Maritime Identification Credentials, 25066-25068 [06-4026]
Download as PDF
25066
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Dated: April 8, 2006.
R.R. Houck,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 06–3992 Filed 4–27–06; 8:45 am]
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e) of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Under figure 2–1,
paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule.
[USCG–2006–24189]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. From May 30, 2006 to April 1, 2007,
amend § 117.1065 by suspending
paragraph (c) and adding paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
I
§ 117.1065
Wishkah River.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The draws of the Heron Street
Bridge, mile 0.2, shall open on signal if
at least 48 hours notice is provided. The
draw of the Wishkah Street Bridge, mile
0.4, shall open on signal if at least one
hour notice is provided. The opening
signal for both bridges is one prolonged
blast followed by two short blasts.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Apr 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 125
Maritime Identification Credentials
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of acceptable
identification credentials.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document informs the
public that the Commandant of the
Coast Guard is directing Coast Guard
Captains of the Port to prevent access to
waterfront facilities to persons that do
not have appropriate identification
credentials as defined under Coast
Guard regulations. This document also
identifies additional identification
documents that have been approved by
the Commandant as identification
credentials.
This announcement is effective
April 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2006–
24189 and are available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, room PL–401, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. They may also be viewed
online at https://dms.dot.gov at any time.
Conduct a simple search and enter in
the last five digits of the docket number
listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this document,
call James Bull, Coast Guard, telephone
202–267–1630. If you have questions on
viewing material in the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–493–
0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background and Purpose
Under the authority of 50 U.S.C. 191
and Coast Guard regulations (33 CFR
part 125), the Coast Guard has the
authority to require identification
credentials for access to waterfront
facilities and to port and harbor areas,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
including vessels and harbor craft in
those areas. The Commandant of the
Coast Guard, pursuant to 33 CFR
125.15(a), is authorized to direct, from
time to time, the Captains of the Port
(COTP) ‘‘to prevent access of persons
who do not possess one or more of the
identification credentials listed in
§ 125.09 to those waterfront facilities,
and port and harbor areas, including
vessels and harbor craft therein, where
the following shipping activities are
conducted: * * * [t]hose essential to
the interests of national security and
defense, to prevent loss, damage or
injury, or to insure the observance of
rights and obligations of the United
States.’’
On August 7, 2002, the Coast Guard
published a ‘‘Clarification of
Regulation’’ in the Federal Register at
67 FR 51082, which notified the public
that the Coast Guard may soon begin
requiring identification credentials from
persons seeking access to waterfront
facilities, areas within the port and
harbor, and on vessels and harbor craft
within such areas.
I have determined that it is necessary
to inform the public of the identification
credential requirement under 33 CFR
125.15(a) for all individuals seeking
access to facilities regulated under 33
CFR part 105. These actions will
improve national security by verifying
maritime workers’ identity, validating
their background information, assisting
transportation facilities in managing
their security risks, and accounting for
access of authorized personnel to
transportation facilities and activities.
This document announces to the public
that, in accordance with my authority
under 33 CFR 125.15, I am directing
COTPs to prevent access to all facilities
regulated under 33 CFR part 105 to
persons who do not have an
identification credential listed in 33
CFR 125.09 or such identification as I
have approved below under 33 CFR
125.09(f).
The Coast Guard notes that it will not
be issuing Port Security Cards at this
time, and reaffirms that when the
regulations implementing the
Transportation Worker Identification
Credential (TWIC) are issued, the Coast
Guard will reevaluate this action.
A. Acceptable Identification Credentials
Acceptable forms of identification
credentials under 33 CFR 125.09
include the following:
• A Merchant Mariner Document.
• An Armed Forces Identification
Card.
• Federal law enforcement
credentials.
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
• Identification credentials issued to
public safety officers.
In addition, pursuant to my authority
under 125.09(f), I approve as
identification credentials the following
forms of identification:
• For non-employees and employees
of the facility, and longshoremen, a
state-issued commercial driver’s license
with hazardous materials endorsement
issued after May 31, 2005.
