Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX, 24831-24834 [E6-6366]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 2006 / Proposed Rules
representative of the entity making the
payment. A waiver shall cover only a
single payment period. Failure to obtain
a waiver may result in the remittance
being returned to the remitter.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 201.17 to revise paragraph
(i)(1) to read as follows:
§ 201.17 Statements of Account covering
compulsory licenses for secondary
transmissions by cable systems.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Royalty fee payment. (1) All royalty
fees must be paid by a single electronic
funds transfer, and must be received in
the designated bank by the filing
deadline for the relevant accounting
period. The following information must
be provided as part of the EFT and/or
as part of the remittance advice as
provided for in circulars issued by the
Copyright Office:
(i) Remitter’s name and address;
(ii) Name of a contact person,
telephone number and extension, and
email address;
(iii) The actual or anticipated date
that the EFT will be transmitted;
(iv) Type of royalty payment (i.e.
cable);
(v) Total amount submitted via the
EFT;
(vi) Total amount to be paid by year
and period;
(vii) Number of statements of account
that the EFT covers;
(viii) ID numbers assigned by the
Licensing Division;
(ix) Legal name of the owner for each
Statement of Account;
(x) Identification of the first
community served (city and state).
(2) The remittance advice shall be
attached to the Statement(s) of Account.
In addition, a copy of the remittance
advice shall be emailed or sent by
facsimile to the Licensing Division.
(3) The Office may waive the
requirement for payment by electronic
funds transfer as set forth in paragraph
(1)(i) of this section. At least 60 days
prior to the royalty fee due date, the
remitter shall submit to the Licensing
Division a certified statement setting
forth the reasons explaining why
payment by an electronic funds transfer
would be virtually impossible or,
alternatively, why it would impose a
financial or other hardship on the
remitter. The statement must be signed
by a duly authorized representative of
the entity making the payment. A
waiver shall cover only a single
payment period. Failure to obtain a
waiver may result in the remittance
being returned to the remitter.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Amend § 201.28 as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:41 Apr 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
a. By revising paragraph (e)(3)(ii);
b. By redesignating § § 201.28(h)
through (l) as § § 201.28(i) through (m)
respectively, and adding a new
§ 201.28(h);
c. By amending newly redesignated
§ 201.28(j)(1)(ii) to remove ‘‘(i)(2)’’ and
add in its place ‘‘(j)(2)’’
d. By amending newly redesignated
§ 201.28(j)(3)(i) to remove ‘‘(i)(3)’’ and
add in its place ‘‘(j)(3)’’
e. By amending newly redesignated
§ 201.28(j)(3)(vi) to remove ‘‘(i)’’ and
add in its place ‘‘(j)’’.
The additions and revisions to
§ 201.28 read as follows:
§ 201.28 Statements of Account for digital
media audio recording devices or media.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) The amount of the royalty
payment shall be calculated in
accordance with the instructions
specified in the quarterly Statement of
Account form. Payment shall be made
as specified in section 201.28(h).
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Royalty fee payment. (1) All
royalty fees must be paid by a single
electronic funds transfer, and must be
received in the designated bank by the
filing deadline for the relevant
accounting period. The following
information must be provided as part of
the EFT and/or as part of the remittance
advice as provided for in circulars
issued by the Copyright Office:
(i) Remitter’s name and address;
(ii) Name of a contact person,
telephone number and extension, and
email address;
(iii) The actual or anticipated date
that the EFT will be transmitted;
(iv) Type of royalty payment (i.e.
DART);
(v) Total amount submitted via the
EFT;
(vi) Total amount to be paid by year
and period;
(vii) Number of statements of account
that the EFT covers;
(viii) ID numbers assigned by the
Licensing Division;
(ix) Legal name of the owner for each
Statement of Account.
(2) The remittance advice shall be
attached to the Statement(s) of Account.
In addition, a copy of the remittance
advice shall be emailed or sent by
facsimile to the Licensing Division.
(3) The Office may waive the
requirement for payment by electronic
funds transfer as set forth in paragraph
(1) of this section. At least 60 days prior
to the royalty fee due date, the remitter
shall submit to the Licensing Division a
certified statement setting forth the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24831
reasons explaining why payment by an
electronic funds transfer would be
virtually impossible or, alternatively,
why it would impose a financial or
other hardship on the remitter. The
certification must be signed by a duly
authorized representative of the entity
making the payment. A waiver shall
cover only a single payment period.
