Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act; Atlantic Striped Bass Fishery, 20984-20986 [E6-6108]
Download as PDF
20984
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Notices
Committee advises the Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration with respect to technical
questions that affect the level of export
controls applicable to transportation
and related equipment or technology.
Agenda:
1. Welcome and Introductions.
2. Regulatory Overview.
3. Policy Overview.
4. Missile Technology Control
Regime.
5. Report on the Wassenaar Experts
Group Meeting.
6. Jurisdiction Technical Working
Group Report.
7. Proposal by Boeing for a New
Working Group Focused on Composite
Materials.
8. Presentation of Papers and
Comments by the Public.
9. Follow-up on Open Action Items.
The meeting willl be open to the
public and a limited number of seats wil
be available. Reservations are not
accepted. To the extent time permits,
members of the public may present oral
statements to the Committee. Written
statements may be submitted at any
time before or after the meeting.
However, to facilitate distribution of
public presentation materials to
Committee members, the Committee
suggests that presenters forward the
public presentation materails to Yvette
Springer at Yspringer@bis.doc.gov
For more information contact Ms.
Springer on (202) 482–4814.
Dated: April 17, 2006.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–3832 Filed 4–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Export Trade Certificate of Review
Notice of Application to Amend
an Export Trade Certificate of Review.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Export Trading Company
Affairs (‘‘ETCA’’), International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, has received an application
to amend an Export Trade Certificate of
Review (‘‘Certificate’’). This notice
summarizes the proposed amendment
and requests comments relevant to
whether the Certificate should be
issued.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Anspacher, Director, Export
Trading Company Affairs, International
Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Apr 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
(this is not a toll-free number) or E-mail
at oetca@ita.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of
the Export Trading Company Act of
1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce to issue Export
Trade Certificates of Review. An Export
Trade Certificate of Review protects the
holder and the members identified in
the Certificate from state and federal
government antitrust actions and from
private treble damage antitrust actions
for the export conduct specified in the
Certificate and carried out in
compliance with its terms and
conditions. Section 302(b)(1) of the
Export Trading Company Act of 1982
and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the
Secretary to publish a notice in the
Federal Register identifying the
applicant and summarizing its proposed
export conduct.
Request for Public Comments
Interested parties may submit written
comments relevant to the determination
whether an amended Certificate should
be issued. If the comments include any
privileged or confidential business
information, it must be clearly marked
and a nonconfidential version of the
comments (identified as such) should be
included. Any comments not marked
privileged or confidential business
information will be deemed to be
nonconfidential. An original and five (5)
copies, plus two (2) copies of the
nonconfidential version, should be
submitted no later than 20 days after the
date of this notice to: Export Trading
Company Affairs, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Room 7021–B H,
Washington, DC 20230. Information
submitted by any person is exempt from
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
However, nonconfidential versions of
the comments will be made available to
the applicant if necessary for
determining whether or not to issue the
Certificate. Comments should refer to
this application as ‘‘Export Trade
Certificate of Review, application
number 05–A0001.’’
A summary of the application for an
amendment follows.
Summary of the Application:
Applicant: Central America Poultry
Export Quota, Inc. (‘‘CA–PEQ’’), 901
New York Avenue, NW., Third Floor,
Washington, DC 20001–4413.
Contact: Kyd D. Brenner, Partner,
DTB Associates, LLP, Telephone: (202)
661–7098.
Application No.: 05–A0001.
Date Deemed Submitted: April 12,
2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The original CA–PEQ Certificate was
issued on January 30, 2006 (71 FR 6753,
February 9, 2006).
Proposed Amendment: CA–PEQ seeks
to amend its Certificate to:
1. Add the following company as a
new ‘‘Member’’ of the Certificate within
the meaning of section 325.2(l) of the
Regulations (15 CFR 325.2(l)):
Federacion de Avicultores de Honduras
(‘‘FEDAVIH’’), San Pedro Sula,
Honduras.
Dated: April 19, 2006.
Jeffrey C. Anspacher,
Director, Export Trading Company Affairs.
