Georgia: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revision, 23864-23867 [06-3851]
Download as PDF
23864
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
30 CFR 250 Subpart/title (OMB control number)
Reasons for collecting information and how used
(15) Subpart P, Sulphur Operations (1010–0086) ...................
To inform MMS of sulphur exploration and development operations on the OCS.
To ensure that OCS sulphur operations are safe; protect the human, marine,
and coastal environment; and will result in diligent exploration, development,
and production of sulphur leases.
To determine that decommissioning activities comply with regulatory requirements and approvals. To ensure that site clearance and platform or pipeline
removal are properly performed to protect marine life and the environment and
do not conflict with other users of the OCS.
Voluntary. We use the information obtained from this form to develop an industry
average that helps to describe how well the offshore oil and gas industry is
performing.
The rig notification requirement is essential for MMS inspection scheduling and to
verify that the equipment being used complies with approved permits.
(16) Subpart Q, Decommissioning Activities (1010–0142) ......
(17) Form MMS–131, Performance Measures (1010–0112) ...
(18) Form MMS–144, Rig Movement Notification Report
(form used in the GOM OCS Region), Subparts D, E, F,
(1010–0150).
§ 250.1402
[Amended]
8. In § 250.1402, remove the
definitions of ‘‘I, me, or you’’ and
‘‘Person.’’
I
[FR Doc. 06–3898 Filed 4–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD05–06–041]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Southern Branch of the Elizabeth
River, Chesapeake, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary deviation from the
regulations.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has
approved a temporary deviation from
the regulations governing the operation
of the Jordan Bridge across the Southern
Branch of the Elizabeth River, at mile
2.8, in Chesapeake, Virginia. This
deviation allows the drawbridge to be
maintained in the limited open-tonavigation position at 90 feet above
mean high water each day from 8 a.m.
to 8 p.m. on May 13, May 14, May 20,
and May 21, 2006. Mariners requiring
openings in excess of 90 feet above
mean high water are requested to
provide at least two hours advance
notice to the Jordan Bridge Office at
(757) 545–4695. This deviation is
necessary to facilitate the completion of
repairs to the counterweight system.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
on May 13, 2006, through 8 p.m. on May
21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this
document are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (dpb), Fifth
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Apr 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
Coast Guard District, Federal Building,
1st Floor, 431 Crawford Street,
Portsmouth, VA 23704–5004 between 8
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is (757) 398–6222.
Commander (dpb), Fifth Coast Guard
District maintains the public docket for
this temporary deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Brazier, Bridge Management Specialist,
Fifth Coast Guard District, at (757) 398–
6422.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Jordan Bridge, a vertical lift-type
drawbridge, has vertical clearances in
the full closed-to-navigation position
and in the full open-to-navigation
position of 15 feet and 145 feet above
mean high water, respectively. The
bridge owner, the City of Chesapeake,
has requested a temporary deviation
from the current operating regulation set
out in 33 CFR 117.997(b), to effect
mechanical repairs of the vertical lift
span.
To facilitate the repairs, the
drawbridge will be maintained in the
limited open-to-navigation position at
90 feet, above mean high water, each
day from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on May 12,
May 13, May 20, and May 21, 2006.
Mariners requiring openings in excess of
90 feet, above mean high water, are
requested to provide at least two hours
advance notice to the Jordan Bridge
Office at (757) 545–4695. At all other
times, the drawbridge will operate in
accordance with the current operating
regulations outlined in 33 CFR
117.997(b).
The Coast Guard has informed the
known users of the waterway so that
they can arrange their transits to
minimize any impact caused by the
temporary deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c),
this work will be performed with all due
speed in order to return the bridge to
normal operation as soon as possible.
This deviation from the operating
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
Dated: April 13, 2006.