Failure to obtain a waiver may result in
the remittance being returned to the
remitter.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 20, 2006.
Tanya M. Sandros,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E6–6186 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–33–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0279; FRL–8162–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX RACT
Determinations for Eight Individual
Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve
revisions to the Pennsylvania State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for
eight major sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides
(NOX) pursuant to the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania’s (Pennsylvania or the
Commonwealth) SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations. EPA is proposing to
approve these revisions in accordance
with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before May 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2006–0279 by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: morris.makeba@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0279,
Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
24832
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 2006 / Proposed Rules
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2006–
0279. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O.
Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Wentworth, (215) 814–2034, or by
e-mail at wentworth.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
1, 1995, March 21, 1996, October 18,
1996, April 20, 1998, October 2, 1998,
June 22, 1999, and February 4, 2003,
PADEP submitted revisions to the
Pennsylvania SIP. These SIP revisions
consist of source-specific operating
permits issued by PADEP to establish
and require RACT for eight individual
sources pursuant to Pennsylvania’s SIPapproved generic RACT regulations.
I. Background
Pursuant to sections 182(b)(2) and
182(f) of the CAA, Pennsylvania is
required to establish and implement
RACT for all major VOC and NOX
sources. The major source size is
determined by its location, the
classification of that area and whether it
is located in the ozone transport region
(OTR). Under section 184 of the CAA,
RACT as specified in sections 182(b)(2)
and 182(f) applies throughout the OTR.
The entire Commonwealth is located
within the OTR. Therefore, RACT is
applicable statewide in Pennsylvania.
State implementation plan revisions
imposing RACT for three classes of VOC
sources are required under section
182(b)(2). The categories are:
(1) All sources covered by a Control
Technique Guideline (CTG) document
issued between November 15, 1990 and
the date of attainment;
(2) All sources covered by a CTG
issued prior to November 15, 1990; and
(3) All major non-CTG sources.
The Pennsylvania SIP already has
approved RACT regulations and
requirements for all sources and source
categories covered by the CTGs. The
Pennsylvania SIP also has approved
regulations to require major sources of
NOX and additional major sources of
VOC emissions (not covered by a CTG)
to implement RACT. These regulations
are commonly termed the ‘‘generic
RACT regulations.’’ A generic RACT
regulation is one that does not, itself,
specifically define RACT for a source or
source categories but instead establishes
procedures for imposing case-by-case
RACT determinations. The
Commonwealth’s SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations consist of the
procedures PADEP uses to establish and
impose RACT for subject sources of
VOC and NOX.
Pursuant to the SIP-approved generic
RACT rules, PADEP imposes RACT on
each subject source in an enforceable
document, usually a Plan Approval
(PA), Consent Order (CO), or Operating
Permit (OP). The Commonwealth then
submits these PAs, COs, or OPs to EPA
for approval as source-specific SIP
revisions. EPA reviews these SIP
revisions to ensure that the PADEP has
determined and imposed RACT in
accordance with the provisions of the
SIP-approved generic RACT rules.
It must be noted that the
Commonwealth has adopted and is
implementing additional ‘‘post RACT
requirements’’ to reduce seasonal NOX
emissions in the form of a NOX cap and
trade regulation, 25 Pa Code Chapters
121 and 123, based upon a model rule
developed by the States in the OTR.
That regulation was approved as a SIP
revision on June 6, 2000 (65 FR 35842).
Pennsylvania has also adopted 25 Pa
Code Chapter 145 to satisfy Phase I of
the NOX SIP call. That regulation was
approved as a SIP revision on August
21, 2001 (66 FR 43795). Federal
approval of a source-specific RACT
determination for a major source of NOX
in no way relieves that source from any
applicable requirements found in 25 PA
Code Chapters 121, 123 and 145.
II. Summary of the SIP Revisions
The following table identifies the
sources and the individual operating
permits (OPs) which are the subject of
this rulemaking.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
PENNSYLVANIA—VOC AND NOX RACT DETERMINATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL SOURCES
Operating Permit
(OP #)
Source type
‘‘Major Source’’
pollutant
OP–21–2009
Combustion Turbines .........................
