Carolina Mills, Inc., Plant No. 9, Valdese, NC; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 26565 [E6-6821]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 87 / Friday, May 5, 2006 / Notices
United States and it uses all of tantalum
products in production abroad.
Conclusion
After reconsideration on remand, I
affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
adjustment assistance for workers and
former workers of Cabot Corporation,
Supermetals Division, Boyertown,
Pennsylvania.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
April, 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–6815 Filed 5–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Carolina Mills, Inc., Plant No. 9,
Valdese, NC; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application of March 28, 2006, the
subject company requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department of Labor’s Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding
Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to
workers of the subject firm. The
Department’s determination was signed
on February 24, 2006, and the Notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register on March 22, 2006 (71
FR 14550).
The subject company filed for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) as a secondarily
affected company, alleging loss of dying
and finishing business from customers
who are import-impacted.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that the subject
company did not shift commission
dying and finishing of fabric to a foreign
country or import fabric that has been
dyed and finished, and that the subject
company’s customers did not increase
imports of commission dyed and
finished fabric during the relevant
period. The Department determined that
because apparel is not considered like
or directly competitive with fabric,
increased imports of apparel cannot be
a basis for TAA certification for the
subject worker group.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and has determined that the Department
18:48 May 04, 2006
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
2006 in response to a worker petition
filed by a state agency representative on
behalf of workers at Eagle Picher,
Hillsdale, Michigan.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of
April 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–6855 Filed 5–4–06; 8:45 am]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
April 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–6821 Filed 5–4–06; 8:45 am]
Jkt 208001
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,150]
Demetron Kerr, Danbury, CT; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 4,
2006 in response to a worker petition
filed by a single worker on behalf of
workers at Demetron Kerr, Danbury,
Connecticut.
The petition regarding the
investigation has been deemed invalid.
Valid petitions must be filed by three or
more workers, by a duly authorized
representative of such workers, by
employers of such workers, by one-stop
operators, or by one-stop partners.
Consequently, the investigation has
been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of
April 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–6848 Filed 5–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,159]
Eagle Picher, Hillsdale, MI; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 5,
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,582 and TA–W–57,582B]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA–W–58,637]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
will conduct an investigation to
determine whether the subject workers
supplied components to a company
adversely impacted by imports and
whether the workers are eligible to
apply for TAA and ATAA.
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Employment and Training
Administration
26565
Sfmt 4703
EPEC, LLC, New Bedford, MA; EPEC,
LLC, Bethel, CT; Amended Notice of
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and a Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on August 16, 2005,
applicable to workers of EPEC, LLC,
New Bedford, Massachusetts. The notice
was published in the Federal Register
on September 8, 2005 (70 FR 53390).
At the request of a company official
and the State agency, the Department
reviewed the certification for workers of
the subject firm. New information
shows that worker separations have
occurred involving employees of the
New Bedford, Massachusetts facility of
EPEC, LLC located in Bethel,
Connecticut. The Bethel Connecticut
workers provide support function
services for the production of printed
circuit boards at the New Bedford,
Massachusetts location of the subject
firm.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include employees of the
New Bedford, Massachusetts facility of
EPEC, LLC located in Bethel,
Connecticut.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
EPEC, LLC, New Bedford,
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 26565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6821]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-58,637]
Carolina Mills, Inc., Plant No. 9, Valdese, NC; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application of March 28, 2006, the subject company requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The
Department's determination was signed on February 24, 2006, and the
Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on March
22, 2006 (71 FR 14550).
The subject company filed for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) as a secondarily
affected company, alleging loss of dying and finishing business from
customers who are import-impacted.
The negative determination was based on the findings that the
subject company did not shift commission dying and finishing of fabric
to a foreign country or import fabric that has been dyed and finished,
and that the subject company's customers did not increase imports of
commission dyed and finished fabric during the relevant period. The
Department determined that because apparel is not considered like or
directly competitive with fabric, increased imports of apparel cannot
be a basis for TAA certification for the subject worker group.
The Department has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and has determined that the Department will conduct an
investigation to determine whether the subject workers supplied
components to a company adversely impacted by imports and whether the
workers are eligible to apply for TAA and ATAA.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of April 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-6821 Filed 5-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