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr.,
Chief, Bridge Administration Branch, Fifth
Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 06–3887 Filed 4–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R04–RCRA–2006–0375; FRL–8161–2]
Georgia: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Georgia has applied to EPA
for Final authorization of the changes to
its hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant final
authorization to Georgia. In the ‘‘Rules
and Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register, EPA is authorizing the changes
by an immediate final rule. EPA did not
make a proposal prior to the immediate
final rule because we believe this action
is not controversial and do not expect
comments that oppose it. We have
explained the reasons for this
authorization in the preamble of the
immediate final rule. Unless we get
written comments which oppose this
authorization during the comment
period, the immediate final rule will
become effective on the date it
establishes, and we will not take further
action on this proposal. If we receive
comments that oppose this action, we
will withdraw the immediate final rule
and it will not take effect. We will
respond to public comments in a later
final rule based on this proposal. You
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
may not have another opportunity for
comment.
DATES: Final authorization will become
effective on June 26, 2006 unless EPA
receives adverse written comment on or
before May 25, 2006. If EPA receives
such comment, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of this immediate final rule
in the Federal Register and inform the
public that this authorization will not
take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
RCRA–2006–0375 by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: baker.audrey@epa.gov.
• Fax: (404) 562–8439 (prior to
faxing, please notify the EPA contact
listed below)
• Mail: Send written comments to
Audrey E. Baker, RCRA Services
Section, RCRA Programs Branch, Waste
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, The
Sam Nunn Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960.
• Hand Delivery: Audrey E. Baker,
RCRA Services Section, RCRA Programs
Branch, Waste Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
The Sam Nunn Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket’s normal
hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–RCRA–2006–
0375. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Apr 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. (For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm).
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy.
You may view and copy Georgia’s
application at The EPA, Region 4,
Library, The Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal
Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. The Library is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Library telephone number
is (404) 562–8190.
You may also view and copy
Georgia’s application from 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. at The Georgia Department of
Natural Resources, Environmental
Protection Division, 2 Martin Luther
King, Jr. Drive, Suite 1154 East Tower,
Atlanta, Georgia 30334–4910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Audrey E. Baker, RCRA Services
Section, RCRA Programs Branch, Waste
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, The
Sam Nunn Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960; (404) 562–8483; fax number: (404)
562–8439; e-mail address:
baker.audrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why Are Revisions to State
Programs Necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23865
be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in
This Rule?
We conclude that Georgia’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
RCRA. Therefore, we grant Georgia
Final authorization to operate its
hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization
application. Georgia has responsibility
for permitting Treatment, Storage, and
Disposal Facilities (TSDF) within its
borders and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program described in its
revised program application, subject to
the limitations of the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that EPA promulgates under
the authority of HSWA take effect in
authorized States before they are
authorized for the requirements. Thus,
EPA will implement those requirements
and prohibitions in Georgia, including
issuing permits, until the State is
granted authorization to do so.
C. What Is the Effect of This
Authorization Decision?
The effect of this decision is that a
facility in Georgia subject to RCRA will
now have to comply with the authorized
State requirements instead of the
equivalent Federal requirements in
order to comply with RCRA. Georgia has
enforcement responsibilities under its
State hazardous waste program for
violations of such program, but EPA
retains its authority under RCRA
sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
which include, among others, authority
to:
• Do inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses or reports
• Enforce RCRA requirements and
suspend or revoke permits
• Take enforcement actions regardless
of whether the State has taken its own
actions
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations for which Georgia is being
authorized by today’s action are already
effective, and are not changed by today’s
action.
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
23866
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
D. Why Wasn’t There a Proposed Rule
Before This Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before
today’s rule because we view this as a
routine program change and do not
expect comments that oppose this
approval. We are providing an
opportunity for public comment now. In
addition to this rule, in the proposed
rules section of today’s Federal Register
we are publishing a separate document
that proposes to authorize the State
program changes.
E. What Happens If EPA Receives
Comments That Oppose This Action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose
this authorization, we will withdraw
this rule by publishing a document in
the Federal Register before the rule
becomes effective. EPA will base any
further decision on the authorization of
the State program changes on the
proposal mentioned in the previous
paragraph. We will then address all
public comments in a later final rule.