• For non-employees of the facility,
excluding longshoremen, a state-issued
driver’s license or identification card or
a personal identification issued by the
individual’s employer, union or trade
association (33 CFR 101.515(b)(2)); or a
passport or commercial drivers license
issued by Canada or Mexico.
• For employees of the facility and
longshoremen, facility-issued employee
identification cards, a state-issued
driver’s license, or a personal
identification issued by the individual’s
employer, union or trade association (33
CFR 101.515(b)(2)), provided the
individual has been screened as
outlined below and has not been
determined a threat.
For the purposes of this action,
‘‘facility employees’’ include all
permanent employees and long-term
contractors. Contractors are considered
to be long-term if they need regular
access to the facility for a period in
excess of 90 days.
As discussed below, TSA will analyze
the relevant information before
determining whether or not an
employee or longshoreman poses or is
suspected of posing a security threat
warranting denial of access to the port
facility. TSA will notify the facility and
the COTP of persons that pose a security
threat. Accordingly, those persons will
not have approved identification
credentials under 125.09(f) and must be
denied access to part 105 facilities.
This action is necessary in the
interests of national security and to
protect these facilities from loss,
damage, or injury.
B. Threat Assessment Screening of
Facility Employees and Longshoremen
In order to accomplish screening, the
facility operator or longshore union
(union) will immediately, but not later
than May 30, 2006, provide the
following information from the union,
facility operator’s or long-term
contractor’s existing files to TSA for
each facility employee or longshoreman
seeking to use as an identification
credential a facility-issued employee
identification card, a state-issued
driver’s license, or personal
identification issued by the individual’s
employer, union or trade association:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Apr 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
• Legal Name (Last, First, Middle,
suffix).
• Date of birth (MonthDayYear,
12121970).
• Social Security number (optional,
no dashes).
• Alien Identification number (if
applicable).
Although the Coast Guard is
providing up to 30 days for facility
operators and longshore unions to
provide the requested information, the
COTP may contact the facility operator
or union and request that such
information be provided immediately.
This information must be contained
in a spreadsheet and submitted via the
Coast Guard’s Homeport Web portal
https://homeport.uscg.mil. For
information about how to register in
Homeport contact the COTP for details.
If unable to access Homeport, the data
may be submitted via a passwordprotected compact disk to Stephen
Sadler, Director, Maritime and Surface
Credentialing, Office of Transportation
Threat Assessment and Credentialing—
TSA–19, Transportation Security
Administration, 601 South 12th Street,
Arlington, VA 22202. When submitting
the information listed above, please
provide it in a password protected Excel
spreadsheet and include a point of
contact (POC) for the facility operator or
union and contact information. TSA
will contact the POC to obtain the
password when it receives information
through the mail. Prior to submitting the
information listed above, facility
operators or unions must notify the
individuals on whom information is
submitted of their intent to submit the
above information for purposes of a
security threat assessment, and notify
these individuals that they may decline
to provide their social security numbers,
but that such action may result in delays
or make it impossible to complete the
assessment. If the port facility operator
or Longshore union does not have the
information listed above in its existing
files and must collect the information
directly from the individual, the
following Privacy Act notice must be
provided to that individual prior to
collecting the information:
Privacy Act Notice
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 114, 50 U.S.C. 191,
and 33 CFR part 125 and authorize the
collection of this information.
Purpose: DHS will use this information to
conduct a security threat assessment on port
facility employees, port facility long-term
contractors, and longshoremen.
Routine Uses: The information will be used
by and disclosed to DHS personnel and
contractors or other agents who need the
information to assist in activities related to
port security. Additionally, DHS may share
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
25067
the information with facility operators,
Longshore unions, and law enforcement or
other government agencies as necessary to
respond to potential or actual threats to
transportation security, or pursuant to its
published Privacy Act system of records
notice.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is
voluntary. However, failure to furnish the
requested information may delay or prevent
the completion of your security threat
assessment, which may prevent your access
to MTSA regulated facilities.
