Proposed Collection of Information; Comment Request-Safety Standard for Cigarette Lighters, 24651-24653 [E6-6297]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
Office of the Secretary, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 East
West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Written comments may also be sent to
the Consumer Product Safety
Commission, Office of the Secretary by
e-mail at cpsc-os@cpsc.gov or facsimile
at (301) 504–0127.
Copies of this request for extension of
the information collection requirements
and supporting documentation are
available from Linda Glatz, Management
and Program Analyst, Office of Planning
and Evaluation, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814;
telephone: (301) 504–7671.
Dated: April 20, 2006.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–6269 Filed 4–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request—Citizens Band Base Station
Antennas
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Consumer Product
Safety Commission requests comments
on a proposed extension of approval of
a collection of information from
manufacturers and importers of citizens
band base station antennas. The
collection of information is in
regulations implementing the Safety
Standard for Omnidirectional Citizens
Band Base Station Antennas (16 CFR
part 1204). These regulations establish
testing and recordkeeping requirements
for manufacturers and importers of
antennas subject to the standard. The
Commission will consider all comments
received in response to this notice
before requesting an extension of
approval of this collection of
information from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
DATES: The Office of the Secretary must
receive comments not later than June
26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be captioned ‘‘Citizens Band Base
Station Antennas’’ and e-mailed to the
Office of the Secretary at cpscos@cpsc.gov. Comments may also be
sent by facsimile to (301) 504–0127, or
by mail to the Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
4330 East West Highway, Bethesda,
Maryland 20814.
For
information about the proposed
extension of approval of the collection
of information, or to obtain a copy of 16
CFR part 1204, call or write Linda L.
Glatz, Office of Planning and
Evaluation, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814; telephone
(301) 504–7671.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
In 1982, the Commission issued the
Safety Standard for Omnidirectional
Citizens Band Antennas (16 CFR part
1204) to reduce risks of death and
serious injury that may result if an
omnidirectional antenna contacts an
overhead power line while being
erected or removed from its site. The
standard contains performance tests to
demonstrate that an antenna will not
transmit a harmful electric current if it
contacts an electric power line with a
voltage of 14,500 volts phase-to-ground.
Certification regulations implementing
the standard require manufacturers,
importers, and private labelers of
antennas subject to the standard to
perform tests to demonstrate that those
products meet the requirements of the
standard, and to maintain records of
those tests. The certification regulations
are codified at 16 CFR part 1204,
subpart B.
The Commission uses the information
compiled and maintained by
manufacturers, importers, and private
labelers of antennas subject to the
standard to help protect the public from
risks of injury or death associated with
omnidirectional citizens band base
station antennas. More specifically, this
information helps the Commission
determine that antennas subject to the
standard comply with all applicable
requirements. The Commission also
uses this information to obtain
corrective actions if omnidirectional
citizens band base station antennas fail
to comply with the standard in a
manner which creates a substantial risk
of injury to the public. The Office of
Management and Budget approved the
collection of information in the
certification regulations under control
number 3041–0006. OMB’s most recent
extension of approval expires on July
31, 2006. The Commission now
proposes to request an extension of
approval without change for the
collection of information in the
certification regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24651
B. Estimated Burden
The Commission staff estimates that
about 5 firms manufacture or import
citizens band base station antennas
subject to the standard. The
Commission staff estimates that the
certification regulations will impose an
average annual burden of about 220
hours on each of those firms. That
burden will result from conducting the
testing required by the regulations and
maintaining records of the results of that
testing. The total annual burden
imposed by the regulations on
manufacturers and importers of citizens
band base station antennas is
approximately 1,100 hours.
The hourly wage for the testing and
recordkeeping required to conduct the
testing and maintain records required by
the regulations is about $42.84 (Bureau
of Labor Statistics, 2006), for an
estimated annual cost to the industry of
$47,000.
C. Request for Comments
The Commission solicits written
comments from all interested persons
about the proposed collection of
information. The Commission
specifically solicits information relevant
to the following topics:
—Whether the collection of information
described above is necessary for the
proper performance of the
Commission’s functions, including
whether the information would have
practical utility;
—Whether the estimated burden of the
proposed collection of information is
accurate;
—Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected could be enhanced; and
—Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms
of information technology.
