Proposed Submission of Information Collection for OMB Review; Comment Request; Customer Satisfaction Surveys and Focus Groups, 26786-26787 [E6-6883]
Download as PDF
26786
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Notices
Management Systems (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons
who do not have access to ADAMS or
who encounter problems in accessing
the documents located in ADAMS
should contact the NRC PDR Reference
staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209,
or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to
pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
of April 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert E. Martin,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch II–1, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing , Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–6914 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Identification of Countries That Deny
Adequate Protection, or Market
Access, for Intellectual Property Rights
Under Section 182 of the Trade Act of
1974
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the United States Trade Representative
(USTR) has submitted its annual report
on the identification of those foreign
countries that deny adequate and
effective protection of intellectual
property rights or deny fair and
equitable market access to United States
persons that rely upon intellectual
property protection, and those foreign
countries determined to be priority
foreign countries, to the Committee on
Finance of the United States Senate and
the Committee on Ways and Means of
the United States House of
Representatives, pursuant to section 182
of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(the Trade Act) (19 U.S.C. 2242).
DATES: This report was submitted on
April 28, 2006 and is available on
USTR’s Web site at https://www.ustr.gov.
ADDRESSES: Office of the United States
Trade Representative, 600 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20508.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Choe Groves, Director for
Intellectual Property and Chair of the
Special 301 Committee at (202) 395–
4510.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974,
as amended by the Omnibus Trade and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
Competitiveness Act of 1988 and the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act
(enacted in 1994), under Special 301
provisions, USTR must identify those
countries that deny adequate and
effective protection for IPR or deny fair
and equitable market access for persons
that rely on intellectual property
protection. Countries that have the most
onerous or egregious acts, policies, or
practices and whose acts, policies, or
practices have the greatest adverse
impact (actual or potential) on the
relevant U.S. products must be
designated as ‘‘Priority Foreign
Countries.’’
Priority Foreign Countries are
potentially subject to an investigation
under the section 301 provisions of the
Trade Act of 1974. USTR may not
designate a country as a Priority Foreign
Country if it is entering into good faith
negotiations or making significant
progress in bilateral or multilateral
negotiations to provide adequate and
effective protection of IPR.
USTR must decide whether to
identify countries within 30 days after
issuance of the annual National Trade
Estimate Report. In addition, USTR may
identify a trading partner as a Priority
Foreign Country or remove such
identification whenever warranted.
USTR has created a ‘‘Priority Watch
List’’ and ‘‘Watch List’’ under Special
301 provisions. Placement of a trading
partner on the Priority Watch List or
Watch List indicates that particular
problems exist in that country with
respect to IPR protection, enforcement,
or market access for persons relying on
intellectual property. Countries placed
on the Priority Watch List are the focus
of increased bilateral attention
concerning the problem areas.
Additionally, under section 306,
USTR monitors a country’s compliance
with bilateral intellectual property
agreements that are the basis for
resolving an investigation under Section
301. USTR may apply sanctions if a
country fails to satisfactorily implement
an agreement.
The interagency Trade Policy Staff
Committee that advises USTR on the
implementation of Special 301 obtains
information from and holds
consultations with the private sector,
U.S. embassies, the United States’
trading partners, the U.S. Congress, and
the National Trade Estimate Report,
among other sources.
The Special 301 Report is available on
USTR’s Web site at https://www.ustr.gov.
On April 28, 2006, USTR identified
48 trading partners that deny adequate
and effective protection of intellectual
property or deny fair and equitable
market access to United States persons
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that rely upon intellectual property
protection.
USTR announced that China and
Russia remain significant concerns.
China is a top IPR enforcement priority;
USTR will maintain heightened scrutiny
of China, will step up consideration of
its WTO dispute settlement options, and
will scrutinize IPR protection and
enforcement at China’s provincial level
by conducting a special provincial
review in the coming year. The China
section of the report recognizes China’s
efforts to address IPR problems but
concludes that IPR infringements
throughout China remain at
unacceptable levels.
The Russia section of the report notes
that although Russia has taken some
steps to curb pirate production of
optical discs in factories, particularly
those located on government-owned
property, high levels of IPR
infringement remain, particularly
infringements connected with Russiabased optical disc plants and Web sites.