[FR Doc. 06–3903 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 041806D]
Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation
Act; Atlantic Striped Bass Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of scoping process;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Based on recommendations
contained in Amendment 6 to Atlantic
States Marine Fisheries Commission’s
(ASMFC) Interstate Fishery
Management Plan for Atlantic Striped
Bass (Amendment 6) and comments
received from an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPR), NMFS
previously announced its intent to begin
a scoping process to gather information
for the preparation of an environmental
impact statement (EIS). Initial scoping
occurred during nine public hearings in
November-December 2003. Due to the
significant time that had passed since
these initial scoping hearings, NMFS is
seeking additional scoping on its
preliminary draft analyses of Federal
management options to open the EEZ to
the harvest of Atlantic Striped Bass. The
purpose of this notice is to alert the
interested public of this further scoping
process and to provide for public
participation in compliance with
environmental documentation
requirements.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received (see ADDRESSES) no later than
5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on or
before May 24, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
requests for copies of the draft
document should be sent to: Tom
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Notices
Meyer, State-Federal Fisheries Division,
Office of Sustainable Fisheries, NMFS,
1315 East West Highway, Room 13248,
Silver Spring, MD 20910. Mark the
outside of the envelope ‘‘Striped Bass
Scoping.’’ An electronic copy of the
draft document and supporting
documents (ANPR and a Notice of
Intent to Prepare an EIS (NOI)) may also
be obtained on the State-Federal
Fisheries Division’s website under
Regulatory Activities at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/statelfederal/
statelfederal.htm. Comments may also
be sent via fax to (301) 713–0596, or via
e-mail to: StripedBass.Comments@noaa.gov. Include in
the subject line of the fax or e-mail the
following document identifier: Striped
Bass Scoping.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Meyer, telephone (301) 713–2334, x173.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Background
An ANPR was published in the
Federal Register on July 21, 2003 (68 FR
43074), with the comment period
closing on August 20, 2003. The
comment period was subsequently
reopened on August 26, 2003 (68 FR
51232) for an additional 30–days. NMFS
announced that it was considering
proposed rulemaking to revise Federal
Atlantic striped bass regulations to be
compatible with the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission’s
(ASMFC) Amendment 6 to the Interstate
Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic
Striped Bass (Amendment 6), and was
seeking comments on the
implementation of ASMFC’s
recommendations to the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary) to open the EEZ
to the harvest of Atlantic striped bass.
NMFS also solicited comments on
possible alternative management
measures and issues that NMFS should
consider relative to these
recommendations. After review of
comments received from the public
during the ANPR comment period,
NMFS determined there were sufficient
issues raised, both in support of and in
opposition to the ASMFC
recommendation, to warrant further
evaluation of the potential impacts of
opening the EEZ to striped bass fishing.
That determination resulted in the
initiation of a decision-making process
required under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). A
‘‘Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and notice of scoping process’’ (NOI)
was published in the Federal Register
on October 20, 2003 (68 FR 59906). The
notice presented a summary of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Apr 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
ANPR comments, and requested further
public input on a list of potential
alternatives and other management
measures. Public meetings were held in
nine Atlantic coast states between
November 5 - December 10, 2003, and
public comment period closed on
December 22, 2003. See ADDRESSES for
information on how to obtain a copy of
the ANPR or the NOI.
Atlantic striped bass management is
based on ASMFC’s Atlantic Striped Bass
Interstate Fishery Management Plan
(ISFMP), first adopted in 1981. From
1981 - 1994, four ISFMP Amendments
were developed that provided a series of
management measures that led to the
rebuilding of the stocks. In 1995,
ASMFC declared the Atlantic striped
bass population fully restored and
implemented Amendment 5 to the
ISFMP to perpetuate the stock so as to
allow a commercial and recreational
harvest consistent with the long-term
maintenance of the striped bass stock.
Since then the population has expanded
to record levels of abundance. To
maintain this recovered population,
ASMFC approved Amendment 6 in
February 2003 (copies of Amendment 6
are available via ASMFC’s website
under Interstate Fisheries Managementstriped bass at https://www.asmfc.org).
ASMFC believes that the measures
contained in Amendment 6 are
necessary to prevent the overfishing of
the Atlantic striped bass resource while
allowing growth in both the commercial
and recreational fishery. Development
of Amendment 6 took almost 4 years
and involved extensive input from
technical and industry advisors, and
provided numerous opportunities for
the public to comment on the future
management of the species.