Dated: April 20, 2006.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–6270 Filed 4–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection of Information;
Comment Request—Safety Standard
for Cigarette Lighters
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
24652
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product
Safety Commission requests comments
on a proposed request for an extension
of approval of a collection of
information from manufacturers and
importers of disposable and novelty
cigarette lighters. This collection of
information consists of testing and
recordkeeping requirements in
certification regulations implementing
the Safety Standard for Cigarette
Lighters (16 CFR part 1210). The
Commission will consider all comments
received in response to this notice
before requesting an extension of
approval of this collection of
information from the Office of
Management and Budget.
DATES: The Office of the Secretary must
receive written comments not later than
June 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be captioned ‘‘Cigarette Lighters’’ and emailed to the Office of the Secretary at
cpsc-os@cpsc.gov. Comments may also
be sent by facsimile to (301) 504–0127,
or by mail to the Office of the Secretary,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
4330 East West Highway, Bethesda,
Maryland 20814.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about the proposed
extension of approval of the collection
of information, or to obtain a copy of 16
CFR part 1210, call or write Linda L.
Glatz, Office of Planning and
Evaluation, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814; telephone
(301) 504–7671.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1993,
the Commission issued the Safety
Standard for Cigarette Lighters (16 CFR
part 1210) under provisions of the
Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA)
(15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.) to eliminate or
reduce risks of death and burn injury
from fires accidentally started by
children playing with cigarette lighters.
The standard contains performance
requirements for disposable and novelty
lighters that are intended to make
cigarette lighters subject to the standard
resist operation by children younger
than five years of age.
A. Certification Requirements
Section 14(a) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C.
2063(a)) requires manufacturers,
importers, and private labelers of a
consumer product subject to a consumer
product safety standard to issue a
certificate stating that the product
complies with all applicable consumer
product safety standards. Section 14(a)
of the CPSA also requires that the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
certificate of compliance must be based
on a test of each product or upon a
reasonable testing program.
Section 14(b) of the CPSA authorizes
the Commission to issue regulations to
prescribe a reasonable testing program
to support certificates of compliance
with a consumer product safety
standard. Section 16(b) of the CPSA (15
U.S.C. 2065(b)) authorizes the
Commission to issue rules to require
that firms ‘‘establish and maintain’’
records to permit the Commission to
determine compliance with rules issued
under the authority of the CPSA.
The Commission has issued
regulations prescribing requirements for
a reasonable testing program to support
certificates of compliance with the
standard for cigarette lighters. These
regulations require manufacturers and
importers to submit a description of
each model of lighter, results of
surrogate qualification tests for
compliance with the standard, and other
information before the introduction of
each model of lighter in commerce.
These regulations also require
manufacturers, importers, and private
labelers of disposable and novelty
lighters to establish and maintain
records to demonstrate successful
completion of all required tests to
support the certificates of compliance
that they issue. 16 CFR part 1210,
subpart B.
The Commission uses the information
compiled and maintained by
manufacturers, importers, and private
labelers of disposable and novelty
lighters to protect consumers from risks
of accidental deaths and burn injuries
associated with those lighters. More
specifically, the Commission uses this
information to determine whether
lighters comply with the standard by
resisting operation by young children.
The Commission also uses this
information to obtain corrective actions
if disposable or novelty lighters fail to
comply with the standard in a manner
that creates a substantial risk of injury
to the public.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approved the collection of
information in the certification
regulations for cigarette lighters under
control number 3041–0116. OMB’s most
recent extension of approval will expire
on June 30, 2006. The Commission
proposes to request an extension of
approval for these collection of
information requirements.
B. Estimated Burden
The cost of the rule’s testing
requirement is the cost of testing, either
by the firm or by outside contractors.
There are an estimated 60 firms that
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
may be affected. If done through outside
contractors, the cost per test has been
estimated at $15,000 to $25,000 on
average. Each firm is expected to test 2
models per year. Thus, for the 60
affected firms, the cost of outside testing
would be $2.4 million. If tests are
conducted in-house, testing 2 new
models is expected to take 175 hours
per firm. The total testing time for all 60
firms, if conducted in-house, would be
approximately 10,500. Based on the
average hourly total compensation
(wages and benefits) for U.S. technical
workers of $42.84 (Bureau of Labor
Statistics, September, 2005), the total
industry cost of the testing component
for this regulation would be in the range
of $450,000 to $2.4 million per year,
depending on the method chosen.
