Inert Ingredients; Proposed Revocation of Tolerance Exemptions with Insufficient Data for Reassessment, 25993-26000 [06-4154]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
areas shall not exceed one-sixteenth
(1⁄16) acre in size and total not more than
ten percent (10%) of the area seeded.
We have received several requests for
a public hearing on the proposed rule.
We are extending the public comment
period in order to afford the public more
time to comment and to allow enough
time to schedule and hold the hearing.
The date, time, and location for the
public hearing may be found under
DATES and ADDRESSES above.
The hearings will be open to anyone
who would like to attend and/or testify.
The primary purpose of the public
hearing is to obtain your comments on
the proposed rule so that we can
prepare a complete and objective
analysis of the proposal. The purpose of
the hearing officer is to conduct the
hearing and receive the comments
submitted. Comments submitted during
the hearing will be responded to in the
preamble to the final rule, not at the
hearing. We appreciate all comments
but those most useful and likely to
influence decisions on the final rule
will be those that either involve
personal experience or include citations
to and analyses of the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, its
legislative history, its implementing
regulations, case law, other State or
Federal laws and regulations, data,
technical literature, or relevant
publications.
At the hearing, a court reporter will
record and make a written record of the
statements presented. This written
record will be made part of the
administrative record for the rule. If you
have a written copy of your testimony,
we encourage you to give us a copy. It
will assist the court reporter in
preparing the written record. Any
disabled individual who needs
reasonable accommodation to attend the
public hearing is encouraged to contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: April 25, 2006.
H. Vann Weaver,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E6–6653 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am]
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0230; FRL–8060–9]
Inert Ingredients; Proposed
Revocation of Tolerance Exemptions
with Insufficient Data for
Reassessment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document proposes
under section 408(e)(1) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
to revoke the existing exemptions from
the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of certain inert ingredients
because there are insufficient data to
make the determination of safety
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2), or
because they are redundant and,
therefore, are not necessary. In addition,
EPA has identified substances within
certain of these tolerance exemptions
that meet the definition of low-risk
polymers and is proposing to establish
new tolerance exemptions for them. The
revocation actions proposed in this
document contribute towards the
Agency’s tolerance reassessment
requirements under FFDCA section
408(q), as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996. By law,
EPA is required by August 2006 to
reassess the tolerances that were in
existence on August 2, 1996. The
regulatory actions proposed in this
document pertain to the proposed
revocation of 129 tolerance exemptions
which would be counted as tolerance
reassessment toward the August 2006
review deadline.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0230, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502C),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPP Regulatory
Public Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal
Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA.
Deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25993
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
• Important Note: OPP will be
moving to a new location the first week
of May 2006. As a result, from Friday,
April 28 to Friday, May 5, 2006, the
OPP Regulatory Public Docket will NOT
be accepting any deliveries at the
Crystal Mall #2 address and this facility
will be closed to the public. Beginning
on May 8, 2006, the OPP Regulatory
Public Docket will reopen at 8:30 a.m.
and deliveries will be accepted in Rm.
S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington,
VA 22202. The mail code for the
mailing address will change to (7502P),
but will otherwise remain the same. The
OPP Regulatory Public Docket
telephone number and hours of
operation will remain the same after the
move.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–
0230. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made
available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The Federal regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
25994
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov,
or, if only available in hard copy, at the
OPP Regulatory Public Docket at the
location identified under ‘‘Delivery’’
and ‘‘Important Note.’’ The hours of
operation for this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kerry Leifer, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–8811; e-mail address:
leifer.kerry@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions in
Unit II. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
1. Revocation because of insufficient
data. EPA is now in the process of
reassessing all inert ingredient
exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance (‘‘tolerance exemptions’’)
established prior to August 2, 1996, as
required by FFDCA section 408(q).
Under FFDCA section 408(q), tolerance
reassessment may lead to regulatory
action under FFDCA section 408(e)(1).
When taking action under FFDCA
section 408(e)(1), EPA may leave a
tolerance exemption in effect only if the
Agency determines that the tolerance
exemption is safe. EPA is proposing to
revoke 129 inert ingredient tolerance
exemptions because insufficient data are
available to the Agency to make the
safety determination required by FFDCA
section 408(c)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
In making the FFDCA reassessment
safety determination, EPA considers the
validity, completeness, and reliability of
the data that are available to the Agency,
FFDCA section 408 (b)(2)(D), and the
available information concerning the
special susceptibility of infants and
children (including developmental
effects from in utero exposure), FFDCA
section 408 (b)(2)(C). Data gaps exist for
these inert ingredients in areas critical
to reassessment. Without these data, the
assessment of possible effects to infants
and children cannot be made. Thus,
EPA has insufficient data to make the
safety finding of FFDCA section
408(c)(2) and is proposing to revoke the
inert ingredient tolerance exemptions
identified in this document.
In developing risk assessment
documents for inert ingredient tolerance
exemptions, EPA currently reviews data
submitted to the Agency as well as
information from reputable, publicly
available sources. For example, studies
may be available in professional (peerreviewed) journals, and chemical
assessments may be available on the
Internet from U.S. Government agencies
(e.g., EPA, the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry,
National Institutes of Health, Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)) and
international organizations (e.g., World
Health Organization, Organization for
Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD)). In some cases,
representatives from chemical and
pesticide manufacturing industry
associations endeavored to locate data
to support reassessment of surfactant
chemicals. Nonetheless, sufficient valid
and reliable data were not available to
make the requisite FFDCA safety
finding.
EPA could not have made the
requisite FFDCA safety finding unless,
at the very least, a set of basic toxicity
studies had been available to the
Agency. It is possible that the tests
agreed to under OECD’s Screening
Information Data Set (SIDS) program
would have sufficed. Especially
important to inert ingredient
reassessment is an acceptable repeatdose study. The preferred test for repeatdose toxicity is the ‘‘Combined
Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the
Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity
Screening Test’’ (OECD Test Guideline
422). More information about the OECD
SIDS and EPA’s High Production
Volume (HPV) programs is found at
https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemrtk/
sidsappb.htm. In some cases, the full
OECD SIDS may not have been
necessary because EPA has available a
limited number of studies and
information on some of the inert
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
ingredients in question (e.g., acute
toxicity studies). In other cases, the
limited toxicity information available to
the Agency may indicate a need for
further testing. EPA always recommends
that parties interested in supporting an
inert ingredient consult with the Agency
prior to embarking on a testing strategy
in order to determine existing data gaps
and if testing certain chemicals within
a multi-chemical exemption would
serve to represent the entire exemption.
The Agency is proposing to revoke
one other inert ingredient because it
does not have sufficient data, as
discussed earlier. The inert ingredient’s
two tolerance exemptions in 40 CFR
180.1001(c) and (e) were inadvertently
removed from the CFR between the
1999 and 2003 editions. Since that time,
180.1001(c) and (e) have been renamed
as 40 CFR 180.910 and 189.930,
respectively. These tolerance
exemptions were omitted from the CFR
by mistake, therefore, they are
considered to be active tolerance
exemptions under 40 CFR 180.910 and
180.930 that are subject to reassessment
as required by the FFDCA section
408(q). The tolerance exemption under
40 CFR 180.910 reads as follows: ‘‘aAlkyl(C12-C15)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate,
ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 3
moles.’’ The name of the tolerance
exemption under 40 CFR 180.930 differs
slightly but not substantively, and reads
as follows: ‘‘a-Alkyl (C12-C15)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate and
its ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 3
moles.’’ As stated in this unit, this inert
ingredient does not has sufficient data
and EPA is proposing to revoke the
tolerance exemptions in 40 CFR 180.910
and 180.930.
In summary, the safety finding
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2)
cannot be made for certain inert
ingredient tolerance exemptions due to
insufficient data. Therefore, EPA is
proposing to revoke under FFDCA
section 408(e)(1) the tolerance
exemptions identified at the end of this
document under 40 CFR 180.910,
180.920, 180.930, and 180.940, with the
revocations effective 2 years after the
date of publication of the final rule in
the Federal Register.
EPA is planning to hold two identical
public meetings about this proposed
action on inert ingredient tolerance
exemptions with insufficient data for
reassessment. EPA will review its
reassessment progress for inert
ingredients, describe the Agency’s data
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
finding efforts, discuss data needs and
the screening level studies that may
suffice, and other topics that may prove
useful to those who are considering
developing data in support of these inert
ingredients. Both identical public
meetings will be held on Tuesday, May
23, 2006, at the Office of Pesticide
Program’s new office building located at
One Potomac Yard, 2777 S. Crystal Dr.,
Arlington, VA, 22202. The first meeting
will be held from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. and
the second meeting will be from 1 p.m.
to 3 p.m. In order to ensure adequate
space for attendees, the Agency requests
an RSVP from those who are interested
in attending the public meetings. Please
RSVP to Karen Angulo at either (703)
306–0404 or angulo.karen@epa.gov, and
indicate whether you prefer the morning
or afternoon meeting and the number of
attendees in your group. The formal
announcement of these public meetings
appears elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
2. Five new tolerance exemptions for
polymer chemicals—i. Exemptions.