Amendment 6 incorporates results of
the 2001 Atlantic striped bass stock
assessment, developed by the Atlantic
Coast States, ASMFC, NMFS, and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see
section 1.2.2 of Amendment 6 for
summary). Amendment 6 also included
recommendations to the Secretary on
the development of complementary
measures in the EEZ. Management of
Atlantic striped bass in the EEZ was one
of the issues that was considered
throughout development of Amendment
6.
Recommendation to the Secretary
In addition to the recommendations to
the Secretary in Amendment 6, the
Secretary also received a letter on April
24, 2003, from ASMFC with the
following three recommendations for
implementation of regulations in the
EEZ: (1) Remove the moratorium on the
harvest of Atlantic striped bass in the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20985
EEZ; (2) implement a 28–inch (71.1–cm)
minimum size limit for recreational and
commercial Atlantic striped bass
fisheries in the EEZ; and (3) allow states
the ability to adopt more restrictive
rules for fishermen and vessels licensed
in their jurisdictions.
In support of its request, ASMFC cited
a number of reasons, including: ASMFC
declared the triped bass stock restored
in 1995; commercial harvest is
controlled by individual state quotas;
with the EEZ closed striped bass caught
there are required to be discarded, and
are often dead when thrown back Opening the EEZ will convert some of
the discarded bycatch of striped bass to
landings; and Amendment 6
incorporates measures that would
address future concerns about the stock
status. See ADDRESSES for information
on how to obtain a copy of the NOI,
which has a complete list of ASMFC’s
cited reasons.
ASMFC also stated that its Atlantic
Striped Bass Technical Committee
would monitor annually the Atlantic
striped bass population, and, if at some
point in the future ASMFC determines
that the Atlantic striped bass population
is overfished or that overfishing is
occurring, it may recommend further
management measures for the EEZ.
Delay in the Development of an EIS
In September 2004, ASMFC’s Striped
Bass Technical Committee prepared its
2004 Stock Assessment Report for use
by the Striped Bass Management Board
(Board), which included data through
2003. That assessment contradicted
previous assessments, which had
indicated that the striped bass
population was not overfished and
continued to grow in abundance.
Instead, the results of the modeling
portion of the 2004 assessment
indicated that the stock was overfished
and that spawning stock biomass had
been reduced to below target levels.
However, the members of the Technical
Committee did not feel the assessment
provided an accurate representation of
stock status, especially given that results
of tagging study analyses did not show
a similar increase in fishing mortality.
The Technical Committee was
concerned with any conclusions that
might be derived from these estimated
and recommended the 2004 assessment
results not be used for management
decisions until both the modeling
software and the input data sets were
reevaluated during the 2005 assessment
process. The results from the 2004 stock
assessment have not been used by
ASMFC for management decisions.
With the great uncertainty in
estimates of spawning stock biomass,
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
20986
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 2006 / Notices
and fishing mortality rates during 2003,
as presented in the 2004 stock
assessment, NMFS decided to delay the
completion of the EIS to be able to
incorporate the 2005 stock assessment
in the EIS.
During 2005, the Technical
Committee and Stock Assessment
Subcommittee reviewed model inputs
and the model itself to determine if the
results from the 2004 assessment truly
reflected status of the population or
were an artifact of data or model errors.
They concluded that a number of the
indices used in the 2004 effort were not
consistent with what was observed in
the population as a whole, or were
contradictory to the majority of other
reliable time series. Those indices were
removed from subsequent model runs.
The Technical Committee believes the
current assessment reflects the true
status of the population (within
reasonable ranges of certainty). Both the
2004 and 2005 Striped Bass Stock
Assessments are available on ASMFC’s
website under Interstate Fisheries
Management-striped bass at https://
www.asmfc.org.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Addendum I to Amendment 6
During the development of
Amendment 6, there were concerns over
the impacts of bycatch mortality on the
overall population. To address these
concerns, ASMFC is currently
developing Addendum 1 to Amendment
6 to increase the accuracy of data on
striped bass bycatch in all sectors of the
striped bass fishery. Addendum I will
outline mandatory data collection and
bycatch mortality studies for the
commercial, recreational, and for-hire
fisheries for striped bass.
Further Public Participation
Due to the significant time that has
passed since the nine initial scoping
hearings were held in NovemberDecember 2003, NMFS is seeking
additional scoping on its preliminary
draft analyses of Federal management
options to open the EEZ to the harvest
of Atlantic Striped Bass. See ADDRESSES
for information on how to obtain a copy
of the draft document and where to send
comments.
