Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License, 26785-26786 [E6-6914]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Notices
CEOSE
Thursday, June 1, 2006
Welcome and Opening Statement by the
CEOSE Chair
Introductions
Mini Symposium on Community Colleges
Topics To Be Presented and Discussed:
The Philosophy and History of Community
Colleges
Challenges and Opportunities in Managing
a Large Urban and Suburban Community
College System
Current State of Affairs at the Nation’s
Community Colleges
The Role of Community Colleges in the
Education of Recent Science and
Engineering Graduates
Presentations and Discussions
The Intersection of Race, Gender and
Disability in NSF’s Employment Data
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders’
Issues: The Challenges of Success
(https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/
nsf0551/)
The Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority
Participation Program
Friday, June 2, 2006
Opening Statement by the CEOSE Chair
Statement from CEOSE Member Whose Term
is Ending
Presentations/Discussions:
Broadening Participation Evaluation and
Assessment within NSF
Subcommittee Reports and Deliberations
Report of CEOSE Liaisons to National
Science Foundation Advisory
Committees
Response to the NSF Strategic Plan
Completion of Unfinished Business
Dated: May 3, 2006.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–4288 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The NRC has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following proposal for the collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby
informs potential respondents that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
that a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: Extension.
2. The title of the information
collection: 10 CFR Part 55, ‘‘Operators’
Licenses.’’
3. The form number if applicable: N/
A.
4. How often the collection is
required: As necessary for NRC to meet
its responsibilities to determine the
eligibility of applicants for operators’
licenses, prepare or review initial
operator licensing and requalification
examinations, and review applications
for and performance of simulation
facilities.
5. Who will be required or asked to
report: Holders of and applicants for
facility (i.e., nuclear power, research,
and test reactors) operating licenses and
individual operators’ licenses.
6. An estimate of the number of
annual responses: 343 (240 responses +
103 recordkeepers).
7. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 103 (70 power reactor
licensees + 33 non-power reactor
licensees).
8. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to complete the
requirement or request: 67,060 (45,464
hrs. reporting + 21,596 hrs.
recordkeeping).
9. An indication of whether Section
3507(d), Public Law 104–13 applies: N/
A.
10. Abstract: 10 CFR part 55,
‘‘Operators’ Licenses,’’ of the NRC’s
regulations, specifies information and
data to be provided by applicants and
facility licenses so that the NRC may
make determinations concerning the
licensing and requalification of
operators for nuclear reactors, as
necessary to promote public health and
safety. The reporting and recordkeeping
requirements contained in 10 CFR part
55 are mandatory for the licensees and
applicants affected.
A copy of the final supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC World Wide Web
site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/. The
document will be available on the NRC
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions should be
directed to the OMB reviewer listed
below by June 7, 2006. Comments
received after this date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but
assurance of consideration cannot be
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26785
given to comments received after this
date. John A. Asalone, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(3150–0018), NEOB–10202, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503.
Comments can also be e-mailed to
John_A._Asalone@omb.eop.gov or
submitted by telephone at (202) 395–
4650.
The NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda
Jo. Shelton, 301–415–7233.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of May, 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Jo. Shelton,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. E6–6915 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–348 and 50–364]
Southern Nuclear Operating Company;
Notice of Withdrawal of Application for
Amendment to Facility Operating
License
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) has
granted the request of Southern Nuclear
Operating Company, Inc. (the licensee)
to withdraw its March 8, 2005
application for proposed amendment to
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–2
and NPF–8 for the Joseph M. Farley
Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2,
located in Houston County, Alabama.
The proposed amendment would have
revised the Technical Specifications to
delete Function 11, Reactor Coolant
Pump (RCP) Breaker Position, in TS
3.3.1, ‘‘Reactor Trip System (RTS)
Instrumentation.’’
The Commission had previously
issued a Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of Amendment published in
the Federal Register on July 5, 2005 (70
FR 38722). However, by letter dated
March 17, 2006, the licensee withdrew
the proposed change.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for
amendment dated March 8, 2005, and
the licensee’s letter dated March 17,
2006, which withdrew the application
for license amendment. Documents may
be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at
the NRC’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publicly available records
will be accessible electronically from
the Agencywide Documents Access and
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
26786
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Notices
Management Systems (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons
who do not have access to ADAMS or
who encounter problems in accessing
the documents located in ADAMS
should contact the NRC PDR Reference
staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209,
or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to
pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
of April 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert E. Martin,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch II–1, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing , Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–6914 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Identification of Countries That Deny
Adequate Protection, or Market
Access, for Intellectual Property Rights
Under Section 182 of the Trade Act of
1974
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the United States Trade Representative
(USTR) has submitted its annual report
on the identification of those foreign
countries that deny adequate and
effective protection of intellectual
property rights or deny fair and
equitable market access to United States
persons that rely upon intellectual
property protection, and those foreign
countries determined to be priority
foreign countries, to the Committee on
Finance of the United States Senate and
the Committee on Ways and Means of
the United States House of
Representatives, pursuant to section 182
of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(the Trade Act) (19 U.S.C. 2242).