The cost of the recordkeeping
requirements has two separate
components: Recordkeeping for new
models and recordkeeping for
comparable models. The time consumed
in recordkeeping for new models has
been estimated at 20 hours per model.
Thus the total time consumed for
recordkeeping of new models would be
2,400 hours (20 hours × 2 models × 60
firms). Based on the average hourly
compensation for technical workers, the
cost of recordkeeping for new models
would be about $100,000 annually
(2,400 × 42.84).
Time consumed in recordkeeping for
lighters that are submitted for
comparison to previously tested models
will require approximately 3 hours for
each model. Based on recent
submission, each firm is expected to
submit 35 models each year for
comparison. Thus, an estimated 6,300
hours may be required by the 60 firms
for recordkeeping regarding comparison
lighters (35 models × 60 firms × 3
hours). Based on the average hourly
compensation for technical workers, the
cost of recordkeeping would be about
$270,000 (6,300 hours × $42.84). The
total recordkeeping costs associated
with the lighter regulation would be
approximately $370,000 ($100,000 +
$270,000).
In addition, each firm will submit
information to the CPSC regarding the
new testing and comparison
submissions totaling about 2,200
responses per year (2 models tested + 35
comparison models × 60 firms). The
total number of hours for these
responses would be approximately
19,200 per year including new-product
testing (175 hours × 60 firms = 10,500),
new product recordkeeping (40 hours ×
60 firms = 2,400), and recordkeeping for
comparison lighters (35 models × 3
hours × 60 firms = 6,300). Based on the
average hourly compensation for
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
technical workers, the total cost of
preparing these submissions would be
about $823,000 (19,200 hours × $42.84).
C. Request for Comments
The Commission solicits written
comments from all interested persons
about the proposed collection of
information. The Commission
specifically solicits information relevant
to the following topics:
—Whether the collection of information
described above is necessary for the
proper performance of the
Commission’s functions, including
whether the information would have
practical utility;
—Whether the estimated burden of the
proposed collection of information is
accurate;
—Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected could be enhanced; and
—Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms
of information technology.
Dated: April 21, 2006.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–6297 Filed 4–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Intent To Request Comments
on Alternative Procedures To
Implement Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation Program Act
(NHPA) Section 106, Per 36 CFR
800.14(E) for Disposal of Naval Vessels
Department of the Navy, DOD.
Notice of intent to request
comments on implementing alternative
procedures.
AGENCY:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
(Navy) is requesting ‘‘Program
Comments’’ for alternative procedures
to implement the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106
regulations. This programmatic
approach substitutes all of 36 CFR part
800 subpart B, covers a category of
undertakings in lieu of individual
reviews and demonstrates the Navy’s
compliance with its responsibilities
under Section 106 of NHPA regarding
the disposal of U.S. Naval vessels which
have been stricken from the Naval
Vessel Register (NVR) and are owned
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
and under the physical custody of the
Navy.
This document will remain in effect
indefinitely. In accordance with 36 CFR
800.14(e)(6), if the Advisory Council for
Historic Preservation (ACHP)
determines that the consideration of
NRHP eligible vessels are not being
carried out in a manner consistent with
this document, the ACHP may withdraw
the comment and the Navy would be
required to comply with the
requirements of 36 CFR 800.3 through
88.7 for each adverse action.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
May 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by any of the following
methods: E-Mail at
Roderick.Speer@navy.mil, fax at 202–
781–4721, or mail to: Navy Inactive
Ships Program Office, 1333 Isaac Hull
Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20376.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander, Program Executive Office
Ships (PEO SHIPS), PMS333, Inactive
Ship Program Office, Ship Donation
Program, ATTN: Mr. Roderick Speer,
1333 Isaac Hull Avenue SE., Stop 2701,
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376–
2701, telephone 202–781–0876.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It is
neither cost effective nor consistent
with the Navy’s mission to retain
vessels once they have been stricken
from the NVR by the Secretary of the
Navy and authorized for disposal. Ship
disposal actions include: Foreign
Military Sales (FMS) to an allied
country, title transfer to another federal
agency, donation to a U.S. nonprofit
organization or state or local
government entity for public display as
a museum and/or memorial, transfer to
the U.S. Fleet for sinking as a target
during at-sea live-fire training exercises,
transfer to a state for sinking as an
artificial reef, or for dismantling and
recycling.
