Proposed Information Collection Activity: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 26178-26179 [E6-6697]
Download as PDF
26178
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
find it advantageous to fail to private
counterparties in their efforts to avoid
failing back to the Treasury, potentially
exacerbating the fails situation that the
SLLR would be intended to address. For
this reason, it might be reasonable to
treat fails back to Treasury in the same
manner that fails among private
counterparties are treated. The original
loan could be extended on a daily basis
at a zero percent rate with the lending
fee thus set equal to the overnight
general collateral repo rate.
6. Legislative, Regulatory, and
Implementation Issues
Beyond determining the structure for
the proposed SLLR, there are a number
of issues that would need to be
addressed prior to implementation,
including statutory changes concerning
the Treasury’s borrowing authority, debt
limit accounting, and the tax treatment
of borrowed securities. Each of these is
considered in more detail below.
• Authority to Issue Securities for the
Purpose of Securities Lending.
Although this paper describes the
proposed transactions of the SLLR as
‘‘lending,’’ Treasury would actually be
issuing additional securities for a
temporary period of time. The Secretary
of the Treasury (‘‘Secretary’’) is
authorized under Chapter 31 of Title 31,
United States Code, to issue Treasury
securities and to prescribe terms and
conditions for their issuance and sale.
The Secretary is authorized to borrow
amounts necessary for expenditures
authorized by law and may issue
securities for the amounts borrowed,
and may also issue securities to buy,
redeem or refund outstanding securities.
These authorities do not appear to
encompass the activities of the proposed
SLLR. As a result, Treasury would likely
need to pursue new authority to issue
securities for the purpose of securities
lending in order to implement an SLLR.
• Debt Limit Treatment.
Treasury would also need to consider
the implications of issuing additional
securities, even on a temporary basis, on
the debt subject to limit. A bond-forbond SLLR may not provide a one-forone offset accounting treatment for debt
limit purposes. Under the current debt
limit treatment, the par amount of the
debt pledged as collateral to the facility
could partially or fully offset the par
amount of the securities that are lent.
However, because the SLLR would
likely use the market value of the
collateral to determine the market value
of borrowed and margined securities, to
the degree that market values and par
values differ, there would not be a onefor-one debt limit accounting offset in a
bond-for-bond SLLR structure. For
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
example, if all securities trade close to
their par values, borrowing at the SLLR
would tend to reduce the debt subject to
the limit because the par value of
securities pledged as collateral
(including the margin) would tend to
exceed the par value of securities
borrowed. However, if the market value
of pledged securities were substantially
above par value, borrowing from the
SLLR would likely increase the debt
subject to limit. Given this uncertainty,
Treasury might need to suspend the
SLLR lending activity during the period
leading up to debt-limit increases unless
there is a legislative change to the
current debt limit treatment.
• Tax Treatment.
Some tax issues would need to be
addressed. For example, to ensure that
Treasury securities borrowed from the
lending facility are fully fungible with
the outstanding securities, both the
outstanding securities and the securities
borrowed from the facility would have
to be treated for Federal tax purposes as
being part of the same issue. It may be
necessary to seek legislation regarding
this treatment.
7. Conclusion
As noted at the outset, maintaining a
safe, efficient, and liquid Treasury
market is a critical public policy
objective. Treasury is seeking comments
on whether a well constructed SLLR
might provide low cost insurance
against certain types of market
disruptions during times of financial
market crisis. An ideal facility would
rarely be utilized, but would be
available to mitigate strains in the
Treasury market and in broader
financial markets. As noted above, there
are potential costs to be considered as
well, including possible increases in
moral hazard and the risk of significant
gaming of the facility.
Public input in evaluating and
designing a SLLR is essential and we
invite comment on any aspect of the
proposed facility, including whether it
should be established at all. Treasury
takes no position on whether a SLLR
should be established or, if such a
facility were established, how it should
be structured. In this regard, comments
focusing on potential benefits and costs
associated with a SLLR together with an
overall assessment of the desirability of
establishing a SLLR would be
particularly useful. In addition,
comments on the various facets of the
proposed structure, including various
terms and conditions and other
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
operational details, would also be most
welcome.
Emil W. Henry, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E6–6639 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4811–37–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
[OMB Control No. 2900–New (FSC)]
Proposed Information Collection
Activity: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Office of Management,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Management
(OM), Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA), is announcing an opportunity for
public comment on the proposed
collection of certain information by the
agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, Federal agencies are
required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each existing collection in use
without an OMB control number, and
allow 60 days for public comment in
response to the notice. This notice
solicits comments on information
needed to obtain customers satisfaction
on Financial Services Center (FSC)
business process and system features.