VOC and NOX.
Northumberland .............
Northampton ..................
OP–49–0002
OP–48–0006
Cogeneration Facility .........................
Combustion Turbines and Boilers .....
NOX.
NOX.
Lycoming ........................
OP–41–0004
Combustion Turbine ...........................
NOX.
Source’s name
County
Pennsylvania Power & Light Company—West Shore.
Foster Wheeler Mt. Carmel, Inc ..........
Metropolitan Edison Company—Portland.
Pennsylvania Power & Light Company
Cumberland ...................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:41 Apr 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
24833
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 2006 / Proposed Rules
PENNSYLVANIA—VOC AND NOX RACT DETERMINATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL SOURCES—Continued
Operating Permit
(OP #)
County
Pennsylvania Power & Light Company
Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation.
Pennsylvania Power & Light Company
Clinton ............................
Juniata County ...............
OP–18–0006
OP–34–2002
Combustion Turbines .........................
Compressor Station ...........................
NOX.
NOX.
Northampton ..................
OP 48–0011
VOC and NOX.
Johnstown Corporation ........................
Cambria .........................
OP–11–000–034
Combustion Turbines and Diesel
Generators.
Steel Foundry .....................................
Interested parties are advised that
copies of Pennsylvania’s SIP submittals
for these sources, including the actual
OPs imposing RACT, PADEP’s
evaluation memoranda, and the sources’
RACT proposals (referenced in PADEP’s
evaluation memoranda) are included
and may be viewed in their entirety in
both the electronic and hard copy
versions of the docket for this final rule.
As previously stated, all documents in
the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O.
Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105.
EPA is approving these RACT SIP
submittals because PADEP established
and imposed these RACT requirements
in accordance with the criteria set forth
in its SIP-approved generic RACT
regulations applicable to these sources.
In accordance with its SIP-approved
generic RACT rule, the Commonwealth
has also imposed recordkeeping,
monitoring, and testing requirements on
these sources sufficient to determine
compliance with the applicable RACT
determinations.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
III. Proposed Action
EPA is approving the revisions to the
Pennsylvania SIP submitted by PADEP
on August 1, 1995, March 21, 1996,
October 18, 1996, April 20, 1998,
October 2, 1998, June 22, 1999, and
February 4, 2003 to establish and
require VOC and NOX RACT for eight
individual sources pursuant to the
Commonwealth’s SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations. EPA is soliciting
public comments on this proposed rule
to approve these source-specific RACT
determinations established and imposed
by PADEP in accordance with the
criteria set forth in its SIP-approved
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:41 Apr 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
Source type
‘‘Major Source’’
pollutant
Source’s name
generic RACT regulations applicable to
these sources. These comments will be
considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). This action merely proposes
to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this rule proposes to
approve pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This proposed rule also
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will
it have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
VOC.
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This proposed rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. EPA
has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order.
This proposed rule to approve eight
source-specific RACT determinations
established and imposed by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
pursuant to its SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
24834
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 19, 2006.
William Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E6–6366 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0296; FRL–8162–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; NOX and VOC RACT
Determinations for Eight Individual
Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve
revisions to the Pennsylvania State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for
seven sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and one source of
nitrogen oxides (NOX) pursuant to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s
(Pennsylvania or the Commonwealth)
SIP-approved generic RACT regulations.
EPA is proposing to approve these
revisions in accordance with the Clean
Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before May 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number EPA–R03–
OAR–2006–0296 by one of the following
methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: morris.makeba@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0296,
Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0296.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:41 Apr 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O.
Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LaKeshia N. Robertson, (215) 814–2113,
or by e-mail at
robertson.lakeshia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
27, 1995, August 1, 1995, January 10,
1996, March 21, 1996, October 18, 1996,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
June 22, 1999, and July 28, 1999, PADEP
submitted revisions to the Pennsylvania
SIP. These SIP revisions consist of
source-specific operating permits and/or
plan approvals issued by PADEP to
establish and require RACT for eight
sources pursuant to Pennsylvania’s SIPapproved generic RACT regulations.
