Domestic Vessel Passenger Weights-Voluntary Interim Measures, 24732-24735 [06-3926]
Download as PDF
24732
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
Developmental Biology Research; 93.88,
Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96,
Special Minority Initiatives, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: April 18, 2006.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 06–3912 Filed 4–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[USCG–2005–22732]
Domestic Vessel Passenger WeightsVoluntary Interim Measures
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice; request for public
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces
voluntary interim measures for certain
domestic vessels to account for
increased passenger and vessel weight
when determining the number of
passengers permitted. The Coast Guard
also requests public comments on the
interim measures.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Docket Management
Facility on or before May 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2005–22732 to the
Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001.
(3) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(4) Delivery: Room PL–401 on the
Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The telephone number is 202–366–
9329.
If
you have questions on this notice, call
Mr. William Peters, Naval Architecture
Division, G–PSE–2, Coast Guard,
telephone 202–267–2988. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–493–0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
Request for Comments
All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://dms.dot.gov
and will include any personal
information you have provided. We
have an agreement with the Department
of Transportation (DOT) to use the
Docket Management Facility. Please see
DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’ paragraph below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a
comment, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this notice (USCG–2005–22732) and
give the reason for each comment. You
may submit your comments by
electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery
to the Docket Management Facility at
the address under ADDRESSES; but
please submit your comments by only
one means. If you submit them by mail
or delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit them by mail and
would like to know that they reached
the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We
will consider all comments received
during the comment period.
Viewing comments and documents:
To view comments, go to https://
dms.dot.gov at any time, click on
‘‘Simple Search,’’ enter the last five
digits of the docket number for this
rulemaking, and click on ‘‘Search.’’ You
may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in room PL–401 on the Plaza
level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the Department of
Transportation’s Privacy Act Statement
in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Background and Purpose
Increased Passenger Weight
The total number of persons
permitted on a small passenger vessel
(inspected and certificated under 46
CFR Subchapters T & K) is limited by
a number of different design factors, one
of which is stability. Stability
characteristics and limitations,
including any restrictions on the
number of passengers permitted, are
provided to the vessel operator most
often in a stability letter or a Coast
Guard Certificate of Inspection (COI).
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Coast Guard typically evaluates a
vessel’s stability through rigorous
engineering calculations (46 CFR parts
170 and 171 (Subchapter S) stability
requirements) or, for vessels not more
than 65 feet in length and pontoon
vessels, operated in a protected
environment, through a performance
test conducted by Officers in Charge,
Marine Inspection (OCMIs) (46 CFR part
178). This test is either a simplified
stability proof test (SST) or a pontoon
simplified stability proof test (PSST).
In all cases, an average weight per
person is assumed to estimate the
anticipated vessel loading (the total test
weight in the SST and PSST) and its
impact on stability. Currently, Coast
Guard regulations governing SSTs and
PSSTs use an average weight per person
of 160 pounds, except that an average
weight per person of 140 pounds is used
if the vessel operates exclusively on
protected waters and the passenger load
consists of men, women, and children.
These weights were established in the
1960s. A Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) report issued in
October 2004 concluded that, in the
United States, the ‘‘average weight has
increased dramatically in the last 40
years with the greatest increase seen in
adults.’’ The increase in passenger and
crew weight has an adverse effect on the
stability of passenger vessels due to
several factors, including increased
vertical center of gravity, reduced
freeboard, and increased passenger
heeling moment.
On March 6, 2004, the small
passenger pontoon vessel Lady D,
carrying 25 persons, capsized in high
winds in Baltimore harbor while a small
craft warning was in effect. Five persons
died and four others suffered serious
injuries. Both the Coast Guard and the
National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB) launched investigations into the
cause of the accident.
On December 20, 2004, the NTSB
issued Safety Recommendation M–04–
04, which stated that the current 140
pound per person weight allowance for
operations on protected waters does not
reflect actual loading conditions. The
NTSB recommended that the Coast
Guard revise its guidance to OCMIs for
determining the maximum passenger
capacity of small passenger pontoon
vessels either by: (1) Dividing the
vessel’s simplified stability proof test
weight by 174 pounds per person, or; (2)
restricting at the time of loading the
actual cumulative weight of passengers
and crew to the vessel’s total test
weight.
In correspondence to the NTSB dated
April 7, 2005, the Coast Guard
concurred that the average weight per
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
person used in SSTs and PSSTs needed
to be updated, and noted that an
internal Coast Guard study initiated
shortly after the Lady D incident
identified the same issue. The Coast
Guard also pointed out that
implementation of the needed changes
would be more complex than the NTSB
recommendation entailed, and that the
Coast Guard had chartered a working
group to assess the potential impacts of
regulatory changes to a higher passenger
weight. The assessment of the working
group is available in the docket.
In a letter dated July 26, 2005, the
NTSB acknowledged the Coast Guard
initiated action to revise the passenger
weight standard, and classified the
Coast Guard’s response to Safety
Recommendation M–04–04 as
acceptable. In order to gather the
information and perform the analyses
required by law before issuing
regulations, the Coast Guard contracted
in September 2005 with BMT Designers
and Planners to conduct an engineering
analysis of the impact of increasing
average passenger weight, assess
alternative implementation strategies,
and conduct an in-depth cost-benefit
analysis.