So as not to prejudice new employees
or longshoremen who seek access to the
facility using a facility-issued employee
identification card, a state-issued
driver’s license, or a personal
identification issued by the individual’s
employer, union or trade association (33
CFR 101.515(b)(2)) under this action
(who will be barred from entry if not
screened in a timely manner), facility
operators or unions must provide, on a
continuing basis, the above-listed
information for all new facility
employees or longshoremen in a timely
manner using the mechanisms listed
above. When submitting lists with
information for new employees or
longshoremen, do not include in the list
any employee or longshoreman whose
information has previously been
submitted.
Threat assessment determinations of
facility employees and longshoremen
will be conducted by TSA pursuant to
its authority to assess threats to
transportation under 49 U.S.C. 114(f).
For the majority of cases, these threat
assessment determinations will be
accomplished within 30 days of TSA’s
receipt of the information discussed
above. While the assessment is being
performed, personnel will continue to
have access to the facility. Unless the
facility operator or union receives a
written document from TSA stating that
TSA has made a threat assessment
determination, as outlined below, that a
particular facility employee or
longshoreman poses a security threat,
that individual may be permitted access
to the port facility.
If TSA is unable to complete the
threat assessment for a specific facility
employee or longshoreman with the
information initially provided, TSA will
request additional information regarding
that individual from the facility operator
or union. A request for additional
information regarding a specific facility
employee or longshoreman is not a
threat assessment determination; it is
merely a request for more information.
If TSA requests additional information
regarding a specific individual from a
facility operator or a union, the operator
or union must provide the requested
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
25068
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
information to TSA within 5 business
days.
TSA will examine various factors for
the threat assessment of facility
employees and longshoremen. TSA’s
examination will not include a criminal
history records check. TSA will check
immigration status in the course of the
threat assessment evaluation. Facility
employees and longshoremen must be a
citizen of the United States, a lawful
permanent resident of the United States
as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101, or hold an
appropriate immigration status, as
discussed below. Other acceptable
immigration statuses include
individuals who possess valid evidence
of unrestricted employment and are in
a lawful nonimmigrant status, are a
refugee admitted under 8 U.S.C. 1137,
or are an alien granted asylum under 8
U.S.C. 1158. When verifying
immigration status, TSA checks relevant
Federal databases and may perform
other checks, including verifying the
validity of the applicant’s social security
number or alien registration number.
Any facility employee or
longshoreman identified as posing a
security threat or as not having legal
status under the immigration laws will
not be permitted to enter or remain on
a 33 CFR part 105 facility. To make such
a determination, TSA will check various
government databases. Upon checking
the relevant databases, TSA will analyze
the relevant information from Federal
law enforcement and intelligence
agencies before determining that a
facility employee or longshoreman
poses or is suspected of posing a
security threat warranting denial of
access to the port facility. As mentioned
above, this will not include a criminal
history records check.
Individuals identified as posing a
security threat will receive an Initial
Determination of Threat Assessment
(hereinafter ‘‘Initial Determination’’). An
Initial Determination does not mean that
an individual must be denied access to
a facility. Individuals who believe that
they have been wrongly identified as
posing a security threat and believe they
meet the standards for the security
threat assessment have the opportunity
to appeal an Initial Determination using
the appeal procedures established for
individuals denied a hazardous
materials endorsement under TSA’s
regulations, which are set forth in 49
CFR 1572.141. If a facility employee or
longshoreman fails to initiate an appeal
within 30 days after receipt, the Initial
Determination becomes final, and TSA
serves a Final Determination of Threat
Assessment upon the individual and
notifies the facility or union and the
COTP.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Apr 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
Facility employees or longshoremen
believed to pose a security threat will
receive a notice from the TSA that they
will be denied access to part 105
facilities. Please note this notice will be
called an Initial Determination of Threat
Assessment and Immediate Revocation
of Access Privileges (hereinafter
‘‘Immediate Revocation of Access
Privileges’’). The Immediate Revocation
of Access Privileges will be sent to the
individual with notification to the
facility or union as well as the COTP at
the same time to immediately deny that
individual access to the facility. Facility
employees or longshoremen wishing to
appeal an Immediate Revocation of
Access Privileges must follow the
appeal procedures set forth in 49 CFR
1572.141(i). If that individual fails to
initiate an appeal within 30 days after
receipt, the Immediate Revocation of
Access Privileges becomes final, and
TSA serves a Final Determination of
Threat Assessment upon the individual
and notifies the facility or union as well
as the COTP.