Several of the tolerance exemptions
discussed in this unit include numerous
chemicals. While EPA does not have
sufficient data to make the safety
finding for all of the chemicals within
these multi-chemical exemptions, EPA
has identified certain chemicals within
these exemptions that meet the criteria
specified in accordance with the Toxic
Substances Control Act for defining a
low-risk polymer under 40 CFR 723.250.
Polymers that are eligible for exemption
under 40 CFR 723.250 will not present
an unreasonable risk of injury to human
health and the environment. Therefore,
EPA is proposing to establish five
tolerance exemptions under 40 CFR
180.960.
ii. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
Unlike other pesticides for which EPA
has followed a cumulative risk approach
based on a common mechanism of
toxicity, EPA has not made a common
mechanism of toxicity finding as to
these chemicals and any other
substances and these chemicals do not
appear to produce a toxic metabolite
produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action,
therefore, EPA has not assumed that
these chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity with other
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25995
substances. For information regarding
EPA’s efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism
of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals,
see the policy statements released by
EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs
concerning common mechanism
determinations and procedures for
cumulating effects from substances
found to have a common mechanism on
EPA’s Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
pesticides/cumulative.
iii. Determination of safety for U.S.
population, infants and children.
Dietary (food and drinking water) and
residential risks are not of concern for
chemicals that meet the criteria
specified for defining a low-risk
polymer in 40 CFR 723.250. Therefore,
EPA finds that exempting these polymer
chemicals in 40 CFR 180.960 will be
safe for the general population
including infants and children.
iv. Analytical enforcement
methodology. An analytical method is
not required for the new tolerance
exemption for enforcement purposes
because the Agency is establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance.
3. Revocations for administrative
reasons. The Agency has identified
seven tolerance exemptions that can be
revoked for administrative reasons, as
described in this unit.
i. The Agency has determined that
two tolerance exemptions describe
chemicals and substances that do not
exist, and can be revoked on the date of
publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register.
a. The first exemption is ‘‘Ethyl vinyl
acetate (CAS Reg. No. 24937–78–8)’’
under 40 CFR 180.930. This chemical
name is wrong; the correct name
associated with this CAS Reg. No. is
‘‘Ethylene, polymer with vinyl acetate.’’
This CAS Reg. No. already has a
tolerance exemption under 40 CFR
180.960 (polymers), therefore, the
tolerance exemption under 40 CFR
180.930 is unnecessary and can be
revoked.
b. The second exemption is for ‘‘a(Methylene (4-(1,1,3,3tetramethylbutyl)-o-phenylene)bis-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) having 6–7.5
moles of ethylene oxide per hydroxyl
group.’’ This name is in error because it
describes a chemical that does not exist.
Therefore, the tolerance exemption
under 40 CFR 180.930 can be revoked.
ii. The Agency has identified five
tolerance exemptions that can be
revoked because they are redundant.
These redundant tolerance exemptions
are unnecessary and can be revoked on
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
25996
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
the date of publication of the final rule
in the Federal Register.
a. The tolerance exemption ‘‘Sodium
mono- and dimethyl
naphthalenesulfonate; molecular weight
(in amu) 245–260’’ under 40 CFR
180.920 is unnecessary because there is
an identically named exemption in 40
CFR 180.910.
b. The tolerance exemptions ‘‘Sodium
butyl naphthalenesulfonate’’ under 40
CFR 180.920 and 180.930 can be
revoked because they are included in
the broader tolerance exemptions
‘‘Sodium mono-, di-, and tributyl
naphthalenesulfonates’’ in 40 CFR
180.910 and 180.930.
c. Similarly, the two tolerance
exemptions called ‘‘a-[p-(1,1,3,3Tetramethylbutyl) phenyl]-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of p-(1,1,3,3tetramethylbutyl) phenol with an
average of 4–14 or 30–70 moles of
ethylene oxide; ...’’ under 40 CFR
180.910 and 180.930 can be revoked
because they are included in the broader
tolerance exemptions that are also in 40
CFR 180.910 and 180.930 that have ‘‘a[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of p-(1,1,3,3tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a range of
1–14 or 30–70 moles of ethylene
oxide;....’’
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking this Action?
A ‘‘tolerance’’ represents the
maximum level for residues of pesticide
chemicals legally allowed in or on raw
agricultural commodities and processed
foods. Section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a, as amended by FQPA, Public Law
104–170, authorizes the establishment
of tolerances, exemptions from tolerance
requirements, modifications in
tolerances, and revocation of tolerances
for residues of pesticide chemicals in or
on raw agricultural commodities and
processed foods. Without a tolerance or
exemption, food containing pesticide
residues is considered to be unsafe and
therefore ‘‘adulterated’’ under FFDCA
section 402(a), 21 U.S.C. 342(a). Such
food may not be distributed in interstate
commerce (21 U.S.C. 331(a)). For a fooduse pesticide to be sold and distributed,
the pesticide must not only have
appropriate tolerances under FFDCA,
but also must be registered under
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136
et seq.). Food-use pesticides not
registered in the United States must
have tolerances in order for
commodities treated with those
pesticides to be imported into the
United States.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
C. When do These Actions Become
Effective?
1. EPA is proposing to revoke the
tolerance exemptions identified in this
document that have insufficient data
effective 2 years after the date of
publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register. Any commodities
listed in this proposal treated with
pesticide products containing the inert
ingredients and in the channels of trade
following the tolerance revocations,
shall be subject to FFDCA section
408(1)(5), as established by FQPA.
Under this section, any residues of these
pesticide chemicals in or on such food
shall not render the food adulterated so
long as it is shown to the satisfaction of
FDA that:
i. The residue is present as the result
of an application or use of the pesticide
at a time and in a manner that was
lawful under FIFRA.
ii. The residue does not exceed the
level that was authorized at the time of
the application or use to be present on
the food under a tolerance or exemption
from tolerance. Evidence to show that
food was lawfully treated may include
records that verify the dates when the
pesticide was applied to such food.
2. EPA is proposing the establishment
of new tolerance exemptions under 40
CFR 180.960 effective on the date of
publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register.
3. EPA is proposing to revoke for
administrative reasons the redundant
and incorrect tolerance exemptions
identified in this document under 40
CFR 180.910, 180.920, and 180.930
effective on the date of publication of
the final rule in the Federal Register.
D. What is the Contribution to Tolerance
Reassessment?
By law, EPA is required by August
2006 to reassess the tolerances and
exemptions from tolerances that were in
existence on August 2, 1996. This
document proposes to revoke 129 inert
ingredient tolerance exemptions, which
will be counted in a final rule as a
tolerance reassessment toward the
August 2006 review deadline under
FFDCA section 408(q), as amended by
FQPA in 1996.
III. Are the Proposed Actions
Consistent with International
Obligations?
The tolerance revocation in this
proposal is not discriminatory and is
designed to ensure that both
domestically produced and imported
foods meet the food safety standard
established by FFDCA. The same food
safety standards apply to domestically
produced and imported foods.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
EPA is working to ensure that the U.S.
tolerance reassessment program under
FQPA does not disrupt international
trade. EPA considers Codex Maximum
Residue Limits (MRLs) in setting U.S.
tolerances and in reassessing them.
MRLs are established by the Codex
Committee on Pesticide Residues, a
committee within the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, an
international organization formed to
promote the coordination of
international food standards. It is EPA’s
policy to harmonize U.S. tolerances
with Codex MRLs to the extent possible,
provided that the MRLs achieve the
level of protection required under
FFDCA. EPA’s effort to harmonize with
Codex MRLs is summarized in the
tolerance reassessment section of
individual Reregistration Eligibility
Decision (RED) documents. EPA has
developed guidance concerning
submissions for import tolerance
support which was published in the
Federal Register of June 1, 2000 (65 FR
35069) (FRL–6559–3). This guidance
will be made available to interested
persons. Electronic copies are available
on the Internet at https://www.epa.gov.
