Withdrawal of Proposed Regulations Regarding Intercompany Transactions; Manufacturer Incentive Payments, 26721-26722 [E6-6888]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules in the definition of a small entity that is set forth in 5 U.S.C. 601. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) This proposed action meets applicable standards in Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, to eliminate ambiguity, and to reduce burden. The FHWA analyzed this proposed amendment in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132, dated August 4, 1999, and the FHWA has determined that this proposed action would not have a substantial direct effect or sufficient federalism implications on States and local governments that would limit the policy-making discretion of the States and local governments. Nothing in the MUTCD directly preempts any State law or regulation. The MUTCD is incorporated by reference in 23 CFR part 655, subpart F. These proposed amendments are in keeping with the Secretary of Transportation’s authority under 23 U.S.C. 109(d), 315, and 402(a) to promulgate uniform guidelines to promote the safe and efficient use of the nation’s streets and highways. Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review) Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act This SNPA would not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, March 22, 1995). The findings of the impacts analysis indicate that this proposed action will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $120.7 million or more in any one year. In addition, sign replacement is eligible for up to 100 percent Federalaid funding—this applies to local jurisdictions and tribal governments, pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 120(c). wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS Paperwork Reduction Act Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the OMB for each collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through regulations. The FHWA has determined that this proposed action does not contain a collection of information requirement for the purposes of the PRA. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:12 May 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children) The FHWA has analyzed this proposed action under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This is not an economically significant proposed action and does not concern an environmental risk to health or safety that may disproportionately affect children. Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property) This proposed action would not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects) The FHWA has analyzed this proposed action under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. The FHWA has determined that this is not a significant energy action under that order because although it is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211 is not required. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation) The FHWA has analyzed this proposed action under Executive Order 13175, dated November 6, 2000, and believes that it will not have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes; will not impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments; and will not preempt tribal law. Therefore, a tribal summary impact statement is not required. National Environmental Policy Act The agency has analyzed this proposed action for the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and has determined that it would not have any effect on the quality of the environment. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 26721 Regulation Identification Number A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of this document can be used to cross-reference this action with the Unified Agenda. List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 655 Design standards, Grant programs— Transportation, Highways and roads, Incorporation by reference, Signs, Traffic regulations. Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101(a), 104, 105, 109(d), 114(a), 135, 217, 307, 315, and 402(a); sec. 406(a), Pub. L. 102–388, 106 Stat. 1520, 1564; 23 CFR 1.32; and 49 CFR 1.48(b). Issued on: May 2, 2006. Frederick G. Wright, Jr., Federal Highway Executive Director. [FR Doc. E6–6882 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–22–P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [REG–131264–04] RIN 1545–BD55 Withdrawal of Proposed Regulations Regarding Intercompany Transactions; Manufacturer Incentive Payments Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG– 131264–04) regarding the treatment of manufacturer incentive payments. The proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2004 (69 FR 50112). After consideration of additional issues, the IRS and Treasury Department have decided to withdraw the proposed regulations. DATES: These proposed regulations are withdrawn May 8, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Kelly, (202) 622–7770 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 13, 2004, the IRS and Treasury Department published a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–131264– 04) in the Federal Register (69 FR 50112) proposing regulations to address additional transactions involving E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM 08MYP1 26722 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules manufacturer incentive payments and to clarify the proper treatment of such incentive payments under the intercompany transaction regulations. On April 25, 2005, the IRS and Treasury Department published Rev. Rul. 2005–28 (2005–19 IRB 997), which suspends, in part, Rev. Rul. 76–96 (1976–1 CB 23). Rev. Rul. 2005–28 states that the IRS will not apply, and taxpayers may not rely upon, the conclusion reached in Rev. Rul. 76–96 that certain rebates made by a manufacturer to retail customers are ordinary and necessary business expenses deductible under section 162, pending the IRS’s reconsideration of the issue and publication of subsequent guidance. The example in paragraph (c) of the proposed regulations relies, in part, upon the premise that the manufacturer incentive payment is an ordinary and necessary business expense deductible under section 162. To the extent that this premise is correct, paragraph (d) of the proposed regulations illustrates the proper application of the intercompany transaction regulations. However, because Rev. Rul. 2005–28 suspends Rev. Rul. 76–96, in pertinent part, these paragraphs of the proposed regulations are withdrawn pending further guidance on the section 162 issue considered in Rev. Rul. 76–96. The example in paragraph (e) of the proposed regulations illustrates the application of the original issue discount rules to the facts described in paragraph (e) and, based on these facts, concludes that the transaction is not an intercompany transaction. This conclusion is not dependent upon the issue being reconsidered in Rev. Rul. 76–96. Nevertheless, because the example in paragraph (e), standing alone, does not provide guidance with respect to the application of the intercompany transaction regulations to an intercompany transaction, paragraph (e) of the proposed regulations is also withdrawn. List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–131264–04) that was published in the Federal Register on 15:54 May 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 Mark E. Matthews, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. [FR Doc. E6–6888 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830–01–P Correction of Publication Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG– 146384–05), which was the subject of FR Doc. 06–3321, is corrected as follows: PART 1—INCOME TAXES Internal Revenue Service Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read, in part, as follows: 26 CFR Part 1 § 1.846–2 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * [REG–146384–05] RIN 1545–BF02 Application of Section 338 to Insurance Companies; Correction Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice of proposed rulemaking that was published in the Federal Register on Monday, April 10, 2006 (71 FR 18053). The document contains temporary regulations providing guidance under section 197 that apply to the treatment of certain insurance contracts assumed in an assumption reinsurance transaction and section 338 that apply to a deemed sale or acquisition of an insurance company’s assets pursuant to an election under section 338 of the Internal Revenue Code, to a sale or acquisition of an insurance trade or business subject to section 1060, and to the acquisition of insurance contracts through assumption reinsurance. DATES: This correction is effective April 10, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark J. Weiss, (202) 622–7790 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–146384–05), that is the subject of this correction, is under sections 197, 338, and 846 of the Internal Revenue Code. Need for Correction Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking VerDate Aug<31>2005 August 13, 2004 (69 FR 50112) is withdrawn. As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–146384–05) contains errors that may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification. List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 [Corrected] On page 18054, column 3, paragraph instruction Par. 5., the language ‘‘Par. 5. Section 1.846–2 as amended by adding new paragraph (d) to read is follows:’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Par. 5. Section 1.846–2 is amended by adding new paragraph (d) to read as follows:’’. Guy R. Traynor, Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration). [FR Doc. E6–6894 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0314; FRL–8165–3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Amendments to Stage II Vapor Recovery at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland for the purpose of amending the regulations pertaining to Stage II Vapor Recovery at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State’s SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM 08MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26721-26722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6888]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-131264-04]
RIN 1545-BD55