You may not have another opportunity
to comment. If you want to comment on
this authorization, you must do so at
this time.
If we receive comments that oppose
only the authorization of a particular
change to the State hazardous waste
program, we will withdraw that part of
this rule but the authorization of the
program changes that the comments do
not oppose will become effective on the
date specified above. The Federal
Register withdrawal document will
specify which part of the authorization
will become effective, and which part is
being withdrawn.
F. What Has Georgia Previously Been
Authorized for?
Georgia initially received Final
authorization on August 7, 1984,
effective August 21, 1984 (49 FR 31417),
to implement the RCRA hazardous
waste management program. We granted
authorization for changes to their
program on July 7, 1986, effective
September 18, 1986 (51 FR 24549), July
28, 1988, effective September 26, 1988
(53 FR 28383), July 24, 1990, effective
September 24, 1990 (55 FR 30000),
February 12, 1991, effective April 15,
1991 (56 FR 5656), May 11, 1992,
effective July 10, 1992 (57 FR 20055),
November 25, 1992, effective January
25, 1993 (57 FR 55466), February 26,
1993, effective April 27, 1993 (58 FR
11539), November 16, 1993, effective
January 18, 1994 (58 FR 60388), April
26, 1994, effective June 27, 1994 (59 FR
21664), May 10, 1995, effective July 10,
1995 (60 FR 24790), August 30, 1995,
effective October 30, 1995 (60 FR
45069), March 7, 1996, effective May 6,
1996 (61 FR 9108), September 18, 1998,
effective November 17, 1998 (63 FR
49852), October 14, 1999, effective
December 13, 1999 (64 FR 55629),
November 28, 2000, effective March 30,
2001 (66 FR 8090), July 16, 2002,
effective September 16, 2002 (67 FR
46600), November 19, 2002, effective
January 21, 2003 (67 FR 69690), July 18,
2003, effective September 16, 2003 (68
FR 42605), and January 27, 2005,
effective April 20, 2005 (70 FR 12973).
G. What Changes Are We Authorizing
With This Action?
On October 13, 2005, Georgia
submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking
authorization of their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21.
Georgia’s revision consists of provisions
promulgated July 1, 2003, through June
30, 2004, otherwise known as RCRA
Cluster XIV. The Georgia Board of
Natural Resources adopted the rules for
RCRA Cluster XIV on December 7, 2004,
which became effective January 9, 2005.
We now make an immediate final
decision, subject to receipt of written
comments that oppose this action, that
Georgia’s hazardous waste program
revision satisfies all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for Final
authorization. Therefore, we grant
Georgia Final authorization for the
following program changes:
Description of Federal requirement
Federal Register
Analogous state authority
Checklist 203, Recycled Used Oil Management Standards; Clarification.
Checklist 204, National Environmental Performance
Track Program.
Checklist 205, NESHAP: Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks.
July 30, 2003, 68 FR 44659–
44665.
April 22, 2004, 69 FR 21737–
21754.
April 26, 2004, 69 FR 22601–
22661.
391–3–11–.07(1) and 391–3–11–.17 Georgia Rule
for Hazardous Waste Management.
391–3–11–.08(1) Georgia Rules for Hazardous
Waste Management.
391–3–11–.10(1) and 391–3–11–.10(2) Georgia
Rules for Hazardous Waste Management.
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules
Different From the Federal Rules?
There are no State requirements in
this program revision considered to be
more stringent or broader in scope than
the Federal requirements.
implement and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which Georgia is not
yet authorized.
J. What Is Codification and Is EPA
Codifying Georgia’s Hazardous Waste
Program as Authorized in This Rule?
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
I. Who Handles Permits After the
Authorization Takes Effect?
