ....... 19260 ....... 19340 ....... 19380 ....... 19460 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 19500 ....... 19660 ....... 19740 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Howard County, MO. Columbia, SC ............................................................................................................................................................................ Calhoun County, SC. Fairfield County, SC. Kershaw County, SC. Lexington County, SC. Richland County, SC. Saluda County, SC. Columbus, GA-AL ..................................................................................................................................................................... Russell County, AL. Chattahoochee County, GA. Harris County, GA. Marion County, GA. Muscogee County, GA. Columbus, IN ............................................................................................................................................................................. Bartholomew County, IN. Columbus, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................... Delaware County, OH. Fairfield County, OH. Franklin County, OH. Licking County, OH. Madison County, OH. Morrow County, OH. Pickaway County, OH. Union County, OH. Corpus Christi, TX ..................................................................................................................................................................... Aransas County, TX. Nueces County, TX. San Patricio County, TX. Corvallis, OR ............................................................................................................................................................................. Benton County, OR. Cumberland, MD-WV ................................................................................................................................................................ Allegany County, MD. Mineral County, WV. Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX ............................................................................................................................................................. Collin County, TX. Dallas County, TX. Delta County, TX. Denton County, TX. Ellis County, TX. Hunt County, TX. Kaufman County, TX. Rockwall County, TX. Dalton, GA ................................................................................................................................................................................. Murray County, GA. Whitfield County, GA. Danville, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................. Vermilion County, IL. Danville, VA ............................................................................................................................................................................... Pittsylvania County, VA. Danville City, VA. Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL ........................................................................................................................................ Henry County, IL. Mercer County, IL. Rock Island County, IL. Scott County, IA. Dayton, OH ................................................................................................................................................................................ Greene County, OH. Miami County, OH. Montgomery County, OH. Preble County, OH. Decatur, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................... Lawrence County, AL. Morgan County, AL. Decatur, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................. Macon County, IL. Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL ............................................................................................................................ Volusia County, FL. Denver-Aurora, CO ................................................................................................................................................................... Adams County, CO. Arapahoe County, CO. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9057 0.8560 0.9588 0.9860 0.8550 1.0729 0.9317 1.0228 0.9079 0.9028 0.8489 0.8724 0.9064 0.8469 0.8067 0.9299 1.0723 27140 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 19780 ....... 19804 ....... 20020 ....... 20100 ....... 20220 ....... 20260 ....... 20500 ....... 20740 ....... 20764 ....... 20940 ....... 21060 ....... 21140 ....... 21300 ....... 21340 ....... 21500 ....... 21604 ....... 21660 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 21780 ....... 21820 ....... 21940 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Broomfield County, CO. Clear Creek County, CO. Denver County, CO. Douglas County, CO. Elbert County, CO. Gilpin County, CO. Jefferson County, CO. Park County, CO. Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA ............................................................................................................................................ Dallas County, IA. Guthrie County, IA. Madison County, IA. Polk County, IA. Warren County, IA. Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, MI ..................................................................................................................................................... Wayne County, MI. Dothan, AL ................................................................................................................................................................................ Geneva County, AL. Henry County, AL. Houston County, AL. Dover, DE .................................................................................................................................................................................. Kent County, DE. Dubuque, IA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Dubuque County, IA. Duluth, MN-WI ........................................................................................................................................................................... Carlton County, MN. St. Louis County, MN. Douglas County, WI. Durham, NC .............................................................................................................................................................................. Chatham County, NC. Durham County, NC. Orange County, NC. Person County, NC. Eau Claire, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................... Chippewa County, WI. Eau Claire County, WI. Edison, NJ ................................................................................................................................................................................. Middlesex County, NJ. Monmouth County, NJ. Ocean County, NJ. Somerset County, NJ. El Centro, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ Imperial County, CA. Elizabethtown, KY ..................................................................................................................................................................... Hardin County, KY. Larue County, KY. Elkhart-Goshen, IN .................................................................................................................................................................... Elkhart County, IN. Elmira, NY ................................................................................................................................................................................. Chemung County, NY. El Paso, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... El Paso County, TX. Erie, PA ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Erie County, PA. Essex County, MA ..................................................................................................................................................................... Essex County, MA. Eugene-Springfield, OR ............................................................................................................................................................ Lane County, OR. Evansville, IN-KY ....................................................................................................................................................................... Gibson County, IN. Posey County, IN. Vanderburgh County, IN. Warrick County, IN. Henderson County, KY. Webster County, KY. Fairbanks, AK ............................................................................................................................................................................ Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK. Fajardo, PR ............................................................................................................................................................................... Ceiba Municipio, PR. Fajardo Municipio, PR. Luquillo Municipio, PR. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9669 1.0424 0.7721 0.9776 0.9024 1.0213 1.0244 0.9201 1.1249 0.8906 0.8802 0.9627 0.8250 0.8977 0.8737 1.0538 1.0818 0.8713 1.1408 0.4153 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27141 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code Urban area (constituent counties) Wage index 22020 ....... Fargo, ND-MN ........................................................................................................................................................................... Cass County, ND. Clay County, MN. Farmington, NM ......................................................................................................................................................................... San Juan County, NM. Fayetteville, NC ......................................................................................................................................................................... Cumberland County, NC. Hoke County, NC. Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO ................................................................................................................................... Benton County, AR. Madison County, AR. Washington County, AR. McDonald County, MO. Flagstaff, AZ .............................................................................................................................................................................. Coconino County, AZ. Flint, MI ...................................................................................................................................................................................... Genesee County, MI. Florence, SC ............................................................................................................................................................................. Darlington County, SC. Florence County, SC. Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL ..................................................................................................................................................... Colbert County, AL. Lauderdale County, AL. Fond du Lac, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................ Fond du Lac County, WI. Fort Collins-Loveland, CO ......................................................................................................................................................... Larimer County, CO. Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL ............................................................................................................ Broward County, FL. Fort Smith, AR-OK .................................................................................................................................................................... Crawford County, AR. Franklin County, AR. Sebastian County, AR. Le Flore County, OK. Sequoyah County, OK. Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL .................................................................................................................................. Okaloosa County, FL. Fort Wayne, IN .......................................................................................................................................................................... Allen County, IN. Wells County, IN. Whitley County, IN. Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ........................................................................................................................................................... Johnson County, TX. Parker County, TX. Tarrant County, TX. Wise County, TX. Fresno, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................ Fresno County, CA. Gadsden, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................. Etowah County, AL. Gainesville, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................... Alachua County, FL. Gilchrist County, FL. Gainesville, GA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Hall County, GA. Gary, IN ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Jasper County, IN. Lake County, IN. Newton County, IN. Porter County, IN. Glens Falls, NY ......................................................................................................................................................................... Warren County, NY. Washington County, NY. Goldsboro, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................... Wayne County, NC. Grand Forks, ND-MN ................................................................................................................................................................ Polk County, MN. Grand Forks County, ND. Grand Junction, CO .................................................................................................................................................................. Mesa County, CO. Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI ...................................................................................................................................................... 0.8486 22140 ....... 22180 ....... 22220 ....... 22380 ....... 22420 ....... 22500 ....... 22520 ....... 22540 ....... 22660 ....... 22744 ....... 22900 ....... 23020 ....... 23060 ....... 23104 ....... 23420 ....... 23460 ....... 23540 ....... 23580 ....... 23844 ....... 24020 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 24140 ....... 24220 ....... 24300 ....... 24340 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.8509 0.9416 0.8661 1.2092 1.0655 0.8947 0.8272 0.9640 1.0122 1.0432 0.8230 0.8872 0.9793 0.9486 1.0538 0.7938 0.9388 0.8874 0.9395 0.8559 0.8775 0.7901 0.9550 0.9390 27142 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 24500 ....... 24540 ....... 24580 ....... 24660 ....... 24780 ....... 24860 ....... 25020 ....... 25060 ....... 25180 ....... 25260 ....... 25420 ....... 25500 ....... 25540 ....... 25620 ....... 25860 ....... 25980 ....... 26100 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 26180 ....... 26300 ....... 26380 ....... 26420 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Barry County, MI. Ionia County, MI. Kent County, MI. Newaygo County, MI. Great Falls, MT ......................................................................................................................................................................... Cascade County, MT. Greeley, CO .............................................................................................................................................................................. Weld County, CO. Green Bay, WI ........................................................................................................................................................................... Brown County, WI. Kewaunee County, WI. Oconto County, WI. Greensboro-High Point, NC ...................................................................................................................................................... Guilford County, NC. Randolph County, NC. Rockingham County, NC. Greenville, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................... Greene County, NC. Pitt County, NC. Greenville, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................... Greenville County, SC. Laurens County, SC. Pickens County, SC. Guayama, PR ............................................................................................................................................................................ Arroyo Municipio, PR. Guayama Municipio, PR. Patillas Municipio, PR. Gulfport-Biloxi, MS .................................................................................................................................................................... Hancock County, MS. Harrison County, MS. Stone County, MS. Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV ............................................................................................................................................ Washington County, MD. Berkeley County, WV. Morgan County, WV. Hanford-Corcoran, CA ............................................................................................................................................................... Kings County, CA. Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA .............................................................................................................................................................. Cumberland County, PA. Dauphin County, PA. Perry County, PA. Harrisonburg, VA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Rockingham County, VA. Harrisonburg City, VA. Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT ................................................................................................................................ Hartford County, CT. Litchfield County, CT. Middlesex County, CT. Tolland County, CT. Hattiesburg, MS ......................................................................................................................................................................... Forrest County, MS. Lamar County, MS. Perry County, MS. Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC .................................................................................................................................................. Alexander County, NC. Burke County, NC. Caldwell County, NC. Catawba County, NC. Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA1 ..................................................................................................................................................... Liberty County, GA. Long County, GA. Holland-Grand Haven, MI ......................................................................................................................................................... Ottawa County, MI. Honolulu, HI ............................................................................................................................................................................... Honolulu County, HI. Hot Springs, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................ Garland County, AR. Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA ......................................................................................................................................... Lafourche Parish, LA. Terrebonne Parish, LA. Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX ........................................................................................................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9052 0.9570 0.9483 0.9104 0.9425 1.0027 0.3181 0.8929 0.9489 1.0036 0.9313 0.9088 1.1073 0.7601 0.8921 0.9198 0.9055 1.1214 0.9005 0.7894 0.9996 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27143 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 26580 ....... 26620 ....... 26820 ....... 26900 ....... 26980 ....... 27060 ....... 27100 ....... 27140 ....... 27180 ....... 27260 ....... 27340 ....... 27500 ....... 27620 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 27740 ....... 27780 ....... 27860 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Austin County, TX. Brazoria County, TX. Chambers County, TX. Fort Bend County, TX. Galveston County, TX. Harris County, TX. Liberty County, TX. Montgomery County, TX. San Jacinto County, TX. Waller County, TX. Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH .............................................................................................................................................. Boyd County, KY. Greenup County, KY. Lawrence County, OH. Cabell County, WV. Wayne County, WV. Huntsville, AL ............................................................................................................................................................................ Limestone County, AL. Madison County, AL. Idaho Falls, ID ........................................................................................................................................................................... Bonneville County, ID. Jefferson County, ID. Indianapolis-Carmel, IN ............................................................................................................................................................. Boone County, IN. Brown County, IN. Hamilton County, IN. Hancock County, IN. Hendricks County, IN. Johnson County, IN. Marion County, IN. Morgan County, IN. Putnam County, IN. Shelby County, IN. Iowa City, IA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Johnson County, IA. Washington County, IA. Ithaca, NY .................................................................................................................................................................................. Tompkins County, NY. Jackson, MI ............................................................................................................................................................................... Jackson County, MI. Jackson, MS .............................................................................................................................................................................. Copiah County, MS. Hinds County, MS. Madison County, MS. Rankin County, MS. Simpson County, MS. Jackson, TN .............................................................................................................................................................................. Chester County, TN. Madison County, TN. Jacksonville, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................... Baker County, FL. Clay County, FL. Duval County, FL. Nassau County, FL. St. Johns County, FL. Jacksonville, NC ........................................................................................................................................................................ Onslow County, NC. Janesville, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................ Rock County, WI. Jefferson City, MO .................................................................................................................................................................... Callaway County, MO. Cole County, MO. Moniteau County, MO. Osage County, MO. Johnson City, TN ....................................................................................................................................................................... Carter County, TN. Unicoi County, TN. Washington County, TN. Johnstown, PA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Cambria County, PA. Jonesboro, AR ........................................................................................................................................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9477 0.9146 0.9420 0.9920 0.9747 0.9793 0.9304 0.8311 0.8964 0.9290 0.8236 0.9538 0.8387 0.7937 0.8354 0.7911 27144 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 27900 ....... 28020 ....... 28100 ....... 28140 ....... 28420 ....... 28660 ....... 28700 ....... 28740 ....... 28940 ....... 29020 ....... 29100 ....... 29140 ....... 29180 ....... 29340 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 29404 ....... 29460 ....... 29540 ....... 29620 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Craighead County, AR. Poinsett County, AR. Joplin, MO ................................................................................................................................................................................. Jasper County, MO. Newton County, MO. Kalamazoo-Portage, MI ............................................................................................................................................................. Kalamazoo County, MI. Van Buren County, MI. Kankakee-Bradley, IL ................................................................................................................................................................ Kankakee County, IL. Kansas City, MO-KS ................................................................................................................................................................. Franklin County, KS. Johnson County, KS. Leavenworth County, KS. Linn County, KS. Miami County, KS. Wyandotte County, KS. Bates County, MO. Caldwell County, MO. Cass County, MO. Clay County, MO. Clinton County, MO. Jackson County, MO. Lafayette County, MO. Platte County, MO. Ray County, MO. Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA ............................................................................................................................................... Benton County, WA. Franklin County, WA. Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX .................................................................................................................................................. Bell County, TX. Coryell County, TX. Lampasas County, TX. Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA ................................................................................................................................................ Hawkins County, TN. Sullivan County, TN. Bristol City, VA. Scott County, VA. Washington County, VA. Kingston, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................. Ulster County, NY. Knoxville, TN ............................................................................................................................................................................. Anderson County, TN. Blount County, TN. Knox County, TN. Loudon County, TN. Union County, TN. Kokomo, IN ................................................................................................................................................................................ Howard County, IN. Tipton County, IN. La Crosse, WI-MN ..................................................................................................................................................................... Houston County, MN. La Crosse County, WI. Lafayette, IN .............................................................................................................................................................................. Benton County, IN. Carroll County, IN. Tippecanoe County, IN. Lafayette, LA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Lafayette Parish, LA. St. Martin Parish, LA. Lake Charles, LA ....................................................................................................................................................................... Calcasieu Parish, LA. Cameron Parish, LA. Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI ....................................................................................................................................... Lake County, IL. Kenosha County, WI. Lakeland, FL .............................................................................................................................................................................. Polk County, FL. Lancaster, PA ............................................................................................................................................................................ Lancaster County, PA. Lansing-East Lansing, MI .......................................................................................................................................................... 