USTR again designated Paraguay for
section 306 monitoring to ensure its
compliance with the commitments
made to the United States under
bilateral intellectual property
agreements.
USTR also announced the placement
of 13 trading partners on the Priority
Watch List: China, Russia, Argentina,
Belize, Brazil, Egypt, India, Indonesia,
Israel, Lebanon, Turkey, Ukraine, and
Venezuela. In addition, USTR placed 34
trading partners on the Watch List:
Bahamas, Belarus, Bolivia, Bulgaria,
Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica,
Croatia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,
European Union, Guatemala, Hungary,
Italy, Jamaica, Kuwait, Latvia,
Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan,
Peru, Philippines, Poland, Republic of
Korea, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan,
Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkmenistan,
Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.
USTR will conduct out-of-cycle
reviews of Canada, Chile, Indonesia,
Latvia, and Saudi Arabia.
Victoria Espinel,
Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for
Intellectual Property.
[FR Doc. E6–6926 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190–W6–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
Proposed Submission of Information
Collection for OMB Review; Comment
Request; Customer Satisfaction
Surveys and Focus Groups
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Notices
Notice of intention to request
extension of OMB approval.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (‘‘PBGC’’) intends to
request that the Office of Management
and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) extend its
approval of a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The purpose of the information
collection, which will be conducted
through focus groups and surveys over
a three-year period, is to help the PBGC
assess the efficiency and effectiveness
with which it serves its customers and
to design actions to address identified
problems. This notice informs the
public of the PBGC’s intent and solicits
public comment on the collection of
information.
Comments should be submitted
by July 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
the Legislative and Regulatory
Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20005–4026.
Comments also may be submitted by email to paperwork.comments@pbgc.gov,
or by fax to 202–326–4224. PBGC will
make all comments available on its Web
site, https://www.pbgc.gov. Copies of
comments may also be obtained without
charge by writing to the Disclosure
Division of the Office of the General
Counsel of PBGC at the above address
or by visiting the Disclosure Division or
calling 202–326–4040 during normal
business hours. TTY and TDD users
may call the Federal relay service tollfree at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be
connected to 202–326–4040.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas H. Gabriel, Attorney,
Legislative & Regulatory Department,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005–4026, 202–326–4024. TTY and
TDD users may call the Federal relay
service toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and
request connection to 202–326–4024.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PBGC
intends to request that OMB extend its
approval, for a three-year period, of a
generic collection of information
consisting of customer satisfaction focus
groups and surveys (OMB control
number 1212–0053; expires October 31,
2006). The information collection will
further the goals of Executive Order
12862, Setting Customer Service
Standards, which states the Federal
Government must seek to provide ‘‘the
highest quality of service delivered to
customers by private organizations
providing a comparable or analogous
service.’’
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:05 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
The PBGC uses customer satisfaction
focus groups and surveys to find out
about the needs and expectations of its
customers and assess how well it is
meeting those needs and expectations.
By keeping these avenues of
communication open, the PBGC can
continually improve service to its
customers, including plan participants
and beneficiaries, plan sponsors and
their affiliates, plan administrators,
pension practitioners, and others
involved in the establishment, operation
and termination of plans covered by the
PBGC’s insurance program. Because the
areas of concern to the PBGC and its
customers vary and may quickly change,
it is important that the PBGC have the
ability to evaluate customer concerns
quickly by developing new vehicles for
gathering information under this generic
approval.
Participation in the focus groups and
surveys will be voluntary. The PBGC
will consult with the Office of
Management and Budget regarding each
specific information collection during
the approval period. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The PBGC estimates that the annual
burden for this collection of information
will total 1,400 hours for 4,200
respondents. The PBGC further
estimates that the cost to respondents
per burden hour will average $65,
resulting in a total cost of $91,000 ($65
× 1,400).
The PBGC is specifically seeking
public comments to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
PBGC’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26787
Issued at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
May 2006.
Rick Hartt,
Chief Technology Officer, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. E6–6883 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–27308]
Notice of Applications for
Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940
April 28, 2006.