Georgia will issue permits for all the
provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. EPA will continue to administer
any RCRA hazardous waste permits or
portions of permits which we issued
prior to the effective date of this
authorization until they expire or are
terminated. We will not issue any more
new permits or new portions of permits
for the provisions listed in the Table
above after the effective date of this
authorization. EPA will continue to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Apr 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the Code
of Federal Regulations. We do this by
referencing the authorized State rules in
40 CFR part 272. We reserve the
amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
L for this authorization of Georgia’s
program changes until a later date.
K. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
has exempted this action from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
therefore this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action authorizes
State requirements for the purpose of
RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Accordingly, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this action authorizes
pre-existing requirements under State
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by State law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For
the same reason, this action also does
not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes State requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a
State’s application for authorization as
long as the State meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ‘‘Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Apr 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
23867
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective June 26, 2006.
The
Regulatory Secretariat, Room 4035, GSA
Building, Washington, DC 20405, (202)
208–7312, for information pertaining to
status or publication schedules. For
clarification of content, contact Mr.
Robert Holcombe, Office of
Governmentwide Policy, Office of
Travel, Transportation, and Asset
Management (MT), at (202) 501–3828 or
e-mail at Robert.Holcombe@gsa.gov.
Please cite FMR case 2006–102–2,
Amendment 2006–01.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
A. Background
In the years since 41 CFR part 102–
37 was published as a final rule, the
references to other regulations which
migrated from the Federal Property
Management Regulations (FPMR) (41
CFR chapter 101) to the Federal
Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR
chapter 102) became outdated. Also,
Public Law 107–217 revised and
recodified certain provisions of the
Federal Property and Administrative
Services Act of 1949 (Property Act). For
example, the Property Act provisions
and topics previously found at 40 U.S.C.
471–514 will now generally be found at
40 U.S.C. 101–705. This revised
regulation updates the title 40 U.S.C.
citations to reflect the changes made by
Public Law 107–217. Additionally, in
the intervening years since these three
regulations were published, several
agencies have moved or changed names.
Finally, updating or clarifying revisions
were made where the revisions are seen
as administrative or clerical in nature.
This includes—
1. Elimination of the requirement for
a biennial report to Congress on the
donation of Federal surplus personal
property (obsolete because of section
3003 of the Federal Reports Elimination
and Sunset Act of 1995 (31 U.S.C. 1113
note)); and
2. A revised threshold for audits made
under OMB Circular A–133.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of Sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b), of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and
6974(b).
Dated: April 3, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 06–3851 Filed 4–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 102–37
[FMR Amendment 2006–01; FMR Case
2006–102–2]
RIN 3090–AI25
Federal Management Regulation;
Donation of Surplus Personal Property
Office of Governmentwide
Policy, General Services Administration
(GSA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The General Services
Administration is amending the Federal
Management Regulation (FMR) language
that pertains to personal property by
correcting references to outdated or
superceded provisions of law or
regulation; correcting text to be in
conformance with revised laws,
regulation, or Federal agency
responsibilities; and clarifying text
where the intended meaning could be
updated or made clearer. The FMR and
any corresponding documents may be
accessed at GSA’s Web site at https://
www.gsa.gov/fmr.
DATES: Effective Date: May 25, 2006.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
B. Executive Order 12866
The General Services Administration
(GSA) has determined that this final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
for the purposes of Executive Order
12866.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule is not required to be
published in the Federal Register for
comment. Therefore, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the changes to the
FMR do not impose information
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23864-23867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3851]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R04-RCRA-2006-0375; FRL-8161-2]
Georgia: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Georgia has applied to EPA for Final authorization of the
changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant final authorization to
Georgia. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal
Register, EPA is authorizing the changes by an immediate final rule.
EPA did not make a proposal prior to the immediate final rule because
we believe this action is not controversial and do not expect comments
that oppose it. We have explained the reasons for this authorization in
the preamble of the immediate final rule. Unless we get written
comments which oppose this authorization during the comment period, the
immediate final rule will become effective on the date it establishes,
and we will not take further action on this proposal. If we receive
comments that oppose this action, we will withdraw the immediate final
rule and it will not take effect. We will respond to public comments in
a later final rule based on this proposal. You
[[Page 23865]]
may not have another opportunity for comment.