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.8582 1.0381 1.0721 0.9476 1.0619 0.8526 0.8054 0.9255 0.8441 0.9508 0.9564 0.8736 0.8428 0.7833 1.0429 0.8912 0.9694 0.9794 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27145 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 29700 ....... 29740 ....... 29820 ....... 29940 ....... 30020 ....... 30140 ....... 30300 ....... 30340 ....... 30460 ....... 30620 ....... 30700 ....... 30780 ....... 30860 ....... 30980 ....... 31020 ....... 31084 ....... 31140 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 31180 ....... 31340 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Clinton County, MI. Eaton County, MI. Ingham County, MI. Laredo, TX ................................................................................................................................................................................. Webb County, TX. Las Cruces, NM ........................................................................................................................................................................ Dona Ana County, NM. Las Vegas-Paradise, NV ........................................................................................................................................................... Clark County, NV. Lawrence, KS ............................................................................................................................................................................ Douglas County, KS. Lawton, OK ................................................................................................................................................................................ Comanche County, OK. Lebanon, PA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Lebanon County, PA. Lewiston, ID-WA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Nez Perce County, ID. Asotin County, WA. Lewiston-Auburn, ME ................................................................................................................................................................ Androscoggin County, ME. Lexington-Fayette, KY ............................................................................................................................................................... Bourbon County, KY. Clark County, KY. Fayette County, KY. Jessamine County, KY. Scott County, KY. Woodford County, KY. Lima, OH ................................................................................................................................................................................... Allen County, OH. Lincoln, NE ................................................................................................................................................................................ Lancaster County, NE. Seward County, NE. Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR .............................................................................................................................................. Faulkner County, AR. Grant County, AR. Lonoke County, AR. Perry County, AR. Pulaski County, AR. Saline County, AR. Logan, UT-ID ............................................................................................................................................................................. Franklin County, ID. Cache County, UT. Longview, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................. Gregg County, TX. Rusk County, TX. Upshur County, TX. Longview, WA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Cowlitz County, WA. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA ................................................................................................................................... Los Angeles County, CA. Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN ........................................................................................................................................... Clark County, IN. Floyd County, IN. Harrison County, IN. Washington County, IN. Bullitt County, KY. Henry County, KY. Jefferson County, KY. Meade County, KY. Nelson County, KY. Oldham County, KY. Shelby County, KY. Spencer County, KY. Trimble County, KY. Lubbock, TX .............................................................................................................................................................................. Crosby County, TX. Lubbock County, TX. Lynchburg, VA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Amherst County, VA. Appomattox County, VA. Bedford County, VA. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.8068 0.8467 1.1437 0.8537 0.7872 0.8459 0.9886 0.9331 0.9075 0.9225 1.0214 0.8747 0.9164 0.8730 0.9579 1.1783 0.9251 0.8783 0.8691 27146 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 31420 ....... 31460 ....... 31540 ....... 31700 ....... 31900 ....... 32420 ....... 32580 ....... 32780 ....... 32820 ....... 32900 ....... 33124 ....... 33140 ....... 33260 ....... 33340 ....... 33460 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 33540 ....... 33660 ....... 33700 ....... 33740 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Campbell County, VA. Bedford City, VA. Lynchburg City, VA. Macon, GA ................................................................................................................................................................................ Bibb County, GA. Crawford County, GA. Jones County, GA. Monroe County, GA. Twiggs County, GA. Madera, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................... Madera County, CA. Madison, WI .............................................................................................................................................................................. Columbia County, WI. Dane County, WI. Iowa County, WI. Manchester-Nashua, NH ........................................................................................................................................................... Hillsborough County, NH. Merrimack County, NH. Mansfield, OH ............................................................................................................................................................................ Richland County, OH. ¨ Mayaguez, PR ........................................................................................................................................................................... Hormigueros Municipio, PR. ¨ Mayaguez Municipio, PR. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX .................................................................................................................................................. Hidalgo County, TX. Medford, OR .............................................................................................................................................................................. Jackson County, OR. Memphis, TN-MS-AR ................................................................................................................................................................ Crittenden County, AR. DeSoto County, MS. Marshall County, MS. Tate County, MS. Tunica County, MS. Fayette County, TN. Shelby County, TN. Tipton County, TN. Merced, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................... Merced County, CA. Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL ............................................................................................................................................... Miami-Dade County, FL. Michigan City-La Porte, IN ........................................................................................................................................................ LaPorte County, IN. Midland, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... Midland County, TX. Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI ........................................................................................................................................ Milwaukee County, WI. Ozaukee County, WI. Washington County, WI. Waukesha County, WI. Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ............................................................................................................................... Anoka County, MN. Carver County, MN. Chisago County, MN. Dakota County, MN. Hennepin County, MN. Isanti County, MN. Ramsey County, MN. Scott County, MN. Sherburne County, MN. Washington County, MN. Wright County, MN. Pierce County, WI. St. Croix County, WI. Missoula, MT ............................................................................................................................................................................. Missoula County, MT. Mobile, AL ................................................................................................................................................................................. Mobile County, AL. Modesto, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Stanislaus County, CA. Monroe, LA ................................................................................................................................................................................ Ouachita Parish, LA. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9443 0.8713 1.0659 1.0354 0.9891 0.4020 0.8934 1.0225 0.9397 1.1109 0.9750 0.9399 0.9514 1.0146 1.1075 0.9473 0.7891 1.1885 0.8031 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27147 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 33780 ....... 33860 ....... 34060 ....... 34100 ....... 34580 ....... 34620 ....... 34740 ....... 34820 ....... 34900 ....... 34940 ....... 34980 ....... 35004 ....... 35084 ....... 35300 ....... 35380 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 35644 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Union Parish, LA. Monroe, MI ................................................................................................................................................................................ Monroe County, MI. Montgomery, AL ........................................................................................................................................................................ Autauga County, AL. Elmore County, AL. Lowndes County, AL. Montgomery County, AL. Morgantown, WV ....................................................................................................................................................................... Monongalia County, WV. Preston County, WV. Morristown, TN .......................................................................................................................................................................... Grainger County, TN. Hamblen County, TN. Jefferson County, TN. Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA .................................................................................................................................................. Skagit County, WA. Muncie, IN ................................................................................................................................................................................. Delaware County, IN. Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI ................................................................................................................................................... Muskegon County, MI. Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC ........................................................................................................................ Horry County, SC. Napa, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................... Napa County, CA. Naples-Marco Island, FL ........................................................................................................................................................... Collier County, FL. Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro, TN ..................................................................................................................................... Cannon County, TN. Cheatham County, TN. Davidson County, TN. Dickson County, TN. Hickman County, TN. Macon County, TN. Robertson County, TN. Rutherford County, TN. Smith County, TN. Sumner County, TN. Trousdale County, TN. Williamson County, TN. Wilson County, TN. Nassau-Suffolk, NY ................................................................................................................................................................... Nassau County, NY. Suffolk County, NY. Newark-Union, NJ-PA ............................................................................................................................................................... Essex County, NJ. Hunterdon County, NJ. Morris County, NJ. Sussex County, NJ. Union County, NJ. Pike County, PA. New Haven-Milford, CT ............................................................................................................................................................. New Haven County, CT. New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA ............................................................................................................................................ Jefferson Parish, LA. Orleans Parish, LA. Plaquemines Parish, LA. St. Bernard Parish, LA. St. Charles Parish, LA. St. John the Baptist Parish, LA. St. Tammany Parish, LA. New York-White Plains-Wayne, NY-NJ .................................................................................................................................... Bergen County, NJ. Hudson County, NJ. Passaic County, NJ. Bronx County, NY. Kings County, NY. New York County, NY. Putnam County, NY. Queens County, NY. Richmond County, NY. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9468 0.8618 0.8420 0.7961 1.0454 0.8930 0.9664 0.8934 1.2643 1.0139 0.9790 1.2719 1.1883 1.1887 0.8995 1.3188 27148 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 35660 ....... 35980 ....... 36084 ....... 36100 ....... 36140 ....... 36220 ....... 36260 ....... 36420 ....... 36500 ....... 36540 ....... 36740 ....... 36780 ....... 36980 ....... 37100 ....... 37340 ....... 37460 ....... 37620 ....... 37700 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 37860 ....... 37900 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Rockland County, NY. Westchester County, NY. Niles-Benton Harbor, MI ............................................................................................................................................................ Berrien County, MI. Norwich-New London, CT ......................................................................................................................................................... New London County, CT. Oakland-Fremont-Hayward, CA ................................................................................................................................................ Alameda County, CA. Contra Costa County, CA. Ocala, FL ................................................................................................................................................................................... Marion County, FL. Ocean City, NJ .......................................................................................................................................................................... Cape May County, NJ. Odessa, TX ............................................................................................................................................................................... Ector County, TX. Ogden-Clearfield, UT ................................................................................................................................................................ Davis County, UT. Morgan County, UT. Weber County, UT. Oklahoma City, OK ................................................................................................................................................................... Canadian County, OK. Cleveland County, OK. Grady County, OK. Lincoln County, OK. Logan County, OK. McClain County, OK. Oklahoma County, OK. Olympia, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Thurston County, WA. Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA .................................................................................................................................................... Harrison County, IA. Mills County, IA. Pottawattamie County, IA. Cass County, NE. Douglas County, NE. Sarpy County, NE. Saunders County, NE. Washington County, NE. Orlando-Kissimmee, FL ............................................................................................................................................................. Lake County, FL. Orange County, FL. Osceola County, FL. Seminole County, FL. Oshkosh-Neenah, WI ................................................................................................................................................................ Winnebago County, WI. Owensboro, KY ......................................................................................................................................................................... Daviess County, KY. Hancock County, KY. McLean County, KY. Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA ....................................................................................................................................... Ventura County, CA. Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL ........................................................................................................................................... Brevard County, FL. Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL ................................................................................................................................................... Bay County, FL. Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH ...................................................................................................................................... Washington County, OH. Pleasants County, WV. Wirt County, WV. Wood County, WV. Pascagoula, MS ........................................................................................................................................................................ George County, MS. Jackson County, MS. Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL ............................................................................................................................................... Escambia County, FL. Santa Rosa County, FL. Peoria, IL ................................................................................................................................................................................... Marshall County, IL. Peoria County, IL. Stark County, IL. Tazewell County, IL. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.8879 1.1345 1.5346 0.8925 1.1011 0.9884 0.9029 0.9031 1.0927 0.9560 0.9464 0.9183 0.8780 1.1622 0.9839 0.8005 0.8270 0.8156 0.8096 0.8870 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27149 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 37964 ....... 38060 ....... 38220 ....... 38300 ....... 38340 ....... 38540 ....... 38660 ....... 38860 ....... 38900 ....... 38940 ....... 39100 ....... 39140 ....... 39300 ....... 39340 ....... 39380 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 39460 ....... 39540 ....... 39580 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Woodford County, IL. Philadelphia, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Bucks County, PA. Chester County, PA. Delaware County, PA. Montgomery County, PA. Philadelphia County, PA. Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ ................................................................................................................................................... Maricopa County, AZ. Pinal County, AZ. Pine Bluff, AR ............................................................................................................................................................................ Cleveland County, AR. Jefferson County, AR. Lincoln County, AR. Pittsburgh, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Allegheny County, PA. Armstrong County, PA. Beaver County, PA. Butler County, PA. Fayette County, PA. Washington County, PA. Westmoreland County, PA. Pittsfield, MA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Berkshire County, MA. Pocatello, ID .............................................................................................................................................................................. Bannock County, ID. Power County, ID. Ponce, PR ................................................................................................................................................................................. ´ Juana Dıaz Municipio, PR. Ponce Municipio, PR. Villalba Municipio, PR. Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME .................................................................................................................................... Cumberland County, ME. Sagadahoc County, ME. York County, ME. Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA ................................................................................................................................... Clackamas County, OR. Columbia County, OR. Multnomah County, OR. Washington County, OR. Yamhill County, OR. Clark County, WA. Skamania County, WA. Port St. Lucie-Fort Pierce, FL ................................................................................................................................................... Martin County, FL. St. Lucie County, FL. Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY ................................................................................................................................ Dutchess County, NY. Orange County, NY. Prescott, AZ ............................................................................................................................................................................... Yavapai County, AZ. Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA ............................................................................................................................. Bristol County, MA. Bristol County, RI. Kent County, RI. Newport County, RI. Providence County, RI. Washington County, RI. Provo-Orem, UT ........................................................................................................................................................................ Juab County, UT. Utah County, UT. Pueblo, CO ................................................................................................................................................................................ Pueblo County, CO. Punta Gorda, FL ........................................................................................................................................................................ Charlotte County, FL. Racine, WI ................................................................................................................................................................................. Racine County, WI. Raleigh-Cary, NC ...................................................................................................................................................................... Franklin County, NC. Johnston County, NC. Wake County, NC. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 1.1038 1.0127 0.8680 0.8845 1.0181 0.9351 0.4939 1.0382 1.1266 1.0123 1.0891 0.9869 1.0966 0.9500 0.8623 0.9255 0.8997 0.9691 27150 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code Urban area (constituent counties) Wage index 39660 ....... Rapid City, SD ........................................................................................................................................................................... Meade County, SD. Pennington County, SD. Reading, PA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Berks County, PA. Redding, CA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Shasta County, CA. Reno-Sparks, NV ...................................................................................................................................................................... Storey County, NV. Washoe County, NV. Richmond, VA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Amelia County, VA. Caroline County, VA. Charles City County, VA. Chesterfield County, VA. Cumberland County, VA. Dinwiddie County, VA. Goochland County, VA. Hanover County, VA. Henrico County, VA. King and Queen County, VA. King William County, VA. Louisa County, VA. New Kent County, VA. Powhatan County, VA. Prince George County, VA. Sussex County, VA. Colonial Heights City, VA. Hopewell City, VA. Petersburg City, VA. Richmond City, VA. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ..................................................................................................................................... Riverside County, CA. San Bernardino County, CA. Roanoke, VA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Botetourt County, VA. Craig County, VA. Franklin County, VA. Roanoke County, VA. Roanoke City, VA. Salem City, VA. Rochester, MN .......................................................................................................................................................................... Dodge County, MN. Olmsted County, MN. Wabasha County, MN. Rochester, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................... Livingston County, NY. Monroe County, NY. Ontario County, NY. Orleans County, NY. Wayne County, NY. Rockford, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................... Boone County, IL. Winnebago County, IL. Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH ............................................................................................................................... Rockingham County, NH. Strafford County, NH. Rocky Mount, NC ...................................................................................................................................................................... Edgecombe County, NC. Nash County, NC. Rome, GA .................................................................................................................................................................................. Floyd County, GA. Sacramento—Arden-Arcade—Roseville, CA ............................................................................................................................ El Dorado County, CA. Placer County, CA. Sacramento County, CA. Yolo County, CA. Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI ..................................................................................................................................... Saginaw County, MI. St. Cloud, MN ............................................................................................................................................................................ Benton County, MN. 0.8987 39740 ....... 39820 ....... 39900 ....... 40060 ....... 40140 ....... 40220 ....... 40340 ....... 40380 ....... 40420 ....... 40484 ....... 40580 ....... 40660 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 40900 ....... 40980 ....... 