If a facility employee or longshoreman
appeals the Initial Determination or the
Immediate Revocation of Access
Privileges, TSA will serve a Final
Determination of Threat Assessment or
a Withdrawal of the Initial
Determination or Immediate Revocation
of Access Privileges on that individual
and notify the facility or union, and the
COTP.
TSA will notify the facility and the
COTP of which facility employees or
longshoremen who must be denied
access to part 105 facilities. The Coast
Guard will make available to facilities a
list of longshoremen who have been
vetted for each port. Access is limited to
only those persons who are authorized.
Facilities will be subject to Coast Guard
examinations to verify that they are
complying with the requirements of 33
CFR part 125, as implemented by this
document.
This requirement does not prohibit a
facility owner or operator from
imposing additional requirements above
these minimums.
The additional screening provision for
specific types of identification
credentials, as listed above, is only
being used for facility employee and
longshoreman credentials at this time
because of their regular and constant
access to the facility and their
knowledge of its operations, as opposed
to the infrequent access by other port
workers. We continue to view the TWIC
as the ultimate solution to the access
credential issue.
Persons seeking additional
information on this announcement or its
enforcement may contact the person
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
Further information regarding the threat
assessments conducted by TSA is
provided in the Privacy Impact
Assessment for U.S. Port Access Threat
Assessments, available on the
Department of Homeland Security Web
site at: https://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/
interapp/editorial/editorial_0511.xml.
As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)), we submitted a copy of this
notice to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for its review of the
collection of information. Due to the
circumstances surrounding this notice,
we asked for ‘‘emergency processing’’ of
our request. We received OMB approval
for the collection of information on
April 24, 2006. It has been given OMB
control number 1625–0110. It is valid
through October 31, 2006.
Dated: April 25, 2006.
Terry M. Cross,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commandant.
[FR Doc. 06–4026 Filed 4–25–06; 2:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Honolulu 06–005]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Waters Surrounding
U.S. Forces Vessel SBX–1, HI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary 500-yard
moving security zone around the U.S.
Forces vessel SBX–1 during transit and
sea trials within the Honolulu Captain
of the Port Zone. This zone is necessary
to protect the SBX–1 from hazards
associated with vessels and persons
approaching too close during transit and
sea trials. Entry of persons or vessels
into this temporary security zone while
it is activated and enforced is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP).
DATES: This rule is effective from 12
a.m. (HST) on April 14, 2006 to 11:59
p.m. (HST) on May 14, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket COTP
Honolulu 06–005 and are available for
inspection or copying at Coast Guard
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25066-25068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-4026]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 125
[USCG-2006-24189]
Maritime Identification Credentials
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of acceptable identification credentials.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document informs the public that the Commandant of the
Coast Guard is directing Coast Guard Captains of the Port to prevent
access to waterfront facilities to persons that do not have appropriate
identification credentials as defined under Coast Guard regulations.
This document also identifies additional identification documents that
have been approved by the Commandant as identification credentials.