DATES: Final authorization will become effective on June 26, 2006
unless EPA receives adverse written comment on or before May 25, 2006.
If EPA receives such comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal of
this immediate final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that this authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
RCRA-2006-0375 by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: baker.audrey@epa.gov.
Fax: (404) 562-8439 (prior to faxing, please notify the
EPA contact listed below)
Mail: Send written comments to Audrey E. Baker, RCRA
Services Section, RCRA Programs Branch, Waste Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, The Sam Nunn Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
Hand Delivery: Audrey E. Baker, RCRA Services Section,
RCRA Programs Branch, Waste Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, The Sam Nunn Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during
the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-RCRA-
2006-0375. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov including any personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or
otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. (For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm).
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy. You may view and copy Georgia's
application at The EPA, Region 4, Library, The Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal
Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The
Library is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Library telephone number is (404) 562-
8190.
You may also view and copy Georgia's application from 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. at The Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental
Protection Division, 2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, Suite 1154 East
Tower, Atlanta, Georgia 30334-4910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey E. Baker, RCRA Services
Section, RCRA Programs Branch, Waste Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, The Sam Nunn Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; (404) 562-8483; fax
number: (404) 562-8439; e-mail address: baker.audrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why Are Revisions to State Programs Necessary?
States which have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes, States must
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to
State programs may be necessary when Federal or State statutory or
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur.
Most commonly, States must change their programs because of changes to
EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in This Rule?
We conclude that Georgia's application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant Georgia Final authorization to
operate its hazardous waste program with the changes described in the
authorization application. Georgia has responsibility for permitting
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDF) within its borders
and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA program described in its
revised program application, subject to the limitations of the
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New Federal
requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal regulations that EPA
promulgates under the authority of HSWA take effect in authorized
States before they are authorized for the requirements. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and prohibitions in Georgia, including
issuing permits, until the State is granted authorization to do so.
C. What Is the Effect of This Authorization Decision?
The effect of this decision is that a facility in Georgia subject
to RCRA will now have to comply with the authorized State requirements
instead of the equivalent Federal requirements in order to comply with
RCRA. Georgia has enforcement responsibilities under its State
hazardous waste program for violations of such program, but EPA retains
its authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, which
include, among others, authority to:
Do inspections, and require monitoring, tests, analyses or
reports
Enforce RCRA requirements and suspend or revoke permits
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the State
has taken its own actions
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which Georgia is being
authorized by today's action are already effective, and are not changed
by today's action.
[[Page 23866]]
D. Why Wasn't There a Proposed Rule Before This Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before today's rule because we view
this as a routine program change and do not expect comments that oppose
this approval. We are providing an opportunity for public comment now.
In addition to this rule, in the proposed rules section of today's
Federal Register we are publishing a separate document that proposes to
authorize the State program changes.
E. What Happens If EPA Receives Comments That Oppose This Action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, we will
withdraw this rule by publishing a document in the Federal Register
before the rule becomes effective. EPA will base any further decision
on the authorization of the State program changes on the proposal
mentioned in the previous paragraph. We will then address all public
comments in a later final rule. You may not have another opportunity to
comment. If you want to comment on this authorization, you must do so
at this time.
If we receive comments that oppose only the authorization of a
particular change to the State hazardous waste program, we will
withdraw that part of this rule but the authorization of the program
changes that the comments do not oppose will become effective on the
date specified above. The Federal Register withdrawal document will
specify which part of the authorization will become effective, and
which part is being withdrawn.