41060 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9686 1.2203 1.0982 0.9328 1.1027 0.8374 1.1131 0.9121 0.9984 1.0374 0.8915 0.9414 1.2969 0.9088 0.9965 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27151 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 41100 ....... 41140 ....... 41180 ....... 41420 ....... 41500 ....... 41540 ....... 41620 ....... 41660 ....... 41700 ....... 41740 ....... 41780 ....... 41884 ....... 41900 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 41940 ....... 41980 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Stearns County, MN. St. George, UT .......................................................................................................................................................................... Washington County, UT. St. Joseph, MO-KS ................................................................................................................................................................... Doniphan County, KS. Andrew County, MO. Buchanan County, MO. DeKalb County, MO. St. Louis, MO-IL ........................................................................................................................................................................ Bond County, IL. Calhoun County, IL. Clinton County, IL. Jersey County, IL. Macoupin County, IL. Madison County, IL. Monroe County, IL. St. Clair County, IL. Crawford County, MO. Franklin County, MO. Jefferson County, MO. Lincoln County, MO. St. Charles County, MO. St. Louis County, MO. Warren County, MO. Washington County, MO. St. Louis City, MO. Salem, OR ................................................................................................................................................................................. Marion County, OR. Polk County, OR. Salinas, CA ................................................................................................................................................................................ Monterey County, CA. Salisbury, MD ............................................................................................................................................................................ Somerset County, MD. Wicomico County, MD. Salt Lake City, UT ..................................................................................................................................................................... Salt Lake County, UT. Summit County, UT. Tooele County, UT. San Angelo, TX ......................................................................................................................................................................... Irion County, TX. Tom Green County, TX. San Antonio, TX ........................................................................................................................................................................ Atascosa County, TX. Bandera County, TX. Bexar County, TX. Comal County, TX. Guadalupe County, TX. Kendall County, TX. Medina County, TX. Wilson County, TX. San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA ...................................................................................................................................... San Diego County, CA. Sandusky, OH ........................................................................................................................................................................... Erie County, OH. San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA .......................................................................................................................... Marin County, CA. San Francisco County, CA. San Mateo County, CA. ´ San German-Cabo Rojo, PR .................................................................................................................................................... Cabo Rojo Municipio, PR. Lajas Municipio, PR. Sabana Grande Municipio, PR. ´ San German Municipio, PR. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA ...................................................................................................................................... San Benito County, CA. Santa Clara County, CA. San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, PR ............................................................................................................................................. Aguas Buenas Municipio, PR. Aibonito Municipio, PR. Arecibo Municipio, PR. Barceloneta Municipio, PR. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9392 0.9519 0.8954 1.0442 1.4128 0.9064 0.9421 0.8271 0.8980 1.1413 0.9019 1.4994 0.4650 1.5099 0.4621 27152 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 42020 ....... 42044 ....... 42060 ....... 42100 ....... 42140 ....... 42220 ....... 42260 ....... 42340 ....... 42540 ....... 42644 ....... 42680 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 43100 ....... 43300 ....... 43340 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Barranquitas Municipio, PR. ´ Bayamon Municipio, PR. Caguas Municipio, PR. Camuy Municipio, PR. ´ Canovanas Municipio, PR. Carolina Municipio, PR. ˜ Catano Municipio, PR. Cayey Municipio, PR. Ciales Municipio, PR. Cidra Municipio, PR. ´ Comerıo Municipio, PR. Corozal Municipio, PR. Dorado Municipio, PR. Florida Municipio, PR. Guaynabo Municipio, PR. Gurabo Municipio, PR. Hatillo Municipio, PR. Humacao Municipio, PR. Juncos Municipio, PR. Las Piedras Municipio, PR. ´ Loıza Municipio, PR. ´ Manatı Municipio, PR. Maunabo Municipio, PR. Morovis Municipio, PR. Naguabo Municipio, PR. Naranjito Municipio, PR. Orocovis Municipio, PR. Quebradillas Municipio, PR. ´ Rıo Grande Municipio, PR. San Juan Municipio, PR. San Lorenzo Municipio, PR. Toa Alta Municipio, PR. Toa Baja Municipio, PR. Trujillo Alto Municipio, PR. Vega Alta Municipio, PR. Vega Baja Municipio, PR. Yabucoa Municipio, PR. San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA ........................................................................................................................................... San Luis Obispo County, CA. Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA ................................................................................................................................................. Orange County, CA. Santa Barbara-Santa Maria, CA ............................................................................................................................................... Santa Barbara County, CA. Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA ...................................................................................................................................................... Santa Cruz County, CA. Santa Fe, NM ............................................................................................................................................................................ Santa Fe County, NM. Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA ........................................................................................................................................................ Sonoma County, CA. Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL ................................................................................................................................................ Manatee County, FL. Sarasota County, FL. Savannah, GA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Bryan County, GA. Chatham County, GA. Effingham County, GA. Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA ....................................................................................................................................................... Lackawanna County, PA. Luzerne County, PA. Wyoming County, PA. Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA .................................................................................................................................................... Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL ........................................................................................................................................................ Indian River County, FL. Sheboygan, WI .......................................................................................................................................................................... Sheboygan County, WI. Sherman-Denison, TX ............................................................................................................................................................... Grayson County, TX. Shreveport-Bossier City, LA ...................................................................................................................................................... Bossier Parish, LA. Caddo Parish, LA. De Soto Parish, LA. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 1.1349 1.1559 1.1694 1.5166 1.0920 1.3493 0.9639 0.9461 0.8540 1.1577 0.9434 0.8911 0.9507 0.8760 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27153 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code Urban area (constituent counties) Wage index 43580 ....... Sioux City, IA-NE-SD ................................................................................................................................................................ Woodbury County, IA. Dakota County, NE. Dixon County, NE. Union County, SD. Sioux Falls, SD .......................................................................................................................................................................... Lincoln County, SD. McCook County, SD. Minnehaha County, SD. Turner County, SD. South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI ................................................................................................................................................. St. Joseph County, IN. Cass County, MI. Spartanburg, SC ........................................................................................................................................................................ Spartanburg County, SC. Spokane, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................ Spokane County, WA. Springfield, IL ............................................................................................................................................................................ Menard County, IL. Sangamon County, IL. Springfield, MA .......................................................................................................................................................................... Franklin County, MA. Hampden County, MA. Hampshire County, MA. Springfield, MO .......................................................................................................................................................................... Christian County, MO. Dallas County, MO. Greene County, MO. Polk County, MO. Webster County, MO. Springfield, OH .......................................................................................................................................................................... Clark County, OH. State College, PA ...................................................................................................................................................................... Centre County, PA. Stockton, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................. San Joaquin County, CA. Sumter, SC ................................................................................................................................................................................ Sumter County, SC. Syracuse, NY ............................................................................................................................................................................ Madison County, NY. Onondaga County, NY. Oswego County, NY. Tacoma, WA .............................................................................................................................................................................. Pierce County, WA. Tallahassee, FL ......................................................................................................................................................................... Gadsden County, FL. Jefferson County, FL. Leon County, FL. Wakulla County, FL. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ...................................................................................................................................... Hernando County, FL. Hillsborough County, FL. Pasco County, FL. Pinellas County, FL. Terre Haute, IN ......................................................................................................................................................................... Clay County, IN. Sullivan County, IN. Vermillion County, IN. Vigo County, IN. Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR ................................................................................................................................................. Miller County, AR. Bowie County, TX. Toledo, OH ................................................................................................................................................................................ Fulton County, OH. Lucas County, OH. Ottawa County, OH. Wood County, OH. Topeka, KS ................................................................................................................................................................................ Jackson County, KS. Jefferson County, KS. Osage County, KS. 0.9381 43620 ....... 43780 ....... 43900 ....... 44060 ....... 44100 ....... 44140 ....... 44180 ....... 44220 ....... 44300 ....... 44700 ....... 44940 ....... 45060 ....... 45104 ....... 45220 ....... 45300 ....... 45460 ....... 45500 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 45780 ....... 45820 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.9635 0.9788 0.9172 1.0905 0.8792 1.0248 0.8237 0.8396 0.8356 1.1307 0.8377 0.9574 1.0742 0.8688 0.9233 0.8304 0.8283 0.9574 0.8920 27154 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 45940 ....... 46060 ....... 46140 ....... 46220 ....... 46340 ....... 46540 ....... 46660 ....... 46700 ....... 47020 ....... 47220 ....... 47260 ....... 47300 ....... 47380 ....... 47580 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 47644 ....... 47894 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Shawnee County, KS. Wabaunsee County, KS. Trenton-Ewing, NJ ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mercer County, NJ. Tucson, AZ ................................................................................................................................................................................ Pima County, AZ. Tulsa, OK .................................................................................................................................................................................. Creek County, OK. Okmulgee County, OK. Osage County, OK. Pawnee County, OK. Rogers County, OK. Tulsa County, OK. Wagoner County, OK. Tuscaloosa, AL .......................................................................................................................................................................... Greene County, AL. Hale County, AL. Tuscaloosa County, AL. Tyler, TX .................................................................................................................................................................................... Smith County, TX. Utica-Rome, NY ........................................................................................................................................................................ Herkimer County, NY. Oneida County, NY. Valdosta, GA ............................................................................................................................................................................. Brooks County, GA. Echols County, GA. Lanier County, GA. Lowndes County, GA. Vallejo-Fairfield, CA ................................................................................................................................................................... Solano County, CA. Victoria, TX ................................................................................................................................................................................ Calhoun County, TX. Goliad County, TX. Victoria County, TX. Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ ................................................................................................................................................. Cumberland County, NJ. Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC ........................................................................................................................ Currituck County, NC. Gloucester County, VA. Isle of Wight County, VA. James City County, VA. Mathews County, VA. Surry County, VA. York County, VA. Chesapeake City, VA. Hampton City, VA. Newport News City, VA. Norfolk City, VA. Poquoson City, VA. Portsmouth City, VA. Suffolk City, VA. Virginia Beach City, VA. Williamsburg City, VA. Visalia-Porterville, CA ................................................................................................................................................................ Tulare County, CA. Waco, TX ................................................................................................................................................................................... McLennan County, TX. Warner Robins, GA ................................................................................................................................................................... Houston County, GA. Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI ............................................................................................................................................. Lapeer County, MI. Livingston County, MI. Macomb County, MI. Oakland County, MI. St. Clair County, MI. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ................................................................................................................... District of Columbia, DC. Calvert County, MD. Charles County, MD. Prince George’s County, MD. Arlington County, VA. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00116 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 1.0834 0.9007 0.8543 0.8645 0.9168 0.8358 0.8866 1.4936 0.8160 0.9827 0.8799 1.0123 0.8518 0.8645 0.9871 1.0926 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 27155 TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code 47940 ....... 48140 ....... 48260 ....... 48300 ....... 48424 ....... 48540 ....... 48620 ....... 48660 ....... 48700 ....... 48864 ....... 48900 ....... 49020 ....... 49180 ....... 49340 ....... mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 49420 ....... 49500 ....... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Wage index Urban area (constituent counties) Clarke County, VA. Fairfax County, VA. Fauquier County, VA. Loudoun County, VA. Prince William County, VA. Spotsylvania County, VA. Stafford County, VA. Warren County, VA. Alexandria City, VA. Fairfax City, VA. Falls Church City, VA. Fredericksburg City, VA. Manassas City, VA. Manassas Park City, VA. Jefferson County, WV. Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA ........................................................................................................................................................... Black Hawk County, IA. Bremer County, IA. Grundy County, IA. Wausau, WI ............................................................................................................................................................................... Marathon County, WI. Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH ................................................................................................................................................... Jefferson County, OH. Brooke County, WV. Hancock County, WV. Wenatchee, WA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Chelan County, WA. Douglas County, WA. West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach, FL ................................................................................................................. Palm Beach County, FL. Wheeling, WV-OH ..................................................................................................................................................................... Belmont County, OH. Marshall County, WV. Ohio County, WV. Wichita, KS ................................................................................................................................................................................ Butler County, KS. Harvey County, KS. Sedgwick County, KS. Sumner County, KS. Wichita Falls, TX ....................................................................................................................................................................... Archer County, TX. Clay County, TX. Wichita County, TX. Williamsport, PA ........................................................................................................................................................................ Lycoming County, PA. Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ ............................................................................................................................................................. New Castle County, DE. Cecil County, MD. Salem County, NJ. Wilmington, NC ......................................................................................................................................................................... Brunswick County, NC. New Hanover County, NC. Pender County, NC. Winchester, VA-WV ................................................................................................................................................................... Frederick County, VA. Winchester City, VA. Hampshire County, WV. Winston-Salem, NC ................................................................................................................................................................... Davie County, NC. Forsyth County, NC. Stokes County, NC. Yadkin County, NC. Worcester, MA ........................................................................................................................................................................... Worcester County, MA. Yakima, WA ............................................................................................................................................................................... Yakima County, WA. Yauco, PR ................................................................................................................................................................................. ˘ Gua≤nica Municipio, PR. Guayanilla Municipio, PR. ˜ Penuelas Municipio, PR. Yauco Municipio, PR. 00:49 May 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2 0.8557 0.9590 0.7819 1.0070 1.0067 0.7161 0.9153 0.8285 0.8364 1.0471 0.9582 1.0214 0.8944 1.1028 1.0155 0.4408 27156 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 1.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX FOR URBAN AREAS BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS—Continued CBSA code Urban area (constituent counties) Wage index 49620 ....... York-Hanover, PA ..................................................................................................................................................................... York County, PA. Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA .................................................................................................................................. Mahoning County, OH. Trumbull County, OH. Mercer County, PA. Yuba City, CA ............................................................................................................................................................................ Sutter County, CA. Yuba County, CA. Yuma, AZ .................................................................................................................................................................................. Yuma County, AZ. 0.9347 49660 ....... 49700 ....... 49740 ....... 0.8603 1.0921 0.9126 1 At this time, there are no hospitals located in this urban area on which to base a wage index. Therefore, the urban wage index value is based on the average wage index for all urban areas within the State. TABLE 2.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS FOR RURAL AREAS CBSA code mmaher on PROD1PC60 with RULES2 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ Wage Index Nonurban Alabama .......................... Alaska ............................. Arizona ............................ Arkansas ......................... California ......................... Colorado ......................... Connecticut ..................... Delaware ......................... Florida ............................. Georgia ........................... Hawaii ............................. Idaho ............................... Illinois .............................. Indiana ............................ Iowa ................................ Kansas ............................ Kentucky ......................... Louisiana ........................ Maine .............................. Maryland ......................... Massachusetts 1 .............. Michigan ......................... Minnesota ....................... Mississippi ...................... Missouri .......................... Montana .......................... Nebraska ........................ Nevada ........................... New Hampshire .............. New Jersey 1 ................... VerDate Aug<31>2005 00:49 May 09, 2006 0.7446 1.1977 0.8768 0.7466 1.1054 0.9380 1.1730 0.9579 0.8568 0.7662 1.0551 0.8037 0.8271 0.8624 0.8509 0.8035 0.7766 0.7411 0.8843 0.9353 1.0216 0.8895 0.9132 0.7674 0.7900 0.8762 0.8657 0.9065 1.0817 ............ Jkt 208001 TABLE 2.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS FOR RURAL AREAS—Continued CBSA code 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 PO 00000 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ TABLE 2.—PROPOSED WAGE INDEX BASED ON CBSA LABOR MARKET AREAS FOR RURAL AREAS—Continued Nonurban Wage Index CBSA code Nonurban Wage Index New Mexico .................... New York ........................ North Carolina ................ North Dakota .................. Ohio ................................ Oklahoma ....................... Oregon ............................ Pennsylvania .................. Puerto Rico 1 ................... Rhode Island 1 ................ South Carolina ................ South Dakota .................. Tennessee ...................... Texas .............................. Utah ................................ Vermont .......................... Virginia ............................ Washington ..................... West Virginia .................. Wisconsin ....................... Wyoming ......................... 0.8635 0.8154 0.8540 0.7261 0.8826 0.7581 0.9826 0.8291 0.4047 ............ 0.8638 0.8560 0.7895 0.8003 0.8118 0.9830 0.8013 1.0510 0.7717 0.9509 0.9257 65 ........ Guam .............................. 0.9611 Frm 00118 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 1 All counties within the State are classified as urban, with the exception of Massachusetts and Puerto Rico. Massachusetts and Puerto Rico have areas designated as rural, however, no short-term, acute care hospitals are located in the area(s) for FY 2006. Because more recent data is not available for those areas, we are using last year’s wage index value. [FR Doc. 06–4202 Filed 5–1–06; 4:00 pm] BILLING CODE 4120–01–P E:\FR\FM\09MYR2.SGM 09MYR2

