Revised Regulations Concerning Disclosure of Relative Values of Optional Forms of Benefit; Correction, 26687 [06-4271]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
is corrected to read ‘‘75% survivor
annuity, and the joint and’’.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 28,
2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 06–4232 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
Guy R. Traynor,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal
Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel,
(Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 06–4271 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9261]
[TD 9256]
RIN 1545–BF32
RIN 1545–BD97
Intercompany Transactions;
Manufacturer Incentive Payments
Revised Regulations Concerning
Disclosure of Relative Values of
Optional Forms of Benefit; Correction
AGENCY:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correction to final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations under section 1502 of the
Internal Revenue Code. Example 13 of
the intercompany transaction
regulations illustrates the treatment of
manufacturer incentive payments.
Because a premise underlying the
example is under reconsideration, these
final regulations remove and reserve
this example. The regulations will affect
corporations filing consolidated returns.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective May 8, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frances Kelly, (202) 622–7770 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains a
correction to final regulations that were
published in the Federal Register on
Friday, March 24, 2006 (71 FR 14798)
concerning content requirements
applicable to explanations of qualified
joint and survivor annuities and
qualified preretirement survivor
annuities payable under certain
retirement plans.
DATES: This correction is effective
March 24, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bruce Perlin or Linda Marshall at (202)
622–6090 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The final regulations (TD 9256) that
are the subject of this correction are
under section 417 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, (TD 9256) contains an
error that may prove to be misleading
and is in need of clarification.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the final regulations (TD
9256), which was the subject of FR Doc.
06–2844, is corrected as follows:
On page 14801, in the preamble,
column 3, under the paragraph heading,
‘‘Explanation of Provisions’’, first
paragraph of the column, line 2 from the
bottom of the paragraph, the language
‘‘75% survivor annuity, and joint and’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 May 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
Background
Section 1.1502–13 of the consolidated
return regulations provides rules for
taking into account items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss of members
from intercompany transactions. In
particular, § 1.1502–13(c)(7)(ii),
Example 13 illustrates how the
matching rule of the intercompany
transaction regulations treats a
transaction involving manufacturer
incentive payments. On August 13,
2004, the IRS and Treasury Department
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–131264–04) in the
Federal Register (69 FR 50112)
proposing regulations to address
additional transactions involving
manufacturer incentive payments and to
clarify the proper treatment of such
incentive payments under the
intercompany transaction regulations.
On April 25, 2005, the IRS and
Treasury Department published Rev.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26687
Rul. 2005–28 (2005–19 IRB 997), which
suspends, in part, Rev. Rul. 76–96
(1976–1 CB 23). Rev. Rul. 2005–28
states that the IRS will not apply, and
taxpayers may not rely upon, the
conclusion reached in Rev. Rul. 76–96
that certain rebates made by a
manufacturer to retail customers are
ordinary and necessary business
expenses deductible under section 162,
pending the IRS’s reconsideration of the
issue and publication of subsequent
guidance.
Explanation of Provisions
The manufacturer incentive payment
transaction described in § 1.1502–
13(c)(7)(ii), Example 13 relies, in part,
upon the premise that the manufacturer
incentive payment is an ordinary and
necessary business expense deductible
under section 162. To the extent that
this premise is correct, this example
illustrates the proper application of the
intercompany transaction regulations.
However, because Rev. Rul. 2005–28
suspends Rev. Rul. 76–96, in pertinent
part, these final regulations remove
§ 1.1502–13(c)(7)(ii), Example 13
pending further guidance on the section
162 issue considered in Rev. Rul. 76–96.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
is hereby certified that these regulations
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. These final regulations do not
alter substantive provisions of the
intercompany transaction regulations.
They merely remove an example which
may be misleading and cause confusion
for taxpayers. Accordingly, good cause
is found for dispensing with prior notice
and comment pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b), and for dispensing with a
delayed effective date pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d). Because no notice of
proposed rulemaking is required, the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) do not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, this regulation
was submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comments on its
impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Frances Kelly of the Office
of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate). However, other personnel
from the IRS and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM
08MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4271]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9256]
RIN 1545-BD97
Revised Regulations Concerning Disclosure of Relative Values of
Optional Forms of Benefit; Correction
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Correction to final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to final regulations that
were published in the Federal Register on Friday, March 24, 2006 (71 FR
14798) concerning content requirements applicable to explanations of
qualified joint and survivor annuities and qualified preretirement
survivor annuities payable under certain retirement plans.
DATES: This correction is effective March 24, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Perlin or Linda Marshall at
(202) 622-6090 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The final regulations (TD 9256) that are the subject of this
correction are under section 417 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, (TD 9256) contains an error that may prove to be
misleading and is in need of clarification.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the final regulations (TD 9256), which was the subject
of FR Doc. 06-2844, is corrected as follows:
On page 14801, in the preamble, column 3, under the paragraph
heading, ``Explanation of Provisions'', first paragraph of the column,
line 2 from the bottom of the paragraph, the language ``75% survivor
annuity, and joint and'' is corrected to read ``75% survivor annuity,
and the joint and''.
Guy R. Traynor,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Publications and
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel,
(Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 06-4271 Filed 5-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P