DATES: This report was submitted on
April 28, 2006 and is available on
USTR’s Web site at https://www.ustr.gov.
ADDRESSES: Office of the United States
Trade Representative, 600 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20508.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Choe Groves, Director for
Intellectual Property and Chair of the
Special 301 Committee at (202) 395–
4510.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974,
as amended by the Omnibus Trade and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
Competitiveness Act of 1988 and the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act
(enacted in 1994), under Special 301
provisions, USTR must identify those
countries that deny adequate and
effective protection for IPR or deny fair
and equitable market access for persons
that rely on intellectual property
protection. Countries that have the most
onerous or egregious acts, policies, or
practices and whose acts, policies, or
practices have the greatest adverse
impact (actual or potential) on the
relevant U.S. products must be
designated as ‘‘Priority Foreign
Countries.’’
Priority Foreign Countries are
potentially subject to an investigation
under the section 301 provisions of the
Trade Act of 1974. USTR may not
designate a country as a Priority Foreign
Country if it is entering into good faith
negotiations or making significant
progress in bilateral or multilateral
negotiations to provide adequate and
effective protection of IPR.
USTR must decide whether to
identify countries within 30 days after
issuance of the annual National Trade
Estimate Report. In addition, USTR may
identify a trading partner as a Priority
Foreign Country or remove such
identification whenever warranted.
USTR has created a ‘‘Priority Watch
List’’ and ‘‘Watch List’’ under Special
301 provisions. Placement of a trading
partner on the Priority Watch List or
Watch List indicates that particular
problems exist in that country with
respect to IPR protection, enforcement,
or market access for persons relying on
intellectual property. Countries placed
on the Priority Watch List are the focus
of increased bilateral attention
concerning the problem areas.
Additionally, under section 306,
USTR monitors a country’s compliance
with bilateral intellectual property
agreements that are the basis for
resolving an investigation under Section
301. USTR may apply sanctions if a
country fails to satisfactorily implement
an agreement.
The interagency Trade Policy Staff
Committee that advises USTR on the
implementation of Special 301 obtains
information from and holds
consultations with the private sector,
U.S. embassies, the United States’
trading partners, the U.S. Congress, and
the National Trade Estimate Report,
among other sources.
The Special 301 Report is available on
USTR’s Web site at https://www.ustr.gov.
On April 28, 2006, USTR identified
48 trading partners that deny adequate
and effective protection of intellectual
property or deny fair and equitable
market access to United States persons
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that rely upon intellectual property
protection.
USTR announced that China and
Russia remain significant concerns.
China is a top IPR enforcement priority;
USTR will maintain heightened scrutiny
of China, will step up consideration of
its WTO dispute settlement options, and
will scrutinize IPR protection and
enforcement at China’s provincial level
by conducting a special provincial
review in the coming year. The China
section of the report recognizes China’s
efforts to address IPR problems but
concludes that IPR infringements
throughout China remain at
unacceptable levels.
The Russia section of the report notes
that although Russia has taken some
steps to curb pirate production of
optical discs in factories, particularly
those located on government-owned
property, high levels of IPR
infringement remain, particularly
infringements connected with Russiabased optical disc plants and Web sites.
USTR again designated Paraguay for
section 306 monitoring to ensure its
compliance with the commitments
made to the United States under
bilateral intellectual property
agreements.
USTR also announced the placement
of 13 trading partners on the Priority
Watch List: China, Russia, Argentina,
Belize, Brazil, Egypt, India, Indonesia,
Israel, Lebanon, Turkey, Ukraine, and
Venezuela. In addition, USTR placed 34
trading partners on the Watch List:
Bahamas, Belarus, Bolivia, Bulgaria,
Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica,
Croatia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,
European Union, Guatemala, Hungary,
Italy, Jamaica, Kuwait, Latvia,
Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan,
Peru, Philippines, Poland, Republic of
Korea, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan,
Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkmenistan,
Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.
USTR will conduct out-of-cycle
reviews of Canada, Chile, Indonesia,
Latvia, and Saudi Arabia.
Victoria Espinel,
Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for
Intellectual Property.
[FR Doc. E6–6926 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190–W6–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
Proposed Submission of Information
Collection for OMB Review; Comment
Request; Customer Satisfaction
Surveys and Focus Groups
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26785-26786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6914]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364]
Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Notice of Withdrawal of
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted
the request of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (the licensee)
to withdraw its March 8, 2005 application for proposed amendment to
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8 for the Joseph M.
Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, located in Houston County,
Alabama. The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical
Specifications to delete Function 11, Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP)
Breaker Position, in TS 3.3.1, ``Reactor Trip System (RTS)
Instrumentation.''
The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on July 5, 2005
(70 FR 38722). However, by letter dated March 17, 2006, the licensee
withdrew the proposed change.
For further details with respect to this action, see the
application for amendment dated March 8, 2005, and the licensee's
letter dated March 17, 2006, which withdrew the application for license
amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically
from the Agencywide Documents Access and
[[Page 26786]]
Management Systems (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the
Internet at the NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html.
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by
e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of April 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert E. Martin,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II-1, Division of
Operating Reactor Licensing , Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6-6914 Filed 5-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P