On the Home Page select ‘‘Laws,
Regulations, and Dockets,’’ then select
‘‘Regulations and Proposed Rules’’ and
then look up the entry for this document
under ‘‘Federal Register—
Environmental Documents.’’ You can
also go directly to the ‘‘Federal
Register’’ listings at https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This proposed rule establishes a
tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition
submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866,
entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
Because this proposed rule has been
exempted from review under Executive
Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this proposed rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This proposed rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public
Law 104–4). Nor does it require any
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the
Agency previously assessed whether
establishment of tolerances, exemptions
from tolerances, raising of tolerance
levels, expansion of exemptions, or
revocations might significantly impact a
substantial number of small entities and
concluded that, as a general matter,
these actions do not impose a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. These analyses
for tolerance establishments and
modifications, and for tolerance
revocations were published on May 4,
1981 (46 FR 24950) and on December
17, 1997 (62 FR 66020) (FRL–5753–1),
respectively, and were provided to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. Taking into
account this analysis, and available
information concerning the pesticides
listed in this proposed rule, the Agency
hereby certifies that this proposed
action will not have a significant
negative economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Specifically, the Agency has concluded
in a memorandum dated May 25, 2001
that for import tolerance revocation
there is a negligible joint probability of
certain defined conditions holding
simultaneously which would indicate
an RFA/Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA) concern and require more
analysis. (This Agency document is
available in the docket of this proposed
rule). Furthermore, for the pesticides
named in this proposed rule, the
Agency knows of no extraordinary
circumstances that exist as to the
present proposal that would change the
EPA’s previous analysis. Any comments
about the Agency’s determination
should be submitted to EPA along with
comments on the proposal, and will be
addressed prior to issuing a final rule.
In addition, the Agency has
determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires
EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This proposed
rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this
proposed rule does not have any ‘‘tribal
implications’’ as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November
6, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by tribal officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have tribal implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that
have tribal implications’’ is defined in
the Executive order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
proposed rule will not have substantial
direct effects on tribal governments, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25997
Dated: April 27, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR
chapter I be amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
§ 180.910
[Amended]
2. In § 180.910, the table is amended
by removing the following entries:
a. a-Alkyl (C9–C18-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) with
poly(oxyethylene) content of 2–30
moles.
b. a-(p-Alkylphenyl)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of
alkylphenol (alkyl is a mixture of
propylene tetramer and pentamer
isomers and averages C13) with 6 moles
of ethylene oxide.
c. a-Alkyl (C6–C14)-whydroxypoly(oxypropylene) block
copolymer with polyoxyethylene;
polyoxypropylene content is 1–3 moles;
polyoxyethylene content is 4–12 moles;
average molecular weight (in amu) is
approximately 635.
d. a-(p-tert-Butylphenyl)-whydroxypoly (oxyethylene) mixture of
dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the poly(oxyethylene)
content averages 4–12 moles.
e. a-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly (oxyethylene) mixture of
dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer and the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4–
14 moles.
f. a-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly (oxyethylene) produced by
condensation of 1 mole of
dinonylphenol (nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer) with an
average of 4–14 or 140–160 moles of
ethylene oxide.
g. Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid,
amine salts.
h. a-(p-Dodecylphenyl)-whydroxypoly (oxyethylene) produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of
dodecylphenol (dodecyl group is a
propylene tetramer isomer) with an
average of 4–14 or 30–70 moles of
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
25998
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is
used, the average number of moles of
ethylene oxide reacted to produce any
product that is a component of the
blend shall be in the range of 4–14 or
30–70.
i. Ethylene oxide adducts of 2,4,7,9tetramethyl-5-decynediol, the ethylene
oxide content averages 3.5, 10, or 30
moles.
j. a-Lauryl-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene), average
molecular weight (in amu) of 600.
k. a-Lauryl-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate,
sodium salt; the poly(oxyethylene)
content is 3–4 moles.
l. Manganous oxide.
m. a-(p-Nonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture of
dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer and the poly
(oxyethylene) content averages 4–14
moles or 30 moles.
n. a-(p-Nonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate,
ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the
nonyl group is a propylene trimer
isomer and the poly(oxyethylene)
content averages 4 moles.
o. Polyglyceryl phthalate ester of
coconut oil fatty acids.
p. Poly(methylene-p-tertbutylphenoxy)- poly(oxyethylene)
ethanol; the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4–12 moles.
q. Poly(methylene-pnonylphenoxy)poly(oxyethylene)
ethanol; the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4–12 moles.
r. Secondary alkyl (C11–C15)
poly(oxyethylene) acetate, sodium salt;
the ethylene oxide content averages 5
moles.
s. Sodium
diisobutylnapthalenesulfonate.
t. Sodium
dodecylphenoxybenzenedisulfonate.
u. Sodium
isopropylisohexylnaphthalenesulfonate.
v. Sodium lauryl glyceryl ether
sulfonate.
w. Sodium monoalkyl and dialkyl
(C8–C16) phenoxybenzenedisulfonate
mixtures containing not less than 70%
of the monoalkylated product.
x. Sodium mono- and
dimethylnaphthalenesulfonates,
molecular weight (in amu) 245–260.
y. Sodium mono-, di-, and tributyl
naphthalenesulfonates.
z. Sodium mono-, di-, and
triisopropyl naphthalenesulfonate.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
aa. Sodium N-oleoyl-N-methyltaurine.
bb. Sodium sulfite.
cc. a-[p-(1,1,3,3Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of p-(1,1,3,3tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a range of
1–14 or 30–70 moles of ethylene oxide:
if a blend of products is used, the
average range number of moles of
ethylene oxide reacted to produce any
product that is a component of the
blend shall be in the range of 1–14 or
30–70.
dd. a-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)
phenyl]-w-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole
of p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl) phenol
with an average of 4–14 or 30–70 moles
of ethylene oxide; if a blend of products
is used, the average number of moles of
ethylene oxide reacted to produce any
product that is a component of the
blend shall be in the range of 4–14 or
30–70.
ee. Tridecylpoly(oxyethylene) acetate,
sodium salt; where the ethylene oxide
content averages 6–7 moles.
§ 180.920
[Amended]
3. In § 180.920, the table is amended
by removing the following entries:
a. a-Alkyl (C12–C18)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) copolymers
with poly(oxypropylene);
polyoxyethylene content averages 3–12
moles and polyoxypropylene content 2–
9 moles.
b. a-Alkyl (C12–C15)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
sulfosuccinate, isopropylamine and Nhydroxyethyl isopropylamine salts of;
the poly(oxyethylene) content averages
3–12 moles.
c. a-Alkyl(C10–12)-whydroxpoly(oxyethylene)
poly(oxypropylene) copolymer;
poly(oxyethylene) content is 11–15
moles; poly(oxyproplene) content is 1–
3 moles.
d. a-Alkyl(C12–C18)-w-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene/oxypropylene) hetero
polymer in which the oxyethylene
content averages 13–17 moles and the
oxypropylene content averages 2–6
moles.
e. a-Alkyl (C10–C16)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene)poly
(oxypropylene) mixture of di- and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the combined
poly(oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene)
content averages 3–20 moles.
f. a-Alkyl (C12–C18)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene/
oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the oxyethylene content is 8–12 moles
and the oxypropylene content is 3–7
moles.
g. a-Alkyl (C12–C15)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene/
oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which
the oxyethylene content is 8–13 moles
and the oxypropylene content is 7–30
moles.
h. a-Alkyl (C21–C71)-w-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) in which the
poly(oxyethylene) content is 2 to 91
moles and molecular weight range from
390 to 5,000.
i. n-Alkyl(C8–C18)amine acetate.
j. Amine salts of alkyl (C8–C24)
benzenesulfonic acid (butylamine,
dimethylaminopropylamine, mono- and
diisopropylamine, mono- , di-, and
triethanolamine).
k. N-(Aminoethyl) ethanolamine salt
of dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid.
l. N,N-Bis[a-ethyl-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) alkylamine;
the poly(oxyethylene) content averages
3 moles; the alkyl groups (C14–C18) are
derived from tallow, or from soybean or
cottonseed oil acids.
m. N,N-Bis(2hydroxyethyl)alkylamine, where the
alkyl groups (C8–C18) are derived from
coconut, cottonseed, soya, or tallow
acids.
n. N,N-Bis 2-(whydroxypolyoxyethylene) ethyl)
alkylamine; the reaction product of 1
mole N,N-bis(2hydroxyethyl)alkylamine and 3–60
moles of ethylene oxide, where the alkyl
group (C8–C18) is derived from coconut,
cottonseed, soya, or tallow acids.
o. N,N-Bis–2-(whydroxypolyoxyethylene/
polyoxypropylene) ethyl alkylamine;
the reaction product of 1 mole of N,Nbis(2-hydroxyethyl alkylamine) and 3–
60 moles of ethylene oxide and
propylene oxide, where the alkyl group
(C8–C18) is derived from coconut,
cottonseed soya, or tallow acids.
p. Butoxytriethylene glycol
phosphate.
q. Cyclohexanol.
r. a-(Di-secbutyl)phenylpoly(oxypropylene) block
polymer with poly(oxyethylene); the
poly(oxypropylene) content averages 4
moles, the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 5 to 12 moles, the molecular.
s. Disodium 4-isodecyl sulfosuccinate.
t. Dodecylphenol.
u. a-Dodecylphenol-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene/
oxypropylene) hetero polymer where
ethylene oxide content is 11–13 moles
and oxypropylene content is 14–16
moles, molecular weight (in amu)
averages 600 to 965.