On October 2, 2005, the New York
State certified monohull passenger
vessel Ethan Allen (whose Coast Guard
COI expired in 1981, and was not
required to be inspected by the Coast
Guard), carrying 49 passengers, capsized
on Lake George and sank, killing 20
people. The NTSB has indicated that
overloading due to increased passenger
weight was a potential contributing
cause of the accident, but has not yet
issued its report.
The Coast Guard is committed to a
high priority rulemaking to develop new
regulations and interim measures to
address increased passenger weight
problems, and has established a
regulatory team. A notice describing the
consultant’s ongoing study and the
Coast Guard’s approach to revising the
passenger weight standard was
published in the Federal Register on
October 27, 2005 (70 FR 61987).
On March 7, 2006, the NTSB held a
meeting to consider its report on the
capsizing of the Lady D. In the report’s
synopsis, the NTSB concluded that the
use of an obsolete average weight
standard for persons on small passenger
vessels caused the Lady D to be more
susceptible to capsizing on the day of
the accident. The combined effects of
the excessive load carried and the wind
and wave conditions experienced at the
time of the accident caused the
capsizing, according to the synopsis. In
addition to recommendations based on
the conclusions summarized above, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
NTSB recommended that the Coast
Guard identify a method for
determining the maximum safe load
condition of a small passenger vessel at
the time of loading.
Reasonable Operating Conditions
Coast Guard OCMIs have the
authority to impose restrictions on the
operating condition of any small
passenger vessel in their zones of
responsibility. For those vessels which
are designed for operation only on
protected waters and mild conditions,
which include pontoon vessels, the COI
usually includes a restriction limiting
the vessel’s operation to ‘‘reasonable
operating conditions.’’
Pontoon Vessels
Pontoon vessels, originally developed
for use as recreational boats on small
lakes and rivers, over time came to be
used as small passenger vessels. Prior to
1996, the Coast Guard published
guidance on pontoon vessel stability in
its Marine Safety Manual (MSM)
https://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/nmc/pubs/
msm/, but there were no Coast Guard
regulations specifically for pontoon
vessels. The MSM guidance dealt only
with vessel heeling due to passenger
movement and did so conservatively,
but did not include a wind component
because passenger pontoon vessels were
designed to operate on restricted routes
where mild conditions prevail.
Because of the growth in the number
of pontoon vessels, the MSM stability
guidance was replaced with regulations
in CFR Title 46, Subchapter T, in 1996.
Those regulations also do not include a
wind component because of the reasons
outlined above. In contrast, the stability
regulations for all other small passenger
vessels specify a minimum wind
component and a passenger heeling
component because those vessels are
permitted to operate with fewer
restrictions, and are designed to operate
in limited wind and wave
environments.
Immediate Corrective Actions for
Pontoon Vessels
To assess the need for immediate
action to protect the safety of passengers
and crew on pontoon vessels, a Coast
Guard working group, established in
March 2004, examined the stability
requirements for that vessel category.
The group recommended that
information be provided to OCMIs
around the country to ensure that
stability tests and standards were being
appropriately and consistently
implemented for pontoon vessels. Coast
Guard G–MOC Policy Letter 04–10
entitled ‘‘Evaluation of Stability &
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24733
Subdivision Requirements for Small
Passenger Vessels Inspected Under 46
CFR Subchapter T’’ resulted from the
group’s efforts. In those instances where
the Coast Guard determined that
stability standards had been incorrectly
applied, it took immediate corrective
action.
Analysis of Passenger Weights
One of the two alternatives suggested
by the NTSB in Recommendation M–
04–04 for determining the maximum
number of occupants of small passenger
pontoon vessels was to use the perperson weight allowance for a presentday average adult. NTSB recommended
use of the per-person weight allowance
stipulated in Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular
120–27D which, for large aircraft, is 174
pounds per person without an
allowance for personal effects or carryon luggage. New Recommendation 1 in
the NTSB’s March 7, 2006 synopsis of
its report on the Lady D incident
suggests that passenger capacity for
domestic passenger vessels be
calculated based on a statistically
representative average passenger weight
standard that is periodically updated.
The CDC National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES) program is a widely
accepted and authoritative source for
weight data on the U.S. population. The
2004 CDC NHANES report on surveys
conducted in the United States between
1960 and 2002 stated that ‘‘on average,
both men and women gained more than
24 pounds between the 1960s and
2002.’’ (See CDC Advance Data, Number
347, dated October 27, 2004.) For a 50/
50 male/female mix and for adults
between 20 and 74 years old, an average
weight of 177.7 pounds without
clothing is calculated from the data
published in the NHANES report.
According to this report, the mean
weight of children of all ages also
increased substantially between 1963
and 2002. Teenage boys and girls aged
12–17 increased 15 and 12 pounds,
respectively, to mean weights of 141
and 130 pounds, respectively, between
the 1960s and 2002.
