Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petitions for Objection to State Operating Permit Amendments for Georgia Power Company-Bowen Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Cartersville (Bartow County), GA; Branch Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Milledgeville (Putnam County), GA; Hammond Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Coosa (Floyd County), GA; McDonough/Atkinson Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Smyrna (Cobb County), GA; Scherer Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Juliette (Monroe County), GA; Wansley Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Roopville (Heard County), GA; and Yates Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Newnan (Coweta County), GA, 26364-26365 [E6-6772]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
26364
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2006 / Notices
the telephone number for the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket
and Information Center Docket is (202)
566–1752.
Use EPA’s electronic docket and
comment system at https://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and
to access those documents in the docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then
key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing at https://www.regulations.gov
as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket,
go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Title: NESHAP for the Surface Coating
of Large Household and Commercial
Appliances (Renewal).
ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number
1954.03, OMB Control Number 2060–
0457.
ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to
expire on May 31, 2006. Under OMB
regulations, the Agency may continue to
conduct or sponsor the collection of
information while this submission is
pending at OMB. An Agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information, unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control numbers for EPA’s
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after
appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9,
are displayed either by publication in
the Federal Register or by other
appropriate means, such as on the
related collection instrument or form, if
applicable. The display of OMB control
numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
Abstract: Respondents are owners or
operators of large appliance surface
coating operations. Owners or operators
of the affected facilities described must
make initial reports when a source
becomes subject to the standard,
conduct and report on a performance
test, demonstrate and report on
continuous monitor performance, and
maintain records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or
malfunction in the operation of an
affected facility. Semiannual reports of
excess emissions are required. These
notifications, reports, and records are
essential in determining compliance;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:45 May 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
and are required, in general, of all
sources subject to National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP). Any owner or operator
subject to the provisions of this part
shall maintain a file of these
measurements, and retain the file for at
least five years following the date of
such measurements, maintenance
reports, and records. All reports are sent
to the delegated state or local authority.
In the event that there is no such
delegated authority, the reports are sent
directly to the EPA regional office.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are
identified on the form and/or
instrument, if applicable.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 97 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
Respondents/Affected Entities:
Owners or operators of large appliance
surface coating operations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
90.
Frequency of Response: Initial,
Semiannually, On Occasion.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
28,845.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$2,326,984, which includes $64,000
annualized capital/startup costs,
$108,000 annualized O&M costs, and
$2,154,984 annualized labor costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is an
increase of 21,108 hours in the total
estimated burden currently identified in
the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens. The increase in burden reflects
the need for facilities to be in
compliance with the rule requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
prior to the date of this ICR. The
increase in O&M costs is due to
installation and maintenance of
equipment used to verify compliance
with the rule requirements.
Dated: April 27, 2006.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E6–6770 Filed 5–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Petitions IV–2002–4 and –6 FRL–8166–7]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petitions for Objection to
State Operating Permit Amendments
for Georgia Power Company—Bowen
Steam-Electric Generating Plant,
Cartersville (Bartow County), GA;
Branch Steam-Electric Generating
Plant, Milledgeville (Putnam County),
GA; Hammond Steam-Electric
Generating Plant, Coosa (Floyd
County), GA; McDonough/Atkinson
Steam-Electric Generating Plant,
Smyrna (Cobb County), GA; Scherer
Steam-Electric Generating Plant,
Juliette (Monroe County), GA; Wansley
Steam-Electric Generating Plant,
Roopville (Heard County), GA; and
Yates Steam-Electric Generating Plant,
Newnan (Coweta County), GA
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order denying
petitions to object to state operating
permit amendments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act
Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 70.8(d),
the EPA Administrator signed an order,
dated March 15, 2006, denying two (2)
petitions to object to state operating
permit amendments issued by the
Georgia Environmental Protection
Division (EPD) to Georgia Power
Company for the following facilities:
Bowen Steam-Electric Generating Plant
located in Cartersville, Bartow County,
Georgia; Branch Steam-Electric
Generating Plant located in
Milledgeville, Putnam County, Georgia;
Hammond Steam-Electric Generating
Plant located in Coosa, Floyd County,
Georgia; McDonough/Atkinson SteamElectric Generating Plant located in
Smyrna, Cobb County, Georgia; Scherer
Steam-Electric Generating Plant located
in Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia;
Wansley Steam-Electric Generating
Plant located in Roopville, Heard
County, Georgia; and Yates SteamElectric Generating Plant located in
Newnan, Coweta County, Georgia. This
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2006 / Notices
order constitutes final action on two (2)
petitions submitted by the Georgia
Center for Law in the Public Interest
(GCLPI) on behalf of the Sierra Club,
Georgia Forest Watch, and Colleen
Kiernan and the Sierra Club and Georgia
Public Interest Research Group,
respectively. Pursuant to section
505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (the Act)
any person may seek judicial review in
the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit within 60 days of
this notice under section 307 of the Act.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Order, the
petitions, and all pertinent information
relating thereto are on file at the
following location: EPA Region 4, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. The final order is
also available electronically at the
following address: https://www.epa.gov/
region7/programs/artd/air/title5/
petitiondb/petitions/bowen7plants_decision2002.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art
Hofmeister, Air Permits Section, EPA
Region 4, at (404) 562–9115 or
hofmeister.art@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act
affords EPA a 45-day period to review
and, as appropriate, to object to
operating permits proposed by state
permitting authorities under title V of
the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f. Section
505(b)(2) of the Act and 40 CFR 70.8(d)
authorize any person to petition the
EPA Administrator to object to a title V
operating permit within 60 days after
the expiration of EPA’s 45-day review
period if EPA has not objected on its
own initiative. Petitions must be based
only on objections to the permit that
were raised with reasonable specificity
during the public comment period
provided by the state, unless the
petitioner demonstrates that it was
impracticable to raise these issues
during the comment period or the
grounds for the issues arose after this
period.