Withdrawal of Proposed Regulations Regarding Intercompany 
Transactions; Manufacturer Incentive Payments

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-
131264-04) regarding the treatment of manufacturer incentive payments. 
The proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register on 
August 13, 2004 (69 FR 50112). After consideration of additional 
issues, the IRS and Treasury Department have decided to withdraw the 
proposed regulations.

DATES: These proposed regulations are withdrawn May 8, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Kelly, (202) 622-7770 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 13, 2004, the IRS and Treasury Department published a 
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-131264-04) in the Federal Register 
(69 FR 50112) proposing regulations to address additional transactions 
involving

[[Page 26722]]

manufacturer incentive payments and to clarify the proper treatment of 
such incentive payments under the intercompany transaction regulations.
    On April 25, 2005, the IRS and Treasury Department published Rev. 
Rul. 2005-28 (2005-19 IRB 997), which suspends, in part, Rev. Rul. 76-
96 (1976-1 CB 23). Rev. Rul. 2005-28 states that the IRS will not 
apply, and taxpayers may not rely upon, the conclusion reached in Rev. 
Rul. 76-96 that certain rebates made by a manufacturer to retail 
customers are ordinary and necessary business expenses deductible under 
section 162, pending the IRS's reconsideration of the issue and 
publication of subsequent guidance.
    The example in paragraph (c) of the proposed regulations relies, in 
part, upon the premise that the manufacturer incentive payment is an 
ordinary and necessary business expense deductible under section 162. 
To the extent that this premise is correct, paragraph (d) of the 
proposed regulations illustrates the proper application of the 
intercompany transaction regulations. However, because Rev. Rul. 2005-
28 suspends Rev. Rul. 76-96, in pertinent part, these paragraphs of the 
proposed regulations are withdrawn pending further guidance on the 
section 162 issue considered in Rev. Rul. 76-96.
    The example in paragraph (e) of the proposed regulations 
illustrates the application of the original issue discount rules to the 
facts described in paragraph (e) and, based on these facts, concludes 
that the transaction is not an intercompany transaction. This 
conclusion is not dependent upon the issue being reconsidered in Rev. 
Rul. 76-96. Nevertheless, because the example in paragraph (e), 
standing alone, does not provide guidance with respect to the 
application of the intercompany transaction regulations to an 
intercompany transaction, paragraph (e) of the proposed regulations is 
also withdrawn.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of 
proposed rulemaking (REG-131264-04) that was published in the Federal 
Register on August 13, 2004 (69 FR 50112) is withdrawn.

Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
 [FR Doc. E6-6888 Filed 5-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.