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27040-27156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4202]



[[Page 27039]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





Department of Health and Human Services





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



42 CFR Parts 412 and 424



Medicare Program; Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment 
System Payment Update for Rate Year Beginning July 1, 2006 (RY 2007); 
Final Rule

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and 
Regulations

[[Page 27040]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Parts 412 and 424

[CMS-1306-F]
RIN 0938-AN82


Medicare Program; Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective 
Payment System Payment Update for Rate Year Beginning July 1, 2006 (RY 
2007)

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule updates the prospective payment rates for 
Medicare inpatient hospital services provided by inpatient psychiatric 
facilities (IPFs). These changes are applicable to IPF discharges 
occurring during the rate year beginning July 1, 2006 through June 30, 
2007. In addition, we are adopting the new Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) labor market area definitions for the purpose of 
geographic classification and the wage index. We are also making 
revisions to existing policies and implementing new polices.

DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on July 1, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorothy Colbert, (410) 786-4533 for 
general information. Mary Lee Seifert, (410) 786-0030 for information 
regarding the market basket and labor-related share. Theresa Bean, 
(410) 786-2287 for information regarding the regulatory impact 
analysis. Matthew Quarrick, (410) 786-9867 for information on the wage 
index.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

    To assist readers in referencing sections contained in this 
document, we are providing the following table of contents.