DATES: Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
collection of information should be
received on or before July 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the collection of information to
Rachel A. Moffitt, Office of
Management, Financial Services Center
(104/BDD), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 1615 Woodward Street, Austin,
TX, 79772–001 or e-mail
rachel.moffitt@mail.va.gov. Please refer
to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–New (FSC)’’
in any correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel A. Moffitt at (512) 460–5310 or
fax to (512) 460–5117.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA of 1995 (Public Law 104–13; 44
U.S.C. 3501–3521), Federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. This request for comment is
being made pursuant to Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA.
With respect to the following
collection of information, OM invites
comments on: (1) Whether the proposed
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Notices
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of OM’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of OM’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
the use of other forms of information
technology.
Titles: FSC Product Line Survey.
OMB Control Number: 2900–New
(FSC).
Type of Review: Existing collection in
use without an OMB control number.
Abstract: Financial Services Center
conducts annual surveys to evaluate
customer satisfaction on various
products and services. FCS data will use
the data to improve FSC business
practices and customer services.
Affected Public: Federal Government.
Estimated Annual Burden: 42 hours.
Estimated Average Burden Per
Respondent: 5 minutes.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
500.
Dated: April 25, 2006.
By direction of the Secretary.
Denise McLamb,
Program Analyst, Records Management
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–6697 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
[OMB Control No. 2900–New (VDBCS)]
Agency Information Collection:
Emergency Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Office of Policy, Planning and
Preparedness, Department of Veterans
Affairs
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521), this notice
announces that the United States
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA),
has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) the
following emergency proposal for the
collection of information under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3507(j)(1)). VA is
requesting an emergency clearance for
the Veterans’ Disability Benefits
Commission Survey regarding disability
rating system for veterans and their
survivors.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before June 2, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF
THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Denise
McLamb, Records Management Service
(005E3), Department of Veterans Affairs,
810 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 565–8374,
FAX (202) 565–6950 or e-mail:
denise.mclamb@mail.va.gov. Please
refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–New
(VDBCS). Send comments and
recommendations concerning any
aspect of the information collection to
VA’s OMB Desk Officer, OMB Human
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26179
Resources and Housing Branch, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395–7316
or FAX (202) 395–6974. Please refer to
‘‘2900–New (VDBCS).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Veterans’ Disability Benefits
Commission Survey.
OMB Control Number: 2900–New
(VDBCS).
Type of Review: New Collection.
Abstract: The data collected on the
Veterans’ Disability Benefits
Commission Survey will be used to
determine whether disabled veterans
and their survivors are properly
compensated for their loss of quality of
life under the current disability rating
system. VA will use the data collected
to develop an overall measure of
disabled veterans and their survivors’
quality of life and to modify existing
policies already in place for
implementing service-connected
disability rating scale.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households and Not-for-ProfitInstitutions.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
12,703 hours.
Estimated Average Burden Per
Respondent: 30 minutes.
Frequency of Response: One time.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
24,739.
Dated: April 21, 2006.
By direction of the Secretary.
Denise McLamb,
Program Analyst, Records Management
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–6703 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26178-26179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6697]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
[OMB Control No. 2900-New (FSC)]
Proposed Information Collection Activity: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Office of Management, Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Management (OM), Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA), is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed
collection of certain information by the agency. Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, Federal agencies are required to publish
notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each existing collection in use without an OMB
control number, and allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on information needed to obtain
customers satisfaction on Financial Services Center (FSC) business
process and system features.
DATES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposed collection
of information should be received on or before July 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the collection of information to
Rachel A. Moffitt, Office of Management, Financial Services Center
(104/BDD), Department of Veterans Affairs, 1615 Woodward Street,
Austin, TX, 79772-001 or e-mail rachel.moffitt@mail.va.gov. Please
refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-New (FSC)'' in any correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel A. Moffitt at (512) 460-5310 or
fax to (512) 460-5117.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA of 1995 (Public Law 104-13; 44
U.S.C. 3501-3521), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor. This request for comment is being
made pursuant to Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA.
With respect to the following collection of information, OM invites
comments on: (1) Whether the proposed
[[Page 26179]]
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
OM's functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of OM's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or the use
of other forms of information technology.
Titles: FSC Product Line Survey.
OMB Control Number: 2900-New (FSC).
Type of Review: Existing collection in use without an OMB control
number.
Abstract: Financial Services Center conducts annual surveys to
evaluate customer satisfaction on various products and services. FCS
data will use the data to improve FSC business practices and customer
services.
Affected Public: Federal Government.
Estimated Annual Burden: 42 hours.
Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 5 minutes.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 500.
Dated: April 25, 2006.
By direction of the Secretary.
Denise McLamb,
Program Analyst, Records Management Service.
[FR Doc. E6-6697 Filed 5-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P