DATES: This announcement is effective April 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2006-24189 and are available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. They may also be viewed online at
https://dms.dot.gov at any time. Conduct a simple search and enter in
the last five digits of the docket number listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
document, call James Bull, Coast Guard, telephone 202-267-1630. If you
have questions on viewing material in the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-493-0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose
Under the authority of 50 U.S.C. 191 and Coast Guard regulations
(33 CFR part 125), the Coast Guard has the authority to require
identification credentials for access to waterfront facilities and to
port and harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft in those
areas. The Commandant of the Coast Guard, pursuant to 33 CFR 125.15(a),
is authorized to direct, from time to time, the Captains of the Port
(COTP) ``to prevent access of persons who do not possess one or more of
the identification credentials listed in Sec. 125.09 to those
waterfront facilities, and port and harbor areas, including vessels and
harbor craft therein, where the following shipping activities are
conducted: * * * [t]hose essential to the interests of national
security and defense, to prevent loss, damage or injury, or to insure
the observance of rights and obligations of the United States.''
On August 7, 2002, the Coast Guard published a ``Clarification of
Regulation'' in the Federal Register at 67 FR 51082, which notified the
public that the Coast Guard may soon begin requiring identification
credentials from persons seeking access to waterfront facilities, areas
within the port and harbor, and on vessels and harbor craft within such
areas.
I have determined that it is necessary to inform the public of the
identification credential requirement under 33 CFR 125.15(a) for all
individuals seeking access to facilities regulated under 33 CFR part
105. These actions will improve national security by verifying maritime
workers' identity, validating their background information, assisting
transportation facilities in managing their security risks, and
accounting for access of authorized personnel to transportation
facilities and activities. This document announces to the public that,
in accordance with my authority under 33 CFR 125.15, I am directing
COTPs to prevent access to all facilities regulated under 33 CFR part
105 to persons who do not have an identification credential listed in
33 CFR 125.09 or such identification as I have approved below under 33
CFR 125.09(f).
The Coast Guard notes that it will not be issuing Port Security
Cards at this time, and reaffirms that when the regulations
implementing the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
are issued, the Coast Guard will reevaluate this action.
A. Acceptable Identification Credentials
Acceptable forms of identification credentials under 33 CFR 125.09
include the following:
A Merchant Mariner Document.
An Armed Forces Identification Card.
Federal law enforcement credentials.
[[Page 25067]]
Identification credentials issued to public safety
officers.
In addition, pursuant to my authority under 125.09(f), I approve as
identification credentials the following forms of identification:
For non-employees and employees of the facility, and
longshoremen, a state-issued commercial driver's license with hazardous
materials endorsement issued after May 31, 2005.
For non-employees of the facility, excluding longshoremen,
a state-issued driver's license or identification card or a personal
identification issued by the individual's employer, union or trade
association (33 CFR 101.515(b)(2)); or a passport or commercial drivers
license issued by Canada or Mexico.
For employees of the facility and longshoremen, facility-
issued employee identification cards, a state-issued driver's license,
or a personal identification issued by the individual's employer, union
or trade association (33 CFR 101.515(b)(2)), provided the individual
has been screened as outlined below and has not been determined a
threat.
For the purposes of this action, ``facility employees'' include all
permanent employees and long-term contractors. Contractors are
considered to be long-term if they need regular access to the facility
for a period in excess of 90 days.
As discussed below, TSA will analyze the relevant information
before determining whether or not an employee or longshoreman poses or
is suspected of posing a security threat warranting denial of access to
the port facility. TSA will notify the facility and the COTP of persons
that pose a security threat. Accordingly, those persons will not have
approved identification credentials under 125.09(f) and must be denied
access to part 105 facilities.
This action is necessary in the interests of national security and
to protect these facilities from loss, damage, or injury.
B. Threat Assessment Screening of Facility Employees and Longshoremen
In order to accomplish screening, the facility operator or
longshore union (union) will immediately, but not later than May 30,
2006, provide the following information from the union, facility
operator's or long-term contractor's existing files to TSA for each
facility employee or longshoreman seeking to use as an identification
credential a facility-issued employee identification card, a state-
issued driver's license, or personal identification issued by the
individual's employer, union or trade association:
Legal Name (Last, First, Middle, suffix).
Date of birth (MonthDayYear, 12121970).
Social Security number (optional, no dashes).
Alien Identification number (if applicable).
Although the Coast Guard is providing up to 30 days for facility
operators and longshore unions to provide the requested information,
the COTP may contact the facility operator or union and request that
such information be provided immediately.