At this time, a preferred option has
not been identified. Options being
considered in this draft document
include: (1) Open the entire EEZ,
implement a 28–inch (71.1–cm)
minimum size limit, and allow states to
adopt more restrictive regulations for
fishermen and vessels licensed in their
state (ASMFC recommendation); (2)
open the entire EEZ, implement a 28–
inch (71.1–cm) minimum size limit,
allow states to adopt more restrictive
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Apr 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
regulations for fishermen and vessels
licensed in their state, implement a
recreational bag limit of 2 fish per day,
require circle hooks for all commercial
and recreational hook and line fishing
using bait, and commercial trip limits
and bycatch trip limit options; (3) open
the entire EEZ, implement a 28–inch
(71.1–cm) minimum size limit, allow
states to adopt more restrictive
regulations for fishermen and vessels
licensed in their state, allow hook and
line gear only, implement a recreational
bag limit of 2 fish per day, require circle
hooks for all commercial and
recreational hook and line fishing using
bait, and implement a commercial trip
limit of 30 fish per trip or day
whichever is greater; and (4) status quo
- maintain moratorium in EEZ.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5151 et seq.
Dated: April 19, 2006.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–6108 Filed 4–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 011806L]
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities; Rim
of the Pacific (RIMPAC) Antisubmarine
Warfare (ASW) Exercise Training
Events Within the Hawaiian Islands
Operating Area (OpArea)
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; receipt of application
and proposed incidental take
authorization; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has received an
application from the U.S. Navy (Navy)
for an Incidental Harassment
Authorization (IHA) to take marine
mammals, by harassment, incidental to
conducting RIMPAC ASW training
events, in which submarines, surface
ships, and aircraft from the United
States and multiple foreign nations
participate in ASW training exercises,
utilizing mid-frequency sonar (1
kilohertz (kHz) to 10 kHz), in the U.S.
Navy’s Hawaiian Operating Area
(OpArea) in the summer of 2006.
Pursuant to the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is
requesting comments on its proposal to
issue an authorization to the Navy to
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
incidentally harass several species of
marine mammals during the training
exercises.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than May 24, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
application should be addressed to
Steve Leathery, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225. The mailbox address for
providing email comments is
PR1.011806L@noaa.gov. NMFS is not
responsible for e-mail comments sent to
addresses other than the one provided
here. Comments sent via e-mail,
including all attachments, must not
exceed a 10–megabyte file size.
A copy of the application containing
a list of the references used in this
document may be obtained by writing to
the address specified above, telephoning
the contact listed below (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), or
visiting the internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm.
Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
In March, 2006, the Navy prepared a
revised 2006 Supplement on the 2002
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment on RIMPAC. That document
will be posted on the Navy’s website
(https://www.smdcen.us/rimpac06/)
concurrently with this notice and the
Navy will be accepting public
comments.
The Navy has also prepared a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
for its Undersea Warfare Training Range
(USWTR), which contains detailed
supporting information for some of the
issues discussed in this document and
may be viewed at: https://
projects.earthtech.com.