On July 9, 2002, EPA received a
petition submitted by GCLPI on behalf
of the Sierra Club, Georgia Forest
Watch, and Colleen Kiernan
(Petitioners), requesting that EPA object
to a state title V operating permit
amendment issued by EPD to Georgia
Power for Plant Bowen. On November
20, 2002, EPA received another petition
from GCLPI on behalf of the Sierra Club
and Georgia Public Interest Research
Group (Petitioners), requesting that EPA
object to another state title V operating
permit amendment issued by EPD to
Georgia Power for Plant Bowen as well
as six (6) other state title V operating
permit amendments issued for Plants
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:45 May 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
Branch, Hammond, McDonough/
Atkinson, Scherer, Wansley, and Yates.
The Petitioners maintain that the
respective permit amendments are
inconsistent with the Act because the
emissions reductions required by the
permit terms contained therein do not
qualify as offsets. Since the petitions
have been determined by EPA to be
interrelated, they have been considered
together.
On March 15, 2006, the Administrator
issued an order denying the petitions.
The order explains the reasons behind
EPA’s conclusion that the Petitioners
failed to demonstrate that the respective
permit amendments are not in
compliance with the requirements of the
Act.
Dated: April 25, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E6–6772 Filed 5–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8167–1; Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–ORD–
2006–0223]
Considerations for Developing
Alternative Health Risk Assessment
Approaches for Addressing Multiple
Chemicals, Exposures and Effects;
External Review Draft
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of peer-review workshop.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is announcing that
Eastern Research Group, Inc., an EPA
contractor for external scientific peer
review, plans to convene an
independent panel of experts and
organize and conduct an external peerreview workshop to review the external
review draft document titled,
‘‘Considerations for Developing
Alternative Health Risk Assessment
Approaches for Addressing Multiple
Chemicals, Exposures and Effects;
External Review Draft’’ (EPA/600/R–06/
013A). The draft document was
prepared by the National Center for
Environmental Assessment (NCEA)
within EPA’s Office of Research and
Development.
The external peer-review workshop
provides an opportunity for all
interested parties to comment on the
document. EPA is releasing this draft
document solely for the purpose of predissemination peer review under
applicable information quality
guidelines. This document has not been
formally disseminated by EPA. It does
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26365
not represent and should not be
construed to represent any Agency
policy or determination.
Eastern Research Group, Inc. invites
the public to register to attend this
workshop as observers. In addition,
Eastern Research Group, Inc. invites the
public to give oral and/or provide
written comments at the workshop
regarding the draft document under
review. The draft document and EPA’s
peer-review charge are available
primarily via the Internet on NCEA’s
home page under the Recent Additions
and the Data and Publications menus at
https://www.epa.gov/ncea. On March 31,
2006, EPA announced a 45-day public
comment period on the draft document
(71 FR 16306). In preparing a final
report, EPA will consider public
comments it received during the public
comment period and will consider the
Eastern Research Group, Inc. report of
the comments and recommendations
from the external peer-review
workshop.
DATES: The peer-review panel workshop
will begin on May 25, 2006, at 9 a.m.,
adjourning at 5:30 p.m. and will
continue on May 26, 2006 at 9 a.m.,
adjourning at 3 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The peer-review workshop
will be held at the Andrew W.
Briedenbach Environmental Research
Building, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr.,
Cincinnati, OH, 45268, in room AG–30.