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
v. Isopropylbenzenesulfonic acid and
its ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts.
w. (3-Lauramidopropyl)
trimethylammonium methyl sulfate.
x. Linoleic diethanolamide (CAS Reg.
No. 56863–02–6).
y. Methyl bis(2-hydroxyethyl)alkyl
ammonium chloride, where the carbon
chain (C8–C18) is derived from coconut,
cottonseed, soya, or tallow acids.
z. a,a′-[Methylenebis]-4-(1,1,3,3tetramethylbutyl)-o-phenylene bis[whydroxypoly(oxyethylene)] having 6–7.5
moles of ethylene oxide per hydroxyl
group.
aa. Methylnapthalenesulfonic acid—
formaldehyde condensate, sodium salt.
bb. Methyl poly(oxyethylene) alkyl
ammonium chloride, where the
poly(oxyethylene) content is 3–15 moles
and the alkyl group (C8–C18) is derived
from coconut, cottonseed, soya, or
tallow acids.
cc. Methyl violet 2B.
dd. Morpholine salt of
dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid.
ee. Napthalenesulfonic acidformaldehyde condensate, ammonium
and sodium salts.
ff. Partial sodium salt of N-lauryl-aiminodipropionic acid.
gg. Poly(methylene-pnonylphenoxy)poly(oxypropylene)
propanol; the poly(oxy-propylene)
content averages 4–12 moles.
hh. Primary n-alkylamines, where the
alkyl group (C8–C18) is derived from
coconut, cottonseed, soya, or tallow
acids.
ii. Sodium butyl
naphthalenesulfonate.
jj. Sodium 1,4-dicyclohexyl
sulfosuccinate.
kk. Sodium 1,4-dihexyl
sulfosuccinate.
ll. Sodium 1,4-diisobutyl
sulfosuccinate.
mm. Sodium 1,4-dipentyl
sulfosuccinate.
nn. Sodium 1,4-ditridecyl
sulfosuccinate.
oo. Sodium mono- and dimethyl
naphthalenesulfonate; molecular weight
(in amu) 245–260.
pp. Sulfosuccinic acid ester with N(2,-hydroxy-propyl) oleamide, ammonia
and isopropylamine salts of.
qq. Tall oil diesters with
polypropylene glycol (CAS Reg. No.
68648–12–4).
rr. N,N,N′,N′′-Tetrakis-(2hydroxypropyl) ethylenediamine.
ss. a-[p-(1,1,3,3Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture of
dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding sodium salts of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
phosphate esters; the poly(oxyethylene)
content averages 6 to 10 moles.
§ 180.930
[Amended]
4. In § 180.930, the table is amended
by removing the following entries:
a. a-Alkyl (C9–C18)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene): the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 2–
20 moles.
b. a-Alkyl (C12–C15)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene/
oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which
the oxyethylene content is 8–13 moles
and the oxypropylene content is 7–30
moles.
c. a-Alkyl (C88–C10)
hydroxypoly(oxypropylene) block
polymer with polyoxyethylene;
polyoxypropylene content averages 3
moles and polyoxyethylene content
averages 5–12 moles.
d. a-Alkyl (C6-C14)-whydroxypoly(oxypropylene) block
copolymer with polyoxyethylene;
polyoxypropylene content is 1–3 moles;
polyoxyethylene content is 7–9 moles;
average molecular weight (in amu)
approximately 635.
e. a-(p-Alkylphenyl)-w-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) produced by the
condensation of 1 mole of alkylphenol
(alkyl is a mixture of propylene tetramer
and pentamer isomers and averages C13)
with 6 moles of ethylene oxide.
f. Amine salts of alkyl (C8–C24)
benzenesulfonic acid (butylamine;
dimethylamino propylamine; monoand diisopropyl- amine; and mono- , di, and triethanolamine).
g. a-(p-tert-Butylphenyl)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture of
dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the poly(oxyethylene)
content averages 4–12 moles.
h. a-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly (oxyethylene) mixture of
dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer and the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4–
14 moles.
i. a-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene), produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of
dinonylphenol (nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer) with an
average of 4–14 moles of ethylene oxide.
j. Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid,
amine salts.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25999
k. a-(p-Dodecylphenyl)-whydroxypoly (oxyethylene) produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of
dodecylphenol (dodecyl group is a
propylene tetramer isomer) with an
average of 4–14 or 30–70 moles of
ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is
used, the average number of moles of
ethylene oxide reacted to produce any
product that is a component of the
blend shall be in the range of 4–14 or
30–70 moles.
l. Ethylene oxide adducts of 2,4,7,9tetramethyl-5-decynediol, the ethylene
oxide content averages 3.5, 10, or 30
moles.
m. Ethyl vinyl acetate (CAS Reg. No.
24937–78–8).
n. a-Lauryl-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene), average
molecular weight (in amu) of 600.
o. a-Lauryl-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene), sulfate,
sodium salt; the poly(oxyethylene)
content is 3–4 moles.
p. Manganous oxide.
q. a-(Methylene (4-(1,1,3,3tetramethylbutyl)-o-phenylene)bis-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) having 6–7.5
moles of ethylene oxide per hydroxyl
group.
r. Mono-, di-, and
trimethylnapthalenesulfonic acidsformaldehyde condensates, sodium
salts.
s. Naphthalenesulfonic acid and its
sodium salt.
t. a-(p-Nonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture of
dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer and the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4–
14 moles.
u. a-(p-Nonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate, and
its ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the
nonyl group is a propylene trimer
isomer and the poly(oxyethylene)
content averages 4 moles.
v. a-(p-Nonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate, and
its ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
monoethanolamine, potassium, sodium,
and zinc salts; the nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer and the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4–
14 or 30–90 moles of ethyiene oxide.
w. Polyglyceryl phthalate esters of
coconut oil fatty acids.
x. Poly(methylene-p tertbutylphenoxy)poly(oxyethylene)
ethanol; the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4–12 moles.
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
26000
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
average molecular weight (in amu), 950
to 1120.
b. The table in paragraph (b) is
amended by removing the following
entries:
i. a-Lauroyl-w-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) with an average of 8–9
moles ethylene oxide, average molecular
weight (in amu), 400.
ii. Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with
oxirane, ether with (1,2ethanediyldinitrilo)tetrakis [propanol]
(4:1).
c. The table in paragraph (c) is
amended by removing the following
entries:
i. a-Alkyl(C10–C14)-w-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) poly (oxypropylene)
average molecular weight (in amu), 768
to 837.
ii. a-Alkyl(C11–C15)-w-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) with ethylene oxide
content 9 to 13 moles.
iii. a-Alkyl(C12–C15)-w-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) polyoxypropylene,
average molecular weight (in amu), 965.
iv. a-Alkyl(C12–C18)-w-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene)
average molecular weight (in amu), 950
to 1120.
v. a-Lauroyl-w-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) with an average of 8–9
moles ethylene oxide, average molecular
weight (in amu), 400.
vi. Naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium
salt.
vii. Naphthalene sulfonic acid sodium
salt, and its methyl, dimethyl and
trimethyl derivatives.
viii. Naphthalene sulfonic acid
sodium salt, and its methyl, dimethyl
and trimethyl derivatives alkylated at
3% by weight with C6–C9 linear olefins.
ix. Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with
oxirane, ether with (1,2ethanediyldinitrilo)tetrakis [propanol]
(4:1).
6. In § 180.960, the table is amended
by alphabetically adding the following
entries:
§ 180.940
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
y. Poly(methylene-pnonylphenoxy)poly(oxyethylene)
ethanol; the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4–12 moles.
z. Poly(methylene-pnonylphenoxy)poly(oxypropylene)
propanol; the poly(oxypropylene)
content averages 4–12 moles.
aa. Secondary alkyl (C11–C15)
poly(oxyethylene) acetate, sodium salt;
the ethylene oxide content averages 5
moles.
bb. Sodium
butylnaphthalenesulfonate.
cc. Sodium
diisobutylnaphthalenesulfonate.
dd. Sodium
isopropylisohexylnaphthalenesulfonate.
ee. Sodium
isopropylnaphthalenesulfonate.
ff. Sodium monoalkyl and diakyl (C8–
C13) phenoxybenzenedisulfonate
mixtures containing not less than 70%
of the monoalkylated product.
gg. Sodium mono- and
dimethylnaphthalenesulfonate,
molecular weight (in amu) 245–260.
hh. Sodium mono-, di-, and
tributylnaphthalenesulfonates.
ii. Sodium N-oleoyl-N-methyl taurine.
jj. a-[p-(1,1,3,3Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of p (1,1,3,3tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a range of
1–14 or 30–70 moles of ethylene oxide:
if a blend of products is used, the
average range number of moles of
ethylene oxide reacted to produce any
product that is a component of the
blend shall be in the range of 1–14 or
30–70.
kk. a-[p-(1,1,3,3Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl) phenol with an
average of 4–14 or 30–70 moles of
ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is
used, the average number of moles of
ethylene oxide reacted to produce any
product that is a component of the
blend shall be in the range of 4–14 or
30–70.
ll. Tridecylpoly(oxyethylene) acetate
sodiums salt; where the ethylene oxide
content averages 6–7 moles.