Additionally, a 2003 New Zealand
Civil Aviation Authority survey of
passenger weights reported an average
weight without carry-on bags or
personal effects of 176.8 pounds.
Transport Canada, Canada’s federal
transportation agency, recommends
assuming an average weight of 182.5
pounds per person in summer and 188.5
pounds in winter for small aircraft.
Transport Canada’s weights included an
allowance for clothing but not luggage.
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
24734
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
An average weight of approximately
185 pounds is obtained when the most
current CDC average weight of 177.7
pounds is added to the FAA average
clothing weight of 7.5 pounds. (See FAA
Advisory Circular 120–27E, paragraph
201, dated June 10, 2005 (superseding
FAA AC 120–27D). Approximately the
same weight is obtained when the CDC
average adult weight gain of 24 pounds
is added to the 160-pound average
established in the 1960s. The accuracy
of this result is further confirmed by the
weights recommended by government
authorities in Canada and New Zealand.
The Coast Guard considered a report
by the Coast Guard Passenger Weight
Working Group, mentioned above. The
report, dated May 19, 2005, used an
average passenger weight of 190 pounds
to assess the potential impacts of
regulatory changes. This average
passenger weight was based on the
FAA’s use in AC 120–27D of an average
winter passenger weight of 189 pounds,
not including carry-on bags and was
noted in the report to be conservative.
The current FAA Circular, AC 120–27E,
also uses an average winter passenger
weight of 189 pounds without carry-on
bags, and includes allowances of 10
pounds each for clothing and personal
items. (See AC 120–27E, paragraphs 201
and 205, and Tables 2–1 and 2–2.)
The FAA arrived at the standard
average passenger weights used in AC
120–27E after performing certain
mathematical calculations using the
CDC’s NHANES data rather than rely on
the average weights published by the
CDC in Advance Data Number 347. (See
AC 120–27E, Appendix 2). Based upon
the Coast Guard’s evaluations of all
available weight studies, though, the
185 pound average appears at this time
to be the most accurate and appropriate
average weight for evaluating the
stability of small passenger vessels.
For these reasons, the Coast Guard
recommends that, for the purposes of
this notice, the assumed weight per
person should be 185 pounds for a mix
of men and women.
Increased Vessel Weight
Independent of our review of
increased passenger weight, the Coast
Guard identified vessel weight growth,
particularly on pontoon vessels, as a
significant factor impacting stability. A
vessel must be kept in the same physical
condition as when its stability letter was
issued in order to remain in compliance
with Federal regulations. Vessel
operators are required to receive OCMI
approval on all vessel alterations for this
reason. If a vessel becomes heavier and
the operating load of passengers is not
similarly reduced, the possibility exists
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
that operation beyond the vessel’s
regulatory stability limits will occur.
This situation was discovered on some
pontoon vessels and, after OCMIs
required updated PSSTs, the total
persons permitted to be carried had to
be reduced between 22 to 43 percent.
Overall, this degree of reduction
probably stems from both unrecorded
alterations and differences in vessel
weight related to inconsistencies and
variances in construction, design, outfit,
and potential absorption of water by
porous vessel materials such as wood or
foam. Pontoon vessels are particularly
sensitive to weight growth due to their
typical round hull geometry. However,
weight growth is an important factor to
monitor on all passenger vessels. The
Coast Guard has already directed the reevaluation of most pontoon vessels and
is considering methods for better
tracking of vessel weight.
Advisory and Regulatory Actions
The Coast Guard is currently engaged
in a rulemaking that will thoroughly
assess the potential consequences of
revising stability regulations for all
domestic passenger vessels to account
for increased passenger and vessel
weight. These changes are estimated to
affect as many as 7,000 vessels operating
nationwide. While the Coast Guard
places paramount importance on the
safety of passengers and crew, the Coast
Guard is required by law to assess the
likely effects of such a far-reaching
change, including the economic
implications for the passenger vessel
industry.
Because of the length of the regulatory
change process, much of which is
mandated by law, and the need for
timely action to ensure public safety,
the Coast Guard is also committed to
institute interim measures to address
those vessels at highest risk of stability
hazard from increased passenger weight,
including small passenger pontoon
vessels. The approach of the 2006
summer season makes the need to
account for increased passenger weight
all the more urgent.
For these reasons, the Coast Guard,
through publication of this notice, is
advising owners and operators of small
passenger vessels of potentially unsafe
conditions, including increases in
passenger and vessel weight, and
voluntary interim measures which may
be used to address these conditions and
to safeguard the public.
Voluntary Measures for Prudent
Operation
The 140 and 160 pound average
weights may not reflect actual loading
conditions. In addition, some small
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
passenger vessels may have experienced
weight growth since their stability was
evaluated. Consequently, the total
number of persons permitted to be
carried, as stated in the COI, might
exceed the anticipated vessel loading of
many vessels.