This information must be contained in a spreadsheet and submitted
via the Coast Guard's Homeport Web portal https://homeport.uscg.mil. For
information about how to register in Homeport contact the COTP for
details. If unable to access Homeport, the data may be submitted via a
password-protected compact disk to Stephen Sadler, Director, Maritime
and Surface Credentialing, Office of Transportation Threat Assessment
and Credentialing--TSA-19, Transportation Security Administration, 601
South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 22202. When submitting the information
listed above, please provide it in a password protected Excel
spreadsheet and include a point of contact (POC) for the facility
operator or union and contact information. TSA will contact the POC to
obtain the password when it receives information through the mail.
Prior to submitting the information listed above, facility operators or
unions must notify the individuals on whom information is submitted of
their intent to submit the above information for purposes of a security
threat assessment, and notify these individuals that they may decline
to provide their social security numbers, but that such action may
result in delays or make it impossible to complete the assessment. If
the port facility operator or Longshore union does not have the
information listed above in its existing files and must collect the
information directly from the individual, the following Privacy Act
notice must be provided to that individual prior to collecting the
information:
Privacy Act Notice
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 114, 50 U.S.C. 191, and 33 CFR part 125 and
authorize the collection of this information.
Purpose: DHS will use this information to conduct a security
threat assessment on port facility employees, port facility long-
term contractors, and longshoremen.
Routine Uses: The information will be used by and disclosed to
DHS personnel and contractors or other agents who need the
information to assist in activities related to port security.
Additionally, DHS may share the information with facility operators,
Longshore unions, and law enforcement or other government agencies
as necessary to respond to potential or actual threats to
transportation security, or pursuant to its published Privacy Act
system of records notice.
Disclosure: Furnishing this information is voluntary. However,
failure to furnish the requested information may delay or prevent
the completion of your security threat assessment, which may prevent
your access to MTSA regulated facilities.
So as not to prejudice new employees or longshoremen who seek
access to the facility using a facility-issued employee identification
card, a state-issued driver's license, or a personal identification
issued by the individual's employer, union or trade association (33 CFR
101.515(b)(2)) under this action (who will be barred from entry if not
screened in a timely manner), facility operators or unions must
provide, on a continuing basis, the above-listed information for all
new facility employees or longshoremen in a timely manner using the
mechanisms listed above. When submitting lists with information for new
employees or longshoremen, do not include in the list any employee or
longshoreman whose information has previously been submitted.
Threat assessment determinations of facility employees and
longshoremen will be conducted by TSA pursuant to its authority to
assess threats to transportation under 49 U.S.C. 114(f). For the
majority of cases, these threat assessment determinations will be
accomplished within 30 days of TSA's receipt of the information
discussed above. While the assessment is being performed, personnel
will continue to have access to the facility. Unless the facility
operator or union receives a written document from TSA stating that TSA
has made a threat assessment determination, as outlined below, that a
particular facility employee or longshoreman poses a security threat,
that individual may be permitted access to the port facility.
If TSA is unable to complete the threat assessment for a specific
facility employee or longshoreman with the information initially
provided, TSA will request additional information regarding that
individual from the facility operator or union. A request for
additional information regarding a specific facility employee or
longshoreman is not a threat assessment determination; it is merely a
request for more information. If TSA requests additional information
regarding a specific individual from a facility operator or a union,
the operator or union must provide the requested
[[Page 25068]]
information to TSA within 5 business days.
TSA will examine various factors for the threat assessment of
facility employees and longshoremen. TSA's examination will not include
a criminal history records check. TSA will check immigration status in
the course of the threat assessment evaluation. Facility employees and
longshoremen must be a citizen of the United States, a lawful permanent
resident of the United States as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101, or hold an
appropriate immigration status, as discussed below. Other acceptable
immigration statuses include individuals who possess valid evidence of
unrestricted employment and are in a lawful nonimmigrant status, are a
refugee admitted under 8 U.S.C. 1137, or are an alien granted asylum
under 8 U.S.C. 1158. When verifying immigration status, TSA checks
relevant Federal databases and may perform other checks, including
verifying the validity of the applicant's social security number or
alien registration number.
