Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Liberty Bayou, LA, 26290-26292 [E6-6738]
Download as PDF
26290
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2006 / Proposed Rules
in the regulated area shall stop the
vessel immediately when instructed to
do so by the Official Patrol and then
proceed as directed. When authorized to
transit the regulated area, all vessels
shall proceed at a minimum safe speed
necessary to maintain a safe course that
minimizes wake near the race course.
(d) Enforcement. This section will be
enforced from annually 11:30 a.m. to
6:30 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday of
Labor Day weekend. If the races are
postponed due to weather, then the
special local regulations will be
enforced during the same time period
on Monday, Labor Day. A notice of
enforcement of this section will be
published annually in the Federal
Register and disseminated through the
Fifth District Local Notice to Mariners
and marine safety radio broadcasts.
Dated: April 21, 2006.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–6732 Filed 5–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08–06–010]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Liberty Bayou, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulations governing the
State Route 433 (S433) pontoon span
bridge across Liberty Bayou, mile 2.0, at
Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana.
The State of Louisiana, Department of
Transportation and Development, has
requested that the notice required for an
opening of the draw be changed from 12
hours to 4 hours.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
July 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpb), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500
Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130–3310. The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 May 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the Bridge
Administration office between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil
Johnson, Bridge Administration Branch,
telephone 504–589–2965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking [CGD08–06–010],
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. You may submit a request for
a meeting by writing to Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U.S. Coast Guard, at the request
of the Louisiana Department of
Transportation and Development
(LDOTD), proposes to change the
existing operating regulation of the S433
Pontoon Span Bridge across Liberty
Bayou, mile 2.0, at Slidell, Louisiana.
The change will reduce the minimum
notice, required for an opening of the
draw, from 12 hours to 4 hours.
Currently, the draw opens on signal;
except that from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the
draw will open on signal if at least 12
hours notice is given. LDOTD is
changing the bridge tender work
schedule, which has reduced the time
required for a bridge tender to man the
bridge for an opening.
Traffic counts indicate that an average
of 6000 vehicles cross the bridge daily
and approximately 220 or about 3.7% of
those vehicles cross between the hours
of 9 p.m. and 5 a.m. Bridge tender logs
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for a three-month period show that the
bridge opens on an average of 6 times
per day to pass vessels. None of the
vessel openings during these months
were between the hours of 9 p.m. and
5 a.m.
Navigation at the site of the bridge
consists primarily of recreational fishing
vessels, recreational powerboats and
sailboats. Alternate routes are not
available.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would change the
existing regulation in 33 CFR 117.469 to
decrease the length of time that is
required for a vessel to request an
opening of the draw from 12 hours to 4
hours. LDOTD is changing the bridge
tender work schedule, which has
reduced the time required for a bridge
tender to man the bridge for an opening.
Thus, it is no longer necessary to require
a full 12-hour notice for a drawbridge
opening. As a result of this change,
mariners will be able to more easily
schedule passage through the bridge.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security. We
expect the economic impact of this
proposed rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. The Coast Guard
does not consider this rule to be
‘‘significant’’ under that Order because
it does not adversely affect the way
vessels operate on the waterway.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would not
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2006 / Proposed Rules
adversely affect the owners and
operators of vessels needing to transit
the bridge between 9 p.m. and 5 a.m.
daily. It would benefit the mariner in
that it would reduce the time needed to
give notice to request an opening of the
draw.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the Eighth
Coast Guard District Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
above. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 May 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
discuss the effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
26291
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
proposed rule is categorically excluded,
under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
Paragraph (32)(e) excludes the
promulgation of operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges from the
environmental documentation
requirements of NEPA. Since this
proposed rule will alter the normal
operating conditions of the drawbridge,
it falls within this exclusion.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); § 117.255 also issued under
the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106 Stat.
5039.
2. Section 117.469 is revised to read
as follows:
Technical Standards
§ 117.469
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
The draw of the S433 bridge, mile 2.0
at Slidell, shall open on signal; except
that, from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw
shall open on signal if at least 4 hours
notice is given.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
Liberty Bayou.
04MYP1
26292
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 86 / Thursday, May 4, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Dated: April 25, 2006.
R.F. Duncan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–6738 Filed 5–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related materials in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01–06–032]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; City of Lynn, Fourth of
July Fireworks Display, Nahant Bay,
MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone for the
City of Lynn ‘‘Fourth of July Fireworks’’
occurring in Nahant Bay, Massachusetts.
This safety zone is necessary to protect
the life and property of the maritime
public from the potential hazards
associated with a fireworks display. The
safety zone would temporarily prohibit
entry into or movement within this
portion of Nahant Bay during the
closure period.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
June 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Sector Boston,
427 Commercial Street, Boston, MA.
Sector Boston maintains the public
docket for this rulemaking. Comments
and material received from the public,
as well as documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket will become part of this docket
and will be available for inspection or
copying at Sector Boston, 427
Commercial Street, Boston, MA between
the hours of 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Petty Officer Paul English, Sector
Boston, Waterways Management
Division, at (617) 223–5007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
the rulemaking (CGD01–06–032),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 May 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting; however, you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to
Sector Boston at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would
be beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
This rule proposes to establish a
safety zone on the waters of Nahant Bay
within a 400-yard radius of the
fireworks barge located at approximate
position 42° 27′.686″ N, 070°55′.101″ W.