The Coast Guard has, therefore,
determined that it would be prudent for
owners and operators of all small
passenger vessels for which passenger
weight is a limiting stability factor to
voluntarily re-evaluate the passenger
capacity for their vessels. In addition,
the Coast Guard expects prudent
operators to conscientiously monitor the
wind and wave conditions. This notice
serves to assist owners and operators of
these vessels in complying with the
operating requirements of 46 CFR
185.304 or 46 CFR 122.304 and the
standards of competence and conduct
detailed in 46 CFR part 5.
To assist the prudent owner and
operator, the Coast Guard recommends
the following:
Vessels Evaluated Using the SST or
PSST
Owners and operators of all pontoon
vessels, and small passenger vessels not
more than 65 feet in length, that met
simplified stability requirements using
either 140 or 160 pounds, should
voluntarily restrict the maximum
number of passengers permitted on
board by:
(1) Changing your passenger capacity
to a reduced number by dividing the
total test weight by 185 pounds; or
(2) Changing your passenger capacity
to a reduced number equal to 140
divided by 185 times the current
number of passengers permitted to be
carried. If the total test weight was
based on 160 pounds per person, the
multiplier may be taken as 160 divided
by 185; or
(3) Weighing persons and effects at
dockside prior to boarding and limiting
the actual load to the total test weight
used in the vessel’s SST or PSST.
Vessels Whose Stability Has Been
Evaluated According to Subchapter S
Owners and operators of small
passenger vessels should voluntarily
review their stability guidance and
ensure that excessive passenger weight
is not carried or that an increased
average passenger weight of 185 pounds
will not reduce stability below
Subchapter S requirements.
All Small Passenger Vessels
Owners and operators of all small
passenger vessels should:
(1) For passenger vessels certificated
for operation only on protected waters,
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
voluntarily operate only in ‘‘reasonable
operating conditions,’’ which, do not
include the conditions listed below:
• A small craft advisory is in effect;
• Wind gusts over 30 knots (35 mph);
• Waves over two feet; or
• Sustained winds over 18 knots (21
mph).
(2) Notify the OCMI if any significant
structural or equipment changes have
been made to the vessel since the
stability was evaluated by the owner or
operator and approved by the Coast
Guard. The OCMI will determine
whether to adjust the passenger load
accordingly or require a new stability
test.
Owners and operators may consider
voluntarily re-evaluating the vessel’s
stability, which may include the
performance of a new SST or PSST or
a new evaluation according to 46 CFR
subchapter S using an assumed weight
per person of 185 pounds.
In general, these voluntary interim
guidelines reflect NTSB’s
recommendations dated March 7, 2006,
with one exception. The NTSB
recommended the use of a method such
as a load mark on the hull to determine
the maximum safe load condition. The
Coast Guard is evaluating these loading
marks to determine if they are adequate
to accurately assess whether or not the
total test weight is exceeded, which
could create an overload condition.
Additionally, the Coast Guard will
consider including a method of
periodically updating the average
passenger weight as part of the
upcoming rule.
The Coast Guard will perform
outreach to owners and operators of all
such vessels as soon as possible to
advise them of this notice. Vessel
owners and licensed operators are
encouraged to comply with these
guidelines until new regulations are
promulgated. Local OCMIs are always
available for assistance if the need
arises.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Upcoming Rule
The Coast Guard is in the process of
preparing a rule that would amend its
regulations to address the stability
issues caused by increases in passenger
and vessel weight. This rule would
apply to the same group of small vessels
covered by the voluntary procedures
described above, as well as all pontoon
vessels. The Coast Guard tentatively
intends that the rule’s provisions be, for
the most part, similar to those of the
voluntary procedures above. The rule
may also include provisions explicitly
providing for prioritizing stability
evaluations among categories of vessels,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
including the performance of new SSTs
or PSSTs.
Dated: April 20, 2006.
Thomas H. Gilmour,
Rear Admiral, Assistant Commandant for
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 06–3926 Filed 4–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–4837–D–59]
Amendment, Consolidated Delegation
of Authority for the Office of
Community Planning and Development
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Amendment to Consolidated
Delegation of Authority for the Office of
Community Planning and Development.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This notice amends the
existing Consolidated Delegation of
Authority for Community Planning and
Development to add the Renewal
Communities, urban Empowerment
Zones, and urban Enterprise
Communities (RC/EZ/EC) Initiative and
Technical Assistance Awards to the list
of programs delegated to the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development and the General Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Community
Planning and Development. This
amendment also authorizes the General
Deputy Assistant Secretary to further
redelegate any of the authority delegated
under the Consolidated Delegation of
Authority, as amended.
DATES: Effective Date: March 27, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Daly, Director of Policy
Development and Coordination, Office
of Community Planning and
Development, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 7240, Washington,
DC 20410–7000, (202) 708–1817. This is
not a toll-free number. For those
needing assistance, this number may be
accessed via TTY by calling the Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 16, 2003 (68 FR 54238), the
Department published a Consolidated
Delegation of Authority for Community
Planning and Development programs.