Vessel donations for public display as
a museum or memorial and title
transfers to another federal agency are
not considered adverse effects subject to
this document. Foreign Military Sales to
an allied country, transfer to the U.S.
Fleet for sinking as a target during at-sea
live-fire training exercises, transfer to a
state for sinking as an artificial reef, or
dismantling and recycling are
considered adverse effects subject to
this document.
Prior to undertaking an adverse effect
described above, vessels shall be
reviewed by the Naval Historical Center
(NHC) for eligibility for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP). Vessels determined to be
eligible for listing in the NRHP shall be
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24653
subject to the provisions of this
document prior to undertaking an
adverse effect.
Vessels included in this program
include those (ships and service craft)
entered in the NVR with the following
exceptions:
a. Active vessels in commission or in
service.
b. Vessels that have already been
disposed of or lost by whatever cause,
and determined to be unsalvageable.
c. Vessels retained in Navy custody
for public display. i.e., USS
CONSTITUTION, Historic Ship
NAUTILUS (SSN 571), or ex-BARRY
(DD 933), which will continue to be
managed individually.
d. Vessels retained by the Navy for
experimental purposes on a not-to-sink
basis.
e. Vessels retained by the Navy for
possible remobilization (Mobilization
B).
f. Leased or chartered vessels not
owned by the Navy, even if listed on the
NVR.
g. Non-self-propelled service craft and
boats (boats are not on the NVR).
Vessels that have already been
determined to be eligible for listing in
the NRHP by a process separate from
this process and that are not the subject
of an existing agreement established
during the Section 106 consultation
process will be subject to the provisions
of this document as though their
eligibility had been established as a
result of this program. Vessels that are
subject of an existing Section 106
agreement will continue to be subject to
the existing agreement.
The following criteria will be used to
determine whether vessels are
considered eligible for listing in the
NRHP:
a. Vessels that have been awarded an
individual Presidential Unit Citation
(granted to military units which have
performed an extremely meritorious or
heroic act, usually in the face of an
armed enemy).
b. Vessels aboard which an individual
act of heroism took place such that the
individual was subsequently awarded
the Medal of Honor (for valor in action
against an enemy force) or the Navy
Cross (for extraordinary heroism in
action not justifying an award of the
Medal of Honor).
c. Vessels to which a President of the
United States was assigned during his or
her naval service.
d. The first vessel to incorporate
weapon system, engineering, or other
upgrades that represent a revolutionary
change in naval design or war-fighting
capabilities, or other special and unique
considerations.
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24651-24653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6297]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
Proposed Collection of Information; Comment Request--Safety
Standard for Cigarette Lighters
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 24652]]
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission requests comments
on a proposed request for an extension of approval of a collection of
information from manufacturers and importers of disposable and novelty
cigarette lighters. This collection of information consists of testing
and recordkeeping requirements in certification regulations
implementing the Safety Standard for Cigarette Lighters (16 CFR part
1210). The Commission will consider all comments received in response
to this notice before requesting an extension of approval of this
collection of information from the Office of Management and Budget.
DATES: The Office of the Secretary must receive written comments not
later than June 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be captioned ``Cigarette Lighters''
and e-mailed to the Office of the Secretary at cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.
Comments may also be sent by facsimile to (301) 504-0127, or by mail to
the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330
East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the proposed
extension of approval of the collection of information, or to obtain a
copy of 16 CFR part 1210, call or write Linda L. Glatz, Office of
Planning and Evaluation, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East
West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814; telephone (301) 504-7671.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1993, the Commission issued the Safety
Standard for Cigarette Lighters (16 CFR part 1210) under provisions of
the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.) to
eliminate or reduce risks of death and burn injury from fires
accidentally started by children playing with cigarette lighters. The
standard contains performance requirements for disposable and novelty
lighters that are intended to make cigarette lighters subject to the
standard resist operation by children younger than five years of age.
A. Certification Requirements
Section 14(a) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2063(a)) requires
manufacturers, importers, and private labelers of a consumer product
subject to a consumer product safety standard to issue a certificate
stating that the product complies with all applicable consumer product
safety standards. Section 14(a) of the CPSA also requires that the
certificate of compliance must be based on a test of each product or
upon a reasonable testing program.
Section 14(b) of the CPSA authorizes the Commission to issue
regulations to prescribe a reasonable testing program to support
certificates of compliance with a consumer product safety standard.