*
[Amended]
5. Section 180.940 is amended as
follows:
a. The table in paragraph (a) is
amended by removing the following
entries:
i. a-Alkyl(C10–C14)-w- hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene)
average molecular weight (in amu), 768
to 837.
ii. a-Alkyl(C12–C18)-w hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 May 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
Polymer
CAS No.
Polymer
CAS No.
*
*
*
*
*
a-(p-Dodecylphenyl)-w9014–92–
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) pro0
duced by the condensation of 1 26401–
mole of dodecylphenol (dodecyl
47–8
group is a propylene tetramer
isomer) with an average of 30–
70 moles of ethylene oxide
*
*
*
*
*
a-(p-Nonylphenyl)-wNone
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture of dihydrogen phosphate
and monohydrogen phosphate
esters and the corresponding
ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts
of the phosphate esters; the
nonyl group is a propylene
trimer
isomer
and
the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 30 moles
a-(p-Nonylphenyl)-whydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate, and its ammonium, calcium,
magnesium,
monoethanolamine, potassium,
sodium, and zinc salts; the
nonyl group is a propylene
trimer
isomer
and
the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 30–90 moles of ethylene
oxide
None
*
*
*
*
*
a-[p-(1,1,3,39036–19–
Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-w5
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) pro- 9002–93–
duced by the condensation of 1
1
mole
of
p-(1,1,3,3tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a
range of 30–70 moles of ethylene oxide
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–4154 Filed 5–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0400; FRL–8068–5]
Pesticide Inert Ingredient Tolerance
Exemptions with Insufficient Data for
Reassessment; Notice of Public
Meeting
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Public meetings.
AGENCY:
*
*
*
*
*
a-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-w9014–93–
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) pro1
duced by condensation of 1
mole of dinonylphenol (nonyl
group is a propylene trimer isomer) with an average of 140–
160 moles of ethylene oxide
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY: EPA will hold two identical
public meetings on Tuesday, May 23,
2006, on the Agency’s proposed action
on pesticide inert ingredient tolerance
exemptions that lack sufficient toxicity
E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM
03MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25993-26000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4154]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0230; FRL-8060-9]
Inert Ingredients; Proposed Revocation of Tolerance Exemptions
with Insufficient Data for Reassessment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes under section 408(e)(1) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to revoke the existing exemptions
from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of certain inert
ingredients because there are insufficient data to make the
determination of safety required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2), or because
they are redundant and, therefore, are not necessary. In addition, EPA
has identified substances within certain of these tolerance exemptions
that meet the definition of low-risk polymers and is proposing to
establish new tolerance exemptions for them. The revocation actions
proposed in this document contribute towards the Agency's tolerance
reassessment requirements under FFDCA section 408(q), as amended by the
Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996. By law, EPA is required by
August 2006 to reassess the tolerances that were in existence on August
2, 1996. The regulatory actions proposed in this document pertain to
the proposed revocation of 129 tolerance exemptions which would be
counted as tolerance reassessment toward the August 2006 review
deadline.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0230, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502C), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The Docket telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
Important Note: OPP will be moving to a new location the
first week of May 2006. As a result, from Friday, April 28 to Friday,
May 5, 2006, the OPP Regulatory Public Docket will NOT be accepting any
deliveries at the Crystal Mall 2 address and this facility
will be closed to the public. Beginning on May 8, 2006, the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket will reopen at 8:30 a.m. and deliveries will
be accepted in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202. The mail code for the mailing address
will change to (7502P), but will otherwise remain the same. The OPP
Regulatory Public Docket telephone number and hours of operation will
remain the same after the move.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2006-0230. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
[[Page 25994]]
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or,
if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket at
the location identified under ``Delivery'' and ``Important Note.'' The
hours of operation for this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerry Leifer, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-8811; e-mail address: leifer.kerry@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in Unit II. If you have
any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
1. Revocation because of insufficient data. EPA is now in the
process of reassessing all inert ingredient exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance (``tolerance exemptions'') established prior
to August 2, 1996, as required by FFDCA section 408(q). Under FFDCA
section 408(q), tolerance reassessment may lead to regulatory action
under FFDCA section 408(e)(1). When taking action under FFDCA section
408(e)(1), EPA may leave a tolerance exemption in effect only if the
Agency determines that the tolerance exemption is safe. EPA is
proposing to revoke 129 inert ingredient tolerance exemptions because
insufficient data are available to the Agency to make the safety
determination required by FFDCA section 408(c)(2).
In making the FFDCA reassessment safety determination, EPA
considers the validity, completeness, and reliability of the data that
are available to the Agency, FFDCA section 408 (b)(2)(D), and the
available information concerning the special susceptibility of infants
and children (including developmental effects from in utero exposure),
FFDCA section 408 (b)(2)(C). Data gaps exist for these inert
ingredients in areas critical to reassessment. Without these data, the
assessment of possible effects to infants and children cannot be made.
Thus, EPA has insufficient data to make the safety finding of FFDCA
section 408(c)(2) and is proposing to revoke the inert ingredient
tolerance exemptions identified in this document.
In developing risk assessment documents for inert ingredient
tolerance exemptions, EPA currently reviews data submitted to the
Agency as well as information from reputable, publicly available
sources. For example, studies may be available in professional (peer-
reviewed) journals, and chemical assessments may be available on the
Internet from U.S. Government agencies (e.g., EPA, the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry, National Institutes of Health, Food
and Drug Administration (FDA)) and international organizations (e.g.,
World Health Organization, Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD)). In some cases, representatives from chemical and
pesticide manufacturing industry associations endeavored to locate data
to support reassessment of surfactant chemicals. Nonetheless,
sufficient valid and reliable data were not available to make the
requisite FFDCA safety finding.
EPA could not have made the requisite FFDCA safety finding unless,
at the very least, a set of basic toxicity studies had been available
to the Agency. It is possible that the tests agreed to under OECD's
Screening Information Data Set (SIDS) program would have sufficed.
Especially important to inert ingredient reassessment is an acceptable
repeat-dose study. The preferred test for repeat-dose toxicity is the
``Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/
Developmental Toxicity Screening Test'' (OECD Test Guideline 422). More
information about the OECD SIDS and EPA's High Production Volume (HPV)
programs is found at https://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemrtk/sidsappb.htm. In
some cases, the full OECD SIDS may not have been necessary because EPA
has available a limited number of studies and information on some of
the inert
[[Page 25995]]
ingredients in question (e.g., acute toxicity studies). In other cases,
the limited toxicity information available to the Agency may indicate a
need for further testing. EPA always recommends that parties interested
in supporting an inert ingredient consult with the Agency prior to
embarking on a testing strategy in order to determine existing data
gaps and if testing certain chemicals within a multi-chemical exemption
would serve to represent the entire exemption.
The Agency is proposing to revoke one other inert ingredient
because it does not have sufficient data, as discussed earlier. The
inert ingredient's two tolerance exemptions in 40 CFR 180.1001(c) and
(e) were inadvertently removed from the CFR between the 1999 and 2003
editions. Since that time, 180.1001(c) and (e) have been renamed as 40
CFR 180.910 and 189.930, respectively. These tolerance exemptions were
omitted from the CFR by mistake, therefore, they are considered to be
active tolerance exemptions under 40 CFR 180.910 and 180.930 that are
subject to reassessment as required by the FFDCA section 408(q). The
tolerance exemption under 40 CFR 180.910 reads as follows: ``[alpha]-
Alkyl(C12-C15)-[omega]- hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
sulfate, ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc
salts; the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 3 moles.'' The name of
the tolerance exemption under 40 CFR 180.930 differs slightly but not
substantively, and reads as follows: ``[alpha]-Alkyl (C12-
C15)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate and its
ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 3 moles.'' As stated in this unit,
this inert ingredient does not has sufficient data and EPA is proposing
to revoke the tolerance exemptions in 40 CFR 180.910 and 180.930.
In summary, the safety finding required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2)
cannot be made for certain inert ingredient tolerance exemptions due to
insufficient data. Therefore, EPA is proposing to revoke under FFDCA
section 408(e)(1) the tolerance exemptions identified at the end of
this document under 40 CFR 180.910, 180.920, 180.930, and 180.940, with
the revocations effective 2 years after the date of publication of the
final rule in the Federal Register.