This notice amends the existing
Consolidated Delegation of Authority
for Community Planning and
Development by adding the Renewal
Communities, urban Empowerment
Zones, and urban Enterprise
Communities (RC/EZ/EC) Initiative and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24735
Technical Assistance Awards to the list
of programs delegated to the Assistant
Secretary and the General Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Community
Planning and Development. The
Consolidated Delegation authorized the
Assistant Secretary to further redelegate
any authority included therein,
excluding those authorities expressly
excepted. This amendment similarly
authorizes the General Deputy Assistant
Secretary to further redelegate any
delegated authority, excluding those
expressly excepted. This notice also
clarifies the authority excepted from the
Consolidated Delegation and updates
the list of prior delegations of authority
superseded by the Consolidated
Delegation. Accordingly, the Secretary
amends the Consolidated Delegation of
Authority for CPD programs at 68 FR
54238 (September 16, 2003), as follows:
Section A. Amendment to Consolidated
Delegation of Authority
At Section A of 68 FR 54238–9
(September 16, 2003), under the heading
entitled ‘‘Authority’’:
1. Paragraph 6 is amended to read as
follows:
6. The Renewal Communities, urban
Empowerment Zones, and urban
Enterprise Communities (RC/EZ/EC)
Initiative as authorized under title 26,
subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter U of
the Internal Revenue Code, as amended,
26 U.S.C. 1391 et seq. with respect to
urban Empowerment Zones and urban
Enterprise Communities and title 26,
subtitle A, chapter 1, subchapter X of
the Internal Revenue Code, as amended,
26 U.S.C. 1400E et seq. with respect to
Renewal Communities; and grants for
urban Empowerment Zones as provided
for in annual HUD appropriations acts
(e.g., Consolidated Appropriations
Resolution, Fiscal Year 2003, Pub. L.
108–7, 117 Stat. 11, approved February
20, 2003).
2. After paragraph 19(f), a new
paragraph is added to the list of
programs under which authority is
delegated as follows:
20. Technical Assistance Awards as
authorized under Section 107(b)(4) of
the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C.
5307; Sections 233 and 242 of the
Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable
Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 12773 and
12781–83; Section 423 of the Stuart B.
McKinney Homeless Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 11383 et seq.; Title IV of the
Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable
Housing Act, as amended by the
Housing and Community Development
Act of 1992, 42 U.S.C. 12899 et seq.; and
as provided for in annual HUD
appropriations acts (e.g., Consolidated
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24732-24735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3926]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
[USCG-2005-22732]
Domestic Vessel Passenger Weights-Voluntary Interim Measures
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice; request for public comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces voluntary interim measures for
certain domestic vessels to account for increased passenger and vessel
weight when determining the number of passengers permitted. The Coast
Guard also requests public comments on the interim measures.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Docket Management
Facility on or before May 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2005-22732 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
(1) Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(3) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(4) Delivery: Room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call Mr. William Peters, Naval Architecture Division, G-PSE-2, Coast
Guard, telephone 202-267-2988. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-493-0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
All comments received will be posted, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov and will include any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation
(DOT) to use the Docket Management Facility. Please see DOT's ``Privacy
Act'' paragraph below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include your
name and address, identify the docket number for this notice (USCG-
2005-22732) and give the reason for each comment. You may submit your
comments by electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery to the Docket
Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES; but please submit
your comments by only one means. If you submit them by mail or
delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them
by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments received during the comment period.
Viewing comments and documents: To view comments, go to https://
dms.dot.gov at any time, click on ``Simple Search,'' enter the last
five digits of the docket number for this rulemaking, and click on
``Search.'' You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in room
PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Background and Purpose
Increased Passenger Weight
The total number of persons permitted on a small passenger vessel
(inspected and certificated under 46 CFR Subchapters T & K) is limited
by a number of different design factors, one of which is stability.
Stability characteristics and limitations, including any restrictions
on the number of passengers permitted, are provided to the vessel
operator most often in a stability letter or a Coast Guard Certificate
of Inspection (COI). The Coast Guard typically evaluates a vessel's
stability through rigorous engineering calculations (46 CFR parts 170
and 171 (Subchapter S) stability requirements) or, for vessels not more
than 65 feet in length and pontoon vessels, operated in a protected
environment, through a performance test conducted by Officers in
Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMIs) (46 CFR part 178). This test is
either a simplified stability proof test (SST) or a pontoon simplified
stability proof test (PSST).
In all cases, an average weight per person is assumed to estimate
the anticipated vessel loading (the total test weight in the SST and
PSST) and its impact on stability. Currently, Coast Guard regulations
governing SSTs and PSSTs use an average weight per person of 160
pounds, except that an average weight per person of 140 pounds is used
if the vessel operates exclusively on protected waters and the
passenger load consists of men, women, and children. These weights were
established in the 1960s. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) report issued in October 2004 concluded that, in the United
States, the ``average weight has increased dramatically in the last 40
years with the greatest increase seen in adults.'' The increase in
passenger and crew weight has an adverse effect on the stability of
passenger vessels due to several factors, including increased vertical
center of gravity, reduced freeboard, and increased passenger heeling
moment.