Any facility employee or longshoreman identified as posing a
security threat or as not having legal status under the immigration
laws will not be permitted to enter or remain on a 33 CFR part 105
facility. To make such a determination, TSA will check various
government databases. Upon checking the relevant databases, TSA will
analyze the relevant information from Federal law enforcement and
intelligence agencies before determining that a facility employee or
longshoreman poses or is suspected of posing a security threat
warranting denial of access to the port facility. As mentioned above,
this will not include a criminal history records check.
Individuals identified as posing a security threat will receive an
Initial Determination of Threat Assessment (hereinafter ``Initial
Determination''). An Initial Determination does not mean that an
individual must be denied access to a facility. Individuals who believe
that they have been wrongly identified as posing a security threat and
believe they meet the standards for the security threat assessment have
the opportunity to appeal an Initial Determination using the appeal
procedures established for individuals denied a hazardous materials
endorsement under TSA's regulations, which are set forth in 49 CFR
1572.141. If a facility employee or longshoreman fails to initiate an
appeal within 30 days after receipt, the Initial Determination becomes
final, and TSA serves a Final Determination of Threat Assessment upon
the individual and notifies the facility or union and the COTP.
Facility employees or longshoremen believed to pose a security
threat will receive a notice from the TSA that they will be denied
access to part 105 facilities. Please note this notice will be called
an Initial Determination of Threat Assessment and Immediate Revocation
of Access Privileges (hereinafter ``Immediate Revocation of Access
Privileges''). The Immediate Revocation of Access Privileges will be
sent to the individual with notification to the facility or union as
well as the COTP at the same time to immediately deny that individual
access to the facility. Facility employees or longshoremen wishing to
appeal an Immediate Revocation of Access Privileges must follow the
appeal procedures set forth in 49 CFR 1572.141(i). If that individual
fails to initiate an appeal within 30 days after receipt, the Immediate
Revocation of Access Privileges becomes final, and TSA serves a Final
Determination of Threat Assessment upon the individual and notifies the
facility or union as well as the COTP.
If a facility employee or longshoreman appeals the Initial
Determination or the Immediate Revocation of Access Privileges, TSA
will serve a Final Determination of Threat Assessment or a Withdrawal
of the Initial Determination or Immediate Revocation of Access
Privileges on that individual and notify the facility or union, and the
COTP.
TSA will notify the facility and the COTP of which facility
employees or longshoremen who must be denied access to part 105
facilities. The Coast Guard will make available to facilities a list of
longshoremen who have been vetted for each port. Access is limited to
only those persons who are authorized. Facilities will be subject to
Coast Guard examinations to verify that they are complying with the
requirements of 33 CFR part 125, as implemented by this document.
This requirement does not prohibit a facility owner or operator
from imposing additional requirements above these minimums.
The additional screening provision for specific types of
identification credentials, as listed above, is only being used for
facility employee and longshoreman credentials at this time because of
their regular and constant access to the facility and their knowledge
of its operations, as opposed to the infrequent access by other port
workers. We continue to view the TWIC as the ultimate solution to the
access credential issue.
Persons seeking additional information on this announcement or its
enforcement may contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Further information
regarding the threat assessments conducted by TSA is provided in the
Privacy Impact Assessment for U.S. Port Access Threat Assessments,
available on the Department of Homeland Security Web site at: https://
www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0511.xml.
As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)), we submitted a copy of this notice to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for its review of the collection of
information. Due to the circumstances surrounding this notice, we asked
for ``emergency processing'' of our request. We received OMB approval
for the collection of information on April 24, 2006. It has been given
OMB control number 1625-0110. It is valid through October 31, 2006.
Dated: April 25, 2006.
Terry M. Cross,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commandant.
[FR Doc. 06-4026 Filed 4-25-06; 2:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P