The following is a notice of
applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 for the month of April,
2006. A copy of each application may be
obtained for a fee at the SEC’s Public
Reference Branch (tel. 202–551–5850).
An order granting each application will
be issued unless the SEC orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing on any application by writing
to the SEC’s Secretary at the address
below and serving the relevant
applicant with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the SEC by 5:30
p.m. on May 23, 2006, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on the
applicant, in the form of an affidavit or,
for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Hearing requests should state the nature
of the writer’s interest, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Secretary, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–
1090.
For Further Information Contact:
Diane L. Titus at (202) 551–6810, SEC,
Division of Investment Management,
Office of Investment Company
Regulation, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–4041.
J.P. Morgan Funds [File No. 811–7340];
J.P. Morgan Institutional Funds [File
No. 811–7342]; J.P. Morgan Mutual
Fund Select Trust [File No. 811–7841];
J.P. Morgan Mutual Fund Select Group
[File No. 811–7843]; Growth & Income
Portfolio [File No. 811–8084]; J.P.
Morgan Mutual Fund Trust [File No.
811–8358]
Summary: Each applicant seeks an
order declaring that it has ceased to be
an investment company. On February
18, 2005, each applicant transferred its
assets to JP Morgan Trust I, based on net
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26786-26787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6883]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Proposed Submission of Information Collection for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Customer Satisfaction Surveys and Focus Groups
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[[Page 26787]]
ACTION: Notice of intention to request extension of OMB approval.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (``PBGC'') intends to
request that the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') extend its
approval of a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction
Act. The purpose of the information collection, which will be conducted
through focus groups and surveys over a three-year period, is to help
the PBGC assess the efficiency and effectiveness with which it serves
its customers and to design actions to address identified problems.
This notice informs the public of the PBGC's intent and solicits public
comment on the collection of information.
DATES: Comments should be submitted by July 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to the Legislative and Regulatory
Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20005-4026. Comments also may be submitted by e-mail to
paperwork.comments@pbgc.gov, or by fax to 202-326-4224. PBGC will make
all comments available on its Web site, https://www.pbgc.gov. Copies of
comments may also be obtained without charge by writing to the
Disclosure Division of the Office of the General Counsel of PBGC at the
above address or by visiting the Disclosure Division or calling 202-
326-4040 during normal business hours. TTY and TDD users may call the
Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be
connected to 202-326-4040.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas H. Gabriel, Attorney,
Legislative & Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026, 202-326-
4024. TTY and TDD users may call the Federal relay service toll-free at
1-800-877-8339 and request connection to 202-326-4024.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PBGC intends to request that OMB extend
its approval, for a three-year period, of a generic collection of
information consisting of customer satisfaction focus groups and
surveys (OMB control number 1212-0053; expires October 31, 2006). The
information collection will further the goals of Executive Order 12862,
Setting Customer Service Standards, which states the Federal Government
must seek to provide ``the highest quality of service delivered to
customers by private organizations providing a comparable or analogous
service.''
The PBGC uses customer satisfaction focus groups and surveys to
find out about the needs and expectations of its customers and assess
how well it is meeting those needs and expectations. By keeping these
avenues of communication open, the PBGC can continually improve service
to its customers, including plan participants and beneficiaries, plan
sponsors and their affiliates, plan administrators, pension
practitioners, and others involved in the establishment, operation and
termination of plans covered by the PBGC's insurance program. Because
the areas of concern to the PBGC and its customers vary and may quickly
change, it is important that the PBGC have the ability to evaluate
customer concerns quickly by developing new vehicles for gathering
information under this generic approval.
Participation in the focus groups and surveys will be voluntary.
The PBGC will consult with the Office of Management and Budget
regarding each specific information collection during the approval
period. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
The PBGC estimates that the annual burden for this collection of
information will total 1,400 hours for 4,200 respondents. The PBGC
further estimates that the cost to respondents per burden hour will
average $65, resulting in a total cost of $91,000 ($65 x 1,400).
The PBGC is specifically seeking public comments to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the PBGC's functions, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Issued at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of May 2006.
Rick Hartt,
Chief Technology Officer, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. E6-6883 Filed 5-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-01-P