NMFS’ Ocean Acoustics Program has
made additional information and
references relating to the effects of
anthropogenic sound available on the
NMFS website at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/acoustics/
bibliography.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie
Harrison, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext 166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of marine mammals
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20984-20986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-6108]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 041806D]
Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act; Atlantic Striped Bass
Fishery
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of scoping process; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Based on recommendations contained in Amendment 6 to Atlantic
States Marine Fisheries Commission's (ASMFC) Interstate Fishery
Management Plan for Atlantic Striped Bass (Amendment 6) and comments
received from an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR), NMFS
previously announced its intent to begin a scoping process to gather
information for the preparation of an environmental impact statement
(EIS). Initial scoping occurred during nine public hearings in
November-December 2003. Due to the significant time that had passed
since these initial scoping hearings, NMFS is seeking additional
scoping on its preliminary draft analyses of Federal management options
to open the EEZ to the harvest of Atlantic Striped Bass. The purpose of
this notice is to alert the interested public of this further scoping
process and to provide for public participation in compliance with
environmental documentation requirements.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received (see ADDRESSES) no
later than 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on or before May 24, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests for copies of the draft
document should be sent to: Tom
[[Page 20985]]
Meyer, State-Federal Fisheries Division, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, NMFS, 1315 East West Highway, Room 13248, Silver Spring, MD
20910. Mark the outside of the envelope ``Striped Bass Scoping.'' An
electronic copy of the draft document and supporting documents (ANPR
and a Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS (NOI)) may also be obtained on
the State-Federal Fisheries Division's website under Regulatory
Activities at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/state_federal/state_
federal.htm. Comments may also be sent via fax to (301) 713-0596, or
via e-mail to: Striped-Bass.Comments@noaa.gov. Include in the subject
line of the fax or e-mail the following document identifier: Striped
Bass Scoping.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Meyer, telephone (301) 713-2334,
x173.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
An ANPR was published in the Federal Register on July 21, 2003 (68
FR 43074), with the comment period closing on August 20, 2003. The
comment period was subsequently reopened on August 26, 2003 (68 FR
51232) for an additional 30-days. NMFS announced that it was
considering proposed rulemaking to revise Federal Atlantic striped bass
regulations to be compatible with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission's (ASMFC) Amendment 6 to the Interstate Fishery Management
Plan for Atlantic Striped Bass (Amendment 6), and was seeking comments
on the implementation of ASMFC's recommendations to the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary) to open the EEZ to the harvest of Atlantic striped
bass. NMFS also solicited comments on possible alternative management
measures and issues that NMFS should consider relative to these
recommendations. After review of comments received from the public
during the ANPR comment period, NMFS determined there were sufficient
issues raised, both in support of and in opposition to the ASMFC
recommendation, to warrant further evaluation of the potential impacts
of opening the EEZ to striped bass fishing. That determination resulted
in the initiation of a decision-making process required under the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). A ``Notice of intent to
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and notice of scoping
process'' (NOI) was published in the Federal Register on October 20,
2003 (68 FR 59906). The notice presented a summary of the ANPR
comments, and requested further public input on a list of potential
alternatives and other management measures. Public meetings were held
in nine Atlantic coast states between November 5 - December 10, 2003,
and public comment period closed on December 22, 2003. See ADDRESSES
for information on how to obtain a copy of the ANPR or the NOI.
Atlantic striped bass management is based on ASMFC's Atlantic
Striped Bass Interstate Fishery Management Plan (ISFMP), first adopted
in 1981. From 1981 - 1994, four ISFMP Amendments were developed that
provided a series of management measures that led to the rebuilding of
the stocks. In 1995, ASMFC declared the Atlantic striped bass
population fully restored and implemented Amendment 5 to the ISFMP to
perpetuate the stock so as to allow a commercial and recreational
harvest consistent with the long-term maintenance of the striped bass
stock. Since then the population has expanded to record levels of
abundance. To maintain this recovered population, ASMFC approved
Amendment 6 in February 2003 (copies of Amendment 6 are available via
ASMFC's website under Interstate Fisheries Management-striped bass at
https://www.asmfc.org). ASMFC believes that the measures contained in
Amendment 6 are necessary to prevent the overfishing of the Atlantic
striped bass resource while allowing growth in both the commercial and
recreational fishery. Development of Amendment 6 took almost 4 years
and involved extensive input from technical and industry advisors, and
provided numerous opportunities for the public to comment on the future
management of the species.
Amendment 6 incorporates results of the 2001 Atlantic striped bass
stock assessment, developed by the Atlantic Coast States, ASMFC, NMFS,
and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see section 1.2.2 of Amendment
6 for summary). Amendment 6 also included recommendations to the
Secretary on the development of complementary measures in the EEZ.
Management of Atlantic striped bass in the EEZ was one of the issues
that was considered throughout development of Amendment 6.
Recommendation to the Secretary
In addition to the recommendations to the Secretary in Amendment 6,
the Secretary also received a letter on April 24, 2003, from ASMFC with
the following three recommendations for implementation of regulations
in the EEZ: (1) Remove the moratorium on the harvest of Atlantic
striped bass in the EEZ; (2) implement a 28-inch (71.1-cm) minimum size
limit for recreational and commercial Atlantic striped bass fisheries
in the EEZ; and (3) allow states the ability to adopt more restrictive
rules for fishermen and vessels licensed in their jurisdictions.