I. Background
    A. General and Legislative History
    B. Overview of the Establishment of the IPF PPS
    C. Applicability of the IPF PPS
II. Overview for Updating the IPF PPS
    A. Requirements for Updating the IPF PPS
    B. Transition Period for Implementation of the IPF PPS
III. Provisions of the Proposed Regulation
IV. Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments
V. Updates to the IPF PPS for RY Beginning July 1, 2006
    A. Calculation of the Average Per Diem Cost
    B. Determining the Standardized Budget-Neutral Federal Per Diem 
Base Rate
    1. Standardization of the Federal Per Diem Base Rate
    2. Calculation of the Budget Neutrality Adjustment
    a. Outlier Adjustment
    b. Stop-Loss Provision Adjustment
    c. Behavioral Offset
    3. Revision of Standardization Factor
    C. Update of the Federal Per Diem Base Rate
    1. Market Basket for IPFs Reimbursed Under the IPF PPS
    a. Market Basket Index for IPF PPS
    b. Overview of the RPL Market Basket
    2. Methodology for Operating Portion of the RPL Market Basket
    3. Methodology for Capital Portion of the RPL Market Basket
    4. Labor-Related Share
VI. Update of the IPF PPS Adjustment Factors
    A. Overview of the IPF PPS Adjustment Factors
    B. Patient-Level Adjustments
    1. Adjustment for DRG Assignment
    2. Payment for Comorbid Conditions
    3. Patient Age Adjustments
    4. Variable Per Diem Adjustments
    C. Facility-Level Adjustments
    1. Wage Index Adjustment
    a. Revisions of IPF PPS Geographic Classifications
    b. Current IPF PPS Labor Market Areas Based on MSAs
    c. Core-Based Statistical Areas
    d. Revision of the IPF PPS Labor Market Areas
    i. New England MSAs
    ii. Metropolitan Divisions
    iii. Micropolitan Areas
    e. Implementation of the Revised Labor Market Areas Under the 
IPF PPS
    f. Wage Index Budget Neutrality
    2. Adjustment for Rural Location
    3. Teaching Adjustment
    4. Cost of Living Adjustment for IPFs Located in Alaska and 
Hawaii
    5. Adjustment for IPFs With a Qualifying Emergency Department 
(ED)
    a. New Source of Admission Code To Implement the ED Adjustment
    b. Applicability of the ED Adjustment to IPFs in Critical Access 
Hospitals
    D. Other Payment Adjustments and Policies
    1. Outlier Payments
    a. Update to the Outlier Fixed Dollar Loss Threshold Amount
    b. Statistical Accuracy of Cost-to-Charge Ratios
    2. Stop-Loss Provision
    3. Patients Who Receive Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
    4. Physician Certification and Recertification Requirements
    5. Provision of Therapeutic Recreation in IPFs
    6. Same Day Transfers
VII. Miscellaneous Public Comments Within the Scope of the Proposed 
Rule
VIII. Provisions of the Final Rule
IX. Collection of Information Requirements
X. Regulatory Impact Analysis

Acronyms

    Because of the many terms to which we refer by acronym in this 
final rule, we are listing the acronyms used and their corresponding 
terms in alphabetical order below:

BBA Balanced Budget Act of 1997, (Pub. L. 105-33)
BBRA Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP [State Children's Health Insurance 
Program] Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999, (Pub. L. 106-113)
BIPA Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP [State Children's Health 
Insurance Program] Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000, 
(Pub. L. 106-554)
CBSA Core-Based Statistical Area
CCR Cost-to-charge ratio
CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
CMSA Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area
DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 
Fourth Edition--Text Revision
DRGs Diagnosis-related groups
FY Federal fiscal year
HCRIS Hospital Cost Report Information System
ICD-9-CM International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, 
Clinical Modification
IPFs Inpatient psychiatric facilities
IRFs Inpatient rehabilitation facilities
LTCHs Long-term care hospitals
MedPAR Medicare provider analysis and review file
MMA Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 
2003, (Pub. L. 108-173)
MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area
NECMA New England County Metropolitan Area
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PIP Periodic Interim Payments
RY Rate Year (July 1 through June 30)
TEFRA Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, (Pub. L. 97-
248)

I. Background

A. General and Legislative History

    The Congress directed implementation of a prospective payment 
system (PPS) for acute care hospitals with the enactment of Pub. L. 98-
21. Section 601 of the Social Security Amendments of 1983 (Pub. L. 98-
21) added a new section 1886(d) to the Social Security Act (the Act) 
that replaced the reasonable cost-based payment system for most 
hospital inpatient services with a PPS.
    Although most hospital inpatient services became subject to the 
PPS, certain hospitals, including IPFs, inpatient rehabilitation 
facilities (IRFs), long term care hospitals (LTCHs), and children's 
hospitals were excluded from the PPS for acute care hospitals. These 
hospitals and units were paid their reasonable costs for inpatient 
services,

[[Page 27041]]

subject to a per discharge limitation or target amount under the 
authority of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 
(TEFRA), Pub. L. 97-248. The regulations implementing the TEFRA 
(reasonable cost-based) payment provisions are located at 42 CFR part 
413. Cancer hospitals were added to the list of excluded hospitals by 
section 6004(a) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, (Pub. 
L. 101-239).
    The Congress enacted various provisions in the Balanced Budget Act 
of 1997 (BBA) (Pub. L. 105-33), the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP 
(State Children's Health Insurance Program) Balanced Budget Refinement 
Act of 1999 (BBRA) (Pub. L. 106-113), and the Medicare, Medicaid, and 
SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (BIPA) (Pub. L. 
106-554) to replace the reasonable cost-based method of reimbursement 
with a PPS for IRFs, LTCHs, and IPFs. Section 124 of the BBRA required 
implementation of the IPF PPS.
    Section 124 of the BBRA mandated that the Secretary--(1) Develop a 
per diem PPS for inpatient hospital services furnished in psychiatric 
hospitals and psychiatric units; (2) include in the PPS an adequate 
patient classification system that reflects the differences in patient 
resource use and costs among psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric 
units; (3) maintain budget neutrality; (4) permit the Secretary to 
require psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric units to submit 
information necessary for the development of the PPS; and (5) submit a 
report to the Congress describing the development of the PPS. Section 
124 of the BBRA also required that the IPF PPS be implemented for cost 
reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2002.
    Section 405(g)(2) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 
and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108-173) extended the IPF 
PPS to distinct part psychiatric units of critical access hospitals 
(CAHs).
    To implement these provisions, the following were published: a 
proposed rule in the Federal Register on November 28, 2003 (68 FR 
66920); a final rule on November 15, 2004 (69 FR 66922); and a 
correction notice to the final rule on April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16724). For 
more detail, see the program memorandum Web site, https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/01_overview.asp.

B. Overview of the Establishment of the IPF PPS

    The November 2004 IPF PPS final rule established regulations for 
the IPF PPS under 42 CFR 412, subpart N.
    The IPF PPS established the Federal per diem base rate for each 
patient day in an IPF derived from the national average daily routine 
operating, ancillary, and capital costs in IPFs in FY 2002. The average 
per diem cost was updated to the midpoint of the first year under the 
IPF PPS, standardized to account for the overall positive effects of 
the IPF PPS payment adjustments, and adjusted for budget neutrality. 
The Federal per diem payment under the IPF PPS is comprised of the 
Federal per diem base rate described above and certain patient and 
facility payment adjustments that were found in the regression analysis 
to be associated with statistically significant per diem cost 
differences (see 69 FR 66933 through 66936 for a description of the 
regression analysis). The patient-level adjustments include age, DRG 
assignment, comorbidities, and variable per diem adjustments to reflect 
the higher cost incurred in the early days of a psychiatric stay. 
Facility-level adjustments include adjustments for the IPF's wage 
index, rural location, teaching status, a cost of living adjustment for 
IPFs located in Alaska and Hawaii, and presence of a qualifying 
emergency department (ED). The IPF PPS provides additional payments for 
outlier cases, stop-loss protection which is applicable only during the 
IPF PPS transition period, includes special payment provisions for 
interrupted stays, and a per treatment adjustment for patients who 
undergo electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). We refer readers to the 
November 2004 IPF PPS final rule for a comprehensive discussion of the 
research and data that supported the establishment of the IPF PPS.
    We established a CMS Web site that contains useful information 
regarding the IPF PPS including the proposed rules, final rules, and 
the correction notices. The Web site URL is https://www.cms.hhs.gov/
InpatientPsychFacilPPS/ and may be accessed to download or view 
publications and other information pertinent to the IPF PPS.

C. Applicability of the IPF PPS

    The IPF PPS is applicable to freestanding psychiatric hospitals, 
including government-operated psychiatric hospitals, and distinct part 
psychiatric units of acute care hospitals and CAHs.
    The regulations at Sec.  412.402 define an IPF as a hospital that 
meets the requirements specified in Sec.  412.22, Sec.  412.23(a), 
Sec.  482.60, Sec.  482.61, and Sec.  482.62, and units that meet the 
requirements specified in Sec.  412.22, Sec.  412.25, and Sec.  412.27.
    However, the following hospitals are paid under a special payment 
provision, as described in Sec.  412.22(c) and, therefore, are not 
subject to the IPF PPS rules:
     Veterans Administration hospitals.
     Hospitals that are reimbursed under State cost control 
systems approved under 42 CFR part 403.
     Hospitals that are reimbursed in accordance with 
demonstration projects specified in section 402(a) of Pub. L. 90-248 
(42 U.S.C. 1395b-1) or section 222(a) of Pub. L. 92-603 (42 U.S.C. 
1395b-1(note)).
     Non-participating hospitals furnishing emergency services 
to Medicare beneficiaries.

II. Overview for Updating the IPF PPS

A. Requirements for Updating the IPF PPS

    Section 124 of the BBRA does not specify an update strategy for the 
IPF PPS and is broadly written to give the Secretary discretion in 
establishing an update methodology. Therefore, we reviewed the update 
approach used in other hospital PPSs (specifically, the IRF and LTCH 
PPS update methodologies). As a result of this analysis, we stated in 
the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66966) that we would 
implement the IPF PPS using the following update strategy--(1) 
Calculate the final Federal per diem base rate to be budget neutral for 
the 18-month period (that is, January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006); 
(2) use a July 1 through June 30 annual update cycle; and (3) allow the 
IPF PPS first update to be effective for discharges July 1, 2006 
through June 30, 2007.
    As explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we believe it 
is important to delay updating the adjustment factors derived from the 
regression analysis until we have IPF PPS data that include as much 
information as possible regarding the patient-level characteristics of 
the population that each IPF serves. For this reason, we do not intend 
to update the regression analysis and recalculate the Federal per diem 
base rate until we analyze IPF PPS data (that is, no earlier than FY 
2008). Until that analysis is complete, we stated our intention to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register each spring to update the IPF 
PPS as specified in Sec.  412.428.

[[Page 27042]]

    However, since the implementation of the IPF PPS, a new market 
basket index was announced in the August 2005 IPPS final rule. We 
believe that this new market basket should be implemented in the IPF 
PPS as well in order to update the system using the best data 
available. Therefore, rather than publish a notice to update the IPF 
PPS in 2006, we published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on 
January 23, 2006 (71 FR 3616) to allow interested parties an 
opportunity to comment on the proposed changes.
    Updates to the IPF PPS as specified in Sec.  412.428 include:
     A description of the methodology and data used to 
calculate the updated Federal per diem base payment amount.
     The rate of increase factor as described in Sec.  
412.424(a)(2)(iii), which is based on the excluded hospital with 
capital market basket under the update methodology of 1886(b)(3)(B)(ii) 
of the Act for each year.
     The best available hospital wage index and information 
regarding whether an adjustment to the Federal per diem base rate is 
needed to maintain budget neutrality.
     Updates to the fixed dollar loss amount in order to 
maintain the appropriate outlier percentage.
     Describe the ICD-9-CM coding and DRG classification 
changes discussed in the annual update to the hospital IPPS 
regulations.
     Update the ECT adjustment by a factor specified by CMS.

B. Transition Period for Implementation of the IPF PPS

    In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we established Sec.  
412.426 to provide for a 3-year transition period from reasonable cost-
based reimbursement to full prospective payment for IPFs. New IPFs, as 
defined in Sec.  412.426(c), are paid 100 percent of the Federal per 
diem rate. However, for those IPFs that are transitioning to the new 
system, during the 3-year period as specified in the November 2004 IPF 
PPS final rule, payment is based on an increasing percentage of the PPS 
payment and a decreasing percentage of each IPF's facility-specific 
TEFRA reimbursement rate. The blend percentages are as follows:

          Table 1.--IPF PPS Final Rule Transition Blend Factors
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Cost reporting                        IPF PPS
   Transition year     periods beginning    TEFRA rate     Federal rate
                          on or after       percentage      percentage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...................  January 1, 2005...              75              25
2...................  January 1, 2006...              50              50
3...................  January 1, 2007...              25              75
                      January 1, 2008...               0             100
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Changes to the blend percentages occur at the beginning of an IPF's 
cost reporting period. We note that we are currently in year two of the 
transition period. As a result, for discharges occurring during IPF 
cost reporting periods beginning in calendar year (CY) 2006, IPFs would 
receive a blended payment consisting of 50 percent of the facility-
specific TEFRA payment and 50 percent of the IPF PPS payment amount. 
However, regardless of when an IPF's cost reporting year begins, the 
payment update will be effective for discharges occurring on or after 
July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. We note that we are not making any 
changes to the transition approach established in the November 2004 IPF 
PPS final rule.