On March 6, 2004, the small passenger pontoon vessel Lady D,
carrying 25 persons, capsized in high winds in Baltimore harbor while a
small craft warning was in effect. Five persons died and four others
suffered serious injuries. Both the Coast Guard and the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) launched investigations into the
cause of the accident.
On December 20, 2004, the NTSB issued Safety Recommendation M-04-
04, which stated that the current 140 pound per person weight allowance
for operations on protected waters does not reflect actual loading
conditions. The NTSB recommended that the Coast Guard revise its
guidance to OCMIs for determining the maximum passenger capacity of
small passenger pontoon vessels either by: (1) Dividing the vessel's
simplified stability proof test weight by 174 pounds per person, or;
(2) restricting at the time of loading the actual cumulative weight of
passengers and crew to the vessel's total test weight.
In correspondence to the NTSB dated April 7, 2005, the Coast Guard
concurred that the average weight per
[[Page 24733]]
person used in SSTs and PSSTs needed to be updated, and noted that an
internal Coast Guard study initiated shortly after the Lady D incident
identified the same issue. The Coast Guard also pointed out that
implementation of the needed changes would be more complex than the
NTSB recommendation entailed, and that the Coast Guard had chartered a
working group to assess the potential impacts of regulatory changes to
a higher passenger weight. The assessment of the working group is
available in the docket.
In a letter dated July 26, 2005, the NTSB acknowledged the Coast
Guard initiated action to revise the passenger weight standard, and
classified the Coast Guard's response to Safety Recommendation M-04-04
as acceptable. In order to gather the information and perform the
analyses required by law before issuing regulations, the Coast Guard
contracted in September 2005 with BMT Designers and Planners to conduct
an engineering analysis of the impact of increasing average passenger
weight, assess alternative implementation strategies, and conduct an
in-depth cost-benefit analysis.
On October 2, 2005, the New York State certified monohull passenger
vessel Ethan Allen (whose Coast Guard COI expired in 1981, and was not
required to be inspected by the Coast Guard), carrying 49 passengers,
capsized on Lake George and sank, killing 20 people. The NTSB has
indicated that overloading due to increased passenger weight was a
potential contributing cause of the accident, but has not yet issued
its report.
The Coast Guard is committed to a high priority rulemaking to
develop new regulations and interim measures to address increased
passenger weight problems, and has established a regulatory team. A
notice describing the consultant's ongoing study and the Coast Guard's
approach to revising the passenger weight standard was published in the
Federal Register on October 27, 2005 (70 FR 61987).
On March 7, 2006, the NTSB held a meeting to consider its report on
the capsizing of the Lady D. In the report's synopsis, the NTSB
concluded that the use of an obsolete average weight standard for
persons on small passenger vessels caused the Lady D to be more
susceptible to capsizing on the day of the accident. The combined
effects of the excessive load carried and the wind and wave conditions
experienced at the time of the accident caused the capsizing, according
to the synopsis. In addition to recommendations based on the
conclusions summarized above, the NTSB recommended that the Coast Guard
identify a method for determining the maximum safe load condition of a
small passenger vessel at the time of loading.
Reasonable Operating Conditions
Coast Guard OCMIs have the authority to impose restrictions on the
operating condition of any small passenger vessel in their zones of
responsibility. For those vessels which are designed for operation only
on protected waters and mild conditions, which include pontoon vessels,
the COI usually includes a restriction limiting the vessel's operation
to ``reasonable operating conditions.''
Pontoon Vessels
Pontoon vessels, originally developed for use as recreational boats
on small lakes and rivers, over time came to be used as small passenger
vessels. Prior to 1996, the Coast Guard published guidance on pontoon
vessel stability in its Marine Safety Manual (MSM) https://www.uscg.mil/
hq/g-m/nmc/pubs/msm/, but there were no Coast Guard regulations
specifically for pontoon vessels. The MSM guidance dealt only with
vessel heeling due to passenger movement and did so conservatively, but
did not include a wind component because passenger pontoon vessels were
designed to operate on restricted routes where mild conditions prevail.
Because of the growth in the number of pontoon vessels, the MSM
stability guidance was replaced with regulations in CFR Title 46,
Subchapter T, in 1996. Those regulations also do not include a wind
component because of the reasons outlined above. In contrast, the
stability regulations for all other small passenger vessels specify a
minimum wind component and a passenger heeling component because those
vessels are permitted to operate with fewer restrictions, and are
designed to operate in limited wind and wave environments.
Immediate Corrective Actions for Pontoon Vessels
To assess the need for immediate action to protect the safety of
passengers and crew on pontoon vessels, a Coast Guard working group,
established in March 2004, examined the stability requirements for that
vessel category. The group recommended that information be provided to
OCMIs around the country to ensure that stability tests and standards
were being appropriately and consistently implemented for pontoon
vessels. Coast Guard G-MOC Policy Letter 04-10 entitled ``Evaluation of
Stability & Subdivision Requirements for Small Passenger Vessels
Inspected Under 46 CFR Subchapter T'' resulted from the group's
efforts. In those instances where the Coast Guard determined that
stability standards had been incorrectly applied, it took immediate
corrective action.