The EPA contractor, Eastern Research
Group, Inc., is organizing, convening,
and conducting the peer-review
workshop. Observers may attend the
meeting of the expert panel by filling
out the form available on the Internet at
https://www2.ergweb.com/projects/
conferences/ncea/ or by calling Eastern
Research Group, Inc.’s conference line
between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5:30
p.m. EST at 781–674–7374 or toll free at
800–803–2833, or by faxing a
registration request to 781–674–2906
(include full address and contact
information). Pre-registration is strongly
recommended as space is limited, and
registrations will be accepted on a firstcome, first-served basis. The deadline
for online pre-registration is May 18,
2006. Telephone and fax registrations
will continue to be accepted after this
date, including on-site registration, if
space allows.
The draft ‘‘Considerations for
Developing Alternative Health Risk
Assessment Approaches for Addressing
Multiple Chemicals, Exposures and
Effects; External Review Draft’’ (EPA/
600/R–06/013A) is available primarily
via the Internet on the National Center
for Environmental Assessment’s home
page under the Recent Additions and
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26364-26365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6772]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[Petitions IV-2002-4 and -6 FRL-8166-7]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petitions for Objection
to State Operating Permit Amendments for Georgia Power Company--Bowen
Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Cartersville (Bartow County), GA;
Branch Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Milledgeville (Putnam County),
GA; Hammond Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Coosa (Floyd County), GA;
McDonough/Atkinson Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Smyrna (Cobb
County), GA; Scherer Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Juliette (Monroe
County), GA; Wansley Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Roopville (Heard
County), GA; and Yates Steam-Electric Generating Plant, Newnan (Coweta
County), GA
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order denying petitions to object to state
operating permit amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR
70.8(d), the EPA Administrator signed an order, dated March 15, 2006,
denying two (2) petitions to object to state operating permit
amendments issued by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division
(EPD) to Georgia Power Company for the following facilities: Bowen
Steam-Electric Generating Plant located in Cartersville, Bartow County,
Georgia; Branch Steam-Electric Generating Plant located in
Milledgeville, Putnam County, Georgia; Hammond Steam-Electric
Generating Plant located in Coosa, Floyd County, Georgia; McDonough/
Atkinson Steam-Electric Generating Plant located in Smyrna, Cobb
County, Georgia; Scherer Steam-Electric Generating Plant located in
Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia; Wansley Steam-Electric Generating
Plant located in Roopville, Heard County, Georgia; and Yates Steam-
Electric Generating Plant located in Newnan, Coweta County, Georgia.
This
[[Page 26365]]
order constitutes final action on two (2) petitions submitted by the
Georgia Center for Law in the Public Interest (GCLPI) on behalf of the
Sierra Club, Georgia Forest Watch, and Colleen Kiernan and the Sierra
Club and Georgia Public Interest Research Group, respectively. Pursuant
to section 505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) any person may seek
judicial review in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit within 60 days of this notice under section 307 of
the Act.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Order, the petitions, and all pertinent
information relating thereto are on file at the following location: EPA
Region 4, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The final order is also
available electronically at the following address: https://www.epa.gov/
region7/programs/artd/air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/bowen-7plants_
decision2002.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art Hofmeister, Air Permits Section,
EPA Region 4, at (404) 562-9115 or hofmeister.art@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act affords EPA a 45-day period to
review and, as appropriate, to object to operating permits proposed by
state permitting authorities under title V of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7661-
7661f. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act and 40 CFR 70.8(d) authorize any
person to petition the EPA Administrator to object to a title V
operating permit within 60 days after the expiration of EPA's 45-day
review period if EPA has not objected on its own initiative. Petitions
must be based only on objections to the permit that were raised with
reasonable specificity during the public comment period provided by the
state, unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to
raise these issues during the comment period or the grounds for the
issues arose after this period.
On July 9, 2002, EPA received a petition submitted by GCLPI on
behalf of the Sierra Club, Georgia Forest Watch, and Colleen Kiernan
(Petitioners), requesting that EPA object to a state title V operating
permit amendment issued by EPD to Georgia Power for Plant Bowen. On
November 20, 2002, EPA received another petition from GCLPI on behalf
of the Sierra Club and Georgia Public Interest Research Group
(Petitioners), requesting that EPA object to another state title V
operating permit amendment issued by EPD to Georgia Power for Plant
Bowen as well as six (6) other state title V operating permit
amendments issued for Plants Branch, Hammond, McDonough/Atkinson,
Scherer, Wansley, and Yates. The Petitioners maintain that the
respective permit amendments are inconsistent with the Act because the
emissions reductions required by the permit terms contained therein do
not qualify as offsets. Since the petitions have been determined by EPA
to be interrelated, they have been considered together.
On March 15, 2006, the Administrator issued an order denying the
petitions. The order explains the reasons behind EPA's conclusion that
the Petitioners failed to demonstrate that the respective permit
amendments are not in compliance with the requirements of the Act.
Dated: April 25, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. E6-6772 Filed 5-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P