III. Provisions of the Proposed Regulation

    In January 2006, we published a proposed rule that appeared in the 
Federal Register at (71 FR 3616), and on February 24, 2006, a 
correction notice appeared in the Federal Register (71 FR 9505) to 
correct technical errors in the proposed rule and to extend the comment 
period for our policy concerning Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). The 
January 2006 proposed rule (hereinafter referred to as the Rate Year 
(RY) 2007 proposed rule) set forth the proposed annual update to the 
proposed prospective payment for IPFs for discharges occurring during 
the RY beginning July 1, 2006. As part of the update, we proposed to 
incorporate OMB's revised definitions for MSAs and its new definitions 
of Micropolitan Statistical Areas and Core-Based Statistical Areas 
(CBSAs). In addition, we proposed the following----
     Update payments for IPFs using a market basket reflecting 
the operating and capital cost structures of IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs.
     Develop cost weights for benefits, contract labor, and 
blood and blood products using the FY 2002-based IPPS market basket.
     Provide weights and proxies for the FY 2002-based RPL 
market basket.
     Indicate the methodology for the capital portion of the FY 
2002-based RPL market basket.
     Update the outlier threshold amount to maintain total 
estimated outlier payments at 2 percent of total estimated payments.
     Use source code ``D'' to identify IPF patients who have 
been transferred to the IPF from the same hospital or CAH.
     Retain the 17 percent adjustment for IPFs located in rural 
areas, the 1.31 adjustment for IPFs with a qualifying ED, the 0.5150 
teaching adjustment to the Federal per diem base rate, and the DRG 
adjustment factors currently being paid to IPFs for discharges 
occurring during RY 2007.
     Update the payment rate for ECT.
     Update the DRG listing and comorbidity categories to 
reflect the ICD-9-CM revisions effective October 1, 2005.
    In addition to addressing these issues in the proposed rule for RY 
2007, we also proposed making the following specific revisions to the 
existing text of the regulations. We proposed to make conforming 
changes in 42 CFR parts 412 and 424, as discussed throughout this 
preamble.
    In Sec.  412.27, we proposed to revise paragraph (b) to remove the 
reference to recreational therapy.
    In Sec.  412.402, we proposed to revise the heading of ``Fixed 
dollar loss-threshold'' to ``Fixed dollar loss threshold amount'' and 
revise the definitions of ``Fixed dollar loss threshold amount'', 
``Qualifying emergency department'', ``Rural area'' and ``Urban area.'' 
For consistency, we proposed to make conforming changes to these 
terminologies wherever they appear in the regulations text.
    In Sec.  412.424, we proposed to add paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(E) to 
clarify that the teaching adjustment is made on a claim basis as an 
interim payment and the final payment in full is made during the final 
settlement of the cost report. For clarity, we also proposed to revise 
paragraph (d)(2) introductory text. The current language in (d)(2)(iii) 
would become the introductory text for paragraph (d)(2) and paragraph

[[Page 27043]]

(d)(2)(iii) would be removed. In addition, we proposed to revise Sec.  
412.424(d)(3)(i)(A) to clarify that an outlier payment is made if an 
IPF's estimated total cost for a case exceeds a fixed dollar loss 
threshold amount plus the Federal payment amount for the case.
    In Sec.  412.426(a), we proposed to correct the cross reference to 
the Federal per diem payment amount. We incorrectly referenced the 
Federal per diem base rate as Sec.  412.424(c). The correct cross 
reference to the Federal per diem payment amount is Sec.  412.424(d).
    In Sec.  412.428, we proposed to revise paragraph (b) to specify 
that for discharges occurring on or after January 1, 2005 but before 
July 1, 2006 the rate of increase factor for the Federal portion of the 
payment is based on the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital 
market basket and for discharges occurring on or after July 1, 2006, 
the rate of increase factor for the Federal portion of the payment is 
based on the FY 2002-based Rehabilitation, Psychiatric, and Long-Term 
Care (RPL) market basket.
    In addition, we proposed to add a new paragraph (g) to state that 
we would update the national urban and rural cost to charge ratio 
medians and ceilings. Paragraph (1) through (3) would specify the types 
of IPFs in which to apply the national cost to charge ratio. 
Furthermore, we proposed to add a new paragraph (h) to update the cost 
of living adjustment factors, if appropriate.
    In Sec.  424.14, we proposed to revise the title to read, 
``Requirements for inpatient services of inpatient psychiatric 
facilities,'' to ensure consistency in compliance with the requirements 
among all IPFs. We also proposed to add a new paragraph (c)(3) to 
clarify for purposes of payment under the IPF PPS, that the physician 
would also recertify that the patient continues to need, on a daily 
basis, active inpatient psychiatric care (furnished directly by or 
requiring the supervision of inpatient psychiatric facility personnel) 
or other professional services that can only be provided on an 
inpatient basis.
    In addition, we proposed to revise paragraph (d)(2) to state that 
the first recertification is required as of the 12th day of 
hospitalization. Subsequent recertifications would be required at 
intervals established by the hospital's utilization review committee 
(on a case-by-case basis if it so chooses), but no less frequently than 
every 30 days.

IV. Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments

    We provided for a 60 day comment period on the RY 2007 proposed 
rule. The correction notice to correct technical errors that appeared 
in the RY 2007 proposed rule appeared in the Federal Register on 
February 24, 2006. The correction notice extended the public comment 
period on the ECT policy, to allow the public an opportunity to comment 
on the corrected policy.
    We received approximately 32 public comments from hospital 
associations, psychiatric hospitals and units, and acute care 
hospitals. In general, commenters expressed some concern about a few of 
our proposals and suggested that we wait to implement specific updates 
to the IPF PPS until we can analyze 2005 claims data. A few commenters 
requested that we provide the provider impact files that are comparable 
to the files prepared for the Inpatient Prospective Payment System 
(IPPS). In addition, several commenters requested that we retain the 
rural adjustment or provide a 3-year hold harmless provision for IPFs 
that would lose their rural adjustment if we adopted the proposed CBSA 
definitions. Several commenters supported the proposed changes to the 
IPF PPS.
    Summaries of the public comments received and our responses to 
those comments are provided in the appropriate sections in the preamble 
of this final rule.

V. Updates to the IPF PPS for RY Beginning July 1, 2006

    The IPF PPS is based on a standardized Federal per diem base rate 
calculated from IPF average per diem costs and adjusted for budget-
neutrality in the implementation year. The Federal per diem base rate 
is used as the standard payment per day under the IPF PPS and is 
adjusted by the applicable wage index factor and the patient-level and 
facility-level adjustments that are applicable to the IPF stay.
    The following is an explanation of how we calculated the Federal 
per diem base rate and the standardization and budget neutrality 
factors as described in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule.

A. Calculation of the Average Per Diem Cost

    As indicated in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, to calculate 
the Federal per diem base rate, we estimated the average cost per day 
for-- (1) routine services from FY 2002 cost reports (supplemented with 
FY 2001 cost reports if the FY 2002 cost report was missing); and (2) 
ancillary services using data from the FY 2002 Medicare claims and 
corresponding data from facility cost reports.
    For routine services, the per diem operating and capital costs were 
used to develop the average per diem cost amount. The per diem routine 
costs were obtained from each facility's Medicare cost report. To 
estimate the costs for routine services included in the Federal per 
diem base rate calculation, we added the total routine costs (including 
costs for capital) submitted on the cost report for each provider and 
divided it by the total Medicare days.
    Some average routine costs per day were determined to be aberrant, 
that is, the costs were extraordinarily high or low and most likely 
contained data errors. We provided a detailed discussion in the 
November 2004 IPF PPS final rule (69 FR 66926 through 66927) of the 
method used to trim extraordinarily high or low cost values from the 
per diem rate development file in order to improve the accuracy of our 
results. For ancillary services, we calculated the costs by converting 
charges from the FY 2002 Medicare claims into costs using facility-
specific, cost-center specific cost-to-charge ratios obtained from each 
provider's applicable cost reports. We matched each provider's 
departmental cost-to-charge ratios from their Medicare cost report to 
each charge on their claims reported in the MedPAR file. Multiplying 
the total charges for each type of ancillary service by the 
corresponding cost-to-charge ratio provided an estimate of the costs 
for all ancillary services received by the patient during the stay. We 
determined the average ancillary amount per day by dividing the total 
ancillary costs for all stays by the total number of covered Medicare 
days.
    Adding the average ancillary costs per day and the average routine 
costs per day including capital costs provided the estimated average 
per diem cost for each patient day of inpatient psychiatric care in FY 
2002.

B. Determining the Standardized Budget-Neutral Federal Per Diem Base 
Rate

    Section 124(a)(1) of the BBRA requires that the implementing IPF 
PPS be budget neutral. In other words, the amount of total payments 
under the IPF PPS, including any payment adjustments, must be projected 
to be equal to the amount of total payments that would have been made 
if the IPF PPS were not implemented. Therefore, in the November 2004 
IPF PPS final

[[Page 27044]]

rule, we calculated the budget neutrality factor by setting the total 
estimated IPF PPS payments to be equal to the total estimated payments 
that would have been made under the TEFRA methodology had the IPF PPS 
not been implemented.
    The November 2004 IPF PPS final rule includes a step-by-step 
description of the methodology we used to estimate payments under the 
TEFRA payment system (69 FR 66930). For the IPF PPS methodology, we 
calculated the final Federal per diem base rate to be budget neutral 
during the implementation period under the IPF PPS using a July 1 
update cycle. Thus, the implementation period for the IPF PPS is the 
18-month period January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006.
    We updated the average cost per day to the midpoint of the IPF PPS 
implementation period (that is, October 1, 2005). We used the most 
recent projection of the full percentage increase in the 1997-based 
excluded hospital with capital market basket index for FY 2003 and 
later in accordance with Sec.  413.40(c)(3)(viii). The updated average 
cost per day was used in the payment model to establish the budget 
neutrality adjustment.
    Public comments and our responses on changes for determining the 
standardized budget neutral federal per diem base rate are summarized 
below.
    Comment: We received several comments regarding the determination 
of the target amount and the temporary caps on the facility-specific 
TEFRA payments which expired in FY 2002. Specifically, the commenters 
stated that even though the temporary caps on the facility-specific 
(TEFRA) payments expired in FY 2002, the capped payment amounts which 
were used to establish the baseline for budget neutrality purposes, 
were inflated by the market basket rate for each year until the PPS 
began in 2005.
    The commenters believe that CMS should have used what would have 
been spent, absent the expired temporary caps inflated using the market 
basket rate, to establish the baseline rather than capped payments. The 
commenters stated that using the capped payments could have 
inappropriately reduced the allowed aggregate spending under the PPS 
each year.
    Response: We are aware that there have been concerns over the 
method we used for calculating the target amount for cost reporting 
periods beginning after FY 2002 for those hospitals and units that were 
subject to the ``payment caps'' in accordance with section 
1886(b)(3)(H) of the Act and regulations at Sec.  413.40(c)(4)(iii). We 
have addressed this issue several times, but most recently in the FY 
2006 IPPS final rule (70 FR 47278 and 70 FR 47464). Specifically, we 
addressed the issue of whether Sec.  413.40(c)(4)(iii) (specifically 
paragraph (c)(4)(iii)(A)) continues to apply beyond FY 2002. In that 
rule, we stated that Sec.  413.40(c)(4)(iii) applies only to cost 
reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997 through 
September 30, 2002, for IPFs, IRFs, and LTCHs. In addition, we clarify 
that once the 75th percentile cap provision in paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of 
Sec.  413.40 expired, the target amount is then determined based on 
Sec.  413.40(c)(4)(ii) which states that, ``Subject to the provisions 
of [Sec.  413.40] paragraph (c)(4)(iii) of this section, for subsequent 
cost reporting periods, the target amount equals the hospital's target 
amount for the previous cost reporting period increased by the update 
factor for the subject cost reporting period'' unless the provisions of 
paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this section apply. Thus, under the 
requirements of Sec.  413.40 (c)(4)(ii), in this instance, the previous 
cost reporting period's target amount would be increased by the 
applicable update factor to arrive at the target amount for FY 2003. 
Similarly, for cost reporting periods beginning in years subsequent to 
FY 2003, we calculate a hospital's target amount by taking its previous 
year's target amount and updating it by the updated factor for the 
subject cost reporting period unless the provision of paragraph 
(c)(5)(ii) of this section apply. We followed the methodology in Sec.  
413.40(c)(4)(ii) and therefore our projections of what would have been 
spent under TEFRA and the budget neutrality adjustment are correct.
    Final Rule Action: To clarify, in order to calculate the target 
amounts for cost reporting periods beginning in FY 2003, our policy is 
that the target amounts for cost reporting periods beginning in FY 2002 
are updated as described in Sec.  413.40(c)(4)(ii). Similarly, for cost 
reporting periods beginning in years subsequent to FY 2003, we 
calculate target amounts by taking the previous year's target amount 
and updating it, consistent with Sec.  413.40(c)(4)(ii).
1. Standardization of the Federal Per Diem Base Rate
    In the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we standardized the IPF 
PPS Federal per diem base rate in order to account for the overall 
positive effects of the IPF PPS payment adjustment factors. To 
standardize the IPF PPS payments, we compared the IPF PPS payment 
amounts calculated from the FY 2002 MedPAR file to the projected TEFRA 
payments from the FY 2002 cost report file updated to the midpoint of 
the IPF PPS implementation period (that is, October 2005). The 
standardization factor was calculated by dividing total estimated 
payments under the TEFRA payment system by estimated payments under the 
IPF PPS. The standardization factor was calculated to be 0.8367. As a 
result, in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, the $724.43 average 
cost per day was reduced by 16.33 percent (100 percent minus 83.67 
percent).
2. Calculation of the Budget Neutrality Adjustment
    To compute the budget neutrality adjustment for the IPF PPS, we 
separately identified each component of the adjustment, that is, the 
outlier adjustment, stop-loss adjustment, and behavioral offset.
a. Outlier Adjustment
    Since the IPF PPS payment amount for each IPF includes applicable 
outlier amounts, we reduced the standardized Federal per diem base rate 
to account for aggregate IPF PPS payments estimated to be made as 
outlier payments. The appropriate outlier amount was determined by 
comparing the adjusted prospective payment for the entire stay to the 
computed cost per case. If costs were above the prospective payment 
plus the adjusted fixed dollar loss threshold amount, an outlier 
payment was computed using the applicable risk-sharing percentages (see 
section VI.D.1 of this final rule). The outlier amount was computed for 
all stays, and the total outlier amount was added to the final IPF PPS 
payment. The outlier adjustment was calculated to be 2 percent. As a 
result, the standardized Federal per diem base rate was reduced by 2 
percent to account for projected outlier payments.
b. Stop-Loss Provision Adjustment
    As explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we provide a 
stop-loss payment to ensure that an IPF's total PPS payments are no 
less than a minimum percentage of their TEFRA payment, had the IPF PPS 
not been implemented. We reduced the standardized Federal per diem base 
rate by the percentage of aggregate IPF PPS payments estimated to be 
made for stop-loss payments.
    The stop-loss payment amount was determined by comparing aggregate 
prospective payments that the provider would receive under the IPF PPS 
to aggregate TEFRA payments that the provider would have otherwise 
received without implementation of the IPF PPS. If an IPF's aggregate 
IPF PPS payments are less than 70 percent of its aggregate