I. Background
Pursuant to sections 182(b)(2) and
182(f) of CAA, Pennsylvania is required
to establish and implement RACT for all
major VOC and NOX sources. The major
source size is determined by its
location, the classification of that area
and whether it is located in the ozone
transport region (OTR). Under section
184 of the CAA, RACT as specified in
sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f) applies
throughout the OTR. The entire
Commonwealth is located within the
OTR. Therefore, RACT is applicable
statewide in Pennsylvania.
State implementation plan revisions
imposing RACT for three classes of VOC
sources are required under section
182(b)(2). The categories are:
(1) All sources covered by a Control
Technique Guideline (CTG) document
issued between November 15, 1990 and
the date of attainment;
(2) All sources covered by a CTG
issued prior to November 15, 1990; and
(3) All major non-CTG sources.
The Pennsylvania SIP already has
approved RACT regulations and
requirements for all sources and source
categories covered by the CTGs. The
Pennsylvania SIP also has approved
regulations to require major sources of
NOX and additional major sources of
VOC emissions (not covered by a CTG)
to implement RACT. These regulations
are commonly termed the ‘‘generic
RACT regulations’’. A generic RACT
regulation is one that does not, itself,
specifically define RACT for a source or
source categories but instead establishes
procedures for imposing case-by-case
RACT determinations. The
Commonwealth’s SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations consist of the
procedures PADEP uses to establish and
impose RACT for subject sources of
VOC and NOX. Pursuant to the SIPapproved generic RACT rules, PADEP
imposes RACT on each subject source in
an enforceable document, usually a Plan
Approval (PA) or Operating Permit (OP).
The Commonwealth then submits these
PAs and OPs to EPA for approval as
source-specific SIP revisions. EPA
reviews these SIP revisions to ensure
that the Pennsylvania DEP has
determined and imposed RACT in
accordance with the provisions of the
SIP-approved generic RACT rules.
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24831-24834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6366]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0279; FRL-8162-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX RACT Determinations for Eight Individual
Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve revisions to the Pennsylvania State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably available control technology (RACT)
for eight major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and
nitrogen oxides (NOX) pursuant to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania's (Pennsylvania or the Commonwealth) SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations. EPA is proposing to approve these revisions in
accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2006-0279 by one of the following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: morris.makeba@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0279, Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
[[Page 24832]]
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2006-0279. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the
State submittal are available at the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400
Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Wentworth, (215) 814-2034, or by
e-mail at wentworth.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 1, 1995, March 21, 1996, October
18, 1996, April 20, 1998, October 2, 1998, June 22, 1999, and February
4, 2003, PADEP submitted revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP. These SIP
revisions consist of source-specific operating permits issued by PADEP
to establish and require RACT for eight individual sources pursuant to
Pennsylvania's SIP-approved generic RACT regulations.
I. Background
Pursuant to sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f) of the CAA, Pennsylvania
is required to establish and implement RACT for all major VOC and
NOX sources. The major source size is determined by its
location, the classification of that area and whether it is located in
the ozone transport region (OTR). Under section 184 of the CAA, RACT as
specified in sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f) applies throughout the OTR.
The entire Commonwealth is located within the OTR. Therefore, RACT is
applicable statewide in Pennsylvania.
State implementation plan revisions imposing RACT for three classes
of VOC sources are required under section 182(b)(2). The categories
are:
(1) All sources covered by a Control Technique Guideline (CTG)
document issued between November 15, 1990 and the date of attainment;
(2) All sources covered by a CTG issued prior to November 15, 1990;
and
(3) All major non-CTG sources.
The Pennsylvania SIP already has approved RACT regulations and
requirements for all sources and source categories covered by the CTGs.
The Pennsylvania SIP also has approved regulations to require major
sources of NOX and additional major sources of VOC emissions
(not covered by a CTG) to implement RACT. These regulations are
commonly termed the ``generic RACT regulations.'' A generic RACT
regulation is one that does not, itself, specifically define RACT for a
source or source categories but instead establishes procedures for
imposing case-by-case RACT determinations. The Commonwealth's SIP-
approved generic RACT regulations consist of the procedures PADEP uses
to establish and impose RACT for subject sources of VOC and
NOX.