EPA is planning to hold two identical public meetings about this
proposed action on inert ingredient tolerance exemptions with
insufficient data for reassessment. EPA will review its reassessment
progress for inert ingredients, describe the Agency's data finding
efforts, discuss data needs and the screening level studies that may
suffice, and other topics that may prove useful to those who are
considering developing data in support of these inert ingredients. Both
identical public meetings will be held on Tuesday, May 23, 2006, at the
Office of Pesticide Program's new office building located at One
Potomac Yard, 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA, 22202. The first
meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. and the second meeting will
be from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. In order to ensure adequate space for
attendees, the Agency requests an RSVP from those who are interested in
attending the public meetings. Please RSVP to Karen Angulo at either
(703) 306-0404 or angulo.karen@epa.gov, and indicate whether you prefer
the morning or afternoon meeting and the number of attendees in your
group. The formal announcement of these public meetings appears
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
2. Five new tolerance exemptions for polymer chemicals--i.
Exemptions. Several of the tolerance exemptions discussed in this unit
include numerous chemicals. While EPA does not have sufficient data to
make the safety finding for all of the chemicals within these multi-
chemical exemptions, EPA has identified certain chemicals within these
exemptions that meet the criteria specified in accordance with the
Toxic Substances Control Act for defining a low-risk polymer under 40
CFR 723.250. Polymers that are eligible for exemption under 40 CFR
723.250 will not present an unreasonable risk of injury to human health
and the environment. Therefore, EPA is proposing to establish five
tolerance exemptions under 40 CFR 180.960.
ii. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative
risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made
a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to these chemicals and any
other substances and these chemicals do not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that these chemicals
have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For
information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a
common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of
such chemicals, see the policy statements released by EPA's Office of
Pesticide Programs concerning common mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from substances found to have a
common mechanism on EPA's Web site at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/
cumulative.
iii. Determination of safety for U.S. population, infants and
children. Dietary (food and drinking water) and residential risks are
not of concern for chemicals that meet the criteria specified for
defining a low-risk polymer in 40 CFR 723.250. Therefore, EPA finds
that exempting these polymer chemicals in 40 CFR 180.960 will be safe
for the general population including infants and children.
iv. Analytical enforcement methodology. An analytical method is not
required for the new tolerance exemption for enforcement purposes
because the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance.
3. Revocations for administrative reasons. The Agency has
identified seven tolerance exemptions that can be revoked for
administrative reasons, as described in this unit.
i. The Agency has determined that two tolerance exemptions describe
chemicals and substances that do not exist, and can be revoked on the
date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register.
a. The first exemption is ``Ethyl vinyl acetate (CAS Reg. No.
24937-78-8)'' under 40 CFR 180.930. This chemical name is wrong; the
correct name associated with this CAS Reg. No. is ``Ethylene, polymer
with vinyl acetate.'' This CAS Reg. No. already has a tolerance
exemption under 40 CFR 180.960 (polymers), therefore, the tolerance
exemption under 40 CFR 180.930 is unnecessary and can be revoked.
b. The second exemption is for ``[alpha]-(Methylene (4-(1,1,3,3-
tetramethylbutyl)-o-phenylene)bis-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
having 6-7.5 moles of ethylene oxide per hydroxyl group.'' This name is
in error because it describes a chemical that does not exist.
Therefore, the tolerance exemption under 40 CFR 180.930 can be revoked.
ii. The Agency has identified five tolerance exemptions that can be
revoked because they are redundant. These redundant tolerance
exemptions are unnecessary and can be revoked on
[[Page 25996]]
the date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register.
a. The tolerance exemption ``Sodium mono- and dimethyl
naphthalenesulfonate; molecular weight (in amu) 245-260'' under 40 CFR
180.920 is unnecessary because there is an identically named exemption
in 40 CFR 180.910.
b. The tolerance exemptions ``Sodium butyl naphthalenesulfonate''
under 40 CFR 180.920 and 180.930 can be revoked because they are
included in the broader tolerance exemptions ``Sodium mono-, di-, and
tributyl naphthalenesulfonates'' in 40 CFR 180.910 and 180.930.
c. Similarly, the two tolerance exemptions called ``[alpha]-[p-
(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl) phenyl]-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)
phenol with an average of 4-14 or 30-70 moles of ethylene oxide; ...''
under 40 CFR 180.910 and 180.930 can be revoked because they are
included in the broader tolerance exemptions that are also in 40 CFR
180.910 and 180.930 that have ``[alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-
Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by
the condensation of 1 mole of p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a
range of 1-14 or 30-70 moles of ethylene oxide;....''
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
A ``tolerance'' represents the maximum level for residues of
pesticide chemicals legally allowed in or on raw agricultural
commodities and processed foods. Section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a,
as amended by FQPA, Public Law 104-170, authorizes the establishment of
tolerances, exemptions from tolerance requirements, modifications in
tolerances, and revocation of tolerances for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on raw agricultural commodities and processed foods.
Without a tolerance or exemption, food containing pesticide residues is
considered to be unsafe and therefore ``adulterated'' under FFDCA
section 402(a), 21 U.S.C. 342(a). Such food may not be distributed in
interstate commerce (21 U.S.C. 331(a)). For a food-use pesticide to be
sold and distributed, the pesticide must not only have appropriate
tolerances under FFDCA, but also must be registered under Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136 et
seq.). Food-use pesticides not registered in the United States must
have tolerances in order for commodities treated with those pesticides
to be imported into the United States.
C. When do These Actions Become Effective?
1. EPA is proposing to revoke the tolerance exemptions identified
in this document that have insufficient data effective 2 years after
the date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. Any
commodities listed in this proposal treated with pesticide products
containing the inert ingredients and in the channels of trade following
the tolerance revocations, shall be subject to FFDCA section 408(1)(5),
as established by FQPA. Under this section, any residues of these
pesticide chemicals in or on such food shall not render the food
adulterated so long as it is shown to the satisfaction of FDA that:
i. The residue is present as the result of an application or use of
the pesticide at a time and in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA.
ii. The residue does not exceed the level that was authorized at
the time of the application or use to be present on the food under a
tolerance or exemption from tolerance. Evidence to show that food was
lawfully treated may include records that verify the dates when the
pesticide was applied to such food.
2. EPA is proposing the establishment of new tolerance exemptions
under 40 CFR 180.960 effective on the date of publication of the final
rule in the Federal Register.
3. EPA is proposing to revoke for administrative reasons the
redundant and incorrect tolerance exemptions identified in this
document under 40 CFR 180.910, 180.920, and 180.930 effective on the
date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register.
D. What is the Contribution to Tolerance Reassessment?
By law, EPA is required by August 2006 to reassess the tolerances
and exemptions from tolerances that were in existence on August 2,
1996. This document proposes to revoke 129 inert ingredient tolerance
exemptions, which will be counted in a final rule as a tolerance
reassessment toward the August 2006 review deadline under FFDCA section
408(q), as amended by FQPA in 1996.
III. Are the Proposed Actions Consistent with International
Obligations?
The tolerance revocation in this proposal is not discriminatory and
is designed to ensure that both domestically produced and imported
foods meet the food safety standard established by FFDCA. The same food
safety standards apply to domestically produced and imported foods.
EPA is working to ensure that the U.S. tolerance reassessment
program under FQPA does not disrupt international trade. EPA considers
Codex Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) in setting U.S. tolerances and in
reassessing them. MRLs are established by the Codex Committee on
Pesticide Residues, a committee within the Codex Alimentarius
Commission, an international organization formed to promote the
coordination of international food standards. It is EPA's policy to
harmonize U.S. tolerances with Codex MRLs to the extent possible,
provided that the MRLs achieve the level of protection required under
FFDCA. EPA's effort to harmonize with Codex MRLs is summarized in the
tolerance reassessment section of individual Reregistration Eligibility
Decision (RED) documents. EPA has developed guidance concerning
submissions for import tolerance support which was published in the
Federal Register of June 1, 2000 (65 FR 35069) (FRL-6559-3). This
guidance will be made available to interested persons. Electronic
copies are available on the Internet at https://www.epa.gov. On the Home
Page select ``Laws, Regulations, and Dockets,'' then select
``Regulations and Proposed Rules'' and then look up the entry for this
document under ``Federal Register--Environmental Documents.'' You can
also go directly to the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This proposed rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this proposed rule has
been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack
of significance, this proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This proposed
rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor does it require any
[[Page 25997]]
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); or OMB review
or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not involve any technical
standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law
104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), the Agency previously assessed whether establishment of
tolerances, exemptions from tolerances, raising of tolerance levels,
expansion of exemptions, or revocations might significantly impact a
substantial number of small entities and concluded that, as a general
matter, these actions do not impose a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. These analyses for tolerance
establishments and modifications, and for tolerance revocations were
published on May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950) and on December 17, 1997 (62 FR
66020) (FRL-5753-1), respectively, and were provided to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. Taking into
account this analysis, and available information concerning the
pesticides listed in this proposed rule, the Agency hereby certifies
that this proposed action will not have a significant negative economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Specifically, the
Agency has concluded in a memorandum dated May 25, 2001 that for import
tolerance revocation there is a negligible joint probability of certain
defined conditions holding simultaneously which would indicate an RFA/
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)
concern and require more analysis. (This Agency document is available
in the docket of this proposed rule). Furthermore, for the pesticides
named in this proposed rule, the Agency knows of no extraordinary
circumstances that exist as to the present proposal that would change
the EPA's previous analysis. Any comments about the Agency's
determination should be submitted to EPA along with comments on the
proposal, and will be addressed prior to issuing a final rule.