Analysis of Passenger Weights
One of the two alternatives suggested by the NTSB in Recommendation
M-04-04 for determining the maximum number of occupants of small
passenger pontoon vessels was to use the per-person weight allowance
for a present-day average adult. NTSB recommended use of the per-person
weight allowance stipulated in Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Advisory Circular 120-27D which, for large aircraft, is 174 pounds per
person without an allowance for personal effects or carry-on luggage.
New Recommendation 1 in the NTSB's March 7, 2006 synopsis of its report
on the Lady D incident suggests that passenger capacity for domestic
passenger vessels be calculated based on a statistically representative
average passenger weight standard that is periodically updated.
The CDC National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
program is a widely accepted and authoritative source for weight data
on the U.S. population. The 2004 CDC NHANES report on surveys conducted
in the United States between 1960 and 2002 stated that ``on average,
both men and women gained more than 24 pounds between the 1960s and
2002.'' (See CDC Advance Data, Number 347, dated October 27, 2004.) For
a 50/50 male/female mix and for adults between 20 and 74 years old, an
average weight of 177.7 pounds without clothing is calculated from the
data published in the NHANES report. According to this report, the mean
weight of children of all ages also increased substantially between
1963 and 2002. Teenage boys and girls aged 12-17 increased 15 and 12
pounds, respectively, to mean weights of 141 and 130 pounds,
respectively, between the 1960s and 2002.
Additionally, a 2003 New Zealand Civil Aviation Authority survey of
passenger weights reported an average weight without carry-on bags or
personal effects of 176.8 pounds. Transport Canada, Canada's federal
transportation agency, recommends assuming an average weight of 182.5
pounds per person in summer and 188.5 pounds in winter for small
aircraft. Transport Canada's weights included an allowance for clothing
but not luggage.
[[Page 24734]]
An average weight of approximately 185 pounds is obtained when the
most current CDC average weight of 177.7 pounds is added to the FAA
average clothing weight of 7.5 pounds. (See FAA Advisory Circular 120-
27E, paragraph 201, dated June 10, 2005 (superseding FAA AC 120-27D).
Approximately the same weight is obtained when the CDC average adult
weight gain of 24 pounds is added to the 160-pound average established
in the 1960s. The accuracy of this result is further confirmed by the
weights recommended by government authorities in Canada and New
Zealand.
The Coast Guard considered a report by the Coast Guard Passenger
Weight Working Group, mentioned above. The report, dated May 19, 2005,
used an average passenger weight of 190 pounds to assess the potential
impacts of regulatory changes. This average passenger weight was based
on the FAA's use in AC 120-27D of an average winter passenger weight of
189 pounds, not including carry-on bags and was noted in the report to
be conservative. The current FAA Circular, AC 120-27E, also uses an
average winter passenger weight of 189 pounds without carry-on bags,
and includes allowances of 10 pounds each for clothing and personal
items. (See AC 120-27E, paragraphs 201 and 205, and Tables 2-1 and 2-
2.)
The FAA arrived at the standard average passenger weights used in
AC 120-27E after performing certain mathematical calculations using the
CDC's NHANES data rather than rely on the average weights published by
the CDC in Advance Data Number 347. (See AC 120-27E, Appendix 2). Based
upon the Coast Guard's evaluations of all available weight studies,
though, the 185 pound average appears at this time to be the most
accurate and appropriate average weight for evaluating the stability of
small passenger vessels.
For these reasons, the Coast Guard recommends that, for the
purposes of this notice, the assumed weight per person should be 185
pounds for a mix of men and women.
Increased Vessel Weight
Independent of our review of increased passenger weight, the Coast
Guard identified vessel weight growth, particularly on pontoon vessels,
as a significant factor impacting stability. A vessel must be kept in
the same physical condition as when its stability letter was issued in
order to remain in compliance with Federal regulations. Vessel
operators are required to receive OCMI approval on all vessel
alterations for this reason. If a vessel becomes heavier and the
operating load of passengers is not similarly reduced, the possibility
exists that operation beyond the vessel's regulatory stability limits
will occur. This situation was discovered on some pontoon vessels and,
after OCMIs required updated PSSTs, the total persons permitted to be
carried had to be reduced between 22 to 43 percent.
Overall, this degree of reduction probably stems from both
unrecorded alterations and differences in vessel weight related to
inconsistencies and variances in construction, design, outfit, and
potential absorption of water by porous vessel materials such as wood
or foam. Pontoon vessels are particularly sensitive to weight growth
due to their typical round hull geometry. However, weight growth is an
important factor to monitor on all passenger vessels. The Coast Guard
has already directed the re-evaluation of most pontoon vessels and is
considering methods for better tracking of vessel weight.