Pursuant to the SIP-approved generic RACT rules, PADEP imposes RACT
on each subject source in an enforceable document, usually a Plan
Approval (PA), Consent Order (CO), or Operating Permit (OP). The
Commonwealth then submits these PAs, COs, or OPs to EPA for approval as
source-specific SIP revisions. EPA reviews these SIP revisions to
ensure that the PADEP has determined and imposed RACT in accordance
with the provisions of the SIP-approved generic RACT rules.
It must be noted that the Commonwealth has adopted and is
implementing additional ``post RACT requirements'' to reduce seasonal
NOX emissions in the form of a NOX cap and trade
regulation, 25 Pa Code Chapters 121 and 123, based upon a model rule
developed by the States in the OTR. That regulation was approved as a
SIP revision on June 6, 2000 (65 FR 35842). Pennsylvania has also
adopted 25 Pa Code Chapter 145 to satisfy Phase I of the NOX
SIP call. That regulation was approved as a SIP revision on August 21,
2001 (66 FR 43795). Federal approval of a source-specific RACT
determination for a major source of NOX in no way relieves
that source from any applicable requirements found in 25 PA Code
Chapters 121, 123 and 145.
II. Summary of the SIP Revisions
The following table identifies the sources and the individual
operating permits (OPs) which are the subject of this rulemaking.
Pennsylvania--VOC and NOX RACT Determinations for Individual Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Permit ``Major Source''
Source's name County (OP ) Source type pollutant
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pennsylvania Power & Light Cumberland........ OP-21-2009 Combustion VOC and NOX.
Company--West Shore. Turbines.
Foster Wheeler Mt. Carmel, Inc. Northumberland.... OP-49-0002 Cogeneration NOX.
Facility.
Metropolitan Edison Company-- Northampton....... OP-48-0006 Combustion NOX.
Portland. Turbines and
Boilers.
Pennsylvania Power & Light Lycoming.......... OP-41-0004 Combustion NOX.
Company. Turbine.
[[Page 24833]]
Pennsylvania Power & Light Clinton........... OP-18-0006 Combustion NOX.
Company. Turbines.
Texas Eastern Transmission Juniata County.... OP-34-2002 Compressor NOX.
Corporation. Station.
Pennsylvania Power & Light Northampton....... OP 48-0011 Combustion VOC and NOX.
Company. Turbines and
Diesel
Generators.
Johnstown Corporation.......... Cambria........... OP-11-000-034 Steel Foundry.... VOC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties are advised that copies of Pennsylvania's SIP
submittals for these sources, including the actual OPs imposing RACT,
PADEP's evaluation memoranda, and the sources' RACT proposals
(referenced in PADEP's evaluation memoranda) are included and may be
viewed in their entirety in both the electronic and hard copy versions
of the docket for this final rule. As previously stated, all documents
in the electronic docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov
index. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during
normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection,
Bureau of Air Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105.
EPA is approving these RACT SIP submittals because PADEP
established and imposed these RACT requirements in accordance with the
criteria set forth in its SIP-approved generic RACT regulations
applicable to these sources. In accordance with its SIP-approved
generic RACT rule, the Commonwealth has also imposed recordkeeping,
monitoring, and testing requirements on these sources sufficient to
determine compliance with the applicable RACT determinations.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is approving the revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP submitted by
PADEP on August 1, 1995, March 21, 1996, October 18, 1996, April 20,
1998, October 2, 1998, June 22, 1999, and February 4, 2003 to establish
and require VOC and NOX RACT for eight individual sources
pursuant to the Commonwealth's SIP-approved generic RACT regulations.
EPA is soliciting public comments on this proposed rule to approve
these source-specific RACT determinations established and imposed by
PADEP in accordance with the criteria set forth in its SIP-approved
generic RACT regulations applicable to these sources. These comments
will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)).
This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-
existing requirements under state law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does
not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect
small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This proposed rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This
proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3
of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This proposed rule to approve eight source-specific RACT
determinations established and imposed by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania pursuant to its SIP-approved generic RACT regulations does
not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
[[Page 24834]]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 19, 2006.
William Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E6-6366 Filed 4-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P