In support of its request, ASMFC cited a number of reasons,
including: ASMFC declared the triped bass stock restored in 1995;
commercial harvest is controlled by individual state quotas; with the
EEZ closed striped bass caught there are required to be discarded, and
are often dead when thrown back - Opening the EEZ will convert some of
the discarded bycatch of striped bass to landings; and Amendment 6
incorporates measures that would address future concerns about the
stock status. See ADDRESSES for information on how to obtain a copy of
the NOI, which has a complete list of ASMFC's cited reasons.
ASMFC also stated that its Atlantic Striped Bass Technical
Committee would monitor annually the Atlantic striped bass population,
and, if at some point in the future ASMFC determines that the Atlantic
striped bass population is overfished or that overfishing is occurring,
it may recommend further management measures for the EEZ.
Delay in the Development of an EIS
In September 2004, ASMFC's Striped Bass Technical Committee
prepared its 2004 Stock Assessment Report for use by the Striped Bass
Management Board (Board), which included data through 2003. That
assessment contradicted previous assessments, which had indicated that
the striped bass population was not overfished and continued to grow in
abundance. Instead, the results of the modeling portion of the 2004
assessment indicated that the stock was overfished and that spawning
stock biomass had been reduced to below target levels. However, the
members of the Technical Committee did not feel the assessment provided
an accurate representation of stock status, especially given that
results of tagging study analyses did not show a similar increase in
fishing mortality. The Technical Committee was concerned with any
conclusions that might be derived from these estimated and recommended
the 2004 assessment results not be used for management decisions until
both the modeling software and the input data sets were reevaluated
during the 2005 assessment process. The results from the 2004 stock
assessment have not been used by ASMFC for management decisions.
With the great uncertainty in estimates of spawning stock biomass,
[[Page 20986]]
and fishing mortality rates during 2003, as presented in the 2004 stock
assessment, NMFS decided to delay the completion of the EIS to be able
to incorporate the 2005 stock assessment in the EIS.
During 2005, the Technical Committee and Stock Assessment
Subcommittee reviewed model inputs and the model itself to determine if
the results from the 2004 assessment truly reflected status of the
population or were an artifact of data or model errors. They concluded
that a number of the indices used in the 2004 effort were not
consistent with what was observed in the population as a whole, or were
contradictory to the majority of other reliable time series. Those
indices were removed from subsequent model runs. The Technical
Committee believes the current assessment reflects the true status of
the population (within reasonable ranges of certainty). Both the 2004
and 2005 Striped Bass Stock Assessments are available on ASMFC's
website under Interstate Fisheries Management-striped bass at https://
www.asmfc.org.
Addendum I to Amendment 6
During the development of Amendment 6, there were concerns over the
impacts of bycatch mortality on the overall population. To address
these concerns, ASMFC is currently developing Addendum 1 to Amendment 6
to increase the accuracy of data on striped bass bycatch in all sectors
of the striped bass fishery. Addendum I will outline mandatory data
collection and bycatch mortality studies for the commercial,
recreational, and for-hire fisheries for striped bass.
Further Public Participation
Due to the significant time that has passed since the nine initial
scoping hearings were held in November-December 2003, NMFS is seeking
additional scoping on its preliminary draft analyses of Federal
management options to open the EEZ to the harvest of Atlantic Striped
Bass. See ADDRESSES for information on how to obtain a copy of the
draft document and where to send comments.
At this time, a preferred option has not been identified. Options
being considered in this draft document include: (1) Open the entire
EEZ, implement a 28-inch (71.1-cm) minimum size limit, and allow states
to adopt more restrictive regulations for fishermen and vessels
licensed in their state (ASMFC recommendation); (2) open the entire
EEZ, implement a 28-inch (71.1-cm) minimum size limit, allow states to
adopt more restrictive regulations for fishermen and vessels licensed
in their state, implement a recreational bag limit of 2 fish per day,
require circle hooks for all commercial and recreational hook and line
fishing using bait, and commercial trip limits and bycatch trip limit
options; (3) open the entire EEZ, implement a 28-inch (71.1-cm) minimum
size limit, allow states to adopt more restrictive regulations for
fishermen and vessels licensed in their state, allow hook and line gear
only, implement a recreational bag limit of 2 fish per day, require
circle hooks for all commercial and recreational hook and line fishing
using bait, and implement a commercial trip limit of 30 fish per trip
or day whichever is greater; and (4) status quo - maintain moratorium
in EEZ.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5151 et seq.
Dated: April 19, 2006.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6-6108 Filed 4-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S