Advisory and Regulatory Actions
The Coast Guard is currently engaged in a rulemaking that will
thoroughly assess the potential consequences of revising stability
regulations for all domestic passenger vessels to account for increased
passenger and vessel weight. These changes are estimated to affect as
many as 7,000 vessels operating nationwide. While the Coast Guard
places paramount importance on the safety of passengers and crew, the
Coast Guard is required by law to assess the likely effects of such a
far-reaching change, including the economic implications for the
passenger vessel industry.
Because of the length of the regulatory change process, much of
which is mandated by law, and the need for timely action to ensure
public safety, the Coast Guard is also committed to institute interim
measures to address those vessels at highest risk of stability hazard
from increased passenger weight, including small passenger pontoon
vessels. The approach of the 2006 summer season makes the need to
account for increased passenger weight all the more urgent.
For these reasons, the Coast Guard, through publication of this
notice, is advising owners and operators of small passenger vessels of
potentially unsafe conditions, including increases in passenger and
vessel weight, and voluntary interim measures which may be used to
address these conditions and to safeguard the public.
Voluntary Measures for Prudent Operation
The 140 and 160 pound average weights may not reflect actual
loading conditions. In addition, some small passenger vessels may have
experienced weight growth since their stability was evaluated.
Consequently, the total number of persons permitted to be carried, as
stated in the COI, might exceed the anticipated vessel loading of many
vessels.
The Coast Guard has, therefore, determined that it would be prudent
for owners and operators of all small passenger vessels for which
passenger weight is a limiting stability factor to voluntarily re-
evaluate the passenger capacity for their vessels. In addition, the
Coast Guard expects prudent operators to conscientiously monitor the
wind and wave conditions. This notice serves to assist owners and
operators of these vessels in complying with the operating requirements
of 46 CFR 185.304 or 46 CFR 122.304 and the standards of competence and
conduct detailed in 46 CFR part 5.
To assist the prudent owner and operator, the Coast Guard
recommends the following:
Vessels Evaluated Using the SST or PSST
Owners and operators of all pontoon vessels, and small passenger
vessels not more than 65 feet in length, that met simplified stability
requirements using either 140 or 160 pounds, should voluntarily
restrict the maximum number of passengers permitted on board by:
(1) Changing your passenger capacity to a reduced number by
dividing the total test weight by 185 pounds; or
(2) Changing your passenger capacity to a reduced number equal to
140 divided by 185 times the current number of passengers permitted to
be carried. If the total test weight was based on 160 pounds per
person, the multiplier may be taken as 160 divided by 185; or
(3) Weighing persons and effects at dockside prior to boarding and
limiting the actual load to the total test weight used in the vessel's
SST or PSST.
Vessels Whose Stability Has Been Evaluated According to Subchapter S
Owners and operators of small passenger vessels should voluntarily
review their stability guidance and ensure that excessive passenger
weight is not carried or that an increased average passenger weight of
185 pounds will not reduce stability below Subchapter S requirements.
All Small Passenger Vessels
Owners and operators of all small passenger vessels should:
(1) For passenger vessels certificated for operation only on
protected waters,
[[Page 24735]]
voluntarily operate only in ``reasonable operating conditions,'' which,
do not include the conditions listed below:
A small craft advisory is in effect;
Wind gusts over 30 knots (35 mph);
Waves over two feet; or
Sustained winds over 18 knots (21 mph).
(2) Notify the OCMI if any significant structural or equipment
changes have been made to the vessel since the stability was evaluated
by the owner or operator and approved by the Coast Guard. The OCMI will
determine whether to adjust the passenger load accordingly or require a
new stability test.
Owners and operators may consider voluntarily re-evaluating the
vessel's stability, which may include the performance of a new SST or
PSST or a new evaluation according to 46 CFR subchapter S using an
assumed weight per person of 185 pounds.
In general, these voluntary interim guidelines reflect NTSB's
recommendations dated March 7, 2006, with one exception. The NTSB
recommended the use of a method such as a load mark on the hull to
determine the maximum safe load condition. The Coast Guard is
evaluating these loading marks to determine if they are adequate to
accurately assess whether or not the total test weight is exceeded,
which could create an overload condition. Additionally, the Coast Guard
will consider including a method of periodically updating the average
passenger weight as part of the upcoming rule.
The Coast Guard will perform outreach to owners and operators of
all such vessels as soon as possible to advise them of this notice.
Vessel owners and licensed operators are encouraged to comply with
these guidelines until new regulations are promulgated. Local OCMIs are
always available for assistance if the need arises.
Upcoming Rule
The Coast Guard is in the process of preparing a rule that would
amend its regulations to address the stability issues caused by
increases in passenger and vessel weight. This rule would apply to the
same group of small vessels covered by the voluntary procedures
described above, as well as all pontoon vessels. The Coast Guard
tentatively intends that the rule's provisions be, for the most part,
similar to those of the voluntary procedures above. The rule may also
include provisions explicitly providing for prioritizing stability
evaluations among categories of vessels, including the performance of
new SSTs or PSSTs.
Dated: April 20, 2006.
Thomas H. Gilmour,
Rear Admiral, Assistant Commandant for Prevention.
[FR Doc. 06-3926 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P