In addition, the Agency has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an
accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This proposed rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has
determined that this proposed rule does not have any ``tribal
implications'' as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal implications'' is
defined in the Executive order to include regulations that have
``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.'' This proposed rule will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 27, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I be amended as
follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
Sec. 180.910 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 180.910, the table is amended by removing the following
entries:
a. [alpha]-Alkyl (C9-C18-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) with poly(oxyethylene) content of 2-30 moles.
b. [alpha]-(p-Alkylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of alkylphenol (alkyl is a
mixture of propylene tetramer and pentamer isomers and averages
C13) with 6 moles of ethylene oxide.
c. [alpha]-Alkyl (C6-C14)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxypropylene) block copolymer with polyoxyethylene;
polyoxypropylene content is 1-3 moles; polyoxyethylene content is 4-12
moles; average molecular weight (in amu) is approximately 635.
d. [alpha]-(p-tert-Butylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and
the corresponding ammonium calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles.
e. [alpha]-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and
the corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the nonyl
group is a propylene trimer isomer and the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4-14 moles.
f. [alpha]-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
produced by condensation of 1 mole of dinonylphenol (nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer) with an average of 4-14 or 140-160 moles of
ethylene oxide.
g. Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, amine salts.
h. [alpha]-(p-Dodecylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of dodecylphenol (dodecyl group
is a propylene tetramer isomer) with an average of 4-14 or 30-70 moles
of
[[Page 25998]]
ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is used, the average number of
moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that is a
component of the blend shall be in the range of 4-14 or 30-70.
i. Ethylene oxide adducts of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decynediol, the
ethylene oxide content averages 3.5, 10, or 30 moles.
j. [alpha]-Lauryl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene), average
molecular weight (in amu) of 600.
k. [alpha]-Lauryl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate, sodium
salt; the poly(oxyethylene) content is 3-4 moles.
l. Manganous oxide.
m. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture
of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the nonyl
group is a propylene trimer isomer and the poly (oxyethylene) content
averages 4-14 moles or 30 moles.
n. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
sulfate, ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc
salts; the nonyl group is a propylene trimer isomer and the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4 moles.
o. Polyglyceryl phthalate ester of coconut oil fatty acids.
p. Poly(methylene-p-tert-butylphenoxy)- poly(oxyethylene) ethanol;
the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles.
q. Poly(methylene-p-nonylphenoxy)poly(oxyethylene) ethanol; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles.
r. Secondary alkyl (C11-C15)
poly(oxyethylene) acetate, sodium salt; the ethylene oxide content
averages 5 moles.
s. Sodium diisobutylnapthalenesulfonate.
t. Sodium dodecylphenoxybenzenedisulfonate.
u. Sodium isopropylisohexylnaphthalenesulfonate.
v. Sodium lauryl glyceryl ether sulfonate.
w. Sodium monoalkyl and dialkyl (C8-C16)
phenoxybenzenedisulfonate mixtures containing not less than 70% of the
monoalkylated product.
x. Sodium mono- and dimethylnaphthalenesulfonates, molecular weight
(in amu) 245-260.
y. Sodium mono-, di-, and tributyl naphthalenesulfonates.
z. Sodium mono-, di-, and triisopropyl naphthalenesulfonate.
aa. Sodium N-oleoyl-N-methyltaurine.
bb. Sodium sulfite.
cc. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the condensation of 1 mole of p-
(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a range of 1-14 or 30-70 moles of
ethylene oxide: if a blend of products is used, the average range
number of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that
is a component of the blend shall be in the range of 1-14 or 30-70.
dd. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl) phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the condensation of 1 mole of p-
(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl) phenol with an average of 4-14 or 30-70
moles of ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is used, the average
number of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that
is a component of the blend shall be in the range of 4-14 or 30-70.
ee. Tridecylpoly(oxyethylene) acetate, sodium salt; where the
ethylene oxide content averages 6-7 moles.
Sec. 180.920 [Amended]
3. In Sec. 180.920, the table is amended by removing the following
entries:
a. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C18)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) copolymers with poly(oxypropylene);
polyoxyethylene content averages 3-12 moles and polyoxypropylene
content 2-9 moles.
b. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfosuccinate, isopropylamine and N-
hydroxyethyl isopropylamine salts of; the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 3-12 moles.
c. [alpha]-Alkyl(C10-12)-[omega]-
hydroxpoly(oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene) copolymer; poly(oxyethylene)
content is 11-15 moles; poly(oxyproplene) content is 1-3 moles.
d. [alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C18)-[omega]-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene/oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which the oxyethylene
content averages 13-17 moles and the oxypropylene content averages 2-6
moles.
e. [alpha]-Alkyl (C10-C16)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)poly(oxypropylene) mixture of di- and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the corresponding ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the combined poly(oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene)
content averages 3-20 moles.
f. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C18)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene/oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which the
oxyethylene content is 8-12 moles and the oxypropylene content is 3-7
moles.
g. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene/oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which the
oxyethylene content is 8-13 moles and the oxypropylene content is 7-30
moles.
h. [alpha]-Alkyl (C21-C71)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) in which the poly(oxyethylene) content is 2
to 91 moles and molecular weight range from 390 to 5,000.
i. n-Alkyl(C8-C18)amine acetate.
j. Amine salts of alkyl (C8-C24)
benzenesulfonic acid (butylamine, dimethylaminopropylamine, mono- and
diisopropylamine, mono- , di-, and triethanolamine).
k. N-(Aminoethyl) ethanolamine salt of dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid.
l. N,N-Bis[[alpha]-ethyl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
alkylamine; the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 3 moles; the alkyl
groups (C14-C18) are derived from tallow, or from
soybean or cottonseed oil acids.
m. N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)alkylamine, where the alkyl groups
(C8-C18) are derived from coconut, cottonseed,
soya, or tallow acids.
n. N,N-Bis 2-([omega]-hydroxypolyoxyethylene) ethyl) alkylamine;
the reaction product of 1 mole N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)alkylamine and 3-
60 moles of ethylene oxide, where the alkyl group (C8-
C18) is derived from coconut, cottonseed, soya, or tallow
acids.
o. N,N-Bis-2-([omega]-hydroxypolyoxyethylene/polyoxypropylene)
ethyl alkylamine; the reaction product of 1 mole of N,N-bis(2-
hydroxyethyl alkylamine) and 3-60 moles of ethylene oxide and propylene
oxide, where the alkyl group (C8-C18) is derived
from coconut, cottonseed soya, or tallow acids.
p. Butoxytriethylene glycol phosphate.
q. Cyclohexanol.
r. [alpha]-(Di-sec-butyl)phenylpoly(oxypropylene) block polymer
with poly(oxyethylene); the poly(oxypropylene) content averages 4
moles, the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 5 to 12 moles, the
molecular.
s. Disodium 4-isodecyl sulfosuccinate.
t. Dodecylphenol.
u. [alpha]-Dodecylphenol-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene/
oxypropylene) hetero polymer where ethylene oxide content is 11-13
moles and oxypropylene content is 14-16 moles, molecular weight (in
amu) averages 600 to 965.