[[Page 27045]]

payments under TEFRA, a stop-loss payment was computed for that IPF. 
The stop-loss payment amounts were computed for those IPFs that were 
projected to receive the payments, and the total amount was added to 
the final IPF PPS payment amount. As a result, the standardized Federal 
per diem base rate was reduced by 0.39 percent to account for stop-loss 
payments.
c. Behavioral Offset
    As explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, 
implementation of the IPF PPS may result in certain changes in IPF 
practices especially with respect to coding for comorbid medical 
conditions. As a result, Medicare may incur higher payments than 
assumed in our calculations. Accounting for these effects through an 
adjustment is commonly known as a behavioral offset.
    Based on accepted actuarial practices and consistent with the 
assumptions made in other prospective payment systems, we assumed in 
determining the behavioral offset that IPFs would regain 15 percent of 
potential ``losses'' and augment payment increases by 5 percent. We 
applied this actuarial assumption, which is based on our historical 
experience with new payment systems, to the estimated ``losses'' and 
``gains'' among the IPFs. The behavioral offset for the IPF PPS was 
calculated to be 2.66 percent. As a result, we reduced the standardized 
Federal per diem base rate by 2.66 percent to account for behavioral 
changes.
    To summarize, the $724.43 updated average per diem cost was reduced 
by 16.33 percent to account for standardization to projected TEFRA 
payments for the implementation period, by 2 percent to account for 
outlier payments, by 0.39 percent to account for stop-loss payments, 
and by 2.66 percent reduction to account for the behavioral offset. The 
final standardized budget-neutral Federal per diem base rate for the 
IPF PPS implementation year was calculated to be $575.95. We discuss 
the Federal per diem base rate for RY 2007 below.
    Public comments and our responses on the behavioral offset are 
summarized below.
    Comment: Several commenters expressed concern that CMS continues to 
maintain the behavioral offset which is intended to account for changes 
in provider practice patterns as a result of movement to prospective 
payment which could result in higher Medicare payments. A few 
commenters stated that accurate coding is already a high priority in 
distinct part units and freestanding facilities. Therefore, coding 
practices in these facilities should not undergo major changes. The 
commenters suggested that because the PPS is being phased in, and only 
50 percent of the payment in the second year would be based on the IPF 
PPS, the incentive for behavior change is diminished.
    Several commenters recommended that CMS analyze the preliminary 
2005 claims data and adjust the calculations for the behavioral offset 
to maintain IPF spending at appropriate levels. A few commenters 
expressed concern that CMS did not indicate whether an analysis was 
conducted to determine if continuing the adjustment for behavioral 
offset is warranted. They believe the assumptions made for both the 
proposed RY and the implementation year of the IPF PPS overestimated 
the likely impact of changes in hospital behavior.
    Response: We explained in the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule and 
the RY 2007 proposed rule that we believe it is reasonable to expect 
changes in IPFs' practices especially with respect to coding for 
comorbid medical conditions and changes in length of stay (LOS), as a 
result of the implementation of the IPF PPS.
    In addition, based on accepted actuarial practices and consistent 
with the assumptions made in implementing other prospective payment 
systems, we assumed in determining the behavioral offset, that IPFs 
would regain 15 percent of potential ``losses'' and augment payment 
increases by 5 percent. We applied this actuarial assumption, which is 
based on our historical experience with new payment systems, to the 
estimated ``losses'' and ``gains'' among the IPFs.
    As indicated in the RY 2007 proposed rule, we do not plan to change 
adjustment factors or projections, including the behavioral offset, 
until we analyze IPF PPS data. At that time, we will re-assess the 
accuracy of the behavioral offset along with the other factors 
impacting budget neutrality. We anticipate analyzing 2005 IPF PPS 
claims and cost report data in the future.
    Comment: Several commenters inquired why CMS is continuing to 
include budget neutrality factors in the Federal per diem base rate 
(behavioral offset, stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment), 
effectively lowering the base rate. Since the PPS is only budget 
neutral for the implementation year, the commenters believe the base 
rate should not reflect budget neutrality factors that effectively 
lower the amount.
    Response: We acknowledge that the PPS is only budget neutral for 
the implementation year. The standardization factor, behavioral offset, 
stop-loss adjustment, and outlier adjustment were included in the 2005 
Federal per diem base rate of $575.95. In implementing the RY 2007 
final rule, we adjust the standardization factor (see section V.B.3 of 
this final rule), and apply the market basket update and the wage index 
budget neutrality factor to the base rate. As indicated above, we do 
not plan to change any adjustment factors or projections, including the 
budget neutrality factors (behavioral offset, stop-loss adjustment, and 
outlier adjustment), until we analyze IPF PPS data. We will revisit all 
assumptions used to calculate the budget neutrality adjustment and make 
any necessary prospective changes to the Federal per diem base rate. In 
section VI.D.3 of this final rule, we address these comments with 
respect to the calculation of the ECT rate.
    Final Rule Action: In summary, for future RYs, we will reassess the 
appropriateness of the behavior offset along with the other factors 
impacting budget neutrality. For the RY 2007 IPF PPS, we will continue 
to adjust the standardization factor and apply the market basket 
updates and the wage index budget neutrality factors.
3. Revision of the Standardization Factor
    In reviewing the methodology used to simulate the IPF PPS payments 
used for the November 2004 IPF PPS final rule, we discovered that the 
computer code incorrectly assigned non-teaching status to most teaching 
facilities. As a result, total IPF PPS payments were underestimated by 
about 1.36 percent. The underestimated IPF PPS payment total was used 
in calculating the IPF PPS standardization factor. The standardization 
factor represents the amount by which the IPF PPS per diem payment rate 
and the ECT rate must be reduced in order to make total IPF PPS 
payments equal to estimated total TEFRA payments assuming IPFs 
continued to be paid solely under TEFRA for the first PPS payment year.
    The standardization factor is calculated as the ratio of estimated 
total TEFRA payments to estimated total IPF PPS payments assuming no 
reduction to the per diem and ECT payment rates. Since the IPF PPS 
payment total should have been larger than the estimated figure, the 
standardization factor should have been smaller (0.8254 vs. 0.8367). In 
turn, the Federal per diem base rate and the ECT rate should have been 
reduced by 0.8254 instead of 0.8367.
    To resolve this issue, we proposed to amend the Federal per diem 
base rate and the ECT payment rate prospectively. Using the 
standardization

[[Page 27046]]

factor of 0.8254, the base rate should have been $568.17 for the 
implementation year of the IPF PPS. It is this base rate that we 
proposed to update using the market basket rate of increase of 4.3 
percent and the budget-neutral wage index factor of 1.0042 (see section 
VI.C.1.f of this final rule). Applying these factors yields a proposed 
Federal per diem base rate of $595.09 for the RY beginning July 1, 2006 
through June 30, 2007.
    Public comments and our responses on the revision of the 
standardization factor are summarized below.
    Comment: One commenter asked whether the overall increase in the 
base rate is appropriately calculated and sufficient.
    Response: As explained above and in the RY 2007 proposed rule, the 
correction of the standardization factor reveals that last year's per 
diem rate should have been $568.17, and not $575.95. To correct this 
error prospectively, we apply the market basket increase of 4.3 percent 
to $568.17, and then apply the wage index budget neutrality factor to 
compute the Federal per diem base rate.
    Final Rule Action: In summary, we are finalizing our decision to 
revise the standardization factor prospectively, and the Federal per 
diem base rate for RY 2007 is $595.09.