F. What Has Georgia Previously Been Authorized for?
Georgia initially received Final authorization on August 7, 1984,
effective August 21, 1984 (49 FR 31417), to implement the RCRA
hazardous waste management program. We granted authorization for
changes to their program on July 7, 1986, effective September 18, 1986
(51 FR 24549), July 28, 1988, effective September 26, 1988 (53 FR
28383), July 24, 1990, effective September 24, 1990 (55 FR 30000),
February 12, 1991, effective April 15, 1991 (56 FR 5656), May 11, 1992,
effective July 10, 1992 (57 FR 20055), November 25, 1992, effective
January 25, 1993 (57 FR 55466), February 26, 1993, effective April 27,
1993 (58 FR 11539), November 16, 1993, effective January 18, 1994 (58
FR 60388), April 26, 1994, effective June 27, 1994 (59 FR 21664), May
10, 1995, effective July 10, 1995 (60 FR 24790), August 30, 1995,
effective October 30, 1995 (60 FR 45069), March 7, 1996, effective May
6, 1996 (61 FR 9108), September 18, 1998, effective November 17, 1998
(63 FR 49852), October 14, 1999, effective December 13, 1999 (64 FR
55629), November 28, 2000, effective March 30, 2001 (66 FR 8090), July
16, 2002, effective September 16, 2002 (67 FR 46600), November 19,
2002, effective January 21, 2003 (67 FR 69690), July 18, 2003,
effective September 16, 2003 (68 FR 42605), and January 27, 2005,
effective April 20, 2005 (70 FR 12973).
G. What Changes Are We Authorizing With This Action?
On October 13, 2005, Georgia submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking authorization of their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. Georgia's revision consists of
provisions promulgated July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004, otherwise
known as RCRA Cluster XIV. The Georgia Board of Natural Resources
adopted the rules for RCRA Cluster XIV on December 7, 2004, which
became effective January 9, 2005. We now make an immediate final
decision, subject to receipt of written comments that oppose this
action, that Georgia's hazardous waste program revision satisfies all
of the requirements necessary to qualify for Final authorization.
Therefore, we grant Georgia Final authorization for the following
program changes:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Federal Analogous state
requirement Federal Register authority
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checklist 203, Recycled Used July 30, 2003, 68 391-3-11-.07(1) and
Oil Management Standards; FR 44659-44665. 391-3-11-.17 Georgia
Clarification. Rule for Hazardous
Waste Management.
Checklist 204, National April 22, 2004, 391-3-11-.08(1)
Environmental Performance 69 FR 21737- Georgia Rules for
Track Program. 21754. Hazardous Waste
Management.
Checklist 205, NESHAP: Surface April 26, 2004, 391-3-11-.10(1) and
Coating of Automobiles and 69 FR 22601- 391-3-11-.10(2)
Light-Duty Trucks. 22661. Georgia Rules for
Hazardous Waste
Management.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules Different From the Federal Rules?
There are no State requirements in this program revision considered
to be more stringent or broader in scope than the Federal requirements.
I. Who Handles Permits After the Authorization Takes Effect?
Georgia will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is
authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will continue
to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of permits
which we issued prior to the effective date of this authorization until
they expire or are terminated. We will not issue any more new permits
or new portions of permits for the provisions listed in the Table above
after the effective date of this authorization. EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which Georgia is
not yet authorized.
J. What Is Codification and Is EPA Codifying Georgia's Hazardous Waste
Program as Authorized in This Rule?
Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste
program into the Code of Federal Regulations. We do this by referencing
the authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 272. We reserve the amendment
of 40 CFR part 272, subpart L for this authorization of Georgia's
program changes until a later date.
K. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993), and therefore this action is not subject to review by OMB. This
action authorizes State requirements for the purpose of RCRA 3006 and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
authorizes pre-existing requirements under State law and does not
impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by State
law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). For the same reason, this
action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities
of Tribal governments, as
[[Page 23867]]
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely authorizes State requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established by RCRA. This action also is not subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant and it does not make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not subject to Executive Order
13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001))
because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a State's application for
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a State authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective June 26, 2006.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of Sections
2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b), of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and 6974(b).
Dated: April 3, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 06-3851 Filed 4-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P