[[Page 25999]]
v. Isopropylbenzenesulfonic acid and its ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts.
w. (3-Lauramidopropyl) trimethylammonium methyl sulfate.
x. Linoleic diethanolamide (CAS Reg. No. 56863-02-6).
y. Methyl bis(2-hydroxyethyl)alkyl ammonium chloride, where the
carbon chain (C8-C18) is derived from coconut,
cottonseed, soya, or tallow acids.
z. [alpha],[alpha]'-[Methylenebis]-4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-o-
phenylene bis[[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)] having 6-7.5 moles of
ethylene oxide per hydroxyl group.
aa. Methylnapthalenesulfonic acid--formaldehyde condensate, sodium
salt.
bb. Methyl poly(oxyethylene) alkyl ammonium chloride, where the
poly(oxyethylene) content is 3-15 moles and the alkyl group
(C8-C18) is derived from coconut, cottonseed,
soya, or tallow acids.
cc. Methyl violet 2B.
dd. Morpholine salt of dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid.
ee. Napthalenesulfonic acid-formaldehyde condensate, ammonium and
sodium salts.
ff. Partial sodium salt of N-lauryl-[alpha]-iminodipropionic acid.
gg. Poly(methylene-p-nonylphenoxy)poly(oxypropylene) propanol; the
poly(oxy-propylene) content averages 4-12 moles.
hh. Primary n-alkylamines, where the alkyl group (C8-
C18) is derived from coconut, cottonseed, soya, or tallow
acids.
ii. Sodium butyl naphthalenesulfonate.
jj. Sodium 1,4-dicyclohexyl sulfosuccinate.
kk. Sodium 1,4-dihexyl sulfosuccinate.
ll. Sodium 1,4-diisobutyl sulfosuccinate.
mm. Sodium 1,4-dipentyl sulfosuccinate.
nn. Sodium 1,4-ditridecyl sulfosuccinate.
oo. Sodium mono- and dimethyl naphthalenesulfonate; molecular
weight (in amu) 245-260.
pp. Sulfosuccinic acid ester with N-(2,-hydroxy-propyl) oleamide,
ammonia and isopropylamine salts of.
qq. Tall oil diesters with polypropylene glycol (CAS Reg. No.
68648-12-4).
rr. N,N,N',N''-Tetrakis-(2-hydroxypropyl) ethylenediamine.
ss. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the corresponding sodium salts of the
phosphate esters; the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 6 to 10 moles.
Sec. 180.930 [Amended]
4. In Sec. 180.930, the table is amended by removing the following
entries:
a. [alpha]-Alkyl (C9-C18)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene): the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 2-20
moles.
b. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene/oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which the
oxyethylene content is 8-13 moles and the oxypropylene content is 7-30
moles.
c. [alpha]-Alkyl (C88-C10)
hydroxypoly(oxypropylene) block polymer with polyoxyethylene;
polyoxypropylene content averages 3 moles and polyoxyethylene content
averages 5-12 moles.
d. [alpha]-Alkyl (C6-C14)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxypropylene) block copolymer with polyoxyethylene;
polyoxypropylene content is 1-3 moles; polyoxyethylene content is 7-9
moles; average molecular weight (in amu) approximately 635.
e. [alpha]-(p-Alkylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of alkylphenol (alkyl is a
mixture of propylene tetramer and pentamer isomers and averages
C13) with 6 moles of ethylene oxide.
f. Amine salts of alkyl (C8-C24)
benzenesulfonic acid (butylamine; dimethylamino propylamine; mono- and
diisopropyl- amine; and mono- , di-, and triethanolamine).
g. [alpha]-(p-tert-Butylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and
the corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles.
h. [alpha]-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and
the corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the nonyl
group is a propylene trimer isomer and the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4-14 moles.
i. [alpha]-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene),
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of dinonylphenol (nonyl group is
a propylene trimer isomer) with an average of 4-14 moles of ethylene
oxide.
j. Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, amine salts.
k. [alpha]-(p-Dodecylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of dodecylphenol (dodecyl group
is a propylene tetramer isomer) with an average of 4-14 or 30-70 moles
of ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is used, the average number
of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that is a
component of the blend shall be in the range of 4-14 or 30-70 moles.
l. Ethylene oxide adducts of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decynediol, the
ethylene oxide content averages 3.5, 10, or 30 moles.
m. Ethyl vinyl acetate (CAS Reg. No. 24937-78-8).
n. [alpha]-Lauryl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene), average
molecular weight (in amu) of 600.
o. [alpha]-Lauryl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene), sulfate, sodium
salt; the poly(oxyethylene) content is 3-4 moles.
p. Manganous oxide.
q. [alpha]-(Methylene (4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-o-
phenylene)bis-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) having 6-7.5 moles of
ethylene oxide per hydroxyl group.
r. Mono-, di-, and trimethylnapthalenesulfonic acids-formaldehyde
condensates, sodium salts.
s. Naphthalenesulfonic acid and its sodium salt.
t. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture
of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the nonyl
group is a propylene trimer isomer and the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4-14 moles.
u. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
sulfate, and its ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and
zinc salts; the nonyl group is a propylene trimer isomer and the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4 moles.
v. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
sulfate, and its ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the nonyl group is a propylene
trimer isomer and the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-14 or 30-90
moles of ethyiene oxide.
w. Polyglyceryl phthalate esters of coconut oil fatty acids.
x. Poly(methylene-p tert-butylphenoxy)poly(oxyethylene) ethanol;
the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles.
[[Page 26000]]
y. Poly(methylene-p-nonylphenoxy)poly(oxyethylene) ethanol; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles.
z. Poly(methylene-p-nonylphenoxy)poly(oxypropylene) propanol; the
poly(oxypropylene) content averages 4-12 moles.
aa. Secondary alkyl (C11-C15)
poly(oxyethylene) acetate, sodium salt; the ethylene oxide content
averages 5 moles.
bb. Sodium butylnaphthalenesulfonate.
cc. Sodium diisobutylnaphthalenesulfonate.
dd. Sodium isopropylisohexylnaphthalenesulfonate.
ee. Sodium isopropylnaphthalenesulfonate.
ff. Sodium monoalkyl and diakyl (C8-C13)
phenoxybenzenedisulfonate mixtures containing not less than 70% of the
monoalkylated product.
gg. Sodium mono- and dimethylnaphthalenesulfonate, molecular weight
(in amu) 245-260.
hh. Sodium mono-, di-, and tributylnaphthalenesulfonates.
ii. Sodium N-oleoyl-N-methyl taurine.
jj. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the condensation of 1 mole of p
(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a range of 1-14 or 30-70 moles of
ethylene oxide: if a blend of products is used, the average range
number of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that
is a component of the blend shall be in the range of 1-14 or 30-70.
kk. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the condensation of 1 mole of p-
(1,1,-3,3-tetramethylbutyl) phenol with an average of 4-14 or 30-70
moles of ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is used, the average
number of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that
is a component of the blend shall be in the range of 4-14 or 30-70.
ll. Tridecylpoly(oxyethylene) acetate sodiums salt; where the
ethylene oxide content averages 6-7 moles.
Sec. 180.940 [Amended]
5. Section 180.940 is amended as follows:
a. The table in paragraph (a) is amended by removing the following
entries:
i. [alpha]-Alkyl(C10-C14)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene) average molecular weight
(in amu), 768 to 837.
ii. [alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C18)-[omega]
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene) average molecular weight
(in amu), 950 to 1120.
b. The table in paragraph (b) is amended by removing the following
entries:
i. [alpha]-Lauroyl-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) with an
average of 8-9 moles ethylene oxide, average molecular weight (in amu),
400.
ii. Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, ether with (1,2-
ethanediyldinitrilo)tetrakis [propanol] (4:1).
c. The table in paragraph (c) is amended by removing the following
entries:
i. [alpha]-Alkyl(C10-C14)-[omega]-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) poly (oxypropylene) average molecular weight (in amu),
768 to 837.
ii. [alpha]-Alkyl(C11-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) with ethylene oxide content 9 to 13 moles.
iii. [alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) polyoxypropylene, average molecular weight
(in amu), 965.
iv. [alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C18)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene) average molecular weight
(in amu), 950 to 1120.
v. [alpha]-Lauroyl-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) with an
average of 8-9 moles ethylene oxide, average molecular weight (in amu),
400.
vi. Naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium salt.
vii. Naphthalene sulfonic acid sodium salt, and its methyl,
dimethyl and trimethyl derivatives.
viii. Naphthalene sulfonic acid sodium salt, and its methyl,
dimethyl and trimethyl derivatives alkylated at 3% by weight with
C6-C9 linear olefins.
ix. Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, ether with (1,2-
ethanediyldinitrilo)tetrakis [propanol] (4:1).
6. In Sec. 180.960, the table is amended by alphabetically adding
the following entries:
Sec. 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Polymer CAS No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[alpha]-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-[omega]- 9014-93-1
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by
condensation of 1 mole of dinonylphenol
(nonyl group is a propylene trimer
isomer) with an average of 140-160 moles
of ethylene oxide
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[alpha]-(p-Dodecylphenyl)-[omega]- 9014-92-0
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the 26401-47-8
condensation of 1 mole of dodecylphenol
(dodecyl group is a propylene tetramer
isomer) with an average of 30-70 moles of
ethylene oxide
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]- None
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture of
dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen
phosphate esters and the corresponding
ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
monoethanolamine, potassium, sodium, and
zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the
nonyl group is a propylene trimer isomer
and the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 30 moles
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]- None
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate, and its
ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
monoethanolamine, potassium, sodium, and
zinc salts; the nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer and the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 30-90
moles of ethylene oxide
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3- 9036-19-5
Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]- 9002-93-1
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the
condensation of 1 mole of p-(1,1,3,3-
tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a range of
30-70 moles of ethylene oxide
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 06-4154 Filed 5-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S