C. Update of the Federal Per Diem Base Rate

1. Market Basket for IPFs Reimbursed Under the IPF PPS
a. Market Basket Index for IPF PPS
    The market basket index used to develop the IPF PPS is the excluded 
hospital with capital market basket. This market basket was based on 
1997 Medicare cost report data and includes data for Medicare 
participating IPFs, IRFs, LTCHs, cancer, and children's hospitals.
    We are presently unable to create a separate market basket 
specifically for psychiatric hospitals due to the small number of 
facilities and the limited data that are provided (for instance, 
approximately 4 percent of psychiatric facilities reported contract 
labor cost data for FY 2002). However, since all IRFs, LTCHs, and IPFs 
are now paid under a PPS, we are updating PPS payments made under the 
IRF PPS, the LTCH PPS, and the IPF PPS using a market basket reflecting 
the operating and capital cost structures for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs 
(hereafter referred to as the rehabilitation, psychiatric, long-term 
care (RPL) market basket). We have excluded children's and cancer 
hospitals from the RPL market basket because their payments are based 
entirely on reasonable costs subject to rate-of-increase limits 
established under the authority of section 1886(b) of the Act, which is 
implemented in regulations at Sec.  413.40. They are not reimbursed 
under a PPS. Also, the FY 2002 cost structures for children's and 
cancer hospitals are noticeably different than the cost structures of 
the IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs.
    The services offered in IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs are typically more 
labor-intensive than those offered in cancer and children's hospitals. 
Therefore, the compensation cost weights for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs are 
larger than those in cancer and children's hospitals. In addition, the 
depreciation cost weights for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs are noticeably 
smaller than those for children's and cancer hospitals.
    In the following discussion, we provide an overview on the market 
basket and describe the methodologies we are using for purposes of 
determining the operating and capital portions of the FY 2002-based RPL 
market basket.
b. Overview of the RPL Market Basket
    The RPL market basket is a fixed weight, Laspeyres-type price index 
that was constructed in three steps. First, a base period was selected 
(in this case, FY 2002) and total base period expenditures were 
estimated for a set of mutually exclusive and exhaustive spending 
categories based upon type of expenditure. Then the proportion of total 
costs that each category represents was determined. These proportions 
are called cost or expenditure weights. Second, each expenditure 
category was matched to an appropriate price or wage variable, referred 
to as a price proxy. In nearly every instance, these price proxies are 
price levels derived from publicly available statistical series that 
are published on a consistent schedule, preferably at least on a 
quarterly basis.
    Finally, the expenditure weight for each cost category was 
multiplied by the level of its respective price proxy for a given 
period. The sum of these products (that is, the expenditure weights 
multiplied by their price levels) for all cost categories yields the 
composite index level of the market basket in a given period. Repeating 
this step for other periods produces a series of market basket levels 
over time. Dividing an index level for a given period by an index level 
for an earlier period produces a rate of growth in the input price 
index over that time period.
    A market basket is described as a fixed-weight index because it 
answers the question of how much it would cost, at another time, to 
purchase the same mix of goods and services purchased to provide 
hospital services in a base period. The effects on total expenditures 
resulting from changes in the quantity or mix of goods and services 
(intensity) purchased subsequent to the base period are not measured. 
In this manner, the market basket measures only pure price change. Only 
when the index is rebased would the quantity and intensity effects be 
captured in the cost weights. Therefore, we rebase the market basket 
periodically so that cost weights reflect changes in the mix of goods 
and services that hospitals purchase (hospital inputs) to furnish 
patient care between base periods.
    The terms rebasing and revising, while often used interchangeably, 
actually denote different activities. Rebasing means moving the base 
year for the structure of costs of an input price index (for example, 
shifting the base year cost structure from FY 1997 to FY 2002). 
Revising means changing data sources, methodology, or price proxies 
used in the input price index. We have rebased and revised the market 
basket used to update the IPF PPS.
2. Methodology for Operating Portion of the RPL Market Basket
    The operating portion of the FY 2002-based RPL market basket 
consists of several major cost categories derived from the FY 2002 
Medicare cost reports for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs: wages, drugs, 
professional liability insurance, and a residual. We chose to use FY 
2002 as the base year because we believe this is the most recent, 
complete year of Medicare cost reports. Due to insufficient Medicare 
cost report data for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs, we have developed cost 
weights for benefits, contract labor, and blood and blood products 
using the FY 2002-based IPPS market basket (70 FR 23384), which we 
explain in more detail later in this section. For example, less than 30 
percent of IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs reported benefit cost data in FY 2002. 
We have noticed an increase in cost data for these expense categories 
over the last 4 years. The next time we rebase the RPL market basket 
there may be sufficient IRF, IPF, and LTCH cost report data to develop 
the weights for these expenditure categories.
    Since the cost weights for the RPL market basket are based on 
facility costs, as proposed and for this final rule, we are limiting 
our sample to hospitals with a Medicare average LOS within a comparable 
range of the total facility average LOS. We believe this provides a 
more accurate reflection of the structure of costs for Medicare covered

[[Page 27047]]

days. Our goal is to measure cost shares that are reflective of case 
mix and practice patterns associated with providing services to 
Medicare beneficiaries.
    As proposed and for this final rule, we are using those cost 
reports for IRFs and LTCHs whose Medicare average LOS is within 15 
percent (that is, 15 percent higher or lower) of the total facility 
average LOS for the hospital. This is the same edit applied to the FY 
1992-based and FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital market 
basket. We are using 15 percent because it includes those LTCHs and 
IRFs whose Medicare LOS is within approximately 5 days of the facility 
LOS.
    As proposed and for this final rule, we use a less stringent 
measure of Medicare LOS for IPFs whose average LOS is within 30 or 50 
percent (depending on the total facility average LOS) of the total 
facility average LOS. Using this less stringent edit allows us to 
increase our sample size by over 150 cost reports and produce a cost 
weight more consistent with the overall facility. The edit we applied 
to IPFs when developing the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with 
capital market basket was based on the best available data at the time.
    Public comments and our responses on the proposed changes for 
implementing the methodology for the operating portion of the RPL 
market basket are summarized below.
    Comment: One commenter disagreed with our proposed LOS methodology, 
which included those cost reports for IRFs and LTCHs whose Medicare 
average LOS is within 15 percent (that is, 15 percent higher or lower) 
of the total facility average LOS and those cost reports for IPFs whose 
average LOS is within 30 or 50 percent (depending on the total facility 
average LOS) of the total facility average LOS.
    A commenter stated that the LOS methodology appears to factor into 
the calculation a disproportionate share of psychiatric facilities with 
a longer LOS. In addition, the commenter indicated that the RY 2007 
proposed rule stated that costs decrease further into a patient's stay 
and that CMS assumes that IPFs have an incompatible cost per discharge 
when grouped with the lower LOS in the IRFs and LTCHs.
    Response: As stated previously, since the cost weights for the RPL 
market basket are based on facility costs, we limited our sample to 
hospitals with a Medicare average LOS within a comparable range of the 
total facility average LOS. We believe this provides a more accurate 
reflection of the structure of costs for Medicare treatments.
    We disagree with the commenter that the IPF LOS edit includes a 
disproportionate share of IPFs with a longer LOS. For clarity, we are 
providing below a table that compares the distribution of the Medicare 
and facility LOSs for IPFs using no edit and the proposed 30/50 edit.

                         Table 2.--IPFs FY 2002 Medicare and Facility LOS Distributions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Medicare length of stay         Facility length of stay
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      No trim       30/50 trim        No trim       30/50 trim
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100% Max........................................              93              70            5334              75
99%.............................................              86              54             822              63
95%.............................................              59              36             333              39
90%.............................................              49              23             227              26
75% Q3..........................................              28              15              57              15
50% Median......................................              13              11              13              10
25% Q1..........................................              10               9               8               8
10%.............................................               8               7               6               6
5%..............................................               7               7               6               5
1%..............................................               4               5               5               5
0% Min..........................................               1               3               1               3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Medicare and facility LOS distributions are consistent when the 
proposed edit is applied. However, not applying the edit would include 
in the market basket those IPFs whose facility LOS are dramatically 
different from their Medicare LOS. In addition, the Medicare LOS 
distribution with the 30/50 edit is similar to the Medicare LOS 
distribution with no edit. Therefore, we believe that the proposed edit 
does not include a disproportionate share of IPFs with a longer LOS in 
the market basket.
    Applying these LOS edits left us with a sample of hospitals whose 
average Medicare utilization was approximately 50 percent, while those 
excluded from the market basket had a Medicare utilization of 
approximately 10 percent. Given this, we firmly believe that these LOS 
edits help us meet our goal to measure cost shares that are reflective 
of case mix and practice patterns associated with providing services to 
Medicare beneficiaries.
    The detailed cost categories under the residual (that is, the 
remaining portion of the market basket after excluding wages and 
salaries, drugs, and professional liability cost weights) are derived 
from the FY 2002-based IPPS market basket and the 1997 Benchmark Input-
Output (I-O) Tables published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. 
Department of Commerce. The FY 2002-based IPPS market basket was 
developed using FY 2002 Medicare hospital cost reports with the most 
recent and detailed cost data (see the August 12, 2005 IPPS final rule 
(70 FR 47388)). The 1997 Benchmark I-O is the most recent, 
comprehensive source of cost data for all hospitals. The RPL cost 
weights for benefits, contract labor, and blood and blood products were 
derived using the FY 2002-based IPPS market basket. For example, the 
ratio of the benefit cost weight to the wages and salaries cost weight 
in the FY 2002-based IPPS market basket was applied to the RPL wages 
and salaries cost weight to derive a benefit cost weight for the RPL 
market basket. As proposed and for this final rule, the remaining RPL 
operating cost categories were derived using the 1997 Benchmark I-O 
Tables, aged to 2002 using relative price changes. (The methodology we 
used to age the data involves applying the annual price changes from 
the price proxies to the appropriate cost categories. We repeated this 
practice for each year.) Therefore, using this methodology, roughly 59 
percent of the RPL market basket was accounted for by wages, drugs, and 
professional liability insurance data from FY 2002 Medicare cost report 
data for IRFs, LTCHs, and IPFs.
    Additional comments and our responses on the methodology for

[[Page 27048]]

operating portion of the RPL market basket are summarized below.
    Comment: Several commenters proposed that CMS regularly re-analyze 
the RPL cost report data, which are the basis of the RPL market basket. 
The commenters indicated that the methodology used for the RPL market 
basket includes data from the IPPS hospital market basket rather than 
relying solely on IPF, IRF, and LTCH data.
    The commenters recommended that CMS work with providers to improve 
the cost reports from rehabilitation, psychiatric, and LTCHs in order 
to ensure that the data used for the market basket represent only the 
types of excluded hospitals for which the RPL market basket was 
developed. The commenters believe that improving the data reported on 
the RPL cost reports would not only refine the RPL market basket but 
also improve the accuracy of the labor-related share to which the wage 
index is applied.
    Response: We rely on the IPPS cost report data to supplement the 
IRF, IPF, and LTCH Medicare cost report data for benefits, contract 
labor, and blood and blood products. For example, the ratio of the 
benefit cost weight to the wages and salaries cost weight in the FY 
2002-based IPPS market basket was applied to the RPL wages and salaries 
cost weight to derive a benefit cost weight for the RPL market basket. 
We did not use expenditure levels from the IPPS data directly but, as 
explained, we developed and used the ratios from IPPS data to determine 
these RPL cost weights.
    The wages and salaries cost weight was derived using the IRF, IPF, 
and LTCH Medicare cost reports and accounts for 50 percent of the RPL 
market basket. Due to data limitations, this was the best methodology 
for developing the latter cost weights.
    We agree with the commenters that improving the data reported on 
the RPL cost reports could improve the RPL market basket and labor-
related share. We have noticed this data improvement on other provider-
type cost reports and encourage IRF, IPF, and LTCH providers to fully 
complete their cost reports. We believe that this would help us develop 
the most complete and accurate market basket possible. We will analyze 
RPL cost report data on a regular basis and continue to consider the 
possibility of provider-specific market basket indices.
    Comment: One commenter requested that CMS explain how it computes 
cost category weights based on Medicare cost report data. The commenter 
stated that if they understood which data elements were used and how 
they were used, CMS could develop educational programs to improve their 
member hospitals' reporting.
    Response: The RPL market basket cost weights are based on 
freestanding Medicare cost report data for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs. We 
mainly rely on data from worksheets A through G to derive the cost 
weights. Worksheet S-3, part II is the only worksheet which allows for 
the reporting of benefits and contract labor data; however, it is not a 
required worksheet for IRFs, IPFs, and LTCHs. As stated previously, we 
relied on the IPPS Medicare cost report worksheet S-3, part II data to 
derive the relationships for benefits and contract labor to wages and 
salaries.
    Additionally, capital cost weights are derived using worksheet A-7. 
The estimates generated using this worksheet, as well as worksheet G, 
could be enhanced with higher reporting rates. Again, we encourage IRF, 
IPF, and LTCH providers to fully complete their cost reports to help us 
in developing the most complete and accurate market basket.
    Table 3 below sets forth the complete 2002-based RPL market basket 
including cost categories, weights, and price proxies. For comparison 
purposes, the corresponding FY 1997-based excluded hospital with 
capital market basket is listed as well.
    As proposed and for this final rule, wages and salaries are 52.895 
percent of total costs in the FY 2002-based RPL market basket compared 
to 47.335 percent for the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital 
market basket. Employee benefits are 12.982 percent in the FY 2002-
based RPL market basket compared to 10.244 percent for the FY 1997-
based excluded hospital with capital market basket. As a result, 
compensation costs (wages and salaries plus employee benefits) for the 
FY 2002-based RPL market basket are 65.877 percent of costs compared to 
57.579 percent for the FY 1997-based excluded hospital with capital 
market basket. Of the 8 percentage-point difference between the 
compensation shares, approximately 3 percentage points were due to the 
new base year (FY 2002 instead of FY 1997), 3 percentage points were 
due to the revised LOS edit, and the remaining 2 percentage points were 
due to the exclusion of other hospitals (that is, only including IPFs, 
IRFs, and LTCHs in the market basket).
    Following the table is a summary outlining the choice of the 
proxies we chose to use for the operating portion of the market basket. 
The price proxies for the capital portion are described in more detail 
in the capital methodology section (see section V.C.3 of this final 
rule).

   Table 3.--FY 2002-Based RPL Market Basket Cost Categories, Weights, and Proxies With FY 1997-Based Excluded
                             Hospital With Capital Market Basket Used for Comparison
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            FY 1997-based
                                          excluded hospital  FY 2002-based RPL     FY 2002 market basket price
           Expense categories                with capital      market  basket                proxies
                                            market basket
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total...................................            100.000            100.000
Compensation............................             57.579             65.877
    Wages and Salaries *................             47.335             52.895  ECI--Wages and Salaries,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.