Section 16(b) of the CPSA (15 U.S.C. 2065(b)) authorizes the Commission
to issue rules to require that firms ``establish and maintain'' records
to permit the Commission to determine compliance with rules issued
under the authority of the CPSA.
The Commission has issued regulations prescribing requirements for
a reasonable testing program to support certificates of compliance with
the standard for cigarette lighters. These regulations require
manufacturers and importers to submit a description of each model of
lighter, results of surrogate qualification tests for compliance with
the standard, and other information before the introduction of each
model of lighter in commerce. These regulations also require
manufacturers, importers, and private labelers of disposable and
novelty lighters to establish and maintain records to demonstrate
successful completion of all required tests to support the certificates
of compliance that they issue. 16 CFR part 1210, subpart B.
The Commission uses the information compiled and maintained by
manufacturers, importers, and private labelers of disposable and
novelty lighters to protect consumers from risks of accidental deaths
and burn injuries associated with those lighters. More specifically,
the Commission uses this information to determine whether lighters
comply with the standard by resisting operation by young children. The
Commission also uses this information to obtain corrective actions if
disposable or novelty lighters fail to comply with the standard in a
manner that creates a substantial risk of injury to the public.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the collection
of information in the certification regulations for cigarette lighters
under control number 3041-0116. OMB's most recent extension of approval
will expire on June 30, 2006. The Commission proposes to request an
extension of approval for these collection of information requirements.
B. Estimated Burden
The cost of the rule's testing requirement is the cost of testing,
either by the firm or by outside contractors. There are an estimated 60
firms that may be affected. If done through outside contractors, the
cost per test has been estimated at $15,000 to $25,000 on average. Each
firm is expected to test 2 models per year. Thus, for the 60 affected
firms, the cost of outside testing would be $2.4 million. If tests are
conducted in-house, testing 2 new models is expected to take 175 hours
per firm. The total testing time for all 60 firms, if conducted in-
house, would be approximately 10,500. Based on the average hourly total
compensation (wages and benefits) for U.S. technical workers of $42.84
(Bureau of Labor Statistics, September, 2005), the total industry cost
of the testing component for this regulation would be in the range of
$450,000 to $2.4 million per year, depending on the method chosen.
The cost of the recordkeeping requirements has two separate
components: Recordkeeping for new models and recordkeeping for
comparable models. The time consumed in recordkeeping for new models
has been estimated at 20 hours per model. Thus the total time consumed
for recordkeeping of new models would be 2,400 hours (20 hours x 2
models x 60 firms). Based on the average hourly compensation for
technical workers, the cost of recordkeeping for new models would be
about $100,000 annually (2,400 x 42.84).
Time consumed in recordkeeping for lighters that are submitted for
comparison to previously tested models will require approximately 3
hours for each model. Based on recent submission, each firm is expected
to submit 35 models each year for comparison. Thus, an estimated 6,300
hours may be required by the 60 firms for recordkeeping regarding
comparison lighters (35 models x 60 firms x 3 hours). Based on the
average hourly compensation for technical workers, the cost of
recordkeeping would be about $270,000 (6,300 hours x $42.84). The total
recordkeeping costs associated with the lighter regulation would be
approximately $370,000 ($100,000 + $270,000).
In addition, each firm will submit information to the CPSC
regarding the new testing and comparison submissions totaling about
2,200 responses per year (2 models tested + 35 comparison models x 60
firms). The total number of hours for these responses would be
approximately 19,200 per year including new-product testing (175 hours
x 60 firms = 10,500), new product recordkeeping (40 hours x 60 firms =
2,400), and recordkeeping for comparison lighters (35 models x 3 hours
x 60 firms = 6,300). Based on the average hourly compensation for
[[Page 24653]]
technical workers, the total cost of preparing these submissions would
be about $823,000 (19,200 hours x $42.84).
C. Request for Comments
The Commission solicits written comments from all interested
persons about the proposed collection of information. The Commission
specifically solicits information relevant to the following topics:
--Whether the collection of information described above is necessary
for the proper performance of the Commission's functions, including
whether the information would have practical utility;
--Whether the estimated burden of the proposed collection of
information is accurate;
--Whether the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected could be enhanced; and
--Whether the burden imposed by the collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated, electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms of information technology.
Dated: April 21, 2006.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-6297 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P