The safety zone would be in effect from
8 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. EDT on July 3,
2006.
The safety zone would temporarily
restrict movement within the effected
portion of Nahant Bay and is needed to
protect the maritime public from the
dangers posed by a fireworks display.
Marine traffic may transit safely outside
the safety zone during the effective
period. The Captain of the Port does not
anticipate any negative impact on vessel
traffic due to this event. Public
notifications will be made prior to the
effective period of this proposed rule via
safety marine information broadcasts
and Local Notice to Mariners.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
a temporary safety zone in Nahant Bay.
The safety zone would be in effect from
8 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. EDT on July 3,
2006. Marine traffic may transit safely
outside of the zone in the majority of
Nahant Bay during the event. This
safety zone would control vessel traffic
during the fireworks display to protect
the safety of the maritime public.
Due to the limited time frame of the
fireworks display, the Captain of the
Port anticipates minimal negative
impact on vessel traffic due to this
event. Public notifications will be made
prior to the effective period via local
media, local notice to mariners and
marine information broadcasts.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary.
Although this proposed rule would
prevent traffic from transiting a portion
of Nahant Bay during the closure
period, the effects of this rule would not
be significant for several reasons:
Vessels will be excluded from the
proscribed area for only two and one
half hours, vessels will be able to transit
around the zone in the unrestricted
portion or Nahant Bay during the event,
and advance notifications will be made
to the local maritime community by
marine information broadcasts and
Local Notice to Mariners notifying them
or the parameters and effective period of
the zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the effected portion of
Nahant Bay from 8 p.m. EDT on July 3,
2006 to 10:30 p.m. EDT on July 3, 2006.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This proposed
rule would be in effect for only two and
one half hours, vessel traffic could pass
safely around the safety zone during the
closure period, and advance
notifications via safety marine
informational broadcasts and Local
Notice to Mariners will be made before
and during the effective period.
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26290-26292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6738]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08-06-010]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Liberty Bayou, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the regulations governing
the State Route 433 (S433) pontoon span bridge across Liberty Bayou,
mile 2.0, at Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana. The State of
Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development, has requested
that the notice required for an opening of the draw be changed from 12
hours to 4 hours.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before July 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander
(dpb), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans,
Louisiana 70130-3310. The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District,
Bridge Administration Branch maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or
copying at the Bridge Administration office between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil Johnson, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone 504-589-2965.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking [CGD08-06-
010], indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. You may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District, Bridge Administration Branch at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U.S. Coast Guard, at the request of the Louisiana Department of
Transportation and Development (LDOTD), proposes to change the existing
operating regulation of the S433 Pontoon Span Bridge across Liberty
Bayou, mile 2.0, at Slidell, Louisiana. The change will reduce the
minimum notice, required for an opening of the draw, from 12 hours to 4
hours. Currently, the draw opens on signal; except that from 9 p.m. to
5 a.m. the draw will open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is
given. LDOTD is changing the bridge tender work schedule, which has
reduced the time required for a bridge tender to man the bridge for an
opening.
Traffic counts indicate that an average of 6000 vehicles cross the
bridge daily and approximately 220 or about 3.7% of those vehicles
cross between the hours of 9 p.m. and 5 a.m. Bridge tender logs for a
three-month period show that the bridge opens on an average of 6 times
per day to pass vessels. None of the vessel openings during these
months were between the hours of 9 p.m. and 5 a.m.
Navigation at the site of the bridge consists primarily of
recreational fishing vessels, recreational powerboats and sailboats.
Alternate routes are not available.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would change the existing regulation in 33 CFR
117.469 to decrease the length of time that is required for a vessel to
request an opening of the draw from 12 hours to 4 hours. LDOTD is
changing the bridge tender work schedule, which has reduced the time
required for a bridge tender to man the bridge for an opening. Thus, it
is no longer necessary to require a full 12-hour notice for a
drawbridge opening. As a result of this change, mariners will be able
to more easily schedule passage through the bridge.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security. We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule
to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory
policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. The Coast Guard does not
consider this rule to be ``significant'' under that Order because it
does not adversely affect the way vessels operate on the waterway.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would not
[[Page 26291]]
adversely affect the owners and operators of vessels needing to transit
the bridge between 9 p.m. and 5 a.m. daily. It would benefit the
mariner in that it would reduce the time needed to give notice to
request an opening of the draw.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the Eighth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administration Branch at the address above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this proposed rule is categorically excluded,
under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Paragraph (32)(e) excludes the
promulgation of operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges
from the environmental documentation requirements of NEPA. Since this
proposed rule will alter the normal operating conditions of the
drawbridge, it falls within this exclusion.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Sec. 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
2. Section 117.469 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 117.469 Liberty Bayou.
The draw of the S433 bridge, mile 2.0 at Slidell, shall open on
signal; except that, from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw shall open on
signal if at least 4 hours notice is given.
[[Page 26292]]
Dated: April 25, 2006.
R.F. Duncan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6-6738 Filed 5-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P